Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IARC T45 Full Corrected
IARC T45 Full Corrected
IARC T45 Full Corrected
OF CERVICAL PRECANCER
WALTER PRENDIVILLE AND RENGASWAMY SANKARANARAYANAN
IARC TECHNICAL
PUBLICATION NO. 45
COLPOSCOPY AND TREATMENT
OF CERVICAL PRECANCER
WALTER PRENDIVILLE AND RENGASWAMY SANKARANARAYANAN
IARC TECHNICAL
PUBLICATION NO. 45
Published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer,
150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
Distributed by
WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
(tel: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: bookorders@who.int).
Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provisions
of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved.
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of
any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status
of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or
recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its
publications, in part or in full. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate IARC publications – whether for sale or
for non-commercial distribution – should be addressed to the IARC Communications Group, at: publications@iarc.fr.
Cover image: The photo shows a mosaic blood vessel pattern and mild acetic acid uptake in a small type 1
transformation zone surrounding copious clear mucus, through which normal columnar epithelium is clearly seen.
Photo reproduced with kind permission from Dr Montserrat Cararach and the Spanish Colposcopy Society.
Manual and to cervical cancer prevention and control and improving the health of women in
Contributors............................................................................................................................................................... vii
Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................................. viii
Foreword.................................................................................................................................................................... ix
Abbreviations............................................................................................................................................................. xi
Chapter 1..................................................................................................................................................................... 1
The role of colposcopy in cervical precancer
Chapter 2................................................................................................................................................................... 13
Anatomy of the uterine cervix and the transformation zone
Chapter 3................................................................................................................................................................... 23
Squamous intraepithelial lesions: cytology–histology correlation
Chapter 4................................................................................................................................................................... 29
The effect of oncogenic HPV on transformation zone epithelium
Chapter 5................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Equipment for a colposcopic examination
Chapter 6................................................................................................................................................................... 45
A systematic approach to colposcopic examination
Chapter 7................................................................................................................................................................... 51
Colposcopic terminology: the 2011 IFCPC nomenclature
Chapter 8................................................................................................................................................................... 59
Colposcopic appearance of the normal cervix
Chapter 9................................................................................................................................................................... 67
Inflammatory lesions of the cervix
Chapter 10................................................................................................................................................................. 77
Colposcopic examination of the abnormal cervix
Chapter 11................................................................................................................................................................. 85
Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
Chapter 14................................................................................................................................................................115
Surgical management of early invasive cervical cancer
Chapter 16................................................................................................................................................................131
Follow-up after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
References...............................................................................................................................................................147
Sources................................................................................................................................................................... 164
Index.........................................................................................................................................................................170
Contributors
Authors Reviewers Professor John Tidy
G18, Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Professor Walter Prendiville Professor Margaret Cruickshank Glossop Road
Screening Group Department of Obstetrics and Sheffield S10 2JF
Section of Early Detection and Gynaecology United Kingdom
Prevention University of Aberdeen john.tidy@sth.nhs.uk
International Agency for Research Aberdeen, Scotland
on Cancer (IARC) United Kingdom
150 cours Albert Thomas m.e.cruickshank@abdn.ac.uk
69372 Lyon Cedex 08 Production Team
France Ms Mary Martin
walter123prendiville@gmail.com Suite 8 Karen Müller
Tallaght Hospital English Editor
Dr Rengaswamy Tallaght
Sankaranarayanan Dublin 24 Sylvia Lesage
Special Advisor on Cancer Control Ireland Publishing Assistant
Head, Screening Group mary.martin@amnch.ie
Section of Early Detection and Nicholas O’Connor
Prevention Professor Pierre Martin-Hirsch Publishing Assistant
International Agency for Research Royal Preston Hospital
on Cancer (IARC) Sharoe Green Lane North Krittika Pitaksaringkarn
150 cours Albert Thomas Fulwood, Preston Publications Technician
69372 Lyon Cedex 08 Lancashire PR2 9HT
France United Kingdom
sankarr@iarc.fr martin.hirsch@mac.com
Contributors vii
Acknowledgements
This book, IARC Technical Publication No. 45, attempts to guide practising or trainee clinicians caring for women
with, or at risk of, precancer and early cancer of the cervix. Partha Basu kindly contributed Chapters 14 and 15.
Profound thanks go to the reviewers of individual chapters or the entire book: Margaret Cruickshank, Mary
Martin, Pierre Martin-Hirsch, Groesbeck Parham, and John Tidy. Thank you also to those who generously allowed
their photographs to be used in this manual: Mihaela Badea, Partha Basu, Christine Bergeron, Montserrat Cararach,
Xavier Carcopino, René and Isabelle Cartier, Quek Swee Chong, John Doorbar, Goran Grubišić, David Hicks,
Michael Jeffers, Peter J. Pronovost, Ramani Rajendran, Catherine Sauvaget, and Mark H. Stoler (a full list of
sources is provided at the end of this book). All of these people were immensely helpful in preparing and editing the
manual.
Krittika Pitaksaringkarn was indispensable in keeping the project on track and managing the timely publication, as
well as performing the layout. We are grateful to our in-house publishing team of Karen Müller and Sylvia Lesage, for
ensuring the typographical, grammatical, and labelling accuracy of the text. We thank Lakshmi Sankaranarayanan,
who helped with the drawings of illustrations.
viii Acknowledgements
Foreword
Cervical cancer is preventable. A In the past few years, there has abnormalities on the cervix, and the
combination of vaccination against been enormous progress in the lesions caused by the HPV types
human papillomavirus (HPV) and understanding of the etiology and other than 16 and 18 are likely to
early detection and treatment after pathogenesis of cervical cancer, have less florid abnormal features.
screening should lead to this cancer with important implications for early Therefore, highly skilled providers
becoming a rarity among women in detection and prevention and for the will be required for accurate and
all parts of the world in the decades practice of colposcopy. Currently, a safe colposcopy practice, and thus
to come, if these life-saving preven- number of women around the world the continuing education and reori-
tive interventions are implemented. are screened using visual inspection entation of colposcopy practitioners
Colposcopy is an important triag- with acetic acid (VIA) or HPV test- with respect to the new develop-
ing investigation of screen-positive ing. Performing colposcopy in VIA or ments is essential. This manual of-
women and thus represents an im- HPV screen-positive women could fers a valuable learning resource in
portant component of cervical can- be challenging because there are this context, incorporating recent
cer screening. Colposcopy permits no prior morphological details linked developments in the understanding
careful inspection of the cervical to the screen positivity with which to of the etiology and pathogenesis of
and vaginal mucosa to detect cer- guide and interpret the examination, CIN, as well as in colposcopy and
vical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in contrast to the situation with cytol- cervical pathology.
and subclinical cervical cancer, and ogy screening. However, irrespec- Expertise in performing ad-
facilitates the treatment of cervical tive of the type of screening test equate, safe, and accurate col-
precancerous lesions under col- used, colposcopy, if it is available poscopic examinations requires
poscopic control. Well-trained and in health services, remains the best high competence in the technical,
informed providers are critical for method to direct biopsies to confirm interpretive, and cognitive aspects,
performing accurate and safe col- the severity of clinical disease and and the capability to develop prag-
poscopy. This colposcopy manual to inform subsequent management matic and effective management
was developed in the context of the of detected lesions. plans and treatment. The compe-
cervical cancer screening research Another evolution that will pose tencies needed are manifold and
studies of the International Agency substantial challenges for colpos- include: basic theoretical knowledge
for Research on Cancer (IARC) copy practice is the increasing im- of the instrumentation, the anatomy
and the related technical support plementation of HPV vaccination in and pathophysiology of the cervix,
provided to national programmes. many countries. Over time this will the natural history and manifesta-
It is thus a highly comprehensive lead to a significant decline in the tions of transient and persistent
manual, both for the training of new prevalence of HPV infection and of HPV infections, the natural history
colposcopists and for the continuing cervical abnormalities among vac- of cervical neoplasia, the cytologi-
education and reorientation of those cinated cohorts of women. On av- cal and histopathological aspects of
who are more experienced. erage, colposcopists will see fewer metaplasia, dysplasia, and cancer,
Foreword ix
and colposcopic indications and trolling bleeding and other compli- required for competence in colpos-
procedures; the ability to recognize cations; and acquisition of commu- copy. Thus, I believe that this IARC
and interpret the colposcopic ap- nication skills. This comprehensive Technical Publication will be a valu-
pearances of normal, inflammatory, and concise manual covers all these able contribution to cancer control
and neoplastic conditions; acquisi- aspects and will serve as a useful and research in the years ahead.
tion of skills in directing biopsies and handbook for acquiring the neces-
managing colposcopic abnormali- sary skills for the visual recognition Dr Christopher P. Wild
ties; treatment of cervical cancer and interpretation of colposcopic Director, International Agency
precursor lesions under colposcopic findings and for developing the per- for Research on Cancer
control; skills in avoiding and con- sonal and professional attributes
x
Abbreviations
Abbreviations xi
MRI magnetic resonance imaging
N 2O nitrous oxide
NETZ needle excision of the transformation zone
NHS United Kingdom National Health Service
OSCE Objective Structured Clinical Examination
PET positron emission tomography
RCTs randomized controlled trials
SCJ squamocolumnar junction
SIL squamous intraepithelial lesion
SOPs standard operating procedures
SWETZ straight wire excision of the transformation zone
TZ transformation zone
VIA visual inspection with acetic acid
VILI visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine
WHO World Health Organization
xii
CHAPTER 1
chapter 1.
CHAPTER 1
A positive diagnostic test result squamous intraepithelial lesion and where low rates of default from
reveals an abnormality or disease. (HSIL) level (cervical intraepithelial follow-up exist, the threshold for
Advice about management is usual- neoplasia grade 2 [CIN2] or greater). treatment may be higher, especially
ly accepted willingly. When a wom- However, in many countries with in young women. The management
an receives an abnormal cervical established screening programmes of screen-positive women would
screening test result, the expecta-
tions and fears that she carries are Fig. 1.1. Relative rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, low-grade
quite different. Cervical screening squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and cervical cancer (high-grade
tests – whether visual inspection, squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]).
cervical cytology, or human papil- 0.5 million cervical cancer cases
lomavirus (HPV) tests – do not give
a diagnosis; rather, they modify the
risk for an individual of developing 10 million
HSIL
cervical cancer. The progression to
precancer and cancer is slow and 60 million
is a very uncommon outcome for LSIL/innocent
screen-positive women (Fig. 1.1). condylomata
The threshold of abnormality at
which the risk of cancer outweighs
any disadvantage of treatment varies 300 million cases
according to patient characteristics
of HPV infection
and local service considerations. The
World Health Organization (WHO)
advises treatment at the high-grade
Fig. 1.3. (a) The ideal screening test. (b) The real screening test.
a b
2
CHAPTER 1
may be identified and referred for Fig. 1.4. Age-standardized incidence of invasive cervical cancer and
colposcopy and management. Also, coverage of screening in England, showing a decrease in incidence after
just as importantly, women who are the introduction of a national call-and-recall screening programme.
at a very low risk of progression may
be spared the interventions of biopsy
and/or treatment. Colposcopy is also
important in avoiding overtreatment
that may occur with “screen-and-
treat” programmes where false-pos-
itive rates may be very high (Basu et
al., 2015). Finally, colposcopy may
recognize invasive cancer not her-
alded by a screening test.
1.2 Management of
screen-positive women
4
4
CHAPTER 1
In 2001, a new reporting system influences modify the risk equation. 1.5 Screening and triage
for cytology smears was published in Finally, the likelihood of default from options in current practice
the USA, and at about the same time follow-up monitoring of untreated pa-
the results were published of a large tients needs to be taken into consid- There are several different scenarios
study in the USA reporting different eration. This thinking was developed where triage might be useful in the
strategies for managing minor cyto- in a clinical opinion paper in 2007 management of cervical precancer.
logical abnormalities (ASCUS-LSIL (Castle et al., 2007). The paper put Local circumstances, cost, avail-
Triage Study (ALTS) Group, 2003a, forward cogent arguments for using ability of test facilities, and expertise
2003b). To guide physicians in the a quantifiable risk assessment rather will all play a role in determining
USA, the American Society for Col- than an individual test result as the which primary screening tool is used
poscopy and Cervical Pathology arbiter of management. It extended and which secondary or triage test
(ASCCP) implemented a process the principle beyond cytology to col- is used. Examples are illustrated in
that developed broad consensus poscopy and histology (Fig. 1.7). Figs. 1.8–1.11.
guidelines to aid clinicians in man- When assessing the thresh- Primary screening tests may
aging women with abnormal cervical old for referral to colposcopy or for also be used as triage tools (cytolo-
cytology. These guidelines became treatment, some researchers have gy, HPV testing, or VIA), and some
a defensible and practical aid for a defined thresholds of risk. The 2012 are used in conjunction with others
busy gynaecologist to use in every- ASCCP clinical guidelines document to improve the test characteristics of
day practice in the USA (Massad et (Massad et al., 2013) includes a risk the primary screening test (co-test-
al., 2013; Nayar and Wilbur, 2015; of progression (Table 1.1) that re- ing with cytology and HPV; dual test-
Wright et al., 2003), and they apply flects this approach. ing, i.e. p16/Ki-67, with HPV). Finally,
to the context of screening principle
and practice in the USA. This is not
Fig. 1.7. Graphical representation of the risk of cervical precancer at different
meant to be a criticism of the process
stages and results of screening and clinical management for cervical cancer
but should make the reader wary
prevention. The risks for each stage and result are approximate risks for
about using management algorithms cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) within a screening interval.
outside of the context in which they The axis to the right of the figure represents increasing risk, from nearly
were generated. 0% (blue) to 100% (red), of cervical precancer on a logarithmic scale. Each
stage of screening and clinical management is represented by a different
1.4 Risk assessment in pattern, and the arrows at the bottom indicate the sequence of the stages.
patient management # Less than half of the cases of CIN2 on biopsy are subsequently diagnosed
as CIN3 on excisional tissue (precancer). † Within a screening interval.
* Test results at the next follow-up visit (≥ 6 months).
When to advise the asymptomatic
screen-positive woman to have fur- 100%
ther intervention requires an assess-
ment of risk. Does the risk of inter-
vention outweigh the risk of cancer
6
CHAPTER 1
Fig. 1.10. Possible triage of positive HPV test using cytology. predictive value of HPV testing is
very high. A large number of studies
have investigated how best to use
this information. HPV testing for all
known oncogenic types has been
available and approved for many
years.
There are essentially three
realms where oncogenic HPV test-
ing is of proven clinical utility:
• as a screening tool in women older
than 30 years;
• as a triage tool for women with low-
grade cytological abnormalities;
and
• as a follow-up tool for women who
have been treated for squamous or
with high-grade CIN prevents the to collect, process, and report cy- glandular cervical precancer.
development of cancer (Miller, 1993). tology are simply not available. It is
However, in LMICs, cytology has not highly unlikely that health systems in 1.5.3.1 Oncogenic HPV testing
been as successful, for several rea- LMICs will wish to establish cytology as the primary screening tool
sons. Unless strict and continuing as the primary screening tool for cer-
quality control programmes are in vical cancer prevention. Sankaranarayanan et al. (2009) first
place, cytology may perform poor- demonstrated in a large cluster ran-
ly in terms of recognizing abnormal 1.5.3 HPV testing domized controlled trial (RCT) that
lesions. It has good specificity but a single round of HPV testing was
lacks sensitivity, and in some series HPV DNA testing will probably re- superior to cytology or VIA or no
may be associated with sensitivity place or complement cytology as screening in reducing the incidence
rates of only 50% (Arbyn et al., 2009; the primary screening tool in many of advanced cervical cancer and
Nanda et al., 2000). Also, the test re- developed countries for women old- in reducing mortality from cervical
quirements are expensive, and the er than 30 years (Arbyn et al., 2013). cancer.
screening interval needs to be rela- Because of the absolute relationship Four RCTs of HPV screening
tively frequent (3–5 years). Finally, in between oncogenic HPV infection versus routine cytological screening
many regions the facilities necessary and cervical cancer, the negative have been undertaken in Europe. In
these studies together, 176 464 wom-
en aged 20–64 years were randomly
Fig. 1.11. Possible use of HPV testing for triage of positive visual inspection
assigned to HPV-based (experimen-
with acetic acid (VIA) test.
tal arm) or cytology-based (control
arm) screening in England, Italy, the
Netherlands, and Sweden.
In all four studies, the incidence
of CIN3 was lower in those women
who had initially been screened by
HPV than in those initially screened
by cytology, and similar rates of
reduction were recorded in each
study. This reduced rate was true
across all studies despite differenc-
es in screening protocols between
the studies. Because none of the
individual studies was sufficiently
large to show a reduction in cancer
8
CHAPTER 1
Table 1.2. Common indications for colposcopy Federation of Cervical Pathol-
What is colposcopy best used for? ogy and Colposcopy (IFCPC)
• A suspicious-looking cervix nomenclature or terminology (see
Annex 3).
• Symptoms suggestive of cervical cancer, e.g. persistent postcoital bleeding, persistent
intermenstrual bleeding 5. Compile a Swede score (see An-
• Cervical leukoplakia nex 4).
6. Where possible, take a video or a
• A cytological abnormality
number of pictures of the exam-
• A positive VIA or VILI screening test
ination findings so as to record:
• A positive high-risk HPV test in the presence of a low-grade or borderline smear
a. the TZ type and size
abnormality or other screening test abnormality
b. the site(s) of greatest abnor-
HPV, human papillomavirus; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid; VILI, visual inspection with
Lugol’s iodine.
mality
c. the site of any biopsy
clinics investigating lower genital tract gen before colposcopic d. the treatment, if performed.
infection. However, the great majority assessment? Misunderstanding the role of the
of colposcopic examinations are of b. Determine whether there is colposcopic examination is common,
the cervix with suspected precancer. inflammation. to the extent that some authors con-
The performance of colposcopy i. Is infection (viral, fungal, sider the major role of colposcopy
as a purely diagnostic tool is known bacterial) present, and is to be guiding the diagnostic biopsy
to be influenced by the result of the investigation and treat- (Jeronimo and Schiffman, 2006;
screening test, and there are sever- ment prudent before col- Wentzensen et al., 2015). Some
al studies where colposcopy has poscopic assessment? aspects of colposcopic evaluation
not performed well (Jeronimo and c. Confirm full visibility of the en- are contextual, and some are not.
Schiffman, 2006; Pretorius et al., tire cervix and upper vagina Diagnostic acumen and recognition
2011). However, in those countries under colposcopic view. of high-grade abnormality will vary
where colposcopy is part of a prop- d. Determine whether there is according to the prevalence of high-
erly constructed, quality-assured evidence of previous treat- grade abnormality in the clinic refer-
programme, it is associated with a ment, or any degree of epi- ral population. Other aspects of col-
very high negative predictive value thelial fibrosis. poscopic evaluation are independent
(Cruickshank et al., 2015; Kelly et Once these assessments have of case characteristics – for example,
al., 2012; Ricci et al., 2015). Also, been made, it will be possible to de- TZ type, adequacy of examination,
colposcopy is not just a diagnostic termine whether a complete colpo- hormonal status, and infection state.
tool; indeed, that is not even its most scopic examination can be undertak- Every colposcopy should assess
valuable role. en. If so, the following steps should the degree of abnormality as reflect-
The colposcopic examination be performed. ed in a simple scoring system, for ex-
should undertake and document 2. Determine the type and size of the ample the Swede score (Strander et
the following: TZ: al., 2005) (see Annex 4). Sometimes
1. Assess the state of the cervix at a. TZ type (see nomenclature in it will be appropriate to take a biop-
the time of examination, and de- Chapter 7, and Annex 1) sy, and sometimes not. Sometimes it
termine whether it is possible to b. TZ size (small or large). will be appropriate to treat at the first/
undertake an adequate examina- 3. Recognize epithelial abnormality assessment visit, and sometimes
tion (see Chapter 6). (i.e. is disease present?). not. Sometimes it will be appropri-
a. Assess the hormonal status. a. Cervical precancer non-inva- ate to take a sample for cytology, for
i. Is the epithelium well-es- sive or intraepithelial abnor- HPV testing, for endocervical brush
trogenized? mality classified as: cytology, or for other biomarkers of
ii. Are pregnancy changes i. CIN1 or LSIL cervical cancer progression. If the
present? ii. CIN2 or HSIL-CIN2 TZ is not fully visible, the examina-
iii. In postmenopausal wom- iii. CIN3 or HSIL-CIN3. tion will be incomplete. In that case,
en, is the degree of atro- 4. Document the above examination the decision about management will
phic epithelial change findings in a standard and au- depend on other case characteristics
sufficient to consider ditable format (see Annex 2) us- and whether to excise the TZ by way
prescribing topical estro- ing the most recent International of a type 2 or type 3 excision. These
a b c
Fig. 1.13. (a) Colposcopic image of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); coarse punctation. (b) Low-
power colposcopic image of high-grade CIN; coarse mosaic pattern. (c) Low-power colposcopic image of high-
grade CIN; note the atypical vessels and sharp margin at the 5 o’clock position.
a b c
10
CHAPTER 1
Fig. 1.14. (a) Microinvasive squamous carcinoma. (b) Colposcopic image of unscreened population or women
microinvasive disease. referred because of a screening test
with low specificity.
a b In deciding whether to take a bi-
opsy, the colposcopist should con-
sider whether the biopsy will alter
management. At each end of the
spectrum of suspected abnormality,
a biopsy will not usually affect man-
agement. It is where uncertainty pre-
vails that a colposcopically directed
biopsy is valuable. Figs. 1.15 and
1.16 illustrate simplified approaches
to managing suspected low-grade
HPV test, is very high (Cruickshank by infection, previous treatment, or and high-grade lesions, respective-
et al., 2015; Kelly et al., 2012; Ricci atrophy. ly, in the context of a cytologically
et al., 2015). Completely normal cer- It is possible to miss a high-grade screened population.
vical epithelium in a fully visible TZ lesion when performing colposco- Attempts to improve colposcopic
is, again, usually very clear. Lesser py, particularly if the lesion is small diagnostic accuracy vary in their ap-
grades of CIN are more difficult to and possibly transient or when the proach. One way is to improve col-
discriminate from normal epithelium, colposcopic examination is compro- poscopic quality control. The Italian
but low-grade disease carries an ex- mised by inflammation, bleeding, region of Emilia-Romagna has intro-
ceedingly low risk of progressing to or hormonal changes (atrophy or duced a voluntary quality assurance
cancer. pregnancy) such that the examina- system. The programme recently
Colposcopically directed biop- tion should be recognized as being reported an Internet-based quality
sies are sometimes necessary and inadequate. Other reasons why col- assurance programme. Of 65 col-
sometimes not. For most women, a poscopy might underperform at a poscopists in the region, 59 partici-
colposcopic impression of CIN3 in diagnostic level are that the colpos- pated in a review of 50 selected col-
the presence of a high-grade smear copist is inadequately trained or that po-photographs and classified them
warrants excision of the TZ rather the women being examined are an according to colposcopic visibility of
than a directed biopsy. Indeed, when
a quality-assured laboratory reports
Fig. 1.15. Algorithm of management where smear report is low-grade
a smear as CIN3, colposcopy will
squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)/atypical squamous cells of undeter-
reveal a high-grade lesion in the mined significance (ASCUS), given an adequate colposcopic examination
great majority of cases. In this situa- in a type 1 transformation zone (TZ) by a properly trained colposcopist and
tion, when colposcopy does not find with a cytology report from a quality-assured laboratory.
evidence of CIN3 the colposcopist
should consider a colposcopical-
ly directed biopsy and, even more
importantly, consultation with the
referring laboratory and review of
the referral smear, before deciding
management. It is far better to com-
petently perform a colposcopy than
to rely on random biopsies. When an
adequate colposcopic examination
is normal, a random biopsy will very
rarely find high-grade CIN (Song et
al., 2015; Wentzensen et al., 2015).
These comments, of course, pertain
to the colposcopic examination that
is adequate and is not compromised
Key points
• Colposcopy is an assessment and diagnostic tool and offers the best way to manage women with suspected
cervical precancer.
• A colposcopic examination should be systematic and structured and should always record the adequacy of the
examination, the transformation zone type and size, and the degree of abnormality as reflected in an objective
diagnostic scoring system, for example the Swede score.
•W
hen quality-assured, colposcopic examination has a high negative predictive value.
•E
xcisional therapy for cervical precancer should always be performed under colposcopic vision.
12
CHAPTER 2
chapter 2.
CHAPTER 1
The cervix is a fibromuscular the uterine arteries superiorly and meets the glandular epithelium at
organ that links the uterine cavity to laterally. the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ).
the vagina. Although it is described The cervix has several different The SCJ is dynamic and moves dur-
as being cylindrical in shape, the an- linings. The endocervical canal is ing early adolescence and during a
terior and posterior walls are more lined with glandular epithelium, and first pregnancy. The original SCJ
often ordinarily apposed. The cer- the ectocervix is lined with squamous originates in the endocervical canal,
vix is approximately 4 cm in length epithelium. The squamous epithelium but as the cervix everts during these
and 3 cm in diameter. The cervix
of a parous woman is considerably Fig. 2.1. Line drawing of normal female genital tract anatomy: sagittal sec-
larger than that of a nulliparous tion. In this drawing, the uterus is anteverted.
woman, and the cervix of a woman
of reproductive age is considerably
larger than that of a postmenopausal
woman. The cervix occupies both Uterus
Cervix
an internal and an external position.
Posterior fornix
Its lower half, or intravaginal part, Bladder
lies at the upper end of the vagina, Anterior Rectum
and its upper half lies above the va- fornix
Sacrum
gina, in the pelvic/abdominal cavity Pubic bone
(Fig. 2.1). The two parts are approx- Vagina
imately equal in size. The cervix lies Urethra
14
membrane separates the epithelium visual examination, it appears pale, The columnar epithelium does
from the underlying stroma. The sometimes with subepithelial pete- not form a flattened surface in the
epithelial–stromal junction is usual- chial haemorrhagic spots, because it endocervical canal but is thrown
ly straight. Sometimes it is slightly is easily prone to trauma. into multiple longitudinal folds pro-
CHAPTER 2
undulating, with short projections of truding into the lumen of the canal,
stroma, which occur at regular inter- 2.1.3 Columnar epithelium giving rise to papillary projections. It
vals. These stromal projections are forms several invaginations into the
called papillae, and the parts of the The endocervical canal is lined with substance of the cervical stroma, re-
epithelium between the papillae are columnar epithelium (often referred sulting in the formation of endocer-
called rete pegs. to as glandular epithelium). It is com- vical crypts (sometimes referred to
The basal cells divide and mature posed of a single layer of tall cells as endocervical glands) (Fig. 2.4).
to form the next few layers of cells, with dark-staining nuclei close to The crypts may traverse as far as
called parabasal cells, which also the basement membrane (Fig. 2.3). 5–6 mm from the surface of the cer-
have relatively large dark-staining Because of its single layer of cells, vix. This complex architecture, con-
nuclei and greenish-blue basophilic it is much shorter in height than the sisting of mucosal folds and crypts,
cytoplasm. Further differentiation stratified squamous epithelium of gives the columnar epithelium a
and maturation of these cells leads the cervix. On visual examination, it grainy or grape-like appearance on
to the intermediate layers of polyg- appears reddish, because the thin visual inspection.
onal cells with abundant cytoplasm single-cell layer allows penetration A localized overgrowth of the en-
and small, round nuclei. These cells of the stromal vascularity. At its dis- docervical columnar epithelium may
form a basket-weave pattern. With tal or upper limit, it merges with the occasionally be visible as a reddish
further maturation, the superficial endometrial epithelium in the lowest mass protruding through the exter-
layers of large and markedly flat- part of the body of the uterus. At its nal os on visual examination of the
tened cells with small, dense, pyk- proximal or lower limit, it meets with cervix. This is called a cervical polyp
notic nuclei and transparent cyto- the squamous epithelium at the SCJ. (Figs. 2.5 and 2.6). It usually begins
plasm are formed. Overall, from the It covers a variable extent of the ec- as a localized enlargement of a sin-
basal layer to the superficial layer, tocervix, depending on the woman’s gle columnar papilla and appears as
these cells undergo an increase in age and reproductive, hormonal, and a mass as it enlarges. It is composed
size and a reduction in nuclear size. menopausal status. of a core of endocervical stroma
The cells in the intermediate and
superficial layers contain abundant Fig. 2.3. Columnar epithelium of the endocervical canal.
glycogen in their cytoplasm, which
stains mahogany brown or black after
the application of Lugol’s iodine and Columnar cells
magenta with periodic acid–Schiff
stain in histological sections. Gly-
cogenation of the intermediate and
Stroma
superficial layers is a sign of normal
maturation and development of the
squamous epithelium. Abnormal or
Basement membrane
altered maturation is characterized
by a lack of glycogen production.
The maturation of the squamous Fig. 2.4. Endocervical crypts lined with columnar epithelium.
epithelium of the cervix is dependent
on estrogen, and if estrogen is lack- Crypt opening
ing, full maturation and glycogena-
tion do not take place. Hence, after
menopause, the cells do not mature Columnar cells
beyond the parabasal layer and do
not accumulate as multiple layers of
flat cells. Consequently, the epitheli- Crypt
um becomes thin and atrophic. On
2.1.4 Squamocolumnar
junction (SCJ)
16
Fig. 2.10. (a) Ectropion with the original squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) including the crypts and the support-
situated on the ectocervix. Inside or proximal to this is an area of columnar ing stroma, is displaced in ectropion.
epithelium. (b) Ectropion with the original SCJ situated on the ectocervix. It is the region in which physiological
Inside or proximal to this is an area of columnar epithelium. In this image, transformation to squamous meta-
CHAPTER 2
the ectropion is beginning to metaplase to squamous epithelium. plasia occurs, and it is the area that
is susceptible to cervical squamous
a b
disease.
18
Fig. 2.13. Development of squamous metaplastic epithelium. (a) The arrows epithelium, which is similar to the
indicate the subcolumnar reserve cells. (b) The reserve cells proliferate. normal glycogen-containing original
(c) The reserve cells further proliferate and differentiate. (d) Mature squa- squamous epithelium for all practical
mous epithelium, indistinguishable from native squamous epithelium. purposes. In a very small minority of
CHAPTER 2
women, an atypical, dysplastic ep-
a (40×) b (20×)
ithelium may develop. Certain on-
cogenic HPV types may infect the
immature basal squamous meta-
plastic cells and, rarely, turn them
into precancerous cells. The uncon-
trolled proliferation and expansion of
these atypical cells may lead to the
formation of an abnormal dysplastic
epithelium, which may regress to
c (10×) d (10×) normal, persist as dysplasia, or pro-
gress to invasive cancer after sever-
al years, depending on whether the
HPV infection is allowed to become
a transforming infection (see Chap-
ter 4).
20
Fig. 2.19. The typical congenital or original transformation zone (TZ). and posterior vaginal walls, as well
as the ectocervix, results in the for-
mation of the congenital TZ. Thus, it
is a variant of intrauterine squamous
CHAPTER 2
Upper limit of TZ metaplasia in which differentiation of
the squamous epithelium is not fully
Columnar epithelium completed because of an interfer-
ence with normal maturation. Exces-
Outer limit of TZ sive maturation is seen on the sur-
face (as evidenced by keratinization),
Squamous epithelium with delayed, incomplete maturation
in deeper layers. Clinically, it may be
seen as an extensive whitish-grey,
hyperkeratotic area extending from
the anterior and posterior lips of the
cervix to the vaginal fornices. Grad-
ual maturation of the epithelium may
SCJ will be located distal to the ex- fornices. The cuboidal epithelium re- occur over several years. This type
ternal os or may rarely be located maining here will undergo squamous of TZ is seen in fewer than 5% of
on the vaginal walls, particularly in- metaplasia. This late conversion to women and is a variant of the normal
volving the anterior and posterior squamous epithelium in the anterior TZ.
Key points
•T
he cervix enters the vagina anteriorly or posteriorly depending on its version.
• The position of the original squamocolumnar junction moves during periods of relatively high circulating
estrogen levels.
•
The exposed everted columnar epithelium will metaplase over time to become mature glycogen-laden
squamous epithelium, which stains iodine-positive (Schiller test-negative).
•T
he transformation zone is where squamous cervical cancer originates.
•
The transformation zone is an area of partially squamous, partially columnar, and partially metaplastic
epithelium, which lies between the original and new squamocolumnar junctions.
Squamous intraepithelial
lesions: cytology–histology
CHAPTER 3
correlation
CHAPTER 1
This chapter discusses the nat- 3.2 Historical context but were confined to the epithelium.
ural history of cervical precancer, The term “dysplasia” was coined
HPV and oncogenesis, cytology no- The precursor phase of the natural about 20 years later by Reagan and
menclature, and the cytological and history of cervical cancer is char- Hicks (1953), and dysplasia was cat-
histological recognition of cervical acterized by cellular changes within egorized as being mild, moderate,
precancer. the epithelial lining of the cervix; in or severe depending on the propor-
other words, the abnormality is en- tion of the epithelial layers involved
3.1 Current understanding of tirely intraepithelial. John Williams in the dysplastic process. Carcino-
the natural history of cervical first described intraepithelial cellular ma in situ was considered to have
precancer changes in tissue adjacent to inva- a greater degree of abnormality and
sive cancer more than 125 years to be the final precancerous state.
Cervical cancer has a long precursor ago (Williams, 1888). During the The term “koilocyte” (halo or vac-
stage. The cervix is accessible and early decades of the 20th centu- uolated cytoplasm or empty space
sheds exfoliated cells easily, and cy- ry, the concept of intraepithelial cytoplasm) was coined by Koss and
tological examination of these cells dysplasia gained acceptance (Cul- Durfee (1956). Meisels and Fortin
reveals precancerous changes that len, 1900; Rubin, 1910). It implied (1976) first recognized these cells as
are easily eradicated. The essential cancerous-looking cells confined being infected with HPV.
causative agent of cervical cancer to the epithelium above the base- Richart (1968) introduced the
is the presence of high-risk HPV, ment membrane and led to the term concept of a continuum and subdi-
which is easily detectable. Cervical “carcinoma in situ” (Broders, 1932), vided the spectrum of abnormality
cancer is a completely preventable which was defined as full-thickness into three categories, called CIN
disease. This is quite apart from the cellular changes that looked mor- grades 1 (mild dysplasia), 2 (moder-
availability of an effective vaccina- phologically similar to undifferenti- ate dysplasia), and 3 (severe dyspla-
tion. The disease should not exist. ated invasive carcinomatous cells sia). In this classification, carcinoma
24
dysplasia (at histology) may contain Fig. 3.3. Different HPV infection stages.
both types of infection, and these are
difficult to distinguish using cytology
or histology. Fortunately, develop-
ments in molecular biology have led
to specific biomarkers of cell biol-
ogy that can discriminate between
these types where doubt exists (see
Chapter 4).
CHAPTER 3
cervical cancer
26
koilocytosis in the superficial layers cannot distinguish between CIN2 architecture changes in the epithe-
and even part of the intermediate and CIN3. The changes seen at cy- lium are relatively unequivocal and
layer, but the undifferentiated cells tology will usually include a definite are disordered throughout all cellular
will be limited to the lower third of the increase in the nuclear–cytoplasmic layers (Fig. 3.6b). Cytological exam-
epithelium (Fig. 3.5b). ratio as well as abnormal nuclear ination of an HSIL cannot be as pre-
size and density and altered chro- cise, and a cytologist reporting HSIL
3.5.3 HSIL (CIN2, CIN3; matin patterns of basal or parabasal will probably describe basal cells that
moderate dyskaryosis, cells (Fig. 3.6a). have risen to the intermediate or su-
severe dyskaryosis) perficial layers, which are abnormal
3.5.3.2 Histology with enlarged nuclei and reduced cy-
3.5.3.1 Cytology toplasm, as in Fig. 3.6b.
CHAPTER 3
At histological examination of a However, the histological diagno-
With a severely abnormal CIN3 le- clear case of CIN3, the great ma- sis is not robust in the middle grade,
sion, cytology will report the diag- jority of pathologists will agree, be- and the category of CIN2 or HSIL-
nosis of HSIL. Cytology, by itself, cause the morphological cellular and IN2 contains some cases where the
virus is transforming and the risk of
Fig. 3.6. (a) Cytology slide of HSIL. The arrows indicate abnormal squa- progression is real and some cas-
mous basal cells. (b) Histological section of HSIL-CIN3. Cellular abnormality es where the virus is proliferative
prevails throughout the full thickness of the epithelium. There is an and not transforming and the risk of
increased nuclear–cytoplasmic ratio, anisocytosis, and a loss of nuclear progression to cancer is very small.
polarity. Several mitoses are present throughout the upper two thirds of the Morphological examination of tissue
epithelium. biopsies from CIN2 cases is not reli-
able, and pathologists will often not
a b
agree. Some will call the case CIN3,
and some will call it CIN1. In this sit-
uation, molecular biology tests can
resolve the disparity. To appreciate
how molecular biology tests can
help, it is necessary to understand a
little about the biology of oncogenic
HPV and its effect on squamous epi-
thelium (see Chapter 4).
