Pdrrmp 2020-2022 Final

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Table and Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Chapter I
Oriental Mindoro Risk Profile and State of the DRRM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Ecological Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Environmental Management and Natural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Risk Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Major Disaster Experiences in Oriental Mindoro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Disaster Characteristics in Oriental Mindoro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Hydrometeorologic Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Geologic Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Ground Shaking Hazard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Liquefaction Hazard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 34
Earthquake Induced Landslide Hazard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Tsunami . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 37
SWOC Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Mission, Vision and Goal Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Chapter II
The Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan (PDRRMP)
Disaster Prevention and Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Disaster Preparedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Disaster Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Implementation Strategies and Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Chapter III
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 . . . . . . . . . 56
PDRRMC Organizational Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Disaster Response Cluster Organizational Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Cluster Committees, Functions and Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

TABLES AND FIGURES
TABLES
Table No. Description Page No.
1 Priority Areas of DRRM 7
by City/Municipality
2 Land Area and No.of Barangays 11
by City/Municipality
3 Major disasters that occurred in Oriental 15
Mindoro, 1981-20__
4 Matrix for Past Flood Events in 25
Oriental Mindoro
5 Flood Susceptibility Matrix by Municipality 28
6 Matrix for Past Earthquake and Tsunami 30
Events in Oriental Mindoro
7 Matrix for Ground Shaking Hazard 33
8 Matrix for Liquefaction Hazard by Municipality 35
9 Matrix for Earthquake-Induced Landslide 36
Hazard by Municipality
FIGURES
Figure No. Description Page No.
1 Flood Susceptibility Map 27
2 Landslide Susceptible Map 31
3 Earthquake Exposure to Ground Shaking 33
Hazard Map
4 Liquefaction Hazard Map 34
5 Earthquake Induced Landslide 37
Exposure Susceptibility Map
6 Tsunami Hazard Susceptibility Map 39

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CCA Climate Change Adaptation

CCC Climate Change Commission
CDRRMC City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council
CHED Commission on Higher Education
DA Department of Agriculture
DAR Department of Agrarian Reform
DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DepEd Department of Education
DILG Department of Interior and Local Government
DOE Department of Energy
DOF Department of Finance
DOH Department of Health
DOLE Department of Labor and Employment
DOST Department of Science and Technology
DPWH Department of Public Works and Highways
DRR Disaster Risk Reduction
DRRM Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
DSWD Department of Social Welfare and Development
DTI Department of Trade and Industry
GDP Gross Domestic Product
HFA Hyogo Framework for Action
HUDCC Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council
IEC Information, Education and Communication
LDRRMF Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund
LDRRMO Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office
LGUs Local Government Units
LWUA Local Water Utilities Administration
MDG Millennium Development Goals
MDRRMC Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council
MILF Moro Islamic Liberation Front NCCAP National Climate Change Action Plan
NDRRMC National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council
NDRRMF National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund
NEDA National Economic and Development Authority
PAGASA Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services
Administration
PAR Philippine Area of Responsibility

PDP Philippine Development Plan
PDRRMC Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council
PHIVOLCS Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology
PIA Philippine Information Agency
PPP Public-Private Partnership
RDRRMC Regional Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council
TESDA Technical Education and Skills Development Authority
UNISDR United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The implementation of the Republic Act 10121 otherwise known as the Philippine Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Act of 2010 has laid the basis for a paradigm shift from just disaster
preparedness and response to disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM). The Provincial DRRM
Plan serves as the provincial guide towards the achievement of sustainable development through
inclusive growth while building the adaptive capacities of communities; increasing the resilience of
vulnerable sectors; and optimizing disaster mitigation opportunities with the end in view of promoting
people’s welfare and security towards gender- responsive and rights-based sustainable development.
Over the past several years, the province has gained a lot of attention and momentum in the area of
disaster risk reduction. Numerous projects and activities have been undertaken by various stakeholders
and agencies in DRRM. However, sustaining the positive results and scaling them up to effect rippling
positive changes in the lives of the people have been constant challenges. Threats remain. Disasters
and people’s risk to disasters are still present.
This is because the underlying causes of people’s vulnerability have yet to be fully recognized and
addressed. For years, DRR has focused more on efforts around disaster preparedness and response and
not so much in identifying the hazard-prone areas and other factors which contribute to people’s
exposure to disasters; incorporating risk analysis to development plans; building people’s capacities
towards sustainable livelihood options; and the like. Although DRR has been gaining attention among
people and institutions, complete paradigm shift from “disasters as an immediate product of hazards”
to “disasters as a function of people’s vulnerability” has not yet fully happened. Also, converging DRR
and CCA remains to be a challenge, both in understanding, mainstreaming into plans and policies,
including institutional mechanisms. Lastly, gaps in terms of increased knowledge, understanding and
capacities remain and cause a big challenge for the province in terms of DRRM.
The PDRRMP of the Provincial Government of Oriental Mindoro outlines the activities aimed at
strengthening the capacity of the provincial government and the lower local government units (LGUs)
together with partner stakeholders, to build disaster-resilience communities and to institutionalize
arrangements and measures for reducing disaster risks, including projected climate risks and enhancing
disaster preparedness and response capabilities at all levels. It highlights, among others, the importance
of mainstreaming DRRM and CCA in the development processes such as policy formulation, socio-
economic development planning, budgeting and governance particularly in the area of environment,
agriculture, water, energy, health, education, poverty reduction, land-use and urban planning and
public infrastructure and housing among others. Mainstreaming also puts to forth the need to develop
common tools to analyze the various hazards and vulnerability factors which put our communities and
people into harm’s way.

Last but not the least, the PDRRMP adheres to the principles of good governance within the context
of poverty alleviation and environmental protection. It is about partnerships and working together –
engaging the participation of CSOs, the private sector and volunteers in the government’s DRRM
programs toward complementation of resources and effective delivery of services to the citizenry.
In accordance with the national and regional DRRM framework, through the DRRMP, the province
will have “Safer, adaptive and disaster resilient communities towards sustainable development.” This
will be achieved through the four distinct yet mutually reinforcing priority areas, namely, (a) Disaster
Prevention and Mitigation; (b) Disaster Preparedness; (c) Disaster Response; and (d) Disaster
Recovery and Rehabilitation. Each priority area has its own long term goal, which when put together
will lead to the attainment of our province’s over-all goal/vision in DRRM.
These priority areas are not autonomous from the other nor do they have clear start and end points. The
4 priority areas are NOT seen as a mere cycle which starts in prevention and mitigation and ends in
rehabilitation and recovery. They:
(a) Mutually reinforce each other and are interoperable.

(b) DO NOT, SHOULD NOT and CANNOT stand alone.
(c) Have no clear starting nor clear ending points between each of the aspects and overlaps are to be
expected.
(d) Are problem-needs and asset-strengths centered
(e) All point to one direction - reduce people’s vulnerabilities and increasing their capacities.
Table 1
PRIORITY AREAS OF DRRM
Priority Areas Long Term Goals Objectives
Disaster Prevention and Avoid hazards and mitigate Reduce vulnerability and
Mitigation their potential impacts by exposure of communities to all
reducing vulnerabilities and hazards
exposure and enhancing Enhance capacities of
capacities of communities communities to reduce their
own risks and cope with the
impacts of all hazards
Disaster Preparedness Establish and strengthen Increase the level of awareness
capacities of communities to of the community to the threats
anticipate, cope and recover and impacts of all hazards, risks
from the negative impacts of and vulnerabilities

emergency occurrences and Equip the community with the
disasters necessary skills to cope with the
negative impacts of a disaster
Increase the capacity of
institutions
Develop and implement
comprehensive national and
local disaster preparedness
policies, plans and systems
Disaster Response Provide life preservation and To decrease the number of
meet the basic subsistence preventable deaths and injuries
needs of affected population To provide basic subsistence
based on acceptable standards needs of affected Population
during or immediately after a To immediately restore basic
disaster social services
Disaster Rehabilitation and Restore and improve facilities, To restore people’s means of
Recovery livelihood and living conditions livelihood and continuity of
and organizational capacities of economic activities and
affected communities, and business
reduced disaster risks in To restore shelter and other
accordance with the “building buildings/installation
back better” Principle To reconstruct infrastructure
and other public utilities
To assist in the physical and
psychological rehabilitation of
persons who suffered from the
effects of disaster
The priority area on Disaster Prevention and Mitigation provides key strategic actions that give
importance to activities revolving around hazards evaluation and mitigation, vulnerability analyses,
identification of hazard-prone areas and mainstreaming DRRM into development plans. It is based on
sound and scientific analysis of the different underlying factors which contribute to the vulnerability
of the people and eventually, their risks and exposure to hazards and disasters.
Disaster Preparedness provides for the key strategic actions that give importance to activities
revolving around community awareness and understanding; contingency planning; conduct of local
drills and the development of a national disaster response plan. Risk-related information coming from
the prevention and mitigation aspect is necessary in order for the preparedness activities to be
responsive to the needs of the people and situation on the ground. Also, the policies, budget and

institutional mechanisms established under the prevention and mitigation priority area will be
further enhanced through capacity building activities, development of coordination mechanisms.
Through these, coordination, complementation and interoperability of work in DRRM operations and
essential services will be ensured. Behavioral change created by the preparedness aspect is eventually
measured by how well people responded to the disasters. At the frontlines of preparedness are the
local government units, local chief executives and communities.
Disaster Response gives importance to activities during the actual disaster response operations from
needs assessment to search and rescue to relief operations to early recovery activities. The success and
realization of this priority area rely heavily on the completion of the activities under both the prevention
and mitigation and preparedness aspects, including among others the coordination and communication
mechanisms to be developed. On-the-ground partnerships and the vertical and horizontal
coordination work between and among key stakeholders will contribute to successful disaster
response operations and its smooth transition towards early and long term recovery work.
The Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery priority area cover areas like employment and livelihood,
infrastructure and lifeline facilities, housing and resettlement, among others. These are recovery
efforts done when people are already outside of the evacuation centers.
The DRRMP recognizes that certain concerns cut across the 4 DRRM priority areas. These include
health, human-induced disasters, gender mainstreaming, environmental protection, cultural sensitivity
or indigenous practices, and the rights based approach. They are a combination of issues and
approaches that should be taken into consideration in each of the priority areas.
All throughout the DRRMP, various strategies were identified to be used in order to achieve the desired
key result areas under each DRRM aspect. These are:
 Advocacy and Information, Education and Communication (IEC)
 Competency-based capability building
 Contingency Planning
 Education on DRRM and CCA for ALL
 Institutionalization of DRRMCs and LDRRMOs
 Mainstreaming of DRRM in ALL plans
 Research, Technology Development and Knowledge Management
 Monitoring, evaluation and learning
 Networking and partnership building between and among stakeholders, media and tiers of
government
In each of the activities under the DRRMP, agency leads and implementing partner agencies and/or
groups were identified. Executive Order No. 222 of 2020 by Governor Humerlito A. Dolor, MPA,
PhD., clearly stipulates the members and the roles and functions of the Provincial DRRM Council.

