WEIGHT
KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES
1.1 Crafted and submitted the Main MOV
School Improvement plan
aligned to the MATATAG
Agenda, BEDP, and DEDP to
ensure the effectiveness of the
teaching and learning processes Supporting MOVs
which contained the required 1. Notice of Meeting, Attendance sheets, Minutes of
MOVs
1.2 Crafted and submitted
Concept Paper, Project
Proposal, Innovation or
Research to operationalize the
learning delivery modalities
identified in the SIP
Leading
Strategically
1.3 Implemented and managed
programs in the school that
support the development of
learners
PERFORMANCE INDICA
MEANS OF VERIFICATION TIMELINE
KRA OBJECTIVE QUALITY
1. Approved SIP/WFP/AIP/PPMP/APP (2023-2024) Complete and Functional SIP/WFP/AIP/PPMP/APP (2023-2024)
aligned to MATATAG Agenda, BEDP and DEDP
Scoring:
-Complete
w/ 2 addt'l contents - 5pts
Annual -Complete w/ 1 addt'l content - 4 pts
Meeting during the planning and crafting of
SIP/WFP/AIP/PPMP/APP -Complete contents - 3 pts
-Lacking 1 required content - 2 pts
-Lacking 2 or more required contents - 1 pt
Main MoV
1. Concept Paper, Project Proposal, Innovation,
Research (BERF and NON-BERF), Work Application Plan
(WAP), Re-entry Application Project (REAP)
2. Accomplishment Reports
Supporting MoV
M&E Report on the Implementation of the approved
Concept Paper, Project Proposal, Innovation, Research,
Work Application Plan (WAP), Re-entry Application
Project (REAP), BERF Concept Paper, Project Proposal, Innovation, Research (BERF and
NON-BERF), Work Application Plan (WAP), Re-entry Application
Project (REAP) complete with required contents - 5 pts
Annual/
-Lacking 1 required content - 4 pts
Quarterly
-Lacking 2 required content - 3 pts
-Lacking 3 required content - 2 pts
-Lacking 4 required content - 1 pt
Main MoVs
1. Report on Child Friendly School System
2. Contengency Plan
3. Preventive Maintenance Plan Presented all 7 MoVs - 5 pts
4. DRRM Action Plan/Quarterly Report
5. Health and Nutrition Programs Presented 6 MoVs - 4 pts
6. Report on Youth Formation Development /Career
Guidance Program Presented 5 MoVs - 3 pts
7. Sports Program
Presented 4 MoVs - 2 pts
Presented 3 or less MoVs - 1 pt
1.4 Documented M&E
processes and conducted
quarterly School M&E
Adjustment (SMEA), and
submitted SMEA Report
Complete with required
contents
Main MoV
1. SMEA Quarterly Report
2. SMEA Presentation Materials/Annual
Accomplishment Report
3. Letter of Invitation to Stakeholders
4. Attendance Sheet Presented all 6 MoVs - 5 pts
5. Notice of Meeting
6. Minutes of Meeting Presented 5 MoVs - 4 pts

Presented 4 MoVs - 3 pts

Presented 3 MoVs - 2 pts

Presented 2 or less MoVs - 1 pt

2.1 Managed the utilization of 1. Monthly/Quarterly Liquidation Reports

100% MOOE and other funds in
adherence to COA rules and
standards
2. Transparency Board
3. Certification of Top Performers/No Unliquidated
Funds
4. Budget Utilization Report (IUs and Non-IUs)
Procurement aligned with PPAs, SIP, WFP, AIP, PPMP with
complete liquidation documents - 5 pts
Lacking 1 document - 4 pts

Lacking 2 documents - 3 pts

Lacking 3 documents - 2 pts

Lacking 4 or more documents - 1 pt

2.2 Kept official records, Main MoVs

communications, and
information in printed and/or
electronic format for easy
access and retrieval
1. School Forms (SF4, SF5, SF6, e-F7, SF8 *if no AO
II/PDO I/ADAS III/etc.)
2. DTR, IDLAR, Appointments, Plantilla, Payrolls
(for UIs), MRs, ICS, FARS Submitted School Forms, DTR, IDLAR, Appointments, Plantilla,
3. e-SRC Payrolls (for UIs), MRs, ICS, FARS, e-SRC in printed and/or
electronic format, complete files, arranged neatly and organized
in a Google drive for easy access and retrieval - 5 pts

