Professional Documents
Culture Documents
QUE
QUE
Ans. The Constitution provides the Election Commission of India with the power of
direction, superintendence, and control of elections to parliament, state legislatures, the
office of president of India and the office of vice-president of India.
The Election Commission is an all-India body that is common to both the Central
government and the State governments. It must be noted here that the commission
does not deal with the elections to the Municipalities and Panchayats in the states.
Hence, a separate State Election Commission is provided by the Constitution of India.
Quasi-judicial
Aspirants preparing for Civil Services exam can go through other such bodies on the
links provided below-
1. Types of Constitutional Bodies
2. Constitutional, Statutory and Quasi-Judicial Bodies
irregularities.
Requesting the Governor or the President for requisitioning the staff required for
conducting elections.
Supervising the machinery of elections throughout the country for ensuring the
ANS. Introduction
Trade has always been important because no country or state can produce all the
products it needs. For this reason, we need regulations and laws governing, managing
and facilitating trade. The freedom of trade, commerce, and intercourse is provided
under Part XIII of the Indian Constitution in Articles 301 to 307. Article 301 lays down
the general principles of trade and commerce whereas Article 302 to 305 enunciates
the restrictions which trade is subjected to. The source for adopting these provisions
was the Australian Constitution.
The object of such provisions in a Federal Constitution
The makers of the Constitution wished to encourage the free flow of trade
and commerce in India because, according to them, a country should work
as a single economic unit without any barriers or obstacles in internal trade.
They perceived that economic unity and integration of the nation would be
the main sustaining power for stability and cultural unity of the federal
polity.
Trade
Trade means buying and selling of goods for profit-making purposes. Under
Article 301, the word trade means an actual, organized & structured activity
with a definite motive or purpose. For the motive of Article 301, the word
trade is interchangeably used with business.
Commerce
Intercourse
The use of the word ‘free’ in Article 301 does not mean freedom from laws
and rules governing the country. There is a clear distinction between the
laws obstructing freedom and laws containing rules and regulations for the
proper conduction of trade activities in a smooth and easy manner.
Article 301 under Part XIII empowers the free flow of the stream of
trade throughout the country whereas Article 19(1)(g) under Part III
provides the freedom to practice any occupation, trade or business in
the interest of the general public. The right under Article 301 is
constitutional and can be claimed by anyone. The right under Article
19(1)(g) is fundamental and can be claimed only by citizens. Thus,
this aspect of limitation of Article 19 is dealt with under Article 301
which gives the right to both citizens and non-citizens to move the
court if their right has been infringed.
Article 19(1)(g) contains restrictions to the freedom of carrying an
occupation or trade while Article 301 is accompanied by Article 302-
307 which lay down the restrictions to the free flow of trade in the
country. However, the restrictions specified in Article 302-307 should
have indirect results and should not directly reduce the freedom laid
down in Article 19(1)(g). Article 301 is thus considered an explanatory
provision to Article 19(1)(g) and also has a more limited scope than
Article 19(1)(g) because it is only concerned about the flow of goods
and services.
It is also often argued that Article 301 is the right available for trade
as a whole whereas Article 19(1)(g) is the right for individuals.
However, this is not true. Article 301 is derived from Section 92 of the
Australian Constitution and hence this right is available to individuals
as well.
Thus both of them can be said to be interrelated in some aspects.
They also can be seen as interrelated concepts at the time of
emergency. At the time of emergency, rights under Article 19(1)(g)
are suspended. At that time the court looks forward to the rights
provided under Article 301 to check whether any violation has
occurred or not.
Restrictions to trade and commerce
The power of the Parliament in Article 302 is kept in check by Article 303.
Article 303(1) states that the Parliament does not have the power to make
any law which will keep one State at a more preferable position than the
other State, by virtue of any entry in trade and commerce in any one of the
lists in 7th Schedule. However, Clause (2) states that the Parliament can do
so if it is proclaimed by law that it is essential to make such provisions or
regulations, as there is indeed a scarcity of goods in some parts of the
country. The power to decide whether there is a scarcity of goods in some
parts of the territory or not is vested in the hands of the Parliament.
