Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 131

Ca p í tulo

Biologia Pulpar e Perirradicular 1


José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Luciana Armada | Domenico Ricucci

18. Pashley DH: Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper


Referências Bibliográficas Dent Suppl 1984; 3:13‑29.
19. Yu C, Abbott PV: An overview of the dental pulp: its functions
1. Nanci A: Ten Cate’s Oral Histology. Development, structure, and responses to injury. Aust Dent J 2007; 52:S4‑16.
and function. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2008. 20. Kawashima N: Characterisation of dental pulp stem cells: a
2. Fristad I, Berggreen E: Structure and functions of the den‑ new horizon for tissue regeneration? Arch Oral Biol 2012;
tin‑pulp complex. In Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, editors: 57:1439‑1458.
Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016; 21. Bakopoulou A, Leyhausen G, Volk J, et al.: Comparative analy‑
p. 532‑572. sis of in vitro osteo/odontogenic differentiation potential of
3. Holland GR, Torabinejad M: The biology of dental pulp and human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) and stem cells from
periradicular tissues. In Torabinejad M, Walton RE, Fouad the apical papilla (SCAP). Arch Oral Biol 2011; 56:709‑721.
AF, editors: Endodontics. Principles and practice. 5th ed. St. 22. Kim S: Microcirculation of the dental pulp in health and di‑
Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2015, p. 1‑20. sease. J Endod 1985; 11:465‑471.
4. Diekwisch TG: The developmental biology of cementum. Int 23. Takahashi K: Changes in the pulpal vasculature during in‑
J Dev Biol 2001; 45:695‑706. flammation. J Endod 1990; 16:92‑97.
5. Trowbridge HO, Kim S, Suda H: Structure and functions of 24. Takahashi K, Kishi Y, Kim S: A scanning electron microscope
the dentin and pulp complex. In Cohen S, Burns RC, editors: study of the blood vessels of dog pulp using corrosion resin
Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002, p. 411‑455. casts. J Endod 1982; 8:131‑135.
6. Huang GT, Sonoyama W, Liu Y, et al.: The hidden treasure in 25. Vongsavan N, Matthews B: The vascularity of dental pulp in
apical papilla: the potential role in pulp/dentin regeneration cats. J Dent Res 1992; 71:1913‑1915.
and bioroot engineering. J Endod 2008; 34:645‑651. 26. Tonder KH, Naess G: Nervous control of blood flow in the
7. Diogenes A, Ruparel NB: Regenerative Endodontic Pro‑ dental pulp in dogs. Acta Physiol Scand 1978; 104:13‑23.
cedures: Clinical Outcomes. Dent Clin North Am 2017; 27. Tonder KJ, Kvinnsland I: Micropuncture measurements of in‑
61:111‑125. terstitial fluid pressure in normal and inflamed dental pulp
8. Linde A: The extracellular matrix of the dental pulp and den‑ in cats. J Endod 1983; 9:105‑109.
tin. J Dent Res 1985; 64 Spec No: 523‑529. 28. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, et al.: Dentinal fluid dyna‑
9. Smith AJ, Duncan HF, Diogenes A, et al.: Exploiting the bio‑ mics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod 1995; 21:191‑194.
active properties of the dentin‑pulp complex in regenerative 29. Vongsavan N, Matthews B: Fluid flow through cat dentine in
endodontics. J Endod 2016; 42:47‑56. vivo. Arch Oral Biol 1992; 37:175‑185.
10. Smith AJ, Scheven BA, Takahashi Y, et al.: Dentine as a bioac‑ 30. Närhi M: The neurophysiology of the teeth. Dent Clin North
tive extracellular matrix. Arch Oral Biol 2012; 57:109‑121. Am 1990; 34:439‑448.
11. Smith AJ: Vitality of the dentin‑pulp complex in health and 31. Lilja J: Innervation of different parts of the predentin and
disease: growth factors as key mediators. J Dent Educ 2003; dentin in young human premolars. Acta Odontol Scand
67:678‑689. 1979;37:339‑346.
12. Linde A, Goldberg M: Dentinogenesis. Crit Rev Oral Biol 32. Lilja J: Sensory differences between crown and root dentin in
Med 1993; 4:679‑728. human teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 1980; 38:285‑291.
13. Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, et al.: Postnatal human 33. Abd‑Elmeguid A, Yu DC: Dental pulp neurophysiology: part
dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl 1. Clinical and diagnostic implications. J Can Dent Assoc
Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:13625‑13630. 2009; 75:55‑59.
14. Garberoglio R, Brännström M: Scanning electron microsco‑ 34. ohnsen DC: Innervation of teeth: qualitative, quantitative,
pic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol and developmental assessment. J Dent Res 1985; 64 Spec
1976; 21:355‑358. No:555‑563.
15. Pashley DH: Dynamics of the pulpo‑dentin complex. Crit Rev 35. Mjor IA, Heyeraas KJ: Pulp‑dentin and periodontal anatomy
Oral Biol Med 1996; 7:104‑133. and physiology. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential
16. Michelich V, Pashley DH, Whitford GM: Dentin permeability: endodontology, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard
a comparison of functional versus anatomical tubular radii. J Ltd; 2008; p. 10‑43.
Dent Res 1978; 57:1019‑1024. 36. Laux M, Abbott PV, Pajarola G, et al.: Apical inflammatory
17. Pashley DH: Dentin‑predentin complex and its permeability: root resorption: a correlative radiographic and histological
physiologic overview. J Dent Res 1985; 64 Spec No: 613‑620. assessment. Int Endod J 2000; 33:483‑493.
2 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

37. Lindskog S, Blomlöf L, Hammarström L: Evidence for a role 39. Grzesik WJ, Narayanan AS: Cementum and periodontal
of odontogenic epithelium in maintaining the periodontal wound healing and regeneration. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
space. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15:371‑373. 2002; 13:474‑484.
38. Heyeraas KJ, Kvinnsland I, Byers MR, et al.: Nerve fibers im‑ 40. Wu Y, Han X, Guo Y, et al.: Response of immortalized murine
munoreactive to protein gene product 9.5, calcitonin ge‑ cementoblast cells to hypoxia in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 2013;
ne‑related peptide, substance P, and neuropeptide Y in the 58:1718‑1725.
dental pulp, periodontal ligament, and gingiva in cats. Acta 41. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontology. An integrated biologi‑
Odontol Scand 1993; 51:207‑221. cal and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing; 2013.
Ca p í tulo

Patologia Pulpar e Perirradicular 2


Isabela N. Rôças | José F. Siqueira Jr. | Fábio R. Pires | Domenico Ricucci

16. Hahn CL, Liewehr FR: Innate immune responses of the den‑
Referências Bibliográficas tal pulp to caries. J Endod 2007; 33:643‑651.
17. Fristad I, Bletsa A, Byers M: Inflammatory nerve responses in
1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ: The effects of sur‑ the dental pulp. Endod Topics 2007; 17:12‑41.
gical exposures of dental pulps in germ‑free and conventio‑ 18. Reeves R, Stanley HR: The relationship of bacterial penetra‑
nal laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; tion and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med
20:340‑349. Oral Pathol 1966; 22:59‑65.
2. Bergenholtz G: Pathogenic mechanisms in pulpal disease. J 19. Hoshino E, Ando N, Sato M, et al.: Bacterial invasion of
Endod 1990; 16:98‑101. non‑exposed dental pulp. Int Endod J 1992; 25:2‑5.
3. Sundqvist G: Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps 20. Bjorndal L, Mjor IA: Pulp‑dentin biology in restorative dentis‑
[Odontological Dissertation no. 7]. University of Umea, try. Part 4: Dental caries‑‑characteristics of lesions and pulpal
Umea, Sweden, 1976. reactions. Quintessence Int 2001; 32:717‑736.
4. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al.: Biocompatibility of surfa‑ 21. Cvek M, Cleaton‑Jones PE, Austin JC, et al.: Pulp reactions to
ce‑sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet exposure after experimental crown fractures or grinding in
Dent 1987; 57:1‑8. adult monkeys. J Endod 1982; 8:391‑397.
5. Stashenko P: Immunological aspects of pulpal infection. In 22. Langeland K: Tissue response to dental caries. Endod Dent
Slots J, Taubman MA, editors: Contemporary oral microbio­ Traumatol 1987; 3:149‑171.
logy and immunology, St Louis: Mosby; 1992:555‑560. 23. Ricucci D: Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and
6. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. London: obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J 1998;
Quintessence Publishing; 2011:403. 31:384‑393.
7. Kim S, Trowbridge HO, Suda H: Pulpal reactions to caries 24. Kim S: Microcirculation of the dental pulp in health and di‑
and dental procedures. In Cohen S, Burns RC, editors: Pa‑ sease. J Endod 1985; 11:465‑471.
thways of the pulp. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002:573‑600. 25. Tonder KJ, Kvinnsland I: Micropuncture measurements of in‑
8. Pashley DH: Dynamics of the pulpo‑dentin complex. Crit Rev terstitial fluid pressure in normal and inflamed dental pulp
Oral Biol Med 1996; 7:104‑133. in cats. J Endod 1983; 9:105‑109.
9. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Life of a tooth. In Patel S, Barnes JJ, 26. Tonder KJ: Vascular reactions in the dental pulp during in‑
editors: The principles of endodontics. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: flammation. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41:247‑256.
Oxford University Press; 2013:6‑20. 27. Van Hassel HJ: Physiology of the human dental pulp. Oral
10. Ackermans F, Klein JP, Frank RM: Ultrastructural localization Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32:126‑134.
of immunoglobulins in carious human dentine. Arch Oral 28. Heyeraas KJ: Pulpal, microvascular, and tissue pressure. J
Biol 1981; 26:879‑886. Dent Res 1985; 64 Spec No: 585‑589.
11. Okamura K, Maeda M, Nishikawa T, et al.: Dentinal res‑ 29. Heyeraas KJ, Berggreen E: Interstitial fluid pressure in
ponse against carious invasion: localization of antibodies normal and inflamed pulp. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;
in odontoblastic body and process. J Dent Res 1980; 59: 10:328‑336.
1368‑1373. 30. Yu C, Abbott PV: An overview of the dental pulp: its functions
12. Okamura K, Tsubakimoto K, Uobe K, et al.: Serum proteins and responses to injury. Aust Dent J 2007; 52:S4‑16.
and secretory component in human carious dentin. J Dent 31. Tronstad L: Clinical endodontics. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Thieme;
Res 1979; 58:1127‑1123. 2009.
13. Stanley HR, Pereira JC, Spiegel E, et al.: The detection and 32. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Correlation between clini‑
prevalence of reactive and physiologic sclerotic dentin, repa‑ cal and histologic pulp diagnoses. J Endod 2014; 40:1932‑1939.
rative dentin and dead tracts beneath various types of den‑ 33. Baume LJ: Diagnosis of diseases of the pulp. Oral Surg Oral
tal lesions according to tooth surface and age. J Oral Pathol Med Oral Pathol 1970; 29:102‑116.
1983; 12:257‑289. 34. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Ziontz M: The dynamics of pulp inflam‑
14. Cooper PR, Takahashi Y, Graham LW, et al.: Inflammation‑re‑ mation: correlations between diagnostic data and actual his‑
generation interplay in the dentine‑pulp complex. J Dent tologic findings in the pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
2010; 38:687‑697. 1963; 16:846‑871, 969‑877.
15. Staquet MJ, Durand SH, Colomb E, et al.: Different roles of 35. Garfunkel A, Sela J, Ulmansky M: Dental pulp pathosis. Clini‑
odontoblasts and fibroblasts in immunity. J Dent Res 2008; copathologic correlations based on 109 cases. Oral Surg Oral
87:256‑261. Med Oral Pathol 1973; 35:110‑117.
4 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

36. Johnson RH, Dachi SF, Haley JV: Pulpal hyperemia‑‑a correla‑ 58. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC: Robbins basic pathology. 10th
tion of clinical and histologic data from 706 teeth. J Am Dent ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018:935.
Assoc 1970; 81:108‑117. 59. Armada‑Dias L, Breda J, Provenzano JC, et al.: Development
37. Levin LG, Law AS, Holland GR, et al.: Identify and define all of periradicular lesions in normal and diabetic rats. J Appl
diagnostic terms for pulpal health and disease states. J Endod Oral Sci 2006; 14:371‑375.
2009; 35:1645‑1657. 60. Tani‑Ishii N, Wang CY, Tanner A, et al.: Changes in root canal
38. Torabinejad M, Shabahang S: Pulp and periapical pathosis. microbiota during the development of rat periapical lesions.
In Torabinejad M, Walton RE, Fouad AF, editors: Endodon‑ Oral Microbiol Immunol 1994; 9:129‑135.
tics. Principles and practice. 5th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Else‑ 61. Ricucci D, Pascon EA, Ford TR, et al.: Epithelium and bac‑
vier; 2015:48‑67. teria in periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
39. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontology. An integrated bio‑ Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101:239‑249.
logical and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing; 62. Stashenko P: Role of immune cytokines in the pathogenesis
2013. of periapical lesions. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6:89‑96.
40. Närhi M: The neurophysiology of the teeth. Dent Clin North 63. Torabinejad M: Mediators of acute and chronic periradicular
Am 1990; 34:439‑448. lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78:511‑521.
41. Trowbridge HO: Intradental sensory units: physiological and 64. Provenzano JC, Antunes HS, Alves FR, et al.: Host‑bacterial
clinical aspects. J Endod 1985; 11:489‑498. interactions in post‑treatment apical periodontitis: a meta‑
42. Olgart LM: Pain research using feline teeth. J Endod 1986; proteome analysis. J Endod 2016; 42:880‑885.
12:458‑461. 65. Simon JH, Enciso R, Malfaz JM, et al.: Differential diagnosis of
43. Panopoulos P, Mejare B, Edwall L: Effects of ammonia and large periapical lesions using cone‑beam computed tomogra‑
organic acids on the intradental sensory nerve activity. Acta phy measurements and biopsy. J Endod 2006; 32:833‑837.
Odontol Scand 1983; 41:209‑215. 66. Cochran DL: Inflammation and bone loss in periodontal di‑
44. Khabbaz MG, Anastasiadis PL, Sykaras SN: Determination of sease. J Periodontol 2008; 79:1569‑1576.
endotoxins in caries: association with pulpal pain. Int Endod 67. Tyrovola JB, Spyropoulos MN, Makou M, et al.: Root resorp‑
J 2000; 33:132‑137. tion and the OPG/RANKL/RANK system: a mini review. J
45. Petersson K, Soderstrom C, Kiani‑Anaraki M, et al.: Evalua‑ Oral Sci 2008; 50:367‑376.
tion of the ability of thermal and electrical tests to register 68. Boyce BF, Xing L: Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprote‑
pulp vitality. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15:127‑131. gerin. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9 Suppl 1:S1.
46. Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAEAPSouoCiE: AAE 69. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, et al.: Osteoprotegerin ligand is
and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activa‑
Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Oral tion. Cell 1998; 93:165‑176.
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 120:508‑512. 70. Teitelbaum SL: Osteoclasts: what do they do and how do they
47. Markowitz K, Moynihan M, Liu M, et al.: Biologic properties do it? Am J Pathol 2007; 170:427‑435.
of eugenol and zinc oxide‑eugenol. A clinically oriented re‑ 71. Teitelbaum SL: Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 2000;
view. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73:729‑737. 289:1504‑1508.
48. Siqueira JF, Jr, Saboia Dantas CJ: Mecanismos celulares e mo‑ 72. Hwang SJ, Choi B, Kang SS, et al.: Interleukin‑34 produced
leculares da inflamação. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI; 2000. by human fibroblast‑like synovial cells in rheumatoid arthritis
49. Kim S: Neurovascular interactions in the dental pulp in heal‑ supports osteoclastogenesis. Arthritis Res Ther 2012; 14:R14.
th and inflammation. J Endod 1990; 16:48‑53. 73. Feng X, Teitelbaum SL: Osteoclasts: New Insights. Bone Res
50. Lessard GM, Torabinejad M, Swope D: Arachidonic acid me‑ 2013; 1:11‑26.
tabolism in canine tooth pulps and the effects of nonsteroi‑ 74. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL: Osteoclast differentiation
dal anti‑inflammatory drugs. J Endod 1986; 12:146‑149. and activation. Nature 2003; 423:337‑342.
51. Hargreaves KM: Pain mechanisms of the pulpodentin com‑ 75. Takayanagi H: Mechanistic insight into osteoclast differentia‑
plex. In Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, editors: Seltzer and tion in osteoimmunology. J Mol Med 2005; 83:170‑179.
Bender’s dental pulp. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 76. Takayanagi H: Inflammatory bone destruction and osteoim‑
2002:181‑203. munology. J Periodontal Res 2005; 40:287‑293.
52. Byers MR, Närhi MV: Nerve supply of the pulpodentin com‑ 77. Zupan J, Jeras M, Marc J: Osteoimmunology and the influen‑
plex and responses to injury. In Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, ce of pro‑inflammatory cytokines on osteoclasts. Biochem
editors: Seltzer and Bender’s dental pulp. Chicago: Quintes‑ Med (Zagreb) 2013; 23:43‑63.
sence Publishing Co; 2002:151‑179. 78. Gillespie MT: Impact of cytokines and T lymphocytes upon
53. Mudie AS, Holland GR: Local opioids in the inflamed dental osteoclast differentiation and function. Arthritis Res Ther
pulp. J Endod 2006; 32:319‑323. 2007; 9:103.
54. Michaelson PL, Holland GR: Is pulpitis painful? Int Endod J 79. Boskey AL, Posner AS: Bone structure, composition, and mi‑
2002; 35:829‑832. neralization. Orthop Clin North Am 1984; 15:597‑612.
55. Owatz CB, Khan AA, Schindler WG, et al.: The incidence of 80. Hienz SA, Paliwal S, Ivanovski S: Mechanisms of Bone Re‑
mechanical allodynia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J sorption in Periodontitis. J Immunol Res 2015; 2015:615486.
Endod 2007; 33:552‑556. 81. Li Z, Kong K, Qi W: Osteoclast and its roles in calcium me‑
56. Gibbs JL, Hargreaves KM: Mechanisms of odontogenic and tabolism and bone development and remodeling. Biochem
non‑odontogenic pain. In Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgart‑ Biophys Res Commun 2006; 343:345‑350.
ner JC, editors: Ingle’s endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC 82. Takahashi N, Koide M, Nogushi T, et al.: Current paradig‑
Decker; 2008:376‑391. ms of osteoblast‑osteoclast interactions and bacterial pa‑
57. Abella F, Patel S, Duran‑Sindreu F, et al.: Evaluating the pe‑ thogen‑induced bone resorption. In Henderson B, Cur‑
riapical status of teeth with irreversible pulpitis by using co‑ tis MA, Seymour RM, Donos N, editors: Periodontal me‑
ne‑beam computed tomography scanning and periapical ra‑ dicine and systems biology. Oxford, UK: Wiley‑Blackwell;
diographs. J Endod 2012; 38:1588‑1591. 2009:379‑393.
Capítulo 2   |   Referências Bibliográficas 5

83. Bahuguna R, Jain A, Khan SA, et al.: Role of odanacatib in CGRP‑immunoreactive nerve fibers in induced rat periapi‑
reducing bone loss due to endodontic disease: An overview. cal lesions. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997; 13:6‑12.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016; 6:S175‑S181. 103. Wakisaka S, Youn SH, Kato J, et al.: Neuropeptide Y‑immu‑
84. Hao L, Chen W, McConnell M, et al.: A small molecule, oda‑ noreactive primary afferents in the dental pulp and perio‑
nacatib, inhibits inflammation and bone loss caused by en‑ dontal ligament following nerve injury to the inferior alveo‑
dodontic disease. Infect Immun 2015; 83:1235‑1245. lar nerve in the rat. Brain Res 1996; 712:11‑18.
85. Suzuki N, Takimoto K, Kawashima N: Cathepsin K Inhibi‑ 104. Byers MR, Taylor PE, Khayat BG, et al.: Effects of injury and
tor Regulates Inflammation and Bone Destruction in Expe‑ inflammation on pulpal and periapical nerves. J Endod
rimentally Induced Rat Periapical Lesions. J Endod 2015; 1990; 16:78‑84.
41:1474‑1479. 105. Khayat BG, Byers MR, Taylor PE, et al.: Responses of ner‑
86. Gao B, Chen W, Hao L, et al.: Inhibiting periapical lesions ve fibers to pulpal inflammation and periapical lesions in
through AAV‑RNAi silencing of cathepsin K. J Dent Res rat molars demonstrated by calcitonin gene‑related peptide
2013; 92:180‑186. immunocytochemistry. J Endod 1988; 14:577‑587.
87. Kawashima N, Suda H: Immunopathological aspects of pul‑ 106. Kimberly CL, Byers MR: Inflammation of rat molar pulp
pal and periapical inflammations. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford and periodontium causes increased calcitonin gene‑related
T, editors: Essential endodontology. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: peptide and axonal sprouting. Anat Rec 1988; 222:289‑300.
Blackwell Munksgaard Ltd; 2008:44‑80. 107. Haug SR, Heyeraas KJ: Effects of sympathectomy on expe‑
88. Kuntz DD, Genco RJ, Guttuso J, et al.: Localization of im‑ rimentally induced pulpal inflammation and periapical le‑
munoglobulins and the third component of complement sions in rats. Neuroscience 2003; 120:827‑836.
in dental periapical lesions. J Endod 1977; 3:68‑73. 108. Torabinejad M, Midrou T, Bakland LK: Detection of kinins
89. Torabinejad M, Kettering JD: Detection of immune comple‑ in human periapical lesions. J Dent Res 1986; 68:201 (abs‑
xes in human dental periapical lesions by anticomplement tract 156).
immunofluorescence technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 109. Marton IJ, Balla G, Hegedus C, et al.: The role of reactive
Pathol 1979; 48:256‑261. oxygen intermediates in the pathogenesis of chronic apical
90. Alfenas CF, Mendes TAO, Ramos HJO, et al.: Human periodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1993; 8:254‑257.
Exoproteome in Acute Apical Abscesses. J Endod 2017; 110. Aqrabawi J, Schilder H, Toselli P, et al.: Biochemical and his‑
43:1479‑1485.
tochemical analysis of the enzyme arylsulfatase in human le‑
91. Torabinejad M, Bakland LK: Prostaglandins: their possible
sions of endodontic origin. J Endod 1993; 19:335‑338.
role in the pathogenesis of pulpal and periapical diseases,
111. Kettering JD, Torabinejad M: Presence of natural killer cells
part 2. J Endod 1980; 6:769‑776.
in human chronic periapical lesions. Int Endod J 1993;
92. Torabinejad M, Bakland LK: Prostaglandins: their possible
26:344‑347.
role in the pathogenesis of pulpal and periapical diseases,
112. Saboia‑Dantas CJ, Coutrin de Toledo LF, Siqueira JF, Jr, et
part 1. J Endod 1980; 6:733‑739.
al.: Natural killer cells and alterations in collagen density:
93. McNicholas S, Torabinejad M, Blankenship J, et al.: The
signs of periradicular herpesvirus infection? Clin Oral In‑
concentration of prostaglandin E2 in human periradicular
vestig 2008; 12:129‑135.
lesions. J Endod 1991; 17:97‑100.
113. Walton RE, Langeland K: Migration of materials in the den‑
94. Takayama S, Miki Y, Shimauchi H, et al.: Relationship be‑
tal pulp of monkeys. J Endod 1978; 4:167‑177.
tween prostaglandin E2 concentrations in periapical exuda‑
114. Pulver WH, Taubman MA, Smith DJ: Immune components
tes from root canals and clinical findings of periapical pe‑
in human dental periapical lesions. Arch Oral Biol 1978;
riodontitis. J Endod 1996; 22:677‑680.
23:435‑443.
95. Torabinejad M, Cotti E, Jung T: Concentrations of leuko‑
triene B4 in symptomatic and asymptomatic periapical le‑ 115. Tani N, Tominaga N, Osada T, et al.: Immunobiological ac‑
sions. J Endod 1992; 18:205‑208. tivities of bacteria isolated from the root canals of posten‑
96. Cotti E, Torabinejad M: Detection of leukotriene C4 in hu‑ dodontic teeth with persistent periapical lesions. J Endod
man periradicular lesions. Int Endod J 1994; 27:82‑86. 1992; 18:58‑62.
97. Suzuki T, Kumamoto H, Ooya K, et al.: Expression of in‑ 116. Torabinejad M, Kettering JD: Identification and relative
ducible nitric oxide synthase and heat shock proteins in concentration of B and T lymphocytes in human chronic
periapical inflammatory lesions. J Oral Pathol Med 2002; periapical lesions. J Endod 1985; 11:122‑125.
31:488‑493. 117. Kaneko T, Okiji T, Kan L, et al.: An immunoelectron‑mi‑
98. Takeichi O, Saito I, Hayashi M, et al.: Production of hu‑ croscopic study of class II major histocompatibility com‑
man‑inducible nitric oxide synthase in radicular cysts. J En‑ plex molecule‑expressing macrophages and dendritic cells
dod 1998; 24:157‑160. in experimental rat periapical lesions. Arch Oral Biol 2001;
99. Marton IJ, Rot A, Schwarzinger E, et al.: Differential in situ 46:713‑720.
distribution of interleukin‑8, monocyte chemoattractant 118. Kaneko T, Okiji T, Kan L, et al.: Ultrastructural analysis of
protein‑1 and Rantes in human chronic periapical granulo‑ MHC class II molecule‑expressing cells in experimentally in‑
ma. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000; 15:63‑65. duced periapical lesions in the rat. J Endod 2001; 27:337‑342.
100. Shimauchi H, Takayama S, Narikawa‑Kiji M, et al.: Produc‑ 119. Kaneko T, Okiji T, Zhao L, et al.: Heterogeneity of dendri‑
tion of interleukin‑8 and nitric oxide in human periapical tic cells in rat apical periodontitis. Cell Tissue Res 2008;
lesions. J Endod 2001; 27:749‑752. 331:617‑623.
101. Kabashima H, Nagata K, Maeda K, et al.: Involvement of 120. Stern MH, Dreizen S, Mackler BF, et al.: Antibody‑produ‑
substance P, mast cells, TNF‑alpha and ICAM‑1 in the infil‑ cing cells in human periapical granulomas and cysts. J En‑
tration of inflammatory cells in human periapical granulo‑ dod 1981; 7:447‑452.
mas. J Oral Pathol Med 2002; 31:175‑180. 121. Kopp W, Schwarting R: Differentiation of T lymphocyte sub‑
102. Toriya Y, Hashiguchi I, Maeda K: Immunohistochemi‑ populations, macrophages, and HLA‑DR‑restricted cells of
cal examination of the distribution of macrophages and apical granulation tissue. J Endod 1989; 15:72‑75.
6 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

122. Stashenko P, Yu SM: T helper and T suppressor cell reversal 143. Sabeti M, Simon J, Kermani V, et al.: Detection of receptor
during the development of induced rat periapical lesions. J activator of NF‑kappa beta ligand in apical periodontitis. J
Dent Res 1989; 68:830‑834. Endod 2005; 31:17‑18.
123. Kawashima N, Stashenko P: Expression of bone‑resorptive 144. Armada L, Marotta PS, Pires FR, et al.: Expression and dis‑
and regulatory cytokines in murine periapical inflamma‑ tribution of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B,
tion. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 44:55‑66. receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, and
124. Kabashima H, Yoneda M, Nakamuta H, et al.: Presence of osteoprotegerin in periradicular cysts. J Endod 2015; 41:
CXCR3‑positive cells and IFN‑gamma‑producing cells in 1281‑1287.
human periapical granulomas. J Endod 2004; 30:634‑637. 145. Fukada SY, Silva TA, Garlet GP, et al.: Factors involved in the
125. Dessaune Neto N, Porpino MTM, Antunes HDS, et al.: T helper type 1 and type 2 cell commitment and osteoclast
Pro‑inflammatory and anti‑inflammatory cytokine expres‑ regulation in inflammatory apical diseases. Oral Microbiol
sion in post‑treatment apical periodontitis. J Appl Oral Sci Immunol 2009; 24:25‑31.
2018; 26:e20170455. 146. Naidorf IJ: Immunoglobulins in periapical granulomas: a
126. Stashenko P: Interrelationship of dental pulp and apical preliminary report. J Endod 1975; 1:15‑18.
periodontitis. In Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, editors: Selt‑ 147. Torres JO, Torabinejad M, Matiz RA, et al.: Presence of se‑
zer and Bender’s dental pulp, Chicago: Quintessence Pu‑ cretory IgA in human periapical lesions. J Endod 1994;
blishing Co, Inc; 2002:389‑409. 20:87‑89.
127. Artese L, Piattelli A, Quaranta M, et al.: Immunoreactivity 148. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA, Jr., Bernie RS, et al.: Serum
for interleukin 1‑beta and tumor necrosis factor‑alpha and IgG reactive with oral anaerobic microorganisms associated
ultrastructural features of monocytes/macrophages in pe‑ with infections of endodontic origin. Oral Microbiol Immu‑
riapical granulomas. J Endod 1991; 17:483‑487. nol 1992; 7:106‑110.
128. Barkhordar RA, Hussain MZ, Hayashi C: Detection of inter‑ 149. Kettering JD, Torabinejad M, Jones SL: Specificity of anti‑
leukin‑1 beta in human periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral bodies present in human periapical lesions. J Endod 1991;
Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73:334‑336. 17:213‑216.
129. Hamachi T, Anan H, Akamine A, et al.: Detection of inter‑ 150. Takahashi K, Lappin DF, MacDonald GD, et al.: Relative dis‑
leukin‑1 beta mRNA in rat periapical lesions. J Endod 1995; tribution of plasma cells expressing immunoglobulin G sub‑
21:118‑121.
class mRNA in human dental periapical lesions using in situ
130. Lim GC, Torabinejad M, Kettering J, et al.: Interleukin
hybridization. J Endod 1998; 24:164‑167.
1‑beta in symptomatic and asymptomatic human periradi‑
151. Matsuo T, Nakanishi T, Ebisu S: Immunoglobulins in peria‑
cular lesions. J Endod 1994; 20:225‑227.
pical exudates of infected root canals: correlations with the
131. Wang CY, Tani‑Ishii N, Stashenko P: Bone‑resorptive cytoki‑
clinical findings of the involved teeth. Endod Dent Trauma‑
ne gene expression in periapical lesions in the rat. Oral Mi‑
tol 1995; 11:95‑99.
crobiol Immunol 1997; 12:65‑71.
152. Torabinejad M, Kiger RD: Experimentally induced alte‑
132. Wang CY, Stashenko P: The role of interleukin‑1 alpha in
rations in periapical tissues of the cat. J Dent Res 1980;
the pathogenesis of periapical bone destruction in a rat mo‑
59:87‑96.
del system. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1993; 8:50‑56.
153. Torabinejad M, Clagett J, Engel D: A cat model for the eva‑
133. Barkhordar RA, Hayashi C, Hussain MZ: Detection of inter‑
luation of mechanisms of bone resorption: induction of
leukin‑6 in human dental pulp and periapical lesions. En‑
bone loss by simulated immune complexes and inhibition
dod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15:26‑27.
by indomethacin. Calcif Tissue Int 1979; 29:207‑214.
134. Colic M, Gazivoda D, Vucevic D, et al.: Proinflammatory
and immunoregulatory mechanisms in periapical lesions. 154. Torabinejad M, Theofilopoulos AN, Ketering JD, et al.:
Mol Immunol 2009. Quantitation of circulating immune complexes, immuno‑
135. Ajuz NC, Antunes H, Mendonca TA, et al.: Immunoexpres‑ globulins G and M, and C3 complement component in
sion of interleukin 17 in apical periodontitis lesions. J En‑ patients with large periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med
dod 2014; 40:1400‑1403. Oral Pathol 1983; 55:186‑190.
136. Oseko F, Yamamoto T, Akamatsu Y, et al.: IL‑17 is involved 155. Kettering JD, Torabinejad M: Concentrations of immune
in bone resorption in mouse periapical lesions. Microbiol complexes, IgG, IgM, IgE, and C3 in patients with acute api‑
Immunol 2009; 53:287‑294. cal abscesses. J Endod 1984; 10:417‑421.
137. Colic M, Vasilijic S, Gazivoda D, et al.: Interleukin‑17 plays a 156. Trowbridge HO, Emling RC: Inflammation. A review of the
role in exacerbation of inflammation within chronic peria‑ process. 5th ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1997.
pical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 115:315‑320. 157. Tronstad L: Clinical endodontics. 2nd ed. New York: Thie‑
138. Colic M, Gazivoda D, Vucevic D, et al.: Regulatory T‑cells in me; 2003.
periapical lesions. J Dent Res 2009; 88:997‑1002. 158. Abbas AK, Lichtman AH, Pillai S: Cellular and molecular
139. Gazivoda D, Dzopalic T, Bozic B, et al.: Production of proin‑ immunology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018:565.
flammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines by inflamma‑ 159. Murphy K: Janeway’s Immunobiology. 8th ed. London: Gar‑
tory cells from periapical lesions in culture. J Oral Pathol land Science; 2012.
Med 2009; 38:605‑611. 160. Takahashi K, MacDonald D, Murayama Y, et al.: Cell synthe‑
140. Alshwaimi E, Purcell P, Kawai T, et al.: Regulatory T cells in sis, proliferation and apoptosis in human dental periapical
mouse periapical lesions. J Endod 2009; 35:1229‑1233. lesions analysed by in situ hybridisation and immunohisto‑
141. Kawashima N, Suzuki N, Yang G, et al.: Kinetics of RANKL, chemistry. Oral Dis 1999; 5:313‑320.
RANK and OPG expressions in experimentally induced rat 161. Bhaskar SN: Periapical lesion: types, incidence, and clinical
periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑ features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 21:657‑671.
diol Endod 2007; 103:707‑711. 162. Nair PN, Pajarola G, Schroeder HE: Types and incidence
142. Zhang X, Peng B: Immunolocalization of receptor activa‑ of human periapical lesions obtained with extracted teeth.
tor of NF kappa B ligand in rat periapical lesions. J Endod Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;
2005; 31:574‑577. 81:93‑102.
Capítulo 2   |   Referências Bibliográficas 7

163. Perrini N, Fonzi L: Mast cells in human periapical lesions: cysts, and keratocystic odontogenic tumors. J Oral Pathol
ultrastructural aspects and their possible physiopathologi‑ Med 2012; 41:630‑636.
cal implications. J Endod 1985; 11:197‑202. 177. Ten Cate AR: The epithelial cell rests of Malassez and the
164. Kornman KS, Page RC, Tonetti MS: The host response to genesis of the dental cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
the microbial challenge in periodontitis: assembling the 1972; 34:956‑964.
players. Periodontol 2000 1997; 14:33‑53. 178. Summers L: The incidence of epithelium in periapical gra‑
165. Roodman GD: Role of cytokines in the regulation of bone nulomas and the mechanism of cavitation in apical dental
resorption. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53 Suppl 1:S94‑98. cysts in man. Arch Oral Biol 1974; 19:1177‑1180.
166. Stashenko P, Dewhirst FE, Peros WJ, et al.: Synergistic in‑ 179. Nair PN, Sundqvist G, Sjogren U: Experimental evidence
teractions between interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor, supports the abscess theory of development of radicular
and lymphotoxin in bone resorption. J Immunol 1987; cysts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
138:1464‑1468. 2008; 106:294‑303.
167. Teitelbaum SL: Osteoclasts; culprits in inflammatory oste‑ 180. Torabinejad M: The role of immunological reactions in api‑
olysis. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8:201. cal cyst formation and the fate of epithelial cells after root
168. Mjor IA, Heyeraas KJ: Pulp‑dentin and periodontal anatomy canal therapy: a theory. Int J Oral Surg 1983; 12:14‑22.
and physiology. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential 181. Lin LM, Huang GT, Rosenberg PA: Proliferation of epithe‑
endodontology, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksga‑ lial cell rests, formation of apical cysts, and regression of
ard Ltd; 2008:10‑43. apical cysts after periapical wound healing. J Endod 2007;
169. Bosshardt DD, Selvig KA: Dental cementum: the dynamic 33:908‑916.
tissue covering of the root. Periodontol 2000 1997; 13:41‑75. 182. Siqueira JF, Jr: Tratamento das infecções endodônticas. Rio
170. Lin LM, Wang SL, Wu‑Wang C, et al.: Detection of epider‑ de Janeiro: MEDSI; 1997.
mal growth factor receptor in inflammatory periapical le‑ 183. Gell PGH, Coombs RRA: Clinical aspects of immunology.
sions. Int Endod J 1996; 29:179‑184. Oxford: Blackwell; 1963.
171. Gao Z, Flaitz CM, Mackenzie IC: Expression of kerati‑ 184. Morse DR, Patnik JW, Schacterle GR: Electrophoretic di‑
nocyte growth factor in periapical lesions. J Dent Res 1996; fferentiation of radicular cysts and granulomas. Oral Surg
75:1658‑1663. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 35:249‑264.
172. Meghji S, Qureshi W, Henderson B, et al.: The role of en‑ 185. Morse DR, Wolfson E, Schacterle GR: Nonsurgical repair of
dotoxin and cytokines in the pathogenesis of odontogenic electrophoretically diagnosed radicular cysts. J Endod 1975;
cysts. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41:523‑531. 1:158‑163.
173. Simon JH: Incidence of periapical cysts in relation to the 186. Trope M, Pettigrew J, Petras J, et al.: Differentiation of radi‑
root canal. J Endod 1980; 6:845‑848. cular cyst and granulomas using computerized tomography.
174. Nair PNR: Non‑microbial etiology: periapical cysts sustain Endod Dent Traumatol 1989; 5:69‑72.
post‑treatment apical periodontitis. Endod Topics 2003; 187. Cotti E, Simbola V, Dettori C, et al.: Echographic evaluation
6:96‑113. of bone lesions of endodontic origin: report of two cases in
175. Bracks IV, Armada L, Goncalves LS, et al.: Distribution of the same patient. J Endod 2006; 32:901‑905.
mast cells and macrophages and expression of interleukin‑6 188. Cotti E, Campisi G: Advanced radiographic techniques for
in periapical cysts. J Endod 2014; 40:63‑68. the detection of lesions in bone. Endod Topics 2004; 7:52‑72.
176. de Noronha Santos Netto J, Pires FR, da Fonseca EC, et 189. Oehlers FAC: Periapical lesions and residual cysts. Brit J
al.: Evaluation of mast cells in periapical cysts, dentigerous Oral Maxillofac Surg 1970; 8:103‑113.
Ca p ít u l o

3 Diagnóstico Diferencial das Lesões


Perirradiculares Inflamatórias
Fábio R. Pires

differential diagnosis of periapical inflammatory disorders.


eferências Bibliográficas Gen Dent 2018; 66:e6‑e11.
16. Mourão CFAB, Miranda AMMA, Santos EJC, et al.: Lingual
1. Amaral SM, Miranda AMMA, Netto JNS, et al.: Prevalence of cortical mandibular bone depression: frequency and clini‑
oral and maxillofacial diseases diagnosed in a Stomatology cal‑radiological features in a Brazilian population. Braz Dent
service during a 7‑year period. J Oral Diag 2012; 1:41‑46. J 2013; 24:157‑162.
2. Wannfors K, Hammarström L: Periapical lesions of mandibu‑ 17. Scholl RJ, Kellett HM, Neumann DP, et al.: Cysts and cystic le‑
lar bone: difficulties in early diagnostics. Oral Surg Oral Med sions of the mandible: clinical and radiologic‑histopathologic
Oral Pathol 1990; 70:483‑489. review. Radiographics 1999; 19:1107‑1124.
3. Kuc I, Peters E, Pan J: Comparison of clinical and histologic 18. Takahama AJ, Pires FR, Jorge J, et al.: Cisto ósseo simples – re‑
diagnoses in periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑ lato de 4 casos e revisão da literatura. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Den‑
thol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:333‑337. tist 2007; 61:488‑491.
4. Ortega A, Fariña V, Gallardo A, et al.: Nonendodontic peria‑ 19. Rodrigues CD, Estrela C: Traumatic bone cyst suggestive of
pical lesions: a retrospective study in Chile. Int Endod J 2007; large apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008; 34:484‑489.
40:386‑390. 20. Velez I, Siegel MA, Mintz SM, et al.: The relationship betwe‑
5. Koivisto T, Bowles WR, Rohrer M: Frequency and distribution en idiopathic bone cavity and orthodontic tooth movement:
of radiolucent jaw lesions: a retrospective analysis of 9,723 ca‑ analysis of 44 cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39:162‑166.
ses. J Endod 2012; p. 729‑732. 21. Discacciati ED, de Faria VMC, Garcia NG, et al.: Idiopathic
6. Sirotheau Corrêa Pontes F, Paiva Fonseca F, Souza de Jesus A, bone cavity: case series involving children and adolescents. J
et al.: Nonendodontic lesions misdiagnosed as apical perio‑ Invest Clin Dent 2012; 3:103‑108.
dontitis lesions: series of case reports and review of literature. 22. Regezi JA: Odontogenic cysts, odontogenic tumors, fibroos‑
J Endod 2014; 40:16‑27. seous, and giant cell lesions of the jaws. Mod Pathol 2002;
7. Huang HY, Chen YK, Ko ECC, et al.: Retrospective analysis of 15:331‑341.
nonendodontic periapical lesions misdiagnosed as endodon‑ 23. Dahlkemper P, Wolcott JF, Pringle GA, et al.: Periapical cen‑
tic apical periodontitis lesions in a population of Taiwanese tral giant cell granuloma: a potential endodontic misdiagno‑
patients. Clin Oral Invest 2017; 21:2077‑2082. sis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;
8. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, et al.: Patologia oral & ma‑ 90:739‑745.
xilofacial. 4a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2016. 24. Lombardi T, Bischof M, Nedir R, et al.: Periapical central
9. Santos Netto JN, Jorge Neto JD, Bastos EP, et al.: Sialolitíase: giant cell granuloma misdiagnosed as odontogenic cyst. Int
aspectos clínicos e sócio‑demográficos de 10 casos. Rev Bras Endod J 2006; 39:510‑515.
Odontol 2005; 62:197‑201. 25. De Carvalhosa AA, Zandonade RMC, de Souza Castro PH, et
10. Sigismund PE, Zenk J, Koch M, et al.: Nearly 3.000 salivary al.: 8‑year follow‑up of central giant cell lesion mimicking api‑
stones: some clinical and epidemiologic aspects. Laryngosco‑ cal periodontitis. JEndod 2014; 40:1708‑1712.
pe 2015; 125:1879‑1882. 26. Francolí JE, Marqués NA, Aytés LB, et al.: Nasopalatine duct
11. Menon K, Bem C, Gouldesbrough D, et al.: A clinical review of cyst: report of 22 cases and review of the literature. Med Oral
128 cases of head and neck tuberculosis presenting over a 10‑year Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13:e438‑443.
period in Bradford, UK. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121:362‑368. 27. Faitaroni LA, Bueno MR, Carvalhosa AA, et al.: Differential
12. Wang WC, Chen JY, Chen YK, et al.: Tuberculosis of the head diagnosis of apical periodontitis and nasopalatine duct cyst. J
and neck: a review of 20 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑ Endod 2011; 37:403‑410.
thol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:381‑386. 28. Bachur AM, Santos TCRB, Silveira HM, et al.: Cisto do ducto
13. Khuzwayo ZB, Naidu TK: Head and neck tuberculosis in Kwa‑ nasopalatino: considerações microscópicas e de diagnóstico
Zulu‑Natal, South Africa. J Laryngol Otol 2014; 128:86‑90. diferencial. Rev Odontol Bras Central 2009; 18:58‑62.
14. Philipsen HP, Takata T, Reichart PA, et al.: Lingual and buc‑ 29. Pascual CR, Nascimento Júnior EM, Souza RB, et al.: Cisto
cal mandibular bone depressions: a review based on 583 cases nasolabial: importância do diagnóstico diferencial. Rev Bras
from a world‑wide literature survey, including 69 new cases Odontol 2007; 64:200‑204.
from Japan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31:281‑290. 30. Yuen HW, Julian CY, Samuel CL: Nasolabial cysts: clinical fe‑
15. Pires FR, Bruzigueses Espíndola CB, Ferreira Espíndola atures, diagnosis, and treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
SH, et al.: Anterior lingual mandibular bone depression: 2007; 45:293‑297.
Capítulo 3   |   Referências Bibliográficas 9

31. Sheikh AB, Chin OY, Fang CH, et al.: Nasolabial cysts: a syste‑ 51. Cunha EM, Fernandes AV, Versiani MA, et al.: Unicystic ame‑
matic review of 311 cases. Laryngoscope 2016; 126:60‑66. loblastoma: a possible pitfall in periapical diagnosis. Int En‑
32. Philipsen HP, Reichart PA, Ogawa I, et al.: The inflammatory dod J 2005; 38:334‑340.
paradental cyst: a critical review of 342 cases from a literature 52. MacDonald‑Jankowski DS: Fibro‑osseous lesions of the face
survey, including 17 new cases from the author’s files. J Oral and jaws. Clin Radiol 2004; 59:11‑25.
Pathol Med 2004; 33:147‑155. 53. de Noronha Santos Netto J, Machado Cerri J, Miranda AM, et
33. Mourão CFB, Cardoso ES, Miranda AMMA, et al.: Cisto pa‑ al.: Benign fibro‑osseous lesions: clinicopathologic features
radentário: importância dos achados clínicos, radiográficos, from 143 cases diagnosed in an oral diagnosis setting. Oral
trans‑cirúrgicos e microscópicos no diagnóstico. Rev Odon‑ Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115:e56‑e65.
tol Bras Central 2007; 16:1‑6. 54. Summerlin DJ, Tomich CE: Focal cemento‑osseous dysplasia:
34. El‑Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, a clinicopathologic study of 221 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med
editors: World Health Organization classification of head Oral Pathol 1994; 78:611‑620.
and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2017. 55. MacDonald‑Jankowski DS: Florid cemento‑osseous dysplasia: a
35. Jones AV, Craig GT, Franklin CD: Range and demographics
systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32:141‑149.
of odontogenic cysts diagnosed in a UK population over a
56. Pereira DL, Pires FR, Lopes MA, et al.: Clinical, demographic,
30‑year period. J Oral Pathol Med 2006; 35:500‑507.
and radiographic analysis of 82 patients affected by florid os‑
36. Shibata Y, Asaumi J, Yanagi Y, et al.: Radiographic examina‑
seous dysplasia: an international collaborative study. Oral
tion of dentigerous cysts in the transitional dentition. Dento‑
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 122:250‑257.
maxillofac Radiol 2004; 33:17‑20.
57. Daviet‑Noual V, Ejeil AL, Gossiome C, et al.: Differentiating
37. Manekar VS, Chavan A, Wadde K, et al.: Cysts in periradicular
region of deciduous molars in mixed dentition: retrospective early stage florid osseous dysplasia from periapical endodon‑
study of five cases. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014; 7:229‑235. tic lesions: a radiological‑based diagnostic algorithm. BMC
38. Azevedo RS, Cabral MG, dos Santos TC, et al.: Histopatholo‑ Oral Health 2017; 17:161.
gical features of keratocystic odontogenic tumor: a descripti‑ 58. Huh JK, Shin SJ: Misdiagnosis of florid cemento‑osseous dys‑
ve study of 177 cases from a Brazilian population. Int J Surg plasia leading to unnecessary root canal treatment: a case re‑
Pathol 2012; 20:154‑160. port. Restor Dent Endod 2013; 38:160‑166.
39. Garlock JA, Pringle GA, Hicks ML: The odontogenic kera‑ 59. MacDonald‑Jankowski DS: Idiopathic osteosclerosis in the
tocyst: a potential endodontic misdiagnosis. Oral Surg Oral jaws of Britons and of the Hong Kong Chinese: radiology and
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:452‑456. systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28:357‑363.
40. Pace R, Cairo F, Giuliani V, et al.: A diagnostic dilemma: en‑ 60. Miloglu O, Yalcin E, Buyukkurt MC, et al.: The frequency and
dodontic lesion or odontogenic keratocyst? A case presenta‑ characteristics of idiopathic osteosclerosis and condensing
tion. Int Endod J 2008; 41:800‑806. osteitis lesions in a Turkish patient population. Med Oral Pa‑
41. Santos JN, Carneiro Júnior B, Alves Malaquias PDTI: Kera‑ tol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14:e640‑645.
tocystic odontogenic tumour arising as a periapical lesion. 61. Tolentino E de S, Gusmão PH, Cardia GS, et al.: Idiopathic
Int Endod J 2014; 47:802‑809. osteosclerosis of the jaw in a Brazilian population: a retros‑
42. Kerezoudis NP, Donta‑Bakoyianni C, Siskos G: The lateral pe‑ pective study. Acta Stomatol Croat 2014; 48: 183‑192.
riodontal cyst: aetiology, clinical significance and diagnosis. 62. Ruprecht A, Hellstein J, Bobinet K, et al.: The prevalence of ra‑
Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:144‑150. diographically evident mandibular tori in the University of Iowa
43. Nikitakis NG, Brooks JK, Melakopoulos I, et al.: Lateral perio‑ dental patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29:291‑296.
dontal cysts arising in periapical sites: a report of two cases. J 63. Brannon RB, Fowler CB, Carpenter WM, et al.: Cementoblas‑
Endod 2010; 36:1707‑1711. toma: an innocuous neoplasm? A clinicopathologic study of
44. Andrade M, Silva APP, Ramos‑Perez FMM, et al.: Lateral pe‑ 44 cases and review of the literature with special emphasis on
riodontal cyst: report of case and review of the literature. recurrence. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑
Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 16:83‑87. dod 2002; 93:311‑320.
45. Fregnani ER, Pires FR, Rivera DQ, et al.: Calcifying odon‑ 64. Chrcanovic BR, Gomez RS: Cementoblastoma: an updated
togenic cyst: clinicopathological features and immunohis‑ analysis of 258 cases reported in the literature. J Cranioma‑
tochemical profile of ten cases. J Oral Pathol Med 2003;
xillofac Surg 2017; 45:1759‑1766.
32:163‑170.
65. Kaplan I, Nicolaou Z, Hatuel D, et al.: Solitary central oste‑
46. MacDonald‑Jankowski DS, Yeung R, Lee KM, et al.: Amelo‑
oma of the jaws: a diagnostic dilemma. Oral Surg Oral Med
blastoma in the Hong Kong Chinese. Part 2: systematic re‑
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106:e22‑29.
view and radiological presentation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
66. Costa AG, Costa RO, Oliveira LR, et al.: Multiple oral radio‑
2004; 33:141‑151.
paque masses leading to Gardner’s syndrome diagnosis. Gen
47. Filizzola AI, Bartholomeu‑dos‑Santos TC, Pires FR: Amelo‑
blastomas: clinicopathological features from 70 cases diagno‑ Dent 2013; 61:e12‑14.
sed in a single oral pathology service in an 8‑year period. Med 67. Marx RE, Cillo JE Jr, Ulloa JJ: Oral bisphosphonate‑induced
Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19:e556‑561. osteonecrosis: risk factors, prediction of risk using serum
48. Ide F, Mishima K, Yamada H, et al.: Unsuspected small ame‑ CTX testing, prevention, and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac
loblastoma in the alveolar bone: a collaborative study of 14 Surg 2007; 65:2397‑2410.
cases with discussion of their cellular sources. J Oral Pathol 68. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, et al.: American Asso‑
Med 2008; 37:221‑227. ciation of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on
49. Faitaroni LA, Bueno MR, De Carvalhosa AA, et al.: Amelo‑ medication‑related osteonecrosis of the jaw – 2014 update. J
blastoma suggesting large apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008; Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72:1938‑1956.
34:216‑219. 69. De Souza Póvoa RC, Marlierè DA, da Silveira HM, et al.: De‑
50. Gondak RO, Rocha AC, Neves Campos JG, et al.: Unicystic nosumab‑related osteonecrosis of the jaws: successful ma‑
ameloblastoma mimicking apical periodontitis: a case series. nagement with a conservative surgical approach. Spec Care
J Endod 2013; 39:145‑148. Dent 2016; 36:231‑236.
10 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

70. Pires FR, Miranda AMMA, Cardoso ES, et al.: Oral avascular 74. Sarathy AP, Bourgeois SL Jr, Goodell GG: Bisphosphonate‑as‑
bone necrosis associated with chemotherapy and biphospho‑ sociated osteonecrosis of the jaws and endodontic treatment:
nate therapy. Oral Dis 2005; 11:365‑369. two case reports. J Endod 2005; 31:759‑763.
71. Pires FR, Miranda AA, Cardoso ES, et al.: Osteonecrose de 75. Wigler R, Steinbock N, Berg T: Oral cutaneous sinus tract,
mandíbula e maxila associada ao uso de bisfosfonatos. Rev vertical root fracture, and bisphosphonate‑related osteone‑
Bras Odontol 2007; 64:42‑48. crosis: a case report. J Endod 2013; 39:1088‑1090.
72. Moinzadeh AT, Shemesh H, Neirynck NAM, et al.: Bisphos‑ 76. Hellstein JW, Adler RA, Edwards B, et al.: Managing the
phonates and their clinical implications in endodontic thera‑ care of patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for pre‑
py. Int Endod J 2013; 46:391‑398. vention and treatment of osteoporosis: executive summa‑
73. Katz H: Endodontic implications of bisphosphonate‑associa‑ ry of recommendations from the American Dental Associa‑
ted osteonecrosis of the jaws: a report of three cases. J Endod tion Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;
2005; 31:831‑834. 142:1243‑1251.
Ca p í tulo

Microbiologia Endodôntica 4
José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças

17. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al.: Biocompatibility of surfa‑
Referências Bibliográficas ce‑sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet
Dent 1987; 57:1‑8.
1. Miller WD: An introduction to the study of the bacterio‑pa‑ 18. Dalton BC, Orstavik D, Phillips C, et al.: Bacterial reduction
thology of the dental pulp. Dent Cosmos 1894; 36:505‑528. with nickel‑titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 1998;
2. Dobell C: Antony van Leeuwenhoek and his “little animals”. 24:763‑767.
London: Staples Press Limited; 1932. 19. Siqueira JF, Jr: Tratamento das infecções endodônticas. Rio
3. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ: The effects of sur‑ de Janeiro: MEDSI; 1997.
gical exposures of dental pulps in germ‑free and conventio‑ 20. Torabinejad M: Mediators of acute and chronic periradicular
nal laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78:511‑521.
20:340‑349. 21. Torabinejad M, Eby WC, Naidorf IJ: Inflammatory and im‑
4. Seltzer S, Farber PA: Microbiologic factors in endodontology. munological aspects of the pathogenesis of human periapical
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78:634‑645. lesions. J Endod 1985; 11:479‑488.
5. Morse DR: Endodontic microbiology in the 1970s. Int Endod 22. Stashenko P: Interrelationship of dental pulp and apical pe‑
J 1981; 14:69‑79. riodontitis. In Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, editors: Seltzer
6. Sundqvist G: Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps and Bender’s dental pulp, Chicago: Quintessence Publishing
[Odontological Dissertation no. 7]. University of Umea, Co, Inc; 2002:389‑409.
23. Kawashima N, Suda H: Immunopathological aspects of pul‑
Umea, Sweden, 1976.
pal and periapical inflammations. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T,
7. Möller AJR, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, et al.: Influence on peria‑
editors: Essential endodontology. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Bla‑
pical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tis‑
ckwell Munksgaard Ltd; 2008:44‑80.
sue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:475‑484. 24. Sasaki H, Stashenko P: Interrelationship of the pulp and
8. Nair PNR: Light and electron microscopic studies of root ca‑ apical periodontitis. In Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, Tay FR,
nal flora and periapical lesions. J Endod 1987; 13:29‑39. editors: Seltzer and Bender’s dental pulp. 2nd ed. Chicago:
9. Molven O, Olsen I, Kerekes K: Scanning electron microsco‑ Quintessence Publishing; 2012:277‑299.
py of bacteria in the apical part of root canals in permanent 25. Finlay BB, Falkow S: Common themes in microbial pathoge‑
teeth with periapical lesions. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991; nicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1997; 61:136‑169.
7:226‑229. 26. Finlay BB, Falkow S: Common themes in microbial pathoge‑
10. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP: Patterns of microbial co‑ nicity. Microbiol Rev 1989; 53:210‑230.
lonization in primary root canal infections. Oral Surg Oral 27. Persson S, Edlund MB, Claesson R, et al.: The formation of
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93:174‑178. hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan by oral bacteria.
11. Sen BH, Piskin B, Demirci T: Observation of bacteria and Oral Microbiol Immunol 1990; 5:195‑201.
fungi in infected root canals and dentinal tubules by SEM. 28. Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms,
Endod Dent Traumatol 1995; 11:6‑9. and perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑
12. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Biofilms and apical periodontitis: diol Endod 2002; 94:281‑293.
study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopa‑ 29. Wilson BA, Salyers AA, Whitt DD, et al.: Bacterial pathogene‑
sis. A molecular approach. 3rd ed. Washington: ASM Press;
thologic findings. J Endod 2010; 36:1277‑1288.
2011.
13. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Souto R, et al.: Microbiological eva‑
30. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Bacterial pathogenesis and media‑
luation of acute periradicular abscesses by DNA‑DNA hybri‑
tors in apical periodontitis. Braz Dent J 2007; 18:267‑280.
dization. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
31. Provenzano JC, Rôças IN, Tavares LF, et al.: Short‑chain fatty
2001; 92:451‑457. acids in infected root canals of teeth with apical periodontitis
14. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Souto R, et al.: Checkerboard DNA‑DNA before and after treatment. J Endod 2015; 41:831‑835.
hybridization analysis of endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral 32. Boneca IG: The role of peptidoglycan in pathogenesis. Curr
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:744‑748. Opin Microbiol 2005; 8:46‑53.
15. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Diversity of endodontic microbiota 33. Wang JE, Dahle MK, McDonald M, et al.: Peptidoglycan and
revisited. J Dent Res 2009; 88:969‑981. lipoteichoic acid in gram‑positive bacterial sepsis: receptors,
16. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Ricucci D: Biofilms in endodontic in‑ signal transduction, biological effects, and synergism. Shock
fection. Endod Topics 2010; 22:33‑49. 2003; 20:402‑414.
12 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

34. Henderson B, Poole S, Wilson M: Bacterial modulins: a novel 55. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Characterization of microbiota of
class of virulence factors which cause host tissue pathology by root canal‑treated teeth with posttreatment disease. J Clin Mi‑
inducing cytokine synthesis. Microbiol Rev 1996; 60:316‑341. crobiol 2012; 50:1721‑1724.
35. Horiba N, Maekawa Y, Abe Y, et al.: Complement activation 56. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Bate AL, et al.: Histologic investi‑
by lipopolysaccharides purified from gram‑negative bacteria gation of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a
isolated from infected root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral retrospective study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod 2009;
Pathol 1992; 74:648‑651. 35:493‑502.
36. Wilson M, Reddi K, Henderson B: Cytokine‑inducing com‑ 57. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Molecular analy‑
ponents of periodontopathogenic bacteria. J Periodontal Res sis of the root canal microbiota associated with endodon‑
1996; 31:393‑407. tic treatment failures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008; 23:
37. Siqueira JF, Jr: Microbiology of apical periodontitis. In Ørsta‑ 275‑281.
vik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential endodontology. 2nd ed. 58. Friedman S: Expected outcomes in the prevention and treat‑
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard Ltd; 2008:135‑196. ment of apical periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, edi‑
38. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Endodontic microbiology. In tors: Essential endodontology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munks‑
Tora­binejad M, Walton RE, editors: Endodontics. Princi­ gaard Ltd; 2008:408‑469.
ples and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008: 59. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Exuberant biofilm in‑
38‑48. fection in a lateral canal as the cause of short‑term endo‑
39. Siqueira JF, Jr, Barnett F: Interappointment pain: mechanis‑ dontic treatment failure: report of a case. J Endod 2013;
ms, diagnosis, and treatment. Endod Topics 2004; 7:93‑109. 39:712‑718.
40. Siqueira JF, Jr: Microbial causes of endodontic flare‑ups. Int 60. Arnold M, Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Infection in a com‑
Endod J 2003; 36:453‑463. plex network of apical ramifications as the cause of per‑
41. Matusow RJ: Endodontic cellulitis “flare‑up”. Case report. sistent apical periodontitis: a case report. J Endod 2013;
Australian Dental Journal 1995; 40:36‑38. 39:1179‑1184.
42. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ: Flare‑ups in endodontics: I. Etiological 61. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Apical actinomycosis as a conti‑
factors. J Endod 1985; 11:472‑478. nuum of intraradicular and extraradicular infection: case re‑
43. Naidorf IJ: Endodontic flare‑ups: bacteriological and immu‑ port and critical review on its involvement with treatment fai‑
nological mechanisms. J Endod 1985; 11:462‑464. lure. J Endod 2008; 34:1124‑1129.
44. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lima KC: Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylo- 62. Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, et al.: Ultrastructural
coccus xylosus in a secondary root canal infection with persis‑ examination of failed molar retreatment with secon­ dary
tent symptoms: a case report. Aust Endod J 2002; 28:61‑63. apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic biofil‑
45. Siqueira JF, Jr, Uzeda M, Varejão E: Sintomatologia clínica ms in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 2009;
persistente devido à infecção endodôntica por Fusobacterium 35:1303‑1309.
nucleatum. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 1995; 43:149‑152. 63. Vieira AR, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: Dentinal tubule in‑
46. Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Ranta K, et al.: Microbiological fin‑ fection as the cause of recurrent disease and late endodontic
dings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases treatment failure: a case report. J Endod 2012; 38:250‑254.
selected for microbiological investigation. Int Endod J 1997; 64. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Lopes WS, et al.: Extraradicular in‑
30:91‑95. fection as the cause of persistent symptoms: a case series. J
47. Anderson AC, Hellwig E, Vespermann R, et al.: Comprehen‑ Endod 2015; 41:265‑273.
sive analysis of secondary dental root canal infections: a com‑ 65. Sunde PT, Olsen I, Gobel UB, et al.: Fluorescence in situ hy‑
bination of culture and culture‑independent approaches re‑ bridization (FISH) for direct visualization of bacteria in pe‑
veals new insights. PLoS One 2012; 7:e49576. riapical lesions of asymptomatic root‑filled teeth. Microbiolo‑
48. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Jacinto RC, et al.: Microbial analy‑ gy 2003; 149:1095‑1102.
sis of canals of root‑filled teeth with periapical lesions using 66. Tronstad L, Barnett F, Cervone F: Periapical bacterial plaque
polymerase chain reaction. J Endod 2008; 34:537‑540. in teeth refractory to endodontic treatment. Endod Dent
49. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Aboim MC, et al.: Denaturing gra‑ Traumatol 1990; 6:73‑77.
dient gel electrophoresis analysis of bacterial communities 67. Grossman LI: Origin of microorganisms in traumatized, pul‑
associated with failed endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral pless, sound teeth. J Dent Res 1967; 46:551‑553.
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98:741‑749. 68. Garberoglio R, Brännström M: Scanning electron microsco‑
50. Rôças IN, Jung IY, Lee CY, et al.: Polymerase chain reac‑ pic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol
tion identification of microorganisms in previously root‑fil‑ 1976; 21:355‑358.
led teeth in a South Korean population. J Endod 2004;30: 69. Trowbridge HO, Kim S, Suda H: Structure and functions of
504‑508. the dentin and pulp complex. In Cohen S, Burns RC, edi‑
51. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Polymerase chain reaction‑based tors: Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002:
analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic 411‑455.
treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑ 70. Pashley DH: Dynamics of the pulpo‑dentin complex. Crit Rev
dod 2004; 97:85‑94. Oral Biol Med 1996; 7:104‑133.
52. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Microorganisms 71. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, et al.: Dentinal fluid dyna‑
from canals of root‑filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int En‑ mics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod 1995; 21:191‑194.
dod J 2003; 36:1‑11. 72. Tonder KJ, Kvinnsland I: Micropuncture measurements of in‑
53. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Microbiologic analy‑ terstitial fluid pressure in normal and inflamed dental pulp
sis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outco‑ in cats. J Endod 1983; 9:105‑109.
me of conservative re‑treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 73. Love RM, Jenkinson HF: Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:86‑93. bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002; 13:171‑183.
54. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, et al.: Microbiological sta‑ 74. Nagaoka S, Miyazaki Y, Liu HJ, et al.: Bacterial invasion into
tus of root‑filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J dentinal tubules of human vital and nonvital teeth. J Endod
1998; 31:1‑7. 1995; 21:70‑73.
Capítulo 4   |   Referências Bibliográficas 13

75. Okamura K, Maeda M, Nishikawa T, et al.: Dentinal response 99. Gomes BP, Berber VB, Kokaras AS, et al.: Microbiomes of
against carious invasion: localization of antibodies in odonto‑ Endodontic‑Periodontal Lesions before and after Chemo‑
blastic body and process. J Dent Res 1980; 59:1368‑1373. mechanical Preparation. J Endod 2015; 41:1975‑1984.
76. Okamura K, Tsubakimoto K, Uobe K, et al.: Serum proteins 100. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M, Fonseca ME: A scanning elec‑
and secretory component in human carious dentin. J Dent tron microscopic evaluation of in vitro dentinal tubules pe‑
Res 1979; 58:1127‑1123. netration by selected anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 1996;
77. Pashley DH: Dentin: a dynamic substrate‑‑a review. Scanning 22:308‑310.
Microsc 1989; 3:161‑174; discussion 174‑166. 101. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, et al.: Viable bacteria in
78. Pashley DH: Dentin‑predentin complex and its permeability: root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J
physiologic overview. J Dent Res 1985; 64 Spec No:613‑620. Endod 2001; 27:76‑81.
79. Edwardsson S: Bacteriological studies on deep areas of ca‑ 102. Matsuo T, Shirakami T, Ozaki K, et al.: An immunohisto‑
rious dentine. Odontol Revy 1974; (Suppl) 32:1‑143. logical study of the localization of bacteria invading root
80. Lima KC, Coelho LT, Pinheiro IV, et al.: Microbiota of denti‑ pulpal walls of teeth with periapical lesions. J Endod 2003;
nal caries as assessed by reverse‑capture checkerboard analy‑ 29:194‑200.
sis. Caries Res 2011; 45:21‑30. 103. Waltimo TM, Sen BH, Meurman JH, et al.: Yeasts in apical
81. Massey WL, Romberg DM, Hunter N, et al.: The association periodontitis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14:128‑137.
of carious dentin microflora with tissue changes in human 104. Siqueira JF, Jr, Sen BH: Fungi in endodontic infections.
pulpitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1993; 8:30‑35. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;
82. Olgart LM: Pain research using feline teeth. J Endod 1986; 97:632‑641.
12:458‑461. 105. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Fungal infection
83. Panopoulos P, Mejare B, Edwall L: Effects of ammonia and of the radicular dentin. J Endod 2002; 28:770‑773.
organic acids on the intradental sensory nerve activity. Acta 106. Jenkinson HF, Lamont RJ: Oral microbial communities in
Odontol Scand 1983; 41:209‑215. sickness and in health. Trends Microbiol 2005; 13:589‑595.
84. Hahn CL, Falkler WA, Jr., Minah GE: Correlation between 107. Kuramitsu HK, He X, Lux R, et al.: Interspecies interactions
thermal sensitivity and microorganisms isolated from deep within oral microbial communities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev
carious dentin. J Endod 1993; 19:26‑30. 2007; 71:653‑670.
108. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Community as the unit of patho‑
85. Martin FE, Nadkarni MA, Jacques NA, et al.: Quantitative
genicity: an emerging concept as to the microbial pathoge­
microbiological study of human carious dentine by culture
nesis of apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
and real‑time PCR: association of anaerobes with histopatho‑
thol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:870‑878.
logical changes in chronic pulpitis. J Clin Microbiol 2002;
109. Sundqvist GK, Eckerbom MI, Larsson AP, et al.: Capacity of
40:1698‑1704.
anaerobic bacteria from necrotic dental pulps to induce pu‑
86. Hoshino E, Ando N, Sato M, et al.: Bacterial invasion of
rulent infections. Infect Immun 1979; 25:685‑693.
non‑exposed dental pulp. Int Endod J 1992; 25:2‑5.
110. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA, Jr., Beckerman T: Experimen‑
87. Dahlén G, Haapasalo M: Microbiology of apical periodonti‑
tally induced infection by oral anaerobic microorganisms in
tis. In Orstavik D, Pitt Ford TR, editors: Essential endodonto­
a mouse model. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1992; 7:253‑256.
logy. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 1998:106‑130.
111. Siqueira JF, Jr, Magalhaes FA, Lima KC, et al.: Pathogenicity
88. Nissan R, Segal H, Pashley D, et al.: Ability of bacterial en‑
of facultative and obligate anaerobic bacteria in monocul‑
dotoxin to diffuse through human dentin. J Endod 1995; ture and combined with either Prevotella intermedia or Prevo-
21:62‑64. tella nigrescens. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1998; 13:368‑372.
89. Khabbaz MG, Anastasiadis PL, Sykaras SN: Determination of 112. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, et al.: Microbial
endotoxins in caries: association with pulpal pain. Int Endod complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 1998;
J 2000; 33:132‑137. 25:134‑144.
90. Love RM: Invasion of dentinal tubules by root canal bacteria. 113. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. Lon‑
Endod Topics 2004; 9:52‑65. don: Quintessence Publishing; 2011:403.
91. Love RM: Bacterial penetration of the root canal of intact 114. Machado de Oliveira JC, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.:
incisor teeth after a simulated traumatic injury. Endod Dent Bacterial community profiles of endodontic abscesses from
Traumatol 1996; 12:289‑293. Brazilian and USA subjects as compared by denaturing gra‑
92. Rôças IN, Lima KC, Assuncao IV, et al.: Advanced caries microbio‑ dient gel electrophoresis analysis. Oral Microbiol Immunol
ta in teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2015; 41:1450‑1455. 2007; 22:14‑18.
93. Rôças IN, Alves FR, Rachid CT, et al.: Microbiome of deep 115. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Rosado AS: Investigation of bacte‑
dentinal caries lesions in teeth with symptomatic irreversible rial communities associated with asymptomatic and symp‑
pulpitis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0154653. tomatic endodontic infections by denaturing gradient gel
94. Baumgartner JC: Endodontic microbiology. In Walton RE, electrophoresis fingerprinting approach. Oral Microbiol
Torabinejad M, editors: Principles and practice of endodon‑ Immunol 2004; 19:363‑370.
tics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:282‑294. 116. Chugal N, Wang JK, Wang R, et al.: Molecular characterization
95. De Deus QD: Frequency, location, and direction of the late­ of the microbial flora residing at the apical portion of infected
ral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod 1975; 1:361‑366. root canals of human teeth. J Endod 2011; 37:1359‑1364.
96. Nanci A: Ten Cate’s Oral Histology. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 117. Santos AL, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Comparing the
2003. bacterial diversity of acute and chronic dental root canal in‑
97. Kobayashi T, Hayashi A, Yoshikawa R, et al.: The microbial fections. PLoS One 2011; 6:e28088.
flora from root canals and periodontal pockets of non‑vital 118. Vengerfeldt V, Spilka K, Saag M, et al.: Highly diverse micro‑
teeth associated with advanced periodontitis. Int Endod J biota in dental root canals in cases of apical periodontitis
1990; 23:100‑106. (data of illumina sequencing). J Endod 2014; 40:1778‑1783.
98. Kurihara H, Kobayashi Y, Francisco IA, et al.: A microbiolo‑ 119. Rôças IN, Hülsmann M, Siqueira JF, Jr: Microorganisms in
gical and immunological study of endodontic‑periodontic le‑ root canal‑treated teeth from a German population. J En‑
sions. J Endod 1995; 21:617‑621. dod 2008; 34:926‑931.
14 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

