INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____

I, ELSIE S. MAGSAEL, Assessment Clerk I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July to
December, 2018

ELSIE S. MAGSAEL 1/25/2019

Assessmen Clerk I Date
Approved by: Legend: Performance Rsting

5 Outstanding Q Quality 0.0 2.0 U

DIBU S. TUAN 4 Very Satisfactory E Efficiency 2.1 3.9 s
Head of Agency ( Date ) 3 Satisfactory T Timeliness 4.0 4.9 vs
2 Unsatisfactory A Average 5.0 10.0 o

TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

No. ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATINGS REMARKS
MFO / PAP SUCCESS INDICATOR ALLOTE
DIVISION /
D
INDIVIDUALS
QL E T BUDGE QL E T
100% (TARGETS-MEASURES) ACCOUNTABLE OUTPUT QL E T APS
T
(%) (#) (#) (%) (#) (#) EPS
100%

Field Appraisal & Field Appraisal &

(min, per (min, per
A 100% 5,500 40 prepn)
1 Asssessment Sheet 100% 7,200 30 prepn) Asssessment Sheet 5 5 4 4.67 ###
recording/transmiittal recordied/transmiitted

(min, per Notice of Assessment Notice of Assessment

B 100% 50 30 prepn)
5
recording/issuance
tal 100% 65 25 recordied/issued 5 5 4 4.67###
(min, per
prepn)

(min, per Notice oif Cancellation (min, per Notice oif Cancellation
C 100% 10 30 prepn)
6 recording/issuance
Fe Guardaya 100% 15 20 prepn) recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00 ###
Issuance delivery of
Assessment Records

(min, per Certifications (min, per Certifications

D 100% 10 30 prepn)
4 recording/issuance
Fe Guardaya 100% 25 20 prepn) recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00 ###

(min, per Tax Declarations (min, per Tax Declarations

E 100% 350 35 prepn)
5
recording/issuance
Fe Guardaya 100% 550 22 prepn) recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00 ###

(min, per Realty Clearance (min, per Realty Clearance

F 100% 30 30 prepn)
6 recording/issuance
Fe Guardaya 100% 39 20 prepn) recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00 ###
 (min, per Sworn Statement (min, per Sworn Statement
G 100% 5 40 prepn)
7 facilitation/recording
Fe Guardaya 100% 10 26 prepn) facilitated/recorded 5 5 5 5.00 ###

PREPARED/ ASSESSED BY:

ROGEN E. GUARDAYA, EnP SALVECIO B. DAGANG, MD DIBU S. TUAN

Municipal Planning & Development Coordinator Municipal Administrator Municipal Mayor / Head of Agency
( Date) PMT Chairperson Date Date

TRANSMUTATION TABLE / REFERENCES :

EFFICIENCY ( SRT) QUANTITY TIME (%) acted on Target

Standard Response Time VLook-up Reference 0% 49% x

0% 49% x N/A 0% 49% X 50% 70% 5
70% 100% 100% 5 50% 89% 2 70.1% 85% 4
101% 150% 80% 4 1.5 X 90% 114% 3 85.1% 100% 3
151% 200% 60% 3 Double(2x) 115% 129% 4 101% 130.0% 2 OPCR: D:/ Folder
130% 200% 5 131% 300% 1 OPCR Format File

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____
 TBOLI MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
For the Rating Period July 1 to December 31, 2007
EMPLOYEE: Office /Division
POSITION: Unit

Part PERFORMANCE
- I.

TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS R A T I N G S

Weight Work /Activity SUPERVISOR
### QUANTITY QUALITY TIME (Hrs) QN QL T APS EPS
Target A Target A Target A
Actual

70% 1. Formulate Plan/Prog. 1 3 100% 98% 164 prep'n 135 10 1 8 6.33 ###
2. Prepare / Evaluate 2 6 100% 98% 138 prep'n 110 10 1 8 6.33 ###
Reports #N/A
3. Prepare / Review 5 6 100% 97% 150 prep'n 118 8 0.97 8 5.66 ###
(Programming) 3 15 100% 98% 20 prep'n 15 10 1 8 6.33 ###
4. Monitor/Evaluate 10 20 100% 99% 8 prep'n 6 10 1 8 6.33 ###
5. Review Draft Maps 15 19 100% 99% 30 prep'n 24 8 1 8 5.67 ###
6. Prepare/ Assist #N/A
[Brgy.&Multi-Sctr'l Affairs] 15 24 100% 98% 3 prep'n 2.5 10 1 8 6.33 ###
20 25 100% 99% 4 prep'n 3 8 1 8 5.67 ###
7. Conduct/Assist/Orient 3 4 100% 99% 10 prep'n 8 10 1 8 6.33 ###
Ave. ........… 6.11 ###

30% 8. Process MDC Document 3 9 100% 99% 6 prep'n 5 10 1 8 6.33 ###

9. Prepare/Review/Signed 50 65 EF EF 2 prep'n 1.5 10 #N/A 8 #N/A ###
(Land Use / NGO's doc.etc)
10. Supervise Projects 3 5 100% 98% 30 min/visit 24 10 1 8 6.33 ###
11. Inspect/Evaluate &Sign 160 188 100% 98% 5 min/Doc 4 8 1 8 5.67 ###
Ave. ........... #N/A ###
Total Equivalent point Score = …………………………… ###
Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation = 70%
 Weighted Average Score (WAS) = ………………………… ###
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: Note: 1. TCAPT - Task Completed Ahead Before Pla
QN - Quantity 2. PT - Planned Time
QL - Quality 3. EF - Error Free
ERNESTO B. MANUEL JAN. 04, 2007 T - Timeliness Other Raters: 1. Subordinate
Municipal Mayor Date APS - Ave. Point Score 2. Client
Rater ) EPS - Equivalent Point Score 3. Peer(Achieving Targets)
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)
Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____