Article 304(a) further says that the State should impose taxes on any goods
transported/imported from other States if alike goods are taxed in the State
too. It is done so that there is no discrimination between goods produced
within the State and goods imported from some other states. In the case
of State of Madhya Pradesh v/s Bhailal Bhai,(1964) the State of Madhya
Pradesh imposed taxes on imported tobacco which was not even subject to
tax in the very own State i.e State of Madhya Pradesh. The Court
disapproved of the tax statement that it was discriminatory in nature.
Clause (2) of Article 304 guides the States to impose certain reasonable
restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce, and intercourse as may suit
the public interest. But no Bill or Amendment for such shall be put forward
in the State Legislature without the prior approval of the President. A law
passed by the State to regulate interstate trade must thus fulfill the
following conditions-
Facts
In The Automobile Transport Ltd. v/s State of Rajasthan, case, State of
Rajasthan imposed an annual tax on motor vehicles (Rs 60 on a motor
vehicle and Rs 2000 on a goods vehicle).
Issue
The appellant challenged the validity of the tax levied under Article 301.
Now whether the tax levied was constitutionality correct or not had to be
checked.
Judgment
It was held by the court that in the present case the tax imposed is valid as
it is only a regulatory measure or a compensatory tax for the facilitation of
the smooth running of trade, commerce, and intercourse. The Court
commented that the taxes are the sole key for a state, in order to preserve
the financial health of the state at large. The concept of “Compensatory or
Regulatory Taxes” has evolved to ensure that the state will levy such taxes
that are set as an objective in the form of compensation, that is, for the
public interest as well as for regulatory purposes if necessary. They would
be used within the state. If the same is challenged in the Court as being an
infringement or as being violative of the freedom under Article 301 then that
would not be considered as an infringement and such a measure or tax does
not even need the validation of the provisions under Article 304(b).
Facts
In the case of the State of Mysore v/s Sanjeeviah, the government under
the Mysore Forest Act, 1900, made a law banning the movement of forest
produce between sunrise and sunset.
Issue
Whether it was violative of the freedom guaranteed Article 301 of the
Constitution?
Judgment
The Supreme Court held the law void. It remarked that such a law was
restrictive and not regulatory thus violative of the freedom provided under
Article 301.
Conclusion
When the Constitution provides the freedom of trade, such freedom cannot
be absolute. Thus Article 302 to 305 impose restrictions and ensures that
trade is conducted in a lawful manner throughout the states and the
country. All these provisions together ensure the provision of Constitutional
status to the freedom of trade, commerce, and intercourse. Now at least
there would be no unreasonable interference with trade and commerce
based upon geographical variations or any other such barriers.
grassroots level in the country. The Act has transformed the representative
democracy into participatory democracy.
Salient Features of the Act
1. Gram Sabha: Gram Sabha is the primary body of the Panchayati Raj system. It is
a village assembly consisting of all the registered voters within the area of the
panchayat. It will exercise powers and perform such functions as determined by
the state legislature. Candidates can refer to the functions of gram panchayat and
gram panchayat work, on the government official website
– https://grammanchitra.gov.in/.
2. Three-tier system: The Act provides for the establishment of the three-tier system
of Panchayati Raj in the states (village, intermediate and district level). States with
a population of less than 20 lakhs may not constitute the intermediate level.
3. Election of members and chairperson: The members to all the levels of the
Panchayati Raj are elected directly and the chairpersons to the intermediate and
the district level are elected indirectly from the elected members and at the village
level the Chairperson is elected as determined by the state government.
4. The Chairperson of a Panchayat and other members of a Panchayat, whether or
not elected directly from territorial constituencies in the Panchayat area, have the
right to vote in Panchayat meetings.
5. Reservation of seats:
For SC and ST: Reservation to be provided at all the three tiers in accordance
with their population percentage.
For women: Not less than one-third of the total number of seats to be reserved
for women, further not less than one-third of the total number of offices for
chairperson at all levels of the panchayat to be reserved for women.
The state legislatures are also given the provision to decide on the reservation
of its dissolution.
7. Disqualification: A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as or for being a
member of panchayat if he is so disqualified –
Under any law for the time being in force for the purpose of elections to the
legislature of the state concerned.
Under any law made by the state legislature. However, no person shall be
the preparation of electoral rolls and conducting elections for the panchayat.
