159655472 Waste Water Costing Xls

To Do List
This is a list of items we have identified as needing work:
WaTER
NaOH
Stabilization
Concentrate disposal (evap. Ponds)
pipelines
intakes
outfalls Energy cost for Concentrate outfall
Dechlorination / Ozonation mods.
Cost formulas, where did they come from, are they estimated from graphs or from qasim
Evap Ponds
Deep Well injection
set lower limits
set upper limits
heating & lighting is not based on day light or outside air temp.
"H2O analysis" - Valence changes with pH
"References" Section
WT Cost Software Comments

have check marks for including/not including certain costs (e.g. building heating)
Introduction to this model (WaTER)
WaTER or "Water Treatment Estimation Routine" is a model for estimating the cost of drinking
water treatment. WaTER is the MS Excel program that is the basis for the Visual Basic program
called "WTCost". WaTER was developed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) "Water
Treatment Engineering and Research Group". WaTER is updated on a semi continuous basis
(adding new treatment techniques, modifying costs, etc.). WaTER can be downloaded at:
http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/water/awtr.html
WaTER uses the 1979 USEPA water treatment cost estimates (1978 dollars) and the 1992
Quasim updates to the 1979 costs as the basis. Costs are updated to todays costs. Processes
not included in the 1979 or 1992 updates are estimated from USBR experience and
manufacturere estimates. The majoirty of the program is based on applicable flows between 1
and 200 MGD. There has been some recent work incorporating smaller flows of 2,500 gpd to 1
MGD.
Information on treatment techniques included in WaTER for all USEPA regulated contaminants
can be found in the USBR publication "Water Treatment Primer for Communities in Need"
WTcost is a Visual Basic version of this program (with some edits and additions) developed by
Irvine Moch. This program is for sale through Irvine Moch & Associates.
I. Moch & Assoc., Inc.
PMB 161, Suite 6, 1812 Marsh Road, Wilmington, DE 19910-4528
(302) 477-0420, Fax: (302) 477-0242, E- Mail:imoch@aol.com
This version last updated on: 12/18/06
Comments
This model is updated on a continuous basis when funding and time permits. Work on this
model is not currently funded and has not been funded since FY04. Although this is labeled as
a "Non Functional Version" there are many components that work. The non functional status
comes from the fact that not everything has been fully checked and there are some components
that do not funciton or do not function correctly.
We welcome any comments (especially corrections).

Comments on this model should be addressed to Michelle Chapman at the USBR in Denver
MCHAPMAN@do.usbr.gov
11/4/2005
Key for WaTER program
= usually contain formulas or data that do change

= requires entry of data, and may or may not change
= entered data that usually do not change
= reference
= goal seek cells
= limit error
### = unknown use of data
= future work and problems that need to be fixed
Major Notes
Capital costs are computed using the peak day flow and an operation time factor (OTF) to account for down time which increases the hourly
O&M costs are computed using the average daily flow which accounts for daily usage of chemicals, power, etc.
Design Notes
me which increases the hourly flow rate, but not the daily flow rate
Components of the WaTER program
Intake Pre-Treatment Primary Treatment Desalination Disinfection
Chemicals
Dechlorination Concentrate Disposal
Concentrate Outfall -Cl2
-Sodium Bisulfite - Outfall
-Ozone
-Sodium Sulfite - Evap. Ponds
-Potassium Permanganate
-Sulfer Dioxide
-Acid
-Lime
-Antiscalant
MF
FLOW
NF/RO
Pre Desal Primary NF/RO NF/RO
Treatment Feed Flow Feed Flow Product Flow
Air Stripping UF
PreDesal Primary Desal
Plant Production Flow
Treatment Product Feed Flow ED
Flow
Desal
Product Flow
Rapid Mix Tank UFSCC Gravity Filter
Chemicals
-Cl2
-Ozone IX
-Potassium Permanganate Disinfection
-Acid -Cl2
-Lime -Ozone
Coagulant -Chlorine Dioxide
-Ferric Chloride Blending Blending -Chloramines
-Ferric Sulfate Flow Stabilization
-Alum (dru)
-Alum (liquid)
Intake Pipe Coagulant Aid

-PolyElectrolyte Plant Production Flow
-PACl Clearwell
FLOW
Plant Feed
Flow
Concentrate Outfall
Drawing Not Completely Accurate
MF
Primary Treatment
Feed Flow
Air Stripping UF
Plant Production Flow
Primary Treatment
Product Flow
Rapid Mix Tank UFSCC Gravity Filter
Chemicals
-Cl2 FLOW Disinfection
-Ozone -Cl2
-Potassium Permanganate -Ozone
-Acid -Chlorine Dioxide
-Lime -Chloramines
Coagulant
-Ferric Chloride
-Ferric Sulfate
-Alum (dry)
-Alum (liquid)
-PACl
-Lime
Coagulant Aid
-PolyElectrolyte
Warnings
Note: If Warnings are present, they are higlighted with red fill e.g.
Worksheet Worksheet Paremeter units Value Lower limit

b Capacity Feed Flow MGD
e H20 Analysis Ion Product for Concentrate 0
i Acid Acid addition H2SO4 Dose Rate by volume 0 0.04
j IronFeed Basis dose rate kg/day 1212 144
Calculated dose rate kg/hr. 64 4
k AlumFeed
Liquid Alum dose rate kg/hr. 128 4
L PolyAC Calculated dose rate kg/hr. 16 4
m De-Cl2&O4 Basis dose rate kg/day: kg/hr. 401 0.5
n CL2 Basis kg/day 946 4
Calculated Cl2 Dose kg/day 1568 4
o NHCL
Calculated Aqua Ammonia kg/day 376 110
p Ozone Ozone Requirements: kg/day 379 4
Basis Lime: kg/hr 118 4
q LimeFeed
Basis Soda: kg/hr 0 4
r Antiscalent Polymer Basis Polymer Feed kg/day 223 0.4
s PolyElectrolyte Basis Polymer Feed kg/day 223 0.5
Basis KMnO4 kg/day 891 0.4
t KMnO4
Feed/Product Flow gpd 81699 2500
w GravityFilt Filter area (m2): m2 2120 13
Filter area (m2): m2 2120 13
Service Flow Rate : L/(hr*L resin) 20 16
y IX
Filter area (m2): m2 50 13
z MF-P input Design MF product flow rate MGD 100 0.01
f RO&NF Input Primary Treatment Product Flow L/s 4796 0
Size hp 528 error
Size hp 163 3
Size hp 139 3
Upper Limit assumptions
0.00019
20 assuming H2SO4 limits and not HCL
72000 assuming ferrics sulfate and not ferrous chloride limits
2300
2500
2300
100
4500
4500
2300
1800
4500
4500
100
100
220
200,000,000
2600 b/w pump
2600 gravity filter
40
2600
0
0
error high pressure pump
350 transfer pump
350 product water pump
Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 39-41)
not in epa
not in epa
not in epa
not in epa
Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, and EPA-600/3-79-162b
wrong calculation/referece in table
EPA-600/2-79-162c
Estimating Water Treatment Costs. Volume 3. Cost Curves Applicable to 2,500 gpd to 1 MGD Treatment Plants
Hansen, Sigurd, Robert Gumerman, and Ressell Culp.
August 1979.Concract # 68-03-2516
196 pages
Project Info
Project Name Model Development
Date 06/07/04
Membrane Stage A1 (if applicable)
Worksheets included in this program:
# Worksheet Description
a Project & Stage Info Project title, date, list of worksheets in WaTER
b Capacity Production Capacity and water data report
c Report Process information input and cost output
d Cost Index Cost indices, interest rates, amortization
e H2O Analysis Water quality input
f RO & NF Input Input of membrane and system parameters
g RO & NF Output Cost and energy output
h CO2 Recarbonation basin
i Acid Sulfuric & Hydorchloric acid
j IronFeed
k Alum Feed
L PACl
m De-Cl2 Dechlorination with sodium sulfite, sodium bisulfite, and sulfer dioxide
n Cl2
o NHCl
p Ozone
q Lime Feed
r Antiscalant
s PolyElectrolyte
t KMnO4
u GAC
v Clearwell
w Gravity Filter
x UFSCC
y IX
z MF Input
aa MF Output
bb Rejection
cc ConcOutfall
dd IonicsED
ee ED2
ff Pumps
gg StandardAnalyses
hh S&DSI
ii LSI NF & RO Conditioning
jj Stiff & Davis
{b}Capacity
Project Name Date Stage

Model Development 06/07/04 A1
Flow Rate Input Page & Water Data Report
Plant Operations Schedule % decimal

Plant availability due to down time 95 0.95 (used to estimate production/year)
Planned operation time per day 100 1.00 (used to calculate energy & chemical costs)
Combined operation time factor (OTF) 0.950
Note: Peak daily flow should be used for capital costs and average daily flow should be used for O&M costs 1000 cfs and 300 cfs.
Most flow rates are limited to 1 to 200 MGD 1,292,630,400 646,315,200 ###
897,660 448,830 134,649
2000 1000 300
Average Daily Flow
Plant Production Flow L/Sec. L/Min. L/day gpm gph gpd MGD gal/year m3/day m3/year
Flowrate (Enter in ONE of these cells, set rest cells to "0 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0 100.00 0
O&M: Flowrate 4,380.79 262,847.2 378,500,000 69436.9 4,166,215 99,989,169 99.99 36,520,244,042 378,500 138,244,097
Flowrate (with OTF) 4,611.35 276,681.3 73,091.5 4,385,490 105,251,757
System Capacity (with OTF) 398,421,053 105.3 38,442,362,150 398,421.1 145,520,102
Peak Day Flow

Plant Production Flow L/Sec. L/Min. L/day gpm gph gpd MGD gal/year m3/day m3/year
Flowrate (Enter in ONE of these cells, set rest cells to "0 0.00 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 1.00 0
Flowrate 43.81 2,628.5 3,785,000 694.4 41,662 999,892 1.00 365,202,440 3,785 1,382,441
Capital: Flowrate (with OTF) 46.11 2,766.8 730.9 43,855 1,052,518
System Capacity (with OTF) 3,984,211 1.1 384,423,621 3,984.2 1,455,201.0
NF/RO Feed Flow Rate L/Sec. L/Min. L/day gpm gph gpd MGD gal/year m3/day m3/year
O&M: NF/RO Feed Flow Rate:* 5,153.87 309,232.03 445,294,118 81,690.50 ### 117,634,316 117.63 42,964,992,991 445,294.12 162,640,114.12
Capital: NF/RO Feed Flow Rate (with OTF): 54.25 3,255.07 859.90 51,594.00 1,238,256
Note: NF/RO Feed Flow = (Plant Production Flow) / (NF/RO Recovery)
Rapid Mix Feed Flow Rate L/Sec. L/Min. L/day gpm gph gpd MGD gal/year m3/day m3/year
O&M: Rapid Mix Feed Flow Rate:* 5,153.87 309,232.03 445,294,118 81,690.50 ### 117,634,316 117.63 42,964,992,991 445,294.12 162,640,114.12
Capital: Rapid Mix Feed Flow Rate (with OTF): 54.25 3,255.07 859.90 51,594.00 1,238,256
Note Rapid Mix Feed Flow = (Plant Production Flow) / (NF/RO Recovery)
Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program

{u}GAC
Granular Activated Carbon Filtration
Units Alternative Units

Desired Flow Rate: 4611 L/s 73,099 gpm
Bed Life (months) 12 6 3

1978 Capital Cost: % $ 28,273,633 $ 59,763,158 $ 79,684,211

{u}GAC
Alternative Units
### m3/day

Cost reports for water treatment processes
Production Capacity
Average Daily Flow (for O&M) Peak Daily Flow (for capital)
378,500 3,785 m3/day
138,244,097 1,382,441 m3/year
99,989 1,000 kgal/day
36,520,244 365,202 kgal/year
Alternative Construction Cost Operating Cost

Process Cost Parameter Units Units $ $/m3 $/kgal $/yr $/m3 $/kgal
Intake
Ozone $ 2,927,245 $ 773.38 $ 2,927.56 $ 233,064 $ 0.18 $ 0.67

Dose Rate (~5mg/L): 1.0 mg/L
Contact Time (~2 min): 2.0 min
Chlorination $ 371,544 $ 98.16 $ 371.58 $ 77,792 $ 0.06 $ 0.22

Pre-Treatment
Residual; 2.5 mg/L

Calculated Dose Rate: 2.5 mg/L
Alternative Dose Rate: mg/L
Air Stripping #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Residual; 2.5 mg/L
Microfiltration $ 62,355,748 $ 164.74 $ 0.05 $2,670,491 $ 0.02 $ 0.07

Microfilter system equipment Memcor, 90M10C
Number of microfilter 103
Recovery 0.98 (decimal)
Granular Activated Carbon

Flow rate 5153.9 L/sec 81699 gal/min
Alternative Flow Rate: L/sec gal/min
Bed Life
Months 12 $ 74,243,293 $ 196.15 $ 742.51 ### $ 0.13 $ 0.48
Months 6 $ 156,931,146 $ 414.61 $ 1,569.48 ### $ 0.17 $ 0.65
Months 3 $ 209,241,528 $ 552.82 $ 2,092.64 ### $ 0.19 $ 0.72
Primary Treatment
Gravity Filtration
Calculated Surface Area: 2,120.45 m2 22825 ft2
Alternative Surface Area: m2
Structure: $ 11,921,849 $ 31.50 $ 119.23 $ 670,324 $ 0.00 $ 0.02
Backwashing: $ 5,647,058 $ 14.92 $ 56.48 $ 59,945 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Media
Rapid Sand $ 1,797,258
Coal/Sand $ 1,797,258
Coal/Sand/Garnet $ 2,546,115
Coal/GreenSand/Coal $ 2,995,430
Upflow Solids Contact Clarifier

