Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pragmatics & Semantics
Pragmatics & Semantics
Lecture 12
https://bond-lab.github.io/Semantics-and-Pragmatics/
Creative Commons Attribution License: you are free to share and adapt
as long as you give appropriate credit and add no additional restrictions:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
HG2002 (2021)
Review Overview
ã Overall Review
ã Parting Words
HG2002 (2021) 1
Big Picture
ã Language can be used to convey information
â we model this as meaning
â lexical semantics looks at relations between words in the
lexicon
â structural semantics looks at relations between words in
utterances
â pragmatics looks at how and why we use words
ã Meaning is infinite
â it can be built up compositionally
â it can vary and be extended continuously
â we can only model it approximately
HG2002 (2021) 2
Revision:
Introduction to Semantics
HG2002 (2021) 3
What is Semantics
HG2002 (2021) 4
Meaning in the larger context
HG2002 (2021) 5
Metalanguages and Notational Conventions
ã lexeme
ã predicate
ã CONCEPT
HG2002 (2021) 6
Utterances, Sentences and Propositions
HG2002 (2021) 7
(5) It was Gaul that Caesar invaded
(6) It was Caesar who invaded Gaul
HG2002 (2021) 8
Information Theory
not in Saeed 9
â Redundant encoding can make the transmission robust
So we can understand even with noise
not in Saeed 10
Revision:
Meaning, Thought and
Reality
HG2002 (2021) 11
Referential View
Speaker Refer
Say
Expression Referent
Denote
HG2002 (2021) 12
Representational View
Refer Concept
Speaker
Denote Represent
Say
Expression Referent
HG2002 (2021) 13
Two types of naming
ã The description theory: Names are like short hands for de-
scriptions:
William Shakespeare = “the playwright who wrote Hamlet”
HG2002 (2021) 14
Mental Representations
ã Introduce concepts
â Classic view is to represent by Necessary and Sufficient
Conditions: definitional view of meaning
bachelor is an unmarried male adult.
HG2002 (2021) 15
Prototype Theory
HG2002 (2021) 16
Basic Level Categories
HG2002 (2021) 17
Linguistic Relativity
ã The idea behind linguistic relativity is that this will effect how
you think
HG2002 (2021) 18
Revision:
Word Meaning
HG2002 (2021) 19
Words
HG2002 (2021) 21
Lexical Relations
HG2002 (2021) 22
Revision:
Sentence Relations and
Truth
HG2002 (2021) 23
Logic
HG2002 (2021) 24
Methods of Argument
ã Modus Ponens
a If something is human then it is mortal
b Socrates is human
c Socrates is mortal
p → q, p |= q
ã Modus tollens
a If something is human then it is mortal
b Zeus is not mortal
c Zeus is not human
p → q, ¬q |= ¬p
HG2002 (2021) 25
ã Hypothetical syllogism
ã Disjunctive syllogism
(modus tollendo ponens: affirm by denying)
HG2002 (2021) 26
Empirical truths and connectives
HG2002 (2021) 27
Necessary Truth, A Priori Truth and Analyticity
ã Arguments from the speaker’s knowledge
â A priori truth is truth that is known without experience.
â A posteri truth is truth known from empirical testing.
HG2002 (2021) 28
Entailment
ã Entailment
a The evil overlord assassinated the man in the red shirt.
b The man in the red shirt died.
ã Sources of Entailment
â Hyponyms
(7) I rescued a dog today. vs I rescued an animal today.
â Paraphrases
(8) My mom baked a cake.vs A cake was baked by my
mom.