120. Blome B, Braun A, Sobarzo V, et al.: Molecular identifica‑ 139. Lin LM, Ricucci D, Lin J, et al.: Nonsurgical root canal the­
tion and quantification of bacteria from endodontic infec‑ rapy of large cyst‑like inflammatory periapical lesions and
tions using real‑time polymerase chain reaction. Oral Mi‑ inflammatory apical cysts. J Endod 2009; 35:607‑615.
crobiol Immunol 2008; 23:384‑390. 140. Parsek MR, Singh PK: Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to
121. Li L, Hsiao WW, Nandakumar R, et al.: Analyzing endodon‑ disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol 2003; 57:677‑701.
tic infections by deep coverage pyrosequencing. J Dent Res 141. Hall‑Stoodley L, Stoodley P: Evolving concepts in biofilm in‑
2010; 89:980‑984. fections. Cell Microbiol 2009; 11:1034‑1043.
122. Siqueira JF, Jr., Antunes HS, Rôças IN, et al.: Microbiome 142. Baumgartner JC, Xia T: Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria
in the apical root canal system of teeth with post‑treatment associated with endodontic abscesses. J Endod 2003; 29:44‑47.
apical periodontitis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0162887. 143. Khemaleelakul S, Baumgartner JC, Pruksakorn S: Identifi‑
123. Machado de Oliveira JC, Gama TG, Siqueira JF, Jr., et al.: cation of bacteria in acute endodontic infections and their
On the use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis ap‑ antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
proach for bacterial identification in endodontic infec‑ thol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94:746‑755.
tions. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11:127‑132. 144. Gomes BP, Jacinto RC, Montagner F, et al.: Analysis of the
124. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Cunha CD, et al.: Novel bacte­ antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated
rial phylotypes in endodontic infections. J Dent Res 2005; from endodontic infections in Brazil during a period of
84:565‑569. nine years. J Endod 2011; 37:1058‑1062.
125. Rôças IN, Neves MA, Provenzano JC, et al.: Susceptibility of 145. Ricucci D, Lin LM, Spångberg LS: Wound healing of
as‑yet‑uncultivated and difficult‑to‑culture bacteria to che‑ apical tissues after root canal therapy: a long‑term clini‑
momechanical procedures. J Endod 2014; 40:33‑37. cal, radiographic, and histopathologic observation study.
126. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: As‑yet‑uncultivated oral bacte‑ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;
ria: breadth and association with oral and extra‑oral di‑ 108:609‑621.
seases. J Oral Microbiol 2013; 5:DOI:10.3402/jom. 146. Marsh PD: Microbiology of dental plaque biofilms and their
v3405i3400.21077. role in oral health and caries. Dent Clin North Am 2010;
127. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Prevalence of new candidate pa‑ 54:441‑454.
thogens Prevotella baroniae, Prevotella multisaccharivorax and 147. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Microbiology and treatment of
as‑yet‑uncultivated Bacteroidetes clone X083 in primary en‑ acute apical abscesses. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26:255‑273.
dodontic infections. J Endod 2009; 35:1359‑1362. 148. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Gonçalves LS, et al.: Histobacteriolo­
128. Ribeiro AC, Matarazzo F, Faveri M, et al.: Exploring bacte‑ gic conditions of the apical root canal system and periapical
rial diversity of endodontic microbiota by cloning and se‑ tissues in teeth associated with sinus tracts. J Endod 2018;
quencing 16S rRNA. J Endod 2011; 37:922‑926. 44:405‑413.
129. Sakamoto M, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, et al.: Molecular analy‑ 149. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Distinctive features of the mi‑
sis of bacteria in asymptomatic and symptomatic endodontic crobiota associated with different forms of apical perio‑
infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2006; 21:112‑122. dontitis. J Oral Microbiol 2009; 1: DOI:10.3402/jom.
130. Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Orstavik D, et al.: Microbial v3401i3400.2009.
analysis of endodontic infections in root‑filled teeth with 150. Siqueira JF, Jr, Ricucci D: Periapikale aktinomykose. mi‑
apical periodontitis before and after irrigation using pyro‑ krobiologie, pathogenese und therapie. Endodontie 2008;
sequencing. J Endod 2018; 44:372‑378. 17:45‑57.
131. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Debelian GJ, et al.: Profiling of 151. Paster BJ, Olsen I, Aas JA, et al.: The breadth of bacterial di‑
root canal bacterial communities associated with chronic versity in the human periodontal pocket and other oral si‑
apical periodontitis from Brazilian and Norwegian subjects. tes. Periodontol 2000 2006; 42:80‑87.
J Endod 2008; 34:1457‑1461. 152. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD: Periodontal microbial ecology.
132. Alves FR, Siqueira JF, Jr., Carmo FL, et al.: Bacterial com‑ Periodontol 2000 2005; 38:135‑187.
munity profiling of cryogenically ground samples from the 153. Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, et al.: The human oral micro‑
apical and coronal root segments of teeth with apical perio‑ biome. J Bacteriol 2010; 192:5002‑5017.
dontitis. J Endod 2009; 35:486‑492. 154. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Endodontic microbiology. In
133. Rôças IN, Alves FR, Santos AL, et al.: Apical root canal mi‑ Torabinejad M, Walton RE, editors: Endodontics. Prin‑
crobiota as determined by reverse‑capture checkerboard ciples and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier;
analysis of cryogenically ground root samples from teeth 2009:38‑48.
with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2010; 36:1617‑1621. 155. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Exploiting molecular methods to
134. Schaudinn C, Carr G, Gorur A, et al.: Imaging of endodon‑ explore endodontic infections: Part 1‑current molecular
tic biofilms by combined microscopy (FISH/cLSM – SEM). technologies for microbiological diagnosis. J Endod 2005;
J Microsc 2009; 235:124‑127. 31:411‑423.
135. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Fate of the tissue in lateral canals 156. Baumgartner JC, Hutter JW, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontic mi‑
and apical ramifications in response to pathologic condi‑ crobiology and treatment of infections. In Cohen S, Har‑
tions and treatment procedures. J Endod 2010; 36:1‑15. greaves KM, editors: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis:
136. Ferreira FB, Ferreira AL, Gomes BP, et al.: Resolution of Mosby/Elsevier; 2006:580‑607.
persistent periapical infection by endodontic surgery. Int 157. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Molecular analysis of endodontic
Endod J 2004; 37:61‑69. infections. In Fouad AF, editors: Endodontic microbiology,
137. Ricucci D, Martorano M, Bate AL, et al.: Calculus‑like depo‑ Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2017:81‑128.
sit on the apical external root surface of teeth with post‑tre‑ 158. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: PCR methodology as a valuable
atment apical periodontitis: report of two cases. Int Endod tool for identification of endodontic pathogens. J Dent
J 2005; 38:262‑271. 2003; 31:333‑339.
138. Strindberg LZ: The dependence of the results of pulp the‑ 159. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Exploiting molecular methods to
rapy on certain factors. Acta Odontol Scand 1956; 14 (suppl explore endodontic infections: Part 2‑redefining the endo‑
21):1‑175. dontic microbiota. J Endod 2005; 31:488‑498.
Capítulo 4   |   Referências Bibliográficas 15

160. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN: Present status and future directions 179. Sundqvist G, Johansson E, Sjogren U: Prevalence of bla‑
in endodontic microbiology. Endod Topics 2014; 30:3‑22. ck‑pigmented bacteroides species in root canal infections.
161. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Bacterial re‑ J Endod 1989; 15:13‑19.
duction and persistence after endodontic treatment proce‑ 180. Wasfy MO, McMahon KT, Minah GE, et al.: Microbiological
dures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:19‑23. evaluation of periapical infections in Egypt. Oral Microbiol
162. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Gomes BP, et al.: In vivo evaluation of Immunol 1992; 7:100‑105.
microbial reduction after chemo‑mechanical preparation 181. Gharbia SE, Haapasalo M, Shah HN, et al.: Characterization
of human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue. Int of Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens isolates
Endod J 2006; 39:484‑492. from periodontic and endodontic infections. J Periodontol
163. Munson MA, Pitt‑Ford T, Chong B, et al.: Molecular and 1994; 65:56‑61.
cultural analysis of the microflora associated with endodon‑ 182. Bae KS, Baumgartner JC, Shearer TR, et al.: Occurrence of
tic infections. J Dent Res 2002; 81:761‑766. Prevotella nigrescens and Prevotella intermedia in infections of
164. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr: Root canal microbiota of teeth endodontic origin. J Endod 1997; 23:620‑623.
with chronic apical periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 183. Dougherty WJ, Bae KS, Watkins BJ, et al.: Black‑pigmented
46:3599‑3606. bacteria in coronal and apical segments of infected root ca‑
165. Brito LC, Teles FR, Teles RP, et al.: Use of multiple‑displace‑ nals. J Endod 1998; 24:356‑358.
ment amplification and checkerboard DNA‑DNA hybridiza‑ 184. Baumgartner JC, Siqueira JF, Jr, Xia T, et al.: Geographical
tion to examine the microbiota of endodontic infections. J differences in bacteria detected in endodontic infections
Clin Microbiol 2007; 45:3039‑3049. using polymerase chain reaction. J Endod 2004; 30:141‑144.
166. Sassone L, Fidel R, Figueiredo L, et al.: Evaluation of the 185. Xia T, Baumgartner JC, David LL: Isolation and identifica‑
microbiota of primary endodontic infections using checker­ tion of Prevotella tannerae from endodontic infections. Oral
board DNA‑DNA hybridization. Oral Microbiol Immunol Microbiol Immunol 2000; 15:273‑275.
2007; 22:390‑397. 186. Baumgartner JC, Watkins BJ, Bae KS, et al.: Association of
167. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Update on endodontic microbio‑ black‑pigmented bacteria with endodontic infections. J En‑
logy: candidate pathogens and patterns of colonization. dod 1999; 25:413‑415.
ENDO 2008; 2:7‑20. 187. Chu FC, Tsang CS, Chow TW, et al.: Identification of cultivable
microorganisms from primary endodontic infections with ex‑
168. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Paiva SSM, et al.: Cultivable bacte‑
posed and unexposed pulp space. J Endod 2005; 31:424‑429.
ria in infected root canals as identified by 16S rRNA gene
188. Gomes BP, Jacinto RC, Pinheiro ET, et al.: Porphyromonas gin-
sequencing. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:266‑271.
givalis, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Prevotella intermedia and
169. Saito D, de Toledo Leonardo R, Rodrigues JLM, et al.: Iden‑
Prevotella nigrescens in endodontic lesions detected by culture
tification of bacteria in endodontic infections by sequence
and by PCR. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2005; 20:211‑215.
analysis of 16S rDNA clone libraries. J Med Microbiol 2006;
189. Seol JH, Cho BH, Chung CP, et al.: Multiplex polymerase
55:101‑107.
chain reaction detection of black‑pigmented bacteria in in‑
170. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Uncultivated phylotypes and newly
fections of endodontic origin. J Endod 2006; 32:110‑114.
named species associated with primary and persistent endo‑
190. van Winkelhoff AJ, Carlee AW, de Graaff J: Bacteroides en-
dontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:3314‑3319.
dodontalis and others black‑pigmented Bacteroides species in
171. Ozok AR, Persoon IF, Huse SM, et al.: Ecology of the micro‑
odontogenic abscesses. Infect Immun 1985; 49:494‑498.
biome of the infected root canal system: a comparison be‑
191. Machado de Oliveira JC, Siqueira JF, Jr, Alves GB, et al.: De‑
tween apical and coronal root segments. Int Endod J 2012;
tection of Porphyromonas endodontalis in infected root canals
45:530‑541. by 16S rRNA gene‑directed polymerase chain reaction. J
172. Siqueira JF, Jr., Alves FR, Rôças IN: Pyrosequencing analy‑ Endod 2000; 26:729‑732.
sis of the apical root canal microbiota. J Endod 2011; 192. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Oliveira JC, et al.: Molecular detec‑
37:1499‑1503. tion of black‑pigmented bacteria in infections of endodon‑
173. Tzanetakis GN, Azcarate‑Peril MA, Zachaki S, et al.: Compa‑ tic origin. J Endod 2001; 27:563‑566.
rison of bacterial community composition of primary and 193. Sundqvist G: Associations between microbial species in den‑
persistent endodontic infections using pyrosequencing. J tal root canal infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1992;
Endod 2015; 41:1226‑1233. 7:257‑262.
174. Siqueira JF, Jr., Fouad AF, Rôças IN: Pyrosequencing as a tool 194. Weiger R, Manncke B, Werner H, et al.: Microbial flora of
for better understanding of human microbiomes. J Oral Mi‑ sinus tracts and root canals of non‑vital teeth. Endod Dent
crobiol 2012; 4: DOI:10.3402/jom.v3404i3400.10743. Traumatol 1995; 11:15‑19.
175. Shah HN, Collins DM: Prevotella, a new genus to inclu‑ 195. Jung IY, Choi BK, Kum KY, et al.: Molecular epidemiology
de Bacteroides melaninogenicus and related species formerly and association of putative pathogens in root canal infec‑
classified in the genus Bacteroides. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1990; tion. J Endod 2000; 26:599‑604.
40:205‑208. 196. Lana MA, Ribeiro‑Sobrinho AP, Stehling R, et al.: Microor‑
176. Shah HN, Collins DM: Proposal for reclassification of Bacte- ganisms isolated from root canals presenting necrotic pulp
roides asaccharolyticus, Bacteroides gingivalis, and Bacteroides en- and their drug susceptibility in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immu‑
dodontalis in a new genus, Porphyromonas. Int J Syst Bacteriol nol 2001; 16:100‑105.
1988; 38:128‑131. 197. Fouad AF, Barry J, Caimano M, et al.: PCR‑based identifi‑
177. Jousimies‑Somer H, Summanen P: Recent taxonomic chan‑ cation of bacteria associated with endodontic infections. J
ges and terminology update of clinically significant anaero‑ Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:3223‑3231.
bic gram‑negative bacteria (excluding spirochetes). Clin In‑ 198. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L: Bacteremia in conjunc‑
fect Dis 2002; 35(Suppl 1):S17‑S21. tion with endodontic therapy. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;
178. Haapasalo M, Ranta H, Ranta K, et al.: Black‑pigmented 11:142‑149.
Bacteroides spp. in human apical periodontitis. Infect Im‑ 199. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: The microbiota of acute apical abs‑
mun 1986; 53:149‑153. cesses. J Dent Res 2009; 88:61‑65.
16 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

200. Nobrega LM, Montagner F, Ribeiro AC, et al.: Bacterial di‑ 222. Foschi F, Cavrini F, Montebugnoli L, et al.: Detection of bac‑
versity of symptomatic primary endodontic infection by clo‑ teria in endodontic samples by polymerase chain reaction
nal analysis. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30:e103. assays and association with defined clinical signs in Italian
201. Moraes SR, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Clonality of Fuso- patients. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2005; 20:289‑295.
bacterium nucleatum in root canal infections. Oral Microbiol 223. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Occurrence of two newly named
Immunol 2002; 17:394‑396. oral treponemes – Treponema parvum and Treponema putidum
202. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr: Detection of novel oral species and – in primary endodontic infections. Oral Microbiol Immu‑
phylotypes in symptomatic endodontic infections including nol 2005; 20:372‑375.
abscesses. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005; 250:279‑285. 224. Gomes BP, Jacinto RC, Pinheiro ET, et al.: Molecular analy‑
203. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr: Identification of Dialister pneumo- sis of Filifactor alocis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denti-
sintes in acute periradicular abscesses of humans by nested cola associated with primary endodontic infections and fai‑
PCR. Anaerobe 2002; 8:75‑78. led endodontic treatment. J Endod 2006; 32:937‑940.
204. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Positive and negative bacterial asso‑ 225. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Diversity of
ciations involving Dialister pneumosintes in primary endodon‑ spirochetes in endodontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 2009;
tic infections. J Endod 2003; 29:438‑441. 47:1352‑1357.
205. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Dialister pneumosintes can be a sus‑ 226. Tanner AC, Izard J: Tannerella forsythia, a periodontal pathogen
pected endodontic pathogen. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑ entering the genomic era. Periodontol 2000 2006; 42:88‑113.
thol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94:494‑498. 227. Conrads G, Gharbia SE, Gulabivala K, et al.: The use of a 16s
206. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr: Characterization of Dialister species rDNA directed PCR for the detection of endodontopatho‑
in infected root canals. J Endod 2006; 32:1057‑1061. genic bacteria. J Endod 1997; 23:433‑438.
207. Dewhirst FE, Tamer MA, Ericson RE, et al.: The diversity of 228. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Santos KR, et al.: “Red complex”
periodontal spirochetes by 16S rRNA analysis. Oral Micro‑ (Bacteroides forsythus, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Treponema
biol Immunol 2000; 15:196‑202. denticola) in endodontic infections: a molecular approach.
208. Dahle UR, Titterud Sunde P, Tronstad L: Treponemes and Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;
endodontic infections. Endod Topics 2003; 6:160‑170. 91:468‑471.
209. Edwards AM, Dymock D, Jenkinson HF: From tooth to 229. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Bacteroides forsythus in primary en‑
hoof: treponemes in tissue‑destructive diseases. J Appl Mi‑ dodontic infections as detected by nested PCR. J Endod
crobiol 2003; 94:767‑780. 2003; 29:390‑393.
210. Ellen RP, Galimanas VB: Spirochetes at the forefront of pe‑ 230. Sassone LM, Fidel RA, Faveri M, et al.: A microbiological
riodontal infections. Periodontol 2000 2005; 38:13‑32. profile of symptomatic teeth with primary endodontic in‑
211. Sakamoto M, Umeda M, Benno Y: Molecular analysis of hu‑ fections. J Endod 2008; 34:541‑545.
man oral microbiota. J Periodontal Res 2005; 40:277‑285. 231. Qi Z, Cao H, Jiang H, et al.: Combinations of bacterial spe‑
212. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Andrade AF, et al.: Oral trepo‑ cies associated with symptomatic endodontic infections in a
nemes in primary root canal infections as detected by Chinese population. Int Endod J 2016; 49:17‑25.
nested PCR. Int Endod J 2003; 36:20‑26. 232. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Pseudoramibacter alactolyticus in pri‑
213. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Treponema species associated with mary endodontic infections. J Endod 2003; 29:735‑738.
abscesses of endodontic origin. Oral Microbiol Immunol 233. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Selected endodon‑
2004; 19:336‑339. tic pathogens in the apical third of infected root canals: a
214. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: PCR‑based identification of Tre- molecular investigation. J Endod 2004; 30:638‑643.
ponema maltophilum, T amylovorum, T medium, and T lecithi- 234. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Detection of Filifactor alocis in endo‑
nolyticum in primary root canal infections. Arch Oral Biol dontic infections associated with different forms of perira‑
2003; 48:495‑502. dicular diseases. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18:263‑265.
215. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Treponema socranskii in primary en‑ 235. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Souto R, et al.: Actinomyces species,
dodontic infections as detected by nested PCR. J Endod streptococci, and Enterococcus faecalis in primary root canal
2003; 29:244‑247. infections. J Endod 2002; 28:168‑172.
216. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Polymerase chain 236. Tang G, Samaranayake LP, Yip HK, et al.: Direct detection
reaction detection of Treponema denticola in endodontic in‑ of Actinomyces spp. from infected root canals in a Chinese
fections within root canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34:280‑284. population: a study using PCR‑based, oligonucleotide‑DNA
217. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Detection of Tre- hybridization technique. J Dent 2003; 31:559‑568.
ponema denticola in endodontic infections by 16S rRNA ge‑ 237. Xia T, Baumgartner JC: Occurrence of Actinomyces in infec‑
ne‑directed polymerase chain reaction. Oral Microbiol Im‑ tions of endodontic origin. J Endod 2003; 29:549‑552.
munol 2000; 15:335‑337. 238. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Polymerase chain reaction detection
218. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Oliveira JC, et al.: Detection of pu‑ of Propionibacterium propionicus and Actinomyces radicidentis in
tative oral pathogens in acute periradicular abscesses by 16S primary and persistent endodontic infections. Oral Surg
rDNA‑directed polymerase chain reaction. J Endod 2001; Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96:215‑222.
27:164‑167. 239. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr: Species‑directed 16S rRNA gene
219. Jung IY, Choi B, Kum KY, et al.: Identification of oral spiro‑ nested PCR detection of Olsenella species in association with
chetes at the species level and their association with other endodontic diseases. Lett Appl Microbiol 2005; 41:12‑16.
bacteria in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 240. Chavez de Paz LE, Molander A, Dahlen G: Gram‑positive
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92:329‑334. rods prevailing in teeth with apical periodontitis under‑
220. Baumgartner JC, Khemaleelakul SU, Xia T: Identification going root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2004; 37:579‑587.
of spirochetes (treponemes) in endodontic infections. J En‑ 241. Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB: Clinical significance of
dod 2003; 29:794‑797. dental root canal microflora. J Dent 1996; 24:47‑55.
221. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Gomes BP, et al.: Microarrays com‑ 242. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Andrade AF, et al.: Peptostreptococ-
plement culture methods for identification of bacteria in cus micros in primary endodontic infections as detected by
endodontic infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2005; 16S rDNA‑based polymerase chain reaction. J Endod 2003;
20:253‑258. 29:111‑113.
Capítulo 4   |   Referências Bibliográficas 17

243. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Santos KR: Association of Enterococ- endodontic abscesses from two geographic locations. J En‑
cus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J dod 2006; 32:1135‑1138.
Endod 2004; 30:315‑320. 263. Siqueira JF, Jr, Jung IY, Rôças IN, et al.: Differences in pre‑
244. Ranta H, Haapasalo M, Ranta K, et al.: Bacteriology of valence of selected bacterial species in primary endodontic
odontogenic apical periodontitis and effect of penicillin infections from two distinct geographic locations. Oral Surg
treatment. Scand J Infect Dis 1988; 20:187‑192. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99:641‑647.
245. Le Goff A, Bunetel L, Mouton C, et al.: Evaluation of root ca‑ 264. Möller AJR: Microbial examination of root canals and peria­
nal bacteria and their antimicrobial susceptibility in teeth with pical tissues of human teeth. Odontologisk Tidskrift 1966;
necrotic pulp. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1997; 12:318‑322. 74(supplement):1‑380.
246. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Campylobacter gracilis and Campylo- 265. Egan MW, Spratt DA, Ng YL, et al.: Prevalence of yeasts in
bacter rectus in primary endodontic infections. Int Endod J saliva and root canals of teeth associated with apical perio­
2003; 36:174‑180. dontitis. Int Endod J 2002; 35:321‑329.
247. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Nested PCR detection of Centipeda 266. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Moraes SR, et al.: Direct amplifica‑
periodontii in primary endodontic infections. J Endod 2004; tion of rRNA gene sequences for identification of selected
30:135‑137. oral pathogens in root canal infections. Int Endod J 2002;
248. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Culture‑independent detection of 35:345‑351.
Eikenella corrodens and Veillonella parvula in primary endo­ 267. Lepp PW, Brinig MM, Ouverney CC, et al.: Methanogenic
dontic infections. J Endod 2006; 32:509‑512. Archaea and human periodontal disease. Proc Natl Acad
249. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Catonella morbi and Granulica- Sci USA 2004; 101:6176‑6181.
tella adiacens: new species in endodontic infections. Oral 268. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Baumgartner JC, et al.: Searching
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: for Archaea in infections of endodontic origin. J Endod
259‑264. 2005; 31:719‑722.
250. Fouad AF, Kum KY, Clawson ML, et al.: Molecular charac‑ 269. Vianna ME, Conrads G, Gomes BPFA, et al.: Identification
terization of the presence of Eubacterium spp and Streptococ- and quantification of archaea involved in primary endo­
cus spp in endodontic infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol dontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44:1274‑1282.
2003; 18:249‑255. 270. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Supplementing
251. Hashimura T, Sato M, Hoshino E: Detection of Slackia exi­gua, the antimicrobial effects of chemomechanical debridement
Mogibacterium timidum and Eubacterium saphenum from pulpal with either passive ultrasonic irrigation or a final rinse with
and periradicular samples using the Polymerase Chain Reac‑ chlorhexidine: a clinical study. J Endod 2012; 38:1202‑1206.
tion (PCR) method. Int Endod J 2001; 34:463‑470. 271. Glick M, Trope M, Bagasra O, et al.: Human immunodefi‑
252. Tatakis DN, Kumar PS: Etiology and pathogenesis of perio‑ ciency virus infection of fibroblasts of dental pulp in seropositi‑
dontal diseases. Dent Clin North Am 2005; 49:491‑516, v. ve patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71:733‑736.
253. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD: Microbiology of periodontal di‑ 272. Li H, Chen V, Chen Y, et al.: Herpesviruses in endodontic
sease. In Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, editors: Clinical pe­ pathoses: association of Epstein‑Barr virus with irreversible
riodontology and implant dentistry. 3rd ed. Copenhagen: pulpitis and apical periodontitis. J Endod 2009; 35:23‑29.
Munksgaard; 1997:138‑188. 273. Straus SE: Herpes simplex virus and herpes related‑virus. In
254. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, de Uzeda M, et al.: Comparison of Schaechter M, Engleberg NC, Eisenstein BI, Medoff G, edi‑
16S rDNA‑based PCR and checkerboard DNA‑DNA hybri­ tors: Mechanisms of microbial disease, Baltimore: Williams
disation for detection of selected endodontic pathogens. J & Wilkins; 1998:380‑390.
Med Microbiol 2002; 51:1090‑1096. 274. Slots J: Herpesviruses in periodontal diseases. Periodontol
255. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Molecular detection and identifi‑ 2000 2005; 38:33‑62.
cation of Synergistes phylotypes in primary endodontic infec‑ 275. Kubar A, Saygun I, Ozdemir A, et al.: Real‑time polymera‑
tions. Oral Dis 2007; 13:398‑401. se chain reaction quantification of human cytomegalovi‑
256. Downes J, Vartoukian SR, Dewhirst FE, et al.: Pyramidobacter rus and Epstein‑Barr virus in periodontal pockets and the
piscolens gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the phylum ‘Syner- adjacent gingiva of periodontitis lesions. J Periodontal Res
gistetes’ isolated from the human oral cavity. Int J Syst Evol 2005; 40:97‑104.
Microbiol 2009; 59:972‑980. 276. Parra B, Slots J: Detection of human viruses in periodon‑
257. Jumas‑Bilak E, Carlier JP, Jean‑Pierre H, et al.: Jonquetella tal pockets using polymerase chain reaction. Oral Microbiol
anthropi gen. nov., sp. nov., the first member of the can‑ Immunol 1996; 11:289‑293.
didate phylum ‘Synergistetes’ isolated from man. Int J Syst 277. Contreras A, Mardirossian A, Slots J: Herpesviruses in
Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2743‑2748. HIV‑periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28:96‑102.
258. Vartoukian SR, Downes J, Palmer RM, et al.: Fretibacterium 278. Kamma JJ, Slots J: Herpesviral‑bacterial interactions in ag‑
fastidiosum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the human gressive periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30:420‑426.
oral cavity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:458‑463. 279. Sabeti M, Slots J: Herpesviral‑bacterial coinfection in peria­
259. Rolph HJ, Lennon A, Riggio MP, et al.: Molecular identifica‑ pical pathosis. J Endod 2004; 30:69‑72.
tion of microorganisms from endodontic infections. J Clin 280. Sabeti M, Simon JH, Nowzari H, et al.: Cytomegalovirus and
Microbiol 2001; 39:3282‑3289. Epstein‑Barr virus active infection in periapical lesions of te‑
260. Vickerman MM, Brossard KA, Funk DB, et al.: Phylogene‑ eth with intact crowns. J Endod 2003; 29:321‑323.
tic analysis of bacterial and archaeal species in symptomatic 281. Sabeti M, Simon JH, Slots J: Cytomegalovirus and Eps­
and asymptomatic endodontic infections. J Med Microbiol tein‑Barr virus are associated with symptomatic periapical
2007; 56:110‑118. pathosis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18:327‑328.
261. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Bacteria in the 282. Sabeti M, Valles Y, Nowzari H, et al.: Cytomegalovirus and
apical root canal of teeth with primary apical periodontitis. Epstein‑Barr virus DNA transcription in endodontic symp‑
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; tomatic lesions. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18:104‑108.
107:721‑726. 283. Slots J, Sabeti M, Simon JH: Herpesviruses in periapical pa‑
262. Rôças IN, Baumgartner JC, Xia T, et al.: Prevalence of selec‑ thosis: an etiopathogenic relationship? Oral Surg Oral Med
ted bacterial named species and uncultivated phylotypes in Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96:327‑331.
18 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

284. Ferreira DC, Paiva SS, Carmo FL, et al.: Identification of 303. Bassler BL: How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of
herpesviruses types 1 to 8 and human papillomavirus in acu‑ gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol
te apical abscesses. J Endod 2011; 37:10‑16. 1999; 2:582‑587.
285. Ferreira DC, Rôças IN, Paiva SS, et al.: Viral‑bacterial asso‑ 304. Withers H, Swift S, Williams P: Quorum sensing as an inte‑
ciations in acute apical abscesses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral gral component of gene regulatory networks in Gram‑nega‑
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112:264‑271. tive bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 2001; 4:186‑193.
286. Saboia‑Dantas CJ, Coutrin de Toledo LF, Siqueira JF, Jr, et 305. Kievit TR, Iglewski BH: Bacterial quorum sensing in patho‑
al.: Natural killer cells and alterations in collagen density: genic relationships. Infect Immun 2000; 68:4839‑4849.
signs of periradicular herpesvirus infection? Clin Oral In‑ 306. Forng R‑Y, Champagne C, Simpson W, et al.: Environmental
vestig 2008; 12:129‑135. cues and gene expression in Porphyromonas gingivalis and Ac-
287. Saboia‑Dantas CJ, Coutrin de Toledo LF, Sampaio‑Filho tinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Oral Dis 2000; 6:351‑365.
HR, et al.: Herpesviruses in asymptomatic apical periodon‑ 307. Kesavalu L, Holt SC, Ebersole JL: In vitro environmental re‑
titis lesions: an immunohistochemical approach. Oral Mi‑ gulation of Porphyromonas gingivalis growth and virulence.
crobiol Immunol 2007; 22:320‑325. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18:226‑233.
288. Mogensen TH, Paludan SR: Molecular pathways in virus‑in‑ 308. Kesavalu L, Holt SC, Ebersole JL: Environmental modula‑
duced cytokine production. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2001; tion of oral treponeme virulence in a murine model. Infect
65:131‑150. Immun 1999; 67:2783‑2789.
289. Wara‑Aswapati N, Boch JA, Auron PE: Activation of inter‑ 309. Frias J, Olle E, Alsina M: Periodontal pathogens produ‑
leukin 1beta gene transcription by human cytomegalovirus: ce quorum sensing signal molecules. Infect Immun 2001;
molecular mechanisms and relevance to periodontitis. Oral 69:3431‑3434.
Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18:67‑71. 310. Zhang Y, Wang T, Chen W, et al.: Differential protein ex‑
290. Chen V, Chen Y, Li H, et al.: Herpesviruses in abscesses and pression by Porphyromonas gingivalis in response to secreted
cellulitis of endodontic origin. J Endod 2009; 35:182‑188. epithelial cell components. Proteomics 2005; 5:198‑211.
291. Griffee MB, Patterson SS, Miller CH, et al.: The relationship 311. Yuan L, Hillman JD, Progulske‑Fox A: Microarray analysis of
of Bacteroides melaninogenicus to symptoms associated with quorum‑sensing‑regulated genes in Porphyromonas gingivalis.
pulpal necrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; Infect Immun 2005; 73:4146‑4154.
50:457‑461. 312. Mims C, Nash A, Stephen J: Mims’ pathogenesis of infec‑
292. Yoshida M, Fukushima H, Yamamoto K, et al.: Correlation tious diseases. 5 ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001.
between clinical symptoms and microorganisms isolated 313. Amaya MP, Criado L, Blanco B, et al.: Polymorphisms of
from root canals of teeth with periapical pathosis. J Endod pro‑inflammatory cytokine genes and the risk for acute su‑
1987; 13:24‑28. ppurative or chronic nonsuppurative apical periodontitis in
293. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Andrade AFB, et al.: Identifica‑ a Colombian population. Int Endod J 2013; 46:71‑78.
tion of selected putative oral pathogens in primary root ca‑ 314. de Sá AR, Moreira PR, Xavier GM, et al.: Association of
nal infections associated with symptoms. Anaerobe 2002; CD14, IL1B, IL6, IL10 and TNFA functional gene poly‑
8:200‑208. morphisms with symptomatic dental abscesses. Int Endod J
294. Musser JM: Molecular population genetic analysis of emer­ 2007; 40:563‑572.
ged bacterial pathogens: selected insights. Emerg Infect 315. Fouad AF: Diabetes mellitus as a modulating factor of endo‑
Dis 1996; 2:1‑17. dontic infections. J Dent Educ 2003; 67:459‑467.
295. Griffen AL, Lyons SR, Becker MR, et al.: Porphyromonas gin- 316. Eriksen HM: Epidemiology of apical periodontitis. In Orsta‑
givalis strain variability and periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol vik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential endodontology. 2nd ed.
1999; 37:4028‑4033. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2008:262‑274.
296. Baker PJ, Dixon M, Evans RT, et al.: Heterogeneity of 317. Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, et al.: Influence of re‑
Porphyromonas gingivalis strains in the induction of alve‑ sidual bacteria on periapical tissue healing after chemome‑
olar bone loss in mice. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000; chanical treatment and root filling of experimentally infec­
15:27‑32. ted monkey teeth. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2006;
297. Özmeriç N, Preus HR, Olsen I: Genetic diversity of Porphyro- 114:278‑285.
monas gingivalis and its possible importance to pathogenici‑ 318. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Influence of infection
ty. Acta Odontol Scand 2000; 58:183‑187. at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic tre‑
298. Feuille F, Ebersole JL, Kesavalu L, et al.: Mixed infection atment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;
with Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum in 30:297‑306.
a murine lesion model: potential synergistic effects on viru‑ 319. Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, et al.: Clinical efficacy
lence. Infect Immun 1996; 64:2095‑2100. of treatment procedures in endodontic infection control
299. Kesavalu L, Holt SC, Ebersole JL: Virulence of a polymicro‑ and one year follow‑up of periapical healing. J Endod 2005;
bic complex, Treponema denticola and Porphyromonas gingi- 31:863‑866.
valis, in a murine model. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1998; 320. Heling B, Shapira J: Roentgenologic and clinical evaluation
13:373‑377. of endodontically treated teeth with or without negative cul‑
300. Yoneda M, Hirofuji T, Anan H, et al.: Mixed infection of ture. Quintessence International 1978; 11:79‑84.
Porphyromonas gingivalis and Bacteroides forsythus in a muri‑ 321. Molander A, Warfvinge J, Reit C, et al.: Clinical and radiogra‑
ne abscess model: involvement of gingipains in a synergistic phic evaluation of one‑ and two‑visit endodontic treatment of
effect. J Periodontal Res 2001; 36:237‑243. asymptomatic necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis: a ran‑
301. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr., Debelian GJ: Analysis of sympto‑ domized clinical trial. J Endod 2007; 33:1145‑1148.
matic and asymptomatic primary root canal infections in 322. Engström B, Hard AF, Segerstad L, et al.: Correlation of po‑
adult Norwegian patients. J Endod 2011; 37:1206‑1212. sitive cultures with the prognosis for root canal treatment.
302. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Frequency and levels of candidate Odontologisk Revy 1964; 15:257‑270.
endodontic pathogens in acute apical abscesses as compa‑ 323. Zeldow BI, Ingle JI: Correlation of the positive culture to
red to asymptomatic apical periodontitis. PLoS One 2018; the prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: a clinical stu‑
13:e0190469. dy. J Am Dent Assoc 1963; 66:9‑13.
Capítulo 4   |   Referências Bibliográficas 19

324. Oliet S, Sorin SM: Evaluation of clinical results based upon 342. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Comparison of the in vivo antimi‑
culturing root canals. J Brit Endod Soc 1969; 3:3‑6. crobial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexi‑
325. Lin LM, Skribner JE, Gaengler P: Factors associated with en‑ dine used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology
dodontic treatment failures. J Endod 1992; 18:625‑627. study. J Endod 2011; 37:143‑150.
326. Lin LM, Pascon EA, Skribner J, et al.: Clinical, radiographic, 343. Sedgley C, Nagel A, Dahlen G, et al.: Real‑time quantitative
and histologic study of endodontic treatment failures. Oral polymerase chain reaction and culture analyses of Enterococ-
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71:603‑611. cus faecalis in root canals. J Endod 2006; 32:173‑177.
327. Adib V, Spratt D, Ng YL, et al.: Cultivable microbial flora 344. Zoletti GO, Siqueira JF, Jr., Santos KR: Identification of En-
associated with persistent periapical disease and coronal le‑ terococcus faecalis in root‑filled teeth with or without perira‑
akage after root canal treatment: a preliminary study. Int dicular lesions by culture‑dependent and ‑independent ap‑
Endod J 2004; 37:542‑551. proaches. J Endod 2006; 32:722‑726.
328. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Clinical implications and micro‑ 345. Spångberg LS: Infatuated by enterococci. Oral Surg Oral
biology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:577‑578.
J Endod 2008; 34:1291‑1301.e1293. 346. Kaufman B, Spångberg L, Barry J, et al.: Enterococcus spp. in
329. Byström A, Sundqvist G: The antibacterial action of sodium endodontically treated teeth with and without periradicular
hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. lesions. J Endod 2005; 31:851‑856.
Int Endod J 1985; 18:35‑40. 347. Zandi H, Rodrigues RC, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Antibacte‑
330. Siqueira JF, Jr, Paiva SS, Rôças IN: Reduction in the culti‑ rial effectiveness of 2 root canal irrigants in root‑filled teeth
vable bacterial populations in infected root canals by a with infection: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2016;
chlorhexidine‑based antimicrobial protocol. J Endod 2007; 42:1307‑1313.
33:541‑547. 348. Antunes HS, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Total and speci‑
331. Siqueira JF, Jr, Magalhães KM, Rôças IN: Bacterial reduction fic bacterial levels in the apical root canal system of tee‑
in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irri‑ th with post‑treatment apical periodontitis. J Endod 2015;
gant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlo‑ 41:1037‑1042.
rophenol paste as an intracanal dressing. J Endod 2007;
349. Noiri Y, Ehara A, Kawahara T, et al.: Participation of bacte‑
33:667‑672.
rial biofilms in refractory and chronic periapical periodon‑
332. Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB: Variations in the suscepti‑
titis. J Endod 2002; 28:679‑683.
bilities of components of the endodontic microflora to bio‑
350. Nair PNR, Schroeder HE: Periapical actinomycosis. J En‑
mechanical procedures. Int Endod J 1996; 29:235‑241.
dod 1984; 10:567‑570.
333. Peters LB, van Winkelhoff AJ, Buijs JF, et al.: Effects of ins‑
351. Tronstad L, Sunde PT: The evolving new understanding of
trumentation, irrigation and dressing with calcium hydro‑
endodontic infections. Endod Topics 2003; 6:57‑77.
xide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical bone le‑
352. Siqueira JF, Jr: Periapical actinomycosis and infection with
sions. Int Endod J 2002; 35:13‑21.
Propionibacterium propionicum. Endod Topics 2003; 6:78‑95.
334. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Paiva SS, et al.: Bacteriologic inves‑
353. Grossman LI: Endodontic practice. Philadelphia: Lea & Fe‑
tigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhe‑
biger; 1966.
xidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical
354. Stromberg T, Hasselgren G, Bergstedt H: Endodontic tre‑
periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 2007; 104:122‑130. atment of resorbtive peripical osteitis with fistula. A clinical
335. Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, et al.: Isolation of and roentgenological follow‑up study. Sven Tandlak Tidskr
yeasts and enteric bacteria in root‑filled teeth with chronic 1972; 65:467‑474.
apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2001; 34:429‑434. 355. Gupta R, Hasselgren G: Prevalence of odontogenic sinus
336. Chavez de Paz LE: On bacteria persisting root canal treat‑ tracts in patients referred for endodontic therapy. J Endod
ment. Identification and potential mechanisms of resistan‑ 2003; 29:798‑800.
ce to antimicrobial measures [PhD thesis]. Göteborg Uni‑ 356. Tronstad L, Barnett F, Riso K, et al.: Extraradicular endo‑
versity, Göteborg, Sweden, 2005. dontic infections. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3:86‑90.
337. Chu FC, Leung WK, Tsang PC, et al.: Identification of cul‑ 357. Sunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, et al.: Microbiota of pe‑
tivable microorganisms from root canals with apical perio‑ riapical lesions refractory to endodontic therapy. J Endod
dontitis following two‑visit endodontic treatment with an‑ 2002; 28:304‑310.
tibiotics/steroid or calcium hydroxide dressings. J Endod 358. Wayman BE, Murata SM, Almeida RJ, et al.: A bacteriologi‑
2006; 32:17‑23. cal and histological evaluation of 58 periapical lesions. J En‑
338. Siqueira JF, Jr, Guimarães‑Pinto T, Rôças IN: Effects of che‑ dod 1992; 18:152‑155.
momechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlori‑ 359. Sunde PT, Tronstad L, Eribe ER, et al.: Assessment of pe‑
te and intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide on riradicular microbiota by DNA‑DNA hybridization. Endod
cultivable bacteria in infected root canals. J Endod 2007; Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:191‑196.
33:800‑805. 360. Gatti JJ, Dobeck JM, Smith C, et al.: Bacteria of asymp‑
339. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Molecular micro‑ tomatic periradicular endodontic lesions identified by
biological evaluation of passive ultrasonic activation as a DNA‑DNA hybridization. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:
supplementary disinfecting step: a clinical study. J Endod 197‑204.
2013; 39:190‑194. 361. Handal T, Caugant DA, Olsen I, et al.: Bacterial diversity in
340. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antimi‑ persistent periapical lesions on root‑filled teeth. J Oral Mi‑
crobial efficacy of NiTi rotary instrumentation with NaOCl crobiol 2009; 1: DOI:10.3402/jom.v3401i3400.1946.
irrigation, final rinse with chlorhexidine and interappoint‑ 362. Happonen RP: Periapical actinomycosis: a follow‑up study
ment medication: a molecular study. Int Endod J 2013; of 16 surgically treated cases. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;
46:225‑233. 2:205‑209.
341. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: In vivo antimicrobial effects of en‑ 363. Sjögren U, Happonen RP, Kahnberg KE, et al.: Survival of
dodontic treatment procedures as assessed by molecular Arachnia propionica in periapical tissue. Int Endod J 1988;
microbiologic techniques. J Endod 2011; 37:304‑310. 21:277‑282.
20 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

364. Nair PN: On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a 389. Heimdahl A, Hall G, Hedberg M, et al.: Detection and quan‑
review. Int Endod J 2006; 39:249‑281. titation by lysis‑filtration of bacteremia after different oral
365. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP: Bacteria on the apical root surgical procedures. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:2205‑2209.
surfaces of untreated teeth with periradicular lesions: a 390. Savarrio L, Mackenzie D, Riggio M, et al.: Detection of bac‑
scanning electron microscopy study. Int Endod J 2001; teraemias during non‑surgical root canal treatment. J Dent
34: 216‑220. 2005; 33:293‑303.
366. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Riche FN, et al.: Clinical outcome 391. Reis LC, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr., et al.: Bacteremia after
of the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodon‑ endodontic procedures in patients with heart disease: cul‑
titis using an antimicrobial protocol. Oral Surg Oral Med ture and molecular analyses. J Endod 2016; 42:1181‑1185.
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106:757‑762. 392. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L: Observation of Saccha-
367. Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S: Treatment outcome in romyces cerevisiae in blood of patient undergoing root canal
endodontics: the Toronto study. Phases I and II: Orthogra‑ treatment. Int Endod J 1997; 30:313‑317.
de retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30:627‑633. 393. Debelian GJ, Eribe ER, Olsen I, et al.: Ribotyping of bacte‑
368. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, et al.: Treatment outco‑ ria from root canal and blood of patients receiving endo‑
me in endodontics: the Toronto study‑‑phases 3 and 4: or‑ dontic therapy. Anaerobe 1997; 3:237‑243.
thograde retreatment. J Endod 2008; 34:131‑137. 394. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L: Profiling of Propionibac‑
369. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root ca‑ terium acnes recovered from root canal and blood during
nal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005; and after endodontic treatment. Endod Dent Traumatol
10:123‑147. 1992; 8:248‑254.
370. Hunter W: Oral sepsis as a cause of disease. Brit Med J 1900; 395. Guntheroth WG: How important are dental procedures as a
2:215‑216. cause of infective endocarditis? Am J Cardiol 1984; 54:797‑801.
371. Hunter W: The rôle of sepsis and antisepsis in medicine. 396. Rajasuo A, Nyfors S, Kanervo A, et al.: Bacteremia after pla‑
Lancet 1911; 14:79‑86. te removal and tooth extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
372. Li X, Kolltveit KM, Tronstad L, et al.: Systemic diseases cau‑ 2004; 33:356‑360.
sed by oral infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000; 13:547‑558. 397. Rajasuo A, Perkki K, Nyfors S, et al.: Bacteremia following
373. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L: Systemic diseases cau‑ surgical dental extraction with an emphasis on anaerobic
sed by oral microorganisms. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994; strains. J Dent Res 2004; 83:170‑174.
10:57‑65. 398. Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Kent ML, et al.: Impact of amo‑
374. Murray CA, Saunders WP: Root canal treatment and ge‑ xicillin prophylaxis on the incidence, nature, and duration
neral health: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2000; of bacteremia in children after intubation and dental pro‑
33:1‑18. cedures. Circulation 2004; 109:2878‑2884.
375. Mattila KJ, Nieminen MS, Valtonen VV, et al.: Association 399. Baltch AL, Pressman HL, Schaffer C, et al.: Bacteremia in
between dental health and acute myocardial infarction. Brit patients undergoing oral procedures. Study following pa‑
Med J 1989; 298:779‑781. renteral antimicrobial prophylaxis as recommended by the
376. Syrjänen J, Peltola J, Valtonen V, et al.: Dental infections American Heart Association, 1977. Arch Intern Med 1988;
in association with certain infarction in young and midd‑ 148:1084‑1088.
le‑aged men. J Intern Med 1989; 225:179‑184. 400. Pallasch TJ, Slots J: Antibiotic prophylaxis and the medically
377. Slots J: Casual or causal relationship between periodon‑ compromised patient. Periodontol 2000 1996; 10:107‑138.
tal infection and non‑oral disease? J Dent Res 1998; 77: 401. Gendron R, Grenier D, Maheu‑Robert L: The oral cavity as
1764‑1765. a reservoir of bacterial pathogens for focal infections. Mi‑
378. Carter L, Lowis E: Death from overwhelming odontogenic crobes Infect 2000; 2:897‑906.
sepsis: a case report. Br Dent J 2007; 203:241‑242. 402. Wright AJ, Wilson WR: Experimental animal endocarditis.
379. Flynn TR: The swollen face. Severe odontogenic infections. Mayo Clin Proc 1982; 57:10‑14.
Emerg Med Clin North Am 2000; 18:481‑519. 403. Wu MK, Dummer PMH, Wesselink PR: Consequences of
380. Boscolo‑Rizzo P, Da Mosto MC: Submandibular space in‑ and strategies to deal with residual post‑treatment root ca‑
fection: a potentially lethal infection. Int J Infect Dis 2009; nal infection. Int Endod J 2006; 39:343‑356.
13:327‑333. 404. Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Ahlqwist M, et al.: Endodontic varia‑
381. Marcus BJ, Kaplan J, Collins KA: A case of Ludwig angina: a bles and coronary heart disease. Acta Odont Scand 2003;
case report and review of the literature. Am J Forensic Med 61:257‑262.
Pathol 2008; 29:255‑259. 405. Hung HC, Joshipura KJ, Colditz G, et al.: The association
382. Kim IK, Kim JR, Jang KS, et al.: Orbital abscess from an between tooth loss and coronary heart disease in men and
odontogenic infection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol women. J Public Health Dent 2004; 64:209‑215.
Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103:e1‑6. 406. Joshipura KJ, Rimm EB, Douglass CW, et al.: Poor oral health
383. Larawin V, Naipao J, Dubey SP: Head and neck space infec‑ and coronary heart disease. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1631‑1636.
tions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 135:889‑893. 407. Joshipura KJ, Pitiphat W, Hung HC, et al.: Pulpal inflamma‑
384. Pappa H, Jones DC: Mediastinitis from odontogenic infec‑ tion and incidence of coronary heart disease. J Endod 2006;
tion. A case report. Brit Dent J 2005; 198:547‑548. 32:99‑103.
385. Li X, Tronstad L, Olsen I: Brain abscesses caused by oral in‑ 408. Caplan DJ, Chasen JB, Krall EA, et al.: Lesions of endodon‑
fection. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15:95‑101. tic origin and risk of coronary heart disease. J Dent Res
386. Bonapart IE, Stevens HP, Kerver AJ, et al.: Rare compli‑ 2006; 85:996‑1000.
cations of an odontogenic abscess: mediastinitis, thoracic 409. Pasqualini D, Bergandi L, Palumbo L, et al.: Association
empyema and cardiac tamponade. J Oral Maxillofac Surg among oral health, apical periodontitis, CD14 polymorphis‑
1995; 53:610‑613. ms, and coronary heart disease in middle‑aged adults. J En‑
387. Lee GT: Septicaemia as a complication of endodontic treat‑ dod 2012; 38:1570‑1577.
ment. J Dent 1984; 12:241‑242. 410. Cotti E, Dessi C, Piras A, et al.: Can a chronic dental infec‑
388. Pallasch TJ, Wahl MJ: Focal infection: new age or ancient tion be considered a cause of cardiovascular disease? A re‑
history? Endod Topics 2003; 4:32‑45. view of the literature. Int J Cardiol 2011; 148:4‑10.
Ca p í tulo

Diagnóstico em Endodontia 5
Seç ã o

Diagnóstico e Seleção de Casos


Wanderson M. M. Chiesa | Wantuil R. Araujo Filho | Marcelo Sendra
5.1

14. Weisleder R, Yamauchi S, Caplan DJ, Trope M, Teixeira FB:


Referências Bibliográficas The validity of pulptesting: a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc
2009; 140(8):1013‑1017.
1. Schweitzer JL: The endodontic diagnostic puzzle. Gen Dent 15. Hargreaves KM and Cohen S (eds): Cohen’s pathways of the
2009; 57(6):560‑567. pulp. 10th ed. St Louis: Elsevier, 2010.
2. Dicionário Online de Português [acesso 2018 nov26]. Dispo‑ 16. Hasan S, Singh K, Salati N: Cracked tooth syndrome: Over‑
nível em: https://www.dicio.com.br. view of literature. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2015; 5(3):164‑168.
3. Glickman GN, Schweitzer JL: Endodontic diagnosis. Endo‑ 17. Bonsor SJ: The use of the operating microscope in general
dontics: Colleagues for Excellence. 2013. Chicago: AAE. 1‑6 dental practice. part 1: magnification in general. Dent Upda‑
[acesso 2018 nov 26]. Disponível em: www.aae.org/collea‑ te 2017; 41(10):912‑919.
gues. 18. Bonsor SJ: The use of the operating microscope in general
4. Neville BW, et al.: Patologia oral e maxilofacial. 4a ed. Rio de dental practice. Part2: If you can see it, you can treat it! Dent
Janeiro: Elsevier, 2016. Update 2015; 42(1):60‑62, 65‑66.
5. Da Rosa WLO, Lima VP, Moraes RR, Piva E, da Silva AF: Is a 19. American Dental Association. Commission on Dental Ac‑
calcium hydroxide liner necessary in the treatment of deep creditation. Accreditation Standards for Advanced Specialty
caries lesions? – A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Int En‑ Education Programs in Endodontics, Chicago, 2018. [acesso
dod J. 2019; 52(5):588‑603. 2018 fev 3]. Disponível em: https://www.ada.org/~/media/
6. Silva GA, Gava E, Lanza LD, Estrela C, Alves JB: Subclinical CODA/Files/2018_endo.pdf?la=en.
failures of direct pulp capping of human teeth by using a 20. Depth of field. 14‑17. [acesso 2014 Mar 3]. Disponível em:
dentin bonding system. J Endod 2013; 39(2):182‑189. http://www.meditec.zeiss.com/C125722800455536/0/
7. American Association of Endodontists: Pulpal/periodontal CD060C8E67D236E8C125722900231998/$File/infor‑
relationships. Endodontics: Colleagues for Excellence. 2001. med02_1417.pdf.
Chicago: AAE. [acesso 2018 nov 26]. Disponível em: www.aae. 21. Moura Jr JR: Operating microscopes in restorative dentistry:
org/colleagues. The pursuit of excellence. Aesthetic Dentistry Today 2008;
8. Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Shemesh H, Roig M, Lemberg K: 2(1):29‑33.
Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics – a review. 22. Scarfe WC: Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomo‑
Int Endod J 2015; 48(1):3‑15. graphic images: a Pandora’sbox? OOOE 2014; 117(5):537‑540.
9. Kajan ZD, Taromsari M: Valueof cone beam CT in detectio‑ 23. Chiesa WMM, Lopes HP, Araújo Filho WR, Iglesias Filho W,
nof dental root fractures. Dento Maxilla Fac Radiol 2012; Correia NR: Formando e quebrando paradigmas na Endo‑
41(1):3‑10. dontia. In Fregnani E, Hizatugu R. Endodontia Uma Visão
10. Ma RH, Ge ZP, Li G: Detectionaccuracy of root fractures in Contemporânea. São Paulo: Santos. p. 665‑673.
cone beam computed tomography images: a systematic re‑ 24. Caldeira CL, Barletta FB, Ilha MC, Abrão CV, Gavini G: Pulse
view and meta‑analysis. Int Endod J 2016 Jul;49(7):646‑654. oximetry: a useful test for evaluating pulp vitality in traumati‑
11. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância zed teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2016; 32(5):385‑389.
Sanitária. Portaria 453/98 – Diretrizes de proteção radioló‑ 25. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Cid‑10: Classificação esta‑
gica em radiodiagnóstico médico e odontológico. Diário Ofi‑ tística internacional de doenças e problemas relacionados à
cial da União; 1998 jun 2. saúde. 7a ed. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2004. 3v.
12. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG: Use of cone 26. Scheuerman O, Grinbaum I, Garty BZ: Münchausen syndro‑
beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent me by proxy. Harefuah 2013; 152(11):639‑642, 689.
2009; [acesso 2018 dez 2]. Disponível em: http://www.ncbi. 27. Chaim, LAF: A responsabilidade ética e legal do cirur‑
nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850139/. gião‑dentista em relação à criança maltratada – [Tese]. Pira‑
13. Pantera EA Jr, Anderson RW, Pantera CT: Reliability of elec‑ cicaba: UNICAMP/FOP; 2001.
tric pulp testing after pulpal testing with dichlorodifluorome‑ 28. Carvalho ACR, Garrido LC, Barros SG; Alves AC: Abuso e ne‑
thane. J Endod 1993; 19(6):312‑314. gligência: estudo na delegacia de repressão aos crimes contra
22 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

a criança e ao adolescente. Jornal Brasileiro de Odontopedia‑ 50. Malamed SF: Medical emergencies in the dental office. 7th
tria e Odontologia do Bebê 2001; 4(18):117‑123. ed. Elsevier, 2018; p. 10‑49.
29. Silva RA, Goncalves LM, Rodrigues AC, Cruz MC: The dentist’s 51. Jardim PCV, Peixoto MR, Monego E, Moreira H, Vitorino
role in identifying child abuse: anevaluation about experien‑ PVO, Souza WSBS, Scala LCN: Hipertensão arterial e alguns
ces, attitudes, and knowledge. Gen Dent 2014; 62(1):62‑66. fatores de risco em uma capital brasileira. Arq Bras Card
30. Brasil. Estatuto da criança e do adolescente. [acesso 2019 fev 2007; 88(4):452‑457.
3]. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/ 52. Chernow B, et al.: Local dental anesthesia with epinephrine.
LEIS/L8069.htm. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143:2141‑2143.
31. Anilkumar K, Lingeswaran S, Ari G, Thyagarajan R, Logaran‑ 53. Conrado VCLS: Efeitos cardiovasculares da anestesia local
jani A: Management of Chronic Hyperplastic Pulpitis in Man‑ com vasoconstritores durante exodontia convencional em
dibular Molars of Middle Aged Adults – A Multidisciplinary coronariopatas (tese). São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Públi‑
Approach. 2016: J ClinDiagn 10(1):ZD23‑ZD25. ca da Universidade de São Paulo. 2005.
32. Sundqvist G: Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps 54. Andrade ED: Terapêutica medicamentosa em odontologia.
[tese]. Umea, Sweden: University of Umea, 1976. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 2013.
33. Shemesh A, Yitzhak A, Ben Itzhak J, Azizi H, Solomonov M: Lu‑ 55. Armonia PL, et al.: Como prescrever em odontologia. 9a ed.
dwig Angina after First Aid Treatment: Possible Etiologies and São Paulo: Santos Livraria e Editora, 2010.
Prevention‑Case Report. 2018; J Endod 2019; 45(1):79‑82. 56. Brounwald J, et al.: Heart disease: A text book of cardiovascu‑
34. Holly D, Jurkovic R, Mracna J: Condensing osteitis in oral re‑ lar disease. 10th ed. 2014; p. 941‑968.
gion. BratislLekListy 2009; 110(11):713‑715. 57. Dajani AS, et al.: Prevention of bacterial endocarditis. Re‑
35. Eliasson S, Halvarsson C, Ljungheimer C: Periapical conden‑ commendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA
sing osteitis and endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med 1997; 277(2):1794‑1801.
Oral Pathol 1984; 57(2):195‑199. 58. Jardim PCV, Peixoto MR, Monego E, Moreira H, Vitorino
36. Serrano Jr. CV, Oliveira MCM, Lotufo RFM, Moraes RGB, PVO, Souza WSBS, Scala LCN. Hipertensão arterial e alguns
Morais TMN: Cardiologia e odontologia. São Paulo: Santos fatores de risco em uma capital brasileira. Arq Bras Card
Editora 2010; 395 p. 2007; 88(4):452‑457.
37. Bender IB, et al.: The relationship of systemic disease of en‑ 59. Pereira dos Santos MA: Profilaxia da endocardite bacteria‑
dodotic failures and treatment procedures. Oral Surg 1963; na nos procedimentos dentários: necessidade ou incerteza.
16:1102‑1115. Tese, Mestrado integrado em Medicina, Instituto de Ciências
38. Bender IB, Montgomery S: Nonsurgical endodontic pro‑ Biomédicas Abel Salazar, da Universidade do Porto, 2018.
cedures for the patient atrisk for infective endocardits and 60. Councils E: 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines
other systemic disorders. J Endodontic 1986; 12:400‑407. for the management of infective endocarditis. European He‑
39. Jowett NI, Cabot LB: Patients with cardiac disease: considera‑ art Journal 2015; 36:3075‑3123.
tions for the dental practitioner. Br Dent J 2000; 189:297‑302. 61. Daly CG: Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures. Aus‑
40. Vanessa AS: A clínica odontológica e o tratamento de pacien‑ tralian Prescriber 2017; 40(5):184.
tes cardiopatas: das concepções teóricas às práticas cotidia‑ 62. Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM,
nas. J Business Techn 2018; 8(2):109. Levison M, et al.: Prevention of infective endocarditis. Circu‑
41. Andrade ED: Cuidados com o uso de medicamentos em diabé‑ lation 2007; 116(15):1736‑1754.
ticos, hipertensos e cardiopatas. Anais do 15o Conclave Odonto‑ 63. Abdallah MN: Inconclusive evidence on using antibiotic pro‑
lógico Internacional de Campinas 2003; 104: ISSN 1678‑1899. phylaxis before dental procedures to prevent infective en‑
42. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evalua‑ docarditis. The Journal of the American Dental Association
tion and Treatmentof High Blood Pressure. The sixt report of 2017; 148(8):618‑620.
the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Eva‑ 64. Thornhill MH, Lockhart PB, Prendergast B, Chambers JB,
luation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure 1997. Washing‑ Shanson D: NICE and antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent en‑
ton DC: National Institute of Health, National Heart, Lung docarditis. British Dental Journal 2015; 218(11):619.
and BloodInstitute. 65. Dayer M, Chambers J, Prendergast B, Sandoe J, Thornhill M:
43. Serrano Jr. CV, Oliveira MCM, Lotufo RFM, Moraes RGB, NICE guidance on antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective
Morais TMN: Cardiologia e odontologia. São Paulo: Santos endocarditis: a survey of clinicians’ attitudes. QJM: An Inter‑
Editora, 2010. 395 p. national Journal of Medicine 2013; 106(3):237‑243.
44. Malamed SF: Medical emergencies in the dental office. 4th 66. Simeão MAS: Atendimento odontológico a pacientes porta‑
ed. St Louis: Mosby 1993; p. 10‑49. dores de doenças sistêmicas crônicas: endocardite bacteria‑
45. Hall MB: Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation. Oral Ma‑ na, insuficiência renal, diabetes mellittus, artrite reumatóide
xillo fac. Surg Clin N Am 1992; 4(3):577‑590. e reumatismo, glaucoma. (Tese). Faculdade de Odontologia,
46. Barros, MNF, et al.: Tratamento de Pacientes Cardiopatas na Universidade de Taubaté, Taubaté, 1998.
Clínica Odontológica. Disponível em: periodicos.unicesu‑ 67. Verma S, Bhat KM: Diabetes mellitus: A modifier of periodon‑
mar.edu.br. [acesso 2019 jan 4]. tal disease expression. J Int Acad Periodontol 2004; 6:13‑20.
47. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, Sociedade Brasileira de 68. Miley DD, Terezhalmy GT: The patient with diabetes melli‑
Hipertensão, Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia: 7a Diretriz tus: Etiology, epidemiology, principles of medical manage‑
Brasileira de Hipertensão Arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016; ment, oral disease burden, and principles of dental manage‑
107(Suppl 3):1‑104. ment. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(10):779‑795.
48. Brounwald J, et al.: Heart disease: A text book of cardiovascu‑ 69. Pérusse R, et al.: Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in
lar disease. 6th ed. 2001; p. 941‑968. dentistry: Part II – Oral Surg 1992; 74(687):91.
49. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizibash N, Peto R, Collins R: For 70. Bedran JR: O uso de drogas na gravidez. Rio de Janeiro: Gua‑
the prospective studies collaboration. Age‑specific relevance nabara Koogan, 1988.
of usualblood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta‑analysis 71. Neves RS: Estudo de parâmetros eletrocardiográficos e de
of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective stu‑ pressão arterial durante o procedimento odontológico res‑
dies. Lancet 2002; 360:1903‑1913. taurador sob anestesia local com e sem vasoconstritor e,
Capítulo 5   |   Referências Bibliográficas 23

portadores de doença arterial coronária (tese). São Paulo: 77. Seavuzzi AIF, Rocha MCBS: Atenção odontológica na gravidez –
Instituto do Coração, 2006 uma revisão. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Fed Bahia 1999; 18:46‑51.
72. Little JM, Falace DA: Dental management of the medically 78. Ranali J, et al.: Profilaxia, tratamento e controle do paciente
compromised patient. 3rd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby 1988; p. com doençaSistêmica ou que requer cuidados especiais. In
325‑331. Todescan FF, Bottino MA. Atualização na clínica odontológi‑
73. Oliveira MAM: Atendimento odontológico na gravidez: con‑ ca: a prática da clínica geral (revista do 17o Congresso). São
siderações clínicas e empregos de medicamentos. São Paulo: Paulo: Artes Médicas, 1996; p. 765‑789.
Santos Livraria e Editora, 1990. 79. Xavier HS, Xavier VBC: Cuidados odontológicos coma ges‑
74. Tirelli MC, Armonia, PL; Tortamano, N: Odontologia e gravi‑ tante. São Paulo: Editora Santos, 2004.
dez: período mais indicado para um tratamento odontológi‑ 80. Silva RA, Goncalves LM, Rodrigues AC, Cruz MC: The dentist’s
co programado em pacientes gestantes. Rev Odontol da UNI‑ role in identifying child abuse: an evaluation about experien‑
SA 1999; 4(1):26‑29. ces, attitudes, and knowledge. Gen Dent 2014; 62(1):62‑66.
75. Abdalla AE: Cuidados com a gestante. JADA‑Brasil, 1999; 81. Corrêa EMC: Tratamento odontológico em gestantes. Escolha
2.American Dental Association. Accepted Dental Therapeu‑ da solução anestésica local. Rev ABO Nac 2003; 11(2):107‑111.
tics. 40a ed. Chicago: ADA, 1984. 82. Araujo Filho WR, Sendra M, Arroyo PDCD: Incidência de
76. Silva FM: Uso de anestésicos locais em gestantes. Rev Robrac doenças sistêmicas em pacientes submetidos a tratamento
2000; 9(28). endodôntico na OCEx. Rev Cient da OCEx 2000; 4:3‑5.
Ca p ít u l o

5 Diagnóstico em Endodontia

Seção Aspectos Radiográficos de


Interesse Endodôntico
5.2 Marcus Vinicius R. Só | Vania R. C. Fontanella

12. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM: Textbook and color atlas of


Referências Bibliográficas traumatic injuries the teeth. 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Munksga‑
ard International 1994; 753 p.
1. Russell M, Pitts NB: Radiovisiography: an update. Dent Upda‑ 13. Frank AL, Bakland LK: Nonendodontic therapy for supra‑
te 1993; 2(4):141‑144. osseous extracanal invasive resorption. J Endod, Baltimore
2. Haiter Neto F, Oliveira NA: Tuji FM, Rocha, AS: Estágio atual 1987; 13:348‑355.
da radiografia digital. Rev ABRO 2000; 1:1‑6. 14. Clark C: A method of ascertaining the relative position of
3. Khademi JA: Digital images & sound. J Dent Educ 1996; unerupted teeth by means of film radiographs. Royal Society
60(1):41‑46. of Medicine Transactions 1909; 3:87‑90.
4. Botelho TL, Mendonça EF, Cardoso LLM: Contribuição da 15. Richards AG: The buccal object rule. J Tenn State Dent Assoc
radiologia digital na clínica odontológica. ROBRAC 2003; 1953; 33:263‑268.
12(33):55‑59. 16. Bramante CM, Berbert A: Técnica Tri‑Angular de Rastrea‑
5. Mistak EJ, Loushine RJ, Primack PD, West LA, Runyan DA: mento Radiográfico. ODOUS 1994; 2:37‑40.
Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, 17. Kerekes K, Tronstad L: Long‑term results of endodontic tre‑
direct digital and telephonically transmitted radiographic atment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod
images. J Endod 1998; 24:262‑266. 1979; 5:83‑90.
6. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, Stelt PF: Efficacy of digital in‑ 18. Halse A, Molven O, Grung B: Follow‑up after periapical sur‑
tra‑oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997; v. 25, p. gery: the value of one year control. Endod Dent Traumatol
215‑224. 1991; 7:246‑250.
7. Walton RE: Radiology and endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med 19. Miguens SAQ, Veeck EB, Fontanella VRC, Da Costa NPA:
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80:495. Comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images
8. Farman AG, Avant SL, Scarfe WC, Farman TT, Green DB: In to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic sub‑
vivo comparison of visualix‑2 and ektaspeed plus in the as‑ traction. J Endod 2008; 34(12):1500‑1503.
sessment of perirradicular lesion dimensions. Oral Surg Oral 20. Benfica e Silva J, Leles CR, Alencar AH, Nunes CA, Mendon‑
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:203‑209. ça EF: Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of the bone
9. Dellazzana FZ, Pohlmann FS, Licks R, Ribeiro Silva AE, repair process of chronic apical periodontitis after root canal
Langlois CO: Uso de posicionadores radiográficos especiais treatment. Int Endod J 2010; 43(8):673‑680.
em procedimentos endodônticos. Stomatos 2010; 16(30): 21. Goldstein A: Overview of the physics of US. Radiographics
73‑81. 1993; 14:701‑704.
10. Stashenko P, Wang CY: Characterization of bone resorptive 22. Musu D, Rossi‑Fedele G, Campisi G, Cotti E: Ultrasonogra‑
mediators in active periapical lesions. Proc Finn Dent Soc, phy in the diagnosis of bone lesions of the jaws: a systema‑
Helsink 1992; 88(1):427‑432. tic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol St. Louis 2016;
11. Linenberg WB, Waldron CA, Delaune JR: A clinical roent‑ 122(1):e19‑e29.
genographic, and histhopathologic evaluation of periapi‑ 23. Di Nardo D, Gambarini G, Capuani S, Testarelli L: Nuclear
cal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. St. Louis 1964; magnetic resonance imaging in endodontics: a review. J En‑
17(1):467‑472. dod 2018; 44(4):536‑542.
Ca p í tulo