Monitoring and evaluation are essential components of results-based programming in DRRM as these
will ensure that the plan’s on-time implementation and that learning from past experiences become
input to the plan altogether. Also, through monitoring and evaluation activities, appropriate and needed
revisions and/or changes can be identified, from the identified activities to the implementation
mechanisms, in case more appropriate ones are realized.
ORIENTAL MINDORO RISK PROFILE AND STATE OF DRRM
A. ECOLOGICAL PROFILE
Oriental Mindoro is a province of the Philippines

located in the island of Mindoro under MIMAROPA
region in Luzon, about 140 km southwest of Manila.
The province occupies the eastern part of the island of
Mindoro. It is bounded on the north by the Verde
Island Passage, on the east by Tablas Strait, on the west
by Occidental Mindoro, and on the south by Semirara
Island.
The province has a total land area of 4,364.72 square

kilometers or 436,472 hectares. It represents 1.5
percent of the total land area of the country and 16
percent of the MIMAROPA Region. The province has
a population of 844,059 as per 2015 Philippine
Statistics Authority census of population. The
projected population in 2019 based on growth rate is 891,624.
Based on the existing land classification system, approximately 213,429 hectares of land are classified
forest land and 148 hectares are unclassified. The 2008 Philippine Forestry Statistics, Forest
Management Bureau – Department of Environment and Natural Resources indicated that of the
province's total land area, 79,299 hectares are established timberland and 85,659 hectares are
established forest reserve. National parks cover 44,289 hectares and 3,680 hectares are for civil
reservation.
There are three distinct geographical zone surfaces in the province. These are the coastal areas covering
a total length of 342.45 kilometers; the lake areas covering 81.28 square kilometers; and the riparian
areas, intermittent valleys and ranges of mountains covering 89% of its total land mass.

Oriental Mindoro is composed of 14 municipalities and one component city, with Calapan City as the
provincial capital. The municipalities are Baco, Bansud, Bongabong, Bulalacao, Naujan, Mansalay,
Pinamalayan, Pola, Puerto Galera, Roxas, San Teodoro, Socorro, Victoria and Gloria. All of which are
divided into two districts. The first district is composed of seven municipalities (Puerto Galera, San
Teodoro, Baco, Naujan, Victoria, Socorro, Pola) and one city (Calapan). It comprises 50.25% of the
total land area of the province, while the second district covers seven municipalities (Pinamalayan,
Gloria, Bansud, Bongabong, Roxas, Mansalay, and Bulalacao) that comprises 49.75% of the total land
area of the province.
The biggest municipality is Naujan with an area of 258 sq km and accounts for 12.10 percent of the
province‟s land area. The smallest is the municipality of Roxas sharing only 1.99 percent with an area
of 87.10 kilometers. Naujan is the most numbered barangay of 70 while San Teodoro has the least
number of barangay of eight.
Table 2
LAND AREA AND NO.OF BARANGAYS BY CITY/MUNICIPALITY
Municipality Land Area (sq % to total No. of
km) Barangays
Baco 241.70 5.54 27
Bansud 260.00 5.96 13
Bongabong 498.20 11.41 36
Bulalacao 305.12 6.99 15
Calapan City 265.20 6.08 62
Gloria 230.80 5.29 27
Mansalay 513.10 11.76 17
Naujan 528.00 12.1 70
Pinamalayan 277.30 6.35 37
Pola 130.20 2.98 23
Puerto Galera 223.50 5.12 13
Roxas 87.10 1.99 20
San Teodoro 369.10 8.46 8
Socorro 149.40 3.42 26
Victoria 286.00 6.55 32
Total 4,364.72 100 426
SOURCE: PPDO
The province, with an estimated coastline of 342 kilometers, has a total of 310,788.73 hectares of
municipal waters. The municipality of Bulalacao recorded the largest municipal water with 59,250.33
hectares and San Teodoro, the smallest covering 4,520.20 hectares. The major rivers that traverse
the province are Bongabong, Pola and Mag-asawang Tubig, Calapan City. Secondary rivers include

Mansalay, Tangon, Balete and Agsalin, Gloria; Bansud, Malitbog, Bongabong and Baroc, Mansalay.
The natural drainage systems generally flow eastward and empty into Tablas Strait.
The Mindoro provinces have a series of outward flowing watersheds which are interlocked in the
mountainous upper reaches and descend steeply, with the coast on each side of the island. The northern
and eastern portions of Oriental Mindoro have watersheds which formed a broad sedimentary plain
extending from the middle reaches to the shoreline, occasionally intruded by sedimentary or volcanic
hills.
From the north, the watersheds, named after the main river corresponding river systems, are Mag-
asawang Tubig, Naujan-Victoria; Baco-Bucayao, Pola; Balete, Gloria; Sumagui-Batasu, Bansud;
Bongabong, Kabilyan, Baroc, Mansalay, and Bulalacao.
There are approximately 53 creeks and rivers found in the province, with length ranging from 213 to
234 kilometers. Malbog River is the shortest river system in the province, with a length of 213 km
while the longest river system is the Nag-iba river system with a length of 234 km.
The province has two declared protected areas under the National Integrated Protected Area System
(NIPAS) category. These are the Naujan Lake National Park and the Mt. Iglit-Baco National Park
which have been declared as national parks by virtue of Proclamation No. 335 dated January 25, 1968
and Proclamation No. 557 on May 8, 1969.
The province's network of protected agricultural areas or networks of areas for agricultural
development are areas considered highly restricted to conversion to any other uses. Practically, all
municipalities of the province except Puerto Galera have Network of Protected Agricultural Areas
and/or the Network of Areas for Agricultural Development (NPAA/NAAD). The province has a total
NPAA/NAAD of 621.25 km2. The biggest NPAA/NAAD area can be found in Naujan with 191.25
km2 representing 30.78% of the total NPAA/NAAD area followed by Calapan City with 119.90 km2
or 19.28% and then by Bongabong with 47.58 km2 or 7.66%.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RISK PROFILE
Oriental Mindoro is vulnerable to many natural hazards due to its geographical location and other
internal disputes in some areas. It is constantly beset by disasters with high frequency of occurrence
each year, accounting to thousands worth of damages to properties and loss of lives. Disasters include
tropical cyclones, earthquake, tsunami and floods. Typhoons are the most frequent of these. An average

of four typhoons hit the province in a year. Flashfloods occur twice every five years; while an
earthquake happened in 1994 which also generated a tsunami.
Typhoon Nona was the most destructive severe tropical storm that hit the province. It happened on
December 15, 2015 and left the province with the following damages and losses: 20,894 totally
damaged and 50,306 partially damaged houses; 3,264,214,849.30 damages and losses in agriculture;
and 1,864,255,493.10 damages in infrastructure sector.
Typhoon Utor (Feria) in 2001 is the worst of these disasters that caused the loss of 223 human lives.
Two typhoons in 2006, namely typhoon Seniang and Caloy destroyed a total of 186,346 houses and
affected 81,860 families, respectively.
Flashfloods that happened in December 2005 brought damage to 304 or 71% of the total number of
barangays affecting 82,834 families or 288,464 persons. Total estimated damages amounted to PhP
325,450,000.00.
The 1994 Mindoro Earthquake with magnitude of 7.1- centered 11 km N22°W of Baco, Mindoro, near
Verde Island is the scariest disaster that hit the whole province. This earthquake generated a local
destructive tsunami. The combined effects of the earthquake and tsunami killed a total of 83 people,
injured 430, damaged or destroyed 7,566 houses, entirely broken down the communications system,
disrupted water supply, knocked out power over wide areas, damaged roads, destroyed or damaged 67
bridges, and sunk numerous fishing boats.
These natural hazards brought considerable damage to lives and properties of Mindoreños amounting
to PhP 1,030,700,490.00 and have greatly affected the production and marketing of agricultural
products.
NATURAL AND GEOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
Oriental Mindoro Geographical location accounts to the province’s exposure to disaster, thus the need
to adopt disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM).
Tropical cyclones and its sequential effects of rain and windstorms, as well as floods are the most
prevalent types of hydro-meteorological hazards in the province. Between 1997 and 2007, eighty- four
(84) tropical cyclones entered the Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR). Some of the most
devastating floods and landslides are triggered by these typhoons that happened also within this period.
The El Nino Southern Oscillation which is a periodic disaster recorded high economic costs in just a
single occurrence.

Environmental factors such as denuded forests aggravate flood risks. The pace of deforestation since
the 1930s accelerated in the 1950s and 1960s, before falling slightly in the 1980s. Even now, the effects
of loose soil and reduced forest cover from past forestry activities are felt in frequent landslides and
floods. Recent events show that the annual monsoon season in the country has brought severe flooding
in most areas. In 2011, most of the disasters that claimed the lives of people and affected properties
and livelihoods of the most vulnerable were brought about by increased rainfall which caused
massive flash flooding in areas which don’t normally experience such.
CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS
The province has two climate types: Type I and Type III. Type I is characterized by two pronounced
seasons, dry and wet. Type III has no pronounced season, relatively dry from November to April and
wet during the rest of the year.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITION
Oriental Mindoro is a first-class province that emerges as the Regional Center of MIMAROPA. It has
a rich agricultural, tourism, and commerce industry, producing an average of 570,492.93 metric tons
of rice, 7,438.18 metric tons of corn, and 10,268 metric tons of different variety of vegetable. Oriental
Mindoro also has a wide area of coconut farms, with 1,359,373 bearing trees as of 2018, producing
191,029,218 pieces of whole nuts and 47.757 tons of copra. There is also 36,687 hectares of high value
crops producing 200,258 metric tons of which, serving 18,824 local farmers. Livestock and fishery
production also booming with 7,107.64 tons and 802.0373 of production respectively.
Oriental Mindoro is also blessed with rich history and culture and numerous natural tourist attractions,
resulting to the development of tourism sector in the province. As of 2018, there is a total of 404
accommodation establishments with 4,192 rooms and 11,351 bedding capacity, giving rise to
employment of 2,317.
Pandang Gitab or Pandango sa Ilaw is one of the famous festivals in Oriental Mindoro that is originally
celebrated every third Saturday of February. It is a popular dance which is believed to have originated
from Oriental Mindoro where the dancers balance oil lamps or “tinghoy” on their heads and on the
back of their extended hands. The traditional dance was believed to have been inspired by the practice
of sending off fishermen going to the see in the wee hours of the morning by their families, who brought
lamps to guide their way through the darkness.
In terms of commerce and industry, Oriental Mindoro has a total investment of 788,960,065.00 with
5,631 employment as of 2018. There are thirty-four (34) onsite automated teller machines and twenty-
three (23) offsite automated teller machines.

