Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MARATHON-StockReport-20240502-1727
MARATHON-StockReport-20240502-1727
533.7
Market Cap: 22.0B Avg Daily Volume: 45.2K
NSE | May 02, 2024 03:43 PM
DVM SUMMARY
These stocks are with good quality scores and with strong financials. They are affordably priced stocks and can give good returns
Durability Score (D) High Financial Strength Valuation Score (V) Affordable Valuation Momentum Score (M) Technically Neutral
80 58 48
0 35 55 100 0 30 50 100 0 35 60 100
TRENDLYNE CHECKLIST
Ownership 1 3
Peer Comparison 1 2
Total 10 13
The Trendlyne Checklist checks if the company meets the key criteria for financial health and
consistent growth.
KEY STATISTICS
Ratios Financials
TTM PE Ratio ROE Annual % ROCE Annual % Operating Revenue TTM Revenue Growth Annual YoY Net Profit Annual
%
15.4 15.4 16.9 719.6 121.0
120.5
Below industry Median High in industry High in industry High in industry
High in industry
EBIT Annual Margin % TTM PEG Ratio Long Term Debt To Equity
Annual Net Profit TTM Growth % Dividend yield 1yr % EPS TTM Growth %
38.9 1.3
1.0 11.6 0.2 11.6
PEG TTM is much higher than 1
High in industry Below industry Median
Below industry Median
500
400
400
200
300
200 0
JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL JAN JUL JAN JUL JAN JUL JAN JUL JAN
Durability Summary
Durability Score Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. has a durability score of 80, which indicates High Financial Strength.
80 / 100
A High Durability Score (greater than 55) indicates good and consistent financial performance : stable revenues, cash flows, and low debt.
The Durability score looks at many different metrics, including long-term performance data, to identify stocks that have stood the test of time.
80
0 35 55 100
Durability Trend Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. : May '23 - Apr '24 Durability v/s Peers
100
Marathon Nextgen Realty 80.0
75 DLF 85.0
GOOD
Macrotech Developers 80.0
50
Godrej Properties 50.0
MEDIUM
Prestige Estates Projects 70.0
25
0
May '23 Jun '23 Jul '23 Aug '23 Sep '23 Oct '23 Nov '23 Dec '23 Jan '24 Feb '24 Mar '24 Apr '24 May '24
Oberoi Realty 55.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Good Medium Bad Maximum Minimum Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. (80) has second-highest Durability score amongst its peers,
100.0% 0% 0% 85.0 (10 Aug '23) 55.0 (23 May '23) behind DLF Ltd. (85) and tied with Macrotech Developers Ltd. and 2 others
Financial Metrics
Total Revenue Annual Net Profit Annual Tax Annual Revenue Growth Annual YoY %
758.943 120.5% YoY Mar'23 120.987 214.1% YoY Mar'23 43.286 278.8% YoY Mar'23 120.5% 122.1% YoY Mar'23
1000 200 50 400
43.3
758.9 759 40.8
142.9
121 200.8
200 120.5
500 100
344.2 25 54.3
249.4 223.1 18.6
38.7 31.5 38.5 -10.5
82.9 24.1 15.2 10.5 11.4 0 -71.2
69.9 8.9
5.9 5.4
0 0
0 -200
8
3
M
M
'1
'1
'2
'2
'2
'2
'1
'1
'2
'2
'2
'2
TT
TT
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 TTM Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23
M
Total Revenue Annual growth is higher than Net Profit Annual growth is higher than Tax Annual growth is higher than historical Revenue Growth Annual YoY % is stable
historical averages. historical averages. averages. compared to historical averages.
