Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fintech-As-A-feature Has Been Disabled. Just Ask Zomato - Ka-Ching! by the Ken
Fintech-As-A-feature Has Been Disabled. Just Ask Zomato - Ka-Ching! by the Ken
Explore A
KA-CHING!
Huh.
Do you remember how not very long ago, every company wanted to
be a fintech?
But that was in 2021. In 2022, fintechs could raise only around US$5.4
billion. In 2023, this fell to US$2 billion, and the writing on the wall
was clear: pureplay fintech was no longer as lucrative a bet as it once
was.
But payments and transactions were still going strong. They had, by
now, become an inseparable function for most companies—be they in
food aggregation, ride hailing, or e-commerce. So many of them
decided to go for the natural extension and enabled lending and
insurance services too. What were earlier standalone businesses
would now exist as mere features on their apps.
Clever.
Anyway, whatever they chose to call it, companies loved it. Take Ola,
for instance. It has a wallet service, Ola Money; it sells co-branded
credit cards; it offers postpaid services. It’s the same with e-commerce
giants Amazon and Flipkart.
Neat. Logical.
Only, if it is so simple, what made Zomato back out? And it’s not just
Zomato, even non-banks are going the same way. Nine of them have
surrendered their licences in the recent past—while two ventured
technical reasons, the remaining have decided to exit the business
altogether.
Fintech-as-a-feature is being toggled off.
And even if you somehow manage to do it, other things don’t quite
make sense.
UPI as a product, for instance, has very thin margins and is mostly
used as a customer acquisition channel by fintechs. But making
payments through UPI is the last activity in a user’s journey on
Zomato, whereas it’s usually the first for users on Google Pay,
Phonepe, or Paytm. It makes sense for the latter kind to use UPI as an
acquisition tool. For Zomato, not so much, especially because it
already has a pretty robust customer acquisition funnel.
As for lending, companies with large user bases can either partner
with lenders and send them loan-worthy customers or lend out of
their own books (which is what the NBFC licence is for). The sourcing
model, though, offers very low revenue potential for the non-lending
partner. And lending from your own books requires very robust
balance sheets and positive cashflows, which few new-age companies
are able to achieve.
And if you still decide to do it, there’s the big scary headmaster to deal
with—the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
It’s fair to say that the RBI has been pretty tough to deal with for
fintechs. Even if we consider Paytm’s massacre as an exception, the
regulator has done enough to scare other companies away—from
raising risk weights for unsecured loans in November last year to
initiating forensic audits in the first quarter of 2024 to asking fintechs
to limit their revenue growth to 15–20% instead of 30%.
But if it’s so difficult, why has Ola continued its financial services
wing, I can hear you thinking.
Well… “it shouldn’t,” a senior banker told me. Ola’s co-branded credit
card with SBI hardly has takers, they told me, and even though the
card offers cashbacks on Ola rides, flights, and hotel bookings, “there
are far better credit cards available in the market.”
Regards,
Rounak
[Got a tip? If you have a lead for a great story that The Ken can pursue,
please send it to tips@the-ken.com or share it through this form. To find
out more about how to do this securely, read our blog post about sharing
tips with The Ken.]
Share
Do you know anyone else who would like to read this newsletter?
Share this edition with them.
https://the-ken.com/kaching/fintech-as-a-feature-has-been-disabled-just-ask-zo…
2 Comments