INTER-ISLAND CONNECTIVITY
Sea travel to the five island provinces in MIMAROPA can be done through the ports of Manila,
Batangas and Lucena. Inter-island sea travel would be possible through small outrigged bancas. Air
travel to Palawan, Occidental Mindoro (San Jose), Marinduque (Gasan) and Romblon (Tugdan) would
all originate in Manila.
MAJOR DISASTER EXPERIENCES IN ORIENTAL MINDORO
A list of some of the major disasters that occurred in the province, with the total number of casualties,
location, and estimated damages is presented in the following:
Table 3
LIST OF MAJOR DISASTERS THAT OCCURRED IN THE PROVINCE
DISASTERS IN ORIENTAL MINDORO
Type of Date Occurred Location No. of Dead/ Estimated
Disaster Injured/Affected Damages ('000
Persons/Families Pesos)
Typhoon Dec. 26, 1981 Dead - 250 1,040.00
Dinang Affected Persons -
180,000
Typhoon 1993 7 barangays Dead - 311 1,080.00
Naning and (Calapan) Injured - 524
Puring Affected Persons -
994,478
Typhoon 1993 Dead - 2 17.68
Goring Affected Persons - 29,413
Typhoon 1994 Dead - 14 2,696.00

Katring Injured - 11
Affected Persons - 90,000
Earthquake Nov. 15, 1994 All Dead - 83 513,021.00

Tsunami Municipaliti Injured - 430
Caused by es Affected Families -
Earthquake Coastal 22,452
brgys. of Affected Persons -
132,712

Baco &
Calapan
Typhoon 1995 Dead -6

Gening Affected Persons -
195,886
Typhoon Eding 2000 Dead - 55 104.000
Injured - 11
Affected Persons - 23,375
Typhoon Utor 2001 Dead - 223 104.000
(Feria) Injured - 180
Affected Persons -
1,091,943
Typhoon November 24, 48 barangays 8 dead, 30 injured and 24 Infrastructure
Unding 2004- in Bansud, missing. damages –
Flashflood- Mansalay, Total of 81,860 families PhP
caused by Pinamalayan and 407,750 individuals 255,130,000.00
heavy rain , Gloria, affected. Totally damaged Agricultural
Bongabong, houses of 8,709 and 7,107 damages-
Roxas and partially damaged houses. PhP515,
Bulalacao. 615,510.00.
Flashflood Dec. 6-7, 2005 163 brgys. Dead - 2 325,450.00
(Calapan, Affected Families -
Naujan, 30,420
Victoria, Affected Persons -
Socorro, 155,274
Pola,
Pinamalayan
& Baco)
Flashflood - December 17 141 Dead - 1 Infrastructure
Typhoon and 27, 2005 barangays Affected Families - damage
Quedan and (Baco, San 52,414 - PhP158.98
continuous Teodoro, Affected Persons - Agricultural
heavy rains Puerto 133,190 losses- PhP166.4
Galera, 7
Naujan,
Victoria,
Calapan
City,

Pinamalayan
, Bansud,
Bongabong,
Roxas,
Mansalay &
Bulalacao)
Typhoon Caloy May 12-13, 2006 379 brgys Dead -8 Php 2,624.81
(all Injured - 30
municipalitie Affected Families -
s) 81,860
Affected Persons -
407,750
Typhoon November 30- 244 3 dead Infrastructure
“Reming”. December 1, barangays in 36,776 families or damages -
2006 Calapan 163,213 persons were PhP25.3
City, Baco, affected. A Agricultural
Gloria, 13,458 Damaged Houses. damages
Naujan, PhP296.1
Pola, Puerto million.
Galera,
Roxas, San
Teodoro, &
Socorro
Typhoon December 6-15, Farmers of PhP139,
Seniang 2006 Baco, 214,281.00.
Bansud,
Bongabong,
Calapan
City, Gloria,
Mansalay,
Pinamalayan
, Roxas and
Victoria.
Typhoon Nov. 19-28, 7
Hagibis 2007 Municipaliti
es
Typhoon Feria June 24, 2009 76 brgys 2,744 families and 13,565 Agricultural
(Calapan, individuals affected Damages PhP
Pinamalayan 30,074,500.00

, Pola Infrastructure
Bansud, Damages
Naujan & PhP6, 250.00.
Socorro)
Flashflood Jan. 17-18, 2010 61 brgys. Dead - 2 Php 72,140.00
(Baco, Injured - 346
Naujan, Affected Families - 5,876
Calapan &
Victoria)
Flashflood Oct. 8, 2010 4 barangays Dead - 1 PhP 6,940.00
in Affected Families - 7
Pinamalayan Affected Persons - 35
Flooding February 7, 2011 A total of 13 2 dead, 329 farmers Agriculutural

Incident. flooded affected. 6 houses totally Damages -
municipalitie damaged PhP1,
s and 240 477,321.00
barangays.
Tropical Storm October 4, 2011 19 6 casualty, 6 missing, Infrastructure
“Pedring” barangays/ 8 2,121 families and 10,397 damages PhP 85
municipalitie individuals were affected. million,
s Agricultural
Damages
PhP537,
947,320.00.
Tropical Storm October 12, 2011 5 115 families / 509 Infrastructure
“Ramon”. municipalitie individuals were damages PhP
(Landslide and s were evacuated. 7,045,000.00
Flooding) affected million.
namely:
Baco,
Bulalacao,
Roxas,
Mansalay,
San Teodoro
and Calapan
City

-“Flashflood”. March 26 and 28, A total of 88 1,835 farmers affected. Infrastructure
2012 barangays damages
from Baco, PhP44.01
Calapan, agricultural
Naujan, damages
Pola, and PhP16.7 million.
Vitoria were
affected.
Flooding August 6 to 7, 14 brys of 1527 affected families
caused by 2012 Baco. 199 farmers affected.
Monsoon Rain
(Habagat)
Typhoon “Ofel” October 25, 2012 240 5 death and 34 injured. Infrastructure
barangay of 29,504 families or 73,031 damages
13 individuals affected. PhP89.4
municipalitie 4,240 damaged houses. agricultural
s of Baco, 13,026 families/person damages
Puerto were rescued and PhP774.1
Galera, evacuated. million
Calapan
City,
Victoria,
Pola,
Bansud,
Bongabong,
Roxas,
Mansalay,
Gloria,
Bulalacao,
and
Pinamalayan
MV BALENO Calapan City 52 passengers were safely
168 incident Port rescued.
18 cargo trucks and
vehicles were damaged.
Tropical Storm June 28,2013 3
“Gorio” signal municipalitie
#1 s namely;
Baco,

Bulalacao,
Bansud and
other 10
barangays
were rarely
affected
Tropical Storm August 19 and Eleven
“Maring” 20, 2013- barangays
(Flashflood) namely:
Alag,
Bangkatan,
Burbuli, Sta.
Cruz,
Mangangan
I,
Mangangan
II, Catwiran
I, Poblacion,
Tagumpay
and the
Tabon-tabon
of the
municipality
of the Baco.
Typhoon November 8-9, 14 4 injured, 11, 547 Agriculture
“Yolanda” 2013 municipalitie families, 45,280 Damages-
s and 1 city individuals rescued and 2,912,000.00.
evacuated. Totally Electrical
damaged houses 439, Facilities-
Partially Damaged 2,000,000.00
Houses 1, 029 Infrastructure-
25,448,100.00
Typhoon July 14-16, 2014 Calapan City 1 dead, 62 totally Agricultural
“Glenda”. and Naujan damaged houses, 97 damages:
partially damaged houses. 1,520,611.00
Typhoon December 8, 15 1 dead Agricultural

“Ruby” 2014 municipalitie 2 injured damages PhP29,
s 299, 845, 98.00.

infrastructure
damages -
PhP6,500,000.00
-“Flashfloods” December 23-27, 12 barangays Agricultural
cause of heavy 2014 namely: Damages
rains Antipolo, 3,787,180.00;
Bayani, 171.35 hectares
Andrialuna, affected.
Pinagsabang
an II, San
Carlos,
Apitong,
Sampaguita,
Gamao,
Nag-iba I,
Tigkan, Sta.
Isabel and
Sto. Niño. 95
persons were
affected.
Flashflood” due December 31, 9 barangays 171 farmers affected. Agricultural
to continuous 2014- January 5, in damages 6.2
heavy rain. 2015- municipality million. A total
of Victoria. of 334 totally
and partially
affected.
“Flashflood” January 1, 2015 Barangay 185 population were Estimated cost
heavy “Rain Alcate, affected and evacuated. were
Shower” that Victoria 6,221,595.00
caused
“Magasawang
Tubig River”
Overflow at
Barangay
Alcate,
Municipality of
Victoria.

Typhoon December 14-15, Calapan Casualty 13 dead and 401 Agriculture
“Nona” 2015 City, Naujan, injured 95,651 families w/coconut
Victoria, and 422,495 individuals 3,587,800,809.3
Socorro, displaced in 396 0 Infrastructure:
Pola, designated evacuation 1,620,313,230.1
Pinamalayan centers from 384 affected 0
, Gloria, barangays Environment:7,4
Baco, San Totally damaged houses: 00,000.00
Teodoro, 30,064 Partially damaged Power:
Pto. Galera houses: 46,478 290,622,177.12
Typhoon Nina Totally Damage Houses Agriculture:

3,702 Infrastructure:
Partially Damage Houses (Damages)
12, 906 National Road
Damages: (9,565,000.00)
104,121,000.00 Provincial Road
Losses: 104,121,000.00 1,549,000.000
Education Sector: 37 Municipal/Brgy.
totally damage classroom - 24,006,370.00
261 partially damage Losses:
houses Damages:
78,497,944.79
Losses:
839,000.00
Typhoon December 30, Calapan Totally damaged houses: Agricultural
Usman 2018 City, Baco, 336 Damages:
Naujan, Partially damaged houses: 314,137,313.25
Victoria, 446 Infrastructure
Socorro, Affected families: 37,468 damages:
Pinamalayan or 98,440 individuals 1,669,733,688.8
, Gloria, 165 flooded barangays 4
Bansud,
Bongabong
Typhoon Tisoy December 3, 371 Totally damaged houses: Agricultural
2019 barangays 5,596 Damages:
province- Partially damaged houses: 1,472,932,956.3
wide 46,007 2

Affected families: 72,082 Infrastructure
or 273,607 individuals damages:
709,307,675.73
Typhoon Ursula December 25, 57 barangays Totally damaged houses:

2019 province- 2,754
wide Partially damaged houses:
3,098
Affected families: 1,016
or 3,736 individuals
DISASTER CHARACTERISTICS IN ORIENTAL MINDORO
The following is a list of natural hazards that hit Oriental Mindoro, with maps and corresponding
matrices of its effects in the province.
1. HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL HAZARDS
A. FLOODS
Floods are among the most frequent and costly natural disasters. Conditions that cause floods include
typhoons as well as heavy or steady rain for several hours or days that saturate the ground. Flash floods
occur suddenly due to rapidly rising water along a stream or low lying area.
Based on the Oriental Mindoro Historical Disaster Data (1993-2010), four flashfloods struck Oriental
Mindoro. December 2005 flashfloods occurred in almost all municipalities in the province. Only the
municipality of Gloria was not affected. This was brought about by the three-day rainfall reaching a
total of 194 millimeters and 77 millimeters on 6 December and 17 December 2005 (as reported by
PAGASA). Heavy rainfall resulted to large discharges in both Mag-asawang Tubig and Bucayao
Rivers. Family victims totaled 82,834 or 288,464 persons. Three casualties in Calapan City and
Pinamalayan were reported due to drowning. The total infrastructure damages estimated at PhP158.98
million while agricultural losses pegged at PhP166.47 million for the December 6, 17 and 27, 2005
flashfloods.
Water from Aglubang and Ibulo rivers, including discharges from smaller tributaries upstream merged
at the foot of the mountain between Villa Cerveza, Victoria, and San Andres Putik, Naujan. The
confluence of Aglubang and Ibulo rivers formed the Mag- asawang Tubig River in the area at the
transition from the mountainous terrain to sprawling floodplains of Naujan, Calapan and parts of

