display_pdf-4

1
Ct. Cases 5609/2018

M/S TOMAR ELECTRONICS PVT LTD. Vs.
M/S S.B.O. EXPORT PVT LTD.
/0 (Bawana)
20.10.2023
Passover is not possible due to heavy workload
This court is handling work of two PS and one traffic circle with
total pendency of almost 8000 matters and shortest possible
dates are given accordingly
Present: Counsel for complainant.
Complainant is directed to furnish affidavit

verifying/ furnishing fresh address of the accused, returnable on
01.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
MM-05 (N) / ROHINI COURT
NEW DELHI/20.10.2023
2
Cr. Case 253/2021
STATE Vs. ANIL KUMAR
FIR no. 264 /2020 (Shabad
Dairy)
20.10.2023
Present: Ld. APP for the State.

None for the accused.
Ld. APP for the State submits that the accused is

deliberately avoiding appearance before the court and requests
that NBWs be issued against the accused.
Heard.
Issue NBWs against the accused alongwith notice
u/s 446 Cr.P.C against his surety, returnable on 06.01.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
3
Cr. Case 3819/2021
STATE Vs. SANTOSH
Dairy)
20.10.2023
Present: Ld APP for the State.

On the basis of material available on record, the
court hereby takes cognizance of the offences mentioned in the
charge-sheet.
Issue summons to the accused and notice to his
surety u/s 446 CrPC through IO/SHO concerned returnable on
01.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
5
Cr. Case 4629/2022
STATE Vs. VARUN@RAHUL
FIR no. 93 /2021 ()
20.10.2023

None for accused.

Heard.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
6
Cr. Case 4659/2022
STATE Vs. SOMBIR SINGH
FIR no. 59 /2021 ()
20.10.2023

charge-sheet.
NDOH.
Issue notice to the complainant through IO,
returnable on 02.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
7
Cr. Case 6184/2022
STATE Vs. AMLESH
FIR no. 629 /2020 (Bawana)
20.10.2023

None for accused.
Issue bailable warrants in sum of Rs.5,000/-

against accused with one surety of like amount and notice to his
surety U/s 446 Cr. P.C through IO/SHO for 01.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
8
Cr. Case 6195/2022
STATE Vs. SIKANDER
20.10.2023

charge-sheet.
01.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
9
Cr. Case 9299/2022
STATE Vs. NAVEEN DAHIYA
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Accused with counsel.
Complainant in person.
Bail bonds/ surety bonds furnished. The same are

accepted.
Copy of the chargesheet along with annexed
documents, if any, be supplied to the accused against due
acknowledgement.
It is submitted on behalf of the accused that the copy
of charge-sheet and documents supplied, are complete.
Issue notice to the IO to appear in person for
clarifications regarding the section in the chargesheet has been
filed, returnable on 03.02.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
11
Cr. Case 10782/2022
STATE Vs. RINKU
20.10.2023
Issue notice to the SHO concerned through DCP to

file the supplementary charge-sheet, returnable on 09.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
12
Cr. Case 10785/2022
STATE Vs. SHUSHILA
20.10.2023

Accused with Ld. Counsel.

Heard on the point of charge.
Prima facie offence u/s 33 Delhi Excise Act is made
out against the accused. Accordingly, charge for the aforesaid
offence has been framed against the accused. Same is explained
to the accused to which he has pleaded not guilty and has
claimed trial.
Vide separate statement of accused u/s 294 Cr.P.C.
admission/ denial of the documents have been conducted. In
view of the same the witnesses mentioned at serial no. 1, 2, 3
and 4in the list of the prosecution witnesses are hereby dropped.
Issue summons to PWs mentioned at serial no. 1 and
6 with MHC M for PE on 10.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
13
Cr. Case 3474/2023
STATE Vs. VINAY KUMAR
FIR no. 254 /2023 ()
20.10.2023

It is submitted by the accused that he wants to plead

guilty.
Separate statement of the accused recorded to this
effect.
In view of plea of guilt of accused for offence U/sec.
188 IPC, accused is convicted.
Heard on the point of sentence.
Court deems it fit to grant benefit of Section 3 of the
Probation of offenders Act to the accused. He is hereby
admonished.
File be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
14
Cr. Case 3475/2023
STATE Vs. SANDEEP KUMAR
FIR no.334 /2022 ()
20.10.2023

