Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Materi PKP Sesi UTS
Materi PKP Sesi UTS
Konsep Konsumsi
Pangan
UNTUK APA MENILAI KONSUMSI PANGAN?
What are the
CHALLENGES to
global food security?
GLOBAL, REGIONAL, AND NATIONAL FOOD SYSTEMS
face major challenges and require fundamental transformation
to meet our food needs sustainably.
1 MALNUTRITION
2 BILLION 144 MILLION 47 MILLION
people children children
lack key micronutrients are are
like iron and vitamin A stunted wasted
2018 2050
55 % 68 %
Source: UN 2018
4 FORCED MIGRATION
2009
43.3 MILLION
2018
Sumberdaya potensial
Kerangka Pikir UNICEF Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Status Gizi Anak
Definition: FOOD SECURITY
1. Physical AVAILABILITY of food. Food availability addresses the “supply side” of food
security and is determined by the level of food production, stock levels and net trade. Food security exists
2. Economic and physical ACCESS to food. An adequate supply of food at the national or when all people, at all
international level does not in itself guarantee household level food security. Concerns times, have physical
about insufficient food access have resulted in a greater policy focus on incomes,
expenditure, markets and prices in achieving food security objectives. and economic access to
sufficient safe and
3. Food UTILIZATION. Utilization is commonly understood as the way the body makes the
most of various nutrients in the food. Sufficient energy and nutrient intake by nutritious food that
individuals is the result of good care and feeding practices, food preparation, diversity meets their dietary
of the diet and intra-household distribution of food. Combined with good biological
utilization of food consumed, this determines the nutritional status of individuals. needs and food
preferences for an
4. STABILITY of the other three dimensions over time. Even if your food intake is
adequate today, you are still considered to be food insecure if you have inadequate active and healthy life.
access to food on a periodic basis, risking a deterioration of your nutritional status. - 1996 World Food Summit
Adverse weather conditions, political instability, or economic factors (unemployment,
rising food prices) may have an impact on your food security status.
9
The three pillars of food security
Food availability: The
amount of food physically
available to a household or
at national level;
Access to food: The
physical and economical
ability of a household to
acquire adequate amounts
of food;
Food utilization: The intra-
household use of the food
accessible and the
individual’s ability to
absorb and use those
nutrients.
1. AVAILABILITY
Food availability is defined as sufficient
quantities of food of appropriate quality,
supplied through domestic production or
imports (including food assistance).
• Failed harvest
Ukraine, 2015: Attempt from Ukraine to block the passage of
importing of foodstuffs
• Lack of markets
• Blockades
11
Food availability
The physical presence of food
stocks in the area of concern
through:
• Blockades, destruction/obstruction of
road networks
13
Food access
How easily house holds can get
food from:
• Own production
• Hunting, fishing or wild foods
• Purchase
• Barter/exchange
• Gifts
3. UTILIZATION
A further component in the definition of food security
concerns the actual quality and type of food supplied and a
requirement that it should not merely satisfy protein-energy
needs but provide the nutritional balance necessary for a
healthy and active life; in addition to this was the
recognition of preferences, traditional habits and socially
acceptable food types when considering the definition of
Somalia, 2017: Cholera spreading in Somalia, 50,000 cases
food security. foreseen according to WHO
N.B.food utilization
includes nutrition and
consumption
4. STABILITY
Another component of food security is the time element.
Food insecurity could be categorized as either chronic or
transitory with the former representing a situation where
the lack of food is a permanent feature and the latter
describing a temporary shortage.
“Access of all people at all times to enough food for an
active, healthy life”.
17
Temporal dimensions of food security
19
MEASUREMENT AND TERMINOLOGY
• Dietary diversity and food frequency: This type of metric
captures the number of different kinds of food or food
groups that people eat and the frequency with which Dietary Diversity and Food
Frequency
they eat them. Sometimes involves weighting these i. Food Consumption Score (FCS);
groups. The result is a score that represents the diversity ii. Household Dietary Diversity
of intake, but not necessarily the quantity, though such Scale (HDDS);
scores have been shown to be significantly correlated iii. Spending on food
iv. Undernourishment
with caloric adequacy measures (IFPRI 2006, Coates et
al. 2007).
Consumption Behaviours
• Consumption behaviours: These measures capture food i. Coping Strategy Index (CSI);
security indirectly, by measuring behaviours related to ii. Reduced Coping Strategy Index (rC
iii. Household Food Insecurity and
food consumption. E.g. the Coping Strategies Index or
Access Scale (HFIAS);
CSI, which counts the frequency and severity of iv. The Household Hunger Scale (HHS)
behaviours in which people engage when they do not v. Self-assessed measure of food
have enough food or enough money to buy food security (SAFS).
