999-Article Text-2479-1-10-20240407

International Medical Science Research Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, April 2024
OPEN ACCESS
International Medical Science Research Journal
P-ISSN: 2707-3394, E-ISSN: 2707-3408
Volume 4, Issue 4, P.No.406-419, April 2024
DOI: 10.51594/imsrj.v4i4.999
Fair East Publishers
Journal Homepage: www.fepbl.com/index.php/imsrj
PREDICTIVE MODELING FOR DISEASE OUTBREAKS: A

REVIEW OF DATA SOURCES AND ACCURACY
Scholastica Ijeh1, Chioma Anthonia Okolo2, Jeremiah Olawumi Arowoogun3,
Adekunle Oyeyemi Adeniyi4, & Olufunke Omotayo5
1
Independent Researcher, Ottawa, Canada
2
Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria
3
Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited, Lagos, Nigeria
4
United Nations Population Fund, Sri Lanka
5
Independent Researcher, Alberta, Canada
___________________________________________________________________________
Corresponding Author: Scholastica Ijeh
Corresponding Author Email: scholaijeh@yahoo.com
Article Received: 15-01-24 Accepted:10-03-24 Published: 08-04-24
Licensing Details: Author retains the right of this article. The article is distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License
(http://www.creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial use,
reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is
attributed as specified on the Journal open access page.
___________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
This review explores the dynamic field of predictive modelling for disease outbreaks, focusing
on the data sources, modelling techniques, accuracy, challenges, and future directions integral
to its advancement. It underscores the significance of diverse data sources, including
epidemiological, environmental, social media, and mobility data. It also discusses various
modelling approaches, from statistical models to advanced machine learning algorithms and
network analysis. The review highlights the critical role of accuracy and validation in predictive
models, alongside the challenges posed by data quality, model complexity, and the ethical use
of personal data. It outlines promising research avenues, such as improving data collection
methods, integrating novel data sources like genomic data, and leveraging emerging
technologies such as AI and IoT to enhance predictive capabilities. This comprehensive
overview emphasizes the importance of predictive modelling in informing public health
Ijeh, Okolo, Arowoogun, Adeniyi, & Omotayo, P.No. 406-419 Page 406
decisions and the continuous need for innovation and collaboration to address the complex
dynamics of disease outbreaks.
Keywords: Predictive Modeling, Disease Outbreaks, Data Sources, Machine Learning, Public
Health, Emerging Technologies.
___________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
Predictive modelling has become a cornerstone in public health, especially concerning disease
outbreaks. This scientific approach uses statistical techniques and algorithms to analyze
historical data and predict future events (Bedi, Vijay, Dhaka, Gill, & Barbuddhe, 2021; Xiong,
Hu, & Wang, 2021). Predictive modelling harnesses various data sources in infectious diseases,
including epidemiological, environmental, and socio-economic data, to forecast disease
outbreaks' likelihood, spread, and impact (Basu & Sen, 2023; Naraharisetti, 2023). The ability
to predict an outbreak before it occurs or to estimate its trajectory once it has begun is
invaluable. It enables health authorities and policymakers to make informed decisions, allocate
resources efficiently, and implement targeted interventions to mitigate the impact on public
health (Petropoulos, Makridakis, & Stylianou, 2022).
The importance of predictive modelling in public health cannot be overstated. It plays a pivotal
role in decision-making processes and outbreak preparedness strategies. Predictive models
enable proactive rather than reactive responses by providing insights into when, where, and how
an outbreak is likely to occur. This foresight helps optimize the distribution of medical supplies,
plan vaccination campaigns, and advise public health measures such as social distancing or
lockdowns. Moreover, predictive modelling contributes to refining public health policies by
offering evidence-based recommendations to save lives and reduce economic losses (Luo,
Wunderink, & Lloyd-Jones, 2022; Sacco, Valle, & De Domenico, 2023).
The objectives of this review are multifaceted. Firstly, it aims to provide a comprehensive
overview of the data sources utilized in predictive modelling for disease outbreaks,
acknowledging the diversity and complexity of data that models can incorporate. Secondly, the
review assesses the accuracy of these predictive models, examining how closely the predictions
align with actual outcomes and the factors influencing model performance. Through this
examination, the review identifies the strengths and limitations of current modelling
approaches, offering insights into areas where improvements are needed. Lastly, by
highlighting the challenges and opportunities within predictive modelling, this review
underscores the critical need for continuous research, development, and integration of new
technologies and methodologies.
This review's relevance extends beyond academic circles to practitioners and policymakers in
public health. As the world grapples with emerging infectious diseases and the threat of
pandemics, understanding the capabilities and limitations of current predictive models is
paramount. By shedding light on these aspects, this review contributes to the ongoing dialogue
on enhancing outbreak preparedness and response strategies to bolster global health security in
an era of unprecedented challenges.