None for accused.
Summons issued to the accused received back

served.
Heard.
returnable on NDOH.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
15
Cr. Case 3476/2023
STATE Vs. JAVED
FIR no.231 /2022 ()
20.10.2023

None for accused.
Issue bailable warrants in sum of Rs.5,000/-

against accused with one surety of like amount and notice to his
surety U/s 446 Cr. P.C through IO/SHO for 10.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
16
Cr. Case 3477/2023
STATE Vs. RAHUL
FIR no.010967 /2021 (Shabad
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Summons issued to the accused received back
unserved.
Heard.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
17
Cr. Case 3478/2023
STATE Vs. JAGPAL SINGH
FIR no.525 /2020 ()
20.10.2023

charge-sheet.
12.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
18
Cr. Case 3479/2023
STATE Vs. PURUSHOTAM
FIR no. 8 /2023 ()
20.10.2023

charge-sheet.
12.07.2024.
returnable on NDOH.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
19
Cr. Case 3480/2023
STATE Vs. LATA
10 /2023 ()
20.10.2023

Complainant with Ld. Counsel.
Counsel for both accused. (Fresh vakalatnama
filed).
Accused Lata is absent.
Accused Pushpender is in person.
Exemption application has been filed on behalf of
the accused Lata. Same is allowed for today only.
Issue notice to the IO to appear in person for

clarifications regarding the name of the accused no. 3 Shruti,
returnable on NDOH.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
20
Cr. Case 3522/2023
STATE Vs. SAVITA AND ORS
Dairy)
20.10.2023

None for accused persons.
Summons issued to the accused persons received
back unserved.
Ld. APP for the State submits that the accused
persons deliberately avoiding appearance before the court and
requests that NBWs be issued against the accused persons.
Heard.
Issue NBWs against the accused persons alongwith
notice u/s 446 Cr.P.C against his surety, returnable on 11.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Issue
21
Ct. Cases 6337/2019
LOKESH KUMAR DABAS Vs. ARUN
KUMAR
/0 (Shabad Dairy)
20.10.2023
Present: Complainant in person.

Counsel for accused.
‘ accused is absent.
Oral exemption is sought on behalf of the accused.

The same is allowed for today only subject to the cost of Rs.
5000/- to be paid to the complainant on the next date of hearing.
Put up on 06.04.2024 for framing of notice.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Prosecution Evidence
22
Cr. Case 5287724/2016
STATE Vs. SUMIT TANDON
FIR no. 132 /2005 (Prashant Vihar)
20.10.2023

Accused in person.
Complainant with Ld. Counsel.
PW Inspector Rakesh in person. He is discharged
unexamined.
Previous cost of Rs. 2500/- has been paid by the

accused to the complainant. Remaining cost of Rs. 2500/- of the
court to be paid before the NDOH.
It is submitted by both the parties that there are
chances of compromise in the present case. There are chances
that the matter can be settled for an amount of Rs. 12.5 lakhs of
which Rs. 5 lakhs has already been paid by the accused.
Considering the submission, matter is referred to the mediation
center.
Parties are directed to appear before the Mediation
Center 21.10.2023 at 12:00 pm and before this court on
27.10.2023.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
23
Cr. Case 5284305/2016
STATE Vs. RAJESH KUMAR
Dairy)
20.10.2023
This court is handling work of two PS and one traffic circle with total
pendency of almost 8000 matters and shortest possible dates are given
accordingly

Accused is absent.
PW HC Wazir Singh in person.

