Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AN EXACT SOLUTION ON THE STRESS ANALYSIS OF FILLET WELDS
AN EXACT SOLUTION ON THE STRESS ANALYSIS OF FILLET WELDS
(English Edition. Vol. 16. No. II, Nov. 1995) Shanghai. China
Xue D a w e i (~)k:~.t) t
Abstract
.Ill t'.X'uct .vohuion on Ihc slre.v.v di.~'lrihuliol! U/'./711cl u't'hl.~ is ohtuincd in this
palWr, This s o h u i o n can he tt.~'cd n o l r m l r /iJr c.~limalin.q, Ihe a c c u r a c r e l the I~rt'.vt'nl
th's(~n method ql'.lilh'l welds hut alstJ.liJr estuhli.~hht~ a new th's&,n methml.
Abstract
l .
The one-dimensional problem of the motion of a rigid flying plate under explosive attack has
an analytic solution only when the polytropic index of detonation products equals to three. In
general, a numerical analysis is required. In this paper, however, by utilizing the "weak" shock
behavior of the reflectionFig. shock
1 in the explosive products, and applying theFig. small2 parameter pur-
terbation method, an analytic, first-order approximate solution is obtained for theinproblem
An exact solution on the stresses distribution of fillet welds is suggested this paper. This
of flying
plate driven
solution canbybevarious
used high explosives
not only with polytropic
to estimate indices
the accuracy of other than butdesign
the present nearlymethod
equal toofthree.
fillet
Final
welds velocities
but also ofto flying platea obtained
establish new ~lesignagree very well
method. Wewith numerical
suggest resultscontrol
a strength by computers. Thus
factor whose
an analytic
value equalsformula
to sevenwith twoofparameters
times the value of
of high explosive
average normal (i.e.stress.
detonation velocity and polytropic
index) for estimation of the velocity of flying plate is established.
II. The Derivation of the Exact Solution
1. Introduction
A fillet welding and the relating loading are shown in Fig. 3(a). Let / denote the length of
the seam and k the radius of the cross section of the seam which has the shape of a quarter of
Explosive driven flying-plate technique ffmds its important use in the study of behavior of
a solid circle. Assuming that this is a plane problems of theory of elasticity and take the polar
materials under intense impulsive loading, shock synthesis of diamonds, and explosive welding and
coordinate
cladding (r. tl) asThe
of metals. shown in Fig.
method 3(b)
of estimation of flyor velocity and the way of raising it are questions
The exact
of common interest.solution of such a problem has to satisfy the following conditions:
I.Under the assumptions
The resultant of one-dimensional
of ~'r0 acting plane
on 0 = 0 equals - P detonation
: and rigid flying plate, the normal
approach of solving the problem of motion of flyor is to solve the following system of equations
/t
--ff
ap +u_~_xp+ au
=o,
au au
y1 =0,
(i.0
hi2 aS as
a--T =o,
1
where p, p, S, u are pressure, density, specific entropy and particle velocity of detonation products
R of reflected shock of detonation wave D as a boundary and the
(b)
trajectory F of flyor as another boundary. Both are unknown; the position of R and the state para-
meters on it are governed by the flow field I of central rarefaction wave behind the detonation wave
Fig. 3
D and by initial stage of motion of flyor also; the position of F and the state parameters of products
293
A n Exact Solution on the Stress At~talysis o f Fillet Welds 1021
The one-dimensional problem of the motion of a rigid 2 =0flying plate under explosive attack (2.5)
has
an analytic solution only when the polytropic index of detonation products equals to three. In
general, a numerical
6. The resultant analysis is required.
o f rt0 acting on 0 = nIn 2this paper,
equals however, by utilizing the "weak" shock
zero:
behavior of the reflection shock in the explosive products, and applying the small parameter pur-
terbation method, an analytic, first-order approximate solution is obtained for the problem of flying
plate driven by various high explosivesIir,o(r, 2)ldr=O
with polytropic (2.6)
indices other than but nearly equal to three.