Background
The practice of predictive modelling for disease outbreaks is a confluence of epidemiology,
statistics, and computational science, evolving significantly over the years. Initially, predictive
efforts were rudimentary, relying on basic statistical methods and limited data to forecast
disease spread. One of the earliest instances of such modelling dates back to the 18th century
when Bernoulli used mathematical calculations to advocate for smallpox inoculation. However,
the real momentum in predictive modelling began in the 20th century with the advent of more
sophisticated statistical techniques and the availability of computers. This period saw the
development of compartmental models, such as the SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered)
model, which provided frameworks for understanding how diseases spread in populations
(Bhandari et al., 2022; Boeing, Batty, Jiang, & Schweitzer, 2022; Costantino, 2021; Tröhler,
2020).
Technological advancements and the digital revolution have significantly influenced the
evolution of predictive modelling. The availability of large-scale data collection methods, the
internet, and mobile technologies have transformed the landscape, enabling the integration of
complex datasets into models. Today, models can incorporate real-time data from various
sources, including social media, satellite imagery, and electronic health records, enhancing the
granularity and accuracy of predictions (Oldekop et al., 2020).
The significance of data in developing predictive models cannot be overstated. Data acts as the
foundation upon which models are built and calibrated. The quality, granularity, and relevance
of data directly influence the model's ability to predict disease outbreaks accurately. For
instance, high-resolution mobility data can improve models' capacity to predict the geographical
spread of a disease. In contrast, social media data can offer insights into public sentiment and
behaviour during an outbreak. However, the utility of data is not without challenges. Data
privacy, accuracy, and representativeness must be carefully managed to ensure ethical and
effective modelling (Chumachenko, Dudkina, Yakovlev, & Chumachenko, 2023;
Keshavamurthy & Charles, 2023). The aging population demands nuanced predictive models,
as Jane Osareme et al. (2024) highlight. These models must adapt to forecast the impact of
demographic shifts on disease outbreaks and healthcare systems, ensuring interventions are
effectively tailored to meet the specific needs of an increasingly older global populace.
Ogugua et al. (2024) stress the importance of integrating predictive modelling into health
policies of developing countries to establish more effective healthcare systems. Their critical
review advocates for policies that support the adaptation and utilization of predictive models,
emphasizing that such integration can significantly enhance disease surveillance, resource
allocation, and emergency preparedness in regions most vulnerable to outbreaks, thereby
improving overall public health outcomes. Muonde et al. (2024) examine global nutrition
challenges, emphasizing the critical role of dietary risks in public health and the effectiveness
of interventions. Their review underscores the necessity of incorporating nutritional data and
intervention outcomes into predictive models for disease outbreaks, highlighting the
interconnectedness of diet, disease prevention, and health promotion. This integration could
greatly enhance the accuracy of public health predictions and the formulation of strategies to
combat malnutrition-related diseases, contributing to more robust and comprehensive public
health initiatives.
Predicting disease outbreaks is fraught with challenges, primarily due to complex and dynamic
disease transmission. Human behaviour, environmental changes, and pathogen evolution can
significantly affect disease spread, making accurate predictions a moving target. Furthermore,
the inherent uncertainty in predicting future events requires models to provide estimates of what
might happen and quantify the uncertainty of these predictions. This is where the role of
accuracy and validation becomes critical. Models must be rigorously tested and validated using
historical data and real-world events to ensure their predictions are reliable and robust. This
validation process involves comparing model predictions with actual outbreak data to assess
accuracy, adjust model parameters, and improve future predictions (Roth, Chadalawada, Jain,
& Miller, 2021; Troin, Arsenault, Wood, Brissette, & Martel, 2021).
Accuracy in predictive modelling is about predicting an outbreak's exact time and location and
providing actionable intelligence that can inform public health decisions. The ultimate goal is
to develop models that can reliably forecast disease outbreaks' scale, duration, and dynamics,
allowing for timely and effective interventions. Despite these challenges, the role of predictive
modelling in public health is indispensable. As models become more sophisticated and data
sources more diverse, the potential for predictive modelling to save lives and prevent disease
spread only grows, underscoring the need for continued innovation and research in this critical
field (Keshavamurthy, Dixon, Pazdernik, & Charles, 2022; Ramos et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2021).
Data Sources for Predictive Modelling
Predictive modelling for disease outbreaks relies on diverse data sources, each contributing
unique insights into disease transmission and spread dynamics. Integrating these data sources
has become a hallmark of modern epidemiological research, leveraging the strengths of each to