BW against photographer Balbir received back
unexecuted with the report that the witness is not residing on the given
address and his whereabout is not known.
Ld. APP submits that witness photographer Balbir may
be dropped from the list of witnesses as he is not traceable.
Considering the submissions of Ld. APP justified, said
witness is dropped.
Exemption application has been filed on behalf of the
accused. It is submitted by counsel that accused shall not dispute his
identity and the evidence may be recorded in the absence of the
accused.
Heard. Same is allowed subject to the condition that the
accused shall not dispute his identity.
Issue summons to PWs mentioned at serial no. 12 and 15
for PE on 16.05.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
24
Cr. Case 5285546/2016
STATE Vs. MUSTAFA
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Accused Mustafa produced from JC. On bail in this
case.
Accused Manirul declared PO vod 20.04.2023.
PW HC Ram Niwas in person.
Ms. Hema Goel, Ld. LAC for the accused.
Matter is listed for PE.

PW-2 and PW- 3 have been examined, cross
examined and discharged.
Issue summons to PWs mentioned at serial no. 7 for
PE on 16.05.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
25
Cr. Case 5292769/2016
STATE Vs. RAJ MAL
20.10.2023

Accused in person.

No PW is present.
PE on 25.05.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
26
Cr. Case 5295047/2016
STATE Vs. Arvind
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Accused in person with proxy counsel.
PW HC Labh Singh in person.

PW-3 , examined, cross examined and discharged.
Issue summons to PWs mentioned at serial no. 5, 7,
8 and 9 for PE on 25.05.2024 at 2: 00 pm.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
28
Cr. Case 5296449/2016
STATE Vs. KULDEEP
20.10.2023

Accused Kuldeep with Ld. Counsel.
Accused Sagar is stated to be expired.
PW ASI Rajbir in person.

An application has been made on behalf of accused
Kuldeep for cancellation of NBW issued against him.
Heard.
In view of the application, NBW issued against the
accused Kuldeep stands cancelled. He is directed to remain
careful in future.
PW ASI Rajbir, examined, cross examined and
discharged.
No PW left to be examined. Hence PE stands closed.
Put up for SA on 13.12.2023.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
29
Cr. Case 5297288/2016
STATE Vs. POOJA
20.10.2023

Accused in person.
This is a parcha yadasht. File is not traceable.
Ahlmad is directed to trace the file and place it
before the court on next date of hearing.
Be listed on 26.06.2024.
Previous order be complied with afresh for NDOH.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
30
Cr. Case 5297450/2016
STATE Vs. Mithun Singh
480 /2013 (Bawana)
20.10.2023

Summons to witness Raj Singh received back with
the report that the witness has expired on 05.10.2020.
accordingly, the said witness is dropped from the list of
witnesses.
Ld. APP for State submits that the no PW left to be
examined, hence PE stands closed.
Statement of accused under Section 313 Cr.PC
recorded. He opted not to lead DE.
Be put up for final arguments on 05.12.2023.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
31
Cr. Case 5297927/2016
STATE Vs. Neeraj Bhanu
Dairy)
20.10.2023
This court is handling work of two PS and one traffic circle with total
pendency of almost 8000 matters and shortest possible dates are given
accordingly

Sh. Hari Om Gupta, Ld. LAC for accused with accused.
PW HC Vishal in person.
PW-2 Vishal, examined, cross examined and discharged.
Summons to IO HC Rajbir received back with the report
the witness has expired on 06.12.2020. accordingly the said witness is
dropped from the list of witnesses.
Ld. APP submits that no more witness is required to be
examined.
Considering the submissions of Ld. APP justified, and
remaining witness are dropped.
No other witnesses remain to be examined. Hence, PE
stands closed.
Statement of accused under Section 313 Cr.PC recorded.
He opted not to lead DE.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
32
Cr. Case 6884/2018
STATE Vs. SHYAM SUNDER BHATIA
FIR no. 159 /2018
(Bawana)
20.10.2023

Accused with Ld. Counsel.
PW/complainant in person.

PW-1 and PW-2, examined, cross examined and
discharged.
11 for PE on 31.05.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
33
Cr. Case 1478/2019
STATE Vs. NEETU SINGH
FIR no. 508 /2018 ()
20.10.2023

None for accused.
PW Satbir in person. He is discharged unexamined
as accused is not present today.

Heard.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
34
Cr. Case 1634/2019
STATE Vs. RAJU AND ORS.
FIR no. 02050 /2019
(Bawana)
20.10.2023

Accused Narender and Raju with counsel.
Accused Lokesh produced from JC.