Operating Profit Margin Annual % Net Profit TTM Growth % Operating Revenues Qtr Net Profit Qtr
31.5% 45.9% YoY Mar'23 210.8% 35.0% YoY Mar'23 210.413 -24.4% YoY Dec'23 50.143 -36.3% YoY Dec'23
75 400 400 100
61.8 62.8
78.7
210.8 278.4
50 200 156.2
209.8 210.4 50.1
28.6 31.5 200 169.9 170.5 50 42.2
25.8 129 34.3
21.6 -23.5 -36.9
25 0
14.7 16.2
0 -200 0 0
Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Sep'22 Dec'22 Mar'23 Jun'23 Sep'23 Dec'23 Sep'22 Dec'22 Mar'23 Jun'23 Sep'23 Dec'23
Operating Profit Margin Annual % is growing Operating Revenues Qtr growth is higher Net Profit Qtr growth is higher than
faster than historical averages. than historical averages. historical averages.
CAGR 2Y 339.0%
CAGR 2Y 5.1% 3Y 307.8% YoY -24.4% YoY -36.3%
3Y 6.9% 5Y 0% QoQ 63.1% QoQ 46.4%
5Y -12.6%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets Annual Total ShareHolders Funds Annual Working Capital Annual
2,153.2 0.7% YoY Mar'23 785.2 20.9% YoY Mar'23 526.7 21.8% YoY Mar'23
3k 1000 750
785.2 566.9
2139 2153.2 526.7
607.4 609.1 649.4
2k 1699.5 549.5 593.3 500 432.4
1497.8 1617.1
500 289.9
1k 885.3 250 164.8
116.4
0 0 0
Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23
Total Assets Annual growth is lower than Total ShareHolders Funds Annual growth is Working Capital Annual growth is stable
historical averages. higher than historical averages. compared to historical averages.
Cashflow
Cash from Operating Activity Annual Cash from Investing Activity Annual Cash from Financing Annual Activity Net Cash Flow Annual
386.3 406.1% YoY Mar'23 -46 87.7% YoY Mar'23 -326.1 -219.2% YoY Mar'23 14.2 157.0% YoY Mar'23
500 0 500 50
386.3 -2.6 32.1
273.5
-46 250 203.1 25
-75.5 144.1 11.2 14.2
250 169.4 60.6 6.6
40.1
100.6 76.3 -200 0 0
21.5 -198.3
0 -7.9
-250 -25
-311.7 -374.8 -24.9
-109.3 -326.1
-250 -400 -500 -50
Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23
Cash from Operating Activity Annual growth Cash from Investing Activity Annual growth Cash from Financing Annual Activity is Net Cash Flow Annual growth is stable
is higher than historical averages. is higher than historical averages. falling slower than historical averages. compared to historical averages.
Financial Ratios
15.4% 159.7% YoY Mar'23 16.9% 143.4% YoY Mar'23 5.6% 211.7% YoY Mar'23 2 15.5% YoY Mar'23
20 20 6 3
16.9 2.5
15.4 4.4 5.6
2
4 2 1.8
1.5 1.6
10 10 1.3
7 6.5 6.3 6.9 2.1
5.2 5.9 5.2 5.8 1.8
4 2 1.5 1
2.5 0.9
0 0 0 0
Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23
ROE Annual % is growing faster than ROCE Annual % is growing faster than RoA Annual % is growing faster than Current Ratio Annual growth is stable
historical averages. historical averages. historical averages. compared to historical averages.
Net Profit Margin Annual % Interest Coverage Ratio Annual EBIT Annual Margin %
15.7% 104.4% YoY Mar'23 2.3 52.3% YoY Mar'23 38.9% 8.6% YoY Mar'23
50 10 75
40.4 62.2 61.9
9.5
29.1 50
36.9 35.8 38.9
25 5 27.8
15.7
11.3 2.4 2.3 25
8.5 7.7 1.6 1.7 1.5
0 0 0
Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'18 Mar'19 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23
Net Profit Margin Annual % is growing faster Interest Coverage Ratio Annual growth is EBIT Annual Margin % is stable compared to
than historical averages. higher than historical averages. historical averages.