enhance model accuracy and reliability. Here, we explore the principal data sources utilized in
predictive modelling, their advantages, limitations, and the impact of data integration on model
performance.
Epidemiological Data
Epidemiological data, including case reports, hospital records, and surveillance data, form the
backbone of disease outbreak modelling. This data provides direct insights into the spread of
disease, including infection rates, mortality rates, and geographical distribution of cases. Its
strength lies in its specificity and direct relevance to the modelled disease. However,
epidemiological data can be limited by reporting delays, underreporting, and inconsistent data
collection methodologies across regions and countries. Such challenges can lead to inaccuracies
in modelling disease spread (Injury et al., 2020; Kotb et al., 2020). Omotayo et al. (2024)
emphasize the COVID-19 pandemic's lessons, highlighting the critical role of timely and
comprehensive epidemiological data in outbreak response and future healthcare preparedness.
Their review underscores the necessity of enhancing data collection and reporting mechanisms
to improve accuracy in disease modelling and the importance of global data sharing for
informed decision-making in public health crises.
Environmental Data
Environmental data, such as temperature, humidity, and rainfall, play a crucial role in predicting
outbreaks of vector-borne and waterborne diseases. This data helps model how environmental
conditions influence the lifecycle of pathogens and vectors, enabling predictions of disease
seasonality and outbreak likelihood in specific regions. The primary challenge with
environmental data is its variability and the complex interplay between multiple environmental
factors. Moreover, global climate change introduces new uncertainties, making it difficult to
predict long-term trends accurately (Pandey, Ranjan, & Tripathi, 2021; Peters et al., 2020).
Olorunsogo et al. (2024) reinforce the significance of environmental factors in public health,
detailing how global challenges like climate change compound the difficulty of predicting
disease outbreaks. Their review calls for integrated approaches that consider environmental
dynamics, advocating for the development of more sophisticated models that can adapt to these
challenges and offer solutions for future public health preparedness.
Social Media Data
Social media platforms provide real-time data on public sentiment and behaviour during
outbreaks. Researchers can gain insights into disease awareness, misinformation spread, and
potential outbreak hotspots by analyzing posts, tweets, and searches related to disease
symptoms and prevention measures. Despite its real-time nature and vast volume, social media
data is often noisy, unstructured, and biased toward the demographic that uses these platforms.
The reliability of this data can be affected by misinformation and the challenge of distinguishing
relevant health information from unrelated content (Hou, Du, Jiang, Zhou, & Lin, 2020; Zhu,
Zheng, Liu, Li, & Wang, 2020).
Mobility Data
Mobility data from smartphones, GPS devices, and transportation networks offers
unprecedented insights into human movement patterns. This data is invaluable in modelling the
spread of diseases across regions and identifying potential transmission hotspots based on travel
patterns and population flows. Privacy concerns and data anonymization can limit the
granularity and usefulness of mobility data. Additionally, mobility patterns can change rapidly
in response to public health interventions and societal events, requiring models to continuously
update to remain accurate.
Integrating multiple data sources addresses the limitations of individual datasets. It leverages
their collective strengths, significantly enhancing the accuracy and robustness of predictive
models. For example, combining epidemiological data with mobility data can improve
predictions of how diseases spread from one region to another, while integrating environmental
data can help predict the timing and location of vector-borne disease outbreaks.
Data integration enables models to capture the multifaceted nature of disease transmission,
accounting for biological, environmental, and social factors. Advanced analytical techniques,
such as machine learning and data fusion methods, facilitate the integration of heterogeneous
data sources, allowing models to learn complex patterns and interactions that are not apparent
from any single data source. However, successful data integration requires careful attention to
data quality, compatibility, and the methodological challenges of combining disparate data
types. It also necessitates robust data privacy and ethical considerations, particularly when
handling sensitive health and personal information (Bibri, Krogstie, Kaboli, & Alahi, 2024; De
Domenico, 2023).
In summary, using and integrating diverse data sources in predictive modelling is crucial for
understanding and forecasting disease outbreaks. By leveraging the complementary strengths
of epidemiological, environmental, social media, and mobility data, researchers can develop
more accurate, timely, and actionable disease predictions, ultimately enhancing public health
response and preparedness efforts.
Predictive Modelling Techniques
Predictive modelling for disease outbreaks employs various techniques, each with its strengths
and optimal applications depending on the nature of the data and the specific diseases being
studied. From traditional statistical models to advanced machine learning algorithms and
network analysis, the choice of modelling technique significantly influences predictions'
accuracy, interpretability, and applicability. This section provides an overview of these