No PW present today.
Issue production warrants against the accused
Lokesh, returnable on NDOH.
Issue summons to PWs mentioned at serial no. 1, 17
and 18 through DCP concerned, for PE on 02.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
35
Ct. Cases 3265/2020
DINESH CHAUDHARY Vs. NITESH
ABROL AND OTHERS
/0 (Shabad Dairy)
20.10.2023
Present: Counsel for the complainant.

Complainant is absent.
Last opportunity is granted to the complainant to

lead PSE today at 12 :00 pm, failing which the matter shall be
dismissed for non prosecution.
Put up at 12: 00 pm.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
At 12: 00 pm,
Present: Complainant with Ld. Counsel.
Matter listed for PSE.
Evidence by way of affidavit tendered. Documents

exhibited. At request of complainant, pre summoning evidence is
closed.
Perusal of record shows that the present complaint
case is within limitation and within jurisdiction of this court.
Arguments on summoning of accused heard.
Considered.
From the perusal of complaint, affidavit in evidence
and documents filed on record, prima facie sufficient grounds are
made out against the accused to proceed u/s. 138 Negotiable
Instrument Act. Accordingly, issue summons to the accused on
filing of PF within 30 days from today through all modes RC/
SP/ affixation/whats App/email, returnable for 22.07.2024.
Counsel for the complainant is at liberty to file the
fresh address of the accused on affidavit with the PF.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
36
Cr. Case 5939/2021
STATE Vs. PRITI@KALI
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Accused is absent.
BWs issued against the accused received back
unexecuted.
Ct. Asha in person. She is discharged unexamined
as accused is not available today.
Issue summons to PWs mentioned at serial no. 3, 5
and 7 for PE on NDOH.
Heard.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
37
Cr. Case 11341/2021
STATE Vs. SONU
20.10.2023

Sh. Hari Om Gupta, Ld. LAC for all accused.
Accused Sonu and Sanjeev in person.
Accused Dheeraj is in JC.

Summons to the complainant through DCP received
back with the report the complainant has not present at the given
address and her whereabouts are not known. Accordingly the said
witness is dropped from the list of witnesses.
PE on 04.07.2023.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
38
Cr. Case 11407/2021
STATE Vs. LOKESH
522 /2021 (Bawana)
20.10.2023

Accused in person.
Matter is listed for SA.

(SAURABH GOYAL)
39
Cr. Case 4492/2017
STATE Vs. DHARAMPAL
40 /2017 (Bawana)
20.10.2023

Accused in person.

(SAURABH GOYAL)
Complaint Evidence
40
Ct. Cases 1952/2022
AMITA Vs. RAJENDRI
/0 (Bawana)
20.10.2023
Present: None for complainant.
Put up for remaining PSE on 01.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Defence Evidence
41
Ct. Cases 11668/2016
MUNNI DEVI Vs. RAJESH KUMAR
/0 (Shabad Dairy)
20.10.2023

Accused in person.
Matter is listed for DE.

DW Lokesh from Sub Registrar office in person. He
is has not brought the relevant record.
Let notice be issued to Sub Registrar Kanjhawala to
bring the record of registry of Janta Flat no. 392, Block20, Sector
20 Rohini on the NDOH.
Put up for DE on 05.01.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Final Argument
42
Ct. Cases 1767/2016
ASHISH GROVER, PROP. MS RENESA
INDUSTRIES (INDIA) Vs.
ROHIT KUMAR
/0 (S.P. Badli)
20.10.2023

None for accused.
Issue fresh NBW against the accused through DCP

alongwith notice u/s 446 Cr.P.C against his surety on filing of PF,
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Arguments
43
Ct. Cases 3215/2019
NEMATUALLAH Vs. HARVINDER SINGH
ANAND
/0 (Bawana)
20.10.2023
Present: Proxy Counsel for complainant.
Matter is listed for arguments on application u/s 156