The state legislature may make provisions with respect to all matters relating
Appointment :- • The judges of subordinate courts are appointed by the governor in consultation
with the chief justice of the high court of the concerned state. A minimum of seven years of
practise as a lawyer at bar is a necessary qualification for direct entry level to become a district
judge upon a written examination and oral interview by a committee of high court judges, the
appointment of district judges is notified by the state government. This is referred to as direct
recruitment. District judges are also appointed by way of elevation of judges from courts
subordinate to district courts provided they fulfill the minimum years of service The next level
of ascendancy for a district judge who served sufficient number of years is the post of high court
judge. High court judges are usually appointed from a pool of advocates practicing at the bar of
the high court and district judges who served for sufficient number of years. This has also
caused angst among district judges as they have come to realize that elevation of lawyers
directly to high court judges dampens their process of being awarded with promotions for the
work they've put in over many years of service. A district judge or additional judge may be
removed from his office by the governor on conformation from the high court collegium.
Appointment of district judges:- (1) Appointments of persons to be, and the posting and
promotion of, district judges in any State shall be made by the Governor of the State in
consultation with the High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to such State. (2) A person
not already in the service of the Union or of the State shall only be eligible to be appointed a
district judge if he has been for not less than seven years an advocate or a pleader and is
recommended by the High Court for appointment.
• Presuming it to be technical legal term of “district judge” rather than layman use of “district
judge” (which will mean all the judges of district court): • According to Article 233, the
appointment of district judges is to be made by Governor in consultation with the High Court
exercising jurisdiction in that area. • This consultation is with the entire body of judges
constituting the High Court and not with a single individual like the Chief Justice of the High
Court.
Ans. Article 165 of the Indian Constitution is related to the office of Advocate General of
State. He is the highest law officer of the state.
When the Speaker of The Lok Sabha is temporarily absent, the Deputy Speaker serves
as acting Speaker. In Lok Sabha, the Speaker has no control over the Deputy Speaker.
During the past two years, the Lok Sabha lacked a Deputy Speaker. The Delhi High
Court has asked the Central government to explain its stance on an appeal that claims
that maintaining the position of Deputy Speaker of the lower house of Parliament India
vacant is a violation of Article 93 of the Constitution.
Lawmakers need to watch over their actions and observe proper decorum when
discussing and voting; otherwise, proper functionality will become impeded. The
Speaker and Deputy Speaker are elected under Article 93 of the Indian Constitution.
The Speaker is responsible for answering questions while maintaining order to
ensure that debate stays focused and relevant to a particular motion or bill under
discussion.
The presiding officer of each House of the Parliament is different.
The Lok Sabha has a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker, whereas the Rajya
Sabha has a Chairman and a Deputy Chairman.
History
The Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of a place in India are known to have come
into existence as early as 1921, following the requirements of the Government of
India Act of 1919.
However, these very titles were President and Deputy President, respectively.
In 1935, the government passed an act that changed these nomenclatures to
“Speaker” and “Deputy Speaker.”
Ans. The state executive is made up of the Governor, Chief Minister, Council of
Ministers, and Advocate-General of State. Governor, as President, heads the state
government. Article 153-167 in the Indian Constitution deal with the provisions related
to the state governments of the country.
Governor is a titular head or constitutional head and at the same time, he is the agent
of the centre as the union government nominates Governor in each state.
Why is the topic Governor important for UPSC Exam?
On 16th February 2021, Kiran Bedi, the Lieutenant Governor of Puducherry has
been replaced. Telangana Governor, Tamilisai Soundararajan has been given the
additional charge as the LG of Puducherry.
There has been constant dissatisfaction between the Maharashtra state
Who is a Governor?
Governor is a nominal executive head of the state. He forms an important part of the
state executive where he acts as the chief executive head. Central Government
nominates the governor for each state.
How is a Governor Appointed?
The Indian President appoints Governor for each state by warrant under his hand and
seal. Central Government is responsible to nominate the governor for each state.
Note:
Unlike elections of the President, there is no direct or indirect election for the post
of Governor.
The office of a governor is not a part of the union executive and is an independent
constitutional office. The governor doesn’t serve the union government and neither
is subordinate to it.
The nomination of a governor by the Union and his appointment by the President
in India is based on the Canadian model of government.
What is the term of the Governor’s office?
Since the Governor holds the office under the pleasure of the President, his office has
no fixed term. President can remove the Governor and the grounds upon which he may
be removed are not laid down in the constitution.
Governor may also get transferred from one state to another by the President. He also
can be reappointed.