(Maxwell and Caldwell 2008)
20
MEASUREMENT: FOOD CONSUMPTION SCORE (FCS)
21
MEASUREMENT: COPING STRATEGY INDEX (CSI)
1 Ketidakcukupan Konsumsi
makanan makanan
2 Penurunan cadangan gizi di Biokimia
jaringan tubuh
3 Penurunan kadar gizi di Biokimia
cairan tubuh
4 Penurunan taraf fungsional Antropometri/bioki
di jaringan tubuh mia
5 Penurunan aktivitas enzim Biokimia
6 Perubahan fungsional Perilaku/Fisiologi
WFP 2018
Figure : Average consumption of protein by income group
WFP 2018
Pola Konsumsi Pangan
No Pola Konsumsi Persentase
1. Konsumsi sayur & buah rendah >10th 93,6%
2. Konsumsi makanan padat gula 65,2 %
3. Konsumsi makanan padat garam 29,5 %
4. Konsumsi makanan padat lemak 12,8 %
Danger
of toxicity
Marginal
Tolerable
Upper Intake
Safety
Level
Safety
RDA or AI
RDA Estimated
Marginal Average
Requirement
Danger Danger
of
deficiency
Naive Accurate
view view
Central question of human
nutrition science :
• What substances in food (and in what
amounts) are necessary for good health ?
• Traditional endpoints
– Growth and development
– Successful reproduction
– Prevention of deficiency diseases
What else constitutes good
health ?
• Observational epidemiology, clinical
trials link diet to increased risk of
chronic diseases of aging.
• Epidemiology and nutrient-gene
expression studies are refining a new
concept : Deveopment origins of health
and diseases.
Endpoints for defining good
health
• Growth and development
• Successful reproduction
• Prevention of deficiency diseases
• Prevention of chronic diseases of aging
• Prevention of toxicity
• Maintenance of physiological function
What are the purposes
of the DRIs?
• To maintain nutritional adequacy
• To promote health
• To reduce risk of chronic disease
• To provide a measure for evaluating
inadequacy and/or excess
• To assess intakes as distributions
– Across population groups
– In individuals
• To plan diets 16
Goal of Indonesian AKG
1. Calculating the nutritional adequacy of the population in the area
2. Develop guidelines for food consumption
3. Assessing food consumption in the population with certain
characteristics
4. Calculating the need for nutritious food in institutional food service
5. Calculating the need for nutritious food in emergency situations
6. Setting a Nutrition Label Reference
7. Developing a food consumption quality index
8. Developing processed food products
9. Determining the poverty line
10.Determine the minimum cost for nutritious food in the food social
security program
11.Determining the minimum wage
12.Other needs
17
Why are the DRIs important to
nutrition, food, and agriculture policy ?
• Dietary assessment
• Planning and procuring food supplies
• Food fortification and supplementation
policies
• Planning education programs
• Planning and evaluating food assistance
• Food labeling policies
• Agricultural policies
Why do we need to assure
nutrient quality?
• To impact nutritional status
• To impact health
• To impact functionality
• To impact quality of life
• To assist older adults in making healthy
choices
• To measure & document outcomes
19
Definitions
What are the Dietary Reference
Intakes (DRIs)?
• Reference values of nutrients,
primarily used by nutrition & health
professionals
• Basis for
– assessing & planning
diets of healthy people
– nutrition &
food programs
21
Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs)
Collective term that includes nutrient-
based dietary reference values
• Estimated Average Requirement (EAR)
• Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)
• Adequate Intake (AI)
• Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL)
• Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution
Range (AMDR)
What are characteristics
of the DRIs?
• Separate values
– men
– women
• Age groups
– 0-6 mo; 7-11mo……
– 51 - 70 yrs
– 70+ yrs
• Deficiency disease reduction
• Chronic disease reduction
• Safe upper levels of intake
25
Who established the DRIs?
26
What are the different
DRI values?
• Estimated Average Requirement: EAR
• Recommended Dietary Allowance: RDA
• Adequate Intake: AI
• Tolerable Upper Intake Level: UL
27
What is a nutrient requirement?
28
What is the EAR?
Estimated Average Requirement
• Nutrient intake to meet the
requirement of half the healthy
people of an age & gender
• The MEDIAN (Think bell curve)
• Basis for establishing an RDA
29
EAR
Number
of people
EAR
Daily requirement for nutrient
What is the RDA?
Recommended Dietary Allowance
• Nutrient intake to meet the
requirement for nearly all (97-98%)
healthy people of an age & gender
• Derived from an EAR
• RDA = EAR + 2 standard deviations
• or RDA = EAR + 2 (10%)
32
RDA
Number
of people
EAR RDA
Daily requirement for nutrient
For Energy : RDA = EAR
What is the AI?