techniques, highlighting their suitability for different data types and diseases.
Statistical Models
Statistical models, including time-series analysis and regression models, have long been staples
in epidemiology. These models use historical data to identify trends, patterns, and relationships
between variables, allowing predictions about future outbreaks based on past occurrences.
They are particularly suited for diseases with well-understood transmission dynamics and where
long-term data is available. They excel in analyzing linear relationships and are often used for
seasonal diseases, where past patterns of outbreaks can inform future predictions. However,
their reliance on assumptions about data distribution and relationships can limit their
applicability to more complex or novel disease outbreaks (Alamo, Reina, Gata, Preciado, &
Giordano, 2021; Kaur, Sandhu, & Kumar, 2022). Olorunsogo et al. (2024) highlight the varied
implementation of epidemiological statistical methods in public health studies across the USA
and Africa, noting disparities in data availability and infrastructure. Their comparative review
underscores the need for adaptable statistical models that can operate effectively under different
conditions and datasets, aiming to bridge the gap in public health responses between regions
with varying resources.
Machine Learning Algorithms
Machine learning algorithms, such as decision trees, support vector machines, neural networks,
and deep learning models, offer powerful tools for predictive modelling. Unlike traditional
statistical models, machine learning can handle large datasets with many variables and model
complex, non-linear relationships without requiring explicit assumptions about the data.
Machine learning is particularly effective for diseases with complex transmission patterns or
when integrating diverse data sources, including unstructured data such as text from social
media. These algorithms can adapt to new information, making them suitable for real-time
outbreak prediction and for diseases that do not have a long historical record. However, their
"black box" nature can make interpretation difficult and require large amounts of data for
training (Bansal, Goyal, & Choudhary, 2022; Bui, Tsangaratos, Nguyen, Van Liem, & Trinh,
2020).
Network Analysis
Network analysis models disease spread within and between communities by representing
populations as networks of individuals or groups. These models can incorporate the structure
of social contacts, transportation links, or geographical connections, simulating disease
transmission dynamics based on how individuals or groups interact. Network analysis is highly
suited for infectious diseases that spread through direct person-to-person contact, such as
sexually transmitted infections or respiratory viruses. It is particularly useful when the pattern
of connections between individuals or locations is critical to understanding the disease spread.
These models can be resource-intensive and require detailed data on contacts or movements,
which may not always be available (Albery, Kirkpatrick, Firth, & Bansal, 2021; Paré, Beck, &
Başar, 2020).
The choice of predictive modelling technique depends on the disease's characteristics, the
quality and type of available data, and the specific objectives of the prediction. In practice,
integrating multiple modelling techniques can leverage the strengths of each, providing a more
nuanced and accurate prediction of disease outbreaks. For example, machine learning models
can identify complex patterns in large datasets. In contrast, statistical models can provide
interpretable predictions for seasonal trends. Network analysis can add depth to these
predictions by considering the impact of individual behaviours and social structures on disease
spread.
This integrative approach enhances the accuracy of predictions. It provides a more
comprehensive understanding of disease dynamics, facilitating the development of targeted and
effective public health interventions. As predictive modelling techniques continue to evolve,
their integration offers promising pathways for advancing our ability to forecast and respond to
disease outbreaks with greater precision and effectiveness.
Accuracy and Validation of Predictive Models
Evaluating the accuracy of predictive models for disease outbreaks is a critical step in ensuring
their reliability and utility in public health decision-making. This process involves using various
metrics and methods to assess how well a model's predictions align with actual outcomes.
Validation, the process of confirming that the models are appropriate and accurate for their
intended use, is equally crucial. This section delves into the metrics and methods used for these
purposes, discusses the general findings regarding the accuracy of current models, and
highlights the challenges faced in validation efforts.
Metrics and Methods for Evaluating Accuracy
Several metrics are commonly used to evaluate the accuracy of predictive models in the context
of disease outbreaks. These include (Hodson, 2022; Nahm, 2022; Olofsen & Dahan, 2021;
Shreffler & Huecker, 2020):
• Sensitivity and Specificity: Sensitivity measures the model's ability to correctly predict
outbreaks (true positives), while specificity measures its ability to correctly identify non-
outbreaks (true negatives).
• Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV): PPV indicates the
proportion of positive test results that are true positives, and NPV indicates the proportion
of negative test results that are true negatives.
• Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC): This metric
evaluates the model's ability to distinguish between outbreak and non-outbreak scenarios
across a range of thresholds, providing an overall performance measure.
• Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE): These metrics measure
the difference between the values predicted by the model and the actual values, providing
insight into the model's prediction error.
Methods for validating predictive models often involve cross-validation techniques, where the
data is divided into subsets; the model is trained on one subset and tested on another. This
approach helps to assess the model's generalizability and performance on unseen data. Scenario-
based validation, where models are tested against historical outbreak scenarios, is also
commonly used to evaluate model accuracy in real-world conditions.
General Findings on Model Accuracy
The accuracy of predictive models for disease outbreaks varies widely depending on the disease,
the data used, and the modelling approach. Generally, models that integrate multiple data
sources and use advanced analytics, such as machine learning, tend to be more accurate.
However, even the most sophisticated models can struggle with the inherent unpredictability of
disease dynamics, such as changes in pathogen virulence or human behaviour.