OFFICE :
Rating Period : January - June , 2016

TRANSMUTATION TABLE / REFERENCES :

EFFICIENCY ( SRT) QUANTITY TIME (%) acted on Target

0% 49% x N/A 0% 49% X 50% 70% 5

70% 100% 100% 5 50% 89% 2 70.1% 85% 4 (Head of Office)

1.5 X 101% 150% 80% 4 90% 114% 3 85.1% 100% 3

Double(2x) 151% 200% 60% 3 115% 129% 4 101% 130.0% 2 5-Jan-16
130% 200% 5 131% 300% 1 Date

SCORE SHEET
EFFICIENCY QUALITY OR EFFECTIVENESS
Weight
Optimuym
Number Acted Standard Percent(%)Act Use of Acceptabili Meeting Client Accuracy Completeness / Creativity/ Personal %
% Weight
Upon (Qn) Response Time ed Upon (Qn) Resources ty Standards Satisfaction Comprehensive
ness of report
Innovation initiative Weight REMARKS 100%
(%)
QN
1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0! 70%

5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE

 EMPLOYEE:

POSITION:

A T I N G S Weight
###

70%

30%
 - Task Completed Ahead Before Planned Time WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE
- Planned Time
- Error Free
Subordinate
Client
Peer(Achieving Targets)
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)
Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____

For the Rating Period June 1 to December 31, 2003

PRE-SET STANDARDS
TARGETS QL Qn(E) T

MFO / PAP SUCCESS INDICATOR QL E TIME 5 4 3 5 4 3 5 4 3

(hrs- Other Items are in % Ranging Rule Range /Bracket TCAPT

Prepn) 30% & above 15% - 29% 0% - 14% 30% 50% 29.9% - 15% 14.9% - 0%
1 Field Appraisal & Asssessment
Sheet recordied/transmiitted
Issuance delivery of Assessment
1 Records 100% 5500 40 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 7150 & above 6325 - 7095 ### - 6270 28 20 28 - 34.0 34 - 40

Notice of Assessment
recordied/issued
5 100% 25 21 15 21 25.5 26 30

50 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 65 & above 57.5 - 64.5 50 - 57 - -

0 Notice oif Cancellation
recorded/issued
2 6 100% 10 30 21 15 21 25.5 26 30

98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 13 & above 11.5 - 12.9 10.00 - 11.4 - -
Certifications recorded/issued

4 100% 10 30 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 13 & above 11.5 - 12.9 10 - 11.4 21 15 21 25.5 26 30

- -
0 Tax Declarations recorded/issued

3 5 100% 550 35 25 18 25 29.8 30 35

98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 455.0 & above 402.5 - 451.5 350 - 399 - -

6 Realty Clearance recorded/issued 3000% 20 20 21 15 21 25.5 26 30

98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 39 & above 34.5 - 38.7 30 - 34.2 - -

 0 7 #REF! 100% 5 40 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 6.5 & above 5.8 - 6.45 5 - 5.7 28 20 28 34.0 34 40
- -

Note : 1. Refer General Rule

WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend:

QN - Quantity

QL - Quality
DIBU S. TUAN ROGEN E. GUARDAYA Jan. 04, 2004 T - Timeliness
Municipal Mayor MPDC Date APS - Ave. Point Score
( Rater ) ( Ratee ) EPS - Equivalent Point Score
 TBOLI MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
For the Rating Period June 1 to December 31, 2003
EMPLOYEE: Rogen E. Guardaya
POSITION: MPDC PRE-SET STANDARDS

Weight Work /Activity Unit of Measurement TARGETS PRE-SET STANDARDS

(No.) QN T
QN QL TIME 10 8 6 10 8 6
(hrs- Exceeded at : TCAPT
Prepn) 30% & above 15% - 29% 0% - 14% 30% 40% 29.9% - 15% 14.9% - 0%

1. Formulate Plan/Prog. a] LDIP/AIP/ ,Plans/Profiles 1 100% 164 1.3 & above 1.15 - 1.29 1.00 - 1.14 115 82 115 - 139.4 140 - 164
2. Prepare / Evaluate b] Reports (Prog/Proj / 2 100% 138 2.6 & above 2.3 - 2.58 2 - 2.28 96.6 69 97 - 117.3 117 - 138
Reports Progress Reports) 0 0 0 0
3. Prepare / Review c] Pre-FS / Proposals 5 100% 150 6.5 & above 5.75 - 6.45 5.00 - 5.7 105 75 105.2 - 128 127.6 - 150
(Programming) d] Prog. /Projects Designs 3 100% 20 3.9 & above 3.4 - 3.87 3 - 3.42 14 10 14 - 17 17.0 - 20
4. Monitor/Evaluate e] Programs / Projects 10 100% 8 13.0 & above 11.5 - 12.9 10 - 11.4 5.6 4 6 - 7 6.8 - 8
5. Review Draft Maps f] Maps/Figures/Diagrams 15 100% 30 19.5 & above 17.3 - 19.35 15 - 17.1 21 15.0 21.03 - 25.50 25.53 - 30
6. Prepare/ Assist g] Documents/Plans/ 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0
[Brgy.&Multi-Sctr'l Affairs] Programs / Projects 15 100% 3 19.5 & above 17.3 - 19.35 15 - 17.1 2.1 1.5 2.1 - 2.55 2.6 - 3
h] Brgy. AIP/BDP, other Plans 20 100% 4 26 & above 23.0 - 25.8 20 - 22.8 2.8 2.0 2.80 - 3.40 3.40 - 4
7. Conduct/Assist/Orient i] Trainings/workshop/Confrnce 3 100% 10 4 & above 3.4 - 3.9 3 - 3.42 7 5 7.0 - 8.50 8.51 - 10
0 0% 0 0
0 0% 0 0
8. Process MDC Doc j] Res./Doc.,P/P/As-Linkages 3 100% 6 3.9 & above 3.4 3.87 3 3.42 4.2 3.0 4 5 5 6
9. Prepare/Review/Signed k] Certifications/Documents 50 EF 2 65 & above 57.5 - 64.5 50 - 57 1.4 1 1.40 - 1.70 1.702 - 2
(Land Use / NGO's doc.etc) Recomend'tn/ Indorsm't. 0 0% 0 0
10. Supervise Projects l] Programs/Projects(Infra) 3 100% 30 3.9 & above 3.4 - 3.87 3 - 3.42 21 15 21 - 26 26 - 30
11. Inspect/Evaluate &Sign m] Inspectorate Doc./Reports 160 100% 5 208 & above 184 206.4 160 182.4 3.5 3 4 4.25 4.26 5