Key points
•
Oncogenic (or high-risk) HPV is an extremely common infection in healthy sexually active women of
reproductive age.
• Cervical cancer is a very rare outcome of oncogenic HPV infection but does not occur in its absence. Up to
80% of women will harbour oncogenic HPV during their reproductive life, but only 1 in 10 000 or fewer will
develop cervical cancer.
•A
positive high-risk HPV test does not imply cancer, precancer, or even an active infection.
• Cytological, colposcopic, and histological recognition of cervical cancer precursor states are all imperfect,
because of their innate subjectivity.
CHAPTER 1
CHAPTER 4
All squamous cervical cancer may also be highly productive and a productive infection or a transform-
(and probably all cervical adeno- yet confer no increased risk of cervi- ing infection.
carcinoma) is associated with on- cal precancer. Many LSILs are highly The secondary biomarkers pro-
cogenic HPV, and the absence of productive and have very high viral duced at different biological stages
oncogenic HPV means that there load counts but confer minimal risk of viral activity are proteins that are
is virtually zero risk of developing of progression to high-grade lesions viral or cellular gene products, and
cervical cancer or genuine precan- and, thereafter, cancer. Fig. 3.3 illus- these proteins are measurable in
cer during the next 5 years or more trates the difference between latent, cervical samples cytologically and/or
Oncogenic HPV tests will reveal the productive, and transforming infec- histologically. In summary, oncogen-
presence or absence of viral DNA tions. A positive oncogenic HPV test ic HPV tests determine the presence
in a sample taken from the cervical does not indicate whether the infec- or absence of virus particles, but pro-
epithelium or adjacent epithelial sur- tion is latent or productive or wheth- tein biomarkers determine the virus
faces. But the presence of oncogen- er it is the much rarer transforming activity, and it is this activity that re-
ic HPV does not always mean that infection. flects the risk of progression to cer-
an active infection is present. The Fortunately, an increasing num- vical cancer. These markers include
virus may be latent or may even be ber of molecular biological markers HPV proteins, surrogate markers
present at the epithelial surface but have enabled a better understand- (e.g. p16), and methylation patterns.
not active or productive. Even when ing of the pathway that progressive Perhaps the best way to understand
an infection is present, this does lesions take (Bergeron et al., 2010; the relative value of cytology, his-
not, by itself, mean that disease Doorbar, 2006; Doorbar et al., tology, and these biomarkers in the
or pre-disease is likely. An infec- 2012). Different measurable viral or recognition and management of cer-
tion may be transient and therefore cellular products are produced at vical precancer is by looking at cy-
harmless, and this is the usual out- different stages of oncogenic HPV tological, histological, and biomarker
come in young women. An infection infection, depending on whether it is images of normality, LSIL, and HSIL.
Productive infection
E4
Real viral proteins
p16
MCM7
Surrogate markers
LSIL (CIN1)
30
4.1.3 HSIL-CIN3 because the normal regulatory in- as being HSIL that histologically ap-
hibition of p16 is diminished. With pears to be a moderate abnormality
In a case of HSIL-CIN3, cellular ac- CIN3, the morphological patterns of CIN2. The pattern of MCM, p16,
tivity is completely disordered and are again relatively clear and interob- and E4 can discriminate between
the abnormal basal and parabasal server variation is uncommon, so it whether the CIN2 is actually just a
cells get pushed up through the cel- is not necessary to use p16 because proliferative infection and is des-
lular layers. At the same time, E4 the morphological changes are clear tined to behave like a CIN1 lesion or
(which reflects cell-cycle comple- and almost all pathologists will agree whether it is associated with a trans-
tion) appears higher and higher up on the grade. forming infection and will behave like
the cellular layers and eventually a CIN3 lesion (Fig. 4.4). Here, both
disappears. p16 will be present and 4.1.4 HSIL-CIN2 E4 and p16 will discriminate between
detectable in the histological sec- those lesions that have a transform-
tion (Fig. 4.3). This is because p16 is Biomarkers are particularly helpful ing infection and are CIN3 and those
overexpressed in high-grade lesions, in the evaluation of a case reported that do not and may be classified
CHAPTER 4
E4
Real viral proteins
p16
MCM7
Surrogate markers
HSIL (CIN3)
E4
Real viral proteins
p16
MCM7
Surrogate markers
HSIL (CIN2)
Table 4.1. Recommendations for biomarkers in HPV-associated lower anogenital squamous lesions
Recommendation Comment
1. p16 IHC is recommended when the H&E morphological differential diagnosis is between Strong and diffuse block-positive p16 results
precancer (CIN2 or CIN3) and a mimic of precancer (e.g. processes known to be not related support a categorization of precancerous
to neoplastic risk, such as immature squamous metaplasia, atrophy, reparative epithelial disease.
changes, tangential cutting).
3. p16 is recommended for use as an adjudication tool for cases in which there is a
professional disagreement in histological specimen interpretation, with the caveat that the
differential diagnosis includes a precancerous lesion (CIN2 or CIN3).
4. WG4 recommends against the use of p16 IHC as a routine adjunct to histological
assessment of biopsy specimens with morphological interpretations of negative, CIN1, and
CIN3.
a. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE: p16 IHC is recommended as an adjunct to morphological Any identified p16-positive area must meet H&E
assessment for biopsy specimens interpreted as ≤ CIN1 that are at high risk for missed morphological criteria for a high-grade lesion to
high-grade disease, which is defined as a prior cytological interpretation of HSIL, ASC-H, be reinterpreted as such.
ASCUS/HPV-16+, or AGC (NOS).
AGC (NOS), atypical glandular cells – not otherwise specified; ASC-H, atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL; ASCUS, atypical squamous
cells of undetermined significance; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; H&E, haematoxylin and eosin; HPV, human papillomavirus; HSIL, high-
grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; IHC, immunohistochemistry; WG4, Working Group 4.
32
Fig. 4.5. High-risk HPV infection and its possible consequences. (a) The detection of HPV DNA in a tissue biopsy
may indicate productive (LSIL) or abortive (HSIL) infection, the presence of virus particles at the epithelial surface
without infection (e.g. from recent transmission), or a latent or silent infection. Infection requires the entry of
HPV virions into the mitotically active epithelial cells of the basal layer, which in stratified epithelium is thought
to require a microwound. In the columnar cell layers, infection is thought to be facilitated by the proximity of the
target cell to the epithelial surface, which may allow the virus to access a cell type that is unable to support the full
productive life-cycle (right). The significance of infection of different cell types remains to be properly assessed.
(b) After infection, shown in (a), expression from the viral genome can sometimes be suppressed (e.g. by genome
methylation), leading to a “silent” infection in which the viral genomes are retained in the basal layer without
apparent disease. Infection may alternatively lead to an ordered pattern of viral gene expression, leading to virus
synthesis and release from the upper epithelial layers (productive infection or LSIL [CIN1]) or to deregulated viral
gene expression and high-grade neoplasia (HSIL [CIN2/CIN3]). Persistent high-grade disease is associated with
an increasing risk of genome integration into the host cell chromosome and progression to cancer. Cells in cycle are
indicated by the presence of red nuclei. Cells expressing E4 are shown in green, and those expressing L1 are shown
in yellow. The brown shading identifies all the cells (differentiated and undifferentiated) that contain viral genomes.
(c) In most cases, HPV infections are resolved as a result of a cell-mediated immune response (left). This may lead
to viral clearance or to viral latency and the persistence of viral episomes in the epithelial basal layer without life-
cycle completion. Viral gene expression patterns during latency are not well characterized. Persistent deregulated
gene expression, as occurs in CIN3 and after viral genome integration, can lead to the accumulation of secondary
genetic changes in the infected host cell and development of cancer. This is facilitated by overexpression of the
CHAPTER 4
high-risk E6 and E7 proteins. Cells in cycle are shown by red nuclei. Brown shading in the immune latency state
indicates cells harbouring viral episomes. In cervical cancer, the viral genome is often integrated, with loss of
expression of full-length E1, E2, E4, and E5 and the L1 and L2 capsid proteins, and with deregulated expression
of E6 and E7.
Infection
and access of
viral genome
to the
basal cells
c
Viral DNA (integrated)
Persistence
Resolution and
by the accumulation
host of secondary
immune genetic
system changes
Cytology 75% sensitivity and 95% specificity HPV 98% sensitivity but low specificity
p16/Ki-67 90% sensitivity but better specificity than HPV and
similar specificity to cytology
Histology High kappa for HSIL (CIN3) p16 Pushes CIN2 to either true low-grade or true high-
Poor discrimination of CIN2 lesions grade lesion
CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Fig. 4.6. Cervical biopsy with SIL showing partial maturation; some there is a proliferative cellular state
might question the lesion grade (CIN2?). (a, c) Haematoxylin and eosin and a transforming infection, there-
morphology at low and medium power with atypical parabasal-like cells by indicating the likelihood of gen-
extending into the middle third of the epithelium (c). (b, d) Corresponding uine cervical precancer, i.e. a high-
p16 immunohistochemical stains with diffuse strong staining meeting the
grade lesion (Ikenberg et al., 2013).
definition of strong and diffuse block-positive p16. Therefore, this case is
Indeed, as Ikenberg and colleagues
best interpreted as HSIL.
concluded in their large pan-Europe-
a b an multicentre study of dual testing,
“The p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytolo-
gy combines superior sensitivity and
non-inferior [similar] specificity over
Pap cytology for detecting CIN2+.
It suggests a potential role of du-
al-stained cytology in screening,
especially in younger women where
HPV testing has its limitations.”
c d
4.3 Summary
34
Fig. 4.8. p16/Ki-67-positive abnormal basal cells.
CHAPTER 4
Fig. 4.9. Influences on the colposcopist’s management advice. TZ, trans-
formation zone.
Key points
• HPV affects the genital tract of most women early on in their reproductive life and only very seldom causes
cervical precancer.
• The negative predictive value of a negative oncogenic HPV test approaches 100% over the subsequent
5 years.
• Secondary biomarkers produced at different biological stages of viral activity are measurable in cervical
samples. Some protein biomarkers reflect viral activity rather than viral presence and are helpful in selecting
those HPV states that are likely to progress to cancer.
Equipment for a
colposcopic examination
CHAPTER 1
CHAPTER 5
This chapter describes the which allows the colposcope head to interference. Any shorter and it is
equipment needed to perform a col- be placed more precisely and with- difficult to use handheld instruments
poscopic examination and its more out interfering with the operator’s under direct colposcopic view; any
common uses in clinical practice. comfort. There are a large number of longer and it is too far to comfortably
A step-by-step description of the colposcopes on the market. Fig. 5.1
colposcopy technique and how to shows a typical colposcope mounted
Fig. 5.1. A typical colposcope with a
optimize the examination follows in on a floor stand.
movable base.
Chapter 6. Certain instrument character-
istics should be considered before
5.1 Colposcope buying a colposcope. It must be
binocular, so that depth of field may
The colposcope is a relatively simple be appreciated. This is particularly
instrument that allows examination important when performing exci-
of the cervix under light illumination sional treatment and when trying to
at various low-power magnifications. assess surface contour and perform
It consists of a binocular microscope examination of endocervical epitheli-
and light source, often incorporating um (Carcopino et al., 2014). The lens
a beam splitter to allow attachment should have a focal length of 30 cm,
of a still or video camera. It may ei- which is short enough to allow the
ther be attached to a central upright examiner to reach the cervix with in-
rigid bar, as in the original colpo- struments, swabs, and spatulas and
scope introduced in Germany in the yet long enough to allow the colpos-
1920s, or be connected to a weight- copist’s hands to move between the
ed stand with an adjustable arm, colposcope and the cervix without
Fig. 5.3. A colposcope with inte- Fig. 5.4. A colposcopy/hysteroscopy gynaecological examination couch. It
grated video camera, monitor, and may be elevated and flattened independently. A waste receptacle is fitted
data collection system attached to just below the patient’s perineum.
the colposcope’s movable stand.
38
lithotomy or semi-lithotomy position to an electrosurgical unit (ESU) has been performed, and also as an
may be used to perform colposco- (Fig. 5.5). The loop electrode is educational tool for attending colpos-
py. However, it is important that the housed in a so-called pencil. Suc- copy trainees.
base of the couch may be tilted so tion tubing will connect the ESU to
that the TZ on the cervix will become the suction speculum, and a ground 5.4 Computerized data
almost perpendicular to the colpo- plate will connect the patient to the management system
scopic line of vision. The back of the ESU. Some ESUs have a suction
couch should also be adjustable, unit incorporated into the unit; others Many companies provide a software
and it should be possible to easily do not, in which case it will be nec- package that allows sociodemo-
elevate or lower the whole couch. A essary to have a separate suction graphic, clinical, colposcopic, and
comfortable couch is hugely impor- machine. The equipment for LLETZ/ laboratory data and image capture
tant for the patient, who will need to LEEP, thermal coagulation, and cryo- as well as automatic audit of colpo-
be in position for several minutes in surgery is described in Chapter 11. scopic diagnostic performance. In
relative undress and who is very like- this way, it is relatively easy to cre-
ly to be anxious. It is important to be 5.3 Camera system ate a full audit of performance for an
able to elevate or lower and tilt the individual colposcopist and to main-
couch to allow optimal positioning Almost all of the major camera com- tain a clinical database for the clinic
of the patient. Also, an examiner’s panies will supply a camera and at- service. However, the programs are
stool that can be elevated or lowered tachment for a colposcope. Unfortu- expensive.
is very helpful. Being able to quickly nately, the colposcopes usually need
flatten the couch so as to deal with a C-mount for the camera to attach 5.5 Instrument trolley
the rare vasovagal attack is impor- to the colposcope, and C-mounts
tant. Finally, the same couch may be are expensive. Many modern colpo- An instrument trolley may seem an
used for most outpatient gynaeco- scopes have a camera system incor- unnecessary luxury in colposcopy
logical procedures (e.g. hysterosco- porated into the instrument, without clinics where budgets are tight. How-
CHAPTER 5
py, intrauterine contraceptive device the need for a C-mount. Nowadays, ever, the reusable and disposable
[IUCD] insertion, and transvaginal the cost of a reasonable video cam- equipment and the fluids needed to
ultrasonography). era is almost the same as that of a perform a proper colposcopic ex-
If a decision is made to perform still image camera, and very high amination have to be housed some-
excisional treatment, it should usu- quality video images can be obtained where, and to have them all to hand
ally be performed as an outpatient and stored for future reference. This in one compartmentalized trolley
procedure using electrosurgery to is immensely valuable as a clinical is both efficient and ergonomically
resect the TZ epithelium, i.e. LLETZ/ aid in following up screen-positive sensible. The last thing a colposco-
LEEP. A loop electrode is attached patients, whether or not treatment pist or the patient needs is to have
to wait for an assistant to find a par-
ticular instrument when it is needed.
Fig. 5.5. A portable, battery-driven electrosurgical unit incorporating a
Finally, if instruments are not housed
suction unit. Ports for the electrosurgical pencil and the ground plate are
displayed. A simple electrical battery charger access point and the on/off in a compartmentalized trolley they
switch complete the display at the front. The suction port site is at the rear are not within arm’s length of the
of the unit. colposcopist, and they should be.
Figs. 5.6–5.8 illustrate how some
reusable instruments and some dis-
posable equipment may be conve-
niently housed in a trolley. The con-
tents of the top, middle, and bottom
drawers are shown in Figs. 5.6, 5.7,
and 5.8, respectively. In Fig. 5.9, the
top surface of the trolley shows some
instruments laid out for a colposcop-
ic examination. A needle disposal
box and a fluid tray are attached on
the side (Fig. 5.10).
5.6 Reusable instruments the perpendicular plane, and a tube on the underside of the anterior
speculum that is too large will hurt blade (Fig. 5.11a). Insulated specu-
5.6.1 Specula the patient. Parity and bimanual ex- la are to be avoided, even if using
amination will reveal the appropriate diathermy. After several steriliza-
It is fundamentally important to have speculum to be used for colposcopy. tion cycles, the insulated speculum
a full set of different sized specula Specula may be metal or plastic. If can lose some of its covering, and
available when performing colposco- LLETZ/LEEP or a “small loop” di- this may not be noticeable to the
py. A speculum that is too small will agnostic biopsy is to be performed, naked eye. If this happens, an elec-
not comfortably expose the cervix in the speculum should have a suction trical contact could indeed burn the
40
Fig. 5.10. On the side of the equipment trolley are attached a needle disposal IFCPC nomenclature (Bornstein et
box and a receptacle for the acetic acid and Lugol’s iodine spray bottles. al., 2012b) as a type 1 TZ. The type 2
TZ, by definition, has an endocervi-
cal component but is fully visible to
the examining colposcopist. To ac-
curately determine the TZ type, it is
necessary to carefully examine the
SCJ as fully as possible. Also, when
investigating a suspicion of adeno-
carcinoma or glandular precancer,
it is necessary to examine the en-
docervix. This will usually require
the use of an endocervical forceps.
There are several good ones on the
market. User-friendly ones are the
Kurihara and the Desjardins forceps,
which are shown in Fig. 5.12.
patient’s vagina. With the uninsulat- Others prefer spray bottles, which Metal dental syringes house 2.2 mL
ed speculum, no such risk arises. may be less cumbersome (Fig. 5.10). vials of either prilocaine with fely-
The area of contact with the vaginal If the spray bottles are used, it is im- pressin or lignocaine with adrenaline.
skin is so large that burns are ex- portant to be aware that splashback They allow attachment of 27-gauge
CHAPTER 5
tremely unlikely even if contact with can occur and to protect one’s eyes needles, which automatically punc-
the loop or ball electrode happens from exposure either with glasses or ture the vials when they are loaded
accidentally. Also, if one ensures with the colposcope. into the dental syringes, ready for
that LLETZ/LEEP is performed at use. They allow exchange of empty
low-power magnification, the entire 5.6.3 Endocervical forceps vials for new, full ones in a matter of
loop should be visible before and seconds, so that complete local an-
during the procedure, so that con- The epithelium that is at risk of de- algesia may be achieved in less than
tact with the vagina or speculum is veloping squamous cervical cancer a minute (see Chapter 2). A loaded
extremely unlikely. Occasionally, the is usually on the ectocervix in young dental syringe is shown in Fig. 5.13.
patulous parous vagina is so lax that women, and this is defined in the The loaded syringe is long enough to
it is not possible to completely visu-
alize the cervix with the colposcope. Fig. 5.11. (a) A Cusco speculum with a suction tube on the underside of
Although lateral vaginal wall retrac- the anterior blade for smoke evacuation. (b) A condom (with its end cut off)
tors are available to attach to some placed around a Cusco speculum to facilitate examination when the vaginal
specula, they are relatively uncom- walls are exceptionally patulous.
fortable; a condom (Fig. 5.11b) or the
finger of a large glove (with its end a b
cut off) is a simpler and often more
effective alternative.
easily reach the cervix, and because the USA but are not often used in 5.7 Disposable equipment
the needle itself is relatively short, it the United Kingdom. Many patients
will not bend sufficiently to cause a find an endocervical curette to be Either a 3% or a 5% concentration of
problem with infiltration. Finally, it is uncomfortable; it often produces in- acetic acid may be used to highlight
narrow enough not to obscure colpo- adequate material and usually pre- colposcopically recognized epithelial
scopic vision during infiltration. cipitates bleeding. It rarely influenc- lesions. There is no evidence to sug-
es practice, and a good endocervical gest that one strength is superior to
5.6.5 Tissue sampling brush smear sample is considered the other, although some authorities
instruments a superior method by many. Biopsy say that the 3% concentration takes a
forceps (Fig. 5.14) need to be sharp little longer to effect whiteness. What
The threshold for taking a biopsy if they are to procure adequate biop- is important is that the same concen-
varies from one setting to another. sies, and some manufacturers make tration is used for all patients. Care
In some colposcopy clinics a biopsy disposable forceps or disposable is needed in preparing the solution;
is considered mandatory for every cutting parts for the reusable biop- disasters have occurred with glacial
examination, whereas in others a sy forceps handles. The common acetic acid, which will de-epithelial-
“see-and-treat” policy prevails for ones available are the Kevorkian and ize cervical and vaginal epithelium.
women with convincing evidence
of high-grade dysplasia (see Chap- Fig. 5.16. An array of loops used Fig. 5.17. A ball diathermy electrode,
ter 1). Endocervical curettes are for LLETZ/LEEP of different sizes used to achieve haemostasis after
routinely used in many practices in and types of transformation zone, excision of the transformation zone
and cervical biopsy loops (pink and or to seal a biopsy site.
Fig. 5.15. A small loop used to take green) used for taking diagnostic
colposcopically directed biopsies us- biopsies.
ing an electrosurgical unit.
42
Lugol’s iodine stains mature is trying to recognize or rule out the board (Fig. 5.18) before immersion
squamous epithelium dark mahoga- presence of intraepithelial neoplasia, in formalin, so that it may be sec-
ny brown and affects immature and punch biopsy forceps are adequate, tioned longitudinally and an accu-
dysplastic epithelium variably (see but if one is concerned about inva- rate assessment of the SCJ may be
Chapter 8). Saline is advocated by sive disease, a small loop electrode reported.
several authorities as a cleaning (Figs. 5.15 and 5.16) should be con-
agent before the application of acetic sidered, because it allows a greater Fig. 5.18. Cork board and pins to
acid or Lugol’s iodine. Cotton swabs depth and confidence in revealing mount LLETZ/LEEP specimens.
are useful to manipulate the cervi- the basement membrane at histolog-
cal epithelium, and jumbo swabs ical examination.
or cotton balls are alternatives (to
spray bottles) for the application of 5.8 Cork boards and pins
acetic acid or Lugol’s iodine. If treat- to mount LLETZ/LEEP
ment is contemplated, 27-gauge specimens
dental syringe needles and vials of
prilocaine with felypressin or ligno- Liaison with one’s local laboratory
caine with adrenaline are needed, will determine in which way excised
and various biopsy forceps or small LLETZ/LEEP specimens will be re-
loops are used to take colposcop- ceived. One option is to open the
ically directed biopsies. When one specimen and then pin it onto a cork
Key points
•C
ertain instrument characteristics should be considered before buying a colposcope.
CHAPTER 5
• The gynaecological examination couch should be adjustable, so that it can be elevated or lowered and tilted
to allow optimal positioning of the patient.
•V
ideo and/or still images are very valuable as a clinical aid and as an educational tool.
• Reusable instruments and disposable equipment may be conveniently housed in a compartmentalized trolley.
A systematic approach to
colposcopic examination
CHAPTER 1
A colposcopic examination may Also, optimal cervical conditions 6.1 Colposcopy training
be easy or difficult. It will be easy will make the examination easier and needs
for the colposcopist who is properly less likely to be inadequate. An un-
infected, non-pregnant, and well-es- Colposcopy expertise is attained by
CHAPTER 6
trained, is well equipped, and has a
comfortable, relaxed patient. Without trogenized cervix is ideal, but, of proper training and continuing case
these ingredients, the examination course, this is not always the case. experience. This manual is a refer-
However, colposcopy is rarely ur- ence manual and an introduction
will be difficult.
gent, and treating infection or achiev- to colposcopy rather than a com-
Colposcopy performs less well
ing estrogenization of the cervical prehensive training course. Train-
as a screening procedure than when ing in colposcopy involves several
epithelium will sometimes tip the bal-
it is used to manage women who components:
ance between an inadequate and an
are screen-positive, are symptomat- 1. Theoretical knowledge
adequate examination.
ic, or have signs suggestive of dis- a. This may be acquired at home,
Finally, it is so easy to have a
ease. Recognizing high-grade CIN online, or by reading and at-
“quick look” at the cervix with a col-
or HSIL is usually straightforward tending a theoretical course or
poscope. This is a mistake. A struc-
and unchallenging in the presence courses.
tured examination and the documen- 2. Image recognition skills
of a high-grade smear. Recognizing tation of specific findings, particularly a. These may be acquired at
a high-grade abnormality when the the TZ type (see Annex 1) and the home, online, or by attending a
screening test suggests a mild ab- Swede score (see Annex 4), will re- busy colposcopy clinic.
normality is more difficult but is re- sult in the best care. 3. Case management skills
liable if the colposcopic examination This chapter describes the a. These may be acquired online
is performed systematically as part preparation required and the steps using video case material or by
of a quality-assured service (see involved in performing colposcopy attending a busy colposcopy
Chapter 1). competently. clinic.
46
Fig. 6.1. Adjusting the colposcope eyepieces to your own interpupillary and this does not usually present a
distance. Start by placing the two eyepieces far apart. Then, while looking problem.
down both eyepieces simultaneously, move the eyepieces closer together
until the two images become one. The colposcope shown has a control 6.7 The colposcopy nurse
knob that adjusts the interpupillary distance. attendant
CHAPTER 6
the examination. Delegating this task the colposcopist, an attendant, and, nation. Have the relevant equipment
to someone else is improper. often, a trainee. The colposcopist ready, including treatment equip-
should introduce both the attendant ment, if necessary and appropriate
6.5 Consent and the trainee. Few patients will ob- at the time. The woman should be
ject to the presence of a trainee if the relaxed and fully informed. The steps
Many centres rely on verbal con- trainee is appropriately introduced. involved in performing colposcopy
sent for the colposcopic examination Finally, the examination room should competently are the following.
and biopsy, as well as for treatment, be locked and the patient made
where necessary. Other centres in- aware of this. 6.8.1 Passing a speculum
sist on written consent after provid- The stress of having an abnor-
ing extensive printed information. mal screening test and a colposcop- First, have the woman adopt the
Different medicolegal and sociocul- ic examination is significant and has lithotomy position on a gynaecolog-
tural settings require different levels been reported as being equivalent to ical couch. If the couch has a cut-out
of medicolegal protection. that of major surgery. A profession- just under the buttocks, this is ideal.
al, sympathetic attendant is hugely If not, the woman can move down the
6.6 Privacy and support reassuring to most patients, and couch so that her buttocks are just
the attendant can usually fulfil this over the end of the couch. It is almost
It is difficult for those who have not task better than a friend or relative. impossible to describe how best to
undergone a gynaecological or Occasionally, a patient requests pass a speculum without doing an in
colposcopic examination to fully the presence of a friend or relative, vivo demonstration or using a pelvic
48
Fig. 6.2. Diagrammatic representation of some image characteristics seen
at colposcopy.
Dense acetowhite
Mosaic – coarse
epithelium – mild
Dense acetowhite
Atypical vessels
epithelium – dense
Key points
• It is relatively easy to perform a comfortable and competent colposcopic examination, providing that circum-
stances are optimized.
• Performing the ideal colposcopy requires a relaxed and informed patient, a trained colposcopist, a nurse
assistant, and a set of appropriate equipment.
• Colposcopic examination should be performed in a systematic and structured way, which documents the
adequacy of the examination, the type and size of the transformation zone, and the degree of abnormality as
CHAPTER 6
reflected in an objective diagnostic scoring system, for example the Swede score.
CHAPTER 1
In any branch of science, pro- the screening itself that reduces the treated, precise excision of the TZ
gress evolves from a clear under- risk of cervical cancer, but rather the is associated with the lowest risk of
standing of previous research and subsequent treatment of screen-pos- pregnancy-related morbidity (Khalid
experience. Clarity of terminology itive women who are found to be at et al., 2011; Carcopino et al., 2013)
and practice is fundamental to un- significant risk of developing cancer. and the highest chance of achieving
derstanding both published research Most screen-positive women are successful eradication of all precan-
and reports of experience in similar at very low risk of progression to can- cerous epithelium (Ghaem-Maghami
and in different clinical circumstanc- cer. These women may be reassured et al., 2007; Manchanda et al., 2008).
es. Otherwise, it is very difficult to and followed up appropriately. Col-
accurately compare existing prac- poscopic assessment of the grade of 7.1 Terms that have been
CHAPTER 7
tice or to evaluate new evidence. abnormality, and therefore the risk of omitted from the 2011 IFCPC
The latest IFCPC nomenclature progression, is crucial to the process nomenclature
(Bornstein et al., 2012a) attempts to of managing screen-positive women.
bring greater clarity to terminology in So also is assessment of other TZ To most colposcopists in the United
diagnostic and therapeutic colpos- characteristics, for example the TZ Kingdom, “cone biopsy” means ex-
copy practice. Individual terms are site and size, and the visibility of the cision of a significant portion of the
listed in Annex 3. entire TZ. Most importantly, when endocervical canal, and the term
Screening programmes for cer- properly undertaken, colposcopy will would be reserved for those cervices
vical precancer have reduced the in- reduce the risk of both overtreatment where the lesion is thought to be out
cidence of cervical cancer, especial- and undertreatment. of colposcopic view in the endocer-
ly in those countries with properly For those women who are at a vical canal, either wholly or in part.
organized, quality-assured call-and- relatively high risk of progression However, to many colposcopists in
recall systems. Of course, it is not to cancer and who do need to be the USA and Europe, “cone biopsy”
Fig. 7.1. Type 1 transformation zone (TZ). (a) Illustration. (b–d) Examples of
type 1 TZs. In each, the entire TZ is visible on the ectocervix.
a Transformation Zone b
Classification
Type 1
• Is completely
ectocervical
• Is fully visible
• May be small
or large
c d
Fig. 7.2. Type 2 transformation zone (TZ). (a) Illustration; the upper limit of the TZ is in the endocervical canal but is
visible below the upper limit of visibility, here represented by the horizontal line. (b, c) A large type 2 TZ; two images
of the same cervix. The upper limit of the TZ is easily seen on the posterior lip but is visible in the canal only with the
aid of a cotton swab. In this young woman, the abundant and clear mucus of an uninfected and well-estrogenized
cervix allows easy manipulation and visualization of the lower endocervical canal and the upper limit of the TZ.
a Transformation Zone b c
Classification
Type 2
• Has endocervical
component
• Is fully visible
• May have
ectocervical
component, which
may be small or large
52
Fig. 7.3. Type 3 transformation zone (TZ). (a) Illustration; the upper limit of the TZ extends beyond the upper limit
of visibility, here represented by the horizontal line. (b, c) Examples of type 3 TZs. In each, the upper limit of the TZ
cannot be seen, because it extends into the canal above the field of view.
a Transformation Zone b c
Classification
Type 3
• Has endocervical
component
• Is not fully visible
• May have
ectocervical
component, which
may be small or large
The visibility and precise location to assess completely, and treat- and 7.6. They relate exactly to the
of the TZ influence both whether col- ment will be associated with greater TZ types 1 and 2. A type 3 excision,
poscopy is adequate and the method difficulty, a higher risk of morbidi- in contrast, may be used in several
of treatment. ty (Khalid et al., 2011), and an in- circumstances not dictated purely by
creased risk of failure to eradicate TZ type. For example, excision of a
7.4 Excision type the disease (Ghaem-Maghami et al., glandular lesion will usually warrant
2007). The TZ excision types are il- a type 3 excision. Also, some clini-
A fully visible ectocervical and small lustrated in Fig. 7.4. Table 7.1 lists the cians may wish to perform a type 3
TZ is both easy to assess and sim- excisional treatments and when they excision in the presence of microin-
ple to treat, either by destruction or are indicated. vasive disease in a woman who has
by simple excision. In contrast, a The first two excision types, types completed her family or in a patient
large type 3 TZ will not be possible 1 and 2, are illustrated in Figs. 7.5 who has previously been treated.
Fig. 7.4. Excision types. (a) Type 1 excision. The dotted green line resects a completely ectocervical or type 1
transformation zone (TZ). In this case, which is the most common in women of reproductive age, the LLETZ/LEEP
procedure need not encroach on the endocervical canal and need not be greater than 8 mm thick throughout the
resection. A small type 1 TZ may also be treated by destruction of the TZ. (b) Type 2 excision. The dotted green
line resects a type 2 TZ, which, although it has an endocervical component, is still completely visible with the
colposcope. In this case, the amount of excised endocervical epithelium may be tailored according to how far up the
canal the TZ extends. (c) Type 3 excision. The dotted green line resects a longer and larger amount of tissue. In this
case, the upper limit of visibility does not reach the upper limit of the TZ, and the excision has to resect a significant
proportion of endocervical epithelium.
a Type 1 Excision b Type 2 Excision c Type 3 Excision
CHAPTER 7
Fig. 7.5. Type 1 excision with LLETZ/ Fig. 7.7. (a, b) Type 3 excision using a large loop (LLETZ/LEEP). (c, d) Type 3
LEEP. excision using a straight wire (SWETZ).
a b
54
Fig. 7.8. The “top-hat” resection. (a) A first pass of the loop resects the 7.6.2 Abnormal colposcopic
ectocervical TZ and a part of the endocervical TZ. (b) A second pass with a findings
smaller loop resects a further part of the endocervical TZ.
Where a squamous lesion is pres-
a b ent, it will be either proximal or distal
to the original SCJ. In other words,
it may be inside or outside the TZ.
The lesion may be small or large and
cover from one to four quadrants of
the TZ. The size of the lesion and
the proportion of the TZ that it covers
appear to be important predictors of
lesion grade, and this is included as
one of the indices of severity in the
Swede score (see Annex 4).
Fig. 7.7 depicts two different ways 7.6 Colposcopic terminology Minor-grade changes include
of performing a type 3 excision: the of cervical epithelium fine vascular patterns (i.e. mosaicism
first with LLETZ/LEEP using a longer or punctation), faint white epithelial
loop, and the second using a straight 7.6.1 Normal colposcopic uptake after the application of 3%
wire excision of the TZ (SWETZ), as findings or 5% acetic acid, irregular or geo-
described by Camargo et al. (2015). graphical borders, and satellite le-
Finally, Fig. 7.8 illustrates the “top- Normal epithelial variations that may sions. Major-grade changes include
hat” technique for removing a type 2 be recognized at colposcopic exam- sharp lesion borders, inner borders
or type 3 TZ. The top-hat excisional ination of the cervix include original (within the TZ), the ridge sign, dense
technique has little to recommend it, squamous epithelium, nabothian and/or rapid uptake of acetic acid,
because it compromises histological follicles (also known as nabothian coarse vascular patterns (mosaic or
interpretation. cysts), metaplastic squamous ep- punctate), and “cuffed” crypt or gland
ithelium, crypt or gland openings, openings.
7.5 The excised specimen and decidual changes associated Non-specific abnormal findings
with pregnancy. include leukoplakia (keratosis or
The size of the excised TZ specimen
is proportional to the risk of subse- Fig. 7.9. An opened LLETZ/LEEP specimen after removal, with the dimen-
quent pregnancy-related complica- sions used to determine thickness, length, and circumference.
tions, so accurate dimensional terms
are important. Some terms have
consensus agreement, and oth-
ers, like “depth”, do not. In the 2011
IFCPC nomenclature, the terms
“depth” and “height” have been aban-
CHAPTER 7
doned. “Length” and “thickness” of
an opened specimen are universally
understood and are included in the
2011 IFCPC nomenclature. When
multiple excision specimens are ob-
tained, as is the case with the top-hat
technique, each specimen should be
measured separately. Fig. 7.9 de-
picts the dimensions of the opened
specimen (thickness, length, and
circumference) just before pinning
onto a cork board and immersion in
formalin.
Fig. 7.10. Satellite lesions. In this Fig. 7.11. A small lesion occupying Fig. 7.12. A large lesion occupying
normal cervix, there are two small only one quadrant of the transfor- more than three quadrants of a large
satellite lesions outside the transfor- mation zone, with several satellite transformation zone.
mation zone. lesions at the 12 o’clock position.
56
containing high-grade or invasive cannot reliably determine which. (Rubio and Thomassen, 1976). Cer-
neoplasia (Hammes et al., 2007). The uptake of Lugol’s iodine is part vical polyps are placed in the cate-
In truth, leukoplakia may cover of the non-specific findings because gory of miscellaneous findings. They
innocent or pathological epitheli- several publications have suggested may, of course, be ectocervical or
um, and colposcopic examination relatively poor reliability of the test endocervical in origin.
Key points
• The 2011 IFCPC nomenclature is the global reference standard for cervical colposcopic examination findings.
• Transformation zone type and size as well as transformation zone excision type have been included in the
latest nomenclature.
• Using the IFCPC classification allows valid comparison between researchers publishing research or reports
of experience.
