Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effective-filtration-area-of-a-pleated-filter-bag-in-a-pu_2017_Powder-Techno
Effective-filtration-area-of-a-pleated-filter-bag-in-a-pu_2017_Powder-Techno
Powder Technology
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Pleated filter bags have received a considerable amount of attention due to their higher filtration area compared
Received 26 August 2016 to that of cylindrical filter bags. They can be used to increase both the filtration efficiency and dust holding capac-
Received in revised form 24 December 2016 ity, as it is possible to decrease the filtration velocity when using the same amount of exhaust gas. However, the
Accepted 9 February 2017
effective filtration area of pleated filter bags remains uncertain, despite the fact that it is an important design pa-
Available online 13 February 2017
rameter in pulse-jet bag house systems. The effective filtration area of a pleated filter bag is determined in this
Keywords:
study by assuming the effective filtration area (50%, 60%, 70% and 100% of the theoretical filtration area) and com-
Bag filter paring its filter cleaning characteristics with those of a cylindrical filter bag.
Pleated filter The filtration characteristics of a pleated filter bag with optimal geometry were investigated under the conditions
Dead space of a filtration velocity of 1.2 m/min and a dust concentration of 10 g/m3. As a result, we found that the pleated
Effective filtration area filter bag assessed here had an effective filtration area of approximately 50 to 60%, in contrast to the theoretical
filtration area, due to the dead space caused by filter pleating. In addition, particle clogging in the outer pleating
section of the pleated filter bag significantly affected the decrease in the effective filtration area.
© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.02.013
0032-5910/© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
J.-U. Kim et al. / Powder Technology 311 (2017) 522–527 523
interval and filter cleaning efficiency between a cylindrical and a pleated Table 1
filter bag. Geometrical configurations of a pleated filter bag.
less than the theoretical area, a higher dust concentration compared to allowable pressure drop and the initial pressure drop as shown in
that of a cylindrical filter bag will appear in the pleated filter bag. There- Eq. (1),
fore, it is certain that the effective filtration area of a pleated filter bag is
less than the theoretical filtration area. ΔP Hi −ΔP Li
ϵd ¼ 100 ð1Þ
In order to determine the effective filtration area of a pleated filter ΔP Hi −ΔP L0
bag, we assumed the dead space to be 0, 30, 40, and 50% of the theoret-
ical filtration area. Fig. 5 shows the filter cleaning intervals over time for where ΔPLo is the initial pressure drop of a fresh filter bag, ΔPLi is the re-
the cylindrical filter bags and pleated filter bags when considering these sidual pressure drop directly after the cleaning of the filter, and ΔPHi is
assumed amounts of dead space. Each experiment was carried out sev- the maximum allowable pressure drop, i.e., 100 mmH2O. As shown in
eral times and plotted in the graph. As shown in the figure, the filter the figure, the filter cleaning efficiency of a pleated filter bag rapidly de-
cleaning interval decreased over time and became shorter with a de- creases with an increase in the assumed filtration area (i.e., a decrease in
crease in the assumed amount of dead space of a pleated filter bag. In the dead space). This can be attributed to the fact that test particles with
addition, the filter cleaning interval when the assumed filtration area a high concentration were introduced to maintain a same dust concen-
was 40 to 50%, was similar to that of a cylindrical filter bag. Therefore, tration identical to that of a cylindrical filter bag. Therefore, it is conceiv-
we can determine that the effective filtration area is approximately 50 able that the filter cleaning efficiency of a pleated filter bag is similar to
to 60% of the theoretical filtration area. that of a cylindrical filter bag, when we consider the dead space of a
The residual pressure drop is also a critical operating parameter in a pleated filter bag to be 40 to 50% of the theoretical filtration area.
pulse-jet bag house. Fig. 6 shows the residual pressure drop after the fil- It is necessary to observe the filter cleaning phenomena in both a cy-
ter was cleaned. The residual pressure drop was relatively stable during lindrical and a pleated filter bag so as to understand the filter cleaning
operation with the cylindrical filter and the pleated filters with dead characteristics in both cases. Figs. 8 and 9 show the dust behavior as
space levels of 30, 40 and 50%. However, the residual pressure drop in- the filter is cleaned in a cylindrical and a pleated filter bag, respectively.
creased with the operation time only when using the pleated filter with The white line shows the boundary layer of the dust cake at the maxi-
the theoretical filtration area. mum allowable pressure drop of 100 mmH2O. The dust cake layer ex-
Fig. 7 shows the filter cleaning efficiency of a cylindrical and a panded until approximately 10 ms due to the pulsing air and then
pleated filter bag as a function of the elapsed time. The filter cleaning ef- became detached in the form of agglomerates from the filter surface
ficiency is defined as the ratio of the decreased pressure drop due to the in the cylindrical filter bag. In addition, the boundary layer moved to
cleaning of the filter and the difference between the maximum the left side of the white line due to the detachment of the dust cake
Table 2
Operating conditions in the test device to determine the effective filtration area of a pleated filter bag.