Note : 1. Refer General Rule

WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend:
QN - Quantity
QL - Quality
ERNESTO B. MANUEL ROGEN E. GUARDAYA June. 27, 2004 T - Timeliness
Municipal Mayor MPDC Date APS - Ave. Point Score
( Rater ) ( Ratee ) EPS - Equivalent Point Score
0.90

0.95
 PRE-SET STANDARDS ( LOOK UP REFERENCE)

QUANTITY QUALITY TIME

PERCENT RANGING Target range Rate Target range rate

a) 1.00 1.14 6 90% 94% 6 s a) 82 115 10 j) 3.0 4.2 10

1.15 1.29 8 95% 97% 8 vs 115 139.4 8 4.2 5 8
1.3 3 10 98% 100% 10 o 139.6 164 6 5 6 6

b) 2 2.28 6 b) 69 96.6 10 K) 1 1.40 10

2.3 2.58 8 EF 10 97 117 8 1.402 1.70 8
2.6 9 10 1 8 117 138 6 1.70 2 6
c) 5.00 5.7 6 3 6 c) 75 105 10
5.75 6.45 8 105 128 8 l) 15 21 10
6.5 10 10 127.6 150 6 21.0 26 8
d) 3 3.42 6 j) 3 3.42 6 d) 10 14 10 26 30 6
3.4 3.87 8 3.4 3.87 8 14 17 8
3.9 15 10 3.9 10 10 17.0 20 6 m) 3 3.5 10
E) 10 11.40 6 E) 4 5.6 10 4 4.25 8
11.50 12.90 8 k) 50 57 6 6 6.8 8 4.26 5 6
13.00 25 10 57.5 64.5 8 7 8 6
f) 15 17.1 6 65 80 10 f) 15.00 21.00 10
17.3 19.35 8 21.03 25.50 8
19.5 25 10 25.53 30 6
g) 15 17.1 6 l) 3 3.42 6 g) 1.5 2.1 10
17.3 19.35 8 3.4 3.9 8 2.1 2.55 8
19.5 25 10 3.9 5 10 2.6 4 6

h) 20 22.8 6 m) 160 182.4 6 h) 2.0 2.8 10

23.0 25.8 8 184 206.4 8 2.80 3.40 8
 26 30 10 208 150 10 3.40 4 6
ii) 3 3.42 6 ii) 5 7 10
3.4 3.9 8 7 8.5 8
4 8 10 8.51 10 6
0.94 s

0.97 vs
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____

I, ELSIE S. MAGSAEL, Assessment Clerk I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July to
December, 2018
ELSIE S. MAGSAEL 1/25/2019
Asessment Clerk Date
Approved by: Legend: Performance Rsting

5 Outstanding Q Quality 0.0 2.0 U

DIBU S. TUAN 4 Very Satisfactory E Efficiency 2.1 3.9 s
Head of Agency ( Date ) 3 Satisfactory T Timeliness 4.0 4.9 vs
2 Unsatisfactory A Average 5.0 10.0 o

TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

No. ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATINGS
MFO / PAP SUCCESS INDICATOR ALLOTE DIVISION /
D INDIVIDUALS
QL E T BUDGET ACCOUNTABLE QL E T
100%
(%) (#) (#)
(TARGETS-MEASURES)
(%) (#) (#)
OUTPUT QL E T APS
100%

(min, per Field Appraisal & Asssessment Sheet (min, per Field Appraisal & Asssessment Sheet
A 100% 5,500 40 prepn)
1 recording/transmiittal - 100% 7,200 20 prepn) recordied/transmiitted 5 5 4 4.67
(min, per Notice of Assessment
B 100% 50 30 prepn)
5 Notice of Assessment recording/issuance - 100% 65 20 (min, per
recordied/issued 5 5 4 4.67
prepn)

(min, per (min, per Notice oif Cancellation

C 100% 10 30 prepn)
6 Notice oif Cancellation recording/issuance - 100% 15 20 prepn) recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00
Issuance delivery of Assessment
Records
(min, per (min, per
D 100% 10 30 prepn)
4 Certifications recording/issuance - 100% 25 20 prepn)
Certifications recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00

(min, per (min, per

E 100% 350 35 prepn)
5 Tax Declarations recording/issuance - 100% 550 22 prepn)
Tax Declarations recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00