Diagnóstico em Endodontia 5
Tomografia Computadorizada de Seç ã o

Feixe Cônico em Endodontia


Navid Saberi | Shanon Patel | Conor Durack
5.3

14. Kundel HL, Revesz G: Lesion conspicuity, structured noise,


Referências Bibliográficas and film reader error. American Journal of Roentgenology
1976; 126:1233‑1238.
1. Cruse W P, Bellizzi R: A historic review of endodontics, 15. Bender IB, Seltzer S, Soltanoff W: Endodontic success‑A rea‑
1689‑1963, part 2. Journal of Endodontics 1980; 6:532‑535. ppraisal of criteria Part I. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral
2. Durack C, Patel S: Cone beam computed tomography in en‑ Pathology. 1966; 22:780‑789.
dodontics. Brazilian Dental Journal 2012; 23:179‑191. 16. Bender IB, Seltzer S, Soltanoff W: Endodontic success – A
3. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T: New dimensions in reappraisal of criteria Part IIl. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine,
endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative ra‑ Oral Pathology 1966; 22:791‑802.
diographic systems. International Endodontic Journal 2009; 17. Schwartz SF, Foster JK: Roentgenographic interpretation of
42:447‑462. experimentally produced bony lesions. Part 1. Oral Surgery,
4. Beckmann E C: CT scanning the early days. The British Jour‑ Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1971; 32:606‑612.
nal of Radiology 2006; 79:5‑8. 18. Andreasen JO: Experimental dental traumatology: develop‑
5. Patel S: New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. ment of a model for external root resorption. Endodontics
Cone beam computed tomography. International Endodon‑ and Dental Traumatology 1987; 3:269‑287.
tic Journal 2009; 42:463‑475. 19. Chapnick L: External root resorption: an experimental ra‑
6. Farman A G, Ruprecht A, Gibbs S J, Scarfe W C: Advances in diographic evaluation. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pa‑
maxillofacial imaging. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997. thology 1989; 67:578‑582.
7. Cotti E, Campisi G: Advanced radiographic techniques 20. Gröndahl H‑G, Huumonen S: Radiographic manifestations
for the detection of lesions in bone. Endod Topics 2004; of periapical inflammatory lesions. Endodontic Topics 2004;
7:52‑72. 8:55‑67.
8. Durack C, Patel S, Davies J, Wilson R, Mannocci F: Diagnostic 21. Rudolph DJ, White SC: Film‑holding instruments for intra‑
accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography oral subtraction radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine,
and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of si‑ Oral Pathology. 1988; 65:767‑772.
mulated external inflammatory root resorption. Internatio‑ 22. Forsberg J: Radiographic reproduction of endodontic
nal Endodontic Journal 2011; 44:136‑147. ‘working length’ comparing the paralleling and the bisec‑
9. Silva JA, Alencar AH, Rocha SS, Lopes LG, Estrela C: Three ting‑angle techniques. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pa‑
dimensional image contribution for evaluation of operati‑ thology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 1987; 64:353‑360.
ve procedural errors in endodontic therapy and dental im‑ 23. Forsberg J: A comparison of the paralleling and bisecting‑an‑
plants. Brazilian Dental Journal 2012; 23:127‑134. gle radiographic techniques in endodontics. International
10. Webber RL, Messura JK: An in vivo comparison of digital in‑ Endodontic Journal 1987; 20:177‑182.
formation obtained from tuned‑aperture computed tomo‑ 24. Forsberg J: Estimation of the root filling length with paralle‑
graphy and conventional dental radiographic imaging mo‑ ling and bisecting‑angle radiographic techniques performed
dalities. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral by undergraduate students. International Endodontic Jour‑
Radiology, and Endododontics 1999; 88:239‑247. nal 1987; 20:282‑286.
11. Nance R, Tyndall D, Levin LG, Trope M: Identification of 25. Whaites E: Periapical radiography. In Essentials of Dental Ra‑
root canals in molars by tuned‑aperture computed tomogra‑ diology and Radiography. Whaites E, editor. 4th ed. Churchill
phy. International Endodontic Journal 2000; 33:392‑396. Livingston Elsevier; 2007.
12. Brynolf I: A histological and roentenological study of the pe‑ 26. Vande Voorde HE, Bjorndahl AM: Estimated endodontic
riapical region of human upper incisors. Odontologisk Revy “working length” with paralleling radiographs. Oral Surgery,
1967; 18: Supplement 11. Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1969; 27:106‑110.
13. Revesz G, Kundel HL, Graber MA: The Influence of Structu‑ 27. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K: Develo‑
red Noise on the Detection of Radiologic Abnormalities. In‑ pment of a compact computed tomographic mapparatus for
vestigative Radiology 1974; 6:479‑486. dental use. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1999; 28:245‑248.
26 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

28. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA: A dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral
new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and
cone‑beam technique: preliminary results. European Radio‑ Endodontics. 2003; 95:371‑377.
logy 1999; 8:1558‑1564. 48. Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Araki M, Sawada K, Akiyama Y:
29. Miles DA: Colour atlas of cone beam volumetric imaging Comparison of image performance between cone‑beam com‑
for dental applications. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pu‑ puted tomography for dental use and four‑row multidetector
blishing Co Inc 2008. helical CT. Journal of Oral Science 2006; 48:27‑34.
30. McNamara JA, Kapila SD: Digital radiography and three di‑ 49. Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Kameoka S, et al.: Comparison
mensional imaging. 1st ed. Ann Arbor: The University of Mi‑ of image validity between cone beam computed tomography
chigan, 2006. for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomo‑
31. Patel S, Dawood A, Pitt Ford T, Whaites E: The potential ap‑ graphy. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2007; 36:465‑471.
plications of cone beam computed tomography in the mana‑ 50. Bartling SH, Majdani O, Gupta R, et al.: Large scan field,
gement of endodontic problems. International Endodontic high spatial resolution flat‑panel detector based volumetric
Journal 2007; 40:818‑830. CT of the whole human skull base and for maxillofacial ima‑
32. Patel S, Kanagasingam S, Mannocci F: Cone beam computed ging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2007; 36:317‑327.
tomography (CBCT) in endodontics. Dental Update 2010; 51. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW: Effective does
37:373‑379. from cone beam CT examinations in Dentistry. British Jour‑
33. Scarfe WC, Farman AG: What is cone‑beam CT and how nal of Radiology 2009; 82:35‑40.
does it work? The Dental Clinics of North America 2008; 52. Lofthag‑Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl
52:707‑730. H‑G: Limited cone beam CT and intraoral radiography for
34. Morita J: Diagnostic Imaging Equipment, Japan. http://www. the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surgery, Oral Me‑
morita.com/usa/cms/website.php?id=/en/products/den‑ dicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
tal/diagnostic_and_imaging_equipment.html 2007; 103:114‑119.
35. Imaging Sciences International, USA. http://www.i‑cat.com/ 53. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR: Ac‑
products/ curacy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic
36. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG: Use of cone radiography for the detection of apical periodontitis. Journal
beam computed tomography in endodontics. International of Endodontics 2008; 34:273‑279.
Journal of Dentistry 2010; p. 20 doi:10.1155/2009/634567. 54. Yamamoto K, Ueno K, Seo K, Shinohara D: Development of
37. ICRP: Publication 103 (2007) Radiation protection. Recom‑ dento‑maxillofacial cone beam X‑ray computed tomography
mendations of the International Commission on Radiologi‑ system. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 2003; 6(Su‑
cal Protection. Pergamon Press. ppl. 1):160‑162.
38. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al.: Comparison be‑ 55. Farman AG, Farman TT: A comparison of 18 different X‑ray
tween effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surgery, Oral Me‑
for dentomaxillofacial applications. European Journal of Ra‑ dicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
diology 2009; 71:461‑468. 2005; 99:485‑489.
39. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Sanderink G, et al.: A comparison of the 56. White S, Pharaoh M: Advanced imaging modalities. In Oral
effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography. radiology: principles and interpretation. White S, Pharaoh
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2002; 31:159‑163. M, editors. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2002.
40. Lennon S, Patel S, Foschi F, Wilson R, Davies J, Mannocci 57. Horner K: Cone‑beam computed tomography: time for an
F: Diagnostic accuracy of limited volume cone beam compu‑ evidence‑based approach. Primary Dental Journal 2013;
ted tomography in the detection of periapical bone loss: 360° 2:22‑31.
scans versus 180° scans. International Endodontic Journal 58. Metska ME, Aartman IHA, Wesselink PR, Özok AR: Detection
2011; 44:1118‑1127. of verticalroot fractures in vivo in endodontically treated tee‑
41. Hashem D, Brown JE, Patel S, et al.: An in vitro comparison th by cone‑beam computed tomography scans. Journal of En‑
of the accuracy of measurements obtained from high‑ and dodontics. 2012; 38:1344‑1347.
low‑resolution cone‑beam computed tomography scans. Jour‑ 59. Petersson A, Axelsson S, Davidson T, et al.: Radiological
nal of Endodontics 2013; 39:394‑397. diagnosis of periapical bone tissue lesions in endodontics:
42. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P: Clinical applications if co‑ a systematic review. International Endodontic Journal 2012;
ne‑beam computed tomography in dental practice. Journal 45:783‑801.
of The Canadian Dental Association 2006; 72:75‑80. 60. Paula‑Silva FWG, Júnior MS, Leonardo MR, Consolaro A, Sil‑
43. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A: Accuracy va LAB, Preto R: Cone‑beam computerized tomographic, ra‑
in Measurement of Distance Using Cone‑Beam Computeri‑ diographic, and histological evaluation of periapical repair
zed Tomography. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial in dogs post‑endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medi‑
Surgery 2004; 19:228‑231. cine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 2009;
44. Murmulla R, Wörtche R, Mϋhling J, Hassfeld S: Geometric ac‑ 108:796‑805.
curacy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofa‑ 61. Paula‑Silva FWG, Hassam B, da Silva LAD, Leonardo MR, Wu
cial Radiology 2005; 34: 28‑31. MK: Outcome of root canal treatment in dogs determined by
45. Jeger FB, Janner SFM, Bornstein MM, Lussi A: Endodontic periapical radiography and cone‑beam computed tomogra‑
working length measurement with pre‑existing cone‑beam phy scans. Journal of Endodontics 2009; 35:723‑726.
computed tomography scanning: A prospective, controlled 62. Cheung GSP, Wei WLL, McGrath C: Agreement between pe‑
clinical study. Journal of Endodontics 2012; 38:884‑888. riapical radiographs and cone‑beam computed tomography
46. Liang YH, Jiang L, Chen C, et al.: The validity of cone‑beam for assessment of periapical status of root filled molar teeth.
computed tomography in measuring root canal length using International Endodontic Journal 2013; 46:889‑895.
a gold standard. Journal of Endodontics. 2013; 39:1607‑1610. 63. Soǧur E, Grӧndahl H‑G, Baks BG, Mert A: Does a combina‑
47. Hashimoto K, Yoshinori Y, Iwai K, et al.: A comparison of a tion of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid‑in‑
new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for duced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of
Capítulo 5   |   Referências Bibliográficas 27

cone‑beam computed tomography scanning? Journal of En‑ 81. Andreasen JO: Luxation of permanent teeth due to trau‑
dodontics 2012; 38:131‑136. ma. A clinical and radiographic follow‑up of 189 injured
64. Low MTL, Dula KD, Bürgin W, von Arx T: Comparison of pe‑ teeth. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1970;
riapical radiography and limited cone‑beam tomography in 78:273‑286.
posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. Journal 82. Andreasen FM, Vestergaard Pedersen B: Prognosis of luxated
of Endodontics 2008; 34:557‑562. permanent teeth – the development of pulp necrosis. Endo‑
65. Abella F, Patel S, Duran‑Sindreu F, Mercadé M, Bueno R, dontics and Dental Traumatology 1985; 1:207‑220.
Roig M: Evaluating the periapical status of teeth with irre‑ 83. Andreasen JO, Hjørting‑Hansen E: Replantation of teeth. I.
versible pulpitis by using cone‑beam computed tomography Radiographic and clinical study of 110 human teeth replan‑
scanning and periapical radiographs. Journal of Endodontics ted after accidental loss. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
2012; 38:1588‑1591. 1966; 24:263‑286.
66. Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, Wilson R, Pitt Ford T: De‑ 84. Andreasen JO, Hjørting‑Hansen E: Replantation of teeth.II.
tection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone Histological study of 22 replanted anterior teeth in humans.
beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. In‑ Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1966; 24:287‑306.
ternational Endodontic Journal 2009; 42:507‑515. 85. Andreasen JO, Borum MK, Jacobsen HL, Andreasen FM: Re‑
67. Stavropoulos A, Wenzel A: Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, plantation of 400 avulsed permanent incisors. 1. Diagnosis of
intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the healing complications. Endodontics and Dental Traumatolo‑
detection of periapical lesions: an ex vivo study in pig jaws. gy 1995; 11:51‑58.
Clinical Oral Investigations 2007; 11:101‑116. 86. Crona‑Larsson G, Bjarnasan S, Norén JG: Effect of luxation
68. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F: The detection of injuries on permanent teeth. Endodontics and Dental Trau‑
periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone matology 1991; 7:199‑206.
beam computed tomography‑ part 1: pre‑operative status. In‑ 87. Patel S, Saberi N: The ins and outs of root resorption. British
ternational Endodontic Journal 2012; 45:702‑710. Dental Journal 2018; 224:691‑699.
69. Tsai P, Torabinejad M, Rice D, Azevedo B: Accuracy of co‑ 88. Tu MG, Tsai CC, Jou MJ, Chen WL, Chang YF, Chen SY, Cheng
ne‑beam computed tomography and periapical radiography HW: Prevalence of three‑rooted mandibular first molars
in detecting small periapical lesions. Journal of Endodontics among Taiwanese individuals. Journal of Endodontics. 2007;
2012; 38:965‑970. 33:1163‑1166.
70. Friedman S: Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy. Endo‑ 89. Zheng Q, Xue‑dong Z, Jiang Y, Sun T, Liu C, Xue H, Huang
dontic Topics 2002; 2:59‑98. D: Radiographic in vestigation of frequency and degree of
71. Sedentexct Radiation Protection: Cone Beam for Dental and canal curvatures in Chinese mandibular permanent incisors.
Maxillofacial Radiology. Evidence Based Guidelines (v2.0 Fi‑ Journal of Endodontics 2009; 35:175‑178.
nal); 2011: http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/guidelines_final. 90. Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S,
pdf. Meyers J: A 5 year clinical investigation of second mesiobuc‑
72. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD: cal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary
Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior molars. Journal of Endodontics 2005; 31:262‑264.
first molar: “low‑does cone‑beam” CT analysis of the pathway 91. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulilid JC, Tira D: Use of co‑
and its anatomic variations. Journal of Endodontics 2003; ne‑beam computed tomography to identify root canal syste‑
29:773‑775. ms in vitro. Journal of Endodontics 2008; 34:87‑89.
73. Tsurumchi T, Honda K: A new cone beam computertized to‑ 92. Abella F, Patel S, Durán‑Sindreu F, Mercadé M, Roig M: Man‑
mography system for use in endodontic surgery. Internatio‑ dibular first molars with disto‑lingual roots: review and cli‑
nal Endodontic Journal 2007; 40:224‑232. nical management. International Endodontic Journal 2012;
74. Patel S, Shemesh H, Saberi N: Non‑surgical and surgical re‑tre‑ 45:963‑978.
atment. In Patel S, Harvey S, Shemesh H, Durack C, eds. Cone 93. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Bray KE: Effect of preparation with endo‑
Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics. 1st ed. p. 89‑99. dontic handpieces on original canal shape. Journal of Endo‑
Berlin, Germany: Quintessence Publishing, 2016. dontics 1976; 2:298‑303.
75. Cohenca N, Simon JH, Roges R, Morag Y, Malfaz JM: Clinical 94. Mullaney TP: Instrumentation of finely curved canals. Dental
indications for digital imaging in dento‑alveolar trauma. Part Clinics of North America 1979; 23:575‑592.
1: traumatic injuries. Dental Traumatology 2007; 23:95‑104. 95. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG: The balanced force
76. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler concept for instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of En‑
WG: Endodontic applications of cone‑beam volumetric to‑ dodontics 1985; 11:203‑211.
mography. Journal of Endodontics 2007; 9:1121‑1132. 96. Zheng Q, Xue‑Dong Z, Jiang Y, et al.: Radiographic investiga‑
77. Patel S, Durack C: Section 7. Case 7.2. Lateral luxation. In tion of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in Chine‑
Pitt Ford’s Problem Based Learning in Endodontology. Patel se mandibular permanent incisors. Journal of Endodontics
S, Duncan HF, editors. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, p. 2009; 35:175‑178.
256‑263. 97. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Sousa Neto MD, Pécora JD: Method
78. Kamburoğlu K, AR Cebeci, Gröndahl HG: Effectiveness of limi‑ for determination of root curvature radius using cone‑be‑
ted cone‑beam computed tomography in the detection of ho‑ am computed tomography images. Brazilian Dental Journal
rizontal root fracture. Dental Traumatology 2009; 25:256‑261. 2008; 19:114‑118.
79. Tsukiboshi M, Durack C: Traumatic dental injuries. In Patel 98. Park P‑S, Kim K‑D, Perinpanayagam H, et al.: Three‑dimen‑
S, Harvey S, Shemesh H, Durack C, eds. Cone beam com‑ sional analysis of root canal curvature and direction of ma‑
puted tomography in endodontics. 1st ed. p. 101‑118. Berlin, xillary lateral incisors by using cone‑beam computed tomo‑
Germany: Quintessence Publishing, 2016. graphy. Journal of Endodontics 2013; 39:1124‑1129.
80. Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ: Epidemiology of traumatic dental 99. Liang YH, Yuan M, Li G, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK:
injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish popu‑ The ability of cone‑beam computed tomography to detect si‑
lation sample. International Journal of Oral Surgery 1972; mulated buccal and lingual recesses in root canals. Interna‑
1:235‑239. tional Endodontic Journal 2012; 45:724‑729.
28 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

100. Patel S: The use of cone beam computed tomography 115. Pasqualini D, Scotti N, Ambrogio P, Alovisi M, Berutti E:
in the conservative management of dens invaginatus: Atypical facial pain related to apical fenestration and over‑
a case report. International Endodontic Journal 2010; filling. International Endodontic Journal 2012; 45:670‑677.
43:707‑713. 116. Behrents KT, Speer ML, Noujeim M: Sodium hypochlorite
101. Durack C, Patel S: The use of cone beam computed tomo‑ accident with evaluation by cone beam computed tomogra‑
graphy in the conservative management of dens invagina‑ phy. International Endodontic Journal 2012; 45:492‑498.
tus: a case report. International Endodontic Journal 2010; 117. Liang YH, Li G, Wesselink PR, Wu MK: Endodontic outco‑
43:707‑713. me predictors identified with periapical radiographs and
102. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM: Root resorption following cone‑beam computed tomography scans. Journal of Endo‑
traumatic dental injuries. Proceedings of the Finnish Den‑ dontics 2011; 37:326‑331.
tal Society 1991; 88:95‑114. 118. Liang YH, Li G, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK: The as‑
103. Patel S, Ricucci D, Durack C, Tay F: Internal root resorp‑ sociation between complete absence of post‑treatment pe‑
tion: a review. Journal of Endodontics 2010; 36:1107‑1121. riapical lesion and quality of root canal filling. Clinical Oral
104. Gulabivala K, Searson LJ: Clinical diagnosis of internal re‑ Investigations 2012; 16:1619‑1626.
sorption: an expception to the rule. International Endo‑ 119. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Foschi F, Mannocci F: The
dontic Journal 1995; 28:255‑260. detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical ra‑
105. Estrela C, Reis Bueno M, Alencar AHG, et al.: Method to diography and cone beam computed tomography‑ Part 2: a
evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam 1‑year post‑treatment follow‑up. International Endodontic
computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics 2009; Journal 2012; 45:711‑723.
35:1491‑1497. 120. European Society of Endodontology: Quality guidelines for
106. Patel S, Dawood A, Wilson R, Horner K, Mannocci F: The endodontic treatment: consensus report of the. Internatio‑
detection and management of root resorption lesions using nal Endodontic Journal 2006; 39:921‑930.
intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomogra‑ 121. Ahlowalia MS, Patel S, Anwar HMS, et al: Accuracy of CBCT
phy – an in vivo investigation. International Endodontic for volumetric measurement of simulated periapical le‑
sions. International Endodontic Journal 2013; 46:538‑546.
Journal 2009; 42:831‑838.
122. Metska ME, Parsa A, Aartman IHA, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR:
107. Kamburoğlu K, Kurşun S, Yüksel S, Oztaş B: Observer abi‑
Volumetric changes in apical radiolucencies of endodonti‑
lity to detect ex vivo simulated internal or external cervical
cally treated teeth assessed by cone‑beam computed tomo‑
root resorption. Journal of Endodontics 2011; 37:168‑175.
graphy 1 year after orthograde retreatment. Journal of En‑
108. Bernardes RA, Silvéria de Paulo R, Pereira LO, Durate
dodontics 2013; 39:1504‑1509.
MAH, Ordinola‑Zapata R, Ribamar de Azevedo: Compara‑
123. Liang Y‑H, Jiang L‑M, Jiang L, et al.: Radiographic healing
tive study of cone beam computed tomography and intra‑
after a root canal treatment performed in single‑rooted te‑
oral periapical radiographs in diagnosis of lingual‑simula‑
eth with and without ultrasonic activation of the irrigant: a
ted external root resorptions. Dental Traumatology 2012;
randomized controlled trial. Journal of Endodontics 2013;
28:268‑272.
39:1218‑1225.
109. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J: An evaluation of endo‑ 124. Suebnukarn S, Rhienmora P, Haddawy P: The use of co‑
dontically treated vertically fractured teeth. Journal of En‑ ne‑beam computed tomography and virtual reality simula‑
dodontics. 1999; 25:506‑508. tion for pre‑surgical practice in endodontic microsurgery.
110. Tamse A, Kaffe I, Lustig J, Ganor J, Fuss Z: Radiographic International Endodontic Journal 2012; 45:627‑632.
features of vertically fractured endodontically treated me‑ 125. Patel S, Aldowaisan A, Dawood A: A novel method for soft tissue
sial roots of mandibular molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medici‑ retraction during periapical surgery using 3D technology: A case
ne, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 2006; report. International Endodontic Journal 2017; 50:813‑822.
101:797‑802. 126. Farman AG: ALARA still applies‑Editorial. Oral Surgery,
111. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ӧzok AR, va der Stelt P, Wesselink Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endo‑
PR: Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically dontics 2005; 100:395‑397.
treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. 127. Brown J, Jacobs R, Levring Jӓghagen E, et al.: Basic training
Journal of Endodontics. 2009; 35:719‑722. requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a po‑
112. Brady E, Mannocci F, Brown J, Wilson R, Patel S: A compa‑ sition paper prepared by the European academy of dento‑
rison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical maxillofacial radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2014;
radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in 43:20130291.
nonendodontically treated teeth. International Endodontic 128. Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Shemesh H, Roig M, Lemberg K:
Journal 2014; doi:10.1111/iej.12209. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics‑a review.
113. Patel S, Brady E, Wilson R, Brown J, Mannocci F: The detec‑ International Endodontic Journal. Accepted for publication.
tion of vertical root fractures in root filled teeth with peria‑ 129. Price JB, Thaw KL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Padilla RJ: Inci‑
pical radiographs and CBCT scans. International Endodon‑ dental findings from cone beam computed tomography of
tic Journal 2013; 46:1140‑1152. the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study.
114. Chavda R, Mannocci F, Andiappan M, Patel S: Comparing Clinical Oral Implants Research 2012; 23:1261‑1268.
the in vivo diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography 130. Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P, Shanbhag V: Association
with cone beam computerised tomography for the detec‑ between periapical lesions and maxillary sinus mucosal thi‑
tion of vertical root fracture. Journal of Endodontics. Sub‑ ckening: a retrospective cone‑beam computed tomography
mitted for publication. study. Journal of Endodontics 2013; 39:853‑857.
Ca pí tulo

Preparação para o Tratamento


Endodôntico 6
Esterilização e Desinfecção Seç ã o

em Endodontia
Flávio R. F. Alves | José Claudio Provenzano
6.1

15. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Bleicher P, et al.: Effects of cleaning, di‑


Referências Bibliográficas sinfection, and sterilization procedures on the cutting effi‑
ciency of endodontic files. J Endod 1996; 22:657‑661.
1. Perkins J: Principles and methods of sterilization in health
16. Testarelli L, Gallottini L, Gambarini G: Mechanical proper‑
sciences.Charles C. Thomas – Publisher. 2nd ed.; 1983.
ties of nickel‑titanium files following multiple heat steriliza‑
2. Leeuwenhoek AV: Concerning little animals by him observed
tions. Minerva Stomatol 2003; 52:169‑173.
in rain‑, well‑, sea‑, and snow‑water; as also in water wherein
17. Schafer E: Effect of physical vapor deposition on cutting effi‑
pepper has lain infused. Phil Trans R Soc 1677; 12:821‑831.
ciency of nickel‑titanium files. J Endod 2002; 28:800‑802.
3. Daniel TM: The history of tuberculosis. Respir Med 2006;
18. Schäfer E: Effect of sterilization on the cutting efficiency of
100:1862‑1870.
PVD‑coated nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. Int En‑
4. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rocas IN: Optimising single‑visit disinfection
dod J 2002; 35:867‑872.
with supplementary approaches: a quest for predictability.
19. Acosta‑Gio AE, Rueda‑Patino JL, Sanchez‑Perez L: Sporicidal
Aust Endod J 2011; 37:92‑98.
activity in liquid chemical products to sterilize or high‑level
5. Sonntag D, Peters OA: Effect of prion decontamination
disinfect medical and dental instruments. Am J Infect Con‑
protocols on nickel‑titanium rotary surfaces. J Endod 2007;
trol 2005; 33:307‑309.
33:442‑446.
6. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância 20. Bourvis N, Boelle PY, Cesbron JY, et al.: Risk assessment of
Sanitária. Serviços odontológicos: prevenção e controle de transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt‑Jakob disease in endo‑
riscos. Brasília: Editora Anvisa. 2006. dontic practice in absence of adequate prion inactivation.
7. Ferreira Murgel CA, Walton RE, Rittman B, et al.: A compa‑ PLoS One 2007; 2:e1330.
rison of techniques for cleaning endodontic files after usage: 21. Ingrosso L, Pisani F, Pocchiari M: Transmission of the 263K
a quantitative scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod scrapie strain by the dental route. J Gen Virol 1999; 80
1990; 16:214‑217. (11):3043‑3047.
8. Walker JT, Dickinson J, Sutton JM, et al.: Cleanability of den‑ 22. Smith A, Letters S, Lange A, et al.: Residual protein levels
tal instruments‑implications of residual protein and risks on reprocessed dental instruments. J Hosp Infect 2005;
from Creutzfeldt‑Jakob disease. Br Dent J 2007; 203:395‑401. 61:237‑241.
9. Perakaki K, Mellor AC, Qualtrough AJ: Comparison of an ul‑ 23. Seago ST, Bergeron BE, Kirkpatrick TC, et al.: Effect of re‑
trasonic cleaner and a washer disinfector in the cleaning of peated simulated clinical use and sterilization on the cutting
endodontic files. J Hosp Infect 2007; 67:355‑359. efficiency and flexibility of Hyflex CM nickel‑titanium rotary
10. Parashos P, Linsuwanont P, Messer HH: A cleaning protocol files. J Endod 2015; 41:725‑728.
for rotary nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. Aust Dent 24. Rapisarda E, Bonaccorso A, Tripi TR, et al.: Effect of sterili‑
J 2004; 49:20‑27. zation on the cutting efficiency of rotary nickel‑titanium en‑
11. Linsuwanont P, Parashos P, Messer HH: Cleaning of rotary dodontic files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 2004; Endod 1999; 88:343‑347.
37:19‑28. 25. Neal RG, Craig RG, Powers JM: Effect of sterilization and ir‑
12. Boyd KS, Sonntag KD, Crawford JJ: Efficacy of sterilization of rigants on the cutting ability of stainless steel files. J Endod
endodontic files after autoclaving in a synthetic sponge. Int 1983; 9:93‑96.
Endod J 1994; 27:330‑333. 26. Pedulla E, Benites A, La Rosa GM, et al.: Cyclic fatigue re‑
13. Velez AE, Thomas DD, del Rio CE: An evaluation of steriliza‑ sistance of heat‑treated nickel‑titanium instruments after im‑
tion of endodontic instruments in artificial sponges. J Endod mersion in sodium hypochlorite and/or sterilization. J En‑
1998; 24:51‑53. dod 2018.
14. Morrison SW, Newton CW, Brown CE, Jr.: The effects of ste‑ 27. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, et al.: Effect of autoclave sterilization
am sterilization and usage on cutting efficiency of endodon‑ on the cyclic fatigue resistance of thermally treated Nickel‑Ti‑
tic instruments. J Endod 1989; 15:427‑431. tanium instruments. Int Endod J 2016; 49:990‑995.
30 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

28. Arias A, Perez‑Higueras JJ, de la Macorra JC: Influence of cli‑ 38. Silva CHFP, Siqueira JF, Jr, Cerqueira MDO, et al.: Uso de
nical usage of GT and GTX files on cyclic fatigue resistance. água sanitária na esterilização rápida de cones de guta‑per‑
Int Endod J 2014; 47:257‑263. cha. JBC 2000; 4:77‑79.
29. Alfoqom Alazemi M, Bryant ST, Dummer PM: Deformation 39. Royal MJ, Williamson AE, Drake DR: Comparison of 5.25%
of HyFlex CM instruments and their shape recovery follo‑ sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, and 2% chlorhexidine in the
wing heat sterilization. Int Endod J 2015; 48:593‑601. rapid disinfection of polycaprolactone‑based root canal
30. Kumar M, Sequeira PS, Peter S, et al.: Sterilisation of extrac‑ filling material. J Endod 2007; 33:42‑44.
ted human teeth for educational use. Indian J Med Microbiol 40. Pang NS, Jung IY, Bae KS, et al.: Effects of short‑term chemi‑
2005; 23:256‑258. cal disinfection of gutta‑percha cones: identification of affec‑
31. Dominici JT, Eleazer PD, Clark SJ, et al.: Disinfection/sterili‑ ted microbes and alterations in surface texture and physical
zation of extracted teeth for dental student use. J Dent Educ properties. J Endod 2007; 33:594‑598.
2001; 65:1278‑1280. 41. Holland R, Bernabé PF, Nagata MJ, et al.: Métodos de esterili‑
32. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Matsumoto CU, et al.: Disinfection
zação dos cones na endodontia – influência do método de es‑
of gutta‑percha cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypo‑
terilização dos cones de papel e de guta‑percha no comporta‑
chlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
mento do tecido conjuntivo subcutâneo do rato. Rev Gaucha
2005; 100:512‑517.
Odontol 1990; 38:133‑137.
33. Gahyva SM, Siqueira JFJ: Avaliação da contaminação de cones de
42. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Costa Filho AS, et al.: Avaliação da ca‑
guta‑percha disponíveis comercialmente. JBE 2001; 4:193‑195.
pacidade de absorção de cones de papel. Rev Bras Odontol
34. Montgomery S: Chemical decontamination of gutta‑percha
cones with polyvinylpyrrolidone‑iodine. Oral Surgery Oral 1992; 49:48‑51.
Medicine Oral Pathology 1971; 31:258‑266. 43. Holland R, Bernabé PF, Gonçalves JC, et al.: Resposta do coto
35. Senia ES, Marraro RV, Mitchell JL, et al.: Rapid sterilization pulpar e tecidos periapicais de dentes de cães a cones de pa‑
of gutta‑percha cones with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J En‑ pel esterilizados em estufa ou vapores de formaldeído. Rev
dod 1975; 1:136‑140. Bras Odontol 1991; 48:2‑8.
36. Siqueira JF, Jr, da Silva CH, Cerqueira MD, et al.: Effective‑ 44. Carvalho MGP, Duarte GCP, Amaral MM, et al.: Poder de ab‑
ness of four chemical solutions in eliminating Bacillus subtilis sorção das pontas de papel: influência da esterilização em es‑
spores on gutta‑percha cones. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; tufa a seco. Avaliação “in vitro”. Rev Gaucha Odontol 1995;
14:124‑126. 43:171‑174.
37. Cardoso CL, Kotaka CR, Redmerski R, et al.: Rapid deconta‑ 45. Almeida BM NM, Marotta PS, Ribeiro TO, Alves FRF, Oliveira
mination of gutta‑percha cones with sodium hypochlorite. J JCM: Avaliação da contaminação de cones de papel absorven‑
Endod 1999; 25:498‑501. te. Rev Bras Odontol 2010; 67:81‑85.
Ca pí tulo

Preparação para o Tratamento


Endodôntico 6
Seç ã o

Anestesia em Endodontia
José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Flávio R. F. Alves | Alejandro R. Pérez
6.2

13. Saloum FS, Baumgartner JC, Marshall G, et al.: A clinical


Referências Bibliográficas comparison of pain perception to the Wand and a traditional
syringe. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
1. Malamed SF: Manual de anestesia local. 6a ed. Rio de Janei‑ 2000; 89:691‑695.
ro: Elsevier; 2013. 14. Saw LH, Messer HH: Root strains associated with different
2. McLean C, Reader A, Beck M, et al.: An evaluation of 4% obturation techniques. J Endod 1995; 21:314‑320.
prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine 15. Murgel CA, Walton RE: Vertical root fracture and dentin de‑
(1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block. J formation in curved roots: the influence of spreader design.
Endod 1993; 19:146‑150. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6:273‑278.
3. Mikesell P, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al.: A comparison of arti‑
16. Holcomb JQ, Pitts DL, Nicholls JI: Further investigation of
caine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J En‑
spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during
dod 2005; 31:265‑270.
lateral condensation. J Endod 1987; 13:277‑284.
4. Kung J, McDonagh M, Sedgley CM: Does articaine provide
17. Chavarria‑Bolanos D, Rodriguez‑Wong L, Noguera‑Gonzalez
an advantage over lidocaine in patients with symptomatic ir‑
D, et al.: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy
reversible pulpitis? A systematic review and meta‑analysis. J
of three diagnostic tests to predict inferior alveolar nerve blo‑
Endod 2015; 41:1784‑1794.
ckade failure in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Pain Res
5. Pogrel MA: Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveo‑
Manag 2017; 2017:3108940.
lar nerve blocks: a current update. J Calif Dent Assoc 2012;
18. Strichartz G: Molecular mechanisms of nerve block by local
40:795‑797.
6. Piccinni C, Gissi DB, Gabusi A, et al.: Paraesthesia after lo‑ anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1976; 45:421‑441.
cal anaesthetics: an analysis of reports to the FDA Adverse 19. Hannan L, Reader A, Nist R, et al.: The use of ultrasound for
Event Reporting System. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2015; guiding needle placement for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.
117:52‑56. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;
7. Haas DA: Articaine and paresthesia: epidemiological studies. 87:658‑665.
J Am Coll Dent 2006; 73:5‑10. 20. Berns JM, Sadove MS: Mandibular block injection: a method
8. Babst CR, Gilling BN: Bupivacaine: a review. Anesth Prog of study using an injected radiopaque material. J Am Dent As‑
1978; 25:87‑91. soc 1962; 65:735‑745.
9. Ranali J, Volpato MC: Bupivacaína – anestésico local de 21. Galbreath JC: Tracing the course of the mandibular block in‑
longa duração: revisão sobre sua farmacologia e uso clíni‑ jection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970; 30:571‑582.
co em odontologia. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 1990; 22. Steinkruger G, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al.: The significance
47:36‑40. of needle bevel orientation in achieving a successful inferior
10. Walton RE, Reader AW, Nusstein JM: Local anesthesia. In To‑ alveolar nerve block. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137:1685‑1691.
rabinejad M, Walton RE, editors: Endodontics. Principles and 23. Remmers T, Glickman G, Spears R, et al.: The efficacy of in‑
practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008:129‑147. traflow intraosseous injection as a primary anesthesia techni‑
11. Nusstein J, Lee S, Reader A, et al.: Injection pain and pos‑ que. J Endod 2008; 34:280‑283.
tinjection pain of the anterior middle superior alveolar in‑ 24. Nusstein J, Reader A, Nist R, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of the
jection administered with the Wand or conventional syringe. supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 1:100,000 epinephrine in irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 1998;
98:124‑131. 24:487‑491.
12. Nusstein J, Burns Y, Reader A, et al.: Injection pain and pos‑ 25. Reisman D, Reader A, Nist R, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of the
tinjection pain of the palatal‑anterior superior alveolar in‑ supplemental intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine in ir‑
jection, administered with the Wand Plus system, comparing reversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine to 3% mepivacaine. diol Endod 1997; 84:676‑682.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 26. Cohen HP, Cha BY, Spangberg LS: Endodontic anesthesia in
97:164‑172. mandibular molars: a clinical study. J Endod 1993; 19:370‑373.
32 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

27. Kennedy S, Reader A, Nusstein J, et al.: The significance undemineralized sections of human permanent third mo‑
of needle deflection in success of the inferior alveolar ner‑ lars. Arch Oral Biol 1997; 42:329‑332.
ve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2003; 47. Yonchak T, Reader A, Beck M, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of
29:630‑633. unilateral and bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks to de‑
28. Bigby J, Reader A, Nusstein J, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of li‑ termine cross innervation in anterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral
docaine/meperidine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pa‑ Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92:132‑135.
tients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2007; 33:7‑10. 48. Claffey E, Reader A, Nusstein J, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of
29. Parirokh M, Ashouri R, Rekabi AR, et al.: The effect of pre‑ articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with ir‑
medication with ibuprofen and indomethacin on the success reversible pulpitis. J Endod 2004; 30:568‑571.
of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with irreversible pul‑ 49. Byers MR, Taylor PE, Khayat BG, et al.: Effects of injury and
pitis. J Endod 2010; 36:1450‑1454. inflammation on pulpal and periapical nerves. J Endod 1990;
30. Modaresi J, Dianat O, Mozayeni MA: The efficacy compari‑ 16:78‑84.
son of ibuprofen, acetaminophen‑codeine, and placebo pre‑ 50. Modaresi J, Dianat O, Soluti A: Effect of pulp inflammation
medication therapy on the depth of anesthesia during tre‑ on nerve impulse quality with or without anesthesia. J Endod
atment of inflamed teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2008; 34:438‑441.
Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:399‑403. 51. Najjar TA: Why can’t you achieve adequate regional anesthe‑
31. Shirvani A, Shamszadeh S, Eghbal MJ, et al.: Effect of preope‑ sia in the presence of infection? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
rative oral analgesics on pulpal anesthesia in patients with ir‑ thol 1977; 44:7‑13.
reversible pulpitis‑a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Clin 52. Wallace JA, Michanowicz AE, Mundell RD, et al.: A pilot study
Oral Investig 2017; 21:43‑52. of the clinical problem of regionally anesthetizing the pulp of
32. Li C, Yang X, Ma X, et al.: Preoperative oral nonsteroidal an‑ an acutely inflamed mandibular molar. Oral Surg Oral Med
ti‑inflammatory drugs for the success of the inferior alveo‑ Oral Pathol 1985; 59:517‑521.
lar nerve block in irreversible pulpitis treatment: a systema‑ 53. Roy ML, Narahashi T: Differential properties of tetrodoto‑
tic review and meta‑analysis based on randomized controlled xin‑sensitive and tetrodotoxin‑resistant sodium channels in rat
trials. Quintessence Int 2012; 43:209‑219. dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurosci 1992; 12:2104‑2111.
33. Fowler S, Reader A: Is a volume of 3.6 mL better than 1.8 mL 54. Gibbs JL, Hargreaves KM: Mechanisms of odontogenic and
for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptoma‑ non‑odontogenic pain. In Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgart‑
tic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod 2013; 39:970‑972. ner JC, editors: Ingle’s endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC
34. Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck FM: Anesthetic efficacy of diffe‑ Decker; 2008:376‑391.
rent volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine for inferior alveo­ 55. Henry MA, Luo S, Foley BD, et al.: Sodium channel expres‑
lar nerve blocks. Gen Dent 2002; 50:372‑375; quiz 376‑377. sion and localization at demyelinated sites in painful human
35. Wali M, Drum M, Reader A, et al.: Prospective, randomized dental pulp. J Pain 2009; 10:750‑758.
single‑blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 and 3.6 56. Bronzo A, Jr., Powers G: Relationship of anxiety with pain
milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine for infe‑ threshold. J Psychol 1967; 66:181‑183.
rior alveolar nerve block. J Endod 2010; 36:1459‑1462. 57. Dworkin SF: Anxiety and performance in the dental environ‑
36. Yared GM, Dagher FB: Evaluation of lidocaine in human in‑ ment: An experimental investigation. J Am Soc Psychosom
ferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod 1997; 23:575‑578. Dent Med 1967; 14:88‑103.
37. Montagnese TA, Reader A, Melfi R: A comparative study of 58. Cunningham CJ, Mullaney TP: Pain control in endodontics.
the Gow‑Gates technique and a standard technique for man‑ Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36:393‑408.
dibular anesthesia. J Endod 1984; 10:158‑163. 59. Walton RE, Torabinejad M: Managing local anesthesia pro‑
38. Gow‑Gates GA, Watson JE: The Gow‑Gates mandibular block: blems in the endodontic patient. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;
further understanding. Anesth Prog 1977; 24:183‑189. 123:97‑102.
39. Gow‑Gates GA: Mandibular conduction anesthesia: a new te‑ 60. Parirokh M, Satvati SA, Sharifi R, et al.: Efficacy of combining
chnique using extraoral landmarks. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral a buccal infiltration with an inferior alveolar nerve block for
Pathol 1973; 36:321‑328. mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral
40. Akinosi JO: A new approach to the mandibular nerve block. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109:468‑473.
Br J Oral Surg 1977; 15:83‑87. 61. Smith GN, Walton RE, Abbott BJ: Clinical evaluation of pe‑
41. Loetscher CA, Melton DC, Walton RE: Injection regimen for riodontal ligament anesthesia using a pressure syringe. J Am
anesthesia of the maxillary first molar. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; Dent Assoc 1983; 107:953‑956.
117: 337-340. 62. Walton RE, Abbott BJ: Periodontal ligament injection: a clini‑
42. Bjorndal L, Darvann T, Thylstrup A: A quantitative light mi‑ cal evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 1981; 103:571‑575.
croscopic study of the odontoblast and subodontoblastic re‑ 63. Clark TM, Yagiela JA: Advanced techniques and armamenta‑
actions to active and arrested enamel caries without cavita‑ rium for dental local anesthesia. Dent Clin North Am 2010;
tion. Caries Res 1998; 32:59‑69. 54:757‑768.
43. Frommer J, Mele FA, Monroe CW: The possible role of the 64. Schleder JR, Reader A, Beck M, et al.: The periodontal liga‑
mylohyoid nerve in mandibular posterior tooth sensation. J ment injection: a comparison of 2% lidocaine, 3% mepivacai‑
Am Dent Assoc 1972; 85:113‑117. ne, and 1:100,000 epinephrine to 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000
44. Sillanpaa M, Vuori V, Lehtinen R: The mylohyoid nerve and epinephrine in human mandibular premolars. J Endod 1988;
mandibular anesthesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 14:397‑404.
17:206‑207. 65. VanGheluwe J, Walton R: Intrapulpal injection: factors rela‑
45. Clark S, Reader A, Beck M, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of the ted to effectiveness. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑
mylohyoid nerve block and combination inferior alveolar diol Endod 1997; 83:38‑40.
nerve block/mylohyoid nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med 66. Birchfield J, Rosenberg PA: Role of the anesthetic solution in
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87:557‑563. intrapulpal anesthesia. J Endod 1975; 1:26‑27.
46. Bjorndal L, Darvann T, Bro‑Nielsen M, et al.: Automated ima‑ 67. Walton RE: The periodontal ligament injection as a primary
ge analysis applied to the odontoblast‑predentine region in technique. J Endod 1990; 16:62‑66.
Capítulo 6   |   Referências Bibliográficas 33

68. Smith GN, Walton RE: Periodontal ligament injection: distri‑ 78. Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G: Advances in local anesthesia in dentis‑
bution of injected solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol try. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55:481‑499, viii.
1983; 55:232‑238. 79. Nusstein J, Kennedy S, Reader A, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of
69. Walton RE: Distribution of solutions with the periodontal li‑ the supplemental X‑tip intraosseous injection in patients with
gament injection: clinical, anatomical, and histological evi‑ irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2003; 29:724‑728.
dence. J Endod 1986; 12:492‑500. 80. Bigby J, Reader A, Nusstein J, et al.: Articaine for supplemen‑
70. White JJ, Reader A, Beck M, et al.: The periodontal ligament tal intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpi‑
injection: a comparison of the efficacy in human maxillary tis. J Endod 2006; 32:1044‑1047.
and mandibular teeth. J Endod 1988; 14:508‑514. 81. Parente SA, Anderson RW, Herman WW, et al.: Anesthetic
71. Childers M, Reader A, Nist R, et al.: Anesthetic efficacy of the efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection for teeth
periodontal ligament injection after an inferior alveolar ner‑ with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 1998; 24:826‑828.
82. Reader A, Nusstein J: Local anesthesia for endodontic pain.
ve block. J Endod 1996; 22:317‑320.
Endodontic Topics 2002; 3:14‑30.
72. Walton RE, Garnick JJ: The periodontal ligament injection:
83. Gutmann JL: Parameters of achieving quality anesthesia and
histologic effects on the periodontium in monkeys. J Endod
hemostasis in surgical endodontics. Anesth Pain Control
1982; 8:22‑26.
Dent 1993; 2:223‑226.
73. Roahen JO, Marshall FJ: The effects of periodontal ligament
84. Buckley JA, Ciancio SG, McMullen JA: Efficacy of epinephri‑
injection on pulpal and periodontal tissues. J Endod 1990; ne concentration in local anesthesia during periodontal sur‑
16:28‑33. gery. J Periodontol 1984; 55:653‑657.
74. Torabinejad M, Peters DL, Peckham N, et al.: Electron mi‑ 85. Kim S, Kratchman S: Modern endodontic surgery concepts
croscopic changes in human pulps after intraligamental in‑ and practice: a review. J Endod 2006; 32:601‑623.
jection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76:219‑224. 86. Gutmann JL, Frazier LW, Jr., Baron B: Plasma catecholamine
75. Meechan JG: Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia. Int and haemodynamic responses to surgical endodontic anaes‑
Endod J 2002; 35:885‑896. thetic protocols. Int Endod J 1996; 29:37‑42.
76. Smith GN, Smith SA: Intrapulpal injection: distribution of an 87. Hargreaves KM, Khan A: Surgical preparation: anesthesia &
injected solution. J Endod 1983; 9:167‑170. hemostasis. Endodontic Topics 2005; 11:23.
77. Kleber CH: Intraosseous anesthesia: implications, instrumen‑ 88. Haas DA: An update on local anesthetics in dentistry. J Can
tation and techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134:487‑491. Dent Assoc 2002; 68:546‑551.
Ca p ít u l o

6 Preparação para o Tratamento


Endodôntico

Se ç ã o

Isolamento Absoluto em Endodontia


6.3 Inês de Fátima A. J. Inojosa

13. European Society of Endodontology: Quality guidelines for


Referências Bibliográficas endodontictreatment: consensus of the european society of
endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39:921‑930.
1. Bramante CM, Bramante AS, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, 14. Kuo SC, Chen YL: Accidental swallowing of an endodontic
Moraes IG: Uso de protetor gengival para isolamento api‑ file. Int Endod J 2008; 41:617‑622.
cal em cirurgia parendodôntica. Full Dentistry Science 2011; 15. Susini G, Camps J: Accidental ingestion and aspiration of root
2:296‑298. canal instruments and other dental items in a French popula‑
2. Guerra JA: Root end isolation for retrograde fillings. J Endod tion. European Cells and Materials 2007; 13(Suppl. 1):34.
1992; 18: 39‑41. 16. Lee CB, et al.: Association of failed root canal treatment with
3. Glenner Richard A: The rubber dam. Bull His Dent 1994; dentist and institutional volumes: a population‑based cohort
42:33‑34. study in Taiwan. J Endod 2017; 43:1628‑1634.
4. Ring EM: Final do século XIX na Europa e Estados Unidos: 17. Patterson CJ: Polydam‑polythene sheet, a practical alternati‑
Dois descobrimentos revolucionários. In História Ilustrada ve to rubber dam for patients allergic to rubber compounds.
da Odontologia. São Paulo: Manole, 1998; p. 271. Int Endod J 1989; 22:252‑253.
5. Carrote P: Helpful hints with rubber dam. CPD Dentistry 18. Sauveur G: Improvement of the rubber dam frame. J Endod
2001; 2:82‑85. 1997; 23:765‑767.
6. Fox J, Moodnik RM: The case of the missing file. Or six re‑ 19. De Deus QD. Endodontia. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi,1992.
asons why root canal therapy must never be performed wi‑ 20. Reuter JE: The isolation of teeth and the protection of
thout rubber dam. NY State Dent J 1996; 32:25‑29. patient during endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 1983;
7. Heling B, Heling I: Endodontics procedures never must be 16:173‑181.
performed without the rubber dam. Oral Surg Oral Med 21. Mejia JL, Donato JE, Posada A: Accidental swallowing of a
Oral Pathol 1977; 43:464‑466. dental clamp. J Endod 1996; 22:619‑620.
8. Minoodt I, Slaus G, Bottenberg P: The rubber dam in dental 22. Ireland L: The rubber dam. Its advantages and application.
practice: use and practical advice. Rev Belge Med Dent 2005; Tex Dent J 1962; 80:6‑15.
60:107‑114. 23. Roahen JO, Lento CA: Using cyanoacrylate to facilitate rub‑
9. Ostrander FD: The practice of endodontics: past, present ber dam isolation of teeth. J Endod 1992; 18:517‑519.
and future J Dent Educ 1967; 31:386‑388. 24. Ng YL, Spratt D, Sriskantharajah S, et al.: Evaluation of pro‑
10. Reams GJ. Baumgartner JC, Kulild JC: Practical application of tocols for field decontamination before bacterial sampling of
infection control in endodontics. J Endod 1995; 21:281‑284. root canals for contemporary microbiology techniques. J En‑
11. Kumar J, et al.: Presence of Candida albicans in root canals of dod 2003; 29:317‑320.
teeth with apicalperiodontitis and evaluation of their possi‑ 25. Saeed, et al.: Bacterial Contamination of Endodontic Ma‑
ble role in failure of endodontic treatment. J Int Oral Health terials before and after Clinical Storage. J Endod 2017;
2015; 7:42‑45. 43:1852‑1856.
12. Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA: The efficacy of the 26. Nica L, Goguta L, Ianes C: Pré‑endodontic restorative treat‑
rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms du‑ ment: the first step to success in endodontic therapy. Rev Clin
ring dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 119:141‑144. Pesq Odontol 2007; 3:33‑36.
Ca p í tulo

Anatomia Interna 7
Marco A. Versiani | Graziela Bianchi Leoni | Jesus D. Pécora | Manoel D. Sousa-Neto

15. Black GV: Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. Philadel‑


Referências Bibliográficas phia: The Wilmington dental manufacturing co. 1890; 153,
p. ix.
1. Schilder H: Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin
16. Gysi A, Röse C: Sammlung von Mikrophotographien zur Ve‑
North Am 1967; 11:723‑744.
ranschaulichung der mikroscopischen Struktur der Zähne
2. Schilder H: Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin
des Menschen. Mikrophotographien der Zahnhistologie.
North Am 1974; 18:269‑296.
Zürich: Schweiz, 1894.
3. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, et al.: Changes in root canal
17. Preiswerk G: Leherbuch und Atlas der Zahnheilkunde mit
geometry after preparation assessed by high‑resolution com‑
Einschluβ der Mund‑Krankheiten. Munich: J. F. Lehmann,
puted tomography. J Endod 2001; 27:1‑6.
1903.
4. Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa‑Neto MD: Microcomputed
18. Fisher G: Beitrage zur behandlung enkrankter zahne mit be‑
tomography analysis of the root canal morphology of sin‑
sonderer beucksichtigung der anatomie und pathologie der
gle‑rooted mandibular canines. Int Endod J 2013; 46:800‑807.
wurzelkanale. Leipzig: Georg Thiéme, 1908.
5. Siqueira JF, Jr., Alves FRF, Versiani MA, et al.: Correlative
19. Spalteholz W: Über das durchsichtigmachen von menschli‑
bacteriologic and micro‑computed tomographic analysis
chen und tierischen präparaten und seine theoretischen be‑
of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by Self‑Adjus‑
digungen. Leipzig: F. Hirzel, 1914.
ting File, Reciproc, and Twisted File systems. J Endod 2013;
20. Fasoli, Arlotta: Sull’anatomia dei canali radicolari dei denti
39:1044‑1050.
6. Ribeiro MVM, Silva‑Sousa YT, Versiani MA, et al.: Compa‑ umani. Giugno: Stomatologia; 1913.
rison of the cleaning efficacy of self‑adjusting file and rota‑ 21. Okumura T: Anatomy of the root canals. J Am Dent Assoc
ry systems in the apical third of oval‑shaped canals. J Endod 1927; 14:632‑636.
2013; 39:398‑410. 22. Hess W: Die pulpaamputation als selbstandige wurzelbehan‑
7. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, et al.: ProTaper ro‑ dlungsmethod. Leipzig: Georg Thiéme, 1917.
tary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final 23. Zürcher E: Zur Anatomie der Wurzelkanale des menschli‑
shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 2003; 36:86‑92. ches Milchgebisses und der 6 Jahr‑Molaren. Zurich, 1922.
8. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV: Comparative eva‑ 24. Hess W, Zürcher E: The anatomy of the root canals of the
luation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, co‑ teeth of the permanent and deciduous dentitions. London:
ne‑beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative com‑ John Bale, Sons & Danielsson, Ltd., 1925.
puted tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain 25. Mayo CV, Montgomery S, de Rio C: A computerized method
and contrast medium‑enhanced digital radiography in stu‑ for evaluating root canal morphology. J Endod 1986; 12:2‑7.
dying root canal morphology. J Endod 2010; 36:1547‑1551. 26. Dobo‑Nagy C, Keszthelyi G, Szabo J, et al.: A computerized
9. Versiani MA, Pascon EA, de Sousa CJ, et al.: Influence of shaft method for mathematical description of three‑dimensional
design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel‑titanium rotary syste‑ root canal axis. J Endod 2000; 26:639‑643.
ms by means of spiral computerized tomography. Oral Surg 27. Gullickson DC, Montgomery S: The study of root canal mor‑
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105:807‑813. phology using a digital image processing technique. J Endod
10. Vesalius A: De Humani Corporis Fabrica Basilea: Libri Sep‑ 1987; 13:158‑163.
tem, 1543. 28. Pao YC, Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, et al.: Computer‑graphics
11. Shklar G, Chernin D: Eustachio and “Libellus de dentibus” aided instruction of three‑dimensional dental anatomy. J
the first book devoted to the structure and function of the te‑ Dent Educ 1984; 48:315‑317.
eth. J Hist Dent 2000; 48:25‑30. 29. Berutti E: Computerized analysis of the instrumentation of
12. Perrini N, Versiani MA: Historical overview of the studies on the root canal system. J Endod 1993; 19:236‑238.
root canal anatomy. In Versiani MA, Basrani B, Sousa Neto 30. Blašković‑Šubat V, Smojver B, MariĆiĆ B, et al.: A computeri‑
MD, editors: The root canal anatomy in permanent denti‑ zed method for the evaluation of root canal morphology. Int
tion. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; Endod J 1995; 28:290‑296.
2018:3‑16. 31. Lyroudia K, Mikrogeorgis G, Nikopoulos N, et al.: Compute‑
13. Carabelli G: Systematisches Handbuch der Zahnheilkunde. II. rized 3‑D reconstruction of two “double teeth”. Endod Dent
Anatomic des Mundes. Vienna: Braumüller and Siedel, 1842. Traumatol 1997; 13:218‑222.
14. Mühlreiter E: Anatomie des menschlichen Gebisses von med. 32. Lyroudia K, Samakovitis G, Pitas I, et al.: 3D reconstruction of
Th. E. de Jonge Cohen. Leipzig: Arthur Felix, 1870. two C‑shape mandibular molars. J Endod 1997; 23:101‑104.
36 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

33. Hegedus C, Flora‑Nagy E, Martos R, et al.: 3D reconstruction 53. Jafarzadeh H, Azarpazhooh A, Mayhall JT: Taurodontism: a
based on hard tissue microtome cross‑section pictures in den‑ review of the condition and endodontic treatment challen‑
tistry. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 63:77‑84. ges. Int Endod J 2008; 41:375‑388.
34. Hounsfield GN: Computerized transverse axial scanning 54. Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R: Root canal morphology of the
(tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973; human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
46:1016‑1022. Pathol 1974; 38:456‑464.
35. Tachibana H, Matsumoto K: Applicability of X‑ray compute‑ 55. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Nazimov H, et al.: Pulpitis‑induced in‑
rized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol terradicular periodontal changes in experimental animals. J
1990; 6:16‑20. Periodontol 1967; 38:124‑129.
36. Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE: Comparison of nickel‑tita‑ 56. Vertucci FJ, Williams RG: Root canal anatomy of the mandi‑
nium and stainless steel hand‑file instrumentation using com‑ bular first molar. J N J Dent Assoc 1974; 45:27‑28.
puted tomography. J Endod 1996; 22:369‑375. 57. Vertucci FJ, Anthony RL: A scanning electron microscopic
37. Barton DJ, Clark SJ, Eleazer PD, et al.: Tuned‑aperture com‑ investigation of accessory foramina in the furcation and pulp
puted tomography versus parallax analog and digital radio‑ chamber floor of molar teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
graphic images in detecting second mesiobuccal canals in thol 1986; 62:319‑326.
maxillary first molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral 58. Ordinola‑Zapata R, Bramante CM, Villas‑Boas MH, et al.:
Radiol 2003; 96:223‑228. Morphologic micro‑computed tomography analysis of man‑
38. Nance R, Tyndall D, Levin LG, et al.: Identification of root ca‑ dibular premolars with three root canals. J Endod 2013;
nals in molars by tuned‑aperture computed tomography. Int 39:1130‑1135.
Endod J 2000; 33:392‑396. 59. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S: Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. 10th
39. Shemesh H, van Soest G, Wu MK, et al.: The ability of optical ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2011, p. 992.
coherence tomography to characterize the root canal walls. J 60. Krasner P, Rankow HJ: Anatomy of the pulp‑chamber floor. J
Endod 2007; 33:1369‑1373. Endod 2004; 30:5‑16.
40. Kottoor J, Hemamalathi S, Sudha R, et al.: Maxillary second 61. De Deus QD: Endodontia. 5th ed. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI,
molar with 5 roots and 5 canals evaluated using cone beam 1992.
computerized tomography: a case report. Oral Surg Oral 62. Versiani MA, Ordinola‑Zapata R: Root canal anatomy: impli‑
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109:e162‑165. cations in biofilm disinfection. In Chavez de Paz L, Sedgley C,
41. Marca C, Dummer PM, Bryant S, et al.: Three‑rooted premo‑ Kishen A, editors: Root canal biofilms. 1st ed. Toronto: Sprin‑
lar analyzed by high‑resolution and cone beam CT. Clin Oral ger International Publishing AG, 2015.
Investig 2013; 17:1535‑1540. 63. Vertucci FJ: Root canal morphology and its relationship to
42. Baumann MA: A new approach to demonstration of root ca‑ endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005; 10:3‑29.
nal anatomy. J Dent Educ 1994; 58: 704‑708. 64. Ordinola‑Zapata R, Versiani MA, Bramante CM: Root canal
43. Baumann MA, Doll GM: Spatial reproduction of the root ca‑ components. In Versiani MA, Basrani B, Sousa Neto MD, edi‑
nal system by magnetic resonance microscopy. J Endod 1997; tors: The root canal anatomy in permanent dentition. 1 ed.
23:49‑51. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018; p. 31‑46.
44. Tanasiewicz M: Magnetic resonance imaging in human teeth 65. Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, et al.: Canal configuration
internal space requirements for visualization of dental pros‑ in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its
thetics. J ExpClin Dent 2010; 2:19‑24. endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
45. Martins JN, Versiani MA: CBCT and Micro‑CT on the study 1969; 28:419‑425.
of root canal anatomy. In Versiani MA, Basrani B, Sousa Neto 66. Weine F: Endodontic therapy. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1982;
MD, editors: The Root Canal Anatomy in Permanent Den‑ p. 209‑222.
tition. 1 ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 67. Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, et al.: Root and canal mor‑
2018:89‑180. phology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;
46. Elliott JC, Dover SD: X‑ray microtomography. J Microsc 1982; 34:359‑370.
126:211‑213. 68. Sert S, Bayirli GS: Evaluation of the root canal configurations
47. Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD, et al.: Microcomputed of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender
tomography: an advanced system for detailed endodontic re‑ in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004; 30:391‑398.
search. J Endod 1995; 21:561‑568. 69. Versiani MA, Ahmed HM, Sousa‑Neto MD, et al.: Unusual de‑
48. Bjørndal L, Carlsen O, Thuesen G, et al.: External and in‑ viation of the main foramen from the root apex. Braz Dent J
ternal macromorphology in 3D‑reconstructed maxillary mo‑ 2016; 27:589‑591.
lars using computerized X‑ray microtomography. Int Endod J 70. Kottoor J, Albuquerque DV, Velmurugan N: A new anatomi‑
1999; 32:3‑9. cally based nomenclature for the roots and root canals‑part 1:
49. Peters OA, Laib A, Ruegsegger P, et al.: Three‑dimensional maxillary molars. Int J Dent 2012; 2012:120565.
analysis of root canal geometry by high‑resolution computed 71. Valerian Albuquerque D, Kottoor J, Velmurugan N: A new
tomography. J Dent Res 2000; 79:1405‑1409. anatomically based nomenclature for the roots and root ca‑
50. Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa‑Neto MD: Update in root ca‑ nals‑part 2: mandibular molars. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 814789.
nal anatomy of permanent teeth using microcomputed to‑ 72. Ahmed HM, Versiani MA, De‑Deus G, et al.: A new system for
mography. In Basrani B, editor: Endodontic irrigation: che‑ classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J 2018;
mical disinfection of the root canal system. 1 ed. Switzerland: 51:389‑404.
Springer International Publishing AG; 2015:15‑44. 73. Oehlers FA: Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odonto‑
51. Wu MK, R’Oris A, Barkis D, et al.: Prevalence and extent of me). I. Variations of the invagination process and associated
long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral anterior crown forms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957;
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:739‑743. 10:1204‑1218.
52. Woelfel JB, Scheid RC: Dental anatomy: its relevance to den‑ 74. Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, et al.: C‑shaped canal system in
tistry. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, mandibular second molars: Part I‑‑Anatomical features. J En‑
2002 p. 422. dod 2004; 30:899‑903.
Capítulo 7   |   Referências Bibliográficas 37

75. Christie WH, Peikoff MD, Fogel HM: Maxillary molars with 96. Green D: A stereomicroscopic study of the root apices of
two palatal roots: a retrospective clinical study. J Endod 1991; 400 maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Oral Surg
17:80‑84. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1956; 9:1224‑1232.
76. American Association of Endodontists (AAE): Glossary of en‑ 97. Mizutani T, Ohno N, Nakamura H: Anatomical study of the
dodontics terms. 8th ed. Chicago: American Association of root apex in the maxillary anterior teeth. J Endod 1992;
Endodontists, 2015; p. 51. 18:344‑347.
77. Nanci A, Ten Cate AR: Ten Cate’s oral histology: develop‑ 98. Ponce EH, Vilar Fernandez JA: The cemento‑dentino‑ca‑
ment, structure, and function. 8th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Else‑ nal junction, the apical foramen, and the apical cons‑
vier, 2013. triction: evaluation by optical microscopy. J Endod 2003;
78. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Fate of the tissue in lateral canals 29:214‑219.
and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions 99. Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pecora JD, et al.: Micro‑computed
and treatment procedures. J Endod 2010; 36:1‑15. tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of man‑
79. De Deus QD: Frequency, location, and direction of the dibular incisors. J Endod 2014; 40:710‑716.
lateral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod 1975; 100. Mauger MJ, Schindler WG, Walker WA, 3rd: An evaluation
1:361‑366. of canal morphology at different levels of root resection in
80. Vertucci FJ: Root canal anatomy of the human permanent te‑ mandibular incisors. J Endod 1998; 24:607‑609.
eth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58:589‑599. 101. Schneider SW: A comparison of canal preparations in strai‑
81. Dammaschke T, Witt M, Ott K, et al.: Scanning electron mi‑ ght and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
croscopic investigation of incidence, location, and size of ac‑ 1971; 32:271‑275.
cessory foramina in primary and permanent molars. Quintes‑ 102. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL, Jr.: Cyclic fatigue testing
sence Int 2004; 35:699‑705. of nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;
82. Adcock JM, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, et al.: Histologic evaluation 23:77‑85.
of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different 103. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Sousa‑Neto MD, et al.: Method for de‑
irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system. J Endod 2011; termination of root curvature radius using cone‑beam com‑
37:544‑548. puted tomography images. Braz Dent J 2008; 19:114‑118.
83. Endal U, Shen Y, Knut A, et al.: A high‑resolution computed 104. Schäfer E, Diez C, Hoppe W, et al.: Roentgenographic in‑
tomographic study of changes in root canal isthmus area by vestigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in
instrumentation and root filling. J Endod 2011; 37: 223‑227. human permanent teeth. J Endod 2002; 28:211‑216.
84. Fan B, Pan Y, Gao Y, et al.: Three‑dimensional morphologic 105. Versiani MA, Pereira MR, Pécora JD, et al.: Root canal ana‑
analysis of isthmuses in the mesial roots of mandibular mo‑ tomy of maxillary and mandibular teeth. In Versiani MA,
lars. J Endod 2010; 36:1866‑1869. Basrani B, Sousa Neto MD, editors: The root canal anatomy
85. Hsu YY, Kim S: The resected root surface. The issue of canal in permanent dentition. 1 ed. Switzerland: Springer Inter‑
isthmuses. Dent Clin North Am 1997; 41:529‑540. national Publishing; 2018:181‑240.
86. Versiani MA, Alves FR, Andrade‑Junior CV, et al.: Micro‑CT 106. Ordinola‑Zapata R, Monteiro Bramante C, Gagliardi Minot‑
evaluation of the efficacy of hard‑tissue removal from the ti P, et al.: Micro‑CT evaluation of C‑shaped mandibular first
root canal and isthmus area by positive and negative pressure premolars in a Brazilian subpopulation. Int Endod J 2015;
irrigation systems. Int Endod J 2016; 49:1079‑1087. 48:807‑813.
87. Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, et al.: Micro‑computed to‑ 107. Ahmad IA, Azzeh MM, Zwiri AMA, et al.: Root and root ca‑
mography study of oval‑shaped canals prepared with the nal morphology of third molars in a Jordanian subpopula‑
Self‑adjusting File, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper uni‑ tion. Saudi Endod J 2016; 6:113‑121.
versal systems. J Endod 2013; 39:1060‑1066. 108. Freitas A, Rosa JE, Souza IF: Radiologia odontológica. 6 ed.
88. Fan B, Yang J, Gutmann JL, et al.: Root canal systems in man‑ São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 2004; 833 p.
dibular first premolars with C‑shaped root configurations. 109. Gonzalez‑Plata RR, Gonzalez‑Plata EW: Conventional and
Part I: Microcomputed tomography mapping of the radicu‑ surgical treatment of a two‑rooted maxillary central incisor.
lar groove and associated root canal cross‑sections. J Endod J Endod 2003; 29:422‑424.
2008; 34:1337‑1341. 110. Lambruschini GM, Camps J: A two‑rooted maxillary cen‑
89. Yang ZP, Yang SF, Lin YC, et al.: C‑shaped root canals in man‑ tral incisor with a normal clinical crown. J Endod 1993;
dibular second molars in a Chinese population. Endod Dent 19:95‑96.
Traumatol 1988; 4:160‑163. 111. Lin WC, Yang SF, Pai SF: Nonsurgical endodontic treatment
90. Ordinola‑Zapata R, Martins JN, Bramante CM, et al.: Mor‑ of a two‑rooted maxillary central incisor. J Endod 2006;
phological evaluation of maxillary second molars with fused 32:478‑481.
roots: a micro‑CT study. Int Endod J 2017; 50:1192‑1200. 112. Gondim E, Jr., Setzer F, Zingg P, et al.: A maxillary central
91. Bergenholtz G, Spångberg LS: Controversies in endodontics. incisor with three root canals: a case report. J Endod 2009;
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004; 15:99‑114. 35:1445‑1447.
92. Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG: The position and topo‑ 113. Mangani F, Ruddle CJ: Endodontic treatment of a “very par‑
graphy of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. ticular” maxillary central incisor. J Endod 1994; 20:560‑561.
Int Endod J 1984; 17:192‑198. 114. Pécora JD, da Cruz Filho AM: Study of the incidence of
93. Gutierrez JH, Aguayo P: Apical foraminal openings in human radicular grooves in maxillary incisors. Braz Dent J 1992;
teeth. Number and location. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 3:11‑16.
Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 79:769‑777. 115. Libfeld H, Stabholz A, Friedman S: Endodontic therapy of
94. Piñeda F, Kuttler Y: Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentge‑ bilaterally geminated permanent maxillary central incisors.
nographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral J Endod 1986; 12:214‑216.
Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33:101‑110. 116. Ghoddusi J, Javidi M, Vatanpour M: Treatment of a two‑ca‑
95. Burch JG, Hulen S: The relationship of the apical foramen nal maxillary lateral incisor. N Y State Dent J 2010; 76:40‑41.
to the anatomic apex of the tooth root. Oral Surg Oral Med 117. Pecora JD, Santana SV: Maxillary lateral incisor with two
Oral Pathol 1972; 34:262‑268. roots‑‑case report. Braz Dent J 1992; 2:151‑153.
38 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

