Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Brief AR PVT LTD Vs UOI
Case Brief AR PVT LTD Vs UOI
Briefing Notes
ISSUE: The issue in this case revolves around the arbitrary invocation of catch-all
provisions under Para 10.05 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2023 (FTP) against the
petitioner, M/s A.R. Sales Private Ltd., resulting in the abrupt halt of their export
process. The petitioner argues that this action has led to significant financial and
reputational losses, as well as discrimination in comparison to other exporters in
similar situations. The primary contention is whether the respondent, DGFT
(Directorate General of Foreign Trade), had the authority to issue the impugned
letter/order and if it was contrary to the provisions of the Foreign Trade
(Development and Regulations) Act, 1992 (FTDR) and FTP 2023.
Origin of the Suit: The origin of the case lies in the impugned letter/order dated
02.02.2024, issued by the respondent No.3, DGFT, which invoked catch-all
provisions under Para 10.05 of FTP 2023 against the petitioner, thereby halting
their export of Civil/Commercial Aircraft Engines/Parts/Components. This action
led to the petitioner filing a writ petition seeking redressal under Article 226 &
227.
Briefs of the case: The petitioner M/s A.R. Sales Private Ltd. is a company
incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 1009,
Prakashdeep Building, 7 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi, inter-alia engaged in the
business of import-export and is having IEC Code No. AAECA5464F. The
petitioner company has been importing Civil /Commercial Aircrafts Engine /
Parts/Components etc. from various countries and exporting the same to Russia
and CIS Countries November 2022. All these items have been directly sold to Civil
and Commercial Airlines, which are public registered companies, engaged in
domestic and international passenger transportation, falling under the Civil
Aviation as per Aircrafts Operating Certificate. The Respondent No.3, vide its
impugned the letter / order dated 02.02.2024 has invoked the Catch-all provisions
under Para 10.05 of FTP 2023 against the petitioner and in between stopped the
process of the export, which greatly prejudice and caused irreparable huge
financial and reputational loss to the petitioner.
However, upon examination of the case's factual background, it is revealed that the
addresses listed on the IEC certificate and GST certificate belong to the residential
premises of two directors, Mr. Mahendar Prakash Agarwal and Mr. Alok Prakash,
where no business activities were conducted. Furthered perusal revealed that all
three directors of A.R Sales Private Limited, namely Mr. Mahendar Prakash
Agarwal, Mr. Alok Prakash, and Ms. Aswany Kumar Sharma, are Dummy
Directors incorporated by Manish Prakash Aggarwal (Chartered Accountant), and
have no knowledge of the company's operations. Additionally, it is discovered that
AR Sales Private Ltd does not possess a DGFT license.
It has come to light that Dr. Naveen Rao from M/s Sentro Group offered Mr.
Mahendar Prakash Agarwal a consideration of 1-2 lakhs per company in exchange
for providing IEC certificates to serve as dummy/proxy IEC firms for import and
export activities, with Mr. Manan Datta (an employee of Naveen’s) overseeing
customs-related tasks. M/s Delmos Aviation Company owned by Naveen Rao,
who provide unsecured loan to M/s AR Sales Pvt. Ltd. for effecting imports of
Aircraft engine/parts. A.R Sales Private Ltd is identified as a dummy/proxy IEC
firm managed by Dr. Naveen Rao. Dr. Naveen Rao had admitted receiving the
letter dated 02.02.2024 via Whatsapp from Manish Prakash Agarwal.
Moreover, export restrictions on aircraft parts from the USA and Europe to Russia,
owing to sanctions, are noted. To bypass these restrictions, goods are routed
through India before being exported to Russia.
It is also stated that the goods exported by M/s AR Sales Pvt. Ltd have the
potential of being used for non-civilian purposes and as the end use or end user of
these items exported is not certain, these items may potentially be falling under
SCOMET list.
Hence, in the light of the factual setting of this instant case, the writ petition is
prayed to be dismissed with cost.
LIST OF DATES & EVENTS