How Many? 1 $ 8,059,211 $ 21.29 $ 80.60
Retention Time (min) 180
Calculated Surface Area: 9857 m2 106101 ft2
Alternative Surface Area: m2 ft2
G Rating % 70 $ 150,352 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
G Rating % 110 $ 234,071 $ 0.00 $ 0.01
G Rating % 150 $ 319,042 $ 0.00 $ 0.01
Reverse Osmosis/Nanofiltration $ 93,010,050 $ 245.73 $ 930.20 ### $ 0.17 $ 0.65

Membrane Type FilmTec
Number of elements 20139 elements
Operating Pressure 1542 kPa 224 lb/in2
NaCl Rejection 0.995 (decimal)
Target Product TDS 50 mg/L
Blending? (Y or N) Y
Ratio (Blend:Product) 9.5 %
Ion Exchange $ 2,208,278 $ 5.83 $ 22.09 $3,081,756 $ 0.02 $ 0.08

Cation Equivalents/L Resin 20
$/m3 Cation Exchange Resin $1,607 45 ft3
Cation Resin Volume: 1,577 m3 56,324 ft3
Desalination
To Remove Cation Equivalents/L: 1.05E-04

Anion Equivalents /L Resin 11
$/m3 Anion Exchange Resin $6,250 175 ft3
Anion Resin Volume 1,577 m3 56,324 ft3
To Remove Anion Equivalents /L: 7.21E-03
Run Cycle 1 days
Ionics Electrodialysis Reversal $ 37,892,808 $ 100.11 $ 378.97 ### $ 0.48 $ 1.82

Staff Days/day 3
TDS 1000 mg/L
Electrodialysis $ - $ - $ - $ 150,865 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

Desalination
Membrane Area: 0 m2 0 ft2

Product TDS 500 mg/L
Number of Stages (1 or 2) 2 stages
Recovery per Stage 0.5 (decimal)
CO2
Stabilization
Outfall
Concentrate Disposal
Free Chlorine Level 1.0 mg/L as Cl2

Sodium Bisulfite: Cost 300 $/ $ 2,499,500 $ 6.60 $ 25.00 $2,462,340 $ 0.02 $ 0.07
Calculated Dose 1.5 mg/L
De-Chlorination
Alternative Dose mg/L
Sodium Sulfite: Cost 300 $/ $ 480,299 $ 1.27 $ 4.80 $ 504,695 $ 0.00 $ 0.01
Cost reports for water treatment processes
Production Capacity
Average Daily Flow (for O&M) Peak Daily Flow (for capital)
378,500 3,785 m3/day
138,244,097 1,382,441 m3/year
99,989 1,000 kgal/day
De-Chlorination
36,520,244 365,202 kgal/year
Alternative Construction Cost Operating Cost

Process Cost Parameter Units Units $ $/m3 $/kgal $/yr $/m3 $/kgal
Sulfur Dioxide: Cost 300 $/ $ 480,299 $ 1.27 $ 4.80 $ 504,695 $ 0.00 $ 0.01
Chlorine $ 371,544 $ 0.98 $ 3.72 $ 77,792 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

Residual; 2.5 mg/L
Chloramines #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! $ 57,885 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

Residual: 3 mg/L
Calculated Chlorine Dose: 4.1 mg/L
Disinfection
Calculated Ammonia Dose: 1.0 mg/L

Alternative Chlorine Dose 6.0 mg/L
Alternative Ammonia Dose 2.0 mg/L
Ozone $ 2,927,245 $ 7.73 $ 29.28 $ 233,064 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Dose Rate (~5mg/L): 1.0 mg/L
Contact Time (~2 min): 2.0 min
Chlorine Dioxide $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Residual; 2.5 mg/L
Calculated Dose Rate: % mg/L
Acidification
Feed LSI (for TDS>5000) -1.77 Conc LSI 0.62
Calc Dose 96% H2SO4 (mg/L) 99.0 Conc LSI 0.32 w/Acid #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! $ 151,276 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Alternative: 7 mg/L
Calc Dose 37% HCl (mg/L) 73.4 Conc LSI -1.43 w/Acid #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! $2,708,709 $ 0.02 $ 0.07
Alternative: mg/L
Alum (dry feed) $ 118,587 $ 0.31 $ 1.19 $ 198,162 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Calculated Dose: 328 mg/L
Alternative Dose: mg/L
Based on: 64 kg/hr 141 lb/hr
Alum (liquid feed) Dose Rate $ 163,393 $ 0.43 $ 1.63 $ 371,823 $ 0.00 $ 0.01
Calculated: 655 mg/L
Alternative: mg/L
Poly Aluminum Chloride Dose Rate $ 74,547 $ 0.20 $ 0.75 $ 260,653 $ 0.00 $ 0.01
Calculated: 98 mg/L
Alternative: mg/L
Chemical Feed Systems (Main Process)
Ferric Sulfate Dose Rate $ 445,537 $ 1.18 $ 4.46 $ 140,350 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Calculated: 259 mg/L
Alternative: mg/L
Based on: 1212 kg/day 2667 lb/day
Ferric Chloride $ 455,307 $ 1.20 $ 4.55 $ 780,776 $ 0.01 $ 0.02

Calculated Dose 266 mg/L 5 - 150
Alternative Dose
Lime & Soda Ash Dose Rate $ 240,456 $ 0.64 $ 2.40 $ 106,016 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Leave out Soda Ash "Y" or "N"? Y
Calculated Lime: 6 mg/L
Calculated Soda Ash: 0 mg/L
Alternative Lime mg/L
Alternative Soda Ash: mg/L
Based on Lime dose: 118 kg/hr 259 lb/hr
Based on Soda Ash: 0 kg/hr 0 lb/hr
AntiScalant Dose Rate $ 164,315 $ 0.43 $ 1.64 $ 182,717 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Suggested: 0.5 mg/L
Alternative: mg/L
Based on: 222.6 kg/day 490 lb/day
Cost of Chemical 990 $/500 lb
Polyelectrolyte Dose Rate $ 164,315 $ 0.43 $ 1.64 $ 182,717 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Suggested: 0.5 mg/L
Alternative: mg/L
Based on: 222.6 kg/day 490 lb/day
Cost of Chemical 990 $/500 lb
Potassium Permanganate Dose Rate $ 94,662 $ 0.25 $ 0.95 $1,309,257 $ 0.01 $ 0.04
Calculated: 0 mg/L
Alternative: 2 mg/L
Pumps
Single Stage Tubine $ 9,003,237 $ 23.79 $ 90.04 ### $ 0.16 $ 0.62
Variable Speed Turbine $ 4,748,362 $ 12.55 $ 47.49
Centrifugal, Singe Stage $ 1,728,164 $ 4.57 $ 17.28
Misc. Equipment
Number of pumps: 1 pump(s)

Height differential: 1 m 3.3 ft
Discharge pressure: 1750 kPa 254 psi Operating Cost Depend on Number and Horsepower only.
Full flow rate: 5.154 m3/s 81699 gal/min
Basis flow rate 5.154 m3/s 81699 gal/min
Pump Efficiency: 75 %
Pipe Diameter: 0.1 m 3.94 in
Motor Efficiency: 87 %
HP 111482
Power consumption: 128140 kWhr
Clearwell
Distrib.
Below Ground Capacity: 60,000 m3 15852 kgal $ 8,118,781 $ 21.45 $ 81.20

Ground Level Capacity: 55,000 m3 14531 kgal $ 4,317,924 $ 11.41 $ 43.18
Daily Production: 3,785 m3 1000 kgal
{d}Cost Index
Project Name Date

Model Development 06/07/04
Cost Indices Data

Month Year
Date of Cost Indices Values November 2006
Desalination Costs
November Ratio for October Ratio for 1995
Cost Indices Categories: 2006 Used For 1978 (1913 basis) (1913 basis)
ENR Construction Cost Index
Construction Cost 7910.81 Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 2.78 1.46
Wage ($/hr) 29.05 Labor (for operating the plant - approximatio 2.81 0.91
ENR Building Cost Index
Building Cost 4462.38 Housing 2.59 1.44
Skilled Labor 7449.82 Excavation and Sitework, Labor 3.02 1.30
ENR Materials Cost Index
Materials 2637.27 Piping & Valves 2.08 1.19
Materials 2637.27 Maintanace Materials 2.08 1.19
Cement ($/ton) 94.42 Concrete 1.96 1.17
Steel ($/CWT) 40.40 Steel 2.57 1.43
Other
Electricity Cost ($/kWHr) 3 0.0700 Power 2.33 1.00
Rates and Lifecycles

Interest Rate (%) 6.00 On Construction & Bond Money
Amortization time (yr) 30.00 For Bond Period
Water Rate ($/kgal) 0.00 Cost of Feed Source Water
Notes
References
ENR - Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index published monthly by McGraw Hill in New York City (212-512-2000)
See http://www.enr.com
http://www.enr.com/features/conEco/costIndexes/mostRecentIndexes.asp
2 EPA-600/2-79-162 "Estimating Water Treatment Costs"
3 DOE - Department of Energy "Electric Power Monthly"

Source of DOE data: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-826, "Monthly Electric Sales and Revenue Report with State Distributions Report."
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm_sum.html

{e}H20 Analysis
Feed Water Analysis
Last check for accuracy of the MCL values 1/1/2000 Implement eH-pH diagrams to automatically change valence with pH
Amount Ionic
Over Valence Molecular Equivalent Moles/ Equiv./ Strengt mg/L as
Component Secondary Eff Units MCL (mg/L) MCL Charges Wt. Weight Liter Liter h CaCO3
Aluminum mg/L 0.05 3 26.98
Antimony mg/L 0.006 3 121.75
Arsenic mg/L 0.010 3 74.92
Barium mg/L 2 2 137.34
Beryllium mg/L 0.004 2 9.01
Boron mg/L 0.5
Cadmium mg/L 0.005 2 112.41
Calcium 2.1000 mg/L --- 2 40.08 20.04 5.24E-5 1.05E-4 2.10E-4 5.24
Chromium, total mg/L 0.1 2 52
Copper mg/L 1 2 63.54
Iron mg/L 0.3 2 55.85
Lead mg/L 0.015 2 207.19
Magnesium mg/L --- 2 24.31
Manganese mg/L 0.05 2 54.94
Mercury mg/L 0.002 2 200.59
Nickel mg/L --- 2 58.71
Potassium 40.0000 mg/L --- 1 39.1 39.10 1.02E-3 1.02E-3 1.02E-3 102.30
Selenium mg/L 0.05 4 78.96
Silver mg/L 0.1 1 107.87
Sodium 140.0000 mg/L --- 1 22.99 22.99 6.09E-3 6.09E-3 6.09E-3 608.96
Strontium mg/L --- 2 87.62
Zinc mg/L 5 2 65.37
Alkalinity-Bicarbonate 180.00 mg/L --- -1 61 61.00 2.95E-3 2.95E-3 2.95E-3 295.08
Alkalinity-Carbonate 0.75 mg/L --- -2 60 30.00 1.25E-5 2.50E-5 5.00E-5 1.25
Carbon Dioxide (aq) 7.91 mg/L --- 0 44 1.80E-4 17.98
Chloride 150.00 mg/L 250 -1 35.45 35.45 4.23E-3 4.23E-3 4.23E-3 423.13
Cyanide, free mg/L 0.2
Fluoride mg/L 4 -1 19
Nitrate (as N) mg/L 10 -1 14
o-Phosphate mg/L --- -3 94
Sulfate mg/L 250 -2 96
Silica 7.60 mg/L
pH 7.54 pH 6.5-8.5 1 1 1.00 2.88E-8 ### 2.88E-8 0.00
pOH 6.46 pOH -1 1 1.00 3.47E-7 ### 3.47E-7 0.03
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 500 mg/L 500
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 22.00 mg/L ---
Conductivity 23.00 uS/cm ---
Temperature 11.75 °C ---
Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program Page 17