Note:
An interregnum is not allowed; following which a Governor may sit in the office
beyond 5 years (expiry of the term) till the new governor assumes the charge of
the office.
At President’s discretion, the Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned state
can also be appointed as the Governor on a temporary basis when and how the
President thinks fit. (Example – On the governor’s death, Chief Justice of HC can
be appointed as the governor.)
Who is qualified to become a Governor?
Unlike Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha members or even in the case of Prime Minister or
President who have a set of qualifications to meet to hold the office; Governor has to
meet only two qualifications:
1. He should be an Indian Citizen
2. He should be 35 years old or more
Note: There are two conventions that the government follows before nominating a
person as a Governor
1. That person is not appointed as the governor who belongs to the state. He shall be
an outsider having no relation with the state he is being appointed to.
2. Consultation of the Chief Minister is taken by the President before appointing a
governor
It should also be noted that both the above conventions are not absolute and have
been ignored by the union government in many instances.
What are the conditions of his office?
There are a few conditions for a person to be appointed as a Governor:
1. He cannot be a member of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. If he has been a member
of either of the house, he should vacate the seat on his first day as Governor in the
office.
2. He should not hold any office of profit.
3. For his residence, Raj Bhavan is provided to him without the payment of rent.
4. Parliament decides his emoluments, allowances, and privileges.
5. When a governor is responsible for two or more states, the emoluments and
allowances payable to him are shared by the states in such proportion as the
President may determine.
6. Parliament cannot diminish his emoluments and allowances during his term of
office.
7. He is given immunity from any criminal proceedings, even in respect of his
personal acts
8. Arrest or imprisonment of the Governor cannot take place. Only civil proceedings
can be initiated for his personal acts that too after giving two months’ of prior
notice.
When provisions mentioned in the bill hinders the larger interests of the country
When provisions mentioned in the bill mention the acquisition of property that is
dealt with Article 31A in the constitution. (Read more about important articles in the
Indian Constitution in the linked article.)
Also,
1. An ordinance can be promulgated by him when either the Legislative Assembly or
Council (Unicameral/Bicameral) are not in session. (Read the Ordinance Making
Power of President & Governor in the linked article.)
2. The following reports are laid by him:
1. State Finance Commission
2. State Public Service Commission
3. Comptroller and Auditor General (Concerning the state finance)
Financial Powers of the Governor
The following are the financial powers and functions of the Governor:
1. He looks over the state budget being laid in the state legislature
2. His recommendation is a prerequisite for the introduction of a money bill in the
state legislature
3. He recommends for the demand for grants which otherwise cannot be given
4. Contingency Fund of State is under him and he makes advances out that to meet
unforeseen expenditure. (Download the notes on the types of funds in India from
the linked article.)
5. State Finance Commission is constituted every five years by him. (Read about
the Finance Commission of India in the linked article.)
Judicial Powers of the Governor
The following are the judicial powers and functions of the Governor:
1. He has the following pardoning powers against punishment:
1. Pardon
2. Reprieve
3. Respite
4. Remit
5. Commute
2. President consults the Governor while appointing judges of High Court.
3. In consultation with the state High Court, Governor makes appointments, postings,
and promotions of the district judges.
4. In consultation with the state high court and state public service commission, he
also appoints persons to the judicial services.
What is the Constitutional Position of Governor?
The Constitutional Position of the governor can be understood by the following articles:
Constitutional Position of the Governor
Article Provision
Note:
Duties of CAG
Articles 148, 149, 150 and 151 of the Constitution of India describe the functions and
powers of this office. The following is a brief description of various areas dealt with in
these Article of the Constitution:
Article 149: Duties and Powers of the Comptroller and Auditor General: To perform
such duties and exercise such powers in relation to accounts of the Union of India
and the states and of any other bodies or authority, as may be prescribed by any
law made by the Parliament.
Article 150: Form of Accounts of the Union of India and the States: To prescribe,
with the approval of the President, the form in which the account of the Union and
of the States are to be kept.