118. Thompson BH, Portell FR, Hartwell GR: Two root canals in 142. Gu Y, Zhang Y, Liao Z: Root and canal morphology of man‑
a maxillary lateral incisor. J Endod 1985; 11:353‑355. dibular first premolars with radicular grooves. Arch Oral
119. Peix‑Sanchez M, Minana‑Laliga R: A case of unusual ana‑ Biol 2013; 58:1609‑1617.
tomy: a maxillary lateral incisor with three canals. Int En‑ 143. Stecker S, DiAngelis AJ: Dens evaginatus: a diagnostic and
dod J 1999; 32:236‑240. treatment challenge. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133:190‑193.
120. Walvekar SV, Behbehani JM: Three root canals and dens 144. Tavano SM, de Sousa SM, Bramante CM: Dens invaginatus
formation in a maxillary lateral incisor: a case report. J En‑ in first mandibular premolar. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;
dod 1997; 23:185‑186. 10:27‑29.
121. Kottoor J, Murugesan R, Albuquerque DV: A maxillary la‑ 145. Aryanpour S, Bercy P, Van Nieuwenhuysen JP: Endodon‑
teral incisor with four root canals. Int Endod J 2012; 45: tic and periodontal treatments of a geminated mandibular
393‑397. first premolar. Int Endod J 2002; 35:209‑214.
122. Fried IL, Winter AA: Diagnosis and treatment of a two‑roo‑ 146. De Moor RJ, Calberson FL: Root canal treatment in a man‑
ted maxillary lateral incisor. Periodontal Case Rep 1984; dibular second premolar with three root canals. J Endod
6:40‑44. 2005; 31:310‑313.
123. Wong M: Treatment considerations in a geminated maxilla‑ 147. Farmakis ET: Four‑rooted mandibular second premolar.
ry lateral incisor. J Endod 1991; 17:179‑181. Aust Endod J 2008; 34:126‑128.
124. Pécora JD, Saquy PC, de Souza JE, et al.: Endodontic treat‑ 148. Demiryürek EO, Gönülol N, Bulucu B: Endodontic treat‑
ment of a maxillary lateral incisor presenting dens invagi‑ ment of a taurodontic premolar with five canals. Aust En‑
natus and transposition to the region of the canine‑‑case re‑ dod J 2013; 39:81‑84.
port. Braz Dent J 1991; 2:5‑8. 149. Goswami M, Chandra S, Chandra S, et al.: Mandibular pre‑
125. Mupparapu M, Singer SR, Goodchild JH: Dens evaginatus molar with two roots. J Endod 1997; 23:187.
and dens invaginatus in a maxillary lateral incisor: report of 150. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC: Anomalous man‑
a rare occurrence and review of literature. Aust Dent J 2004; dibular premolars: a mandibular first premolar with three
49:201‑203. roots and a mandibular second premolar with a C‑shaped
126. Boveda C, Fajardo M, Millan B: Root canal treatment of an canal system. Int Endod J 2008; 41:1005‑1014.
invaginated maxillary lateral incisor with a C‑shaped canal. 151. Koh ET, Ford TR, Kariyawasam SP, et al.: Prophylactic treat‑
Quintessence Int 1999; 30:707‑711. ment of dens evaginatus using mineral trioxide aggregate. J
127. Sachdeva GS, Malhotra D, Sachdeva LT, et al.: Endodontic Endod 2001; 27:540‑542.
management of mandibular central incisor fused to a su‑ 152. Muthukumar RS, Arunkumar S, Sadasiva K: Bilateral fusion
pernumerary tooth associated with a talon cusp: a case re‑ of mandibular second premolar and supernumerary tooth: A
port. Int Endod J 2012; 45:590‑596. rare case report. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2012; 16:128‑130.
128. Khabbaz MG, Konstantaki MN, Sykaras SN: Dens invagi‑ 153. Gopikrishna V, Bhargavi N, Kandaswamy D: Endodontic
natus in a mandibular lateral incisor. Int Endod J 1995; management of a maxillary first molar with a single root
28:303‑305. and a single canal diagnosed with the aid of spiral CT: A
129. Loushine RJ, Jurcak JJ, Jeffalone DM: A two‑rooted mandi‑ case report. J Endod 2006; 32:687‑691.
bular incisor. J Endod 1993; 19:250‑251. 154. Beatty RG: A five‑canal maxillary first molar. J Endod 1984;
130. Alapati S, Zaatar EI, Shyama M, et al.: Maxillary canine with 10:156‑157.
two root canals. Med Princ Pract 2006; 15:74‑76. 155. Albuquerque DV, Kottoor J, Dham S, et al.: Endodontic ma‑
131. Barkhordar RA, Nguyen NT: Maxillary canine with two nagement of maxillary permanent first molar with 6 root
roots. J Endod 1985; 11:224‑227. canals: 3 case reports. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
132. Bolla N, Kavuri SR: Maxillary canine with two root canals. J Radiol Endod 2010; 110:e79‑83.
Conserv Dent 2011; 14:80‑82. 156. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Sudha R, et al.: Maxillary first mo‑
133. Sousa Neto MD, Zuccolotto WG, Saquy PC, et al.: Treat‑ lar with seven root canals diagnosed with cone‑beam com‑
ment of dens invaginatus in a maxillary canine case report. puted tomography scanning: a case report. J Endod 2010;
Braz Dent J 1992; 2:147‑150. 36:915‑921.
134. Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa‑Neto MD: The anatomy 157. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Surendran S: Endodontic mana‑
of two‑rooted mandibular canines determined using mi‑ gement of a maxillary first molar with eight root canal syste‑
cro‑computed tomography. Int Endod J 2011; 44:682‑687. ms evaluated using cone‑beam computed tomography scan‑
135. Orguneser A, Kartal N: Three canals and two foramina in a ning: a case report. J Endod 2011; 37:715‑719.
mandibular canine. J Endod 1998; 24:444‑445. 158. De Moor RJ: C‑shaped root canal configuration in maxillary
136. Soares JA, Leonardo RT: Root canal treatment of three‑roo‑ first molars. Int Endod J 2002; 35:200‑208.
ted maxillary first and second premolars – a case report. Int 159. Di Fiore PM: A four‑rooted quadrangular maxillary molar. J
Endod J 2003; 36:705‑710. Endod 1999; 25:695‑697.
137. Lammertyn PA, Rodrigo SB, Brunotto M, et al.: Furcation 160. Sert S, Bayrl G: Taurodontism in six molars: a case report. J
groove of maxillary first premolar, thickness, and dentin Endod 2004; 30:601‑602.
structures. J Endod 2009; 35:814‑817. 161. Peikoff MD, Christie WH, Fogel HM: The maxillary second
138. Nahmias Y, Rampado ME: Root‑canal treatment of a trifid molar: variations in the number of roots and canals. Int En‑
crown premolar. Int Endod J 2002; 35:390‑394. dod J 1996; 29:365‑369.
139. Colak H, Aylikci BU, Keklik H: Dens evaginatus on maxilla‑ 162. Koenen DJ, Pahncke D: Gemination or fusion: use of a
ry first premolar: Report of a rare clinical case. J Nat Sci Biol CT scan to assist in diagnosis and endodontic treatment
Med 2012; 3:192‑194. of a maxillary second molar – a case report. ENDO 2008;
140. Rotstein I, Stabholz A, Friedman S: Endodontic therapy for 2:145‑151.
dens invaginatus in a maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg 163. Versiani MA, Pecora JD, de Sousa‑Neto MD: Root and root
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 63:237‑240. canal morphology of four‑rooted maxillary second mo‑
141. Vaghela DJ, Sinha AA: Endodontic management of four roo‑ lars: a micro‑computed tomography study. J Endod 2012;
ted mandibular first premolar. J Conserv Dent 2013; 16:87‑89. 38:977‑982.
Capítulo 7   |   Referências Bibliográficas 39

164. Radwan A, Kim SG: Treatment of a hypertaurodontic ma‑ permanent teeth: a full‑mouth approach by cone‑beam CT.
xillary second molar in a patient with 10 taurodonts: a case PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165329.
report. J Endod 2013; (in press). 186. da Silva EJ, de Castro RW, Nejaim Y, et al.: Evaluation of root
165. Friedman S, Moshonov J, Stabholz A: Five root canals in canal configuration of maxillary and mandibular anterior
a mandibular first molar. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; teeth using cone beam computed tomography: An in‑vivo
2:226‑228. study. Quintessence Int 2016; 47:19‑24.
166. Ryan JL, Bowles WR, Baisden MK, et al.: Mandibular first 187. Somalinga Amardeep N, Raghu S, Natanasabapathy V: Root
molar with six separate canals. J Endod 2011; 37:878‑880. canal morphology of permanent maxillary and mandibular
167. Reeh ES: Seven canals in a lower first molar. J Endod 1998; canines in Indian population using cone beam computed
24:497‑499. tomography. Anat Res Int 2014; 2014:731859.
168. De Moor RJ, Deroose CA, Calberson FL: The radix entomo‑ 188. Torres HM, Arruda JJ, Silva‑Filho JMD, et al.: Maxillary cani‑
laris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge. ne morphology: comparative and descriptive analysis from
Int Endod J 2004; 37:789‑799. periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomogra‑
169. Ashwin R, Arathi R: Taurodontism of deciduous and perma‑ phy. Gen Dent 2017; 65:37‑41.
nent molars: report of two cases. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev 189. Abella F, Teixido LM, Patel S, et al.: Cone‑beam computed
Dent 2006; 24:42‑44. tomography analysis of the root canal morphology of ma‑
170. Tsesis I, Steinbock N, Rosenberg E, et al.: Endodontic tre‑ xillary first and second premolars in a spanish population. J
atment of developmental anomalies in posterior teeth: tre‑ Endod 2015; 41:1241‑1247.
atment of geminated/fused teeth – report of two cases. Int 190. Bulut DG, Kose E, Ozcan G, et al.: Evaluation of root mor‑
Endod J 2003; 36:372‑379. phology and root canal configuration of premolars in the
171. Schäfer E, Breuer D, Janzen S: The prevalence of three‑roo‑ Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomogra‑
ted mandibular permanent first molars in a German popu‑ phy. Eur J Dent 2015; 9:551‑557.
lation. J Endod 2009; 35:202‑205. 191. Bürklein S, Heck R, Schäfer E: Evaluation of the root canal
172. Bolger WL, Schindler WG: A mandibular first molar with a anatomy of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a selec‑
C‑shaped root configuration. J Endod 1988; 14:515‑519. ted German population using cone‑beam computed tomo‑
173. Baugh D, Wallace J: Middle mesial canal of the mandibu‑ graphic data. J Endod 2017; 43:1448‑1452.
lar first molar: a case report and literature review. J Endod 192. Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, et al.: Root and canal morphology
2004; 30:185‑186. of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation eva‑
174. Kottoor J, Sudha R, Velmurugan N: Middle distal canal of luated using cone‑beam computed tomography. Int Endod
the mandibular first molar: a case report and literature re‑ J 2012; 45:996‑1003.
view. Int Endod J 2010; 43:714‑722. 193. Yang L, Chen X, Tian C, et al.: Use of cone‑beam computed
175. Fava LR, Weinfeld I, Fabri FP, et al.: Four second molars tomography to evaluate root canal morphology and locate
with single roots and single canals in the same patient. Int root canal orifices of maxillary second premolars in a Chi‑
Endod J 2000; 33:138‑142. nese subpopulation. J Endod 2014; 40:630‑634.
176. Chokshi S, Mehta J, Chokshi P, et al.: Morphological varia‑ 194. Alrahabi M, Sohail Zafar M: Evaluation of root canal mor‑
tions in the root canal system of mandibular second molar: phology of maxillary molars using cone beam computed to‑
A case series. Endodontology 2013; 25:135‑138. mography. Pak J Med Sci 2015; 31:426‑430.
177. Beatty RG, Krell K: Mandibular molars with five canals: re‑ 195. Altunsoy M, Ok E, Nur BG, et al.: Root canal morphology
port of two cases. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 114:802‑804. analysis of maxillary permanent first and second molars in a
178. Ballal S, Sachdeva G, Kandaswamy D: Endodontic manage‑ southeastern Turkish population using cone‑beam compu‑
ment of a fused mandibular second molar and paramolar ted tomography. J Dent Sci 2015; 10:401‑407.
with the aid of spiral computed tomography: a case report. 196. Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy D: Anato‑
J Endod 2007; 33:1247‑1251. mic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of poste‑
179. Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, et al.: C‑shaped canal system in rior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam com‑
mandibular second molars: Part II – Radiographic features. puted tomography: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent 2015;
J Endod 2004; 30:904‑908. 9:500‑507.
180. Pomeranz HH, Eidelman DL, Goldberg MG: Treatment 197. Ghobashy AM, Nagy MM, Bayoumi AA: Evaluation of root
considerations of the middle mesial canal of mandibular and canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars in an
first and second molars. J Endod 1981; 7:565‑568. Egyptian population by cone‑beam computed tomography.
181. Altunsoy M, Ok E, Nur BG, et al.: A cone‑beam computed J Endod 2017; 43:1089‑1092.
tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior 198. Guo J, Vahidnia A, Sedghizadeh P, et al.: Evaluation of root
teeth in a Turkish population. Eur J Dent 2014; 8:302‑306. and canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molars
182. Beshkenadze E, Chipashvili N: Anatomo‑morphological in a North American population by cone‑beam computed
feutures of the root canal system in Georgian population tomography. J Endod 2014; 40:635‑639.
– cone‑beam computed tomography study. Georgian Med 199. Jing YN, Ye X, Liu DG, et al.: [Cone‑beam computed tomo‑
News 2015:7‑14. graphy was used for study of root and canal morphology of
183. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Couto GS, et al.: Study of root canal maxillary first and second molars]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao
anatomy in human permanent teeth in a subpopulation of 2014; 46:958‑962.
Brazil’s center region using cone‑beam computed tomogra‑ 200. Khademi A, Zamani Naser A, Bahreinian Z, et al.: Root mor‑
phy – Part 1. Braz Dent J 2015; 26:530‑536. phology and canal configuration of first and second ma‑
184. Martins JNR, Marques D, Mata A, et al.: Root and root ca‑ xillary molars in a selected Iranian population: a cone‑be‑
nal morphology of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian am computed tomography evaluation. Iran Endod J 2017;
population: a cone‑beam computed tomography study. Int 12:288‑292.
Endod J 2017; 50:1013‑1026. 201. Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J: Morphology of maxillary first and se‑
185. Monsarrat P, Arcaute B, Peters OA, et al.: Interrela‑ cond molars analyzed by cone‑beam computed tomogra‑
tionships in the variability of root canal anatomy among the phy in a korean population: variations in the number of
40 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod 2012; 218. Liu J, Luo J, Dou L, et al.: CBCT study of root and canal
38:1063‑1068. morphology of permanent mandibular incisors in a Chine‑
202. Lyra CM, Delai D, Pereira KC, et al.: Morphology of mesio‑ se population. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72:26‑30.
buccal root canals of maxillary first molars: a comparison 219. Verma GR, Bhadage C, Bhoosreddy AR, et al.: Cone beam
of CBCT scanning and cross‑sectioning. Braz Dent J 2015; computed tomography study of root canal morphology of
26:525‑529. permanent mandibular incisors in Indian subpopulation.
203. Naseri M, Safi Y, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, et al.: Survey of Pol J Radiol 2017; 82:371‑375.
anatomy and root canal morphology of maxillary first mo‑ 220. Zhao Y, Dong YT, Wang XY, et al.: [Cone‑beam computed
lars regarding age and gender in an Iranian population tomography analysis of root canal configuration of 4 674
using cone‑beam computed tomography. Iran Endod J mandibular anterior teeth]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2014;
2016; 11:298‑303. 46:95‑99.
204. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, et al.: Cone‑beam 221. Zhengyan Y, Keke L, Fei W, et al.: Cone‑beam computed to‑
computed tomography study of root and canal morpholo‑ mography study of the root and canal morphology of man‑
gy of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian popula‑ dibular permanent anterior teeth in a Chongqing popula‑
tion. J Endod 2010; 36:1622‑1627. tion. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2016; 12:19‑25.
205. Perez‑Heredia M, Ferrer‑Luque CM, Bravo M, et al.: Co‑ 222. Soleymani A, Namaryan N, Moudi E, et al.: Root canal mor‑
ne‑beam computed tomographic study of root anatomy and phology of mandibular canine in an Iranian population: a
canal configuration of molars in a Spanish population. J En‑ CBCT assessment. Iran Endod J 2017; 12:78‑82.
dod 2017; 43:1511‑1516. 223. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: use of cone
206. Plotino G, Tocci L, Grande NM, et al.: Symmetry of root and beam computed tomography in Endodontics 2015 upda‑
root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular molars te. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;
in a white population: a cone‑beam computed tomography 120:508‑512.
study in vivo. J Endod 2013; 39:1545‑1548. 224. Arslan H, Çapar ID, Ertas ET, et al.: A cone‑beam compu‑
207. Rouhani A, Bagherpour A, Akbari M, et al.: Cone‑beam ted tomographic study of root canal systems in mandibular
computed tomography evaluation of maxillary first and se‑ premolars in a Turkish population: Theoretical model for
cond molars in Iranian population: a morphological study. determining orifice shape. Eur J Dent 2015; 9:11‑19.
225. Llena C, Fernandez J, Ortolani PS, et al.: Cone‑beam com‑
Iran Endod J 2014; 9:190‑194.
puted tomography analysis of root and canal morphology
208. Silva EJ, Nejaim Y, Silva AI, et al.: Evaluation of root canal
of mandibular premolars in a Spanish population. Imaging
configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population
Sci Dent 2014; 44:221‑227.
using cone‑beam computed tomographic imaging: an in
226. Martins JNR, Francisco H, Ordinola‑Zapata R: Prevalence
vivo study. J Endod 2014; 40:173‑176.
of C‑shaped configurations in the mandibular first and se‑
209. Tian XM, Yang XW, Qian L, et al.: Analysis of the root and
cond premolars: a cone‑beam computed tomographic in
canal morphologies in maxillary first and second molars in
vivo study. J Endod 2017; 43:890‑895.
a Chinese population using cone‑beam computed tomogra‑
227. Shetty A, Hegde MN, Tahiliani D, et al.: A three‑dimen‑
phy. J Endod 2016; 42:696‑701.
sional study of variations in root canal morphology using
210. Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, et al.: Use of CBCT to identify the
cone‑beam computed tomography of mandibular premo‑
morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chi‑
lars in a South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;
nese subpopulation. Int Endod J 2011; 44:162‑169.
8:Zc22‑24.
211. Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, et al.: A cone‑beam compu‑
228. Yang H, Tian C, Li G, et al.: A cone‑beam computed tomo‑
ted tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar graphy study of the root canal morphology of mandibular
root and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J En‑ first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and
dod 2010; 36:1480‑1484. apical foramina in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod 2013;
212. Li L, Zhan FL, Jin YW: [Preliminary study on root canal 39:435‑438.
morphology of maxillary second molars]. Shanghai Kou 229. Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, et al.: Cone‑beam computed tomogra‑
Qiang Yi Xue 2014; 23:179‑183. phy study of root and canal morphology of mandibular pre‑
213. Wu D, Zhang G, Liang R, et al.: Root and canal morphology molars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging
of maxillary second molars by cone‑beam computed tomo‑ 2012; 12:18.
graphy in a native Chinese population. J Int Med Res 2017; 230. Kazemipoor M, Hajighasemi A, Hakimian R: Gender diffe‑
45:830‑842. rence and root canal morphology in mandibular premo‑
214. Aminsobhani M, Sadegh M, Meraji N, et al.: Evaluation lars: a cone‑beam computed tomography study in an Ira‑
of the root and canal morphology of mandibular per‑ nian population. Contemp Clin Dent 2015; 6:401‑404.
manent anterior teeth in an Iranian population by co‑ 231. Kazemipoor M, Poorkheradmand M, Rezaeian M, et al.:
ne‑beam computed tomography. J Dent (Tehran) 2013; Evaluation by CBCT of root and canal morphology in man‑
10:358‑366. dibular premolars in an Iranian population. Chin J Dent
215. Arslan H, Ertas H, Ertas ET, et al.: Evaluating root canal Res 2015; 18:191‑196.
configuration of mandibular incisors with cone‑beam com‑ 232. Caputo BV, Noro Filho GA, de Andrade Salgado DM, et al.:
puted tomography in a Turkish population. J Dent Sci 2015; Evaluation of the root canal morphology of molars by using
10:359‑364. cone‑beam computed tomography in a Brazilian popula‑
216. Han T, Ma Y, Yang L, et al.: A study of the root canal mor‑ tion: Part I. J Endod 2016; 42:1604‑1607.
phology of mandibular anterior teeth using cone‑beam 233. Celikten B, Tufenkci P, Aksoy U, et al.: Cone beam CT
computed tomography in a Chinese subpopulation. J En‑ evaluation of mandibular molar root canal morphology
dod 2014; 40:1309‑1314. in a Turkish Cypriot population. Clin Oral Investig 2016;
217. Lin Z, Hu Q, Wang T, et al.: Use of CBCT to investigate the 20:2221‑2226.
root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Surg Radiol 234. Demirbuga S, Sekerci AE, Dincer AN, et al.: Use of co‑
Anat 2014; 36:877‑882. ne‑beam computed tomography to evaluate root and
Capítulo 7   |   Referências Bibliográficas 41

canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars 247. Green D: Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg Oral Med
in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; Oral Pathol 1973; 35:689‑696.
18:e737‑744. 248. Hession RW: Endodontic morphology. II. A radiographic
235. Kim SY, Kim BS, Woo J, et al.: Morphology of mandibular analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977; 44:610‑620.
first molars analyzed by cone‑beam computed tomography 249. Pécora JD, Woelfel JB, Sousa Neto MD, et al.: Morpholo‑
in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots gic study of the maxillary molars. Part II: Internal anatomy.
and canals. J Endod 2013; 39:1516‑1521. Braz Dent J 1992; 3:53‑57.
236. Madani ZS, Mehraban N, Moudi E, et al.: Root and canal 250. Guerisoli DM, de Souza RA, de Sousa Neto MD, et al.: Exter‑
morphology of mandibular molars in a selected Iranian po‑ nal and internal anatomy of third molars. Braz Dent J 1998;
pulation using cone‑beam computed tomography. Iran En‑ 9:91‑94.
dod J 2017; 12:143‑148. 251. Stropko JJ: Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clini‑
237. Mukhaimer RH: Evaluation of root canal configuration of cal observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999;
mandibular first molars in a Palestinian population by using 25:446‑450.
cone‑beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study. Int Sch 252. Sidow SJ, West LA, Liewehr FR, et al.: Root canal morpholo‑
Res Notices 2014; 2014:583621. gy of human maxillary and mandibular third molars. J En‑
238. Nur BG, Ok E, Altunsoy M, et al.: Evaluation of the root dod 2000; 26:675‑678.
and canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars in 253. Ng YL, Aung TH, Alavi A, et al.: Root and canal morphology
a south‑eastern Turkish population using cone‑beam com‑ of Burmese maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2001; 34:620‑630.
puted tomography. Eur J Dent 2014; 8:154‑159. 254. Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, et al.: Root and canal
239. Torres A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, et al.: Characterization of morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002;
mandibular molar root and canal morphology using cone 35:478‑485.
beam computed tomography and its variability in Belgian 255. Weng XL, Yu SB, Zhao SL, et al.: Root canal morphology of
and Chilean population samples. Imaging Sci Dent 2015; permanent maxillary teeth in the Han nationality in Chine‑
45:95‑101. se Guanzhong area: a new modified root canal staining te‑
240. Wang Y, Zheng QH, Zhou XD, et al.: Evaluation of the root chnique. J Endod 2009; 35:651‑656.
and canal morphology of mandibular first permanent mo‑ 256. Sert S, Sahinkesen G, Topcu FT, et al.: Root canal configu‑
lars in a western Chinese population by cone‑beam compu‑ rations of third molar teeth. A comparison with first and se‑
ted tomography. J Endod 2010; 36:1786‑1789. cond molars in the Turkish population. Aust Endod J 2011;
241. Zhang X, Xiong S, Ma Y, et al.: A cone‑beam computed to‑ 37:109‑117.
mographic study on mandibular first molars in a Chinese 257. Cosic J, Galic N, Vodanovic M, et al.: An in vitro morpholo‑
subpopulation. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0134919. gical investigation of the endodontic spaces of third molars.
242. Silva EJ, Nejaim Y, Silva AV, et al.: Evaluation of root canal Coll Antropol 2013; 37:437‑442.
configuration of mandibular molars in a Brazilian popula‑ 258. Tomaszewska IM, Leszczynski B, Wrobel A, et al.: A mi‑
tion by using cone‑beam computed tomography: an in vivo cro‑computed tomographic (micro‑CT) analysis of the root
study. J Endod 2013; 39:849‑852. canal morphology of maxillary third molar teeth. Ann Anat
243. Kim SY, Kim BS, Kim Y: Mandibular second molar root ca‑ 2017. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2017.09.003 [in press].
nal morphology and variants in a Korean subpopulation. 259. Zakhary SY, Fahim OM, Gorgy AA: Morphologic characte‑
Int Endod J 2016; 49:136‑144. ristics of lower third molar as related to successful endodon‑
244. Pawar AM, Pawar M, Kfir A, et al.: Root canal morphology tic therapy. Egypt Dent J 1988; 34:323‑337.
and variations in mandibular second molar teeth of an In‑ 260. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, et al.: Root and canal
dian population: an in vivo cone‑beam computed tomogra‑ morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2002;
phy analysis. Clin Oral Investig, 2017. 35:56‑62.
245. Zhang R, Wang H, Tian YY, et al.: Use of cone‑beam com‑ 261. Kuzekanani M, Haghani J, Nosrati H: Root and canal mor‑
puted tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology phology of mandibular third molars in an Iranian popula‑
of mandibular molars in Chinese individuals. Int Endod J tion. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2012; 6:85‑88.
2011; 44:990‑999. 262. Park JB, Kim N, Park S, et al.: Evaluation of root anatomy of
246. Barrett MT: The internal anatomy of the teeth with special permanent mandibular premolars and molars in a Korean
reference to the pulp with its branches. Dent Cosmos 1925; population with cone‑beam computed tomography. Eur J
67:581‑592. Dent 2013; 7:94‑101.
Ca p ít u l o

8 Acesso Coronário e Localização


dos Canais Radiculares
Weber S. P. Lopes | Adalberto R. Vieira

17. Peters OA, Laib A, Ruegsegger P, Barbakow F: Three‑dimen‑


Referências Bibliográficas sion analysis of root canal geometric by high‑resolution com‑
puted tomography. J Dent Res. 2000; 79:1405‑1409.
1. Friedman S: Expected outcomes in the prevention and tre‑ 18. Lichota D, Lipski M, Woz’niak K, et al.: Endodontic tre‑
atment of apical periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, atment of a maxillary canine with type 3 dens invaginatus
eds. Essential endodontology. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell and large periradicular lesion: a case report. J Endod 2008;
Munksgaard Ltd, 2008:408‑469. 34:756‑758.
2. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr: Anatomic and microbiologic chal‑ 19. Kim S: Modern endodontic practice: instruments and techni‑
lenges to achieving success with endodontic treatment: a case ques. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48:1‑9.
report. J Endod 2008; 34:1249‑1254. 20. Zehnder M: Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32:389‑398.
3. Ricucci D, MD, Russo J, Rutberg M, et al.: A prospective co‑ 21. Schäfer E: irrigation of the root canal. ENDO (Lond, Engl)
hort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: re‑ 2007; 1:11‑27.
sults after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑ 22. Baumgartner JC: Microbiologic aspects of endodontic infec‑
diol Endod 2011; 12:825‑842. tions. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32:459‑468.
4. De Deus QD: Endodontia. In Preparo intracoronário. Aces‑ 23. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr, Bate AL, et al.: Histologic investi‑
so. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi, 1995:281‑295. gation of the root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodonti‑
5. Pucci FM, Reig R: Conductos radiculares. Anatomia patolo‑ tis: a retrospective study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod
gía y terapia. Montevidéu: Barreiro y Ramos, 1945. 2009; 35:493‑502.
6. Siqueira JF, Jr, Roças IN: Clinical implications and microbio‑ 24. Spangberg LSW: Endodontic treatment of teeth without api‑
logy of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J En‑ cal periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, eds. Essential en‑
dod 2008; 34:1291‑1301. dodontology. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard Ltd,
7. Siqueira JF, Jr, Roças IN: Community as the unit of pathoge‑ 2008:316‑346.
nicity: na emerging concept as to the microbial pathogenesis 25. Ahmad IA: Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: a
of apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral review. Int Endod J. 2009; 42:963‑972.
Radiol Endod 2009; 107:870‑878. 26. Siqueira JF, Jr, Roças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Chemo‑mechanical
8. Walton RE, Torabinejad M: Principles and practice of endo‑ reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after
dontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996. instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2,5% and 5,25% so‑
9. Schilder H: Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin dium hypochlorite. J Endod 2000; 26:331‑334.
North Am 1974; 18:269‑296. 27. Schilder H: Filling root canal in three dimensions. Dent Clin
10. Bramante CM, Berbet A: Recursos radiográficos no diagnós‑ North Am 1967; 11:723‑744.
tico e no tratamento endodôntico. 3a ed. São Paulo: Pancast, 28. Vertucci FJ: Root canal morphology and its relationship to
2002. endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005; 10:3‑29.
11. Nair MK, Nair UP: Digital advanced imaging in endodontics: 29. Willershausen B, Kasaj A, Tekyatan H, et al.: Radiographic
a review. J Endod, 2007; 33:1‑6. investigation of location and angulation of curvatures in hu‑
12. Hess W, Zürcher E, Dolamore WH: The anatomy of the root man maxillary incisors. J Endod 2008; 34:1052‑1056.
canals of the teeth of the permanent and deciduous denti‑ 30. Park PS, Kim KD, Perinpanayagam H, et al.: Three‑dimensio‑
tions. New York: William Wood Co, 1925. nal analysis of root canal curvature and direction of maxillary
13. De Deus QD: Topografia da cavidade pulpar − contribuição lateral incisors by using cone‑beam computed tomography. J
ao seu estudo (Doutorado). Belo Horizonte: Universidade de Endod 2013; 39:1124‑1129.
Minas Gerais, 1960. 31. Kartal N, Ozgelik B, Cimilli H. Root canal morphology of ma‑
14. De Deus QD: Frequency location, and direction of the late‑ xillary premolars. J Endod 1998; 6:417‑419.
ral, secondary and accessory canals. J Endod 1975; 1:361‑366. 32. Hartmann RC, Baldasso FER, Sturmer CP, et al.: Clinically re‑
15. Vertucci FJ, Williams RG: Root canal anatomy of the human levant dimensions of 3‑rooted maxillary premolars obtained
permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; via high‑resolution computed tomography. J Endod 2013;
58:589‑599. 39:1639‑1645.
16. Dowker SE, Davis GR, Elliott JC: X‑ray microtomography: 33. Kerekes K, Tronstad L: Morphometric observations on root
nondestructive three‑dimensional imaging for in vitro endo‑ canals of human molars. J Endod 1977; 3:114‑118.
dontic studies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 34. Foreman PC, Soames JV: Analysis of the pulp chamber floor
Endod 1997; 83:510‑516. of human molar teeth. Int Endod J 1988; 21:257‑263.
Capítulo 8   |   Referências Bibliográficas 43

35. Park J‑W, Lee J‑K, Ha B‑H, et al.: Three‑dimesional analy‑ 55. Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction
sis of maxillary first molars mesiobuccal root canal confi‑ of intracanal bacteria using nickel‑titanium rotary instrumen‑
guration and curvature using micro‑computed tomography. tation and various medications. J Endod 2000; 26:751‑5.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 56. Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Enersen M, Mda‑
108:437‑442. la I, Orstavik D, et al.: Influence of the apical preparation
36. Leal Silva EJN, Neijam Y, Silva AIV, et al.: Evaluation of root size and the irrigant type on bacterial reduction in root ca‑
canal configuration of maxillary molars in a brazilian popula‑ nal‑treated teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2017;
tion using cone‑beam computed tomographic imaging: an in 43:1058‑63.
vivo study. J Endod 2014; 40:173‑176. 57. Krishan R, Paque F, Ossareh A, Kishen A, Dao T, Friedman
37. Vertucci FJ: Root canal anatomy of the mandibular anterior S. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root ca‑
teeth. J Am Dent Assoc; 1974; 89:369‑371. nal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture as‑
38. Kartal N, Yanikoglu FÇ: Root canal morphology of mandibu‑ sessed in incisors, premolars, and molars. J Endod 2014;
lar incisor. J Endod 1992; 18:562‑564. 40:1160‑1166.
39. Pécora JD, Sousa Neto MD, Saquy PC: Internal anatomy, di‑
58. Yuan K, Niu C, Xie Q, Jiang W, Gao L, Huang Z, et al.: Com‑
rection and number of roots and size of human mandibular
parative evaluation of the impact of minimally invasive pre‑
canines. Braz Dent J 1993; 4:53‑57.
paration vs. conventional straight‑line preparation on too‑
40. Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa‑Neto MD: The anatomy
th biomechanics: a finite element analysis. Eur J Oral Sci
of two‑rooted mandibular canines determined using mi‑
2016;124:591‑596.
cro‑computed tomographgy. Int Endod J. 2011; 44:682‑687.
59. Plotino G, Grande NM, Isufi A, Ioppolo P, Pedulla E, Be‑
41. Fernandes LMPSR, Rice D, Ronald Ordinola‑Zapata R, et al.:
Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in man‑ dini R, et al.: Fracture strength of endodontically treated
dibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, cone‑be‑ teeth with different access cavity designs. J Endod 2017;
am computed tomographic scanners, and micro‑computed 43:995‑1000.
tomographic imaging. J Endod 2014; 40:42‑45. 60. Rover G, Belladonna FG, Bortuluzzi EA, De‑Deus G, et al.: In‑
42. Clegborn BM, Christie WH, Dong CCS: The root and root ca‑ fluence of acess cavity design on root canal detection, instru‑
nal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar: mentation efficacy, ande fracture resistance assessed in ma‑
a literature review. J Endod 2007; 33:1031‑1037. xillary molars. J Endod 2017; 43:1657‑1662.
43. Yang H, Tian C, Li G, et al.: A Cone‑beam computed tomo‑ 61. Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, Musso E, Babbio E,Giuliani C, et al.:
graphy study of the root canal morphology of mandibular Influence of contracted endodontic acess on root canl geo‑
first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and metry: an in vitro study. J Endod 2018; 44:614‑620.
apical foramina in a chinese subpopulation. J Endod 2013; 62. Özyürek T, Ülker Ö,Demiryürek Ö, Yilmaz F. The effects of
39:435‑438. endodontic acess cavity preparation design on the fracture
44. Ordinola‑Zapata R, Bramante CM, Villas‑Boas MH, et al.: strengh of endodontically treated teeth: traditional versus
Morphologic microcomputed tomography analysis of man‑ conservative preparation. J Endod 2018; 44:800‑805.
dibular premolars with three root canals. J Endod 2013; 63. Moore B, Verdelis K, Kishen A, Dao T, Friedman S. Impacts of
39:1130‑1135. contracted endodontic cavities on instrumentation efficacy
45. Cunningham CJ, Senia ES: A three‑dimensional study of ca‑ and biomechanical responses in maxillary molars. J Endod
nal curvatures in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J En‑ 2016; 42(12):1779‑1783.
dod 1992; 6:294‑300. 64. Trope M, Debelian G. Microbial control: the first stage of
46. Jafarzadeh H, Wu YN: The c‑shaped root canal configuration: root canal treatment. Gen Dent. 2009; 57:580‑588.
a review. J Endod 2007; 33:517‑523. 65. Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Molven O. Effects of extensive apical
47. Wang Y Zheng QH, Zhou XD, et al.: Evaluation of the root reaming and calcium hydroxide dressing on bacterial infec‑
and canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molars tion during treatment of apical periodontitis: a pilot study.
in a western chinese population by cone‑beam computed to‑ Int Endod J. 1991; 24:1‑7.
mography. J Endod 2010; 36:1786‑1789. 66. Dalton BC, Orstavik D, Phillips C, Pettiette M, Trope M. Bac‑
48. Pablo OV, Estevez R, Sanchez MP, et al.: Root anatomy and terial reduction with nickel‑titanium rotary instrumentation.
canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first mo‑
J Endod 1998; 24:763‑767.
lar: a systematic review. J Endod 2010; 36:1919‑1931.
67. Card SJ, Sigurdsson A, Orstavik D, Trope M. The effective‑
49. Paqué F, Peters OA: Microcomputed tomography evaluation
ness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal
of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular mo‑
bacteria. J Endod 2002; 28:779‑783.
lars with the self‑adjusting file. J Endod 2011; 37:517‑521.
68. Saini HR, Tewari S, Sangwan P, Duhan J, Gupta A. Effect of
50. Krasner P, Rankow HJ. Anatomy of the pulp chamber floor. J
different apical preparation sizes on outcome of primary en‑
Endodon 2004; 30:5‑16.
51. Silva E, Rover G, Belladonna FG, De‑Deus G, da Silveira Tei‑ dodontic treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod
xeira C, da Silva Fidalgo TK. Impact of contracted endodon‑ 2012; 38:1309‑1315.
tic cavities on fracture resistance of endodontically treated te‑ 69. Crane AB: A practicable root canal technique. London: Hen‑
eth: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig. ry Kempton, 1921.
2018; 22:109‑18. 70. Levini HJ: Acess cavities. Dent Clin North Am 1967; 11:701‑710.
52. Bóveda C, Kishen A. Contracted endodontic cavities: the 71. Carr GB, Murguel CAF: The use of the operating microscope
foundation for less invasive alternatives in the management in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54:191‑214.
of apical periodontitis. Endodontic Topics. 2015; 33:169‑86. 72. Clark D: The operating microscope and ultrasonics: a perfect
53. Asundi A, Kishen A. A strain gauge and photoelastic analysis marriage. Dent Today 2004; 23:74‑81.
of in vivo strain and in vitro stress distribution in human den‑ 73. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, et al.: Ultrasonics in en‑
tal supporting structures. Arch Oral Biol. 2000; 45:543‑50. dodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 2007; 33:81‑95.
54. Asundi A, Kishen A. Stress distribution in the dento‑alveolar 74. Zuolo ML, Carvalho MCC: O uso do microscópio clínico na
system using digital photoelasticity. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. solução de complicações endodônticas. Rev Assoc Paul Cir
2000; 214:659‑67. Dent 2003; 57:461‑464.
44 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

75. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new of reports of parallet‑group randomized trials. Ann Int Med
volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the co‑ 2001; 134:657‑662.
ne‑beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol1998; 8 79. Trope M. Regenerative potential of dental pulp. J Endod
(9):1558‑1564. 2008; 34:513‑517.
76. Buchgreitz J, Buchgreitz M, Morttensen D, Bjørnadal. Gui‑ 80. Roças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Del Aguila CA: Polymorphism of the
ded access cavity preparation using cone‑beam computed to‑
CD14 and TLR4 genes and post‑treatment apical periodonti‑
mography and optical surface scans – an ex vivo study. Int En‑
tis. J Endod 2014; 40:168‑172.
dod J 2016; 49:790‑795.
81. Wu D, Fan W, Kishen A, et al.: Evaluation of the antibacterial
77. Lara‑Mendes STO, Barbosa CFM, Machado CM, Santa‑Rosa
CC. A new approach for minimally invasive access to severely efficacy of silver nanoparticles against enterococcus faecalis
calcified anterior teeth using the guided endodontics techni‑ biofilm. J Endod 40:285‑290.
que. J Endod 2018; 44:1578‑1582. 82. Chiappelli F, Brant XMC, Oluwadara O, et al.: Evidence‑ba‑
78. Moher D, Schultz KL, Altman DG: The CONSORT state‑ sed practice toward optimizing clinical outcomes. New York,
ment: Revised recommendations for improving the quality NY, Springer, 2009.
Ca pí tulo

Fundamentação Filosófica do
Tratamento Endodôntico 9
José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Hélio P. Lopes

18. Siqueira JF, Jr: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why
Referências Bibliográficas well‑treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34:1‑10.
19. Siqueira JF, Jr: Ursachen endodontischer misserfolge. Endo‑
1. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al.: Biocompatibility of surfa‑ dontie 2001; 10/3:243‑257.
ce‑sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet 20. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Ricucci D, et al.: Causes and ma‑
Dent 1987; 57:1‑8. nagement of post‑treatment apical periodontitis. Br Dent J
2. Trowbridge HO: Pathogenesis of pulpitis resulting from den‑ 2014; 216:305‑312.
tal caries. J Endod 1981; 7:52‑60. 21. Bender IB, Seltzer S: Roentgenographic and direct observa‑
3. Spångberg LSW: Endodontic treatment of teeth without api‑ tion of experimental lesions in bone. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;
cal periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential 62:152‑160.
endodontology. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard; 22. Tsai P, Torabinejad M, Rice D, et al.: Accuracy of cone‑beam
2008:316‑346. computed tomography and periapical radiography in detec‑
4. Langeland K: Tissue response to dental caries. Endod Dent ting small periapical lesions. J Endod 2012; 38:965‑970.
Traumatol 1987; 3:149‑171. 23. Durack C, Patel S: Cone beam computed tomography in en‑
5. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Correlation betwe‑ dodontics. Braz Dent J 2012; 23:179‑191.
en clinical and histologic pulp diagnoses. J Endod 2014; 24. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, et al.: Accuracy of cone beam
40:1932‑1939. computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radio‑
6. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontology. An integrated bio‑ graphy for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008;
logical and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing, 34:273‑279.
2013. 25. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ: The effects of sur‑
7. Trope M, Blanco L, Chivian N, et al.: The role of endodontics gical exposures of dental pulps in germ‑free and conventio‑
after dental traumatic injuries. In Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, nal laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;
editors: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Else‑ 20:340‑349.
vier; 2006:610‑649. 26. Sundqvist G: Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps
8. Paster BJ, Olsen I, Aas JA, et al.: The breadth of bacterial di‑ [Odontological Dissertation no.7]. University of Umea,
versity in the human periodontal pocket and other oral sites. Umea, Sweden, 1976.
Periodontol 2000 2006; 42:80‑87. 27. Bergenholtz G: Micro‑organisms from necrotic pulp of trau‑
9. Siqueira JF, Jr, Saboia Dantas CJ: Mecanismos celulares e mo‑ matized teeth. Odontol Revy 1974; 25:347‑358.
leculares da inflamação. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI, 2000. 28. Möller AJR, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, et al.: Influence on peria‑
10. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, et al.: Cytotoxic effects pical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tis‑
of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod 1985; 11:525‑528. sue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:475‑484.
11. Harrison JW, Svec TA, Baumgartner JC: Analysis of clinical to‑ 29. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Exploiting molecular methods to ex‑
xicity of endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1978; 4:6‑11. plore endodontic infections: Part 2‑redefining the endodon‑
12. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. London: tic microbiota. J Endod 2005; 31:488‑498.
Quintessence Publishing, 2011, p. 403. 30. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Diversity of endodontic microbiota
13. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, et al.: A prospective cohort revisited. J Dent Res 2009; 88:969‑981.
study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results 31. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Distinctive features of the micro‑
after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑ biota associated with different forms of apical periodontitis. J
dod 2011; 112:825‑842. Oral Microbiol 2009; 1: doi:10.3402/jom.v3401i3400.2009.
14. Fava LR: Tratamento endodôntico em sessão única: vanta‑ 32. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Endodontic microbiology. In Tora‑
gens e desvantagens. Rev Bras Odontol 1999; 56:273‑278. binejad M, Walton RE, editors: Endodontics. Principles and
15. Trope M, Bergenholtz G: Microbiological basis for endodon‑ practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008:38‑48.
tic treatment: can a maximal outcome be achieved in one vi‑ 33. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Polymerase chain reaction‑based
sit? Endod Topics 2002; 1:40‑53. analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic
16. Holland R, Souza V: Considerações clínicas e biológicas so‑ treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑
bre o tratamento endodôntico. II – Tratamento endodôntico dod 2004; 97:85‑94.
radical. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 1977; 31:232‑241. 34. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Microorganisms
17. Siqueira JF, Jr: Tratamento das infecções endodônticas. Rio from canals of root‑filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int En‑
de Janeiro: MEDSI; 1997: dod J 2003; 36:1‑11.
46 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

35. Jacinto RC, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Microbiological 56. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Characterization of microbiota of
analysis of infected root canals from symptomatic and asymp‑ root canal‑treated teeth with posttreatment disease. J Clin Mi‑
tomatic teeth with periapical periodontitis and the antimicro‑ crobiol 2012; 50:1721‑1724.
bial susceptibility of some isolated anaerobic bacteria. Oral 57. Siqueira JF, Jr, Sen BH: Fungi in endodontic infections.
Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18:285‑292. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;
36. Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB: Clinical significance of 97:632‑641.
dental root canal microflora. J Dent 1996; 24:47‑55. 58. Waltimo TM, Sen BH, Meurman JH, et al.: Yeasts in apical pe‑
37. Sundqvist G: Associations between microbial species in den‑ riodontitis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14:128‑137.
tal root canal infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1992; 59. Byström A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G: The antibacterial effect
7:257‑262. of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phe‑
38. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Souto R, et al.: Checkerboard nol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root
DNA‑DNA hybridization analysis of endodontic infections. canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:170‑175.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 60. Waltimo TM, Siren EK, Ørstavik D, et al.: Susceptibility of
89:744‑748. oral Candida species to calcium hydroxide in vitro. Int Endod
39. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Andrade AF, et al.: Oral treponemes J 1999; 32:94‑98.
in primary root canal infections as detected by nested PCR. 61. Ranta K, Haapasalo M, Ranta H: Monoinfection of root canal
Int Endod J 2003; 36:20‑26. with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;
40. Rôças IN, Baumgartner JC, Xia T, et al.: Prevalence of selec‑ 4:269‑272.
ted bacterial named species and uncultivated phylotypes in 62. Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, et al.: Mechanisms involved
endodontic abscesses from two geographic locations. J En‑ in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide.
dod 2006; 32:1135‑1138. Int Endod J 2002; 35:221‑228.
41. Baumgartner JC, Siqueira JF, Jr, Xia T, et al.: Geographical di‑ 63. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP: Patterns of microbial co‑
fferences in bacteria detected in endodontic infections using lonization in primary root canal infections. Oral Surg Oral
polymerase chain reaction. J Endod 2004; 30:141‑144. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93:174‑178.
42. Xia T, Baumgartner JC: Occurrence of Actinomyces in infec‑ 64. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Biofilms and apical periodontitis:
tions of endodontic origin. J Endod 2003; 29:549‑552. study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopa‑
thologic findings. J Endod 2010; 36:1277‑1288.
43. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA, Jr.: Bacteria in the apical 5 mm
65. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Ricucci D: Biofilms in endodontic in‑
of infected root canals. J Endod 1991; 17:380‑383.
fection. Endod Topics 2010; 22:33‑49.
44. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: The microbiota of acute apical abs‑
66. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, et al.: Viable bacteria in
cesses. J Dent Res 2009; 88:61‑65.
root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J En‑
45. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Molecular analysis of endodontic in‑
dod 2001; 27:76‑81.
fections. In Fouad AF, editor: Endodontic microbiology, Ho‑
67. Byström A, Happonen RP, Sjogren U, et al.: Healing of pe‑
boken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2017:81‑128.
riapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment
46. Ribeiro AC, Matarazzo F, Faveri M, et al.: Exploring bacterial
with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3:58‑63.
diversity of endodontic microbiota by cloning and sequen‑
68. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Influence of infection
cing 16S rRNA. J Endod 2011; 37:922‑926.
at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic tre‑
47. Sakamoto M, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, et al.: Molecular analy‑
atment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;
sis of bacteria in asymptomatic and symptomatic endodontic 30:297‑306.
infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2006; 21:112‑122. 69. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al.: Factors affecting
48. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Frequency and levels of candida‑ the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;
te endodontic pathogens in acute apical abscesses as com‑ 16:498‑504.
pared to asymptomatic apical periodontitis. PLoS One 2018; 70. Katebzadeh N, Hupp J, Trope M: Histological periapical re‑
13:e0190469. pair after obturation of infected root canals in dogs. J Endod
49. Siqueira JFJ, Rôças IN: Microbiology of endodontic infections. 1999; 25:364‑368.
In Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, editors: Cohen’s pathways of 71. Trope M, Delano EO, Ørstavik D: Endodontic treatment of
the pulp. 11th ed. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016:599‑629. teeth with apical periodontitis: single vs. multivisit treatment.
50. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Clinical implications and microbio‑ J Endod 1999; 25:345‑350.
logy of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J En‑ 72. Ricucci D, Lin LM, Spångberg LS: Wound healing of apical
dod 2008; 34:1291‑1301,1293. tissues after root canal therapy: a long‑term clinical, radiogra‑
51. Zoletti GO, Siqueira JF, Jr., Santos KR: Identification of Entero- phic, and histopathologic observation study. Oral Surg Oral
coccus faecalis in root‑filled teeth with or without periradicular Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108:609‑621.
lesions by culture‑dependent and ‑independent approaches. 73. Siqueira JF, Jr: Strategies to treat infected root canals. J Calif
J Endod 2006; 32:722‑726. Dent Assoc 2001; 29:825‑837.
52. Rôças IN, Jung IY, Lee CY, et al.: Polymerase chain reaction 74. Siqueira JF, Jr, Araujo MC, Garcia PF, et al.: Histological eva‑
identification of microorganisms in previously root‑filled teeth luation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techni‑
in a South Korean population. J Endod 2004; 30:504‑508. ques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod
53. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Microbiologic analy‑ 1997; 23:499‑502.
sis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outco‑ 75. Zehnder M: Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32:389‑398.
me of conservative re‑treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 76. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, et al.: Irrigation in endodon‑
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:86‑93. tics. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54:291‑312.
54. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, et al.: Microbiological sta‑ 77. Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, et al.: Scanning electron
tus of root‑filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solu‑
1998; 31:1‑7. tions. J Endod 1975; 1:127‑135.
55. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Molecular analysis 78. Byström A, Sundqvist G: Bacteriologic evaluation of the effi‑
of the root canal microbiota associated with endodontic treat‑ cacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic
ment failures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008; 23:275‑281. therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:321‑328.
Capítulo 9   |   Referências Bibliográficas 47

79. Dalton BC, Ørstavik D, Phillips C, et al.: Bacterial reduction 99. Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA: Effects of root canal prepara‑
with nickel‑titanium rotary instrumentation. J Endod 1998; tion on apical geometry assessed by micro‑computed tomo‑
24:763‑767. graphy. J Endod 2009; 35:1056‑1059.
80. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, et al.: Mechanical re‑ 100. Yang G, Yuan G, Yun X, et al.: Effects of two nickel‑titanium
duction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrument systems, Mtwo versus ProTaper universal, on
instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1999; 25:332‑335. root canal geometry assessed by micro‑computed tomogra‑
81. Ingle JI, Zeldow BJ: An evaluation of mechanical instrumen‑ phy. J Endod 2011; 37:1412‑1416.
tation and the negative culture in endodontic therapy. J Am 101. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, et al.: Root canal preparation of
Dent Assoc 1958; 57:471‑476. mandibular molars with 3 nickel‑titanium rotary instru‑
82. Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Influence ments: a micro‑computed tomographic study. J Endod
of the apical preparation size and the irrigant type on bacte‑ 2014;40:1860‑1864.
rial reduction in root canal‑treated teeth with apical perio‑ 102. Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, et al.: Effects of three ni‑
dontitis. J Endod 2017; 43:1058‑1063. ckel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry
83. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root ca‑ assessed by micro‑computed tomography. Int Endod J 2015;
nal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005; 48:162‑170.
10:123‑147. 103. Limoeiro AGS, Dos Santos AH, De Martin AS, et al.: Mi‑
84. Rollison S, Barnett F, Stevens RH: Efficacy of bacterial remo‑ cro‑computed tomographic evaluation of 2 nickel‑titanium
val from instrumented root canals in vitro related to instru‑ instrument systems in shaping root canals. J Endod 2016;
mentation technique and size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑ 42:496‑499.
thol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94:366‑371. 104. Alves FR, Andrade‑Junior CV, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.:
85. Mickel AK, Chogle S, Liddle J, et al.: The role of apical size Adjunctive steps for disinfection of the mandibular molar
determination and enlargement in the reduction of intraca‑ root canal system: a correlative bacteriologic, micro‑compu‑
nal bacteria. J Endod 2007; 33:21‑23. ted tomography, and cryopulverization approach. J Endod
86. Card SJ, Sigurdsson A, Orstavik D, et al.: The effectiveness of 2016; 42:1667‑1672.
increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacte‑ 105. Siqueira JF, Jr., Perez AR, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.:
ria. J Endod 2002; 28:779‑783. What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a corre‑
87. Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, et al.: Reduction of lative analysis using micro‑computed tomography and
intracanal bacteria using nickel‑titanium rotary instrumenta‑ histology/scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J
tion and various medications. J Endod 2000; 26:751‑755. 2018;51(5):501‑508.
88. Usman N, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG: Influence of ins‑ 106. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, et al.: ProTaper ro‑
trument size on root canal debridement. J Endod 2004; tary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on fi‑
30:110‑112. nal shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 2003; 36:86‑92.
89. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG: Evaluation of api‑ 107. Paque F, Barbakow F, Peters OA: Root canal preparation with
cal debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile Endo‑Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by mi‑
GT files. J Endod 2004; 30:425‑428. cro‑computed tomography. Int Endod J 2005; 38:456‑464.
90. Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B, et al.: The effect of api‑ 108. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, et al.: Micro‑computed tomogra‑
cal preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated phy evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root ca‑
using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int nals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files,
Endod J 2010;43(10):874‑881. and K3 instruments. J Endod 2013; 39:385‑388.
91. Saini HR, Tewari S, Sangwan P, et al.: Effect of different 109. De‑Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, et al.: Micro‑CT eva‑
apical preparation sizes on outcome of primary endodon‑ luation of non‑instrumented canal areas with different en‑
tic treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod 2012; largements performed by NiTi systems. Braz Dent J 2015;
38:1309‑1315. 26:624‑629.
92. Aminoshariae A, Kulild JC: Master apical file size – smaller or 110. Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa‑Neto MD, et al.: Evalua‑
larger: a systematic review of healing outcomes. Int Endod J tion of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTa‑
2015; 48:639‑647. per NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. J En‑
93. Paqué F, Zehnder M, De‑Deus G: Microtomography‑based dod 2015; 41:1718‑1724.
comparison of reciprocating single‑file F2 ProTaper techni‑ 111. Brasil SC, Marceliano‑Alves MF, Marques ML, et al.: Canal
que versus rotary full sequence. J Endod 2011; 37:1394‑1397. transportation, unprepared areas, and dentin removal after
94. Markvart M, Darvann TA, Larsen P, et al.: Micro‑CT analyses preparation with bt‑race and protaper next systems. J En‑
of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity. Int dod 2017; 43:1683‑1687.
Endod J 2012; 45:273‑281. 112. Duque JA, Vivan RR, Cavenago BC, et al.: Influence of NiTi
95. Siqueira JF, Jr., Alves FR, Versiani MA, et al.: Correlative bacte‑ alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper
riologic and micro‑computed tomographic analysis of mandi‑ Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems. J
bular molar mesial canals prepared by self‑adjusting file, Re‑ Appl Oral Sci 2017; 25:27‑33.
ciproc, and Twisted File systems. J Endod 2013; 39:1044‑1050. 113. Paqué F, Balmer M, Attin T, et al.: Preparation of oval‑sha‑
96. Peters OA, Arias A, Paque F: A micro‑computed tomographic ped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel‑titanium
assessment of root canal preparation with a novel instrument, rotary instruments: a micro‑computed tomography study. J
TRUShape, in mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod Endod 2010; 36:703‑707.
2015; 41:1545‑1550. 114. Busquim S, Cunha RS, Freire L, et al.: A micro‑compu‑
97. Peters OA, Schönenberger K, Laib A: Effects of four Ni‑Ti ted tomography evaluation of long‑oval canal preparation
preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by using reciprocating or rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015;
micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 2001; 34:221‑230. 48:1001‑1006.
98. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, et al.: Changes in root canal 115. Versiani MA, Pécora JD, de Sousa‑Neto MD: Flat‑oval root
geometry after preparation assessed by high‑resolution com‑ canal preparation with self‑adjusting file instrument: a mi‑
puted tomography. J Endod 2001; 27:1‑6. cro‑computed tomography study. J Endod 2011; 37:1002‑1007.
48 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

116. Peters OA, Paqué F: Root canal preparation of maxillary 135. Yared G: Canal preparation using only one Ni‑Ti rotary
molars with the self‑adjusting file: a micro‑computed tomo‑ instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008;
graphy study. J Endod 2011; 37:53‑57. 41:339‑344.
117. Paqué F, Peters OA: Micro‑computed tomography evaluation 136. Marinho AC, Martinho FC, Gonçalves LM, et al.: Does the Re‑
of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular ciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effec‑
molars with the self‑adjusting file. J Endod 2011; 37:517‑521. tively as multifile rotary systems? Int Endod J 2015; 48:542‑548.
118. Stavileci M, Hoxha V, Gorduysus O, et al.: Evaluation of 137. Machado ME, Nabeshima CK, Leonardo MF, et al.: Influen‑
root canal preparation using rotary system and hand ins‑ ce of reciprocating single‑file and rotary instrumentation
truments assessed by micro‑computed tomography. Med Sci on bacterial reduction on infected root canals. Int Endod J
Monit Basic Res 2015; 21:123‑130. 2013; 46:1083‑1087.
119. Coelho BS, Amaral RO, Leonardi DP, et al.: Performance of 138. Alves FR, Rôças IN, Almeida BM, et al.: Quantitative mo‑
three single instrument systems in the preparation of long lecular and culture analyses of bacterial elimination in
oval canals. Braz Dent J 2016; 27:217‑222. oval‑shaped root canals by a single‑file instrumentation te‑
120. Espir CG, Nascimento‑Mendes CA, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru chnique. Int Endod J 2012; 45:871‑877.
JM, et al.: Counterclockwise or clockwise reciprocating mo‑ 139. Nakamura VC, Candeiro GT, Cai S, et al.: Ex vivo evaluation
tion for oval root canal preparation: a micro‑CT analysis. Int of three instrumentation techniques on E. faecalis biofilm
Endod J 2018;51(5):541‑548. within oval shaped root canals. Braz Oral Res 2015; p. 29.
121. Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, et al.: Micro‑CT assess‑ 140. Basmaci F, Oztan MD, Kiyan M: Ex vivo evaluation of va‑
ment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation rious instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing
systems in oval‑shaped canals. Int Endod J 2018;51(5):564‑571. E. faecalis within root canals. Int Endod J 2013; 46:823‑830.
122. Guimarães LS, Gomes CC, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: Pre‑ 141. Martinho FC, Freitas LF, Nascimento GG, et al.: Endodontic
paration of oval‑shaped canals with TRUShape and Reci‑ retreatment: clinical comparison of reciprocating systems
proc systems: a micro‑computed tomography study using versus rotary system in disinfecting root canals. Clin Oral
contralateral premolars. J Endod 2017; 43:1018‑1022. Investig 2015; 19:1411‑1417.
123. Arias A, Paque F, Shyn S, et al.: Effect of canal preparation 142. Martinho FC, Gomes AP, Fernandes AM, et al.: Clinical
with TRUShape and Vortex rotary instruments on three‑di‑ comparison of the effectiveness of single‑file reciprocating
mensional geometry of oval root canals. Aust Endod J 2018 systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and
Apr;44(1):32‑39. cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals. J En‑
124. Lacerda M, Marceliano‑Alves MF, Perez AR, et al.: Cleaning dod 2014; 40:625‑629.
and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: a 143. Neves MA, Provenzano JC, Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antibac‑
correlative micro‑computed tomographic and histologic terial effectiveness of root canal preparation with recipro‑
study. J Endod 2017; 43(11):1878‑1884. cating single‑instrument or continuously rotating multi‑ins‑
125. Siqueira JF, Jr., Perez AR, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: What trument systems. J Endod 2016; 42:25‑29.
happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analy‑ 144. Cavalli D, Toia CC, Flores Orozco EI, et al.: Effectiveness in
sis using micro‑computed tomography and histology/scan‑ the removal of endotoxins and microbiological profile in
ning electron microscopy. International Endodontic Jour‑ primary endodontic infections using 3 different instrumen‑
nal (in press) 2017. tation systems: a randomized clinical study. J Endod 2017;
126. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Bate AL, et al.: Histologic inves‑ 43:1237‑1245.
tigation of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodonti‑ 145. De‑Deus G, Souza EM, Barino B, et al.: The self‑adjusting
tis: a retrospective study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod file optimizes debridement quality in oval‑shaped root ca‑
2009; 35:493‑502. nals. J Endod 2011; 37:701‑705.
127. Pérez AR, Alves FRF, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: Effects of 146. Siqueira JF, Jr, Alves FR, Almeida BM, et al.: Ability of che‑
increased apical enlargement on the amount of unprepa‑ momechanical preparation with either rotary instruments
red areas and coronal dentine removal: a micro‑computed or self‑adjusting file to disinfect oval‑shaped root canals. J
tomography study. Int Endod J 2018; 51:684‑690. Endod 2010; 36:1860‑1865.
128. Wu MK, R’Oris A, Barkis D, et al.: Prevalence and extent 147. Ribeiro MVM, Silva‑Sousa YT, Versiani MA, et al.: Compari‑
of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med son of the cleaning efficacy of self‑adjusting file and rotary
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:739‑743. systems in the apical third of oval‑shaped canals. J Endod
129. Kerekes K, Tronstad L: Morphometric observations on the 2013; 39:398‑401.
root canals of human molars. J Endod 1977; 3:114‑118. 148. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R, et al.: The self‑adjus‑
130. Kerekes K, Tronstad L: Morphometric observations on root ting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer
canals of human premolars. J Endod 1977; 3:74‑79. – A scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010; 36:
131. Kerekes K, Tronstad L: Morphometric observations on root 697‑702.
canals of human anterior teeth. J Endod 1977; 3:24‑29. 149. Neves MA, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Clinical antibacterial
132. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Santos SR, et al.: Efficacy of instru‑ effectiveness of the self‑adjusting file system. Int Endod J
mentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing 2013.
the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod 2002; 150. Rodrigues RC, Antunes HS, Neves MA, et al.: Infection con‑
28:181‑184. trol in retreatment cases: in vivo antibacterial effects of 2
133. Chuste‑Guillot M‑P, Badet C, Peli J‑F, et al.: Effect of three instrumentation systems. J Endod 2015; 41:1600‑1605.
nickel‑titanium rotary file techniques on infected root den‑ 151. Alves FRF, Paiva PL, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: Bacteria
tin reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol and hard tissue debris extrusion and intracanal bacterial re‑
Endod 2006; 102:254‑258. duction promoted by XP‑endo Shaper and Reciproc instru‑
134. Rôças IN, Lima KC, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Reduction in bacterial ments. J Endod 2018; 44:1173‑1178.
counts in infected root canals after rotary or hand nickel‑ti‑ 152. Stewart GG: Importance of chemomechanical preparation
tanium instrumentation – a clinical study. Int Endod J 2013; of the root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1955;
46:681‑687. 8:993‑997.
Capítulo 9   |   Referências Bibliográficas 49