{f}RO&NF Input

RO & NF INPUT 95.9 574 35.0853659

7570
Process Input Construction Cost Input Operations & Maintenance Cost Input
Applicable Range Applicable Range
Lower Limit Upper Limit Lower Limit Upper Limit
Flow & Water Quality Membrane & Unit Configuration
Membrane Capacity 342,666 m3/day 90,532,544 gpd Electricity Rate 0.07 $/kWh
Primary Treatment Product Flow 4795.5 L/s 76019 gpm Bypass 35,834 m3/day 9,467,456 gpd Chemical Costs
Plant Production Flow 4380.8 L/s 69444 gpm Total Capacity 378,500 m3/day 100,000,000 gpd Citric Acid 0.14 $/kg
Feed TDS 500 mg/L Element Productivity m3/day
17 4,496 gpd H2PO4 23.7 $/kg
Production TDS (target) 50 mg/L Flux m3/(m2 * day)
0.46 11.29 gfd NaOH 18 $/kg 50% Some Example Membrane Specifications
Percent of Mono-valent ions 1.00 Decimal Number of Elements 20,137.0elements Membrane Life 3 Years Date last checked: 9/24/2004 9/24/2004
Percent of Multi-valent ions 0.00 Decimal Number of elements per vessel 7
elements / vessel Ave Intrinsic Rejection 0.996 Type NF NF
Average Molecular Weight 35.82 g/mol Number of Elements 20139elements Ave Observed Rejection 0.996 Test Solution Membrane Manufacturer FilmTec FilmTec Hydranautics Koch/Fluid Systems Koch/Fluid Systems Koch/Fluid Systems DuPont Rowpu SW30M-60408040 HSY SWC NF 90 BW30
Allow Blending Y Yes (Y) or No (N) Number of Pressure Vessels 2877for 2:1 array Apparent Rejection 0.996 Site Concentrate Model # BW30-400 SW30-8040 8040LHYCPA2 FS8822HR400 Prem TFC-S4 (4920 S) TFC-SR2 8" (8723 SR2-400) 6880T B-10 Twin Rowpu SW30M-60408040 HSY SWC
Recovery Rate 0.85 Decimal Max Vessels per Skid 60
vessels / skid Productivity 23 m3/module Membrane Diameter (cm) 20.32 20.32 20.32 20.32 10.16 20.32 20.32 15.24 20.2
Product TDS 3 mg/L Number of Skids (manual input) skids Cleaning Rate 6 per Year Productivity (m3/day) 40 23 41.6 32.2 7.6 45.4 60.5 8 23.5
Product Flow 3966.0 L/s 62870 gpm Number of Skids (automatic calc) 48 skids Staff Days/day 30 Area per module (m2) 37 27.7 37.2 30.7 7.2 37.2 1810 4389.0 29.26
NF/RO Feed Flow 4665.9 L/s 73964 gpm Recovery Rate 0.85 Decimal Labor Rate 29.05 $/hr Operating pressure, Papp (kPa) 1550 5500 1550 1550 552 380 6890 5500 5500
Concentrate TDS 3317 mg/L Building Area 10934 m2 117692 ft2 Lifetime 30 Years Test solution TDS 2000 35000 1500 2000 850 2000 35000 19000 32000
Concentrate Flow 699.9 L/s 11095 gpm Administrative Area 100 m2 1076 ft2 Interest Rate 6 % Avg. MW of TDS, 58.44 58.44 58.4 58.4 58.4 58.4 58.44 58.44 58.44 90 99
Bypass flow for blending 414.75 L/s 6575 gpm Odor Control? N Yes (Y) or No (N) Chloride Rejection 99.5 99.1 99 99.7 85 20 99.1 99 99.2 95 99.5
% blending 9.5 % Emergency Generatore Size 0.7 MW Sulfate Rejection 99.8 99.8 99.8 99.9 98.5 97 99.8 99 99.8
Membrane Manufacturer Specifications High Pressure Feed Pump Y Yes (Y) or No (N) Recovery Rate 15 10 15 10 15 15 35 8 10
Membrane Manufacturer FilmTec Pump Style PD *PD, VST or CSS Temperature (oC) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 8" size 8" size
Model # BW30-400 Height DIfference 4m 13.12 ft
Membrane Diameter 20.32 (10.16 or 20.32 cm) 8.0 in Motor Efficiency 0.95
Productivity 23 m3/day 6.1 kgal/day Pump Efficiency 0.90 Densities Cost
Area per module 37 m2 398 ft2 Coupling Efficiency 1.00 Sufuric acid 1.84 g/mL 0.11 $/kg
Operating pressure, Papp 1550 kPa 225 psi Number of Pumps 21 Sodium Hydroxide 2.13 g/mL
Test solution TDS 1500 mg/L Differential Pressure 1542 kPa 224 psi Antiscalant 1.3 g/mL
Avg. MW of TDS, 58 mg/mmole NaCl Capacity per pump 0.245 m3/s 3890 gpm Disinfectant 1 g/mL
Chloride Rejection 99.5 % 0.995 decimal Pipe X-Sectional Area 0.098 m2 152.2 in2 H2PO4 1.7 g/mL
Sulfate Rejection 99.8 % 0.998 decimal Size 528.3 hp
Recovery Rate 10 % Energy Recovery for Seawater n Yes (Y) or No (N) error error HCl 37% 0.14 $/kg
Temperature 25 C
o
77 Fo
Efficiency 0.60
NaCl dissociation constant 0.99 Efficiency 0.00 This number is the efficiency of the energy recovery device - it reduces the size of the High Pressure pump
Transfer Pumps (to HPP) Y Yes (Y) or No (N)
Cf, conc. of salt in feed water 26 mole/m 3
Pump Style css VST or CSS
Cp, conc. of salt in product water 0.13 mole/m3 Height DIfference 2m 6.56 ft
Cr, conc. of salt in reject 29 mole/m3 Motor Efficiency 0.94
Cm, bulk conc. 27 mole/m3 Pump Efficiency 0.75
Osmotic pressure 146 kpa 21 psi Coupling Efficiency 1.00
Net driving pressure, NDPo 1404 kpa 203.8 psi Number Transfer Pumps 20
A, water transport coefficient 4.64E-12 m3m-2Pa-1sec-1 Pressure Differential 310 kPa 45.0 psi
Operating pressure Capacity per Pump 0.258 m3/s 4085.0 gpm
Net driving pressure , NDPi 1404 kPa 203.8 psi Pipe X-Sectional Area 0.103 m2 1.11 ft2
Cf, conc. of salt in feed water 14 mole/m3 Size 163 hp
Cp, conc. of salt in product water 0.062 mole/m3 Product Water Pump Y Yes (Y) or No (N)
Cr, conc. of salt in reject 93 mole/m3 Pump Style CSS VST or CSS 3 350
Cm, conc. of 53 mole/m3 Height DIfference 2m 6.56 ft
Temperature 12 oC Length of Pipe 10 m 32.81 ft
Temperature Coefficient =1.023^(-25 0.740 Motor Efficiency 0.94
Osmotic pressure, Posm 138 kpa 20 psi Pump Efficiency 0.75
Applied pressure, Papp 1542 kPa 224 psi Coupling Efficiency 1.00
Number Pumps 20
Pressure Differential 310 kPa 45.0 psi
Capacity per Pump 0.219 m3/s 3472.2 gpm
Pipe X-Sectional Area 0.088 m2 0.29 ft
Size 139 hp
3 350

{g}RO&NF Output

RO & NF OUTPUT
Estimating Construction Costs for NF90 Membrane Treatment Plant Estimating O&M Costs
Membranes $ 10,069,500 @ $ 500 $/module Electricity $ 7,442,994

RO Skids $ 20,542,736 Steel @ $ 5,000 $/Vessel Labor $ 2,544,780
Building $ 17,124,107 Housing @ $ 1,076 $/m2 $100/ft2 Membrane Replacement $ 3,988,841
Electrical $ 5,634,062 Manf & Elect With Base of $ 977 $/m3 Cleaning Chemicals $ 261,376
Insturmentation & Controls $ 4,843,764 Manf & Elect add $300,000 for top $ 65,000 base cost Cartridge Filters $ 1,695,709
Repairs and Replacement $ 435,421
High Pressure Pumps $ 3,955,456 Piping 68,878,199 kWhr Insurance $ 174,169
Energy Recovery for Seawater $ - Manf & Elect Lab fees $ 547,612
Transfer Pumps $ 1,518,818 Piping 20,243,395 kWhr Total O&M Cost $ 17,090,902
Product Water Pumps $ 1,212,889 Piping 17,206,886 kWhr
Odor Control $ - Piping $ 50,000 base cost Total Costs
Process Piping $ 76,888 Piping $ 55,000 base cost
Yard Piping $ 67,117 Piping $ 50,000 base cost Capital Recovery $ 6,757,079
Cartridge Filters $ 20,465 Maint Materials $ 15,000 base cost O&M $ 17,090,902
Membrane Cleaning Equip $ 97,574 Manf & Elect $ 67,000 From Reference
Contractor Engineering & Training $ 91,266 Labor $ 100,000 base cost
Concentrate Treatment & Piping $ 806,912 Piping $ 13 $/m3 Concentrate Annual cost $ 23,847,981
Generators $ 73,271 Electrical 0.7 MW RO & Building $/m3 Product $ 0.18
$/1000 gal Product $ 0.69
Sitework $ 7,144,179 Electrical $ 14.53 $/m3 $/acre foot Product $ 224.12
Total Direct Capital Costs $ 73,279,004
Indirect Capital Costs

Interest During Construction $ 3,663,950 5 % of Total
Contingencies $ 4,379,095 6 % of Total
A&E Fees, Proj. Management $ 8,756,841 12 % of Total
Working Capital $ 2,931,160 4 % of Total
Total Indirect Captial Cost $ 19,731,046 27
Total Construction Cost $93,010,050
Cost per m3/day capacity $ 246

Cost per gpd capacity $ 0.93
References
Based on "Estimating the Cost of Membrane (RO or NF) Water Treatment Plants" By William B. Suratt, P.E., Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Vero Beach Florida
Presented at the AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, Reno, NV, 1995. also published as "Estimating the cost of membrane water treatment plants."

Recarbonation Basins Not currently being used
Single Basin Volume

Cost Category (ft3) 770 1375 2750 5630 8800 17600 35200
Cost Category (m3) 22 39 78 159 249 498 997
Excavation & Sitework $ 520 $ 620 $ 980 $ 1,390 $ 1,790 $ 3,050 $ 5,570
Concrete $ 1,380 $ 1,860 $ 2,820 $ 4,050 $ 5,190 $ 8,570 $15,320
Steel $ 2,250 $ 3,010 $ 4,670 $ 6,560 $ 8,320 $ 13,960 $25,240
Labor $ 2,830 $ 3,800 $ 5,730 $ 8,090 $ 10,240 $ 16,740 $29,730
Pipe & Valves $ 90 $ 130 $ 250 $ 480 $ 680 $ 1,360 $ 3,360
Subtotal $ 7,070 $ 9,420 $14,450 $20,570 $ 26,220 $ 43,680 $79,220
Miscellaneous & contingency $ 1,060 $ 1,410 $ 2,170 $ 3,090 $ 3,930 $ 6,550 $11,880
Total $ 8,130 $10,830 $16,620 $23,660 $ 30,150 $ 50,230 $91,100
Percent of Subtotal
Excavation & Sitework 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Concrete 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19
Steel 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Labor 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.38
Pipe & Valves 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04
Subtotal 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Miscellaneous & contingency 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Total 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
Construction Cost of Recarbonation Basins 1979 $

$100,000
f(x) = − 0.00772575132065311 x² + 90.969477979544 x + 7900.15376444089
$80,000 R² = 0.998135406286342
$60,000
1979 $
Total
$40,000
Polynomial ( Total)
$20,000
$-
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Volume - Cubic Meters
Construction Cost for Liquid CO2 as CO2 Source
Cost Category (Installed - lb/day 380 750 1500 3750 7500 15000
Cost Category (Installed - kg/da 173 341 682 1705 3409 6818
Manufactured Equipment $ 27,000 $31,000 $35,250 $49,250 $ 73,000 $141,000
Labor $ 7,650 $ 8,780 $12,170 $17,330 $ 28,990 $ 58,010
Pipe & Valves $ 1,530 $ 2,340 $ 4,620 $ 8,710 $ 16,940 $ 37,540
Housing $ 7,360 $ 7,360 $ 7,360 $ 7,360 $ 8,450 $ 8,900
Subtotal $ 43,540 $49,480 $59,400 $82,650 $127,380 $245,450
Micsellaneous & Contingency $ 6,530 $ 7,420 $ 8,910 $12,400 $ 19,110 $ 36,820
Total $ 50,070 $56,900 $68,310 $95,050 $146,490 $282,270
Percent of Subtotal
Manufactured Equipment 0.62 0.63 0.59 0.60 0.57 0.57
Labor 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.24
Pipe & Valves 0.04 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.15
Housing 0.17 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.04
Subtotal
Micsellaneous & Contingency 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Total 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
Construction Cost of Recarbonation - Liquid CO2 as a CO2

source
Construction Cost 1978$
$300,000
f(x) = 55052.7549730458 exp( 0.000252394115622862 x )
$200,000 R² = 0.972736167991685
$100,000
$-
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Installed Capacity (kg/day)
O&M Summary for Recarbonation - Liquid CO2 as CO2 source
Cost Category (Installed - lb/day 380 750 1500 3750 7500 15000
Cost Category (Installed - kg/da 173 341 682 1705 3409 6818
Energy kWhr/yr * $/kWhr $ 520 $ 728 $ 1,147 $ 2,290 $ 4,428 $ 8,549
Maintenance Material $/yr $ 2,860 $ 3,300 $ 4,400 $ 5,500 $ 7,700 $ 10,000
Labor Hr/yr * $/Hr $ 910 $ 910 $ 910 $ 1,820 $ 1,820 $ 2,730
Total Cost $ 4,290 $ 4,938 $ 6,457 $ 9,610 $ 13,948 $ 21,279
$/kWhr 0.03
$/hr Labor 10
Energy kWhr/yr * $/kWhr 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.24 0.32 0.40

Maintenance Material $/yr 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.57 0.55 0.47
Labor Hr/yr * $/Hr 0.21 0.18 0.14 0.19 0.13 0.13
Total Cost 1 1 1 1 1 1
Operation & Maintenance of Recarbonation - Liquid CO2 as a
CO2 source
Construction Cost 1979$

$25,000
$20,000
f(x) = − 0.000136997446504986 x² + 3.48076265677602 x + 3878.7452482663
$15,000
R² = 0.999060378828706
$10,000
$5,000
$-
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Installed Capacity (kg/day)
assuming from qasim

Average
0.07 ENR Skilled Labor Index
0.20 ENR Cement Cost ($/ton)
0.32 ENR Steel Cost ($/cwt)
0.39 ENR Labor Rate ($/hr)
0.02 ENR Materials Index
0.15
Average
0.60 ENR Construction Cost Index
0.11 ENR Building Cost Index
0.15
1.15
Average
0.23 Electricity Cost ($/kWhr)
1.00
{i}Acid
Acid: Sulfuric & Hydrochloric Acid

This estimates the amount of acid addition which is depenedent on NF/RO feed flow rate.
Capital Calculations 96% H2SO4 37% HCL

NF/RO Feed flow (peak day flow w/ OTF) (433.69) -433.69 L/sec.
(37.47) (37.47) m3/day
Dose by mass 7.00 73.40 mg/L
Density 1.841 1.600 g/L
Percent solution 0.96 0.37 decimal Applicable Range
Dose by volume 0.0040 0.1240 mL/L Lower Limit Upper Limit
Dose Rate by volume (0.1484) (4.6461) m3/day 0.04 20 Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 30-32)
1978 Capital Cost: % #NUM! #NUM!