Article 151: CAG Reports: To report to the President or to the Governors of the
States on the accounts of the Union or State. The constitution has also provided in
Article 279(i) that the CAG has to ascertain and certify the net proceeds of any tax
or duty mentioned in Chapter I of Part XII of the Constitution. Besides these
constitutional provisions and the Duties Powers and Conditions of Service Act of
1971, is necessary to mention that, before 1976, the CAG had a two-dimensional
role, that accounting and auditing. Due to the separation of accounts and audit in
1976, the CAG’s duty is the auditing of accounts. Since 1976, accounting is being
done by the various departments themselves with the help of the Indian Civil
Accounts Service.
this regard, the CAG cannot call for particulars of expenditure incurred by the
executive agencies but has to accept a certificate from the competent
administrative authority that the expenditure has been so incurred under his
authority.
The Constitution of India visualizes this office to be Comptroller as well as Auditor
General. However, in practice, the incumbent officer is fulfilling the role of an Auditor-
General only and not that of a Comptroller. In other words, ‘the office has no control
over the issue of money from the consolidated fund and many departments are
authorised to draw money by issuing cheques without specific authority from the CAG,
who is concerned only at the audit stage when the expenditure has already taken
place.
The powers of the CAG, regarding audits, are provided for in the Comptroller and
Auditor General of India (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971.
According to this act, the CAG can audit:
All receipts and expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India and of the states
and union territories.
All transactions relating to the Contingency Funds and Public Accounts. • All
trading, manufacturing, profit and loss accounts and balance sheets and other
subsidiary accounts kept in any department.
All stores and stock of all government offices or departments.
Accounts of all government companies set up under the Indian Companies Act,
1956.
Accounts of all central government corporations whose Acts provide for audit by
the CAG.
Accounts of all authorities and bodies substantially funded from the Consolidated
Fund. Accounts of any authority, even though not substantially funded by the
government, at either the request of the Governor/President or at the CAG’s own
initiative.
The President lays these reports before both the Houses of Parliament. After this, the
Public Accounts Committee examines them and reports its findings to the Parliament
CAG Reports
The three CAG Reports as stated above deal with different facets of public audits. The
following paragraphs give a brief overview of these audit reports:
Audit Report on Appropriation Accounts: The appropriation accounts show the
appropriation of the money granted by the legislature to the various grants and
heads of expenditure and whether the money granted for a specific purpose has
been spent for that purpose or not.
Audit report on Finance Accounts: The Finance Accounts show the accounts of
enactments and is in accordance with the financial rules and regulations framed by
the competent authority;
that there is a sanction, either general or special, accorded by the competent
authority;
that it is within the ambit of the purpose for which the grant was intended; that the
demand is supported by a voucher in proper form and the person to whom the
payment has been made has duly acknowledged the payment and the fact of
payment has been so recorded as to make a second claim on the government
impossible;
that the various programmes, schemes and projects in which large funds have
them; and
that the expenditure has been incurred with due regard to the broad and general
principles of financial propriety. All these constitute what is called the statutory
audit. In other words, these are specifically provided for by statute or law.
Audit of Government Undertakings
The CAG also undertakes an audit of the commercial undertakings of the governments
of the union and the states. Commercial undertakings exist in three forms:
Departmental undertakings, run on the pattern of departments.
Statutory corporations created by specific laws of the Parliament and broadly
Directors General
Principal Directors
Directors/Deputy Directors
Independence of a judiciary
1. The State should guarantee the independence of the judiciary by
enshrining the following in its Constitution and the laws of that
country. The duty of the government is to ensure an independent
judiciary by removing all interference from the organs of the
government.
2. On the other hand, the judiciary should observe all the cases based
on facts and the concerning laws relating to the cases without being
influenced. The jurisdiction of the judiciary is extended up to all
judicial matters and matters contain serious questions of law.
3. There should not be any kind of unsolicited interference in the
judiciary and judicial decisions should not be subjected to random
revision. However, an individual can always approach judicial reviews
and also can appeal to reduce any sentences ordered by the judicial
officers.
4. Every member of society should have the right to approach the
judiciary whenever required.
5. An independent judiciary should ensure that the judicial proceedings
are being performed without any prejudices and biases toward any of
the litigant parties.
6. The Member state should ensure that the judiciary has enough
resources to run its function properly.
The judges are also free to form any kind of association with fellow judges
for representing their own interests as well as promotion of judicial
independence.
The judges should be selected based on their qualifications and should not
be discriminated against on any grounds such as “race, colour, sex, religion,
political or other opinions, national or social origin, property, birth or
status”. However, the candidate should be a citizen of the concerned
country and this requirement should not be termed discriminatory.
The promotion of the judges should be based on the ability, integrity and
experience of an individual judge instead of any other preferences.