Victoria and Baco. During high water discharge, considerable water volume of flow from Mag-
asawang Tubig River was diverted to Bucayao River.
The diversion of water occurred in two locations at the western bank of Mag-asawang Tubig River:
a) just above the point of confluence of Aglubang and Ibulo Rivers due to greater flow
contribution, hence, greater momentum and flow of water from Aglubang River, and
b) opposite Muyod in Villa Cerveza, Victoria as the flow was deflected by the solid high ground
flows diverted from Mag-asawang Tubig merged further downstream and eventually joined
the flow in Bucayao River.
This resulted to exceptionally high water level in Bucayao River beyond its capacity and breached the
dike due to scouring at the curved section of the river in Sitio Buhuan of Barangay Comunal in the
City of Calapan. As a result, the large volume and uncontrollable flow of water spilled over the areas
of Calapan City, Naujan and some parts of Victoria and Baco, causing flooding in above-mentioned
areas.
Heavy rains on 17 January 2010 resulted to the overflowing of riverbanks along Bucayao and Mag-
asawang Tubig Rivers. Said weather disturbance triggered flooding in 56 barangays of the
municipalities of Naujan and Baco affecting 1,875 and 2,277 families respectively. Five barangays in
the municipality of Victoria and Calapan City were also affected by flashflood with 1,724 families or
8528 persons. With this disaster two people were reported dead and 346 injured. Total damage to
infrastructure facilities and agricultural crops/livestock amounted to PhP27.81 million and PhP0.69
million, respectively.
In the early morning of 8 October 2010, flashflood occurred in Pinamalayan due to continuous heavy
rains. Four barangays were affected namely: Pagalagala, Nabuslot, Sto. Niño and Anoling. A total of
seven families comprising 35 persons were affected and one person was reported dead. Agricultural
damage pegged at PhP6.94 million.
On December 15, 2015, Typhoon Nona devastated the province and caused floodings in various
barangays. Heavily affected were the communities of Arangin, Mulawin, Masagana and Evangelista
in Naujan. In the case of Barangay Bayanan in Baco, the waters that came from the mountains are
supplemented with boulders that erased their entire community. The whole municipality of Baco was
submerged in water during the onslaught of Nona. Rainfall amount of the said typhoon was registered
at 493 mm, which according to PAGASA the said amount should have been an accumulated rainfall
amount for one month but was poured by Nona for only eight hours.

Table 4
MATRIX FOR PAST FLOOD EVENTS IN ORIENTAL MINDORO
Description Population/Areas Affected Impacts
December 6, 2005 - Flashflood 163 brgys. (Calapan City, Two casualties
-Heavy rainfall resulted to Naujan, Victoria, Socorro, Pola,
large discharges in both Mag- Pinamalayan & Baco). A total of
asawang Tubig and Bucayao 30,420 families or 155,274
Rivers persons were affected.
December 17 and 27, 2005 - 141 barangays of Baco, Registered one death.
Flashflood - Typhoon Quedan Naujan,Victoria and Calapan Infrastructure damage posted
and continuous heavy rains City; and Pinamalayan, Bansud, to PhP158.98 million while
contributed to overflow of Bongabong, Roxas, Mansalay agricultural losses pegged at
some major rivers and its and Bulalacao. A total of 23,364 PhP166.47 million for the
tributaries families were affected. December 6, 17 and 27, 2005
flashfloods.
Calapan City, Baco, Naujan, San
Teodoro, Puerto Galera. A total
of 29,050 families or 133,190
persons were affected.
January 17, 2010 - Flashflood Naujan-41 barangays. A total of Registered two casualties
- Heavy rains in the mountain 1,875 families or 9,375 persons Infrastructure damage posted
area resulted to the were affected. to PhP3.7 million while
overflowing of riverbanks agricultural losses pegged at
along Bucayao and Mag- PhP29.66 million.
asawang Tubig Rivers
Baco-15 barangays - Alag, Agricultural losses pegged at
Burbuli, Sta Rosa I, Catwiran I, PhP10.28 million.
Catwiran II, Sta Cruz,
Tagumpay, Malapad, Poblacion,
Bangkatan, Dulangan I,
Dulangan II, Dulangan III,
Putican Cabulo, and Pulang
Tubig. A total of 2,277 families
or 11,376 persons were affected.
January 17, 2010 - Flashflood Three hundred forty six were

- Continuous heavy rains injured. One and 2,064 houses

5 brgys. (Calapan & Victoria).A totally and partially damaged,
total of 1,724 families or 8,528 respectively. Infrastructure
persons were affected. damage posted to PhP27.81
million while agricultural
losses pegged at PhP0.69
million.
October 8, 2010 - Flashflood - Four barangays were affected Registered one death.
Continuous heavy rains namely: Pagalagala, Nabuslot, Agricultural losses pegged at
Sto. Niño and Anoling of the PhP6.94 million.
municipality of Pinamalayan. A
total of seven families or 35
persons were affected.
Source: PPDO, PSWDO, OCD, PDRRMO
HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION
Most of the surveyed areas by Mines and Geosciences Bureau are situated on a flat to very gently
sloping terrain traversed by numerous braided and meandering streams. Among these prominent rivers
posing immediate hydrologic hazards in the area are Bucayao and Mag-asawang Tubig Rivers that
flow in the alluvial plain of Calapan, Naujan and Victoria; and the Bongabong and Baroc Rivers in
Bongabong and Roxas, respectively.
Highly susceptible areas for flooding in the form of overbank river flooding and sheet flooding are
confined with the floodplain and on the downstream most portions of the river systems inundation
levels way from 0.5 to more than 1.0 meter in depth.
A total of 176.72 square kilometers in the municipalities of Baco, Bulalacao, Naujan, Pinamalayan,
Puerto Galera and San Teodoro are identified as none susceptible to flooding. All municipalities of
the province have susceptibility levels from none - low and low - low to moderate; and moderate -
moderate to high with total land areas of 1,316.71 and 1,464.07 square kilometers, respectively.
Calapan City and the municipalities of Baco, Bansud, Bongabong, Gloria, Naujan, Pinamalayan, Pola,
Roxas and Victoria are identified as highly susceptible to flooding with a total land area of 495.94
square kilometers.

Figure 1
FLOOD SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP
Riverbank erosion and channel migration due to heavy river siltation are highly noticeable near the
mouth of rivers.
Regional geomorphology shows that Naujan and Victoria are found under alluvial fan conditions and
Roxas under deltaic conditions geologic environments formed under these conditions are highly
vulnerable to flooding.

Low-lying areas confined along the periphery of Naujan Lake are subject to inundation attributed to
swelling of the lake water rise to excessive surface water inflows from the rivers; much of the rivers at
the nearby areas drain their water into this lake.
Flooding in low-lying areas near the coast of eastern Mindoro is attributed to abnormal sea tidal
fluctuation. Mass movement hazards were likewise identified on steep slopes in the southern
mountainous portion of the province, particularly near the Central Mindoro Fault.
Susceptible areas are mostly underlain by fractured and weakened limestone deposits which are found
in Sitio Tagudtod in Manaul, Mansalay while some over changing rock units were also observed in
barangays of San Vicente, Roxas and San Roque, Bulalacao especially in Sitios Namalayan and
Dangkalan.
Table 5
FLOOD SUSCEPTIBILITY MATRIX BY MUNICIPALITY
City/ High Moderate- None to Low- None

Municipality Moderate to Low- Low to
High Moderate
Land Area (km2)
Baco 69.42 21.02 18.11 3.55
Bansud 4.72 87.54 19.04 -
Bongabong 231.79 215.57 50.84 -
Bulalacao - 116.27 213.78 31.91
Calapan City 41.96 130.07 45.03 -
Gloria 3.17 108.34 31.08 -
Mansalay - 154.57 334.33 -
Naujan 52.72 359.94 80.06 36.32
Pinamalayan 15.06 63.03 78.29 7.13
Pola 4.13 14.03 122.68 -
Puerto Galera - 47.47 107.32 97.68
Roxas 43.74 6.52 34.98 -
San Teodoro - 57.49 0.87 0.13
Socorro - 19.36 139.3 -
Victoria 29.23 62.5 41 -
OR. MINDORO 495.94 1464.07 1316.71 176.72
Source: MGB

3. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
A. EARTHQUAKE AND RELATED HAZARDS
Earthquake is the shaking of the Earth’s surface caused by rapid movement of the Earth’s rocky outer
layer. Tsunami is the related hazard of earthquake and is defined as a large destructive ocean wave
caused by an underwater earthquake or another movement of the Earth’s surface.
There are two documented occurrences of tsunamis in Oriental Mindoro. The first tsunami occurred
in March 1675 which affected the coastal areas of Pola. The second is the November 15, 1994 Mindoro
earthquake which affected all the municipalities in the province. The earthquake occurred at 03:15AM
(local time) with magnitude 7.1 and an epicenter of 13.5° N, 121.1° E, and a hypocenter of 15 km. This
was tectonic in origin, related to movement along zones of weakness transecting the Philippine
Archipelago along an active fault which is now called as Aglubang River Fault. The tsunami totally
destroyed 1,530 houses and killed 41 people. Approximately five minutes after the tremor, tsunami
waves struck along a 40 km stretch of the northern and eastern shoreline of Mindoro Island, from
Puerto Galera up to Pinamalayan. As per official report of the Provincial Social Welfare and
Development Office (PSWDO), about 22,452 families were affected. Casualties numbered 83
confirmed dead and 430 injured. The municipality of Baco sustained the biggest number of casualties,
with 41 confirmed deaths from drowning due to the tsunami that hit the coastal area of Malaylay, San
Andres, Baco. The capital town, Calapan, has the second most number of casualties, with 17 deaths
from Barangay Wawa, also a coastal area. Almost half of the casualties were children below 10 years
old who were drowned. Damage to property include some 7,566 houses: 1,530 totally and 6,036
partially washed away by tsunami. The municipalities of Calapan and Baco had the biggest number of
totally destroyed houses. However, Naujan and Gloria had the biggest number of partially damaged
houses with 2,204 and 1,138 houses, respectively. Damaged infrastructure includes 24 bridges, 8 of
which were rendered impassable for days, isolating villages and towns in the interior. Roads with a
combined span of 500 km likewise sustained damage. The main pier and adjacent terminal building
at Calapan Harbor was damaged, limiting ferry access for a period immediately after the earthquake
(EERI, 1995). Three major power plants, two in Luzon Grid and one in Visayas, tripped during the
earthquake causing brown outs in Mindoro Island and parts of Leyte and Samar. Some areas in Metro
Manila also experienced brief power interruption. In Calapan, the floating 7.2 megawatt power barge
was swept inland by the tsunami. This ran aground 2 kilometers away from its original location. Water
supply was also disrupted due to ruptured water lines and the lack of electricity to run pumps. Power
was partially restored in Mindoro before the end of November, but it took another month before the
power situation in the province was normalized. Total cost of rehabilitating damaged buildings and
infrastructures is placed at PhP5.15 million.