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.7 #NUM! #NUM!
Housing 0.07 #NUM! #NUM!
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.16 #NUM! #NUM!
Piping and Valves 0.07 #NUM! #NUM!
Steel 0 #NUM! #NUM!
Concrete 0 #NUM! #NUM!
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 #NUM! #NUM!
O&M Calculations 96% H2SO4 37% HCL

NF/RO Feed flow (average daily flow) 4,665.93 4665.93 L/sec.
403.14 403.14 m3/day
Dose by mass 7.00 73.40 mg/L
Density 1.841 1.600 g/L
Percent solution 0.96 0.37 decimal
Dose by volume 0.0040 0.1240 mL/L
Dose Rate by volume 1.5967 49.9858 m3/day
Acid Cost ($/ton): $ 124 $ 72
O&M Cost: $ 1,630 $ 14,741 1978 Costs

%
Materials 0.04 $ 136 $ 1,227
Energy 0.05 $ 190 $ 1,720
Labor 0.91 $ 4,173 $ 37,723 Today's
Costs
Chemical Cost $/yr: $ 146,778 $ 2,668,039
November, 2006 O&M $: 1.00 $ 151,276 $ 2,708,709
Sulfuric Acid feed

Capital Cost
General Form: (A)*(XB) + C
A= 6010.6

{j}IronCoag
Capital Calculations Fe2(SO4)3-7H2O FeCl3 6H20 Units

NF/RO Feed flow (peak day flow w/ OTF) 54 54 L/sec.
4687307 4687307 L/day
Molecular weight 526.0 270.2 g/mol
Bicarbonate Alkalinity: 180 180 mg/L
2.95 2.95 mmoles/L
Alternative dose 0.0 0.0 mg/L
Calculated dose 258.6 265.7 mg/L Lower Limit
Basis dose rate 1,212.2 1,245.4 kg/day
Chemical Cost $/ton bulk $150 $1,420
Fe2(SO4)3-7H2O FeCl3 6H20

Capital Cost: $ 164,585 $ 168,194 1978 Costs
%
Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.72 $ 328,850 $ 336,061
Housing 0.21 $ 89,611 $ 91,576
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.02 $ 9,948 $ 10,166
Piping and Valves 0.05 $ 17,128 $ 17,503 Today's
Costs
Steel 0 $ - $ -
Concrete 0 $ - $ -
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.000 $ 445,537 $ 455,307
O&M Cost: $ 24,704 $ 25,298 1978 Costs

%
Materials 0.07 $ 3,599 $ 3,686
Energy 0.09 $ 5,188 $ 5,313
Labor 0.84 $ 58,357 $ 59,761 Today's
Costs
Ferric Sulfate Cost $/yr: $ 73,206 $ 712,017
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance $: 1.00 $ 140,350 $ 780,776
Ferric Sulfate Feed

Capital Cost
General Form: A*X^B*e^(C*X)
A= 10613
B= 0.319
C= 0.000393
O&M Cost
General Form: A*e^(B*X)+C
A= 1260926
B= 0.00001394

{k}Alum
Capital Calculations
Al2(SO4)3-18H2O Units
NF/RO Feed flow (peak day flow w/ OTF) 54 L/sec
195 m /hr.
3
Molecular weight of Alum 666.41 g/mol

Cost $/100 lbs. $ 15 per 100 lbs
Bicarbonate Alkalinity 180 mg/L
2.95 mmoles/L
Alternative dose 0 mg/L
Alternative dose rate 0 kg/hr
Calculated Alum Dose Rate (6 mmol/mmol HCO3) 0.492 mmoles/L
Calculated dose 328 mg/L Lower Limit Upper Limit
Calculated dose rate 64 kg/hr. 4 2300 Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 16)
Basis dose rate 64 kg/hr.
Capital Cost: $ 48,335 1978 Costs Construction Cost Equations (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 16)
%
Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.46 $ 61,701
Housing 0.03 $ 3,760
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.04 $ 5,843
Piping and Valves 0.47 $ 47,283 Today's
Costs
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 $ 118,587
O&M Cost: $ 4,723 1978 Costs Applicable Range

% Lower Limit Upper Limit
Materials 0.17 $ 1,671 4 2300 Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 16)
Energy 0.03 $ 331
Labor 0.8 $ 10,625 Today's
Costs
Alum Cost: $ 185,535
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance $: 1.00 $ 198,162
Coagulant: Aluminum Sulfate (Alum) (Liquid) Feed Cost Calculations
Units
Liquid Alum dose rate 128 kg/hr. O&M cost (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 19,20)
Multiplier between dry and liquid 2
Alternative dose rate 0 kg/hr.
Capital Cost: $ 53,996 1978 Costs Applicable Range

% Lower Limit Upper Limit
Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.71 $ 106,388 4 2500
Housing 0.15 $ 41,375 Construction Cost Equations (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 16)
Piping and Valves 0.02 $ 625 Today's
Costs
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
O&M Calculations
Units
Liquid Alum dose rate 128 kg/hr.
Multiplier between dry and liquid 2
Alternative dose rate 0 kg/hr.
O&M Cost: $ 2,376 1978 Costs O&M cost (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 17,18)
%
Materials 0.04 $ 198 Applicable Range
Energy 0.59 $ 272 Lower Limit Upper Limit
Labor 0.37 $ 283 Today's 4 2500
Costs
Alum Feed
Capital Cost
General Form: A*X^(B)*e^(C*X)
Dry Feed Liquid Feed
A= 12333.4 13223.3
B= 0.3205 0.285
C= 0.000515 0.000377
O&M Cost

{L}PACl
Al6(OH)12Cl6 Units
Primary Treatment Feed flow (peak day flow w/ OT 46 L/sec.
166 m3/hr.
MW of PACL 596.66 g/mol
Cost $/100 lbs.: $ 80 per 100 lbs.
Alternative dose rate 0 mg/L
0 kg/hr
Bicarbonate Alkalinity: 180 mg/L
2.95 mmoles/L
PACl Dose Rate 98 mg/L Applicable Range
PACl Dose Rate (18:1 HCO3:PACl) 0.164 mmoles/L Lower LimitUpper Limit
Calculated dose rate 16 kg/hr. 4 2300
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 30,385 1978 Costs

Housing 0.03 $ 2,363
Piping and Valves 0.47 $ 29,723 Today's
Costs
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 3,603 1978 Costs
Materials 0.17 $ 1,275

Energy 0.03 $ 252
Labor 0.8 $ 8,107 Today's
Costs
Alum Feed
Capital Cost
General Form: A*X^(B)*e^(C*X)
A= 12333.4 13223.3
B= 0.3205 0.285
C= 0.000515 0.000377
O&M Cost
A= 1205293 -6880.7
B= 1.9433E-05 -0.000659
C= -1202070 8700

{L}PACl
Upper Limit

{m}De-Cl2
(not included here are: sodium thiosulfate, hydrogen peroxide, ammonia)
NaHSO3 Na2SO3 SO2
Volume Treated (): 445,294 m3/day

Free Chlorine Level (mg/L) 1 1 1 mg/L
Default Free Chlorine Level (mg/L) 0.5 0.5 0.5 mg/L
Calculated dose rate (mg/L) 1.47 0.9 0.9 mg/L
Alternative dose rate (mg/L) 0 0 0 mg/L Lower Limit
Basis dose rate kg/day: 654.6 400.8 400.8 kg/day
Water Usage (totally dissolved) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cost $/ton: $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $/ton
Relationship between ORP & Dose, see Membrane Manual 29
1978 Capital Cost: % ### ### ###

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.72 ### ### ###
Housing 0.19 ### $ 87,287 $ 87,287
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.04 ### $ 21,421 $ 21,421
Piping and Valves 0.01 $ 19,192 $ 3,688 $ 3,688
Steel 0 $ - $ - $ -
Concrete 0.04 $ 72,149 $ 13,864 $ 13,864
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 ### ### ###
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 11,633 $ 6,879 $ 6,879

Materials 0.24 ### $ 88,511 $ 88,511
Energy 0.1 ### $ 41,345 $ 41,345
Labor 0.66 ### ### ###
Chemical Cost $/yr: $ 75,072 $ 45,963 $ 45,963
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance $: 1.00 ### ### ###
Polymer Feed - Yes I know - This is a place holder equiation. I need to find out how these chemical injection systems differ fro
Capital Cost
A= 11760.71
B= 0.00665
C= 8200
O&M Cost
General Form: A*e^(B*X)
A= 3000.8
B= 0.00207

{m}De-Cl2
Chemical options:
Applicable Range
Lower Limit Upper Limit
0.5 100
se chemical injection systems differ from polymer.

{n}CL2

Production Flow 4,380.79 L/sec.
Chromium (Cr 2+): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+00 mMoles/L

Nickel (Ni 2+): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+00 mMoles/L
Iron (Fe 2+): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+00 mMoles/L
Manganese (Mn 2+): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+00 mMoles/L
Total: 0.00E+00 mMoles/L
Desired Residual 2.50 mg/L 3.52E-02 mMoles/L
Cl2 needed 2.50 mg/L 3.52E-02 mMoles/L
Alternative Dose 0.00 mg/L Lower Limit
Basis 946.25 kg/day
Cl2 Cost $ 20 per ton, tanks
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 137,974

Housing 0.38 $ 135,936
Piping and Valves 0.04 $ 11,487
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 27,196

Materials 0.18 $ 10,189
Energy 0.18 $ 11,422
Labor 0.64 $ 48,947
Chemical Cost $/yr: $ 7,234
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance 1.00 $ 77,792
Chlorine storage and feed with Cylinder storage

Capital Cost
General Form: A*X^B + C
A= 680.75
B= 0.763
C= 11010
O&M Cost
General Form: A*X^B+C
A= 47.6
B= 0.89
C= 6000

NHCL
Data from water analysis. Units Alternative Units The addition of Chlorine and Ammonia to water produces chloramines.
Production Flow to be treated 4380.79 L/sec. Chloramines are the "combined chlorine residual." They are more persistent
in the water lines than "free chlorine," which is HOCl, and OCl-.
Chromium (Cr): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+0 mMoles/L If there is sufficient ammonia in the water already, it doesn't need to be added,
Copper (Cu): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+0 mMoles/L of course. If not, chlorine and aqueous ammonia should be added at the molar
Iron (Fe): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+0 mMoles/L ratio of 1:1, Cl2:NH3(aq). We will use the moles of divalent metal ions
Manganese (Mn): 0.00 mg/L 0.00E+0 mMoles/L and NO2- to calculate a chlorine demand. The molar ratio is 1:2 Cl2 to divale
cations, and 1:1 for Cl2:NO2-. The residual for Chloramines must be at least
Desired NH2Cl Residual 3.00 mg/L 5.84E-2 mMoles/L 2 mg/L which translates to approximately .03 moles per liter at pH 7.
Cl2 needed/L: 4.14 mg/L 5.84E-2 mMoles/L Applicable Range
Ammonia Needed/L: 0.99 mg/L 5.84E-2 mMoles/L Lower Limit Upper Limit
Calculated Cl2 Dose 1568.49 kg/day 4 4500
Alternative Cl2 Dose 2.15 kg/day Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b,
Chlorine
figure
storage
1-3) and feed with Cylinder storage
Basis Cl2 Dose 2.15 kg/day Applicable Range
Cl2 Cost $/ton: $ 20 per ton Lower Limit Upper Limit General Form: A*X^B + C
Calculated Aqua Ammonia 375.55 kg/day 110 2300 Capital Cost
Alternative Aqua Ammonia 757.00 kg/day A=
Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 42-44) 680.75
Basis Ammonia kg/day: 757.00 kg/day 1665.4 lbs/day B= 0.763
NH4OH Cost $/ton: $ 200 per ton C= 11010
Total Capital Cost #VALUE! O&M Cost

Total O&M Cost $57,885 A= 47.6
B= 0.89
C= 6000
Chlorine Feed Source: Qasim, et al, Aug. 1992, AWWA
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 12,230

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.52 $ 16,489 Anhydrous Ammonia Feed
Housing 0.38 $ 10,844 same place and form.
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.06 $ 2,036 X=kg/day ammonia feed capacity
Piping and Valves 0.04 $ 957
Steel 0 $ - Capital Cost:
Concrete 0 $ - A*X^B*e^(C*X)
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 $ 30,326 A= 3849.2
B= mg/L
1978 O&M Cost: % C= -0.000035
Materials 0.18 $ -
Energy 0.18 $ - O&M Cost:
Labor 0.64 $ - A*e^(B*X) +C
Chemical Cost $/yr: $ 16 A= -28063
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenan 1.00 $ 16 B= -2.41E-4
C= 36160
Ammonia Feed
1978 Capital Cost: % #VALUE!