(min, per (min, per

F 100% 30 30 prepn)
6 Realty Clearance recording/issuance - 100% 39 20 prepn)
Realty Clearance recorded/issued 5 5 5 5.00
(min, per (min, per
G 100% 5 40 prepn)
7 Sworn Statement facilitation/recording - 100% 10 26 prepn)
Sworn Statement facilitated/recorded 5 5 5 5.00
14 TOTAL AVERAGE RATING ………………… 34.33
FINAL AVERAGE RATING ………………… 4.90
ADJECTIVAL RATING ………………… vs
PREPARED BY: Final Rating By: Noted By:

ELSIE S. MAGSAEL 1/25/2018 FE A. GUARDAYA, REA, REB 1/25/2018 DIBU S. TUAN

Assessment Clerk I ( Date) Municipal Assessor ( Date) Municipal Mayor / Head of Agency Date

IPCR: D:/ Folder

IPCR Format File

 TBOLI MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
For the Rating Period July 1 to December 31, 2007
EMPLOYEE: Office /Division
POSITION: Unit

Part PERFORMANCE
- I.
 TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Weight Work /Activity SUPERVISOR
### QUANTITY QUALITY TIME (Hrs) QN QL T APS
Target A Target A Target A
Actual

70% 1. Formulate Plan/Prog. 1 3 100% 98% 164 prep'n 135 10 1 8 6.33

2. Prepare / Evaluate 2 6 100% 98% 138 prep'n 110 10 1 8 6.33
Reports #N/A
3. Prepare / Review 5 6 100% 97% 150 prep'n 118 8 0.97 8 5.66
(Programming) 3 15 100% 98% 20 prep'n 15 10 1 8 6.33
4. Monitor/Evaluate 10 20 100% 99% 8 prep'n 6 10 1 8 6.33
5. Review Draft Maps 15 19 100% 99% 30 prep'n 24 8 1 8 5.67
6. Prepare/ Assist #N/A
[Brgy.&Multi-Sctr'l Affairs] 15 24 100% 98% 3 prep'n 2.5 10 1 8 6.33
20 25 100% 99% 4 prep'n 3 8 1 8 5.67
7. Conduct/Assist/Orient 3 4 100% 99% 10 prep'n 8 10 1 8 6.33
Ave. ........… 6.11

30% 8. Process MDC Document 3 9 100% 99% 6 prep'n 5 10 1 8 6.33

9. Prepare/Review/Signed 50 65 EF EF 2 prep'n 1.5 10 #N/A 8 #N/A
(Land Use / NGO's doc.etc)
10. Supervise Projects 3 5 100% 98% 30 min/visit 24 10 1 8 6.33
11. Inspect/Evaluate &Sign 160 188 100% 98% 5 min/Doc 4 8 1 8 5.67
Ave. ........... #N/A
Total Equivalent point Score = ……………………………
Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation = 70%
Weighted Average Score (WAS) = …………………………
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: Note:1. TCAPT -
QN - Quantity 2. PT -
QL - Quality 3. EF -
ERNESTO B. MANUEL JAN. 04, 2007 T - Timeliness Other Raters:
Municipal Mayor Date APS - Ave. Point Score
Rater ) EPS - Equivalent Point Score
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)
Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____

Rating Period : January - June , 2016

TRANSMUTATION TABLE / REFERENCES :

EFFICIENCY ( SRT) QUANTITY TIME (%) acted on Target

0% 49% x N/A 0% 49% X 50% 70% 5

70% 100% 100% 5 50% 89% 2 70.1% 85% 4 (Head of Office)

1.5 X 101% 150% 80% 4 90% 114% 3 85.1% 100% 3

Double(2x) 151% 200% 60% 3 115% 129% 4 101% 130.0% 2 5-Jan-16
130% 200% 5 131% 300% 1 Date

EFFICIENCY QUALITY OR EFFECTIVENESS

REMARKS Optimuym
Acceptabili Meeting Client Accuracy Completeness / Creativity/ Personal
Number Acted Standard Percent(%)Act Use of %
% Weight ty Standards Satisfaction Comprehensive Innovation initiative
Upon (Qn) Response Time ed Upon (Qn) Resources ness of report Weight REMARKS
(%)

QN
EPS 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

### 5 890% 100% / 495% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

### 5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

### 5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

### 5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

### 5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

### 5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

### 5 100% 100% / 100% / / / / / / / #DIV/0!

Office /Division
 R A T I N G S

EPS

###
###

###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###

###
###

###
###
###
###

###
1. TCAPT - Task Completed Ahead Before Planned Time
2. PT - Planned Time
3. EF - Error Free
1. Subordinate
2. Client
3. Peer(Achieving Targets)
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)
Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____

Weight TARGETS QL Qn(E) T

100%
MFO / PAP SUCCESS INDICATOR QL E TIME 5 4 3 5 4 3 5 4 3

(hrs- Other Items are in % Ranging Rule Range /Bracket TCAPT

Prepn) 30% & above 15% - 29% 0% - 14% 30% 50% 29.9% - 15% 14.9% -
1 Field Appraisal & Asssessment
Issuance delivery of Assessment
70% 1 Records
Sheet recordied/transmiitted 100% 5500 40 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 7150 & above 6325 - 7095 ### - 6270 28 20 28 - 34.0 34 -

