Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

IN THE COURT OF MS. SAVITRI, LD.

ASJ, KKD COURTS,


DELHI
IN RE:
STATE VERSUS JAAN MOHD.
FIR NO.995/2014
U/S 394/397/34 IPC
PS: KHAJURI KHAS
DOD:09.06.2023

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT/SURETY


EEDUL HASAN S/O MEHNDI HASAN FOR RELEASE OF
THE ORIGINAL REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF
VEHICLE BEARING NO.DL-5S-CK-6308

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:


1. That the applicant namely Eedul Hasan had stood surety for
the accused Jaan Mohd. in the above noted case, while this
Hon’ble Court was pleased to acquit the accused vide order
dated 09.06.2023 and ordered to furnish surety bond U/s
437-A Cr.P.C. The original RC of the applicant of his
vehicle bearing No.DL-5S-CK-6308 was impounded by the
Hon’ble Court, after issuance of Robkar.

2. That as the time period of 6 months has already been passed


after furnishing the aforesaid surety bond U/s 437-A Cr.P.C.,
the applicant is before this Hon’ble Court with the request
for releasing of his original Registration Certificate.
P R A Y E R :-

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the


original Registration Certificate of vehicle bearing No. DL-
5S-CK-6308, may kindly be released to the applicant, in the
interest of justice.

Delhi
Dated: Applicant
Through

SANJIV KUMAR RATHI


Advocate
IN THE COURT OF SH. PANKAJ ARORA, LD. ASJ, KKD
COURTS, DELHI
IN RE:
STATE VERSUS DEEPAK ETC.
FIR NO.301/2017
U/S 397/394/34 IPC
PS: SEELAMPUR
NDOH: 24.04.2024

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT/ACCUSED


SALMAN FOR CALLING STATUS REPORT FROM THE
JAIL SUPERINTENDENT, MANDOLI JAIL, DELHI

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the above noted case is pending before this Hon’ble


Court and is now fixed for 24.04.2024.

2. That the applicant/accused Salman was granted bail by this


Hon’ble Court and accordingly, the applicant furnished his
bail bond and surety bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- on
11.03.2024 and was accepted by this Hon’ble Court on
14.03.2024.

3. That despite acceptance of the bail bond, the accused


/applicant has not been released by the Jail Authority till date
and hence the present application.
P R A Y E R :-

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Jail


Superintendent may kindly be directed to furnish status
report with respect of non release of the applicant/accused
Salman from Mandoli Jail, Delhi, in the interest of justice.

Delhi
Dated: Applicant
Through

SANJIV KUMAR RATHI


Advocate
IN THE COURT OF SH. SUKHJEET SINGH, LD. M.M.,
KKD COURTS, DELHI
IN RE:
STATE VERSUS GUDDU @ FARMAN

FIR NO.351/2023
U/S 25/54/59 ARMS ACT
PS: KHAJURI KHAS
NDOH: 15.05.2024

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT/ACCUSED


GUDDU @ FARMAN REQUESTING THIS HON’BLE
COURT TO PASS AN APPROPRIATE ORDER TO
RELEASE THE APPLICANT ON PERSONAL BOND

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the above noted case is pending before this Hon’ble


Court and is now fixed for 15.05.2024.

2. That the applicant/accused Salman was granted bail by this


Hon’ble Court vide order dated 11.08.2023, on furnishing
bail bond as well as personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/-
with one surety of the like amount.

3. That the applicant/accused is a poor person and is having


nobody to take care of him. Therefore, the applicant/accused
could not arrange a surety for his release and further, is
unable to arrange the surety till date, hence this application.
4. That the applicant/accused is in custody in the present case
since long and despite being granted bail by this Hon’ble
Court, is inside the jail on account of non arrangement of
surety.

P R A Y E R :-

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that


appropriate orders may kindly be passed for release of the
applicant/accused Guddu @ Farman on personal bond, in the
interest of justice.

Delhi
Dated: Applicant
Through

SANJIV KUMAR RATHI


Advocate
IN THE COURT OF SH. SUKHJEET SINGH, LD. M.M.,
KKD COURTS, DELHI
IN RE:
STATE VERSUS GUDDU @ FARMAN

FIR NO.351/2023
U/S 25/54/59 ARMS ACT
PS: KHAJURI KHAS
NDOH: 15.05.2024

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT/ACCUSED


GUDDU @ FARMAN FOR CALLING STATUS REPORT
FROM THE JAIL SUPERINTENDENT, MANDOLI JAIL,
DELHI, WITH RESPECT TO THE CASES PENDING
AGAINST HIM

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the above noted case is pending before this Hon’ble


Court and is now fixed for 15.05.2024.

