Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foundations of Financial Management Canadian 10th Edition Block Solutions Manual instant download all chapter
Foundations of Financial Management Canadian 10th Edition Block Solutions Manual instant download all chapter
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-canadian-10th-edition-block-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-canadian-8th-edition-block-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-canadian-11th-edition-block-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-15th-edition-block-solutions-manual/
Foundations of Financial Management 17th Edition Block
Solutions Manual
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-17th-edition-block-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-16th-edition-block-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-14th-edition-block-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-canadian-11th-edition-block-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/foundations-of-financial-
management-canadian-1st-edition-block-test-bank/
Chapter 6
Discussion Questions
6-1. Rapidly expanding sales will require a buildup in assets to support the growth. In
particular, more and more of the increase in current asset will be permanent in nature. A
non-liquidating aggregate stock of current assets will be necessary to allow for floor
displays, multiple items for selection, and other purposes. All of these ‘asset’ investments
can drain the cash resources of the firm.
6-2. If sales and production can be matched, the level of inventory and the amount of current
assets needed can be kept to a minimum; therefore, lower financing costs will be
incurred. Matching sales and production has the advantage of maintaining smaller
amounts of current assets than level production, and therefore less financing costs are
incurred. However, if sales are seasonal or cyclical, workers will be laid off in a declining
sales climate and machinery (capital assets) will be idle. Here lies the tradeoff between
level and seasonal production: Full utilization of capital assets with skilled workers and
more financing of current assets versus unused capacity, training and retraining workers,
with lower financing for current assets.
6-3. A cash budget helps minimize current assets by providing a forecast of inflows and
outflows of cash. It also encourages the development of a schedule as to when inventory
is produced and maintained for sales (production schedule), and accounts receivables are
collected. The cash budget allows us to forecast the level of each current asset and the
timing of the buildup and reduction of each.
6-4. Only a financial manager with unusual insight and timing could design a plan in which
asset buildup and the length of financing terms are perfectly matched. One would need to
know exactly what parts of current assets are temporary and what parts are permanent.
Furthermore, one is never quite sure how much short-term or long-term financing is
available at appropriate rates at all times. Even if this were known, it would be difficult to
change the financing mix on a continual basis.
6-5. By establishing a long-term financing arrangement for temporary current assets, a firm is
assured of having necessary funding in good times as well as bad, thus we say there is
low risk. However long-term financing is generally more expensive than short-term
financing and profits may be lower than those which could be achieved with a
synchronized or normal financing arrangement for temporary current assets. This is
demonstrated in Figure 6-12.
6-6. By financing a portion of permanent current assets on a short-term basis, we run the risk
of inadequate financing in tight money periods. However, since short-term financing is
less expensive than long-term funds, a firm tends to increase its profitability over the long
run (assuming it survives). In answer to the preceding question, we stressed less risk and
less return; here the emphasis is on high risk and high return.
6-7. The term structure of interest rates shows the relative level of short-term and long-term
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-1 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
6-8. Liquidity premium theory, the segmentation theory, and the expectations theory:
The liquidity premium theory indicates that long-term rates should be higher than short-
term rates. This premium of long-term rates over short-term rates exists because short-
term securities have greater liquidity, and therefore higher rates have to be offered to
potential long-term bond buyer for enticement to hold these less liquid and more price
sensitive securities.
The segmentation theory states that Treasury securities are divided into market segments
by the various financial institutions investing in the market. The changing needs, desires,
and strategies of these investors tend to strongly influence the nature and relationship of
short- and long-term rates.
The expectations hypothesis maintains that the yields on long-term securities are a
function of short-term rates. The result of the hypothesis is that when long-term rates are
much higher than short-term rates, the market is saying that it expects short-term rates to
rise. When long-term rates are lower than short-term rates, the market is expecting short-
term rates to fall.
6-9. An inverted yield curve reflects investor expectations that interest rates will decline in the
future. Furthermore, an inverted yield curve has usually preceded a recession. Lower
interest rates are generally a reflection of lower inflation and lower inflation is usually the
result of an economic slowdown. This information would be valuable for planning
purposes.