153. Auerbach MB: Antibiotics vs. instrumentation in endodon‑ 171. Rôças IN, Provenzano JC, Neves MA, et al.: Disinfecting
tics. N Y State Dent J 1953; 19:225‑228. effects of rotary instrumentation with either 2.5% sodium
154. Byström A, Sundqvist G: Bacteriologic evaluation of the hypochlorite or 2% chlorhexidine as the main irrigant: a
effect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic randomized clinical study. J Endod 2016; 42:943‑947.
therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983; 55:307‑312. 172. Siqueira JF, Jr, da Silva CH, Cerqueira MD, et al.: Effective‑
155. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Chemomechanical ness of four chemical solutions in eliminating Bacillus sub-
reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after tilis spores on gutta‑percha cones. Endod Dent Traumatol
instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% 1998; 14:124‑126.
sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2000; 26:331‑334. 173. Senia ES, Marraro RV, Mitchell JL, et al.: Rapid sterilization
156. Brito PR, Souza LC, Machado de Oliveira JC, et al.: Compa‑ of gutta‑percha cones with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J
rison of the effectiveness of three irrigation techniques in Endod 1975; 1:136‑140.
reducing intracanal Enterococcus faecalis populations: an 174. Dychdala GR: Chlorine and chlorine compounds. In Block
in vitro study. J Endod 2009; 35:1422‑1427. SS, editor: Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. 4th
157. Siqueira JF, Jr, Guimarães‑Pinto T, Rôças IN: Effects of chemo‑ ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991:133‑150.
mechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 175. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, et al.: Mechanism of ac‑
intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide on cultivable tion of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J 2002; 13:113‑117.
bacteria in infected root canals. J Endod 2007; 33:800‑805. 176. Chavez de Paz LE, Bergenholtz G, Svensater G: The effects
158. Byström A, Sundqvist G: The antibacterial action of sodium of antimicrobials on endodontic biofilm bacteria. J Endod
hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. 2010; 36: 70‑77.
Int Endod J 1985; 18:35‑40. 177. Arias‑Moliz MT, Ferrer‑Luque CM, Espigares‑Garcia M, et
159. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, et al.: The antimicrobial al.: Enterococcus faecalis biofilms eradication by root canal
effect of calcium hydroxide as a short‑term intracanal dres‑ irrigants. J Endod 2009; 35:711‑714.
sing. Int Endod J 1991; 24:119‑125. 178. Tawakoli PN, Ragnarsson KT, Rechenberg DK, et al.: Effect
160. Kvist T, Molander A, Dahlen G, et al.: Microbiological eva‑ of endodontic irrigants on biofilm matrix polysaccharides.
luation of one‑ and two‑visit endodontic treatment of teeth Int Endod J 2017; 50:153‑160.
with apical periodontitis: a randomized, clinical trial. J En‑ 179. Behrents KT, Speer ML, Noujeim M: Sodium hypochlorite
dod 2004; 30:572‑576. accident with evaluation by cone beam computed tomogra‑
161. McGurkin‑Smith R, Trope M, Caplan D, et al.: Reduction of phy. Int Endod J 2012; 45:492‑498.
intracanal bacteria using GT rotary instrumentation, 5.25% 180. Ehrich DG, Brian JD, Jr., Walker WA: Sodium hypochlori‑
NaOCl, EDTA, and Ca(OH)2. J Endod 2005; 31:359‑363. te accident: inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J
162. Paquette L, Legner M, Fillery ED, et al.: Antibacterial effi‑ Endod 1993; 19:180‑182.
cacy of chlorhexidine gluconate intracanal medication in 181. Becker GL, Cohen S, Borer RE: The sequelae of acciden‑
vivo. J Endod 2007; 33:788‑795. tally injecting sodium hypochlorite beyond the root apex.
163. Siqueira JF, Jr, Magalhães KM, Rôças IN: Bacterial reduction Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;
in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irri‑ 38:633‑638.
gant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlo‑ 182. Sabala CL, Powell SE: Sodium hypochlorite injection into
rophenol paste as an intracanal dressing. J Endod 2007; periapical tissues. J Endod 1989; 15:490‑492.
33:667‑672. 183. Siqueira JF, Jr, Batista MM, Fraga RC, et al.: Antibacte‑
164. Siqueira JF, Jr, Paiva SS, Rôças IN: Reduction in the culti‑ rial effects of endodontic irrigants on black‑pigmented
vable bacterial populations in infected root canals by a gram‑negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod
chlorhexidine‑based antimicrobial protocol. J Endod 2007; 1998; 24:414‑416.
33:541‑547. 184. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR: Efficacy of several concentra‑
165. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Paiva SS, et al.: Bacteriologic inves‑ tions of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J En‑
tigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhe‑ dod 1992; 18:605‑612.
xidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical 185. Verma N, Sangwan P, Tewari S, et al.: Effect of different con‑
periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol centrations of sodium hypochlorite on outcome of primary
Endod 2007; 104:122‑130. root canal treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J En‑
166. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Bacterial re‑ dod 2019; 45:357‑363.
duction and persistence after endodontic treatment proce‑ 186. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, et al.: In vivo
dures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:19‑23. antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root ca‑
167. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Identification of bacteria endu‑ nal irrigating solution. J Endod 1999; 25:167‑171.
ring endodontic treatment procedures by a combined re‑ 187. Ercan E, Ozekinci T, Atakul F, et al.: Antibacterial activity of
verse transcriptase‑polymerase chain reaction and rever‑ 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite
se‑capture checkerboard approach. J Endod 2010; 36:45‑52. in infected root canal: in vivo study. J Endod 2004; 30:84‑87.
168. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Comparison of the in vivo antimi‑ 188. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Gomes BP, et al.: In vivo evaluation of
crobial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexi‑ microbial reduction after chemo‑mechanical preparation
dine used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology of human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue. Int
study. J Endod 2011; 37:143‑150. Endod J 2006; 39:484‑492.
169. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: In vivo antimicrobial effects of en‑ 189. Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, et al.: Clinical efficiency of
dodontic treatment procedures as assessed by molecular 2% chlorhexidine gel in reducing intracanal bacteria. J En‑
microbiologic techniques. J Endod 2011; 37:304‑310. dod 2007; 33:1283‑1289.
170. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Supplementing 190. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Conrads G, et al.: Effect of root canal
the antimicrobial effects of chemomechanical debride‑ procedures on endotoxins and endodontic pathogens. Oral
ment with either passive ultrasonic irrigation or a final Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:411‑418.
rinse with chlorhexidine: a clinical study. J Endod 2012; 191. Zandi H, Rodrigues RC, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Antibacte‑
38:1202‑1206. rial effectiveness of 2 root canal irrigants in root‑filled teeth
50 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

with infection: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2016; 209. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Clinical implications and micro‑
42:1307‑1313. biology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures.
192. Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Ørstavik D, et al.: Microbial J Endod 2008; 34:1291‑1301 e1293.
analysis of endodontic infections in root‑filled teeth with 210. Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, et al.: Influence of re‑
apical periodontitis before and after irrigation using pyro‑ sidual bacteria on periapical tissue healing after chemome‑
sequencing. J Endod 2018; 44: 372‑378. chanical treatment and root filling of experimentally infec‑
193. Trope M: Flare‑up rate of single‑visit endodontics. Int En‑ ted monkey teeth. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114:278‑285.
dod J 1991; 24:24‑26. 211. Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, et al.: Clinical efficacy
194. Fava LRG: A comparison of one versus two appointment en‑ of treatment procedures in endodontic infection control
dodontic therapy in teeth with non‑vital pulps. Int Endod J and one year follow‑up of periapical healing. J Endod 2005;
1989; 22:179‑183. 31:863‑866.
195. Yoldas O, Topuz A, Isci AS, et al.: Postoperative pain after 212. Heling B, Shapira J: Roentgenologic and clinical evaluation
endodontic retreatment: single‑ versus two‑visit treatment. of endodontically treated teeth with or without negative cul‑
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; ture Quintessence International 1978; 11:79‑84.
98:483‑487. 213. Engström B, Hard AF, Segerstad L, et al.: Correlation of po‑
196. Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M: Radiographic eva‑ sitive cultures with the prognosis for root canal treatment.
luation of periapical healing after obturation of infected Odontol Revy 1964; 15:257‑270.
root canals: an in vivo study. Int Endod J 2000; 33:60‑66. 214. Huffaker SK, Safavi K, Spångberg LS, et al.: Influence of a
197. Holland R, Otoboni Filho JA, de Souza V, et al.: A com‑ passive sonic irrigation system on the elimination of bacte‑
parison of one versus two appointment endodontic thera‑ ria from root canal systems: a clinical study. J Endod 2010;
py in dogs’ teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2003; 36:1315‑1318.
29:121‑124. 215. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antimicro‑
198. Leonardo MR, Hernandez ME, Silva LA, et al.: Effect of a bial efficacy of NiTi rotary instrumentation with NaOCl irri‑
calcium hydroxide‑based root canal dressing on periapi‑ gation, final rinse with chlorhexidine and interappointment
cal repair in dogs: a histological study. Oral Surg Oral Med medication: a molecular study. Int Endod J 2013; 46:225‑233.
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:680‑685. 216. Vera J, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: One‑ versus two‑visit
199. Silveira AM, Lopes HP, Siqueira JF, Jr, et al.: Periradicular endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a
repair after two‑visit endodontic treatment using two diffe‑ histobacteriologic study. J Endod 2012; 38:1040‑1052.
rent intracanal medications compared to single‑visit endo‑ 217. Evans GE, Speight PM, Gulabivala K: The influence of pre‑
dontic treatment. Braz Dent J 2007; 18:299‑304. paration technique and sodium hypochlorite on removal of
200. Friedman S, Lost C, Zarrabian M, et al.: Evaluation of suc‑ pulp and predentine from root canals of posterior teeth. Int
cess and failure after endodontic therapy using a glass iono‑ Endod J 2001; 34:322‑330.
mer cement sealer. J Endod 1995; 21:384‑390. 218. Walton RE: Histologic evaluation of different methods of
201. Molander A, Warfvinge J, Reit C, et al.: Clinical and ra‑ enlarging the pulp canal space. J Endod 1976; 2:304‑311.
diographic evaluation of one‑ and two‑visit endodontic 219. Zuolo ML, Walton RE, Imura N: Histologic evaluation of
treatment of asymptomatic necrotic teeth with apical pe‑ three endodontic instrument/preparation techniques. En‑
riodontitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2007; 33: dod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:125‑129.
1145‑1148. 220. Barbizam JV, Fariniuk LF, Marchesan MA, et al.: Effective‑
202. Penesis VA, Fitzgerald PI, Fayad MI, et al.: Outcome of ness of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for
one‑visit and two‑visit endodontic treatment of necrotic te‑ cleaning flattened root canals. J Endod 2002; 28:365‑366.
eth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial 221. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Exuberant biofilm in‑
with one‑year evaluation. J Endod 2008; 34:251‑257. fection in a lateral canal as the cause of short‑term endo‑
203. Paredes‑Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ: Success rate of single‑ ver‑ dontic treatment failure: report of a case. J Endod 2013;
sus two‑visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical pe‑ 39:712‑718.
riodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod 2012; 222. Arnold M, Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Infection in a com‑
38:1164‑1169. plex network of apical ramifications as the cause of per‑
204. Peters LB, Wesselink PR: Periapical healing of endodonti‑ sistent apical periodontitis: a case report. J Endod 2013;
cally treated teeth in one and two visits obturated in the pre‑ 39:1179‑1184.
sence or absence of detectable microorganisms. Int Endod 223. Vieira AR, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: Dentinal tubu‑
J 2002; 35:660‑667. le infection as the cause of recurrent disease and late en‑
205. Weiger R, Rosendahl R, Lost C: Influence of calcium hydro‑ dodontic treatment failure: a case report. J Endod 2012;
xide intracanal dressings on the prognosis of teeth with en‑ 38:250‑254.
dodontically induced periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2000; 224. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Apical actinomycosis as a conti‑
33:219‑226. nuum of intraradicular and extraradicular infection: case
206. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer HH: Effectiveness of single‑ report and critical review on its involvement with treatment
versus multiple‑visit endodontic treatment of teeth with api‑ failure. J Endod 2008; 34:1124‑1129.
cal periodontitis: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Int 225. Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, et al.: Ultrastructu‑
Endod J 2005; 38:347‑355. ral examination of failed molar retreatment with seconda‑
207. Su Y, Wang C, Ye L: Healing rate and post‑obturation pain ry apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic bio‑
of single‑ versus multiple‑visit endodontic treatment for films in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 2009;
infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod 2011; 35:1303‑1309.
37:125‑132. 226. Leonardo MR, Almeida WA, Ito IY, et al.: Radiographic and
208. Siqueira JF, Jr: Microbiology of apical periodontitis. In microbiologic evaluation of posttreatment apical and peria‑
Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential endodontology. pical repair of root canals of dogs’ teeth with experimen‑
2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard Ltd; 2008: tally induced chronic lesion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
135‑196. thol 1994; 78:232‑238.
Capítulo 9   |   Referências Bibliográficas 51

227. Holland R, Soares IJ, Soares IM: Influence of irrigation 247. Peciuliene V, Balciuniene I, Eriksen HM, et al.: Isolation of
and intracanal dressing on the healing process of dogs’ te‑ Enterococcus faecalis in previously root‑filled canals in a Li‑
eth with apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; thuanian population. J Endod 2000; 26:593‑595.
8:223‑229. 248. Rôças IN, Hülsmann M, Siqueira JF, Jr: Microorganisms in
228. Hermann BW: Calciumhydroxyd als mittel zum behandeln root canal‑treated teeth from a German population. J En‑
und füllen von zahnwurzelkanälen. Würzburg, Med. Diss., dod 2008; 34:926‑931.
1920; 48 p. 249. Waltimo TM, Ørstavik D, Siren EK, et al.: In vitro susceptibi‑
229. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP: Mechanisms of antimicrobial ac‑ lity of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their com‑
tivity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int Endod J binations. Int Endod J 1999; 32:421‑429.
1999; 32:361‑369. 250. Atlas RM: Principles of microbiology. 2nd ed. Dubuque,
230. Portenier I, Haapasalo H, Rye A, et al.: Inactivation of root USA: WCB Publishers, 1997.
canal medicaments by dentine, hydroxylapatite and bovine 251. Padan E, Zilberstein D, Schuldiner S: pH homeostasis in
serum albumin. Int Endod J 2001; 34:184‑188. bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981; 650:151‑166.
252. Booth IR: Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Micro‑
231. Haapasalo HK, Siren EK, Waltimo TM, et al.: Inactivation of
biol Rev 1985; 49:359‑378.
local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study.
253. Frank AL: Therapy for the divergent pulpless tooth by con‑
Int Endod J 2000; 33:126‑131.
tinued apical formation. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 72:87‑93.
232. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M: Disinfection by calcium hydroxi‑
254. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Elimination of
de pastes of dentinal tubules infected with two obligate and
Candida albicans infection of the radicular dentin by intra‑
one facultative anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 1996; 22:674‑676.
canal medications. J Endod 2003; 29:501‑504.
233. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M: Intracanal medicaments: eva‑ 255. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Magalhaes FA, et al.: Antifungal
luation of the antibacterial effects of chlorhexidine, metro‑ effects of endodontic medicaments. Aust Endod J 2001;
nidazole, and calcium hydroxide associated with three vehi‑ 27:112‑114.
cles. J Endod 1997; 23:167‑169. 256. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M: Influence of different vehicles
234. Wang JD, Hume WR: Diffusion of hydrogen ion and hydro‑ on the antibacterial effects of calcium hydroxide. J Endod
xyl ion from various sources through dentine. Int Endod J 1998; 24:663‑665.
1988; 21:17‑26. 257. Oliveira JC, Alves FR, Uzeda M, et al.: Influence of serum
235. Haapasalo M, Qian W, Portenier I, et al.: Effects of den‑ and necrotic soft tissue on the antimicrobial effects of intra‑
tin on the antimicrobial properties of endodontic medica‑ canal medicaments. Braz Dent J 2010; 21:295‑300.
ments. J Endod 2007; 33:917‑925. 258. Holland R, Souza V, Nery MJ, et al.: A histological study of
236. Estrela C, Pimenta FC, Ito IY, et al.: Antimicrobial evalua‑ the effect of calcium hydroxide in the treatment of pulpless
tion of calcium hydroxide in infected dentinal tubules. J En‑ teeth of dogs. J Brit Endod Soc 1979; 12:15‑23.
dod 1999; 25:416‑418. 259. Grecca FS, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, et al.: Radiographic
237. Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D: In vitro infection and disinfection evaluation of periradicular repair after endodontic treat‑
of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1375‑1379. ment of dog’s teeth with induced periradicular periodonti‑
238. Orstavik D, Haapasalo M: Disinfection by endodontic irri‑ tis. J Endod 2001; 27:610‑612.
gants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tu‑ 260. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M: Recontamination of
bules. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6:142‑149. coronally unsealed root canals medicated with camphora‑
239. Safavi KE, Spångberg LS, Langeland K: Root canal dentinal ted paramonochlorophenol or calcium hydroxide pastes af‑
tubule disinfection. J Endod 1990; 16:207‑210. ter saliva challenge. J Endod 1998; 24:11‑14.
240. Sukawat C, Srisuwan T: A comparison of the antimicrobial effi‑ 261. Torneck CD, Smith JS, Grindall P: Biologic effects of endo‑
cacy of three calcium hydroxide formulations on human den‑ dontic procedures on developing incisor teeth. IV. Effect of
tin infected with Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2002; 28:102‑104. débridement procedures and calcium hydroxide‑campho‑
241. Weiger R, de Lucena J, Decker HE, et al.: Vitality status of rated parachlorophenol paste in the treatment of experi‑
microorganisms in infected human root dentine. Int En‑ mentally induced pulp and periapical disease. Oral Surg
dod J 2002; 35:166‑171. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 35:541‑554.
262. Gahyva SM, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Direct genotoxicity and muta‑
242. Abdulkader A, Duguid R, Saunders EM: The antimicrobial
genicity of endodontic substances and materials as evalu‑
activity of endodontic sealers to anaerobic bacteria. Int En‑
ated by two prokaryotic test systems. J Appl Oral Sci 2005;
dod J 1996; 29:280‑283.
13:387‑392.
243. DiFiore PM, Peters DD, Setterstrom JA, et al.: The antibac‑
263. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Incidence of posto‑
terial effects of calcium hydroxide apexification pastes on
perative pain after intracanal procedures based on an anti‑
Streptococcus sanguis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
microbial strategy. J Endod 2002; 28:457‑460.
1983; 55:91‑94. 264. Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Waltimo TM, et al.: In vitro an‑
244. Barbosa CA, Goncalves RB, Siqueira JF Jr, et al.: Evaluation tibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with
of the antibacterial activities of calcium hydroxide, chlorhe‑ chlorhexidine or iodine potassium iodide on Enterococcus fa-
xidine, and camphorated paramonochlorophenol as intra‑ ecalis. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112:326‑331.
canal medicament. A clinical and laboratory study. J Endod 265. Evans MD, Baumgartner JC, Khemaleelakul SU, et al.: Effi‑
1997; 23:297‑300. cacy of calcium hydroxide: chlorhexidine paste as an intraca‑
245. Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Molven O: Effects of extensive apical nal medication in bovine dentin. J Endod 2003; 29:338‑339.
reaming and calcium hydroxide dressing on bacterial infec‑ 266. Podbielski A, Spahr A, Haller B: Additive antimicrobial ac‑
tion during treatment of apical periodontitis: a pilot study. tivity of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on common
Int Endod J 1991; 24:1‑7. endodontic bacterial pathogens. J Endod 2003; 29:340‑345.
246. Reit C, Dahlen G: Decision making analysis of endodontic 267. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Sena NT, et al.: In vitro evaluation
treatment strategies in teeth with apical periodontitis. Int of the antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide combi‑
Endod J 1988; 21:291‑299. ned with chlorhexidine gel used as intracanal medicament.
52 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 288. De‑Deus G, Murad C, Paciornik S, et al.: The effect of the
102:544‑550. canal‑filled area on the bacterial leakage of oval‑shaped ca‑
268. Gomes BP, Souza SF, Ferraz CC, et al.: Effectiveness of 2% nals. Int Endod J 2008; 41:183‑190.
chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide against Enterococ- 289. Brosco VH, Bernardineli N, Torres SA, et al.: Bacterial le‑
cus faecalis in bovine root dentine in vitro. Int Endod J 2003; akage in root canals obturated by different techniques. Part
36:267‑275. 1: microbiologic evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
269. Provenzano JC, Pereira OLS, Magalhães FAC, et al.: Eficácia thol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105:e48‑53.
antimicrobiana de diferentes medicamentos intracanais so‑ 290. Pitout E, Oberholzer TG, Blignaut E, et al.: Coronal leakage
bre Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans e Actinomyces radici- of teeth root‑filled with gutta‑percha or Resilon root canal
dentis. Rev Bras Odontol 2007; 64:13‑16. filling material. J Endod 2006; 32:879‑881.
270. Manzur A, Gonzalez AM, Pozos A, et al.: Bacterial quanti‑ 291. Saleh IM, Ruyter IE, Haapasalo M, et al.: Bacterial pene‑
fication in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instru‑ tration along different root canal filling materials in the
mentation and different intracanal medications: a randomi‑ presence or absence of smear layer. Int Endod J 2008;
zed clinical trial. J Endod 2007; 33:114‑118. 41:32‑40.
271. Zerella JA, Fouad AF, Spångberg LS: Effectiveness of a cal‑ 292. Fransen JN, He J, Glickman GN, et al.: Comparative assess‑
cium hydroxide and chlorhexidine digluconate mixture as ment of ActiV GP/glass ionomer sealer, Resilon/Epiphany,
disinfectant during retreatment of failed endodontic cases. and gutta‑percha/AH plus obturation: a bacterial leakage
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; study. J Endod 2008; 34:725‑727.
100:756‑761. 293. Peters OA, Barbakow F, Peters CI: An analysis of endodontic
272. Moorer WR, Genet JM: Evidence for antibacterial activity of treatment with three nickel‑titanium rotary root canal pre‑
endodontic gutta‑percha cones. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral paration techniques. Int Endod J 2004; 37:849‑859.
Pathol 1982; 53:503‑507. 294. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Fate of the tissue in lateral canals
273. Moorer WR, Genet JM: Antibacterial activity of gutta‑percha and apical ramifications in response to pathologic condi‑
cones attributed to the zinc oxide component. Oral Surg tions and treatment procedures. J Endod 2010; 36:1‑15.
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53:508‑517. 295. Jeansonne MJ, White RR: A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexi‑
274. al‑Khatib ZZ, Baum RH, Morse DR, et al.: The antimicrobial dine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimi‑
effect of various endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med crobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994; 20:276‑278.
Oral Pathol 1990; 70:784‑790. 296. Naenni N, Thoma K, Zehnder M: Soft tissue dissolution ca‑
275. Siqueira JF, Jr, Favieri A, Gahyva SM, et al.: Antimicrobial ac‑ pacity of currently used and potential endodontic irrigants.
tivity and flow rate of newer and established root canal sea‑ J Endod 2004; 30:785‑787.
lers. J Endod 2000; 26:274‑277. 297. Grossman LI, Meinam BW: Solution of pulp tissue by che‑
276. Siqueira JF, Jr, Gonçalves RB: Antibacterial activities of root mical agent. J Am Dent Assoc 1941; 28:223‑225.
canal sealers against selected anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 298. Jungbluth H, Marending M, De‑Deus G, et al.: Stabilizing
1996; 22:89‑90. sodium hypochlorite at high pH: effects on soft tissue and
277. Ørstavik D: Antibacterial properties of root canal sealers, dentin. J Endod 2011; 37:693‑696.
cements and pastes. Int Endod J 1981; 14:125‑133. 299. Yang SE, Cha JH, Kim ES, et al.: Effect of smear layer and
278. Zhang H, Shen Y, Ruse ND, et al.: Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine treatment on the adhesion of Enterococcus
endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against faecalis to bovine dentin. J Endod 2006; 32:663‑667.
Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2009; 35:1051‑1055. 300. Basrani B, Santos JM, Tjaderhane L, et al.: Substantive anti‑
279. Barros J, Silva MG, Rodrigues MA, et al.: Antibacterial, phy‑ microbial activity in chlorhexidine‑treated human root den‑
sicochemical and mechanical properties of endodontic se‑ tin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
alers containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine 2002; 94:240‑245.
nanoparticles. Int Endod J 2013. 301. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR: Residual antimicrobial acti‑
280. Sabeti MA, Nekofar M, Motahhary P, et al.: Healing of api‑ vity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod 1997;
cal periodontitis after endodontic treatment with and wi‑ 23:229‑231.
thout obturation in dogs. J Endod 2006; 32:628‑633. 302. Weber CD, McClanahan SB, Miller GA, et al.: The effect of
281. Budd CS, Weller RN, Kulild JC: A comparison of thermo‑ passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 5.25%
plasticized injectable gutta‑percha obturation techniques. J sodium hypochlorite irrigant on residual antimicrobial acti‑
Endod 1991; 17:260‑264. vity in root canals. J Endod 2003; 29:562‑564.
282. Schilder H: Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent 303. Rosenthal S, Spangberg L, Safavi K: Chlorhexidine substan‑
Clin North Am 1967; 11:723‑744. tivity in root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
283. Gutmann JL: Clinical, radiographic, and histologic perspec‑ Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98:488‑492.
tives on success and failure in endodontics. Dent Clin North 304. Lenet BJ, Komorowski R, Wu XY, et al.: Antimicrobial subs‑
Am 1992; 36:379‑392. tantivity of bovine root dentin exposed to different chlorhe‑
284. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Valois CR: Apical sealing ability of xidine delivery vehicles. J Endod 2000; 26:652‑655.
five endodontic sealers. Aust Endod J 2001; 27:33‑35. 305. Komorowski R, Grad H, Wu XY, et al.: Antimicrobial subs‑
285. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Bacterial leakage tantivity of chlorhexidine‑treated bovine root dentin. J En‑
in coronally unsealed root canals obturated with 3 different dod 2000; 26:315‑317.
techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 306. Trope M, Debelian G: Endodontic treatment of apical pe‑
Endod 2000; 90:647‑650. riodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential en‑
286. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Coronal leakage dodontology. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard
of two root canal sealers containing calcium hydroxide after Ltd; 2008:347‑380.
exposure to human saliva. J Endod 1999; 25:14‑16. 307. Basrani BR, Manek S, Mathers D, et al.: Determination of
287. Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M: Human saliva penetration 4‑chloroaniline and its derivatives formed in the interac‑
of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. J Endod 1993; tion of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by using gas
19:458‑461. chromatography. J Endod 2010; 36:312‑314.
Capítulo 9   |   Referências Bibliográficas 53

308. Krishnamurthy S, Sudhakaran S: Evaluation and preven‑ 328. Harrison AJ, Chivatxaranukul P, Parashos P, et al.: The
tion of the precipitate formed on interaction between so‑ effect of ultrasonically activated irrigation on reduction of
dium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2010; Enterococcus faecalis in experimentally infected root canals.
36:1154‑1157. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 968‑977.
309. Zamany A, Safavi K, Spångberg LS: The effect of chlorhe‑ 329. Martin H: Ultrasonic disinfection of the root canal. Oral
xidine as an endodontic disinfectant. Oral Surg Oral Med Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 42:92‑99.
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96:578‑581. 330. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TJ, Crum LA: Ultrasonic debridement
310. Alves FR, Almeida BM, Neves MA, et al.: Disinfecting of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. J En‑
oval‑shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supple‑ dod 1987; 13:490‑499.
mentary approaches. J Endod 2011; 37:496‑501. 331. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA: Ultrasonic debridement
311. Torabinejad M, Shabahang S, Bahjri K: Effect of MTAD on of root canals: an insight into the mechanisms involved. J
postoperative discomfort: a randomized clinical trial. J En‑ Endod 1987; 13:93‑101.
dod 2005; 31:171‑176. 332. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA, et al.: Ultrasonic debri‑
312. Mohammadi Z, Shahriari S: Residual antibacterial activity dement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance.
of chlorhexidine and MTAD in human root dentin in vitro. J Endod 1988; 14:486‑493.
J Oral Sci 2008; 50:63‑67. 333. Liang YH, Jiang LM, Jiang L, et al.: Radiographic healing af‑
313. Malkhassian G, Manzur AJ, Legner M, et al.: Antibacterial ter a root canal treatment performed in single‑rooted teeth
efficacy of MTAD final rinse and two percent chlorhexidine with and without ultrasonic activation of the irrigant: a ran‑
gel medication in teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomi‑ domized controlled trial. J Endod 2013; 39:1218‑1225.
zed double‑blinded clinical trial. J Endod 2009; 35:1483‑1490. 334. Debelian G, Trope M: Cleaning the third dimension. Endo‑
314. Shabahang S, Pouresmail M, Torabinejad M: In vitro anti‑ dontic Practice 2015; 8:22‑24.
microbial efficacy of MTAD and sodium hypochlorite. J En‑ 335. Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Silva‑Sousa YT, et al.: Ex vivo eva‑
dod 2003; 29:450‑452. luation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of
315. Shabahang S, Torabinejad M: Effect of MTAD on Entero‑ hard‑tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of man‑
coccus faecalis‑contaminated root canals of extracted hu‑ dibular first molars. Int Endod J 2017; 50(4):398‑406.
man teeth. J Endod 2003; 29:576‑579. 336. Silva E, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, et al.: Effectiveness of
316. Baumgartner JC, Johal S, Marshall JG: Comparison of the
XP‑endo Finisher and XP‑endo Finisher R in removing
antimicrobial efficacy of 1.3% NaOCl/BioPure MTAD to
root filling remnants: a micro‑CT study. Int Endod J 2018;
5.25% NaOCl/15% EDTA for root canal irrigation. J En‑
51:86‑91.
dod 2007; 33:48‑51.
337. Alves FR, Marceliano‑Alves MF, Sousa JC, et al.: Removal of
317. Ruddle C: Endodontic disinfection – tsunami irrigation.
Root Canal Fillings in Curved Canals Using Either Recipro‑
Endod Practice 2008; 11:7‑15.
cating Single‑ or Rotary Multi‑instrument Systems and a Su‑
318. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, et al.: Passive ultraso‑
pplementary Step with the XP‑Endo Finisher. J Endod 2016;
nic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int
42:1114‑1119.
Endod J 2007; 40:415‑426.
338. Azim AA, Aksel H, Zhuang T, et al.: Efficacy of 4 irrigation
319. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, et al.: Review of contemporary irri‑
protocols in killing bacteria colonized in dentinal tubules
gant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009; 35:
examined by a novel confocal laser scanning microscope
791‑804.
analysis. J Endod 2016; 42(6):928‑934.
320. Weller RN, Brady JM, Bernier WE: Efficacy of ultrasonic cle‑
339. Kimura Y, Wilder‑Smith P, Matsumoto K: Lasers in endo‑
aning. J Endod 1980; 6:740‑743.
321. Huque J, Kota K, Yamaga M, et al.: Bacterial eradication dontics: a review. Int Endod J 2000; 33:173‑185.
from root dentine by ultrasonic irrigation with sodium hy‑ 340. Fegan SE, Steiman HR: Comparative evaluation of the anti‑
pochlorite. Int Endod J 1998; 31:242‑250. bacterial effects of intracanal Nd:YAG laser irradiation: an
322. Siqueira JF, Jr, Machado AG, Silveira RM, et al.: Evaluation in vitro study. J Endod 1995; 21:415‑417.
of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three 341. Azim AA, Aksel H, Zhuang T, et al.: Efficacy of 4 irrigation
irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis protocols in killing bacteria colonized in dentinal tubules
from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J 1997; 30:279‑282. examined by a novel confocal laser scanning microscope
323. Tardivo D, Pommel L, La Scola B, et al.: Antibacterial effi‑ analysis. J Endod 2016; 42:928‑934.
ciency of passive ultrasonic versus sonic irrigation. Ultra‑ 342. Al Shahrani M, DiVito E, Hughes CV, et al.: Enhanced re‑
sonic root canal irrigation. Odontostomatol Trop 2010; moval of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in the root canal
33:29‑35. using sodium hypochlorite plus photon‑induced photoa‑
324. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Molecular micro‑ coustic streaming: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg
biological evaluation of passive ultrasonic activation as a 2014; 32:260‑266.
supplementary disinfecting step: a clinical study. J Endod 343. Olivi G, DiVito E, Peters O, et al.: Disinfection efficacy of
2013; 39:190‑194. photon‑induced photoacoustic streaming on root canals
325. Beus C, Safavi K, Stratton J, et al.: Comparison of the effect infected with Enterococcus faecalis: an ex vivo study. J Am
of two endodontic irrigation protocols on the elimination Dent Assoc 2014; 145:843‑848.
of bacteria from root canal system: a prospective, randomi‑ 344. Soukos NS, Som S, Abernethy AD, et al.: Phototargeting
zed clinical trial. J Endod 2012; 38:1479‑1483. oral black‑pigmented bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemo‑
326. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al.: In vivo debridement ther 2005; 49: 1391‑1396.
efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand‑rotary ins‑ 345. Soukos NS, Socransky SS, Mulholland SE, et al.: Photome‑
trumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 2005; chanical drug delivery into bacterial biofilms. Pharm Res
31:166‑170. 2000; 17:405‑409.
327. Carver K, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al.: In vivo antibacterial 346. Soukos NS, Ximenez‑Fyvie LA, Hamblin MR, et al.: Targe‑
efficacy of ultrasound after hand and rotary instrumentation ted antimicrobial photochemotherapy. Antimicrob Agents
in human mandibular molars. J Endod 2007; 33:1038‑1043. Chemother 1998; 42:2595‑2601.
54 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

347. Jori G, Fabris C, Soncin M, et al.: Photodynamic therapy in 360. Garcez AS, Nunez SC, Hamblin MR, et al.: Antimicrobial
the treatment of microbial infections: basic principles and effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic
perspective applications. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38:468‑481. pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 2008; 34:138‑142.
348. Sigusch BW, Pfitzner A, Albrecht V, et al.: Efficacy of pho‑ 361. Ng R, Singh F, Papamanou DA, et al.: Endodontic photody‑
todynamic therapy on inflammatory signs and two selected namic therapy ex vivo. J Endod 2011; 37:217‑222.
periodontopathogenic species in a beagle dog model. J Pe‑ 362. Shrestha A, Kishen A: Antibiofilm efficacy of photosensiti‑
riodontol 2005; 76:1100‑1105. zer‑functionalized bioactive nanoparticles on multispecies
349. Konopka K, Goslinski T: Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. biofilm. J Endod 2014; 40:1604‑1610.
J Dent Res 2007; 86:694‑707. 363. Shon WJ: Introducing the GentleWave System. Restor Dent
350. Shrestha A, Kishen A: Antibacterial efficacy of photosensiti‑ Endod 2016; 41:235.
zer functionalized biopolymeric nanoparticles in the presen‑ 364. Molina B, Glickman G, Vandrangi P, et al.: Evaluation of
ce of tissue inhibitors in root canal. J Endod 2014; 40:566‑570. Root Canal Debridement of Human Molars Using the Gen‑
351. Pagonis TC, Chen J, Fontana CR, et al.: Nanoparticle‑based tleWave System. J Endod 2015; 41:1701‑1705.
endodontic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. J Endod 365. Sigurdsson A, Garland RW, Le KT, et al.: Healing of Periapi‑
2010; 36: 322‑328. cal Lesions after Endodontic Treatment with the GentleWa‑
352. Shrestha A, Kishen A: Antibacterial Nanoparticles in Endo‑ ve Procedure: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. J
dontics: A Review. J Endod 2016; 42:1417‑1426.
Endod 2018; 44:510‑517.
353. Williams JA, Pearson GJ, Colles MJ: Antibacterial action of
366. Sigurdsson A, Garland RW, Le KT, et al.: 12‑month Healing
photoactivated disinfection (PAD) used on endodontic bac‑
Rates after Endodontic Therapy Using the Novel GentleWa‑
teria in planktonic suspension and in artificial and human
ve System: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. J En‑
root canals. J Dent 2006; 34:363‑371.
dod 2016; 42:1040‑1048.
354. Soukos NS, Chen PS, Morris JT, et al.: Photodynamic thera‑
367. Pallasch TJ: Pharmacokinetic principles of antimicrobial
py for endodontic disinfection. J Endod 2006; 32:979‑984.
therapy. Periodontol 2000 1996; 10:5‑11.
355. Foschi F, Fontana CR, Ruggiero K, et al.: Photodynamic
368. Costerton JW: The biofilm primer. Berlin, Heidelberg:
inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis in dental root canals
in vitro. Lasers Surg Med 2007; 39:782‑787. Springer‑Verlag, 2007.
356. Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Tegos GP, et al.: Antimicrobial pho‑ 369. Baumgartner JC, Xia T: Antibiotic susceptibility of bacte‑
todynamic therapy combined with conventional endodon‑ ria associated with endodontic abscesses. J Endod 2003;
tic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection. La‑ 29:44‑47.
sers Surg Med 2007; 39:59‑66. 370. Kuriyama T, Williams DW, Yanagisawa M, et al.: Antimicro‑
357. Fimple JL, Fontana CR, Foschi F, et al.: Photodynamic tre‑ bial susceptibility of 800 anaerobic isolates from patients
atment of endodontic polymicrobial infection in vitro. J En‑ with dentoalveolar infection to 13 oral antibiotics. Oral Mi‑
dod 2008; 34:728‑734. crobiol Immunol 2007; 22:285‑288.
358. Bergmans L, Moisiadis P, Huybrechts B, et al.: Effect of pho‑ 371. Siqueira JF, Jr, Pérez AR, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: What
to‑activated disinfection on endodontic pathogens ex vivo. happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analy‑
Int Endod J 2008; 41:227‑239. sis using micro‑computed tomography and histology/scan‑
359. Souza LC, Brito PR, de Oliveira JC, et al.: Photodynamic ning electron microscopy. Int Endod J 2018; 51:501‑508.
therapy with two different photosensitizers as a supplement 372. Lacerda M, Marceliano‑Alves MF, Perez AR, et al.: Cleaning
to instrumentation/irrigation procedures in promoting and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: a
intracanal reduction of Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2010; correlative micro‑computed tomographic and histologic
36:292‑296. study. J Endod 2017; 43:1878‑1884.
Ca pí tulo

Instrumentos Endodônticos 10
Hélio P. Lopes | Carlos N. Elias | Márcia V. B. Vieira | Victor T. L. Vieira

Part I: Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod


Referências Bibliográficas J 2003; 36:199‑207.
20. Song YL, Bian Z, Fan B, et al.: A comparison of instrument –
1. Anusavice K: Phillips Materiais Dentários. 11a ed. Rio de Ja‑ centering ability within the root canal for three contemporany
neiro: Elsevier Editora, 2005. instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2004; 37:265‑271.
2. Brocas SKF: Manual de Brocas e furações 83. São Paulo: SKF, 21. Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A: Nickel‑titanium instruments.
1983 Applications in endodontic. St. Louis: Ishiyaku Euroamerica
3. Elias CN, Sendra M, Lopes HP: Corrosão em instrumen‑ Inc., 1995.
tos endodônticos de níquel‑titânio. Rev Paul Odont 2002; 22. Larsen CM, Watanabe I, Glickman GN, et al.: Cyclic fatigue
24:16‑19. analysis of a new generation of nickel‑titanium rotary instru‑
4. American Iron and Steel Institute, Ohio: Chemical Composi‑ ments. J Endod 2009; 35:401‑403.
tions of SAE Wrought Stainless Steel. Jan 1965:11 [Report of 23. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al.: Fatigue resistance
American Iron e Steel. Institute (AISI) and Society of Auto‑ of engine‑driven rotary nickel‑titanium instruments produced
motive Engineers (SAE)]. by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008; 34:1003‑1005.
5. Chiaverini V: Aços e ferros fundidos. 4a ed. São Paulo: Asso‑ 24. Lopes HP, Gambarra‑Soares T, Elias CN, et al.: Comparison
ciação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais, 1979. of the mechanical properties of rotary instruments made of
6. Elias CN, Lopes HP: Materiais dentários – ensaios mecânicos. conventional nickel‑titanium wire, M‑wire or nickel‑titanium
São Paulo: Livraria Santos Editora, 2007. alloy in R‑Phase. J Endod 2013; 39:516‑520.
7. Gentil V: Corrosão. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC Editora Ge‑ 25. Berendt C: Method of preparing Nitinol for use in manufac‑
nelli, 2007. turing instruments with improved fatigue resistance. US Pa‑
8. Callister YRW: Ciência e engenharia de materiais: uma intro‑ tent Application 20070072147, 2007.
dução. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 2002. 26. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, et al.: Mettalurgical cha‑
9. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM: Pathways of the pulp. 9a ed. St Lou‑ racterization of a new nickel‑titanium wire for rotary endo‑
is: Mosby, Inc., 2002. dontic instruments. J Endod 2009; 35:1589‑1593.
10. Ingle JI, Bakland LK: Endodontics. 4a ed. Philadelphia: 27. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, et al.: Comparison between a
Williams & Wilkins, 1994. novel nickel‑titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fati‑
11. Lopes HP, Siqueira Jr JF: Endodontia. Biologia e técnica 3a gue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;
ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Guanabara Koogan, 2010. 34:1406‑1409.
12. Otsuka K, Wayman CM: Shape memory materials. Cambrid‑ 28. Gao Y, Shotton V, Wilkinson K, et al.: Effects of raw material
ge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, cap 1, p. 1‑26. and rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of ProFile Vortex
13. Thompson SA: An overview of nickel‑titanium alloys used in rotary instruments. J Endod 2010; 36:1205‑1209.
dentistry. Int Endod J 2000; 33:297‑310. 29. Vieira VTL, Lopes HP, Elias CN, et al.: Effect of autoclave
14. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al‑Sudani D, et al.: Bending proper‑ cycles on cyclic fatigue resistance of control memory NiTi
ties of a new nickel‑titanium alloy with a lower percent by wei‑ files observed by scanning electron microscopy. Rev Bras
ght of nickel. J Endod 2011; 37:1293‑1295. Odontol 2017; 74:23‑26.
15. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, et al.: Mechani‑ 30. Ninan E, Berzins DW: Torsion and bending properties of sha‑
cal root canal preparation with NiTi rotatory instruments: ra‑ pe memory and superelastic nickel‑titanium Rotary instru‑
tionale, performance and safety. Am J Dent 2001; 14:324‑333. ments. J Endod 2013; 39:101‑104.
16. Coleman CL, Svec TA: Analysis of NiTi versus stainless ste‑ 31. Shen Y, Qian W, Abtin H, et al.: Fatigue testing of control‑
el instrumentation in resin simulated canals. J Endod 1997, led memory wire nickel‑titanium rotary instruments. J Endod
23:232‑235. 2013; 37:997‑1001.
17. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Estrela C, et al.: Influência de limas en‑ 32. Soares RG, Lopes HP, Elias CN, et al.: Comparative study of
dodônticas de NiTi e de aço inoxidável, manuais e acionados the mechanical properties of instruments made of conventio‑
a motor no deslocamento apical. RBO 1997; 50:67‑70. nal, M‑wire, R‑phase, and controlled memory nickel‑titanium
18. Myers GL, Montgomery S: A comparison of weights of debris alloys. ENDO 2017; 11:271‑277.
extruded apically by conventional filling and canal master te‑ 33. Inojosa IAJ, Lopes HP, Pereira PLR, et al.: Fatigue resistance
chniques. J Endod 1991; 17:275‑79. of endodontic instruments manufactured in NiTi CM wire
19. Schäfer E, Florek KH: Efficiency of rotary nickel‑titanium K3 and in conventional alloy with eletrochemical treatment. Rev
instruments compared with stainless steel hand K‑Flexofile. Gaúch Odontol 2018; 66:111‑116.
56 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

34. Silva EJNL, Tinoco JM, Tinoco, et al.: Bending resistance and 56. Koch K, Brave D: Real world endo: design features of rotatory
cyclic fatigue life of a new single‑file reciprocating instrument files and how they affect clinical performance. Oral Health
WaveOne Gold.Eur Endod J 2016; p. 1‑4. 2002; p. 39‑49.
35. De Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, et al.: Blue thermomecha‑ 57. Wildey WL, Senia S, Montgomery S: Another look at root ca‑
nical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of nal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med. Oral Pathol 1992;
the reciproc files.J Endod 2017; 43:462‑466. 74(4):499‑507.
36. Silva EJN, Hecksher F, Antunes HS, et al.: Torsional fatigue 58. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, et al.: Considerações sobre
resistance of blue‑treated reciprocating instruments. J Endod a conicidade e o diâmetro das limas endodônticas. Rev Paul
2018 a; 44:1038‑1041. Odont 1998; 20(2):8‑14.
37. Silva EJN, Vieira VTL, Hecksher F, et al.: Cyclic fatigue using 59. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Mangelli M, et al.: Buckling resistan‑
severely curved canals and torsional resistance of thermally ce of pathfinding endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012;
treated reciprocating instruments. Clin Oral Invest 2018 b; 38:402‑404.
22:2633‑2638. 60. Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G, et al.: The effectiveness
38. Zhou H, Peng B, Zeng YF: An overview of the mechanical of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreat‑
ment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod
properties of nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. Endo‑
2008; 34:466‑469.
dontic Topics 2013; 29:42‑45.
61. Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, et al.: Efficacy of ProTaper Univer‑
39. Shen Y, Cheung GSP: Methods and models to study nickel‑ti‑
sal rotary retreatment system for gutta‑percha removal front
tanium instruments. Endodontic Topics 2013; 29:18‑41.
root canals. Int Endod J 2008; 41:288‑295.
40. Beer FP, Johnston Jr ER: Resistência dos Materiais. 3a ed. São
62. Hulsmann M, Blishm V: Efficacy cleaning ability and safety of
Paulo: Makron Books, 1995.
different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
41. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, et al.: Mechanical beha‑ Int Endo J 2004; 37:468‑476.
vior of pathfinding endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012; 63. Tasdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, et al.: Efficacy of three rotary
38:1417‑1420. NiTi instruments in removing guta‑percha from root canals.
42. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Mangelli M, et al.: Buckling resistance of Int Endod J 2008; 41:191‑196.
pathfinding endodontic instruments. J Endod 38:402‑404. 64. Yared GM, Boudagher FE, Machtou P: Influence of rotatio‑
43. Rodrigues RCV, Lopes HP, Elias CN, et al.: Influence of di‑ nal speed, torque and operator’s proficiency on ProFile failu‑
fferent manufacturing methods on the cyclic fatigue of ro‑ res. Int Endod J 2001; 34:47‑53.
tary nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2011; 65. Lopes HP, Elias CN: Fratura dos instrumentos endodônticos
37:1553‑1557. de NiTi acionados a motor. Fundamentos teóricos e práticos.
44. Diniz AE, Marcondes FC, Coppini NL: Tecnologia da usina‑ RBO 2001; 58:207‑10.
gem dos materiais. 5a ed. São Paulo: Artliber Editora, 2006. 66. Lopes HP, Vieira MVB, Elias CN, et al.: Influence of the geo‑
45. Ferraresi D. Fundamentos da Usinagem dos metais. São Pau‑ metry of curved artificial canals on the fracture of rotary ni‑
lo: Edgard Blücher, 1970. ckel‑titanium instruments subjected to cyclic fatigue tests. J
46. Freire JM. Tecnologia Mecânica – Máquinas de serrar e furar. Endod 2013; 39:704‑707.
Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 1983. 67. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, et al.: Fatigue life of Reci‑
47. Seto BG, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW: Torsional properties proc and Mtwo instruments subjected to static and dynamic
of twisted and machined endodontic files. J Endod 1990; tests. J Endod 2013; 39:693‑96.
16:355‑360. 68. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GSP, et al.: Cyclic fatigue and tor‑
48. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Letra AMG, et al.: Geometria da ponta sional resistance of two new nickel‑titanium instruments used
de instrumentos endodônticos. Estudo crítico. Revista Paulis‑ in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod
ta de Odontologia 2004; 26(6):18‑24. 2012; 38:541‑544.
49. Freitas LMAC: Avaliação de padronização dos instrumentos 69. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Costa Filho AS, et al.: Variação do diâme‑
endodônticos. Vitória 2003. Monografia – Curso de Especia‑ tro do furo em função do diâmetro da broca de Gates‑Glid‑
lização em Endodontia. Faculdade de Odontologia da Uni‑ den. Rev Paul Odont 1993; 15(2):2‑4.
versidade Federal do Espírito Santo. 70. Lopes HP, Costa Filho AS: Contribuição para o estudo de
50. Keate KC, Wong M: A comparison of endodontic file tip qua‑ uma variação de técnicas no preparo biomecânico de canais
lity. J Endod 1990; 16:486‑491. radiculares, utilizando‑se as brocas de Gates e de Largo. RBO
1990; 47(6):16‑22.
51. Letra AMG: Análise morfométrica e avaliação da estandardi‑
71. Eriksson A, Abraktsson T, Grane B, et al.: Thermal injury to
zação de instrumentos endodônticos manuais de aço inoxi‑
bone. A vital microscope description of heat effects. IntJ Oral
dável e níquel‑titânio. Rio de Janeiro 2003. 196p. Dissertação
Sugery 1982; 11:115‑121.
(Mestrado). Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Es‑
72. Eriksson A: Heat induced bone tissue injury. University of Go‑
tadual do Rio de Janeiro.
teborg, Goteborg, Sweden, 1984.
52. Miserendino LJ, Moser JB, Heuer M, et al.: Cutting efficiency
73. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Estrela C, et al.: Medida da temperatura
of endodontic instruments. Part I. A quantitative comparison na superfície radicular durante o preparo biomecânico dos
of the tip and fluted region. J Endod 1985; 11:435‑441. canais. Rev ABO Nac 1996; 4(4):237‑239.
53. Miserendino LJ, Moser JB, Heuer MA, et al.: Cutting effi‑ 74. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF: Defeitos do processo de
ciency of endodontic instruments. Part II. Analysis of tip de‑ fabricação de instrumentos tipo K. Revista Paulista de Odon‑
sign. J Endod 1986; 12:8‑12. tologia 2002; 24(5):4‑7.
54. Zinelis S, Magnissalis EA, Margelos J, et al.: Clinical rele‑ 75. Cetlin PR, Silva PSP, Penna JA: Análise de Fratura. Associação
vance of standardization of endodontic files dimensions Brasileira de Metais, 1988.
according to the ISO 3630‑1 specification. J Endod 2002; 76. Griffith AA: The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids.
28:367‑370. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London 1920;
55. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, et al.: Geometria da has‑ 221A:163‑197.
te helicoidal de instrumentos endodônticos de NiTi aciona‑ 77. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L: Influence of structure on Ni‑
dos a motor. Estudo crítico. Revista Paulista de Odontologia ckel‑Titanium endodontic instruments failure. J Endod 2001;
2006; 28(1):8‑13. 27:516‑20.
Capítulo 10   |   Referências Bibliográficas 57

78. Lopez HF, Calderón H: Plastic straining on the microstruc‑ 84. Seltzer S: Endodontology, Biologic Considerations in Endo‑
ture of a Ti rich NiTi shape memory alloy. Metallurgical and dontic Procedures. 2a ed. St. Louis: Lea & Febiger, 1988.
Materials Transactions 2001; 32A:717‑729. 85. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Costa Filho AS: Avaliação da corrosão de
79. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF: Mecanismo de fratura brocas Gates‑Glidden. RBO 1992; 49(2):32‑35.
dos instrumentos endodônticos. Rev Paul de Odont 2000; 86. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Costa Filho AS: Corrosão em limas endo‑
22:4‑9. dônticas de aço inoxidável. RBO 1994; 51 (1):26‑28.
80. Lopes HP, Elias CN: Fratura das limas endodônticos tipo K. 87. Stokes OW, Di Fiore PM, Barss JT, et al.: Corrosion in stainless
Fundamentos teóricos e práticos. RBO 2001; 58:406‑410. steel and nickel‑titanium files. J Endod 1999; 25:17‑20.
81. Sotokawa T: An analysis of clinical breakage of root canal 88. Edie JW, Andreasen GF, Zaytoun MP: Surface corrosion of ni‑
instruments.J Endod 1988; 14:75‑82. tinol and stainless steel under clinical conditions. Angle Or‑
82. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, et al.: Influence of surface thod1981; 51:319‑329.
roughness on the fatigue life of nickel‑titanium rotary endo‑ 89. Yang HB, Hong WO, Dao CS: The study on applications NiTi
dontic instruments. J Endod 2016; 42:965‑968. shape memory alloyed. Journal of Shanghae Steel Research
83. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, et al.: Influence of the sur‑ 1982; 25:1‑8.
face roughness on the torsional resistance of nickel‑titanium 90. Sarkar NK, Redmond W, Schwaninger B, et al.: The chloride
rotary endodontic instruments. ENDO (Lond Engl) 2017; corrosion behaviour of four orthodontic wires. J Oral Rehabil
11:51‑55. 1983; 10:121‑128.
Ca p ít u l o
Preparo Químico-Mecânico
11 dos Canais Radiculares
Hélio P. Lopes | José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Carlos N. Elias |
Márcia V. B. Vieira

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 2000;
Referências Bibliográficas 89:509‑518.
16. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Silveira CEL, Araujo Filho WR, Siquei‑
1. Schilder H: Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin
ra Jr JF: Extrusão de material do canal via forame apical. Rev
North Am 1974; 18(2):269‑296.
Paul Odont 1997; 19:34‑36.
2. Ingle JI, Bakland LK: Endodontics. 4th ed. Philadelphia –
17. Reddy SA, Hicks ML: Apical extrusion of debris using two
USA: Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J Endod
3. Lopes HP, Siqueira Jr JF: Endodontia. Biologia e Técnica. 3a
1998; 24:180‑183.
ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi – Guanabara Koogan, 2010.
18. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM,
4. Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T: Comparative study on
Oliveira JC, Abad EC: Incidence of postoperative pain after
the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo ins‑
intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J
truments. Parte 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability
Endod 2002; 28: 457‑460.
in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J
19. Koçak S, Koçak MM, Saǧlam BC, Türker AS, Saǧsen B, Er Ö:
2006; 39:203‑212.
Apical extrusion of debris using Self‑Adjusting File, recipro‑
5. Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T: Comparative study on
cating single‑file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J En‑
the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo ins‑
dod 2013; 39: 1278‑1280.
truments. Parte 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
20. Amaral G, Lopes HP, Bonbana AC, Elias CN: Avaliação da ca‑
Int Endod J 2006; 39:196‑202.
6. Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A: Nickel‑titanium instruments pacidade de corte de limas tipo K de aço inoxidável e de ní‑
– applications in endodontics. St. Louis‑USA: Ishiyaku Euroa‑ quel titânio. J Bras Endod 2003; 4:223‑230.
mericana, 1995. 21. Liu R, Li DY: Experimental studies on tribological properties
7. Berutti E, Chiandusi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, of pseudoelastic NiTi alloy with comparison to stainless steel
Castellucci A, Pasqualini D: Canal shaping with WaveOne pri‑ 304. Metallurg Mat Transactions 2000; 31A:2773‑2783.
mary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative 22. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr: Fate of the tissue in lateral canals
study. J Endod 2012; 38: 505‑509. and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions
8. Bürklein S, Schäfer E: Critical evaluation of root canal and treatment procedures. J Endod 2010; 36: 1‑15.
transportation by instrumentation. Endod Top 2013; 29: 23. Schneider SW: A comparison of canal preparations in strai‑
110‑124. ght and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
9. Metzger Z, Solomonov M, Kfir A: The role of mechanical ins‑ 1971; 32:271‑75.
trumentation in the cleaning of root canals. Endod Top 2013; 24. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr: Cyclic fatigue testing of
29: 87‑109. nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997; 23:
10. Haapasalo M, Shen Y: Evolution of nickel‑titanium instru‑ 77‑85.
ments: from past to future. Endod Top 2013; 29: 3‑17. 25. Lopes HP, Vieira MVB, Elias CN, Gonçalves LS, Siqueira Jr JF,
11. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, Siqueira Jr JF, Mangelli M, Moreira EJL, Vieira VTL: Influence of the geometry of cur‑
Lopes WSP, Vieira VTL, Alves FF, Oliveira JCM, Soares TG: ved artificial canals on the fracture of rotary nickel‑titanium
Fatigue life of Reciproc and Mtwo instruments subjected to instruments subjected to cyclic fatigue tests. J Endod 2013;
static and dynamic tests. J Endod 2013; 39: 693‑696. 39: 704‑707.
12. Walton RE: Histologic evaluation of different methods of en‑ 26. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Estrela C, Siqueira Jr JF: Assessment of
larging the pulp space. J Endod 1976; 2:304‑311. the apical transportation of root canals using the method of
13. Barbizam JVB, Fariniuk LF, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD, Sousa the curvature radius. Braz Dent J 1998; 9:39‑45.
Neto MD: Effectiveness of manual and rotatory instrumenta‑ 27. Siqueira Jr JF: Treatment of endodontic infections. London:
tion techniques for cleaning flattened root canals. J Endod Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd. 2011.
2002; 28:365‑366. 28. Chugal NM, Clive JM, Spangberg LS: Endodontic infection:
14. Rhodes JS, Ford TR, Lynch JA, Liepins PJ, Curtins RV: Mi‑ some biologic and treatment factors associated with outco‑
cro‑computed tomography: a new tool for experimental en‑ me. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
dodontology. Int Endod J 1999; 32:165‑170. 2003; 96: 81‑90.
15. Terakodo M, Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Honda M, Sekiwa T, Sato 29. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K: Factors affec‑
H: Diagnostic imaging with newly developed ortho cubic‑su‑ ting the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod
per‑high resolution computed tomography (Ortho. CT). 1990; 16: 498‑504.
Capítulo 11   |   Referências Bibliográficas 59

30. Bender IB, Seltzer S: Roentgenographic and direct observa‑ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;
tion of experimental lesions in bone. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 107: 721‑726.
62: 152‑160. 54. Alves FR, Siqueira JF Jr, Carmo FL, Santos AL, Peixoto RS,
31. Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, et al.: Cone beam computed to‑ Rôças IN, Rosado AS: Bacterial community profiling of cryo‑
mography in Endodontics – a review. Int Endod J 2015; 48: genically ground samples from the apical and coronal root
3‑15. segments of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2009; 35:
32. Siqueira JF Jr: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why 486‑492.
well‑treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 1‑10. 55. Rôças IN, Alves FR, Santos AL, Rosado AS, Siqueira JF Jr: Api‑
33. De Deus QD: Frequency, location, and direction of the cal root canal microbiota as determined by reverse‑capture che‑
lateral, secondary, and acessory canals. J Endod 1975; 1: ckerboard analysis of cryogenically ground root samples from
361‑366. teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2010; 36: 1617‑1621.
34. De Deus QD: Endodontia. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi, 1992. 56. Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Rôças IN: Pyrosequencing analy‑
35. Simon JH: The apex: how critical is it? Gen Dent 1994; 42: sis of the apical root canal microbiota. J Endod 2011; 37:
330‑334. 1499‑1503.
36. Ferreira Alves FR, Siqueira Jr JF, Lopes HP: O terço apical 57. Kerekes K, Tronstad L: Long‑term results of endodontic tre‑
da raiz: características morfológicas, microbiotas e considera‑ atment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod
ções terapêuticas. RBO 2005; 62:172‑176. 1979; 5: 83‑90.
37. Baugh D, Wallace J: The role of apical instrumentation in 58. Holland R, De Souza V, Nery MJ, de Mello W, Bernabe PF,
root canal treatment: A review of the Literature. J Endod Otoboni Filho JA: Tissue reactions following apical plugging
2005; 31:333‑340. of the root canal with infected dentin chips. A histologic stu‑
38. Kuttler Y: Endodoncia prática. México: Alpha, 1961. dy in dogs’ teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 49:
39. Stein TY, Corcoran J: Anatomy of the root apex and its his‑ 366‑369.
tologic changes with age. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 59. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Lopes WS, et al.: Extraradicular in‑
1990; 69:238‑242. fection as the cause of persistent symptoms: a case series. J
40. Wu MK, R’oris R, Barkis D, Wesselink PR: Prevalence and ex‑ Endod 2015; 41: 265‑273.
tent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral 60. Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, et al.: One‑ versus two‑visit en‑
Med Oral Pathol 2000; 89:739‑743. dodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histo‑
41. Green D: Astereo – bocular microscopic study of the root api‑ bacteriologic study. J Endod 2012; 38: 1040‑1052.
ces and surrounding areas of 100 mandibular molars; preli‑ 61. Ricucci D, Bergenholtz G: Bacterial status in root‑filled teeth
minary study. J Oral Surg 1955; 8:1298‑1304. exposed to the oral environment by loss of restoration and
42. Gutierrez JH, Aguayo P: Apical foraminal openings in human fracture or caries‑‑a histobacteriological study of treated ca‑
teeth. Number and location. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ses. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 787‑802.
1995; 79:769‑777. 62. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr: Biofilms and apical periodontitis:
43. Walton RE, Torabinejad M: Principles and practice of endo‑ study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopa‑
dontics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1996. thologic findings. J Endod 2010; 36: 1277‑1288.
44. Siqueira JF Jr: Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms, 63. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR: Histologic in‑
and perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑ vestigation of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodon‑
diol Endod 2002; 94: 281‑293. titis: a retrospective study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod
45. Fukushima H, Yamamoto K, Hirohata K, Sagawa H, Leung 2009; 35: 493‑502.
KP, Walker CB: Localization and identification of root canal 64. Engström B, Lundberg M: The correlation between positive
bacteria in clinically asymptomatic periapical pathosis. J En‑ culture and the prognosis of root canal therapy after pulpec‑
dod 1990; 16: 534‑538. tomy. Odontol Revy 1965; 16: 193‑203.
46. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Gonçalves LS, et al.: Histobacteriologic 65. Engström B, Spangberg L: Wound healing after partial pul‑
conditions of the apical root canal system and periapical tis‑ pectomy. A histological study performed on contralateral
sues in teeth associated with sinus tracts. J Endod 2018; 44: tooth pairs. Odontol Tidskr 1967; 75: 5‑18.
405‑413. 66. Tronstad L: Tissue reactions following apical plugging of the
47. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Ricucci D, et al.: Causes and manage‑ root canal with dentin chips in monkey teeth subjected to pul‑
ment of post‑treatment apical periodontitis. Br Dent J 2014; pectomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978; 45: 297‑304.
216: 305‑312. 67. Nery MJ, Souza V, Holland R: Reação do coto pulpar e teci‑
48. Siqueira JF Jr, Lopes HP: Bacteria on the apical root surfaces dos periapicais de dentes de cães a algumas substâncias em‑
of untreated teeth with periradicular lesions: a scanning elec‑ pregadas no preparo biomecânico de canais radiculares. Rev
tron microscopy study. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 216‑220. Fac Odont Araçatuba 1974; 3: 245‑254.
49. Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Ohman AE, Möller AJR: Predomi‑ 68. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH: Cytotoxic
nant indigenous oral bacteria isolated from infected root ca‑ effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod 1985; 11: 525‑528.
nals after varied times of closure. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90: 69. Becker GL, Cohen S, Borer RE: The sequelae of accidentally
134‑144. injecting sodium hypochlorite beyond the root apex. Report
50. Baumgartner LC, Falker Jr WA: Bacteria in the apical 5mm of of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38: 633‑638.
infected root canals. J Endod 1991; 17:380‑383. 70. Ehrich DG, Brian JD Jr, Walker WA: Sodium hypochlorite ac‑
51. Dougherty WJ, Bae KS, Watkins BJ, Baumgartner JC: Bla‑ cident: inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J En‑
ck‑pigmented bacteria in coronal and apical segments of in‑ dod 1993; 19: 180‑182.
fected root canals. J Endod 1998; 24: 356‑358. 71. Witton R, Henthorn K, Ethunandan M, Harmer S, Brennan
52. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Alves FR, Santos KR: Selected endo‑ PA: Neurological complications following extrusion of so‑
dontic pathogens in the apical third of infected root canals: a dium hypochlorite solution during root canal treatment. Int
molecular investigation. J Endod 2004; 30: 638‑643. Endod J 2005; 38: 843‑848.
53. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Alves FR, Silva MG: Bacteria in the 72. Nanci A: Ten Cate’s oral histology. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby,
apical root canal of teeth with primary apical periodontitis. 2003.
60 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

73. Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Sinai I, Goldenberg A, Bender IB: Bio‑ 93. Buchanan LS: The shape of things to come. Dentristry To‑
logic aspects of endodontics. Part III. Periapical tissue reac‑ day 1994; 13(5).
tions to root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 94. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Moreira EJL: Flexibilidade de instru‑
Pathol 1968; 26: 694‑705. mento endodôntico tipo K de aço inoxidável e de NiTi.
74. Sinai I, Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Goldenberg A, Bender IB: Bio‑ RBO 2004; 61(1): 65‑68.
logic aspects of endodontics. Part II. Periapical tissue reac‑ 95. Esposito PT, Cunninghan CJ: A comparison of canal prepa‑
tions to pulp extirpation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ration with nickel‑titanium and stainless steel instruments. J
1967; 23: 664‑679. Endod 1995; 21:173‑176.
75. Benatti O, Valdrighi L, Biral RR, Pupo J: A histological study 96. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Estrela C, Siqueira Jr JF, Fontes PP: In‑
of the effect of diameter enlargement of the apical portion of fluência de limas endodônticas de NiTi e de aço inoxidável,
the root canal. J Endod 11: 428‑434. manuais e acionadas a motor, no deslocamento apical. RBO
76. Holland R, Nery MJ, Mello W, Souza V, Bernabe PF, Otobo‑ 1997; 50:67‑70.
ni Filho JA: Root canal treatment with calcium hydroxide. II. 97. Schafer E, Bongert US, Tulus G: Comparison of hand stain‑
Effect of instrumentation beyond the apices. Oral Surg Oral less and nickel titanium rotary: A clincal study. J Endod
Med Oral Pathol 1979; 47: 93‑96. 2004; 30:432‑435.
77. Souza‑Filho FJ, Valdrighi L, Bernardinelli N: Influência do nível 98. Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A: The shaping effects of
da obturação e do alargamento do forame apical no processo de three nickel‑titanium rotatory instruments in simulated S –
reparo tecidual. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 1996; 50: 175‑177. shaped canals. J Endod 2005; 31:373‑375.
78. Torabinejad M, Kettering JD, McGraw JC, Cummings RR, 99. Ajuz NCC, Armada L, Gonçalves LS, Debelian G, Siqueira
Dwyer TG, Tobias TS: Factors associated with endodontic in‑ Jr JF: Glide path preparation in S‑shaped canals with rotary
terappointment emergencies of teeth with necrotic pulps. J pathfinding nickel‑titanium instruments. J Endod 2013; 39:
Endod 1988; 14: 261‑266. 534‑537.
79. Izu KH, Thomas SJ, Zhang P, Izu AE, Michalek S: Effectiveness 100. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG: Evaluation of
of sodium hypochlorite in preventing inoculation of periapical apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of Pro‑
tissues with contaminated patency files. J Endod 2004; 30: 92‑94. File GT files. J Endod 2004; 30: 425‑428.
80. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K: A prospective study of the fac‑ 101. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH: Mechanical pra‑
tors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: paratiom of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and me‑
part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 583‑609. ans. Endod Top 2005; 10:30‑76.
102. Peters AO: Current chalenges and concepts in the preparation
81. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: Unpre‑
of root canal systems: A review. J Endod 2004; 30:559‑567.
pared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications,
103. Tan TB, Messer HH: The quality of apical canal preparation
and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e65.
using hand and rotatory instruments with specific criteria
82. Paqué F, Balmer M, Attim T, Peters OA: Preparation of
for enlargement based on initial apical file size. J Endod
oval‑shaped root canals in mandibular molar using nickel‑ti‑
2002; 28:658‑664.
tanium rotary instruments: a micro‑computed tomography
104. Lopes HP, Soares TG, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, Inojosa IFJ,
study. J Endod 2012; 38: 402‑404.
Lopes WSP, Vieira VT: Comparison of the mechanical pro‑
83. Cohen S, Burns RC: Pathways of the pulp. 6th ed. St. Louis,
perties of rotary instruments made of conventional nickel‑ti‑
Missouri, USA: Mosby Year Book Inc., 1994.
tanium wire, M‑wire, or nickel‑titanium alloy in R‑phase. J
84. Weine FS: Endodontic therapy. 5th ed. St. Louis, USA: Mos‑
Endod 2013; 39: 516‑520.
by, 1996.
105. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al‑Sudani D, Vincenzi V,Giansiracussa
85. Leeb J: Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechani‑ A, Grande NM, Gambarini G: Bending properties of a new
cal preparation. J Endod 1983; 9:463‑469. nickel‑titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of ni‑
86. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Mangelli M, Lopes WSP, Amaral G, Sou‑ ckel. J Endod 2011; 37: 1293‑1295.
za LC, Siqueira Jr JF: Buckling resistance of pathfinding en‑ 106. Ninan E, Serzins DN: Torsion and bending properties of
dodontic instruments. J Endod 2012; 38: 402‑404. shape memory and superelastic nickel‑titanium rotary ins‑
87. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, Soares RG, Souza LC, Oliveira truments. J Endod 2013; 39: 101‑104.
JCM, Lopes WSP, Mangelli M: Mechanical behavior of pathfin‑ 107. Rodrigues RCV, Lopes HP, Elias CN, Amaral G, Vieira VTL,
ding endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012; 38: 1417‑1421. De Martin AS: Influence of different manufacturing metho‑
88. Pérez AR, Alves FRF, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: Effects of ds on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel‑titanium endodontic
increased apical enlargement on the amount of unprepared instruments. J Endod 2011; 37: 1553‑1557.
areas and coronal dentine removal: a micro‑computed tomo‑ 108. Abou‑Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH: The anticurvature filing
graphy study. Int Endod J 2018; 51: 684‑690. method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc
89. Card SJ, Sigurdsson A, Orstavik D, Trope M: The effective‑ 1980; 101(5):792‑794.
ness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal 109. Lopes HP, Costa Filho AS: Contribuição para o estudo de
bacteria. J Endod 2002; 28: 779‑783. uma variação de técnica no preparo biomecânico dos ca‑
90. Rollison S, Barnett F, Stevens RH: Efficacy of bacterial remo‑ nais radiculares, utilizando‑se as brocas de Gates e de Lar‑
val from instrumented root canals in vitro related to instru‑ go. RBO 1990; 47:16‑22.
mentation technique and size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑ 110. Lim SS, Stock CJR: The risk of perforation in the curved
thol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 366‑371. canal: anticurvature filing compared with step back techni‑
91. Siqueira JF Jr, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, Lopes HP, de Uze‑ que. Inter Endod J 1987; 20:30‑39.
da M: Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in 111. Pinheiro SL, Araújo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C: Eva‑
the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J Endod luation of cleaning capacity nd instrumentation time of ma‑
1999; 25: 332‑335. nual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in pri‑
92. Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Influence mary molars. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 379‑385.
of the apical preparation size and the irrigant type on bacte‑ 112. Cheung GSP, Liu CSY: A retrospective study of endodon‑
rial reduction in root canal‑treated teeth with apical perio‑ tic treatment outcome between nickel‑titanium rotary and
dontitis. J Endod 2017; 43: 1058‑1063. stainless hand filing techniques. J Endod 2009; 35: 938‑943.
Capítulo 11   |   Referências Bibliográficas 61

113. Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MM, de Souza RV, de Car‑ instrumentos endodônticos na modelagem do segmento fi‑
valho Rocha MJC: Ex vivo study of manual and rotary ins‑ nal de canais artificiais curvos. RBO 2007; 64:261‑265.
trumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Oral Surg 119. Yared G: Canal preparation using only one NiTi Rotary
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 84‑92. instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008;
114. Song YL, Bian Z, Fan B, Fan MW, Gutmann JL, Peng B: A 41:339‑344.
comparison of instrument‑centering ability within the root 120. Ye J, Gao Y: Metallurgical characterization of M‑Wire ni‑
canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques. ckel‑titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic ro‑
Int Endod J 2004; 37: 265‑271. tary instruments during low‑cicle fatigue. J Endod 2012; 38:
115. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GSP, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee 105‑107.
WC: Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new ni‑ 121. Neves MA, Provenzano JC, Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antibac‑
ckel‑titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: terial effectiveness of root canal preparation with recipro‑
Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012; 38: 541‑544. cating single‑instrument or continuously rotating multi‑ins‑
116. Lopes HP, Vieira MVB, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, Mangelli M, trument systems. J Endod 2016; 42: 25‑29.
Lopes WSP, Vieira VTL, Rocha EA: Fatigue life of WaveO‑ 122. Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Versiani MA, et al.: Correlative bac‑
ne and ProTaper instruments operated in reciprocating or teriologic and micro‑computed tomographic analysis of
continuous rotation movements and subjected to dynamic mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by self‑adjusting
and static tests. ENDO 2013; 7 (3): 217‑222. file, Reciproc, and Twisted File systems. J Endod 2013; 39:
117. Wan J, Rasimick BJ, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS: A compari‑ 1044‑1050.
son of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary ni‑ 123. Alves FR, Rôças IN, Almeida BM, et al.: Quantitative mo‑
ckel‑titanium instruments. Aust Endodc J 2011; 37: 122‑127. lecular and culture analyses of bacterial elimination in
118. Lopes HP, Moreira Filho JA, Elias CN, Viana GAD: Influên‑ oval‑shaped root canals by a single‑file instrumentation te‑
cia do movimento de alargamento contínuo alternado de chnique. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 871‑877.
Ca p ít u l o

12 Fratura dos Instrumentos Endodônticos:


Fundamentos Teóricos e Práticos
Hélio P. Lopes | Carlos N. Elias | José F. Siqueira Jr. | Victor T. L. Vieira