Notice of Assessment
5 recordied/issued 100% 20 21 15 21 25.5 26
50 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 65 & above 57.5 - 64.5 50 - 57 - -
0 Notice oif Cancellation
2 6 recorded/issued 100% 10 30 21 15 21 25.5 26
98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 13 & above 11.5 - 12.9 10.00 - 11.4 - -
Certifications recorded/issued
4 100% 10 30 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 13 & above 11.5 - 12.9 10 - 11.4 21 15 21 25.5 26
- -
0 Tax Declarations recorded/issued
3 5 100% 550 35 25 18 25 29.8 30
98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 455.0 & above 402.5 - 451.5 350 - 399 - -

6 Realty Clearance recorded/issued 3000% 20 20 21 15 21 25.5 26

98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 39 & above 34.5 - 38.7 30 - 34.2 - -

0 7 #REF! 100% 5 40 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 6.5 & above 5.8 - 6.45 5 - 5.7 28 20 28 34.0 34
- -
Note : 1. Refer General Rule

WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend:

QN - Quantity

QL - Quality
DIBU S. TUAN ROGEN E. GUARDAYA Jan. 04, 2004 T - Timeliness
Municipal Mayor MPDC Date APS - Ave. Point Score
( Rater ) ( Ratee ) EPS - Equivalent Point Score
 TBOLI MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
For the Rating Period June 1 to December 31, 2003
EMPLOYEE: Rogen E. Guardaya
POSITION: MPDC PRE-SET STANDARDS
Weight Work /Activity Unit of Measurement TARGETS PRE-SET STANDARDS
### (No.) QN T
QN QL TIME 10 8 6 10 8 6
(hrs- Exceeded at : TCAPT
Prepn) 30% & above 15% - 29% 0% - 14% 30% 40% 29.9% - 15% 14.9% -

70% 1. Formulate Plan/Prog. a] LDIP/AIP/ ,Plans/Profiles 1 100% 164 1.3 & above 1.15 - 1.29 1.00 - 1.14 115 82 115 - 139.4 140 -

2. Prepare / Evaluate b] Reports (Prog/Proj / 2 100% 138 2.6 & above 2.3 - 2.58 2 - 2.28 96.6 69 97 - 117.3 117 -

Reports Progress Reports) 0 0 0

3. Prepare / Review c] Pre-FS / Proposals 5 100% 150 6.5 & above 5.75 - 6.45 5.00 - 5.7 105 75 105.2 - 128 127.6 -

(Programming) d] Prog. /Projects Designs 3 100% 20 3.9 & above 3.4 - 3.87 3 - 3.42 14 10 14 - 17 17.0 -

4. Monitor/Evaluate e] Programs / Projects 10 100% 8 13.0 & above 11.5 - 12.9 10 - 11.4 5.6 4 6 - 7 6.8 -

5. Review Draft Maps f] Maps/Figures/Diagrams 15 100% 30 19.5 & above 17.3 - 19.35 15 - 17.1 21 15.0 21.03 - 25.50 25.53 -

6. Prepare/ Assist g] Documents/Plans/ 0 0% 0 0 0 0

[Brgy.&Multi-Sctr'l Affairs] Programs / Projects 15 100% 3 19.5 & above 17.3 - 19.35 15 - 17.1 2.1 1.5 2.1 - 2.55 2.6 -

h] Brgy. AIP/BDP, other Plans 20 100% 4 26 & above 23.0 - 25.8 20 - 22.8 2.8 2.0 2.80 - 3.40 3.40 -

7. Conduct/Assist/Orient i] Trainings/workshop/Confrnce 3 100% 10 4 & above 3.4 - 3.9 3 - 3.42 7 5 7.0 - 8.50 8.51 -

0 0% 0 0
0 0% 0 0
30% 8. Process MDC Doc j] Res./Doc.,P/P/As-Linkages 3 100% 6 3.9 & above 3.4 3.87 3 3.42 4.2 3.0 4 5 5
9. Prepare/Review/Signed k] Certifications/Documents 50 EF 2 65 & above 57.5 - 64.5 50 - 57 1.4 1 1.40 - 1.70 1.702 -

(Land Use / NGO's doc.etc) Recomend'tn/ Indorsm't. 0 0% 0 0

10. Supervise Projects l] Programs/Projects(Infra) 3 100% 30 3.9 & above 3.4 - 3.87 3 - 3.42 21 15 21 - 26 26 -

11. Inspect/Evaluate &Sign m] Inspectorate Doc./Reports 160 100% 5 208 & above 184 206.4 160 182.4 3.5 3 4 4.25 4.26

Note : 1. Refer General Rule

WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend:

QN - Quantity
QL - Quality
ERNESTO B. MANUEL ROGEN E. GUARDAYA June. 27, 2004 T - Timeliness
Municipal Mayor MPDC Date APS - Ave. Point Score
( Rater ) ( Ratee ) EPS - Equivalent Point Score
T

TCAPT
0%

40

30

30

30

35

30

40
VERNMENT
ATION FORM
December 31, 2003

PRE-SET STANDARDS ( LOOK UP REFERENCE)

QUANTITY QUALITY TIME

 PERCENT RANGING Target range Rate Target range rate
RDS
T a) 1.00 1.14 6 90% 94% 6 s a) 82 115 10 j) 3.0 4.2 10
6 1.15 1.29 8 95% 97% 8 vs 115 139.4 8 4.2 5 8
TCAPT 1.3 3 10 98% 100% 10 o 139.6 164 6 5 6 6
0%