6-10. The factors that could be discussed include inflation, inflationary pressures, monetary
policy and the money supply, fiscal policy (including spending, taxation, and
deficits/debt) and the demand for money, and international influences. A supply/demand
diagram is useful for discussing the impacts.
6-11. Before interest rates drop, a bond trader would like to lock into longer term interest rates.
The trader will see the value of longer term bonds appreciate faster than short term bonds
for a given increase in interest rates. The action of the trader of buying longer term bonds,
relative to short term bonds, will drive their price up and their yields down. The yield
curve will become inverted.
6-12. Normally, short-term rates are much more volatile than long-term rates. This is
demonstrated in Figure 6-12 with a long-run view of interest rates.
6-13. Corporate liquidity has been decreasing since the early 1960s because of more
sophisticated, profit-oriented financial management (at times the profit orientation has
been taken too far). The use of the computer has allowed for more volume being
conducted with smaller cash balances. Also, inflation has forced a diversion of funds
away from liquid assets to handle ever-expanding inventory costs. Likewise decreasing
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-2 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-3 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
Problems
$750,000 Sales
.10 Profit margin
75,000 Net income
– 22,500 Dividends (30%)
$ 52,500 Increase in retained earnings
$300,000 Sales
.08 Profit margin
24,000 Net income
– 4,800 Dividends (20%)
$ 19,200 Increase in retained earnings
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-4 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
Beginning Ending
Inventory + Production – Sales = Inventory
January 700 + 600 – 500 = 800
February 800 + 600 – 250 = 1,150
March 1,150 + 600 – 1,000 = 750
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-5 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-6 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
1
Total annual sales = $696,000
$696,000/ $5 per unit = 139,200 units
139,200 units/ 12 months = 11,600 per month
2
Monthly dollar sales/ $5 price = unit sales
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-7 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-8 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
Foundations of Fin. Mgt. 10Ce 6-9 Block, Hirt, Danielsen, Short, Perretta
Chapter 6
d. Cash Budget
January February March April May June
Net cash flow $35,300 $29,700 $ 4,400 $(43,200) $(44,700) $(43,700)
Beginning cash 5,000 40,300 70,000 74,400 31,200 5,000
Cumulative cash balance 40,300 70,000 74,400 31,200 (13,500) (38,700)
Monthly loan or (repayment) -0- -0- -0- -0- 18,500 43,700
Cumulative loan -0- -0- -0- -0- 18,500 62,200
Ending cash balance 40,300 70,000 74,400 31,200 5,000 5,000
July August Sept. October Nov. Dec.
Net cash flow ($30,200) ($23,200) ($20,200) ($4,200) $22,800 $42,200
Beginning cash 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Cumulative cash balance (25,200) (18,200) (15,200) 800 27,800 47,200
Monthly loan or (repayment) 30,200 23,200 20,200 4,200 (22,800) (42,200)
Cumulative loan 92,400 115,600 135,800 140,000 117,200 75,000
Ending cash balance 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
1
$168,000 sales/$2 price = 84,000 units
84,000 units/12 months = 7,000 units per month
2
Monthly dollar sales/$2 = number of units
d. Cash Budget
January February March April May June
Cash flow $ 3,000 $ 6,000 $0 ($ 8,400) ($10,400) ($11,600)
Beginning cash 1,000 4,000 10,000 10,000 1,600 1,000
Cumulative cash balance 4,000 10,000 10,000 1,600 (8,800) (10,600)
Monthly loan or (repayment) -0- -0- -0- -0- 9,800 11,600
Cumulative loan -0- -0- -0- -0- 9,800 21,400
Ending cash balance $4,000 $10,000 $10,000 $1,600 $1,000 $1,000
e. Assets
Accounts Total
Cash Receivable Inventory Current
January $ 4,000 $16,000 $ 2,000 $22,000
February 10,000 12,000 1,500 23,500
March 10,000 4,000 6,000 20,000
April 1,600 2,400 11,500 15,500
May 1,000 800 18,000 19,800
June 1,000 2,400 23,500 26,900
July 1,000 8,000 25,500 34,500
August 1,000 11,200 25,500 37,700
September 1,000 16,000 22,500 39,500
October 1,000 20,000 17,000 38,000
November 1,000 24,000 9,000 34,000
December 7,400 17,600 5,000 30,000
The instructor may wish to point out how current assets are at
relatively high levels and illiquid during June through October. In
November and particularly December, the asset levels remain high,
but they become increasingly more liquid as inventory diminishes
relative to cash.