Filter type Effective filtration area [m2] Filtration velocity Gas Dust concentration Dust
[m/min] flow rate [g/m3] feed rate
[m3/min] [g/min]
Fig. 3. Sample preparation to measure the partial pressure drop of a cleaned filter medium.
Fig. 4. Changes in the pressure drop of a cylindrical and a pleated filter bag when regarding Fig. 6. Residual pressure drops of a cylindrical filter bag and a pleated filter bag considering
the effective filtration area as the theoretical filtration area. the amount of dead space.
Fig. 5. Comparison of the filter cleaning interval between a cylindrical filter bag and a Fig. 7. Comparison of the filter cleaning efficiency between a cylindrical filter bag and a
pleated filter bag considering the amount of dead space. pleated filter bag considering the amount of dead space.
526 J.-U. Kim et al. / Powder Technology 311 (2017) 522–527
Fig. 8. Dust behavior when cleaning the filter in a cylindrical filter bag.
layer at the final stage of filter cleaning. However, the dust behavior the particles, and the medium were all important factors when remov-
when the filter was cleaned in the pleated filter bag was quite different. ing the dust cake layer and determining the cleaning properties [12–14].
The particles deposited in the filter were scattered by the pulsing air and Table 3 shows the partial pressure drop at a filtration velocity of
the boundary layer was similar to that in the initial stage. Several re- 2.1 m/min in a cylindrical and a pleated filter bag. The effective filtration
searchers have noted that the fabric movement, adhesion force between area of the pleated filter bag in this experiment was assumed to be the
Fig. 9. Dust behavior when cleaning the filter in a pleated filter bag.
J.-U. Kim et al. / Powder Technology 311 (2017) 522–527 527
Table 3 detaching by the filter cleaning process. The effective filtration area,
Partial pressure drop in a cylindrical and a pleated filter bag. i.e., the most important design parameter in relation to filtration, was
(unit: mmH2O) also investigated experimentally by comparing the filter cleaning inter-
Cylindrical filter bag #1 #2 #3 Average val and filter cleaning efficiency of a cylindrical and a pleated filter bag.
Top 8.42 8.84 8.93 8.73 The pleated filter bag had lower filter cleaning efficiency and a shorter
Middle 7.53 7.93 7.47 7.64 filter cleaning interval than the cylindrical filter bag at the same filtra-
Bottom 8.25 8.55 7.99 8.26 tion velocity when we considered the effective filtration area as the the-
Average 8.07 8.44 8.13
oretical filtration area. This outcome can be attributed to an incorrect
Pleated filter bag Outer pleat Inclined plane Inner pleat Average assumption of the effective filtration area. We found that the filtration
characteristics of the pleated filter bag used in this study were similar
Top 9.57 6.26 6.81 7.55
Middle 9.11 5.18 6.23 6.84
to those of the cylindrical filter bag when we considered the effective fil-
Bottom 9.49 5.38 6.74 7.20 tration area as 50 to 60% of the theoretical filtration area. Even with a de-
Average 9.39 5.60 6.60 creased filtration area in the pleated filter bag due to a clogged filter, we
could still utilize twice the filtration area comparing to the usable
amount in the cylindrical filter bag.
theoretical filtration area. Although the deposited particles were partial-
ly detached from the filter surface during the sample preparation,
resulting in lower pressure drops as compared to the values in Fig. 4, Acknowledgments
we noted that patch cleaning phenomena arose on the filter medium.