Adequate Intake
• Nutrient intake of healthy people
assumed to be adequate
• Used when an RDA cannot be established
• Insufficient data to determine an EAR
• Based on observed intakes, experimental
data, etc.
35
Figure. Dietary Reference Intakes for
vitamins and minerals in individuals one
year and older. EAR = Estimated
Average Requirement; RDA =
Recommended Dietary Allowance; AI =
Adequate Intake; UL = Tolerable Upper
Intake Level; — = no value established.
What is the UL?
Tolerable Upper Intake Level
• Highest daily nutrient intake likely to pose
no risk of adverse health effects to almost
all the general population
• Applies to daily use
• Not a recommended level
– No established benefits of higher level
– Increased risks at higher intakes
37
Tolerable Upper Intake Level
• ULs vary among nutrients:
– some apply to intake from all sources -- food,
fortified food, supplements, water (eg, calcium,
vitamin D)
– some apply to intake from synthetic forms
alone (eg, folic acid, niacin, magnesium)
– not all nutrients have ULs established presently
(eg, vitamin B12)
38
EAR:
Setting DRIs UL:
50% risk of Upper Limit with no
RDA:
inadequacy risk of inadequacy
2-3% risk
or adverse effects
of inadequacy
Nutrient AMDR
Carbohydrate 45 - 65%
Fat 20 - 35%
Protein 10 - 35%
Dietary Reference Intakes
Why use the DRIs?
• Increase accuracy of dietary
assessments, taking care that :
– dietary data are complete,
– portions are correctly specified,
– food composition data are accurate,
– methodologies & plans for sampling
group intakes are appropriate.
43
Use of DRIs:
Assessing Intakes
• For an Individual • For a Group
EAR: Use to examine the probability EAR: Use to examine the prevalence
that usual intake is inadequate of inadequate intakes within a
RDA: Usual intake at/above this group
level has low probability of RDA: Do not use to assess intakes of
inadequacy groups
AI: Usual intake at/above this level AI: Mean usual intake at/above this
has low probability of inadequacy level implies a low prevalence of
UL: Usual intake above this level inadequate intakes
may place individual at risk of UL: Use to estimate % population at
adverse effects from excessive potential risk of adverse effects
nutrient intake from excessive nutrient intake
44
RDA is inappropriate for assessing
groups
• RDA: intake levels that exceed requirements
of 97–98 % of all individuals when
requirements in the group have a normal
distribution
• Thus, RDA: not a cut-point for assessing
nutrient intakes of groups-- serious
overestimation of the proportion of the group
at risk of inadequacy would result
45
Group Prevalence of
Inadequate Intakes
• What proportion of
individuals in a
group have usual
intake below
requirements?
47
Planning for groups
or individuals
• Dietary Reference Intakes for
Planning: publication in July 2002.
• RDAs can be used in planning for
groups or individuals – but not in
assessing adequacy of intake.
48
Uses of DRIs (cont.)
• Diet Planning
– Individual
• aim for RDA & AI
• use UL as guide to limit intake
– Group
• use EAR to set goals for intake of group
UL Women
Food composition
database and
dietary
assessment tool
Departemen Gizi Masyarakat, FEMA-
IPB University
2022
Learning Objectives
Able to identify various types of data
01 on food composition and types of
nutrients.
www.panganku.org
DATA
PRIMARY SOURCES OF FOOD COMPOSITION
DATA
❖ Another ARS database is the Food and Nutrient
Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS), which is
used to assess dietary intakes for the National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES).
❖ The FNDDS includes the foods reported as being
consumed by NHANES participants and contains
62 food components for approximately 7,000
foods. The data in FNDDS are derived primarily
from the NDSR, and all missing values are
imputed so that the database is complete for
FOOD COMPOSITION making
❖ dietary intake assessments.
DATA ❖ The FNDDS is also freely available on the
Internet. Figure 1 summarizes the features of the
NDSR and FNDDS.
Features of the US Department of Agriculture
Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (NDSR)
and Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary
Studies (FNDDS)
NETWORK OF FCT
❖ Several international institutions have
developed and compiled data on the
nutrient composition of foods and computer
programs that present DKPI data.
❖ FAO through The International Network of
Food Data Systems (INFOODS) compiles
TKPI from various countries in the world in
the International Food Composition Tables
Directory. This activity which has been
carried out since 1988 is supported by
Tabel Komposisi Pangan databases from various regional regions,
including Southeast Asia through The
Indonesia Association of Southeast Asian Network of
Food Data Systems (ASEANFOODS).
NETWORK OF FCT
❖ ASEANFOODS was founded in 1986 by 6
countries, namely Brunei Darussalam,
Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines,
Singapore, and Thailand. Vietnam became
a member in 1996, followed by Cambodia,
Myanmar and Laos in 2001.