a. Short-term financing
On Monthly Actual
Month Rate Basis Amount Interest
January 8% 0.67% $8,000 $53.33
February 9% 0.75% 2,000 15.00
March 12% 1.00% 3,000 30.00
April 15% 1.25% 8,000 100.00
May 12% 1.00% 9,000 90.00
June 12% 1.00% 4,000 40.00
$328.33
b. Long-term financing
Conservative
% of Interest Interest
Amount Total Rate Expense
$900,000 .80 = $720,000 .15 = $108,000 Long-term
$900,000 .20 = $180,000 .10 = 18,000 Short-term
Total interest charge $126,000
Aggressive
% of Interest Interest
Amount Total Rate Expense
$900,000 .30 = $270,000 .15 = $40,500 Long-term
$900,000 .70 = $630,000 .10 = 63,000 Short-term
Total interest charge $103,500
b. Conservative Aggressive
EBIT $180,000 $180,000
– Int. 126,000 103,500
EBT 54,000 76,500
Tax 40% 21,600 30,600
EAT $ 32,400 $ 45,900
c. Reversed
Conservative
% of Interest Interest
Amount Total Rate Expense
$900,000 .80 = $720,000 .10 = $72,000 Long-term
$900,000 .20 = $180,000 .15 = 27,000 Short-term
Total interest charge $99,000
Aggressive
% of Interest Interest
Amount Total Rate Expense
$900,000 .30 = $270,000 .10 = $ 27,000 Long-term
$900,000 .70 = $630,000 .15 = 94,500 Short-term
Total interest charge $121,500
Conservative Aggressive
EBIT $180,000 $180,000
– Int 99,000 121,500
EBT 81,000 58,500
Tax 40% 32,400 23,400
EAT $ 48,600 $ 35,100
Hedged
Share capital = $8,000,000 ÷ $25 = 320,000
Short-term interest expense = 11% $1,000,000 = $110,000
Earnings before interest and taxes $1,000,000
Interest expense 110,000
Earnings before taxes 890,000
Taxes (40%) 356,000
Earnings after taxes $ 534,000
Earnings per share $ 1.67
6-20. Library assignment. Answers will vary with the state of the
economy.
OR:
2 year bond = 6%
2 year bond = (1st year bond + 2nd year bond) / 2
6% = (5% + f2) / 2
f2 = 7.0%
OR:
OR:
3rd year rate = (1st year rate + 2nd year rate + 3rd year rate) / 3
3.39% = (2.60% + 3.92% + f3) / 3
10.17% = 6.52% + f3
f3 = 3.65%
OR:
OR:
3rd year rate = (1st year rate + 2nd year rate + 3rd year rate) / 3
6.22% = (5.78% + 5.92% + f3) / 3
18.66% = 11.63% + f3
f3 = 6.96%
OR:
State of Expected
Economy Sales Probability Outcome
Strong $1,500,000 .20 $300,000
Steady 800,000 .50 400,000
Weak 500,000 .30 150,000
Expected level of sales = $850,000
a. Most aggressive
Low liquidity $2,000,000 18% = $360,000
Short-term financing 2,000,000 10% = – 200,000
Anticipated return $160,000
b. Most conservative
High liquidity $2,000,000 14% = $280,000
Long-term financing 2,000,000 12% = – 240,000
Anticipated return $ 40,000
c. Moderate approach
Low liquidity $2,000,000 18% = $360,000
Long-term financing 2,000,000 12% = – 240,000
$120,000
OR:
High liquidity $2,000,000 14% = $280,000
Short-term financing 2,000,000 10% = – 200,000
$ 80,000
d. You may not necessarily select the plan with the highest return. You must
also consider the risk inherent in the plan. Of course, some firms are better
able to take risks than others. The ultimate concern must be for maximizing
the overall valuation of the firm through a judicious consideration of risk-
return options.