19. Lopes HP, Soares TG, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, Inojosa I, Lo‑
Referências Bibliográficas pes WSP, Vieira VTL: Comparison of the mechanical proper‑
ties of rotary instruments made by conventional nickel‑tita‑
1. Elias CN, Lopes HP: Materiais dentários. Ensaios mecânicos.
nium wire, M‑Wire or nickel‑titanium alloy in R‑phase. J En‑
São Paulo: Livraria Santos, 2007.
dod 2013; 39:516‑520.
2. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira JF Jr: Mecanismo de fratura dos
20. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Mangelli M, Moreira EJL: Instrumentos
instrumentos endodônticos. Rev Paul Odontol 2000; 22:4‑9.
endodônticos de NiTi de diferentes conicidades. Fratura por
3. Cheung GSP: Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal
torção em flexão. RBO 2006; 63:113‑116.
of fragments and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2009;
21. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Júnior JF, Araujo Filho WR: Li‑
16:1‑26.
mas endodônticas manuais de aço inoxidável e de níquel‑titâ‑
4. Callister Jr WD: Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais: Uma In‑
nio: ensaio de torção até a fratura. UFES Rev Odontol 2001;
trodução. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 2002.
3:8‑13.
5. Courtney TH: Mechanical Behavior of materials. Singapore:
McGrow Hill 1990. 22. Guilford WL, Lemons BS, Eleager PD: Comparison of torque
6. Phillips Materiais Dentários: Anusavice. 11a ed. Rio de Janei‑ required to fracture rotary files with tips bound in simulated
ro: Elsevier, 2005. curved canal. J Endod 2005; 31:468‑470.
7. Lopes HP, Siqueira JF Jr: Endodontia – Biologia e técnica. 3a 23. Schafer E, Tepel J. Relationship between design features of
ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2010. endodontic instruments and their properties. Part 3. Resis‑
8. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L: Influence of structure on ni‑ tence to bending and fracture. J Endod 2001; 27:299‑303.
ckel‑titanium endodontic instruments failure. J Endod 2001; 24. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM: Impact of two theori‑
27:516‑520. cal cross‑sections on torsional and bending stresses of ni‑
9. Lopes HP, Elias CN: Fratura dos instrumentos endodônticos ckel‑titanium root canal instrument model. J Endod 2000;
de NiTi acionados a motor. Fundamentos teóricos e práticos. 26:414‑417.
RBO 2001; 58:207‑209. 25. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Prado MAR, Batista MMD, Vieira MVB,
10. Lopes HP, Elias CN: Fratura das limas endodônticas tipo K. Silveira AMV, Fidel RAS: Influência da conicidade de instru‑
Fundamentos teóricos e práticos. RBO 2001; 58:406‑410. mentos endodônticos de NiTi mecanizados na falha por tror‑
11. Garcia A, Spim JA, Santos CA: Ensaio dos materiais. Rio de ção. RBO 2010; 67:233‑236.
Janeiro: LTC, 2000. 26. Zhang EW, Cheung GSP, Zheng YF: Influence of cross‑sec‑
12. Rodrigues RCV, Lopes HP, Elias CN, Amaral G, Vieira VTL, tion design and dimension on mechanical behavior of ni‑
De Martin AS: Influence of different manufacturing metho‑ ckel‑titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a nu‑
ds on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel‑titanium endodontic merical analysis. J Endod 2010; 36:1394‑1398.
instruments. J Endod 2011; 37:1553‑1557. 27. American Dental Association: Specification no. 28. Root ca‑
13. Carmo AMR, Valera MC, Lopes HP, Elias CN: Fratura por tor‑ nal files and reamers, type K for hand use. Amer Dent Ass
ção de instrumentos endodônticos de níquel‑titânio aciona‑ June 1988.
dos a motor. RBO 2002; 59:197‑199. 28. Canalda‑Sahli C, Brau‑Aguade E, Berastegui‑Jimeno E: A
14. Matheus TCU, Albuquerque DS, Lopes HP, Elias CN, Carmo comparation of bending and torsional properties of K‑fi‑
AMR, Moreira EJL: Fratura por torção de instrumentos de les manufactured with different metallic alloys. Int Endod J
níquel‑titânio, K3 endo e ProFile. RBO 2003; 60:202‑204. 1996; 29:185‑189.
15. Rowan MB, Nicholls JI, Steiner J: Torsional properties of 29. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Júnior JF: Fratura por torção das
stainless steel and nickel‑titanium endodontic files. J Endod limas endodônticas de aço inoxidável. RBO 2000; 57:142‑146.
1996; 22:341‑345. 30. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Júnior JF, Araujo Filho WR: Fra‑
16. Seto BG, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW: Torsional properties tura por torção de limas endodônticas de aço inoxidável e de
of twisted and machined endodontic files. J Endod 1990; níquel‑titânio. Rev Paul Odont 2001; 23:8‑12.
16:355‑360. 31. Camps J, Pertot WJ: Torsional and stiffness properties of ni‑
17. Yum J, Cheung GSP, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC: Torsional stren‑ ckel‑titanium K‑files. Int Endod J 1995; 28:239‑243.
ght and thoughness of nickel‑titanium rotary files. J Endod 32. Gambarini G: Torsional and cyclic fatigue testing of ProFile
2011; 37:382‑386. NiTi rotary instruments. Smile Journal of evolutionary Den‑
18. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vedovello GAF, Bueno CES, Mangelli tistry 1999; 2(1):4‑14.
M, Siqueira JF Jr: Torsional resistance of retreatment instru‑ 33. Svec TA, Powers JM: Effects of simulated clinical conditions
ments. J Endod 2011; 37:1442‑1445. on nickel‑titanium rotatory files. J Endod 1999; 25:759‑760.
Capítulo 12   |   Referências Bibliográficas 63

34. Silva EJNL, Hecksher F, Antunes HS, De‑Deus G, Elias CN, 53. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira VTL, Moreira EJL, Marques RVL,
Vieira VTL: Torsional fatigue resistance of blue‑treated reci‑ Oliveira JCM, Debelian G, Siqueira JF Jr: Effects of electropo‑
procating instruments. J Endod 2018; 44:1038‑1041. lishing surface treatment on the cyclic fatigue resistance of
35. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA, Messer HH: Defects in BioRace nickel‑titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2010e;
rotatory nickel‑titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000; 36:1653‑1657.
26:161‑165. 54. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, De‑Souza LC, Dos‑Santos
36. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, Huang X, Liu L: Modes of failure of AL: Influence of surface roughness the fatigue life of ni‑
ProTaper nickel‑titanium rotary instruments after clinical ckel‑titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2016;
use. J Endod 2007; 33:276‑279. 42:965‑968.
37. Yared GM Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P: Influence of rotatio‑ 55. Rodrigues CS, Vieira VTL, Antunes HS, De‑Deus G, Elias CN,
nal speed, torque and operator’s proficiency on ProFile failu‑ Moreira EJL, Silva EJNL: Mechanical characteristics of coun‑
res. Int Endod J 2001; 34:47‑53. terfeit Reciproc instruments: a call for atention. Int Endod J
38. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr: Cyclic fatigue testing of ni‑ 2017; 51:556‑563.
ckel‑titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997; 23:77‑85. 56. Vaz‑Garcia ES, Vieira VTL, Petitet NPSF, Moreira EJL, Lopes
39. Li UM, Lee B, Shih C, Lan W, Lin C: Cyclic fatigue of endo‑ HP, Elias CN, Silva ENJL, Antunes HS: Mechanical properties
dontic nickel‑titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic of anatomic finishing files: XP‑Endo finisher and XP‑Clean.
tests. J Endod 2002; 28:448‑451. Brazilin Dental Journal 2018; 29:208‑213.
40. Lopes HP, Vieira MVB, Elias CN, Gonçalves LS, Siqueira Jr. JF, 57. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, Vieira VTL, Inojosa I, Fer‑
Moreira EJ, Vieira VTL: Influence of the geometry of curved reira L: Influence of the surface roughness on the torsional
artificial canals on the fracture of Rotary nickel‑titanium instru‑
resistance of nickel‑titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
ments subjected to cyclic fatigue tests. J Endod 2013; 39:704‑707.
ENDO (Long Engl) 2017; 11:51‑55.
41. Haïkel Y, Serfaty R, Baterman G, Senger B, Allemann C: Dy‑
58. Silva EJNL, Rodrigues C, Vieira VTL, Belladona FG, De‑Deus
namic and cyclic fatigue of engine‑driven rotary nickel‑tita‑
G, Lopes HP: Bending resistance and ciclic fatigue of a new he‑
nium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1999; 25:434‑440.
at‑treated reciprocating instrument. SCANNING 2016; 9999:1‑5.
42. Lopes HP, Moreira EJL, Elias CN, Almeida RA, Neves MS:
59. Silva EJNL, Tinoco JM, Tinoco BEM, Vieira VTL, Sassone
Cyclic fatigue of Protaper instruments. J Endod 2007; 33:55‑57.
LM, Lopes HP: Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of a
43. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, Siqueira Jr JF, Mangelli M,
new single‑file reciprocating instrument WaveOne Gold. Eur
Lopes WSP, Vieira VTL, Alves FRF, Oliveira JCM, Soares TG:
Endod J 2016; 1:1‑4.
Fatigue life of Reciproc and Mtwo instruments subjected to
static and dynamic tests. J Endod 2013; 39:693‑696. 60. Soares RG. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, Vieira VTL,
44. Tobushi H, Shimeno Y, Hachisuka T Tanaka K: Influence of De-Paula CB, Alves FRF: Comparative study of the mechani‑
strain rate on superelastic properties of TiNi shape memory cal properties of instruments made of conventional, M-wire,
alloy. Mec Mat 1998; 30:141‑150. R-phase, and controlled memory nickel-titanium alloys.
45. Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ: Cyclic fatigue of three types ENDO 2017; 11: 271-277.
of rotary nickel‑titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod 61. Parashos P, Messer HH: Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and
2006; 32:55‑57. its consequences. J Endod 2006; 32:1031‑1043.
46. Kitchens GG Jr, Liewehr FR, Moon PC: The effect of opera‑ 62. Zelada G, Varela P, Martín B, Bahílio JG, Magan F, AHN S:
tional speed on the fracture of nickel‑titanium rotary Instru‑ The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root ca‑
ments. J Endod 2007; 33:52‑54. nals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments. J En‑
47. Lopes HP, Britto IMO, Elias CN, Oliveira JCM, Neves MS, Mo‑ dod 2002; 28:540‑542.
reira EJL, Siqueira JF Jr: Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper 63. Daugherty DW, Gound TG, Comer TL: Comparison of frac‑
Universal instruments when subjected to static and dynamic ture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary en‑
tests. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod dodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J En‑
2010; 110:401‑404. dod 2001; 27:93‑95.
48. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GSP, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee 64. Dietz DB, di Fiore PM, Bahcall JK, Lautenschlager EP: Effect
WC: Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new ni‑ of rotational speed on the breakage of nickel‑titanium rotary
ckel‑titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Re‑ files. J Endod 2000; 26:68‑71.
ciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012; 38:541‑544. 65. Eggeler G, Hornbogen E, Yawny A, Heckmann A, Wagner M:
49. De‑Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN: Extended cyclic Strutural and functional fatigue of NiTi shape memory alloys.
fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating Mat Scien Eng 2004; 378:24‑33.
movement. Int Endod J 2010; 43:1063‑1068. 66. Gabel WP, Hoen M, Steiman R, Pink FE, Dietz: Effect of rota‑
50. Wan J, Rasimick BJ, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS: A compari‑ tional speed on nickel‑titanium file distortion. J Endod 1999;
son of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary ni‑ 25:752‑754.
ckel‑titanium instruments. Aust Endod J 2011; 37:122‑127. 67. Lopes HP, Ferreira AAP, Elias CN, Moreira EJL, Oliveira JLM,
51. Lopes HP, Vieira MVB, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, Mangelli M, Siqueira JF Jr: Influence of rotational speed on the cyclic fa‑
Lopes WSP, Vieira VTL, Rocha EA: Fatigue life of WaveOne tigue of rotary nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. J En‑
and ProTaper instruments operated in reciprocating or con‑ dod 2009; 35:1013‑1016.
tinuous rotation movements and subjected to dynamic and 68. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Costa Filho AS: Estudo das superfícies da
static tests. ENDO 2013; 7:1‑6. fratura das brocas Gate‑Glidden. Rev Paul Odont 1992; 14:34‑36.
52. Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, et al.: Influence of di‑ 69. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Rios Maria C, Estrela C, Leite HSM: Fra‑
fferent angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel‑ti‑ tura em rotação e flexão de brocas Gates e de Largo. RBO
tanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012; 38:1408‑1411. 1996; 53:15‑17.
Ca p ít u l o
Acidentes e Complicações
13 em Endodontia
Hélio P. Lopes | José F. Siqueira Jr. | Emmanuel J. N. L. Silva | Marcelo Sendra |
Carlos N. Elias

17. Kapalas A, Lambrianidis T: Factors associated with root ca‑


Referências Bibliográficas nal ledging during instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol
2000; 16:229‑231.
1. Lopes HP, Siqueira JR JF: Endodontia: biologia e técnica. 2a 18. Bramante CM: Acidentes e Complicações no tratamento En‑
ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2004. dodôntico: Soluções Clínicas. São Paulo: Livraria Santos Edi‑
2. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S: Caminhos da polpa. 9a ed. Rio de tora 2003.
Janeiro: Elsevier, 2007. 19. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Treponema species associated with
3. Lopes HP, Elias CN: Fratura dos instrumentos endodônticos abscesses of endodontic origin. Oral Microbiol Immunol
de Ni‑Ti. Fundamentos teóricos e práticos. Rev Bras Odontol 2004; 19:336‑339.
2001; 58:207‑209. 20. Weine FS: Endodontic therapy. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996.
4. Lopes HP, Elias CN: Fratura das limas endodônticas tipo K. 21. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Mangelli M, et al.: Flexibilidade de ins‑
Fundamentos teóricos e práticos. Rev Bras Odontol 2001; trumentos endodônticos tipo K, de aço inoxidável e de Ni‑Ti.
58:406‑410. Estudo comparativo. Rev Odontol – Univ Fed Esp Sant 2006;
5. Serene TP AJ, Saxena A: Nickel‑titanium instruments and 8:59‑65.
applications in endodontic. St Louis: Ishiyaku Euroamerica 22. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ: A comparison of canal prepa‑
Inc., 1995. ration with nickel‑titanium and stainless steel instruments. J
6. Silva E, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, et al.: Cyclic and torsio‑ Endod 1995; 21:173‑176.
nal fatigue resistance of XP‑endo Shaper and TRUShape ins‑ 23. Cruz Junior JA, Coelho MS, Kato AS, et al.: The effect of fo‑
truments. J Endod 2018; 44:168‑172. raminal enlargement of necrotic teeth with the Reciproc sys‑
7. Silva E, Vieira VTL, Gabina TTG, et al.: The impact of using tem on postoperative pain: a prospective and randomized cli‑
a pneumatic contra‑angle device on the lifespan of M‑Wire‑ nical trial. J Endod 2016; 42:8‑11.
and Blue‑treated instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018. 24. Silva EJ, Menaged K, Ajuz N, et al.: Postoperative pain after
8. Silva E, Vieira VTL, Hecksher F, et al.: Cyclic fatigue using foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and
severely curved canals and torsional resistance of thermally apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical
treated reciprocating instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018; trial. J Endod 2013; 39:173‑176.
22:2633‑2638. 25. Saini HR, Sangwan P, Sangwan A: Pain following foraminal
9. Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE: Comparison of nickel‑tita‑ enlargement in mandibular molars with necrosis and api‑
nium and stainless steel hand‑file instrumentation using com‑ cal periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J
puted tomography. J Endod 1996; 22:369‑375. 2016; 49:1116‑1123.
10. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira Jr JF, et al.: Influência de limas 26. Yaylali IE, Teke A, Tunca YM: The effect of foraminal enlar‑
endodônticas de Ni‑Ti e de aço inoxidável, manuais e aciona‑ gement of necrotic teeth with a continuous rotary system on
dos a motor, no deslocamento apical. Rev Bras Odontol 1997; postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod
50:67‑70. 2017; 43:359‑363.
11. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Castro AMM, et al.: Flexibilidade de 27. Borlina SC, de Souza V, Holland R, et al.: Influence of apical
ins­
trumentos de Ni‑Ti acionados a motor. Rev Odontol foramen widening and sealer on the healing of chronic peria‑
Bras‑Cent 2006; 15:71‑77. pical lesions induced in dogs’ teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
12. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MVB, et al.: Geometria da haste Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109:932‑940.
helicoidal de instrumentos endodônticos de Ni‑Ti acionados 28. Brandão PM, de Figueiredo JAP, Morgental RD, et al.: In‑
a motor. Estudo crítico. Rev Paul Odontol 2006; 28:8‑13. fluence of foraminal enlargement on the healing of periapi‑
13. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Letra AMG, et al.: Geometria da pon‑ cal lesions in rat molars. Clin Oral Investig 2018.
ta de instrumentos endodônticos. Estudo crítico. Rev Paul 29. de Souza Filho FJ, Benatti O, de Almeida OP: Influence of
Odontol 2004; 26: 18‑24. the enlargement of the apical foramen in periapical repair of
14. Leeb J: Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechani‑ contaminated teeth of dog. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
cal preparation. J Endod 1983; 9:463‑470. 1987; 64:480‑484.
15. Marshall FJ, Pappin J: A crown‑down pressureless prepara‑ 30. Sjögren U: Success and failure in endodontics [Odontologi‑
tion root canal enlargement technique. Oregon Health Sci cal Dissertation n. 60]. University of Umea, Umea, Sweden,
Univ 1980. 1996.
16. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV: Ledge formation: review of a great 31. Friedman S: Treatment outcome and prognosis of endodon‑
challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007; 33:1155‑1162. tic therapy. In Orstavik D, Pitt Ford TR, editors: Essential
Capítulo 13   |   Referências Bibliográficas 65

endodontology. Prevention and treatment of apical perio‑ cálcio e de óxido de zinco e eugenol. Rev Bras Odontol 1997;
dontitis. London: Blackwell Science, 1998. 54:138‑142.
32. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Ricucci D, et al.: Causes and ma‑ 51. Bargholz C: Perforation repair with mineral trioxide aggrega‑
nagement of post‑treatment apical periodontitis. Br Dent J te: a modified matrix concept. Int Endod J 2005; 38:59‑69.
2014; 216:305‑312. 52. Holland R, Filho JA, de Souza V, et al.: Mineral trioxide ag‑
33. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Lopes WS, et al.: Extraradicular in‑ gregate repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 2001;
fection as the cause of persistent symptoms: a case series. J 27:281‑284.
Endod 2015; 41:265‑273. 53. Main C, Mirzayan N, Shabahang S, et al.: Repair of root per‑
34. Ricucci D, Lopes WSP, Loghin S, et al.: Large bacterial floc forations using mineral trioxide aggregate: a long‑term study.
causing an independent extraradicular infection and post‑ J Endod 2004; 30:80‑83.
treatment apical periodontitis: a case report. J Endod 2018; 54. Sonada CK, Okamoto T: Influência da pasta de hidróxido:
44:1308‑1316. estudo histomorfológico em ratos. Rev Bras Odontol 2000;
35. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L: Bacteremia in conjunc‑ 57:182‑186.
tion with endodontic therapy. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995; 55. Torabinejad M, Chivian N: Clinical applications of mineral
11:142‑149. trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25:197‑205.
36. Bender IB, Seltzer S, Yermish M: The incidence of bactere‑ 56. Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR: Sealing ability of a
mia in endodontic manipulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling
Pathol 1960; 13:353‑360. material. J Endod 1993; 19:591‑595.
37. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K: A prospective study of the fac‑ 57. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, et al.: Physical and
tors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: chemical properties of a new root‑end filling material. J En‑
part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 2011; 44:583‑609. dod 1995; 21:349‑353.
38. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K: A prospective study of the fac‑ 58. Torabinejad M, White DJ: Tooth filling material and use. US
tors affecting outcomes of non‑surgical root canal treatment: Patent Number: 5, 769, 638; 1995.
part 2: tooth survival. Int Endod J 2011; 44:610‑625. 59. Dammaschke T, Gerth HU, Zuchner H, et al.: Chemical and
39. Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Truitt JE: K3 Endo, ProTaper, and physical surface and bulk material characterization of white
ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements. Dent Mater 2005;
roots of molars. J Endod 2004; 30:234‑237. 21:731‑738.
40. Lopes HP, Moreira EJ, Elias CN, et al.: Cyclic fatigue of ProTa‑ 60. Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU: Comparison of the physical and
per instruments. J Endod 2007; 33:55‑57. mechanical properties of MTA and portland cement. J En‑
41. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL, Jr.: Cyclic fatigue testing dod 2006; 32:193‑197.
of nickel‑titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997; 61. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M, Dummer PMH: Mineral trioxide
23:77‑85. aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an upda‑
42. Ounsi HF, Salameh Z, Al‑Shalan T, et al.: Effect of clinical use ted overview – part I: vital pulp therapy. Int Endod J 2018;
on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper nickel‑titanium 51:177‑205.
rotary instruments. J Endod 2007; 33:737‑741. 62. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M, Dummer PMH: Mineral trioxide
43. Nagai O, Tani N, Kayaba Y, et al.: Ultrasonic removal of broken aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an upda‑
instruments in root canals. Int Endod J 1986; 19:298‑304. ted overview – part II: other clinical applications and compli‑
44. Masserann J: L’extraction des instruments casses dans les ca‑ cations. Int Endod J 2018; 51:284‑317.
naux radiculaires: Technique nouvelle. Actual Odontostoma‑ 63. Marciano MA, Costa RM, Camilleri J, et al.: Assessment of co‑
tol (Paris) 1959; 47:265‑274. lor stability of white mineral trioxide aggregate angelus and
45. Fors UG, Berg JO: A method for the removal of broken bismuth oxide in contact with tooth structure. J Endod 2014;
endodontic instruments from root canals. J Endod 1983; 40:1235‑1240.
9:156‑159. 64. Marciano MA, Duarte MA, Camilleri J: Dental discoloration
46. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH: The impact of instrument caused by bismuth oxide in MTA in the presence of sodium
fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2005; hypochlorite. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19:2201‑2209.
31:845‑850. 65. Camilleri J: Will bioceramics be the future root canal filling
47. Madarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PM: Management of in‑ materials?. Curr Oral Health Rep 2017; 4:228‑238.
tracanal separated instruments. J Endod 2013; 39:569‑581. 66. Zou L, Liu J, Yin SH, et al.: Effect of placement of calcium
48. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Rios MC, et al.: Fratura em rotação e flexão sulphate when used for the repair of furcation perforations
de brocas Gates e de Largo. Rev Bras Odontol 1996; 53:15‑17. on the seal produced by a resin‑based material. Int Endod J
49. Tsesis I, Fuss Z: Diagnosis and treatment of accidental root 2007; 40:100‑105.
perforations. Endod Topics 2006; 13:95‑107. 67. Pontius V, Pontius O, Braun A, et al.: Retrospective evalua‑
50. Bittencourt AZ: Comportamento da polpa após pulpoto‑ tion of perforation repairs in 6 private practices. J Endod
mia e recobrimento com materiais à base de hidróxido de 2013; 39:1346‑1358.
Ca p ít u l o

14 Irrigação dos Canais Radiculares

Seção

Irrigação: Aspectos Físicos


14.1 Marco Antonio H. Duarte | Rodrigo R. Vivan | Murilo P. Alcalde

14. Tay FR, Gu L, DDS, Schoeffel J, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang


Referências Bibliográficas K, Arun SN, Kim J, Looney SW, Pashley DH: Effect of vapor
lock on root canal debridement by using a side‑vented ne‑
1. Moser JB, Heuer MA: Forces and efficacy in endodontic ir‑
edle for positive‑pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod 2010;
rigation systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 36(4):745‑750.
53(4):425‑428. 15. Vera J, Hernandez EM, Romero M, Arias A, van der Sluis
2. Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J LWM: Effect of maintaining apical patency on irrigant pene‑
Endod 1983; 9(11):475‑479. tration into the apical two millimeters of large root canals: An
3. Sedgley CM, Nagel AC, Hall D, Applegate B: Influence of irri‑ In Vivo Study. J Endod 2012; 38(10):1340‑1343.
gant needle depth in removing bioluminescent bacteria ino‑ 16. Vera J, Arias A, Romero M: Effect of maintaining apical pa‑
culated into instrumented root canals using real‑time ima‑ tency on irrigant penetration into the apical third of root ca‑
ging in vitro. Int Endod J 2005; 38(2):97‑104. nals when using passive ultrasonic irrigation: an in vivo study.
4. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E: Irrigant flow wi‑ J Endod 2011; 37(9):1276‑1278.
thin a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computa‑ 17. Vera J, Arias A, Romero M: Dynamic movement of intraca‑
tional fluid dynamics study. Int Endod J 2009; 42(2):144‑155. nal gas bubbles during cleaning and shaping procedures: the
5. Gao Y, Haapasalo M, Shen Y, et al.: Development and valida‑ effect of maintaining apical patency on their presence in the
tion of a three‑dimensional computational fluid dynamics mo‑ middle and cervical thirds of human root canals – an in vivo
del of root canal irrigation. J Endod 2009; 35(9):1282‑1287. study. J Endod 2012; 38(2):200‑203.
6. Usman N, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG: Influence of ins‑ 18. Khademi A, Yazdizadeh M, Feizianfard M: Determination of
trument size on root canal debridement. J Endod 2004; the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irri‑
30(2):110‑112. gants to the apical third of root canal systems. J Endod 2006;
7. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M: In vivo debridement 32(5):417‑420.
efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand‑rotary ins‑ 19. Vinothkumar TS, Kavitha S, Lakshminarayanan L, et al.: In‑
trumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 2005; fluence of irrigating nee‑dle‑tip designs in removing bacteria
31(3):166‑170. inoculated into instrumented root canals measured using sin‑
8. Burleson A, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M: The in vivo evalua‑ gle‑tube luminometer. J Endod 2007; 33(6):746‑748.
tion of hand/rotary/ ultrasound instrumentation in necro‑ 20. Falk KW, Sedgley CM: The influence of preparation size on
tic, human mandibular molars. J Endod 2007; 33(7):782‑787. the mechanical efficacy of root canal irrigation in vitro. J En‑
9. Dovgyallo GI, Migun NP, Prokhorenko PP: The complete dod 2005; 31(10):742‑745.
filling of dead‑end conical capillaries with liquid. J Eng Phy 21. Gulabivala K, Patel B, Evans G, et al.: Effects of mechanical
1989; 56(4):395‑397. and chemical procedures on root canal surfaces. Endod To‑
10. Migun NP, Azuni MA: Filling of one‑side‑closed capillaries pics 2005; 10(1):103‑122.
immersed in liquids. J Coll Interf Sci 1996; 181(1):337‑340. 22. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, et al.: Passive ultrasonic
11. Pesse AV, Warrier GR, Dhir VK: An experimental study of the irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int En‑
gas entrapment process in closed‑end microchannels. Int J dod J 2007; 40(6):415‑426.
Heat Mass Transfer 2005; 48(25‑26):5150‑5165. 23. Gao Y, DDS, Haapasalo M, DDS, Shen Y, Wu H, Li B, Ruse
12. Senia ES, Marshall FJ, Rosen S: The solvent action of sodium ND, Zhou X: Development and Validation of a Three‑dimen‑
hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth. Oral Surg sional Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of Root Canal
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 31(1):96‑103. Irrigation. J Endod 2009; 35(9):1282‑1287.
13. de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Heilborn C, Cohenca 24. Wang R, Shen Y, Ma J, Huang D, DDS, Zhou X, Yuan Gao Y,
N: Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the pe‑ Haapasalo M: Evaluation of the effect of needle position on
netration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral ca‑ irrigant flow in the c‑shaped root canal using a computatio‑
nals: an in vitro study. J Endod 2009; 35(6):891‑895. nal fluid dynamics model. J Endod 2015; 41(6):931‑936.
Capítulo 14   |   Referências Bibliográficas 67

25. Lecrivain G, Slaouti A, Payton C, et al.: Using reverse engi‑ using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vi‑
neering and computationalfluid dynamics to investigate a lo‑ tro study. Cont Clin Dent 2013; 4(4):432‑436.
wer arm amputee swimmer’s performance.J Biomech 2008; 42. Freire LG, DDS, Iglecias EF, Cunha RS, Santos M, DDS, MS,
41(13):2855‑2859. PhD, Gavini G: Micro‑computed tomographic evaluation of
26. Tokuda Y, Song MH, Ueda Y, et al.: Three‑dimensional nu‑ hard tissue debris removal after different irrigation metho‑
merical simulation of blood flow in the aortic arch during ds and its influence on the filling of curved canals. J Endod
cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 2015; 41(10):1660‑1666.
33(2):164‑167. 43. Iriboz E, Bayraktar K, Türkaydın D, Tarc B: Comparison of api‑
27. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E, et al.: Measure‑ cal extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using 4 different root ca‑
ment of pressure and flow rates during irrigation of a root ca‑ nal irrigation techniques. J Endod 2015; 41(3):380‑384.
nal ex vivo with three endodontic needles. Int Endod J 2007; 44. Mitchell RP, Yang SE, Baumgartner JC: Comparison of apical
40(7):504‑513. extrusion of naocl using the EndoVac or needle irrigation of
28. Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wes‑ root canals. J Endod 2010; 36(2):338‑341.
selink PR, van der Sluis LWM: Evaluation of irrigant flow 45. Pawar R, DDS, Alqaied A, Safavi K, Boyko J, BS, Kaufman, B:
in the root canal using different needle types by an uns‑ Influence of an apical negative pressure irrigation system on
teady computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod 2010; bacterial elimination during endodontic therapy: a prospecti‑
36(5):875‑879. ve randomized clinical study. J Endod 2012; 38(9):1177‑1181.
29. Perez R, Neves AA, Belladonna FG, Silva EJNL, Souza EM, Fi‑ 46. Vivan RR, Bortolo MV, Duarte MA, Moraes IG, Tanomaru‑Fi‑
del S, Versiani MA, Lima I, Carvalho C, De‑Deus G: Impact of lho M, Bramante CM: Scanning electron microscopy analysis
needle insertion depth on the removal of hard‑tissue debris. of RinsEndo system and conventional irrigation for debris re‑
2017; 50(6):560‑568. moval. Braz Dent J 2010; 21(4):305‑309.
30. Versiani MA, De‑Deus G, Vera J, Souza E, Steier L, Pécora 47. Hauser V, Braun A, Frentzen M: Penetration depth of a dye
JD, Sousa‑Neto MD: 3D mapping of the irrigated areas of the marker into dentine using a novel hydrodynamic system
root canal space using micro‑computed tomography. Clin (RinsEndo). Int Endod J. 2007; 40(8): 644‑652.
Oral Investig. 2015; 19(4):859‑866. 48. McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng YL: The efficacy of
31. Paqué F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M: Hard‑tissue debris dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system
accumulation analysis by high‑resolution computed tomogra‑ (RinsEndo) determined by removal of a collagen “bio‑mo‑
phy scans. J Endod. 2009; 35(7):1044‑1047. lecular film” from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J 2008;
32. De‑Deus G, Marins J, Neves Ade A, Reis C, Fidel S, Versia‑ 41(7):602‑608.
ni MA, Alves H, Lopes RT, Paciornik S: Assessing accumu‑ 49. Rödig T, Bozkurt M, Konietschke F, Hülsmann M: Compari‑
lated hard tissue debris using micro‑computed tomography son of the Vibringe system syringe and passive ultrasonic irri‑
and free software for image processing and analysis. J Endod. gation in removing debris from simulated root canal irregu‑
2014; 40(2):271‑276. larities. J Endod 2010; 36:1410‑1143.
33. De‑Deus G, Marins J, Silva EJ, Souza E, Belladonna FG, Reis 50. Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P: Effectiveness of
C, Machado AS, Lopes RT, Versiani MA, Paciornik S, Neves different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer re‑
AA: Accumulated hard tissue debris produced during reci‑ moval in curved canals. J Endod 2010; 36(8):1361‑1366.
procating and rotary nickel‑titanium canal preparation. J En‑ 51. Cachovan G, Schiffner U, Altenhof S, Guentsch A, Pfister W,
dod. 2015; 41(5):676‑681. Eick S: Comparative antibacterial efficacies of hydro‑dyna‑
34. Shen Y, Gao Y, Qian W, Ruse ND, Zhou X, Wu H, Haapasalo mic and ultrasonic irrigation systems in vitro. J Endod 2013;
M: Three‑dimensional numeric simulation of root canal ir‑ 39(9):1171‑1175.
rigant flow with different irrigation needles. J Endod 2010; 52. Bago JI, Plečko V, Anič I: Antimicrobial efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG
36(5):884‑889. laser‑activated irrigation compared with passive ultrasonic ir‑
35. Rôças IN, Siqueira‑Junior JF: Comparison of the in vivo anti‑ rigation and RinsEndo(®) against intracanal Enterococcus
microbial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhe‑ faecalis. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014; 32(11):600‑605.
xidine used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology 53. Rödig T, Hirschleb M, Zapf A, Hülsmann M: Comparison of
study. J Endod 2011; 37(2):143‑150. ultrasonic irrigation and RinsEndo for the removal of cal‑
36. Kahn H, Zelikow R, Major GR, Smulson MH, Weine FS: An cium hydroxide and Ledermix paste from root canals. Int
improved endodontic irrigation technique. Oral Surg 1973; Endod J 2011; 44:1155‑1161.
36(6):887‑890. 54. Ethem Yaylali I, Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B: Ultrasonically ac‑
37. Berbert A, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N: Endodontia práti‑ tivated irrigation to remove calcium hydroxide from apical
ca. São Paulo: Sarvier, 1980. third of human root canal system: a systematic review of in vi‑
38. Versiani MA, Alves FRF, Andrade‑Junior CV, Marceliano‑Al‑ tro studies. J Endod 2015; 41(10):1589‑1599.
ves MF, Provenzano C, Rôças IN, Sousa‑Neto MD, Siquei‑ 55. Grischke J, Müller‑Heine A, Hülsmann M: The effect of four
ra‑Júnior JF: Micro‑CT evaluation of the efficacy of hard‑tis‑ different irrigation systems in the removal of a root canal se‑
sue removal from the root canal and isthmus area by positi‑ aler. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18(7):1845‑1851.
ve and negative pressure irrigation system. Int Endod J 2016; 56. Bao P, Shen Y, Lin J, Haapasalo M: In vitro efficacy of XP‑en‑
49(11):1079‑1087. do Finisher with 2 different protocols on biofilm removal
39. Brunson M, DDS, Heilborn C, Johnson DJ, Cohenca N: from apical root canals. J Endod. 2017; 43(2):321‑325.
Effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on ir‑ 57. Silva EJNL, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Rodrigues E, Ehrhardt
rigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation IC, Souza EM, De‑Deus G: Effectiveness of XP‑endo Finisher
system. J Endod 2010; 36(4):721‑724. and XP‑endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a
40. Naenni N, Thoma K, Zehnder M: Soft tissue dissolution ca‑ micro‑CT study. Int Endod J. 2018; 51(1):86‑91.
pacity of currently used and potential endodontic irrigants. J 58. Karamifar K, Mehrasa N, Pardis P, Saghiri MA: Cleanliness
Endod 2004; 30(11):785‑787. of canal walls following gutta‑percha removal with hand files,
41. Gade VJ, Sedani SK, Lokade JS, Belsare LD, Gade JR: Com‑ RaCe and RaCe plus XP‑Endo Finisher instruments: a photo‑
parative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by graphic in vitro analysis. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12(2):242‑247.
68 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

59. Campello AF, Almeida BM, Franzoni MA, Alves FRF, Marce‑ pho‑to‑activated disinfection, conventional and sonic activa‑
liano‑Alves MF, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Provenzano JC: In‑ ted irrigation during root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2013;
fluence of solvent and a supplementary step with a finishing 46(4):339‑347.
instrument on filling material removal from canals connec‑ 74. Alturaiki S, Lamphon H, Edrees H, Ahlquist M: Efficacy of 3
ted by an isthmus. Int Endod J. 2018. doi:10.1111/iej.13047. different irrigation systems on removal of calcium hydroxide
60. Machado AG, Guilherme BPS, Provenzano JC, Marceliano‑Al‑ from the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. J
ves MF, Gonçalves LS, Siqueira JF Jr, Neves MAS: Effects of pre‑ Endod 2015; 41(1):97‑101.
paration with the Self‑Adjusting File, TRUShape and XP‑Endo 75. Ordinola‑Zapata R1, Bramante CM, Aprecio RM, Handysides
Shaper systems, and a supplementary step with XP‑Endo Fini‑ R, Jaramillo DE: Biofilm removal by 6% sodium hypo‑ chlo‑
sher R on filling material removal during retreatment of mandi‑ rite activated by different irrigation techniques. Int Endod J
bular molar canals. Int Endod J. 2018 doi:10.1111/iej.13039. 2014; 47(7):659‑666.
61. Gokturk H, Ozkocak I, Buyukgebiz F, Demir O: Effectiveness 76. Rödig T,Sedghi M, Konietschke F, Lange K, Ziebolz D, Hüls‑
of various irrigation protocols for the removal of calcium mann M: Efficacy of syringe irrigation, RinsEndo and passive
hydroxide from artificial standardized grooves. J Appl Oral ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from irregularities
Sci. 2017; 25(3):290‑298. in root canals with different apical sizes. Int Endod J 2010;
62. Keskin C, Sariyilmaz E, Sariyilmaz Ö: Efficacy of XP‑endo Fi‑ 43(7):581‑589.
nisher file in removing calcium hydroxide from simulated in‑ 77. Johnson M, DDS, Sidow SJ, DDS, Looney SW, PhD, Lindsey
ternal resorption cavity. J Endod. 2017; 43(1):126‑130. K, DDS, Niu LN, Tay FR: Canal and isthmus debridement effi‑
63. Uygun AD, Gündoğdu EC, Arslan H, Ersoy I: Efficacy of cacy using a sonic irrigation technique in a closed‑canal sys‑
XP‑endo finisher and TRUShape 3D conforming file com‑ tem. J Endod 2012; 38(9):1265‑1268.
pared to conventional and ultrasonic irrigation in removing 78. Karatas E, Ozsu D, Arslan H, Erdogan AS: Comparison of the
calcium hydroxide. Aust Endod J. 2017; 43(2):89‑93. effect of non‑activated self‑adjusting file system, Vi‑bringe,
64. Kfir A, Blau‑Venezia N, Goldberger T, Abramovitz I, Wigler R: EndoVac, ultrasonic and needle irrigation on apical extru‑
Efficacy of self‑adjusting file, XP‑endo finisher and passive ul‑ sion of debris. Int Endod J 2015; 48(4):317‑322.
trasonic irrigation on the removal of calcium hydroxide pas‑ 79. Urban K, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S: Canal cle‑
te from an artificial standardized groove. Aust Endod J. 2018; anliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM
44(1):26‑31. evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21(9):2681‑2687.
65. Ulusoy ÖI, Savur IG, Alaçam T, Çelik B: The effectiveness of 80. Zeng C, Meghil MM, Miller M, Gou Y, Cutler CW, Bergeron
various irrigation protocols on organic tissue removal from BE, Niu L, Ma J, Tay FR: Antimicrobial efficacy of an apical
simulated internal resorption defects. Int Endod J. 2018; negative pressure root canal irrigation system against intraca‑
51(9):1030‑1036. nal microorganisms. J Dent 2018; 72:71‑75.
66. Kato AS, Cunha RS, da Silveira Bueno CE, Pelegrine RA, Fon‑ 81. Molina B, Glickman G, Vandrangi P, Khakpour M: Evaluation
tana CE, de Martin AS: Investigation of the efficacy of passive of root canal debridement of human molars using the Gen‑
ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating acti‑ tleWave system. J Endod 2015; 41(10):1701‑1705.
vation: an environmental scanning electron microscopic stu‑ 82. Charara K, Friedman S, Sherman A, Kishen A, Malkhas‑
dy. J Endod. 2016; 42(4):659‑663. sian G, Khakpour M, Basrani B: Assessment of apical extru‑
67. Cesario F, Hungaro Duarte MA, Duque JA, Alcalde MP, de sion during root canal irrigation with the novel GentleWa‑
Andrade FB, Reis So MV, De Vasconcelos BC, Vivan RR: Com‑ ve system in a simulated apical environment. J Endod 2016;
parisons by microcomputed tomography of the efficiency of 42(1):135‑139.
different irrigation techniques for removing dentinal debris 83. Versiani MA, De‑Deus G, Vera J, Souza E, Steier L, Pécora
from artificial grooves. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21(4):383‑387. JD, Sousa‑Neto MD: 3D mapping of the irrigated areas of the
68. Duque JA, Duarte MA, Canali LC, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Ber‑ root canal space using micro‑computed tomography. Clin
nardes RA, Bramante CM: Comparative effectiveness of new Oral Investig. 2015; 19(4):859‑866.
mechanical irrigant agitating devices for debris removal from 84. Macedo RG, Robinson JP, Verhaagen B, Walmsley AD, Ver‑
the canal and isthmus of mesial roots of mandibular molars. sluis M, Cooper PR, van der Sluis LW: A novel methodo‑
J Endod. 2017; 43(2):326‑331. logy providing insights into removal of biofilm‑mimicking
69. Marques AC, Aguiar BA, Frota LM, Guimarães BM, Vivac‑ hydrogel from lateral morphological features of the root ca‑
qua‑Gomes N, Vivan RR, Duarte MA, de Vasconcelos BC: Eva‑ nal during irrigation procedures. Int Endod J. 2014; 47(11):
luation of influence of widening apical preparation of root 1040‑1051.
canals on efficiency of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid agita‑ 85. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TJ, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debridement of
tion protocols: study by scanning electron microscopy. J Con‑ root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. J Endod
temp Dent Pract. 2018; 19(9):1087‑1094. 1987; 13:490‑499.
70. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR: Passive 86. Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellstein JW: A comparison of the
ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literatu‑ cleaning efficacy of short term sonic and ultrasonic passive
re. Int Endod J. 2007; 40(6):415‑426. irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J
71. Ordinola‑Zapata R, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, de Andrade Endod 2003; 29(1):674‑678.
FB, Bernardineli N, de Moraes IG, Duarte MA: The antimi‑ 87. Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, et al.: Ultrastructural
crobial effect of new and conventional endodontic irrigants examination of failed molar retreatment with secon­ dary
on intra‑orally infected dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic bio‑
71(3‑4):424‑431. films in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 2009;
72. Kumar VR, Bahuguna N, Manan R: Comparison of efficacy 35:1303‑1309.
of various root canal irrigation systems in removal of smear 88. Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J: Microbial status of apical
layer generated at apical third: An SEM study. J Conserv Dent root canal system of human mandibular first molars with pri‑
2015; 18(3):252‑256. mary apical periodontitis after “one‑visit” endodontic treat‑
73. Bago I, Plecko V, Gabric‑Panduric D, Schauperl Z, Baraba ment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
A, Anic I: Antimicrobial efficacy of a high‑power diode laser, 2005; 99:231‑252.
Capítulo 14   |   Referências Bibliográficas 69

89. Vera J, Hernández EM, Romero M, Arias A, van der Sluis 105. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Carmo FL, Leite DC, Fer‑
LW: Effect of maintaining apical patency on irrigant pene‑ reira DC, Rachid CT, Rosado AS: Molecular micro‑biologi‑
tration into the apical two millimeters of large root canals: cal evaluation of passive ultrasonic activation as a supple‑
an in vivo study. J Endod 2012; 38(10):1340‑1343. mentary disinfecting step: a clinical study. J Endod 2013;
90. Estrela C, Rabelo LE, de Souza JB, Alencar AH, Estrela CR, 39(2):190‑194.
Sousa Neto MD, Pécora JD: Frequency of root canal isthmi 106. Huang TY, Gulabivala K, Ng YL: A bio‑molecular film ex‑vi‑
in human permanent teeth determined by cone‑beam com‑ vo model to evaluate the influence of canal dimensions and
puted tomography. J Endod 2015; 41:1535‑1539. irrigation variables on the efficacy of irrigation. Int Endod J
91. Paque F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M: Hard‑tissue debris 2008; 41(1):60‑71.
accumulation analysis by high‑resolution computed tomo‑ 107. Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR: The effectiveness of syringe
graphy scans. J Endod 2009; 35:1044‑1047. irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated
92. De‑Deus G, Marins J, Silva EJNL, Erick Souza E, Bella‑ don‑ irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J
na FG, Reis C, Machado Lopes RT, Versiani MA, Paciornik 2004; 37(10):672‑678.
S, Neves AA: Accumulated hard tissue debris produced du‑ 108. Merino A, Estevez R, de Gregorio C, Cohenca N: The effect
ring reciprocating and rotary nickel‑titanium canal prepa‑ of different taper preparations on the ability of sonic and
ration. J Endod 2015; 41:676‑681. passive ultrasonic irrigation to reach the working length in
93. Weller RN, Brady JM, Bernier WE: Efficacy of ultrasonic cle‑ curved canals. Int Endod J 2013; 46(5):427‑433.
aning. J Endod 1980; 6:740‑743. 109. Faria G, Viola KS, Coaguila‑Llerena H, Oliveira LRA, Leo‑
94. Freire LG, DDS, Iglecias EF, Cunha RS, Santos M, DDS, MS, nardo RT, Aranda‑García AJ, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM: Pe‑
PhD, Gavini G: Micro‑computed tomographic evaluation of netration of sodium hypochlorite intoroot canal dentine:
hard tissue debris removal after different irrigation metho‑ effect of surfactants, gel form and passive ultrasonic irriga‑
ds and its influence on the filling of curved canals. J Endod tion. Int Endod J. 2018. doi:10.1111/iej.13015.
2015; doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.001. 110. Passalidou S, Calberson F, De Bruyne M, De Moor R, Mei‑
95. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA, Walton AJ: Ultrasonic re MA: Debris removal from the mesial root canal system of
debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its rele‑ mandibular molars with laser‑activated irrigation. J Endod.
vance. J Endod 1988; 14(10):486‑493. 2018; 44(11):1697‑1701.
96. Liang YH, Jiang LM, Jiang L, Chen XB, Liu YY, Tian FC, Bao 111. Malki M, Verhaagen B, Jiang LM, Nehme W, Naaman A,
XD, Gao XJ, Versluis M, Wu MK, van der Sluis L: Radiogra‑ Versluis M, Wesselink P, van der Sluis L: Irrigant flow
phic healing after a root canal treatment performed in sin‑ beyond the insertion depth of an ultrasonically oscillating
gle‑rooted teeth with and without ultra‑sonic activation of file in straight and curved root canals: visualization and cle‑
the irrigant: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod 2013; aning efficacy. J Endod 2012; 38(5):657‑661.
39(10):1218‑1225. 112. Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LW: In‑
97. Beus C, Safavi K, Stratton J, Kaufman B: Comparison of fluence of the oscillation direction of an ultrasonic file on
the effect of two endodontic irrigation protocols on the the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J En‑
elimination of bacteria from root canal system: a pros‑ dod. 2010; 36(8):1372‑1376.
pective, randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2012; 38(11): 113. Al‑Jadaa A, Paqué F, Attin T, Zehnder M: Acoustic hypochlo‑
1479‑1483. rite activation in simulated curved canals. J Endod. 2009;
98. Nakamura VC, Pinheiro ET, Prado LC, Silveira AC, Car‑ 35(10):1408‑1411.
valho APL, Mayer MPA, Gavini G: Effect of ultrasonic ac‑ 114. Grischke J, Müller‑Heine A, Hülsmann M: The effect of
tivation on the reduction of bacteria and endotoxins in four different irrigation systems in the removal of a root ca‑
root canals: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2018; nal sealer. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18(7):1845‑1851.
51(1):e12‑e22. 115. Fruchi Lde C, Ordinola‑Zapata R, Cavenago BC, Hungaro
99. Balvedi RP, Versiani MA, Manna FF, Biffi JC: A comparison Duarte MA, Bueno CE, De Martin AS: Efficacy of reciproca‑
of two techniques for the removal of calcium hydroxide ting instruments for removing filling material in curved ca‑
from root canals. Int Endod J 2010; 43(9):763‑768. nals obturated with a single‑cone technique: a micro‑com‑
100. Ma J, Shen Y, Yang Y, Gao Y, Wan P, Gan Y, Patel P, Curtis A, puted tomographic analysis. J Endod 2014;40(7):1000‑4.
Khakpour M, Haapasalo M: In vitro study of calcium hydro‑ doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.011.
xide removal from mandibular molar root canals. J Endod 116. Bernardes RA, Duarte MAH, Vivan RR, Alcalde MP, Vascon‑
2015; 41(4):553‑558. celos BC, Bramante CM: Comparison of three retreatment
101. Van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR: Passive techniques with ultrasonic activation in flattened canals
ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the litera‑ using micro‑computed tomography and scanning electron
ture. Int Endod J 2007; 40(6):415‑426. microscopy. Int Endod J. Sep 2016; 49(9):890‑897.
102. Berkhoff JA, Chen PB, Teixeira FB, Diogenes A: Evaluation 117. Rivera‑Peña ME, Duarte MAH, Alcalde MP, DE Andrade FB, Vi‑
of triple antibiotic paste removal by different irrigation pro‑ van RR: A novel ultrasonic tip for removal of filling material in
cedures. J Endod 2014; 40(8):1172‑1177. flattened/oval‑shaped root canals: a microCT study. Braz Oral
103. van der Sluis LW, Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink PR: An Res. Aug 13 2018; 32:e88. doi:10.1590/1807‑3107bor‑2018.
evaluation of the influence of passive ultrasonic irriga‑ vol32.0088. PubMed PMID: 30110086
tion on the seal of root canal fillings. Int Endod J. 2007; 118. Castelo‑Baz P, Martín‑Biedma B, Cantatore G, Ruíz‑Piñón
40(5):356‑361. M, Bahillo J, Rivas‑Mundiña B, Varela‑Patiño P: In vitro
104. Ahmad M, Roy RA, Kamarudin AG: Observations of acous‑ comparison of passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation
tic streaming fields around an oscillating ultrasonic file. En‑ in simulated lateral canals of extracted teeth. J Endod 2012;
dod Dent Traumatol. 1992; 8(5):189‑194. 38:688‑691.
Ca p ít u l o

14 Irrigação dos Canais Radiculares

Seção Irrigação: Substâncias Químicas Empregadas


no Preparo de Canais Radiculares
14.2 Hélio P. Lopes | José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Carlos N. Elias

17. Dakin HD: On the use of certain antiseptics substances in


Referências Bibliográficas treatment of infected wounds. British Medical Journal 1915;
28:318‑320.
1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ: The effects of sur‑ 18. Crane AB: A practicable root canal technic. Philadelphia: Lea
gical exposures of dental pulps in germ‑free and conventio‑ & Febiger, 1920.
nal laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; 19. Walker A: Definite and dependable therapy for pulpless tee‑
20:340‑349. th. J Am Dent Assoc 1936; 23:1418‑1424.
2. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Diversity of endodontic microbiota
20. Grossman LI: Irrigation of root canals. J Am Dent Assoc 1943;
revisited. J Dent Res 2009; 88:969‑981.
30: 915‑917.
3. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Biofilms and apical periodontitis:
21. Grossman LI: Endodontic practice. Philadelphia: Lea & Febi‑
study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopa‑
ger, 1966.
thologic findings. J Endod 2010; 36:1277‑1288.
22. Grossman LI, Meinam BW: Solution of pulp tissue by chemi‑
4. Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Influence
cal agent. J Am Dent Assoc 1941; 28:223‑225.
of the apical preparation size and the irrigant type on bacte‑
23. Dychdala GR: Chlorine and chlorine compounds. In Block
rial reduction in root canal‑treated teeth with apical perio‑
SS, editor: Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. 4th
dontitis. J Endod 2017; 43:1058‑1063.
ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1991; p. 133‑150.
5. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Chemomechanical
24. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, et al.: Mechanism of action
reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after
instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% so‑ of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J 2002; 13:113‑117.
dium hypochlorite. J Endod 2000; 26:331‑334. 25. Zehnder M: Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32: 389‑398.
6. Byström A, Sundqvist G: The antibacterial action of sodium 26. Rutala WA, Weber DJ: Uses of inorganic hypochlorite (ble‑
hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. ach) in health‑care facilities. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;
Int Endod J 1985; 18:35‑40. 10:597‑610.
7. Ostby NB: Chelating in root canal therapy. Ethylenediamine 27. McDonnel G, Russell AD: Antiseptics and disinfectants: activi‑
tetra‑acetic acid for cleansing and widening of root canals. ty, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12:147‑179.
Odontologic Tidskrift 1957; 65:3‑11. 28. Parks LM, et al.: Inorganic chemistry in pharmacy.Lippincott
8. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ: Flare‑ups in endodontics: I. Etiological Company, 1949.
factors. J Endod 1985; 11:472‑478. 29. Lopes HP, Martins CMMS, Carvalho RM: Análise de diversas
9. Fanibunda KB: A method of measuring the volume of human marcas de água sanitária: confiabilidade e segurança para uso
dental pulp cavities. Int Endod J 1986; 19:194‑197. como solução química auxiliar em endodontia. Revista Brasi‑
10. Campos H: Determinação volumétrica dos canais radiculares leira de Odontologia 1999; 56:319‑322.
após a instrumentação. Arq Cent Est Fac Odont 1965; 2:47‑76. 30. Cunningham WT, Balekjian AY: Effect of temperature on
11. Harrison JW, Svec TA, Baumgartner JC: Analysis of clinical to‑ collagen‑dissolving ability of sodium hypochlorite endodon‑
xicity of endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1978; 4:6‑11. tic irrigant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 49:175‑177.
12. Harrison JW: Irrigation of the root canal system. Dent Clin 31. Hand RE, Smith ML, Harrison JW: Analysis of the effect of di‑
North Am 1984; 28:797‑808. lution on the necrotic tissue dissolution property of sodium
13. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, et al.: Cytotoxic effects hypochlorite. J Endod 1978; 4:60‑64.
of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod 1985; 11:525‑528. 32. The SD: The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on fixed
14. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root ca‑ and unfixed necrotic tissue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
nal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005; 1979; 47: 558‑561.
10:123‑147. 33. Dip EC, Carvalho RM, Lopes HP, et al.: Hipoclorito de sódio:
15. Sabala CL, Powell SE: Sodium hypochlorite injection into pe‑ influência da alcalinidade cáustica na dissolução de tecido
riapical tissues. J Endod 1989; 15:490‑492. pulpar. Revista da APCD 2002; 56:369‑373.
16. Zhu WC, Gyamfi J, Niu LN, et al.: Anatomy of sodium hy‑ 34. Abou‑Rass M, Oglesby SW: The effects of temperature, con‑
pochlorite accidents involving facial ecchymosis – a review. J centration, and tissue type on the solvent ability of sodium hy‑
Dent 2013; 41:935‑948. pochlorite. J Endod 1981; 7:376‑377.
Capítulo 14   |   Referências Bibliográficas 71

35. Sirtes G, Waltimo T, Schaetzle M, et al.: The effects of tempe‑ 56. Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, et al.: Reduction of
rature on sodium hypochlorite short‑term stability, pulp dis‑ intracanal bacteria using nickel‑titanium rotary instrumenta‑
solution capacity, and antimicrobial efficacy. J Endod 2005; tion and various medications. J Endod 2000; 26:751‑755.
31:669‑671. 57. Siqueira JF, Jr, Guimarães‑Pinto T, Rôças IN: Effects of chemo‑
36. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR: Efficacy of several concentra‑ mechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and
tions of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J En‑ intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide on cultivable
dod 1992; 18:605‑612. bacteria in infected root canals. J Endod 2007; 33:800‑805.
37. Koskinen KP, Stenvall H, Uitto VJ: Dissolution of bovine 58. Siqueira JF, Jr, Magalhães KM, Rôças IN: Bacterial reduc‑
pulp tissue by endodontic solutions. Scand J Dent Res 1980; tion in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an
88:406‑411. irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramono‑
38. Jungbluth H, Peters C, Peters O, et al.: Physicochemical and chlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing. J Endod 2007;
pulp tissue dissolution properties of some household blea‑ 33:667‑672.
ch brands compared with a dental sodium hypochlorite solu‑ 59. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Paiva SS, et al.: Bacteriologic inves‑
tion. J Endod 2012; 38:372‑375. tigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhe‑
39. De‑Deus G, de Berredo Pinho MA, Reis C, et al.: Sodium hy‑ xidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical
pochlorite with reduced surface tension does not improve in periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
situ pulp tissue dissolution. J Endod 2013; 39:1039‑1043. Endod 2007; 104:122‑130.
40. Siqueira JF, Jr, da Silva CH, Cerqueira MD, et al.: Effective‑ 60. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Gomes BP, et al.: In vivo evaluation of
ness of four chemical solutions in eliminating Bacillus subtilis microbial reduction after chemo‑mechanical preparation of
spores on gutta‑percha cones. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue. Int En‑
14:124‑126. dod J 2006; 39:484‑492.
41. Senia ES, Marraro RV, Mitchell JL, et al.: Rapid sterilization 61. Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Orstavik D, et al.: Microbial analy‑
of gutta‑percha cones with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J En‑ sis of endodontic infections in root‑filled teeth with apical pe‑
dod 1975; 1:136‑140. riodontitis before and after irrigation using pyrosequencing.
42. Chavez de Paz LE, Bergenholtz G, Svensater G: The effects J Endod 2018; 44:372‑378.
of antimicrobials on endodontic biofilm bacteria. J Endod 62. Neves MA, Provenzano JC, Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antibacte‑
2010; 36:70‑77. rial effectiveness of root canal preparation with reciprocating
43. Arias‑Moliz MT, Ferrer‑Luque CM, Espigares‑Garcia M, et al.: single‑instrument or continuously rotating multi‑instrument
Enterococcus faecalis biofilms eradication by root canal irri‑ systems. J Endod 2016; 42:25‑29.
gants. J Endod 2009; 35:711‑714. 63. Rôças IN, Provenzano JC, Neves MA, et al.: Disinfecting
44. Tawakoli PN, Ragnarsson KT, Rechenberg DK, et al.: Effect of effects of rotary instrumentation with either 2.5% sodium hy‑
endodontic irrigants on biofilm matrix polysaccharides. Int pochlorite or 2% chlorhexidine as the main irrigant: a rando‑
Endod J 2017; 50:153‑160. mized clinical study. J Endod 2016; 42:943‑947.
45. Baumgartner JC, Ibay AC: The chemical reactions of irrigants 64. Zandi H, Rodrigues RC, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Antibacte‑
used for root canal debridement. J Endod 1987; 13:47‑51. rial effectiveness of 2 root canal irrigants in root‑filled teeth
46. Spanó JCE: Estudo “in vitro” das propriedades físico‑quími‑ with infection: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2016; 42:
cas das soluções de hipoclorito de sódio, em diferentes con‑ 1307‑1313.
centrações, antes e após a dissolução de tecido pulpar bovi‑ 65. Rodrigues RC, Antunes HS, Neves MA, et al.: Infection con‑
no. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universida‑ trol in retreatment cases: in vivo antibacterial effects of 2 ins‑
de de São Paulo, 1999. trumentation systems. J Endod 2015; 41:1600‑1605.
47. Tasman F, Cehreli ZC, Ogan C, et al.: Surface tension of root 66. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rocas IN, et al.: Clinical antimicro‑
canal irrigants. J Endod 2000; 26:586‑587. bial efficacy of NiTi rotary instrumentation with NaOCl irri‑
48. Cunningham WT, Joseph SW: Effect of temperature on the gation, final rinse with chlorhexidine and interappointment
bactericidal action of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irri‑ medication: a molecular study. Int Endod J 2013; 46:225‑233.
gant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50:569‑571. 67. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Bacterial reduc‑
49. Siqueira JF, Jr., Lopes HP, Magalhäes FAC, et al.: Efeito anti‑ tion and persistence after endodontic treatment procedures.
bacteriano do hipoclorito de sódio a 1% e a 5.25% sobre ba‑ Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:19‑23.
cilos anaeróbicos produtores de pigmentos negros. Revista 68. Brito PR, Souza LC, Machado de Oliveira JC, et al.: Compa‑
Paulista de Odontologia 1999; 21:4‑6. rison of the effectiveness of three irrigation techniques in re‑
50. Siqueira JF, Jr, Batista MM, Fraga RC, et al.: Antibacterial effects ducing intracanal Enterococcus faecalis populations: an in vi‑
of endodontic irrigants on black‑pigmented gram‑negative tro study. J Endod 2009; 35:1422‑1427.
anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 1998; 24:414‑416. 69. Denton GW: Chlorhexidine. In Block SS, editor: Disinfec‑
51. Lewis SP: Sodium hypochlorite root canal therapy. J Fla Dent tion, sterilization, and preservation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea
Soc 1954; 24:10. & Febiger; 1991:276‑277.
52. Marchesan MA, Souza RA, Guerisoli DMZ, et al.: Análise de 70. Rolla G, Melsen B: On the mechanism of the plaque inhibi‑
algumas propriedades físico‑químicas das águas sanitárias en‑ tion by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res 1975; 54 Spec No B: B57‑62.
contradas no mercado brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Odon‑ 71. Souza M, Cecchin D, Farina AP, et al.: Evaluation of chlorhe‑
tologia 1988; 55:301‑303. xidine substantivity on human dentin: a chemical analysis. J
53. Siqueira JF, Jr, Moraes SR, Lopes HP: Atividade antimicrobia‑ Endod 2012; 38:1249‑1252.
na de águas sanitárias disponíveis no mercado nacional. Re‑ 72. Rosenthal S, Spangberg L, Safavi K: Chlorhexidine substan‑
vista Brasileira de Odontologia 1999; 56:57‑60. tivity in root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
54. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Santos SR, et al.: Efficacy of instru‑ Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98:488‑492.
mentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing 73. Basrani B, Santos JM, Tjaderhane L, et al.: Substantive antimi‑
the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod 2002; crobial activity in chlorhexidine‑treated human root dentin.
28:181‑184. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;
55. Byström A, Sundqvist G: Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect 94:240‑245.
of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. 74. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Comparison of the in vivo antimicro‑
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983; 55:307‑312. bial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine
72 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology study. 96. Pecora JD, Guimaraes LF, Savioli RN: Surface tension
J Endod 2011; 37:143‑150. of several drugs used in endodontics. Braz Dent J 1992;
75. Yesilsoy C, Whitaker E, Cleveland D, et al.: Antimicrobial and 2:123‑127.
toxic effects of established and potential root canal irrigants. 97. Morgan RW, Carnes DL, Jr., Montgomery S: The solvent
J Endod 1995; 21:513‑515. effects of calcium hydroxide irrigating solution on bovine
76. Tanomaru Filho M, Leonardo MR, Silva LAB, et al.: Inflam‑ pulp tissue. J Endod 1991; 17:165‑168.
matory response to different endodontic irrigating solutions. 98. Sperança PA: Atividade germicida do hidróxido de cálcio.
Int Endod J 2002; 35:735‑739. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 1989; 37:346‑348.
77. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, et al.: Interaction between 99. Siqueira JF, Jr, Machado AG, Silveira RM, et al.: Evaluation
sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three
2007; 33:966‑969. irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis
78. Krishnamurthy S, Sudhakaran S: Evaluation and prevention from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J 1997; 30:279‑282.
of the precipitate formed on interaction between sodium hy‑ 100. Svec TA, Harrison JW: Chemomechanical removal of pulpal
pochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2010; 36:1154‑1157. and dentinal debris with sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen
79. Siqueira JF, Jr, Paiva SS, Rôças IN: Reduction in the cultivable peroxide vs normal saline solution. J Endod 1977; 3:49‑53.
bacterial populations in infected root canals by a chlorhexidi‑ 101. Violich DR, Chandler NP: The smear layer in endodontics –
ne‑based antimicrobial protocol. J Endod 2007; 33:541‑547. a review. Int Endod J 2010; 43:2‑15.
80. Kleier DJ, Averbach RE, Mehdipour O: The sodium hypo‑ 102. Sen BH, Wesselink PR, Turkun M: The smear layer: a pheno‑
chlorite accident: experience of diplomates of the American menon in root canal therapy. Int Endod J 1995; 28:141‑148.
Board of Endodontics. J Endod 2008; 34:1346‑1350. 103. McComb D, Smith DC: A preliminary scanning electron mi‑
81. Sand HF: The dissociation of EDTA and EDTA‑sodium salts. croscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures.
Acta Odontol Scand 1961; 19:469‑482. J Endod 1975; 1:238‑242.
82. Patterson SS: In vivo and in vitro studies of the effect of the 104. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, et al.: Clinical
disodium slat of ethylenediamine tetra‑acetate on human implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review.
dentine and its endodontic implications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;
Oral Pathol 1963; 16:83‑103. 94:658‑666.
83. Nery MJ, Souza V, Holland R: Reação do coto pulpar e teci‑ 105. Pashley DH: Smear layer: overview of structure and func‑
dos periapicais de dentes de cães a algumas substâncias em‑ tion. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88 Suppl 1:215‑224.
pregadas no preparo biomecânico de canais radiculares. Rev 106. Pashley DH: Clinical considerations of microleakage. J En‑
Fac Odont Araçatuba 1974; 3:245‑254. dod 1990; 16:70‑77.
84. Stewart GG, Kapsimalas P, Rappaport H: EDTA and urea pe‑ 107. Mader CL, Baumgartner JC, Peters DD: Scanning electron
roxide for root canal preparation. J Am Dent Assoc 1969; microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root ca‑
78:335‑338. nal walls. J Endod 1984; 10:477‑483.
85. Wayman BE, Kopp WM, Pinero GJ, et al.: Citric and lactic aci‑ 108. Drake DR, Wiemann AH, Rivera EM, et al.: Bacterial reten‑
ds as root canal irrigants in vitro. J Endod 1979; 5:258‑265. tion in canal walls in vitro: effect of smear layer. J Endod
86. Loel DA: Use of acid cleanser in endodontic therapy. J Am 1994; 20:78‑82.
Dent Assoc 1975; 90:148‑151. 109. Brannstrom M: Smear layer: pathological and treatment
87. Smith JJ, Wayman BE: An evaluation of the antimicrobial considerations. Oper Dent Suppl 1984; 3:35‑42.
effectiveness of citric acid as a root canal irrigant. J Endod 110. Fogel HM, Pashley DH: Dentin permeability: effects of endo‑
1986; 12:54‑58. dontic procedures on root slabs. J Endod 1990; 16: 442‑445.
88. Torabinejad M, Shabahang S, Bahjri K: Effect of MTAD on 111. Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M: Disinfection by endodontic irri‑
postoperative discomfort: a randomized clinical trial. J En‑ gants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tu‑
dod 2005; 31:171‑176. bules. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6:142‑149.
89. Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, et al.: A new solution 112. Hovland EJ, Dumsha TC: Leakage evaluation in vitro of
for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod 2003; 29:170‑175. the root canal sealer cement Sealapex. Int Endod J 1985;
90. Newberry BM, Shabahang S, Johnson N, et al.: The anti‑ 18:179‑182.
microbial effect of biopure MTAD on eight strains of En‑ 113. Gettleman BH, Messer HH, ElDeeb ME: Adhesion of sealer
terococcus faecalis: an in vitro investigation. J Endod 2007; cements to dentin with and without the smear layer. J En‑
33:1352‑1354. dod 1991; 17:15‑20.
91. Shabahang S, Torabinejad M: Effect of MTAD on Enterococ‑ 114. Cergneux M, Ciucchi B, Dietschi JM, et al.: The influence
cus faecalis‑contaminated root canals of extracted human te‑ of the smear layer on the sealing ability of canal obturation.
eth. J Endod 2003; 29:576‑579. Int Endod J 1987; 20:228‑232.
92. Portenier I, Waltimo T, Ørstavik D, et al.: Killing of Enterococ- 115. Saunders WP, Saunders EM: The effect of smear layer upon
cus faecalis by MTAD and chlorhexidine digluconate with or the coronal leakage of gutta‑percha fillings and a glass iono‑
without cetrimide in the presence or absence of dentine po‑ mer sealer. Int Endod J 1992; 25:245‑249.
wder or BSA. J Endod 2006; 32:138‑141. 116. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, et al.: A scanning electron
93. Dunavant TR, Regan JD, Glickman GN, et al.: Comparative microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with se‑
evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis veral irrigating solutions: Part 3. J Endod 1983; 9:137‑142.
biofilms. J Endod 2006; 32:527‑531. 117. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Estrela C, et al.: Smear layer removal:
94. Malkhassian G, Manzur AJ, Legner M, et al.: Antibacterial Influence of the chelating agent (EDTA). Braz Endod J
efficacy of MTAD final rinse and two percent chlorhexidine 1996; 1:52‑55.
gel medication in teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomi‑ 118. Cheung GS, Stock CJ: In vitro cleaning ability of root canal
zed double‑blinded clinical trial. J Endod 2009; 35:1483‑1490. irrigants with and without endosonics. Int Endod J 1993;
95. Giardino L, Ambu E, Savoldi E, et al.: Comparative evalua‑ 26:334‑343.
tion of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, 119. Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, et al.: Efficacy of
and Tetraclean against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J En‑ Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer
dod 2007; 33:852‑855. on root canal walls. J Endod 1998; 24:548‑551.
Ca pí tulo

Medicação Intracanal 15
José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Hélio P. Lopes

14. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Identification of bacteria enduring


