ANSWERS

Q1.
*Notes for meeting in respect of corporate matters (Exhibit 1)*
Q1 (a)
*(i) Changes to trading arrangements in the country of Stolia* (7 marks)
*Part 1-*
*Calculation of UK corporation tax liability on chargeable gain arising from sale of branch premises in
Stolia*
- The sale of the branch business premises in Stolia by Flo Ltd will give rise to a chargeable gain for
UK corporation tax purposes.
- Since Flo Ltd has not elected to exempt the profits of its overseas permanent establishment (PE)
from UK corporation tax, the chargeable gain will be subject to UK corporation tax.
- The chargeable gain will be calculated as the proceeds from the sale less the cost of the premises,
plus any allowances given or expenses incurred in relation to the sale.
- The entire chargeable gain will be subject to UK corporation tax at the main rate, which is currently
25% for the financial year 2023-24 (assumed to be the same for 2024-25).

*Part 2- *
*Taxation of profits generated by Yea Co from 1 July 2024*

- Yea Co is a tax resident company in Stolia, and its profits will be subject to corporation tax in Stolia
at the rate of 14%.
- As Yea Co is a separate legal entity from Flo Ltd, its profits will not be subject to UK corporation tax
in the hands of Flo Ltd (ignoring CFC rules).
- However, when Yea Co distributes dividends to Flo Ltd (assumed to be 80% of its post-tax profits),
the dividend income will be subject to UK corporation tax in the hands of Flo Ltd, with credit given
for the underlying tax paid in Stolia.

Q1 (a)
*(ii) Flo Ltd*
*Part 1-*
*Corporation tax payment dates*
- Vera's belief that Flo Ltd will be required to pay its UK corporation tax liability for the year ending 31
March 2026 in quarterly instalments is incorrect.
- A company is required to pay corporation tax in quarterly instalments if its augmented profits
exceed the profit threshold, which is £1.5 million for the financial year 2023-24 (assumed to be the
same for 2024-25 and 2025-26).
- Flo Ltd's augmented profits will be £600,000 every year, which does not exceeds the profit
threshold.
- The cessation of the Stolian branch will not affect the requirement to pay quarterly instalments, as
the branch profits were already included in Flo Ltd's augmented profits.
- The acquisition of Yea Co will not affect the requirement to pay quarterly instalments, as Yea Co,
and its profits will not be included in Flo Ltd's augmented profits and Dividend received from
overseas subsidiary will be exempt and ignored in computing augmented profits
Normal : Corporation tax is payable 9 months and one day after the end of each accounting period.
Note : Augmented Profit: Taxable total Profit + Dividend from non-Associated companies
*Part 2-*
VAT implications of purchasing Services from Stolia*
As far as TX-UK is concerned, there has been no change to the VAT treatment of services. Services
supplied to a VAT registered business are generally treated as being supplied in the country where
the customer is situated. Therefore, where a UK VAT registered business receives international
services, the place of supply will be the UK. The supply of international services by a UK VAT
registered business will generally be outside the scope of UK VAT as the place of supply will be
outside the UK.
(8 marks)

Q1(a)
*(iii) Qualifying research and development (R&D) costs*(4 marks)

- As Flo Ltd is a small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) for the purposes of R&D tax relief, it will be
eligible for the SME R&D tax relief.
Enhanced relief is available if the company spends money on qualifying R&D, as defined by generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and guidelines from the Department for Business, Energy and
Industrial Strategy.
 SMEs can deduct an additional 86% of qualifying expenditure for tax purposes.
 If the deduction creates a loss it may be surrendered in return for a cash payment from HMRC =
10% of the surrendered amount.
 The surrendered amount is the lower of:
– unrelieved trading loss (after a deemed current year claim and any
actual carry back and group relief claims)
– 186% of qualifying R&D expenditure
 If surrendered in return for cash, the loss cannot also be carried forward for future relief.
 The government has introduced a cap on the amount that a loss making
SME can claim in R&D tax credits. This cap is not examinable.
Qualifying R&D expenditure must be revenue expenditure on a project that seeks to achieve an
advance in science or technology that is relevant to the company's trade.
It can include expenditure on the following:
 staffing costs for staff directly involved in the R&D work, including NICs (class 1 employer) and
pension contributions but excluding taxable benefits
 agency staff for R&D
 materials, water, fuel and power for R&D
 software directly used in R&D
 payments to subcontractors (see below)
It cannot include:
 contributions to other bodies for independent research
 rent
 expenditure covered by a grant or subsidy.