CHAPTER 7
Colposcopic appearance
of the normal cervix
CHAPTER 1
The anatomy of the cervix has Because CIN and squamous cer- original squamous epithelium may
been outlined in Chapter 2. The col- vical cancer always derive from the appear slightly darker pink com-
poscopic appearances of normal TZ, it is essential that the entire TZ pared with the lighter shade of the
squamous epithelium, columnar can be visualized for the colposco- metaplastic squamous epithelium
epithelium, the SCJ, immature and pist to be able to recognize or rule of the TZ. If one looks closely, it is
mature metaplasia, and the congen- out disease. The ectocervical part apparent in some women that a few
ital TZ are described in this chapter. of the TZ is very rarely inaccessible, crypt openings, which look like tiny
An awareness of and the ability to but the upper limit of the TZ may be circular holes, are scattered over the
identify the colposcopic features of partially or wholly endocervical, and surface of the squamous epithelium
the normal cervix provide the basis it may be partially or fully visible to of the TZ (Figs. 8.1 and 8.2). When
for recognizing abnormal cervical the examining colposcopist. Even these are occluded, they become
epithelium. though no abnormal findings may nabothian follicles. Looking distally,
The most important anatomical be evident in the visible, ectocervical away from the os towards the outer
entity in colposcopy is the TZ. This part of the TZ, the presence of cervi- part of the ectocervix, one comes to
anatomical zone is where CIN and cal neoplasia in the hidden, endocer- a point where no more crypt open-
invasive cervical carcinoma arise. vical component cannot be ruled out. ings and/or nabothian follicles are
An examination is adequate if it apparent. An imaginary line drawn
is possible to examine the entire TZ 8.1 After application of connecting the most distal of these
CHAPTER 8
without it being obscured by inflam- normal saline solution defines the original SCJ (the junction
mation, atrophy, bleeding, scarring, between the original or native squa-
or other problems. 8.1.1 Squamous epithelium mous epithelium and the metaplastic
The TZ is categorized according squamous epithelium). The original
to the site, size, and visibility of the Squamous epithelium is pink, par- SCJ forms the outer, distal, or cau-
TZ (Annex 1). tially translucent, and smooth. The dal border of the TZ through its entire
Most distal cervical crypt In most young women, the new SCJ
opening Area of original
squamous epithelium will be located at or close to the cer-
vical os (Figs. 8.2 and 8.3a). The co-
lumnar epithelium, surrounded by the
360° circumference. Sometimes, it is to visualize the new SCJ, by the new SCJ, may appear at first glance
the subtle colour variation between gentle use of an endocervical for- to be “an erosion”, which of course
the native and metaplastic or dys- ceps such as the Desjardins or the it is not. An erosion implies denud-
plastic squamous epithelium that de- Kurihara forceps (Fig. 5.12). If the ed epithelium, and erosions do often
fines the original SCJ. Unfortunately,
this method is not foolproof. Lugol’s Fig. 8.2. A series of images of a normal cervix at increasing magnifications.
iodine is also an unreliable test of The patient was in early reproductive life and mid-cycle. The cervix is well
the outer limit of the TZ, because the estrogenized, and normal columnar epithelium is clearly seen through
metaplastic epithelium covering the abundant clear mucus. The last image is after the application of Lugol’s
TZ may be more or less mature and iodine. The outer limit of the transformation zone does not coincide with
therefore strongly or weakly positive. iodine positivity, because much of the transformation zone is often covered
by relatively mature squamous epithelium, as in this case.
Finally, glands underneath the ap-
parent outer reaches of the TZ may
travel distally underneath the surface
epithelium, and these glands are, of
course, part of the TZ epithelium.
The next task is to identify the
proximal or inner border of the TZ,
which defines the new SCJ, which is
the line of demarcation between the
metaplastic squamous epithelium of
the TZ and the native and untrans-
formed columnar epithelium above
the TZ (Figs. 8.2 and 8.3a). Where
the new SCJ is situated and wheth-
er it is fully visible will determine
the TZ type. The new SCJ tends to
recede towards, and eventually into,
the endocervical canal as a woman
ages, most particularly after meno-
pause (Fig. 8.3b). It is often possible
60
Fig. 8.3. (a) Squamocolumnar junction; clear demarcation between pattern is seen in or through the orig-
normal columnar epithelium and transformation zone epithelium. (b) The inal squamous epithelium.
squamocolumnar junction is not visible here, in a postmenopausal woman. The appearances of ectocer-
It is in the endocervical canal. vical vessels described above are
more prominent towards the outer
a b
TZ, closer to the original SCJ. In
the more recently formed immature
metaplastic squamous epithelium
closer to the new SCJ, other vascu-
lar patterns become more prominent.
These are large (compared with cap-
illaries) branching surface vessels
with three recognizable basic pat-
terns (Fig. 8.5). The first pattern is
much like a tree branching, and the
look red. Normal columnar epithelium Two types of capillaries are ap- second is commonly seen overlying
is single-layered and therefore looks parent in or underneath the native or nabothian cysts (Figs. 8.5 and 8.6).
redder than the surrounding pinkish original squamous epithelium: reticu- The regular structure and branching
squamous epithelium. The columnar lar (network) or hairpin-shaped capil- of the blood vessels suggest a be-
epithelium is thrown into crypts or laries (Fig. 8.5). The reticular pattern nign (normal) nature. A third pattern
folds, which often produce a grape- is especially visible because the sometimes occurs when healing has
like or villous appearance, in contrast epithelium is thinner, for example in taken place after therapy for CIN,
to the smooth, light pink squamous women using oral contraceptives and when the vessels are long and run
epithelium, which is multilayered and in postmenopausal women. The hair- parallel to one another.
does not allow the stromal redness pin capillaries actually ascend ver- The vessels in the columnar epi-
to penetrate as easily. Each colum- tically, loop over, and then descend thelium are actually terminal capillary
nar villous structure contains a fine back into the stroma where they networks. One capillary network is
capillary (Fig. 8.4), and the blood in came from. Because these loops are confined to the stromal core of each
the capillary and the vascularity of seen end-on, the colposcopic view
grape-like villus (Fig. 8.4), which
the underlying connective tissue give usually is of dots with only a slight,
projects up to the epithelial surface.
the columnar epithelium its strikingly if any, appearance of a loop at each.
With the colposcope, the rounded
dark reddish appearance. Small pol- Inflammation of the cervix (e.g. tricho-
yps may be detected during exami- moniasis) often causes hairpin ves- tips of the individual villi are the main
nation of the endocervical canal. sels to form staghorn-like shapes, features seen, and the top of the ves-
so that the vessels become more sel network in each villus appears as
8.1.3 Vasculature prominent and the loop appearance a dot. Large, deep branching vessels
is more apparent. Often, no vascular may be seen in some cases.
If a green or blue filter is used after
cleaning away mucus with saline, Fig. 8.4. Diagrammatic representation of the capillary network projecting up
the vasculature will be easier to see. into a columnar villus.
These filters remove the background
redness, thereby enhancing the im-
age of the vessels, which will ap-
Columnar epithelium
pear to be black. Using higher-pow-
er magnification (about 10×) is also
helpful. Depending on the thickness
CHAPTER 8
Efferent capillary
or opacity of the overlying squamous Afferent capillary
epithelium, smaller vessels may or Connective tissue
may not be visible. The smaller ves-
sels that may be visible are capillar-
ies that are in the stroma below the
epithelium.
62
Fig. 8.6. Normal branching vessels 2006). In the earliest stage, the trans- 8.3 Nabothian follicles
(labelled a) stretched over a nabo- lucence of the columnar epithelial villi
thian follicle. is lost and the villi become opaque at Immature metaplastic epithelium
their tips; the villi widen and flatten, eventually becomes fully developed
and successive villi fuse into clusters mature metaplastic squamous epi-
and sheets with a pale pink colour. thelium resembling the original native
a
Consequently, the metaplastic ep- squamous epithelium, except for the
a ithelium looks like a patchily distrib- presence of some crypts (Fig. 8.3a)
uted pale cluster, or sheet-like area, or nabothian follicles in the meta-
in the ectopic columnar epithelium plastic epithelium (Fig. 8.6). Nabothi-
(Fig. 8.7a). an follicles may appear as white, dot-
As the metaplasia progresses, like areas in the beginning, before
the grape-like configuration of the they enlarge with progressive accu-
columnar epithelium disappears mulation of mucus within the follicle,
(Fig. 8.7b) and the spaces between presenting as pimple- or button-like
the villi are fused with glassy, pink- ivory-white or mildly yellowish ar-
ish-white finger- or tongue-like mem- eas. The typical vessel formations
but in truth it does not usually af- branes pointing towards the external in the metaplastic epithelium include
fect management. The differences long regular branching vessels with
os (Fig. 8.7c). There may be nu-
between normal, metaplastic, and gradually decreasing calibre and a
merous crypt openings and islands
low-grade squamous lesions are network of regular branching ves-
of columnar epithelium scattered
not reliably recognizable colposcop- sels. These vascular patterns may
throughout the metaplastic epitheli-
ically and are not important clinical- be seen more prominently over the
um. The rims of the crypt openings
ly. Women should be treated if they nabothian follicles simply because
have evidence of HSILs that are truly may not turn white with acetic acid they have been stretched over the
precancerous (HSIL-IN3) – this is early in the process of metaplasia, distending surface of the follicle.
when a transforming infection has but may turn mildly white as the
taken place – and not when there is metaplastic process progresses. 8.4 Cervical polyps
a LSIL or squamous metaplasia (see Gradually, the tongue-like metaplas-
Chapters 4 and 11). tic areas fuse together to form a con- Cervical polyps are common and
The development of squamous tinuously advancing glassy, shining, are usually benign. When they are
metaplasia may be recognized col- pinkish-white, or mildly pale epithe- protected in the endocervical ca-
poscopically (Jordan and Singer, lial area. nal by endocervical mucus, their
Fig. 8.7. (a) Early immature squamous metaplasia seen after acetic acid application. The tips of the villi are becoming
white (labelled a), and some are fusing together (labelled b). (b) Immature squamous metaplasia seen after acetic
acid application. Some of the villi have coalesced to form a thin squamous layer (labelled a). In other areas, some villi
are beginning to fuse together (labelled b). (c) Immature metaplasia seen after acetic acid application. Peninsulas
or tongues of metaplastic epithelium can be seen (labelled a), and some crypt openings are apparent (labels b and
c, also arrow).
a b c
b CHAPTER 8
a b
a
b
a a a
b
c
Fig. 8.9. (a) Clear distinction between full uptake of Lugol’s iodine in the native squamous epithelium (Schiller
test-negative) outside a transformation zone and no uptake in the immature squamous metaplastic epithelium
(Schiller test-positive). (b) Immature squamous metaplasia in this normal transformation zone before the application
of Lugol’s iodine. (c) Minimal patchy uptake of Lugol’s iodine in this normal transformation zone with immature
squamous metaplasia (labelled a) (same cervix as in part b).
a b c
64
Key points
•S
quamous epithelium appears smooth and translucent, with a pinkish tinge.
• The original squamous epithelium, i.e. outside the transformation zone, appears slightly darker pink than the
metaplastic epithelium within the transformation zone.
•C
olumnar epithelium appears darker red, with a grape-like or villous appearance.
•O
ften no vascular patterns are seen in or through the original squamous epithelium.
• After the application of acetic acid, the transformation zone squamous epithelium appears dull and pale in
contrast to the usual pink hue.
• Squamous metaplasia has a range of colposcopic appearances, which cannot be reliably distinguished from
low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
• Both the original squamous and the mature squamous metaplastic epithelium of the transformation zone stain
mahogany brown with Lugol’s iodine (Schiller test-negative).
• Immature squamous metaplastic epithelium will usually partially take up Lugol’s iodine.
•P
ostmenopausal squamous epithelium will not take up Lugol’s iodine (Schiller test-positive).
CHAPTER 8
Inflammatory lesions
of the cervix
CHAPTER 1
This chapter describes the col- and other non-proprietary formula- 9.1 Wet preparation,
poscopic appearances of a variety tions that have been prescribed for cytological, and histological
of common inflammatory condi- symptomatic reasons. Table 9.1 lists appearances of infection
tions but is not a substitute for a the common infections responsible
for cervicovaginitis. Lower genital The infective organism responsible
full description of lower genital tract
tract infections are usually symptom- for cervicovaginitis is most accu-
infection.
rately identified in the laboratory. At
The interested reader is referred atic and should always be treated.
Pruritus and vaginal discharge, a tissue level, inflammatory changes
to Hicks (2002) for a fuller descrip-
which is often offensive, and dysuria in the epithelium are characterized
tion of the investigation and manage-
and introital dyspareunia are addi- by vascular hypertrophy and intraep-
ment of gynaecological infections.
tional burdens for affected women. ithelial cellular damage and denuda-
Inflammatory conditions are ex- tion. Cellular layers may be denuded
They should always be treated.
tremely common in many parts of through the full spectrum of desqua-
The more common infections are
the Southern Hemisphere and in mation, from fewer epithelial layers
trichomoniasis (caused by Tricho-
particular for socioeconomically dis- to frank ulceration. In the deeper
monas vaginalis), candidiasis, bac-
advantaged women. They are usu- terial vaginosis, chlamydia, gonor- layers, the cells may be enlarged
ally, but not always, caused by infec- rhoea, and herpes simplex. and swollen with a neutrophilic infil-
tion, which may be viral, bacterial, or Less common infections that oc- tration. There is an associated col-
protozoal. cur in the cervicovaginal epithelium lection of cellular debris and fluid as
Non-infective causes of inflam- are tuberculosis, amoebiasis, schis- discharge on the epithelial surface.
mation include a foreign body (tam- tosomiasis, Haemophilus ducreyi, Gram staining or even cytological
pon, IUCD), trauma, or chemical ir- Mycoplasma hominis, and Esche- examination of infection is diagnosti-
ritation in the form of gels, creams, richia coli. cally specific.
CHAPTER 9
Treatment guidelines
Reproductive tract
infection
Non-pregnant women Pregnant women
Trichomonas vaginalis Metronidazole 400–500 mg orally, 2 times daily for Metronidazole 400–500 mg orally, 2 times daily for
(trichomoniasis) 7 days or a single dose of metronidazole 2 g orally or a 7 days. High-dose treatment not recommended. Safety
single dose of tinidazole 2 g orally. of tinidazole not well evaluated.
Candidiasis Clotrimazole pessary 500 mg immediately or clotrimazole Clotrimazole pessary 200 mg for 3 nights or
pessary 200 mg for 3 nights or a single dose of clotrimazole pessary 100 mg for 6 nights. Oral treatment
fluconazole 150 mg orally. All topical and oral azoles are contraindicated.
effective.
Bacterial vaginosis Metronidazole 400 mg orally, 2 times daily for 5–7 days Metronidazole 400 mg orally, 2 times daily for 5–7 days
or metronidazole 2 g immediately or intravaginal or intravaginal metronidazole gel (0.75%) once daily for
metronidazole gel (0.75%) once daily for 5 days or 5 days or intravaginal clindamycin cream (2%) once daily
intravaginal clindamycin cream (2%) once daily for for 7 days.
7 days.
Chlamydial infection Doxycycline 100 mg orally, 2 times daily for 7 days or a A single dose of azithromycin 1 g orally or erythromycin
single dose of azithromycin 1 g orally. 500 mg orally, 4 times daily for 7 days or amoxicillin
500 mg orally, 3 times daily for 7 days. Pregnant women
require a test of cure.
Gonococcal infection Refer to local sensitivity data. Refer to local sensitivity data.
A single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg plus a A single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg plus a
single dose of oral azithromycin 2 g. Alternatives include single dose of oral azithromycin 1 g. Alternatives include
a single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg or a a single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg or a
single dose of intramuscular spectinomycin 2 g plus a single dose of intramuscular spectinomycin 2 g plus a
single dose of oral azithromycin 2 g or other regimens as single dose of oral azithromycin 1 g or other regimens as
guided by sensitivities. guided by sensitivities.
Syphilis Early syphilis: A single dose of intramuscular benzathine Early syphilis: A single dose of intramuscular benzathine
penicillin 2.4 MU or doxycycline 100 mg, 2 times daily for penicillin 2.4 MU or intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg,
14 days. once daily for 10 days.
Late syphilis: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin 2.4 MU Late syphilis: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin 2.4 MU
weekly for 3 doses or doxycycline 100 mg, 2 times daily weekly for 3 doses.
for 28 days. Neurosyphilis: Seek specialist advice.
Neurosyphilis: Seek specialist advice.
Lymphogranuloma Doxycycline 100 mg orally, 2 times daily for 21 days or Erythromycin 500 mg orally, 4 times daily for 21 days.
venereum erythromycin 500 mg orally, 4 times daily for 21 days.
Chancroid Ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally, 2 times daily for 3 days or A single dose of azithromycin 1 g orally or erythromycin
a single dose of azithromycin 1 g orally or erythromycin 500 mg orally, 4 times daily for 7 days.
500 mg orally, 4 times daily for 7 days.
Granuloma inguinale Azithromycin 1 g orally, weekly or ciprofloxacin 500 mg, Erythromycin 500 mg, 4 times daily for 3 weeks or until
2 times daily or doxycycline 100 mg, 2 times daily. All ulcers have healed.
treatment should be for a minimum of 3 weeks or until
lesions have healed.
Genital herpes Acyclovir 400 mg orally, 3 times daily for 5 days or Acyclovir 400 mg orally, 3 times daily. Seek specialist
famciclovir 250 mg, 3 times daily for 5 days. advice.
Pelvic inflammatory A single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg plus A single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg plus a
disease a single dose of azithromycin 1 g orally plus doxycycline single dose of azithromycin 1 g orally plus erythromycin
100 mg, 2 times daily and metronidazole 400 mg, 2 times 500 mg orally, 4 times daily for 14 days. Poor evidence
daily for 14 days. available.
Figs. 9.1–9.9 show examples 9.2 Colposcopic appearance epithelial damage. The inflammato-
of specific infections recognized at of cervicovaginitis ry response does not usually reflect
either Gram staining or cytological the infecting organism. The vascular
examination. Cytology is not the The epithelium of a mild infection response includes redness, puncta-
best method of detecting cervico- may be minimally altered, but by the tion (often grouped in a distribution
vaginal infections but will sometimes time it presents to a gynaecologist commonly known as “strawberry ap-
incidentally recognize them and can the appearances are usually very pearance”), and a diffuse, fluffy ace-
alert the clinician to an unsuspected abnormal. Typically, there is a vascu- towhiteness not dissimilar to LSIL
infection. lar response as well as evidence of but distributed non-specifically and
68
Fig. 9.1. (a) A Gram stain view of a trichomonad. (b) A cytology preparation Fig. 9.2. A cytology preparation
revealing trichomoniasis. showing a typical cytoplasmic halo,
characteristic of HPV infection.
a b
Fig. 9.3. (a) A Gram stain preparation of candidiasis. (b) A cytology slide Fig. 9.4. A cytology preparation
showing candidiasis. showing a case of herpes simplex.
a b
Fig. 9.5. A cytology preparation Fig. 9.6. (a) A Gram stain revealing bacterial vaginosis. (b) A cytology slide
showing a case of actinomycosis. showing a case of bacterial vaginosis.
a b
Fig. 9.7. A tissue culture slide Fig. 9.8. (a) A Gram stain showing an (intracellular) gonococcus infection.
showing a case of chlamydia. (b) A cytology preparation showing an (intracellular) gonococcus infection.
a b
CHAPTER 9
70
Fig. 9.11. Strawberry appearance in containing glycogen. If desquama- to the vagina, red colour tone, and
an inflamed cervix, with multiple red tion is limited to the summit of the associated symptoms such as dis-
spots (labelled a). stromal papillae, where the squa- charge and pruritus.
mous epithelium is thinnest, a series
a of thin yellow spots are seen on a 9.4 Specific infections
mahogany-brown background, giv-
ing a stippled appearance (Fig. 9.12). 9.4.1 Candidiasis
a When the inflammation persists and
the infection becomes chronic, the Infection with Candida albicans is
a small desquamated areas become extremely common and, with low-
a a confluent to form large desquamat- grade chronic infection, may be en-
ed areas, leading to the so-called tirely asymptomatic. It is sometimes
a
leopard-skin appearance (Fig. 9.13). called a thrush infection, because
These features are often found the breast of the common thrush bird
following criteria. Inflammatory punc- with Trichomonas infection but also has the speckled grey-white appear-
tations are fine, with extremely mini- may be seen with fungal and bac- ance once thought typical of can-
mal intercapillary distances, and are terial infections. If there is marked didal pharyngitis. When it flourishes,
diffusely distributed (not restricted to desquamation, the cervix appears it nearly always becomes symptom-
the TZ), and they involve the original yellowish-red, with involvement of atic, producing a thick cheese-like
squamous epithelium and vagina. the vagina. Again, the application discharge and pruritus of the vulva
As the inflammation persists and of Lugol’s iodine can be intensely and vagina. There may be a concur-
becomes chronic, it results in large, uncomfortable in the presence of rent vulvitis. The appearances are
focal red punctations due to large infection. more specific than for most cervico-
collections of capillaries grouped to- vaginal infections and do not usually
gether, which appear as several red 9.3.4 Summary require laboratory confirmation, but
spots of different sizes visible on a where simple treatment does not
pinkish-white background, produc- Inflammatory conditions of the cervix work, the usual workup for candidal
ing the so-called strawberry spots are associated with excessive, usu- vulvovaginitis should be implement-
(Fig. 9.11). Colposcopically, a chroni- ally malodorous, mucopurulent, se- ed. Fig. 9.14 depicts candidal cervi-
cally inflamed cervix may sometimes ropurulent, or whitish discharge, red citis and vaginitis seen through the
resemble invasive cervical cancer. punctations, ulceration, and healing colposcope.
by fibrosis. The secretion is frothy
9.3.3 After application of with bubbles in the case of trichomo- 9.4.2 Trichomoniasis
Lugol’s iodine niasis, and sticky and cheese-white
in candidiasis. Inflammatory lesions This extremely common infection
The test outcome after the applica- of the cervix may be differentiated causes serious discomfort by way
tion of Lugol’s iodine depends on the from CIN by their large, diffuse in- of an intensely pruritic and offensive
desquamation and loss of cell layers volvement of the cervix, extension discharge often described as fishy
Fig. 9.12. Stippled appearance Fig. 9.13. Leopard-skin appearance Fig. 9.14. Typical candidiasis seen
(labelled a) after the application of vaginitis associated with a tricho- at high-power examination of the
of Lugol’s iodine in a case of moniasis infection. cervix.
trichomoniasis.
a
CHAPTER 9
may be observed in the cervix and potassium hydroxide, the discharge Syphilis
vaginal epithelia in the early vesic- also has a fishy smell (Fig. 9.18).
Herpes simplex
ular phase of herpes simplex viral
infection. Herpetic infections are as- 9.4.5 Syphilis Chancroid
Fig. 9.16. Colposcopic appearance of cervical and vulvar herpes simplex, representing the (a) blistering,
(b) ulcerating, (c) healing (arrow indicates healing vulvar ulcer), and (d) scabbing phases of the condition.
a b c d
72
Fig. 9.17. Greyish discharge sug- Fig. 9.18. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) before (a) and after (b) the application
gestive of bacterial vaginosis. of Lugol’s iodine. Note the nondescript discharge in (a). The BV infection
has produced relatively little inflammatory response and shows the thick,
adherent nature of the discharge associated with BV.
a b
chlamydia and gonorrhoea may Fig. 9.19. (a) Cervical discharge suggestive of cervicitis. (b) Beefy-red cervix
present in completely asymptomatic with discharge suggestive of cervicitis.
women or they may present with cer-
vicitis of a varying degree. To con- a b
firm or rule out the suspicion of either
requires a laboratory diagnosis from
swabs taken from the endocervical
canal. This will often cause contact
bleeding. These infections are both
intracellular infections. Gonorrhoea
is an obligate human pathogen. It is
a gram-negative diplococcus. The
bacterial parasite chlamydia is also
an intracellular organism. When
symptomatic, chlamydia does pro-
duce a relatively specific cervical
folliculitis, but this is not in all cases, a profound inflammatory response She was seen for colposcopic evalu-
and it may infect the upper genital that they are indistinguishable from ation 7 years after symptoms began,
tract with significant organ function cancer and a biopsy is required for and at examination, contact bleeding
damage without any lower genital diagnosis. Fig. 9.20a–q follows the was immediate. The series of imag-
tract symptoms or signs. The in- chronology of a case of cervical tu- es reveals the cervical appearance
terested reader is referred to Faro berculosis. The case is typical in over 6 years from before diagnosis
(2006) for a fuller description of both that it was difficult to recognize and to post-treatment follow-up. The di-
gonorrhoeal and chlamydial cervici- responded completely to appropriate agnosis was made at histological
tis (Fig. 9.19). therapy. The patient, a 26-year-old examination of a colposcopically di-
nulliparous and married woman, pre- rected biopsy. A cytology smear was
9.4.7 Other infections sented after many years of postcoital persistently reported as normal over
bleeding, serosanguinous vaginal 6 years after treatment with antitu-
Tuberculosis, schistosomiasis, and discharge, and, eventually, almost berculous therapy.
amoebiasis may all produce such continuous per vaginal bleeding.
CHAPTER 9
a b c d
e f g
h i j k
l m n o
p q
74
Key points
• Inflammatory lesions of the cervix are most commonly caused by specific infections and will produce a non-
specific inflammatory response, which typically includes redness, discharge, vascular abnormalities, and
varying degrees of epithelial desquamation.
• Cervical infections may mimic intraepithelial lesions or cancer. A biopsy will sometimes be necessary to
discriminate between infection and squamous intraepithelial lesion or cancer.
•C
olposcopy and cytology are not methods to be relied upon in diagnosing sexually transmitted infection.
• A delay in treating a significant sexually transmitted infection can be the cause of more morbidity than delay in
treating squamous intraepithelial lesion, particularly low-grade (e.g. gonorrhoea or chlamydia).
CHAPTER 9
Colposcopic examination
of the abnormal cervix
CHAPTER 1
To perform a useful colposcopic Colposcopy is a dynamic pro- image recognition skills to discrimi-
examination of the abnormal cervix, cess, not a single-image examina- nate between different lesional char-
one should first be thoroughly fa- tion, and so documentation needs to acteristics. These characteristics
miliar with the appearances of the describe findings at different times are best assessed formally using a
normal cervix and with the current during the examination (before and scoring system (Bowring et al., 2010;
international standard nomenclature after saline application, after ace- Reid and Scalzi, 1985; Strander et
(see Annex 3). tic acid application, at low and high al., 2005). The Swede score (see
Also, to maximize the examina- power, after Lugol’s iodine applica-
tion, the colposcopist should use a tion). A video recording is ideal but is Table 10.1. Core findings of every
standard reporting method so that not always available. Clear drawings colposcopic examination
self-audit and comparison with nor- on standard diagram templates are
mal parameters of quality may be good substitutes. Finding
performed. The examination should After it is established that the ex- Adequacy of examination
always record the core findings list- amination is adequate (i.e. it is not
Transformation zone type
ed in Table 10.1. compromised by any circumstances
A large drawing or a video re- such as infection, bleeding, or scar- Transformation zone size
cording should always be made ring), the TZ type and size should Swede score
for future reference (see Annex 2). be determined. In some colposcopy
Fig. 6.2 shows some commonly clinics, it is routine to examine the Drawing of transformation zone and
lesion(s)
used icons to document individu- entire lower genital tract; in many
al colposcopic features. Fig. 10.1a others, the examination is confined Biopsy (if required) taken and from where
shows an example of a drawing with to the cervix and upper vagina. Management options
some of the patterns seen at a col- The diagnostic accuracy of col-
Details of treatment, if performed
poscopic examination. poscopy (see Section 1.6.3) relies on
a b
1
C 7
3
7
6 6 7
7 2
A Outer TZ limit
B Upper TZ limit 6 6 6
5
C Upper limit of visibility
3
D External os
6 4
6
AWE
A
AWE with mosaicism 5 4
B
C AWE with punctation
4
D
Columnar epithelium 7
78
CHAPTER 10
grades of CIN, with some inflamma- the cervix or of comparing colpos- Table 10.2. Characteristics to be
tory conditions, and with any kind of copists’ performance. Finally, the recognized for colposcopic deter-
condylomatous change. In severe SCJ will often appear white, as Carti- mination of abnormality
dysplastic lesions, the whiteness is er’s illustration (Fig. 10.2a) depicts.
often denser and is sometimes called Fig. 10.2b–h reflects some of the dif- Characteristic
oyster white. But acetowhiteness, by ferent effects of acetic acid applica-
itself, is not a reliable discriminator tion that will present in colposcopic Acetowhiteness
between normal and abnormal or practice.
between a transient and a transform- Vascular pattern
Fig. 10.2. (a) Illustration of acetowhiteness at the squamocolumnar junction: (1) normal squamous epithelium laden
with glycogen; (2) small area of squamous epithelium lacking glycogen and corresponding to the white margin;
(3) papillae of glandular mucosa; (4) connective tissue. (b) Mild or faint acetowhiteness on the posterior lip of a
low-grade/normal lesion. (c) Faint acetowhiteness in LSIL. (d) Acetowhite epithelium in the endocervical part of an
abnormal transformation zone (TZ). (e) Faint acetowhiteness throughout the anterior lip of the cervix but denser
whiteness at the 9 o’clock position. (f) Large TZ with HSIL. The acetowhiteness in this case varies throughout the
TZ from faint to dense. (g) Dense acetowhiteness is evident in much of this HSIL. (h) Blood obscures assessment of
much of this cervix, but between the 7 o’clock and 10 o’clock positions there is very dense acetowhiteness.
a b c
1
2
d e
f g h
Fig. 10.3. (a) Illustration of mosaicism: (1) cobbles of mosaic, unequal and separated by a red interval, which
corresponds to the areas where the epithelium is very thin; (2) epithelial buds dip in and become ramified in the
connective tissue; (3) connective tissue: (4) deep surface of the epithelium without connective tissue (note the shape
of the digital processes of the squamous epithelium and their ramification). (b) Coarse mosaic pattern seen centrally
in a case of HSIL. (c) Coarse mosaic pattern between the 1 o’clock and 3 o’clock positions. Proximal to this are some
pollarded vessels. Suspicion of CIN3 or microinvasion. (d) High-power view of both mosaic and punctate vessel
pattern. (e) Higher-power view of coarse mosaic and punctate pattern. Also, an innocent normally branching blood
vessel is seen stretched over a nabothian follicle at about the 11 o’clock position. (f) Low-power view of HSIL. Coarse
mosaicism is seen developing quickly after the application of acetic acid. The upper limit of the transformation zone
is not seen in this image, and it is not possible to say whether it is a type 2 or type 3 transformation zone. (g) Higher-
power view of the same case of HSIL as in (f). The acetowhiteness has intensified, and the mosaic pattern is more
evident. The lesion has a relatively sharp margin anteriorly.
Coarse
a b c mosaic
Pollarded
vessels pattern
d e
2
3
f g
80
CHAPTER 10
the epithelium appears as individ- located close to one another, pro- appearance is called umbilication
ual blocks: small or large, round or ducing a delicate stippling effect (Fig. 10.3e).
polygonal, and regular or irregular. (Fig. 10.4b). Fine mosaics are a net- Coarse mosaicism or coarse
Punctation and mosaic areas may work of fine-calibre blood vessels punctation scores 2 in the Swede
be classified as either fine or coarse. that appear in close proximity to one score.
Coarse vascular changes tend to another, as a mosaic pattern, when
be associated with more severe de- viewed with the colposcope. These 10.2.2 Atypical patterns
grees of abnormality (CIN2 or great- two vascular appearances may oc-
er including microinvasion). When cur together and may be found in Abnormal vessel patterns that do not
both punctation and mosaic patterns low-grade (CIN1) lesions. The pat- appear mosaic or punctate include
are found to coexist, the same eval- terns do not necessarily appear corkscrew vessels, comma-like
uation criteria for colposcopic pre- throughout the whole lesion. vessels, and character-writing-type
diction of disease are used as when Coarse punctation (Fig. 10.4d) vessels. These are associated with
they exist separately. and coarse mosaics (Fig. 10.3b–d, high-grade lesions or microinvasive
Vessels exhibiting punctation g, and h) are formed by vessels of and invasive disease. Character-writ-
and mosaics are usually more strik- larger calibre and with larger inter- ing-type vessels are particularly
ingly obvious than the normal stro- capillary distances, in contrast to the associated with adenocarcinoma
mal vessels because these vessels corresponding fine changes. Coarse in situ or invasive adenocarcinoma
penetrate into the epithelium and punctation and mosaicism tend to (Fig. 10.4e).
are thus closer to the surface. When occur in more severe neoplastic le- A pollarded branch refers to one
acetic acid is applied, these abnor- sions, such as CIN2 and CIN3 le- that is cut off at the trunk (see Fig.
mal vascular patterns are usually sions and early preclinical invasive 13.5b), and in colposcopic ves sel
confined to the acetowhite areas. cancer. Sometimes, the two pat- terminology this refers to a vessel
“Fine punctation” refers to looped terns are superimposed in an area that does not appear to branch but
capillaries – viewed end-on – that so that the capillary loops occur in seems cut off. A pollarded vessel is
appear to be of fine calibre and the centre of each mosaic “tile”. This seen in Fig. 10.5c and d.
Fig. 10.4. (a) Illustration of punctation: (1) red dots visible on colposcopy; (2) vascular bundles – at the summit of
each papilla, the squamous epithelium is very thin, allowing the vessels to show through; (3) connective tissue; (4)
the deep surface of the epithelium is flat, and the points of depression corresponding to each vascular bundle are
visible. (b) Faint and fine punctation seen in a case of LSIL. (c) Low-power magnification image of the anterior lip
of a dysplastic transformation zone with acetowhite epithelium in which there are many gland openings. (d) Coarse
punctation in a high-grade lesion. (e) Atypical “character writing” vessel patterns, sometimes seen with severe
glandular dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma.
a b c
3
d e
82
CHAPTER 10
seldom observed in low-grade le- coarse punctation and/or mosaic harbour atypical vessels. CIN3 le-
sions. In contrast, high-grade lesions and with regular and well-demarcat- sions tend to be complex, involving
are associated with dense, opaque, ed borders. These lesions often in- the os.
grey-white, acetowhite areas with volve both lips and may occasionally
Fig. 10.5. (a) Occasional cuffed gland openings are seen on the posterior lip of this case of HSIL. (b) Sharp margin
of an HSIL seen at the 5 o’clock position on the posterior lip of the cervix at low-power magnification. (c) Higher-
power view of the same case as in (b), which again reveals a sharp lesion margin and a pollarded vessel. (d) A
pollarded vessel is seen at the 11 o’clock position in this case of HSIL. (e) A small lesion in an otherwise normal
transformation zone (TZ) in the presence of a mild smear which regressed to normal without intervention. (f) A large
lesion relative to the size of the TZ, i.e. the lesion occupies all four quadrants of the small TZ. (g) Low-power view
of the same case of HSIL as in (a) after the application of Lugol’s iodine. (h) The ridge sign. The arrow points to
an opaque protuberance within a white lesion within the TZ. (i) The inner border sign. The arrow points to a sharp
demarcation between thin and dense acetowhite areas in a large TZ. (j) Leukoplakia (labelled a). This white lesion is
apparent before acetic acid is applied. Leukoplakia prevents adequate examination of the underlying epithelium and
frequently warrants biopsy. (k) Colposcopic view of cervical condyloma at low-power magnification. (l) Colposcopic
view of the same cervical condyloma at high-power magnification. (m) Colposcopic view of the same cervical
condyloma after the application of Lugol’s iodine, showing partial uptake of iodine.
a b c d e
f g h i
j k l m
a
• Recognition of abnormality will be improved if specific image characteristics are documented at each exam-
ination. Scoring the individual components of the Swede score is more likely to provide an accurate diagnosis.
These are acetowhiteness, margin status, vascular patterns, lesion size, and iodine uptake.
• Beware the leukoplakic epithelium, because it is not possible to see the underlying epithelium, which may or
may not be innocent.
•M
icroinvasive lesions usually exhibit more pronounced characteristics of high-grade disease.
84
CHAPTER 11
chapter 11.
Treatment of cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
Because current screening tests an individual screening or diagnostic biopsy material for an accurate diag-
(cytology, oncogenic HPV testing, test but should take into account the nosis. If the treatment is excisional,
and visual inspection methods) are individual case characteristics, which then it should be performed under
not specific for cervical precancer, may modify the risk of progression to binocular colposcopic guidance, to
treatment methods need to be ef- cancer and the need to treat as well minimize excising excessive or insuf-
fective but also minimally damaging as the relative risks of treatment. Rel- ficient normal tissue (Carcopino et
and uncomplicated. evant case characteristics include al., 2013) and inflicting minimal arte-
Treatment methods of actual or age, parity, previous treatment, fer- factual damage, so that an adequate
suspected CIN should be both effec- tility aspirations, likelihood of default histology report may be generated
tive and safe. Effective treatment of from follow-up, HPV status, and any and so that the cervical wound is not
CIN implies eradicating the TZ and other available biomarker triage test excessively damaged.
reducing risk of cancer to nearly results. Treatment should accomplish
zero. Safe treatment implies reduc- Safe treatment will mean a pre- complete eradication of the TZ and
ing the risk of complications to an liminary colposcopic examination by not only the lesion. It should ablate
absolute minimum. a properly trained colposcopist with the TZ, the whole TZ, and, ideally,
At the outset, the patient should adequate documentation of findings nothing but the TZ.
be counselled about the need for in a structured format (see Annex 2). Whether the TZ is being excised
treatment, the risks of the proce- It should record the TZ type, the ad- or destroyed, ablation to a depth of
dure, and the risk of not treating the equacy of the examination, and an 7 mm is considered optimal (Shafi et
lesion, as well as the need for fol- objective diagnostic score, for exam- al., 2006). This is because the deep-
low-up and how this should be per- ple the Swede score (Strander et al., est gland crypt can contain CIN as
formed. The decision to treat should 2005) (see Annex 4). Ideally, if the low as 4 mm (Anderson and Hartley,
not be automatic and should not treatment advised is a destructive 1980), and destroying to 7 mm gives
depend exclusively on the results of method, there should be sufficient a sufficient degree of safety.
