8/20/22, 1:37 PM UK journalist explains Bhuttos’ attitude towards power - Newspaper - DAWN.

COM

TODAY'S PAPER | AUGUST 20, 2022

UK journalist explains Bhuttos’ attitude towards

power
Shazia Hasan | Published October 22, 2021

KARACHI: As part of the Aga Khan University’s (AKU) Special Lecture Series,
British journalist and author Owen Bennett-Jones, formerly of the BBC, spoke
about the Bhuttos live via Zoom from the AKU auditorium here on Thursday.

The journalist’s books on Pakistan include The Bhutto Dynasty: The Struggle for Power in
Pakistan and it was power politics that he highlighted in his talk as this is what binds all the
Bhuttos — from Shahnawaz to Zulfikar, and Benazir to Bilawal.

Mr Bennett-Jones pointed out that several political parties in Pakistan are dynastic. He also said
this phenomenon is not limited to Pakistan but is also seen in other South Asian countries as well
as the United States.

Coming to the Bhuttos, he wondered aloud whether they are liberals. “I thought of looking into
that and the family’s attitude to power,” he said.

Beginning with Sir Shahnawaz Bhutto, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s father, the British journalist said he
had a colonial and political attitude, and he was not very progressive.

“He did feel that Muslim landlords had to be saved from the Hindu money lenders. He resented
Hindu encroachment upon Muslim land but he had a very pro-establishment stance as well.
“Being knighted by the British, he backed the status quo,” he said.

“But he also spearheaded the campaign for separating Sindh from Bombay. Even though he got
folded into the Bombay administration, as many in Sindh objected, still, he is often credited for
separating Sindh from Bombay. It was said to be the greatest, crowning political achievement of
his life,” he said.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1653260 1/14
8/20/22, 1:37 PM UK journalist explains Bhuttos’ attitude towards power - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

He then asked if Zulfikar inherited this attitude? “He was the son of a Hindu convert. That was a
problem for him. Many in his family were not willing to accept that union. This sense of rejection
was one of the driving forces in his life. He bitterly resented the way his mother was treated. He
said that poverty was her only crime. And this is what led to his socialist ideas,” the journalist
explained.

“So we have him taking quite a different stance to his father. Did he inherit his pro-establishment
position? Well, no. He was an anti-establishment figure in Pakistan, at first at least. He wanted to
introduce a socialist system here. And he always defended minorities,” the author said.

“The Pakistan Peoples Party have benefited from the minorities’ vote. Benazir and Bilawal, too,
have defended the minorities. In fact, Bilawal had announced that he will defend the minorities in
Pakistan after his mother’s assassination. This was a break from Shahnawaz’s thinking,” he
pointed out, reminding that the latter was not a socialist but a conservative figure.

“Actually, Zulfikar, too, was seen as a conservative figure. He captured the minds and souls of
voters. His rhetoric and ideology inspired so many Pakistanis to vote for him. His library in 70
Clifton had social texts but also books on Mussolini and Hitler. He spoke about Hitler’s capacity to
face power. Even when he was in prison he asked for that literature of his to be brought to him
there.”

About Benazir, Mr Bennett-Jones said she wanted to empower the poor. “As she got more power
over her party and got closer to becoming the prime minister, she changed. She tried to move her
party from the left to the right,” he said.

“She would say that she admired Margaret Thatcher, and she pretty much rejected socialist ideas.
And when asked about her moving away from her father’s ideals, she said that times had changed
and that she had changed with the times.”

“I think that now Bilawal is not too far away from what his mother’s thinking was,” he said.

“So have the Bhuttos inherited their political views? Not really. But they have inherited that
attitude for power. Shahnawaz was ambitious. He enjoyed power as he climbed the British system.
He had a British attitude from his youth. His son Zulfikar was anti-system, anti-establishment.
But when it came to it, he was also willing to compromise with the military for power.

“When climbing the ladder, Zulfikar was quite happy to work with the powers that be, when the
need was there,” he said.

“But what about his daughter Benazir? Well she began with an anti-military stance but then in her
second government, she pretty much gave all powers to military and she was willing to do it again

https://www.dawn.com/news/1653260 2/14
8/20/22, 1:37 PM UK journalist explains Bhuttos’ attitude towards power - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

in exchange for a third term in power. So all the Bhuttos are willing to cut deals to carry them to
power,” he concluded.

In response to a question about dynastic trends in Pakistan, the British author said there were
political dynasties in other countries too. “For example, the Americans don’t have (a) subject’s
mindset. But they did vote for Bush, for both the father and the sons because of the name and the
expectations from that family name. Here as well, people have expectations from Bilawal since he
was 18. He also wants power. So there are lots of reasons that lead to dynastic successions,” he
explained.

Answering a question about the steps taken by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto against the Ahmadiyya despite
his pro-minority stance, the journalist agreed that ZAB was very much for protecting all
minorities from his university days, when he also made a speech about it. “But his declaration that
the Ahmadis were non-Muslim was for trying to win over the Islamic vote. He had been heard
saying that he didn’t mean to keep the declaration in place and when the time and opportunity
came he will reverse it,” he said.

When asked about ZAB’s role in the dismemberment of Pakistan, Mr Bennett-Jones said there
were three men responsible for that break-up. “It was a struggle between Mujib-ur-Rehman,
Yahya Khan and Bhutto and the main drive for the break-up was from East Pakistan. But, yes,
Bhutto also did not help keep the country together. It is said that he didn’t really believe that the
West and East will go separate ways, which is strange given that he was famous for being far-
seeing. He saw the rise of China. How could he miss this?”

Published in Dawn, October 22nd, 2021

Read more
Enraged people take to streets against loadshedding

Who owns restaurants, tea shops on Seaview beach, SHC asks CBC

Sindh govt says criteria for hiring VCs not changed

https://www.dawn.com/news/1653260 3/14