Lacking 1 file/folder - 4 pts

Lacking 2 files/folders - 3 pts

Lacking 3 files/folders - 2 files

Lacking 4 or more files/folders - 1 pt

2.3 Documented
implementation of programs,
projects, and activities (PPAs)
under School-based
Management (SBM)
2.4 Ensured that teachers and
personnel comply with the
policy on attendance
2.5 Ensured that teachers are 1. Approved e-SF7
equitably assigned to teaching 2. Class program SY 23-24 approved by the SDS
loads indicated in the
e-SF7/Class Program at the
Start of School Year 2023-2024
Main MoV
1. Annual Accomplishment Report of PPAs
2. NSBI/Inventory of School Buildings
3. Annual Inspection Report
4. SBM Level of Practice with Analysis Documented implementation of PPAs/CI Reports, plans,
5. Reports on Continuous Improvement (CI) Projects inventory/inspection report under SBM arranged completely,
Implemented updated, and filed for easy access and retrieval - 5 pts
Lacking 1 MoV - 4 pts
Lacking 2 MoVs - 3 pts
Lacking 3 MoVs - 2 pts
Lacking 4 or more MoVs - 1 pt
1.Teachers' signed DTR
2. Monthly Report on Absences (ROA)/ (Form 7)
3. Issuance of School Memo on Policy Review in
adherence to Dep Ed Order 9 s 2005 and DepEd Order
No. 291 s.2008
4. Notice of Meeting Submitted all 5 MOVs - 5 pts
5. Consolidated reports /findings/action taken &
recommendation Submitted 4 MOVs - 4 pts
Supporting MOVs: Submitted 3 MOVs - 3 pts
attendance sheets, minutes of meeting
Submitted 2 MOVs - 2 pts
Submitted 1 MOV - 1 pt
Submitted validated and approved e-SF7 and class program
by the SDS
5- pts -validated and approved by SDS
1- pt- not appproved by SDS
 3.1 Submitted and 1. Approved Monthly Instructional Supervisory Plan
Implemented monthly (ISP) 2. Instructional
Instructional Supervisory Plan Supervisory Plan monthly Accomplishment Reports
(ISP) in the delivery and/or 3. Consolidated Results of M&E (PMCF)
implementation of face-to-face, 4. Analyses of M&E Results
distance, or blended learning Submitted all 4 MOVs
modality (approved monthly ISP, accomplishment report, and consolidated
M&E report and analyses) - 5 pts

Submitted 3 MOVs - 4 pts

Submitted 2 MOVs - 3 pts

Submitted 1 MOVs - 2 pts

No MOVs - 1 pt

3.2 Conducted school-based 1. Approved school LAC plan on curriculum

review, contextualization and
implementation of learning
standards
contextualization
2.Contextualized Matrix Submitted all 5 MOVs - 5 pts
3. Copy of school policy/issuance on curriculum
contextualization 4. Copy of Submitted 4 MOVs - 4 pts
contextualized learning resources with certification
from LREs 5. Submitted 3 MOVs - 3 pts
Certification of utilization /adoption of contextualized
LRs Submitted 2 MOVs - 2 pts

Submitted 1 MOV - 1 pt

3.3 Conducted needs 1. Updated Inventory of learning resources needs

assesment on type/kind of 2. Approved
learning resources to be School LR plan
developed
5- conducted, implemented approved school LR plan with
complete MOVs

1- implemented , incomplete MOV presented

3.4 Monitored and evaluted the 1. Updated Monitoring and evaluation tool in the
utilization of quality assured utilization and distribution of learning resources per
contextualized learning quarter 2.
resources Consolidated Monitoring and Evaluation report in
contextualization and distribution of learning
resources per quarter
5- submitted M&E report on the utilization of contextualized LRs

1- incomplete submission

Focusing on
 3.5 Implemented reading and 1. Approved Implementation Plan and Literacy and
Focusing on numeracy program to improve Numeracy Roadmap and school-initiated intervention
Teaching and learning outcomes approved by SDS l
Learning 2. Quarterly
monitoring report in the implementation of Litnum 5- Submitted approved LitNum Plan, implemented school-initated
programs (List of learners intervention with progress monitoring report, analysis and
progress), (issues/concerns/action taken) presented complete MOVs
3. Progress 4- submitted only 3 MOVs 3 - submitted only 2
Monitoring Report with analysis MOVs 2- submitted only 1 MOV 1-No
MOV presented