Table 6.
MATRIX FOR PAST EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI EVENTS IN ORIENTAL
MINDORO
Description Population/Areas Affected Impacts
March 1965 Tsunami Coastal barangays of Pola
(Tagumpay, Puting Cacao,
Tiguihan, Pahilahan, Tagbakin,
Batuhan, Buhay na Tubig,
Bakawan)
Nov. 15, 1994 - 7.1 intensity All Municipalities. A total of 83 dead, 430 injured and eight
earthquake 22,452 families or 132,712 were reported missing. One
persons were affected. thousand one hundred thirty
and 6,036 houses totally and
partially damaged,
respectively.
Infrastructure damage posted to
PhP447.631 million while
agricultural losses pegged at
PhP65.39 million.
Tsunami waves up to 1.5m Coastal barangays of Baco and
high Calapan
Source: PPDO, PSWDO, OCD, PDRRMO
HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION
Studies of historic earthquakes provide basic background for projecting future seismic hazards and
losses. A map of historic earthquakes of Magnitude 7.7 and earthquake catalogs are listed in the Rapid
Earthquake Damage Assessment System of the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology
user database.
PHIVOLCS map was used to create earthquake induced hazards map of the province generated by
NEDA IV-B in coordination with the Provincial Planning and Development Office.
The earthquake generators that may affect the province include the Lubang Fault, East Mindoro Trench
and the Manila Trench based on the tectonic map of the country. Active faults in the province are the
Aglubang River and Central Mindoro Faults. Raster based iteration maps are reprojected to UTM
Zone 51, Luzon Datum, converted to vector format and processed using ArcGis 9.3. PHIVOLCS
Earthquake Intensity Scale (PEIS) from one to 10 is used as the unit of categorization on the severity

of earthquake effects in the Philippines. A scale of seismic intensity is a way of measuring or rating
the effects of an earthquake at different sites.
Figure 2
LANDSLIDE HAZARD SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP
Most of the coastal areas and the alluvial plains of the northeastern part of the province are considered
vulnerable to flooding/liquefaction and lateral spreading. The narrow zone extending 500 meters on
both sides of the active faults is also vulnerable to liquefaction.

In historical large-magnitude earthquakes, lateral spreading have been a very damaging type of ground
failure. When a subsurface soil deposit liquefies, intact blocks of surficial soil can move down slope,
or toward a vertical free face, even when the ground surface is nearly level. A lateral spread is defined
as the mostly horizontal movement of gently sloping ground (less than 5% surface slope) due to
elevated pore pressures or liquefaction in underlying, saturated soils.
GROUND SHAKING HAZARD
The first main earthquake hazard is the effect of ground shaking. Earthquakes send a number of
seismic waves that cause the ground to vibrate. Intensity of shaking varies depending on a number of
factors namely earthquake magnitude, distance from the epicenter, and degree of ground consolidation
and thickness of soil overburden. Ground shaking as a result of a shallow seated and large magnitude
earthquake leads to other secondary hazards such as liquefaction, ground rupture along faults and
landslides, fires and toppling of buildings which may result to deaths, property damage and sort to long
term effects to the economy.
Ground shaking hazard map of the province (Fig. 3) depicts the active faults of Aglubang River and
Central Mindoro; and the earthquake generators near the province such as the Lubang Fault, East
Mindoro Trench and the Manila Trench.
In order to identify the maximum ground shaking levels that the province may experience during large
magnitude shallow seated earthquakes three worst case scenario iterations were created using the Rapid
Earthquake Damage Assessment System-Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology. Raster
based iteration maps are reprojected to UTM Zone 51, Luzon Datum, converted to vector format and
processed using ArcGis 9.3.
Areas affected are the municipality of Puerto Galera and the Verde Island with Intensity VI.

Figure 3
EARTHQUAKE EXPOSURE TO GROUNDSHAKING HAZARD
Table 7
MATRIX FOR GROUND SHAKING HAZARD
Municipalities Susceptibility Levels Total land area
High Moderate Low (sq km)
Puerto Galera Aninuan 21.73
Balatero 14.32
Dulangan 12.94
Palangan 3.87
Sabang 4.48
San Antonio 1.13
San Isidro 8.53
Santo Niño 5.32
Sinandigan 4.56
Tabinay 97.68
Villaflor 46.77
Poblacion 3.76
Baclayan 27.38
Total 252.47

LIQUEFACTION HAZARD
Buildings can even sink into the ground if soil liquefaction occurs. Liquefaction is the mixing of sand
or soil and groundwater (water underground) during the shaking of a moderate or strong earthquake.
When the water and soil are mixed, the ground becomes very soft and acts similar to quicksand. If
liquefaction occurs under a building, it may start to lean, tip over, or sink several feet. The ground
firms up again after the earthquake has past and the water has settled back down to its usual place
deeper in the ground. Liquefaction prone areas can be found in beach zones, sand pits, sand bars,
tombolos, wide coastal plains, deltaic plains, flood plains, abandoned river meanders, former beds,
former or existing marshland, and swamplands. Areas underlain by lahar deposits, especially those
that will preferentially receive the finer sandy fractions of active lahar flows are also susceptible to
liquefaction (Punongbayan, 1998).
Liquefaction hazard map of the province of Oriental Mindoro (Fig. 4) indicates the areas prone to
liquefaction at varying susceptibility levels. The liquefaction potential categories shown on this map
depend on the probability of having an earthquake within a 100-year period that will be strong enough
to cause liquefaction in those zones. High liquefaction potential means that there is a 50% probability
of having an earthquake within a 100-year period that will be strong enough to cause liquefaction.
Moderate means that the probability is between 10% and 50%, low between 5 and 10%, and very low
less than 5%.
Figure 4
EARTHQUAKE EXPOSURE TO LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP

The map shows the liquefaction hazard in the city and municipalities of Oriental Mindoro for a
magnitude 7.7 earthquake with an average depth of 25.8 km. The map predicts the approximate
percentage of each designated area that will liquefy and show surface manifestations of liquefaction.
It also depicts the hazard at a regional scale and should not be used for site-specific design and
consideration. Subsurface conditions can vary abruptly and borings are required to address the hazard
at a given location. Some areas in the all municipalities and component city of Oriental Mindoro will
have moderate to low susceptibility.
Table 8
MATRIX FOR LIQUEFACTION HAZARD BY MUNICIPALITY
Baco Malaylay Island 298,170
Baco All Barangays All Barangays 241.70
Bansud All Barangays All Barangays 260.00
Bongabong All Barangays All Barangays 498.20
Bulalacao All Barangays All Barangays 305.12
Bulalacao Buyayao Island Buyayao Island 298,170
Calapan All Barangays All Barangays 265.20
Gloria All Barangays All Barangays 230.80
Mansalay All Barangays All Barangays 513.10
Naujan Naujan Lake 81,250
Naujan All Barangays All Barangays 528.00
Pinamalayan All Barangays All Barangays 277.30
Pola All Barangays All Barangays 130.20
Puerto Galera All Barangays 223.50
Roxas All Barangays All Barangays 87.10
San Teodoro All Barangays All Barangays 369.10
Socorro All Barangays All Barangays 149.40
Victoria All Barangays All Barangays 286.00
Total 681,954.72
EARTHQUAKE INDUCED LANDSLIDE HAZARD
Earthquake triggered landslide is an earthquake associated hazard as a result of severe ground shaking
leading to slope failure. These can be in the form of rapidly moving detached masses and bits of pieces
of soil and rock materials. In general, steep slopes with weathered bedrock or soft rock units, hilly to
mountainous areas exposed to high precipitation rate slopes modified by road cuts, quarrying

operations, river erosion and denuded forests are areas highly prone to landslide occurrences
(Punongbayan, 1998).
Earthquake induced landslide hazard map (Fig. 5) was produced by generating three iterations based
on the identified three scenario earthquakes. Raster based iteration maps are reprojected to UTM Zone
51, Luzon Datum, converted to vector format and processed using ArcGis 9.3.
The landslide susceptibility map (Fig. 6) shows that the municipalities of Puerto Galera, Baco, Victoria,
Socorro, Pinamalayan, Gloria, Bansud, Bongabong, Mansalay and Bulalacao are highly susceptible.
On the other hand, the municipalities of Puerto Galera, San Teodoro, Baco, Naujan, Victoria, Pola,
Socorro, Pinamalayan, Gloria, Bansud, Bongabong, Mansalay, Roxas and Bulalacao are moderately
susceptible to landslides. And finally, the city/municipalities of Calapan, Puerto Galera, San Teodoro,
Baco, Victoria, Pola, Socorro, Pinamalayan, Gloria, Bansud, Bongabong, Mansalay, Roxas,
Bulalacao, Naujan and Naujan Lake are low susceptible to earthquake induced landslide.
Table 9
MATRIX FOR EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED LANDSLIDE HAZARD BY
MUNICIPALITY
Baco All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 241.70
Bansud All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 260.00
Bongabong All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 498.20
Bulalacao All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 305.12
Calapan All Barangays 265.20
Gloria All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 230.80
Mansalay All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 513.10
Naujan Naujan Lake 81,250
Naujan All Barangays 528.00
Pinamalayan All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 277.30
Pola All Barangays All Barangays 130.20
Puerto Galera All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 223.50
Roxas All Barangays All Barangays 87.10
San Teodoro All Barangays All Barangays 369.10
Socorro All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 149.40
Victoria All Barangays All Barangays All Barangays 286.00
Total 5,614.72

Figure 5
EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED LANDSLIDE EXPOSURE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP
TSUNAMI
Initial tsunami modeling was performed by the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology
(PHIVOLCS) of Department of Science and Technology (DOST) funded under the DOST – Tsunami
Risk Mitigation Program 2006 – 2007. The tsunami modeling process utilized the Rapid Earthquake
Damage Assessment System software, based on empirical records of Abe (1989), Hall and Watt
(1983), Prist (1995), Hills and Mader (1999) which allows for wave evolution over a variable
bathymetry and topographic maps of NAMRIA used for the inundation mapping to estimate the extent
to which coastal land is likely to be inundated by tsunamis. Assuming tsunami height of three meters
at coastline, tsunami inundation zones were modeled for Mindoro Island coastlines. Earthquake
parameters used in modeling is the Manila Trench with magnitude 7.2, 7.9 and 8.2. The tsunami hazard
map (Fig. 7) was developed for the Tsunami Risk Mitigation Program ‟06-„07 purpose of PHIVOLCS-
DOST but could also be used by governments as a basis for land-use planning. This indicative map is
based on maximum computed wave height and inundation using worst case scenario earthquakes from
major offshore source zones. The indicated wave height decreases away from the shoreline.
The modeled inundation depth for a three-meter tsunami is indicated in shades of red. A high degree
of agreement between the calculated inundation zone and the areas actually destroyed can be seen in

the Earthquake Tsunami Map. These areas can be found in the city/municipalities of Puerto Galera,
Baco, San Teodoro and Calapan with five-meter inundation depth. Six barangays of Puerto Galera
namely: Sinandigan, Palangan, Poblacion, Tabinay, Dulangan and Villaflor have an inundation depth
of six meters. In addition, five barangays of Roxas namely San Jose, Bagumbayan, Dangay, Paclasan
and San isidro and three barangays of Bongabong namely Cawayan, Dayhagan, and San Jose have an
inundation depth of 3.65 meters. And lastly, the barangays of the municipality of Mansalay namely
Wasig, B Del Mundo, Manaul, Cabalwa and Poblacion have an inundation of 3.72 meters.
The results of the scenario show that there are residential areas that would be hit, including tourism,
education, electric and gas utilities, health and human services, transportation facilities such as national
and municipal ports located in Calapan City, Roxas and Puerto Galera and other institutional/industrial
establishments. A total of 118,048 population and 496 square kilometers of land area would be
affected.
This tsunami inundation map was prepared to assist cities and municipalities in identifying their
tsunami hazard. It is intended for local jurisdictional, coastal evacuation planning uses only. This map
and the information presented herein, is not a legal document and do not meet disclosure requirements
neither for real estate transactions nor for any other regulatory purpose. The inundation map has been
compiled with best currently available scientific information. The inundation line represents the
maximum considered tsunami run up from a number of extreme, yet realistic, tsunami sources.
Tsunamis are rare events; due to a lack of known occurrences in the historical record, this map includes
no information about the probability of any tsunami affecting any area within a specific period of time.