(3) CrPC. As per the ATR, after inquiry, IO has found that the
facts mentioned in the complaint are contrary to the allegations
and complainant has made false allegations against the accused.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of the complainant
as main counsel is not available.
Put up for maintainability and arguments on
01.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
44
Ct. Cases 935/2022
RAJ KUMAR SAINI Vs. ROHIT VERMA
AND ORS.
/0 (Bawana)
20.10.2023
Arguments heard.
Put up for orders at 4: 00 pm.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
At 4: 00 pm
Present: None.
1. Briefly, the case of the complainant is that on

27.07.2021, complainant had received a phone call from the
alleged person Rohit Verma (mobile number 7669130328) hwo
represent himself sale manager PNB Life Insurance company and
disclosed the policy of complainant bearing no. 22565798 of
PNB Met Life Insurance company of the year 2018. The alleged
no. 1 told to the complainant that a commission amount of Rs.
72,000/ have been generated against the said policy of
complainant and Insurance agent had applied for the said
amount. However, the complainant was induced to purchase
another policy of Rs. 37,500/ with the benefit that commission
amount of Rs. 72,000/ shall be credited in the account of the
complainant. It is further alleged that after some days the
complainant was again pressurized to invest and the complainant
was issued two policies of Rs. 1,50,000/ and Rs. 99,999/ of
Barti Axa Life Insurance. Thereafter, the complainant was again
allured that if he purchase another policy the GST amount on the
earlier policy shall be credited in the new policy and therefore
complainant has purchased another policy of Rs. 75,000/,
however, no such amount was ever paid by the alleged person in
the account of the complainant.
3. Complainant submits that the accused, thus,

committed the offence of criminal breach of trust, cheating,
criminal intimidation against him. However, despite complaints
to SHO PS SB Dairy and also DCP concerned, no action has
been taken so far. Hence the present complaint U/s 156(3) Cr.
P.C has been moved.
4. The ATR was called from the concerned PS as per
judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in matter of
“Subhkaran Luharuka & Anr. Vs.State (Government of NCT
of Delhi) & Anr.” DLT 170 (2010) 516.
5. As per the ATR, the IO stated that the complainant
had purchased all the polices through online mode and the
process was carried out by the complainant himself. The policies
were found genuine. Further the alleged company has cancelled
two policies on the request of the complainant.
7. I have considered the arguments and gone through the
complaint and ATR.
8. In “M/s Skipper Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State”
2002 Crl. LJ NOC 333 (Delhi), it has been held that, “It is true
that Section 156(3) of the Code empowers to a Magistrate to
direct the police to register a case and initiative investigations
but this power has to be exercised judiciously on proper grounds
and not in a mechanical manner. In those cases where the
allegations are not very serious and the complainant himself is
in possession of evidence to prove his allegations there should be
no need to pass order under Section 156(3) of the Code. The
discretion ought to be exercised after proper application of the
mind and only in those cases where the Magistrate is of the
view that the nature of allegations is such that the complainant
himself may not be in position to collect and produce evidence
before the Court and interests of justice demand that the police
should step into held the complaint”.
9. In view of the settled position of law and after going
through the enquiry report and material on record, this court is of
the view that there is no need to invoke section 156(3) Cr.P.C for
issuing direction to register FIR against the respondents for the
following reasons:
(i) The identity of proposed accused is ascertained.
(ii) No facts are needed to be unearthed as the same are well
within the knowledge of the complainant and can be proved by
complainant himself or through summoned witnesses.
(iii) Custodial interrogation of alleged accused is not
necessary.
(iv) The evidence is well within the reach of complainant
and no assistance of police is required to gather the same.
(v) The facts of the case are not such that would warrant
detailed and complex investigation to be carried out by the
State Agency.
10. Hence, the application u/s 156 (3) Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
Put up for PSE on 02.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Arguments
45
Ct. Cases 1233/2022
DIKSHA KUMARI Vs. PARDEEP
/0 (Shabad Dairy)
20.10.2023

IO SI Surender in person.
IO submits that the bank official has still not

providing the loan documents despite service of four notices u/s
91 CrPC.
IO is directed to take appropriate action against the
bank officials as per law.
Put up for filing of fresh ATR on 30.11.2023.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
46
Ct. Cases 1251/2022
SUNITA Vs. SANTOSH
/0 (Shabad Dairy)
Order on Application
20.10.2023
ATR filed. Copy supplied.

