Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interpersonal Communication Relating to Others Canadian 7th Edition Beebe Solutions Manual instant download all chapter
Interpersonal Communication Relating to Others Canadian 7th Edition Beebe Solutions Manual instant download all chapter
https://testbankdeal.com/product/interpersonal-communication-
relating-to-others-canadian-7th-edition-beebe-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/interpersonal-communication-
relating-to-others-canadian-6th-edition-beebe-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/interpersonal-communication-
relating-to-others-canadian-5th-edition-beebe-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/interpersonal-communication-
relating-to-others-8th-edition-beebe-test-bank/
THINK Interpersonal Communication Canadian 1st Edition
Engleberg Test Bank
https://testbankdeal.com/product/think-interpersonal-
communication-canadian-1st-edition-engleberg-test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/reflect-and-relate-an-
introduction-to-interpersonal-communication-3rd-edition-
mccornack-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/interpersonal-relationships-
professional-communication-skills-for-nurses-7th-edition-arnold-
test-bank/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/interpersonal-communication-and-
you-an-introduction-1st-edition-mccornack-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/business-and-professional-
communication-3rd-edition-beebe-test-bank/
Part 2
Chapter 6
Verbal Communication Skills
CHAPTER 6 LEARNING OBJECTIVES
2. Identify how words influence our perceptions, thoughts, actions, relationships, and
culture.
CHAPTER 6 OUTLINE
(All key terms appear in bold)
WORDS OF SUPPORT
1. Differentiate between Debate and Dialogue
a. Words and actions are tools we use to let someone know whether we support
them or not.
b. Words can be used to create a supportive climate rather than an antagonistic
one.
HOW TO APOLOGIZE
1. We’re human; we make mistakes. Words not only inflict pain but also have power
to repair relational damage.
a. Apology. Explicit admission of an error, along with a request for forgiveness.
b. An apology expresses that we were wrong (not simply sorry), we are sincerely
remorseful, we want to do something to repair the damage, and we understand
how much we may have hurt our communication partner.
HOW TO BE ASSERTIVE
1. At times, it is necessary to respond to others who communicate in a way that
creates a defensive climate.
a. Responding in an assertive manner allows you to make requests, ask for your
rights, and generally pursue your own best interests.
b. Assertive is to be able to pursue one’s own best interests without denying a
partner’s rights.
c. Aggressive is expressing one’s interests while denying the rights of others by
blaming, judging, and evaluating other people.
d. One way to respond appropriately to aggressive or inappropriate
communication is through the use of “I” language that expresses your thoughts
and feelings.
How do words work? (Point to an object in the classroom and ask student what it is.)
Why? Who named it? Must we use that word or can we change it?
What conditions would have to exist before we could change something’s name?
What new words have come into the language lately?
Ask students to generate a list of words that have come about because of the Internet,
TV, or technology. Who gave words to these things?
How do words that mean one thing come to mean something else?
Does your culture influence your language choices?
Do you say pop, soda, or soft drink?
What do you call the three meals you eat each day?
What cultural distinctions might influence language?
How can communication avoid offending anyone?
What is the purpose of “politically correct” language?
Why do people take offense at some words?
Can we take it too far?
In pairs with someone who you’ve got to know quite well, interview each other with
regard to your communication beliefs to fill out a Wanted Poster for each person based
on the following template.
Distinguishing features:
Known to say, “ .”
Thinks the most important thing for someone to remember about verbal communication
is:
Introduce your partner to the rest of the class on the basis of Wanted Poster information.
Ensure instructor gets introduced.
Debrief by discussing what information you learned about your partner or others.
Have students work in small groups comparing the names they each use for the following
popular foods:
Carbonated drinks
Sandwiches made on long rolls
Drinks made with ice cream
Cut and fried potatoes
Tubular links of processed meat, often seen on barbecue grills
Dog
Date
Home
Job
School
Bad
Love
Take each word in turn and generate a list of words from the class. You may need to
probe with questions, such as:
This can lead to a discussion of meanings being in people and not in the words we use.
Taking it further:
For each of the nouns, can we agree on a common definition (the denotative
meaning)?
Where do our personal (connotative) meanings for these nouns come from?
Which nouns created a more positive association in you? Why?
Which has greater impact on you, denotative or connotative meanings? When?
What kind of connotative meanings seem to be connected to very strong
emotions? Why would that be? Do these emotionally charged nouns seem more or
less abstract than others? Why would that make a difference?