Final velocities of flying plate obtained agree very well with numerical results by computers. Thus
7. The n o r m a l stress tr, (r. 0) at r = h equals zei'o:
an analytic formula with two parameters of high explosive (i.e. detonation velocity and polytropic
index) for estimation of the velocity of flying plate is established.
or, (h, O) = o (2.7)
1. Introduction
8. The shear stress rr0 (r, 0) ;.it r = h equals zero:
Explosive driven flying-plate technique ffmds its important use in the study of behavior of
r,~(h, O)=o (2.8)
materials under intense impulsive loading, shock synthesis of diamonds, and explosive welding and
cladding of metals. The method of estimation of flyor velocity and the way of raising it are questions
9. The interest.
of common shear stress rt8 acting on the cross section o f f l = 0 and the same shear stress
actingUnder
on thethecross-section
assumptions oof one-dimensional
f 0=Tr 2 at point Oplane detonation
a r e equal andother.
to each rigid flying plate, the normal
approach of solving the problem of motion of flyor is to solve the following system of equations
0)---,,,(0,
governing the flow field of detonation products behind the flyor (Fig. I):
(9
dr (r2r"g) = ( a r + b r : + c r 3) c o s O - crrcosO (b)
za br
~,o=~T+T+ -~)cos0- TcosO-I
cr f,(O)
r~ (c)
~hcrc..l;(0) is an arbitrar> function of 0. this function has to b c o m i t t e d due to the reason that
the \alne o f r,.0 can not be infinite. So that we have
l a . br . cr z \ . (r
" t - - ~ " t - - ~ ) C OSU -- V C OSO (2. l l)
Abstract
The equilibrium equation o f an infinitesimal clement along the direction of r is
cry.= a l~l r rz r r
(2.16)
-~ )oo 0 (2.17)
It is eusil5 proved that fornlulae (2.15), (2.16) and (2.17) satisl)' all the conditions
expressed by (2.1) to (2.11). In fact. c o n d i t i o n s (2.2), (2'.3) and (2.9) were satisfied when
d c t c r m i n g the c o n s t a n t s o f a. /~ and c: from formula (2.17) and letting 0 = 0 we have
Abstract
The one-dimensional problem of the motion of a rigid flying plate under explosive attack has
(i)
an analytic solution only when the polytropic index of detonation products equals to three. In
and substituting
general, a numericalintoanalysis formulais (2.1) we can
required. In seethis that
paper, however, by utilizing the "weak" shock
behavior of the reflection shock in the explosive products, and applying the small parameter pur-
terbation method, an analytic, first-order approximate solution is obtained for the problem of flying (J)
plate driven by various high explosives with polytropic indices other than but nearly equal to three.
Final
s o thnt velocities
c o n d i tof
i o nflying
(2.1) plate obtained we
is satisfied: agreek nvery
o ~ well that with
a..=rrnumerical
is a c o results
n s t a n t by
at computers.
0=re/2, soThus
that
an analytic formula with two parameters of high explosive (i.e. detonation velocity
c o n d i t i o n (2.4) and (2.5) are all satislied: fiom (2.17) we know that v,.0 (r. ' r t 2 ) = 0 at 0 = r e 2 and polytropic
index)
and then for estimation
c o n d i t i o n of(2.6)
the velocity of flying
is satisfied: the plate
c o n disi testablished.
i o n s (2.7) and (2.8) are also satisfied from
I\~rmulae (2.15) and (2.17) if we take r = h into these two later formulae and the conditions (2.
1. Introduction
10) and (2. I I ) are oF course satisfied because these c o n d i t i o n s were utilized before.
O f course, xve can easily. =,,et the c o r r e s p o n d i n g expressions o f c o m p o n e n t s o f strains and
d i s p l aExplosive driven flying-plate
c c m c n l respectively by usingtechnique ffmdslaw.
the Hooke's. its important use in the
formulae (2.15). study
(2.16) and of(2.17)
behavior
and of
the
materials under intense impulsive loading, shock synthesis of diamonds, and explosive
relations bct\veen strain and displacement. Here. all o f these expressions are onlitted, because i]
welding and
cladding of metals. The method of estimation of flyor velocity and the way of raising it are questions
is not necessary in design. So that. ~ve can conclude that an exact solution on the analysis o f
of common interest.
l]llet Under
welds is theo bassumptions
t a i n e d here.of one-dimensional plane detonation and rigid flying plate, the normal
approach
III. S o m ofe solving
C o m pthe a r i sproblem
oos of motion of flyor is to solve the following system of equations
governing the flow field of detonation products behind the flyor (Fig. I):
The results given by Norris shown in Fig 4(a) and the results given by this p a p e r for the
same p r o b l e m shoxvn in Fig. 4(b) are not the same. After a c o m p a r i s o n between these results
--ff
ap +u_~_xp+ au
=o,
~ e can see that:
I. The shear stress distribution I~1
auon b oau
u n d a r y1 O C is wrong: the exact solution sho~vs that
y =0,
this stress equals zero. (i.0
2. The n o r m a l stress ~r acting aS on b o uansd a r y O C ul is wrong. It is necessary' to emphasize
that the p h e n o m e n o n o f stress c oa--T
n c e n t r a t i o n =o,
at point O in Fig. 4(a) can not happen. IF
s o m e o n e makes a strength design basedp =p(p, s), results shown in Fig. 4(a), then the wrong value
on the
o f n o r m a l stress will function as a control factor.
