Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5-mass-transport-and-separation-2003
5-mass-transport-and-separation-2003
5-mass-transport-and-separation-2003
MASSTRANSPORTAND SEPARATION
I. TYPES OF DIFFUSION
II. MODELING DIFFUSION
A. Fick's First Law
B. Fick's Second Law
III. CHROMATOGRAPHIC IMPLICATIONS
A. Longitudinal Molecular Diffusion
B. Sorption and Desorption
C. Flow and Diffusion in the Mobile Phase
IV. DIFFUSION RATES IN VARIOUS MEDIA
A. Diffusion in Gases
B. Diffusion in Liquids
C. Diffusion in Solids
V. MASS TRANSFER
A. Flow Through Packed Columns
REFERENCES
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW
69
10 $. AHUJA
I. TYPES OF DIFFUSION
field is another example of forced diffusion that has been found tremendously
useful in centrifugation.
• Diffusion in Chromatography. It is important to remember that the term
diffusion is used mainly for the real molecular processes. In chromato-
graphic systems that are based on the flow of the mobile phase, complex
diffusional and flow processes are encountered that are more appro-
priately called axial dispersion.
• Axial Dispersion. When mass is distributed in the direction of flow
because of complex diffusion and flow processes, the phenomenon is
called axial dispersion.
dC
J--D d---~ (1)
where J--flux (the rate of mass flow per unit area in the direction x in
g mol/cm2/s), D - diffusion coefficient in cm2/s, C - concentration of the
solute in g mol/cm. 3
In Eq. (1), dc/dx is the concentration gradient (g mol/cm 4) in the direction x,
which is normal to the plane. The mass flow in the direction of lower
concentration is indicated by the negative sign. As per this equation, the
flux is directly proportional to the concentration gradient as it is equal to
the product of driving force (concentration gradient) and the diffusivity
constant.
The diffusion coefficient is not always constant, as it can depend on
concentration. Therefore, the actual driving force is the gradient of chemical
potential, which may be different from the concentration gradient. However,
in dilute solutions, Eq. (1) is valid. It should be noted that in a single phase,
diffusion takes place in any direction in which there is a concentration gradient.
The three-dimensional nature of molecular diffusion is undesirable from the
standpoint of separation technology because it leads to mixing instead of
separation.
72 S. AHUJA
C - ~ e - 11/ 2 ( x / c r ) 2 (4)
cr(2:r/-)1/2
where C = concentration in mass per unit length at position x after time t and
cr =standard deviation (in units of length) in normalized form.
In chromatography, the spreading of a band or front (see Fig. 1) that
moves down the column can be treated as a one-dimensional process. If the
74 S. AHUJA
1.25 i i i i i i i i i
1.0
0.125
0.75
0
0.5
0.25
0 !
I I I I
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
X X
FIGURE I Concentration profiles obtained by diffusion from planar source ( I ) .
center of a band or front moves with a velocity, v, we can consider the spread-
ing to take place in a moving coordinate system by the following equation:
x' - x + vt (5)
where x - diffusion of solute and x ' - p o s i t i o n at time t.
Based on Eq. (4), we can derive
C 1 -l/2[(x'-vt)/~]2
- ~ e (6)
0-(27/') 1/2
This equation conveys the fact that the center of distribution is not at x ' = 0,
but is at x ' = v t after time t at a flow velocity v.
It is important to note that this equation describes the Gaussian
concentration peaks that are usually obtained in elution chromatography.
The solute is injected as a planar source into the stream; it progresses down
the column and then becomes dispersed in a diffusion-like course. The
concentration of the emerging analyte is measured at the exit of the column,
and the peak is recorded. The ordinate denotes concentration, C, expressed as
amount per volume, and the abscissa represents the time, t, on the recorder
chart paper. The Gaussian peak on the chromatogram is basically the
graphical expression of Eq. (6).
To evaluate a given peak, we have to consider that x' in Eq. (6) is equal
to the length of the column and the concentration is given in mass per unit
length. From the recorded chromatogram, we can measure the time, tR, in
which the source moving at the peak center passes through the column at
constant velocity, v. Thus, x ' - v t may be replaced by t R - t in the exponent,
and the standard deviation may be measured in time units, crt. The
concentration would then be obtained per unit time.
A. Diffusion in Gases
Diffusion in a gas phase is of interest in separation methods such as distillation
or gas chromatography. Interdiffusion of equal molecules (self-diffusion) and
interdiffusion of similar small molecules such as nitrogen gas are well
understood on the basis of the kinetic theory of gases. However, gas mixtures
that contain large molecules and exhibit nonideal behavior are often important.
Based on experimentally measured diffusivities, the magnitude of diffusion
coefficients are shown in Table 1.
It is generally difficult to obtain diffusion data experimentally. As a
result, a dependable estimation of diffusion coefficients in mixtures and their
reliance on temperature and pressure is important for quantitative treatment
of many separation processes.
Based on kinetic theory, Hirschfelder and coworkers derived the following
equation for diffusion constant DAB for a binary mixture:
1"86 x 10-3T3/2 ( M
~ ~ B ) 1/2
DAB -- po.2g ~ D + (7)
equations are sound at low pressures, where the diffusivities are essentially
independent of concentration.
B. Diffusion in Uquids
Solute diffusivities in liquids are ordinarily strongly contingent on the composi-
tion, and their magnitude is resolved primarily by solvent properties. The
diffusion coefficients in liquids (Table 2) are generally smaller than in gases
by at least four orders of magnitude.
The Wilke-Chang equation is a well-known example of the various
equations that have been proposed for use in predicting diffusivities in liquids.
DAB- 7.4 X 10 . 8 ( ~ B M B ) I / 2 T
,7vo.6 (9)
where VA = molar volume of solute A, cubic centimeter per gram mole as a liquid
at its normal boiling point, MB = molecular weight of solvent, T = temperature
in K, r/= viscosity of solution in centipoises, and ~B -- "association factor" for
the solvent.
The recommended values for ~B are 1.0 for solvents such as ether,
aliphatic hydrocarbons, and benzene; 1.5 for ethanol; and 2.6 for water.
Equation (9) provides values within 10% of actual values for dilute solutions
of nondissociating small- and medium-size molecules.
The solute diffusivity depends strongly on solvent viscosity; for example,
see Eq. (9). While the square roots of the molecular weights of common solvents
vary slightly, the reciprocal velocities vary several thousand-fold, thus having a
large effect on diffusivity. The dependence of DAB on the solute properties is less
obvious for small solutes, as exhibited by the 0.6 power of the molar volume of
the solute. Table 3 demonstrates clearly that the diffusivities of large molecules
and macromolecules are greatly reduced.
The tendency of cations and anions to migrate with different speeds may
also affect the diffusivity of electrolytes. A so-called diffusion potential is
10 2.20 2.9
100 0.70 6.2
1000 0.25 13.2
10,000 0.11 28.5
100,000 0.05 62.0
1,000,000 0.025 132
C. Diffusion in Solids
The diffusion rates in solids are much smaller than in gases or liquids. As a
result, separation processes that require mass transfer in solids are of little
interest. However, diffusion in porous solid materials, such as ion-exchange
resins and membranes, is of great interest in many separation processes. It is
a good idea to remember that the solute diffusion is confined mostly to the pore
fluid or to the internal surface in these porous media.
V. MASS TRANSFER
The flux of the solute through the interface, Ji, may be described as follows:
L = k x ( C x - Cx~) = k,,:(CYs - C,,:) (11)
I. Darcy's Law
This law states that the flow velocity is proportional to the pressure gradient:
vo - B° Po - Pi
r/L (12)
B0 = d282 (13)
180(1 - e) 2
REFERENCES
1. Karger, B. L., Snyder, L. R., and Horvath, C. An Introduction to Separation Science, Wiley,
New York, NY, 1973.
2. Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion, Oxford University Press, London, 1956.
3. Giddings, J. C. Unified Separation Science, Wiley, New York, NY, 1991.
4. Fuller, E. N., Schettler, P. D., and Giddings, J. C~ Ind. Eng. Chem., 58:19, 1966.
5. Chemical Engineering Handbook (J. H. Perry, Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1963.
QUESTIONSFOR REVIEW