Do people (poets, protesters, or others) ever use the connotative power of words
as a weapon? Does it work? What defense is there against that?
Ask students to listen for common themes in types of information commonly put into
restricted code.
Their responses typically include restricted codes for: sex, sexually-related body parts
and codes to speak negatively about others who are present.
Dog
Large dog
Large dog with spots
Large dog with black and white spots
Dalmatian
Discuss the use of concrete and abstract terms when attempting to create meaning with
others.
Smith _____________
When considering the rankings, think about the cultural values that influence your
decision to rank a name or title in a certain way. Would this be the same in all cultures?
Ask students from different ethnic backgrounds or students who have traveled and
experienced different cultures to add to the discussion.
If you marry, should you change your name? Imagine that John Smith marries Mary
Jones. Discuss the communication implications of the following names with your
classmates. Which name would you prefer? Explain your choice.
Any of the above with the female name first and the male name second.
The program is divided into seven parts for easy reference: 1. Boys & Girls; 2. Status &
Connection; 3. Directness & Indirectness; 4. Public Talk & Private Talk; 5. Ritual
Opposition; 6. Conversational Style; 7. Conclusion. The video also comes with a booklet
of discussion questions.
Ask students to generate a list of words they find offensive. You can begin with the
homophobic epithets offered by the authors but then move beyond this list. What words
create a hostile or threatening environment?
Questions:
1. Should these words EVER be used? If so, in what context?
2. When members of a particular group use the epithet, does this diminish the credibility
of others using it? (In other words, does a woman joking around and calling another
woman a “bitch” validate the use of the words for others?)
3. How should we deal with these words? (Practice that assertive behaviour!)
4. Do words have the ability to harm us?
Explain that students will work in groups to change defensive climate strategies into
supportive ones using “I” language.
Divide the class into small groups. Distribute several of the following statements to each
group for revision. Have the groups report their revisions to the class.
Statements
“I’m perfectly willing to admit when I’m wrong – I am just never wrong.”
“Well, when you reach my level of education, you might be able to make such
intellectual.”
“Maybe some big, strong, manly man would be so kind as to move this stack of books
for little, dainty me.”
“Okay, let me try to explain this to you in itsy-bitsy, teeny-tiny baby steps.”
“Certain persons should know that speaking to someone like me in that manner will
not benefit certain persons.”
“Did I ever tell you how ravishingly beautiful you are when you’re angry?”
“I’m not interested in your opinions; I already told you what the right answer is.”
“I am the boss here and I can terminate your employment at any time.”
“No, we don’t need to discuss our feelings; they’re your feelings–not mine.”
Following this, ask students to work in groups and make a list of ten things they
appreciate about your college or university. As a class, agree upon the top ten things and
send this list to your provost, dean, and/or president.
Have students come up with other acronyms for building a positive communication
climate and making apologies using the concepts from the text.
Using those situations, have individual students craft a suitable apology and then,
working in groups of three, try out their apology. Each person will apologize to one other
member while the third person observes the delivery including: words, tone of voice, and
body language. The receiver will comment of the sincerity of the apology and how it left
them feeling. The observer will give feedback to improve the quality of the apology.
Each member will take turns in each role.
Debrief in the whole group on how the feedback helped them improve the quality of their
apologies and their best suggestions on making sincere apologies.
In groups of three, with two students having the conversation and the third student as an
observer, practise the skills from page 146.
The observer will then tell the group their observations of the interchange and give
constructive feedback.
Look for other educational films by CRM, including I Told ’Em Exactly How to Do It,
Clear as Mud, and Communication: Getting in Touch.
Robert Bolton, author of People Skills (Simon and Schuster, 1979), asserts that
genuineness has three ingredients: self-awareness, self-acceptance, and self-expression.
Bolton argues that the children’s story The Velveteen Rabbit (Margery Williams, Avon,
1985) describes the development of genuineness. Discuss this with students.
Discuss Civility and Courtesy a bit with students. For research, check out Mark
Cardwell’s book, A Short History of Rudeness: Manners, Morals, and Misbehaviour in
Modern America.
A 1996 survey by Princeton Survey Research Associates found that 61% of the general
public agrees that Americans are rude. A 1996 Gallup poll found that 80% think we’re
less civil now than we were ten years ago, in 1986. Show the training film, “In Your
Face: Why Courtesy and Respect” (The Learning Seed; 1997, 800-634-4941) and discuss
this issue with students.