164 b) 2 2.28 6 b) 69 96.6 10 K) 1 1.40 10

138 2.3 2.58 8 EF 10 97 117 8 1.402 1.70 8
0 2.6 9 10 1 8 117 138 6 1.70 2 6
150 c) 5.00 5.7 6 3 6 c) 75 105 10
20 5.75 6.45 8 105 128 8 l) 15 21 10
8 6.5 10 10 127.6 150 6 21.0 26 8
30 d) 3 3.42 6 j) 3 3.42 6 d) 10 14 10 26 30 6
0 3.4 3.87 8 3.4 3.87 8 14 17 8
3 3.9 15 10 3.9 10 10 17.0 20 6 m) 3 3.5 10
4 E) 10 11.40 6 E) 4 5.6 10 4 4.25 8
10 11.50 12.90 8 k) 50 57 6 6 6.8 8 4.26 5 6
13.00 25 10 57.5 64.5 8 7 8 6
f) 15 17.1 6 65 80 10 f) 15.00 21.00 10
6 17.3 19.35 8 21.03 25.50 8
2 19.5 25 10 25.53 30 6
g) 15 17.1 6 l) 3 3.42 6 g) 1.5 2.1 10
30 17.3 19.35 8 3.4 3.9 8 2.1 2.55 8
5 19.5 25 10 3.9 5 10 2.6 4 6

h) 20 22.8 6 m) 160 182.4 6 h) 2.0 2.8 10

23.0 25.8 8 184 206.4 8 2.80 3.40 8
26 30 10 208 150 10 3.40 4 6
ii) 3 3.42 6 ii) 5 7 10
3.4 3.9 8 7 8.5 8
4 8 10 8.51 10 6
0.90 0.94 s

0.95 0.97 vs
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)
Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____

I, __________________, Head of the _______________________________ of Tboli, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the
indicated measures for the period________________________.

TIME
EFFICIENCY (SRT) QUANTITY (%) acted on Target
Date
(Head of Office) Standard Response Time Transmutation
Table /Look-up 0% 49%
Ref

Approved by: Legend: Performance Rsting 0% 49% x N/A 0% 49% X 50% 70%

D 5 Outstanding Q Quality 0.0 2.0 U 70% 100% 100% 5 50% 89% 2 70.1% 85%
I
DIBU S. TUAN V
4 Very Satisfactory E Efficiency 2.1 3.9 s 101% 150% 80% 4 90% 114% 3 85.1% 100%

( Date ) I 3
Head of Agency S Satisfactory T Timeliness 4.0 4.9 vs 151% 200% 60% 3 115% 129%
4
101% 130.0%

I
O
2 Unsatisfactory A Average 5.0 10 o 130% 200%
5
131% 300%

/
A
I
L SCORE SHEET
TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS L
N ACTUAL REMARKS
No. D RATINGS
O ACCOMPLISHMENTS QUALITY OR EFFECTIVENESS
SUCCESS INDICATOR T
I EFFICIENCY
V O
E
MFO / PAP

Percent(%)Acte
Response Time

Optimuym Use
I

Comprehensive
Completeness /
Number Acted
U

of Resources

Acceptability
d Upon (Qn)
D

ness of report
Upon (Qn)

Satisfaction
Standard
D

Innovation
Standards
T

Creativity/
%

Accuracy

Personal
100% QL E T (TARGETS-MEASURES) U QL E T QL E T APS

initiative
Meeting
B P Weight
A

Client
U U
D
L
T
EPS
S
G QN
100% E 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
A
A T
C
C
Issuance delivery of (min, per Field Appraisal & Asssessment Sheet O ###
Assessment Records
100% ### 40
prepn)
1 recording/transmiittal ###
U
7200 30 (min,
prepn)
per
5 5 4 4.67 ### 5 100% 100% 90% 97% 95 98 98 100 95 95 95
N
T
A
B B
(min, per Notice of Assessment
25 (min,
L 1920% per
0 100% 50 30 5 recording/issuance 65 prepn) 5 5 4 4.67### 5 100% 100% 90% 97% 94 98 95 96 98 96 95
prepn) E
###
C
(min, per Notice oif Cancellation (min, per
0 100% 10 30 prepn)
6 recording/issuance 1909% 15 20 prepn) 5 5 5 5.00 ### 5 100% 100% 90% 97% 95 96 94 95 95 97 96

D
(min, per (min, per
0 100% 10 30 prepn)
4 Certifications recording/issuance 1906% 25 20 prepn) 5 5 5 5.00 ### 5 100% 100% 90% 97% 90 96 96 97 97 95 96

E
(min, per (min, per
0 100% 350 35 prepn)
5 Tax Declarations recording/issuance 1923% 550 22 prepn) 5 5 5 5.00 ### 5 100% 100% 90% 97% 98 90 98 98 97 96 96

14 TOTAL AVERAGE RATI ………………… 34.33

 FINAL AVERAGE RATIN………………… 2.45
ADJECTIVAL RATING ………………… s

PREPARED/ ASSESSED BY: ASSESSED BY: Final Rating By:

ROGEN E. GUARDAYA SALVECIO B. DAGANG, MD DIBU S. TUAN

MPDC Municipal Administrator ### Municipal Mayor / Head of Agency
Municipal Planninng and Development Office ( Date) PMT Chairperson Date Date
OPCR: D:/ Folder

Extension

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____
 TBOLI MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
For the Rating Period
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION:
July 1 to December 31, 2007
Office /Division
Unit

Part - I. PERFORMANCE

TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS R A T I N G S

Weight Work /Activity SUPERVISOR
100% QUANTI QUALITY TIME (Hrs) QN QL T APS EPS
Target A Target A Target
A
Actual