Figure 6
TSUNAMI HAZARD SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP

SWOC ANALYSIS
DRRM conducts Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges (SWOC) analysis to the four
thematic areas of DRRM to identify key areas which shall be the basis for the review and improvement
of the entire DRRM programs, projects and activities.
THEMATIC STRENGTH WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITIES CHALLENGES

AREA
RAHABILITATION AND RECOVERY
Natural Hazards (Typhoon, Flood, Rain induced landslide, Tornado, Storm surge, Drought)
Inclusion of 1. Accessibility 1. Lesson learned 1. Accessibility
immediate 2. Availability of from previous 2. Availability of
recovery, fund disaster/calamities fund
short term 3. Lack of Power 2. Internal and 3. Lack of Power and
recovery, and External funds Communication
long term Communication (donations) (bug down)
recovery (bug down) 3. Provision of 4. Lack of
activities 4. Lack of livelihood and cooperation/particip
cooperation/partici cooperative ation of communities
pation of assistance 5. Lack of
communities coordination of
5. Lack of Government
coordination of agencies
Government 6. Political
agencies intervention
6. Lack of
mechanism to
encourage
discipline of
neighboring
municipalities on
waste disposal
7. Existing ECs do
not meet the
standards
8. Activation of
wash cluster
Human induced hazard

Fire 1. Manpower 1. Ratio of BFP 1. 1. Relocation of
(24/7 duty) Personnel vs. Availability/participat displaced victims
2. Equipment population ion of volunteers from 2. Funds
2. Out model fire different sectors
truck and 2. Livelihood
equipment Programs
3. Without site for
temporary shelter
4. Waste disposal
of the debris
during clearing
operation
Armed 1. Presence of 1. Lack of 1. Internal and 1. No identified
Conflict police/military reinforcement External funds relocation site/area
and other officer from other (donations) for the victims
of the law (24/7 agencies 2. Livelihood 2. Political
duty) 2. Lack medical Programs interventions
and pyscho-social 3. Funds
assistance
3. No identified
relocation
site/area for the
victims
4.
Availability/insuf
ficient funds
Maritime 1. Presence of 1. Lack of 1. Internal and 1. Procurement of
Incident coast guard / equipment and External funds needed equipment
maritime trained personnel (donations) for rehab and
agencies (24/7 2. recovery
duty) Availability/participat 2. Funds
2. Presence of ion of volunteers from 3. Weather condition
local vessels for different sectors
rescue and
recovery
Oil Spill 1. Availability 1. Lack of 1. Internal and 1. Weather condition
of chemicals for equipment External funds 2. Funds
clean-up and 2. Lack of (donations) 3. Volume of Oil
recovery policies and spill

2. Lack of regulations 2. Short-term
personnel implemented (temporary)
trained in oil Employment/
spill rehab and Livelihood Programs
recovery in nearby affected
areas
3. Policies/Regulation
formulation
4. PPAs to
improve/rehabilitate
the affected areas
EPIDEMIC
Air borne 1. Availability 1. Unavailable 1. Internal and 1. Isolation of the
Disease of hospitals Doctors External funds patients from their
Water (specialist) and (donations) families
borne medicines 2. Vaccines 2. Funds
Disease 3. Tertiary Hospitals
THEMATIC AREA STRENGTH WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITIES CHALLENGES

PREPAREDNESS
INSTITUTIONALIZ 1. With 1. Unfilled 1. Establishment of 1. Change in
ATION created LDRRMO DRR network to leadership might
LDRRMO Staff include CSOs/ weaken the
plantilla positions. Private Sector for established DRR
positions. 2. Detailing of complementation system in the
2. With LDRRMO 2. Partnership with LGU (political
organized and Staff to other media organizations accommodations,
functional offices. for disaster movement of
LDRRMCs. 3. Not all preparedness personnel, etc)
3. With LGUs in the advocacies.
organized province have
volunteer re-organized
groups in the their
LGUs. Response
Clusters.

SYSTEMS 1. With 1. Not all 1. Establishment of 1. Accurate
established LGUs has MOA /MOU reporting and
Operations established delineating monitoring
Center the Response responsibilities in disaster related
Cluster transfer of patients. incidents / events
System 2. Involve private are influenced by
following the hospitals the crafting the capacity of
DSWD / formulation of LDRRMOs.
Cluster manual of operations
System. for response.
2. No
established
protocol /
manual of
operations for
transfer of
patients from
incident to
hospital.
3. Bulk of the
responsibilitie
s are
delegated to
the
LDRRMO.
4. No manual
of operations
for response.
POLICIES AND 1. With 1. Absence of 1. Establishment of 1. DRRM PPAs
PLANS LDRRM accreditation connections (means are least
Plan, LCCAP, guidelines for and mode of prioritized
CDP, CLUP, volunteer partnership) to avail compared to
PDPFP, groups. aid from others.
PDIP, LDIP, 2. Limited international
Evacuation number of organizations.
Plan. LGUs
adapting the
ICS.

3. Several
plans of
component
LGUs are
outdated.
4. Not all
LGUs have
approved
CLUPs
5. Policies
from NGAs
are not
effectively
cascaded.
COMPETENCIES Limited 1. Technical 1. Availability of
number of Assistance offered resource persons
personnel by NGAs and other for conduct of
trained on the organizations that training
following: will programs/activiti
1. Collapsed increase/enhance the es.
Structure capacity of the LGUs
Training in DRRM.
2. Basic
Rescue
Technique
Course
3. Public
Service
Continuity
Planning
4. Hazarad
Mapping
Training
5. Hazardous
Materials
Handling
6.
Management
of the Dead

and Mssing
(MDM)
7. CSIP
(Psychologica
l First
Aid/MHPSS)
8. Climate
and Disaster
Risk
Assessment
9.
Infrastructure
Audit
10. Risk
Communicati
on
11. Media
Relations
12. Nutrirtion
and
Emergency
13. WASH
RESOURCES 1. With 1. Inadequate 1. Funding from Effective
adequate gears and international utilization of the
provision of equipment for organizations and LDRRM fund,
resources for hazardous partners can be process of
the purchse of materials tapped for DRRM procurement,
supplies and handling, oil PPAs. standard
equipage. spills and 2. Increasing interpretation of
collapsed awareness of the COA.
structures. community in
2. DRRM provides
Underutilizati force multipliers in
on of the DRRM endeavors.
LDRRM
Fund.

AREA
RESPONSE
INTERNAL 1. Some rescue 1. Some trained 1. With available 1. Lack of
CAPABILITY equipment are staff are external source of technical person
OF LDRRM available with terminated or fund to do the proposal
RESOURCES organized replaced because * NGO and other
volunteer of lack of * PRIVATE documentations
groups to assist security of SECTORS 2. Adoption of
on relief tenure. * BUSINESS humanitarian
operation and 2. Insufficient SECTORS standards for
other services rescue equipment * RED CROSS relief operation
2. Trained and vehicle * 3. Change of
responders on 3. Insufficient INTERNATIONAL administration
SAR. communication ORGANIZATION and leadership
3. Availability command * NATIONAL 4. Reluctance of
of budget 4. Budgetary OFFICES the affected
4. With active constraints / 2. With outside communities to
PDRRMC insufficient funds partners stakeholders adhere to rules on
5. Some 5. Insufficient and donors that evacuation - the
MDRRM trainings and provide assistance imposition of
Council are trainers for * REDCROSS preemptive
active with capacitating the * WATER evacuation and
completed responders DISTRICT forced evacuation
MOAs with 6. Lack of * PRIVATE 5. QRF funds
suppliers and evacuation SECTORS cannot be utilized
traders in case centers in most 3. Organized timely
of immediate areas volunteer groups 6. Insufficient
response 7. Organized but 4. Response standard
not active capability of nearby evacuation center
DRRMC during MDRRMO 7. No clear
response arrangement
8. Existing ECs between port
do not meet the management,
standards PGOM and

9. Activation of shipping
wash cluster companies on the
issue of stranded
passengers
8. Limited funds
to provide
assistance to
stranded
passengers in
ports and bus
terminals
9. No declared
alternate route in
case of severe
flooding

AREA
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY
Natural Hazards (Typhoon, Flood, Rain induced landslide, Tornado, Storm surge, Drought)
Inclusion of 1. 1. Lesson learned 1. Accessibility
immediate Accessibility from previous 2. Availability of fund
recovery, short 2. Availability disaster/calamities 3. Lack of Power and
term recovery, of fund 2. Internal and Communication (bug
long term 3. Lack of External funds down)
recovery Power and (donations) 4. Lack of
activities Communicati 3. Provision of cooperation/participat
on (bug livelihood and ion of communities
down) cooperative 5. Lack of
4. Lack of assistance coordination of
cooperation/p Government agencies
articipation of 6. Political
communities intervention
5. Lack of
coordination
of
Government
agencies

6. Lack of
mechanism to
encourage
discipline of
neighboring
municipalities
on waste
disposal
7. Existing
ECs do not
meet the
standards
8. Activation
of wash
cluster
Human-induced hazard
Fire 1. 1. Ratio of BFP 1. 1. Relocation of
Manpower Personnel vs. Availability/participat displaced victims
(24/7 duty) population ion of volunteers from 2. Funds
2. 2. Out model fire different sectors
Equipment truck and equipment 2. Livelihood
3. Without site for Programs
temporary shelter
4. Waste disposal of
the debris during
clearing operation
Armed 1. Presence 1. Lack of 1. Internal and 1. No identified
Conflict of reinforcement from External funds relocation site/area
police/milita other agencies (donations) for the victims
ry and other 2. Lack medical and 2. Livelihood 2. Political
officer of the pyscho-social Programs interventions
law (24/7 assistance 3. Funds
duty) 3. No identified
relocation site/area
for the victims
4.
Availability/insuffici
ent funds

Maritime 1. Presence 1. Lack of equipment 1. Internal and 1. Procurement of
Incident of coast and trained personnel External funds needed equipment
guard / (donations) for rehab and
maritime 2. recovery
agencies Availability/participat 2. Funds
(24/7 duty) ion of volunteers from 3. Weather condition
2. Presence different sectors
of local
vessels for
rescue and
recovery
Oil Spill 1. 1. Lack of equipment 1. Internal and 1. Weather condition
Availability 2. Lack of policies External funds 2. Funds
of chemicals and regulations (donations) 3. Volume of Oil
for clean-up implemented 2. Short-term spill
and recovery (temporary)
2. Lack of Employment/
personnel Livelihood Programs
trained in oil in nearby affected
spill rehab areas
and recovery 3. Policies/Regulation
formulation
4. PPAs to
improve/rehabilitate
the affected areas
EPIDEMIC
Air borne 1. 1. Unavailable 1. Internal and 1. Isolation of the
Disease Availability Doctors (specialist) External funds patients from their
Water of hospitals and medicines (donations) families
borne 2. Vaccines 2. Funds
Disease 3. Tertiary Hospitals

VISION
A full pledge office of the Provincial Government manned by well-trained and dedicated
manpower who are always ready to risk their lives and limbs in the performance of DRRM
services.
MISSION
The DRRMD is committed to implement priority disaster risk reduction and management
activities under the thematic areas of preparedness, prevention and mitigation, response and
recovery and rehabilitation.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