3.6 Ensured effective 1. Consolidated results of Quarterly Assessment with

implementation of the
management of learning in
schools and learning centers for
better learning outcomes
Analyses 2. Report on
instructional interventions / best practices based on
analysed quarterly assessment results
3. Contextualized learning assessment tools to
diagnose learners and determine their mastery level 5- Submitted complete 4 MOVs
4- submitted only 3 MOVs
4. Inventory/list localized/contextualized 3 - submitted only 2 MOVs
assessment tools 2- submitted only 1 MOV
1-No MOV presented

3.7. Provided learners a child- 1. Approved implementation plan on ADM

friendly, inclusive and healthy
learning environment 2. CFSS Survey Tool-
Child Friendly School System Survey Report

3 SBM WinS Level of Practice-Wash in School Level of 5- 100% of programs /activities implemented with presented
Practice accomplishment reports as MOVs 4 -4 out of 5
4 . NSED Quarterly Report- National Simultaneous implemented
Earthquake Drill 5 . CSSMT- 3 - 3- out of 5 implemented
Comprehensive Schol Safety Monitoring Report 2- 2 out of 5 implemented
1 -less than 2 programs implemented
 3.8 Implemented curricular and
co-curricular activities
promoting learner's values
formation and holistic
development evident in the
school calendar of activities
4.1 Designed and implemented
programs for the personal and
professional development of
teachers and personnel based
on needs assessment and those
required by DepEd
4.2 Observed performance
cycle such as setting
performance targets, coaching
and mentoring performance,
Developing Self and midyear review, and
Others performance evaluation of ALL
teachers and personnel using
RPMS Tools (IDLAR, COT
Coaching and Mentoring Form,
etc.)
Implemented various curricular and co-curricular
activities based on DepEd Order 22, s. 2023, and DO
003., s. 2024
1. United Nations Celebration
2. Functional School Sports and Cultural Program
3. Campus Journalism /School/ Division Press
Conference 5- 100% of programs /activities implemented with presented
4. Nutrition/Dental Month accomplishment reports as MOVs 4 -8-9 out of 10
5. Reading Month Celebration / 3Bs /LitNum implemented 3 - 6-7- out of 10
implemented 2- 4-5 out of 10 implemented
6. Career Guidance Program/orientation 1 -less than 4 programs implemented
7. Community School Day
8. Home Gardening Program
9. NLC -NLRP 10. Catch-
Up Fridays
1. Approved SLAC plans and report
2. Approved INSET Proposal and
Accomplishment Report 3.
Evaluation Report 4. INSET
Activity Schedule, Attendance Sheet
5. Inventory of PD Programs conducted for Teachers'
development needs
-Crafted and submitted program design on INSET/SLAC complete
with required content - 5 pts
-Lacking 1 required content - 4 pts
-Lacking 2 required content - 3 pts
-Lacking 3 required content - 2 pts
-Lacking more than 3 required content - 1 pt
1. Sample of signed IPCRF Commitment of teachers
(signed) 2. Sample
of Accomplished Mid-year Review Forms of Teachers
3. Sample of Performace Conducted all 4 phases of the RPMS Cycle:
Coaching and Mentoring Form Year Round
4. Sample COT Accomplished Form of Teachers Signed performance targets; coached and monitored
5. Sample IPCRF of teachers with Rating performance, conducted midyear review, rated and signed IPCRF
of all teachers and personnel - 5 pts
Lacking 1 process - 4 pts
Lacking 2 processes - 3 pts
Lacking 3 processes - 2 pts
Only 1 process done - 1 pt
4.3 Recognized and awarded
teachers and personnel for
outstanding and exemplary
performance based on their
performance ratings and actual
accomplishments
4.4 Conduct self-assessment of 1. Consolidated summary of teachers' needs based on
personal and professional
development needs to teachers 2. IPPD/SPPD
using the Philippine