❖ In order to coordinate the activities of each
member country, the Institute of Nutrition,
University of Mahidol (INMU) was
appointed as the regional center of
Tabel Komposisi Pangan ASEANFOODS since 1986 and also as the
center of the INFOODS regional database
Indonesia since 1991.
Network Purpose
❖ Promote and support the development of
national and regional food composition
databases,
❖ Ensure that the database is maintained to a
high standard and can be accessed by
users, both in the ASEAN region and in
other regional areas.
❖ Contribute to the sustainability of science
towards improving food and nutrition
security and achieving sustainable
Tabel Komposisi Pangan consumption.
Indonesia
DEFINITION
❖The Indonesian Food Composition
Table (TKPI) or Food Ingredients
Composition List (DKBM) is a database
that contains the composition and
content of nutrients contained in a food
made by a country and contains data
on energy, nutrients, and other
important components contained in
food.
Tabel Komposisi Pangan ❖Nutrient content figures are obtained
based on laboratory analysis or
Indonesia estimated from other appropriate data.
OBJECTIVE
❖To estimate/compare the nutrient content of
various foods and identify food sources of
certain nutrients.
❖To be used as a basic instrument in the
assessment of nutrient consumption, both for
individuals and communities.
❖In the field of clinical nutrition, this information
is used to prepare special menus for patients
with certain diseases and provide information
to patients.
❖In the field of research, information on nutrient
composition is useful for assessing the effect of
Tabel Komposisi Pangan food consumption on health.
Indonesia
OBJECTIVE (Cont..)
❖In the field of public health, information
is used to monitor the availability of food
and nutrients, as well as to provide
information and educational materials
for consumers.
❖In the food industry, information is used
for food labeling and preparation of
nutritional claims, product development
and formulation, and food product
marketing.
Tabel Komposisi Pangan ❖For food and nutrition policy planning,
Indonesia including projections of future food
needs.
TYPES OF FOOD
❖Single food is food that has not undergone
processing and does not have a mixture of
other food ingredients (including salt and oil),
usually in raw or fresh form or still in its natural
form.
❖Processed food is food that has undergone a
processing process so that it changes the
natural form of food.
❖ The processed food ingredients can be in the form
of single/single food ingredients that have
undergone processing or composite/mixed foods.
Examples of processed single foodstuffs are wheat
Tabel Komposisi Pangan flour and rice flour.
❖ Composite/mixed foods, for example, are cooking,
Indonesia pastries, and manufactured foods.
Food Groups
Definition
Rumus :
BERAT MENTAH = BERAT MATANG X FAKTOR KONVERSI
Contoh Daftar Faktor No. Kelompok Bahan Makanan Faktor Konversi
BERAS GILING
Konversi Berat Pangan 1 Nasi liwet 0,4
Matang-Mentah 2
3
Nasi tim
Bubur nasi
0,2
0,2
KETAN PUTIH
SEREALIA, UMBI 4 Ketan liwet 0,6
5 Ketan bubur 0,2
DAN HASIL 6 Ketan kukus 0,6
7 Ketan rengginang 0,4
OLAHNYA 8 Ketan lontong 0,3
9 Ketan Tape 0,6
KETAN HITAM
10 Ketan liwet 0,3
11 Ketan bubur 0,2
12 Ketan kukus 0,5
13 Ketan tape 0,7
TEPUNG BERAS
14 Tepung bubur 0,1
15 Bihun rebus-goreng 04
16 Bihun rebus 0,3
17 Mi basah goreng 0,5
18 Mi basah rebus 0,6
19 Mi kering rebus goreng 0,3
20 Mi kering rebus 0,4
9. CALCULATION OF EDIBLE WEIGHT (BDD)
Gunakan data konversi matang-mentah dan % BDD dari bahan makanan yang
paling mendekati
Untuk konversi matang-mentah jika tidak ada yang mendekati, gunakan pendekatan Berat
matang = berat mentah
NO. BAHAN MAKANAN FAKTOR
KONVERSI
Serealia dan olahannya BDD
Daftar faktor 1
2
Beras
Beras jagung
100
100
konversi bagian 3
4
Jagung kuning, pipl baru
Jagung kuning, pipil lama
90
90
yang dapat 5 Jagung muda, kuning (untuk rebus & bakar,
ada bonggol)
28
Alur
Penghitungan Daftar konversi serapan minyak
Serapan Minyak
Ada Tidak
68
71
74
77
80
83
86
89
92
95
98
01
04
07
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
Objective
General
The Food Balance Sheet is prepared to
provide data and information on the
supply/procurement and use of food as
well as the availability of food for
consumption by the population in the
form of volume and nutrients.