HG2002 (2021) 29
Presuppositions
ã Sources of Presuppositions
â Names presuppose that their referents exist
â Clefts (it was X that Y); Time adverbials; Comparatives
â Factive verbs: realize; some judgement verbs: blame; …
HG2002 (2021) 30
Revision: Situations
HG2002 (2021) 31
Summary of Situation
ã Verb/Situation Types
â Stative
â Dynamic
∗ Punctual
∗ Durative
· Telic/Resultative
· Atelic
ã Modality
â Epistemic: Knowledge, Possibility
â Deontic: Permission, Obligation
ã Evidentiality
HG2002 (2021) 32
Situation Types
Situations Stative Durative Telic Examples
States + + desire, know
Activities − + − run, drive a car
Accomplishment − + + bake, walk to school, build
Punctual − − − knock, flash
Achievement − − + win, start
HG2002 (2021) 33
Tense and Time
HG2002 (2021) 34
Aspect in General
ã Imperfective
â Progressive I was listening/I am listening
â Habitual I listen to the Goon Show
HG2002 (2021) 35
Mood: Knowledge vs Obligation
(10) You can drive this car (You are able to)
HG2002 (2021) 36
Mood more Generally
HG2002 (2021) 37
Revision: Participants
HG2002 (2021) 38
Thematic Roles
HG2002 (2021) 39
Thematic Roles
ã THEME
â Moved, location or state is described
â Typically OBJECT
â He put the book on the shelf
HG2002 (2021) 40
ã EXPERIENCER
â Non-volitional, displaying awareness of action, state
â Typically SUBJECT
â He heard thunder
ã BENEFICIARY
â for whose benefit the action was performed
â Typically indexed by ”for” PP and ”to” PP in English
â They gave me a present
â They gave a present to me
â They made a present for me
HG2002 (2021) 41
ã LOCATION
â Place
â Typically indexed by locative PPs in English
â I live in Jurong
ã GOAL
â towards which something moves (lit or metaphor)
â Typically indexed by ”to” PP in English
â She handed her form to him, She handed him her form
ã SOURCE
â from which something moves or originates
â Typically indexed by ”from” PP in English
â We gleaned this from the Internet
HG2002 (2021) 42
ã INSTRUMENT/MANNER
â Means by which action is performed
â Can be indexed by ”with” PP in English
â I ate breakfast with chopsticks
ã STIMULUS
â Usually used in connection with EXPERIENCER
â The lightning scared him
HG2002 (2021) 43
Theta-Grid
ã Distinguish between
â participant roles depend on the verb — in the grid
(arguments)
â non-participant roles combine freely — not in the grid
(adjuncts)
HG2002 (2021) 44
Linking Grammatical Relations and Thematic Roles
HG2002 (2021) 45
â Generally true across languages
HG2002 (2021) 46
Dowty’s Proto-Arguments
HG2002 (2021) 47
Alternations
HG2002 (2021) 48
Voice
50
What gets Classified?
ã Location: towns
Allan (2001) 51
Noun Classes vs Classifiers
Noun classes Classifiers
Size Small Finite Set Large Number (low hundreds)
Realization Closed Grammatical System Separate Morpheme
Marking Also outside the noun word Only in the noun phrase
Dixon (1986) 52
Summary
53
Revision:
Context and Inference
HG2002 (2021) 54
What is Deixis
HG2002 (2021) 55
Spatial Deixis
HG2002 (2021) 56
Person Deixis
HG2002 (2021) 57
Social Deixis
HG2002 (2021) 58
Strict and Sloppy Readings
59
Context-dependence is everywhere
HG2002 (2021) 61
Information Structure
HG2002 (2021) 62
Cooperation in Conversation
ã Implicature
The aspect of meaning that a speaker conveys, implies,
or suggests without directly expressing.
Can you pass the salt? may implicate “pass me the salt”
HG2002 (2021) 63
Gricean Maxims
Maxim of Quantity
ã Make your contribution as informative as is required (for the current pur-
poses of the exchange).
ã Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.
Maxim of Quality
ã Do not say what you believe to be false.
ã Do not say that for which you lack proper evidence.
Maxim of Relation
ã Be relevant.
Maxim of Manner
ã Be perspicuous [= be easily understood]
ã Avoid obscurity of expression.