Professional Standards for
Teachers (PPST)
5.1 Prepared, issued, and/or
published information and
official communication to
teachers/personnel, clients,
and stakeholders using printed
and/or electronic
Memorandum, Infographics,
Tarpaulins, websites, FB Pages,
GC
1. Sample of certificates awarded to teachers and
personnel 2. Awards and
Recognition Program 3. Criteria
for the awards and recognition
4. List of Awardees Recognized and awarded teachers and personnel for outstanding
and exemplary performance based on their performance ratings
and actual accomplishments based on 4 or more criteria - 5 pts
Based on 3 criteria - 4 pts
Based on 2 criteria - 3 pts
Based on 1 criterion - 2 pts
No criterion was used - 1 pt
E-SAT/CSAT Results
-100% of the teachers have undergone needs assessment - 5 pts
-90-99% of the teachers have undergone needs assessment - 4
pts
-80-89% of the teachers have undergone needs assessment - 3
pts
-70-79% of the teachers have undergone needs assessment - 2
pts
-less than 70% oof the teachers have undergone needs
assessment - 1 pt
1. Any sample of information and official
communication to teachers/personnel, clients, and
stakeholders using printed and/or electronic
Memorandum, Infographics, Tarpaulins, websites, FB Information and official communication published in any 5 of the
Pages, GC printed formats (infographics, tarpaulins, electronic formats in
website, FB page, GC) - 5 pts
Any 4 - 4 pts
Any 3 - 3 pts
Any 2 - 2 pts
Any 1 - 1 pt
 5.2 Conducted a
consolidation/database
mechanism on the directory of 2. Annual Consolidated Report on Partnership
stakeholders/partners
Building
Connections
5.3 Conducted partnerships
and Social Mobilization
activities (brigada, dagyaw,
adopt a school, SBm, etc.) to
generate resources and
programs to help the school as
evidenced by presence of
actual projects, Deed of
Donation, or MOUs/MOAs, etc.
5.4 Conducted regular
meetings with PTA, ExeCom,
teams, grade leaders, faculty
clubs, and other stakeholders
to discuss plans to improve the
delivery of educational services
1. Monthly Report on the Directory or Inventory of
Partners
1. Attendance sheets
Program and Accomplishment Report
3. School Partnership Data Report with
Transmittal (Submitted through DPDS Site and
Onedrive)
4. Signed MOUs/MOAs for partnership
1. Notice of meeting
sheets with meeting quorum
3. Minutes of the Meeting
12 reports on Directory/Inventory of Partners submitted to Soc
Mob - 5 pts.
10-11 reports on Directory/Inventory of Partners submitted to Soc
Mob - 4 pts
8-9 reports on Directory/Inventory of Partners submitted to Soc
Mob - 3 pts
6-7 reports on Directory/Inventory of Partners submitted to Soc
Mob - 2 pts
less than 6 reports on Directory/Inventory of Partners submitted
to Soc Mob - 1 pt
Year Round
2. Activity
Conducted partnerships and Social Mobilization activities with at
least 5 stakeholders - 5 pts
With 4 stakeholders - 4 pts
With 3 stakeholders - 3 pts
With 2 stakeholders - 2 pts
With 1 stakeholder - 1 pt
2. Attendance
Conducted regular meetings/conferences with ExeCom, Teams,
Grade Leaders, Teachers League, SSG/SPG), and any 1 external
(PTA, SGC, Alumni, Barangay, External Partner, etc.) stakeholders'
group
85-100% Attendance - 5 pts
75-85% Attendance - 4 pts
65-75% Attendance - 3 pts
55-65% Attendance - 2 pts
55% or lesser attendance - 1 pt
 1. Served as Officer-in-Charge in
school, cluster, division position
2. Resource
Person in any division/cluster-
led seminars/trainings
3. Awardee of division-led
contest
4. Member of division-
organized committee
Plus Factor 5. Host of Division Activity 1% 1.0%
6. Other
noteworthy accomplishments
(Maximum of 1.0
only)

In blue are the MOVs that will come from the SDO Personnel in-charge while those in red shall be provided by the School Head.