Studies have found that models can accurately predict the onset and spread of seasonal and
well-understood diseases, such as influenza. However, the accuracy can be significantly lower
for emerging diseases or outbreaks with limited historical data. The variability in accuracy
underscores the importance of continuous model refinement and validation against new data
and scenarios.
Challenges in Validating Predictive Models
Validating predictive models for disease outbreaks presents several challenges:
• Data Quality and Availability: The accuracy of any predictive model is highly dependent
on the quality and completeness of the data it uses. Inconsistent, incomplete, or biased data
can lead to inaccurate predictions and misinformed decisions.
• Dynamic Nature of Diseases: The evolution of pathogens, changing human behaviour, and
the impact of interventions (e.g., vaccination campaigns) can alter disease dynamics,
making it difficult for models to maintain accuracy over time.
• Generalizability: Models developed and validated in one context may not perform well in
others due to differences in population density, healthcare infrastructure, or social practices.
• Ethical and Privacy Concerns: Using detailed mobility or social media data for model
validation must navigate privacy concerns and ethical considerations, potentially limiting
data availability for model training and validation.
Ensuring the reliability of predictive models in real-world scenarios requires ongoing validation
efforts, adaptation to new data and insights, and a cautious interpretation of model predictions.
Collaborative efforts between modellers, epidemiologists, and public health officials are
essential to refine these models, enhance their accuracy, and provide actionable intelligence for
outbreak preparedness and response.
Challenges in Predictive Modelling for Disease Outbreaks
Predictive modelling for disease outbreaks is a complex and nuanced endeavour that faces
numerous challenges. These challenges span the technical aspects of model development and
implementation, including data quality and model complexity, broader issues such as the
dynamic nature of disease spread and ethical considerations related to personal data use.
Addressing these challenges is crucial for developing reliable and actionable predictive models.
Omotayo et al. (2024) highlight the escalating challenge of non-communicable diseases (NCDs)
in global health, stressing the importance of predictive modelling in addressing NCDs. They
review the multifaceted challenges and prevention strategies, suggesting that predictive models
must evolve to incorporate factors beyond infectious disease dynamics, such as lifestyle and
environmental influences, to effectively forecast and mitigate the rising impact of NCDs on
global health systems. This underscores the need for models that are both versatile and capable
of addressing the broad spectrum of factors influencing disease outbreaks.
Data Quality and Availability
One of the fundamental challenges in predictive modelling is the reliance on high-quality,
comprehensive data. Data quality issues such as inaccuracies, missing values, and biases can
significantly impair model performance. Furthermore, the availability of timely data is critical
for outbreak prediction but is often hindered by delays in data collection and sharing, privacy
concerns, and the lack of standardized reporting protocols across regions and countries. Models
are only as good as the data they use, making data quality and availability a central concern for
predictive modelling efforts (Teh, Kempa-Liehr, & Wang, 2020).
Model Complexity
The complexity of predictive models poses another challenge. While more complex models,
such as those employing advanced machine learning techniques, can capture the nuanced
dynamics of disease spread, they also require substantial computational resources and expertise
to develop and interpret. Additionally, complex models may suffer from overfitting, performing
well on the data they were trained on but poorly on new, unseen data. Balancing complexity
with interpretability and generalizability is a key challenge in model development.
Dynamic Nature of Disease Spread
Disease outbreaks are influenced by many factors that change over time, including pathogen
mutation rates, human behaviour, environmental conditions, and the effectiveness of public
health interventions. This dynamic nature makes it difficult to predict how a disease will spread
and impact populations. Predictive models must be flexible and adaptable to incorporate new
data and insights. This requirement adds to the complexity and resource demands of modelling
efforts.
Ethical Considerations in Using Personal Data
The use of personal data for predictive modelling raises significant ethical considerations.
Privacy concerns are paramount, as models often rely on sensitive health data, mobility patterns,
and even social media activity to predict outbreaks. Ensuring that individuals' privacy is
protected while using their data to inform public health efforts is a delicate balance. Ethical
modelling practices must include data anonymization, secure data storage and handling
protocols, and transparency about data use. Moreover, there must be a clear public health benefit
to using personal data, with efforts to mitigate any potential harm or biases in model predictions.
Addressing these ethical considerations involves technical solutions and policy and governance
frameworks that respect individual rights and promote public trust. Public engagement and
consent are crucial for ethical predictive modelling, particularly in communities
disproportionately affected by disease outbreaks or surveillance efforts (Char, Abràmoff, &
Feudtner, 2020; Landers & Behrend, 2023; Paulus & Kent, 2020).
The challenges in predictive modelling for disease outbreaks are significant but not
insurmountable. Addressing these challenges requires a multidisciplinary approach that
combines technical expertise in data science and epidemiology with ethical considerations and
public health knowledge. Advances in data collection and sharing, model development, and
ethical frameworks can enhance the accuracy, reliability, and acceptability of predictive
models. As the field evolves, continuous evaluation and adaptation of modelling practices will
be essential to meet the changing dynamics of disease spread and the needs of public health
decision-making.
Future Directions
Predictive modelling for disease outbreaks is at a pivotal juncture, with rapid advancements in
technology and data science offering new opportunities for innovation. Future research
directions are poised to address existing challenges, harness emerging data sources, and
leverage cutting-edge technologies to enhance predictive accuracy and utility. This section
outlines key areas for future research. It highlights the potential for integrating novel data
sources and technologies in predictive modelling.
Improving Data Collection Methods

