Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF ABATTOIR EFFLUENT ON WELL WATER QUALITY
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF ABATTOIR EFFLUENT ON WELL WATER QUALITY
BY
JANUARY, 2020
1
TABLE OF CONTNENTS
Title page - - - - - - - - - - i
Declaration page - - - - - - - - - ii
Approval page- - - - - - - - - - iii
Dedication - - - - - - - - - - iv
Acknowledgement - - - - - - - - - v
Table of contents - - - - - - - - - vi
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction - - - - - - - - - 1
1.1 Background of the Study - - - - - - - 1
1.2 Statement of Problem - - - - - - - 2
1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Study - - - - - 2
1.3.1 Aim of the Study - - - - - - - - 2
1.3.2 Objectives of the Study - - - - - - - 2
1.4 Significance of the Study - - - - - - - 3
1.5 Scope of the Study - - - - - - - - 3
1.6 Limitation of the Study - - - - - - - 4
CHAPTER TWO
LIITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction - - - - - - - - - 6
2.1 Introduction of Abattoir Waste Water - - - - - 8
2.2 Sources of Waste Water in Red Meat Abattoirs - - - 9
2.3 Technical Definition of Abattoir Waste - - - - 10
2.4 Provisional Best Management Practice - - - - 11
2.5 Definition of Water Waste - - - - - - 12
2.6 Quality of Waste Water - - - - - - - 12
2.7 Physical Properties of Waste Water - - - - - 13
2.8 Classes of Waste Water - - - - - - - 13
2
2.9 Characteristics of Waste Water - - - - - 14
2.10 Composition of Waste Water - - - - - - 15
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction - - - - - - - - - 20
3.2 Sampling Locations - - - - - - - 22
3.2.1 Sampling Point 1 - - - - - - - - 22
3.2.2 Sampling point 2 - - - - - - - - 22
3.3 Conditions of Sampling - - - - - - - 23
3.3.1 Time - - - - - - - - - - 23
3.3.2 Type of Sampling - - - - - - - - 23
3.4 Data Analysis - - - - - - - - 23
3.5 Solid Waste Management - - - - - - 24
3.6 Abattoir Waste Water Sampling - - - - - -
24
3.7 Colour - - - - - - - - - 25
3.8 Temperature- - - - - - - - - 26
3.9 Turbidity - - - - - - - - - 27
3.12 Photometric method - - - - - - - 29
3.14 pH - - - - - - - - - -
30
3.17 Total iron (Fe) - - - - - - - - 31
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
3
Fig: 1, Temperature - - - - - - - - - - 35
Fig: 2, Turbidity - - - - - - - - - - 36
Fig: 3, Colour - - - - - - - - - - - 37
Fig: 4, PH - - - - - - - - - - - - 38
Fig: 5, TDS - - - - - - - - - - - - 39
Fig: 6, Conductivity - - - - - - - - - - 40
Fig: 7, Total Hardness - - - - - - - - - 41
Fig: 8, Total Iron - - - - - - - - - - 42
Fig: 9, Total Alkalinity - - - - - - - - - 43
Fig: 10 Calcium - - - - - - - - - - - 44
Fig: 12, Magnesium - - - - - - - - - - 45
Fig: 13, Faecal Coli Form - - - - - - - - 46
Fig: 14 Total Coli Form - - - - - - - - - 47
4.3 Physical Analysis of well water - - - - - - 47
4.4 Chemical Analysis of well water - - - - - - 49
4.5 Microbiological Analysis of well water - - - - - 51
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMEDATION
5.1 Conclusion - - - - - - - - - 52
5.2 Recommendation - - - - - - - 52
References - - - - - - - - 53
Appendixes - - - - - - - - 56
List of Plates - - - - - - - - 56
Plate: 1, Sample collection - - - - - - 56
Plate: 2, Distance of Well - - - - - - 56
Plate: 3, Abbatoir Activites - - - - - - 57
4
Plate: 4, Laboratory Test - - - - - - 57
ABSTRACT
The research examined the impact of abattoir wastes on groundwater quality of Inkil
abattoir Bauchi metropolis, Bauchi Local Government. Water sample were collected
from two point of bore holes in the study are. The water sample were tested for
physical, chemical and biological parameters such as temperature, Turbidity, color P H,
total dissolved solid, conductivity, total hardness, Alkalinity, iron, calcium, magnesium
total caliform and total fical coliform. The main values of parameters in the water
samples collected from the studied wells range from649 - 647μs, 398 – 202mg/L, 70 –
84mg/L 0.00 – 0.02mg/L 111.2 – 44mg/L, 29.30 – 19.86mg/L. There was a great
difference in the water quality from staged and control well in the parameters except
the total coliform the quality of the ground water improved with increasing distance
from the abattoir. Findings revealed that abattoir have the potential to impact the
quality of ground water. Therefore, careful precaution should be consideration in
required when choosing a location for sitting new abattoir, not forgetting existing
areas close to residential area, effective pollution control measure should be put in
place to protect ground water from pollution. The study recommends creating
awareness and treating of underground water in slaughter areas before use.
5
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
and Snyder, 2015). With over 2000 Gm3 of water requires per year for the
water for the meat production yields considerable equal amount of waste
content ranging from organic to inorganic pollution. The need for regular
6
1.2 Statement of Problem
In Nigeria, many abattoir dispose their effluent directly into streams and
rivers without any form of treatment and the slaughter meat is washed by the
organization (WHO 2011), more than 3.4 million people die each year from
the waterborne disease most of them are hound men. It was estimated that
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of abattoir effluent on the
taste.
7
3. To measure the level of pollution from disposal of abattoir effluents
pollutants.
residential areas will help to anticipate the impacts on the health of residents
who depend solely on the well waters for consumption and other domestic
no effects on their health. The study, therefore, intends to assess the water
laboratory analysis of sample obtained. The field survey will be carried out
over 80 to 100 Meters distance of the wells within the area (specifically
between slaughterhouse and wells area). The following test will be conduct.
8
hardness, pH, Magnesium, Chlorine iron, Dissove oxygen Nitrate) and
water sample.
The study will provide basic information only the water use and
conflict. It will also evaluate the current water quality and degree of
pollution of the wells. The data will furnish information that will be useful to
moved down the slope into the drainage and percolates into the ground.
a. Physical Parameters
I. PH
II. Temperature
III. Colour
IV. Odor
V. Conductivity
VI. Turbidity
9
b. Chemical Test
10
11