Professional Documents
Culture Documents
new-limb-lengthening-deformity-correction-2016
new-limb-lengthening-deformity-correction-2016
Specialty Update
What’s New in Limb Lengthening
and Deformity Correction
Reggie C. Hamdy, MD, MSc, FRCS(C), Mitchell A. Bernstein, MD, FRCS(C), Austin T. Fragomen, MD,
and S. Robert Rozbruch, MD
Limb reconstruction surgery is an emerging subspecialty. In a study involving the largest series of tibial hemimelia cases
the past year, 5 major events highlighted the growing interest in reported from a single institution, other investigators used a
this field. The first combined meeting of the 3 international modified Jones classification that included a “type V” for cases
societies devoted to the study and advancement of limb with global deficiency of the tibia. There were no cases of type
lengthening and reconstruction—the Association for the Study III2. In a study involving children >4 years of age with type-II
and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) Interna- fibular hemimelia, Popkov et al. concluded that tibial length-
tional, the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society ening should be associated with resection of the fibular anlage in
(LLRS)-North America, and the International LLRS (ILLRS)— order to prevent recurrence of the valgus deformity of the ankle3.
was held in November 2015, in Miami. Second, a new journal, On the basis of radiographic assessment of the feet of patients
the Journal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction, was with fibular hemimelia, Reyes et al. noted that the deficiency
launched. Third, the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction “should not be viewed as a global ‘lateral lower-limb deficiency’
Surgery Case Atlas was published (Springer International; nor the foot ray deficiency as ‘lateral.’”4 Other investigators
S.R.R. and R.C.H., editors). This is a major work in association found satisfactory results following a specific protocol of
with the LLRS, with 3 volumes and 302 cases covering all lengthening in children with congenital femoral deficiency 5.
aspects of limb reconstruction. Fourth, the LLRS supported Osteonecrosis of the femoral head in the contralateral hip was
and participated in the AAOS/OREF/ORS (American Academy described for 3 children with congenital femoral deficiency6.
of Orthopaedic Surgeons/Orthopaedic Research and Education Prophylactic femoral rodding with Rush rods following fixator
Foundation/Orthopaedic Research Society) Clinician Scholar removal was reported to be a safe and effective method to de-
Career Development Program. Lastly, the LLRS Traveling crease the incidence of fracture following lengthening7. However,
Fellowship program was implemented. femoral lengthening with circular external fixation had a higher
In addition to these events, numerous articles related to rate of complications than that with use of a motorized nail8.
limb reconstruction and deformity correction were published
in 2015. This Specialty Update provides a summary of this Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT)
recent research. Three studies provided additional insight into the treatment
of CPT in pediatric patients. Comparable results were found
Pediatrics between those with and without neurofibromatosis type I who
Congenital Limb Deficiencies were treated with use of the same Ilizarov technique9. Refrac-
Several studies investigated the treatment of congenital limb ture was the main issue following Ilizarov bone transport10.
deficiencies. Shahcheraghi and Javid found that the majority of Proximal tibial lengthening after initial union of CPT was an
children with tibial hemimelia had a good functional outcome effective form of management of tibial shortening11.
following reconstructive procedures or knee disarticulation1. In
Blount Disease
Specialty Update has been developed in collaboration with the Board of For patients with Blount disease who require minimal lengthening,
Specialty Societies (BOS) of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. correction using the Taylor Spatial Frame (Smith & Nephew)
Disclosure: One or more of the authors received a stipend from JBJS for writing this work. On the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms, which
are provided with the online version of the article, one or more of the authors checked “yes” to indicate that the author had a relevant financial relationship
in the biomedical arena outside the submitted work.
References
1. Shahcheraghi GH, Javid M. Functional assessment in tibial hemimelia (can we 3. Popkov A, Aranovich A, Popkov D. Prevention of recurrence of tibia and ankle
also save the foot in reconstruction?). J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 May 14. [Epub ahead deformities after bone lengthening in children with type II fibular hemimelia. Int
of print]. Orthop. 2015 Jul;39(7):1365-70. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2. Clinton R, Birch JG. Congenital tibial deficiency: a 37-year 4. Reyes BA, Birch JG, Hootnick DR, Cherkashin AM, Samchukov ML. The nature of
experience at 1 institution. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jun;35(4): foot ray deficiency in congenital fibular deficiency. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Sep 9.
385-90. [Epub ahead of print].
1413
TH E JO U R NA L O F B O N E & JO I N T SU RG E RY J B J S . O RG
d
W H AT ’ S N E W IN LIMB LENGTHENING AND DEFORMITY CORRECTION
V O L U M E 9 8-A N U M B E R 16 A U G U S T 17, 2 016
d d