where3.p,All
p, S,
theucomponents
are pressure, acting
density,
on specific entropy Aand
the boundary O IHparticle velocity of detonation products
are wrong.
respectively, with the trajectory R of reflected shock of detonation
So that, the resultg given by Norris can not be used for a strength wave Ddeisgn
as a boundary and the
of fillet welds.
trajectory F of flyor as another boundary. Both are unknown; the position of R and the state para-
The results introduced from Salakianj and Claussen's review are shown in Fig. 5(a) and
meters on it are governed by the flow field I of central rarefaction wave behind the detonation wave
Dtheandr by initial stage
diagram
of motiongiven by the
of flyor also;exact solutio~
the position of Ffor
andthe
the same problem of
state parameters is shown in
products
Fig. 5(b).
293
1024 Xue Dawei
(7 B a, B
~s
The one-dimensional problem of the motion of a rigid flying plate under explosive attack has
~
an analytic solution only when the polytropic index of detonation products equals to three. In
general, a numerical analysis is required. In this paper, however, by utilizing the O't
"weak" shock
behavior of the reflection shock in the explosive products, and applying the small parameter pur-
terbation method, an analytic, first-order approximate solution is obtained for the problem of flying
plate driven by various high explosives with polytropic indices other o than but nearly
B equal to three.
O B
Final velocities of flying plate obtained agree very well with numerical results by computers. Thus
an analytic formula with two parameters of high explosive (i.e. detonation velocity and polytropic
index) for estimation of the velocity
(a) of flying plate is established. (b)
Fig. 5
1. Introduction
It is obviously that the dangerous point of the seam is at point O as shown in Fig. 5(a),
but this point isdriven
Explosive not tile dangeroustechnique
flying-plate point as ffmds
shownits inimportant
Fig. 5(b).useThe
in value of stresses
the study at point
of behavior of
materials
O just asunder
shownintense
by theimpulsive loading,
exact solution ~reshock
a r = c rsynthesis
0 = c r , r ,of
~ =diamonds,
0. and explosive welding and
cladding
It isofimportant
metals. Theas method
shown by of estimation of flyor velocity
the exact solution that theand the way
throat of raising
section it are questions
of a welding seam is
of
notcommon
the placeinterest.
where the stress takes its rnaximum value. We suggest that the designers use the
exact Under
formulathe given
assumptions of one-dimensional
by (2.15), (2.16) and (2.17) planewhen detonation
they make and their
rigid strength
flying plate, the normal
design of'fillet
approach of solving the problem of motion of flyor is to solve the following system of equations
~velds. We suggest that the strength control factor be the normal stress of ~r0 at r = h and (i=0
governing the flow field of detonation products behind the flyor (Fig. I):
where the value of stress is seven times of the average stress.
References --ff
ap +u_~_xp+ au
=o,
[1] C. H. Norris. Photoelastic investigation of stress distribution in transferse fillet welds,
au au
Welding Journal, 24 (19"~5), 557. y1 =0,
[2] (i.0
J. E. Shigley and C . R . Mischke, Mechanical Engineering Design, Fifth ed., McGraw-Hill
aS as
Book Co., New York, (1989), a--T
I - 779. =o,
[3] A. G. Salakian and G. E. Claussen, Stress distribution in fillet welds: A review of the
p =p(p, s),
literature, WeMing Journal, 16 (*1937)~ 1 - 2 4 .
[4] M. Faires Virgil, Design of Machine Elements, Fourth ed., The Macmillon Company,
where p, p, S, u are pressure, density, specific entropy and particle velocity of detonation products
New York,
respectively, with the(1965), 624. R of reflected shock of detonation wave D as a boundary and the
trajectory
[5] R. F
trajectory flyor asFundamentals
M.ofPhelan, of Mechani'cal
another boundary. Design, Third
Both are unknown; ed,, McGraw-Hill
the position Bookpara-
of R and the state Co.,
meters New
on it York,
are governed by the flow field I of central rarefaction wave behind the detonation wave
(1970),-1-678.
D[6]
and by
M. initial
Kutz, stage of motion
a n d other of flyor also;
-Mechanical the position
Engineers of F and
Handbook,. the state parameters
John-Wiley and Sons, ofNew
products
York,
(1986i, 1 - 2 3 1 6 . 293