JUAN DELA CRUZ

RATER
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
SCORE
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

0-1 error - 5 pts -Submitted before the deadline - 5 pts

2-3 errors - 4 pts
4-5 errors - 3 pts -On the deadline - 4 pts
6-7 errors - 2 pts -Delay of 1-2 days - 3 pts
More than 7 errors - 1 pt -Delay of 3-5 days - 2 pts
-Delay of more than 5 days - 1 pt

Concept Paper, Project Proposal, Innovation, Research (BERF and NON-

BERF), Work Application Plan (WAP), Re-entry Application Project (REAP)
completed, submitted, reviewed, approved, and implemented with
MOVs - 5 pts
-Concept Paper, Project Proposal, Innovation, Research (BERF and NON-
BERF), Work Application Plan (WAP), Re-entry Application Project (REAP)
completed, submitted, reviewed, approved, and implemented - 4pts
Submitted twice a year - 5 pts
-Concept Paper, Project Proposal, Innovation, Research (BERF and NON- Submitted once a year - 4 pts
BERF), Work Application Plan (WAP), Re-entry Application Project (REAP) No submission - 1 pt
completed, submitted, reviewed, approved - 3 pts

-Concept Paper, Project Proposal, Innovation, Research (BERF and NON-

BERF), Work Application Plan (WAP), Re-entry Application Project (REAP)
completed, submitted, reviewed but NOT approved - 2 pts
-NO submission Concept Paper, Project proposal, Innovation or Research
- 1 pt

sy

-Submitted all documents on time - 5 pts

Files have an average of: -Any document/file submitted with 1-2 days
0-1 error - 5 pts delay - 4 pts
2 errors - 4 pts -Any document/file submitted with 3-4 days
3 errors - 3 pts delay - 3 pts
4 errors - 2 pts -Any document/file submitted with 5-6 days
With 5 or more errors - 1 pt delay - 2 pts
-Any document/file submitted with more than
6 days delay - 1 pt
 Conducted SMEA within the schedule - 5 pts

SMEA Reports submitted have 0-1 correction - 5 pts Conducted SMEA a day after the schedule - 4
pts
SMEA Reports submitted have 2-3 corrections - 4 pts
Conducted SMEA 2 days after the schedule - 3
SMEA Reports submitted have 4-5 corrections - 3 pts pts

SMEA Reports submitted have 6-7 corrections - 2 pts Conducted SMEA 3 days after the schedule - 2
pts
SMEA Reports submitted have more than 7 correction - 1 pt
Conducted SMEA 4 or more days after the
schedule - 1 pt

30 days after the ADA day with complete

95-100% utilization - 5 pts
documents, and fully liquidated - 5 pts
90-94% utilization - 4 pts
Submitted 1 day after the deadline - 4 pts
85-89% utilization - 3 pts
Delay of 2-3 days - 3 pts
80-84% utilization - 2 pts
Delay of 4-5 days - 2 pts
Below 80% utilization with reversion- 1 pt
Delay of 6 days or more - 1 pt

-Submitted all documents on time - 5 pts

Files have an average of: -Any document/file submitted with 1-2 days
0-1 error - 5 pts delay - 4 pts
2 errors - 4 pts -Any document/file submitted with 3-4 days
3 errors - 3 pts delay - 3 pts
4 errors - 2 pts -Any document/file submitted with 5-6 days
With 5 or more errors - 1 pt delay - 2 pts
-Any document/file submitted with more than
6 days delay - 1 pt
Files have an average of: Frequency of documentation:
0-1 error - 5 pts Weekly - 5 pts
2 errors - 4 pts Every other week - 4 pts
3 errors - 3 pts Monthly - 3 pts
4 errors - 2 pts Every other month - 2 pts
With 5 or more errors - 1 pt Quarterly - 1 pt

Submitted Reports 2-3 days after the end of

the month - 5pts
With 1 error and no compliance - 5 pts
Submitted Reports 4-5 days after the end of
the month - 4pts
With 2-3 errors and no compliance - 4 pts
Submitted Reports 6-7 days after the end of
With 4-5 errors and no compliance - 3 pts
the month - 3pts
With 6-7 errors and no compliance - 2 pts
Submitted Reports 8-9 days after the end of
the month - 2pts
With no reports submitted - 1 pts
Submitted Reports 10 days or more after the
end of the month - 1pt

