Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coal Liquefaction method assignment
Coal Liquefaction method assignment
It was also an integral part of Adolf Hitler's four-year plan of 1936, and became a
part of German industry during World War II. During the mid-1930s, companies
like IG Farben and Ruhrchemie started industrial production of synthetic fuels
obtained from coal. This led to the construction of twelve Direct liquefaction plants
using hydrogenation and nine Indirect liquefaction plants using Fischer–Tropsch
synthesis in Germany by the end of World War II.
South Africa also developed its own CTL technology in the 1950s by the South
African Coal, Oil and Gas Corporation (Sasol) which was founded in 1950 as part
of industrialization process. South Africa had no domestic oil reserves, and this
made the country very vulnerable to disruption of supplies coming from outside.
For years its principal product was synthetic fuel, and this business enjoyed
significant government protection in South Africa even though it was generally
much more expensive to produce oil from coal than from natural petroleum but
the political as well as economic importance of achieving as much independence as
possible in this sphere was sufficient to overcome any objections. CT L played a
significant role in South Africa's economy, providing around 30% of its domestic
fuel demand.
The United States military also has a program to promote alternative fuels and
utilizing vast domestic U.S. coal reserves to produce fuels through coal
liquefaction .It would obviously have economic and security advantages. But with
their higher carbon footprint, fuels from coal liquefaction face the significant
challenge of reducing carbon emission.
Coal liquefaction technologies have steadily improved since the World War 2 and
technical developments have resulted in a number of systems capable of handling a
wide variety of coal types. However, only a few companies based on generating
liquid fuels from coal have been successful, most of them based on ICL(indirect)
technology. Among them, arguably the most successful one has been Sasol in
South Africa. CTL also received new interest in the early 2000s as a possible
mitigation option for reducing oil dependence, at a time when rising oil prices
forced investors and business venturers rethink already existing supply chains for
liquid fuels.
Processes used:
Liquefaction technologies fall into two categories: direct (DCL) and indirect
liquefaction (ICL) processes. Direct processes are based on approaches of
carbonization and hydrogenation. Indirect liquefaction processes generally involve
gasification of coal to a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, often known as
synthesis gas or simply syngas.
The best-known CTL process is Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FT), named after its
inventors Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch . The FT synthesis is the basis for
indirect coal liquefaction (ICL) technology. Friedrich Bergius, also a German
chemist, invented direct coal liquefaction (DCL) as a way to convert lignite into
synthetic oil in 1913. The DCL (direct) and ICL (indirect) plants effectively
complemented each other rather than competing. Reason for this is that coal
hydrogenation yields high quality gasoline for aviation, while FT synthesis chiefly
produced high-quality diesel, lubrication oil, and waxes. The DCL plants were also
more developed, as lignite – the only coal available in many parts of Germany –
worked better with hydrogenation (DCL) than with FT synthesis(ICL).
Indirect liquefaction is mostly the type of technology used in the U.S. It involves
two steps, first is the turning of coal into a gas mixture of hydrogen and carbon
monoxide called syngas. Then,in second step the gas is turned into a liquid
hydrocarbon that is used as fuel. This is done most often through the Fischer-
Tropsch process or methanol synthesis. It also involves chemically refining the
syngas to eliminate impurities, including sulfur and nitrogen, and converting it into
either gasoline or diesel. This fuel is said to be cleaner than gasoline as it is sulfur-
free.
On the other hand, direct liquefaction processes convert coal into liquids directly
without having to rely on intermediate steps by breaking down the organic
structure of coal with application of hydrogen-donor solvent, often at high
pressures and temperatures in absence of oxygen. Direct processes are based on
methods like carbonization, pyrolysis, and hydrogenation.
Coal contains about twice the amount of carbon per unit of energy compared to
natural gas, and about 20 percent more than petroleum. Then, turning coal into
liquid fuel produces large amounts of CO2 at the plant and again when the fuel is
burned by the vehicle.
There is also some debate over the technology's efficiency in cases where Carbon
Capture and Storage is implemented. Most accounts, including a report by the
EPA, say that even if 90 percent of emissions are captured, liquid coal still
produces more emissions than gasoline, when total emissions i.e,from the point of
extraction through consumption are considered. However,a study by the National
Energy Technology Laboratory , found that when coal-to-liquid plants use carbon
capture, the lifecycle emissions will be five to 10 percent lower than conventional
petroleum.In the end,it all comes down to carbon capture technonlogies and even
in that regard it is not gaurranted that companies will even use it as the use of this
technonlogy further increases the cost of production of petroleum.
Coal liquefaction is also a water-intensive process, using about ten gallons of water
for every gallon of fuel produced. According to the Argonne National Laboratory,
gasoline production from crude uses around 11to 26 litres of water for every litre
of gasoline produced. Thus, high water consumption in the chemical processes is
another adverse environmental effect.