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.66 #VALUE!
Housing 0.09 #VALUE!
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.15 #VALUE!
Piping and Valves 0.1 #VALUE!
Steel 0 #VALUE!
Concrete 0 #VALUE!
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 #VALUE!
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 12,776

Materials 0.4 $ -
Energy 0.06 $ -
Labor 0.54 $ -
Ammonia Cost: $ 57,869
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenan 1.00 $ 57,869

{p} Ozone

Production Flow to be treated 4380.79 L/s
Flow Rate: 262847 L/min 69444 gpm
Ozone level required (typically 1-5 mg/L 1 mg/L
Total ozone needed: 378.50 kg/day 832.7 lbs/day
Contact time : 2 min
Contact chamber size: 525.7 m3 ### ft3
Power (~26.5kWh per kg ozone): 22067 kWh
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS: $2,927,245
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS: $ 233,064
Note: Ozone requirements (ozone demand) are based on water quality analysis outside of this program
Ozone Generator: Contact Chamber:

Applicable Range
Lower Limit Upper Limit
Ozone Requirements: 378.50 kg/day 4 1800
1978 Capital Cost: % ### 1978 Capital Cost: % ###

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.81 ### B) Manufactured Equipment 0.00 $ -
Housing 0.03 $ 75,656 H) Housing 0.00 $ -
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.16 ### A) Excavation and Site Work 0.50 ###
Piping and Valves 0.00 $ - F) Piping and Valves 0.00 $ -
Steel 0.00 $ - D) Steel 0.31 ###
Concrete 0.00 $ - C) Concrete 0.19 ###
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 ### Capital Cost: 1.00 ###
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 98,627

Materials 0.11 $ 22,580
Energy 0.77 ###
Labor 0.12 $ 33,283
November, 2006 Operation & Maintena 1.00 ###
Ozone Generation Costs Ozone Contact Chamber Costs

Construction Costs: Construction Costs:
General Form: A *X ^B*e^(C*X) General Form: A *X ^B+C
A= 18631.2 A= 1771.4
B= 0.674 B= 0.5967
C= -0.000121 C= 1700
O & M Costs: O&M Costs: NONE

General Form: A*X^B+C
A= 392.4
B= 0.919
C= 6800
Source: Qasim, et al, Aug. 1992, AWWA Source: Qasim, et al, Aug. 1992, AWWA

{q}LimeFeed
Ratio
Volume Treated 5154 L/sec. Lime Soda Ash Limit
Requirement Requirement eq
Purity 0.9 0.58 mg/L
FROM WATER ANALYSIS Units Alternative Units

Ca (2+): 2.1 mg/L 0.1 mmoles/L 0.0 mg/L Ratio
Mg (2+): 0.0 mg/L 0.0 mmoles/L 0.0 mg/L eq
HCO3 (-): 180.0 mg/L 3.0 mmoles/L 0.0 mg/L mg/L
CO2 (2-): 0.8 mg/L 0.0 mmoles/L 0.72 mg/L
Excess: 5.0 mg/L
Total 6.4 mg/L 0.0 mg/L Ratio
volume treated: 18554 m3/hr. eq
Lime Dose: 118 mg/L 0 mg/L mg/L
Lime Cost $/ton: $ 60 mg/L
Soda Ash Cost $/ton: $ 160 per ton
Alternative dosage rate Lime 0.0 kg/hr.
Alternative dosage rate Soda 0.0 kg/hr. Applicable Range
Lower LimitUpper Limit
Basis Lime: 117.8 kg/hr 4 4500 Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 24-26)
Basis Soda: 0.0 kg/hr 4 4500
1.80
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 88,611
Housing 0.25 $ 57,435
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 15,124

Materials 0.06 $ 1,889
Energy 0.09 $ 3,176
Labor 0.85 $ 36,151
Lime Cost: $ 64,799
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenan 1.00 $ 106,016
Updated from
EPA-600/2-79-162b, Aug. 1979

{q}LimeFeed
Mg Ca HCO3+CO2Ca(OH)2 Mg and Ca react with Alkalinity and Lime to precipitate CaCO3 and Mg(OH)2
1 1 4 3
0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mg Ca HCO3+CO2Ca(OH)2 Remaining Mg or Ca react with remaining alkalinity

1 1 2 1
0.00 0.05 5.94 0.00
0.0 2.1 362.1 0.0
Mg Ca Na2CO3 Ca(OH)2 If Ca and/or Mg are in excess of Alkalinity, then add soda ash
1 1 1*mg+1*Ca 1*Mg
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
100
0.09 mol/m3
100 g/mol Calcium Carbonate
11.4 g CaCO3 /m3 treated
19 g sludge/m3 treated assuming 30% solids
8,493 kg sludge per day
18,684 lbs sludge per day

{r}Antiscalent

Volume Treated 5,154 L/sec. ###
Alternative dosage rate (default = 0.5 mg/L 0 mg/L
Basis Polymer Feed 222.6 kg/day
American Water Chemicals $/500 lb.: $ 500 per 500 lbs.
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 59,895

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.76 $126,323
Housing 0.19 $ 29,505
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 $164,315
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 4,758

Materials 0.1 $ 990
Energy 0.24 $ 2,664
Labor 0.66 $ 8,830
AntiScalant Cost $/yr: $170,232
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance 1.00 $182,717
Polymer Feed
Capital Cost
A= 11760.71
B= 0.00665
C= 8200
O&M Cost
A= 3000.8
B= 0.00207
Source: Qasim, et al, Aug. 1992, AWWA

{s}PolyElectrolyte

Volume Treated 5154 L/sec. 445,294
Alternative dosage rate (default = 0.5 mg/L 0 mg/L
Basis Polymer Feed 222.6 kg/day
American Water Chemicals $/500 lb.: $ 500 per 500 lbs.
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 59,895

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.76 $126,323
Housing 0.19 $ 29,505
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 $164,315
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 4,758

Materials 0.1 $ 990
Energy 0.24 $ 2,664
Labor 0.66 $ 8,830
PolyElectrolyte Cost $/yr: $170,232
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance 1.00 $182,717
Polymer Feed
Capital Cost
A= 11760.71
B= 0.00665
C= 8200
O&M Cost
A= 3000.8
B= 0.00207

{t}KMnO4

Feed/Product Flow 5154 L/sec. ### m3/day
Mn 2+ 0.00 mg/L
Fe 2+ 0.00 mg/L
Calculated KMnO4 Dose: 0.000 mg/L
Alternative dosage rate 2 mg/L
Basis KMnO4 890.6 kg/day
KMnO4 $/lb (hopper trucks): $ 1.9 per lb.
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 35,277

Housing 0.19 $ 17,378
Steel 0 $ -
Concrete 0 $ -
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 5,600

Materials 0.03 $ 350
Energy 0.05 $ 653
Labor 0.92 $ 14,488
KMnO4 Cost $/yr: ###
November, 2006 Operation & Maintena 1.00 ###
Permanganate Feed
Capital Cost
General Form: A*X^B*e^(C*X)
A= 9681.7
B= 0.0304
C= 0.00122
O&M Cost
A= -2125.9
B= -0.01689
C= 5600
Source: Qasim, et al, Aug. 1992, AWWA

{v}Clearwell
Construction cost for clear well storage
Below Ground (concrete)

Storage Capacity 15852 kgal
60000 m3
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 3,169,927

Manufactured & Electrical Equipmen 0.02 $ 175,936
Housing 0.13 $ 1,068,429
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.3173 $ 3,039,822
Piping and Valves 0 $ -
Steel 0.2753 $ 2,241,342
Concrete 0.25695 $ 1,593,252
November, 2006 Capital Cost: 1.00 $ 8,118,781
November, 2006 Unit Cost ($/kgal) $512
Data from EPA-600/2-79-162b, August 1979, pg453-454. They are used in determining cost formula.

{v}Clearwell
Ground Level (steel)

Storage Capacity 14531 kgal
55000 m3
1978 Capital Cost: % $1,628,817

Manufactured & Electrical Equipmen 0.6891 $3,114,799
Housing 0.13 $ 548,995
Steel 0.044 $ 184,068
Concrete 0.0569 $ 181,289
November, 2006 Capital Cost: 1.00 $4,317,924
November, 2006 Unit Cost ($/kgal) $297
in determining cost formula.

{w}GravityFilt

Desired Flow Rate 5153.87 L/s 81721 gpm
Temperature 53.15 oF
Total Suspended Solids 22.0 mg/L
Wash Cycle 24 hr
TSS Density 35 g/L*
Media Depth 1.2 m 1.31 yd
Maximum Media Capacity 110 L-TSS/m3*
Required Media Volume 2,544.54 m3 3328.26 yd3
Calculated Bed Area: 2,120.45 m2 4156.08 yd2
Alternative Bed Area: 0.00 m2 0.00 yd2
Tank Depth 1.56 m 1.7 yd
Backwash rate 13.93 gpm/ft2
Backwash duration 6 min.
Backwash frequency times per day
Loading Rate 2.2 gpm/sqft
Media Cost Delivered

$/yd3 Sand $ 540 $ 699 $/m3
$/yd3 Coal $ 540 $ 699 $/m3
$/yd3 Greensand $ 1,620 $ 2,098 $/m3
$/yd3 Garnet $ 1,215 $ 1,573 $/m3
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS: ###

Rapid Sand: $1,797,258
Coal/ Sand: $1,797,258
Coal/ Sand/ Garnet: $2,546,115
Sand/Greensand/Coal $2,995,430
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS: $ 730,268
Media costs assume equal parts of each type.
*Media capacity based on information in 'Water Treatment and Plant Design',

R.L. Sanks, Co: 1978, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc.
Construction cost is 100% Manufactured Equipment

O&M costs are included with the structure.

{w}GravityFilt
Gravity Filter
Backwashing Pump Gravity Filter Structure

What is relationship of BW pump to Applicable Range Applicable Range
18000
filter area for min and max calcs Actual Lower Limit Upper Limit Actual Lower Limit Upper Limit
16000
Filter area (m2): ### 13 2600 Filter area (m2): 2,120.45 13 2600 50
Limits (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 67-69) 14000 100
f(x) = 53.3774118969911 x^0.700664241362944
12000 200
R² = 0.994123915558261
1978 Capital Cost: % $ 2,150,536 1978 Capital Cost: % $ 4,625,190 10000 300
Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.69 $ 4,117,857 Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.26 $ 3,337,171 400 Column R
8000
Housing 0 $ - Housing 0.18 $ 2,158,515 600 Power (Column R)
6000
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.07 $ 454,960 Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.22 $ 3,075,255 800
4000
Piping and Valves 0.24 $ 1,074,241 Piping and Valves 0.23 $ 2,214,120 1000
Steel 0 $ - Steel 0.05 $ 593,953 2000 1200
Concrete 0 $ - Concrete 0.06 $ 542,835 0 1400
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 $ 5,647,058 November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 $ 11,921,849 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
1600
1800
1978 O&M Cost: % $ 25,105 1978 O&M Cost: % $ 262,655 2000
Materials 0.24 $ 12,540 Materials 0.12 $ 65,601 2300
Energy 0.52 $ 30,460 Energy 0.36 $ 220,630 2600
Labor 0.24 $ 16,944 Labor 0.52 $ 384,092 2800
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenan 1.00 $ 59,945 November, 2006 Operation & Maintenan 1.00 $ 670,324
Backwash Pumping Costs Gravity Filter Structure Costs

Construction Costs: Construction Costs:
General Form: A + B*X + C*X^2 General Form: A *X^B*e^(CX)
A= 36000 A= 35483.4
B= 1254.2 B= 0.591
C= -0.1212 C= 0.000162
O & M Costs: O & M Costs:

General Form: A*X^B+C General Form: A*X^B+C
A= 73.3 A= 359.5
B= 0.75 B= 0.8568
C= 2200 C= 8100
Source: Qasim, et al, Aug. 1992, AWWA Source: Qasim, et al, Aug. 1992, AWWA

{x}UFSCC
Upflow Solids Contact Clarifier (UFSCC)

Production Flow to be treated 4380.79 L/sec 69444 gpm
Retention Time 180 min.
Assumed Depth = 4.8 m 4.8 m
Calculated Settling Area 9856.8 m2
Alternative settling Area 0 m2
Basis: 9856.8 m2
1978 Construction Cost % ###

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.516 ###
Housing 0 $ -
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.293 ###
Piping and Valves 0 $ -
Steel 0.11 $ 825,425
Concrete 0.081 $ 462,918
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: ###
% G=70 % G=110 % G=150

1978 O&M Cost: $ 58,325 $ 92,595 $128,007
Materials 0.17 $ 20,637 0.14 $ 26,981 0.11 $ 29,307
Energy 0.23 $ 31,301 0.38 $ 82,101 0.5 $149,342
Labor 0.6 $ 98,413 0.48 ### 0.39 $140,393
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance $: $ 150,352 ### $319,042
Construction Cost Equations (From EPA-600/2-79-162b, figure 63)

$ = a+b*x a b
<400 m2 62801.114 416.7716
>400 m2 132264.71 244.3322
O&M Cost (From EPA-600/2-79-162b figure 63 & 64)

$=a+b*x a b
G = 70 5967.9519 5.31182
G = 110 5806.5744 8.80491
G = 150 5939.8245 12.38412