Objective
1. Analyzing changes in the types of food available/consumed from
year to year;
2. Knowing the overview of procurement (production , import , stock
or reserve )
3. Knowing the use and availability of food for population
consumption and its changes in an area at a certain time (every
year)
4. Obtain a detailed picture of the level of food availability (deficit or
surplus), food self-sufficiency, dependence on imports, post-
harvest efficiency; competition for food use for humans and
livestock (food versus feed); trend of production, export, import,
food stock and quality/composition of available food
14
Objective
5. Analyze adequacy level compared to RDA;
6. Research/ predict the food situation of a country / region ;
7. Estimate a surplus/ deficit of a certain area ;
8. Make projections of food availability and food trade;
9. Formulate and evaluate food and nutrition policy ;
10. Associate with cases of starvation and lack of food/ nutrition ;
11.Analyze the dependencies towards import ;
15
Benefit
1. Knowing the amount of food supply, food use
and food availability per capita for
population consumption.
2. Evaluate the procurement and use of food.
3. Evaluating the level of food availability based
on recommendations for nutritional
adequacy and expected food patterns from
the aspect of availability.
4. Reference material in food
production/procurement planning.
5. Materials for formulating food and nutrition
policies.
Food Balanced Sheet:
Provision Utilization
Availability per
capita
Food Availability Formula:
TD = O – St + M – X – (F + S + I + W)
Description :
TD = availability food for consumption of the population;
O = Production input/output; St = Change in stock;
M = Import ;
X = Export ;
F = Feed ;
S = Seeds ;
I = Industry ( food and non -food) food );
W = waste
• Type of Commodity (Column 1) :
All food ingredients that are common / can be
consumed by residents in the area concerned,
whether traded or not.
• Import (Column 5)
Amount of food ingredients which enter to a
country/territory of another country/ administrative
region ( trade between island / between province )
• Domestic Provision before export (Column 6)
Amount of food ingredient that comes from production
( output ) minus change pf stock added with import
( column 3 – column 4 + column 5)
• Export (Column 7)
Amount of food ( according to type ) that are sent abroad /
To other administrative areas
-Not accurate ?
-Not on time ?
-Not informative ?
-Never informed?
Analysis of
Regional Food
Availability
What is PPH/DDP?
FAO-RAPA (1989) defines PPH as "the
composition of the main food groups which
when consumed can meet the needs of energy
and other nutrients". PPH is an arrangement of
various foods based on the proportion of energy
balance from various food groups to meet the
needs of energy and other nutrients, both in
quantity and quality by taking into account
terms of acceptability, food availability,
economy, culture and religion.
What is PPH?
PPH is a simple instrument to assess the food
consumption situation of the population, both the
amount and composition of food according to the type of
food stated in the PPH score. The higher the PPH score,
the more diverse and nutritionally balanced food
consumption (maximum 100).
The PPH score is an indicator of nutritional quality and
diversity of food consumption so that it can be used to
plan food consumption needs in the coming years.
PPH can be used as a guide in evaluating and planning
the provision, production and consumption of food for the
population, both in terms of quantity, quality, and
diversity by considering social, economic, cultural,
religious and taste aspects.
PPH objective
To produce a composition of food norms
(standards) to meet the nutritional needs of
the population, which takes into account the
nutritional balance based on: taste
(palatability), digestibility (digestability),
community acceptance (acceptability),
quantity and purchasing power
(Affortability).
PPH Uses
1. To assess the situation of food
consumption or availability, both the
amount and composition/diversity of
food.
2. For planning consumption or food
availability
→ PPH approach ( measure of nutritional balance and
food diversity )
→ fulfillment nutritional balance: the higher the PPH
score, the more diverse and balanced food
consumption is which based on the concept of triguna
food
→ balance of quantities between food groups is a
condition for the realization of nutritional balance
→ concept of balanced nutrition balance between intake
(consumption) of nutrients and their needs, as well as
the amount between meals ( Hardinsyah et al . 2001)
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF PPH
Side dish
Substance Substance
builder regulator Vegetables & Fruits
(100/3 %) (100/3 %) (100/3 %) (100/3 %)
Staple Food
Substance power
(100/3 %)
(100/3 %)
BALANCED NUTRITION
1. S e re a lia … … … … … .. 5 0 %
2. U m b i-u m b ia n … … … 6 %
Sum ber Tenaga 3. M in y a k & le m a k … … .1 0 %
(K H , le m a k ) 4. B iji d a n b u a h 3 3 .3
T ig a B e rm in y a k .… … … … . 3 %
G una 5 . G u la … … … … … … … 5 %
M akanan 3 3 .3 : 7 4 = 0 .5
1 Grains 40.0 40.0-60.0 50.0 0.5 25.0 50.0 0.5 25.0 300.0
5.0
2 tubers 0.0-8.0 5.0 0.5 2.5 6.0 0.5 2.5 100.0
3 Animal Food 20.0 5.0-20.0 15.3 2.0 30.6 12.0 2.0 24.0 150.0
4 Oil and fat 10.0 5.0-15.0 10.0 1.0 10.0 10.0 0.5 5.0 25.0
5 Oily fruit/seeds 3.0 0.0-3.0 3.0 0.5 1.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 10.0
6 Nuts 6.0 2.0-10.0 5.0 2.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 10.0 35.0
7 Sugar 8.0 2.0-15.0 6.7 0.5 3.4 5.0 0.5 2.5 30.0
Vegetable and
8 5.0 3.0-8.0 5.0 2.0 10.0 6.0 5.0 30.0 250.0
fruit
9 Etc 3.0 0.0-5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 (25)
58
How to calculate PPH?