86
Table 11.3. Conditions for destructive treatment the gas cylinders are quite variable.
Condition Cryotherapy gas tanks are large
and are heavy (10–15 kg) and thus
• The TZ must be fully visible (i.e. type 1 or type 2 TZ) and accessible (i.e. type 1 TZ or
CHAPTER 11
shallow type 2 TZ).
difficult to transport. They require re-
filling relatively frequently. At a clini-
• The TZ must be small enough to be covered by the destructive method probe.
cal level, the major disadvantage of
• Invasive disease must be ruled out. cryotherapy, and of all destructive
• There should be no suspicion of glandular disease. techniques, is the lack of tissue to
allow histological examination. Fi-
• There should be no disparity between cytology and colposcopy.
nally, cryotherapy treatment takes
• There should not have been a previous treatment of the cervix. considerably longer (approximately
• There should not be upper or lower genital tract infection (relative contraindication). 15 minutes from start to finish) than
thermal coagulation or LLETZ/LEEP,
• The patient should not be pregnant.
each of which may be completed in a
• If the patient has recently delivered, she should be at least 3 months postpartum. minute or two, although infiltration of
TZ, transformation zone. local anaesthetic may add a minute
to LLETZ/LEEP. Cryotherapy had
include laser treatment (Monaghan, the lesion, and for those women in become very popular as part of a
1995), radical diathermy (Chanen whom unsuspected invasive disease see-and-treat approach to screening
and Rome, 1983), and cryosurgery is revealed at hysterectomy, the pa- and management in many LMICs in
(Hatch et al., 1981). The temperature tient will have been poorly served. the past decade, but difficulties with
applied in radical diathermy reached After a simple hysterectomy, it is not maintaining a cheap and reliable
300 °C; it is no longer used and is of possible to offer the appropriate ra- supply of carbon dioxide (CO2) have
historical interest only. As a destruc- diotherapy regime, and radical hys- limited its popularity.
tive technique, laser treatment has terectomy is also not possible. Hys- Cryotherapy achieves a destruc-
few advantages over cryosurgery or terectomy should not be used as a tive effect by freezing tissue down
thermal coagulation in resource-lim- treatment of CIN. to less than −20 °C. A metal probe
ited regions and will not be discussed is held in close contact with the TZ
in depth here. The interested reader 11.3.1 Cryotherapy epithelium (Figs. 11.1–11.3). Gas-
is referred to excellent descriptive eous CO2 is allowed to escape and
publications (Monaghan, 1995). Cryotherapy, which was popular circulate in the probe head, thereby
This chapter is devoted to two in the USA during the 1970s and cooling the cryocautery probe sur-
methods of destructive therapy and 1980s, was introduced into clinical face that is in contact with the epi-
several excisional methods. The practice by Crisp et al. (1967) and thelium. The cellular necrosis of the
destructive techniques are cryosur- has been used in many countries affected epithelial cells occurs as a
gery (also known as cryocautery, for several decades. Cryotherapy is result of intracellular fluid crystalliza-
cryotherapy, or cryo) and thermal also known as cryocautery, cryosur- tion and consequent cell membrane
coagulation (also called cold coag- gery, or cryo. Where the equipment rupture. The probe tip must be the
ulation). The excisional techniques is available and the gas supply is appropriate size and shape for the
are LLETZ/LEEP and other modifi- assured and when the precondi- relevant TZ. When the TZ involves
cations of electrosurgical excision. tions for destructive therapy have the endocervical canal for more than
Cold-knife conization is also used in been met, it is a reasonable choice 5 mm (i.e. beyond a shallow type 2
some regions and may have a role in of therapy. It has few serious compli-
excising a type 3 TZ or where there cations, and although it is described Fig. 11.1. Cryoprobe tips.
is a suspicion of glandular disease, as causing relative discomfort, it is
but otherwise cold-knife excision has usually well tolerated without the
little to recommend it. Although hys- need for local infiltration, so that
terectomy is also used as a method it may be performed as an outpa-
of excising CIN, this is nearly always tient procedure or in a rural clinic.
inadvisable. For women with precan- The capital equipment necessary
cerous lesions, hysterectomy offers is inexpensive, although the price
no advantage over local excision of of gas and the cost of transporting
the tissue for ablation should reach CO2 < −68 °C −20 °C −68 °C About −20 °C
−20 °C throughout. Providing that
N 2O < −89 °C −20 °C −89 °C About −20 °C
the gas cylinder maintains sufficient
88
walls. A support person, usually a has occurred, the probe does not de- transmission between patients) after
nurse attendant, is invaluable in com- tach from the tissue. It is important to cryosurgery is unknown; very limited
forting and reassuring the patient be- be careful that the vaginal walls do data are available.
CHAPTER 11
fore and during the procedure. The not fall against the frozen tissue or To perform as effectively as pos-
clean, non-pregnant and uninflamed probe, so as not to cause inadvertent sible, the machine needs to be work-
cervix should be free of mucus, and damage. Finally, after each freeze a ing properly and needs to have a
the TZ should be completely acces- minute or so should be allowed be- constant supply of CO2, and the op-
sible to contact with the cryoprobe. fore detaching the probe, to allow it erator should use the double-freeze
This will usually mean a small type 1 to easily separate from the tissue. technique. Results in the literature
TZ or a small and shallow type 2 TZ. The probe and cryosurgery device are somewhat variable. In the early
After cleaning, the cryosurgery should then be thoroughly cleaned non-controlled studies, the success
probe should be firmly applied to the (see Chapter 18). of cryocautery for CIN3 varied be-
TZ on the cervix and the cryosurgical After cryosurgery, the vagina tween 77% and 93% (Benedet et
effect begun by activating the trig- should not be packed. Providing that al., 1981; Hatch et al., 1981; Popkin
ger (Fig. 11.3a and b). A stopwatch the cervix was not inflamed, there is et al., 1978). The Cochrane me-
is useful to time the procedure. The no need for antibiotic or other treat- ta-analysis review of 29 trials cover-
operator should observe the proce- ment. The patient should be advised ing 4509 cases, 1843 of whom had
dure, to ensure adequate contact not to use internal tampons, not to CIN3, found a lower rate of treatment
and to ensure that the vaginal walls douche, and not to have penetra- success for CIN3 for cryotherapy
are not in contact with the probe tive intercourse for at least a month compared with thermal coagulation
during the freeze. The procedure is or until all discharge has stopped. A (Martin-Hirsch et al., 2013). The sin-
uncomfortable but is not usually de- take-home information sheet is valu- gle-freeze cryotherapy technique
scribed as painful. A slight hissing able. It should detail the follow-up was associated with a non-signif-
noise is emitted from the cryosur- arrangements and briefly describe icant increase (relative risk, 2.66;
gery probe during active freezing. the usual effects and complications 95% confidence interval, 0.96–7.37)
Treatment should be performed in associated with cryosurgery. Healing in the risk of residual disease com-
two phases – a 3-minute freeze, fol- is usually complete after 6 weeks, pared with the double-freeze tech-
lowed by a 5-minute thaw, followed and during this time it is common to nique (Schantz and Thormann,
by a 3-minute freeze – so as to en- experience a light watery and slightly 1984). The authors of the Cochrane
sure adequate depth of tissue ne- bloodstained discharge. Excessive review concluded that there was no
crosis (≥ 5 mm). Ideally, a stopwatch and/or offensive discharge, bleed- overwhelmingly superior surgical
should be used; otherwise, a busy ing, pain, fever, or any suspicion technique for eradicating CIN and
clinician may overestimate the pas- of cervicitis or pelvic inflammato- that cryotherapy appeared to be
sage of time. Technically, it is a sim- ry disease warrants a clinic visit. A an effective treatment of low-grade
ple procedure. Maintaining even but checklist for cryosurgery is given in disease but not of high-grade dis-
firm contact with the tissue is impor- Table 11.5. Finally, the risk of HIV ac- ease. This conclusion concurs with
tant at the outset, but once a freeze quisition by HIV-negative women (or recent results of non-comparative
Fig. 11.3. (a) The cryoprobe in place during treatment. (b) The activated cryoprobe on the cervical transformation
zone. Note that the frozen epithelium extends a few millimetres beyond the edge of the cryoprobe. (c) The cervical
wound immediately after cryosurgery.
a b c
• Freeze observed, vaginal walls not in contact with probe or any frozen tissue In the early papers reporting the use
• Freeze maintained for 3 minutes of thermal coagulation, Gordon and
Duncan wrote that the Semm coagu-
• Thaw allowed for 5 minutes
lator was very user-friendly, because
• Second freeze maintained for 3 minutes it was quick and silent and did not
• Remove probe after thawing require local or other analgesia. In
their original series, 95% of patients
observational studies. For example, published work on cold coagulation required no anaesthesia. The capital
in the study of Nene et al. (2008) of came from the United Kingdom, in equipment is relatively inexpensive
cryotherapy performed by midwives particular from Ian Duncan’s unit in (equivalent to costs for cryosurgery)
in India, the cure rate of CIN3 was Dundee (Duncan, 1983, 1984; Gor- and easily portable. The therapeutic
82.1% (95% confidence interval, don and Duncan, 1991). The meth- temperature is 100 °C, which is not
74.7–89.4%) for CIN2 and CIN3 le- od was not widely used in North high enough to produce charring
sions combined. These relatively low America, where cryocautery and or smoke, thereby avoiding any un-
rates of cure may be unacceptable then laser ablation were the destruc- pleasant odour for the patient and
in some regions. However, WHO tive method of choice. With thermal doctor. Neither a suction machine
has stated that where resources coagulation, the intracellular water nor a filter is required, because there
are limited, cryosurgery, as part of a reaches boiling point and the cells is no smoke plume. All the equip-
screen-and-treat programme, is an necrose. It achieves tissue destruc- ment is reusable. There are enough
acceptable option to treat high-grade tion to a depth of 4–7 mm (Haddad et probes of different dimensions to
lesions also. al., 1988). The method fell out of pop- accommodate almost all type 1 TZs,
ularity (Semple et al., 1999) when and postoperative discharge and
11.3.2 Thermal coagulation LLETZ/LEEP was introduced but is bleeding were not reported to be a
now being reconsidered, because problem for most women.
The term “cold coagulation” is a mis- of its apparent advantages over Subsequent pregnancy and fertil-
nomer, and the method should prop- cryocautery and because excisional ity rates do not appear to be affected
erly be called thermal coagulation. techniques are not considered fea- by thermal coagulation. Also, it may
The probe is heated electrically and sible in remote regions by relatively be applied as one or several appli-
reaches temperatures of 100–120 °C untrained staff in poorly equipped cations for large or irregular ecto-
(Duncan, 1983). The technique was facilities without the necessary ad- cervical TZs. Finally, at the time (in
named cold coagulation to discrimi- ditional resources (e.g. histopatholo- the 1970s and 1980s), it was rightly
nate it from radical diathermy, which gy services and the very occasional seen as an inexpensive alternative
reaches temperatures of 300 °C. need for general anaesthesia). Ther- to the then-popular laser ablation
The method was introduced to clin- mal coagulation has equivalent suc- technique. Its singular disadvantage
ical practice by Kurt Semm (Semm, cess rates to cryosurgery, is quicker is that the TZ epithelium is destroyed
1966) in Kiel, Germany, and was to perform with similarly low compli- rather than preserved, thereby ne-
used widely throughout Europe in cation rates, and does not require re- gating the opportunity for histopatho-
the 1970s and 1980s. Much of the frigerated gas. The procedure takes logical examination.
90
11.3.2.2 Treatment with thermal Table 11.6. Thermal coagulation procedure
coagulation Steps/checklist
CHAPTER 11
Treating the TZ using the thermal
coagulator could not be simpler. • Confirmation of suitability (see Table 11.3)
visible ice ridge just outside the • Thermal coagulation probe activated, stopwatch started
probe during activation and, unlike • Temperature > 100 °C maintained for 45 seconds
electrosurgical techniques (LLETZ/
• If transformation zone larger than thermal coagulation probe head, apply probe for further 45
LEEP, etc.), there is no smoke plume seconds to untreated area, overlapping with the previous treatment
to evacuate. As with any destructive
• Remove probe
or excisional technique, it is entirely
possible to damage the epithelium
and other adjacent structures if the 11.4 Excisional methods hysterectomy, the woman will have
probe is applied to anywhere other been undertreated and it will no
than the cervix, but it is difficult to do There are several ways of removing longer be possible to offer the opti-
this, providing that the vaginal walls the TZ. These include hysterecto- mal radical hysterectomy or radio-
are clearly seen to be distant to the my, cold-knife excision (also known therapy regime. In the great majority
cervix and the thermal coagulation as cold-knife cone biopsy or cold- of cases, it is far more sensible to re-
probe head. A checklist for thermal knife conization), laser cone biopsy, sect the TZ first and deal with associ-
coagulation is given in Table 11.6. LLETZ/LEEP, and other variations of ated pathology subsequently.
electrosurgical excision, for example
SWETZ, which is an alternative to 11.4.2 Cold-knife cone biopsy
Fig. 11.4. The Liger thermal coagu- LLETZ/LEEP, laser excision, or cold-
lator.
knife excision when performing a Cold-knife cone biopsy, the oldest
type 3 excision (Camargo et al., 2015). method of local excision, is still wide-
ly used, especially where colposco-
11.4.1 Hysterectomy py facilities and/or expertise are not
available. It has similar success rates
Hysterectomy has been very widely to other excisional techniques (Lars-
used to treat suspected or proven son, 1983). The technique leaves a
cervical precancer. The advantage relatively large cervical defect and
of ridding a woman of fertility and will often remove more tissue than is
menstruation and any associated necessary. The procedure is usually
symptoms as well as treating sepa- performed under general anaesthe-
Fig. 11.5. The WISAP “cold” coagu- rate benign pathology (e.g. fibroids sia. A suture or sutures are often
lator.
or adenomyosis) may seem attrac- used to achieve post-excision hae-
tive in the presence of CIN. However, mostasis. Cold-knife cone biopsy
the risk of undertreatment of unsus- is associated with well-recognized
pected invasive disease means that short- and long-term complications,
an adequate and satisfactory col- including primary and secondary
poscopic examination should be per- haemorrhage, cervical stenosis,
formed before hysterectomy for CIN. and cervical incompetence. It may
If invasive disease is discovered at be worth considering with a type 3
wounds and vessels. The heat was energy is concentrated into a very
originally transmitted using a metal small area (here, the loop wire), the
implement heated in a fire. For the electrosurgical effect will be achieved
past century, electrical generation at the point of contact, i.e. as the wire
92
some other meat or simulated tissue the tissue, and the electrosurgery To prevent passage of electricity
(e.g. playdough). The method is illus- produces a lower temperature but to somewhere other than the ground
trated diagrammatically in Figs. 11.7 a deeper diathermy effect. It is less plate, it should be positioned relative-
CHAPTER 11
and 11.8. coagulative and more damaging in ly close to the point of contact. For
its effect. Desiccation is appropriate LLETZ, a convenient and appropri-
11.5.2 Electrosurgical in diathermy ablation of the endome- ate position is under the patient’s but-
effects: fulguration versus trium, for example, but undesirable tocks. Having the patient’s buttocks
desiccation when cutting through or coagulating on the ground plate will help ensure
the post-LLETZ wound. In practice, complete contact, which reduces the
When passing the activated elec- one can achieve a fulgurative rather risk of burn injury. The ground plate
trode through the tissue or when than a desiccative effect by: (return electrode or dispersive pad)
achieving coagulative diathermy to • activating the electrode (i.e. the is wide, and this together with good
effect haemostasis of the LLETZ loop) before contacting the tissue; contact of skin to the entire plate will
wound, it is important to try to pro- • passing the loop slowly through prevent focal contact and a burn.
duce a fulgurative rather than a des- the tissue, whereby a small steam Many recently manufactured ESUs
iccative electrosurgical effect. With window will occur between the loop incorporate a resistance recognition
fulguration, the electricity passes and the tissue; in this way, the loop system in the ground-plate circuitry
across a very small air gap to the tis- will not bend as it passes through such that electricity will be cut off if
sue at relatively high temperatures. the tissue underneath and around there is not good contact. Typically,
This will usually achieve very su- the TZ (Fig. 11.8); and these ground plates are split, and an
perficial tissue damage and a suffi- • holding the ball diathermy electrode even flow through both is necessary
cient cutting or coagulative effect for just off the tissue when attempting to allow electricity to pass around the
LLETZ. With desiccation, there is full haemostasis, and producing a visi- circuit. Often, an alarm warns the
contact between the electrode and ble spray of electricity between the operator if there is not good ground-
ball and the tissue (Fig. 11.7b). plate contact.
Fig. 11.7. Diagrammatic represen-
tation of (a) the LLETZ technique 11.6 Safety issues with LLETZ 11.6.2 Prevention of electro-
and (b) post-LLETZ ball diathermy surgical injuries
management of the wound (ground 11.6.1 Ground-plate contact
plate not shown). ESU, electrosurgi- It is possible to injure the vaginal wall
cal unit. LLETZ uses monopolar electrosur- and the structures immediately adja-
gery and therefore needs a ground cent to it. Electrosurgical injuries to
a plate for the electricity to return to
the ESU after achieving its effect Fig. 11.8. The loop should be passed
at the point of contact between the slowly through the cervix underneath
loop and the tissue (or the ball elec- the transformation zone, so slowly
trode and the post-LLETZ wound). If that the loop wire does not bend. If
there is poor ground-plate contact, it does, the operator is pushing it too
ESU quickly through the tissue, and the
an injury can occur when the current
finds an easier pathway to return to electrosurgical effect changes from
fulgurative to desiccative.
ground. Examples of sites are the
Pathology metal stirrups of some gynaecologi-
laboratory
cal couches, jewellery, or other met-
al body adornments. Metal jewellery
b
and adornments should, of course,
be removed before any electrosur-
gery, but they are unlikely to cause
injury if the ground plate is large and
in good contact with the skin, espe-
ESU cially if the ESU has a resistance
recognition system and uses a split
ground plate.
94
coagulation and cutting may be used cylinder of fluid to assess volume. Annex 5), on its own or after initial
(i.e. blend 1, or 20% coagulation and Volume of excision appears to be a re- ball electrode point diathermy of
80% cutting) so as to minimize the liable prognosticator for future preg- any bleeding points, is highly effec-
CHAPTER 11
coagulating diathermy effect on the nancy-related complications (Casta- tive and minimally damaging to the
extirpated TZ and the LLETZ wound. non et al., 2014; Khalid et al., 2012; LLETZ wound bed. If using diather-
The entry point should usually be Kyrgiou et al., 2014). my to achieve coagulative haemosta-
only a millimetre or two outside the The aim of treatment by LLETZ sis, use a small ball and a fulgurative
outer limit of the TZ. is to excise the entire TZ and only technique. Try to ensure that the up-
It is preferable to resect the the TZ to a depth of about 5–7 mm. per limit of resection (the new SCJ) is
TZ, usually in one piece from the This is sufficient to resect virtually all not diathermized, to reduce the risk
9 o’clock position, thereby passing epithelial crypts, and the diathermy of functional stenosis (Paraskevai-
from the patient’s right to left. In this artefactual damage of the loop will dis et al., 2001a). Finally, any blood
way, the resected TZ does not fall inflict artefactual diathermy necro- or iodine may be evacuated from the
onto the loop, as can happen when sis for a further 2–3 mm. Although it posterior vaginal fornix with a large
resecting antero-posteriorly. While might seem sufficient to resect only cotton swab, and the speculum then
performing the procedure, the col- the lesion within the TZ, the pub- removed. While the patient is dress-
poscopist should be conscious of the lished treatment success rates relate ing, the procedure should be docu-
depth of the loop in the stroma un- to treatment by excising or destroy- mented. Thereafter, the patient may
derneath the TZ epithelium. Fig. 11.9 ing the entire TZ and not only the be counselled about the procedure
presents a simple LLETZ in a type 1 lesion. and the follow-up arrangements.
TZ, i.e. a type 1 TZ excision.
After the TZ is removed, it should 11.8 Post-LLETZ wound 11.9 Management of the
be transferred to the attendant, who management specimen
may transect it and pin it onto a cork
board before immersion in formalin There are few RCTs of post-LLETZ The extirpated TZ will be processed
(Fig. 11.10). It is also worth immers- management, but the evidence according to the preferences of the
ing the extirpated TZ in a graduated suggests that Monsel’s paste (see pathologist. Some prefer to section
Fig. 11.9. A simple type 1 excision in a patient with HSIL in a type 1 transformation zone. (a) The cervix after the
application of Lugol’s iodine. (b) Local infiltration of prilocaine with felypressin. (c) The loop just before the procedure.
(d) The cervix immediately after the procedure, with the resected transformation zone still in situ. (e) The cervical
wound before fulgurative diathermy coagulation. (f) The cervical wound after fulgurative diathermy coagulation.
a b c
d e f
a b Thickness of specimen
Length of
specimen
Circumference of specimen
the unopened disc of tissue, and oth- there are symptoms suggestive of insignificant increase in subsequent
ers to open it before fixing in formal- either a severe infection or, more se- pregnancy-related complications,
dehyde. The latter technique has the riously, an electrosurgical injury. whereas removing a large amount
advantage that it allows for longitudi- of tissue by cold-knife excision, laser
nal sections through the entire length 11.11 Complications after excision, or electrosurgery is likely to
of the excised TZ and allows assess- LLETZ cause a definite increase in subse-
ment of margin status at either end quent pregnancy-related complica-
of the specimen (i.e. endocervical In the short term, complications after tions (Arbyn et al., 2008; Castanon
and ectocervical margins). Because LLETZ are mild but are to be expect- et al., 2014; Khalid et al., 2012; Kyr-
of the confusion in the literature be- ed. These include light per vaginal giou et al., 2006, 2014; Strander and
tween terms like “depth” and “height”, bleeding, mild discomfort, and a little Adolfsson, 2014).
these terms have been abandoned in discharge. The bleeding during the
the latest IFCPC nomenclature, and first 2 or 3 weeks is not usually more 11.12 See-and-treat
instead the more universally under- than that which occurs during nor-
stood terms “length” and “thickness” mal menstruation, providing that the “See-and-treat” has several interpre-
(of the open specimen) have been in- cervix was not inflamed at the time tations. It may mean that:
cluded. These dimensions are illus- of LLETZ. Severe bleeding or symp- • every patient with an abnormal
trated in Fig. 11.10 (see also Fig. 7.9). toms suggestive of a secondary in- smear report who has been re-
fection (bleeding greater than during ferred for colposcopy is treated at
11.10 Post-treatment advice to normal menses, discharge, and/or their first visit in the colposcopy
patients pain) are uncommon and should pre- clinic (non-selective see-and-treat);
cipitate immediate return to the clinic or
Every patient should be given a clear- service. • every woman who has a positive
ly written handout of post-LLETZ It is entirely biologically plausible screening test (e.g. VIA) is treated
instructions, and these should be that excision of part of a reproduc- at the time of the screening test
explained verbally before the patient tive organ is likely to compromise (non-selective screen-and-treat); or
leaves the clinic. The handout should its function. Since the review of Kyr- • only those women in whom both
state what has been performed, de- giou et al. (2006), there have been the primary screening test and
scribe the likely short-term course a plethora of publications reporting the colposcopic impression are
(mild bleeding for a few weeks), conflicting evidence about the risk in agreement and suspect a high-
provide advice to abstain from pen- of premature labour after excision- grade abnormality are treated (se-
etrative intercourse for a month, and al treatment for cervical precancer. lective see-and-treat).
state what follow-up arrangements The most recent review of the ev- Non-selective see-and-treat (i.e.
have been made. The patient should idence suggests that removing a screen-and-treat) protocols will treat
be advised to return to the clinic if small type 1 TZ is associated with an a large proportion of patients who
96
would not have developed cancer. have completed their family, it is rea- risk of subsequent pregnancy-relat-
This is not to say that this policy is sonable to treat at a lower threshold ed complications (primarily prema-
wrong; it may be the most efficient than HSIL. A selective see-and- ture labour) (Khalid et al., 2012), it is
CHAPTER 11
and effective way of reducing can- treat protocol is very patient-friendly sometimes necessary to perform a
cer rates in a particular region. But and is a very efficient use of limited type 3 excision. Examples include a
where competently performed col- resources. type 3 TZ with suspected HSIL, glan-
poscopic examination is available, it dular disease, or even suspected
is better to select for treatment only 11.13 Modifications of LLETZ microinvasion. Performing a type 3
those who have a high risk of pro- technique: SWETZ; type 2 excision is not as simple as perform-
gression and to monitor those who and type 3 excisions ing a type 1 excision and may require
have a low risk of progression. There general anaesthesia, depending on
is now good evidence that the risk of The LLETZ (or LEEP) technique de- how large and how long the excision
progression to cancer for histolog- scribed above is for a type 1 exci- needs to be, access to the cervix,
ically proven CIN1 is similar to the sion and is appropriate for the great and patient compliance.
risk for normal epithelium. majority of women with CIN, i.e. for Sometimes a large, long loop will
The logic supporting a selective a small or medium-sized type 1 TZ, be perfectly adequate (Fig. 11.12).
see-and-treat protocol is that for which will be resectable as an out- However, some colposcopists feel
women with a clinically significant patient procedure using local anaes- that the risk of inadequate exci-
risk of progression to cancer (i.e. thesia with a small or medium-sized sion margin status at the upper lim-
HSIL suspected cytologically and loop (Fig. 11.8). However, for some it is greater with a loop and that a
also at colposcopic examination) or cases the technique needs to be straight wire, laser excision, or even
when there is an obvious need to modified, and some cases require cold-knife excision under general
treat, there is little advantage to tak- general anaesthesia, most common- anaesthesia is better. Camargo et
ing a biopsy and asking the patient ly for a type 3 TZ excision. Two ex- al. (2015) have recently published
to return when the result is avail- amples of different excisional meth-
able. During one calendar year at the ods follow. Fig. 11.11. LLETZ removal of the
Coombe Women & Infants University central portion of a large transforma-
Hospital in Dublin, Ireland, where a 11.13.1 Excision of a large tion zone (TZ) with the medium loop
selective see-and-treat protocol pre- and/or irregular TZ (20 × 15 mm) in one sweep includ-
ing the squamocolumnar junction,
vailed, histological audit revealed a
followed by removal of the periph-
very low rate of negative histology Optimal excisional treatment is a bal-
eral parts of the TZ separately as
in the extirpated TZs (< 1%). There ance between removing the entire one or more pieces with one or more
were, however, a relatively large TZ and not removing unnecessary passes of the medium or small loop.
number of low-grade lesions (13.0%, amounts of normal tissue. When the
or 30 of 230 cases) revealed at his- ectocervical component of the TZ (of
tology. On closer examination of the any type, 1, 2, or 3) is very large or
case records of these patients, the very irregular, it is possible that try-
majority (19 of 30) were older than ing to remove it in one piece may re-
40 years and had completed their move a lot of normal tissue. In this
family. The remainder had a refer- case, it is worth considering remov-
ral smear that suspected ASCUS-H ing the central part (always including
(ASCUS, cannot exclude HSIL) or the SCJ). It is then easy to remove
CIN2 (6 cases), ASCUS (4 cases), or destroy the remaining peripheral
or atypical glandular cells of unde- TZ parts separately, as depicted in
termined significance (AGUS) (1 Fig. 11.11.
case). The United Kingdom clinical
guidelines document expects that 11.13.2 Type 3 excision
a see-and-treat protocol should not
produce negative or low-grade his- Excision types are illustrated in
tological reports in more than 10% Fig. 7.4. Although type 3 excisions,
of cases (NHS, 2016). However, in especially large ones, are known to
women older than 40 years who be associated with an increase in the
98
compared with excisional biopsies but some things are well established. demonstrated that disease at the
performed by knife or loop excision, First, women who have been treat- endocervical resection margin is as-
particularly if high-grade disease is ed for cervical precancer are much sociated with increased risk of resid-
CHAPTER 11
present (Anderson, 1986; Chappatte more likely to develop cervical can- ual disease compared with involved
et al., 1991).” cer. This increased risk has been ectocervical margins. Women aged
The available data are not defini- quantified as being 2–5 times the 50 years or older are particularly at
tive, and often the early observation- background risk, and much of it is risk of persistent/recurrent disease
al trials of a treatment are published a result of poor long-term follow-up (Flannelly et al., 2001; Ghaem-
from centres of excellence. Their ex- (Soutter et al., 1997; Strander et al., Maghami et al., 2007).
perience may not equate to success 2007). Several case series of cancer As a result of these studies, it
rates in normal practice. But in sum- demonstrated that more than 50% is clear that women need follow-up
mary, from the available data and the of cancers are in women who are after treatment. Regional facilities
practicality issues mentioned above, lost to follow-up (Ghaem-Maghami and the cost of colposcopy, cytology,
thermal coagulation would appear to et al., 2007) and that this increase and HPV testing will dictate the ap-
be the treatment of choice where col- in risk lasts for 20 years or more. propriate follow-up strategies, but in
poscopy and histopathology servic- Excisional treatments permit histo- terms of test characteristics, there is
es are sparse or unavailable. Where logical assessment of a biopsy and no doubt that HPV testing is the most
they are available, colposcopy and can determine specific risk factors sensitive test and that it has the best
LLETZ are still the gold standard for for residual disease. The NHS Cer- negative predictive values. Several
investigation and management of vical Screening Programme clinical meta-analytical reviews have attest-
women with suspected CIN. guidelines document details several ed to this (Arbyn et al., 2005). In the
retrospective studies (Dobbs et al., context of an organized, system-
11.15 Follow-up after 2000; Flannelly et al., 2001; NHS, atic call-and-recall screening pro-
treatment of CIN 2010; Schantz and Thormann, 1984) gramme, HPV testing has also been
that report residual disease rates af- shown to be cost-effective (Coupé et
Because treatment methods are not ter excision and have demonstrated al., 2007), but the cost of HPV test-
associated with a 100% success that negative excision margins are ing varies and may not be perceived
rate, it is important to establish a fol- associated with lower risk of resid- as being affordable in some LMICs.
low-up protocol to identify the small ual disease and positive excision No matter which method of follow-up
percentage (< 10%) of those treat- margins are associated with higher is arranged, it should continue for at
ed who will have residual CIN. The risk of residual disease. Also, those least 20 years.
rates of residual disease vary con- studies that compared endocervical
siderably in the published literature, with ectocervical margin status have
Key points
• Where possible, every patient requiring treatment should have a colposcopic examination to determine the
transformation zone type and the presence or absence of precancerous or cancerous change.
• Excisional treatment is superior to destructive therapy because it facilitates histological examination of the
transformation zone, whereby the diagnosis may be verified and margin status confirmed.
• Where excisional therapy is not available, destructive therapy is an entirely reasonable alternative to excision.
When destructive therapy is used, the transformation zone should be of type 1 and small, and there should be
no suspicion of invasive or glandular abnormality.
• Excisional therapy should always be performed under colposcopic vision, so as to achieve complete excision
and minimize removal and damage of normal tissue. Some workers would advocate the same for ablative
therapy, particularly where the transformation zone is larger than the probe tip and warrants overlapping ap-
plication (e.g. using cold or thermal coagulation).
Glandular abnormalities,
adenocarcinoma in situ, and
CHAPTER 12
glandular intraepithelial neoplasia
CHAPTER 1
The implementation of a high- cervical glandular disease and only ratio of abnormal glandular smear
coverage and quality-assured cytolo- one of those was pure glandular reports to glandular cancer rates.
gy-based screening programme will dysplasia. There were 4 cases of mi- Although glandular precancer smear
reduce the incidence of and mor- croinvasive adenocarcinoma, 2 un- reports are 0.02 times as common
tality from cervical cancer, largely differentiated cancers, 1 squamous as squamous lesions, glandular can-
because of the effect on squamous cell cancer, and 21 cases of HSIL. cer accounts for 20% or all cervical
disease. This is to be expected, Thirteen women had endometrial pa- cancer cases.
given that cervical cancer preven- thology (8 endometrial cancers), and
tive screening programmes are one woman even had colon cancer. 12.1 Glandular disease
designed to detect squamous cell In all, 16 of the 50 women had a ma-
abnormalities and not glandular dis- lignancy (Pisal et al., 2003). The natural history of glandular pre-
ease. Even in well-screened popu- As many programmes move cancer (adenocarcinoma in situ) or
lations, adenocarcinoma rates have to HPV-based screening, this may high-grade glandular abnormality
been largely unaffected. Glandular change. Because most glandular (cervical glandular intraepitheli-
abnormalities are rare (reported disease exists in the endocervical al neoplasia [CGIN]) is not as well
in 0.5–0.8 cases per 1000), but a site, glandular precancer will of-
mapped out as that of squamous dis-
smear report of glandular abnormal- ten be missed by visual inspection
ease. It is highly likely that glandular
ity is more predictive of disease than methods. However, many glandular
dysplasia will progress to invasive
an equivalent squamous abnormal- lesions coexist in the TZ. Further-
cancer in a significant proportion of
ity, and not only of purely glandular more, many glandular lesions are
abnormalities (Krane et al., 2001). associated with concurrent ectocer- cases, for several reasons.
The study of Pisal et al. (2003) of vical squamous disease. A good il- • Glandular intraepithelial lesions are
50 smears reporting glandular dys- lustration of the failure of screening often found adjacent to invasive
karyosis found that 13 cases were to prevent glandular cancer is the lesions.
Chapter 12. Glandular abnormalities, adenocarcinoma in situ, and glandular intraepithelial neoplasia 101
Fig. 12.1. High-grade glandular dys- Fig. 12.2. Higher-power magnifica lesions, because of their endocervi-
plasia in a gland crypt. tion view of glandular dysplasia. cal site; and the colposcopic signs of
glandular disease are more difficult
to recognize. Also, because glandu-
lar disease is so much less common,
it is more difficult to acquire image
recognition skills for glandular dis-
ease. Colposcopy is important in
the investigation and management
of suspected glandular disease but
on its own has a poor negative or
positive predictive value for glandu-
lar disease (Ullal et al., 2009), and
• The cellularity of CGIN and glan- not as easily discovered, either cyto- abnormal cytology is more likely to
dular cancer are very similar mor- logically or colposcopically. Finally, predict histologically proven glandu-
phologically; indeed, differentiating the colposcopic signs of high-grade lar disease than is colposcopy. This
the very earliest stages of invasive CGIN are less recognizable than is one of the reasons why excisional
adenocarcinoma from intraepitheli- those of HSIL. treatment of suspected high-grade
al disease can be challenging and Several lessons derive from the glandular disease is fundamentally
is often highly subjective (Cullimore above-mentioned situation. First, a important. Although colposcopy may
et al., 1992). histological diagnosis is mandatory recognize signs of glandular disease
• The mean age of women who de- in making a diagnosis of high-grade (Fig. 12.4), it will also often miss the
velop adenocarcinoma in situ is CGIN, and the diagnosis needs to be unheralded case (i.e. not suspected
about 15 years less than that for made with a sufficiently large biopsy, cytologically).
invasive glandular cancer. whereby it is possible to recognize or The interested reader is referred
• Similar HPV types are found in rule out disease. There is no place for to an excellent atlas of colposcopic
CGIN and glandular cancer cases punch biopsies in the investigation images of glandular disease (Wright,
(Zaino, 2000). of CGIN. At the very least, a small 2010); however, not many colposco-
As with squamous disease, low- loop biopsy (or biopsies) is neces- pists feel able to reliably recognize
grade abnormalities are not easily sary. CGIN and adenocarcinoma glandular disease using colposcopy
defined or uniformly agreed upon (Fig. 12.3) is a challenging diagno- alone. Typical signs that have been
between pathologists, whereas high- sis. Colposcopic examination does reported include white lesions ad-
grade CGIN (Figs. 12.1 and 12.2) or not usually discover covert glandular jacent to the SCJ, character writing
adenocarcinoma is a relatively ro- disease, and this is not surprising: (Fig. 12.5), large gland openings,
bust diagnosis. Also, because high- the disease is largely endocervical; fused clumped villi, variegated red
grade glandular disease is much less the concept of an adequate or sat- and white lesions after acetic acid
common than high-grade squamous isfactory colposcopic examination
cancer (at a ratio of about 1:50), it is does not usually apply to glandular
Fig. 12.5. Colposcopic image of a
high-grade glandular lesion using
Fig. 12.3. Cross-section of an ade- Fig. 12.4. Colposcopic image of a the green filter to highlight blood
nocarcinoma. high-grade glandular lesion. vessel patterns.