However, the age of retirement of the High Court judges was proposed to
increase to 65 through the Constitution (114th Amendment) Bill, 2010. But
it was not passed.
Article 124(2) lays down that the President should appoint every Supreme
Court judge and they will remain in office until the age of sixty-five years.
For the appointment of the judges in the High Court and Supreme Court,
the President shall consult the Chief Justice of India and here consultation
means concurrence and this was held in the case of Supreme Court
Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India (1993), also known as
the Second Judges Case (1993).
In the cases of judges in the Supreme Court, their salaries are provided by
the Consolidated Fund of India and the judges of the High Court of the
respective states are paid by the consolidated fund of that state.
Under Article 32, the Supreme Court of India has the power to issue writs
and an individual may move to the Supreme Court to access proper justice.
Though the Parliament can change the pecuniary jurisdiction in civil
matters, it cannot curtail any powers of the Supreme Court
Conclusion
Judiciary is often termed as a ‘fragile bastion’ as there are apprehensions
that the impartiality and neutrality of the institution and the personal
integrity of an individual judge may crumble owing to the outside influences
and pressures it has to face. An independent judiciary is the base of a
thriving democracy and acts as the last recourse for people to secure
justice. It is important to remember that the ultimate responsibility to
maintain the independence of the judiciary is on the shoulders of the
individual judges.
At the end of the day, it must be remembered that the independence of the
judiciary is an indispensable requirement to uphold the rule of law. That is
why the government and media rhetoric that aims to villainise the judiciary
should be of great concern.
Despite all the existing flaws in the judicial system, it serves as the last
recourse for common people to seek justice. Without an independent
judiciary, a democracy cannot function properly since there will be no
institution to protect and supervise the rights of the common people. Hence,
the independence of the judiciary must be upheld at any cost
Ans. Indian Parliament consists of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha and the President of
India. Lok Sabha is the lower house of the parliament and is termed as the
popular chamber of the Indian Parliament. What is Lok Sabha and who are Lok
Sabha members?
Indian Parliament is bicameral in nature i.e. that it has two houses. Lok Sabha is one of
those two houses. The other house is the Rajya Sabha. (You may check
the differences between Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha in the linked article.) Lok Sabha
is the first chamber of the parliament and represents the people of India as a whole.
The members elected by universal adult suffrage are part of Lok Sabha.
Composition of Lok Sabha:
Composition of Lok Sabha
Note: After coming into effect of The Constitution (One Hundred and Fourth
Amendment) Act, 2019, the provision of special representation of the Anglo-Indian
community in the House of the People by nomination has not been extended further.
Note: Voting age was reduced from 21 to 18 years by the 61st Constitutional
Amendment Act, 1988.
Representation of Union Territories in Lok Sabha:
Parliament is empowered to choose the members from the UTs in any manner as
it desires
Election Principle used – Direct Election
Note: Union Territories (Direct Election to the House of the People) Act, 1965, has
been enacted by which the members of Lok Sabha from the union territories are
chosen by direct election.
Representation of Nominated Members in Lok Sabha:
President nominates 2 members from Anglo-Indian Community if they are not
adequately represented.
Note: The provision to nominate Anglo-Indians was extended till 2020 by 95th
Amendment Act, 2009.
Facts about Lok Sabha elections for UPSC
1st Lok Sabha Election took place in 1952. There were 489 seats elected.
Congress won 364 out of 489 seats. Jawaharlal Nehru became the first Prime
Minister.
2019 Lok Sabha elections were country’s 17th General Elections. Elections took
place for 552 seats. BJP won 303 seats out of 552. Narendra Modi is the Prime
Minister.
In 1952, only 22 women were elected while in 2014, 49 women candidates were
elected.
Elections to Lok Sabha are carried out using a first-past-the-post electoral system.
Impeachment
Impeachment is defined as the act of questioning something’s integrity or legitimacy.
The term impeachment refers to the procedure for removing a person in a position from
all of the powers and obligations that the post requires. Impeachment is the term used
to describe the complete process of removing someone from office. It generally refers
to the President, judicial judges, and other constitutional officers. Impeachment refers
to a claim of misbehavior leveled against a public official in a country with a federal
presidential Constitutional republic government.
Conclusion
The President of India is the head of the state of India and the executive decisions are
taken in the name of the President.