5- submitted 1 week before the opening of

classes

4- submitted on the opening of classes

5- 0-2 revisions
4- 3-4 revisions 3- submitted 1-2 days after the opening of
3- 5-6 revisions
2- 7-8 revisions classes
1- 9 and above revisions
2- submitted 3-4 days after the opening of
classes

1- submitted 5 or more days after the

opening of classes
 Submitted ISP Reports 2-3 days after the
end of the month - 5pts
Submitted 10 well-written and complete MOVs - 5pts

Submitte 8-9 well-written MOVs - 4pts
Submitted 6-7 well-written MOVs - 3pts
Submitted 4-5 well-written MOVs - 2pts
Submitted ISP Reports 4-5 days after the
end of the month - 4pts
Submitted ISP Reports 6-7 days after the end of
the month - 3pts

Submitted less than 4 well-written MOVs - 1pt Submitted ISP Reports 8-9 days after the end of
the month - 2pts

Submitted ISP Reports 10 days or more after

the end of the month - 1pt

5- submitted 1 week before the next quarter

4- submitted on the 1st week of the quarter

5- 0-2 revisions
4- 3-4 revisions
3- 5-6 revisions
3- submitted on the 2nd week of the quarter
2- 7-8 revisions
1- 9 and above revisions
2- submitted on the 3rd week of the quarter

1- submitted on the 4th week of the quarter

5- submitted 1 week before the next quarter

School LR Plan with 0 - 1 area for improvement - 5 pts
4- submitted on the 1st week of the quarter
with 2 areas for improvement - 4 pts
with 3 areas for improvement - 3 pts
with 4 areas for improvement - 2 pts
3- submitted on the 2nd week of the quarter
with 5 or more areas for improvement - 1 pt
2- submitted on the 3rd week of the quarter

1- submitted on the 4th week of the quarter

5- submitted 1 week before the next quarter

Submitted 4 well-written and complete M&E reports on the
utilization of contextualized LRs - 5pts
4- submitted on the 1st week of the quarter
Submitte 3 well-written reports - 4pts

Submitted 2 well-written reports - 3pts

3- submitted on the 2nd week of the quarter
Submitted 1 well-written report - 2pts
2- submitted on the 3rd week of the quarter
No M&E report submitted - 1pt
1- submitted on the 4th week of the quarter
 5- submitted 1 week before the next quarter
Submitted 4 well-written and complete progress monitoring
reports with analysis - 5pts
4- submitted on the 1st week of the quarter
Submitted 3 well-written reports - 4pts

Submitted 2 well-written reports - 3pts

3- submitted on the 2nd week of the quarter
Submitted 1 well-written report - 2pts
2- submitted on the 3rd week of the quarter
No progress monitoring report submitted - 1pt
1- submitted on the 4th week of the quarter

5- submitted 1 week before the next quarter

Submitted 4 well-written and complete progress monitoring
reports with analysis - 5pts
4- submitted on the 1st week of the quarter
Submitted 3 well-written reports - 4pts

Submitted 2 well-written reports - 3pts 3- submitted on the 2nd week of the quarter

Submitted 1 well-written report - 2pts 2- submitted on the 3rd week of the quarter

No progress monitoring report submitted - 1pt 1- submitted on the 4th week of the quarter

Submitted any 5 well-written and complete accomplishment

reports - 5pts
5- -On time submission of reports
Submitted 3 well-written reports - 4pts 4- delay of 1-3 days
3- delay of 4-6 days
Submitted 2 well-written reports - 3pts 2- delay of 7-9 days
1- delay of 10 or more days
Submitted 1 well-written report - 2pts

No progress monitoring report submitted - 1pt

Submitted any 5 well-written and complete accomplishment
reports - 5pts 5- -On time submission of reports
4- delay of 1-3 days
Submitted 3 well-written reports - 4pts 3- delay of 4-6 days
Submitted 2 well-written reports - 3pts 2- delay of 7-9 days
1- delay of 10 or more days
Submitted 1 well-written report - 2pts

No progress monitoring report submitted - 1pt

-All Training/SLAC proposals submitted on time

Crafted program design on INSET/SLAC completed, submitted, - 5 pts
reviewed, approved, and implemented with MOVs - 5 pts
-Any 1 Training/SLAC proposals submitted with
PD completed, submitted, reviewed, approved, and delay - 4 pts
implemented - 4 pts
-Any 2 Training/SLAC proposals submitted with
PD completed, submitted, reviewed, approved, but not delay - 3 pts
implemented - 3 pts
-Any 3 Training/SLAC proposals submitted with
PD completed and submitted - 2 pts delay - 2 pts