102
application, and exophytic white 12.3 Excisional treatment with to 5 mm from the margin of the canal
lesions. CGIN: what type and how big? (Bertrand et al., 1987). Cylindrical
type 3 excisions avoid this potential
12.2 Management of suspected A cylindrical type 3 excision should problem.
glandular dysplasia be performed using a straight wire,
a cold knife, or a laser to perform 12.4 Anatomical distribution
The definitive management of glan- the excision. LLETZ may also be of CGIN
dular dysplasia is excision of the TZ used if the operator is experienced
and a proportion of full-thickness en- and audit reveals clear undamaged The interested reader is referred to
docervical canal epithelium. When margins in excised tissue. It is cru- John Cullimore’s excellent chapter
a borderline glandular smear has cial that the pathologist has sufficient on glandular disease (Cullimore,
CHAPTER 12
been reported, it may be sufficient and undamaged tissue with which 2003), and his illustrations of the
to perform colposcopy and biopsy, to make a diagnosis and assess distribution of CGIN are reproduced
but where there is any suspicion of margin involvement. The diagrams in Fig. 12.8. Bertrand et al. (1987),
genuine CGIN, excisional treatment in Figs. 12.6 and 12.7 illustrate this Nicklin et al. (1991), and Teshima
is mandatory. This is for several point. The traditional cone biopsy et al. (1985) have also examined
reasons. has a cone shape and is likely to the subject in detail. The disease is
• Most glandular disease has an en- miss disease at the base of deep unicentric in more than 85% of cas-
docervical component, and there- cervical clefts, which can extend up es and arises just above the SCJ. It
fore destructive techniques are
contraindicated. Fig. 12.6. A traditional cone biopsy, Fig. 12.7. A cylindrical type 3 exci-
• It is often not possible to determine which risks inadequate excision at sion, which is less likely to produce
the extent of endocervical involve- the upper margin and excessive incomplete excision and removes
removal of stromal tissue. less normal stromal tissue.
ment of dysplastic epithelium in the
canal. Colposcopic assessment of
glandular dysplasia is less reliable
than with squamous disease.
• Multicentric disease (skip lesions)
occurs with glandular disease in
about 15% of cases.
• About 50% of cases of glandu-
lar disease will have concomitant
squamous disease.
Fig. 12.8. Distribution of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN). TZ, transformation zone.
Chapter 12. Glandular abnormalities, adenocarcinoma in situ, and glandular intraepithelial neoplasia 103
usually extends in a contiguous fash- Fig. 12.9. Distribution of the site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the endo-
ion up the endocervical canal. Skip cervical canal.
lesions are uncommon but not rare
(Zaino, 2002), but the distribution is Cervicoendometrial junction
multicentric in approximately 15%
of cases. Fortunately, in more than Site of origin of invasive
95% of cases in women younger adenocarcinoma Upper third
than 36 years, the disease appears
to be confined to within 10 mm of the 6%
SCJ, whereas in women older than 3%
Middle third
35 years it can extend to 20 mm or 10%
25 mm above the SCJ.
As for invasive disease, the 20%
distribution is equally important Lower third
60%
(Fig. 12.9). Teshima et al. (1985),
reporting the histological findings of
30 cases of early adenocarcinoma Squamocolumnar junction
of the endocervical glandular epi-
thelium, reported that 27 of 30 orig-
inated in the lower third of the canal, and clear margins are powerful as has completed her family, then the
and of these 18 were exclusively in negative predictors of residual/re- initial excision should include a fur-
the lower third. Lee and Flynn (2000) current disease. Salani et al. (2009) ther 5 mm of endocervical canal. For
reported that invasive disease was undertook a meta-analysis of ob- women older than 35 years in whom
found originating in or immediately servational studies including a total future fertility is not desired, the initial
adjacent to the TZ in 78% of their of 1278 patients and found positive excision should be 20–25 mm of en-
case series. Also, 85% of the cases margins to be associated with a clini- docervical canal epithelium and, of
in their series had associated CGIN cally important increase in the risk of course, should also include the TZ.
or adenocarcinoma in situ. When both residual precancerous glandu- For whichever excisional length is
managing women with abnormal lar disease and the development of chosen, the excision should be cylin-
glandular disease, one is as likely to invasive disease (Table 12.1). drical and should excise a one-piece
discover covert cancer as covert ad- specimen. Invasive disease (squa-
enocarcinoma in situ. This is another 12.5 Individualizing treatment mous or glandular) should not be
reason that complete excision and with CGIN excised in pieces. After the precise
histopathologically clear margins diagnosis has been made and inva-
are crucial when treating glandular Taking the above-mentioned data sive cancer has been ruled out, the
dysplasia. into account, a reasonable approach patient may be followed up until she
These findings have important to the management of CGIN is to in- has completed her family. It is impor-
clinical implications. How much of dividualize it. For young women who tant to recognize that clear margins
the endocervical canal should be ex- still wish to have children, it is rea- do not give the same degree of nega-
cised is influenced by the position of sonable to limit the excision to 12– tive prediction against recurrence as
the SCJ (the upper limit of the TZ) as 15 mm above the TZ and, also, to in- with squamous disease. The risk of
well as the woman’s age, her fertil- clude the entire TZ in the specimen. recurrence after treatment for glan-
ity aspirations, and the likelihood of Coincident squamous disease is dular disease is 3 times that for squa-
default from follow-up. Glandular dis- common (NHS, 2010). If the woman mous disease. Once the patient has
ease typically presents in women of
reproductive age, and many women Table 12.1. Risk associated with incomplete excision
will not have completed their family,
Risk Positive margins Negative margins
so that taking the minimum amount of
tissue necessary would seem sensi- Risk of residual CGIN 19.4% 2.6%
ble. However, there is good evidence Risk of subsequent invasive cancer 6% 0.35%
that histologically involved margins
CGIN, cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia.
are a risk factor for residual disease,
104
completed her family, a hysterectomy addition of HPV testing (NHS, 2016), which is more difficult to monitor than
is probably wise. Until then, follow-up although the evidence base for this ectocervical squamous precancer.
with endocervical brush cytology, recommendation is unclear. Women Finally, when HPV vaccination pro-
HPV testing, and colposcopic exam- who decide not to have a hysterec- grammes become universal, CGIN
ination at least annually is prudent; tomy in the presence of true glandu- rates will begin to fall. CGIN is uni-
recent NHS Cervical Screening Pro- lar disease need to know that there versally associated with high-risk
gramme guidelines imply that this is a risk of residual disease and of HPV (types 16 and 18).
can be further rationalized since the the development of invasive cancer,
Key points
CHAPTER 12
•T
he diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) can only be made at histology.
•C
ytology and colposcopy are unreliable methods of detecting CGIN.
• Excision of the transformation zone and part of the endocervical canal is the diagnostic and treatment method
of choice for CGIN.
•N
egative margins are good but not absolutely reliable markers of complete treatment.
• With precancerous glandular disease, the definitive treatment is hysterectomy, which may usually be deferred
until the patient has completed her family.
• Conservative management of CGIN is justified in young women, assured of adequate follow-up, until the
patient has completed her family, when hysterectomy should be considered.
•F
ollow-up should continue for 10 years or more, or until hysterectomy and for 1 year after hysterectomy.
Chapter 12. Glandular abnormalities, adenocarcinoma in situ, and glandular intraepithelial neoplasia 105
chapter 13.
Microinvasive squamous
cervical cancer
CHAPTER 13
CHAPTER 1
This chapter deals with microin- The risk of lymph node involve- basement membrane but has not
vasive squamous cervical cancer ment in stage IA1 disease is very spread beyond the superficial stro-
(Fig. 13.1). It is an introduction to the low. Ostör (1993), in a study of ma. Currently, the term is reserved
disease and not a reference text. several thousand cases, estimated for lesions with a depth of less than
A gynaecologist caring for women the probability of lymph node in- 3 mm (stage IA1) or 5 mm (stage
with cervical cancer should, ideally, volvement to be 0.1% if the depth of IA2) and a width of less than 7 mm.
undertake a subspecialist training invasion was less than 1 mm (3 out Table 13.1 details the FIGO staging
course. of 2274 cases) and 0.5% if the depth of early invasive squamous cervical
was between 1 mm and 3 mm (7 out cancer.
13.1 Early preclinical micro- of 1324 cases). As noted above, these very ear-
invasive disease of the cervix Microinvasive disease is not of- ly lesions are usually asymptomatic
(stages IA1 and IA2) ten symptomatic but may present
with abnormal per vaginal bleeding. Fig. 13.1. Low-power view of inva-
The management of cancer de- The referral smear, if there is one, sive squamous cervical cancer.
pends crucially on the stage of the will usually report features of an HSIL
disease. Microinvasive disease, or but may occasionally describe spe-
International Federation of Gyne- cific cytological markers for invasion.
cology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stag-
es IA1 and IA2, constitutes invasive 13.2 Clinical features of
cancer at its earliest stage. It has microinvasive disease
broken through the basement mem-
brane but does not extend beyond a “Microinvasive disease” is a wide-
depth of 3 mm (stage IA1) or 5 mm ly used term, which refers to very
(stage IA2) or a width of 7 mm. early disease that has breached the
c d
108
Fig. 13.4. Vascular patterns. (a–f) Abnormal blood vessel patterns (apart (Fig. 13.9). The colposcopist needs
from mosaic and punctate patterns) are irregular in a variety of ways. to be especially gentle in performing
Their common feature is lack of branching and any form of symmetry. application of fluid and manipulation
(a) Wide hairpin-like vessel. (b) Waste thread vessel. (c) Tendril-like vessel. of the cervix when the diagnosis of
(d) Bizarre branching waste thread vessel. (e) Pollarded vessel. (f) Comma-
microinvasion is suspected.
shaped or tadpole vessel. Normal blood vessel patterns branch like a tree
does. (g) Normal branching vascular patterns, often best seen stretched
over a nabothian follicle. 13.4 Management of suspected
microinvasive disease
a b c g
The diagnosis of microinvasion can
only be made at histology. Further-
more, the stage of invasion can only
be accurately assessed if the entire
d e f
lesion is presented to the pathologist,
preferably as one excised specimen.
Unfortunately, punch biopsies are
unreliable when assessing possible
CHAPTER 13
microinvasion as they are sometimes
Fig. 13.5. (a) A normally branching tree. (b) A pollarded tree. not deep or wide enough for the pa-
a b thologist to confidently recognize the
disease or its extent. A small loop bi-
opsy or removal of a wedge-shaped
piece of tissue using a cold knife (a
wedge biopsy) will usually provide
an adequate specimen, but once the
diagnosis of microinvasion is made
or seriously suspected, the entire
TZ with a clear margin of normal tis-
Fig. 13.7. Bizarre branching vessels, sue should be excised as one piece.
Fig. 13.6. An example of a pollarded
vessel, at the centre of the image. seen here using the green filter. How this specimen is removed will
vary; depending on the experience
and expertise of the colposcopist, it
is entirely reasonable to use LLETZ,
SWETZ, laser excision, or cold-knife
excision, providing that the colposco-
pist can ensure a sufficient margin of
normal tissue surrounding the lesion.
When there is any extent of endocer-
vical involvement (type 2 or type 3
TZ), the procedure should excise a
Fig. 13.8. The ridge sign, seen here Fig. 13.9. Epithelial stripping, seen cylindrical specimen such that the
in an island of acetowhite epithe- here at the 6 o’clock position in this upper extent of the specimen does
lium. case of microinvasion. not cut across or damage lesional
tissue with diathermy (Figs. 12.6 and
12.7). For the inexperienced opera-
tor, it is probably wiser to perform the
excision under general anaesthesia
in an operating theatre.
Once the diagnosis has been
made, the histology slides should be
reviewed by the pathologist to as-
sess as accurately as possible the
110
Table 13.3. FIGO classification of malignant tumours of the cervix
Stage Description
Stage I Stage I is carcinoma strictly confined to the cervix; extension to the uterine corpus should be disregarded. The diagnosis
of both stages IA1 and IA2 should be based on microscopic examination of removed tissue, preferably a cone, which must
include the entire lesion.
Stage IA Invasive cancer identified only microscopically. Invasion is limited to measured stromal invasion with a maximum depth of
5 mm and no wider than 7 mm in diameter.
Stage IA1 Measured invasion of the stroma no greater than 3 mm in depth and no wider than 7 mm in diameter.
Stage IA2 Measured invasion of the stroma greater than 3 mm but no greater than 5 mm in depth and no wider than 7 mm in diameter.
Stage IB Clinical lesions confined to the cervix or preclinical lesions greater than stage IA. All gross lesions even with superficial
invasion are stage IB cancers.
CHAPTER 13
Stage III Stage III is carcinoma that has extended into the pelvic sidewall. On rectal examination, there is no cancer-free space
between the tumour and the pelvic sidewall. The tumour involves the lower third of the vagina. All cases with hydronephrosis
or a non-functioning kidney are stage III cancers.
Stage IIIA No extension into the pelvic sidewall but involvement of the lower third of the vagina.
Stage IIIB Extension into the pelvic sidewall or hydronephrosis or a non-functioning kidney.
Stage IV Stage IV is carcinoma that has extended beyond the true pelvis or has clinically involved the mucosa of the bladder and/or
rectum.
Stage IVA Spread of the tumour into adjacent pelvic organs.
Stage IVB Spread to distant organs.
FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
lymphoedema. When the tumour appear as a cauliflower-like growth. cancers often produce a hard, bar-
spreads anteriorly, it may cause any When tumours are endophytic, they rel-shaped cervix. Some cancers
urinary symptom, including haema- may infiltrate extensively, with very may be both endophytic and exo-
turia, bladder pain, and urinary reten- little epithelial revelation. Endophytic phytic. Infection is commonly asso-
tion, or even symptoms associated growths may expand the cervix for ciated with exophytic cancers. With
with a vesicovaginal fistula. Poste- several centimetres before breach- advanced cervical cancer, the cervix
rior involvement will often cause ing the epithelial surface. Endophytic usually bleeds on contact. Regional
back pain, tenesmus, and symp-
toms associated with a rectovaginal Table 13.4. Available investigations for staging cervical cancer
fistula. With late-stage disease, the Type of investigation Available investigations
Fig. 13.11. (a) Keratinizing well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. (b) Non-keratinizing well-
differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. (c) Adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
112
growth is preferred for diagnosis, Fig. 13.12. Diagrammatic representation of cervical cancer staging.
because this is more likely to contain
morphologically intact tumour tissue,
whereas a biopsy specimen tak-
en from the centre of a growth may Lateral pelvic wall
Bladder
Rectum
contain necrotic material, which will Parametrium
compromise the accuracy of histo-
Upper 2/3 vagina
logical diagnosis. Also, punch biop-
sies may not procure enough tissue Lower 1/3 vagina
to allow for a confident histological
diagnosis. A large punch biopsy, a
small loop biopsy, or a wedge biopsy
(or a TZ excision biopsy) will allow for
a definitive diagnosis.
The best management for a pa-
tient with cervical cancer depends Invasive cancer
crucially on the accurate staging of
CHAPTER 13
the disease as well as a compre-
STAGE I STAGE IIA STAGE IIB
hensive evaluation of the patient’s
general physical condition and her
individual circumstances. Currently,
optimal care cannot be offered to
all women in LMICs because of the
lack of equipment, lack of trained
staff, competing health-care needs,
and other factors. Case mortality
differences between LMICs and de- STAGE IIIA STAGE IIIB STAGE IVA
veloped countries reflect the lack of
resources in LMICs as well as the
relative deficiency in health for many precisely and the stage determined. There have been more than 20
low-income women in LMICs. Then a management plan may be different definitions of microinva-
The global standard staging outlined to the patient and treatment sion in the literature (Marsden et
system is that provided by FIGO. may be begun. al., 2006). In summary, the most
Fig. 13.12 is a diagram of this cervical recent and widely used is the FIGO
cancer staging system. It is primarily 13.7 Treatment of squamous classification (Kurman et al., 2014),
a clinical staging system, based on microinvasive cervical cancer which limits microinvasive disease
the tumour size and the extent of to a depth of 5 mm and a width of
spread from the original epithelium The treatment of squamous cervi- 7 mm (stage IA1 limits the depth to
source. As well as clinical assess- cal cancer may be surgical and/or 3 mm and stage IA2 to 5 mm). The
ment of tumour size and spread, an radiotherapeutic. Radiotherapy may likelihood of there being positive
array of methods, if available, will al- be used for all stages of squamous lymph nodes in stage IA1 disease
low more precise staging of disease cervical cancer, although in practice is remote. For stage IA1 disease, a
(Table 13.4). Usually, as well as clin- few centres would treat stage IA1 simple but complete and intact (i.e.
ical assessment, X-ray assessment, disease other than by surgical ex- one-piece) excision is the treatment
intravenous pyelogram, skeletal cision. Surgery is usually reserved of choice. Chapters 14 and 15 deal,
X-ray, and cystoscopy will be avail- for disease confined to the cervix. respectively, with the surgical and
able in dedicated cancer centres in Radiotherapy regimes vary and may non-surgical treatment of later-stage
LMICs. After as full an assessment be used exclusively or to shrink the disease.
as possible has been undertaken, tumour in preparation for surgical
the findings should be documented excision.
• The colposcopic appearances of microinvasion are similar to but often more exaggerated than those associ-
ated with high-grade but pre-invasive or intraepithelial change.
•E
xcisional therapy is the mainstay of treatment for microinvasion.
114
chapter 14.
Surgical management of
early invasive cervical cancer
CHAPTER 1
CHAPTER 14
Wertheim described the prin- morbidity, including intra-operative on improvement in quality of life, free
ciples of surgical management of deaths, in his case series. Radical of long-term treatment sequelae.
invasive cervical cancer more than vaginal hysterectomy was initially Like for any other malignancies, in-
100 years ago in his treatise on 500 described by Schauta (1908) and volvement of a multidisciplinary team
cervical cancers operated by radi- was subsequently combined with ex- comprising gynaecological oncolo-
cal hysterectomy (Wertheim, 1912). traperitoneal lymphadenectomy by gists, radiation and medical oncolo-
Wertheim’s radical hysterectomy Mitra (1959). Over the past decades, gists, pathologists, and radiologists
included removal of the uterus, up- two major developments have taken can optimize the patient care.
per vagina, and adjacent supporting place in the surgical management of The management of microinva-
tissues medial to the ureters, along early cervical cancer: the increasing sive cancer (stage IA1) has been de-
with the metastatic lymph nodes. use of minimal access techniques scribed in Chapter 13. In this chapter,
In the 1940s, Meigs introduced the for radical surgery, and tailoring the the discussion is restricted to princi-
concept of routine systematic pel- radicality of surgery to the extent of ples of surgical management of more
vic lymphadenectomy along with the disease. With the increasing pop- advanced cervical cancers. Detailed
extended parametrial dissection up ularity of minimal access surgeries, descriptions of the steps of radical
to the lateral pelvic wall. With his im- there has been a renewed interest in surgeries are beyond the scope of
proved technique, he demonstrated radical vaginal hysterectomy. this manual.
a high survival rate (Meigs, 1951). Because of the effective screen-
By that time, the surgical practice ing programmes, early-stage cervi- 14.1 Diagnosis and staging
had become much safer with the cal cancers are increasingly being
use of antibiotics, thromboprophy- detected in younger women. These Diagnosis of cervical cancer should
laxis, and administration of blood women have a long life expectancy be confirmed by histology before
products. As a result, Meigs could after treatment, and the management treatment is planned. Like for cancers
also demonstrate significantly lower strategies are increasingly focusing of other sites, the management of
Table 14.1. FIGO staging for cervical cancer (last updated in 2009)
FIGO stage (2009) Description
IA Only microscopically visible lesion with stromal invasion not exceeding 5.0 mm and horizontal extension not exceeding
7.0 mm
IA1 Stromal invasion no greater than 3 mm in depth and no wider than 7 mm in diameter
IA2 Stromal invasion greater than 3 mm but does not exceed 5 mm in depth and no wider than 7 mm in diameter
IB Microscopic lesion exceeding stage IA2 or clinically visible lesion confined to the cervix
II Tumour extends beyond the cervix but not to the pelvic wall or to the lower third of the vagina (extension to corpus should
be disregarded)
III Tumour extends to the pelvic wall and/or involves the lower third of the vagina and/or causes hydronephrosis or non-
functioning kidney
IIIA Extends to the lower third of the vagina without any spread to the lateral pelvic wall
IIIB Extends to the pelvic wall and/or causes hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney
IV Tumour involves the bladder or rectal mucosa and/or extends beyond the true pelvis
116
intraepithelial neoplasia. Vesical co-morbidities, and availability of ed as much as possible. Surgery
involvement should be suspected and access to different treatment op- should not be attempted or may be
if there is extensive involvement of tions. Radical surgery for early cer- abandoned if there is any suspicion
the anterior vaginal wall by a large vical cancer requires good surgical that the patient would require radio-
growth with induration of the blad- skills and operative facilities. Defini- therapy in spite of surgery. Patients
der base. Rectal examination is very tive surgical management is feasible with bulky tumour volume and radio-
valuable to diagnose the nature and only in early stages of the disease, logical evidence of lymph node in-
extent of parametrial involvement such as stages IA, IB1, and IIA1, volvement should not be scheduled
and infiltration of the disease to the when the vaginal involvement does for surgery and should be referred
rectal mucosa. Pelvic and abdom- not extend beyond 2 cm. Radiother- directly for radiotherapy.
inal ultrasonography has replaced apy can be equally effective at the
routine intravenous urography to ex- early stages, although surgical treat- 14.3 Radical hysterectomy for
clude hydroureter and hydronephro- ment is preferred. The major advan- cervical cancer
sis. Ultrasonography provides addi- tages of surgery are preservation of
tional information, such as the size ovarian function, better preservation The most common surgery for early
of the growth, possible invasion of of sexual function (by avoiding radia- invasive cervical cancer is a com-
the bladder and rectum, metastasis tion-induced stenosis and shortening bination of radical hysterectomy
to the liver, and so forth. Cystoscopy of the vagina), accurate assessment and bilateral pelvic lymphadenecto-
and proctosigmoidoscopy should be of the lymph node status, and avoid- my. Radical hysterectomy involves
performed if there are clinical and/ ance of long-term radiation seque- en bloc removal of the uterus with
or radiological suspicions of bladder lae, such as vaginal atrophy, steno- the cervix, the upper vagina, and
and rectal involvement, respectively. sis, and bladder and rectal morbidity. the parametrium. Ovaries can be
Bladder or rectal mucosal involve- Fertility can also be preserved by preserved in younger women with
ment has to be proven by histology. specialized surgical procedures. Ra- squamous cell cancers, because
CHAPTER 14
Bullous oedema of the bladder epi- diation-induced long-term complica- the risk of the tumour spreading to
thelium does not, by itself, confirm tions, especially cystitis and proctitis, the ovaries is very low in these pa-
malignant infiltration of the bladder can be very distressing to the patient tients. During surgery, the ovaries
wall. Additional information may and difficult to treat. Radiotherapy are trans-positioned retroperitoneal-
be obtained from CT scans, MRI, may be the treatment of choice for ly above the pelvic brim so that they
and PET scans. MRI (thin-section early cervical cancer in women with escape radiation-induced damage in
T2-weighted images perpendicular co-morbid conditions that may make case the patient requires postopera-
to the cervix) is more accurate than surgical interventions more risky. For tive radiotherapy.
other imaging modalities in assess- small-volume early disease, survival The extent of radicality of the
ing the tumour volume and the extent outcomes are similar for surgery and surgery depends on the size and
of spread to the vagina or parame- radiotherapy. As a general principle, the nature of the tumour. Piver et
trium and is useful in selecting cas- surgery should be avoided if there is al. (1974) classified radical hyster-
es for more conservative surgery. a need for adjuvant radiotherapy or ectomy into five types, ranging from
Involvement of pelvic and para-aor- chemoradiotherapy. extrafascial hysterectomy (type I) to
tic nodes can be best assessed by From stages IB2, IIA1 with vaginal partial resection of the ureter and
PET-CT scan. However, the results involvement of more than 2 cm, and bladder along with the uterus and
of these specialized diagnostic pro- IIA2 onward, radiotherapy (with or vagina (type V). Each class requires
cedures should not alter the initial without concomitant cisplatin-based progressively more radical resec-
clinical FIGO staging. chemotherapy) is the treatment of tion than the previous one and is
choice, because the incidence of associated with increased morbid-
14.2 Principles of surgical lymph node metastasis increases ity (Fig. 14.1). Querleu and Morrow
treatment of early cervical significantly (> 35%) if the size of (2008) modified Piver’s classification
cancer the lesion exceeds 4 cm (stage IB2 and included paracervical lymph
or stage IIA2). It is important to un- node dissection and nerve-sparing
The management of cervical cancer derstand that the combination of radical hysterectomy. The compari-
depends on the age of the patient, surgery and radiotherapy increases son between the two classifications
the stage of the disease, wheth- the risk of post-treatment morbidities is shown in Table 14.2. Piver type V
er fertility preservation is required, several-fold and should be avoid- has become obsolete, because the
118
Table 14.2. Comparison between the classifications of radical hysterectomy by Piver et al. (1974) and Querleu and
Morrow (2008)
Class I Extrafascial hysterectomy Type A Extrafascial hysterectomy Stage IA1 with LVSI
Ureter not dissected Cardinal and uterosacral ligaments
Cardinal and uterosacral ligaments resected resected as close as possible to uterus
as close as possible to uterus Removal of < 1 cm of vagina
Vagina not excised
Class II Modified radical hysterectomy Type B1 Ureters mobilized laterally Stage IA2
Uterine artery ligated medial to the ureters Partial resection of vesico-uterine and
Ureter freed from paracervical tissues but not uterosacral ligaments
mobilized from pubovesical ligament Resection of paracervical tissue at ureteric
Cardinal ligament resected up to medial half tunnel
Uterosacral ligament resected midway from At least 1 cm of vagina from cervix or
sacral insertion tumour excised
Lateral paracervical lymph nodes not
removed
Class III Radical hysterectomy Type C1 Complete mobilization of ureter Stage IB1 (> 2 cm);
Complete mobilization of ureter including Complete resection of paracervical tissue stage IIA1
from pubovesical ligament Sectioning of uterosacral ligaments at the
Uterine artery ligated at origin level of the rectum
Cardinal ligament resected close to pelvic 1.5–2 cm of vagina from cervix or tumour
wall resected with paracolpos
Uterosacral ligament excised near sacral Autonomic nerve supply preserved
insertion
CHAPTER 14
Upper half of vagina removed Type C2 All resections as per type C1
Autonomic nerve supply not preserved
Class IV Complete dissection of ureter Type D1 Ureter fully mobilized Recurrent (central,
Umbilical-vesical artery sacrificed Complete resection of paracervical tissues < 4 cm) cervical cancer
Three quarters of upper vagina excised up to lateral pelvic wall
Internal iliac vessels tied
Sciatic nerve roots exposed
14.4 Pelvic lymphadenectomy rator nodes should be collected from detected either by injecting 1% iso-
for cervical cancer below the obturator nerve up to the sulfan blue dye around the tumour
level of the pelvic diaphragm. or by injecting 99mTc-nanocolloid into
Pelvic lymphadenectomy includes Identification of the sentinel node the tumour after anaesthesia (van de
removal of all the lymph nodes along and tailoring of the subsequent man- Lande et al., 2007). Sometimes both
with the fibro-fatty tissues from the agement based on the histology of are used, for more accurate detec-
external iliac, internal iliac, and com- the node is widely practised in breast tion. The sentinel node is detected
mon iliac vessels and also from the cancer, vulvar cancer, and so forth. mostly in the internal iliac, obtura-
obturator fossa. The distal extent of The sentinel lymph node is the first tor, or external iliac group of nodes,
nodal dissection is the crossing of node involved in case of lymphatic in that order of frequency, and has
the deep circumflex iliac vein over spread, and if the sentinel node is a high negative predictive value.
the external iliac artery, and the prox- negative, the remainder of the nodes If the frozen-section histopatholo-
imal extent is the aortic bifurcation or in the nodal basin are considered to gy of the sentinel node is negative,
at least the middle of the length of be free of disease. In early cervical further systematic lymphadenec-
the common iliac artery. The obtu- cancer, the sentinel node can be tomy and the consequential risk of
120
• deep stromal invasion (greater tomy in appropriately selected cases the clinical extent of disease and the
than 10 mm); is high. Rates of 5-year disease-free gestational age. A biopsy is man-
• LVSI; survival have been reported to be datory to confirm diagnosis, and it
• parametrial infiltration; between 80% and 95% (Ware and may be necessary to resort to MRI
• positive or close vaginal or parame- van Nagell, 2010). The survival rate to establish the stage of disease. In
trial margin. decreases significantly with the in- patients with stage IA2 or stage IB
For these high-risk cases, post- volvement of lymph nodes and the disease, waiting for viability of the fe-
operative pelvic irradiation substan- parametrium, in spite of the adju- tus may be an option if there is no ev-
tially reduces the local recurrence vant radiotherapy. Although there is idence of lymphatic spread. Patients
rate, at the cost of a high incidence of concern about the prognostic signifi- with stage IA2 or stage IB disease
some of the distressing side-effects, cance of adenocarcinoma, large pro- and with lymph node spread should
like lymphoedema, increased urinary spective and retrospective studies undergo immediate treatment.
frequency, bladder dysfunctions, di- have not found any difference in sur- Patients with stage II and great-
arrhoea, radiation cystitis, and radi- vival between early-stage patients er disease should undergo radio-
ation proctitis. Radiotherapy involves with squamous cell carcinoma and therapy or chemoradiotherapy. If
a combination of external beam ra- those with adenocarcinoma. possible, fetal evacuation should be
diotherapy and brachytherapy. performed before radiotherapy is ini-
14.9 Surgical management of tiated. If evacuation is not feasible,
14.8 Survival after treatment early cervical cancer during radiation will result in spontaneous
of early-stage cervical cancer pregnancy abortion 4–5 weeks after initiation of
radiotherapy.
The survival rate after radical hys- The treatment of cervical cancer
terectomy and pelvic lymphadenec- during pregnancy is determined by
CHAPTER 14
Key points
• Radical hysterectomy with lymph node dissection is the classic surgical option for the treatment of early
cervical cancer, up to stage IIA1.
•R
adiation may be used for every treatable stage of cervical cancer.
• Radical trachelectomy is increasingly popular as fertility-preserving surgery for stage IA2 or stage IB1 disease.
• Laparoscopic access is the preferred access method for treatment, where adequate training and equipment
are in place.
Non-surgical management
of cervical cancer
CHAPTER 1
This chapter deals with the urinary bladder and the small and accurate radiation delivery, with the
treatment modalities used in the large bowels, and thus ICR is need- potential for dose escalation, im-
non-surgical management of cer- ed to deliver cancerocidal doses to proved tumour control, and reduced
CHAPTER 15
vical cancer. These include radio- the gross tumour in the cervix and toxicity by minimizing the dose to the
therapy, chemotherapy, and various parametrium. surrounding normal tissues. Howev-
combinations of radiotherapy and For many patients with advanced er, these techniques require sophis-
chemotherapy. loco-regional disease, radiotherapy ticated equipment infrastructure and
may be integrated with concomitant adequately trained personnel and
15.1 Radiotherapy chemotherapy to augment the pros- are not feasible in low-income coun-
pects of a cure. The primary goals tries with weak health systems.
Radiotherapy for cervical cancer of EBRT are to sterilize regional dis-
usually involves a combination of ease and to shrink the central tumour, 15.1.1 Radiotherapy
external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to facilitate subsequent ICR. Ideally, equipment
and brachytherapy using intracav- the entire course of treatment should
itary radiotherapy (ICR). The goal be completed in less than 8 weeks; Radiotherapy for cervical cancer in-
of the treatment is to balance EBRT excessive prolongation of the overall volves both EBRT and ICR.
and ICR in a way that maximizes the treatment time may compromise dis- In EBRT, the radiation is deliv-
likelihood of loco-regional tumour ease control. ered as a beam from a radioactive
control while minimizing the risk of With image-based technical ad- source kept at a source-to-axis
treatment complications. vances such as three-dimensional distance of 100 cm or 80 cm in a
The total radiation dose that can conformal radiotherapy, intensi- teletherapy machine such as a lin-
be delivered to the pelvis by EBRT ty-modulated radiotherapy, and im- ear accelerator (linac) (Fig. 15.1) or
is limited by the tolerance of normal age-guided radiotherapy, it is pos- a telecobalt machine (Fig. 15.2).
tissues in the pelvis, such as the sible to provide more precise and Modern teletherapy machines are
124
Fig. 15.3. High-dose-rate remote af- tolerance in the radiotherapy portals ICR can be given using a high
terloading brachytherapy machine. or fields and the cancerocidal dose dose rate over a few minutes (5–
required to destroy the cancer cells 15 minutes) per session or a low
and the lesion in radical treatments. dose rate over 20–60 hours. Low-
The normal tissue tolerance dose dose-rate brachytherapy is delivered
varies between tissues/organs and at a dose rate to point A (see below)
depends on the proportion of tis- of less than 0.5 Gy/hour, typically
sues/organs treated. using caesium-137. Since the early
Radiotherapy dose is described 2000s, the traditional low-dose-rate
in terms of grays (Gy) or centigrays brachytherapy with caesium-137 has
(cGy = 0.01 Gy). The total radiation largely been replaced by high-dose-
dose is usually divided into several rate brachytherapy with iridium-192.
small fractions of radiation (about With high-dose-rate brachytherapy,
180 cGy or 200 cGy per fraction), a remote afterloading technology al-
which, as daily treatment progress- lows the iridium source attached to
es, gradually accumulate to the total the end of a cable to be robotically
dose prescribed. Radiation is usual- driven through multiple channels,
ly delivered as one fraction per day, stopping at predetermined dwell po-
5 days per week for a total period sitions for varied lengths of time. The
of 4–8 weeks. Fractionation of the most common fractionation sched-
total radiation dose over a period of ules for high-dose-rate brachyther-
4–8 weeks leads to maximum can- apy are 5–6 Gy in 5 fractions or
brachytherapy is similar to that of cer cell kill while allowing maximal 7 Gy in 4 fractions. High-dose-rate
low-dose-rate brachytherapy in recovery of and minimal damage to fractions are typically delivered 1 or
terms of loco-regional control and normal cells. During the interval be- 2 times per week.
complication rates. tween the fractions, normal cells re-
cover much faster than tumour cells, 15.1.3 Radiotherapy reference
15.1.2 Radiotherapy dose ideally resulting in maximum tumour points and EBRT portals
cell kill and minimal damage to nor-
It is important to prescribe the optimal mal tissues. The target volume for treatment of
dose for both radical and palliative ra- Radical radiotherapy doses are cervical cancer involves the gross
CHAPTER 15
diotherapy and to measure the dose typically 35–40 Gy in 15–20 frac- tumour as defined by clinical and
correctly to avoid unintended dam- tions over 3–4 weeks for highly ra- radiological investigations as well as
age to normal tissues. Radical treat- diosensitive lymphomas and germ- the suspected subclinical disease
ment refers to prescription of a high cell tumours, whereas the doses and the parametrial, pararectal, in-
dose of radiation with curative intent, range from 50 Gy in 15 fractions over ternal iliac, external iliac, common
while accepting a certain amount of 3 weeks to 65–70 Gy in 30–35 frac- iliac, obturator, and presacral lymph
side-effects, complications, and late tions over 6–7 weeks for most squa- node regions. Radiotherapy proto-
sequelae and anticipating an even- mous cell carcinomas. Palliative ra- cols for patients with cervical cancer
tual cure or long-term disease-free diotherapy doses are on the order of have traditionally used dosing at two
survival. Palliative treatment refers 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks or anatomical points, called point A and
to the delivery of smaller doses of 20 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week, or point B (Fig. 15.4), to standardize the
radiation (which by itself does not even a single dose of 8–10 Gy. doses delivered. Point A is defined
cause any toxicity or complications) The skin may be marked to indi- as a point 2 cm from the external os
to relieve symptoms, accepting that cate the radiotherapy portal where and 2 cm lateral to the endocervical
long-term survival or a cure is unlike- treatment should be delivered. The canal. Point B is defined as a point
ly because of the very advanced clin- patient should be immobilized so that 2 cm from the external os and 5 cm
ical extent of disease, as in disease the target region receives the intend- lateral to the patient’s midline, rela-
with distant metastases. ed dose. The daily treatment setup is tive to the bony pelvis. In general,
The choice of radiotherapy dose reproduced by in-room laser align- for smaller cervical cancers, such
and delivery techniques takes into ment to either skin marks or fixation as stage IA2 and IB1 disease, the
account the normal tissue/organ aids such as thermoplastic devices. radical (with curative intent) dose to
126
largely replaced radiotherapy alone of women with locally advanced cer- not superior to radiotherapy alone
for locally advanced cervical cancer. vical cancer who are treated with ra- or CCRT. To date, there is no evi-
In a Cochrane review of RCTs diotherapy alone or CCRT (Kokka et dence that overall survival improves
comparing CCRT with radiotherapy al., 2015). after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and
for locally advanced cervical cancer, However, acute haematological, definitive treatment, and the toxicity
adding chemotherapy to radiothera- renal, and gastrointestinal toxicities of chemotherapy and the delay of
py seemed to offer a modest but sig- are increased with chemoradiother- definitive radiotherapy could reduce
nificant additional benefit on all out- apy. Serious haematological toxicity overall survival.
comes and for all stages of disease. increased by approximately 2–10-
However, the interpretation of the fold in several individual trials. There 15.5 Non-surgical options by
benefits was complicated by the use was also a significant increase in se- stage
of different treatments in the control rious gastrointestinal toxicity associ-
arms of the included studies, het- ated with platinum-based chemora- The various options for treatment of
erogeneity in trial results, and incon- diotherapy (Green et al., 2005). cervical cancer using radiotherapy
sistency in the definition of outcomes and chemotherapy are listed in Ta-
between trials (Green et al., 2005). 15.4 Neoadjuvant chemo- ble 15.1 and outlined below.