{y}IX
Ion Exchange
Regeneration/Backwashing Pump
Applicable Range
Actual Lower Limit Upper Limit
Production Flow to be treated 4380.79 L/s Filter area (m2): 49.61 13 2600
Equiv/L , CATION >+1 1.05E-04 equiv/L Applicable Range
Equiv/L , ANION 7.21E-03 equiv/L Lower Limit Upper Limit
Service Flow Rate : 20 L/(hr*L resin) 16 40 1978 Capital Cost: % $ 97,922
Cation Equivalents/Liter of Resin 20 equiv/L Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.69 $ 187,501
Anion Equivalents/Liter of Resin 11 equiv/L Housing 0.00 $ -
Desired Run Cycle: 1 days Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.07 $ 20,716
Medium: Cation Anion Steel 0.00 $ -
Min Volume: 788.5 788.5 m3 Concrete 0.00 $ -
Time until exhaustion of min vol 397.6 3.2 days November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.00 $ 257,131
Resin for desired Run Cycle: 788.54 788.54 m3
Resin Expansion Coefficient 2 2 1978 O&M Cost: % $ 3,570
Total Vessel Volume 1,577 1,577 m3 Materials 0.24 $ 1,783
Nominal Resin Price $/m3 $1,607 $6,250 Energy 0.52 $ 4,332
Resin Cost: $ 1,267,299 ### Labor 0.24 $ 2,410
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenanc 1.00 $ 8,525
Vessel:
Aspect ratio: 4 height/dia
Bed area : 49.61 m2
Base pressure vessel correlation: Total Construction Cost: % ### Resin w/ Tank & Regeneration Tank
Number of Vessels (Reality chec Height is 31.8 m Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 0.57 ###
(446 kPa/ 50 psig) b= 3.446 Housing 0.01 $ 31,839
log($) = b + m*log(m^3) m= 0.562 Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.03 $ 86,053
Cost factor for operating pressure: 2 Piping and Valves 0.43 ###
Tank cost at base pressure: $ 174,786 Steel 0.00 $ -
TOTAL TANK COST: $ 349,572 Concrete 0.00 $ -
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: 1.04 ###
Regeneration (with NaCl) Units Alternative Units 1978 O&M Cost: % $ 820,280
Mass of NaCl /vol of resin: 150 kg/m3 9 lb/ft3 Materials 0.24 $ 233,956
NaCl required: 236,563 kg 521,526 lb Energy 0.52 $ 426,546
Chemical cost per kg NaCl: $0.02 per kg $0.01 per lb. Labor 0.24 $ 179,673
TOTAL CHEMICAL COST PER YEAR: $ 820,280 November, 2006 Operation & Maintenanc 1.00 $ 840,175
Chemical concentration: 10 percent

Regeneration fluid req'd : 2,366 m3 625 kgal
STORAGE TANK COST: $ 591,406
Units Alternative Units 80,000 gallon 319,000.00

Pumping 100,000 gallon 333,000.00
Height DIfference 32 m 104.3 ft
Pipe Diameter 0.51 m 1.7 ft
Length of Pipe 10 m 32.8 ft
Efficiency 78
Number Transfer Pumps 1
Pressure Differential 200 kPa 29.0 psi
Capacity per Pump 5.154 m3/s 81,699 gpm
Size 6512.9 hp

{z}MF-P input
Process input Units Alternative Units Alternative Units Lower Limit Upper Limit Process Flow Calculation Units Alternative Units
Design MF product flow rate 99,989,169 gpd Feed flow 4380.3 L/s 69430 gpm
Design MF product flow rate 100.0 MGD 0.01 Product flow 4351.1 L/s 68966 gpm
Design MF product flow rate 69437 gpm Backwash 908.4 L/hr 4 gpm
Design MF product flow rate 4380 L/s 378,459,004 L/day Recovery rate 99.3 %
Design MF product flow rate 378,459 m3/day Feed pump horsepower 1519 hp MF Feed
Feed pump (kwh) 9,429,856 kwh
Plant availability (%) 95 % Backflush (kwh) 62,866 kwh
Membrane Module equipment cos $ 211,500 90M10C Number of Modules 103
Cost per membrane $650 Number of Membranes 9270
modular system flow rate 675 gpm 42.6 L/s 0.972 MGD Building Area 49995 ft2 4645 m2
Flow per module 7.5 gpm
No. membranes per module 90
Pump efficiency 80 %
Motor efficiency 93 %
Design feed pressure 30 psi 207 kpa
Backflush pressure 29 psi 200 kpa 576
Backwash Flow 600 gpm 37.9 L/s
Backwash intervals 15 minutes 900 second 0.0104 days
Backwash and backflush duration 0.1 minutes 6 second 0.0001 days
Operations & Maintenance Cost Input
Electricity Rate 0.07 $/kWh

Sodium Hypochlorite Cost 0.43 $/L
Design dosage 200 mg/L
Specific gravity (NaOCl) 1.168
Solution concentration 12 %
Membrane Life 10 Years
Staff Days/day 3

O&M Cost Estimation
Direct Capital Costs
Membrane Modules $ 21,784,500 @ 211500 $ each Electricity $ 664,491
Membrane $ 6,025,500 @ 650 $ each Labor $ 254,000
Building $ 4,999,464 @ 100 $/ft2 1076 $/m2 Chemicals (Sodium Hypochlorite) $ 215,000
Installation $ 7,210,000 @ 70000 $/90M10C Membrane Replacement $ 603,000
Miscellaneous $ 1,089,225 5 % of Module Cost Cleaning Chemicals(NaOCl) $ 43,000
Plant interconnecting piping $ 1,143,686 5 % of Module and misc. Repairs and Replacement and Mis $ 891,000
Engineering $ 2,287,373 10 % of Module and misc. Total O & M Cost $ 2,670,491
Total Direct Capital Costs $ 44,539,748
Indirect Capital Costs

Interest During Construction $ 2,672,000 6 % of Total direct
Contingencies $ 8,908,000 20 % of Total direct
A&E Fees, Proj. Management $ 4,454,000 10 % of Total direct
Working Capital $ 1,782,000 4 % of Total direct
Total Indirect Captial Cost $ 17,816,000
Total Construction Cost ### Total costs

769922254.xls
0.996
Pure water permeability (m3/s) 2.66E-04 3.97E+00
Feed Flow (m3/s) 2.66E-03 3.97E+01
Transmembrane pressure (Pa) 1,550,000 1,404,096
Area (m2) 37 551245
Channel height dh(m) 1.00E-05 1.00E-05 0.995
Cf (mol/m ) 3
25.68 13.96
Density (kg/m3) 1000 1000
Viscosity (Pa s) 0.001 0.001
a (Pa m3mol-1) 4908 4908
Diffusivity of NaCl (m2/s) 1.20E-09 1.20E-09 0.995
1 2 3 4 5 6
Calculated paramters determined by configuration and
operating conditions Ra Test Ri
Jv (m/s) 1st pass 7.19E-06 7.19E-06 A Ri Site Jv
Pv/tm (m m s Pa )
3 -2 -1 -1
4.64E-12 5.12E-12 A
Average Uc (m/s) 1.44E+01 1.44E+01 A
Schmidt Number 837 837 A
Reynolds Number 143 143 A
a 0.875 0.875 B
b 0.250 0.250 B
c 0.065 0.065 B
k (m/s) for laminar flow in flat chan 3.23E-03 3.23E-03 A and B
Iterations neccessary for model convergence (pp 9.13 item 8, reference A)

Solving the design equations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jv/k 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recovery 0.1000 0.0910 0.0911 0.0911 0.0911 0.0911 0.0911 0.0911
Intrinsic Rejection Ro 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996
Appartent Rejection Ra 0.9955 0.9956 0.9956 0.9956 0.9956 0.9956 0.9956 0.9956
Cw (mol/L) 28.5895 2.83E+01 2.83E+01 2.83E+01 2.83E+01 2.83E+01 2.83E+01 2.83E+01
Cp (mol/L) 0.1144 1.13E-01 1.13E-01 1.13E-01 1.13E-01 1.13E-01 1.13E-01 1.13E-01
Cr (mol/L) 28.5261 28.2444 28.2472 28.2472 28.2472 28.2472 28.2472 28.2472
Jv Theoretical (m m s) 3 -2
6.55E-06 6.55E-06 6.55E-06 6.55E-06 6.55E-06 6.55E-06 6.55E-06 6.55E-06
Exp (Jv/k) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
{bb}Rejection
What is purpose of graph?
This sheet originally from Ellen Show dp or diameter as a function of the
other
Velocity 2.3 m/sec
Used for predicting optimum pipe diameter.
Outfall Length (enter "m" or "ft.") 100 m
Two equations, one simpler (Darcy-
Wisebeck) given to calculate dP, depending
Concentrate Flow 0.70 m /sec
3
on pipe diameter size.
Pipe Diameter 0.62 m
dP 0.37 m The other eqn which is used to calculate dP
99.9 kPa Hazen Williams with HDPE pipe, Cf = 145
Schedule 80 Pipe Cost 900 $/m
Total Pipe Cost $90,025
Use this one.

Pressur
Velocity Length Flow m3/s Diameter (m) dP1 kPa dP2 kPa
2.3 100 0.001 0.024 22.947 4.496 100
0.01 0.074 5.379 1.422
0.02 0.105 3.476 1.005
0.03 0.129 2.692 0.821
0.04 0.149 2.246 0.711
0.05 0.166 1.952 0.636 10
dP (Kpa)
0.06 0.182 1.740 0.580
0.07 0.197 1.579 0.537
0.08 0.210 1.451 0.503
0.09 0.223 1.348 0.474 1
0.1 0.235 1.261 0.450
0.11 0.247 1.188 0.429
0.12 0.258 1.124 0.410
0.13 0.268 1.069 0.394
0.14 0.278 1.020 0.380 0
0.15 0.288 0.977 0.367 0.0 0.1 0.
0.16 0.298 0.938 0.355
0.17 0.307 0.903 0.345
0.18 0.316 0.871 0.335
0.19 0.324 0.842 0.326
0.2 0.333 0.815 0.318
0.3 0.408 0.631 0.260
0.4 0.471 0.527 0.225
0.5 0.526 0.457 0.201
0.6 0.576 0.408 0.184
0.7 0.623 0.370 0.170
0.8 0.666 0.340 0.159
0.9 0.706 0.316 0.150
1 0.744 0.296 0.142
1.1 0.781 0.278 0.136
1.2 0.815 0.264 0.130
1.3 0.849 0.251 0.125
1.4 0.881 0.239 0.120
1.5 0.911 0.229 0.116
1.6 0.941 0.220 0.112
1.7 0.970 0.212 0.109
1.8 0.998 0.204 0.106
1.9 1.026 0.197 0.103
2 1.052 0.191 0.101
urpose of graph?
or diameter as a function of the
predicting optimum pipe diameter.
tions, one simpler (Darcy-

) given to calculate dP, depending
iameter size.
eqn which is used to calculate dP is

illiams with HDPE pipe, Cf = 145
Pressure Drop vs Diameter - Two

Versions
100
Eq III
Alt
10
dP (Kpa)
0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Diameter (m)
Ionics Formulas for USBR Pricing of an EDR System

Last Revision Date 7/6/2000
TDS 1000 mg/l 500

Production Flow 105.25 mgd
Capital Cost $ 35,326,384
Total Power 22.8 kWh/Kgal
Membrane Replacement $ 5,049,026
WATER RECOVERY 75%
Staff days/day 3
All cost numbers are only within +,- 15%
Estimate O&M Costs
Electricity $ 58,171,969
Labor $ 31,810
Membrane Replacement $ 5,049,026
Cleaning Chemicals $ 105,252
Cartridge Filters $ 2,024,874
Repairs and Replacement $ 176,632
Insurance $ 70,653
Lab fees $ 1,010,417
Total O & M Cost $ 66,640,633
Total Costs $ 35,326,384
Capital Recovery $ 2,566,423
Annual cost $ 69,207,056

$/m3 Product $0.50
$/1000 gal Product $1.90
$/acre foot Product $617.99
Ms. Antonia von Gottberg

avongottberg@ionics.com, personal communication.
{ee}ED2
First Stage
Input from Interface Value: Units Sample Values: Membrane Replacement Suggested Values
Production Flow to be treated 4380.79 L/sec. Membrane Cost/m2: $ 25.00 $ 100.00
Flow Rate 15771 m3/Hr. Membrane Life Expectancy (yrs): 15 15
Feed TDS 500 mg/L
Product TDS 500 mg/L Construction Cost Items
Average Equivalent Weight: 35.55 Construction Cost Factor (%): 1.65 1.65
Percent Recovery: 0.5 Electricity Cost $/kWh: $ 0.07 $ 0.08
Production Data Labor and Overhead

Delta N eq/m3: 0.00 Labor cost, Lh ($/h) $ 29.05 $ 15.00
Desal Ratio: 1.00 Shifts per day, S (number/day) 0.2 0.2
Workers per shift, Ws (number/shift) 1 1
Membrane Characteristics
Transport efficiencies Sum<=1.00 Capital Recovery
Insert rows after Na+ or Cl- System lifetime, r (yr) 30 15
to add more ion efficiencies. Downtime, Dt (%) 0.05 15
Na+: 0.470 0.400 Annual interest rate, i (%) 6 10
Sum cations efficiencies: 0.470 First Stage Capital Costs

Based on Membrane Cost @ $25/m2 $ -
Cl-: 0.470 0.400
First Stage O&M Costs/ year
Sum anions efficiencies: 0.470 Chemicals $ 1,249
Maintenance $ -
Transport effieciency: 0.940 Membrane Replacement: $ -
Sum of Anion & Cation Efficiency. Labor Cost: $ 16,965
Area/membrane pair Asahi is 0.85 m^2 0.850 m2 ED Electicity Cost/year @ $0.07/kWhr: $ 82,201
Dilute side resistance "Rd" 0 (ohms/cm)/cm2 Capital Recovery $ -
Concentrate side resistance "Rc" 0 (ohms/cm)/cm2 November, 2006 O&M $: $ 100,415
Membrane resistance "Rm" 0.070 (ohms/cm)/cm2:
Total resistance Rt = (Rd+Rc+Rm): 0.070 0.860
Current density 30 amps/m2 30 - 300
Current Efficiency: 0.860
Membrane Voltage Potential "Vm" volts/pair
Voltage per cell Vc = Rt*CD+Vm: 0.021 1.000
Energy Requirements
Power requirements 0.00 kWhr/m3:
Pumping energy requirements 0.17 kWhr/m3 0.17
Total 64345 kWh/day
Membrane Requirements
Total Membrane Area 0 m2
Number of cell pairs: 0