Referências Bibliográficas endodontic treatment procedures by a combined reverse
transcriptase‑polymerase chain reaction and reverse‑capture
1. Byström A, Sundqvist G: The antibacterial action of sodium
checkerboard approach. J Endod 2010; 36:45‑52.
hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy.
15. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Comparison of the in vivo antimi‑
Int Endod J 1985; 18:35‑40.
crobial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexi‑
2. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, et al.: The antimicrobial
dine used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology
effect of calcium hydroxide as a short‑term intracanal dres‑
study. J Endod 2011; 37:143‑150.
sing. Int Endod J 1991; 24:119‑125.
16. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: In vivo antimicrobial effects of en‑
3. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Influence of infection
dodontic treatment procedures as assessed by molecular mi‑
at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic tre‑
crobiologic techniques. J Endod 2011; 37:304‑310.
atment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;
17. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Supplementing
30:297‑306.
the antimicrobial effects of chemomechanical debride‑
4. Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, et al.: Reduction of
ment with either passive ultrasonic irrigation or a final
intracanal bacteria using nickel‑titanium rotary instrumenta‑
rinse with chlorhexidine: a clinical study. J Endod 2012;
tion and various medications. J Endod 2000; 26:751‑755.
38:1202‑1206.
5. Kvist T, Molander A, Dahlen G, et al.: Microbiological eva‑
18. Neves MA, Provenzano JC, Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antibacte‑
luation of one‑ and two‑visit endodontic treatment of teeth
with apical periodontitis: a randomized, clinical trial. J En‑ rial effectiveness of root canal preparation with reciprocating
dod 2004; 30:572‑576. single‑instrument or continuously rotating multi‑instrument
6. McGurkin‑Smith R, Trope M, Caplan D, et al.: Reduction of systems. J Endod 2016; 42:25‑29.
intracanal bacteria using GT rotary instrumentation, 5.25% 19. Rôças IN, Provenzano JC, Neves MA, et al.: Disinfecting
NaOCl, EDTA, and Ca(OH)2. J Endod 2005; 31:359‑363. effects of rotary instrumentation with either 2.5% sodium hy‑
7. Paquette L, Legner M, Fillery ED, et al.: Antibacterial efficacy pochlorite or 2% chlorhexidine as the main irrigant: a rando‑
of chlorhexidine gluconate intracanal medication in vivo. J mized clinical study. J Endod 2016; 42:943‑947.
Endod 2007; 33:788‑795. 20. Love RM, Jenkinson HF: Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral
8. Siqueira JF, Jr, Guimarães‑Pinto T, Rôças IN: Effects of chemo‑ bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002; 13:171‑183.
mechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 21. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, et al.: Viable bacteria in
intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide on cultivable root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J En‑
bacteria in infected root canals. J Endod 2007; 33:800‑805. dod 2001; 27:76‑81.
9. Siqueira JF, Jr, Magalhães KM, Rôças IN: Bacterial reduction 22. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Fungal infection of
in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant the radicular dentin. J Endod 2002; 28:770‑773.
and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophe‑ 23. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M, Fonseca ME: A scanning elec‑
nol paste as an intracanal dressing. J Endod 2007; 33:667‑672. tron microscopic evaluation of in vitro dentinal tubules pe‑
10. Siqueira JF, Jr, Paiva SS, Rôças IN: Reduction in the cultivable netration by selected anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 1996;
bacterial populations in infected root canals by a chlorhexidi‑ 22:308‑310.
ne‑based antimicrobial protocol. J Endod 2007; 33:541‑547. 24. Matsuo T, Shirakami T, Ozaki K, et al.: An immunohistological
11. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Paiva SS, et al.: Bacteriologic inves‑ study of the localization of bacteria invading root pulpal walls
tigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhe‑ of teeth with periapical lesions. J Endod 2003; 29:194‑200.
xidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical 25. Siqueira JF, Jr, Araujo MC, Garcia PF, et al.: Histological eva‑
periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol luation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techni‑
Endod 2007; 104:122‑130. ques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod
12. Huffaker SK, Safavi K, Spångberg LS, et al.: Influence of a 1997; 23:499‑502.
passive sonic irrigation system on the elimination of bacte‑ 26. Walton RE: Histologic evaluation of different methods of en‑
ria from root canal systems: a clinical study. J Endod 2010; larging the pulp canal space. J Endod 1976; 2:304‑311.
36:1315‑1318. 27. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Bate AL, et al.: Histologic investi‑
13. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Bacterial reduc‑ gation of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a
tion and persistence after endodontic treatment procedures. retrospective study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod 2009;
Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:19‑23. 35:493‑502.
74 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

28. Vera J, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: One‑ versus two‑vi‑ molar mesial canals prepared by self‑adjusting file, Reciproc,
sit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a and Twisted File systems. J Endod 2013; 39:1044‑1050.
histobacteriologic study. J Endod 2012; 38:1040‑1052. 48. Siqueira JF, Jr., Perez AR, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: What
29. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. London: happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis
Quintessence Publishing, 2011; p. 403. using micro‑computed tomography and histology/scanning
30. Siqueira JF, Jr: Strategies to treat infected root canals. J Calif electron microscopy. International Endodontic Journal (in
Dent Assoc 2001; 29:825‑837. press) 2017.
31. Trope M, Bergenholtz G: Microbiological basis for endodon‑ 49. Lacerda M, Marceliano‑Alves MF, Perez AR, et al.: Cleaning
tic treatment: can a maximal outcome be achieved in one vi‑ and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: a
sit? Endod Topics 2002; 1:40‑53. correlative micro‑computed tomographic and histologic stu‑
32. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root ca‑ dy. J Endod 2017; 43:1878‑1884.
nal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005; 50. Baik JE, Jang KS, Kang SS, et al.: Calcium hydroxide inactiva‑
10:123‑147. tes lipoteichoic acid from Enterococcus faecalis through de‑
33. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, et al.: A prospective cohort acylation of the lipid moiety. J Endod 2011; 37:191‑196.
study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results 51. Baik JE, Kum KY, Yun CH, et al.: Calcium hydroxide inactiva‑
after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑ tes lipoteichoic acid from Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2008;
dod 2011; 112:825‑842. 34:1355‑1359.
34. Riche FNSJ, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Análise prospectiva do 52. Silva L, Nelson‑Filho P, Leonardo MR, et al.: Effect of calcium
índice de sucesso da terapia endodôntica usando uma es‑ hydroxide on bacterial endotoxin in vivo. J Endod 2002;
tratégia antimicrobiana. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 28:94‑98.
2006; 63:133‑137. 53. Safavi KE, Nichols FC: Alteration of biological properties of
35. Byström A, Happonen RP, Sjogren U, et al.: Healing of pe‑ bacterial lipopolysaccharide by calcium hydroxide treatment.
riapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treat‑ J Endod 1994; 20:127‑129.
ment with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 54. Safavi KE, Nichols FC: Effect of calcium hydroxide on bacte‑
3:58‑63. rial lipopolysaccharide. J Endod 1993; 19:76‑78.
36. Holland R, Soares IJ, Soares IM: Influence of irrigation and 55. Tronstad L: Root resorption‑‑etiology, terminology and clini‑
intracanal dressing on the healing process of dogs’ teeth with cal manifestations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4:241‑252.
apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:223‑229. 56. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Bakland L, et al.: Traumatic
37. Leonardo MR, Almeida WA, Ito IY, et al.: Radiographic and dental injuries. A manual. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
microbiologic evaluation of posttreatment apical and peria‑ 57. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontology. An integrated bio‑
pical repair of root canals of dogs’ teeth with experimentally logical and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing,
induced chronic lesion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2013.
1994; 78:232‑238. 58. Siqueira JF, Jr: Tratamento das infecções endodônticas. Rio
38. Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M: Radiographic evalua‑ de Janeiro: MEDSI, 1997.
tion of periapical healing after obturation of infected root ca‑ 59. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM: Textbook and color atlas of
nals: an in vivo study. Int Endod J 2000; 33:60‑66. traumatic injuries to the teeth. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1994.
39. Katebzadeh N, Hupp J, Trope M: Histological periapical re‑ 60. Spångberg LSW: Intracanal medication. In Ingle JI, Bakland
pair after obturation of infected root canals in dogs. J Endod LK, editors: Endodontics. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wi‑
1999; 25:364‑368. lkins, 1994.
40. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al.: Factors affecting 61. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M: Intracanal medicaments: evalua‑
the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990; tion of the antibacterial effects of chlorhexidine, metronida‑
16:498‑504. zole, and calcium hydroxide associated with three vehicles. J
41. Trope M, Delano EO, Ørstavik D: Endodontic treatment of Endod 1997; 23:167‑169.
teeth with apical periodontitis: single vs. multivisit treatment. 62. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G: Microbiological evaluation of
J Endod 1999; 25:345‑350. clindamycin as a root canal dressing in teeth with apical pe‑
42. Holland R, Otoboni Filho JA, de Souza V, et al.: A comparison riodontitis. Int Endod J 1990; 23:113‑118.
of one versus two appointment endodontic therapy in dogs’ 63. Windley W, 3rd, Teixeira F, Levin L, et al.: Disinfection of
teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2003; 29:121‑124. immature teeth with a triple antibiotic paste. J Endod 2005;
43. Leonardo MR, Hernandez ME, Silva LA, et al.: Effect of a cal‑ 31:439‑443.
cium hydroxide‑based root canal dressing on periapical re‑ 64. Banchs F, Trope M: Revascularization of immature perma‑
pair in dogs: a histological study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral nent teeth with apical periodontitis: new treatment protocol?
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:680‑685. J Endod 2004; 30: 196‑200.
44. Silveira AM, Lopes HP, Siqueira Jr JF, et al.: Periradicular re‑ 65. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Detection of antibiotic resistance
pair after two‑visit endodontic treatment using two different genes in samples from acute and chronic endodontic infec‑
intracanal medications compared to single‑visit endodontic tions and after treatment. Arch Oral Biol 2013; 58:1123‑1128.
treatment. Braz Dent J 2007; 18:299‑304. 66. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Antibiotic resistance genes in anae‑
45. Molander A, Warfvinge J, Reit C, et al.: Clinical and radiogra‑ robic bacteria isolated from primary dental root canal infec‑
phic evaluation of one‑ and two‑visit endodontic treatment of tions. Anaerobe 2012; 18:576‑580.
asymptomatic necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis: a ran‑ 67. Jungermann GB, Burns K, Nandakumar R, et al.: Antibiotic
domized clinical trial. J Endod 2007; 33:1145‑1148. resistance in primary and persistent endodontic infections. J
46. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M: Recontamination of Endod 2011; 37:1337‑1344.
coronally unsealed root canals medicated with camphorated 68. Nagata JY, Gomes BP, Rocha Lima TF, et al.: Traumatized im‑
paramonochlorophenol or calcium hydroxide pastes after sa‑ mature teeth treated with 2 protocols of pulp revasculariza‑
liva challenge. J Endod 1998; 24:11‑14. tion. J Endod 2014; 40:606‑612.
47. Siqueira JF, Jr., Alves FR, Versiani MA, et al.: Correlative bacterio‑ 69. Arruda MEF, Neves MAS, Diogenes A, et al.: Infection con‑
logic and micro‑computed tomographic analysis of mandibular trol in teeth with apical periodontitis using a triple antibiotic
Capítulo 15   |   Referências Bibliográficas 75

solution or calcium hydroxide with chlorhexidine: a rando‑ 92. Oncag O, Hosgor M, Hilmioglu S, et al.: Comparison of an‑
mized clinical trial. J Endod 2018. tibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants.
70. Fava LR, Saunders WP: Calcium hydroxide pastes: classifica‑ Int Endod J 2003; 36:423‑432.
tion and clinical indications. Int Endod J 1999; 32:257‑282. 93. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR: Residual antimicrobial acti‑
71. Hermann BW: Calciumhydroxyd als mittel zum behandeln vity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod 1997;
und füllen von zahnwurzelkanälen. Würzburg, Med. Diss., 23:229‑231.
1920; 48 p. 94. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, et al.: In vivo
72. Heithersay GS: Calcium hydroxide in the treatment of pul‑ antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root ca‑
pless teeth with associated pathology. J Brit Endod Soc 1975; nal irrigating solution. J Endod 1999; 25:167‑171.
8:74‑92. 95. Rosenthal S, Spangberg L, Safavi K: Chlorhexidine substan‑
73. Stewart GG: Calcium hydroxide‑induced root healing. J Am tivity in root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Dent Assoc 1975; 90:793‑800. Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98:488‑492.
74. Byström A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G: The antibacterial effect 96. Basrani B, Santos JM, Tjaderhane L, et al.: Substantive anti‑
of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phe‑ microbial activity in chlorhexidine‑treated human root den‑
nol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root tin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:170‑175. 2002; 94:240‑245.
75. Lopes HP, Estrela C, Siqueira Jr JF, et al.: Considerações quí‑ 97. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP: Mechanisms of antimicrobial ac‑
micas, microbiológicas e biológicas do hidróxido de cálcio. tivity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int Endod J
OdontoMaster Endodontia 1996; 1:1‑17. 1999; 32:361‑369.
76. Walkhoff O: Ein beitrag der pharmakologic der chlorophe‑ 98. Souza V, Bernabé PFE, Holland R, et al.: Tratamento não ci‑
nol‑Kanpfer‑preparate. Zhnrztl Rdsch 1929; p. 965. rúrgico de dentes com lesões periapicais. Revista Brasileira
77. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP, Uzeda M: Atividade antibacteriana de Odontologia 1989; 46:39‑46.
de medicamentos endodônticos sobre bactérias anaeróbias 99. Tronstad L, Mjor IA: Capping of the inflamed pulp. Oral
estritas. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 1996; 50:326‑332. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34:477‑485.
78. Ohara P, Torabinejad M, Kettering JD: Antibacterial effects of 100. Waltimo TM, Ørstavik D, Siren EK, et al.: In vitro susceptibi‑
various endodontic medicaments on selected anaerobic bac‑ lity of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their com‑
teria. J Endod 1993; 19:498‑500. binations. Int Endod J 1999; 32:421‑429.
79. Koontongkaew S, Silapichit R, Thaweboon B: Clinical and la‑ 101. Waltimo TM, Siren EK, Ørstavik D, et al.: Susceptibility of
boratory assessments of camphorated monochlorophenol in oral Candida species to calcium hydroxide in vitro. Int En‑
endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; dod J 1999; 32:94‑98.
65:757‑762. 102. Kalfas S, Figdor D, Sundqvist G: A new bacterial species as‑
80. Messer HH, Chen RS: The duration of effectiveness of root sociated with failed endodontic treatment: identification
canal medicaments. J Endod 1984; 10:240‑245. and description of Actinomyces radicidentis. Oral Surg
81. Naumovich DB: Surface tension and pH of drugs in root canal Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92:208‑214.
therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1963; 16:965‑968. 103. Halliwell B: Oxidants and human disease: some new con‑
82. Milano NF, Kolling IG, Fachini EF: Tensão superficial de al‑ cepts. Faseb J 1987; 1:358‑364.
guns auxiliares químicos em endodontia. Revista Gaúcha de 104. Freeman BA, Crapo JD: Biology of disease: free radicals and
Odontologia 1983; 31:37‑38. tissue injury. Lab Invest 1982; 47:412‑426.
83. Denton GW: Chlorhexidine. In Block SS, editor: Disinfec‑ 105. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T: Robbins’ pathologic basis of
tion, sterilization, and preservation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1999.
& Febiger; 1991:276‑277. 106. Padan E, Zilberstein D, Schuldiner S: pH homeostasis in
84. Stanley A, Wilson M, Newman HN: The in vitro effects of bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981; 650:151‑166.
chlorhexidine on subgingival plaque bacteria. J Clin Perio‑ 107. Imlay JA, Linn S: DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity.
dontol 1989; 16: 259‑264. Science 1988; 240:1302‑1309.
85. Ohara P, Torabinejad M, Kettering JD: Antibacterial effects of 108. Georgopoulou M, Kontakiotis E, Nakou M: In vitro evalua‑
various endodontic irrigants on selected anaerobic bacteria. tion of the effectiveness of calcium hydroxide and paramo‑
Endod Dent Traumatol 1993; 9:95‑100. nochlorophenol on anaerobic bacteria from the root canal.
86. McDonnel G, Russell AD: Antiseptics and disinfectants: activi‑ Endod Dent Traumatol 1993; 9:249‑253.
ty, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12:147‑179. 109. Abdulkader A, Duguid R, Saunders EM: The antimicrobial
87. Ercan E, Ozekinci T, Atakul F, et al.: Antibacterial activity of activity of endodontic sealers to anaerobic bacteria. Int En‑
2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite dod J 1996; 29:280‑283.
in infected root canal: in vivo study. J Endod 2004; 30:84‑87. 110. DiFiore PM, Peters DD, Setterstrom JA, et al.: The antibac‑
88. Vianna ME, Gomes BP, Berber VB, et al.: In vitro evaluation terial effects of calcium hydroxide apexification pastes on
of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hy‑ Streptococcus sanguis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
pochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑ 1983; 55:91‑94.
dod 2004; 97:79‑84. 111. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Garrido FD, et al.: Microbial suscep‑
89. Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Orstavik D, et al.: Microbial analy‑ tibility to calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles. J En‑
sis of endodontic infections in root‑filled teeth with apical pe‑ dod 2002; 28:758‑761.
riodontitis before and after irrigation using pyrosequencing. 112. Siqueira JF, Jr, Gonçalves RB: Antibacterial activities of root
J Endod 2018; 44:372‑378. canal sealers against selected anaerobic bacteria. J Endod
90. Zandi H, Rodrigues RC, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Antibacterial 1996; 22:89‑90.
effectiveness of 2 root canal irrigants in root‑filled teeth with in‑ 113. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP, Uzeda M: Atividade antibacteriana
fection: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2016; 42:1307‑1313. da pasta de hidróxido de cálcio/PMCC/glicerina contendo
91. Tanomaru Filho M, Leonardo MR, Silva LAB, et al.: Inflam‑ diferentes proporções de iodofórmio sobre bactérias anae‑
matory response to different endodontic irrigating solutions. róbias estritas e facultativas. Revista Paulista de Odontologia
Int Endod J 2002; 35:735‑739. 1997; 19:17‑21.
76 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

114. Siqueira JF, Jr, Magalhães FAC, Uzeda M: Avaliação da ati‑ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;
vidade antibacteriana de medicação intracanal. Três bases 96:215‑222.
fortes e pastas à base de hidróxido de cálcio e paramonoclo‑ 135. Collins MD, Hoyles L, Kalfas S, et al.: Characterization of Ac-
rofenol canforado. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 1996; tinomyces isolates from infected root canals of teeth: descrip‑
44:271‑274. tion of Actinomyces radicidentis sp. nov. J Clin Microbiol 2000;
115. Vieira AR, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: Dentinal tubule in‑ 38:3399‑3403.
fection as the cause of recurrent disease and late endodontic 136. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, et al.: Microbiological sta‑
treatment failure: a case report. J Endod 2012; 38:250‑254. tus of root‑filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J
116. Estrela C, Pimenta FC, Ito IY, et al.: Antimicrobial evalua‑ 1998; 31:1‑7.
tion of calcium hydroxide in infected dentinal tubules. J En‑ 137. Rôças IN, Jung IY, Lee CY, et al.: Polymerase chain reac‑
dod 1999; 25:416‑418. tion identification of microorganisms in previously root‑fil‑
117. Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D: In vitro infection and disinfection led teeth in a South Korean population. J Endod 2004;
of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1375‑1379. 30:504‑508.
118. Heling I, Steinberg D, Kenig S, et al.: Efficacy of a sustai‑ 138. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Santos KR: Association of Enterococ-
ned‑release device containing chlorhexidine and Ca(OH)2 cus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J
in preventing secondary infection of dentinal tubules. Int Endod 2004; 30:315‑320.
Endod J 1992; 25:20‑24. 139. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Polymerase chain reaction‑based
119. Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M: Disinfection by endodontic irri‑ analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodon‑
gants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tu‑ tic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
bules. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6:142‑149. Endod 2004; 97:85‑94.
120. Safavi KE, Spångberg LS, Langeland K: Root canal dentinal 140. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Jacinto RC, et al.: Microbial analy‑
tubule disinfection. J Endod 1990; 16:207‑210. sis of canals of root‑filled teeth with periapical lesions using
121. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M: Disinfection by calcium hydroxi‑ polymerase chain reaction. J Endod 2008; 34:537‑540.
de pastes of dentinal tubules infected with two obligate and 141. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Evaluation of root
one facultative anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 1996; 22:674‑676. canal microorganisms isolated from teeth with endodontic
122. Sukawat C, Srisuwan T: A comparison of the antimicrobial failure and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral Micro‑
efficacy of three calcium hydroxide formulations on hu‑ biol Immunol 2003; 18:100‑103.
man dentin infected with Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2002; 142. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Microorganisms
28:102‑104. from canals of root‑filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int
123. Siqueira JF, Jr, Machado de Oliveira JC, Magalhães FAC, et Endod J 2003; 36:1‑11.
al.: Efeitos do hidróxido de cálcio associado a diferentes 143. Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, et al.: Isolation of
veículos sobre dentina contaminada. Revista Brasileira de yeasts and enteric bacteria in root‑filled teeth with chronic
Odontologia 2001; 58:44‑47. apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2001; 34:429‑434.
124. Weiger R, de Lucena J, Decker HE, et al.: Vitality status of 144. Peciuliene V, Balciuniene I, Eriksen HM, et al.: Isolation of
microorganisms in infected human root dentine. Int En‑ Enterococcus faecalis in previously root‑filled canals in a Li‑
dod J 2002; 35:166‑171. thuanian population. J Endod 2000; 26:593‑595.
125. Nerwich A, Figdor D, Messer HH: pH changes in root den‑ 145. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Characterization of microbiota of
tin over a 4‑week period following root canal dressing with root canal‑treated teeth with posttreatment disease. J Clin
calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1993; 19:302‑306. Microbiol 2012; 50:1721‑1724.
126. Wang JD, Hume WR: Diffusion of hydrogen ion and hydro‑ 146. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Paiva SSM, et al.: Cultivable bacte‑
xyl ion from various sources through dentine. Int Endod J ria in infected root canals as identified by 16S rRNA gene
1988; 21:17‑26. sequencing. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:266‑271.
127. Tronstad L, Andreasen JO, Hasselgren G, et al.: pH changes 147. Sundqvist G: Associations between microbial species in den‑
in dental tissues after root canal filling with calcium hydroxi‑ tal root canal infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1992;
de. J Endod 1981; 7:17‑21. 7:257‑262.
128. Portenier I, Haapasalo H, Rye A, et al.: Inactivation of root 148. Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, et al.: Mechanisms invol‑
canal medicaments by dentine, hydroxylapatite and bovine ved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydro‑
serum albumin. Int Endod J 2001; 34:184‑188. xide. Int Endod J 2002; 35:221‑228.
129. Haapasalo HK, Siren EK, Waltimo TM, et al.: Inactivation of 149. Siqueira JF, Jr, Sen BH: Fungi in endodontic infections.
local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;
Int Endod J 2000; 33:126‑131. 97:632‑641.
130. Kontakiotis E, Nakou M, Georgopoulou M: In vitro study of 150. Waltimo TMT, Haapasalo M, Zehnder M, et al.: Clinical as‑
the indirect action of calcium hydroxide on the anaerobic pects related to endodontic yeast infections. Endod Topics
flora of the root canal. Int Endod J 1995; 28:285‑289. 2004; 9:66‑78.
131. Oliveira JC, Alves FR, Uzeda M, et al.: Influence of serum 151. Waltimo TM, Sen BH, Meurman JH, et al.: Yeasts in apical
and necrotic soft tissue on the antimicrobial effects of intra‑ periodontitis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14:128‑137.
canal medicaments. Braz Dent J 2010; 21:295‑300. 152. Manzur A, Gonzalez AM, Pozos A, et al.: Bacterial quanti‑
132. Booth IR: Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Micro‑ fication in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instru‑
biol Rev 1985; 49:359‑378. mentation and different intracanal medications: a randomi‑
133. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Microbiologic zed clinical trial. J Endod 2007; 33:114‑118.
analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the 153. Peters LB, van Winkelhoff AJ, Buijs JF, et al.: Effects of ins‑
outcome of conservative re‑treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med trumentation, irrigation and dressing with calcium hydro‑
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:86‑93. xide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical bone le‑
134. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Polymerase chain reaction de‑ sions. Int Endod J 2002; 35:13‑21.
tection of Propionibacterium propionicus and Actinomyces ra- 154. Teixeira FB, Levin LG, Trope M: Investigation of pH at di‑
dicidentis in primary and persistent endodontic infections. fferent dentinal sites after placement of calcium hydroxide
Capítulo 15   |   Referências Bibliográficas 77

dressing by two methods. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol sobre Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans e Actinomyces radi-
Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99:511‑516. cidentis. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 2007; 64:13‑16.
155. Frank AL: Therapy for the divergent pulpless tooth by con‑ 174. Schafer E, Bossmann K: Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexi‑
tinued apical formation. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 72:87‑93. dine and two calcium hydroxide formulations against Ente-
156. Stevens RH, Grossman LI: Evaluation of the antimicrobial rococcus faecalis. J Endod 2005; 31:53‑56.
potential of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medica‑ 175. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Elimination of
ment. J Endod 1983; 9:372‑374. Candida albicans infection of the radicular dentin by intra‑
157. Stuart KG, Miller CH, Brown CE, Jr., et al.: The comparative canal medications. J Endod 2003; 29:501‑504.
antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide. Oral Surg Oral 176. Zerella JA, Fouad AF, Spångberg LS: Effectiveness of a cal‑
Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72:101‑104. cium hydroxide and chlorhexidine digluconate mixture as
158. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Magalhaes FA, et al.: Antifungal disinfectant during retreatment of failed endodontic cases.
effects of endodontic medicaments. Aust Endod J 2001; Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;
27:112‑114. 100:756‑761.
159. Spångberg L, Rutberg M, Rydinge E: Biologic effects of en‑ 177. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antimicro‑
dodontic antimicrobial agents. J Endod 1979; 5:166‑175. bial efficacy of NiTi rotary instrumentation with NaOCl irri‑
160. Holland R, Souza V, Nery MJ, et al.: A histological study of gation, final rinse with chlorhexidine and interappointment
the effect of calcium hydroxide in the treatment of pulpless medication: a molecular study. Int Endod J 2013; 46:225‑233.
teeth of dogs. J Brit Endod Soc 1979; 12:15‑23. 178. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Bacterial pathogenesis and media‑
161. Torneck CD, Smith JS, Grindall P: Biologic effects of endo‑ tors in apical periodontitis. Braz Dent J 2007; 18:267‑280.
dontic procedures on developing incisor teeth. IV. Effect of 179. Siqueira JF, Jr: Microbiology of apical periodontitis. In
débridement procedures and calcium hydroxide‑campho‑ Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential endodontology.
rated parachlorophenol paste in the treatment of experi‑ 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard Ltd., 2008; p.
mentally induced pulp and periapical disease. Oral Surg 135‑196.
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 35:541‑554. 180. Rietschel ET, Kirikae T, Schade U, et al.: Bacterial endo‑
162. Grecca FS, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, et al.: Radiographic toxin: molecular relationships of structure to activity and
evaluation of periradicular repair after endodontic treat‑ function. FASEB J 1994; 8:217‑225.
ment of dog’s teeth with induced periradicular periodonti‑ 181. Rietschel ET, Brade H: Bacterial endotoxins. Sci Am 1992;
tis. J Endod 2001; 27:610‑612. 267:26‑33.
163. Gahyva SM, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Direct genotoxicity and mutage‑ 182. Nelson‑Filho P, Leonardo MR, Silva LA, et al.: Radiographic
nicity of endodontic substances and materials as evaluated by evaluation of the effect of endotoxin (LPS) plus calcium
two prokaryotic test systems. J Appl Oral Sci 2005; 13: 387‑392. hydroxide on apical and periapical tissues of dogs. J Endod
164. Tanomaru Filho M, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA: Effect of ir‑ 2002; 28:694‑696.
rigating solution and calcium hydroxide root canal dressing 183. Tanomaru JM, Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, et al.:
on the repair of apical and periapical tissues of teeth with Effect of different irrigation solutions and calcium hydroxi‑
periapical lesion. J Endod 2002; 28:295‑299. de on bacterial LPS. Int Endod J 2003; 36:733‑739.
165. Anthony DR, Gordon TM, del Rio CE: The effect of three 184. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Conrads G, et al.: Effect of root canal
vehicles on the pH of calcium hydroxide. Oral Surg Oral procedures on endotoxins and endodontic pathogens. Oral
Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54:560‑565. Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:411‑418.
166. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M: Influence of different vehicles 185. de Oliveira LD, Carvalho CA, Carvalho AS, et al.: Efficacy of
on the antibacterial effects of calcium hydroxide. J Endod endodontic treatment for endotoxin reduction in primari‑
1998; 24:663‑665. ly infected root canals and evaluation of cytotoxic effects. J
167. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Incidence of posto‑ Endod 2012; 38:1053‑1057.
perative pain after intracanal procedures based on an anti‑ 186. Xavier AC, Martinho FC, Chung A, et al.: One‑visit versus
microbial strategy. J Endod 2002; 28:457‑460. two‑visit root canal treatment: effectiveness in the remo‑
168. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Riche FN, et al.: Clinical outcome val of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria. J Endod 2013;
of the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodon‑ 39:959‑964.
titis using an antimicrobial protocol. Oral Surg Oral Med 187. Baik JE, Ryu YH, Han JY, et al.: Lipoteichoic acid partially
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008 (in press). contributes to the inflammatory responses to Enterococcus fa-
169. Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Waltimo TM, et al.: In vitro an‑ ecalis. J Endod 2008; 34:975‑982.
tibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with 188. Lee JK, Baik JE, Yun CH, et al.: Chlorhexidine gluconate atte‑
chlorhexidine or iodine potassium iodide on Enterococcus fa- nuates the ability of lipoteichoic acid from Enterococcus faecalis
ecalis. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112:326‑331. to stimulate toll‑like receptor 2. J Endod 2009; 35:212‑215.
170. Evans MD, Baumgartner JC, Khemaleelakul SU, et al.: Effi‑ 189. Glass RL, Zander HA: Pulp healing. J Dent Res 1949; 28:
cacy of calcium hydroxide: chlorhexidine paste as an intraca‑ 97‑107.
nal medication in bovine dentin. J Endod 2003; 29:338‑339. 190. Holland R, de Mello W, Nery MJ, et al.: Reaction of human
171. Podbielski A, Spahr A, Haller B: Additive antimicro‑ periapical tissue to pulp extirpation and immediate root ca‑
bial activity of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on nal filling with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1977; 3:63‑67.
common endodontic bacterial pathogens. J Endod 2003; 191. Holland R: Histochemical response of amputated pulps to
29:340‑345. calcium hydroxide. Rev Bras Pesq Med Biol 1971; 4:83‑95.
172. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Sena NT, et al.: In vitro evaluation 192. Schröder U: Effects of calcium hydroxide‑containing pulp‑
of the antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide combi‑ capping agents on pulp cell migration, proliferation, and
ned with chlorhexidine gel used as intracanal medicament. differentiation. J Dent Res 1985; 64:541‑548.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 193. Schröder U, Granath LE: Early reaction of intact human
102:544‑550. teeth to calcium hydroxide following experimental pulpo‑
173. Provenzano JC, Pereira OLS, Magalhães FAC, et al.: Eficá‑ tomy and its significance to the development of hard tissue
cia antimicrobiana de diferentes medicamentos intracanais barrier. Odontologisk Revy 1971; 22:379‑396.
78 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

194. Stanley HR: Pulp capping: conserving the dental pulp – 209. Sigurdsson A, Stancill R, Madison S: Intracanal placement
Can it be done? Is it worth it? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑ of Ca(OH)2: a comparison of techniques. J Endod 1992;
thol 1989; 68:628‑639. 18:367‑370.
195. Cvek M, Granath L, Cleaton‑Jones P, et al.: Hard tissue bar‑ 210. Lopes HP: Emprego de instrumentos rotatórios no preenchi‑
rier formation in pulpotomized monkey teeth capped with mento de canais radiculares com pasta de hidróxido de cál‑
cyanoacrilate or calcium hydroxide for 10 and 60 minutes. cio. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 1998; 55:201‑203.
J Dent Res 1987; 66:1166‑1174. 211. Holland R, Souza V, Nery MJ, et al.: Emprego da associação
196. Trope M: Treatment of immature teeth with non‑vital pulps corticosteróide‑antibiótico durante o tratamento endodôn‑
and apical periodontitis. Endod Topics 2006; 14:51‑59. tico. Revista Paulista de Odontologia 1980; 1:4‑7.
197. Hasselgren G, Olsson B, Cvek M: Effects of calcium hydroxi‑ 212. Holland R: Emprego tópico de medicamentos no interior dos
de and sodium hypochlorite on the dissolution of necrotic canais radiculares. OdontoMaster Endodontia 1994; 1: 23‑35.
porcine muscle tissue. J Endod 1988; 14:125‑127. 213. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP: Estudo comparativo da ativida‑
198. Andersen M, Lund A, Andreasen JO, et al.: In vitro solubi‑ de antimicrobiana de medicamentos intracanais através do
lity of human pulp tissue in calcium hydroxide and sodium contato direto e a distância. Rev UFES 1999; 1:60‑64.
hypochlorite. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:104‑108. 214. Rivera EM, Williams K: Placement of calcium hydroxide in
199. Siqueira JF, Jr, Fraga RC, Saboia Dantas CJ: Avaliação histo‑ simulated canals: comparison of glycerin versus water. J En‑
lógica da influência do hidróxido de cálcio e do hipoclorito dod 1994; 20:445‑448.
de sódio na limpeza de canais radiculares. Revista Brasileira 215. Weine FS: Endodontic therapy. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996.
de Odontologia 1998; 55: 132‑134. 216. Noguera AP, McDonald NJ: Comparative in vitro coronal
200. Siqueira JF, Jr, Saboia Dantas CJ: Mecanismos celulares e microleakage study of new endodontic restorative mate‑
moleculares da inflamação. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI, 2000. rials. J Endod 1990; 16:523‑527.
201. Teitelbaum SL: Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 217. Anderson RW, Powell BJ, Pashley DH: Microleakage of tem‑
2000; 289:1504‑1508. porary restorations in complex endodontic access prepara‑
202. Hammarström LE, Blomlof LB, Feiglin B, et al.: Effect of tions. J Endod 1989; 15:526‑529.
calcium hydroxide treatment on periodontal repair and 218. Deveaux E, Hildelbert P, Neut C, et al.: Bacterial microle‑
root resorption. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2:184‑189. akage of Cavit, IRM, TERM, and Fermit: a 21‑day in vitro
203. Siqueira JF, Jr, Luquette LB, Werneck HF, et al.: Effective‑ study. J Endod 1999; 25:653‑659.
ness of formocresol and a calcium hydroxide/compharated 219. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP, Uzeda M: Avaliação da capacidade
paramonochlorophenol paste in preventing entire root ca‑ de seladores temporários de prevenir a infiltração bacteria‑
nal recontamination by bacteria from saliva. Braz Endod J na. ROBRAC 1997; 6:24‑27.
1997; 2:23‑25. 220. Lee YC, Yang SF, Hwang YF, et al.: Microleakage of endodon‑
204. De Moor RJG, De Witte AMJC: Periapical lesions accidentally tic temporary restorative materials. J Endod 1993; 19:516‑520.
filled with calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 2002; 35:946‑958. 221. Teplitsky PE, Meimaris IT: Sealing ability of Cavit and
205. De Bruyne MAA, De Moor RJG, Raes FM: Necrosis of the TERM as intermediate restorative materials. J Endod 1988;
gingiva caused by calcium hydroxide: a case report. Int En‑ 14:278‑282.
dod J 2000; 33:67‑71. 222. Civjan S, Huget EF, Wolfhard G, et al.: Characterization of
206. Lindgren P, Eriksson K‑F, Ringberg A: Severe facial ische‑ zinc oxide‑eugenol cements reinforced with acrylic resin. J
mia after endodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Dent Res 1972; 51:107‑114.
2002; 60:576‑579. 223. O’Brien WJ, Ryge G: Materiais Dentários. Rio de Janeiro:
207. Lopes HP: O emprego do hidróxido de cálcio associado a Interamericana, 1981.
veículo oleoso no tratamento endodôntico de dentes com 224. Roghanizad N, Jones JJ: Evaluation of coronal microleakage
necrose pulpar e ápice aberto. Estudo “in vivo”. Tese (Livre after endodontic treatment. J Endod 1996; 22:471‑473.
Docência) 77. Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade 225. Blaney TD, Peters DD, Setterstrom J, et al.: Marginal sealing
Estadual Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1987. quality of IRM and Cavit as assessed by microbiol penetra‑
208. Cvek M, Hollender L, Nord CE: Treatment of non‑vital per‑ tion. J Endod 1981; 7:453‑457.
manent incisors with calcium hydroxide. VI. A clinical, mi‑ 226. Lamers AC, Simon M, van Mullem PJ: Microleakage of Ca‑
crobiological and radiological evaluation of treatment in vit temporary filling material in endodontic access cavities
one sitting of teeth with mature or immature root. Odontol in monkey teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;
Revy 1976; 27:93‑108. 49:541‑543.
Ca pí tulo

Obturação dos Canais Radiculares 16


Seç ã o

Materiais Obturadores
Mario Tanomaru-Filho | Roberta Bosso-Martelo | Juliane M. Guerreiro-Tanomaru
16.1

canal filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;
Referências Bibliográficas 6(1):107‑113.
14. Leonardo MR: Contribuição para o estudo da reparação apical
1. Leonardo MR, Leal JM: Endodontia: tratamento de canais ra‑
e periapical pós‑tratamento de canais radiculares [tese]. Arara‑
diculares. 2. ed. São Paulo: Panamericana, 1991.
quara: Faculdade de Farmácia e Odontologia, 1973; p. 87.
2. Holland R, Souza V: Ability of a new calcium hydroxide root
15. Camilleri J, Pitt Ford TR: Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review
canal filling material to induce hard tissue formation. J En‑
of the constituents and biological properties of the material.
dod 1985; 11(12):535‑543.
Int Endod J 2006; 39(10):747‑754.
3. Bonetti Filho I: Avaliação da biocompatibilidade de quatro
16. Reyes‑Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT: Biomineraliza‑
técnicas de obturação de canais radiculares. Estudo em den‑
tion ability and interaction of mineral trioxide aggregate and
tes de cães [tese]. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia da
white Portland cement with dentin in a phosphate‑contai‑
UNESP, 1990.
ning fluid. J Endod 2009; 35(5):731‑736.
4. Barbosa SV, Araki K, Spangberg LS: Citotoxicity of some mo‑
17. Taddei P, Tinti A, Gandolfi MG, Rossi PL, Prati C: Vibrational
dified root canal sealers and their leach able components.
study on the bioactivity of portland cement‑based materials
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75(3):357‑361.
for endodontic use. J Mol Struct 2009; 924(6):548‑554.
5. Bernardes RA, de Amorim Campelo A, Junior DD, Pereira
LO, Duarte MA, Moraes IG, et al.: Evaluation of the flow rate 18. Holland R, Souza V, Pannain R, Nery MJ, Bernabé PF, Mello
of 3 endodontic sealers: Sealer 26, AH plus, and MTA Obtu‑ W: Resposta tecidual à implantação de diferentes marcas
ra. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; de cones de guta‑percha. Rev Fac Odont Araçatuba 1975;
109(1):47‑49. 4(1):81‑89.
6. Ersahan S, Aydin C: Dislocation resistance of iroot sp, a cal‑ 19. Maniglia‑Ferreira C, Silva JB Jr, Paula RC, Feitosa JP, Cortez
cium silicate‑based sealer, from radicular dentine. J Endod. DG, Zaia AA, Souza‑Filho FJ: Brazilian gutta‑percha points.
2010; 36(12):2000‑2002. Part I: chemical composition and X‑ray diffraction analysis.
7. Holland R: Processo de reparo do coto pulpar e dos tecidos Braz Oral Res 2005; 19(3):193‑197.
periapicais após biopulpectomia e obturação de canal com 20. American Dental Association: Specification No. 57 for endo‑
hidróxido de cálcio ou óxido de zinco e eugenol: estudo his‑ dontic filling materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108‑188.
tológico em cães [tese]. Araçatuba: Faculdade de Odontolo‑ 21. Cunningham KP, Walker MP, Kulild JC, Lask JT: Variability of
gia da UNESP, 1975. p. 35. the Diameter and Taper of Size #30, 0.04 Gutta‑Percha Co‑
8. Weine FS: Endodontic therapy. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1989. nes. Int Endod J 2006; 32(11):1081‑1084.
9. Nguyen TM: Obturação do sistema de canais radiculares. ln: 22. Chesler MB, Tordik PA, Imamura GM, Goodell GG: Intra‑
Cohen S, Burns R. Caminhos da polpa. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: manufacturer diameter and taper variability of rotary instru‑
Guanabara Koogan, 1997. p. 216‑270. ments and their corresponding Gutta‑percha cones. Int En‑
10. Tavares T, Soares IJ, Silveira NL: Reaction of a rat subcuta‑ dod J 2013; 39(4):538‑541.
neous tissue to implants of gutta‑percha for endodontic use. 23. Huang Y, Orhan K, Celikten B, Orhan AI, Tufenkci P, Sevimay
Endod Dent Traumatol 1994; 10(4):174‑178. S: Evaluation of the sealing ability of different root canal se‑
11. Limkangwalmongkol S, Abbott PV, Sandler AB: Apical dye alers: a combined SEM and micro‑CT study. J Appl Oral Sci
penetration with four root canal sealers and gutta‑per‑ 2018; e20160584. doi:10.1590/1678‑7757‑2016‑0584.
cha using longitudinal sectioning. J Endod 1992; 18(11): 24. Combe EC, Cohen BD, Cummings K: Alpha‑ e Beta‑forms of
535‑539. gutta‑percha in products for root canal filling. Int Endod J
12. Holland R, Souza V, Abdalla T, Russo MC: Sealing properties 2001; 34(6):447‑451.
of some root‑canal filling materials evaluated with radioisoto‑ 25. Gurgel‑Filho ED, Andrade Feitosa JP, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC,
pe. Aust Dent J 1974; 19(5):322‑325. Souza‑Filho FJ, Teixeira FB: Assessment of different gutta‑per‑
13. Benatti O, Stolf WL, Ruhnke LA: Verification of the con‑ cha brands during the filling of simulated lateral canals. Int
sistency, setting time, and dimensional changes of root Endod J 2006; 39(2):113‑118.
80 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

26. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Silveira GF, Reis JM, Bonetti‑Filho I, 43. Gesi A, Raffaelli O, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Ferrari M:
Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM: Effect of compression load and Interfacial strength of resilon and gutta‑percha to intraradi‑
temperature on thermomechanical tests for gutta‑percha cular dentin. J Endod 2005; 31(11):809‑813.
and Resilon. Int Endod J 2011; 44(11):1019‑1023. 44. Ungor M, Onay EO, Orucoglu H: Push‑out bond strengths:
27. Gurgel‑Filho ED, Andrade Feitosa JP, Teixeira FB, Monteiro The Epiphany‑Resilon endodontic obturation system compa‑
de Paula RC, Araújo Silva JB, Souza Filho FJ: Chemical and red with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and
X‑ray analyses of five brands of dental gutta‑percha cone. Int gutta‑percha. Int Endod J 2006; 39(8):643‑647.
Endod J 2003; 36(4):302‑307. 45. Patil SA, Dodwad PK, Patil AA: An in vitro comparison of
28. Menezes MM, Valera MC, Jorge AO, Koga‑Ito CY, Camargo bond strengths of Gutta‑percha/AH Plus, Resilon/Epiphany
CH, Mancini MN: In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of self‑etch and EndoREZ obturation system to intraradicular
irrigants and intracanal medicaments on microorganisms wi‑ dentin using a push‑out test design. J Conserv Dent 2013;
thin root canals. Int Endod J 2004; 37(5):311‑319. 16(3):238‑242.
29. Kim YK, Grandini S, Ames JM, Gu LS, Kim SK, Pashley DH, 46. Schwartz RS: Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2.
et al.: Critical review on methacrylate resin‑based root canal Bonding in the root canal system: the promise and the pro‑
sealers. J Endod 2010; 36(3):383‑399. blems: a review. J Endod 2006; 32(12):1125‑1134.
30. Miner MR, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK: A comparison of ther‑ 47. Collares FM, Portella FF, Rodrigues SB, Celeste RK, Leitu‑
mal properties between gutta‑percha and a synthetic polymer ne VCB, Samuel SMW: The influence of methodological va‑
based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 2006; riables on the push‑out resistance to dislodgement of root
32(7):683‑686. filling materials: a meta‑regression analysis. Int Endod J 2016;
31. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Silveira GF, Tanomaru JM, Bier CA: Eva‑ 49(9):836‑849.
luation of the thermoplasticity of different gutta‑percha co‑ 48. Grossman LI: An improved root canal cement. J Am Dent As‑
nes and Resilon. Aust Endod J 2007; 33(1):23‑26. soc 1958; 56(3):381‑385.
32. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Sant’anna‑Junior A, Bosso R, Guerrei‑ 49. Simões Filho AP: Contribuição para o estudo de materiais ob‑
ro‑Tanomaru JM: Effectiveness of gutta‑percha and Resilon turadores de canais radiculares. Verificação da solubilidade e
in filling lateral root canals using the Obtura II system. Braz desintegração [tese]. Araraquara: Faculdade de Farmácia e
Oral Res 2011; 25(3):205‑209. Odontologia, 1969; p. 49.
33. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Sant’Anna A Jr, Berbert FL, Bosso R, 50. Holland R, Souza V, Holland C, Nery MJ. Estudo histológico
Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM: Ability of gutta‑percha and Resilon do comportamento do tecido conjuntivo subcutâneo do rato
to fill simulated lateral canals by using the Obtura II system. J ao implante de alguns materiais obturadores de canal radicu‑
Endod 2012; 38(5):676‑679. lar. Influência da proporção pó‑líquido. Rev Assoc Paul Cir
34. Sant’Anna‑Junior A, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM, Martelo RB, Dent 1971; 25(3):101‑110.
Silva GF, Tanomaru Filho M: Filling of simulated lateral ca‑ 51. Holland R, Souza V, Milanézi LA: Resposta do coto pulpar e
nals with gutta‑percha or thermoplastic polymer by warm ver‑ tecidos periapicais a algumas pastas empregadas na obtura‑
tical compaction. Braz Oral Res 2015; 29(1):29‑56. ção dos canais radiculares. Arq Centro Est Fac Odont 1971;
35. Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson J, Leinfelder KF, Trope 8(2):189‑197.
M: Dentinal bonding reaches the root canal system. J Esthet 52. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Utrilla LS: Effect
Restor Dent 2004; 16(6):348‑354. of different root canal sealers on periapical repair of teeth
36. Hiraishi N, Papacchini F, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Ferra‑ with chronic periradicular periodontitis. Int Endod J 1998;
ri M, Pashley DH, et al: Shear bond strength of Resilon to 31(2):85‑89.
a methacrylate‑based root canal sealer. Int Endod J 2005; 53. Holland R: Apostila de endodontia. Araçatuba: Faculdade de
38(10):753‑763. Odontologia da UNESP, 1979.
37. Gogos C, Theodorou V, Economides N, Beltes P, Kolokouris 54. Brodin P, Roed A, Aars H, Orstavik D: Neurotoxic effects of
I: Shear bond strength of AH‑26 and Epiphany to composite root filling materials on rat phrenic nerve in vitro. J Dent Res
resin and Resilon. J Endod 2008; 34(11):1385‑1387. 1982; 61(8):1020‑1023.
38. Nagas E, Cehreli ZC, Durmaz V, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV: She‑ 55. Pupo J, Biral RR, Benatti O, Abe A, Valdrighi L: Antimicro‑
ar bond strength between a polyester‑based root canal filling bial effects of endodontic filling cements on microorganis‑
material and a methacrylate‑based sealer with an intermedia‑ ms from root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;
te layer of fiber‑reinforced resin‑based material. J Adhes Dent 55(6):622‑627.
2009; 11(4):325‑330. 56. Leinenbach F, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W: Citotoxic altera‑
39. Doyle MD, Loushine RJ, Agee KA, Gillespie WT, Weller tions in different fibroblasts cultures caused by matrix mono‑
RN, Pashley DH, et al: Improving the performance of En‑ mers. J Dent Res 1993; 72:219.
doRez root canal sealer with a dual‑cured two‑step self‑etch 57. Lee JH, Lee HH, Kim HW, Yu JW, Kim KN, Kim KM: Immu‑
adhesive. I. Adhesive strength to dentin. J Endod 2006; nomodulatory/anti‑inflammatory effect of ZOE‑based dental
32(8):766‑770. materials. Dent Mater 2017; 33(1):1‑12.
40. Gillespie WT, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Mazzoni A, Doyle 58. Schröeder AG: AH26 ses proprietés et son comportamento.
MD, Waller JL, et al: Improving the performance of Endo‑ Rev Franc d’Odonto‑Stomat 1959; 6:1134‑1138.
REZ root canal sealer with a dual‑cured two‑step self‑etch 59. Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva RS: Relea‑
adhesive. II. Apical and coronal seal. J Endod 2006; se of formaldehyde by 4 endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral
32(8):771‑775. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88(2):221‑225.
41. Fisher MA, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK: An in vitro compari‑ 60. Versiani MA, Carvalho‑Junior JR, Padilha MI, Lacey S, Pascon
son of bond strength of various obturation materials to root EA, Sousa‑Neto MD: A comparative study of physicochemical
canal dentin using a push‑out test design. J Endod 2007; properties of AH Plus and Epiphany root canal sealants. Int
33(7):856‑858. Endod J 2006; 39(6):464‑471.
42. Skidmore LJ, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK: An in vitro comparison 61. De‑Deus G, Di Giorgi K, Fidel S, Fidel RA, Paciornik S: Push‑out
of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of resilon and gut‑ bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany and Resilon/Epiphany
ta‑percha. J Endod 2006; 32(10):963‑936. self‑etch to root dentin. J Endod 2009; 35(7):1048‑1050.
Capítulo 16   |   Referências Bibliográficas 81

62. Carvalho NK, Prado MC, Senna PM, Neves AA, Souza EM, 77. Bueno CR, Valentim D, Marques VA, Gomes‑Filho JE, Cin‑
Fidel SR, et al.: Do smear‑layer removal agents affect the tra LT, Jacinto RC, et al.: Biocompatibility and biominerali‑
push‑out bond strength of calcium silicate‑based endodontic zation assessment of bioceramic‑, epoxy‑, and calcium hydro‑
sealers? Int Endod J 2017; 50(6):612‑619. xide‑based sealers. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30(1). doi:10.1590/
63. Viapiana R, Moinzadeh AT, Camilleri L, Wesselink PR, Tano‑ 1807‑3107BOR‑2016.vol30.0081.
maru Filho M, Camilleri J: Porosity and sealing ability of root 78. Badole GP, Warhadpande MM, Meshram GK, Bahadure RN,
fillings with gutta‑percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sea‑ Tawani SG, Tawani G, et al.: A comparative evaluation of cyto‑
lers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods. Int Endod J 2016; toxicity of root canal sealers: an in vitro study. Restor Dent
49(8):774‑782. Endod 2013; 38(4):204‑209.
64. Cintra LTA, Benetti F, de Azevedo Queiroz ÍO, Ferreira LL, 79. Yilmaz Z, Dogan AL, Ozdemir O, Serper A: Evaluation of the
Massunari L, Bueno CRE, et al.: Evaluation of the cytotoxi‑ cytotoxicity of different root canal sealers on L929 cell line by
city and biocompatibility of new resin epoxy‑based endo‑ MTT assay. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(6):1028‑1032.
dontic sealer containing calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2017; 80. Marín‑Bauza GA, Silva‑Sousa YT, da Cunha SA, Rached‑Ju‑
43(12):2088‑2092. nior FJ, Bonetti‑Filho I, Sousa‑Neto MD, et al.: Physicochemi‑
65. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 6876: cal properties of endodontic sealers of different bases. J Appl
dental root sealing materials. Geneva, 2001. Oral Sci 2012; 20(4):455‑461.
66. Vertuan GC, Duarte MAH, Moraes IG, Piazza B, Vasconce‑ 81. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Luis MR, Leonardo MR, Tanomaru JM,
los BC, Alcalde MP, et al.: Evaluation of physicochemical Silva LA: Evaluation of periapical repair following retrograde
properties of a new root canal sealer. J Endod 2018; 44(3): filling with different root‑end filling materials in dog teeth
501‑505. with periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
67. Piai GG, Duarte MAH, Nascimento ALD, Rosa RAD, Só MVR, Radiol Endod 2006; 102(1):127‑132.
Vivan RR: Penetrability of a new endodontic sealer: A confo‑ 82. Vivan RR, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM, Bosso‑Martelo R, Costa
cal laser scanning microscopy evaluation. Microsc Res Tech BC, Duarte MA, Tanomaru‑Filho M: Push‑out bond strength
2018; 8. doi:10.1002/jemt.23129. of root‑end filling materials. Braz Dent J 2016; 27(3):332‑335.
68. Scelza MZ, da Silva D, Scelza P, de Noronha F, Barbosa IB, 83. De Gee AJ, Wu MK, Wesseling PR: Sealing properties of Ke‑
Souza E, et al.: Influence of a new push‑out test method on tac‑Endo glass ionomer cement and AH 26 root canal sealers.
Int Endod J 1994; 27(5):239‑244.
the bond strength of three resin‑based sealers. Int Endod J
84. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR: A 1‑year follow‑up
2015; 48(8):801‑806.
study on leakage of single‑cone fillings with RoekoRSA sealer.
69. Al Batouty KM, Hashem AA: Push‑out bond strength of
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;
a newly introduced glass fiber root canal filling material. J
101(5):662‑667.
Adhes Dent 2013; 15(2):161‑166.
85. Leonardo MR, Almeida WA, da Silva LA, Utrilla LS: Histo‑
70. Fuzinatto RN, Farina AP, Souza MA, Miyagaki DC, Randi Fer‑
logical evaluation of the response of apical tissues to glass
raz CC, Cecchin D: Effects of an endodontic auxiliary chemi‑
ionomer and zinc oxide‑eugenol based sealers in dog tee‑
cal substance on the bond strength of two methacrylate‑ba‑
th after root canal treatment. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;
sed endodontic sealers to dentin. Microsc Res Tech 2017;
14(6):257‑261.
80(6):627‑633.
86. Pupo J: Atividade antimicrobiana de cimentos obturadores
71. Silva LA: Cimentos obturadores de canal radicular à base de
frente às amostras de microrganismos freqüentes em canais
hidróxido de cálcio. Avaliação histopatológica do reparo api‑
radiculares [tese]. Piracicaba: Faculdade de Odontologia da
cal e periapical em dentes de cães, da resposta inflamatória
UNICAMP, 1976.
em tecido subcutâneo de camundongos. Análise do pH, con‑ 87. Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR: Fluid transport and dye
centração de cálcio total e condutividade [tese]. Ribeirão penetration along root canal fillings. Int Endod J 1994;
Preto: Faculdade de Odontologia da USP, 1995. 27(5):233‑238.
72. Tanomaru‑Filho M: Reparo apical e periapical após trata‑ 88. Leonardo MR, Flores DS, de Paula e Silva FWG, Leonardo
mento endodôntico em dentes com reação periapical crôni‑ RT, Silva LA: A comparison study of periapical repair in dogs’
ca em função da solução irrigadora e do curativo de demora: teeth using RoekoSeal and AH Plus Root Canal Sealers: a his‑
estudo em cães. Resposta inflamatória após injeção de dife‑ topathological evaluation. J Endod 2008; 34(7):822‑825.
rentes soluções irrigaforas: estudo em camundongos [tese de 89. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Tanomaru JMG, Leonardo MR, Silva LA:
livre‑docência]. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia da Periapical repair after root canal filling with different root ca‑
UNESP, 2001. nal sealers. Braz Dent J 2009; 20(5):389‑395.
73. Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Utrilla LS, Assed S, Ether SS: Cal‑ 90. Zhou H, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng Y, Haapasalo M:
cium hydroxide root canal sealers‑‑histopathologic evalua‑ Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 2013;
tion of apical and periapical repair after endodontic treat‑ 39(10):1281‑1286.
ment. J Endod 1997; 23(7):428‑432. 91. Accardo C, Himel VT, Lallier TE: A novel guttaflow sealer sup‑
74. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Jorge EG, Tanomaru JM, Gonçalves M: ports cell survival and attachment. J Endod 2014; 40(2):231‑234.
Evaluation of the radiopacity of calcium hydroxide‑andglass‑ 92. Mandal P, Zhao J, Sah SK, Huang Y, Liu J: In vitro cytotoxicity
ionomer‑based root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2008; of GuttaFlow 2 on human gingival fibroblasts. J Endod 2014;
41(1):50‑53. 40(8):1156‑1159.
75. Gomes‑Filho JE, Bernabé PF, Nery MJ, Otoboni‑Filho JA, De‑ 93. Kapralos V, Koutroulis A, Ørstavik D, Sunde PT, Rukke HV:
zan‑Júnior E, de Moraes Costa MM, et al.: Reaction of rat Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers against planktonic
connective tissue to a new calcium hydroxide‑based sealer. bacteria and bacteria in biofilms. J Endod 2018; 44(1):149‑154.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 94. Camargo RV, Silva‑Sousa YTC, Rosa RPFD, Mazzi‑Chaves JF,
106(2):71‑76. Lopes FC, Steier L, et al.: Evaluation of the physicochemi‑
76. Silva LA, Barnett F, Pumarola‑Suñé J, Cañadas PS, Nelson‑Fi‑ cal properties of silicone‑ and epoxy resin‑based root canal
lho P, Silva RA: Sealapex Xpress and RealSeal XT feature tis‑ sealers. Braz Oral Res Aug 21 2017; 31:e72. doi:10.1590/
sue compatibility in vivo. J Endod 2014; 40(9):1424‑1428. 1807‑3107BOR‑2017.vol31.0072.
82 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

95. Carvalho CN, Freire LG, Carvalho AP, Duarte MA, Bauer 111. Sagsen B, Ustün Y, Demirbuga S, Pala K: Push‑out bond
J, Gavini G: Ions Release and pH of calcium hydroxide‑, strength of two new calcium silicate‑based endodontic sealers
chlorhexidine‑ and bioactive glass‑based endodontic medi‑ to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2011; 44(12):1088‑1091.
caments. Braz Dent J 2016; 27(3):325‑331. 112. Braga JM, Oliveira RR, de Castro Martins R, Vieira LQ, So‑
96. Montazerian M, Zanotto ED: Bioactive and inert dental brinho AP: Assessment of the cytotoxicity of a mineral trio‑
glass‑ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017; 105(2):619‑639. xide aggregate‑based sealer with respect to macrophage ac‑
97. Collado‑González M, Tomás‑Catalá CJ, Oñate‑Sánchez RE, tivity. Dental Traumat 2015; 31(5):390‑395.
Moraleda JM, Rodríguez‑Lozano FJ: Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow 113. Scelza MZ, Linhares AB, da Silva LE, Granjeiro JM, Alves
Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus on human GG: A multiparametric assay to compare the cytotoxicity of
periodontal ligament stem cells. J Endod 2017; 43(5):816‑822. endodontic sealers with primary human osteoblasts. Int En‑
98. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Torres FFE, Chávez‑Andrade GM, de Al‑ dod J 2012; 45(1):12‑18.
meida M, Navarro LG, Steier L, et al.: Physicochemical pro‑ 114. Rodríguez‑Lozano FJ, García‑Bernal D, Oñate‑Sánchez RE,
perties and volumetric change of silicone/bioactive glass Ortolani‑Seltenerich PS, Forner L, Moraleda JM: Evaluation
and calcium silicate‑based endodontic sealers. J Endod of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate‑based endodontic se‑
2017; 43(12):2097‑2101. alers and their effects on the biological responses of mesen‑
99. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M: Mineral trioxide aggregate: a chymal dental stem cells. Int Endod J 2017; 50(1):67‑76.
comprehensive literature review‑‑part II: leakage and bio‑ 115. McMichael GE, Primus CM, Opperman LA: Dentinal tubu‑
compatibility investigations. J Endod 2010; 36(2):190‑202. le penetration of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod 2016;
100. Massi S, Tanomaru‑Filho M, Duarte MA, Grizzo LT, Buzalaf 42(4):632‑636.
MA, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM: pH, calcium ion release, and 116. Alzraikat H, Taha NA, Hassouneh L: Dissolution of a mine‑
setting time of an experimental mineral trioxide aggrega‑ ral trioxide aggregate sealer in endodontic solvents com‑
te‑based root canal sealer. J Endod 2011; 37(6):844‑846. pared to conventional sealers. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30. doi:
101. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Chaves Faleiros FB, Saçaki JN, Hungaro 10.1590/1807‑3107BOR‑2016.vol30.0016.
Duarte MA, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM: Evaluation of pH and 117. Forghani M, Gharechahi M, Karimpour S: In vitro evalua‑
calcium ion release of root‑end filling materials containing tion of tooth discolouration induced by mineral trioxide ag‑
calcium hydroxide or mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod gregate Fillapex and iRoot SP endodontic sealers. Aust En‑
2009; 35(10):1418‑1121. dod J 2016; 42(3):99‑103.
102. Silva GF da, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM, Sasso‑Cerri E, Tano‑ 118. Gürel MA, Kivanç BH, Ekici A, Alaçam T: Evaluation of cro‑
maru‑Filho M, Cerri PS: Histological and histomorphome‑ wn discoloration induced by endodontic sealers and colour
trical evaluation of furcation perforations filled with MTA, change ratio determination after bleaching. Aust Endod J
CPM and ZOE. Int Endod J 2011; 44(2):100‑110. 2016; 42(3):119‑123.
103. Gomes‑Filho JE, Watanabe S, Gomes AC, Faria MD, Lodi 119. Camilleri J: Hydration characteristics of calcium silicate ce‑
CS, Penha Oliveira SH: Evaluation of the effects of endo‑ ments with alternative radiopacifiers used as root‑end filling
dontic materials on fibroblast viability and cytokine produc‑ materials. J Endod 2010; 36(3):502‑508.
tion. J Endod 2009; 35(11):1577‑1579. 120. Camilleri J: Staining potential of Neo MTA Plus, MTA Plus,
104. Scarparo RK, Haddad D, Acasigua GA, Fossati AC, Fachin and biodentine used for pulpotomy procedures. J Endod
EV, Grecca FS: Mineral trioxide aggregate‑based sealer: 2015; 41(7):1139‑1145.
analysis of tissue reactions to a new endodontic material. J 121. Formosa LM, Mallia B, Camilleri J: Mineral trioxide aggre‑
Endod 2010; 36(7):1174‑1178. gate with anti‑washout gel – properties and microstructure.
105. Viapiana R, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM, Hungaro‑Duarte MA, Dent Mater 2013; 29(3):294‑306.
Tanomaru‑Filho M, Camilleri J: Chemical characterization 122. Formosa LM, Mallia B, Camilleri J: Push‑out bond streng‑
and bioactivity of epoxy resin and Portland cement‑based th of MTA with antiwashout gel or resins. Int Endod J 2014;
sealers with niobium and zirconium oxide radiopacifiers. 47(5):454‑462.
Dent Mater 2014; 30(9):1005‑1020. 123. Eid AA, Gosier JL, Primus CM, Hammond BD, Susin LF,
106. Dudeja C, Taneja S, Kumari M, Singh N: An in vitro com‑ Pashley DH, et al.: In vitro biocompatibility and oxidati‑
parison of effect on fracture strength, pH and calcium ion ve stress profiles of different hydraulic calcium silicate ce‑
diffusion from various biomimetic materials when used for ments. J Endod 2014; 40(2):255‑260.
repair of simulated root resorption defects. J Conserv Dent 124. Gomes‑Cornélio AL, Rodrigues EM, Salles LP, Mestieri LB,
2015 Jul‑Aug; 18(4):279‑283. Faria G, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM, et al.: Bioactivity of MTA
107. Borges RP, Sousa‑Neto MD, Versiani MA Rached‑Júnior FA, Plus, Biodentine and an experimental calcium silicate‑ba‑
De‑Deus G, Miranda CE, et al.: Changes in the surface of sed cement on human osteoblast‑like cells. Int Endod J
four calcium silicate‑containing endodontic materials and 2017; 50(1):39‑47.
an epoxy resin‑based sealer after a solubility test. Int Endod 125. Rodrigues EM, Cornélio AL, Mestieri LB, Fuentes AS, Sal‑
J 2012; 45(5):419‑428. les LP, Rossa‑Junior C, et al.: Human dental pulp cells res‑
108. Faria‑Júnior NB, Tanomaru‑Filho M, Berbert FL, Guerrei‑ ponse to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and MTA Plus:
ro‑Tanomaru JM: Antibiofilm activity, pH and solubility of cytotoxicity and gene expression analysis. Int Endod J 2016;
endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2013 Aug; 46(8):755‑762. 50(8):780‑789.
109. Viapiana R, Flumignan DL, Guerreiro‑Tanomaru JM, Ca‑ 126. Tanomaru‑Filho M, Andrade AS, Rodrigues EM, Viola KS,
milleri J, Tanomaru‑Filho M: Physicochemical and mecha‑ Faria G, Camilleri J, et al.: Biocompatibility and mineralized
nical properties of zirconium oxide and niobium oxide mo‑ nodule formation of Neo MTA Plus and an experimental
dified Portland cement‑based experimental endodontic se‑ tricalcium silicate cement containing tantalum oxide. Int
alers. Int Endod J 2014; 47(5):437‑448. Endod J 2017; 50 Suppl 2:e31‑e39. doi: 10.1111/iej.12780.
110. Lee JK, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Lee W, Kim HC: Physicochemical Epub 2017 May 2.
properties of epoxy resin‑based and bioceramic‑based root 127. Fernández R, Restrepo JS, Aristizábal DC, Álvarez LG: Eva‑
canal sealers. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2017; 2017:2582849. luation of the filling ability of artificial lateral canals using
doi:10.1155/2017/2582849. calcium silicate‑based and epoxy resin‑based endodontic
Capítulo 16   |   Referências Bibliográficas 83

sealers and two gutta‑percha filling techniques. Int Endod J 140. Collado‑González M, García‑Bernal D, Oñate‑Sánchez RE,
2016 Apr; 49(4):365‑373. Ortolani‑Seltenerich PS, Lozano A, Forner L, et al.: Bio‑
128. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B: Effects of iRoot SP on mineraliza‑ compatibility of three new calcium silicate‑based endodon‑
tion‑related genes expression in MG63 cells. J Endod 2010; tic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells. Int
36(12): 1978‑1982. Endod J 2017; 50(9):875‑884.
129. Guven EP, Yalvac ME, Kayahan MB, Sunay H, Şahın F, Bayirli G: 141. Alsubait SA, Al Ajlan R, Mitwalli H, Aburaisi N, Mahmood
Human tooth germ stem cell response to calcium‑silicate based A, Muthurangan M, et al.: Cytotoxicity of different concen‑
endodontic cements. J Appl Oral Sci 2013; 21(4):351‑357. trations of three root canal sealers on human mesenchymal
130. Bósio CC, Felippe GS, Bortoluzzi EA, Felippe MC, Felippe stem cells. Biomolecules 2018; 8(3):ii‑E68.
WT, Rivero ER: Subcutaneous connective tissue reactions 142. Candeiro GT, Correia FC, Duarte MA, Ribeiro‑Siqueira DC,
to iRoot SP, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Fillapex, Gavini G: Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium
DiaRoot BioAggregate and MTA. Int Endod J 2014; 47(7): ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod
667‑674. 2012; 38(6):842‑845.
131. Chang SW, Lee SY, Kang SK, Kum KY, Kim EC: In vitro bio‑ 143. Al‑Haddad A, Abu Kasim NH, Che Ab Aziz ZA: Interfacial
compatibility, inflammatory response, and osteogenic po‑ adaptation and thickness of bioceramic‑based root canal se‑
tential of 4 root canal sealers: Sealapex, Sankin apatite root alers. Dent Mater J 2015; 34(4):516‑521.
sealer, MTA Fillapex, and iRoot SP root canal sealer. J En‑ 144. El Hachem R, Khalil I, Le Brun G, Pellen F, Le Jeune B, Daou
dod 2014; 40(10):1642‑1648. M, et al.: Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer
132. Nirupama DN, Nainan MT, Ramaswamy R, Muralidha‑ and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scan‑
ran S, Usha HH, Sharma R, et al.: In vitro evaluation of ning microscopy study. Clin Oral Investig 2018 (in press).
145. Silva Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG:
the antimicrobial efficacy of four endodontic biomaterials
Are premixed calcium silicate‑based endodontic sealers
against Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Staphylococ-
comparable to conventional materials? a systematic review
cus aureus. Int J Biomater 2014; 2014:383756. doi:10.1155/
of in vitro studies. J Endod 2017 Apr; 43(4):527‑535.
2014/383756.
146. da Silva EJ, Zaia AA, Peters OA: Cytocompatibility of cal‑
133. Ozcan E, Yula E, Arslanoğlu Z, Inci M: Antifungal activity
cium silicate‑based sealers in a three‑dimensional cell cultu‑
of several root canal sealers against Candida albicans. Acta
re model. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21(5):1531‑1536.
Odontol Scand 2013; 71(6):1481‑1485.
147. Candeiro GTM, Moura‑Netto C, D’Almeida‑Couto RS,
134. Bidar M, Sadeghalhoseini N, Forghani M, Attaran N: Effect
Azambuja‑Junior N, Marques MM, Cai S, et al.: Cytotoxicity,
of the smear layer on apical seals produced by two calcium
genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic
silicate‑based endodontic sealers. J Oral Sci 2014; 56(3): endodontic sealer. Int Endod J 2016; 49(9):858‑864.
215‑219. 148. Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Fleury A, Solomon
135. Tuncel B, Nagas E, Cehreli Z, Uyanik O, Vallittu P, Lassi‑ E, He J: Clinical outcome of non‑surgical root canal tre‑
la L: Effect of endodontic chelating solutions on the bond atment using a single‑cone technique with endosequence
strength of endodontic sealers. Braz Oral Res 2015; 29: bioceramic sealer: a retrospective analysis. J Endod 2018;
doi:10.1590/1807‑3107. 44(6):941‑945.
136. Uzunoglu E, Yilmaz Z, Sungur DD, Altundasar E: Retrea‑ 149. Agrafioti A, Koursoumis AD, Kontakiotis EG: Re‑esta‑
tability of Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta‑Percha with blishing apical patency after obturation with gutta‑percha
Bioceramic, MTA and Resin‑Based Sealers. Iran Endod J and two novel calcium silicate‑based sealers. Eur J Dent
2015; 10(2):93‑98. 2015 Oct‑Dec; 9(4):457‑461.
137. Wang Y, Liu S, Dong Y: In vitro study of dentinal tubule pe‑ 150. Poggio C, Dagna A, Ceci M, Meravini MV, Colombo M, et
netration and filling quality of bioceramic sealer. PLoS One al.: Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: A
2018; 13(2):e0192248. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192248. comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9(10):1189‑1194.
eCollection 2018. 151. Graunaite I, Skucaite N, Lodiene G, Agentiene I, Machiul‑
138. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 6876: skiene V: Effect of resin‑based and bioceramic root canal se‑
Dentistry – Root Canal Sealing Materials. British Standards alers on postoperative pain: a split‑mouth randomized con‑
Institution, London, UK, 2012. trolled trial. J Endod 2018; 44(5):689‑693.
139. Camps J, Jeanneau C, Ayachi IE, Laurent P, About I: Bioac‑ 152. Teixeira‑Mendes A, da Silva PB, Só BB, Hashizume LN, Vi‑
tivity of a Calcium Silicate‑based Endodontic Cement (Bio‑ van RR, da Rosa RA, et al.: Evaluation of physicochemical
Root RCS): Interactions with Human Periodontal Ligament properties of new calcium silicate – based sealer. Braz Dent
Cells In Vitro. J Endod 2015; 41(9):1469‑1473. J 2018; 29(6):1‑5.
Ca p ít u l o