In a meta-analysis based on 13 tri- therapy
als comparing chemoradiotherapy 15.5.1 Stage IA2
versus the same radiotherapy, there The use of chemotherapy before the
was a 6% improvement in 5-year application of definitive treatments, Patients with stage IA2 cervical can-
survival with chemoradiothera- such as surgery or radiotherapy, with cer who are poor surgical risk may be
py (hazard ratio, 0.81; P < 0.001) the aim of decreasing tumour size treated with EBRT plus brachythera-
(Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical and extent and improving curability, py or with brachytherapy alone. If the
Cancer Meta-Analysis Collabo- is called neoadjuvant chemotherapy. depth of invasion is less than 3 mm
ration, 2008; Chemoradiotherapy Despite significant response rates and there is no lymphovascular inva-
for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis to chemotherapeutic agents such sion, EBRT is not needed and these
Collaboration (CCCMAC), 2010). A as cisplatin and paclitaxel, the role patients may be treated with ICR
meta-analysis of seven RCTs found of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the alone to a total dose of 65–75 Gy to
insufficient evidence that hysterecto- treatment of cervical cancer remains point A in one or two sessions. Al-
my with radiotherapy, with or without controversial. Neoadjuvant chemo- ternatively, patients with stage IA2
chemotherapy, improves the survival therapy followed by radiotherapy is disease may be treated with EBRT
CHAPTER 15
Table 15.1. Non-surgical options for treatment of cervical cancer
Stage Treatment option
IIB and III • Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy, intracavitary brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy
with cisplatin or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is the standard treatment of choice
• External beam radiotherapy with intracavitary brachytherapy
IVA • Radical or palliative treatment, based on extent of rectal/bladder involvement, renal function, parametrial involvement,
general health, and performance status
• If patient is in good general health, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy, intracavitary
brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil
• If extensive rectal/bladder involvement, renal failure, bilateral, hard, fixed parametrial involvement, palliative short-course
radiotherapy or palliative chemotherapy
128
cancer. Unfortunately, many LMICs much-needed and affordable cancer of clinical skills, the introduction of
have extremely limited cancer diagnosis and treatment services. multidisciplinary tumour clinics, and
health-care services, and access to These services will also provide care the introduction of evidence-based
and availability of radiotherapy and for patients with a wide range of oth- management policies.
chemotherapy continue to be bar- er common cancers. Cervical cancer prevention is
riers to effective treatment in many It is illustrative to read about the easy and affordable, by introducing
developing countries. For instance, experience at the Tata Memorial population-based screening and
there are no radiotherapy services Centre, in Mumbai, India. There, the vaccination programmes, but there
available in 22 countries in sub-Sa- phased development of infrastruc- is still a need to care for the women
haran Africa, and access to cancer ture and skills and the adoption of affected by cervical cancer now and
medication is meagre. new developments in management in the future in those LMICs where
The main objective of including and cervical cancer care have, over these proven programmes have not
the chapters on management of inva- time, led to substantial improve- yet been introduced. The best way to
sive cervical cancer in this manual is ments in outcomes (Shrivastava et do this is by developing basic health
to convince the reader how easy it is al., 2013). This retrospective anal- infrastructure to offer much-needed
to prevent cervical cancer by screen- ysis based on 6234 patients with and affordable cancer diagnosis and
ing and vaccination, while emphasiz- cervical cancer treated over a 15- treatment services. These will serve
ing the need to care for those women year period illustrates how much not only patients with cervical cancer
affected by cervical cancer now and patient treatment and outcomes can but also those with a wide range of
in the future in LMICs by developing be improved with the acquisition of other common cancers.
basic health infrastructure to offer new equipment, the improvement
Key points
• The treatment modalities used in the non-surgical management of cervical cancer include radiotherapy,
chemotherapy, and various combinations of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, particularly concomitant or
concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
• Adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy seems to offer a modest but significant additional benefit on all outcomes
and for all stages of disease, but the combination has significant side-effects.
CHAPTER 15
• The best way to care for women with cervical cancer is by developing basic health infrastructure, whereby
affordable cancer diagnosis and treatment services will serve not only patients with cervical cancer but also
those with a wide range of other common cancers.
CHAPTER 1
International practice varies for 16.1 Risk of development of for cervical precancer. Such a case
almost every clinical circumstance, invasive disease in treated is shown in Fig. 16.1.
and follow-up after treatment of CIN women Some women are more at risk
is no exception. The availability of than others. Women who have
clinical, laboratory, and nursing staff Treatment confers a profoundly re- positive margins at histology, i.e.
as well as the cost to the patient of duced risk of developing cancer for incomplete excision, have a 6-fold
attendance for follow-up will influ- women who have had SIL (Kalliala increased risk of residual disease
ence the follow-up arrangements. et al., 2005; McCredie et al., 2008). (Ghaem-Maghami et al., 2007).
The advice that follows is based on However, treated women remain at Women who are older than 50 years
the available evidence and does not risk. Indeed, treated women have a at the time of treatment (Flannelly et
CHAPTER 16
take into account which tests or facil- 2–5-fold increased risk of develop- al., 2001) or who have a persistently
ities are available locally. ing cervical cancer compared with positive oncogenic HPV test are also
Traditionally, women have been the general population (Soutter et al., more likely to have residual disease.
invited to attend for a follow-up col- 1997). Much of this increased risk Women who have a large type 2 or
poscopic examination and cervical may be attributed to poor compliance type 3 TZ have a 3-fold increased
smear at relatively frequent intervals with long-term follow-up (Khalid et risk of having incomplete excision re-
for 1–2 years before being returned al., 2011; Soutter et al., 2006; Strand- ported at histology. For women with
to routine screening in the commu- er et al., 2007). It does not appear a large, endocervical TZ, particular
nity. Table 16.1 details advice in that the grade of abnormality or the attention should be paid to the SCJ
the United Kingdom in 2016 (NHS, type of treatment affects the long- during initial treatment, to avoid a
2016). Practice in most European term risk (Kalliala et al., 2005, 2007). second excision. In most women
countries is similar, although in office The nightmare scenario for every who have a positive margin, there is
practice, more frequent attendance colposcopist is to see a patient with no need to do an automatic second
for colposcopy is often advised. cancer some years after treatment excision, because the great majority
Chapter 16. Follow-up after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 131
Table 16.1. Clinical guidelines of the NHS Cervical Screening Programme
Duration and frequency of follow-up after treatment for CIN under the HPV “test of cure” protocol
• Women who have been treated for CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3 should be invited 6 months after treatment for “test of cure” repeat cytology in the community.
Patient compliance with follow-up protocols should be encouraged.
• Women with a sample that has been reported as negative, or as showing borderline changes or low-grade dyskaryosis, and whose HR-HPV test is
negative should be recalled in 3 years, whatever their age. Where the 3-year test is negative, women older than 50 years can return to 5-yearly routine
recall.
• Women with a sample that has been reported as negative, or as showing borderline changes or low-grade dyskaryosis, and whose HR-HPV report is
positive should be referred for colposcopy.
• Women with a sample that has been reported as showing high-grade dyskaryosis should be referred for colposcopy. No HR-HPV test is required.
• Women with a sample that has been reported as negative, or as showing borderline changes or low-grade dyskaryosis, and whose HR-HPV test result
is unavailable should undergo repeat cytology at 3 months.
• Women who reach 65 years must still complete the protocol and otherwise comply with national guidance.
• Women in annual follow-up after treatment for CIN are eligible for the HPV test of cure at their next screening test unless that test is carried out at
colposcopy.
CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; HR-HPV, high-risk HPV; NHS, United Kingdom National Health Service.
of these women (86%) will have nor- these first 2 years. Until recently, the history and counsel the patient about
mal epithelium (Ghaem-Maghami et standard follow-up regime in most the need for longer-term follow-up,
al., 2011). However, they do require colposcopy centres has involved two as well as the colposcopic recogni-
more considered and perhaps longer or more cytology smears and two tion of cervical stenosis or possible
follow-up in the clinic than those who or more colposcopic examinations functional incompetence. However,
have complete excision reported at during the first 1–2 years, followed colposcopy is relatively expensive. In
histology. Finally, women who are by regular cytology for 10 years or developing countries it is sometimes
older than 50 years and also have in- more. There is conflicting evidence simply too difficult and too expensive
volved margins should have elective about the effectiveness of colposco- for women to attend for colposcopic
retreatment by way of excision (Flan- py over cytology in detecting treat- examination, and self-testing for
nelly et al., 2001). ment failures, with some reporting high-risk HPV is a very reasonable
that colposcopy enhances detection alternative.
16.2 Current guidelines (Baldauf et al., 1998) and others re- Self-testing for HPV has been
porting no advantage (Gardeil et al., shown to be superior to cytology
Because most residual disease will 1997). collection by a physician in terms of
be recognized in the first 1–2 years A visit to a colposcopy clinic of- sensitivity for CIN2 or greater (Laz-
(Chew et al., 1999), follow-up test- fers other advantages, for example cano-Ponce et al., 2011). A physi-
ing should be comprehensive in the opportunity to review the case cian-taken HPV sample is even more
Fig. 16.1. This case reveals invasive cancer at the vaginal vault some 10 years after treatment for cervical precancer
as HSIL-CIN3. (a, b) Low-power colposcopy images of the vaginal vault (a) before and (b) after the application of
iodine. (c) Histopathology image; invasive disease is evident.
a b c
132
sensitive and is the gold standard 16.4 Specific circumstances 16.4.2 Adenocarcinoma in
test for post-treatment monitoring. situ
There is very good evidence that 16.4.1 Microinvasive disease
HPV testing is more sensitive than and incomplete excision The natural history of glandular
cytology for detecting HSIL (Ronco precancer is less well documented
et al., 2014). In the screening con- Incomplete excision of microinvasive than with squamous disease, and
text, this means more sensitive de- cancer should be managed, a priori, follow-up protocols should be even
tection of HSIL, less frequent testing, by a repeat excision without waiting more rigorous. Because skip le-
and lower surveillance costs (Uijter- for follow-up tests. sions occur in about 15% of cases
waal et al., 2014).
Fig. 16.2. Meta-analysis of studies comparing high-risk HPV testing with
16.3 Oncogenic HPV testing cytology for the detection of residual disease after treatment of CIN.
after treatment
Prediction of failure
The advantages of HPV testing make HPV/Cytology
it the test of choice after treatment,
when its high sensitivity and negative
Elfgren et al. (1996)
predictive value are so important (Ar-
Chua and Hjerpe (1997)
byn et al., 2005).
Figs. 16.2 and 16.3 show me- Nagai et al. (2000)
CHAPTER 16
ing with cytology and oncogenic HPV Chua and Hjerpe (1997)
is the most reassuring of all, and a
negative co-test at both 6 months and Jain et al. (2001)
24 months carries a risk of finding Lin et al. (2001)
HSIL during the subsequent 5 years
Paraskevaidis et al. (2001b)
of less than 1%, which is as low as
that associated with a normal smear Bodner et al. (2002)
in a screened population (Kocken et
Houfflin et al. (2003)
al., 2011). The positivity rate for HPV
testing after treatment falls steeply
from 3 months to 12 months, and
Combined
therefore it is prudent to perform the
HPV test 12–18 months after treat- 0.33 0.5 0.67 1 1.5 2 3
ment (Coupé et al., 2007). Sensitivity ratio
Chapter 16. Follow-up after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 133
of glandular disease, margin status treated for CIN, and this increased For women with incomplete or uncer-
is less reassuring. Where there is risk lasts for at least 20 years (Sout- tain excision of CIN, follow-up should
any doubt about margin status, a ter et al., 2006). Therefore, most au- be conducted as if the cervix were
repeat excision of endocervical ep- thorities advise follow-up for at least still in situ (vault smear and HPV test
ithelium should be performed. Also, this long, although not necessarily at 6 months and 18 months, and an-
residual/recurrent glandular disease in a clinic setting. Also, the profound nual combined tests for 20 years, re-
occurs more frequently (15%) than protection afforded by a negative co- gardless of the grade of the original
with squamous disease. Follow-up of test (negative cytology and HPV test- disease).
women treated for adenocarcinoma ing) means that women may usually
in situ should include cytology spec- be followed up in the community. 16.5 Summary
imens taken from the endocervical
canal separately to the ectocervical 16.4.4 Follow-up after Women being offered treatment for
smear, and HPV testing should be hysterectomy SIL or microinvasive disease should
performed on all follow-up cervical be advised that follow-up treatment
samples. When the patient has com- For women in whom previous frequent is essential to reduce the risk of can-
pleted her family, a simple hyster- screening tests have been normal, cer to almost zero. Default from fol-
ectomy should be performed (NHS, there is no need for continued screen- low-up is probably the single most
2010). ing. Where a hysterectomy was done important reason for cancer devel-
in part because of CIN and where the opment in women who have been
16.4.3 Duration of follow-up margins of excision were complete, treated for SIL. HPV testing is the
it would seem prudent to perform most sensitive test of cure currently
Long-term studies have found a 5-fold co-testing at least annually for the first available. Self-testing is a reason-
increased risk of developing cervical 2 years, and if these are both negative, able alternative to attendance at a
cancer in women who have been then no further follow-up is necessary. colposcopy clinic or doctor’s office.
Key points
•F
ollow-up monitoring is crucial.
• Women who have been treated for suspected cervical precancer have a 5-fold increased risk of developing
cervical cancer compared with women who have not had an abnormal smear.
•N
o method of treatment of CIN is 100% successful.
•T
he increased risk of residual or recurrent disease lasts for at least 20 years.
•R
isk factors for residual disease include:
οο positive margins at histology;
οο older than 50 years at the time of treatment; and
οο positive oncogenic HPV test at follow-up after treatment.
•T
he main reason for the development of cancer after treatment is default from follow-up.
•D
efault rates may be improved by considering self-testing for oncogenic HPV.
• Co-testing with cytology and oncogenic HPV is superior to all other methods of monitoring women after
treatment.
134
chapter 17.
Pregnancy, contraception,
menopause, and hysterectomy
CHAPTER 1
This chapter discusses with the if not, it may be the only opportunity often be necessary to hold back the
management of CIN during preg- to do so. vaginal walls (Fig. 5.11b). Engorged
nancy, use of contraception and The pregnant cervix is both easi- vulvovaginal varices may add to the
hormone replacement therapy, and er and more difficult to examine than difficulty.
hysterectomy. the non-pregnant one. It is usually However, there are times when
easier to see the entire TZ because colposcopy will be necessary during
17.1 Management of CIN of eversion of the cervical epithelium, pregnancy. If so, it is wise to refer the
during pregnancy whereby there is a relatively large woman to a colleague who is experi-
ectropion, which inverts postpartum. enced with colposcopy during preg-
The management of CIN during However, the extra mucus, increased nancy. If a woman meets the criteria
pregnancy is dealt with comprehen- vascularity, stromal hypertrophy, and for colposcopy, pregnancy should
sively elsewhere (Freeman-Wang decidual changes induced by preg- not defer it, but biopsy and treatment
and Walker, 2006). nancy are more difficult to interpret in thresholds will be different. The pri-
Inevitably, CIN will sometimes be the presence of an abnormal screen- mary ambition of a colposcopic ex-
first recognized during pregnancy, ing test, and this is one of the few amination during pregnancy is to
particularly if the population has not times that cancer may be mistakenly recognize or rule out malignancy.
been systematically screened. CIN suspected when the tissue is actual- Precancerous lesions are usually left
CHAPTER 17
is also the most common gynaeco- ly normal. As pregnancy progresses, untreated until about 3 months post-
logical cancer of pregnancy (Yoon- the vaginal walls may become highly partum (NHS, 2010). However, it is
essi et al., 1982). Opinions vary as patulous and the cervix more diffi- often prudent to monitor suspected
to whether it is wise to perform a cult to visualize. The use of lateral HSIL colposcopically and cytologi-
smear during pregnancy. If a com- vaginal wall specula or, more com- cally as pregnancy progresses.
prehensive screening programme fortably, a condom (with its end cut Although the evidence is not
is in place, it is not necessary, but off) placed around a speculum will conclusive, several observational
136
the IUCD may be grasped and gently 17.4 Hysterectomy and is difficult to evaluate or treat (see
removed. It is rarely necessary to re- treatment of CIN Chapter 16).
sort to general anaesthesia. For women who have no other
It is prudent to take a smear or per- pathology, hysterectomy is gross
17.3 Hormone replacement form another screening test for any overtreatment of CIN, which is better
therapy and CIN woman who is having a hysterectomy treated locally (by excision or abla-
for benign pathology. Every woman tion). Hysterectomy is associated with
Use of hormone replacement ther- who is due to have a hysterectomy far greater morbidity than local treat-
apy does not increase or decrease and who has an abnormal screening ment. Finally, simple hysterectomy is
the risk of CIN development or test should have a preliminary col- an inadequate treatment for invasive
progression. There is no reason poscopic examination (NHS, 2010). cancer (Roman et al., 1992). Where
to advise cessation of hormone re- The inadvertent undertreatment or coexisting benign pathology exists or
placement therapy use because of overtreatment of CIN at hysterec- where unexplained endocervical pa-
a suspicion of CIN (Sawaya et al., tomy is a preventable error. Where thology persists, it may be justifiable
2000). In women who are not using HSIL is present, if the TZ is not com- to perform hysterectomy, providing
hormone replacement therapy, it is pletely excised at hysterectomy, the that all reasonable efforts have been
sometimes useful to prescribe it for risk of subsequent cancer develop- made to rule out cancer and provid-
several weeks, when estrogen-relat- ing will be increased and monitoring ing that iodine is applied just before
ed atrophic change confuses the col- the vaginal vault is difficult. Some hysterectomy to ensure excision of
poscopic appearances or to increase dysplastic epithelium may be buried any vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
the chance of successfully examin- in the scar of a hysterectomy, and (Mohamed-Noor et al., 1997).
ing the endocervical canal. this vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
Key points
• Colposcopy should be performed at the same threshold during pregnancy as for women who are not pregnant,
but for women with suspected LSIL, management may usually be deferred until 3 months postpartum.
• A large biopsy must be performed for women with suspected microinvasive or invasive disease, and endocer-
vical curettage is contraindicated during pregnancy.
• Women with suspected HSIL should have a follow-up examination in the second half of pregnancy and again
3 months postpartum.
•T
he investigation of abnormal bleeding after menopause must include direct visual inspection of the cervix.
• All patients in the cervical screening age range undergoing a hysterectomy for other gynaecological reasons
should have a negative test result within the screening interval or as part of their preoperative investigations.
• All patients being considered for hysterectomy who have an undiagnosed abnormal sample or symptoms
attributable to cervical cancer should have diagnostic colposcopy and an appropriate biopsy. CHAPTER 17
CHAPTER 1
In tandem with a national HPV Every aspect of a cervical precancer scope of this manual. The interested
vaccination programme, a system- screening programme needs to be reader is referred to the NHS Cer-
atic, quality-assured call-and-recall included in a quality assurance pro- vical Screening Programme web-
system of cervical screening is the gramme, but the screening, organi- site (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/
best way to reduce rates of cervi- zational, and laboratory components cer vical-screening-programme -
cal cancer and associated mortal- of the programme are outside the overview) for a fuller description of
ity. In an opportunistic programme,
opportunities may be lost, leading Fig. 18.1. In an opportunistic screening programme, lost opportunities may
to a diagnosis of cervical cancer ultimately lead to cancer.
(Fig. 18.1). For a screen-positive
patient attending a colposcopy ser- Health-care providers do not
screen women at visits
vice, there is still potential for error. Patient does not get
After proper training, a colposcopist appropriate therapy
will be able to competently perform
colposcopic examination and un-
dertake treatment for women with
suspected cervical precancer. To
deliver this service, the colposco-
pist needs a facility in which to pro- Women do not come
vide the service as well as appro- in for screening
Chapter 18. Quality assurance: fail-safe protocols and clean equipment 139
every aspect of the quality assur- Fig. 18.2. Some clinic management mistakes that may occur in a patient
ance system of the United Kingdom pathway through a colposcopy clinic service.
screening programme. Discharged
free of risk
Enters colposcopy Has colposcopy Returns for Followed up of cervical
18.1 Standard operating clinic screen-positive and biopsy treatment 1 year later cancer for
procedures at least
5 years
It is possible to reduce the risk of
Biopsy Defaults Defaults
mistakes in any clinical case by report appointment appointment
conscientious attention to detail. lost or appointment Perhaps
However, when a colposcopy ser- not made treatment
failure not
vice is managing large numbers of recognized
similar clinical presentations (i.e.
screen-positive women) and dealing
with large numbers of similar labora-
tory reports, it is easy for mistakes to
Precancer diagnosis not recognized
happen. Patient continues to be at risk for
The organizational aspects of a cervical cancer
colposcopy service are as important
as the diagnostic skill of the colpos-
copist. If a system of routine patient
Fig. 18.3. The audit cycle: trying to achieve excellence.
care and management of laboratory
reports is established at the outset,
failures and oversights will be much 5. Implement 2. Set criteria and
less likely to occur (Fig. 18.2). A man- change standards
ual of standard operating procedures
(SOPs) of how to routinely manage
every presentation will reduce the
chance of mistakes happening.
SOPs will contain the expected pro-
tocol for: how to deal with patient 1. Identify
appointment default; how to arrange problem or issue
supply of disposable equipment; how
to clean, disinfect, and sterilize reus-
able equipment; how laboratory re-
ports should be filed and acted upon;
and how samples should be routine- 4. Compare 3. Observe practice/
performance data collection
ly processed, labelled, and delivered
with criteria
on time. SOPs should be available and standards
and known to everyone in the clinic.
Auditing of how these SOPs are
being adhered to and how effective 18.2 Protection against with reproductive tract infection are
they are will allow a centre of excel- infection outlined in Table 9.1. Use of oral met-
lence to evolve (Fig. 18.3). Constant ronidazole is contraindicated during
updating of the manual on the basis First, if a patient has a genital tract the first trimester of pregnancy, but
of changing evidence in the litera- infection, it is almost always nec- it can be safely used during the sec-
ture and review of the audit cycle will essary to treat it before proceeding ond and third trimesters. Patients
maintain excellence. Table 18.1 lists to colposcopic examination. Any taking oral metronidazole should be
some of the issues that a quality as- degree of cervicitis will usually pre- cautioned not to consume alcohol
surance programme will attempt to clude an adequate examination. The while they are taking the drug or up
maintain at a level of excellence, or treatment policies for pregnant and to 24 hours after taking the last dose.
at least competence. non-pregnant women diagnosed Patients with advanced syphilis may
140
Table 18.1. Quality assurance issues
Issue Explanation Examples
Clinical guidelines Details best practice according to NHS Cervical Screening Programme clinical guidelines (NHS, 2016)
best evidence and available local WHO comprehensive cervical cancer control guide (WHO, 2014)
circumstances
Manual of standard operating Lists agreed clinic and service Locally produced; includes how to process samples, ensure that
procedures (SOPs) management protocols laboratory reports are acted upon, ensure that appointment system is
effective, etc.
Fail-safe protocols Details strategies to prevent mistakes Establish a tracking system for cytology and biopsy specimens and
in patient and report management, reports
particularly oversights in report
management
Waiting time for appointments Maximum time allowed for implementing Time from when cancer report is made until management is
Time to treatment when management (e.g. for a cancer diagnosis) implemented should be < 2 weeks
cancer diagnosed
Equipment log Equipment maintenance and replacement List all functional equipment failures and act to correct them
arrangements
Information leaflets Patient information Ensure that all information leaflets and other routine paperwork are up
Waiting-time lists to date and available
Follow-up arrangements
Documentation How records are collected Standardized forms for colposcopic examinations (new visits, follow-up
visits, treatment visits, etc.)
Ideally, computerized
Cleaning, disinfection, How patients and staff are protected from Equipment management before, during, and after an examination
sterilization infection in the clinic
require prolonged treatment with a new clinic or for new staff in an be accessible and organized, and
antibiotics. There is no known cure existing service, SOPs are particu- the room should preferably be kept
for genital herpes infections, but the larly useful. There are three different locked.
course of symptoms can be modified infection risks to consider in the col-
if systemic therapy with acyclovir or poscopy clinic: (i) managing equip- 18.2.2 Managing equipment
its analogues is initiated. ment before it enters the clinic room in the colposcopy room and
Establishing a system of equip- area; (ii) managing equipment in the during colposcopy
ment management is fundamental to colposcopy room and during colpos-
good practice. This is true for man- copy; and (iii) managing equipment Establishing a system of equipment
aging the equipment before, during, after it has been used. flow in the clinic room will reduce
and after the colposcopic examina- the risk of accidental infection. Such
tion. Ideally, a clean room should 18.2.1 Managing equipment a system is both easy to arrange
house the clean equipment and a before it enters the clinic and ergonomically efficient. Given
separate cleaning room (sometimes room area the repetitive nature of colposcopy,
called a sluice room) should receive it is prudent to procure and stock
equipment after use in the clinic Clean, disinfected, or sterile instru- a compartmentalized trolley to ac-
room, where it can be cleaned be- ments and all disposable equipment commodate the reusable and dis-
fore disinfection and/or sterilization. should be stored in a clean, simple posable equipment needed for the
SOPs for the care of equipment and environment, preferably a dedicat- clinic (see Chapter 5). Dirty or used
disposable supplies are a crucial part ed room, which should be kept free equipment should never be placed
of preventing systematic errors in the of any used or clinically unclean on or in this trolley. Care should be
flow and use of safe equipment. For equipment. The equipment should taken to arrange the hardware used
CHAPTER 18
Chapter 18. Quality assurance: fail-safe protocols and clean equipment 141
in colposcopy so that the equip- are performed by the nursing, tech- solution, 5% available chlorine) to 9
ment and cables are not in the line nical, or cleaning staff, and decon- parts of water.
of potential infection and will not trip tamination protects these workers The general formula for making
anyone up. If possible, the monitor, from inadvertent infection. If these a dilute solution from a commercial
computer, camera system, ESU, and procedures are carried out properly, preparation of any given concentra-
ablative treatment equipment should decontamination of the instruments tion is as follows: total parts of water
be stacked on fixed wall-mounted will be ensured before they are han- = [% concentrate/% dilute] − 1. For
shelving. The cables and tubes from dled for cleaning. This step results in example, to make a 0.5% dilute solu-
this equipment should come from the inactivation of most organisms, tion of chlorine from 5% concentrated
only one side of the colposcopist. such as hepatitis B virus and HIV. liquid household bleach, total parts
A simple layout illustrating the Further processing is needed to en- of water = [5.0%/0.5%] − 1 = 10 – 1
different parts that come together sure that the object is cleaned and = 9; hence, add 1 part of concentrat-
in the working interface is shown in then sterilized. ed bleach to 9 parts of water.
Fig. 18.4. This interface is where the If commercially available dry
risk of contamination is greatest. The 18.3.1 Method of powder chlorine is used to make the
colposcopist should take care not decontamination solution, use the following formula to
to place used or dirty instruments calculate the amount (in grams) of
back onto the clean supplies trolley. Immediately after use, place in- dry powder required to make a 0.5%
The flow of equipment should be in struments and other items, such chlorine solution: grams/litre = [% di-
one direction: from the instrument as gloves, in a large clean plastic lute/% concentrate] × 1000. For ex-
trolley to the working interface area bucket containing a 0.5% chlorine ample, to make a 0.5% dilute solu-
and then to the receptacle for used solution for 10 minutes. The 0.5% tion of chlorine from a dry powder of
equipment. It is often useful to have chlorine solution can be prepared by 35% calcium hypochlorite, grams/
a temporary storage bowl or dish just adding 1 part of concentrated house- litre = [0.5%/35%] × 1000 = 14.2 g.
underneath the patient’s perineum hold bleach (sodium hypochlorite Hence, add 14.2 g of dry powder to
where instruments and swabs may
be kept during the procedure until Fig. 18.4. Layout of equipment and cables relative to the working interface.
finished with (Fig. 18.5). Equipment The colposcopist should ensure that used equipment does not contaminate
may then be transferred to the re- the permanently stacked hardware or the relevant cables, or the clean
ceptacle for used equipment. There supply trolley.
should be a hand wash basin for the
patient to wash her hands and, ide-
ally, a separate one for the colpos-
Patient
copist to do so after each procedure.
18.3 Decontamination
142
Fig. 18.5. The flow of instruments and equipment (reusable and disposable) to physical or chemical agents. This
should be in one direction: from the instrument trolley (A) to the working process kills all forms of microbial
interface area (B) and then to the receptacle for used equipment (C) and life, including bacterial spores. In
never back to A. practice, sterility is considered to be
achieved if the probability of a sur-
viving microorganism is less than 1
in 1 million. The sterilization process
B is fundamental to the safe reuse of
instruments in clinical care.
Colposcopy couch
When sterilization equipment is
not available or the instrument can-
C A not be sterilized, HLD is used. Dis-
infection implies that the microbial
Instrument trolley burden of an instrument is reduced
but is not entirely eliminated. The
Examiner’s stool
extent of this reduction depends on
the disinfection process used and
the resistance of the microbial forms
present. In practice, however, HLD
results in all forms of microbial life
being destroyed except bacterial
1 litre of water or 142 g of dry powder decontamination in 0.5% chlorine spores.
to 10 litres of water. solution for 10 minutes, is of the ut-
The instruments should not be most importance before sterilization 18.5.1 Methods of sterilization
left in dilute bleach for more than or HLD. A brush should be used to
10 minutes and should be cleaned scrub the instruments free of bio- Instruments that are considered crit-
in boiled water immediately after logical matter. Instruments should ical (instruments that enter sterile
decontamination to prevent discolor- be cleaned as soon as possible af- body tissues or the vascular system,
ation and corrosion of metal. ter use, so that no organic material such as biopsy punches, surgical in-
will dry and stick to the instruments, struments, electrocautery tips, and
18.4 Cleaning providing a sanctuary for microbes. vaginal specula; see Table 18.3)
The person cleaning should use util- require sterilization before reuse.
Cleaning is a crucial step in providing ity gloves while washing the instru- Two methods of sterilization are de-
safe, infection-free instruments. Vig- ments. scribed here: steam sterilization and
orous manual cleaning with running Protective glasses or goggles chemical sterilization.
water and liquid soap or detergent should be worn by the cleaners to High-pressure saturated steam
removes biological material such protect their eyes from contaminated sterilization using autoclaves is
as blood, body fluids, and tissue water. Special attention should be recommended for sterilization. Un-
remnants. Instruments should be given to instruments with teeth (e.g. wrapped instruments should be
cleaned as soon as possible after biopsy punches) or joints and screws exposed for 20 minutes to temper-
use. (e.g. vaginal specula), to which bio- atures of 121–132 °C at a pressure
If biological material is left be- logical material can become stuck. of 106 kPa (15 lb/inch2). The manu-
hind, it can act as a sanctuary for After cleaning, rinse the instruments facturer’s recommendations should
residual microorganisms, protecting thoroughly with boiled water to re- be followed, because pressure set-
them from the effects of disinfection move detergent residue. tings may vary slightly depending
and sterilization. on the make of the autoclave. Small
18.5 Sterilization or high-level wrapped packs of instruments should
18.4.1 Method of cleaning disinfection be exposed for 30 minutes. The ma-
terial used for wrapping should be
Thorough manual cleaning of in- Sterilization is defined as the pro- porous enough to let steam through.
struments with water and detergent cess of destroying all microorgan- Wrapped sterile instruments have a
to remove all organic material, after isms on an instrument by exposure shelf life of up to 7 days, if kept dry
CHAPTER 18
Chapter 18. Quality assurance: fail-safe protocols and clean equipment 143
and intact. Unwrapped instruments is 30 minutes. After disinfection, inspection of the equipment being
should be placed in a sterile contain- instruments should be rinsed thor- used for sterilization. The frequency
er. Small autoclaves are ideal for use oughly with boiled water and then of pelvic infection after clinical proce-
in clinics. air-dried or dried with a sterile cloth dures in this context (i.e. screening,
Chemical sterilization by soak- before use. However, this solution early detection, and treatment of cer-
ing in 2–4% glutaraldehyde for will damage the external surfaces vical precancer) is a good indicator
8–10 hours or in 8% formalde- of rubbers and plastics and will cor- of the quality of the sterilization pro-
hyde for 24 hours is an alternative rode copper, zinc, and brass instru- cess in place.
to steam sterilization. This requires ments after prolonged use.
special handling with gloves, and the • 2% Glutaraldehyde: It must be pre- 18.7 Spaulding’s classifica-
instruments thus sterilized should be pared according to the manufac- tion of medical instruments
rinsed with sterile water before use, turer’s instructions. Activated 2% (modified)
because these chemicals form a res- solution in a covered container has
idue on the instruments. Glutaralde- a shelf life of 2 weeks. The contact Spaulding (1968) categorized medi-
hyde is very expensive, whereas form- time required is 20 minutes. Be- cal instruments as critical, semi-crit-
aldehyde is more irritating to skin, cause glutaraldehyde forms a res- ical, or non-critical, according to
lungs, and eyes. Steam sterilization idue on instruments, which is toxic how they are used (Table 18.2). This
is preferred to chemical sterilization. to tissues, the instruments must be classification is useful in guiding the
rinsed thoroughly with sterile water processing of instruments for reuse.
18.5.2 Methods of high-level and dried with a sterile cloth before Intermediate-level disinfection re-
disinfection use. sults in destruction of Mycobacteri-
um tuberculosis, vegetative bacteria,
Two methods of HLD are described 18.6 Quality assurance of most viruses (HIV, hepatitis B virus,
here. equipment safety and sterility and herpes simplex viruses), and
Boiling plain tap water in a clean most fungi (Candida, Aspergillus),
vessel offers a cheap and readily Strict implementation of decontami- but it does not kill bacterial spores.
accessible form of HLD. The con- nation, cleaning, and sterilization or Low-level disinfection destroys most
tact time for instruments should be HLD of instruments according to a bacteria, some viruses, and some
at least 20 minutes after boiling has written manual is helpful in quality as- fungi, but not Mycobacterium tuber-
started. Water in the vessel should surance of the procedures. The man- culosis or bacterial spores. Antisep-
be changed daily. The vessel should ual must be prominently displayed in tics such as 60–90% ethyl or iso-
be washed and kept dry every day. the clinic for ready reference. The propyl alcohol or iodophors such as
Alternatively, HLD may be ob- quality assurance process includes 10% povidone iodine act as interme-
tained by soaking instruments in regular audits, analysis, system ad- diate-level or low-level disinfectants.
one of the following solutions for justments, and education. The audits Alcohol does not leave a residue on
20–30 minutes. should include: review of the meth- instruments, but iodophors do.
• 0.1% Chlorine solution: If boiled ods of sterilization used, the items A guide to the processing of in-
water is used to make the solution, being sterilized, and the duration and struments and materials used for
0.1% chlorine may be used for HLD. temperature of exposure; identifi- screening of cervical neoplasia, col-
If not, 0.5% chlorine solution should cation of the person performing the poscopy, and treatment of CIN is giv-
be used. The contact time required sterilization; and periodic review and en in Table 18.3.
is 20 minutes. The solution is very
corrosive to stainless steel. After Table 18.2. Spaulding’s categorization of medical instruments
disinfection, instruments should be Class Use Processing
rinsed thoroughly with boiled water
Critical (C) Enters sterile body site or vascular Decontamination and cleaning
and then air-dried or dried with a system followed by sterilization
sterile cloth before use. The shelf
Semi-critical (SC) Comes into contact with intact Decontamination and cleaning
life of prepared solution is 1 week. mucous membrane or non-intact followed by high-level disinfection
• 6% Hydrogen peroxide solution: It skin
can be prepared by adding 1 part of Non-critical (NC) Comes into contact with intact skin Decontamination and cleaning
a 30% solution to 4 parts of boiled followed by intermediate-level or
low-level disinfection
water. The contact time required
144
18.8 Decontamination of sur- clinic may be contaminated with daily by wiping with 0.5% chlorine
faces in the screening clinic body fluids such as vaginal secre- solution, 60–90% ethyl or isopropyl
tions, purulent discharge, and blood. alcohol, or other chemical disinfec-
Procedure tables, trolleys, and The surface of the procedure table tants such as iodophors. The floor
equipment (colposcope, cryosurgical should be decontaminated after each of the screening clinic should also be
equipment, ESU, smoke evacuator, patient procedure, and the other sur- decontaminated daily.
halogen lamp, etc.) in the screening faces should be decontaminated
Table 18.3. Guide to the processing of instruments and materials used for early detection and treatment of cervical
neoplasia
Instrument/material Category Processing Suggested procedure
Vaginal speculum, vaginal retractor, biopsy forceps, C Decontamination and cleaning Autoclaving or disinfection with boiling
endocervical curette, endocervical speculum, needle followed by sterilization or HLD water
holder, toothed forceps, vulsellum forceps, mosquito
forceps, insulated speculum, vaginal sidewall retractor
Gloves C Decontamination and cleaning Autoclaving as wrapped packs
followed by sterilization
Cryoprobes SC Decontamination and cleaning Disinfection with 0.1% chlorine or
followed by HLD 2% glutaraldehyde or 6% hydrogen
peroxide
Colposcope head, stand SC Intermediate-level or low-level Wiping with 60–90% ethyl or isopropyl
LLETZ/LEEP equipment, cryogun and regulator, cryo disinfection alcohol
gas cylinder, examination table, hand lens, handheld
magnification device, torch lights, halogen lamp,
instrument trolley, trays
C, critical; HLD, high-level disinfection; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; LLETZ, large loop excision of the transformation zone; SC,
semi-critical.
Key points
• The organizational aspects of a colposcopy service are as important as the diagnostic skill of the colposcopist.
•C
ontamination and cross-infection are risks for both patients and staff in a colposcopy clinic.
• Decontamination, cleaning, sterilization, and high-level disinfection are different terms with precise meanings.
CHAPTER 18
Chapter 18. Quality assurance: fail-safe protocols and clean equipment 145
References
Al-Kalbani M, McVeigh G, Nagar H, McClug- Arbyn M, Roelens J, Simoens C, Buntinx Bekkers RL, Melchers WJ, Bakkers JM,
gage WG (2012). Do FIGO stage IA and small F, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch PP, et al. Hanselaar AG, Quint WG, Boonstra H, et al.
(≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a (2013). Human papillomavirus testing versus (2002). The role of genotype-specific human
good prognosis and warrant less radical sur- repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological papillomavirus detection in diagnosing residu-
gery? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 22(2):291–5. http:// cervical lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. al cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Can-
dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182339fff 3:CD008054. PMID:23543559 cer. 102(2):148–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.
PMID:22080884 10691 PMID:12385010
ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group
Anderson M (1986). Are we vaporizing microin- (2003a). A randomized trial on the management Benedet JL, Nickerson KG, White GW (1981).
vasive lesions? In: Sharp F, Jordan JA, editors. of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Laser therapy for cervical intraepithelial
Gynaecological laser surgery: proceedings of cytology interpretations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 58(2):188–91.
the Fifteenth Study Group of the Royal College 188(6):1393–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S00 PMID:7254731
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Ithaca 02-9378(03)00413-7 PMID:12824968
(NY), USA: Perinatology Press; pp. 127–31. Bergeron C, Ordi J, Schmidt D, Trunk MJ, Keller
ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group T, Ridder R; European CINtec Histology Study
Anderson MC, Hartley RB (1980). Cervical (2003b). Results of a randomized trial on Group (2010). Conjunctive p16INK4a testing sig-
crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia. the management of cytology interpreta- nificantly increases accuracy in diagnosing
Obstet Gynecol. 55(5):546–50. PMID:7366912 tions of atypical squamous cells of undeter- high-grade cervical intraepithelial neopla-
mined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. sia. Am J Clin Pathol. 133(3):395–406. http://
Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, 188(6):1383–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S00 dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCPXSVCDZ3D5MZM
Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. (2008). 02-9378(03)00418-6 PMID:12824967 PMID:20154278
Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse
pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Cuenin C, Bergeron C, Ronco G, Reuschenbach M,
of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-anal- Tissier I, Meyer P (1998). Cytology and col- Wentzensen N, Arbyn M, Stoler M, et al. (2015).
ysis. BMJ. 337:a1284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ poscopy after loop electrosurgical excision: The clinical impact of using p16INK4a immu-
bmj.a1284 PMID:18801868 implications for follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. nochemistry in cervical histopathology and
92(1):124–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029- cytology: an update of recent developments.
Arbyn M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, 7844(98)00144-6 PMID:9649107 Int J Cancer. 136(12):2741–51. http://dx.doi.
Prendiville W, Dillner J (2005). Clinical util- org/10.1002/ijc.28900 PMID:24740700
ity of HPV-DNA detection: triage of minor Bar-Am A, Gamzu R, Levin I, Fainaru O, Niv J,
cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated Almog B (2003). Follow-up by combined cytol- Bertrand M, Lickrish GM, Colgan TJ (1987).
for high-grade CIN: an update of pooled evi- ogy and human papillomavirus testing for pa- The anatomic distribution of cervical adeno-
dence. Gynecol Oncol. 99(3 Suppl 1):S7–11. tients post-cone biopsy: results of a long-term carcinoma in situ: implications for treatment.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.033 follow-up. Gynecol Oncol. 91(1):149–53. http:// Am J Obstet Gynecol. 157(1):21–5. http://
PMID:16154623 dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00435-9 dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80338-1
PMID:14529675 PMID:3605256
Arbyn M, Rebolj M, De Kok IM, Fender M,
Becker N, O’Reilly M, et al. (2009). The chal- Basu P, Mittal S, Banerjee D, Singh P, Panda Bodner K, Bodner-Adler B, Wierrani F, Kim-
lenges of organising cervical screening pro- C, Dutta S, et al. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of berger O, Denk C, Grünberger W (2002). Is
grammes in the 15 old member states of the VIA and HPV detection as primary and sequen- therapeutic conization sufficient to eliminate a
European Union. Eur J Cancer. 45(15):2671–8. tial screening tests in a cervical cancer screen- high-risk HPV infection of the uterine cervix?
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.016 ing demonstration project in India. Int J Can- A clinicopathological analysis. Anticancer Res.
PMID:19695867 cer. 137(4):859–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ 22(6B):3733–6. PMID:12552985
ijc.29458 PMID:25631198
References 147
Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, Girardi F, Camargo MJ, Russomano FB, Tristão MA, Chanen W, Rome RM (1983). Electrocoagula-
Haefner H, Menton M, et al. (2012a). 2011 Huf G, Prendiville W (2015). Large loop ver- tion diathermy for cervical dysplasia and carci-
Colposcopic terminology of the International sus straight-wire excision of the transformation noma in situ: a 15-year survey. Obstet Gynecol.
Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colpos- zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial 61(6):673–9. PMID:6843923
copy. Obstet Gynecol. 120(1):166–72. http:// neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of elec-
dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318254f90c trosurgical techniques. BJOG. 122(4):552–7. Chappatte OA, Byrne DL, Raju KS, Naya-
PMID:22914406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13200 PMID: gam M, Kenney A (1991). Histological differ-
25516462 ences between colposcopic-directed biopsy
Bornstein J, Sideri M, Tatti S, Walker P, Pren- and loop excision of the transformation zone
diville W, Haefner HK; Nomenclature Com- Carcopino X, Barde K, Petrovic M, Beucher (LETZ): a cause for concern. Gynecol Oncol.
mittee of International Federation for Cervical G, Capmas P, Huchon C, et al. (2014). Threat- 43(1):46–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-82
Pathology and Colposcopy (2012b). 2011 Ter- ened late miscarriage. French guidelines [in 58(91)90007-R PMID:1959787
minology of the vulva of the International Fed- French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Par-
eration for Cervical Pathology and Colposco- is). 43(10):842–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Me-
py. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 16(3):290–5. http:// jgyn.2014.09.015 PMID:25447364 ta-Analysis Collaboration (2008). Reducing
dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825934c7 uncertainties about the effects of chemora-
PMID:22659778 Carcopino X, Mancini J, Charpin C, Grisot C, diotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic
Maycock JA, Houvenaeghel G, et al. (2013). review and meta-analysis of individual patient
Bosch FX, Manos MM, Muñoz N, Sherman Direct colposcopic vision used with the LLETZ data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol.
M, Jansen AM, Peto J, et al.; International Bi- procedure for optimal treatment of CIN: results 26(35):5802–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.
ological Study on Cervical Cancer (IBSCC) of joint cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008.16.4368 PMID:19001332
Study Group (1995). Prevalence of human 288(5):1087–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004
papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide 04-013-2882-0 PMID:23670207 Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Me-
perspective. J Natl Cancer Inst. 87(11):796–802. ta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC) (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/87.11.796 PMID: Cartier R, Cartier I (1993). Practical colposco- Reducing uncertainties about the effects of
7791229 py. Paris, France: Laboratoire Cartier. chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individ-
ual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Data-
Bowring J, Strander B, Young M, Evans H, Walk- Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, base Syst Rev. 1:CD008285. PMID:20091664
er P (2010). The Swede score: evaluation of a Peebles D, Singh N, et al.; PaCT Study Group
scoring system designed to improve the predic- (2014). Risk of preterm delivery with increasing Chew GK, Jandial L, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener
tive value of colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neo- HC (1999). Pattern of CIN recurrence following
14(4):301–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b0 plasia in England: nested case-control study. laser ablation treatment: long-term follow-up.
13e3181d77756 PMID:20885156 BMJ. 349:g6223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 9(6):487–90. http://
g6223 PMID:25378384 dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.99066.x
Broders AC (1932). Carcinoma in situ con- PMID:11240816
trasted with benign penetrating epithelium. Castle PE, Sideri M, Jeronimo J, Solomon
J Am Med Assoc. 99(20):1670. http://dx.doi. D, Schiffman M (2007). Risk assessment Chua KL, Hjerpe A (1997). Human papillo-
org/10.1001/jama.1932.02740720024007 to guide the prevention of cervical cancer. mavirus analysis as a prognostic marker fol-
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 197(4):356.e1–6. http:// lowing conization of the cervix uteri. Gynecol
Bucchi L, Cristiani P, Costa S, Schincaglia P, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.049 PMID: Oncol. 66(1):108–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/
Garutti P, Sassoli de Bianchi P, et al. (2013). 17904958 gyno.1997.4753 PMID:9234930
Rationale and development of an on-line
quality assurance programme for colposcopy Ceccaroni M, Roviglione G, Spagnolo E, Casa- Coppola A, Sorosky J, Casper R, Anderson B,
in a population-based cervical screening set- dio P, Clarizia R, Peiretti M, et al. (2012). Pelvic Buller RE (1997). The clinical course of cervical
ting in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res. 13(1):237. dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-spar- carcinoma in situ diagnosed during pregnan-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-237 ing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter com- cy. Gynecol Oncol. 67(2):162–5. http://dx.doi.
PMID:23809615 parative study. Anticancer Res. 32(2):581–8. org/10.1006/gyno.1997.4856 PMID:9367700
PMID:22287748
148
Coupé VM, Berkhof J, Verheijen RH, Meijer CJ Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, Heller DS, Duncan ID (1983). The Semm cold coagulator
(2007). Cost-effectiveness of human papilloma- Henry MR, Luff RD, et al.; Members of LAST in the management of cervical intraepithelial
virus testing after treatment for cervical intraep- Project Work Groups (2012). The Lower Ano- neoplasia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 26(4):996–1006.
ithelial neoplasia. BJOG. 114(4):416–24. http:// genital Squamous Terminology Standard- http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003081-19831
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01265.x ization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: 2000-00022 PMID:6661847
PMID:17378816 background and consensus recommendations
from the College of American Pathologists Duncan I (1984). Destruction of cervical in-
Cox JT (2005). Management of women and the American Society for Colposcopy and traepithelial neoplasia at 100°C with the Semm
with cervical cytology interpreted as ASC- Cervical Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. coagulator. In: Heintz APM, Griffiths CT, Trim-
US or as ASC-H. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 136(10):1266–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa. bos JB, editors. Surgery in gynecological on-
48(1):160–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.grf. LGT200570 PMID:22742517 cology. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus
0000151571.91814.f3 PMID:15725868 Nijhoff Publishers; pp. 71–85. http://dx.doi.
Denny L, Prendiville W (2015). Cancer of the org/10.1007/978-94-009-6750-2_8
Crisp WE, Asadourian L, Romberger W (1967). cervix: early detection and cost-effective solu-
Application of cryosurgery to gynecologic tions. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 131(Suppl 1):S28– Elfgren K, Bistoletti P, Dillner L, Walboomers
malignancy. Obstet Gynecol. 30(5):668–73. 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.009 JM, Meijer CJ, Dillner J (1996). Conization for
PMID:4167866 PMID:26433500 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is followed
by disappearance of human papillomavirus
Cruickshank ME, Cotton SC, Sharp L, Smart L, Dobbs SP, Asmussen T, Nunns D, Holling- deoxyribonucleic acid and a decline in serum
Walker LG, Little J; TOMBOLA Group (2015). worth J, Brown LJ, Ireland D (2000). Does and cervical mucus antibodies against human
Management of women with low grade cytolo- histological incomplete excision of cervical papillomavirus antigens. Am J Obstet Gyne-
gy: how reassuring is a normal colposcopy ex- intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop col. 174(3):937–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
amination? BJOG. 122(3):380–6. http://dx.doi. excision of transformation zone increase re- S0002-9378(96)70330-7 PMID:8633673
org/10.1111/1471-0528.12932 PMID:24947656 currence rates? A six year cytological follow
up. BJOG. 107(10):1298–301. http://dx.doi. Faro S (2006). Common non-viral infections of
Cullen TS (1900). Cancer of the uterus: its pa- org /10.1111/ j.1471- 0 528. 20 0 0.tb11623.x the cervix: clinical features and management.
thology, symptomatology, diagnosis, and treat- PMID:11028584 In: Jordan JA, Singer A, editors. The cervix.
ment. New York, USA: Appleton. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; pp. 231–43.
Dolman L, Sauvaget C, Muwonge R, Sankara- http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444312744.ch16
Cullimore J (2003). The management of atyp- narayanan R (2014). Meta-analysis of the effi-
ical intraepithelial glandular lesions. In: Pren- cacy of cold coagulation as a treatment method Fergusson IL, Craft IL (1974). A new “cold
diville W, Ritter J, Tatti S, Twiggs L, editors. for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a system- coagulator” for use in the outpatient treat-
Colposcopy: management options. Saunders; atic review. BJOG. 121(8):929–42. http://dx.doi. ment of cervical erosion. J Obstet Gynae-
pp. 165–70. org/10.1111/1471-0528.12655 PMID:24597779 col Br Commonw. 81(4):324–7. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00469.x PMID:
Cullimore JE, Luesley DM, Rollason TP, By- Doorbar J (2006). Molecular biology of human 4824692
rne P, Buckley CH, Anderson M, et al. (1992). papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer.
A prospective study of conization of the cervix Clin Sci (Lond). 110(5):525–41. http://dx.doi. Ferris DG, Litaker MS; ALTS Group (2006).
in the management of cervical intraepithelial org/10.1042/CS20050369 PMID:16597322 Prediction of cervical histologic results using
glandular neoplasia (CIGN) – a preliminary re- an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during
port. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 99(4):314–8. http:// Doorbar J, Quint W, Banks L, Bravo IG, Stol- ALTS. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 194(3):704–10.
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13730.x er M, Broker TR, et al. (2012). The biology and http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.204
PMID:1316142 life-cycle of human papillomaviruses. Vaccine. PMID:16522401
30(Suppl 5):F55–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
Dargent D, Burn JL, Roy M, Remi I (1994). vaccine.2012.06.083 PMID:23199966 Flannelly G, Bolger B, Fawzi H, De Lopes AB,
Pregnancies following radical trachelectomy Monaghan JM (2001). Follow up after LLETZ:
for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Duensing S, Münger K (2004). Mechanisms of could schedules be modified according to risk
52:105. genomic instability in human cancer: insights of recurrence? BJOG. 108(10):1025–30. http://
from studies with human papillomavirus onco- dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00240.x
proteins. Int J Cancer. 109(2):157–62. http:// PMID:11702832
dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11691 PMID:14750163
References 149
Franco EL, Rohan TE, Villa LL (1999). Epide- Gök M, Coupé VM, Berkhof J, Verheijen RH, Houfflin Debarge V, Collinet P, Vinatier D, Ego
miologic evidence and human papillomavirus Helmerhorst TJ, Hogewoning CJ, et al. (2007). A, Dewilde A, Boman F, et al. (2003). Value of
infection as a necessary cause of cervical can- HPV16 and increased risk of recurrence after human papillomavirus testing after conization
cer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 91(6):506–11. http://dx. treatment for CIN. Gynecol Oncol. 104(2):273– by loop electrosurgical excision for high-grade
doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.6.506 PMID:10088620 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.011 squamous intraepithelial lesions. Gynecol On-
PMID:17157365 col. 90(3):587–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Freeman-Wang T, Walker PG (2006). The S0090-8258(03)00372-X PMID:13678729
management of cervical malignancy and pre- Gordon HK, Duncan ID (1991). Effective de-
malignancy in pregnancy. In: Jordan JA, Sing- struction of cervical intraepithelial neopla- Howe DT, Vincenti AC (1991). Is large loop ex-
er A, editors. The cervix. Oxford, UK: Black- sia (CIN) 3 at 100°C using the Semm cold cision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) more
well Publishing; pp. 491–503. http://dx.doi. coagulator: 14 years experience. Br J Ob- accurate than colposcopically directed punch
org/10.1002/9781444312744.ch34 stet Gynaecol. 98(1):14–20. http://dx.doi. biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial
org /10.1111/ j.1471- 0 528.19 91.tb103 0 4.x neoplasia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 98(6):588–
Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, Higuchi PMID:1998626 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.
T, Yura S, Mandai M, et al. (2007). Anatom- tb10376.x PMID:1651758
ic identification and functional outcomes of Gortzak-Uzan L, Jimenez W, Nofech-Mozes
the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hyster- S, Ismiil N, Khalifa MA, Dubé V, et al. (2010). IARC (2005). Cervix cancer screening. IARC
ectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 107(1):4–13. http:// Sentinel lymph node biopsy vs. pelvic lymph- Handb Cancer Prev. 10:1–302. Available from:
dx.doi.org /10.1016 / j.ygyno. 20 07.0 8 .076 adenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: is http://publications.iarc.fr/380.
PMID:17905140 it time to change the gold standard? Gynecol
Oncol. 116(1):28–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. IARC (2007). Human papillomaviruses. IARC
Gardeil F, Barry-Walsh C, Prendiville W, Clinch ygyno.2009.10.049 PMID:19875161 Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 90:1–636.
J, Turner MJ (1997). Persistent intraepithelial PMID:18354839. Available from: http://publica
neoplasia after excision for cervical intraep- Green J, Kirwan J, Tierney J, Vale C, Symonds tions.iarc.fr/108.
ithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol. P, Fresco L, et al. (2005). Concomitant chemo-
89(3):419–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029- therapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the Ikenberg H, Bergeron C, Schmidt D, Griesser
7844(96)00505-4 PMID:9052597 uterine cervix. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. H, Alameda F, Angeloni C, et al.; PALMS Study
3:CD002225. PMID:16034873 Group (2013). Screening for cervical cancer
Gemer O, Eitan R, Gdalevich M, Mamanov precursors with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytolo-
A, Piura B, Rabinovich A, et al. (2013). Can Haddad NG, Hussein IY, Blessing K, Kerr-Wil- gy: results of the PALMS study. J Natl Cancer
parametrectomy be avoided in early cervical son R, Smart GE (1988). Tissue destruction Inst. 105(20):1550–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/
cancer? An algorithm for the identification of following cold coagulation of the cervix. Col- jnci/djt235 PMID:24096620
patients at low risk for parametrial involvement. poscopy Gynecol Laser Surg. 4(1):23–7. http://
Eur J Surg Oncol. 39(1):76–80. http://dx.doi. dx.doi.org/10.1089/gyn.1988.4.23 Jain S, Tseng CJ, Horng SG, Soong YK, Pao
org/10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.013 PMID:23131429 CC (2001). Negative predictive value of hu-
Hammes LS, Naud P, Passos EP, Matos J, man papillomavirus test following conization
Ghaem-Maghami S, De-Silva D, Tipples M, Brouwers K, Rivoire W, et al. (2007). Value of of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol. 82(1):177–
Lam S, Perryman K, Soutter W (2011). Deter- the International Federation for Cervical Pa- 80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6241
minants of success in treating cervical intraep- thology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) Terminology PMID:11426982
ithelial neoplasia. BJOG. 118(6):679–84. http:// in predicting cervical disease. J Low Genit Tract
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02770.x Dis. 11(3):158–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. Jarruwale P, Huang K-G, Benavides DR, Su H,
PMID:21083861 lgt.0000265778.36797.03 PMID:17596761 Lee C-L (2013). Nerve-sparing radical hyster-
ectomy in cervical cancer. Gynecol Minim Inva-
Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, Sout- Hatch KD, Shingleton HM, Austin JM Jr, Soong sive Ther. 2(2):42–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
ter WP (2007). Incomplete excision of cervi- SJ, Bradley DH (1981). Cryosurgery of cervi- gmit.2013.02.003
cal intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treat- cal intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol.
ment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 57(6):692–8. PMID:7231822 Jeronimo J, Schiffman M (2006). Colposco-
8(11):985–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470- py at a crossroads. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2045(07)70283-8 PMID:17928267 Hicks DA (2002). Colposcopy in the setting 195(2):349–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.
of a genitourinary clinic. In: Luesley DM, Shafi 2006.01.091 PMID:16677597
MI, Jordan JA, editors. Handbook of colpos-
copy. 2nd ed. London, UK: Hodder Arnold; pp.
138–46.
150
Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM (1979). Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevai- Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Kristensen FB
The outcome of pregnancy after cone biop- dis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity C, et al. (2012). The (1993). Increased risk of preterm birth in wom-
sy of the cervix: a case-control study. Br J thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens en with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol.
Obstet Gynaecol. 86(12):913–6. http://dx. can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-re- 81(6):1005–8. PMID:8497340
doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11237.x lated morbidity. BJOG. 119(6):685–91. http://
PMID:575050 dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS,
PMID:22329499 Young RH, editors (2014). WHO Classification
Jordan JA, Singer A, editors (2006). The cervix. of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs.
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. http://dx.doi. Kierkegaard O, Byralsen C, Hansen KC, Frand- Lyon, France: International Agency for Re-
org/10.1002/9781444312744 sen KH, Frydenberg M (1995). Association search on Cancer.
between colposcopic findings and histology
Kalliala I, Anttila A, Pukkala E, Nieminen P in cervical lesions: the significance of the size Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P,
(2005). Risk of cervical and other cancers of the lesion. Gynecol Oncol. 57(1):66–71. Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E
after treatment of cervical intraepithelial http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.1100 (2006). Obstetric outcomes after conservative
neoplasia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. PMID:7705702 treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive
331(7526):1183–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ cervical lesions: systematic review and me-
bmj.38663.459039.7C PMID:16293840 Kinney WK, Manos MM, Hurley LB, Ransley ta-analysis. Lancet. 367(9509):489–98. http://
JE (1998). Where’s the high-grade cervical dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6 PMID:
Kalliala I, Nieminen P, Dyba T, Pukkala E, Ant- neoplasia? The importance of minimally abnor- 16473126
tila A (2007). Cancer free survival after CIN mal Papanicolaou diagnoses. Obstet Gynecol.
treatment: comparisons of treatment methods 91(6):973–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029- Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, Stasinou SM,
and histology. Gynecol Oncol. 105(1):228–33. 7844(98)00080-5 PMID:9611007 Martin-Hirsch P, Bennett P, et al. (2014). Fer-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.12.028 tility and early pregnancy outcomes after
PMID:17289128 Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, Louw- treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:
ers JA, Nobbenhuis MA, Bais AG, et al. (2011). systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ.
Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, Lorey Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepi- 349:g6192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6192
T, Poitras NE, Cheung L, et al. (2011). Cervi- thelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a PMID:25352501
cal cancer risk for women undergoing con- long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol.
current testing for human papillomavirus and 12(5):441–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470- Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F,
cervical cytology: a population-based study 2045(11)70078-X PMID:21530398 Milani R, Perego P, et al. (1997). Randomised
in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol. study of radical surgery versus radiothera-
12(7):663–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470- Kokka F, Bryant A, Brockbank E, Powell M, py for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet.
2045(11)70145-0 PMID:21684207 Oram D (2015). Hysterectomy with radiotherapy 350(9077):535–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
or chemotherapy or both for women with locally S0140-6736(97)02250-2 PMID:9284774
Kelly RS, Walker P, Kitchener H, Moss SM advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database
(2012). Incidence of cervical intraepithelial neo- Syst Rev. 4:CD010260. PMID:25847525 Landoni F, Maneo A, Zapardiel I, Zanagnolo V,
plasia grade 2 or worse in colposcopy-nega- Mangioni C (2012). Class I versus class III rad-
tive/human papillomavirus-positive women with Koss LG, Durfee GR (1956). Unusual patterns ical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical can-
low-grade cytological abnormalities. BJOG. of squamous epithelium of the uterine cervix: cer. A prospective randomized study. Eur J Surg
119(1):20–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-05 cytologic and pathologic study of koilocytotic Oncol. 38(3):203–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
28.2011.02970.x PMID:21624034 atypia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 63(6):1245–61. http:// ejso.2011.12.017 PMID:22244909
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1956.tb32134.x
Khalid S, Carcopino X, Michail G, Metchette PMID:13314471 LaPolla JP, O’Neill C, Wetrich D (1988). Colpo-
S, Conroy R, Prendiville W (2011). Compliance scopic management of abnormal cervical cytol-
with follow up cytology after discharge from Krane JF, Granter SR, Trask CE, Hogan CL, Lee ogy in pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 33(3):301–6.
the colposcopy clinic. Ir Med J. 104(6):167–70. KR (2001). Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for PMID:3361522
PMID:22111391 the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix:
a study of 49 cases. Cancer. 93(1):8–15. http:// Larsson G (1983). Conization for preinvasive
dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010225)93:1<8::AID- and early invasive carcinoma of the uterine cer-
CNCR9001>3.0.CO;2-K PMID:11241260 vix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 114:1–
40. PMID:6574684
References 151
Lazcano-Ponce E, Lorincz AT, Cruz-Valdez A, Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Miller AB (1993). Cervical cancer screening
Salmerón J, Uribe P, Velasco-Mondragón E, Dickinson HO (2013). Surgery for cervical in- programmes: managerial guidelines. Gene-
et al. (2011). Self-collection of vaginal speci- traepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database va, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
mens for human papillomavirus testing in cer- Syst Rev. 12:CD001318. PMID:24302546 Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/
vical cancer prevention (MARCH): a commu- 10665/39478.
nity-based randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA,
378(9806):1868–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ Kinney WK, Schiffman M, et al.; 2012 ASCCP Mitra S (1959). Extraperitoneal lymphadenecto-
S0140-6736(11)61522-5 PMID:22051739 Consensus Guidelines Conference (2013). my and radical vaginal hysterectomy for cancer
2012 Updated consensus guidelines for the of the cervix (Mitra technique). Am J Obstet Gy-
Lee KR, Flynn CE (2000). Early invasive management of abnormal cervical cancer necol. 78(1):191–6.
adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low
89(5):1048–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097- Genit Tract Dis. 17(5 Suppl 1):S1–27. http:// Mohamed-Noor K, Quinn MA, Tan J (1997).
0142(20000901)89:5<1048::AID-CNCR14> dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e318287d329 Outcomes after cervical cold knife coniza-
3.0.CO;2-S PMID:10964335 PMID:23519301 tion with complete and incomplete excision
of abnormal epithelium: a review of 699 cas-
Leeson SC, Alibegashvili T, Arbyn M, Bergeron Mayeaux EJ, Cox JT (2011). Modern colposco- es. Gynecol Oncol. 67(1):34–8. http://dx.doi.
C, Carriero C, Mergui JL, et al. (2014). The fu- py: textbook and atlas. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer. org/10.1006/gyno.1997.4817 PMID:9345353
ture role for colposcopy in Europe. J Low Genit
Tract Dis. 18(1):70–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baran- Monaghan JM (1995). Laser vaporization
LGT.0b013e318286b899 PMID:23774077 yai J, Medley G, Jones RW, et al. (2008). and excisional techniques in the treatment of
Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Baillieres
Legood R, Smith M, Lew JB, Walker R, Moss of invasive cancer in women with cervical in- Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 9(1):173–87. http://
S, Kitchener H, et al. (2012). Cost effective- traepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective co- dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80365-7
ness of human papillomavirus test of cure after hort study. Lancet Oncol. 9(5):425–34. http:// PMID:7600726
treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70103-7
in England: economic analysis from NHS Sen- PMID:18407790 Moscicki AB, Ma Y, Wibbelsman C, Darragh
tinel Sites Study. BMJ. 345:e7086. http://dx.doi. TM, Powers A, Farhat S, et al. (2010). Rate of
org/10.1136/bmj.e7086 PMID:23117060 Meigs JV (1951). Radical hysterectomy with and risks for regression of cervical intraepithe-
bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections; a re- lial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young wom-
Lin CT, Tseng CJ, Lai CH, Hsueh S, Huang KG, port of 100 patients operated on five or more en. Obstet Gynecol. 116(6):1373–80. http://
Huang HJ, et al. (2001). Value of human pap- years ago. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 62(4):854–70. dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe777f
illomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing after PMID:14885271 PMID:21099605
conization in the prediction of residual disease
in the subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Am Meisels A, Fortin R (1976). Condylomatous le- Nagai Y, Maehama T, Asato T, Kanazawa K
J Obstet Gynecol. 184(5):940–5. http://dx.doi. sions of the cervix and vagina. I. Cytologic pat- (2000). Persistence of human papillomavirus
org/10.1067/mob.2001.112589 PMID:11303202 terns. Acta Cytol. 20(6):505–9. PMID:1069445 infection after therapeutic conization for CIN 3:
is it an alarm for disease recurrence? Gynecol
Manchanda R, Baldwin P, Crawford R, Vowler Melnikow J, Nuovo J, Willan AR, Chan BK, Oncol. 79(2):294–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/
SL, Moseley R, Latimer J, et al. (2008). Effect Howell LP (1998). Natural history of cervical gyno.2000.5952 PMID:11063660
of margin status on cervical intraepithelial neo- squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-anal-
plasia recurrence following LLETZ in women ysis. Obstet Gynecol. 92(4 Pt 2):727–35. http:// Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian
over 50 years. BJOG. 115(10):1238–42. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00245-2 LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, et al. (2000).
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01853.x PMID:9764690 Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screen-
PMID:18715408 ing for and follow-up of cervical cytolog-
Mergui JL, Carcopino X, Marchetta J, Gondry ic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann
Marsden DE, Hacker NF, Edwards L (2006). J, Boubli L (2010). Modern management of Intern Med. 132(10):810–9. http://dx.doi.
The management of microinvasive carci- cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a proposal org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-
noma of the cervix. In: Jordan JA, Singer for a risk assessment method in colposcop- 00009 PMID:10819705
A, editors. The cervix. Oxford, UK: Black- ic decision-making [in French]. J Gynecol
well Publishing; pp. 531–50. http://dx.doi. Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 39(7):520–8.
org/10.1002/9781444312744.ch37 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.08.002
PMID:20926205
152
Nayar R, Wilbur DC (2015). The Pap test and Nobbenhuis MA, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ, Parham GP, Mwanahamuntu MH, Kapambwe
Bethesda 2014. “The reports of my demise Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Risse EK, et al. S, Muwonge R, Bateman AC, Blevins M, et al.
have been greatly exaggerated.” (after a quo- (2001). Addition of high-risk HPV testing im- (2015). Population-level scale-up of cervical
tation from Mark Twain). Acta Cytol. 59(2):121– proves the current guidelines on follow-up after cancer prevention services in a low-resource
32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000381842 PMID: treatment for cervical intraepithelial neopla- setting: development, implementation, and
25997404 sia. Br J Cancer. 84(6):796–801. http://dx.doi. evaluation of the cervical cancer prevention
org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1689 PMID:11259094 program in Zambia. PLoS One. 10(4):e0122169.
Nene BM, Hiremath PS, Kane S, Fayette JM, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122169
Shastri SS, Sankaranarayanan R (2008). Ostör AG (1993). Natural history of cervical PMID:25885821
Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int
cryotherapy by midwives for cervical intraep- J Gynecol Pathol. 12(2):186–92. http://dx.doi. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE
ithelial neoplasia in Maharashtra, India. Int J org/10.1097/00004347-199304000 - 00018 (2004). The cervical cancer epidemic that
Gynecol Obstet. 103(3):232–6. http://dx.doi. PMID:8463044 screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet.
org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.07.016 PMID:18817909 364(9430):249–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0
Palle C, Bangsbøll S, Andreasson B 140-6736(04)16674-9 PMID:15262102
Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benig- (2000). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
no BB, Welander CE (1992). Laparoscopic in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. Pisal NV, Sindos M, Desai S, Mansell E, Singer
radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pel- 79(4):306–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600- A (2003). How significant is a cervical smear
vic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 0412.2000.079004306.x PMID:10746847 showing glandular dyskaryosis? Eur J Obstet
166(3):864–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002- Gynecol Reprod Biol. 108(2):209–12. http://
9378(92)91351-A PMID:1532291 Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Alamanos dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00466-9
Y, Malamou-Mitsi V, Lolis ED, Kitchener HC PMID:12781413
NHS (2004). Colposcopy and programme (2001b). Human papillomavirus testing and the
management: guidelines for the NHS Cervical outcome of treatment for cervical intraepithelial Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP (1974). Five
Screening Programme. NHSCSP Publication neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 98(5 Pt 1):833–6. classes of extended hysterectomy for wom-
No. 20, April 2004. Sheffield, UK: NHS Cancer PMID:11704177 en with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol.
Screening Programmes. 44(2):265–72. PMID:4417035
Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Kalantaridou
NHS (2010). Colposcopy and programme S, Pappa L, Navrozoglou I, Zikopoulos K, et al. Plante M, Renaud MC, François H, Roy M
management: guidelines for the NHS Cervical (2002). Management and evolution of cervical (2004). Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an on-
Screening Programme. NHSCSP Publication intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy and cologically safe fertility-preserving surgery.
No. 20, Second Edition, May 2010. Sheffield, postpartum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. An updated series of 72 cases and review of
UK: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. 104(1):67–9. PMID:12128266 the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 94(3):614–23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.032
NHS (2016). NHS Cervical Screening Pro- Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Paschopoulos PMID:15350349
gramme: colposcopy and programme manage- M, Stefanidis K, Navrozoglou I, Lolis D (2001a).
ment. NHSCSP Publication No. 20, Third Edi- Effects of ball cauterization following loop exci- Popkin DR, Scali V, Ahmed MN (1978). Cryosur-
tion, March 2016. London, UK: Public Health sion and follow-up colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. gery for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial
England. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/ 97(4):617–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029- neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 130(5):551–4.
government/uploads/system/uploads/attach- 7844(00)01194-7 PMID:11275038 PMID:629310
ment_data/file/515817/NHSCSP_colposcopy_
management.pdf. Pareja R, Rendón GJ, Sanz-Lomana CM, Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S (1989).
Monzón O, Ramirez PT (2013). Surgical, on- Large loop excision of the transformation zone
Nicklin JL, Wright RG, Bell JR, Samaratunga H, cological, and obstetrical outcomes after ab- (LLETZ). A new method of management for
Cox NC, Ward BG (1991). A clinicopathological dominal radical trachelectomy - a systematic women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
study of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 131(1):77–82. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 96(9):1054–60. http://
The influence of cervical HPV infection and oth- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.010 dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03380.x
er factors, and the role of conservative surgery. PMID:23769758 PMID:2804007
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 31(2):179–83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1991.
tb01814.x PMID:1656927
References 153
Prendiville W, Davies R, Berry PJ (1986). A low Reid R, Scalzi P (1985). Genital warts and Salani R, Puri I, Bristow RE (2009). Ade-
voltage diathermy loop for taking cervical biop- cervical cancer. VII. An improved colposcop- nocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a
sies: a qualitative comparison with punch biop- ic index for differentiating benign papilloma- metaanalysis of 1278 patients evaluating the
sy forceps. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 93(7):773–6. viral infections from high-grade cervical in- predictive value of conization margin sta-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986. traepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. tus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 200(2):182.e1–5.
tb07980.x PMID:3730349 153(6):611–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.012
9378(85)80244-1 PMID:2998190 PMID:19019325
Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Burchette RJ, Hu S,
Zhang X, Qiao YL (2011). Regardless of skill, Ricci C, Martin M, Neenman K, Prendiville W Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R,
performing more biopsies increases the sen- (2015). Management of patients with cytologi- Muwonge R, Swaminathan R, Shanthakumari
sitivity of colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. cal low grade or borderline abnormalities: how S, et al. (2007). Effect of visual screening on
15(3):180–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b powerful is a negative colposcopy? Oral pre- cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil
013e3181fb4547 PMID:21436729 sentation, EUROGIN, Seville, Spain. Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet.
370(9585):398–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, Huang Richart RM (1968). Natural history of cervical S0140-6736(07)61195-7 PMID:17679017
MN, Wu LY, Zhang X, et al. (2004). Colpo- intra epithelial neoplasia. Clin Obstet Gynecol.
scopically directed biopsy, random cervical 5:748–84. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS,
biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the di- Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, et al.
agnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II Richart RM (1990). A modified terminology for (2009). HPV screening for cervical cancer in
or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 191(2):430–4. cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gyne- rural India. N Engl J Med. 360(14):1385–94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.065 col. 75(1):131–3. PMID:2296409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0808516
PMID:15343217 PMID:19339719
Robinson WR, Webb S, Tirpack J, Degefu S,
Querleu D, Leblanc E, Castelain B (1991). O’Quinn AG (1997). Management of cervical Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J (2003). Benefit of
Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy with cervical screening at different ages: evidence
the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix. LOOP excision. Gynecol Oncol. 64(1):153–5. from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 164(2):579–81. http:// http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1996.4546 Cancer. 89(1):88–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/
dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)80025-6 PMID:8995565 sj.bjc.6600974 PMID:12838306
PMID:1825150
Roman LD, Morris M, Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Ger- Sauvaget C, Fayette JM, Muwonge R, Wesley
Querleu D, Morrow CP (2008). Classifica- shenson DM, Wharton JT (1992). Reasons for R, Sankaranarayanan R (2011). Accuracy of vi-
tion of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. inappropriate simple hysterectomy in the pres- sual inspection with acetic acid for cervical can-
9(3):297–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470- ence of invasive cancer of the cervix. Obstet cer screening. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 113(1):14–
2045(08)70074-3 PMID:18308255 Gynecol. 79(4):485–9. PMID:1553163 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.012
PMID:21257169
Reade CJ, Eiriksson LR, Covens A (2013). Sur- Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S,
gery for early stage cervical cancer: how radical Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, et al.; International Sauvaget C, Muwonge R, Sankaranarayanan
should it be? Gynecol Oncol. 131(1):222–30. HPV screening working group (2014). Effica- R (2013). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.078 cy of HPV-based screening for prevention of of cryotherapy in the treatment of cervical in-
PMID:23863357 invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four Eu- traepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Obstet.
ropean randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 120(3):218–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.
Reagan JW, Hicks DJ (1953). A study of in situ 383(9916):524–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0 2012.10.014 PMID:23265830
and squamous-cell cancer of the uterine cer- 140-6736(13)62218-7 PMID:24192252
vix. Cancer. 6(6):1200–14. http://dx.doi.org/10. Sawaya GF (2005). A 21-year-old woman with
1002/1097-0142(195311)6:6<1200::AID-CN Rubin IC (1910). The pathological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined sig-
CR2820060614>3.0.CO;2-8 PMID:13106837 incipient carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet nificance. JAMA. 294(17):2210–8. http://dx.doi.
Gynecol. 62:668–76. org/10.1001/jama.294.17.2210 PMID:16264163
154
Sawaya GF, Grady D, Kerlikowske K, Valleur Semple D, Saha A, Maresh M (1999). Colpos- Solomon D (1989). The 1988 Bethesda Sys-
JL, Barnabei VM, Bass K, et al. (2000). The copy and treatment of cervical intra-epithelial tem for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic
positive predictive value of cervical smears in neoplasia: are national standards achievable? diagnoses: developed and approved at the
previously screened postmenopausal women: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 106(4):351–5. http:// National Cancer Institute workshop in Bethes-
the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08273.x da, MD, December 12–13, 1988. Diagn Cyto-
Study (HERS). Ann Intern Med. 133(12):942– PMID:10426242 pathol. 5(3):331–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
50. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133- dc.2840050318 PMID:2791840
12-200012190-00009 PMID:11119395 Shafi MI, Finn CB, Luesley DM, Jordan JA,
Dunn J (1991). Lesion size and histology of Song Y, Zhao YQ, Zhang X, Liu XY, Li L,
Schantz A, Thormann L (1984). Cryosur- atypical cervical transformation zone. Br J Pan QJ, et al. (2015). Random biopsy in col-
gery for dysplasia of the uterine ectocervix. Obstet Gynaecol. 98(5):490–2. http://dx.doi. poscopy-negative quadrant is not effective
A randomized study of the efficacy of the org /10.1111/ j.1471- 0 528.19 91.tb103 49.x in women with positive colposcopy in prac-
single- and double-freeze techniques. Acta PMID:2059601 tice. Cancer Epidemiol. 39(2):237–41. http://
Obstet Gynecol Scand. 63(5):417–20. http:// dx.doi.org /10.1016/ j.c anep. 2015.01.0 0 8
dx.doi.org/10.3109/000163 48 409156695 Shafi MI, Jordan JA, Singer A (2006). The PMID:25684646
PMID:6496044 management of cervical intraepithelial neo-
plasia (squamous). In: Jordan JA, Singer Soutter WP (1994). Management of women
Schauta F (1908). Die erweiterte vaginale To- A, editors. The cervix. Oxford, UK: Black- with mild dyskaryosis. Immediate referral to
talexstirpation des Uterus bei Kollumkarzinom. well Publishing; pp. 462–77. http://dx.doi. colposcopy is safer. BMJ. 309(6954):591–2.
Vienna, Leipzig: Verlag von Josef Šafář. org/10.1002/9781444312744.ch31 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.591
PMID:8086951
Scheungraber C, Glutig K, Fechtel B, Kuehne- Shaw E, Sellors J, Kaczorowski J (2003). Pro-
Heid R, Duerst M, Schneider A (2009a). Inner spective evaluation of colposcopic features in Soutter WP, de Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A,
border – a specific and significant colposcopic predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Monaghan JM, Duncan ID, Paraskevaidis E,
sign for moderate or severe dysplasia (cervical degree of acetowhite change most important. et al. (1997). Invasive cervical cancer after
intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3). J Low Genit J Low Genit Tract Dis. 7(1):6–10. http://dx.doi. conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial
Tract Dis. 13(1):1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ org/10.1097/00128360 -200301000 - 00003 neoplasia. Lancet. 349(9057):978–80. http://
LGT.0b013e31817ff92a PMID:19098598 PMID:17051037 dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08295-5
PMID:9100623
Scheungraber C, Koenig U, Fechtel B, Kuehne- Shrivastava S, Mahantshetty U, Engineer R,
Heid R, Duerst M, Schneider A (2009b). The Tongaonkar H, Kulkarni J, Dinshaw K (2013). Soutter WP, Hanoch J, D’Arcy T, Dina R, McIn-
colposcopic feature ridge sign is associated Treatment and outcome in cancer cervix pa- doe GA, DeSouza NM (2004). Pretreatment
with the presence of cervical intraepithe- tients treated between 1979 and 1994: a single tumour volume measurement on high-reso-
lial neoplasia 2/3 and human papillomavi- institutional experience. J Cancer Res Ther. lution magnetic resonance imaging as a pre-
rus 16 in young women. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 9(4):672–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-14 dictor of survival in cervical cancer. BJOG.
13(1):13–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b01 82.126480 PMID:24518716 111(7):741–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-05
3e318180438a PMID:19098601 28.2004.00172.x PMID:15198766
Siegler E, Amit A, Lavie O, Auslender R,
Schiffman M, Brinton LA, Devesa SS, Fraumeni Mackuli L, Weissman A (2014). Cervical in- Soutter WP, Sasieni P, Panoskaltsis T (2006).
JF Jr (1996). Cervical cancer. In: Schottenfeld traepithelial neoplasia 2, 3 in pregnancy: time Long-term risk of invasive cervical cancer after
D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiol- to consider loop cone excision in the first tri- treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial
ogy and prevention. New York, USA: Oxford mester of pregnancy? J Low Genit Tract Dis. neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 118(8):2048–55. http://
University Press; pp. 1090–116. 18(2):162–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21604 PMID:16284947
013e318299c0af PMID:23994950
Semm K (1966). New apparatus for the “cold-co- Spaulding EH (1968). Chemical disinfection of
agulation” of benign cervical lesions. Am J Ob- Smith JS, Green J, Berrington de Gonza- medical and surgical materials. In: Lawrence
stet Gynecol. 95(7):963–6. PMID:5914130 lez A, Appleby P, Peto J, Plummer M, et al. C, Block SS, editors. Disinfection, sterilization,
(2003). Cervical cancer and use of hormonal and preservation. Philadelphia (PA), USA: Lea
contraceptives: a systematic review. Lancet. & Febiger; pp. 517–31.
361(9364):1159–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(03)12949-2 PMID:12686037
References 155
Strander B, Adolfsson J (2014). Safety of mod- Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Woodrow N, Permezel M, Butterfield L, Rome
ern treatment for cervical pre-cancer. BMJ. Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. (1999). R, Tan J, Quinn M (1998). Abnormal cervical
349:g6611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6611 Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause cytology in pregnancy: experience of 811 cas-
PMID:25378385 of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J es. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 38(2):161–5.
Pathol. 189(1):12–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.
Strander B, Andersson-Ellström A, Milsom I, (SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH tb02992.x PMID:9653851
Sparén P (2007). Long term risk of invasive 431>3.0.CO;2-F PMID:10451482
cancer after treatment for cervical intraepi- Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J,
thelial neoplasia grade 3: population based Ware RA, van Nagell JR (2010). Radical hys- Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ; 2001 ASCCP-spon-
cohort study. BMJ. 335(7629):1077. http:// terectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: in- sored Consensus Workshop (2003). 2001
dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39363.471806.BE dications, technique, and complications. Ob- Consensus guidelines for the management of
PMID:17959735 stet Gynecol Int. 2010:587610. http://dx.doi. women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
org/10.1155/2010/587610 PMID:20871657 J Low Genit Tract Dis. 7(3):154–67. http://dx.
Strander B, Ellström-Andersson A, Franzén doi.org/10.1097/00128360-200307000-00002
S, Milsom I, Rådberg T (2005). The perfor- Wentzensen N, Walker JL, Gold MA, Smith KM, PMID:17051063
mance of a new scoring system for colpos- Zuna RE, Mathews C, et al. (2015). Multiple bi-
copy in detecting high-grade dysplasia in the opsies and detection of cervical cancer precur- Wright VC (2010). Color atlas of colposcopy –
uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. sors at colposcopy. J Clin Oncol. 33(1):83–9. cervix, vagina, vulva and adjacent sites. Hous-
84(10):1013–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0001- http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.9948 ton (TX), USA: Biomedical Communications.
6349.2005.00895.x PMID:16167921 PMID:25422481
Ylitalo N, Sørensen P, Josefsson A, Frisch M,
Teshima S, Shimosato Y, Kishi K, Kasamatsu T, Wertheim E (1912). The extended abdominal Sparén P, Pontén J, et al. (1999). Smoking and
Ohmi K, Uei Y (1985). Early stage adenocarci- operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 op- oral contraceptives as risk factors for cervical
noma of the uterine cervix. Histopathologic anal- erative cases). Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. carcinoma in situ. Int J Cancer. 81(3):357–65.
ysis with consideration of histogenesis. Cancer. 66:169–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(199
56(1):167–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097- 90505)81:3<357::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-1 PMID:
0142(19850701)56:1<167::AID-CNCR2820 WHO (2012). Cryosurgical equipment for the 10209949
560126>3.0.CO;2-T PMID:4005786 treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and
prevention of cervical cancer. WHO technical Yoonessi M, Wieckowska W, Mariniello D,
Uijterwaal MH, Verhoef VM, Snijders PJ, Meijer specifications. Geneva, Switzerland: World Antkowiak J (1982). Cervical intra-epithelial
CJ (2014). Arguments in favor of HPV testing for Health Organization. Available from: http:// neoplasia in pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet.
cervical screening and post-treatment CIN2+ www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ 20(2):111–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-729
monitoring. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 14(3):245– cancers/9789241504560/en/. 2(82)90021-2 PMID:6125429
8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2014.893
829 PMID:24598044 WHO (2014). Comprehensive cervical can- Zaino RJ (2000). Glandular lesions of the
cer control: a guide to essential practice. 2nd uterine cervix. Mod Pathol. 13(3):261–74.
Ullal A, Roberts M, Bulmer JN, Mathers ME, ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Orga- http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880047
Wadehra V (2009). The role of cervical cytology nization. Available from: http://www.who.int/ PMID:10757337
and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular reproductivehealth/publications/cancers/cervi
neoplasia. Cytopathology. 20(6):359–66. http:// cal-cancer-guide/en/. Zaino RJ (2002). Symposium part I: adenocar-
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00566.x cinoma in situ, glandular dysplasia, and early
PMID:18557985 Wiebe E, Denny L, Thomas G (2012). Cancer of invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 119(Sup- Int J Gynecol Pathol. 21(4):314–26. http://dx.
van de Lande J, Torrenga B, Raijmakers PG, pl 2):S100–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020- doi.org/10.1097/00004347-200210000-00002
Hoekstra OS, van Baal MW, Brölmann HA, et 7292(12)60023-X PMID:22999501 PMID:12352181
al. (2007). Sentinel lymph node detection in
early stage uterine cervix carcinoma: a sys- Williams J (1888). Cancer of the uterus. Harvian Zielinski GD, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Berk-
tematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 106(3):604–13. lectures for 1886. London, UK: HK Lewis. hof J, Snijders PJ, Risse EJ, et al. (2003). HPV
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.010 testing can reduce the number of follow-up
PMID:17628644 Wilson JMG, Jungner G (1968). Principles and visits in women treated for cervical intraep-
practice of screening for disease. Geneva, ithelial neoplasia grade 3. Gynecol Oncol.
Switzerland: World Health Organization. 91(1):67–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-
8258(03)00415-3 PMID:14529664
156
annex 1.
Figure A1.1. Diagrammatic representations of types of transformation zone (TZ). (a) Type 1 TZ, which is completely
ectocervical, is fully visible, and may be small or large. (b) Type 2 TZ, which has an endocervical component but
is still fully visible; the ectocervical component may be small or large. (c) Type 3 TZ, which has an endocervical
component, and the upper limit is not fully visible; the ectocervical component, if present, may be small or large.
a Type 1 TZ
Native mature Upper limit of Columnar epithelium
squamous epithelium visibility
Upper limit of
visibility
Columnar epithelium
Native mature
squamous
epithelium
Transformation zone Transformation zone
b Type 2 TZ
Native mature Upper limit of Columnar epithelium
squamous epithelium visibility
Upper limit of
visibility
Columnar epithelium
Native mature
squamous
epithelium
Transformation zone Transformation zone
c Type 3 TZ
Native mature
squamous epithelium Upper limit of Columnar epithelium
Upper limit of visibility
visibility
Native mature
squamous
Transformation zone epithelium
Transformation zone
__________________________________________________________
Patient address: __________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Colposcopic examination
Colposcopic opinion: (0. No cervix; 1. Normal; 2. HPV / Inflamm / Benign; 3. CIN/Low grade; 4. CIN/High grade;
5. Invasion; 6. Other; 7. Not performed)
Swede score
Management plan
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
General assessment Adequate or inadequate; if inadequate, for what reason (e.g. cervix obscured by inflammation, bleeding, scar)
Squamocolumnar junction visibility: completely visible, partially visible, not visible
Transformation zone types 1, 2, 3
Non-specific
• Leukoplakia (keratosis, hyperkeratosis); erosion
• Lugol’s staining (Schiller test): stained or nonstained
Excision specimen Length: the distance from the distal or external margin to the proximal or internal margin
dimensions Thickness: the distance from the stromal margin to the surface of the excised specimen
Circumference (optional): the perimeter of the excised specimen
The Swede score assigns a score of 0, 1, or 2 to each of five different characteristics. The total score ranges from 0
to a maximum of 10.
0 1 2
Uptake of acetic acid Zero or transparent Shady, milky (not transparent, not Distinct, opaque white
opaque)
Margins and surface Diffuse Sharp but irregular, jagged, Sharp and even; difference in
“geographical”. Satellites surface level, including “cuffing”
Lesion size < 5 mm 5–15 mm or spanning 2 quadrants > 15 mm or spanning 3–4 quadrants,
or endocervically undefined
Annex 5. Preparation of 5% acetic acid, Lugol’s iodine solution, and Monsel’s paste 161
Monsel’s paste
Ingredients Quantity
1. Ferric sulfate base 15 g
2. Ferrous sulfate powder a few grains
3. Sterile water for mixing 10 mL
4. Glycerol starch 12 g
Preparation
Take care: The reaction is exothermic (emits heat).
A. Add a few grains of ferrous sulfate powder to 10 mL of sterile water in a glass beaker. Shake.
B. Dissolve the ferric sulfate base in the solution by stirring with a glass stick. The solution should become crystal
clear.
C. Weigh the glycerol starch in a glass mortar. Mix well.
D. Slowly add ferric sulfate solution to glycerol starch, constantly mixing to get a homogeneous mixture.
E. Place in a 25 mL brown glass bottle.
F. For clinical use, most clinics prefer to allow enough evaporation to give the solution a sticky, paste-like
consistency that looks like mustard. This may take 2–3 weeks, depending on the environment. The top of the
container can then be secured for storage. If necessary, sterile water can be added to the paste to thin it.
Note: This preparation contains 15% elemental iron.
Storage
6 months
Label
Monsel’s paste
Shake well
External use only
Use by (date)
162
Disclosures of interests
Ms Mary Martin reports receiving personal consultancy fees from Zilico Ltd.
Professor Walter Prendiville reports benefiting from royalties from, and being named in a patent on, an
endocervical conization device for excision of a tissue specimen from the uterine cervix, owned by Utah Medical
Products, Inc.
Professor John Tidy reports receiving personal consultancy fees from, and holding stocks in his capacity
as clinical founder of, Zilico Ltd., and being named in a patent for the electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)
technology.
164
3.2 Walter Prendiville
3.3 Reproduced, with permission, from Bergeron C, Ronco G, Reuschenbach M, Wentzensen N, Arbyn M, Stoler M,
et al. (2015). The clinical impact of using p16(INK4a) immunochemistry in cervical histopathology and cytology: an
update of recent developments. Int J Cancer. 136(12):2741–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28900 PMID:24740700;
and Adapted from von Knebel Doeberitz M, Vinokurova S (2009). Host factors in HPV-related carcinogenesis:
cellular mechanisms controlling HPV infections. Arch Med Res. 40(6):435–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
arcmed.2009.06.002 PMID:19853183, copyright (2009), with permission from Elsevier.
3.4 a & b Courtesy of Christine Bergeron
3.5 a & b Courtesy of Christine Bergeron
3.6 a & b Courtesy of Christine Bergeron
4.1–4.4 Courtesy of Mark H. Stoler
4.5 a–c Courtesy of Mark H. Stoler
4.6 a–d Reproduced from Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, Heller DS, Henry MR, Luff RD, et al. (2012). The
Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and
consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy
and Cervical Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 136(10):1266–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.LGT200570
PMID:22742517, © 2010 College of American Pathologists.
4.7 a & b Reproduced from Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, Heller DS, Henry MR, Luff RD, et al. (2012). The
Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and
consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy
and Cervical Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 136(10):1266–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.LGT200570
PMID:22742517, © 2010 College of American Pathologists.
4.8 Courtesy of Christine Bergeron
4.9 Walter Prendiville
5.1–5.10 Walter Prendiville
5.11 a & b Walter Prendiville
5.12 a & b Walter Prendiville
5.13–5.18 Walter Prendiville
6.1 & 6.2 Walter Prendiville
7.1 a–c Walter Prendiville d Courtesy of Montserrat Cararach
7.2 a–c Walter Prendiville
7.3 a–c Walter Prendiville
7.4 a–c Reproduced, with permission, from Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity
C, et al. (2012). The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related
morbidity. BJOG. 119(6):685–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x PMID:22329499
7.5 & 7.6 Prendiville W, Ritter J, Tatti SA, Twiggs LB (2003). Colposcopy: management options. Amsterdam: Elsevier
Limited.
7.7 a–d Prendiville W, Ritter J, Tatti SA, Twiggs LB (2003). Colposcopy: management options. Amsterdam: Elsevier
Limited.
7.8 a & b Walter Prendiville
7.9 Reproduced, with permission, from Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity C, et al.
(2012). The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity.
BJOG. 119(6):685–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x PMID:22329499
7.10–7.12 Walter Prendiville
8.1 Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a
beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
8.2 Walter Prendiville
Sources 165
8.3 a Walter Prendiville b Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia: a beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
8.4 Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a
beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
8.5 Line drawings by Lakshmi Sankaranarayanan; images from Atlas of Colposcopy: Principles and Practice
(available from: http://screening.iarc.fr/atlascolpo.php).
8.6 Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a
beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
8.7 a–c Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a
beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
8.8 a & b Walter Prendiville
8.9 a–c Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a
beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
9.1 a & b Courtesy of David Hicks
9.2 Courtesy of David Hicks
9.3 a & b Courtesy of David Hicks
9.4 & 9.5 Courtesy of David Hicks
9.6 a & b Courtesy of David Hicks
9.7 Courtesy of David Hicks
9.8 a & b Courtesy of David Hicks
9.9 Courtesy of David Hicks
9.10–9.13 Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:
a beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
9.14 & 9.15 Courtesy of David Hicks
9.16 a–d Courtesy of David Hicks
9.17 Atlas of Colposcopy: Principles and Practice (available from: http://screening.iarc.fr/atlascolpo.php).
9.18 a & b Courtesy of David Hicks
9.19 a & b Atlas of Colposcopy: Principles and Practice (available from: http://screening.iarc.fr/atlascolpo.php).
9.20 a–q Courtesy of Ramani Rajendran
10.1 a Walter Prendiville b Cartier R, Cartier I (1993). Practical colposcopy. 3rd ed. Paris: Laboratoire Cartier.
10.2 a Cartier R, Cartier I (1993). Practical colposcopy. 3rd ed. Paris: Laboratoire Cartier. b–h Walter Prendiville
10.3 a Cartier R, Cartier I (1993). Practical colposcopy. 3rd ed. Paris: Laboratoire Cartier. b & c Walter Prendiville
d & e Courtesy of Quek Swee Chong f & g Walter Prendiville
10.4 a Cartier R, Cartier I (1993). Practical colposcopy. 3rd ed. Paris: Laboratoire Cartier. b & c Walter Prendiville
d Courtesy of Quek Swee Chong e Republished, with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., from Jordan JA, Singer
A, editors (2006). The cervix. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; permission conveyed through Copyright
Clearance Center, Inc.
10.5 a Courtesy of Partha Basu b & c Walter Prendiville d Reproduced, with kind permission of Goran Grubišić,
from Grubišić G (2013). On development of colposcopy in Croatia: on 15th anniversary of the first Croatian
colposcopic course (June 20. 1998.–June 20. 2013.). Gynaecologia et Perinatologia. 22(1):16–21. Available from:
http://gynaecolperinatol.com/files/pdf/v22n1_16-21.pdf [Croatian]; and Grubišić G, Babić D. “The role of colposcopy
in the early diagnosis and prevention of the preinvasive lesions of the uterine cervix and lower genital tract” for
attendees of Croatian colposcopic courses from 2001 to 2014. e–g Walter Prendiville h & i Bornstein J, Bentley
J, Bösze P, Girardi F, Haefner H, Menton M, et al. (2012). 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International
Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 120(1):166–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/
AOG.0b013e318254f90c PMID:22914406 j Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment
of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
k–m Walter Prendiville
166
11.1 Reproduced from WHO (2012). Cryosurgical equipment for the treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and
prevention of cervical cancer. WHO technical specifications. Geneva: WHO; p. 7, copyright (2012). Available from:
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/cancers/9789241504560/en/.
11.2 Reproduced from WHO (2012). Cryosurgical equipment for the treatment of precancerous cervical lesions and
prevention of cervical cancer. WHO technical specifications. Geneva: WHO; p. 31, copyright (2012). Available from:
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/cancers/9789241504560/en/.
11.3 a Reproduced from WHO (2012). Cryosurgical equipment for the treatment of precancerous cervical lesions
and prevention of cervical cancer. WHO technical specifications. Geneva: WHO; p. 40, copyright (2012). Available
from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/cancers/9789241504560/en/. b & c Courtesy of Partha
Basu
11.4 Courtesy of Liger Medical
11.5 Courtesy of WISAP Medical Technology
11.6 Walter Prendiville
11.7 a & b Walter Prendiville
11.8 Walter Prendiville
11.9 a–f Prendiville W, Ritter J, Tatti SA, Twiggs LB (2003). Colposcopy: management options. Amsterdam: Elsevier
Limited.
11.10 a & b Walter Prendiville
11.11–11.14 Prendiville W, Ritter J, Tatti SA, Twiggs LB (2003). Colposcopy: management options. Amsterdam:
Elsevier Limited.
12.1–12.3 Courtesy of Michael Jeffers
12.4 & 12.5 Courtesy of Quek Swee Chong
12.6 & 12.7 Walter Prendiville
12.8 & 12.9 Prendiville W, Ritter J, Tatti SA, Twiggs LB (2003). Colposcopy: management options. Amsterdam:
Elsevier Limited.
13.1 Walter Prendiville
13.2 a–d Courtesy of Michael Jeffers
13.3 Courtesy of Quek Swee Chong
13.4 a–g Walter Prendiville
13.5 a & b Krittika Pitaksaringkarn
13.6–13.8 Walter Prendiville
13.9 Courtesy of Quek Swee Chong
13.10 a & b Courtesy of Ramani Rajendran
13.11 a–c Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:
a beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
13.12 Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R (2003). Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a
beginners’ manual. Lyon: IARC. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/402.
14.1 DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, editors (2015). Devita, Hellman, and Rosenberg's cancer: principles
& practice of oncology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
15.1–15.3 Taken at the Cancer Institute, Chennai, India, by Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
15.4 Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
16.1 a–c Courtesy of Goran Grubišić
16.2 Reprinted from Arbyn M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Dillner J (2005). Clinical utility of HPV-
DNA detection: triage of minor cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated for high-grade CIN: an update of pooled
evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 99(3 Suppl 1):S7–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.033 PMID:16154623,
copyright (2005), with permission from Elsevier.
Sources 167
16.3 Adapted, with permission, from Arbyn M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Dillner J (2005).
Clinical utility of HPV-DNA detection: triage of minor cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated for high-grade CIN:
an update of pooled evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 99(3 Suppl 1):S7–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.033
PMID:16154623, copyright (2005), with permission from Elsevier.
18.1 Courtesy of Peter J. Pronovost
18.2 Walter Prendiville
18.3 Craig Parylo; image accessed at https://commons.wikimedia.org. Licence: GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 and CC-BY-SA-3.0.
18.4 & 18.5 Walter Prendiville
A1.1 a–c Walter Prendiville
Tables
1.1 Compiled from Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, et al. (2013). 2012 updated
consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J
Low Genit Tract Dis. 17(5 Suppl 1):S1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e318287d329 PMID:23519301
1.2 Walter Prendiville
4.1 Reproduced from Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, Heller DS, Henry MR, Luff RD, et al. (2012). The Lower
Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and
consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy
and Cervical Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 136(10):1266–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.LGT200570
PMID:22742517, © 2010 College of American Pathologists.
4.2 Walter Prendiville
7.1 Walter Prendiville
9.1 Compiled from WHO (2003). Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted infections. Geneva: WHO.
Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/pub6/en/.
9.2 Walter Prendiville
10.1 & 10.2 Walter Prendiville
11.1–11.7 Walter Prendiville
12.1 Compiled from Salani R, Puri I, Bristow RE (2009). Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a metaanalysis
of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 200(2):182.e1–5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.012 PMID:19019325
13.1 Adapted with permission from Pecorelli S (2010). Corrigendum to “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the
vulva, cervix, and endometrium” [Int J Gynaecol Obstet (2009) 105(2):103–4]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 108(2):176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.009, copyright (2010), with permission from Elsevier.
13.2 Walter Prendiville
13.3 Reprinted from Mutch DG (2009). The new FIGO staging system for cancers of the vulva, cervix, endometrium
and sarcomas [meeting report]. Gynecol Oncol. 115(3):325–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.050,
copyright (2009), with permission from Elsevier.
13.4 Walter Prendiville
14.1 Adapted from Wiebe E, Denny L, Thomas G (2012). Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 119(Suppl
2):S100–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60023-X PMID:22999501, copyright (2012), with permission
from Elsevier; and Pecorelli S (2009). Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 105(2):103–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012 PMID:19367689, copyright (2009),
with permission from Elsevier.
14.2 Compiled from Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP (1974). Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with
cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 44(2):265–72. PMID:4417035; and Querleu D, Morrow CP (2008). Classification
of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 9(3):297–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70074-3
PMID:18308255
15.1 Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
168
16.1 Public Health England (2016). NHS Cervical Screening Programme: colposcopy and programme management.
3rd ed. London: PHE Screening. NHSCSP Publication No. 20. PHE Publications Gateway No.: 2015734. Available
from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cervical-screening-programme-and-colposcopy-management.
© Crown copyright 2016.
18.1 Walter Prendiville
18.2 Compiled from Lawrence C, Block SS, editors (1968). Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. 1st ed.
Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
18.3 Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
A3.1 Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, Girardi F, Haefner H, Menton M, et al. (2012). 2011 colposcopic terminology of
the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 120(1):166–72. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318254f90c PMID:22914406
A4.1 Republished, with permission of Wiley, from Strander B, Ellström-Andersson A, Franzén S, Milsom I, Rådberg
T (2005). The performance of a new scoring system for colposcopy in detecting high-grade dysplasia in the
uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 84(10):1013–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00895.x
PMID:16167921; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Text
Section 1.5.3.1 (page 8) Text quotation reprinted from Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ,
Arbyn M, et al. (2014). Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four
European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 383(9916):524–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-
7 PMID:24192252, copyright (2014), with permission from Elsevier.
Section 1.6.3 (page 12) Text quotation reprinted from Song Y, Zhao YQ, Zhang X, Liu XY, Li L, Pan QJ, et al. (2015).
Random biopsy in colposcopy-negative quadrant is not effective in women with positive colposcopy in practice.
Cancer Epidemiol. 39(2):237–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.01.008 PMID:25684646, copyright (2015),
with permission from Elsevier.
Section 4.2.2 (page 34) Text quotation reprinted from Ikenberg H, Bergeron C, Schmidt D, Griesser H, Alameda
F, Angeloni C, et al. (2013). Screening for cervical cancer precursors with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: results
of the PALMS study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 105(20):1550–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt235 PMID:24096620, by
permission of Oxford University Press.
Section 11.14 (pages 98 and 99) Text quotation reprinted from Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A,
Dickinson HO, Keep SL (2010). Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
(6):CD001318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub2 PMID:20556751
Sources 169
Index
A coarse mosaic 55, 80, 81, 83, 108
acetic acid solution 41–43, 48, 55, 62–64, 70, 78, coarse punctation 55, 80, 81, 83, 108
79, 82 cold-knife conization 87, 91, 98, 118, 120
acetowhitening 62–64, 68, 70, 78, 79, 82, 83, 108 colposcope 8, 37–39, 45, 46, 48, 145
adenocarcinoma 29, 81, 101, 102, 104, 112, 118, colposcopic terminology/nomenclature 51–53, 55,
121 56
adenocarcinoma in situ 81, 101, 102, 104, 133, colposcopy record/documentation 48, 77, 78, 85
134
columnar epithelium 14–19, 25, 59–62, 64, 80
adenosquamous carcinoma 112
concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) 126–128
adequacy 9, 45, 48, 52, 56, 59, 77, 140
condyloma 56, 79, 82
American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical
Pathology (ASCCP) 5, 25 congenital transformation zone 20, 21, 56, 59, 64,
82
atypical squamous cells of undetermined
significance (ASCUS) 2, 5, 8, 97 consent 47
atypical surface vessels 56, 79–83, 108 contraception 25, 61, 136
atypical transformation zone 20 cryotherapy (cryosurgery, cryo) 87–90, 98
crypts 15–18, 55, 59, 61, 63, 95
B
Bethesda system 25 D
biopsy 8–12, 26, 42, 46–48, 51, 64, 70, 72, 73, 82, decontamination 142–145
88, 98, 102, 103, 108, 109, 113, 118, 136 desiccation 93
blended cutting waveform 92, 95 dual testing (p16/Ki-67) 5, 32, 34
brachytherapy 123–128 dyskaryosis 4, 5, 24, 26, 27, 101
branching surface vessels 61, 63 dysplasia 4, 23–25, 60, 77, 79, 80, 82, 101–104
C E
carcinoma in situ 23, 24 ectocervix 6, 13–17, 19, 20, 26, 48, 52, 53, 59, 64
cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) ectopy 16, 17
101–105
ectropion 16, 17, 135
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 2, 7,
electrosurgical unit (ESU) 39, 92–94, 142, 145
11, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 31, 32, 56, 59, 60,
79–83, 85–87, 89–92, 97–99, 131–137, 144 endocervical curettage 14
cervical stenosis 91, 132 endocervix 13–17, 19, 41, 48, 51, 52, 56, 59–63,
73, 101–104, 109, 112
cervicitis 67, 68, 70–73, 140
excision types 52, 53, 55, 95, 97, 103, 104, 109,
cervicovaginitis 67, 68, 70–73
110, 118
chemotherapy 126–129
external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) 123, 124,
coagulation waveform 92, 95 126–128
170
F L
fine mosaic 55, 64, 81, 82 large loop excision of the transformation zone
fine punctation 55, 64, 70, 71, 80–82 (LLETZ) 4, 40–43, 53, 55, 86, 87, 91–99,
103, 109, 136
fulguration 93
leopard-skin appearance 71
leukoplakia 55, 56, 82
G
loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) 4,
glandular dysplasia/disease/abnormality 86, 87, 40–43, 53, 55, 86, 87, 91–99, 103
97, 101–105, 134
low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)
8, 26, 30, 32, 82, 136
H Lugol’s iodine solution 14–16, 41, 43, 48, 57, 64,
71
high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)
1, 5, 10, 26, 27, 31, 32, 63, 79, 80, 82, 97,
101, 108, 133, 135–137
M
high-level disinfection (HLD) 142–144
mature squamous metaplasia 18, 19, 59, 63
histopathology 26
menopause 14, 15, 60–62, 64
hormone replacement therapy 137
microinvasive carcinoma 81, 101, 107–111, 113,
human papillomavirus (HPV) 2, 7, 8, 19, 20, 118, 133
23–26, 29, 30, 32, 34, 80, 82, 85, 99, 101,
molecular biomarkers (E6, E7, E4, MCM) 29–32,
102, 105, 128, 132–134
34
hyperkeratosis 82
Monsel’s paste 42, 95
hyperplasia 17, 18, 82
hysterectomy 87, 91, 105, 115, 117, 118, 120, 121,
134, 137 N
nabothian cyst/follicle 18, 55, 59, 61, 63
needle excision of the transformation zone (NETZ)
I
86
IFCPC/IARC training programme 46
neoadjuvant chemotherapy 127
immature squamous metaplasia 18, 19, 59,
new squamocolumnar junction 14, 17, 25, 60–62
61–64, 78, 82
non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma 112
inflammatory lesions 67, 68, 70–73, 79
inner border sign 55, 56, 108
instruments 37, 39–43, 46–48, 94, 141–144 O
International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)
Colposcopy (IFCPC) 9, 46, 51, 52, 55, 56 46
Index 171
R T
radiotherapy 113, 117, 118, 120, 121, 123–129, thermal coagulation 87, 90, 91, 98, 99
133, 134 transformation zone (TZ) 3, 4, 6, 9, 14, 18–21,
Reid Colposcopic Index 78 25, 48, 51–53, 55, 56, 59–61, 64, 70, 78,
reproductive tract infection 67, 68, 70–73, 110, 82, 85–98, 101, 103, 104, 109, 118, 131,
111, 140, 141 135–137
ridge sign 55, 56, 108 transformation zone types (1, 2, and 3) 20, 41, 48,
52, 53, 56, 60, 77, 85–89, 95, 97, 98, 109,
131
S transforming HPV infection 24–27, 29, 31, 34, 79
saline solution 43, 48, 59–61
Schiller test 14, 64 U
screening 3–8, 34, 51, 85, 96, 99, 101, 105, 108, umbilication 81
131–136, 139, 140
United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) 4,
squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) 13, 14, 16–19, 25, 99, 105, 131, 139
21, 48, 55, 56, 59–62, 79, 82, 97, 102–104,
131
squamous epithelium 13–21, 24, 26, 55, 59–64, V
71, 80 vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 117, 137
squamous metaplasia 17–21, 55, 60, 62, 63, 80 viral proteins (E6, E7) 24, 30, 32
sterilization 141–144 visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) 2, 5, 6, 48,
straight wire excision of the transformation zone 55, 62–64, 70, 78, 79, 82
(SWETZ) 53, 55, 91, 98, 109 visual inspection with acetic acid using
stratified, non-keratinizing squamous epithelium magnification 6
14, 15 visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine (VILI) 6, 14,
strawberry appearance 68, 70–72 48, 64, 71
Swede score 9, 48, 55, 64, 77, 78, 81, 85, 108
172
© Courtesy of Montserrat Cararach
ISBN 978-92-832-2459-4