Professional Documents
Culture Documents
First Solar Case Report 3
First Solar Case Report 3
First Solar Case Report 3
First Solar has adopted a cost leadership business-level strategy in the field of solar
energy production with the goal of outperforming its competitors in terms of economic returns
through the production of solar panels at a much lower cost. First Solar's historic achievement in
2009—becoming the first solar producer to produce panels generating a megawatt of power at a
production cost of less than $1.00 per watt—substantiates this strategy. This noteworthy
manufacturing core competency. The goal of the business-level strategy is to offer a large market
The capacity of First Solar to produce solar panels at an industry-low cost of $.75 per
watt is the most persuasive evidence supporting their cost leadership strategy. This
accomplishment not only demonstrates the company's dedication to core efficiency but also
establishes it as a powerful competitor in the solar energy market. The company's historical
production costs compared to typical crystalline-silicon solar panels, is evident in its cost
leadership strategy.
3. Did First Solar have the core competencies to support its strategy? What were they?
Key cost leadership competencies form the foundation of First Solar's cost leadership
strategy. One essential core strength is the capacity to produce solar panels for an industry-low
$.75/watt. This entails making use of supply chain efficiency, technical innovation, and
sophisticated production techniques. Furthermore, the company's cost leadership strategy is
supported by its core competency of vertical integration. First Solar is able to optimize efficiency
and reduce costs at different points in the process by controlling the whole value chain, from the
production of solar cells and modules to the engineering, procurement, building, operations,
The capacity of First Solar to provide solar panels at a cheaper cost than competitors is a
key factor in its competitive advantage. The company sells its products at a market price while
keeping production costs lower, according to its cost leadership strategy, which enables it to earn
a greater profit margin. This competitive advantage is backed by ongoing efforts to optimize
manufacturing processes and control costs throughout the value chain, in addition to being
evident in the previous achievement of producing a megawatt of power at less than $1.00 per
watt.
Financial statements and pertinent exhibits are taken into consideration based on several
factors. To evaluate the cost competitiveness of First Solar's products, it is essential to look at
Exhibit 7, which displays the manufacturing costs per watt of competitors. To help comprehend
the company's cost advantage, this display offers a comparative analysis. Furthermore, based on
its lower output/ft2 than its competitors, exhibit 3 indicates that First Solar may be strategically
focusing on market sectors or distinctive product attributes that support the cost leadership
strategy.
A thorough examination of the financial statements—especially Exhibit 9—enables one
to comprehend First Solar's financial situation and strategic choices on a deeper level. The $393
million goodwill impairment charge in 2011 emphasizes First Solar's past experience with
vertical integration through acquisitions. It is described as a non-cash charge that adjusts earlier
acquisition overpayments. This is consistent with the business's strategy to manage the full value
chain, from system integration and development to component manufacture. In addition, the
restructuring charge and the notable rise in research and development (R&D) expenses in 2011
are noteworthy factors to consider when evaluating the fall in the company's profits. These
investments highlight First Solar's strategic positioning for long-term success by demonstrating a
First Solar's ongoing work can be understood by comparing the project assets and balance
sheets to those of its competitors, as stated in the lawsuit. First Solar may be a more appealing
vendor with more projects in development than its competitors, according to the different
finance for solar power plants is the company's core strength, and this component fits in with
that.
First Solar's impressive rise in the utility-scale systems business, which accounted for
25% of total sales between 2009 and 2011, is a testament to the company's effective market
development, this expansion strengthens the company's competitive position and is in line with
analyzing First Solar's strategic posture, in addition to financial data. The company's noteworthy
market share suggests that its cost benefits may contribute to its appeal as a vendor. The
difficulties presented by Chinese competitors flooding the market with inexpensive solar panels
made of crystalline silicon highlight the necessity for First Solar to retain its cost leadership to
In conclusion, First Solar has established and maintained a competitive advantage in the
solar energy market thanks to its cost leadership business-level strategy, which is bolstered by
positioned as a leader in the sector since it can provide solar panels at a lower cost than its
competitors. A thorough understanding of First Solar's competitive stance and strategic choices is
provided by the examination of pertinent exhibits, market dynamics, and financial statement
analysis. The company is positioned favorably for long-term success due to its commitment to
cost efficiency and continual innovation, even in the face of headwinds in the solar industry.