1. Grouping food
2. Conversion type and unit
3. Counting availability / consumption energy
according to group food
4. Calculate total energy
5. Counting contribution energy from every group
food (%)
6. Counting actual
7. Counting PPH score based on adequacy energy
8. Use maximum PPH score
9. Calculating the total PPH score
59
1. Food Group
• Weakness :
- Produce inaccurate data because the food recorded is in units and URT
- Does not take into account food consumed outside the home and discarded as leftovers.
- Kurang teliti, karena anggota keluarga yang diminta mencatat tersebut tidak berlatar
belakang pengumpul data yang profesional sehingga hasil ukurnya tidak dapat
menggambarkan tingkat konsumsi rumah tangga.
- Sangat tergantung pada kejujuran responden untuk melaporkan/mencatat makanan dalam
keluarga.
Food Account
• Steps:
1. Introduce yourself and the purpose of the survey
2. Ask the identity and number of household
members, age and gender
3. On the first day ask what foods provided or entered
the HH today in household sizes and their origin and
price
4. The next day, check again, if there are other foods
provided yesterday that have not been recorded
5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until the survey is complete
Formulir Food Account Method
Food List Method
• Metode pendaftaran makanan dilakukan dengan
menanyakan dan mencatat seluruh bahan makanan
yang digunakan keluarga selama periode survei
dilakukan (biasanya 1-7 hari).
• Pencatatan berdasarkan jumlah bahan makanan
yang dibeli, harga dan nilai pembeliannya,
termasuk makanan yang dimakan anggota keluarga
dluar rumah.
• Data yang diperoleh merupakan perkiraan dari
responnden.
• Metode ini tidak memperhitungkan bahan makanan
yang terbuang, rusak atau diberikan pada binatang
piaraan.
Food List Method
• Jumlah bahan makanan diperkirakan dengan
ukuran berat atau URT. Dalam pelaksanaannya
dapat dipergunakan alat bantu seperti food
model atau contoh lainnya(gambar-gambar, contoh
bahan makanan aslinya dan sebagainya) untuk
membantu daya ingat responden.
• Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara
wawancara yang dibantu dengan formulir yang
telah disiapkan yaitu, kosioner terstruktur yang
memuat daftar bahan makanan utama yang
digunakan keluarga.
• Karena data yang diperoleh merupakan taksiran
atau perkiraan maka data yang diperoleh kurang
teliti.
Food List
• Kelebihan :
• Biaya relatif murah karena hanya membutuhkan
waktu yang singkat
• Kekurangan :
• Hasil yang diperoleh kurang teliti karena didasarkan
atas estimasi atau perkiraan.
• Sangat subjektif, tergantung kejujuran dari
responden
• Sangat bergantung pada daya ingat responden
Food Inventory
• Information to note:
• Identity of all families living in the house
(age, gender, activity, anthropometry
• Every time a food is weighed, it must be
noted who the family members eat,
including if there are guests
• This information is very useful for
calculating the average daily consumption
and the average adequacy of energy and
other nutrients
Food Inventory
• Strengths :
- Has high accuracy
• Weakness :
- Expensive
- It takes a lot of time
- Requires trained personnel
- It needs high active participation from data collectors and
respondents
- The target is to change food consumption habits / patterns
- Not suitable for the type of family who is not used to storing
food
Food Inventory
• Steps (1) :
1. Introduce yourself and the purpose of the survey
2. Ask the identity and number of household
members, age and gender
3. On the first day, weigh the food available at home,
which is considered an initial stock (Sai)
4. On the following day (day 2 until the day before the
end of the survey) weigh and record all incoming
food (purchased, given, eaten outside the basket)
(Pmi)
5. Record and weigh all food issued to be given to
others (Pki)
Food Inventory
• Steps (2) :
6. On the last day of the survey, record and weigh all
food at home, which is considered as end stock
(Ski)
7. The amount of food consumed (Ki) by the family
can be calculated using this equation:
• Steps (3) :
8. The nutrient intake of the family can be calculated:
KGj = ∑ Ki NGj / 100
Note:
KGj = Nutrient intake for a wekk
NGj = Nutritional value per 100 grams of food
J = Types of nutrients
Ki = Weight of food of i..