Arguments heard.
Notice be issued to the IO to file fresh ATR after
verifying the contents of the MLC, returnable on 07.03.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
48
Ct. Cases 937/2022
SANJAY KUMAR Vs. RAKESH SEHGAL
AND ANR.
/0 (Bawana)
20.10.2023
Present: None for the complainant.
Put up for arguments on application u/s 156 (3)

Cr.P.C on 02.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Arguments On Charge
49
Cr. Case897/2017
STATE Vs. RAJESH ETC
741 /2015 (Shabad
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Both accused in person.
Notice to complainant received back unserved.
Issue notice to the complainant through DCP,
(SAURABH GOYAL)
50
Cr. Case 2557/2017
STATE Vs. ROHIT KUMAR AND OTHERS.
Dairy)
20.10.2023

All accused in person with counsel.
Matter is listed for arguments on charge.

Issue notice to the IO to appear in person in terms of
order dated 23.01.2023, returnable on 04.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
51
Cr. Case 6386/2018
STATE Vs. RAKESH MADAN
Dairy)
20.10.2023

It is submitted that quashing petition be pending

before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi for 31.10.2023.
Exemption application has been filed on behalf of
the accused. Same is allowed for today only.
Put up for further proceedings on 11.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
52
Cr. Case 6511/2018
STATE Vs. BALRAJ SINGH
20.10.2023

Accused with proxy counsel.

Heard on the point of charge.
Prima facie offence u/s 323/341/506(II) IPC is made
out against the accused. Accordingly, charge for the aforesaid
offence has been framed against the accused. Same is explained
to the accused to which he has pleaded not guilty and has
claimed trial.
2 for PE on 05.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
53
Cr. Case 6731/2018
STATE Vs. NARENDER AND OTHERS
359 /2017 (Shabad
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Accused for accused with accused.
Be listed on 03.07.2024 for framing of charge.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
54
Cr. Case 352/2019
STATE Vs. BHUPENDER KUMAR
Dairy)
20.10.2023

Sh. Vijendra Partab, Ld. Counsel for accused. (Fresh
vakalatnama filed).
Accused is stated to be JC in FIR no. 410/2021, PS
SB Dairy.
Issue production warrants against the accused,

returnable on NDOH.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
55
Cr. Case 3124/2020
STATE Vs. NITESH @ NITIN
20.10.2023

Counsel for the accused submits that the accused is
residing at house no. 973, main chowk, Village Pooth Khurd,
Delhi-39.
Put up for arguments on charge on 05.07.2024.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
NEWDELHI/20.10.2023
Surendra vs. Mohan
Ct. no. 2518/2019
20.10.2023
Present: None for the complainant.
Be awaited for appearance of complainant.
MM(NORTH), ROHINI/DELHI
20.10.2023
At 12:30 PM
Present: None.
Be awaited for appearance of complainant.
MM (NORTH), ROHINI/DELHI
20.10.2023
At 2:30 PM
Present: None for complainant despite several calls.

Record reveals that on the last date of hearing as
well none had appeared on behalf of the complainant. It seems
that the complainant is not inclined to pursue the present
complaint. Same is dismissed in default for non-appearance and
for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to Record Room after due
compliance.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
MM-05 (N) / ROHINI COURTS
NEW DELHI 20.10.2023
13
Cr. Case 3474/2023
STATE Vs. VINAY KUMAR
FIR no. 254 /2023 ()
20.10.2023
Statement of accused Vinay Kumar S/o Sh. Hosiyar Singh.
ON SA
I voluntarily plead guilty in this case for the offence

U/s 188 IPC. Lenient view may kindly be taken against me.
The aforesaid statement is made without any force,
coercion and undue influence.
RO & AC (SAURABH GOYAL)