No submission - 1 pt -More than 3 Training/SLAC proposals

submitted with delay - 1 pt

Implemented performance cycle with 10 or more MOVs - 5 pts Conducted on time - 5 pts
Implemented performance cycle with 7-9 MOVs - 4 pts Delay of 1-2 days - 4 pts
Implemented performance cycle with 4-6 MOVs - 3 pts Delay of 3-5 days - 3 pts
Implemented performance cycle with 1-3 MOVs - 2 pts Delay of 6-8 days - 2 pts
Implemented performance cycle with no MOVs - 1 pt Delay of 9 days or more - 1 pt
 Conducted recognition and awarding of
teachers:
Recognized 5 or more teachers - 5 pts
Recognized 4 teachers - 4 pts
for 4 Quarters- 5 pts
Recognized 3 teachers - 3 pts
for 3 Quarters - 4 pts
Recognized 2 teachers - 2 pts
for 2 Quarters - 3 pts
Recognized 1 teacher - 1 pt
for 1 Quarter - 2 pts
No R&R activity conducted - 1 pt

-100% of the needs assessment result was consolidated and

submitted to HRD - 5 pts

-90-99% of the needs assessment result was consolidated and

SPPD submitted on or before the deadline - 5
submitted to HRD - 4 pts
pts
-80-89% of the needs assessment result was consolidated and
-submitted a week after the deadline - 4 pts
submitted to HRD - 3 pts
-submitted 2 weeks after the deadline - 3 pts
-submitted 3 weeks after the deadline - 2 pts
-70-79% of the needs assessment result was consolidated and
-submitted a month or more after the deadline
submitted to HRD - 2 pts
- 1 pt
-less than 70% of the needs assessment result was
consolidated and submitted to HRD - 1 pt

Published information and official communication with an

average of:
Published before schedule - 5 pts
Published on time - 4 pts
0-1 error - 5 pts
Delay of 1-2 days - 3 pts
2-3 errors - 4 pts
Delay of 3-5 days - 2 pts
4-5 errors - 3 pts
Delay of 6 days or more - 1 pt
6-7 errors - 2 pts
More than 7 errors - 1 pt
at least 120 partners/donors engaged/involved in the school
activities/programs/projects annually - 5 pts
All Reports on Directory/Inventory of Partners
95-119 partners/donors engaged/involvedin the school submitted to Soc Mob without delay - 5pts
activities/programs/projects annually - 4 pts
Any 1 delayed submission - 4 pts
75-94 partners/donors engaged/involved in the school Any 2 delayed submissions - 3 pts
activities/programs/projects annually - 3 pts Any 3 delayed submissions - 2 pts
4 or more delayed submissions - 1 pt
55-74 partners/donors engaged/involved in the school
activities/programs/projects annually - 2 pts

less than 55 partners/donors engaged/involved in the school

activities/programs/projects annually - 1 pt

School generated resources with an estimated money value Submitted School Partnership Data Report with
of: Transmittal (Submitted through DPDS Site and
Onedrive) without delay - 5 pts
Php 20,000 and above - 5 pts
Php 15,000-19,999 - 4 pts -with one delayed reporting - 4 pts
Php 10,000-14,999 - 3 pts -with 2-4 delayed reporting - 3 pts
Php 5,000-9,999 - 2 pts -with 5-7 delayed reporting - 2 pts
Below Php 5,000 - 1 pt -with more than 7 delayed reporting - 1 pt

Prepared more than 8 minutes of the meeting - 5 pts

Conducted meeting/Conferences for:
Prepared 7-8 minutes of the meeting - 4 pts
4 Quarters - 5 pts
3 Quarters - 4 pts
Prepared 5-6 minutes of the meeting - 3 pts
2 Quarters - 3 pts
1 Quarter - 2 pts
Prepared 3-4 minutes of the meeting - 2 pts
None - 1 pt
Prepared 1-2 minutes of the meeting - 1 pt
 0

JUAN DELA CRUZ JUAN DELA CRUZ

RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY