Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Westernization
Westernization
Westernization
also Europeanisation or occidentalization (from the Occident), is a process whereby societies come
under or adopt what is considered to be Western culture, in areas such
as industry, technology, science, education, politics, economics, lifestyle, law, norms, mores, customs
, traditions, values, mentality, perceptions, diet, clothing, language, writing system, religion,
and philosophy. During colonialism it often involved the spread of Christianity.[1]
Westernization has been a growing influence across the world in the last few centuries, with some
thinkers assuming Westernization to be the equivalent of modernization,[2] a way of thought that is
often debated. The overall process of Westernization is often two-sided in that Western influences
and interests themselves are joined with parts of the affected society, at minimum, to become a
more Westernized society, with the putative goal of attaining a Western life or some aspects of it,
while Western societies are themselves affected by this process and interaction with non-Western
groups.
Westernization traces its roots back to Ancient Greece.[citation needed] Later, the Roman Empire took on
the first process of Westernization as it was heavily influenced by Greece and created a new culture
based on the principles and values of the Ancient Greek society. The Romans emerged with a culture
that grew into a new Western identity based on the Greco-Roman society.
The phenomenon of Westernization does not follow any one specific pattern across societies as the
degree of adaption and fusion with Western customs will occur at varying magnitudes within
different communities.[4] Specifically, the extent to which domination, destruction, resistance,
survival, adaptation, or modification affect a native culture may differ following inter-ethnic contact.
[5]
Western world[edit]
The "West" was originally defined as the Western world. A thousand years later, the East-West
Schism separated the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church from each other. The definition
of Western changed as the West was influenced by and spread to other nations. Islamic and
Byzantine scholars added to the Western canon when their stores of Greek and Roman literature
jump-started the Renaissance. The Cold War also reinterpreted the definition of the West by
excluding the countries of the former Eastern Bloc. Today, most modern uses of the term refer to the
societies in the West and their close genealogical, linguistic, and philosophical descendants. Typically
included are those countries whose ethnic identity and dominant culture are derived from Western
European culture. Though it shares a similar historical background, the Western world is not a
monolithic bloc, as many cultural, linguistic, religious, political, and economic differences exist
between Western countries and populations.
Significantly influenced countries[edit]
Cape Verde:[12] An insular country in West Africa, Cape Verde has influences of European
culture (particularly Portuguese) and, together with the Azores and Madeira (Portugal), and
the Canary Islands (Spain), it is part of the archipelagos of Macaronesia. Due to this, the
country has shared close diplomatic and cultural relations with both Iberian countries and
has even tried to approach Western organizations, like the EU and NATO.
Israel:[14][15] Although Israel is geographically located in Western Asia, many Western cultural
influences were brought in Israel by Jewish settlers from the diaspora, particularly countries
like Canada, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. It is a member of
the OECD. It is often a member of European organisations for sports and cultural events such
as UEFA and Eurovision, which is due in large part to Israel's ouster from their respective
Asian counterparts. According to Sammy Smooha, a professor emeritus of sociology at Haifa
University, Israel is described as a "hybrid," a modern and developed "semi-Western" state.
With time, he acknowledged, Israel will become "more and more Western." But as a result of
the ongoing Arab–Israeli conflict, full Westernization will be a slow process in Israel.[15]
Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan:[16] Although they are geographically located in East Asia, the
three countries have westernized themselves by adopting democratic forms of government,
free market economic systems, major contributions to Western science and technology, and
could be described as "hybrid", "semi-Western" states.
Americas:[17] Most countries in Americas are considered Western countries, largely because
most of its peoples are descended from Europeans (Spanish and Portuguese settlers and
later immigration from other European nations), and their society operates in a highly
Westernized way. Most countries in the Americas use
either English, French, Spanish or Portuguese as their official language. According to the CIA
World Factbook, there has also been considerable immigration to South America, particularly
to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay, from European nations other
than Spain and Portugal (for example, from Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, etc.—
see Immigration to Argentina, Immigration to Brazil, Immigration to Chile, and Immigration
to Uruguay).[citation needed]
Thailand:[20] Although Thailand is geographically located in Southeast Asia, through the 18th
and 19th centuries, Siam faced imperialist pressure from France and the United Kingdom,
including many unequal treaties with Western powers and forced concessions of territory; it
nevertheless remained the only Southeast Asian country to avoid direct Western
colonization. The country became westernized by itself, the Siamese system of government
was centralized and initially organized into a modern unitary absolute monarchy during the
reign of Chulalongkorn, later as a constitutional monarchy following the Siamese revolution
of 1932. In the late 1950s, Thailand became a major ally of the United States, and played a
key anti-communist role in the region as a member of the SEATO. Currently, Thailand
continues to have strong ties to Western countries.
Turkey:[21] Although geographically only 3% of Turkey lies in Europe (East Thrace) and the rest
in Western Asia, Turkey is one of the most Westernized Turkic countries. The country has a
similar economic system, has a customs union with the European Union in addition to being
an official candidate for membership, and is a member of traditional European & Western
organisations such as the OECD, the Council of Europe, and NATO. It is also a member of
European organisations for sports such as UEFA and the European Olympic Committees, and
has participated in the Eurovision Song Contest. Relations between Turkey and Western
countries have been deteriorating since the 2010s.[citation needed]
Views[edit]
Kishore Mahbubani[edit]
Kishore Mahbubani's book entitled The Great Convergence: Asia, the West, and the Logic of One
World (Public Affairs), is very optimistic.[why?] It proposes that a new global civilization is being created.
The majority of non-Western countries admire and adhere to Western living standards. It says this
newly emerging global order has to be ruled through new policies and attitudes. He argues that
policymakers all over the world must change their preconceptions and accept that we live in one
world. The national interests must be balanced with global interests and the power must be shared.
Mahbubani urges that only through these actions can we create a world that converges benignly.
Samuel P. Huntington posits a conflict between "the West and the Rest" and offers three forms of
general action that non-Western civilizations can react toward Western countries.[23]
1. Non-Western countries can attempt to achieve isolation to preserve their own values and
protect themselves from Western invasion. He argues that the cost of this action is high and
only a few states can pursue it.
Mahbubani counters this argument in his other book, The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible
Shift of Global Power to the East. This time, he argues that Western influence is now "unraveling",
with Eastern powers such as China arising. He states:
…the 5.6 billion people who live outside the West no longer believe in the innate or inherent
superiority of Western civilization. Instead, many are beginning to question whether the West
remains the most civilized part of the world. What we are witnessing today…is the progressive
unwrapping of these many layers of Western influences.[24]
He explains the decline of Western influence, stating reasons as to the loss of Western credibility
with the rest of the world.
1. There is an increasing perception that Western countries will prioritize their domestic
problems over international issues, despite their spoken and written promises of having
global interests and needs.
2. The West has become increasingly biased and close-minded in their perception of "non-
Western" countries such as China, declaring it an "un-free" country for not following a
democratic form of government.
3. The West uses a double standard when dealing with international issues.
4. As the biggest Eastern populations gain more power, they are moving away from the
Western influences they sought after in the past. The "anti-Americanism" sentiment is not
temporary, as Westerners like to believe – the change in the Eastern mindset has become far
too significant for it to change back.
Samuel P. Huntington[edit]
In contrast to territorial delineation, others, like the American political scientist Samuel P.
Huntington (see The Clash of Civilizations), consider what is "Western" based on religious affiliation,
such as deeming the majority-Western Christian part of Europe and North America the West, and
creating 6 other civilizations, including Latin America, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu and Slavic-
Orthodox, to organize the rest of the globe.[25]
Huntington claimed that after the end of the cold war, world politics had been moved into a new
aspect in which non-Western civilizations were no more the exploited recipients of Western
civilization but become another important actor joining the West to shape and move the world
history.[26]
Huntington believed that while the age of ideology had ended, the world had only reverted to a
normal state of affairs characterized by cultural conflict. In his thesis, he argued that the primary axis
of conflict in the future will be along cultural and religious lines.[27]
Edward Said[edit]
Process[edit]
From the 1400s onward, Europeanization and colonialism spread gradually over much of the world
and controlled different regions during this five centuries long period, colonizing or subjecting the
majority of the globe.
Following World War II, Western leaders and academics sought to expand innate liberties and
international equality. A period of decolonization began. At the end of the 1960s, most colonies were
allowed autonomy. Those new states often adopted some aspects of Western politics such as a
constitution, while frequently reacting against Western culture.[citation needed]
In Asia[edit]
Korea[edit]
In Korea, the first contact with Westernization was during the Joseon Dynasty, in the 17th century.
Every year, the emperor dispatched a few envoy ambassadors to China and while they were staying
in Beijing, the Western missionaries were there. Through the missionaries, Korean ambassadors were
able to adopt Western technology. In the 19th century, Korea started to send ambassadors to the
foreign countries, other than Japan and China. While Korea was being Westernized slowly in the late
19th century, Korea had the idea of "Eastern ways and Western frames (東道西器)", meaning that
they accepted the Western "bowl", but used it with Eastern principles inside.[citation needed]
Japan[edit]
In Japan, the Netherlands continued to play a key role in transmitting Western know-how to the
Japanese from the 17th century to the mid-19th century, because the Japanese had only opened
their doors to Dutch merchants before US Navy Commodore Matthew Perry's visit in 1853. After
Commodore Perry's visit, Japan began to deliberately accept Western culture to the point of hiring
Westerners to teach Western customs and traditions to the Japanese starting in the Meiji era. Since
then, many Japanese politicians have encouraged the Westernization of Japan with the use of the
term Datsu-A Ron, which means the argument for "leaving Asia" or "Good-bye Asia". In Datsu-A Ron,
"Westernization" was described as an "unavoidable" but "fruitful" change. In contrast, despite many
advances in industrial efficiency, Japan has sustained a culture of strict social hierarchy and limited
individualization.[30]
Another example of Westernization: Prince Yorihito Higashifushimi of Japan in typical Western naval
dress uniform with white gloves, epaulettes, medals and hat.
Similarity with U.S. General John C. Bates's uniform.
Iran[edit]
In Iran, the process of Westernization dates back to the country's attempt to westernize during the
beginning of the 1930s, which was dictated by Shah Rezā Khan and continued by his son during the
Cold War and agitated the largely conservative Shia Muslim masses of the country which was partly
responsible for the 1979 Iranian Revolution.[31]
Turkey[edit]
Globalization (1970s–present)[edit]
Westernization is often regarded as a part of the ongoing process of globalization. This theory
proposes that Western thought has led to globalisation, and that globalisation propagates Western
culture, leading to a cycle of Westernization. On top of largely Western government systems such
as democracy and constitution, many Western technologies and customs like music, clothing, and
cars have been introduced across various parts of the world and copied and created in traditionally
non-Western countries.
Westernization has been reversed in some countries following war or regime change. For
example: Russia in aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution around 1917, Continental China by
1949, Cuba in aftermath of the Revolution in 1959, and Iran by the 1979 revolution.[32]
The main characteristics are economic and political (free trade) democratisation, combined with the
spread of an individualised culture. Often it was regarded as opposite to the worldwide influence
of communism. After the break-up of the USSR in late 1991 and the end of the Cold War, many of its
component states and allies nevertheless underwent Westernization, including privatization of
hitherto state-controlled industry.[33]
With debates still going on, the question of whether globalization can be characterized as
Westernization can be seen in various aspects. Globalization is happening in various aspects, ranging
from economics, politics, and even food or culture. Westernization, to some schools, is seen as a
form of globalization that leads the world to be similar to Western powers. Being globalized means
taking positive aspects of the world, but globalization also brings the debate about being
Westernized. Democracy, fast food, and American pop culture can all be examples that are
considered as Westernization of the world.
According to the "Theory of the Globe scrambled by Social network: a new Sphere of Influence 2.0",
published by Jura Gentium (University of Florence), the increasing role of Westernization is
characterized by social media. The comparison with Eastern societies, who decided to ban American
social media platforms (such as Iran and China with Facebook and Twitter), marks a political desire to
avoid the Westernization process of their own populations and ways to communicate.[34]
Consequences[edit]
Due to the colonization of the Americas and Oceania by Europeans, the cultural, ethnic, and linguistic
make-up of the Americas and Oceania has been changed. This is most visible in settler colonies such
as: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States,Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica,
and Uruguay, where the traditional indigenous population has been predominantly replaced
demographically by non-indigenous settlers due to transmitted disease and conflict. This
demographic takeover in settler countries has often resulted in the linguistic, social, and cultural
marginalisation of indigenous people. Even in countries where large populations of indigenous
people remain or the indigenous peoples have mixed (mestizo) considerably with European settlers,
such as: Mexico, Peru, Panama, Suriname, Ecuador, Bolivia, Venezuela, Belize, Paraguay, South
Africa, Colombia, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Guyana, El Salvador, Jamaica, Cuba, or Nicaragua,
relative marginalisation still exists.
Linguistic influence[edit]
Due to colonization and immigration, the formerly prevalent languages in the Americas, Oceania, and
part of South Africa, are now usually Indo-European languages or creoles based on them:
English (Australia, New Zealand, United States, and Canada without mainly French-
speaking Quebec); English along with English-based creole languages (Anglophone
Africa, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Dominica, Federated States of
Micronesia, Fiji, Grenada, Guyana, Hong Kong, India, Jamaica, Kiribati, Marshall
Islands, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint
Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sri
Lanka, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Trinidad and Tobago).
French (Quebec, New Brunswick and parts of Ontario in Canada and Saint Pierre and
Miquelon); French along with French-based creole languages (Francophone Africa, French
Guiana, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Vanuatu, Martinique, and Saint-Barthelemy).
Spanish (the Americas, Equatorial Guinea, Western Sahara, and the Philippines).
Portuguese (Brazil, Lusophone Africa, East Timor, Macau, Goa, and other members of
the Community of Portuguese Language Countries).
Dutch along with Creole languages (Suriname, Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles).
German along with Creole languages (along with Afrikaans in Namibia and some areas in the
US, such as Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania Dutch))
Many indigenous languages are on the verge of becoming extinct. Some settler countries have
preserved indigenous languages; for example, in New Zealand, the Māori language is one of three
official languages, the others being English and New Zealand sign language, another example is
Ireland, where Irish is the first official language, followed by English as the second official language.
The importance of sports partly comes from its connection to Westernization. The insight by
Edelman, R., & Wilson, W. (2017) explains “This new system of thought and practices imbued with
positive values in the exertion and strategic deployment of the human body, embracing the Anglo-
American notion that physical activity was meaningful in and of itself, conducive to values such as
learning and character-building. Modern athletics and competitive sports, avatars of this new body
culture, elicited largely willing local receptions in North Asia, though there were no doubt isolated
cases of coercive foisting better characterized as cultural imperialism.”[35]
See also[edit]
The Culture of Nakedness and the Nakedness of Culture – Study of Islamic and western views
on clothing and culture
Global citizenship – Idea that all people have rights and responsibilities from being a member
of the world
References[edit]
1. ^ Thong, Tezenlo (July 2012). "'To Raise the Savage to a Higher Level': The
Westernization of Nagas and their Culture". Modern Asian Studies. 46 (4): 893–
918. doi:10.1017/S0026749X11000412. JSTOR 41478422. S2CID 145414470. ProQu
est 1011622231.
6. ^ (Garsoïan, Nina (1997). R.G. Hovannisian (ed.). Armenian People from Ancient to
Modern Times. Vol. 1. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 81.)
8. ^ "92% of the Armenian public considers relations with the EU as very good, FM says
at EaP ministerial", Armenpress, 2020-09-24.
10. ^ "The future of the Trio Plus Strategy 2030: building a future of Eastern
Partnership" (PDF).
12. ^ "Afrol News - EU, Cape Verde display different interests in integration".
13. ^ Puga, Rogério Miguel (2013). The British Presence in Macau, 1637–1793. Royal
Asiatic Society. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. ISBN 978-988-8139-79-
8. LCCN 2013383538. OL 25637013M. Retrieved 2022-03-22.
14. ^ Arndt, Richard T.; Rubin, David Lee (1993). The Fulbright Difference: 1948-1992.
Transaction Publishers. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-4128-2424-8.
15. ^ Jump up to:a b Sheldon Kirshner (2013-10-16). "Is Israel Really a Western Nation?".
Sheldon Kirshner Journal. Retrieved 2013-11-09.
17. ^ Huntington, Samuel P. (1991). Clash of Civilizations (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.
pp. 38–39. ISBN 978-0-684-84441-1 – via Internet Archive. The origin of western
civilization is usually dated to 700 or 800 AD. In general, researchers consider that it
has three main components, in Europe, North America and South america. [...]
However, South America has followed a quite different development path from
Europe and North America. Although it is a scion of European civilization, it also
incorporates more elements of indigenous American civilizations compared to those
of Northern America and Europe. It also currently has a more corporatist and
authoritarian culture. Both Europe and Northern America felt the effects of
Reformation and the combination of Catholic and Protestant cultures. Historically,
many countries in the Americas has been only Catholic, although this may be
changing. [...] the Americas could be considered, or a sub-set, within Western
civilization, or can also be considered a separate civilization, intimately related to the
West, but divided as to whether it belongs with it.
20. ^ Leventon, Melissa; Gluckman, Dale Carolyn (June 2013). "Modernity Through the
Lens: The Westernization of Thai Women's Court Dress". Costume. 47 (2): 216–
233. doi:10.1179/0590887613Z.00000000025.
21. ^ Cagaptay, Soner (2014). The Rise of Turkey: The Twenty-First Century's First Muslim
Power. Potomac Books. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-61234-651-9.
22. ^ Nguyen, Quynh Thi Nhu (2016). "The Vietnamese Values System: A Blend of
Oriental, Western and Socialist Values". International Education Studies. 9 (12): 32–
40. doi:10.5539/ies.v9n12p32.
23. ^ Huntington, Samuel P. (2000). "The Clash of Civilizations?". Culture and Politics.
pp. 99–118. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_6. ISBN 978-1-349-62399-0.
24. ^ Mahbubani, Kishore (2009). The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of
Global Power to the East. PublicAffairs. pp. 129–130. ISBN 978-1-58648-628-0.
26. ^ Murden, Simon (2011). "Cultures in world affairs". In Baylis, John; Smith, Steve;
Owens, Patricia (eds.). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to
International Relations. OUP Oxford. pp. 414–427. ISBN 978-0-19-956909-0.
27. ^ mehbaliyev (30 October 2010). "Civilizations, their nature and clash possibilities (c)
Rashad Mehbal…".[self-published source?]
28. ^ "McDonald's China Plans To Open A New Store Every Day". HuffPost. 29 July 2011.
29. ^ Adrian, Bonnie (2003). Framing the Bride: Globalizing Beauty and Romance in
Taiwan's Bridal Industry. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
30. ^ Dore, Ronald (1984). "Unity and Diversity in World Culture". In Bull, Hedley;
Watson, Adam (eds.). The Expansion of International Society. Clarendon Press.
pp. 407–424 [416]. ISBN 978-0-19-821942-2.
31. ^ del Giudice, Marguerite (2008). "Persia: ancient soul of Iran". National
Geographic. 214 (2): 34–67.
32. ^ Priborkin, Emily (8 April 2019). "40 Years Later: Iran after the Islamic
Revolution". American University. Retrieved 1 August 2021. {{cite journal}}: Cite
journal requires |journal= (help)
33. ^ "Consequences of the Collapse of the Soviet Union". Norwich University. 2 October
2017. Retrieved 1 August 2021. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
34. ^ Peccia, Tiziano (2014). "The Theory of the Globe Scrambled by Social
Networks". Jura Gentium.
35. ^ Edelman, Robert; Wilson, Wayne (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Sports History.
Oxford University Press. p. 273. ISBN 978-0-19-985892-7.
Further reading[edit]
'Bonnett, Alastair (2004). The Idea of the West: Culture, Politics, and History. Basingstoke,
Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1403900345.
The Limits of Westernization: American and East Asian Intellectuals Create Modernity, 1860-
1960 (2019) Routledge, written by Jon Thares Davidann
The End of History and the Last Man (1992), written by Francis Fukuyama.
The Triumph of the West (1985) written by Oxford University historian J.M. Roberts.
Ankerl, Guy (2000). Global communication without universal civilization. INU societal
research. Vol. 1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and
Western. Geneva: INU Press. ISBN 978-2-88155-004-1.
Watters, Ethan (2011). Crazy like us. London. ISBN 978-1-84901-577-6. OCLC 751584971.
tion
y control databases
Categories:
Global culture
Cultural assimilation
Cultural geography
Imperialism
Western culture
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional
terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.