Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tamil 2
Tamil 2
===================================================================================
===================================================================================
==
Sinhalese are a mix of Nagas and Rakshas ( who are south Indian from about 7000
Years ) and Bengali's.. With people in Colombo having some Portuguese ancestry.
Jayasuriya is a Naga ( i guess South Indian ) But Malinga Is a classic Bengali
look. Ranatunga, Mahanama, Pramaodaya Wickremasinghe are Bengali looking.
Kaluwitharana is the south Indian look. Vass has Portuguese ancestry and Attapattu
- Dutch. When the Britsh left Ceylon the population was less than 7 million. 500
years of European colonization had an effect. Lighter skinned Sinhalese don't play
Cricket, they opt for Rugby, Football, Hockey, Athletics, Swimming etc. For some
strange reason only dark -skinned Sinhalese play cricket. Hence everyone assumes
everyone is dark like Mathews and Jayasuriya. Most Sinhalese have a Rahul
Dravid /Akshay Kumar type complexion.
Sinhalese academics are very clear we are mostly Bengali's not north Indians. Yes
Lanka was an Shivtie Hindu domain just like every country from Afghanistan to Burma
to Cambodia and Vietnam. Its so long ago - what can anyone do. South India was also
Buddhist for a long time 1900 Bc till about 1000 BC. When the Bahamians destroyed
Buddhism and Jain's. Its all in the past , Mate.
===================================================================================
=================================
If you want a challenge come with proof. if a word is coming out of your mouth, it
can't be a proof. you are a delusional moron. do you have any proof that all the
religious text is based on proof? first prove that then come to argue. up to that
time you can keep this idea in your mind if you are skeptic
==============================================================================
a lot of people not able to digest the things against their beliefs. a skeptic
should not be against any new idea. accepting the new idea is up to the individual.
But before making any conclusion you should analyze the possibility. He is
explaining the meaning of the workship, symbols, time frame using the linguistic
and other evidence as a proof. Simply denying is not good. Take the idea and
analyze it with your self if you have a thinking mind.
==============================================================
a lot of people not able to digest the things against their beliefs. a skeptic
mind should not be against any new idea. accepting the new idea is up to the
individual. But before making any conclusion you should analyze the possibility. He
is explaining the meaning of the workship, symbols, time frame using the linguistic
and other evidence as a proof. Simply denying is not good. Take the idea and
analyze it with your self if you have a thinking mind. the same if he asks the
proof of your beliefs and scripture for a evidence will you produce?
========================================================