70% 1. Formulate Plan/Prog. 1 3 ### 98% ###

prep'n
### 10 1 8 6.33 ###
2. Prepare / Evaluate 2 6 ### 98% ###
prep'n
### 10 1 8 6.33 ###
Reports #N/A
3. Prepare / Review 5 6 ### 97% ###
prep'n
### 8 0.97 8 5.66 ###
(Programming) 3 15 ### 98% ###
prep'n
### 10 1 8 6.33 ###
4. Monitor/Evaluate 10 20 ### 99% ###
prep'n
### 10 1 8 6.33 ###
5. Review Draft Maps 15 19 ### 99% ###
prep'n
### 8 1 8 5.67 ###
6. Prepare/ Assist #N/A
[Brgy.&Multi-Sctr'l Affairs] 15 24 ### 98% ###
prep'n
### 10 1 8 6.33 ###
20 25 ### 99% ###
prep'n
### 8 1 8 5.67 ###
7. Conduct/Assist/Orient 3 4 ### 99% ###
prep'n
### 10 1 8 6.33 ###
Ave. ........… 6.11 ###

30% 8. Process MDC Document 3 9 ### 99% ###

###
prep'n 10 1 8 6.33 ###
9. Prepare/Review/Signed 50 65 EF EF ###
prep'n
### 10 #N/A 8 #N/A ###
(Land Use / NGO's doc.etc)
10. Supervise Projects 3 5 ### 98% ###
###
min/visit 10 1 8 6.33 ###
11. Inspect/Evaluate &Sign 160 188 ### 98% ###
###
min/Doc 8 1 8 5.67 ###
Ave. ........... #N/A ###
Total Equivalent point Score = …………………………… ###
Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation = ###
Weighted Average Score (WAS) = ………………………… ###
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: Note:1. TCAPT - Task Completed Ahead Before Planned Time
QN - Quantity 2. PT - Planned Time
QL - Quality 3. EF - Error Free
ERNESTO B. MANUEL JAN. 04, 2007 T - Timeliness Other Raters: 1. Subordinate
Municipal Mayor Date APS - Ave. Point Score 2. Client
( Rater ) EPS - Equivalent Point Score 3. Peer(Achieving Targets)
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)
Office Performance Commitment and Review Form # ____
For the Rating Period June 1 to December 31, 2003

TIME
acted on Target

PRE-SET STANDARDS
REMARKS Weight TARGETS QL Qn(E)
ESS 100% QL E TIME 5 4 3 5
MFO / PAP SUCCESS INDICATOR

% Weight
Other Items are in % Ranging Rule
(hrs- Range /Bracket
Prepn) 30%
1 0

Issuance delivery of Assessment

1931.4% 70% 1 Records 100% 5500 40 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 7150

0
1920.0% 5 100% 25
50 98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 65
0 0

1909% 2 6 100% 10 30

98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 13

0

1905.7% 4 100% 10 30

98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 13

0 0

1922.9% 3 5 100% 550 35

98% - 100% 95%-97% 90%-94% 455.0

Note : 1. Refer General Rule

WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS:

DIBU S. TUAN ROGEN E. GUARDAYA Jan. 04, 2004

Municipal Mayor MPDC Date
( Rater ) ( Ratee )
 TBOLI
PERFORM
For the Rat
EMPLOYEE: Rogen E. Guardaya
POSITION: MPDC PRE-SET STANDA

Weight Work /Activity Unit of Measurement TARGETS P

### (No.)
QN QL TIME 10
(hrs- Exceeded at :
Prepn) 30%

70% 1. Formulate Plan/Prog. a] LDIP/AIP/ ,Plans/Profiles 1 100% 164 1.3

2. Prepare / Evaluate b] Reports (Prog/Proj / 2 100% 138 2.6
Reports Progress Reports)
3. Prepare / Review c] Pre-FS / Proposals 5 100% 150 6.5
(Programming) d] Prog. /Projects Designs 3 100% 20 3.9
4. Monitor/Evaluate e] Programs / Projects 10 100% 8 13.0
5. Review Draft Maps f] Maps/Figures/Diagrams 15 100% 30 19.5
6. Prepare/ Assist g] Documents/Plans/ 0 0% 0
[Brgy.&Multi-Sctr'l Affairs] Programs / Projects 15 100% 3 19.5
h] Brgy. AIP/BDP, other Plans 20 100% 4 26
7. Conduct/Assist/Orient i] Trainings/workshop/Confrnce 3 100% 10 4
0 0% 0
0 0% 0
30% 8. Process MDC Doc j] Res./Doc.,P/P/As-Linkages 3 100% 6 3.9
9. Prepare/Review/Signed k] Certifications/Documents 50 EF 2 65
(Land Use / NGO's doc.etc) Recomend'tn/ Indorsm't. 0 0% 0
10. Supervise Projects l] Programs/Projects(Infra) 3 100% 30 3.9
11. Inspect/Evaluate &Sign m] Inspectorate Doc./Reports 160 100% 5 208

Note : 1. Refer General Rule

WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS:

ERNESTO B. MANUEL ROGEN E. GUARDAYA June. 27, 2004

Municipal Mayor MPDC Date
( Rater ) ( Ratee )
CR)

cember 31, 2003

PRE-SET STANDARDS ( LOOK UP REFERENCE: TABLE ARRAY )

EFFICIENCY QUALITY TIME

DS PERCENT RANGING Target range
Qn(E) T a) ### 5500.00 6270 3 50% 89% 2 F a) 20 28
5 4 3 5 4 3 6325 7095 4 90% 94% 3 s 28 34.0