Enhancing data collection methods is critical for overcoming the limitations of current
predictive models. Future research should focus on developing real-time data collection
frameworks that provide timely and accurate information on disease spread. This includes
harnessing mobile health (mHealth) technologies and wearables for symptom tracking and
contact tracing, which can offer granular data on population health and mobility patterns.
Standardizing data collection and reporting protocols across regions and countries will also
improve data comparability and facilitate more effective global outbreak prediction and
management.
Developing Sophisticated Modeling Techniques
Advancing modelling techniques is essential for capturing the complex dynamics of disease
outbreaks. Research should explore integrating machine learning, artificial intelligence, and
computational modelling methods to develop more sophisticated predictive models. This
includes leveraging deep learning for pattern recognition in vast datasets and exploring
simulation models that can account for the nonlinear interactions between epidemiological,
environmental, and socio-economic factors. Enhancing model interpretability and developing
frameworks for real-time model updating and adaptation will also be crucial.
Enhancing Model Accuracy
Improving the accuracy of predictive models requires ongoing validation and refinement.
Future research should focus on developing robust validation frameworks to assess model
performance in diverse scenarios and across different diseases. This includes creating
comprehensive datasets for model testing and developing metrics that accurately measure
model performance in predicting outbreak size, duration and spread. Collaborative efforts
between data scientists, epidemiologists, and public health practitioners are essential for
iteratively refining models based on real-world outcomes and feedback.
Integrating New Data Sources
The integration of novel data sources presents significant opportunities for enhancing predictive
modelling. Genomic data, for example, can provide insights into pathogen evolution and spread,
enabling models to predict outbreak trajectories based on changes in the pathogen's genetic
makeup. Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling from air, water, and soil can also offer early
indicators of pathogen presence before human cases are reported. Research into effective
methods for incorporating these data sources into predictive models will be key to advancing
outbreak prediction capabilities.
Leveraging Emerging Technologies
Emerging technologies such as AI, the Internet of Things (IoT), and blockchain hold promise
for revolutionizing predictive modelling. AI and machine learning can analyze vast datasets to
identify patterns and predict outbreaks more accurately and quickly. IoT devices, including
environmental sensors and wearable health monitors, can provide real-time data streams that
enrich predictive models. Blockchain technology could ensure the secure and transparent
sharing of health data, facilitating collaboration while respecting privacy concerns.
The future of predictive modelling for disease outbreaks is bright, with numerous avenues for
research and development that could significantly enhance public health response capabilities.
The field can move towards more accurate, timely, and actionable predictions by improving
data collection methods, developing more sophisticated modeling techniques, and integrating
new data sources and technologies. Collaborative and interdisciplinary efforts will be essential
to realize these advancements, driving innovations that can protect populations and mitigate the
impact of future disease outbreaks.
CONCLUSION
Predictive modelling for disease outbreaks stands as a crucial intersection of data science,
epidemiology, and public health, offering the profound potential to mitigate the impact of
infectious diseases. This review has traversed the landscape of predictive modelling, from the
foundational data sources and modelling techniques to the challenges and future directions that
shape the field. Despite the hurdles of data quality, model complexity, and ethical
considerations, advancements in technology and methodology continue to push the boundaries
of what is possible in outbreak prediction. The integration of novel data sources and emerging
technologies like AI and IoT into predictive models promises to enhance accuracy and
operational utility, guiding public health interventions with unprecedented precision. As the
field evolves, a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach will be paramount in harnessing
these innovations to safeguard public health and improve global outbreak preparedness and
response.
References
Alamo, T., Reina, D. G., Gata, P. M., Preciado, V. M., & Giordano, G. (2021). Data-driven
methods for present and future pandemics: Monitoring, modelling and managing.
Annual Reviews in Control, 52, 448-464.
Albery, G. F., Kirkpatrick, L., Firth, J. A., & Bansal, S. (2021). Unifying spatial and social
network analysis in disease ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology, 90(1), 45-61.
Bansal, M., Goyal, A., & Choudhary, A. (2022). A comparative analysis of K-nearest neighbor,
genetic, support vector machine, decision tree, and long short term memory algorithms
in machine learning. Decision Analytics Journal, 3, 100071.
Basu, S., & Sen, S. (2023). Covid 19 pandemic, socio-economic behaviour and infection
characteristics: An inter-country predictive study using deep learning. Computational
Economics, 61(2), 645-676.
Bedi, J. S., Vijay, D., Dhaka, P., Gill, J. P. S., & Barbuddhe, S. B. (2021). Emergency
preparedness for public health threats, surveillance, modelling & forecasting. The Indian
Journal of Medical Research, 153(3), 287.
Bhandari, H. N., Rimal, B., Pokhrel, N. R., Rimal, R., Dahal, K. R., & Khatri, R. K. (2022).
Predicting stock market index using LSTM. Machine Learning with Applications, 9,
100320.
Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., Kaboli, A., & Alahi, A. (2024). Smarter eco-cities and their leading-
edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A
comprehensive systematic review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 19,
100330.
Boeing, G., Batty, M., Jiang, S., & Schweitzer, L. (2022). Urban analytics: History, trajectory
and critique. In Handbook of Spatial Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 503-516):
Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bui, D. T., Tsangaratos, P., Nguyen, V.-T., Van Liem, N., & Trinh, P. T. (2020). Comparing the
prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional
machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena, 188, 104426.

