ζ m+ 1

1
R 1
m+1 =¿ ∫
Γ (α) 0
α− 1
( t m+1 −ζ ) ϕ(U (ζ ))d ζ

[ ]
m
hπ
and ∑
− am , p ϕ (condition,
U ( t p ) ) +ϕ ( U t m+1 ) ) .
we( arrive
|
By applying triangle inequality
Γ (αe +2) Lipschitz
|+ r l(αe +2)
K P=0
|E εm+1| ≤|E m+1
p
U ( t m+1 ) −U m+1 +¿ N ( U ( t m+1 ) )
p
− N ( U m+1 ) ∣
p

Since |R|m+1m+1
|≤|2 Γ (α +1)′′. 1| ≤ κ E m+1|+|R m+1|.
1 α 2 p 1
+ 1R T Lh ¿
where L=maxθ ∈[0 ,6 +1]|ϕ (U (θ))|. From inequality (52), we get we get
α 2
|E cm+1|≤ κ1|Emp +1|+ 2 TΓ (αL +h 1) .
Next, we find a bound for |E m+1| by using the similar argument given in Theorem 1, we
p

obtain

|E m+1
p
|≤ ¿
Since |E 0|=0 , we arrive
m
|E m+1
p
|≤ hα K ∑ O¿
p=1
From inequalities (54) and (55), we get

|E cm+1|≤ ¿
Using Grönwall's inequality, we conclude that |E m+1|≤C 7 h .
c 2

Next, we prove the convergence in Caputo Fabrizio sense, considering the true and
approximate solutions difference, we get