9. Average nutrient intake per capity per day = KGj /
N, where N is the number of family members
Food Inventory
Keterangan : Pencatatan stok harus dilakukan pada waktu yang sama setiap hari
Household Food Record
• Strengths :
1. Does not rely on memory
2. Provides detailed data on portion sizes consumed,
especially when weighed
3. Said to be reasonably valid for up to 5 days
4. Can assess food patterns and eating habit in relation
to the socio-demographic environment of respondent
5. Can enhance interpretation of laboratory,
anthropometric and clinical data
6. Multiple-day data more representative of usual intake
Food Record
• Weaknesses :
1. Require high degree of subject cooperation
2. Act of recording may alter habitual diet
3. High respondent burden may result in low
response rate
4. Subjects must be literate to complete the
records, or a research assistant will need to do it
for them
5. Time-consuming
6. Analysis is labor-intensive and expensive
7. Significant underreporting may still occur
Household 24-H Recall Method
No Nama anggota rumah Jenis Kelamin Umur (th) Berat badan (kg)
tangga
Household 24-H Recall Method
Pagi
Snack pagi
Siang
Snack sore
Malam
Informasi tambahan seperti harga per porsi dan persiapan dan pemasakan
HOUSEHOLD FOOD WEIGHING
Description
Data on actual amounts of food consumed by household are obtained by
means of weighing with the use of dietetic scales. Consumption amounts are
recorded in grams and in whole number.
Kelebihan :
1. Relatif cepat, karena tidak harus mengunjungi responden
2. Dapat mencakup responden lebih banyak
Kekurangan :
1. Biaya relatif mahal untuk rekening telepon
2. Sulit dilakukan untuk daerah yang belum mempunyai
jaringan telepon
3. Dapat menyebabkan terjadinya kesalahan interpretasi
dari hasil informasi yang diberikan responden
4. Sangat tergantung pada kejujuran dan motivasi serta
kemampuan responden untuk menyampaikan makanan
keluarganya.
Telephone Survey
Daftar Pustaka
1. Charney P. 2016. Nutrition Assessment. New York : Momentum Press.
2. Munoz N & Bernstein M. 2019. Nutrition assessment : clinical and research
applications. Burlington, MA : Jones & Barlett Learning.
3. Gibson, R.S. 2005. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Second Edition. Oxford
University Press, New York.
4. Lee RD & Nieman DC. 2019. Nutritional Assessment. Fifth Edition. New York :
McGraw-Hill.
5. Preedy VR, Hunter Lan-Anh, Patel VB (Editors). 2012. Diet Quality : An Evidence-
Based Approach Volume 1. London : Humana Press.
6. Preedy VR, Hunter Lan-Anh, Patel VB (Editors). 2012. Diet Quality : An Evidence-
Based Approach Volume 2. London : Humana Press.
7. Schoeller DA & Westerterp-Plantenga MS. 2017. Advances in the Assessment of
Dietary Intake. Boca Raton : CRC Press.
8. Thompson FE, Subar AF. 2017. Dietary assessment methodology. In Coulston AM,
Boushey CJ (eds.), Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of disease, Fourth
ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Tim Survei Konsumsi Makanan Indonesia. 2014. Buku Foto Makanan. Jakarta :
Pusat Teknologi Terapan Kesehatan dan Epidemiologi Klinik, Balitbangkes.