ã Avoid ambiguity
ã Be brief (avoid unnecessary prolixity)
ã Be orderly
HG2002 (2021) 64
Conversational Implicatures and Hedges
ã Conventional implicatures
implicatures attached to lexical items
HG2002 (2021) 65
Revision:
Speech as Action
HG2002 (2021) 66
Speech as Action
HG2002 (2021) 67
Perfomative Utterances
HG2002 (2021) 68
Felicity Conditions
HG2002 (2021) 69
Explicit and Implicit Performatives
ã Explicit Performatives
â Tend to be first person
â The main verb is a performative: promise, warn, sentence,
bet, pronounce, …
â You can use hereby
ã Implicit Performatives
HG2002 (2021) 70
Elements of Speech Acts
HG2002 (2021) 71
Searle’s speech act classification
HG2002 (2021) 72
Literal and non-literal uses
ã Sincerity: S wants H to do A
HG2002 (2021) 75
Revision:
Componential Analysis
HG2002 (2021) 76
Break word meaning into its components
HG2002 (2021) 77
Defining Relations using Components
ã Redundancy Rules
[+HUMAN] → [+ANIMATE]
[+ANIMATE] → [+CONCRETE]
[+MARRIED] → [+ADULT]
[+MARRIED] → [+HUMAN] …
HG2002 (2021) 78
Katz’s Semantic Theory
HG2002 (2021) 79
Verb Classification
Levin (1993) 80
Diathesis Alternations
â Causative/inchoative alternation:
Kim broke the window ↔ The window broke
also the window is broken (state)
â Middle construction alternation:
Kim cut the bread ↔ The bread cut easily
â Conative alternation:
Kim hit the door ↔ Kim hit at the door
â Body-part possessor ascension alternation:
Kim cut Sandy’s arm ↔ Kim cut Sandy on the arm
HG2002 (2021) 81
Diathesis Alternations and Verb Classes
Levin (1993) 82
Cognitive Semantics
HG2002 (2021) 84
Motion as a tree
(47) Bobby went into the (50) The car is in the garage
house (51) “The car is in the state lo-
(48) “Bobby traverses a path cated in the interior of the
that terminates at the in- garage”
terior of the house” (52) State
(49) Event
BE-LOC Thing Place
GO Thing Path
CAR IN Thing
BOBBY TO Place
GARAGE
IN Thing
HOUSE
HG2002 (2021) 85
Things: Boundedness and Internal Structure
â Two components:
HG2002 (2021) 86
Conversion: Boundedness and Internal Structure
â Including
â Excluding
88
Modifier Ambiguity
89
Qualia Structure
90
Summary
HG2002 (2021) 91
Revision: Formal
Semantics
HG2002 (2021) 92
Language meets Logic (again)
HG2002 (2021) 93
Model-Theoretical Semantics
HG2002 (2021) 94
Translating English into a Logical Metalanguage
Recall lecture 4 95
Quantifiers in Predicate Logic
∀ and →; ∃ and ∧ 96
Some Advantages in Translating to Predicate Logic
97
Creating a Model
HG2002 (2021) 98
â Predicate constants are sets of individuals for which the
predicate holds
{< x, y, z >: x hands y to z}
HG2002 (2021) 99
Defining Relations using Logic
ã hyponymy
â ∀x(DOG(x) → ANIMAL(x))
ã antonym
â ∀x(DEAD(x) → ¬ALIVE(x))
ã converse
â ∀x∀y(PARENT(x,y) → CHILD(y,x))
ã synonym
â ∀x((EGGPLANT(x) → BRINJAL(x)) ∧ (BRINJAL(x) → EGG-
PLANT(x)))
ã Q(A,B): Q A are B
ã all(A,B) =1 iff A ⊆ B
ã some(A,B) =1 iff A ∩ B ̸= ∅
ã no(A,B) =1 iff A ∩ B = ∅
(75) a. Kim doesn’t eat dessert ⇒ Kim doesn’t eat hot dessert
b. Kim doesn’t eat hot dessert ̸⇒ Kim doesn’t eat dessert
Downward entailment
(76) a. Kim eats some desserts ̸⇒ Kim eats hot dessert
b. Kim eats some hot dessert ⇒ Kim eats some desserts
Upward entailment
ã What (if anything) did you hope to learn that you didn’t?