Q1(a)
*(iv) Error in VAT return*
*Part 1-
*Reporting the error to HMRC*
De-minimis level is the greater of: £10,000 and 1% × turnover (maximum limit £50,000) sine less
then De-minimis level, then
- Flo Ltd should report the error in its VAT return for the quarter ended 31 March 2023 to HMRC by
submitting a voluntary disclosure.
- The voluntary disclosure should include details of the error, the amount of VAT underpaid (£7,200),
and the reason for the error.
- HMRC may charge a penalty for the error, but the penalty will be reduced if the disclosure is
unprompted and made before HMRC initiates an investigation or compliance check. There will be no
Interest Charge
*Penalties for the error*
Maximum Penalty
- If the error is considered to be a careless inaccuracy, the penalty could be up to 30% of the
potential lost revenue (£7,200 in this case).
- If the error is considered to be deliberate but not concealed, the penalty could be up to 70% of the
potential lost revenue.
- If the error is considered to be deliberate and concealed, the penalty could be up to 100% of the
potential lost revenue.
- HMRC may suspend or reduce the penalty if Flo Ltd has taken steps to prevent future errors, such as
implementing additional checks or staff training.
*Part 2-*
*Ethical implications for Flo Ltd and our firm* (5 marks)
- If Vera does not accept our advice and fails to report the error to HMRC, Flo Ltd would be in breach
of its legal obligations and could face interest charges and penalties from HMRC, as well as potential
reputational damage.
- As professional advisors, our firm has an ethical obligation to provide competent and diligent advice
to our clients and to uphold the principles of integrity and objectivity.
- If Vera refuses to follow our advice, we may need to consider resigning from our role as advisors to
Flo Ltd, as continuing to act could compromise our professional ethics and potentially expose our
firm to legal or reputational risks.
- We should also consider our legal obligations regarding the reporting of suspected tax evasion
under the relevant anti-money laundering regulations.

Q1.
*(b) Vera and Ray's personal tax affairs (Exhibit 2)* (12 marks)
*Calculation of post-tax proceeds from the sale of Ray's car*
Proceeds from sale of car: £125,000
Cost of car (base cost): £70,000
Gain on disposal: £55,000

As the car was gifted to Ray by Vera, the gain will be subject to capital gains tax (CGT) in Ray's hands.
Ray's taxable income: £21,000 (salary) + £750 (dividends) = £21,750
Personal allowance: £12,570 (assumed for 2024-25)
Taxable income after personal allowance: £21,750 - £12,570 = £9,180

The basic rate band for 2024-25 is assumed to be £37,700.

The remaining basic rate band after deducting taxable income is £37,700 - £9,180 = £28,520.
The gain of £55,000 can be partially covered by the remaining basic rate band.

CGT calculation:
First £28,520 of gain taxed at 10%: £2,852
Remaining £26,480 (£55,000 - £28,520) taxed at 20%: £5,296
Total CGT liability: £2,852 + £5,296 = £8,148
Post-tax proceeds from the sale of the car:
Proceeds from sale: £125,000
Less CGT liability: (£8,148)
Net proceeds: £116,852

*Calculation of post-tax proceeds from the sale of the jointly-owned holiday cottage*

Proceeds from sale of cottage: £400,000

Cost of cottage (base cost for Vera): £220,000
Cost of cottage (base cost for Ray): £145,000 (50% of £290,000 when gifted)

Vera's gain on disposal: £200,000 - £110,000 = £80,000

Ray's gain on disposal: £200,000 - £110,000 = £80,000

Vera's CGT liability (assuming she has already used her annual exempt amount):
£80,000 x 28% (assumed additional rate for 2024-25) = £22,400

Ray's CGT liability:

First £28,520 (assumed remaining basic rate band) taxed at 10%: £2,852
Remaining £51,480 (£80,000 - £28,520) taxed at 20%: £10,296
Total CGT liability for Ray: £2,852 + £10,296 = £13,148

Post-tax proceeds from the sale of the jointly-owned holiday cottage:

Proceeds from sale: £400,000
Less Vera's CGT liability: (£22,400)
Less Ray's CGT liability: (£13,148)
Net proceeds: £364,452

Assumptions:
- The annual exempt amount for CGT has been fully utilized by both Vera and Ray.
- The tax rates and bands are as assumed for the 2024-25 tax year.
- No other reliefs or allowances are available to Vera or Ray.
Q2.
Sure, here is a more detailed response with all necessary calculations for an ACCA ATX (UK) student,
based on the UK Finance Act 2023 for the 2023-24 tax year:
(a) Tax deductions for Lavash Ltd (year ending 31 March 2024):
1. Cash bonus:
- Cash bonus per employee = £10,000
- Number of key employees = 8
- Total cash bonus = £10,000 x 8 = £80,000
- As the bonus is paid in the year ending 31 March 2024 and provision is made in the accounts, it is
deductible in calculating Lavash Ltd's corporation tax liability for the year ending 31 March 2024.

2. Pension contribution:
- Pension contribution per employee = £10,000
- Number of key employees = 8
- Total pension contribution = £10,000 x 8 = £80,000
- Contributions to a registered pension scheme are generally deductible for corporation tax purposes
when paid, subject to being wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade.
- As the contributions are paid on 30 April 2024 and provision is made in the accounts for the year
ending 31 March 2024, the contributions are deductible in that period.

Therefore, the total deduction for corporation tax purposes in the year ending 31 March 2024 is
£80,000 under both options.

(b) Yufka's additional taxes in 2024/25:

(i) Cash bonus:

- Cash bonus received = £10,000
- Yufka is a higher rate taxpayer, so income tax at 40% applies: £10,000 x 40% = £4,000
- Employee Class 1 NIC at 2% (as earnings above Upper Earnings Limit): £10,000 x 2% = £200
- Total additional tax and NIC = £4,000 + £200 = £4,200

(ii) Pension contribution:

- Employer contribution = 8% x £85,000 salary = £6,800
- Additional employer contribution = £10,000
- Gross personal contribution to registered pension scheme = £32,000
- Pension input amount = £6,800 + £10,000 + £32,000 = £48,800
- Annual allowance for 2024/25 = £40,000
- Excess over annual allowance = £48,800 - £40,000 = £8,800

Assuming no unused annual allowance to bring forward, the excess of £8,800 is chargeable to the
annual allowance charge at Yufka's marginal rate of 40%:
Annual allowance charge = £8,800 x 40% = £3,520

(c) EMI scheme tax implications for Yufka:

Grant of options (1 April 2024):
- No income tax or NIC implications as EMI options are tax-advantaged

Exercise of options (31 March 2029):

- Number of shares = 5,000
- Exercise price per share = £6.25
- Market value per share at date of grant = £6.40
- As exercise price is less than market value at grant, Yufka will potentially be subject to income tax
on the difference between the market value of the shares at the time of exercise and the price paid
for the shares and the Difference will also be subject to NIC.
However, as the expected share price on 1 April 2024 is £6.40, and Yufka will pay £6.25 per share, the
difference of £0.15 per share (£6.40 - £6.25) is relatively small i.e., £ 750 which will be subject to
Income tax and NIC
- Cost of acquiring shares = 5,000 x £6.40 = £32,000

Sale of shares (immediately after exercise):

- Sale proceeds = 5,000 x £14 = £70,000
- Cost of shares = £32,000
- Chargeable gain = £70,000 - £32,000 = £38,00 0
- Assuming annual exempt amount (£12,300 in 2023/24) is used elsewhere, the full gain is
chargeable to CGT
- Shares are a chargeable business asset as they are acquired through an EMI option
- Disposal is more than 3 years after grant, so shares qualify for business asset disposal relief (BADR)
if Yufka holds at least 5% of ordinary share capital and voting rights for 2 years prior to disposal
- If BADR applies (2-year holding period met), CGT at 10% on first £1 million lifetime gains: £38,000 x
10% = £3,800
- If BADR not available, CGT at 20% as a higher rate taxpayer: £38,000 x 20% = £76,00

(d) Chipa's redundancy package tax implications:

Statutory redundancy pay: £7,200

Non-contractual payment: £26,000
Total redundancy payment: £7,200 + £26,000 = £33,200