95% 97%

Range /Bracket TCAPT 7150 7250 5 4 vs 34.0 40

& above 15% - 29% 0% - 14% 30% 50% 29.9% - 15% 14.9% - 0% 98% 100% 5 o

& above 6325 - 7095 ### - 6270 28 20 28 - 34.0 34 - 40 50 57 3

b) 5 b) 15 21

21 15 21 25.5 26 30
& above 57.5 - 64.5 50 - 57 - - 57.5 64.5 4 EF 10 21 26

21 15 21 25.5 26 30

& above 11.5 - 12.9 10.00 - 11.4 - - c) 6 10.00 11.4 3 3 6 c) 15 21

21 15 21 25.5 26 30

& above 11.5 - 12.9 10 - 11.4 - - 11.5 12.9 4 21 26

25 18 25 29.8 30 35 QN _ Continuation
& above 402.5 - 451.5 350 - 399 - - 13 113 5 25.5 30
h) 0 0 0 3 m) 0 0 0 3 h) 0.0 0
 0.0 0 4 0 0 4 0.00 0.00
0 100 5 0 100 5 0.00 0

Legend: ii) 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 ii) 0 0

QN - Quantity 0.0 0.0 4 0 0 4 0 0.0
0 100 0 100 5
QL - Quality 5 0.00 0
Jan. 04, 2004 T - Timeliness
Date APS - Ave. Point Score
EPS - Equivalent Point Score
 TBOLI MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
For the Rating Period June 1 to December 31, 2003

PRE-SET STANDARDS PRE-SET STANDARDS ( LOOK UP REFERENCE)

QUANTITY QUALITY TIME

PERCENT RANGING Target range
PRE-SET STANDARDS
QN T a) 1.00 1.14 6 90% 94% 6 s a) 82 115
10 8 6 10 8 6 1.15 1.29 8 95% 97% 8 vs 115 139.4
Exceeded at : TCAPT 1.3 3 10 98% 100% 10 o 139.6 164
& above 15% - 29% 0% - 14% 30% 40% 29.9% - 15% 14.9% - 0%

& above 1.15 - 1.29 1.00 - 1.14 115 82 115 - 139.4 140 - 164 b) 2 2.28 6 b) 69 96.6
& above 2.3 - 2.58 2 - 2.28 96.6 69 97 - 117.3 117 - 138 2.3 2.58 8 EF 10 97 117
0 0 0 0 2.6 9 10 1 8 117 138
& above 5.75 - 6.45 5.00 - 5.7 105 75 105.2 - 128 127.6 - 150 c) 5.00 5.7 6 3 6 c) 75 105
& above 3.4 - 3.87 3 - 3.42 14 10 14 - 17 17.0 - 20 5.75 6.45 8 105 128
& above 11.5 - 12.9 10 - 11.4 5.6 4 6 - 7 6.8 - 8 6.5 10 10 127.6 150
& above 17.3 - 19.35 15 - 17.1 21 15.0 21.03 - 25.50 25.53 - 30 d) 3 3.42 6 j) 3 3.42 6 d) 10 14
0 0 0 0 3.4 3.87 8 3.4 3.87 8 14 17
& above 17.3 - 19.35 15 - 17.1 2.1 1.5 2.1 - 2.55 2.6 - 3 3.9 15 10 3.9 10 10 17.0 20
& above 23.0 - 25.8 20 - 22.8 2.8 2.0 2.80 - 3.40 3.40 - 4 E) 10 11.40 6 E) 4 5.6
& above 3.4 - 3.9 3 - 3.42 7 5 7.0 - 8.50 8.51 - 10 11.50 12.90 8 k) 50 57 6 6 6.8
0 13.00 25 10 57.5 64.5 8 7 8
0 f) 15 17.1 6 65 80 10 f) 15.00 21.00
& above 3.4 3.87 3 3.42 4.2 3.0 4 5 5 6 17.3 19.35 8 21.03 25.50
& above 57.5 - 64.5 50 - 57 1.4 1 1.40 - 1.70 1.702 - 2 19.5 25 10 25.53 30
0 g) 15 17.1 6 l) 3 3.42 6 g) 1.5 2.1
& above 3.4 - 3.87 3 - 3.42 21 15 21 - 26 26 - 30 17.3 19.35 8 3.4 3.9 8 2.1 2.55
& above 184 206.4 160 182.4 3.5 3 4 4.25 4.26 5 19.5 25 10 3.9 5 10 2.6 4

h) 20 22.8 6 m) 160 182.4 6 h) 2.0 2.8

23.0 25.8 8 184 206.4 8 2.80 3.40
26 30 10 208 150 10 3.40 4
 Legend: ii) 3 3.42 6 ii) 5 7
QN - Quantity 3.4 3.9 8 7 8.5
QL - Quality 4 8 10 8.51 10
June. 27, 2004 T - Timeliness
Date APS - Ave. Point Score
EPS - Equivalent Point Score
ABLE ARRAY )

TIME
Rate Target range RATE
5 j) 0.00 0.00 5
4 0.00 0.00 4

3 0.00 0.00 3

5 K) 0 0.00 5 0.90 0.94 s

4 0.00 0.00 4 0.95 0.97 vs

4 l) 0 0 5

3 0.0 0 4
5
4
3

5
4

3
 TIME
Rate Target range rate

10 j) 3.0 4.2 10
8 4.2 5 8
6 5 6 6

10 K) 1 1.40 10
8 1.402 1.70 8
6 1.70 2 6
10
8 l) 15 21 10
6 21.0 26 8
10 26 30 6
8
6 m) 3 3.5 10
10 4 4.25 8
8 4.26 5 6
6
10
8
6
10
8
6

10
8
6
10
8
6