{ee}ED2
Second Stage
Input from Interface Value: Sample Values: Membrane Replacement Suggested Values
Flow Rate 2576.9 L/sec Membrane Cost/m2: $100.00 100
Flow Rate 9277 m3/hr. Membrane Life Expectancy (yrs): 15 15
Feed TDS 500 mg/L
Product TDS 500 mg/L Construction Cost Items
Ave Equivalent Weight: 35.55 Construction Cost Factor (%): 1.65 1.65
Percent Recovery: 0.50 Electricity Cost $/kWh: $0.07 0.08
Production Data Labor and Overhead

Delta N 0.00 equiv/m3 Labor cost, Lh ($/h) 29.05 15
Desal Ratio: 1.00 Shifts per day, S (number/day) 0.2 0.2
Workers per shift, Ws (number/shift) 1 1
Membrane Characteristics
Transport efficiencies Sum<=1.00 Capital Recovery
Insert rows after Na+ or Cl- System lifetime, r (yr) 30 15
to add more ion efficiencies. Downtime, Dt (%) 0.05 15
Na+: 0.470 0.400 Annual interest rate, i (%) 6 10
Sum cations efficiencies: 0.470

Second Stage Capital Costs
Cl-: 0.470 0.400 Based on Membrane Cost @ $100/m2 $ -
Sum anions efficiencies: 0.470 Second Stage O&M Costs/ year

Chemicals $ 1,249
Transport effieciency: 0.940 Maintenance $ -
Sum of Anion & Cation Efficiency. Membrane Replacement: $ -
Area/membrane pair Asahi is 0.85 m^2 0.850 m2 Labor Cost: $ 848
Dilute side resistance "Rd" 0 (ohms/cm)/cm2 ED Electicity Cost/year @ $0.07/kWhr: $ 48,353
Concentrate side resistance "Rc" 0 (ohms/cm)/cm2 Capital Recovery $ -
Membrane resistance "Rm" 0.070 (ohms/cm)/cm2 November, 2006 O&M $: $ 50,450
Total resistance Rt = (Rd+Rc+Rm): 0.070 0.860
Current density 30 amps/m2 30 - 300
Current Efficiency: 0.860
Membrane Voltage Potential "Vm" 0.650 volts/pair
Voltage per cell Vc = Rt*CD+Vm: 0.671 1.000
Energy Requirements
Power requirements 0.00 kWhr/m3
Pumping energy requirements 0.17 kWhr/m3 0.17
Total 37850 kWh/day
Membrane Requirements
Total Membrane Area 0 m2
Number of cell pairs: 0
Total
Total capital cost (1st and 2nd stage) $0

Pumps
Number of pumps: 1 pump
Height differential: 100 m 328.1 ft
Discharge pressure: 1750 kPa 254 psi
Full flow rate: 5.15 m3/s 81,699 gal/min
Basis flow rate 5.15 m3/s 81,699 gal/min
Pump Efficiency: 75 %
Velocity (m/s) 2.4 m/s 8 ft/sec
Motor Efficiency: 87 %
HP 24251 hp calc may change if hp calc changes
Power consumption: 20795 kW
PD VST Cent
Direct Costs (material and labor) 3 - 300 HP 3 - 500 HP 3 - 1200 HP
Pump, drive, Piping and driver 7,275,306 3,016,431 234
Piping 1,727,931 1,727,931 1,727,931
Controls 4,000
Installed Capital Cost $9,003,237 $4,748,362 ###
Operating Costs
Power Cost $/year 12,113,659
Lubrication ($/L oil) 0.7 59,483
Cooling water ($/m3 water) 0.075 9,559,752
Maintenance (hr/Hp) 1.51,056,738
###
Source: "Pump Handbook" Karassik, Krutzsch, Fraser and Messina pg (9-66)
Required Information
Plant life expectancy, n 30
Annual Interest Rate, i 6%
Annual fixed-charge rate, AFC 10
Present-worth factor, PWF 13.76
Captial-recovery factor, CRF 0.073
Operating factor, OF 0.95
Annual levelized cost, ALC $0
change if hp calc changes for RO sheet
6.31E-05 1 235.9613
6.31E-04 10 235.613 Chart Title
3.15E-03 50 234.065
6.31E-03 100 232.13 250
6.31E-02 1000 197.3 200 f(x) = − 0.0387 x + 236
1.26E-01 2000 158.6 R² = 1
150
3.15E-01 5000 42.5
100
50
gal/min
0
Linear (gal/min)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
rt Title
gal/min
Linear (gal/min)
0 5000 6000
Stiff and Davis Saturation Index

For water with TDS > 15000 mg/L
Ca+2 mg/L as CaCO3 5

Alkf mg/L as CaCO3 148
CO2 mg/L as CO2 7.91 Calculated from alkalinity & pH
H+ 2.88E-08
Major Ions mg/L 500
TDS Concentrate 3317
Cac= 35
Alkc= 979
Ionic Strengthf = 0.01
Ionic Strengthc = 0.05
pCa 4.28
pAlk 2.55
pHs = 9.21 2.38 K from 'Stiff&Davis'
S&DSIf -1.67
pCac 3.46
pAlkc 1.70
pHsc = 7.66 2.50 for concentrate Ionic Strength and Temperature
Alkc/CO2 123.85
pHc = 8.34
S&DSIc 0.68
For the Concentrate Stream with Acid
Guess mg H2SO4 7.00 Guess mg HCl 73.40
Alk C acid 972 879
CO2 acid 14 97
Alk c acid/CO2 acid 68.4 9.1
pHc acid 8.09 7.24
pAlk 1.70 1.75
pHs = 7.67 7.71
pHc = 8.09 7.24
S&DSI (c adjusted) 0.42 -0.48
Temperature
Use pCa and pAlk and pH vs MO Alk/CO2 from 'Stiff&Davis' sheet
From Water Analysis

Caf in mg/L CaCO3 5
Alkf in mg/L CaCO3 148
TDSf 500
pHf 7.54
Temperature 12
pHf 7.54
CO2f 8
pCaf 4.28
pAlkf 2.55
"C" 2.48
pHs 9.31
LSIf -1.77
From Report or RO&NF

Recovery 0.85
Rejection 0.995
Concentrate Values Product Values

Cac 35 Cap 0
Alkc 979 Alkp 1
TDSc 3319 TDSp 3
CO2c 7.91 CO2p 7.91
pHc 8.34 pHf 5.37
pCac 3.46 pCap 6.51
pAlkc 1.70 pAlkp 4.86
"C" 2.56 "C" 2.29
pHs 7.72 pHs 13.66
LSIc 0.62 LSIp -8.29
Acidification H2SO4 HCl

Guess mg/L Acid 7.0 73.4 Could change this to a goal seek equation
Alk acid 140.4 46.94
CO2 acid 14.2 96.73
Alkf/CO2 9.88 0.49
pHf acid 7.3 6.00
pAlk 2.58 2.22
pCa 4.28 3.46
"C"acid 2.48 2.56
pHs = 9.34 8.23
LSIf -2.07 -3.31
Alkc acid 931.94 311.59
Alkc/CO2 65.58 3.22
pHc = 8.06 6.80
pAlkc 1.72 2.22
"C"c 2.56 2.56
pHs 7.74 4.77
LSIc 0.32 -1.43
Caustic Soda Soda Ash Lime Calcium Hydraded Lime

Product Stabilization 98% NaOH 99.16% NaHCO3 90% CaO Hypochlorite 93% Ca(OH)2
Guess mg/L 2.1 100 0.015105 0.0666 0
Alkstab 3 95 1 1 1
Ca stab 0 0 0 0 0
CO2 stab 5.6 -33.1 7.9 7.9 7.9
Alkstab/CO2stab 0.6 -2.9 0.1 0.1 0.1
pHp stab (actual pH after chem. addition) 6.1 Err:502 5.4 5.4 5.4
pAlk 4.2 2.8 4.9 4.9 4.9
pCa 6.5 6.5 5.9 6.0 6.5
TDS stab 7 145 3 3 3
"C"stab 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3
pHs (theoretical pH of stabilized water) 13.1 11.7 13.1 13.2 13.7
LSIstab -7.0 Err:502 -7.7 -7.8 -8.3
"C" Values dependent on Temperature and TDS in mg/L from figure 2 in ASTM D 3739
Temperature °C
TDS (mg/L 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
10 2.51 2.39 2.28 2.17 2.07 1.97 1.86
20 2.53 2.41 2.29 2.18 2.08 1.98 1.87
30 2.54 2.42 2.3 2.19 2.09 1.99 1.88
50 2.55 2.43 2.31 2.2 2.1 2 1.9
100 2.58 2.45 2.34 2.22 2.12 2.02 1.93
200 2.6 2.48 2.37 2.26 2.15 2.05 1.96
300 2.62 2.5 2.38 2.27 2.17 2.07 1.98
500 2.65 2.52 2.41 2.3 2.2 2.1 2
1000 2.68 2.56 2.44 2.33 2.23 2.13 2.03
2000 2.71 2.58 2.47 2.36 2.26 2.16 2.05
5000 2.73 2.6 2.49 2.38 2.28 2.18 2.08
Calculated Values
10 2.48 2.38 2.27 2.17 2.06 1.96 1.85
20 2.51 2.40 2.30 2.19 2.09 1.98 1.88
30 2.52 2.42 2.31 2.21 2.10 2.00 1.89
50 2.54 2.44 2.33 2.23 2.12 2.02 1.91
100 2.57 2.46 2.36 2.25 2.15 2.04 1.94
200 2.59 2.49 2.38 2.28 2.17 2.07 1.97
300 2.61 2.50 2.40 2.29 2.19 2.09 1.98
500 2.63 2.52 2.42 2.31 2.21 2.10 2.00
1000 2.65 2.55 2.44 2.34 2.23 2.13 2.03
2000 2.68 2.57 2.47 2.37 2.26 2.16 2.05
5000 2.71 2.61 2.50 2.40 2.30 2.19 2.09
x = TDS in mg/L
C (45) = 0.0368Ln(x) + 1.5825 R2 = 0.9871
C (40) = 0.0371Ln(x) + 1.6678 R2 = 0.987
C (35) = 0.0383Ln(x) + 1.7581 R2 = 0.9923
C (30) = 0.0372Ln(x) + 1.865 R2 = 0.9785
C (25)= 0.0372Ln(x) + 1.965 R2 = 0.9785
C (20) = 0.0372Ln(x) + 2.0658 R2 = 0.9811
C (15) = 0.037Ln(x) + 2.1775 R2 = 0.9854
C (10) = 0.0362Ln(x) + 2.2963 R2 = 0.9862
C (5) = 0.0377Ln(x) + 2.412 R2 = 0.9882
Temp A B C (x) = A Ln (x) +B C

45 0.0368 1.5825
40 0.0371 1.6678 3
35 0.0383 1.7581
2.5
30 0.0372 1.865 f(x) = − 0.02071
2
25 0.0372 1.965 R² = 0.9950856
1.5
B
1
0.5
0
3
2.5
2 f(x) = − 0.02071
R² = 0.9950856
20 0.0372 2.0358 1.5
B
15 0.037 2.1775
1
10 0.0362 2.2963
5 0.0377 2.412 0.5
A= 0.037189 0
B =- 0.0207*Temp + 2.491 R2 = 0.9983 0 5 10 15 20
T
C (x,T)= 0.0372*Ln(x)-0.0209*T+2.499
Incomplete
Gas Lime & Soda ash

CO2(g) TDS Factor
1.00 Could change this to a goal seek equation
2 95 1.22
0 0 0.8
8.9 -33.09
0.2 -2.9
5.6 Err:502
4.5 2.8
6.5 6.5
5 118
2.3 2.4
13.4 11.7
-7.8 Err:502
40 45
1.77 1.68 2.9
1.78 1.69 5
1.79 1.71 2.7 f(x) = 0.0377390602913234 ln(x) + 2.41195829687206
1.8 1.72 R² = 0.988200691595297 Logarithmic (5)
1.83 1.74 2.5 10
1.86 1.77
1.88 1.79 2.3 15
1.9 1.81 20
1.93 1.85 2.1
f(x) = 0.0371557363178179 ln(x) + 1.86500533031113
1.96 1.87 R² = 0.978528096893052 25
1.98 1.89 1.9 f(x) = 0.0367723976795819 ln(x) + 1.58246227186501 30
R² = 0.987123486028975
1.75 1.64 1.7 Logarithmic (30)
1.78 1.67 35
1.79 1.69 1.5
1.81 1.70 40
1.84 1.73 1.3 45
1.86 1.76
1.88 1.77 1.1 Logarithmic (45)
1.90 1.79
1.92 1.82 10 100 1000 10000
1.95 1.84
1.98 1.88
Coefficients for Calculated "C"
3 0.0385 B
Linear (B)
.5 0.038
A
2 0.0375
f(x) = − 0.0207103333333333 x + 2.49109166666667
R² = 0.995085610084689 0.037
.5
0.0365
A
1 0.036
.5 0.0355
0 0.035
3 0.0385 B
Linear (B)
.5 0.038
A
2 0.0375
f(x) = − 0.0207103333333333 x + 2.49109166666667
R² = 0.995085610084689 0.037
.5
0.0365
A
1 0.036
.5 0.0355
0 0.035
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Temperature
= 0.0372*Ln(x)-0.0209*T+2.499
thmic (5)
33031113
thmic (30)
thmic (45)
Temp 50 40 30 25 20 10 0
Ionic Strength K
0 1.5 1.7 1.85 1.97 2.12 2.3 2.52
0.2 2.27 2.45 2.65 2.75 2.9 3.05 3.25
0.4 2.57 2.77 2.95 3.07 3.18 3.35 3.5
0.6 2.7 2.92 3.14 3.25 3.35 3.5 3.63
0.8 2.8 3.04 3.25 3.36 3.47 3.6 3.7
1 2.82 3.1 3.32 3.42 3.5 3.65 3.75
1.2 2.85 3.1 3.33 3.44 3.55 3.68 3.78
1.4 2.85 3.09 3.32 3.42 3.54 3.68 3.78
1.6 2.82 3.09 3.3 3.4 3.52 3.65 3.75
1.8 2.81 3.08 3.28 3.38 3.49 3.62 3.72
2 2.8 3.05 3.24 3.35 3.45 3.6 3.7
Curve Fits: x = ionic strength