a. Most aggressive
Low liquidity $800,000 15% = $120,000
Short-term financing 800,000 8% = – 64,000
Anticipated return $56,000
b. Most conservative
High liquidity $800,000 12% = $96,000
Long-term financing 800,000 10% = – 80,000
Anticipated return $ 16,000
c. Moderate approach
Low liquidity $800,000 15% = $120,000
Long-term financing 800,000 10% = – 80,000
$40,000
OR:
High liquidity $800,000 12% = $96,000
Short-term financing 800,000 8% = – 64,000
$ 32,000
d. You may not necessarily select the plan with the highest return. You must
also consider the risk inherent in the plan. Of course, some firms are better
able to take risks than others. The ultimate concern must be for maximizing
the overall valuation of the firm through a judicious consideration of risk-
return options.
Mini Case
Gale Force Corporation
(Working Capital: Level vs., Seasonal Production)
Purpose: This case forces the student to view the impact of level versus
seasonal production on inventory levels, bank loan requirements, and profitability.
It also considers the efficiencies (or inefficiencies) covered by the different
production plans. The computations in the case are parallel Tables 1 to 5 in the
text, with the only difference being that seasonal production rather than level
production is being utilized. The case allows the student to properly track the
movement of cash flow through the production process.
Though not required, you may wish to refer to the old and new Table 4 to
make a special point. Note that Tim’s suggestion causes inventory balances
to decrease over the time period and total current assets to fluctuate less, but
the same balances occur at the end of September for inventory and total
current assets.
b. New Table 5 shows the new cumulative loan balances and the interest
expenses incurred each month. Under the old system (level production), total
interest expense (at 1% a month on the cumulative loan balance) was
$254,250. Under the proposed system it decreases to $50,750 for a savings
of $203,500.
c. The first step is to compute total sales. Using the second row of Table 3
(either the old or new table), the total is $14,400,000. With an added expense
burden of 0.5%, expenses will go up by $72,000. This is still far less than the
interest savings of $203,500 computed in question 2, so the seasonal
production plan is justified. ($203,500 – $72,000 = $131,500). Please note
that the values are assumed to be computed on a pretax basis.
Beginning Ending
Inventory + Production – Sales = Inventory
October 400 + 150 – 150 = 4001
November 400 + 75 – 75 = 400
December 400 + 25 – 25 = 400
January 400 + 0 – 0 = 400
February 400 + 0 – 0 = 400
March 400 + 300 – 300 = 400
April 400 + 500 – 500 = 400
May 400 + 1,000 – 1,000 = 400
June 400 + 1,000 – 1,000 = 400
July 400 + 1,000 – 1,000 = 400
August 400 + 500 – 500 = 400
September 400 + 250 – 250 = 400
1
Inventory ($2,000 per unit) × 400 = $800,000
Table 3: Cash Receipts Schedule: (sales price = $3,000/ unit) (in thousands)
October November December January February March
Sales forecast 150 75 25 0 0 300
Sales (in dollars) $450.0 $ 225.0 $75.0 -0- -0- $ 900.0
50% Cash sales 225.0 112.5 37.5 -0- -0- 450.0
50% Prior month’s
sales * 375.0 225.0 112.5 37.5 -0- -0-
Total receipts $600.0 $ 337.5 $ 150.0 $ 37.5 $-0- $ 450.0
*based on September sales of $750,000
April May June July August September
Sales forecast 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 250
Sales (in dollars) $1,500.0 $3,000.0 $3,000.0 $ 3,000.0 $1,500.0 $750.0
50% Cash sales 750.0 1,500.0 1,500.0 1,500.0 750.0 375.0
50% Prior month’s
sales 450.0 750.0 1,500.0 15,00.0 1,500.0 750.0
Total receipts $1,200.0 $2,250.0 $3,000.0 $3,000.0 $2,250.0 $1,125.0
Table 3: Cash Payments Schedule: (Production costs = $2,000/ unit) (in thousands)
October November December January February March
Production in units 150 75 25 0 0 300
Production costs $ 300.0 $ 150.0 $ 50.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 600.0
Overhead 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0
Dividends & Interest
Taxes 150.0 $ 150.0
Total payments $ 650.0 $ 350.0 $ 250.0 $ 350.0 $ 200.0 $ 800.0
Table 5: Cumulative Loan Balance and Interest Expense (12% per year OR 1% per month)