MM-05 (N)/RohiniCourts
New Delhi/ 20.10.2023.
FIR no 493/2019
PS SB Dairy
State VS. Dinesh
20.10.2023
Accused produced from JC through VC.
Copy of the supplementary chargesheet along with
annexed documents, have been supplied to the accused against due
acknowledgement.
Accused submits that he has received complete copies of
challan along with documents. Compliance of Section 207 Cr.PC has
been made. As per record, the offences alleged against the accused are
U/s 302/34 IPC. The offence u/s 302 IPC is exclusively triable by the
court of Sessions. The main chargesheet is already pending in the
court of Sh. Sushil Kumar, Ld. ASJ, North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi. In view of the same, let this supplementary chargesheet be also
committed to the court of Sessions.
The case file be placed before the Ld. Principal District
& Sessions Judge, (North), New Delhi for order/ directions. Notice be
issued to the Ld. Public Prosecutor.
Accused shall be produced before the Ld. Principal
District & Sessions Judge, (North), ND on 25.10.2023.
Ahlmad is directed to send the file complete in all
respect before Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge, (North) well in
advance before the date fixed.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
MM05 (N) / ROHINI COURTS
FIR no. 547/2020
PS Bawana
State VS. Mohd. Suleman
20.10.2023
File is taken up today at instance of parties.

Complainant in person.
Perusal of record shows that inadvertently the last

ordersheet does not reflect the submissions made by the parties. The
said order stands rectified.
It is submitted by the parties that matter was referred to
Mediation center for settlement on 12.10.2023 for 20.10.2023 at 2: 00
pm but the file could not sent inadvertently and further they request to
refer the matter today itself for mediation.
In view of the submissions, let the matter be sent today
itself at 3 :30 pm to the Mediation Center.
Put up for report on 12.12.2024.
Ahlmad is directed to sent the file to mediation center.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
CC no.
Sita Ram vs. Sumer Singh
Fresh complaint received by way of assignment. It be

checked and registered.
Present: Counsel for the complainant.
Heard on the application U/s 156 (3) Cr.P.C. I have
perused the file.
SHO, concerned is directed to file an action taken
report stating the following :
1. Whether any complaint has been made/received by
the complainant in the police station.
2. If yes, whether any action has been taken on the
complaint.
3. Whether as a result of investigation/inquiry, any
cognizable offence has been made out against the accused person
and whether any action has been taken by the police.
4. If yes, whether any FIR has been registered and
status of investigation.
5. If no cognizable offence has been made out, whether
the complainant has been informed accordingly.
Copy of the complaint alongwith the annexures be
supplied to the Naib Court, PS today.
Put up for filing of report on 18.11.2023.
(SAURABH GOYAL)
Naresh Kumar vs. Tara Chand
PS SB Dairy
Ct. no. 2531/2020
20.10.2023
Present: None.

(SAURABH GOYAL)
FIR no 316/2011
PS Bawana
Cr. no. 5282617/2016
State Vs. Munfed Khan
21.10.2023

(SAURABH GOYAL)

display_pdf-4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

display_pdf-4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

Ct. Cases 5609/2018

Present: Counsel for complainant.

Complainant is directed to furnish affidavit

Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Ld. APP for the State submits that the accused is

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Ld. APP for the State submits that the accused is

Present: Ld APP for the State.

On the basis of material available on record, the

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Issue bailable warrants in sum of Rs.5,000/-

Present: Ld APP for the State.

On the basis of material available on record, the

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Bail bonds/ surety bonds furnished. The same are

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Issue notice to the SHO concerned through DCP to

Present: Ld APP for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the accused that the copy

Present: Ld APP for the State.

It is submitted by the accused that he wants to plead

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Summons issued to the accused received back

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Issue bailable warrants in sum of Rs.5,000/-

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Issue notice to the IO to appear in person for

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Complainant in person.

Oral exemption is sought on behalf of the accused.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Previous cost of Rs. 2500/- has been paid by the

Present: Ld APP for the State.

PW HC Wazir Singh in person.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.

Present: Counsel for the complainant.

Last opportunity is granted to the complainant to

Present: Complainant with Ld. Counsel.

Matter listed for PSE.

Evidence by way of affidavit tendered. Documents

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Present: Ld APP for the State.

Matter is listed for PE.