 To develop and implement DRRM policies, structures, coordination mechanism
and programs with continuing budget appropriations on DRR from provincial
level to barangay level.
 To strengthen the capacity of the service providers, partner stakeholders, CSO,
private sector and volunteers build a disaster resilient communities.
 To institutionalize arrangement and measures for reducing disaster risk, including
climate risks by mainstreaming DRRM and CCA in the development processes
such as policy formulation, socio-economic development planning, budgeting and
governance.
 To harness and mobilize the participation of Civil Society Organization (CSO),
the private sectors and volunteers in the Provincial DRRM programs, projects and
activities
 To align DRRM systems, programs, projects and activities to the vision, mission
and goal of the Provincial Government of Oriental Mindoro and ensures it is
consistent with national, regional, provincial framework, policies, standards and
guidelines on DRRM

Chapter II
The Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan (PDRRMP)
It is imperative for the province to have a plan that will serve a road map on how disaster risk reduction
and management will contribute to the attainment of sustainable development through inclusive growth
and build the adaptive capacities of communities, increase the resilience of vulnerable sectors and
optimize disaster mitigation opportunities with the end in view of promoting people’s welfare and
security towards gender-responsive and rights-based sustainable development.
The following is the three-year Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan:
Thematic Prevention and Mitigation
Objectively ESTIMATE COST (PESO)

Objectives Outcomes TOTAL
Verifiable Indicators
2020 2021 2022
1 Training of
Trainers in 500,000.00 500,000.00
Vulnerability
and Risk
Assessment
conducted, 45
participants
trained
15
Vulnerability and Risk Vulnerability 200,000.00 250,000.00 450,000.00
Assessment of hazard and Risk
prone areas in the Assessment
province conducted; 12
VRA Analysis
Report
prepared
Vulnerability
and Risk 500,000.00 500,000.00
Vulnerability Assessment
and exposure conducted at
of Aglubang-
communities
River Fault
to hazards
100% of C/M
and risk Review of Local
DRRM plans 50,000.00 70,000.00 120,000.00
reduced DRRM Plans
reviewed
100% of flood
control 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 90,000,000.00
Flood Control Projects
projects
funded
1 Indegenous
Warning 300,000.00 300,000.00
research and
developEWS
(Science-
Establishment/Improve Base/Indigeno
ment of forecasting and us) (1)
early warning Provision of
early warning 800,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,800,000.00
equipment and
establishment
facilities for
EWS
TOTAL INVESTMENT ON PREVENTION AND
30,000,000.00 32,350,000.00 32,322,022.00 94,670,000.00
MITIGATION

Disaster Preparedness
ESTIMATE COST (PESO)
Objectives Objectively Verifiable Indicators Outcomes TOTAL
2020 2021 2022
'Strengthening of LDRRMO's and

other DRRM partners/stakeholders
in the Province
1080 stakeholders/ service providers trained in
24 training conducted
4 drills conducted in 4 brgys/communities
2,000.00 stakeholders/ service provider trained
in the 4 Quarterly Nationwide Simultaneous
Earthquake Drill (NSED) conducted
1 National Disaster Resiliency Month(NDRM)

1.1 Capability Development for celebration facilitated; 1 Regional Rescue 1,000,000.00 3,500,000.00 3,500,000.00
stakeholders and service providers Challenge participated 8,000,000.00
4 Quarterly PDRRM Council Meeting

provided with secretariat services
4 Quarterly LDRRM Officers Association
Meeting conducted; 15 LDRRMO officers
attended
6 staff sent to/trained in 4 capacity
enhancement trainings/seminars
1.2 Conduct of multi-stakeholders 100% of PDRRMC/ response cluster meeting 200,000.00 250,000.00 450,000.00
dialogue/meetings conducted
4 IEC activities conducted (Earth Day
conducted on April 22, World Environment
Day on June 5,International Day for the
Conservation of the Mangrove Ecosystem
July 26 and International Coastal Clean Up
Sept 19); (World Tsunami Awareness Day
conducted in Pto. Galera on November 5) 70
1.3 Conduct of Information, participants benefited
300,000.00 500,000.00 700,000.00 1,200,000.00
Education and Communication
15 ABC ,15 Student Council Federation, 15
Farmers Association, 1 Provincial Local
Enhanced Council for Women, 1 Federation of PWD,
capacities of IIPs provided with DRRM Orientation;
communities
to reduce 150 tarpaulin, 1000, flyers disseminated
their own
4 Contingency Plan for Human-Induced,
risk and
Emerging and Reemerging Diseases, Storm
cope with
1.4 Conduct of regular Surge and Tsunami reviewed/formulated
impacts of 520,000.00 700,000.00
hazards review/update of Contingency Plan 1,200,000.00
100% of contingency plans reviewed and
updated
1.3 Acquisition and prepositioning 100% disaster supplies and materials,
of disaster supplies and materials, medicines and medical
medicines and medical supplies,communication, vehicles and rescue
supplies,communication, vehicles and equipment acquired/prepositioned 7,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 62,000,000.00
rescue equipment
1.4 Provisions of insurance for 500 disaster response volunteers insured

disaster response volunteers 500,000.00 500,000.00 1,000,000.00
Construction/ Completion/ 100% of evacuation center

Improvement of Evacuation Center constructed/completed/improved/ 22,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 62,000,000.00
provincewide
24/7 DRRM Operation Center
maintained and managed
100% of Monitoring Reports prepared and
submitted to OCD, DILG and DOH, 1
quarterly summary of report of untoward
2.1 Monitoring of weather incidents prepared
update/bulletin, untoward incident,
100% of monitoring equipment equipment 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 5,000,000.00
hazard prone areas and critical
infrastructure conducted acquired; 4 CCTV installed in Mag-asawang
Tubig River Alcate Area , Balete River, Pula
River
2.4 Maintenance of disaster rescue 100% Maintenance of disaster rescue 400,000.00 500,000.00 900,000.00
equipment and communication equipment and communication equipment
equipment
Activation of Emergency 3 Activation of Emergency Operations Center 200,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,200,000.00
Operations Center facilitated
Activation of All Hazard Incident 100% deployment of the All Hazard Incident 26,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 30,500,000.00
Management Team Management provided
Construction/Completion/Improvem 100% Construction/Completion/Improvement 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 15,000,000.00

ent of LDRRMC Building of LDRRMC Building provincewide
TOTAL INVESTMENT COST ON PREPAREDNESS 61,500,000.00 65,620,000.00 62,650,000.00 189,450,000.00

Disaster Response
Objectives Verifiable Outcomes TOTAL
Indicators 2020 2021 2022
Mobilization
of Response
Mechanisms
3.1.1 100% of public
Issuance of advisories in
public accordance to
advisories protocols issued
before, before, during and
during and after inclement
after weather
inclement
weather
3.1.2 Rapid 100% of Rapid
Damage Damage Assessment
Assessment and Needs Analysis
and Needs (RDANA) conducted
Immediate Analysis and 1 Consolidated
basic needs (RDANA) RDANA report
of affected submitted to OCD 180,000,000.00 29,670,000.00 33,000,000.00 242,670,000.00
population 3.1.3 100% Integrated and
met Conduct of coordinated search
Integrated and rescue (SAR)
Search and conducted/facilitated;
Rescue 100% of required
reports submitted to
OCD
3.1.4 100% damage repairs
Conduct of and road clearing
Damage operations conducted
repairs and
road clearing
operations
3.1.5 100% of affected
Provision of families/individuals
relief goods provided with relief
and non-food goods and non-food
items items
TOTAL INVESTMENT COST ON RESPONSE 180,000,000.00 29,670,000.00 33,000,000.00 242,670,000.00
Rehabilitation and Recovery

Objectives Verifiable Outcomes TOTAL
Indicators 2020 2021 2021
Mobilization of
Rehab and Recovery
Mechanisms
1 Post Disaster Needs

Livelihood, 4.1.1 Conduct of Post Assessment (PDNA)
living
Disaster Needs conducted and 1
conditions, Assessment (PDNA) PDNA report
organizational submitted
capacities and
facilities of 4.1.2 Address/
affected Provide Non-food 100% of Non-food 300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 1,300,000.00
communities Items, livelihood, Items, livelihood,
are restored housing assistance housing assistance
and psychosocial and psychosocial
needs of affected needs of affected
families/individuals families/individuals
addressed/ provided
TOTAL COST OF INVESTMENT ON RECOVERY AND

REHABILITATION 300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 1,300,000.00

Implementation Strategies and Mechanisms
All throughout the DRRMP, various strategies were identified to be used in order to achieve the desired
key result areas under each DRRM aspect. These are:
Advocacy and Information, Education and Communication (IEC) a strong national and local
commitment is required to save lives and livelihoods threatened by natural and human-induced
disasters. Achieving this will need increasing visibility and understanding of DRRM and
CCA issues, mobilize partnerships, encourage actions and gather public support for successful
implementation of the different activities. The DRRMP will use evidence-based advocacy to influence
people, policies, structures and systems in order to build resilient Filipino communities by raising
awareness, working with the media and key stakeholders. The NDRRM will develop advocacy, IEC
and various communication strategies based on risk assessments and good DRRM practices.
Competency-based capability building Conducting customized training programs should be developed

to ensure that people are trained based on the needed skills in the different DRRM aspects. Different
people have different needs and capacities and developing competency-based capability building
programs ensures that knowledge, skills and attitudes are enhanced and built upon further.
Contingency Planning more commonly used before as only part of disaster preparedness activities,
contingency planning is now a living document which is updated and used in all the different the
priority areas of DRRM. Learnings from past experiences and complementary actions between and
across areas should be taken into consideration in developing contingency planning at all levels.
Education on DRRM and CCA for ALL Mainstreaming DRRM into formal education through the
integration of DRRM and CCA concepts in the curriculum for basic education, NSTP, and bachelors’
degree programs. This also includes the conduct of DRRM and CCA training to all public sector
employees as mandated by law.
Institutionalization of DRRMCs and LDRRMOs The creation of permanent local DRRM offices and
functioning councils at the local level are some of the ways to ensure that all DRRM-related activities,
plans and program will be implemented and sustained, especially at the local level. Having a point of
convergence is important to ensure that risk reduction measures complement one another and are
institutionalized with the end in view of reducing people and institutional vulnerabilities to disasters.
This will likewise promote the paradigm shift into local planning by investing into risk-reduction
measures and not just be reactionary and conduct response operations when the disaster strikes.
Mainstreaming of DRR in ALL plans in all 4 priority areas under the DRRMP, ensuring the
mainstreaming of DRRM and CCA in the various programs, plans, projects of either national or local

government units, including the private sector groups and other members of the community is a must.
This primarily means that disaster risks analysis and impacts are integrated and taken into consideration
in the development of policies and plans by the different agencies, organizations and sectors.
Research, Technology Development and Knowledge Management With the changes in the climate and
technological advances, regularly conducting research and technology development will contribute to
more innovative and adaptive mechanisms and approaches towards DRRM and CCA. Alongside new
information, knowledge management through database development, documentation, replication and
recognition of good practices will help achieve the objectives and targets of the DRRMP through more
efficient use of resources, learning and experiences.
Monitoring, evaluation and learning Feedback mechanisms are important aspects of gauging
performance targets and learning from our experiences on the ground. The DRRMP, being a long
plan which transcends various administrations and leaderships, need to be constantly looked into in
terms of its relevance and impact on the changing situations on the ground.
Networking and partnership building between and among stakeholders, media and tiers of government
Building resilient communities cannot and should not be done by a single agency or organization. Its
success is highly dependent on the close collaboration and cooperation of the different stakeholders.
Building effective and mutually reinforcing partnerships and evolving networks ensure the multi-
stakeholder and multi-sectoral participation of the different players in DRRM.