Char, D. S., Abràmoff, M. D., & Feudtner, C. (2020). Identifying ethical considerations for
machine learning healthcare applications. The American Journal of Bioethics, 20(11),
7-17.
Chumachenko, D., Dudkina, T., Yakovlev, S., & Chumachenko, T. (2023). Effective Utilization
of Data for Predicting COVID-19 Dynamics: An Exploration through Machine Learning
Models. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 2023.
Costantino, V. (2021). Optimising public health decision-making and interventions for
infectious disease control. UNSW Sydney,
De Domenico, M. (2023). More is different in real-world multilayer networks. Nature Physics,
19(9), 1247-1262.
Hodson, T. O. (2022). Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When
to use them or not. Geoscientific Model Development, 15(14), 5481-5487.
Hou, Z., Du, F., Jiang, H., Zhou, X., & Lin, L. (2020). Assessment of public attention, risk
perception, emotional and behavioural responses to the COVID-19 outbreak: social
media surveillance in China. MedRxiv, 2020.2003. 2014.20035956.
Injury, I. O. C., Group, I. E. C., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Derman, W., Dvorak, J., . . . Kemp, S.
(2020). International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording
and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sports 2020 (including the
STROBE extension for sports injury and illness surveillance (STROBE-SIIS)).
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 8(2), 2325967120902908.
Jane Osareme, O., Muonde, M., Maduka, C.P., Olorunsogo, T.O. and Omotayo, O., 2024.
Demographic shifts and healthcare: A review of aging populations and systemic
challenges.
Kaur, I., Sandhu, A. K., & Kumar, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence techniques for predictive
modeling of vector-borne diseases and its pathogens: a systematic review. Archives of
Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(6), 3741-3771.
Keshavamurthy, R., & Charles, L. E. (2023). Predicting Kyasanur forest disease in resource-
limited settings using event-based surveillance and transfer learning. Scientific Reports,
13(1), 11067.
Keshavamurthy, R., Dixon, S., Pazdernik, K. T., & Charles, L. E. (2022). Predicting infectious
disease for biopreparedness and response: A systematic review of machine learning and
deep learning approaches. One Health, 100439.
Kotb, S., Lyman, M., Ismail, G., Abd El Fattah, M., Girgis, S. A., Etman, A., . . . Rashed, H.-a.
G. (2020). Epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Egyptian
intensive care units using National Healthcare–associated Infections Surveillance Data,
2011–2017. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 9(1), 1-9.
Landers, R. N., & Behrend, T. S. (2023). Auditing the AI auditors: A framework for evaluating
fairness and bias in high stakes AI predictive models. American Psychologist, 78(1), 36.
Luo, Y., Wunderink, R. G., & Lloyd-Jones, D. (2022). Proactive vs reactive machine learning
in health care: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA, 327(7), 623-624.
Muonde, M., Olorunsogo, T.O., Ogugua, J.O., Maduka, C.P. and Omotayo, O., 2024. Global
nutrition challenges: A public health review of dietary risks and interventions. World
Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 1467-1478.
Nahm, F. S. (2022). Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for
clinicians. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 75(1), 25-36.
Naraharisetti, R. (2023). Data-driven Approaches to Understand the Implications of Social
Processes for Infectious Disease Risk.
Ogugua, J.O., Olorunsogo, T.O., Muonde, M., Maduka, C.P. and Omotayo, O., 2024.
Developing countries' health policy: A critical review and pathway to effective
healthcare systems.
Oldekop, J. A., Rasmussen, L. V., Agrawal, A., Bebbington, A. J., Meyfroidt, P., Bengston, D.
N., . . . Davies, P. (2020). Forest-linked livelihoods in a globalized world. Nature Plants,
6(12), 1400-1407.
Olofsen, E., & Dahan, A. (2021). Calculating positive and negative predictive values. Comment
on Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 564-7. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 126(5), e170-e171.
Omotayo, O., Muonde, M., Olorunsogo, T.O., Ogugua, J.O. and Maduka, C.P., 2024. Pandemic
Epidemiology: A Comprehensive Review Of Covid-19 Lessons And Future Healthcare
Preparedness. International Medical Science Research Journal, 4(1), 89-107.