COMPARISON MARATHON NEXTGEN REALTY DLF MACROTECH DEVELOPERS GODREJ PROPERTIES PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS PHOENIX MILLS OBEROI REALTY
LTD. LTD. LTD. LTD. LTD. LTD. LTD.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
P/E Ratio TTM 15.4 93.4 79.8 105.7 33.0 54.5 34.4
PEG Ratio TTM 1.3 3.5 0.4 1.8 1.6 -4.1 -15.1
Price to Book Value 2.8 5.9 7.1 7.6 5.5 5.1 4.6
Price to Sales TTM 3.1 38.6 12.0 21.6 6.7 16.5 13.4
Price to Sales Annual 1.8 15.5 10.9 12.7 1.9 8.8 7.3
Market Cap to Sales 1.8 15.5 10.9 12.7 1.9 8.8 7.3
Price to Free Cash Flow 14.2 -100.5 516.2 459.6 -671.1 -43.2 -538.5
Valuation Summary
Valuation Score Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. has a valuation score of 58, which indicates an Affordable Valuation.
58 / 100
A High Valuation Score (greater than 50) indicates the stock is competitively priced at current P/E, P/BV and share price.
The Valuation helps you identify stocks which are still bargains, and whose strengths are not fully priced into the share price.
Affordable Valuation
58
0 30 50 100
Valuation Trend Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. : May '23 - Apr '24 Valuation v/s Peers
100
Marathon Nextgen Realty 58.2
75 DLF 15.0
GOOD
Macrotech Developers 24.8
50
0
Phoenix Mills 21.7
3
23
23
24
4
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'
r'
ar
n
ec
b
p
ct
ay
ov
ay
Ju
Ap
Ju
Au
Se
Fe
Ja
O
M
D
N
M
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Good Medium Bad Maximum Minimum Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. (58) has highest Valuation score amongst its peers.
99.2% 0.8% 0% 72.5 (05 Feb '24) 49.2 (28 Mar '24)
Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. has spent 52.2% of the time below the current P/E 15.4. This puts it
in the PE Neutral Zone
Neutral Zone 52.2% into P/E buy sell zone This is based on the tendency of the P/E value to revert to its historical mean.
If the P/E value has spent most of its time below the current value, then it means that most gains
have probably been realised already, and it is time to sell.
Strong upside potential % time spent below current P/E Gains already realized If the P/E value has spent very little time below the current value, then it means that there is strong
potential upside, and it is time to buy.
Valuation Metrics
15.4 54.8% YoY May'24 1.8 2.1% YoY May'24 0 79.3% YoY May'24 312.1 4.9% YoY May'24
100 10 0.1 400
297.3 312.1
67.2 6.9 0.1
Momentum Summary
Momentum Score Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. has a Momentum score of 48, which indicates that it is Technically Neutral.
48 / 100
A High Momentum Score indicates the stock is seeing buyer demand, and is bullish across its technicals compared to the rest of the stock
universe.
Momentum is a very effective short term score, while Durability and Valuation help assess the stock’s health over the long term.
Technically Neutral
48
0 35 60 100
Momentum Trend Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. : May '23 - Apr '24 Momentum v/s Peers 30 Apr '24
100
Marathon Nextgen Realty 47.9
75 DLF 64.3
GOOD
Macrotech Developers 72.8
50
25
Prestige Estates Projects 73.9
0
Phoenix Mills 64.2
3
23
23
24
4
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'
r'
ar
n
ec
p
ct
b
ay
ov
ay
Ju
Ap
Ju
Au
Se
Fe
Ja
O
M
D
N
M
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Good Medium Bad Maximum Minimum Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. (48) has lowest Momentum score amongst its peers, behind
60.2% 39.8% 0% 72.8 (04 Dec '23) 41.7 (14 Feb '24) Oberoi Realty Ltd. (62)
ATR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
17.6
Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. is trading below 7 out of 8 SMAs. Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. is trading below 7 out of 8 EMAs.