Temp x3 x2 x a r2 4
50 0.634 -2.5651 3.2205 1.5931 0.9738
40 0.6053 -2.508 3.2522 1.7809 0.9821
30 0.6061 -2.5612 3.3709 1.9387 0.9813 3 f(x) = − 0.000413310
R² = 0.898667128342
25 0.615 -2.5826 3.3744 2.0527 0.9832 f(x) = − 0.020595428
20
10
0.5679
0.576
-2.4127
-2.4149
3.1941
3.1519
2.2134
2.3873
0.9771
0.9784
2 R² = 0.994110018024
0 0.5466 -2.2635 2.9032 2.616 0.9681

1
f(x) = 0.00160885714
0 R² = 0.814720209213
0 10 20
-1
-2
f(x) = 0.00017282913
R² = 0.831629978410
-3
-2
f(x) = 0.00017282913
R² = 0.831629978410
-3
From Feed Water Analysis
T 11.75
I 0.01 Curve fit: T = Temperature, I = Ionic Strength
K= (.0016*T+.5528)I +(.0002T^2-.0142T-2.2695)*I2+(-.0004T^2+.0266T+2.9072)I+(-.0206T+2.598)
3
K= 2.3788520254
From Concentrate Analysis

T 11.75
I 0.05
K= (.0016*T+.5528)I3+(.0002T^2-.0142T-2.2695)*I2+(-.0004T^2+.0266T+2.9072)I+(-.0206T+2.598)
K= 2.504296137
Source: ASTM Method for S&DSI

4
f(x) = 0.5465714841 x³ − 2.263548951 x² + 2.9032245532 x + 2.616013986
3.5
R² = 0.968054230828351
3
50
f(x) = − 0.555434 x⁴ + 2.855721 x³ − 5.342293 x² + 4.331401 x + 1.529161
2.5 R² = 0.993272168184924 Polynomial (50)
40
2 30
K
1.5 25
20
1 10
0 Con
0.5
Polynomial (0)
6
0
5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 f(x)
f(x)
4 R² =
pCa and pAlk

Ionic Strength
3
4 0
1
3 f(x) = − 0.000413310924369747 x² + 0.0265632605042017 x + 2.90716554621849

R² = 0.898667128342362 x3
2
f(x) = − 0.0205954285714286 x + 2.59804285714286
R² = 0.994110018024602 Linear (x3)
x2
1 Polynomial (x2)
f(x) = 0.00160885714285714 x + 0.552764285714286
0 R² = 0.814720209213579 x
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Polynomial (x)
1 a
2 Linear (a)
f(x) = 0.000172829131652662 x² − 0.0141723137254902 x − 2.26948907563025
R² = 0.831629978410272
3
a
2 Linear (a)
f(x) = 0.000172829131652662 x² − 0.0141723137254902 x − 2.26948907563025
R² = 0.831629978410272
3
72)I+(-.0206T+2.598)
72)I+(-.0206T+2.598)
pH vs Alk/CO2
pCa pAlk Fig 3 D 4582 1998 Annual Book of ASTM Standards Volume 11.02 W
5 4.75 1
4 3.7 10 pH of Water MO Alk/CO2 Expressed as mg/L CaCO
3 2.7 100 5.3 0.098
2 1.7 1000 5.4 0.12
pH vs Alk/CO
1 0.7 10000 5.6 0.19
5.8 0.305 9
6 0.5 8
f(x) = 0.423011190061762 ln(
6.2 0.775 7 = 0.999709034895022
R²
6.4 1.25 6
pH of Water
6.6 2 5
6.8 3.2 4
7 5 3
7.2 8 2
Conversion of Ca and Alk to pCa and pAlk 7.4 13 1
7.5 17 0
6 7.6 21.5 0.01 0.1 1
7.8 34 MO Alk/
5
f(x) = − 0.434294481903252 ln(x) + 5 8 54
f(x) = − 0.438637426722284 ln(x) + 4.73
4 R² = 1 8.2 100
pCa and pAlk
3 8.3 1000 pH=0.423 Ln(Alk/CO

Alk
2 Logarithmic (Alk)
Ca
1
Logarithmic (Ca)
0
1 10 100 1000 10000
Ca and Alk as mg/L CaCO3
STM Standards Volume 11.02 Water (II)
ed as mg/L CaCO3/mg/L CO2
pH vs Alk/CO2
9
8
f(x) = 0.423011190061762 ln(x) + 6.30216587304321
7 = 0.999709034895022
R²
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
MO Alk/CO2
pH=0.423 Ln(Alk/CO2) + 6.3022

UV
Volume treated: 69437 gal/min ### gal/day
Power consumption per lamp: 0.05 kW
Alternative power consumption per lam 0.00 kW
Lamp replacement time: 1.0 year 12 months
Alternative lamp replacement time: 0.0 year 0 months
Required UV lamps: 4907 lamps
Lamp replacement cost: $48.00 per lamp
Annual lamp replacements: 4907 lamps
Annual power consumption: 2,149,266 kWh
Required annual labor hours: 834 hours

Capital cost: $2,009,031
Annual lamp replacement cost: $235,536
Annual power cost: $150,449
Annual labor cost $24,219
Total annual operating cost: $410,204
data from Irvine Moch, 5/2/2000

Double Wall Fiberglass Tanks

Required Tank Capacity 500,000 gallons ### liters
Nov 2000 Construction Cost % $ 546,043

Material 0.901 $ 603,206
Labor 0.089 $ 62,239
Equipment 0.010 $ 6,881
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: $ 672,326
Construction Cost Equations (From http://www.get-a-quote.net)

$ = a+b*x a b
2842.7 1.0864
Microfiltration / Ultrafiltration

Production Flow to be treated 99.99 mgd 69437 gpm
2001 Construction Cost % ###

Manufactured & Electrical Equipment 1.00 ###
Housing 0.00 $ -
Excavation, Site Work & Labor 0.00 $ -
Piping and Valves 0.00 $ -
November, 2006 Capital Cost $: ###
2001 O&M Cost: %1 $3,083,396

Materials 0.13 $ 514,167
Energy 0.12 $ 359,730
Labor 0.75 $2,839,634
November, 2006 Operation & Maintenance $: $3,713,531
Construction Cost2
$ = a*x^b a b
2.4914 -0.3471
O&M Cost2
$ = a*x^b a b
1.0451 -0.5462
1 from Oneby, Nordgren, and Ericson, Membrane Microfiltration As A Cost Effective Solution For A Small Utility,
AWWA Membrane Conference Proceedings, 2001
2
from Elarde & Bergman, The Cost of Membrane Filtration for Municipal Water Supplies,
AWWA Membrane Conference Proceedings, 2001
{gg}StdAnalyses
Secondary 2nd Eff RO

Brackish 1 Brackish 2 Brackish 3 Hi Brackish Seawater Municipal Eff Perm
Aluminum 0.35 0.01
Antimony 3.30E-04
Arsenic 0.0029 0.0025
Barium 0.050 0.0983 0.03 0.11
Beryllium 6.00E-07 0.0005
Boron 0.2230 0.1300
Cadmium 0.001 1.10E-04
Calcium 100.000 182 110 637 406 22.2 64.0000 1.1000
Chromium 0.010 0.023 5.00E-05
Copper 0.050 0.09 3.00E-03
Iron 0.050 0.019 0.01
Lead 0.005 0.006 3.00E-05
Magnesium 35.000 85 80 283 1.29E+03 7.3 24.0000
Manganese 0.550 0.0811 2.00E-03 0.03 0.0285
Mercury 3.00E-05
Nickel 5.40E-03 0.004
Potassium 1.800 4.78 10 131 385 2 14.3000 1.3000
Selenium 0.005 9.00E-05 0.005
Silver 0.005 3.00E-04
Sodium 110.900 175.8 815 3284 10741 25 62.5000 3.1500
Strontium 1.300 2.71 5 15 14 0.61 0.2600
Zinc 0.050 0.01 0.02 0.0593
Alkalinity-Bicarbonate 232.000 189.00 125.00 163.00 144.00 25 345.00 11.60
Alkalinity-Carbonate 0.000 0.5 16.60
Carbon Dioxide (aq) 10.100 13 13.7 44.8 2.50E+00 2.7
Chloride 95.000 560 811 6545 19333 71.7 55.00 5.30
Cyanide
Flouride 0.640 0.31 1 1 1.3 0.5 0.30
Nitrate (as N) 1.000 10.7 0.5 12.50
o-Phosphate 0.37 0.07 0.04 3.70 1.22
Sulfate 300.000 231 1100 680 2688 20 39.50
Silica 17.000 11.9 12 18 10 27.00
pH 7.620 7.39 7.2 6.8 8 7.2 7.50 6.80
pOH 6.50 7.20
Solids (TDS) 905.000 1453 3070 11757 35005 184 425 18
Total Suspended Solids: 1.000 1.3 1 1 1 1
Conductivity 1560.000 2758 5232 19604 54534 362 790.00 25.00
Temperature 25.000 25 25 25 25 25 25.00 25.00

159655472 Waste Water Costing Xls

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

159655472 Waste Water Costing Xls

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

To Do List

This is a list of items we have identified as needing work:

WT Cost Software Comments

This version last updated on: 12/18/06

We welcome any comments (especially corrections).

= usually contain formulas or data that do change

Intake Pipe Coagulant Aid

Drawing Not Completely Accurate

Worksheet Worksheet Paremeter units Value Lower limit

Membrane Stage A1 (if applicable)

Worksheets included in this program:

Project Name Date Stage

Flow Rate Input Page & Water Data Report

Plant Operations Schedule % decimal

Peak Day Flow

Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program

Granular Activated Carbon Filtration

Units Alternative Units

Bed Life (months) 12 6 3

Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program

Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program

Cost reports for water treatment processes

Alternative Construction Cost Operating Cost

Ozone $ 2,927,245 $ 773.38 $ 2,927.56 $ 233,064 $ 0.18 $ 0.67

Chlorination $ 371,544 $ 98.16 $ 371.58 $ 77,792 $ 0.06 $ 0.22

Residual; 2.5 mg/L

Air Stripping #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Microfiltration $ 62,355,748 $ 164.74 $ 0.05 $2,670,491 $ 0.02 $ 0.07

Granular Activated Carbon

Upflow Solids Contact Clarifier

Reverse Osmosis/Nanofiltration $ 93,010,050 $ 245.73 $ 930.20 ### $ 0.17 $ 0.65

Ion Exchange $ 2,208,278 $ 5.83 $ 22.09 $3,081,756 $ 0.02 $ 0.08

To Remove Cation Equivalents/L: 1.05E-04

Ionics Electrodialysis Reversal $ 37,892,808 $ 100.11 $ 378.97 ### $ 0.48 $ 1.82

Electrodialysis $ - $ - $ - $ 150,865 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

Membrane Area: 0 m2 0 ft2

Free Chlorine Level 1.0 mg/L as Cl2

Alternative Dose mg/L

36,520,244 365,202 kgal/year

Alternative Construction Cost Operating Cost

Chlorine $ 371,544 $ 0.98 $ 3.72 $ 77,792 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

Chloramines #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! $ 57,885 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

Calculated Ammonia Dose: 1.0 mg/L

Ozone $ 2,927,245 $ 7.73 $ 29.28 $ 233,064 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Alum (dry feed) $ 118,587 $ 0.31 $ 1.19 $ 198,162 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Based on: 16 kg/hr 36 lb/hr

Ferric Chloride $ 455,307 $ 1.20 $ 4.55 $ 780,776 $ 0.01 $ 0.02

AntiScalant Dose Rate $ 164,315 $ 0.43 $ 1.64 $ 182,717 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Polyelectrolyte Dose Rate $ 164,315 $ 0.43 $ 1.64 $ 182,717 $ 0.00 $ 0.01

Number of pumps: 1 pump(s)

Below Ground Capacity: 60,000 m3 15852 kgal $ 8,118,781 $ 21.45 $ 81.20

Project Name Date

Cost Indices Data

Rates and Lifecycles

2 EPA-600/2-79-162 "Estimating Water Treatment Costs"

3 DOE - Department of Energy "Electric Power Monthly"

Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program

Feed Water Analysis

Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program Page 17

Project Name Date Stage

RO & NF INPUT 95.9 574 35.0853659

Water Treatment Cost Estimation Program

Project Name Date Stage

Membranes $ 10,069,500 @ $ 500 $/module Electricity $ 7,442,994