The partial pressure drops in the cylindrical filter bag were relatively This work was financially supported by the Eco-Innovation Project
constant in the radial direction at different positions (#1, #2, and #3). (Project Number: E316-00011-0603-1) through the Ministry of the En-
However, there was a slight difference among the axial positions (top, vironment, Republic of Korea.
middle and bottom). The partial pressure drop in the middle position
was lower than those at other positions, stemming from the high filter References
cleaning efficiency in the middle of the filter bag. However, we noted [1] K. Schulz, M. Durst, Advantages of an integrated system for hot gas filtration using
a different tendency in the pleated filter bag. The partial pressure rigid ceramic elements, Filtr. Sep. 31 (1994) 25–28.
drops at the axial positions were relatively constant. However, those [2] K.-J. Jeon, Y.-W. Jung, A simulation study on the compression behavior of dust cakes,
Powder Technol. 141 (2004) 1–11.
at the radial positions showed considerable differences among the posi- [3] J.-H. Choi, S.-J. Ha, H.-J. Jang, Compression properties of dust cake on fine fly ashes
tions (outer pleat, inclined plane and inner pleat). The particles depos- from a fluidized bed coal combustor on a ceramic filter, Powder Technol. 140
ited on the inclined plane and inner pleat in the pleated filter bag (2004) 106–115.
[4] L.-M. Lo, D.-R. Chen, D.-Y. Pui, Experimental study of pleated fabric cartridges in a
were easily detached during the filter cleaning process. However, the
pulse-jet cleaned dust collector, Powder Technol. 197 (2010) 141–149.
particles deposited nearby the outer pleat remained. In other words, [5] B.H. Park, Y.M. Jo, S.B. Kim, M.-H. Lee, Filtration characteristics of fine particulate
the pulse-jet air could easily pass through the inclined plane and inner matters in a PTFE/glass composite bag filter, Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 12 (2012)
pleat, which undergo a relatively low pressure drop in the filter bag [9]. 1030–1036.
[6] L.-M. Lo, S.-C. Hu, D.-R. Chen, D.-Y. Pui, Numerical study of pleated fabric cartridges
In summary, particle clogging in the outer pleat region of a pleated during pulse-jet cleaning, Powder Technol. 198 (2010) 75–81.
filter bag strongly influenced the decrease in the effective filtration area. [7] B.H. Park, M.-H. Lee, Y.M. Jo, S.B. Kim, Influence of pleat geometry on filter cleaning
in PTFE/glass composite filter, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 62 (2012) 1257–1263.
[8] D.-R. Chen, D.-Y. Pui, B.Y.H. Liu, Optimization of pleated filter designs using a finite-
4. Conclusion element numerical model, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 23 (1995) 579–590.
[9] A. Subrenat, J. Bellettre, P. Le Cloirec, 3-D numerical simulations of flows in a cylin-
The dust behavior and partial pressure drop on the filter surface drical pleated filter packed with activated carbon cloth, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003)
4965–4973.
when the filters were cleaned in a cylindrical and in a pleated filter [10] R. Wakeman, N. Hanspal, A. Waghode, V. Nassehi, Analysis of pleat crowding and
bag were investigated in this study. The resulting dust cake layer was medium compression in pleated cartridge filters, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 83 (2005)
expanded by pulsing air and detached itself in the form of agglomerates 1246–1255.
[11] B.H. Park, M.-H. Lee, S.B. Kim, G.S. Kim, Y.M. Jo, Preparation and characterization of
from the filter surface in the cylindrical filter bag. However, this layer porous composite filter medium by polytetrafluoroethylene foam coating, J. Air
was scattered in the form of particles in the pleated filter bag. This ten- Waste Manage. Assoc. 60 (2010) 137–141.
dency influenced the filter cleaning efficiency of both the cylindrical and [12] R. Allen, H. Goyder, K. Morris, Modelling media movement during cleaning of pulse-
jet fabric filters, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 77 (1999) 223–230.
the pleated filter bag. The partial pressure drop on the filter surface of
[13] X. Simon, S. Chazelet, D. Thomas, D. Bémer, R. Régnier, Experimental study of pulse-
the cylindrical filter bag was relatively uniform. However, we found jet cleaning of bag filters supported by rigid rings, Powder Technol. 172 (2007)
that the pressure drop on the folded section in the pleated filter bag 67–81.
was higher than that on the inclined flat surface. This difference may [14] Y. Qian, Y. Bi, M. Zhang, H. Chen, G. Xu, Effect of filtration operation and surface
treatment on pulse-jet cleaning performance of filter bags, Powder Technol. 277
have been due to patch cleaning by the dead zone. The particles depos- (2015) 82–88.
ited on the folded section in the filter remained without becoming