Omotayo, O., Maduka, C.P., Muonde, M., Olorunsogo, T.O., & Ogugua, J.O. (2024). The rise
of non-communicable diseases: a global health review of challenges and prevention
strategies. International Medical Science Research Journal, 4(1), 74-88.
Olorunsogo, T.O., Ogugua, J.O., Muonde, M., Maduka, C.P., & Omotayo, O. (2024).
Environmental factors in public health: A review of global challenges and
solutions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 1453-1466.
Olorunsogo, T.O., Ogugua, J.O., Muonde, M., Maduka, C.P., & Omotayo, O. (2024).
Epidemiological statistical methods: A comparative review of their implementation in
public health studies in the USA and Africa. World Journal of Advanced Research and
Reviews, 21(1), 1479-1495.
Pandey, V., Ranjan, M. R., & Tripathi, A. (2021). Climate Change and Its Impact on the
Outbreak of Vector-Borne Diseases. In Recent Technologies for Disaster Management
and Risk Reduction: Sustainable Community Resilience & Responses (pp. 203-228):
Springer.
Paré, P. E., Beck, C. L., & Başar, T. (2020). Modeling, estimation, and analysis of epidemics
over networks: An overview. Annual Reviews in Control, 50, 345-360.
Paulus, J. K., & Kent, D. M. (2020). Predictably unequal: understanding and addressing
concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities. NPJ digital
Medicine, 3(1), 99.
Peters, D. P., McVey, D. S., Elias, E. H., Pelzel‐McCluskey, A. M., Derner, J. D., Burruss, N.
D., . . . Lombard, J. (2020). Big data–model integration and AI for vector‐borne disease
prediction. Ecosphere, 11(6), e03157.
Petropoulos, F., Makridakis, S., & Stylianou, N. (2022). COVID-19: Forecasting confirmed
cases and deaths with a simple time series model. International Journal of Forecasting,
38(2), 439-452.
Ramos, P. I. P., Marcilio, I., Bento, A. I., Penna, G. O., de Oliveira, J. F., Khouri, R., . . . Galvão,
L. A. C. (2024). Combining Digital and molecular approaches using health and alternate
data sources in a next-generation surveillance system for anticipating outbreaks of
pandemic potential. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 10, e47673.
Roth, J., Chadalawada, J., Jain, R. K., & Miller, C. (2021). Uncertainty matters: Bayesian
probabilistic forecasting for residential smart meter prediction, segmentation, and
behavioral measurement and verification. Energies, 14(5), 1481.
Sacco, P. L., Valle, F., & De Domenico, M. (2023). Proactive vs. reactive country responses to
the COVID-19 pandemic shock. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(1), e0001345.
Shreffler, J., & Huecker, M. R. (2020). Diagnostic testing accuracy: Sensitivity, specificity,
predictive values and likelihood ratios.
Teh, H. Y., Kempa-Liehr, A. W., & Wang, K. I.-K. (2020). Sensor data quality: A systematic
review. Journal of Big Data, 7(1), 1-49.
Tröhler, U. (2020). Probabilistic thinking and the evaluation of therapies, 1700-1900. JLL
Bulletin.
Troin, M., Arsenault, R., Wood, A. W., Brissette, F., & Martel, J. L. (2021). Generating ensemble
streamflow forecasts: A review of methods and approaches over the past 40 years. In:
Wiley Online Library.
Wu, J. T., Leung, K., Lam, T. T., Ni, M. Y., Wong, C. K., Peiris, J. M., & Leung, G. M. (2021).
Nowcasting epidemics of novel pathogens: lessons from COVID-19. Nature Medicine,
27(3), 388-395.
Xiong, L., Hu, P., & Wang, H. (2021). Establishment of epidemic early warning index system
and optimization of infectious disease model: Analysis on monitoring data of public
health emergencies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 65, 102547.
Zhu, B., Zheng, X., Liu, H., Li, J., & Wang, P. (2020). Analysis of spatiotemporal characteristics
of big data on social media sentiment with COVID-19 epidemic topics. Chaos, Solitons
& Fractals, 140, 110123.

999-Article Text-2479-1-10-20240407

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

999-Article Text-2479-1-10-20240407

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Medical Science Research Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, April 2024

PREDICTIVE MODELING FOR DISEASE OUTBREAKS: A

Article Received: 15-01-24 Accepted:10-03-24 Published: 08-04-24

accuracy, interpretability, and applicability. This section provides an overview of these

Improving Data Collection Methods

machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena, 188, 104426.

You might also like