CHAPTER III
MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING
Monitoring and evaluation are essential components of results-based programming in DRRM as these
will ensure that the plan’s on-time implementation and that learnings from past experiences become
input to the plan altogether. Also, through monitoring and evaluation activities, appropriate and needed
revisions and/or changes can be identified, from the identified activities to the implementation
mechanisms, in case more appropriate ones are realized. These will be led by the PDRRMO, in close
coordination with the four vice chairpersons of the PDRRMC by focusing on relevance, effectiveness,
efficiency, impact and sustainability. A standard monitoring and evaluation template will be developed
by the PDRRMC together with the members of the Technical Management Group.
Primarily, monitoring and evaluation will be based on the indicators, targets and activities identified
in each of the four priority areas on DRRM. The indicators set in the DRRMP will be applicable to
both the national and local levels. The national level targets will be monitored by the lead and
implementing agencies, in close coordination with the regional and local DRRM councils. Each lead
agency will in turn submit reports to the respective vice chairperson of the PDRRMC in charge of the
specific priority area.
The local level targets will be operationalized depending on the needs and situation on the LGU. These
will be captured in the respective local DRRM plans which the LGUs need to develop through their
respective local DRRM offices and councils. Customization of the targets will depend on the risk
assessments and analysis done in their respective local areas. The local DRRM plan will be
mainstreamed into the CDP and CLUP and will form part of the LGU mandated plans.
Throughout all activities, ensuring “Safer, Adaptive and Disaster-Resilient Filipino Communities
toward Sustainable Development” will be the main focus. It will be essential that this learning is
captured and shared amongst the various stakeholders, leads and partners. Relatedly, throughout its
implementation, reporting on the progress on the DRRMP will be communicated through various
media and partners, making sure that we are able to share the learning effectively. These will then
feed-into the DRRMP, making it adaptive to the changing environment and needs on the ground.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030

Global Targets
Target 1 Substantially reduce global disaster mortality by 2030, aiming to lower the average per 100,000
global mortality rate in the decade 2020-2030 compared to the period 2005-2015
Target 2 Substantially reduce the number of affected people globally by 2030, aiming to lower the
average global figure per 100,000 in the decade 2020-2030 compared to the period 2005-2015
Target 3 Reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to global gross domestic product (GDP) by
2030

Target 4 Substantially reduce disaster damage to critical infrastructure and disruption of basic services,
among them health and educational facilities, including through developing their resilience by 2030
Target 5 Substantially increase the number of countries with national and local disaster risk reduction
strategies by 2020
Target 6 Substantially enhance international cooperation to developing countries through adequate and
sustainable support to complement their national actions for implementation of the present Framework by
2030
Target 7 Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard early warning systems and
disaster risk information and assessments to people by 2030

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
(PDRRMC) ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (PDRRMC) ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
DISASTER RESPONSE CLUSTER

CLUSTER COMMITTEES, FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
DISASTER PREVENTION AND MITIGATION CLUSTER
This cluster shall ensure to avoid hazards and mitigate their potential impacts by reducing
vulnerabilities and exposure and enhancing capacities of communities.
Lead Agency : Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office

Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical
Services Administration (PAGASA)
Member Agencies : Provincial Planning and Development Office
Provincial Engineering Office
Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office
Provincial Agriculture Office
Provincial Health Office
Provincial Veterinary Office
Department of the Environment and Natural Resources
Provincial Office
Oriental Mindoro Electric Cooperative
203rd Infantry Brigade
Bureau of Fire Protection Oriental Mindoro
Philippine National Police Oriental Mindoro
City/Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office
Philippine Red Cross
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS CLUSTER
This cluster shall establish and strengthen capacities of communities to anticipate, cope and recover
from the negative impacts of emergency occurrences and disasters.

Department of the Interior and Local Government Oriental Mindoro
Member Agencies : National Food Authority Oriental Mindoro
Provincial Information Office
Department of Education Division of Oriental Mindoro
Department of Education Division of Calapan City
Halcon Mountaineers
Tamaraw Fire Brigade
Oriental Mindoro Riders Federation

Department of Health Oriental Mindoro
Provincial Social Welfare and Development Office
DISASTER RESPONSE CLUSTER
This cluster shall provide life preservation and meet the basic subsistence needs of affected population
based on acceptable standards during or immediately after a disaster.
A. Food and Non- Food Cluster

This cluster shall ensure to save lives by providing food and non-food items to the affected populations
during the emergency response phase in the short-term, and to restore at least the pre-disaster level of
food security in the affected areas in the long-term.
Lead Agency : Provincial Social Welfare and Development Office

Member Agencies : National Food Authority Oriental Mindoro
Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office
Department of Education Oriental Mindoro
Department of Education Calapan City
Philippine Ports Authority
Boy Scouts of the Philippines Oriental Mindoro
Girl Scouts of the Philippines Oriental Mindoro
Calapan Waterworks
Oriental Mindoro Disaster Youth Volunteers
Oriental Mindoro Medical Society
Halcon Mountaineers
Sesinando Bugarin DeMolay Alumni Chapter
Tamaraw Fire Volunteer

Calapan Labor Services Development Cooperative (CALSEDECO)
Philippine Nurses Association Oriental Mindoro Chapter
Galing at Serbisyo para sa Mindoreño Action Center (GSMAC)
B. Health Cluster
This cluster shall ensure the provision of support for the delivery of appropriate and timely health
services to the affected population.
Lead Agency : Provincial Health Office

Member Agencies : Provincial Department of Health Office
Philippine Nurses Association Oriental Mindoro Chapter
Oriental Mindoro Medical Society
Calapan Waterworks
Provincial Veterinary Office
Halcon Mountaineers
Sesinando Bugarin DeMolay Alumni Chapter
Tamaraw Fire Volunteer
Calapan Labor Services Development Cooperative (CALSEDECO)
C. Protection, Camp Coordination and Management Operations Protocol Cluster

This cluster shall ensure the provision of assistance and augment all requirements for the management
and evacuation of individual’s families affected by disasters
Lead Agency : Provincial Social Welfare and Development Office

Member Agencies : Philippine National Police Oriental Mindoro
Department of Public Works and Highways 1 st District

Department of Public Works and Highways 2nd District
Calapan Waterworks
Department of Education Oriental Mindoro
Department of Education Calapan City
D. Logistics Cluster
This cluster shall ensure the provision of an efficient and effective logistics coordinating structure that
will harmonize the activities of all clusters and encourage regular info-sharing among all stakeholders
and other partners. This cluster shall also formulate, update, implement and monitor logistical policies,
plans, programs and procedures that will harmonize the activities of each cluster.

Member Agencies : Provincial Budget Office
Office of the Provincial Accountant
Provincial Treasury Office
Provincial Planning and Development Office
` Provincial Engineering Office
E. Emergency Telecommunications Cluster

This cluster shall strengthen ICT capacities at the regional Cluster level down to local levels to prepare
for, respond to and recover from the impacts of disasters.

Member Agencies : Provincial Department of Science and Technology Office
Oriental Mindoro Electric Cooperative
Provincial Information Office

Services Administration
F. Education Cluster
This cluster shall ensure safety of students, teachers and non-teaching personnel. It also aims to provide
continued access to quality education to all affected learners.
Lead Agencies : Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office

Department of Education Division of Oriental Mindoro
Department of Education Division of Calapan City
Member Agencies : Bureau of Fire Protection Oriental Mindoro
Services Administration
G. Search, Rescue and Retrieval Cluster

This cluster shall provide support for an effective, timely, organized and systematic search, rescue and
retrieval operations to affected areas in all emergencies to further minimize loss of lives and casualties,
including the hand-over of casualties to the Health Cluster for proper treatment and management.
Lead Agency : 203rd Infantry Brigade

Member Agencies : Philippine National Police Oriental Mindoro
Philippine Coast Guard Oriental Mindoro
City/Municipal Disaster Response Teams
ARESCOM
Halcon Mountaineers
Tamaraw Fire Brigade

H. Management of the Dead and Missing
This cluster shall provide assistance in the proper identification and disposition of the remains in a
sanitary manner with cautions to prevent negative psychological and social impact on the bereaved and
the community.
Lead Agency : Department of the Interior and Local Government Oriental

Mindoro
Member Agencies : Provincial Health Office
City/Municipal Disaster Response Teams
I. Engineering and Rehabilitation Cluster

This cluster shall undertake emergency repair of damaged structures, utilities and facilities and such
other activities which will restore said services.
Lead Agency : Provincial Planning and Development Office

Member Agencies : Provincial Engineering Office
All Clusters
J. Law and Order

The Law and Order Cluster shall assist the Response Operations and provide assistance to the affected
areas through the provision of security to the Response Clusters operating in the affected area;
provision of traffic management that will facilitate the speedy movement of people, goods and
equipment to the affected population and responding agencies and enforce law and order in the
community through the provision of information on the disaster response operations and the
maintenance of community policing to reduce or arrest criminality in the area.
Lead Agency : Philippine National Police Oriental Mindoro

Member Agencies : 203rd Infantry Brigade
Land Transportation Office
Provincial Highway Patrol Team

DISASTER REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY CLUSTER
This cluster shall restore and improve facilities, livelihood and living conditions and organizational
capacities of affected communities, and reduce disaster risks in accordance with the “building back
better” principle.
Lead Agency : Provincial Planning and Development Office

Member Agencies : Provincial Engineering Office
All Cluster

Pdrrmp 2020-2022 Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pdrrmp 2020-2022 Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 2

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 3

CCA Climate Change Adaptation

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 4

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 5

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 6

(a) Mutually reinforce each other and are interoperable.

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 7

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 8

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 9

ORIENTAL MINDORO RISK PROFILE AND STATE OF DRRM

Oriental Mindoro is a province of the Philippines

The province has a total land area of 4,364.72 square

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 10

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 12

NATURAL AND GEOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 13

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 14

MAJOR DISASTER EXPERIENCES IN ORIENTAL MINDORO

Typhoon 1994 Dead - 14 2,696.00

Earthquake Nov. 15, 1994 All Dead - 83 513,021.00

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 15

Typhoon 1995 Dead -6

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 16

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 17

Flooding February 7, 2011 A total of 13 2 dead, 329 farmers Agriculutural

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 18

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 19

Typhoon December 8, 15 1 dead Agricultural

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 20

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 21

Typhoon Nina Totally Damage Houses Agriculture:

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 22

Typhoon Ursula December 25, 57 barangays Totally damaged houses:

DISASTER CHARACTERISTICS IN ORIENTAL MINDORO

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 23

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 24

January 17, 2010 - Flashflood Three hundred forty six were

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 25

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 26

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 27

City/ High Moderate- None to Low- None

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 28

A. EARTHQUAKE AND RELATED HAZARDS

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 29

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 30

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 31

GROUND SHAKING HAZARD

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 32

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 33

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 34

EARTHQUAKE INDUCED LANDSLIDE HAZARD

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 35

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 36

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 37

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 38

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 39

THEMATIC STRENGTH WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITIES CHALLENGES

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 40

PROVINCIAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (PDRRMP) 2020-2022 41