THANK YOU
GIZ 22B Kuliah 6-8
Procedure :
a. The respondent is asked to record, at the same time
of consumption, all foods and beverages (including
snacks) eaten in household measures, for a specified
time period
b. Detailed description of the food, including the
following details : name, method of cooking, state of
food, brand names where applicable, all condiments,
herbs, and spices, complete description of each food
Food Record
Strengths :
1. Does not rely on memory
2. Provides detailed data on portion sizes consumed,
especially when weighed
3. Said to be reasonably valid for up to 5 days
4. Can assess food patterns and eating habit in relation to
the socio-demographic environment of respondent
5. Can enhance interpretation of laboratory, anthropometric
and clinical data
6. Multiple-day data more representative of usual intake
Food Record
Weaknesses :
1. Require high degree of subject cooperation
2. Act of recording may alter habitual diet
3. High respondent burden may result in low response rate
4. Subjects must be literate to complete the records, or a
research assistant will need to do it for them
5. Time-consuming
6. Analysis is labor-intensive and expensive
7. Significant underreporting may still occur
24-H Food Recall
Food Recall Technique
Description (Individual Level)
Personnel Requirement
Procedure :
1. Respondent recalls all foods and beverages eaten in
the past 24-h
2. Respondent describes in detail each food item
consumed starting from first thing in the morning
and moving sequentially through the day ending
with the last food items eaten at the end of the day
24-hour recall
Strengths
1. simple, easy and quick
2. Provides a qualitative description of the
dietary pattern as well as nutrient intakes
3. Useful for assessing average usual intakes of
a large population, and are therefore often
used for large dietary surveys
4. Can be used equally well with both literate
and illiterate participants
24-hour recall
Weakness
1. Relies on memory
2. Due its retrospective nature (less suitable for
use with children and elderly)
3. Prone to errors in estimating portion sized
consumed
4. May not reflect the usual intake of the group if
recalls do not represent all days of the week
5. The interviewer must be well trained
24-hour recall
6. Continous questioning and answering is tiring for both the
respondent and the interviewer and may result in errors
7. Prone to errors when portion size estimates are converted to
gram equivalents
8. Prone to errors in coding food items if limited number of
food items in database
9. Omissions of dressing, sauce and beverages can lead to low
estimates of energy intakes
Foods eaten but not reported are known as missing foods, while
foods not eaten but reported are known as phantom foods.
10. Data entry can be very labor intensive
11.Several researchers report that, when respondents’ actual
food consumption is low, they have a tendency to
overestimate the amount recalled, and, when their actual
consumption is high, they underestimate the amount
recalled. Some researchers call this phenomenon the “flat-
slope syndrome.”
Repeated 24-hour recall
Repeated 24-hour recall
Tujuan
1. Mengukur asupan aktual makanan dan zat gizi dari
responden penelitian
2. Hasilnya sebagai dasar untuk melaksanakan
konseling gizi
3. Menentukan gold standar bagi seseorang yang
bekrja di institusi tertentu, seperti karyawan di
suatu perusahaan, pasien di rumah sakit dan orang
orang yang tinggal di panti
Food Weighing Technique
Personnel Requirements
Advantages
Disadvantages
✓ Expensive method
✓ Time consuming
✓ Difficult to undertake for individual subjects
✓ Needs preliminary interview
✓ Bias may still be evident as respondent may prepare
for the survey
Guidelines/Tips in Food Weighing (1)
Frequency
Food Item
Daily Weekly Monthly Yearly Never
Tempe
Tofu
Soybean
Semi–Quantitative
Food Frequency Questionnaires (SQ-FFQ)
Tempe 1 pc = 50 gr
1 pc = 100
Tofu
gr
2 ½ tsp =
Soybean
25 gr
Weaknesses :
1. Results depend on the completeness of the food list in
the questionnaire
2. Seasonal foods difficult to quantify
3. Relies on memory
4. Portion sizes given in a semi-quantitative FFQ may not
reflect those eaten by the subject
5. Difficult to relate result to those obtained using other
dietary methodologies overestimates intakes
6. Only suitable for certain nutrient-cannot be used for all
nutrient
Food Frequency
Questionnaires (FFQ)
Burke (1947)
1. Collect general information about respondent’s overall
health and eating patterns, including : number of meals
eaten per day, appetite, food dislike, presence/absence
of nausea and vomiting, use of supplements, cigarette
smoking, habits related to sleep, rest, work, exercise,
etc
2. Conduct a 24-hr recall of actual intake
3. Perform a cross-check by questioning frequency of
consumption of specific food items mentioned in step 2
4. Ask the respondent to complete a 3-day weighed or
estimated food record
Dietary History
SENECA (1991)
1. Complete 3-d estimated record of the respondent
2. Interview respondent on their dietary intake over the
past month
3. Weigh portions of the most commonly eaten foods
• Strengths :
- Assess usual nutrient intake (can be more
representative of habitual intake than 7-d
weighed records)
- Can detect seasonal changes
- Data on all nutrients can be obtained
- Can correlate well with biochemical
measures
Dietary History
• Weaknesses :
- Lengthy interview process (up to 2 hour)
- Requires highly trained interviewers
- Difficult and expensive to code
- May tend to overestimate nutrient intake
- Requires cooperative respondent with
ability to recall usual diet
Selecting an Appropriate Dietary
Assessment Methods
The method of choice for assessing food or nutrient
intakes depends primarily on the objectives of the study.
No method is devoid of random or systematic errors, or
prevents alterations in the food habits of the subjects.
Selecting the appropriate measurement method, correctly
applying it, and using proper data analysis techniques can
make the difference between data showing a diet disease
relationship and data showing no relationship where one
may actually exist.
Choosing the appropriate method for measuring diet
depends on such considerations as the research design,
characteristics of the study participants, and available
resources.
Factors to Consider in Choosing
Dietary Assessment Methods