The first £30,000 of a genuine redundancy payment is exempt from income tax.
Taxable redundancy payment = £33,200 - £30,000 = £3,200
As Chipa is a basic rate taxpayer (salary £54,000), the excess is taxed at 20%:
Tax on taxable redundancy payment = £3,200 x 20% = £640

Chipa's contractual notice period is 3 months, but he was not required to work it. The pay for this
period is treated as normal earnings and is fully taxable:
3 months' notice pay = 3 x £4,500 monthly salary = £13,500
Tax on notice pay at 20% basic rate = £13,500 x 20% = £2,700
Employee Class 1 NIC on notice pay at 12% = £13,500 x 12% = £1,620

In summary:
- £30,000 of redundancy payment is tax-free and NIC-free
- £3,200 of redundancy payment taxed as earnings (£640 tax)
- £13,500 notice pay taxed as earnings (£2,700 tax and £1,620 NIC)
Q3.
Here is a detailed answer for an ACCA ATX (UK variant) student based on the UK Finance Act 2023 for
the 2023-24 financial year:
(a)(i) Relief for lifetime gift (2 marks):
Potentially exempt transfer (PET) relief applies to the lifetime gift made by Fiera to Perla on 1 March
2020. As Fiera died within 7 years of making the gift, the PET becomes chargeable. However, taper
relief is available as the gift was made more than 3 years before death.
The taper relief percentage is 20% (gift made 3-4 years before death). So the chargeable value is
reduced by 20%.
(a)(ii) Inheritance tax calculation (6 marks):
Chargeable estate:
House £370,000
Shares in Gato Ltd (see below) £240,000
Less: Business property relief (BPR)
on shares (£240,000 x 100%) (£240,000)
Personal chattels £160,000
Failed PET (£210,000 x 80%) £168,000
Total £698,000
Less: Nil rate band (£325,000)
Taxable estate £373,000

IHT @ 40% £149,200

Explanation of BPR:
BPR is available at 100% on the unquoted trading company shares in Gato Ltd. Fiera owned the
shares for more than 2 years before death (acquired by her husband on 2 May 2014). The minimum
2-year ownership period includes her husband's period of ownership as she inherited them on his
death.
An additional nil rate band, up to a maximum of £175,000 in 2023/24, is
available when calculating the IHT on the death estate where a main residence
is inherited on death by the deceased’s direct descendants. ((e.g. child/grandchild)
Risa's after-tax inheritance:
Residue of estate £770,000
(£370,000 + £240,000 + £160,000)
Less: IHT payable (£149200)
Net inheritance £620,800

(b)(i) Options to relieve trading loss (3 marks):

Risa's options to relieve her share of the Perro & Co trading loss (£32,000) in 2023/24, assuming she
doesn't want to carry it forward, are:

1. Carry back against total income of the previous 3 tax years, i.e., 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23
(maximum £50,000 for 2020/21). Loss set against later years first.
2. Set against capital gains in 2023/24 or carry back to 2022/23 (no limit).

(b)(ii) Option providing highest tax saving (5 marks):

Setting £32,000 trading loss against total income will provide the highest tax saving. Carrying back
will be most beneficial as Risa was previously employed, so income was likely higher than in 2023/24
when she only worked for 6 months.
Optimal loss relief:
2022/23: £32,000 x 40% = £12,800 tax saving
(Risa was a higher rate taxpayer based on £96,000 salary + £34,000 bonus)
Setting the loss against capital gains would only save tax at 20% (assuming Risa is a higher rate
taxpayer but her gains are within the basic rate band for CGT in 2023/24). The tax saving would be
£32,000 x 20% = £6,400, which is lower than carrying back against income.

(c) Loan interest relief (4 marks):

Loan 1 (£50,000 business loan): Interest paid (£4,000) is fully deductible from Risa's trading income
from Perro & Co. This will save income tax at her marginal rate of 40% in 2024/25. Tax relief = £4,000
x 40% = £1,600.

Loan 2 (£80,000 residential property loan): Interest (£5,020) Interest expense is not deductible from
property income instead 20% of interest expense will be deducted from income tax liability
Tax reduction = £5,020 x 20% = £1,004.

Total income tax saving for loan interest in 2024/25 = £1,600 + £1,004 = £2,604