Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADR.pdf
ADR.pdf
ADR.pdf
In Serajuddin v. Michael Golodetz[6] the Calcutta High Court laid down the
essential conditions of a ‘foreign arbitration’ where the award is further called a
foreign arbitral award, the main points of this case were:
● Arbitration should have been held in foreign a foreign country
● By a foreign arbitrator
● Arbitration by applying foreign laws
● One of the parties consists of foreign nationals
The reason applied behind the award should be explicit clearly. However, if the
parties have agreed for settlement then no reason behind an arbitral award on
agreed terms, need to be showcased. The date of declaration of an Award and
also the place wherever it’s made shall be mentioned. Place of the award is
additionally called as the seat of arbitration. A replica of the award shall be
issued to every party. Arbitral Tribunals can also pass an interim award.
In the case of Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandya[7] non-signatories
to an arbitration agreement can even participate in arbitration proceedings as
long as the necessary and proper parties to the agreement are present. This is
often to both Indian seated International Commercial Arbitration and domestic
arbitration.
Termination of Arbitral Proceedings under Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 32 of the Arbitrational and Conciliation Act, 1996 is totally coherent with
Article 32 of UNCITRAL Model Law. According to Section 32(1) of the Act
termination of Arbitral proceedings takes place once the final award declared by
the arbitral tribunal. The other three grounds of termination of arbitral
proceedings are given under Sub-section 2 of Section 32.
To terminate the arbitration proceedings arbitral tribunal shall issue an order:
● The parties themselves agree to terminate the proceedings.
● If the arbitral tribunal finds that the continuation of the proceedings is either
unnecessary or impossible for any other reason.
● the plaintiff withdraws their claim. It can also be terminated if the
respondent objects to the arbitral award. Looking at which the arbitral
tribunal come to a conclusion that it has a legitimate interest in obtaining a
final settlement.
In the last, The mandate of the arbitral tribunal will terminate with the termination
of the procedure itself. Sub-section (3) of this section lays down that the above
provisions are subject to Section 34(4) and section 33.
Conclusion
The termination of proceedings procedure and making an arbitral award laid
down is pretty straightforward and simple. The Supreme Court has sometimes
come up with suggested amendments and necessary interpretations. It’s
interesting to note that the termination of arbitral proceedings is different under
Section 32 and Section 25. The conclusiveness of award marks the termination
of proceedings under Arbitration and Conciliation Act under Section 32 along with
three other grounds. Not several radical judgments are passed with regard to the
above subject however Sai Babu v. M/S Clariya Steels Private Limited holds
good laThe parties themselves agree to terminate the proceedings.
● If the arbitral tribunal finds that the continuation of the proceedings is either
unnecessary or impossible for any other reason.
● the plaintiff withdraws their claim. It can also be terminated if the
respondent objects to the arbitral award. Looking at which the arbitral
tribunal come to a conclusion that it has a legitimate interest in obtaining a
final settlement.
In the last, The mandate of the arbitral tribunal will terminate with the termination
of the procedure itself. Sub-section (3) of this section lays down that the above
provisions are subject to Section 34(4) and section 33.
Conclusion
The termination of proceedings procedure and making an arbitral award laid
down is pretty straightforward and simple. The Supreme Court has sometimes
come up with suggested amendments and necessary interpretations. It’s
interesting to note that the termination of arbitral proceedings is different under
Section 32 and Section 25. The conclusiveness of award marks the termination
of proceedings under Arbitration and Conciliation Act under Section 32 along with
three other grounds. Not several radical judgments are passed with regard to the
above subject however Sai Babu v. M/S Clariya Steels Private Limited holds
good law.