Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 1
Session 1
Buchanan (1990)**
Constitutional economics examines the choice of constraints within which economic and political
interactions occur, distinguishing itself from non-constitutional or orthodox economics, which
focuses on choices made within given constraints. This field recognizes that institutions and rules
governing behavior are not exogenously given but are subject to deliberate choice and design.
1. **Individualistic Analysis**:
2. **Selection of Rules**:
- Emphasis is placed on the selection of rules or institutions that limit the behavior of individuals
operating within them. Institutions are viewed as variables subject to deliberate evaluation and
explicit choice, affecting both individual and collective behavior in various membership groupings
beyond just the political realm.
- Constitutional analysis can apply to different levels, from the individual acting in private space to
the entire polity. It also includes the analysis of rules that govern organizations like clubs, trade
unions, corporations, parties, and universities.
1. **Distinction in Perspectives**:
- Constitutional economics is distinguished from constitutional politics by its focus on rules and
institutions that enable cooperative interactions, even within conflictual ordinary politics.
Constitutional politics involves the analysis of how rules for collective decisions are agreed upon,
supporting a cooperative framework.
- The roots of constitutional political economy lie in classical political economy and contractarian
political philosophy. This tradition emphasizes rational choice behavior and the comparative analysis
of political-legal structures.
2. **Methodological Individualism**:
1. **Positive Analysis**:
- Constitutional economics involves the positive analysis of how rules work and how they might be
chosen. It compares alternative structures from within the perspective defined by the research
program's core assumptions.
2. **Normative Grounding**:
- While the enterprise has a normative grounding, especially in the selection of desirable rules, this
does not negate the relevance of positive analyses. The study of rules encompasses both descriptive
and prescriptive dimensions, aiming to understand and improve the institutional framework.
- The research program in constitutional economics faces challenges from external intellectual
traditions. Critics often target the core elements of the program, such as methodological
individualism, which are taken as presuppositions by scholars within the field.
2. **Role of Perception, Vision, and Belief**:
- The role of perception, vision, and belief is crucial in constitutional economics. These elements
influence how rules are perceived and chosen, highlighting the interplay between objective analysis
and subjective interpretation.
**Conclusion**
Constitutional economics offers a distinctive approach to understanding the choice and impact of
institutional constraints on economic and political behavior. By focusing on the selection and analysis
of rules, this field bridges the gap between individual interests and collective outcomes, providing a
framework for cooperative and deliberative decision-making in various domains.
**References**