MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: AIMEE V. ORENDAIN Name of Rater: MA. EDEN P. MACARAMPAT

Position: TEACHER II Position: PRINCIPAL II
Rating Period: AUGUST 2023 - JANUARY 2024 Date of Review: JANUARY 24, 2024

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 "Demonstr
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services and content within and observer agreement form/s Level 7 in
Pedagogy across curriculum done through onsite / face-to- Objective
teaching areas. face / in-person classroom 1 as
(PPST 1.1.2) observation. shown in
2COT
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
rating
person classes are not
implemented, sheets /
inter-
observer
● through observation agreemen
of synchronous / t forms."
asynchronous Efficiency 5 Objective
teaching in other was met
modalities; or
with the
● through observation allotted
of a demonstration time.
teaching* via LAC
session.

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Classroom Observation Tool 5 Demonstr
Education teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services strategies that observer agreement form/s Level 7 in
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
enhance learner done through onsite / face-to- Quality Objective
achievement in face / in-person classroom 2 as
literacy and observation. shown in
numeracy skills. 2 COT
(PPST 1.4.2) If onsite / face-to-face / in- rating
person classes are not sheets /
implemented,
inter-
observer
● through observation agreemen
of synchronous / t forms."
asynchronous Efficiency 5 Objective
teaching in other was met
modalities; or with the
● through observation allotted
of a demonstration time.
teaching* via LAC Timeliness
session.

Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 Demonstr

Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services strategies to observer agreement form/s Level 7 in
develop critical done through onsite / face-to- Objective
and creative face / in-person classroom 3 as
thinking, as well observation. shown in
as other higher- 2 COT
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
order thinking rating
person classes are not
skills. (PPST implemented, sheets /
1.5.2) inter-
observer
● through agreemen
observation of t forms."
synchronous / Efficiency 5 Objective
asynchronous was met
teaching in other
with the
modalities; or
allotted
time.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness
● through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via
LAC session

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 Demonstr

Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services and Diversity structure to observer agreement form/s Level 7 in
of Learners engage learners, done through onsite / face-to- Objective
individually or in face / in-person classroom 4 as
groups, in observation. shown in
meaningful 2 COT
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
exploration, rating
person classes are not
discovery and implemented, sheets /
hands-on activities inter-
within a range of observer
physical learning ● through observation of agreemen
environments. synchronous / t forms."
(PPST 2.3.3) asynchronous teaching in Efficiency 5 Objective
other modalities; or was met
● through observation of a with the
demonstration teaching* allotted
via LAC session. time.

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 Demonstr
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s Level 7 in
applying positive done through onsite / face-to- Objective
and non-violent face / in-person classroom 5 as
discipline to observation. shown in
ensure learning- 2COT
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
focused rating
person classes are not
environments. sheets /
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
(PPST 2.6.2) implemented, inter-
observer
● through observation agreemen
t forms."
of synchronous /
asynchronous Efficiency 3 Objective
teaching in other was met
modalities; or but
instruction
● through observation exceeded
of a demonstration the
teaching* via LAC allotted
session. time.

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used Classroom Observation Tool Quality 4 Demonstr
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services developmentally observer agreement form/s Level 6 in
appropriate done through onsite / face-to- Objective
learning face / in-person classroom 6 as
experiences to observation. shown in
address learners’ 2 COT
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
gender, needs, rating
person classes are not
strengths, implemented, sheets /
interests and inter-
experiences. observer
(PPST 3.1.2) ● through observation of agreemen
synchronous / t forms."
asynchronous teaching in Efficiency 5 Objective
other modalities; or was met
● through observation of a with the
demonstration teaching* allotted
via LAC session. time.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 Demonstr

Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services implemented observer agreement form/s Level 7 in
developmentally done through onsite / face-to- Objective
sequenced face / in-person classroom 7 as
teaching and observation. shown in
learning 2 COT
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
processes to meet rating
person classes are not
curriculum implemented, sheets /
requirements and inter-
varied teaching observer
contexts. (PPST ● through observation agreemen
4.1.2) of synchronous / t forms."
asynchronous Efficiency 3 Objective
teaching in other was met
modalities; or
but
● through observation instruction
of a demonstration exceeded
teaching* via LAC the
session. allotted
time.
Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance Quality 4 Planned
collegial in LAC sessions / for
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
discussions that FGDs / meetings / enriched
use teacher and other collegial teaching
learner feedback discussions practice
to enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC based on
practice. (PPST sessions / FGDs / LAC
4.4.2) meetings / other session/F
collegial discussions
GDs/meeti
on use of teacher
ngs other
and learner feedback
to enrich teaching collegial
practice discussion
3. Reflection notes of attended
teachers on their as shown
demonstration of in MOV 3.
teaching practices Efficiency
following participation
from LAC sessions /
FGDs / meetings /
other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich Timeliness 5 Participate
teaching practice, d in
with proof/s of collegial
attendance discussion
4. Any equivalent ALS that
form/document that discusses
highlights the teacher
objective) and
learner
feedback.
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 Demonstr
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services organized and observer agreement form/s Level 7 in
used appropriate done through onsite / face-to- Objective
teaching and face / in-person classroom 9 as
learning observation. shown in
resources,
COT
including ICT, to If onsite / face-to-face / in-
rating
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
address learning person classes are not sheets /
goals. implemented, inter-
(PPST 4.5.2) observer
● through observation agreemen
t forms."
of synchronous /
asynchronous Efficiency 5 Objective
teaching in other was met
modalities; or with the
allotted
● through observation
time.
of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.

Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality 4 Demonstr
Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- ated
Services and organized and observer agreement form/s Level 6 in
Reporting used diagnostic, done through onsite / face-to- Objective
formative and face / in-person classroom 10 as
summative observation. shown in
assessment COT
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
strategies rating
person classes are not
consistent with implemented, sheets /
curriculum inter-
requirements. observer
(PPST 5.1.2) ● through observation agreemen
of synchronous / t forms."
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation
of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Efficiency 5 Objective
was met
with the
allotted
time.

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the Quality 4 Monitored
Education evaluated learner following: and
Services progress and ● Individual Learning evaluated
achievement using Monitoring Plan (ILMP) learner
learner attainment progress
● Peer assessment data
data. and
(PPST 5.2.2) ● Sample of learners’ achievem
output with reflection / ent based
self-assessment on the
● Progress class
charts/anecdotal records attainment
● Class/e-class data.
record/grading sheets Efficiency
● Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors
with identified least/most
mastered skills
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
highlights the objective Timeliness 3 Submitted
(e.g., Individual Learning MOVs
Agreement (ILA), ALS show/s
monitoring
Assessment Form 2) and
● Others (Please specify evaluation
and provide annotations) done
across 2
quarters.

Basic 12. Any one (1) of the Quality 5 Sustained

Education Communicated following: engageme
Services promptly and ● A sample of corrected nt through
clearly the test paper of a learner in regular
learners’ needs, communic
a learning area with
progress and ation of
parent’s or guardian’s
achievement to learners’
key stakeholders,
signature and date of needs,
including receipt progress
parents/guardians ● Minutes of meetings and
(PPST 5.4.2) with key stakeholders achievem
(e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT, ent to key
CPC) with proof of stakehold
attendance ers
● Report card with including
parent’s or guardian’s parents/gu
signature in all quarters ardians as
shown in
supported by minutes of
the MOV
meeting
submitted.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● Communication with Efficiency
key stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
● Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
Timeliness 3 Showed
highlights the objective
prompt
● Others (Please specify communic
and provide annotations) ation of
learner’s
needs,
progress
and
achievem
ent across
2
quarters.
5. Personal 13. Applied a A reflection/journal Quality 5 Submitted
Growth and personal entry that highlights the MOV that
Professional philosophy of application of a learner- details the
Development teaching that is centered teaching consistent
learner- philosophy in the lesson involveme
nt of
centered. plan or community work
learners in
(PPST 7.1.2)
the
teaching-
learning
process
resulting
from the
applicatio
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
n of
personal
philosoph
y of
teaching
that is
learner-
centered.
Efficiency
Timeliness 4 Applied
personal
philosoph
y of
teaching
that is
learner-
centered
across 3
quarters
14. Set 1. Certification from the Quality 5 Updated
professional ICT Coordinator / School profession
development Head / Focal Person in al
goals based on charge of e-SAT developm
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP ent goals
during
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Phase II
Standards for (MRF)
of the
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP RPMS
(PPST 7.5.2) from Phase II Cycle as
evidence
by MOV 4
Efficiency 3 Submitted
2
acceptabl
e MOVs
Timeliness Two of the
submitted
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
MOVs
were
accomplis
hed within
the
prescribed
RPMS
phase
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality 5 Performed
Education various related ● committee involvement; one
Services works / related
● involvement as
activities that work/
module/learning material activity
contribute to writer/validator; that
the teaching- ● involvement as a contribute
learning
resource to the
process
person/speaker/learning teaching-
facilitator in in the learning
RO/SDO/school-initiated process
beyond
TV/radio-based
the School
instruction; Communit
● book or journal y Learning
authorship/ co- Center as
authorship/contributorshi evidenced
p; by the
● submitted
MOV.
advisorship/coordinators
Efficiency 5 Submitted
hip/ chairpersonship;
MOV that
● participation in details the
demonstration teaching; achieved
● participation as positive
research presenter in a contributio
forum/conference; n to the
● mentoring of pre- teaching-
learning
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
service/in-service process
teachers; as
evidenced
● conducted research
by the
within the rating period; annotation
● others (please specify) provided.
Timeliness
1. with annotation on how
it contributed to the
teaching-learning
process.

MA. EDEN P. MACARAMPAT AIMEE V. ORENDAIN NERI ANNE M. ALIBUYOG EdD, JD, CESO V

Rater Ratee Approving Authority