5Day SMA 439 50Day SMA 468.2 5Day EMA 437.4 26Day EMA 457.1
10Day SMA 441.6 100Day SMA 443.5 10Day EMA 443.4 50Day EMA 457.8
20Day SMA 461.8 150Day SMA 444.1 12Day EMA 446 100Day EMA 447.1
30Day SMA 468.3 200Day SMA 424.3 20Day EMA 453.9 200Day EMA 416.7
Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. is trading below 7 out of 9 Oscillators in bearish zone. Marathon Nextgen Realty Ltd. at 430.90 is trading below it's Pivot 433.90.
Volatility Metrics
Beta
1 month 3 month 1 year 3 year ADX Day Bollinger Bands Mid_20_2
beta value for 3 month indicates price tends to be more volatile than the market
Checklist Summary
43.5% pass 10 | 13
=
Financial
5|3
+
Value & Momentum
3|5
+
Ownership
1|3
+
Peer Comparison
1|2
Company has seen consistent profit growth in the last eight The stock is in the Buy Zone according to its historical P/E?
quarters? No
No The stock is in the Buy Zone according to its historical P/E
Stock has seen consistent profit growth in the last eight quarters
FII/FPI or DIIs are buying the stock? Company is giving better long term returns than the industry?
Yes
Institutions have been increasing stake in the company over the past No Company is giving better long term returns than the industry
four quarters
100%
Promoter 73.7%
74.4% 73.5% 73.7% 73.7% 73.7%
75%
DII 0.0%
50%
FII 0.6%
25%
8.5% 8.5% 8.5%
Public 25.8% -% -% -% -% -%
0%
Jun 2023 Sep 2023 Nov 15, 2023 Dec 2023 Mar 2024
Retail investors (Promoter) form the biggest shareholding segment Promoter , Pledges as % of promoter shares (%) , Locked as % of promoter shares (%) , FII ,
DII , over the Mar 2024 quarter
FII/FPI have decreased holdings from 1.56% to 0.56% in Mar 2024 qtr
Institutional Investors have decreased holdings from 1.63% to 0.57% in Mar 2024
qtr
Promoters
Date Client Name Deal Type Action Avg Price Qty Exchange
22 Dec'20 AMBE SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED Bulk Purchase 91.7 300,000 BSE
22 Mar'14 SILVERSOIL BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED Bulk Sell 147 520,553 BSE
Reporting Date Insider Name Insider Type Regulation Action Avg Price Qty Mode
30 Jan'24 Chetan R Shah & Others Promoter SAST Acquisition - 3,200,000 Pref. Allotment
16 Aug'23 Rohini Shashank Basangar Employee Insider Trading Disposal 351.5 6,500 Market Sale
11 May'23 Chintan Javahar Raval Employee Insider Trading Acquisition 307 3,474 ESOP
11 May'23 Shrinivas Mallesh Ubdi Employee Insider Trading Acquisition 307 10,655 ESOP
11 May'23 Krishnamurthy Srinivas Raghavan Employee Insider Trading Acquisition 307 8,662 ESOP
11 May'23 Rishi Vikram Audich Employee Insider Trading Acquisition 307 4,236 ESOP
25 Jan'23 Santoshkumar Premchandra Dubey Employee Insider Trading Acquisition 148.8 36,410 ESOP
25 Jan'23 Kishor Arun Patil Employee Insider Trading Acquisition 277.7 4,963 ESOP
25 Jan'23 Santoshkumar Premchandra Dubey Employee Insider Trading Disposal 270.8 20,000 ESOP
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
Financial Officer
DIRECTOR INFORMATION
Durability scores are calculated from 0-100, with zero the worst and 100 the best. Trendlyne Checklist evaluates a stock based on its financial performance, ownership, peer
Durability scores above 55 are considered good(G) and below 35 are considered bad(B). comparison, value and momentum. This helps give an overall performance of the
Scores between 35-55 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle(M). company based on the score.
Stocks with a high durability score (top 20 percentile) are companies that have
consistently and over time, demonstrated good growth and cash flow, stable revenues
and profits, and low debt. PE buy/sell zone
The durability score considers several different metrics and ratios around earnings and
models these over time. Our stocks with high durability scores outperform the index The PE buy/sell zone is calculated based on how many days a stock has traded at its
significantly current PE level. The current PE is compared to the stock’s historical PE performance, to
find out how often (for how many days in the past) the stock has traded at its current PE
value.