BY
SUB-CLASS II.—EMBOLOBRANCHIATA.[238]
Order I. Scorpionidea.
External Structure.
Internal Anatomy.
Classification.
More than 350 species of scorpions have been described, but many
of these are “doubtful,” and probably the number of known forms
may be put at about 300. These are divided by Kraepelin[247] into six
families and fifty-six genera. The best indications of the family of a
scorpion are to be found in the shape of the sternum, the armature of
the tarsi, and the number of the lateral eyes, while assistance is also
to be derived from the shape of the stigmata and of the pectines, and
from the absence or presence of a spine beneath the aculeus.
The six families are: Buthidae, Scorpionidae, Chaerilidae,
Chactidae, Vejovidae, and Bothriuridae.
Fam. 1. Buthidae.—Sternum small and generally triangular.
Tibial spurs in the third and fourth legs. Generally a spur beneath
the aculeus. Lateral eyes three to five in number.
There are two sub-families: Buthinae and Centrurinae.
The Buthinae, which possess a tibial spur, comprise fourteen
genera, most of them Old World forms. The principal genera are
Buthus, which contains about 25 species, and Archisometrus with 20
species. One genus only, Ananteris, is South American, and it
includes only a single species. The genus Uroplectes, with 16 species,
is almost entirely African.
The Centrurinae, without tibial spur, are New World scorpions,
though Isometrus europaeus (maculatus) is cosmopolitan. The
principal genera are Tityus with 30 species, Centrurus with 13, and
Isometrus with 6.
Fam. 2. Scorpionidae.—Sternum broad and pentagonal, with
sides approximately parallel. No tibial spur, but a single pedal spur.
Generally three lateral eyes.
Nearly a hundred species of Scorpionidae have been described,
distributed among fifteen genera. The following sub-families are
recognised: Diplocentrinae, Urodacinae, Scorpioninae,
Hemiscorpioninae, and Ischnurinae.
The Diplocentrinae have a spur under the aculeus. They form a
small group of only eight species. The principal genus, Diplocentrus,
is entirely Neotropical, but Nebo has a single Old World
representative in Syria.
The Urodacinae, with the single genus Urodacus, are Australian
scorpions. As in the next sub-family, there are rounded lobes on the
tarsi, but there is only a single keel on the “tail,” and the lateral eyes
are two in number. Six good and three doubtful species are
recognised.
The Scorpioninae are Asiatic and African forms, and are
recognised by the tarsi having a large lobe on each side, by the
convex upper surface of the “hand,” by the presence of two median
keels on the “tail,” and by the possession of three lateral eyes.
Palamnaeus (Heterometrus) has sixteen species in the Indian
region. There are about thirty species of Opisthophthalmus, all
natives of South Africa. Pandinus includes about ten species, but
there are only two species of the type genus Scorpio, S. maurus and
S. boehmei.
The sub-family Hemiscorpioninae was formed for the reception of
the single Arabian species Hemiscorpion lepturus. Its most striking
characteristic is the cylindrical vesicle of the tail in the male.
The Ischnurinae differ from the Scorpioninae chiefly in the
absence of the tarsal lobes, the presence of a well-marked finger-keel,
and the generally more depressed form of the body and hand. In the
opinion of some authors they should be separated from the
Scorpionidae as a distinct family, the Ischnuridae. There are more
than twenty species, divided among six genera. The type genus
Ischnurus has only the single species I. ochropus. There are eight
species of Opisthacanthus, which has representatives in Africa and
America.
Fam. 3. Chaerilidae.—Sternum pentagonal with median
depression or “sulcus” rounded posteriorly. Two pedal spurs.
Stigmata circular. Two lateral eyes with a yellow spot behind the
second. Pectines very short.
This small family has the single genus Chaerilus with but seven
species, natives of the Oriental region.
Fam. 4. Chactidae.—Two pedal spurs. Two lateral eyes (or,
rarely, no eyes) but without yellow spot. Characteristic dentition on
movable finger of “hand.”
There are three sub-families, Megacorminae, Euscorpiinae, and
Chactinae.
The Megacorminae include but a single Mexican form,
Megacormus granosus. There is a single toothed keel under the
“tail,” and all the under surface is spiny. There is a row of long
bristles under the tarsus.