2. That the applicant/accused Salman was granted bail by this


Hon’ble Court in the present case vide order dated
11.08.2023.

3. That the applicant/accused is a poor person and is having


nobody to take care of him. Therefore, the applicant/accused
could not arrange a surety for his release and further, is
unable to arrange the surety till date.
4. That for the purpose of moving bail in any other case, if any
pending against the accused Guddu @ Farman, the applicant
is moving the present application seeking directions to the
Jail Superintendent, Mandoli Jail, to furnish the status
regarding the cases pending against the applicant/accused.

P R A Y E R :-

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Jail


Superintendent may kindly be directed to furnish status
report / list of cases, pending against the applicant/accused
Guddu @ Farman, if any, apart from the present case, in the
interest of justice.

Delhi
Dated: Applicant
Through

SANJIV KUMAR RATHI


Advocate
IN THE COURT OF SH. ALOK SHUKLA, LD. ASJ, KKD
COURTS, DELHI
IN RE:
STATE VERSUS MOHSIN ETC.

FIR NO.78/2019
U/S 392/397/411/34 IPC
PS: P.I.A
DOD: 09.08.2023

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT / SURETY


SHAHNAZ W/O ISHAQ R/O T HUTS -105, CHANDER
PURI, DHARAMPURA, GANDHI NAGAR, DELHI-110031,
SEEKING DIRECTIONS TO THE BANK OFFICIALS OF
PUNJAB NATIONAL BRANCH AT SECTOR-10, DWARKA,
NEW DELHI, FOR RELEASING THE FDR OF RS.30,000/-
TO THE APPLICANT

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the above noted case has been decided by this Hon’ble
Court vide order dated 09.08.2023, whereby the Hon’ble
Court has acquitted the accused persons.

2. That the applicant Shahnaz had stood surety for the accused
Firoz in the present matter and had furnished her FDR of
Rs.30,000/- towards the satisfaction of this Hon’ble Court.

3. That now the statutory period of 6 months have already been


passed and the surety stands discharged. The original copy
of the FDR is with the applicant, but the bank officials are
not ready to release the amount to the applicant until it is
directed or ordered by this Hon’ble Court. Hence, this
application.

P R A Y E R :-

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that an


appropriate order with respect to acquittal of the accused
persons and discharge of surety may kindly be passed and
the bank officials of Punjab National Bank, Sector-10,
Dwarka, New Delhi, may kindly be directed to release the
FDR to the applicant, in the interest of justice.

Delhi
Dated: Applicant
Through

SANJIV KUMAR RATHI


Advocate
IN THE COURT OF SH. SUKHJEET SINGH, LD. M.M.,
KKD COURTS, DELHI
IN RE:
STATE VERSUS SHAHNAWAZ
S/o Sh. Aftab
R/o H.No.120, B Block,
Gali No.3, Shri Ram
Colony, Rajiv Nagar, Delhi

FIR No.
U/S 379/411/34 IPC
PS: SHASTRI PARK
IN JC-PC: 12.03.2024
APPLICATION U/S 437 Cr.P.C. ON BEHALF OF
APPLICANT / ACCUSED SHAHNAWAZ FOR
GRANT OF REGULAR BAIL

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the applicant/accused is the resident of the above


address and is peace loving and law abiding citizen of India.

2. That the applicant/accused has been falsely implicated in the


above case FIR, while he has nothing to do with commission
of any alleged offence.

3. That the applicant/accused is the victim of police atrocities


and despite the police remand of the applicant/accused,
nothing has been recovered from the possession of the
applicant/accused.
4. That the applicant is the resident of the above address and
there is no chance of his absconding or tampering with
evidence.

5. That there is nothing incriminating on record against the


applicant/accused. He is totally innocent.

6. That the applicant/accused is in JC/PC since 12.03.2024 and


is no more required for any further custody.

7. That the applicant /accused is ready to furnish reliable surety


to the entire satisfaction of this Hon’ble Court.

8. That no fruitful result would be served by keeping the


applicant/accused behind the bars.

9. That the applicant/accused is ready to abide by all terms and


conditions, so imposed by this Hon’ble Court while
releasing the applicant on bail.

PRAYER:

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the


applicant/accused may kindly be released on regular bail, in
the interest of justice.

Delhi
Dated: Applicant/Accused In JC

Through
SANJIV KUMAR RATHI
Advocate

You might also like