Valuation Score If the stock has usually traded above its current PE level (it’s at a higher PE for the
majority of trading days), then the stock is cheaper than usual and in the PE buy zone.
Valuation scores are calculated from 0-100, with zero the worst and 100 the best. If the stock has usually traded below its current PE level (it’s at a lower PE for the
Valuation scores above 50 are considered good(G) and below 30 are considered bad(B). majority of trading days), then the stock is more expensive than usual and in the PE sell
Scores between 30-50 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle(M) zone.
Stocks with a high valuation score (top 20 percentile) are companies whose business and
financial advantages have not yet been priced into their share price. These companies
typically have strong earnings but are currently flying under the radar, and Trendlyne’s Price Volume Charts
valuation score helps shine a spotlight on these companies.
Firms with a low valuation score (bottom 20 percentile) are expensive stocks that have Price volume charts are a type of financial chart that combines two key pieces of
good broker coverage and already have their strengths priced in. They are popular but information about a stock: its price and trading volume. They are commonly used in
pricey. If you are buying them now it would be for a steep price tag: valuation scores help technical analysis to identify trends and patterns in the market.
you identify that. In a price volume chart, the price of the security is plotted on the vertical axis, while the
trading volume is shown on the horizontal axis. Each data point on the chart represents a
single trading day, and the size of the data point may be proportional to the trading
Momentum Score volume.
Scores are calculated from 0-100, with zero being the worst and 100 the best.
Momentum scores above 59 are considered good(G) and below 30 are considered Peer Comparison
bad(B). Scores between 30-59 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle(M)
Momentum score or momentum score identifies the bullish/bearish nature of the stock. Peer comparison in financial analysis is a method of comparing the financial performance
Stocks with a high momentum score (which is calculated daily from over 30 technical and position of one company to its competitors or peers in the same industry or sector.
indicators) are seeing their share price rise, and increase in volumes and sentiment. The purpose of this comparison is to gain insights into how the company is performing
A low and falling momentum score indicates a falling share price. The pace at which this is relative to its competitors and to identify areas where it may be underperforming or
changing is also important for the momentum score. overperforming. In Trendlyne’s stock report, DVM scores are also included in the peer
comparison section.
Analyst recommendation
Technical Analysis
Analyst recommendation of a stock is an assessment made by financial analysts or
brokerage firms about the investment potential of a particular stock. It is usually based Technical analysis is a method of analyzing stocks and other financial instruments that
on a thorough analysis of the company's financial performance, market trends, industry relies on charts and statistical indicators to identify trends and patterns in price and
outlook, and other factors that may impact the stock's value. trading volume.
The analyst recommendation of a stock typically takes the form of a rating or a Key momentum metrics included - relative strength index (RSI), Stochastic RSI, Ultimate
recommendation, such as "buy," "hold," or "sell." The recommendation is usually Oscillator, moving average convergence divergence (MACD), average true range (ATR),
accompanied by a price target, which is the analyst's estimate of the stock's fair value. money flow index (MFI), William, CCI 20 and Awesome Oscillator. Simple and
A low and falling momentum score indicates a falling share price. The pace at which this is exponential moving averages are also included.
changing is also important for the momentum score. To analyse the volatility of the stock, Beta over different periods of time, Average
Directional Movement Index and Bollinger bonds are used. Along with this, active
candlesticks, daily volume analysis is also provided in the rapport.
Disclaimer
© 2024 Giskard Datatech Pvt Ltd
Republication or redistribution of Giskard content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Giskard. All information in this report is assumed to be
accurate to the best of our ability. Giskard is not liable for any errors or delays in Giskard content, or for any actions taken in reliance on such content. Any forward-looking statements included in the
Giskard content are based on certain assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.