16 Obturação dos Canais Radiculares

Seção Princípios e Técnica de Compactação


Lateral
16.2 José F. Siqueira Jr. | Hélio P. Lopes | Irene Pina Vaz | Ana M. Teles | Isabela N. Rôças

with rotary versus self‑adjusting files: a three‑dimensional mi‑


Referências Bibliográficas cro‑computed tomographic study. J Endod 2010; 36:1569‑1573.
16. Lee KS, Kim JS, Lee DY, et al.: In vitro microleakage of six
1. Johnson WT, Gutmann JL: Obturation of the cleaned and
different dental materials as intraorifice barriers in endo‑
shaped root canal system. In Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, edi‑
dontically treated teeth. Dental Materials Journal 2015;
tors: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier,
34:425‑431.
2006; p. 358‑399.
17. Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M: Human saliva penetration
2. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. London:
of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. J Endod 1993;
Quintessence Publishing, 2011; p. 403.
19:458‑461.
3. Lopes HP, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontia: Biologia e técnica. 3a
18. Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD: In vitro bacterial pene‑
ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Guanabara Koogan/MEDSI, 2010.
tration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J
4. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Clinical implications and microbio‑
Endod 1990; 16:566‑569.
logy of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J En‑
19. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Bacterial leakage in
dod 2008; 34:1291‑1301 e1293.
coronally unsealed root canals obturated with 3 different te‑
5. Teles AM, Manso MC, Loureiro S, et al.: Effectiveness of two
chniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑
intracanal dressings in adult Portuguese patients: a qPCR and
dod 2000; 90:647‑650.
anaerobic culture assessment. Int Endod J 2014; 47:32‑40.
6. Sabeti MA, Nekofar M, Motahhary P, et al.: Healing of apical 20. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Coronal leakage of
periodontitis after endodontic treatment with and without two root canal sealers containing calcium hydroxide after ex‑
obturation in dogs. J Endod 2006; 32:628‑633. posure to human saliva. J Endod 1999; 25:14‑16.
7. Ricucci D, Lin LM, Spångberg LS: Wound healing of apical 21. Ørstavik D: Endodontic filling materials. Endod Topics 2014;
tissues after root canal therapy: a long‑term clinical, radiogra‑ 31:53‑67.
phic, and histopathologic observation study. Oral Surg Oral 22. Ray HA, Trope M: Periapical status of endodontically treated
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 609‑621. teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling
8. Torabinejad M, Walton RE: Endodontics: principles and and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28:12‑18.
practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier, 2009. 23. Tronstad L, Asbjornsen K, Doving L, et al.: Influence of co‑
9. Siqueira JF, Jr: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why ronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically
well‑treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34:1‑10. treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:218‑221.
10. Sundqvist G: Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of the 24. Ricucci D, Grondahl K, Bergenholtz G: Periapical status of
root canal flora. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; root‑filled teeth exposed to the oral environment by loss of
78:522‑530. restoration or caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
11. Torneck C: Reaction of rat connective tissue to polyethylene Radiol Endod 2000; 90:354‑359.
tube implants. Oral Surg 1966; 21:379‑387. 25. Moreno JO, Alves FR, Goncalves LS, et al.: Periradicular
12. Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms, status and quality of root canal fillings and coronal resto‑
and perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑ rations in an urban Colombian population. J Endod 2013;
diol Endod 2002; 94:281‑293. 39:600‑604.
13. Paqué F, Peters OA: Micro‑computed tomography evaluation 26. Tavares PB, Bonte E, Boukpessi T, et al.: Prevalence of apical
of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular mo‑ periodontitis in root canal‑treated teeth from an urban Fren‑
lars with the self‑adjusting file. J Endod 2011; 37:517‑521. ch population: influence of the quality of root canal fillings
14. Paque F, Ganahl D, Peters OA: Effects of root canal prepara‑ and coronal restorations. J Endod 2009; 35:810‑813.
tion on apical geometry assessed by micro‑computed tomo‑ 27. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Periradicular status
graphy. J Endod 2009; 35:1056‑1059. related to the quality of coronal restorations and root canal
15. Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, et al.: The quality of root ca‑ fillings in a Brazilian population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
nal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100:369‑374.
Capítulo 16   |   Referências Bibliográficas 85

28. Craveiro MA, Fontana CE, de Martin AS, et al.: Influence of outcome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑
coronal restoration and root canal filling quality on periapi‑ dod 2003; 96:81‑90.
cal status: clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Endod 2015; 50. Chugal NM, Clive JM, Spångberg LS: A prognostic model for
41:836‑840. assessment of the outcome of endodontic treatment: Effect
29. Prati C, Pirani C, Zamparini F, et al.: A 20‑year historical pros‑ of biologic and diagnostic variables. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
pective cohort study of root canal treatments. A Multilevel Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91:342‑352.
analysis. Int Endod J 2018; 51:955‑968. 51. Barbosa SV, Araki K, Spångberg LS: Cytotoxicity of some mo‑
30. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K: A prospective study of the fac‑ dified root canal sealers and their leachable components.
tors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75:357‑361.
part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 2011; 44:583‑609. 52. Spångberg LS, Barbosa SV, Lavigne GD: AH 26 releases for‑
31. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, et al.: Impact of the quality of maldehyde. J Endod 1993; 19:596‑598.
coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on 53. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root canal
success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and me‑ treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005; 10:
ta‑analysis. J Endod 2011; 37:895‑902. 23‑147.
32. Roghanizad N, Jones JJ: Evaluation of coronal microleakage 54. Gutmann JL, Lovdahl PE: Problem solving in endodontics.
after endodontic treatment. J Endod 1996; 22:471‑473. Prevention, identification, and management. 5th ed. Ma‑
33. Yamauchi S, Shipper G, Buttke T, et al.: Effect of orifice ryland Heights, Missouri: Elsevier/Mosby, 2011.
plugs on periapical inflammation in dogs. J Endod 2006; 55. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Bate AL, et al.: Histologic investi‑
32:524‑526. gation of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a
34. Bayram HM, Celikten B, Bayram E, et al.: Fluid flow evalua‑ retrospective study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod 2009;
tion of coronal microleakage intraorifice barrier materials in 35:493‑502.
endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Dent 2013; 7:359‑362. 56. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Molecular analysis
35. Mesquita FAR: Avaliação in vitro da capacidade de selamento de of the root canal microbiota associated with endodontic treat‑
diferentes materiais usados como barreiras intra‑coronal (Mas‑ ment failures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008; 23:275‑281.
ter thesis). Fernando Pessoa University, Porto, Portugal, 2016. 57. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Polymerase chain reaction‑based
36. Siqueira JF, Jr, Uzeda M, Varejão E: Sintomatologia clínica analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic
persistente devido à infecção endodôntica por Fusobacterium treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑
nucleatum. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 1995; 43:149‑152. dod 2004; 97:85‑94.
37. Vera J, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: One‑ versus two‑vi‑ 58. Saeed M, Koller G, Niazi S, et al.: Bacterial contamination of
sit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a endodontic materials before and after clinical storage. J En‑
histobacteriologic study. J Endod 2012; 38:1040‑1052. dod 2017; 43:1852‑1856.
38. Paiva SS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, et al.: Clinical antimicro‑ 59. Moorer WR, Genet JM: Antibacterial activity of gutta‑percha
bial efficacy of NiTi rotary instrumentation with NaOCl irri‑ cones attributed to the zinc oxide component. Oral Surg
gation, final rinse with chlorhexidine and interappointment Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53:508‑517.
medication: a molecular study. Int Endod J 2013; 46:225‑233. 60. Seabra Pereira OL, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Contamination of gut‑
39. Huffaker SK, Safavi K, Spångberg LS, et al.: Influence of a pas‑ ta‑percha and Resilon cones taken directly from the manu‑
sive sonic irrigation system on the elimination of bacteria from facturer. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14:327‑330.
root canal systems: a clinical study. J Endod 2010; 36:1315‑1318. 61. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lima KC: Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylo-
40. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, et al.: The antimicrobial coccus xylosus in a secondary root canal infection with persis‑
effect of calcium hydroxide as a short‑term intracanal dres‑ tent symptoms: a case report. Aust Endod J 2002; 28:61‑63.
sing. Int Endod J 1991; 24:119‑125. 62. Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Ranta K, et al.: Microbiological findings
41. McGurkin‑Smith R, Trope M, Caplan D, et al.: Reduction of and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases selected
intracanal bacteria using GT rotary instrumentation, 5.25% for microbiological investigation. Int Endod J 1997; 30:91‑95.
NaOCl, EDTA, and Ca(OH)2. J Endod 2005; 31:359‑363. 63. Ranta K, Haapasalo M, Ranta H: Monoinfection of root canal
42. Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, et al.: Reduction of with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;
intracanal bacteria using nickel‑titanium rotary instrumenta‑ 4:269‑272.
tion and various medications. J Endod 2000; 26: 751‑755. 64. Haapasalo M, Ranta H, Ranta KT: Facultative gram‑negative
43. Langeland K: Tissue response to dental caries. Endod Dent enteric rods in persistent periapical infections. Acta Odontol
Traumatol 1987; 3:149‑171. Scand 1983; 41:19‑22.
44. Tronstad L: Clinical endodontics. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Thieme; 65. Gahyva SM, Siqueira JFJ: Avaliação da contaminação de co‑
2009. nes de guta‑percha disponíveis comercialmente. JBE 2001;
45. Ricucci D, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Apically extruded sea‑ 4:193‑195.
lers: fate and influence on treatment outcome. J Endod 2016; 66. Montgomery S: Chemical decontamination of gutta‑percha
42:243‑249. cones with polyvinylpyrrolidone‑iodine. Oral Surg Oral Med
46. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al.: Factors affecting Oral Pathol 1971; 31:258‑266.
the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990; 67. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Matsumoto CU, et al.: Disinfection
16:498‑504. of gutta‑percha cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypo‑
47. Araújo Filho WR: Tratamento endodôntico de dentes desvi‑ chlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
talizados realizado em sessão única: Avaliação clínica e radio‑ 2005; 100:512‑517.
gráfica (Tese de Doutorado). Faculdade de Odontologia da 68. Pang NS, Jung IY, Bae KS, et al.: Effects of short‑term chemi‑
USP, São Paulo, 2003. cal disinfection of gutta‑percha cones: identification of affec‑
48. Schaeffer MA, White RR, Walton RE: Determining the opti‑ ted microbes and alterations in surface texture and physical
mal obturation length: a meta‑analysis of literature. J Endod properties. J Endod 2007; 33:594‑598.
2005; 31:271‑274. 69. Silva CHFP, Siqueira JF, Jr, Cerqueira MDO, et al.: Uso de
49. Chugal NM, Clive JM, Spångberg LS: Endodontic infec‑ água sanitária na esterilização rápida de cones de guta‑per‑
tion: some biologic and treatment factors associated with cha. JBC 2000; 4:77‑79.
86 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

70. Siqueira JF, Jr, da Silva CH, Cerqueira MD, et al.: Effective‑ 91. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR: A 1‑year follow‑up
ness of four chemical solutions in eliminating Bacillus subtilis study on leakage of single‑cone fillings with RoekoRSA se‑
spores on gutta‑percha cones. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; aler. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
14:124‑126. 2006; 101:662‑667.
71. Senia ES, Marraro RV, Mitchell JL, et al.: Rapid sterilization 92. Iglecias EF, Freire LG, de Miranda Candeiro GT, et al.: Pre‑
of gutta‑percha cones with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J En‑ sence of voids after continuous wave of condensation and
dod 1975; 1:136‑140. single‑cone obturation in mandibular molars: a micro‑com‑
72. Pina‑Vaz I, Espinar MJ, Noites R, et al.: In vitro evaluation of puted tomography analysis. J Endod 2017; 43:638‑642.
the antimicrobial activity of different antiseptics on contami‑ 93. Moinzadeh AT, Zerbst W, Boutsioukis C, et al.: Porosity dis‑
nated gutta‑percha cones Revista de Clínica e Pesquisa Odon‑ tribution in root canals filled with gutta percha and calcium
tológica 2008; 3:153‑159. silicate cement. Dent Mater 2015; 31:1100‑1108.
73. Dychdala GR: Chlorine and chlorine compounds. In Block 94. Viapiana R, Moinzadeh AT, Camilleri L, et al.: Porosity and
SS, editor: Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. 4th sealing ability of root fillings with gutta‑percha and BioRoot
ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991:133‑150. RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo metho‑
74. Short RD, Dorn SO, Kuttler S: The crystallization of sodium ds. Int Endod J 2016; 49:774‑782.
hypochlorite on gutta‑percha cones after the rapid‑steriliza‑ 95. McMichael GE, Primus CM, Opperman LA: Dentinal tubu‑
tion technique: an SEM study. J Endod 2003; 29:670‑673. le penetration of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod 2016;
75. Alves MJ, Grenho L, Lopes C, et al.: Antibacterial effect and 42:632‑636.
biocompatibility of a novel nanostructured ZnO‑coated gut‑ 96. Jeong JW, DeGraft‑Johnson A, Dorn SO, et al.: Dentinal tu‑
ta‑percha cone for improved endodontic treatment. Mater bule penetration of a calcium silicate‑based root canal se‑
Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2018; 92:840‑848. aler with different obturation methods. J Endod 2017;
76. Glickman GN, Gutmann JL: Contemporary perspectives on 43:633‑637.
canal obturation. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36:327‑341. 97. Schafer E, Nelius B, Burklein S: A comparative evaluation of
77. American Association of Endodontists. Contemporary terms gutta‑percha filled areas in curved root canals obturated with
of endodontics. 7th ed. Chicago, 2003. different techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16:225‑230.
78. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Neves MAS, et al.: Flexibilidade de espa‑ 98. Whitworth J: Methods of filling root canals: principles and
çadores endodônticos digitais de aço inoxidável e de NiTi. practices. Endod Topics 2005; 12:2‑24.
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 2006; 63:280‑284. 99. Gordon MP, Love RM, Chandler NP: An evaluation of .06
79. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Mussel MAS, et al.: Geometria e acaba‑ tapered gutta‑percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared
mento superficial de espaçadores endodônticos digitais de curved root canals. Int Endod J 2005; 38:87‑96.
aço inoxidável e de NiTi. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 100. Inan U, Aydin C, Tunca YM, et al.: In vitro evaluation of
2005; 62:281‑284. matched‑taper single‑cone obturation with a fluid filtration
80. Lopes HP, Neves MA, Elias CN, et al.: Comparison of some method. J Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75:123.
physical properties of finger spreaders made of stainless steel 101. Lopes HP, Costa Filho AS: Uso do hidróxido de cálcio com
or nickel‑titanium alloys. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15:661‑665. veículo oleoso como tampão apical em dentes despolpados
81. Lopes HP, Siqueira JF, Jr, Elias CN: Scanning electron micros‑ com lesões periapicais. RGO 1988; 36:133‑138.
copic investigation of the surface of gutta‑percha cones after 102. Trope M: Treatment of the immature tooth with a non‑vital
cutting. J Endod 2000; 26:418‑420. pulp and apical periodontitis. Dent Clin North Am 2010;
82. Vieira MV, Lopes HP, Elias CN, et al.: Investigarea prin mi‑ 54:313‑324.
croscopie electronica de baleaj a suprafetelor conurilor de 103. Torabinejad M, Chivian N: Clinical applications of mineral
gutaperca si resilon dupa sectionarea prin diferite metode. trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25:197‑205.
Medic Dentistro 2005; 2:56‑58. 104. Sluyk SR, Moon PC, Hartwell GR: Evaluation of setting pro‑
83. Hatton JF, Ferrillo PJ, Jr., Wagner G, et al.: The effect of conden‑ perties and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide ag‑
sation pressure on the apical seal. J Endod 1988; 14:305‑308. gregate when used as a furcation perforation repair mate‑
84. Meister F, Jr., Lommel TJ, Gerstein H: Diagnosis and possible rial. J Endod 1998; 24:768‑771.
causes of vertical root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑ 105. Colman HL: Restoration of endodontically treated teeth.
thol 1980; 49:243‑253. Dent Clin North Am 1979; 23:647‑662.
85. Holcomb JQ, Pitts DL, Nicholls JI: Further investigation of 106. Dickey DJ, Harris GZ, Lemon RR, et al.: Effect of post space
spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during preparation on apical seal using solvent techniques and Pe‑
lateral condensation. J Endod 1987; 13:277‑284. eso reamers. J Endod 1982; 8:351‑354.
86. Abo‑Hamar SE, Federlin M, Hiller KA, et al.: Effect of tempo‑ 107. Barros J, Cruz J, Carvalho MF, et al.: Influence of the timing
rary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to den‑ of post space preparation on apical sealing. Revista Gaúcha
tin. Dent Mater 2005; 21:794‑803. de Odontologia 2013; 61:199‑204.
87. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Ardila CN, et al.: Fluid movement 108. Paiva J, Barros J, Noites R, et al.: Comparação da infiltra‑
along the coronal two‑thirds of root fillings placed by three di‑ ção apical entre a desobturação imediata do canal radicular
fferent gutta‑percha techniques. Int Endod J 2003; 36:533‑540. e a desobturação após 8 dias para a preparação de espaço
88. Kontakiotis EG, Wu MK, Wesselink PR: Effect of sealer thick‑ para espigão. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medici‑
ness on long‑term sealing ability: a 2‑year follow‑up study. Int na Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial 2010; 51:197‑205.
Endod J 1997; 30:307‑312. 109. Horvath SD, Altenburger MJ, Naumann M, et al.: Clean‑
89. Tasdemir T, Yesilyurt C, Ceyhanli KT, et al.: Evaluation of api‑ liness of dentinal tubules following gutta‑percha removal
cal filling after root canal filling by 2 different techniques. J with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic
Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75:201a‑201d. study. Int Endod J 2009; 42:1032‑1038.
90. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Macri E: Evaluation of the apical 110. Topcuoglu HS, Demirbuga S, Tuncay O, et al.: The bond
seal in root canals prepared with a new rotary system and ob‑ strength of endodontic sealers to root dentine expo‑
turated with a methacrylate based endodontic sealer: an in vi‑ sed to different gutta‑percha solvents. Int Endod J 2014;
tro study. J Endod 2005; 31:392‑395. 47:1100‑1106.
Capítulo 16   |   Referências Bibliográficas 87

111. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Estrela C, et al.: Aquecimento da super‑ 115. Friedman S: Expected outcomes in the prevention and tre‑
fície radicular durante a criação do espaço para pino. Revis‑ atment of apical periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T,
ta da APCD 1995; 49:299‑301. editors: Essential endodontology, Oxford, UK: Blackwell
112. Eriksson AR, Albektsson T, Grane B, et al.: Termal injury to Munksgaard Ltd; 2008:408‑469.
bone: a vital microscopic description of heat effects. Int J 116. Friedman S: Prognosis in the treatment of teeth with
Oral Surgery 1982; 11:115‑121. endodontic infections. In Fouad AF, editor: Endodon‑
113. Melo L, Ferreira I, Lacet G, et al.: Apical periodontitis and tic microbiology, Ames, Iowa: Wiley‑Blackwell, 2009; p.
oral status in patients with different systemic conditions 281‑319.
and smoking habits in Portuguese population. Revista En‑ 117. Ng YL, Gulabivala K: Evaluation of outcomes. In Hargrea‑
dodoncia 2017; 35:10‑22. ves KM, Berman LH, editors: Cohen’s pathways of the pulp.
114. Correia‑Sousa J, Madureira AR, Carvalho MF, et al.: Apical 11th ed. St. Louis, MI: Elsevier, 2016; p. 474‑531.
Periodontitis and related risk factors: cross‑sectional study. 118. Gutmann JL: Clinical, radiographic, and histologic perspec‑
Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e tives on success and failure in endodontics. Dent Clin North
Cirurgia Maxilofacial 2015; 56:226‑232. Am 1992; 36:379‑392.
Ca p ít u l o

16 Obturação dos Canais Radiculares

Seção Técnicas de Termoplastificação


da Guta-Percha
16.3 Manoel Brito-Júnior | Stéphanie Q. Tonelli | Eduardo Nunes | Frank F. Silveira

13. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE: Apical enlargement: influence on


Referências Bibliográficas overextensions during in vitro vertical compaction. J Endod
1994; 20:269‑271.
1. Schilder H: Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin
14. Venturi M, Pasquantonio G, Falconi M, et al.: Temperature
North Am 1967; 11:723‑744.
2. Angerame D, De Biasi M, Brun F, et al.: Computed micro‑ change within gutta‑percha induced by the System‑B heat
tomography study of untreated, shaped and filled mesio‑ source. Int Endod J 2002; 35:740‑746.
buccal canals of maxillary first molars. Aust Endod J 2018; 15. Beraldo DZ, Pereira KF, Yoshinari FM, et al.: Temperature
doi:10.1111/aej.12286. changes on external root surfaces with the use of several ther‑
3. Suassuna FCM, Maia AMA, Melo DP, et al.: Comparison of moplastic filling techniques. J Endod 2016; 42:1131‑1134.
microtomography and optical coherence tomography on 16. Cen R, Wang R, Cheung GSP: Periodontal blood flow pro‑
apical endodontic filling analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol tects the alveolar bone from thermal Injury during thermo‑
2018; 47:20170174; doi:10.1259/dmfr.20170174. plasticized Obturation: A finite element analysis study. J En‑
4. Buchanan LS: The continuous wave of condensation techni‑ dod 2018; 44:139‑144.
que: a convergence of conceptual and procedural advances 17. Floren JW, Weller RN, Pashley DH, et al.: Changes in the root
in obturation. Dent Today 1994; 13:80‑85. surface temperatures with in vitro use of the system B heat
5. Fernández R, Restrepo JS, Aristizábal DC, et al.: Evaluation of source. J Endod 1999; 25:593‑595.
the filling ability of artificial lateral canals using calcium sili‑
18. Jung IY, Lee SB, Kim ES, et al.: Effect of different tempera‑
cate‑based and epoxy resin‑based endodontic sealers and two
tures and penetration depths of a System B plugger in the
gutta‑percha filling techniques. Int Endod J 2016; 49:365‑373.
filling of artificially created oval canals. Oral Surg Oral Med
6. Yared GM, Chahine TI, Bou Dagher FE: Master cone apical
behavior under in vitro compaction. J Endod 1992; 18:318‑321. Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96:453‑457.
7. Zhang C1, Huang W, Sun Z, et al.: A comparison of two gut‑ 19. Tomson RM, Polycarpou N, Tomson PL: Contemporary obtu‑
ta‑percha master points consisting of different phases in ration of the root canal system. Br Dent J 2014; 216:315‑322.
filling of artificial lateral canals and depressions in the apical 20. Al‑Dewani N, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM: Comparison of late‑
region of root canals when using a warm vertical compaction rally condensed and low‑temperature thermoplasticized gut‑
technique. Int Endod J 2011; 44:1041‑1046. ta‑percha root fillings.J Endod 2000; 26:733‑738.
8. Kwon SJ, Park YJ, Jun SH, et al.: Thermal irritation of tee‑ 21. Jindal D, Sharma M, Raisingani D, et al.: Volumetric analysis
th during dental treatment procedures. Restor Dent Endod. of root filling with cold lateral compaction, Obtura II, Ther‑
2013; 38:105‑112. mafil, and Calamus using spiral computerized tomography:
9. Maniglia‑Ferreira C, Gurgel‑Filho ED, Silva JB Jr, et al.: Bra‑ An In vitro Study. Indian J Dent Res 2017; 28:175‑180.
zilian gutta‑percha points. Part II: thermal properties. Braz 22. Jain H, Ballal NV: Comparison between the use of thermo‑
Oral Res 2007; 21:29‑34. plasticized gutta‑percha and a polydimethyl siloxane‑based
10. Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X: Outcome of root canal obtura‑ material in filling internal resorptive cavities using spiral
tion by warm gutta‑percha versus cold lateral condensation: a
computed tomography. Microsc Res Tech 2018. doi:10.1002/
meta‑analysis. J Endod 2007; 33:106‑109.
jemt.23163.
11. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al.: Factors affecting
23. Gutmann JL, Rakusin H, Powe R, et al.: Evaluation of heat
the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;
16:498‑504. transfer during root canal obturation with thermoplasticized
12. Nino‑Barrera JL, Gamboa‑Martinez LF, Laserna‑Zuluaga H, gutta‑percha. Part II. In vivo response to heat levels genera‑
et al.: Factors associated to apical overfilling after a ther‑ ted. J Endod 1987; 13:441‑445.
moplastic obturation technique – Calamus® or Guttacore®: 24. Sweatman TL; Baumgartner JG; Sakaguchi RL: Radicular
a randomized clinical experiment. Acta Odontol Latinoam temperatures associated with thermoplasticized gutta‑per‑
2018; 31:45‑52. cha. J Endod 2001; 27:512‑515.
Capítulo 16   |   Referências Bibliográficas 89

25. Ho ES, Chang JW, Cheung GS: Quality of root canal fillings 36. Farias AB, Pereira KF, Beraldo DZ, et al.: Efficacy of three
using three gutta‑percha obturation techniques: Restor Dent thermoplastic obturation techniques in filling oval‑shaped
Endod 2016; 41:22‑28. root canals. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2016; 29:76‑81.
26. Suguro H, Takeichi O, Hayashi M, et al.: Microcomputed to‑ 37. Silva EJ, Herrera DR, Souza‑Júnior EJ, et al.: Influence of irri‑
mographic evaluation of techniques for warm gutta‑percha gation and obturation techniques on artificial lateral root ca‑
obturation. J Oral Sci 2018; 60:165‑169. nal filling capacity. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2013; 26:112‑115.
27. Goldberg F, Massone EJ, Esmoris M, et al.: Comparison of di‑ 38. Guimarães, MAM, Silveira FF, Brito M Jr, et al.: Correção da
fferent techniques for obturating experimental internal re‑ obturação do sistema de canais radiculares empregando a
sorptive cavities. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:116‑121. técnica híbrida de Tagger. Relato de caso clínico. JBC 2004;
28. Mohammad Y, Alafif H, Hajeer MY, et al.: An evaluation of 43:37‑40.
GuttaFlow2 in filling artificial internal resorption cavities: An 39. Tagger M, Santa Cecilia M, Moraes IG: Técnica híbrida de
in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17:445‑450. Tagger – modificações do método original. RGO 1994;
29. Tani‑Ishii N, Teranaka T: Clinical and radiographic evalua‑ 42:207‑208.
tion of root‑canal obturation with obtura II.J Endod 2003;
40. Moeller L, Wenzel A, Wegge‑Larsen AM, et al.: Quality of root
29:739‑742.
fillings performed with two root filling techniques. An in vitro
30. Lee A: Endodontic management of internal inflammatory re‑
study using micro‑CT. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71:689‑696.
sorption‑‑report of a case. Aust Endod J 1999; 25:140‑143.
41. Pirani C, Iacono F, Gatto MR, et al.: Outcome of secondary
31. Sarris S, Tahmassebi JF, Duggal MS, et al.: A clinical evalua‑
root canal treatment filled with Thermafil: a 5‑year follow‑up
tion of mineral trioxide aggregate for root‑end closure of
of retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22:
non‑vital immature permanent incisors in children‑a pilot
study. Dent Traumatol 2008; 24:79‑85. 1363‑1373.
32. Lakshmi VN, Varma KM, Sajjan GS, et al.: Surgical manage‑ 42. Rödig T, Wagner J, Wiegand A, et al.: Efficacy of the ProTaper
ment of lateral incisor with type II dens invaginatus and a pe‑ retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or ver‑
riapical pathosis: A case report with 1‑year follow‑up. J Con‑ tically compacted gutta‑percha from curved root canals asses‑
serv Dent 2017; 20:54‑57. sed by micro‑CT. Int Endod J 2018; 51:808‑815.
33. McSpadden JT: Self‑study course for the thermatic condensa‑ 43. Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S: Real‑time intracanal
tion of gutta‑percha. Toledo: Ramson & Randolph, 1978. temperature measurement during different obturation tech‑
34. Tagger M: Use of thermo‑mechanical compactors as an ad‑ niques. J Endod 2018; 44:1832‑1836.
junct to lateral condensation. Quint Int 1984; 15:27‑30. 44. Camilleri J: Sealers and warm gutta‑percha obturation techni‑
35. Tagger M, Tamse A, Katz A, et al.: Evaluation of the apical ques. J Endod 2015; 41:72‑78.
seal produced by a hybrid root canal filling method, combi‑ 45. Gambarini L, Piasecki G, Schianchi L, et al.: In vitro evalua‑
ning lateral condensation and thermatic compaction. J En‑ tion of carrier based obturation technique: a CBCT study.
dod 1984; 10:299‑303. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2016; 7:11‑15.
Ca p ít u l o

17 Reparação Pós‑Tratamento
Endodôntico
Domenico Ricucci | José F. Siqueira Jr.

18. Engström B, Lundberg M: The correlation between positive


Referências Bibliográficas culture and the prognosis of root canal therapy after pulpec‑
tomy. Odontologisk Revy 1965; 16:193‑203.
1. Spångberg LSW: Endodontic treatment of teeth without api‑
19. Nyborg H, Tullin B: Healing process after vital extirpation.
cal periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential
An experimental study of 17 teeth. Odontologisk Tidskrift
endodontology. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard,
1965; 73:430‑446.
2008; p. 316‑346.
20. Horsted P, Nygaard‑Ostby B: Tissue formation in the root ca‑
2. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontology. An integrated bio‑
nal after total pulpectomy and partial root filling. Oral Surg
logical and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing,
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978; 46:275‑282.
2013.
21. Benatti O, Valdrighi L, Biral RR, et al.: A histological study of
3. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root ca‑
the effect of diameter enlargement of the apical portion of
nal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005;
the root canal. J Endod 1985; 11:428‑434.
10:123‑147.
22. Holland R, Nery MJ, Mello W, et al.: Root canal treatment
4. Gosain A, DiPietro LA: Aging and wound healing. World J
with calcium hydroxide. II. Effect of instrumentation
Surg 2004; 28:321‑326.
beyond the apices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979;
5. Guo S, Dipietro LA: Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent
47:93‑96.
Res 2010; 89:219‑229.
23. Holland R, Nery MJ, Mello W, et al.: Root canal treatment
6. Siqueira JF, Jr, Saboia Dantas CJ: Mecanismos celulares e mo‑
leculares da inflamação. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI, 2000. with calcium hydroxide. I. Effect of overfilling and refilling.
7. Holland GR: Periapical innervation of the ferret canine one Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979; 47:87‑92.
year after pulpectomy. J Dent Res 1992; 71:470‑474. 24. Ricucci D, Langeland K: Apical limit of root canal instrumen‑
8. Wu MK, Dummer PMH, Wesselink PR: Consequences of and tation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod
strategies to deal with residual post‑treatment root canal in‑ J 1998; 31:394‑409.
fection. Int Endod J 2006; 39:343‑356. 25. Molven O, Halse A, Fristad I, et al.: Periapical changes follo‑
9. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Clinical implications and microbio‑ wing root‑canal treatment observed 20‑27 years postoperati‑
logy of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J En‑ vely. Int Endod J 2002; 35:784‑790.
dod 2008; 34:1291‑1301 e1293. 26. Nygaard‑Østby B: Über die Gewäbsveränderungen im apika‑
10. Lin LM, Ricucci D, Lin J, et al.: Nonsurgical root canal the‑ len Paradentium des Menschen nach verschiedenartigen Ein‑
rapy of large cyst‑like inflammatory periapical lesions and in‑ griffen in den Wurzelkanälen. Det Norske Videnskaps‑Akade‑
flammatory apical cysts. J Endod 2009; 35:607‑615. mi 1939; 4:211.
11. Torabinejad M: The role of immunological reactions in api‑ 27. Strömberg T: Wound healing after total pulpectomy in dogs.
cal cyst formation and the fate of epithelial cells after root ca‑ A comparative study between rootfillings with calciumhydro‑
nal therapy: a theory. Int J Oral Surg 1983; 12:14‑22. xide, dibasic calciumphosphate, and gutta‑percha. Odontolo‑
12. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC: Robbins basic pathology. 10th gisk Revy 1969; 20:147‑163.
ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2018; p. 935. 28. Barthel CR, Zimmer S, Trope M: Relationship of radiologic
13. Armada‑Dias L, Breda J, Provenzano JC, et al.: Development and histologic signs of inflammation in human root‑filled te‑
of periradicular lesions in normal and diabetic rats. J Appl eth. J Endod 2004; 30:75‑79.
Oral Sci 2006; 14:371‑375. 29. Brynolf I: A histological and roentgenological study of pe‑
14. Tani‑Ishii N, Wang CY, Tanner A, et al.: Changes in root canal riapical region of human upper incisors. Odontologisk Revy
microbiota during the development of rat periapical lesions. 1967; 18(Suppl. 11):1‑97.
Oral Microbiol Immunol 1994; 9:129‑135. 30. Green TL, Walton RE, Taylor JK, et al.: Radiographic and his‑
15. Ricucci D, Pascon EA, Ford TR, et al.: Epithelium and bac‑ tologic periapical findings of root canal treated teeth in ca‑
teria in periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol daver. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101:239‑249. 1997; 83:707‑711.
16. Kronfeld R: Histopathology of the teeth and their surroun‑ 31. Ricucci D, Lin LM, Spångberg LS: Wound healing of
ding structures. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1943. apical tissues after root canal therapy: a long‑term clini‑
17. Engström B, Spångberg L: Wound healing after partial pul‑ cal, radiographic, and histopathologic observation study.
pectomy. A histological study performed on contralateral Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;
tooth pairs. Odontologisk Tidskrift 1967; 75:5‑18. 108:609‑621.
Capítulo 17   |   Referências Bibliográficas 91

32. Ricucci D, Grondahl K, Bergenholtz G: Periapical status of 36. Meyer W: Der Spontanverschlub des Foramen apikale als Er‑
root‑filled teeth exposed to the oral environment by loss folg der rogenannten Wurzelbehandlung. Dtsch Zahnaerztl
of restoration or caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Z 1964; 19:783‑791.
Radiol Endod 2000; 90:354‑359. 37. Holland R, de Souza V: Ability of a new calcium hydroxide
33. Ricucci D, Bergenholtz G: Bacterial status in root‑filled teeth root canal filling material to induce hard tissue formation. J
exposed to the oral environment by loss of restoration and Endod 1985; 11:535‑543.
fracture or caries – a histobacteriological study of treated ca‑ 38. Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Leonardo Rde T, et al.: Histologi‑
ses. Int Endod J 2003; 36:787‑802. cal evaluation of therapy using a calcium hydroxide dressing
34. Ricucci D, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Apically extruded sea‑ for teeth with incompletely formed apices and periapical le‑
lers: fate and influence on treatment outcome. J Endod 2016; sions. J Endod 1993; 19:348‑352.
42:243‑249. 39. Leonardo MR, Holland R: Healing process after vital pulp
35. Muruzábal M: Aposición de tejidos calcificados. Act Sem Soc extirpation and immediate root canal filling with calcium
Arg Endodonc 1972; 1:49‑50. hydroxide. Rev Fac Odontol Araçatuba 1974; 3:159‑169.
Ca p ít u l o

18 Tratamento do Fracasso Endodôntico

Se ç ã o

Causas do Fracasso Endodôntico


18.1 Isabela N. Rôças | José F. Siqueira Jr.

15. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Microbiologic analy‑


Referências Bibliográficas sis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outco‑
me of conservative re‑treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
1. Vire DE: Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classifica‑
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:86‑93.
tion and evaluation. J Endod 1991; 17:338‑342.
16. Engström B: The significance of enterococci in root canal
2. Chen SC, Chueh LH, Hsiao CK, et al.: First untoward events
treatment. Odontol Revy 1964; 15:87‑106.
and reasons for tooth extraction after nonsurgical endodon‑
17. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, et al.: Microbiological sta‑
tic treatment in Taiwan. J Endod 2008; 34:671‑674.
tus of root‑filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J
3. Siqueira JF, Jr: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why
1998; 31:1‑7.
well‑treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34:1‑10.
18. Peciuliene V, Balciuniene I, Eriksen HM, et al.: Isolation of
4. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Ricucci D, et al.: Causes and mana­
Enterococcus faecalis in previously root‑filled canals in a Li‑
gement of post‑treatment apical periodontitis. Br Dent J
thuanian population. J Endod 2000; 26:593‑595.
2014; 216:305‑312.
19. Adib V, Spratt D, Ng YL, et al.: Cultivable microbial flora asso‑
5. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Bate AL, et al.: Histologic investigation
ciated with persistent periapical disease and coronal leakage
of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospec‑
after root canal treatment: a preliminary study. Int Endod J
tive study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod 2009; 35:493‑502.
6. Siqueira JF, Jr: Microbiology of apical periodontitis. In Ørsta‑ 2004; 37:542‑551.
vik D, Pitt Ford T, editors: Essential endodontology. 2nd ed. 20. Sedgley C, Nagel A, Dahlen G, et al.: Real‑time quantitative
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard Ltd; 2008:135‑196. polymerase chain reaction and culture analyses of Enterococ-
7. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Distinctive features of the micro‑ cus faecalis in root canals. J Endod 2006; 32:173‑177.
biota associated with different forms of apical periodontitis. J 21 Williams JM, Trope M, Caplan DJ, et al.: Detection and quan‑
Oral Microbiol 2009; 1: doi:10.3402/jom.v3401i3400.2009. titation of Enterococcus faecalis by real‑time PCR (qPCR), rever‑
8. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Diversity of endodontic microbiota se transcription‑PCR (RT‑PCR), and cultivation during endo‑
revisited. J Dent Res 2009; 88:969‑981. dontic treatment. J Endod 2006; 32:715‑721.
9. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Characterization of microbiota of 22. Foschi F, Cavrini F, Montebugnoli L, et al.: Detection of bac‑
root canal‑treated teeth with posttreatment disease. J Clin Mi‑ teria in endodontic samples by polymerase chain reaction as‑
crobiol 2012; 50:1721‑1724. says and association with defined clinical signs in Italian pa‑
10. Hancock HH, 3rd, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, et al.: Bacteria tients. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2005; 20:289‑295.
isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North 23. Zoletti GO, Siqueira JF, Jr., Santos KR: Identification of Entero-
American population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral coccus faecalis in root‑filled teeth with or without periradicular
Radiol Endod 2001; 91:579‑586. lesions by culture‑dependent and ‑independent approaches.
11. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Microorganisms J Endod 2006; 32:722‑726.
from canals of root‑filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int En‑ 24. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Jacinto RC, et al.: Microbial analy‑
dod J 2003; 36:1‑11. sis of canals of root‑filled teeth with periapical lesions using
12. Rôças IN, Jung IY, Lee CY, et al.: Polymerase chain reaction polymerase chain reaction. J Endod 2008; 34:537‑540.
identification of microorganisms in previously root‑filled teeth 25. Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, et al.: Mechanisms involved
in a South Korean population. J Endod 2004; 30:504‑508. in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide.
13. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Santos KR: Association of Enterococ- Int Endod J 2002; 35:221‑228.
cus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J En‑ 26. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M: Disinfection by calcium hydro‑
dod 2004; 30:315‑320. xide pastes of dentinal tubules infected with two obliga‑
14. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Polymerase chain reaction‑based te and one facultative anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 1996;
analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic 22:674‑676.
treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En‑ 27. Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D: In vitro infection and disinfection
dod 2004; 97:85‑94. of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1375‑1379.
Capítulo 18   |   Referências Bibliográficas 93

28. Stevens RH, Grossman LI: Evaluation of the antimicrobial 48. Vengerfeldt V, Spilka K, Saag M, et al.: Highly diverse mi‑
potential of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament. crobiota in dental root canals in cases of apical perio‑
J Endod 1983; 9:372‑374. dontitis (data of illumina sequencing). J Endod 2014; 40:
29. Siqueira JF, Jr, de Uzeda M, Fonseca ME: A scanning electron 1778‑1783.
microscopic evaluation of in vitro dentinal tubules penetra‑ 49. Tzanetakis GN, Azcarate‑Peril MA, Zachaki S, et al.: Compari‑
tion by selected anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 1996; 22:308‑310. son of bacterial community composition of primary and per‑
30. Sedgley CM, Lennan SL, Appelbe OK: Survival of Enterococcus sistent endodontic infections using pyrosequencing. J Endod
faecalis in root canals ex vivo. Int Endod J 2005; 38:735‑742. 2015; 41:1226‑1233.
31. Rolph HJ, Lennon A, Riggio MP, et al.: Molecular identifica‑ 50. Hong BY, Lee TK, Lim SM, et al.: Microbial analysis in prima‑
tion of microorganisms from endodontic infections. J Clin ry and persistent endodontic infections by using pyrosequen‑
Microbiol 2001; 39:3282‑3289. cing. J Endod 2013; 39:1136‑1140.
32. Cheung GS, Ho MW: Microbial flora of root canal‑treated te‑ 51. Chavez de Paz LE: Redefining the persistent infection in root
eth associated with asymptomatic periapical radiolucent le‑ canals: possible role of biofilm communities. J Endod 2007;
sions. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2001; 16:332‑337. 33:652‑662.
33. Kaufman B, Spångberg L, Barry J, et al.: Enterococcus spp. in 52. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Exuberant biofilm in‑
endodontically treated teeth with and without periradicular fection in a lateral canal as the cause of short‑term endo‑
lesions. J Endod 2005; 31:851‑856. dontic treatment failure: report of a case. J Endod 2013;
34. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Aboim MC, et al.: Denaturing gra‑ 39:712‑718.
dient gel electrophoresis analysis of bacterial communities 53. Arnold M, Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Infection in a complex
associated with failed endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral network of apical ramifications as the cause of persistent api‑
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98:741‑749. cal periodontitis: a case report. J Endod 2013; 39:1179‑1184.
35. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Molecular analysis 54. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Ricucci D: Biofilms in endodontic in‑
of the root canal microbiota associated with endodontic treat‑ fection. Endod Topics 2012; 22:33‑49.
ment failures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008; 23:275‑281. 55. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Biofilms and apical periodontitis:
36. Rôças IN, Hülsmann M, Siqueira JF, Jr: Microorganisms in study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopa‑
root canal‑treated teeth from a German population. J Endod thologic findings. J Endod 2010; 36:1277‑1288.
2008; 34:926‑931. 56. Möller AJR: Microbial examination of root canals and peria‑
37. Siqueira JF, Jr., Antunes HS, Rôças IN, et al.: Microbiome in pical tissues of human teeth. Odontologisk Tidskrift 1966;
the apical root canal system of teeth with post‑treatment api‑ 74(supplement): 1‑380.
cal periodontitis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0162887. 57. Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, et al.: Isolation of
38. Henriques LC, de Brito LC, Tavares WL, et al.: Microbial yeasts and enteric bacteria in root‑filled teeth with chronic
ecosystem analysis in root canal infections refractory to endo‑ apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2001; 34:429‑434.
dontic treatment. J Endod 2016; 42:1239‑1245. 58. Egan MW, Spratt DA, Ng YL, et al.: Prevalence of yeasts in sa‑
39. Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, Orstavik D, et al.: Microbial analy‑ liva and root canals of teeth associated with apical periodon‑
sis of endodontic infections in root‑filled teeth with apical pe‑ titis. Int Endod J 2002; 35:321‑329.
riodontitis before and after irrigation using pyrosequencing. 59. Siqueira JF, Jr, Sen BH: Fungi in endodontic infections. Oral
J Endod 2018; 44:372‑378. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97:
40. Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Influence 632‑641.
of the apical preparation size and the irrigant type on bacte‑ 60. Sen BH, Safavi KE, Spångberg LS: Colonization of Candida al-
rial reduction in root canal‑treated teeth with apical perio‑ bicans on cleaned human dental hard tissues. Arch Oral Biol
dontitis. J Endod 2017; 43:1058‑1063. 1997; 42:513‑520.
41. Zandi H, Rodrigues RC, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Antibacte‑ 61. Sen BH, Safavi KE, Spångberg LS: Growth patterns of Can-
rial effectiveness of 2 root canal irrigants in root‑filled teeth dida albicans in relation to radicular dentin. Oral Surg Oral
with infection: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2016; 42: Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84:68‑73.
1307‑1313. 62. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Fungal infection of
42. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, et al.: Bacterial reduc‑ the radicular dentin. J Endod 2002; 28:770‑773.
tion and persistence after endodontic treatment procedures. 63. Waltimo TM, Siren EK, Ørstavik D, et al.: Susceptibility of
Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22:19‑23. oral Candida species to calcium hydroxide in vitro. Int Endod
43. Rodrigues RC, Antunes HS, Neves MA, et al.: Infection con‑ J 1999; 32:94‑98.
trol in retreatment cases: in vivo antibacterial effects of 2 ins‑ 64. Waltimo TM, Ørstavik D, Siren EK, et al.: In vitro susceptibi‑
trumentation systems. J Endod 2015; 41:1600‑1605. lity of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their combi‑
44. Antunes HS, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Total and specific nations. Int Endod J 1999; 32:421‑429.
bacterial levels in the apical root canal system of teeth 65. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. London:
with post‑treatment apical periodontitis. J Endod 2015; Quintessence Publishing, 2011; p. 403.
41:1037‑1042. 66. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root ca‑
45. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Evaluation of root nal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005;
canal microorganisms isolated from teeth with endodontic 10:123‑147.
failure and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral Microbiol 67. Vera J, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: One‑ versus two‑vi‑
Immunol 2003; 18:100‑103. sit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a
46. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN: Uncultivated phylotypes and newly histobacteriologic study. J Endod 2012; 38:1040‑1052.
named species associated with primary and persistent endo‑ 68. Vieira AR, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: Dentinal tubu‑
dontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:3314‑3319. le infection as the cause of recurrent disease and late en‑
47. Zoletti GO, Carmo FL, Pereira EM, et al.: Comparison of dodontic treatment failure: a case report. J Endod 2012;
endodontic bacterial community structures in root‑canal‑ 38:250‑254.
treated teeth with or without apical periodontitis. J Med Mi‑ 69. Ricucci D, Candeiro GT, Bugea C, et al.: Complex apical intra‑
crobiol 2010; 59:1360‑1364. radicular infection and extraradicular mineralized biofilms as
94 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

the cause of wet canals and treatment failure: report of 2 ca‑ 93. Subramanian K, Mickel AK: Molecular analysis of persistent
ses. J Endod 2016; 42:509‑515. periradicular lesions and root ends reveals a diverse micro‑
70. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Lopes WS, et al.: Extraradicular in‑ bial profile. J Endod 2009; 35:950‑957.
fection as the cause of persistent symptoms: a case series. J 94. Ricucci D, Lopes WSP, Loghin S, et al.: Large bacterial floc
Endod 2015; 41:265‑273. causing an independent extraradicular infection and post‑
71. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Apical actinomycosis as a conti‑ treatment apical periodontitis: a case report. J Endod 2018;
nuum of intraradicular and extraradicular infection: case re‑ 44:1308‑1316.
port and critical review on its involvement with treatment fai‑ 95. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lopes HP: Bacteria on the apical root surfa‑
lure. J Endod 2008; 34:1124‑1129. ces of untreated teeth with periradicular lesions: a scanning
72. Atlas RM: Principles of microbiology. 2nd ed. Dubuque, USA: electron microscopy study. Int Endod J 2001; 34:216‑220.
WCB Publishers, 1997. 96. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al.: Factors affec‑
73. Siqueira JF, Jr: Ursachen endodontischer misserfolge. Endo‑ ting the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod
dontie 2001; 10/3:243‑257. 1990; 16:498‑504.
74. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Clinical implications and microbio‑ 97. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, et al.: A prospective cohort
logy of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J En‑ study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results
dod 2008; 34:1291‑1301 e 1293. after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
75. Tronstad L, Sunde PT: The evolving new understanding of Endod 2011; 112:825‑842.
endodontic infections. Endod Topics 2003; 6:57‑77. 98. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, et al.: Treatment outco‑
76. Siqueira JF, Jr: Periapical actinomycosis and infection with me in endodontics: the Toronto study – phase 4: initial tre‑
Propionibacterium propionicum. Endod Topics 2003; 6:78‑95. atment. J Endod 2008; 34:258‑263.
77. Tronstad L, Barnett F, Cervone F: Periapical bacterial plaque 99. Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S: Treatment outcome in
in teeth refractory to endodontic treatment. Endod Dent endodontics: the Toronto study. Phases I and II: Orthogra‑
Traumatol 1990; 6:73‑77. de retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30:627‑633.
78. Noiri Y, Ehara A, Kawahara T, et al.: Participation of bacterial 100. Lin LM, Skribner JE, Gaengler P: Factors associated with en‑
biofilms in refractory and chronic periapical periodontitis. J dodontic treatment failures. J Endod 1992; 18:625‑627.
Endod 2002; 28:679‑683. 101. Friedman S: Expected outcomes in the prevention and tre‑
79. Happonen RP: Periapical actinomycosis: a follow‑up study atment of apical periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T,
of 16 surgically treated cases. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; editors: Essential endodontology, Oxford, UK: Blackwell
2:205‑209. Munksgaard Ltd., 2008; p. 408‑469.
80. Sjögren U, Happonen RP, Kahnberg KE, et al.: Survival of 102. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Periradicular status
Arachnia propionica in periapical tissue. Int Endod J 1988; related to the quality of coronal restorations and root canal
21:277‑282. fillings in a Brazilian population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
81. Sundqvist G, Reuterving CO: Isolation of Actinomyces israelii Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100:369‑374.
from periapical lesion. J Endod 1980; 6:602‑606. 103. Strindberg LZ: The dependence of the results of pulp the‑
82. Byström A, Happonen RP, Sjogren U, et al.: Healing of pe‑ rapy on certain factors. Acta Odontol Scand 1956; 14(suppl
riapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment 21):1‑175.
with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3:58‑63. 104. Muruzábal M, Erasquin J, DeVoto FCH: A study of periapi‑
83. Siqueira JF, Jr, Ricucci D: Periapikale aktinomykose. Mikro­ cal overfilling in root canal treatment in the molar of rat.
biologie, pathogenese und therapie. Endodontie 2008; Arch Oral Biol 1966; 11:373‑383.
17:45‑57. 105. Spångberg LS, Barbosa SV, Lavigne GD: AH 26 releases for‑
84. Baumgartner JC: Microbiologic aspects of endodontic infec‑ maldehyde. J Endod 1993; 19:596‑598.
tions. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32:459‑468. 106. Barbosa SV, Araki K, Spångberg LS: Cytotoxicity of some
85. Tronstad L, Barnett F, Riso K, et al.: Extraradicular endodon‑ modified root canal sealers and their leachable compo‑
tic infections. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3:86‑90. nents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75:357‑361.
86. Sunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, et al.: Microbiota of periapi‑ 107. Ricucci D, Rôças IN, Alves FR, et al.: Apically extruded se‑
cal lesions refractory to endodontic therapy. J Endod 2002; alers: fate and influence on treatment outcome. J Endod
28:304‑310. 2016; 42:243‑249.
87. Wayman BE, Murata SM, Almeida RJ, et al.: A bacteriological 108. Yusuf H: The significance of the presence of foreign mate‑
and histological evaluation of 58 periapical lesions. J Endod rial periapically as a cause of failure of root treatment. Oral
1992; 18:152‑155. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54:566‑574.
88. Sunde PT, Tronstad L, Eribe ER, et al.: Assessment of perira‑ 109. Saunders WP, Saunders EM: Coronal leakage as a cause of
dicular microbiota by DNA‑DNA hybridization. Endod Dent failure in root‑canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Trauma‑
Traumatol 2000; 16:191‑196. tol 1994; 10:105‑108.
89. Gatti JJ, Dobeck JM, Smith C, et al.: Bacteria of asymptomatic 110. Ray HA, Trope M: Periapical status of endodontically treated
periradicular endodontic lesions identified by DNA‑DNA hy‑ teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling
bridization. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:197‑204. and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28:12‑18.
90. Sunde PT, Olsen I, Gobel UB, et al.: Fluorescence in situ hy‑ 111. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Influence of infection
bridization (FISH) for direct visualization of bacteria in pe‑ at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic tre‑
riapical lesions of asymptomatic root‑filled teeth. Microbiolo‑ atment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;
gy 2003; 149:1095‑1102. 30:297‑306.
91. Handal T, Caugant DA, Olsen I, et al.: Bacterial diversity in 112. Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, et al.: Clinical efficacy of
persistent periapical lesions on root‑filled teeth. J Oral Micro‑ treatment procedures in endodontic infection control and one
biol 2009; 1: doi:10.3402/jom.v3401i3400.1946. year follow‑up of periapical healing. J Endod 2005; 31:863‑866.
92. Saber MH, Schwarzberg K, Alonaizan FA, et al.: Bacterial flo‑ 113. Heling B, Shapira J: Roentgenologic and clinical evaluation
ra of dental periradicular lesions analyzed by the 454‑pyrose‑ of endodontically treated teeth with or without negative cul‑
quencing technology. J Endod 2012; 38:1484‑1488. ture. Quintessence International 1978; 11:79‑84.
Capítulo 18   |   Referências Bibliográficas 95

114. Engström B, Hard AF, Segerstad L, et al.: Correlation of po‑ restorations in an adult Spanish population. Int Endod J
sitive cultures with the prognosis for root canal treatment. 2004; 37:525‑530.
Odontologisk Revy 1964; 15:257‑270. 126. Moreno JO, Alves FR, Goncalves LS, et al.: Periradicular
115. Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, et al.: Influence of re‑ status and quality of root canal fillings and coronal resto‑
sidual bacteria on periapical tissue healing after chemome‑ rations in an urban Colombian population. J Endod 2013;
chanical treatment and root filling of experimentally infec‑ 39:600‑604.
ted monkey teeth. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2006; 127. Pak JG, Fayazi S, White SN: Prevalence of periapical radio‑
114:278‑285. lucency and root canal treatment: a systematic review of
116. Marquis VL, Dao T, Farzaneh M, et al.: Treatment outcome cross‑sectional studies. J Endod 2012; 38:1170‑1176.
in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phase III: initial treat‑ 128. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Bacterial leakage
ment. J Endod 2006; 32:299‑306. in coronally unsealed root canals obturated with 3 different
117. Hoskinson SE, Ng YL, Hoskinson AE, et al.: A retrospective techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
comparison of outcome of root canal treatment using two Endod 2000; 90:647‑650.
different protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral 129. Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M: Human saliva penetration
Radiol Endod 2002; 93:705‑715. of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. J Endod 1993;
118. Chugal NM, Clive JM, Spångberg LS: Endodontic infection: 19:458‑461.
some biologic and treatment factors associated with outco‑ 130. Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD: In vitro bacterial pene‑
me. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod tration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J
2003; 96:81‑90. Endod 1990; 16:566‑569.
119. Ostavik D, Qvist V, Stoltze K: A multivariate analysis of the 131. De‑Deus G, Murad C, Paciornik S, et al.: The effect of the
outcome of endodontic treatment. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; canal‑filled area on the bacterial leakage of oval‑shaped ca‑
112:224‑230. nals. Int Endod J 2008; 41:183‑190.
120. Peters OA, Barbakow F, Peters CI: An analysis of endodontic 132. Nair PN, Sjogren U, Schumacher E, et al.: Radicular cyst
treatment with three nickel‑titanium rotary root canal pre‑ affecting a root‑filled human tooth: a long‑term post‑treat‑
paration techniques. Int Endod J 2004; 37:849‑859. ment follow‑up. Int Endod J 1993; 26:225‑233.
121. Ricucci D, Bergenholtz G: Bacterial status in root‑filled te‑ 133. Morse DR, Wolfson E, Schacterle GR: Nonsurgical repair of
eth exposed to the oral environment by loss of restoration electrophoretically diagnosed radicular cysts. J Endod 1975;
and fracture or caries – a histobacteriological study of trea‑ 1:158‑163.
ted cases. Int Endod J 2003; 36:787‑802. 134. Morse DR, Patnik JW, Schacterle GR: Electrophoretic di‑
122. Tronstad L, Asbjornsen K, Doving L, et al.: Influence of fferentiation of radicular cysts and granulomas. Oral Surg
coronal restorations on the periapical health of endo‑ Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 35:249‑264.
dontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16: 135. Torabinejad M: The role of immunological reactions in api‑
218‑221. cal cyst formation and the fate of epithelial cells after root
123. Tavares PB, Bonte E, Boukpessi T, et al.: Prevalence of api‑ canal therapy: a theory. Int J Oral Surg 1983; 12:14‑22.
cal periodontitis in root canal‑treated teeth from an ur‑ 136. Lin LM, Huang GT, Rosenberg PA: Proliferation of epithe‑
ban French population: influence of the quality of root lial cell rests, formation of apical cysts, and regression of
canal fillings and coronal restorations. J Endod 2009; 35: apical cysts after periapical wound healing. J Endod 2007;
810‑813. 33:908‑916.
124. Georgopoulou MK, Spanaki‑Voreadi AP, Pantazis N, et al.: 137. Koppang HS, Koppang R, Solheim T, et al.: Cellulose fibers
Periapical status and quality of root canal fillings and co‑ from endodontic paper points as an etiological factor in
ronal restorations in a Greek population. Quintessence Int postendodontic periapical granulomas and cysts. J Endod
2008; 39:e85‑92. 1989; 15:369‑372.
125. Segura‑Egea JJ, Jimenez‑Pinzon A, Poyato‑Ferrera M, et al.: 138. Walker A: Definite and dependable therapy for pulpless
Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1936; 23:1418‑1424.
Ca p ít u l o

18 Tratamento do Fracasso Endodôntico

Se ç ã o

Retratamento Endodôntico
18.2 Hélio P. Lopes | José F. Siqueira Jr. | Carlos N. Elias

16. Buoncristiani J, Seto BG, Caputo AA: Evaluation of ultrasonic


Referências Bibliográficas and sonic instruments for intraradicular post removal. J En‑
dod 1994; 20(10):486‑489.
1. Siqueira JF, Jr: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why 17. Leonardo MR, Leal JM: Endodontia. 3a ed. São Paulo: Pana‑
well‑treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34:1‑10. mericana, 1998.
2. Gutmann JL, Dumsha TC, Lovdahl PE, Hovland EJ: Problem 18. Chalfin H, Weseley P, Solomon C: Removal of restorative posts
Solving in Endodontics: Prevention Identification, and Ma‑ for the purpose of nonsurgical endodontic retreatament: re‑
nagement. 3a ed. 3st Louis: Mosby Inc., 1997. port of cases. J Amer Dent Assoc 1990; 120(2):169‑172.
3. Matsumoto T, Nagai T, Ida K, et al.: Factors affecting suc‑ 19. Lopes HP, Siqueira Jr. JF: Endodontia. Biologia e técnica. 2a
cessfull prognosis of root canal treatment. J Endod 1987; ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2004.
13(5):239‑242. 20. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Estrela C, Pellegrinelli A, Leite HASM, To‑
4. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K: Factors affec‑ ledo PF: Aquecimento da superfície radicular durante a cria‑
ting the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod ção do espaço para pino. Rev da APCD 1995; 49(4):299‑302.
1990; 16:498‑504. 21. Eriksson AR, Albektsson T, Grane B, McQueen D: Termal in‑
5. European Society of Endodontology: Consensus report of jury to bone: a vital microscopic description of heat effects.
the Europen Society of Endodontology on quality guide‑ Int J Oral Surgery 1982; 11:115‑121.
lines for endodontic treatment. Int Endo J 1994; 27(5): 22. Eriksson AR: Heat induced bone tissue injury. Goteborg,
115‑1124. 1984. Diss. University of Goteborg, Sweden.
6. Siqueira JF, Jr: Microbiology of apical periodontitis. In Essen‑ 23. Hulsmann M, Blishm V: Efficacy cleaning ability and safety of
tial endodontology. D Ørstavik, T Pitt Ford, editors. Oxford, different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
UK: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008; p. 135‑196. Int Endo J 2004; 37:468‑476.
7. Bergennholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, et al.: Retreatment 24. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata GI, Uemura M, Toda F, Weine F: A
of endodontic fillings. Scand J Dent Res 1979; 87:217‑224. comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary
8. Swartz DB, Skidmore AK, Griffin JA: Twenty years of endo‑ instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment.
dontic success and failure. J Endod 1983; 9(5):198‑202. Int Endod J 2000; 33:361‑366.
9. Friedman S: Expected outcomes in the prevention and treat‑ 25. Masiero AV, Barletta FB: Effectiveness of different techniques
ment of apical periodontitis. In Essential endodontology. D for removing gutta‑percha during retreatment. Int Endo J
Ørstavik, T Pitt Ford, editors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munks‑ 2005; 38:2‑7.
gaard, 2008; p. 408‑469. 26. Schirrmeisten JF, Strohl C, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT,
10. Carr GB: Retratamento. In Cohen S, Burns RC: Caminhos da pol‑ Hellwig E: Shaping ability and safety of five different rota‑
pa. 7a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2000; p. 747‑790. ry nickel‑titanium instruments compared with stainless ste‑
11. Magura ME, Kafrawy AH, Brown CE, Newton CW: Human sa‑ el hand instrumentation in simulated curved rood canals.
liva coronal microleakage in obtured root canals: an in vitro Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;
study. J Endod 1991; 17(7):324‑331. 101:807‑813.
12. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St 27. Schirrmeisten JF, Wrbas KT, Schneider FH, Altenburger MJ,
Louis: Mosby, 2002. Hellwig E: Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel‑tita‑
13. Shillingburg HT, Kessler JC: Restoration of the endodonti‑ nium rotary instruments for removing gutta‑percha in curved
cally treated tooth. 1a ed. Illinois: Quintessence, 1982. root canals during retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
14. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC: Retention of endodon‑ thol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101:542‑547.
tic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length diameter, and de‑ 28. Dall’agnol C, Hartmann MSM, Barleta FB: Computed tomogra‑
sign. J Prosth Dent 1978; 39(4):401‑405. phy assessments of the efficacy of different techniques for remo‑
15. Lopes HP, Estrela C, Rocha NSM, Costa Filho AS, Siqueira Jr val of root canal filling material. Braz Dent J 2008; 18:306‑312.
JF: Retentores intrarradiculares: análise radiográfica do com‑ 29. Zuolo ML, Kerlakian D, Mello JR Jr, Carvalho JE, Coelho MC,
primento do pino e da condição da obturação do canal radi‑ Fagundes MIRC: Reintervenção em endodontia. São Paulo:
cular. RBO 1997; 54 (5):277‑280. Santos Editora, 2009.
Capítulo 18   |   Referências Bibliográficas 97

30. Bueno CES, Delboni MG, Araújo RA, Carrara HJ, Cunha RS: 54. Estrela C, Camapun FF, Lopes HP: Prevalência de dor após
Effectiveness of rotary and hand files in gutta‑percha and sea‑ retratamentos endodônticos. RBO 1998; 55(2):84‑87.
ler removal using chloroform or chlorexidine gel. Braz Dent 55. Allen RK, Newton CW, Brown CE: A statistical analysis of sur‑
J 2006; 17:139‑143. gical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatment cases. J Endod
31. Barrieshi‑Nusair KM: Guta‑percha retreatment: effectiveness 1989; 15:261‑266.
of steel hand files. J Endod 2002; 28:454‑546. 56. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U: Microbiologic
32. Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, Huang XY: Efficacy of ProTaper Uni‑ analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the ou‑
versal rotary retreatment system for gutta‑percha removal tcome of conservative re‑treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
front root canals. Int Endod J 2008; 41:288‑295. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 86‑93.
33. Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Pameijer 57. Araújo Filho WR: Avaliação clínica e radiográfica de dentes
CH: The effectiveness of ual and mechanical instrumenta‑ desvitalizados, tratados endodonticamente em única sessão.
tion for the retreatment of three different root canal filling São Paulo, 2002:75. Tese (doutorado) Facudade de Odonto‑
materials. J Endod 2008; 34:466‑469. logia de São Paulo.
34. Tasdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, Çelik D: Efficacy of three rotary 58. Friedman S, Mor C: The success of endodontic therapy – he‑
NiTi instruments in removing guta‑percha from root canals. aling and functionality. Calif Dent Assoc J 2004; 32:493.
Int Endod J 2008; 41:191‑196.
35. Ezzie E, Fleury A, Solomon E, Spears R, He Y: Efficacy of re‑ Boxe 18.1
treatment techniques for a resin‑based root canal obturation 1. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Fate of the tissue in lateral canals
material. J Endod 2006; 32:341‑344. and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions
36. Ferreira JJ, Rhodes JS, Pitt Ford TR: The efficacy of gutta‑per‑ and treatment procedures. J Endod 2010; 36:1‑15.
cha removal using ProFiles. Int Endod J 2001; 34:267‑274. 2. Vieira AR, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: Dentinal tubule in‑
37. Wilcox LR, Krell KV, Madison S, Rittman B: Endodontic re‑ fection as the cause of recurrent disease and late endodontic
treatment: Evaluation of gutta‑percha and sealer removal and treatment failure: a case report. J Endod 2012; 38:250‑254.
canal reinstrumentation. J Endod 1987; 13:453‑457. 3. Vera J, Siqueira JF, Jr., Ricucci D, et al.: One‑ versus two‑vi‑
38. American Dental Association: Remédios Dentários Oficiais. sit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a
27a ed. Rio de Janeiro, 1962. histobacteriologic study. J Endod 2012; 38:1040‑1052.
39. Hunter RK, Doblecki W, Pelleu GB: Halothane and eucalyp‑ 4. Siqueira JF, Jr.: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why
tol as alternatives to chloroform for softening gutta‑percha. J well‑treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34:1‑10.
Endod 1991; 17(7):310‑312. 5. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Bate AL, et al.: Histologic investigation
40. Kaplowitz GJ: Evaluation of gutta‑percha solvents. J Endod of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospec‑
1990; 16(11):539‑540. tive study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod 2009; 35:493‑502.
41. Tamse A, Unger U, Metzger Z, Rosenberg M: Gutta‑percha 6. Alves J, Walton R, Drake D: Coronal leakage: endotoxin pe‑
solvents – A comparative study. J Endod 1986; 12(8): 337‑339. netration from mixed bacterial communities through obtura‑
42. Oliveira DP de, Barbizan JV, Trope M, Teixeira FB: Compa‑ ted, post‑prepared root canals. J Endod 1998; 24:587‑591.
rison between guta‑percha and resilon removal using two di‑ 7. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Schneider FH, et al.: Effective‑
fferent techniques in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2006; ness of a hand file and three nickel‑titanium rotary instru‑
32:362‑364. ments for removing gutta‑percha in curved root canals du‑
43. Lasala A: Endodoncia. 3a ed. Barcelona: Salvat, 1979. ring retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑
44. Maisto AO: Endodontica. 3a ed. Buenos Aires: Mundi S.A., 1975. diol Endod 2006; 101:542‑547.
45. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Howell I, Costa Filho AS: Avaliação da so‑ 8. Alves FR, Ribeiro TO, Moreno JO, et al.: Comparison of the
lubilidade e desintegração do cimento de óxido de zinco‑eu‑ efficacy of nickel‑titanium rotary systems with or without the
genol. Rev Paul de Odont 1994; 16(3):40‑43. retreatment instruments in the removal of gutta‑percha in
46. Lopes HP, Gahyva SMM: Retratamento endodôntico. Avalia‑ the apical third. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14:102.
ção da quantidade apical de resíduos de material obturador 9. Alves FR, Marceliano‑Alves MF, Sousa JC, et al.: Removal of
após a reinstrumentação. RGO 1992; 40:181‑184. root canal fillings in curved canals using either reciprocating
47. Lopes HP, Gahyva SMM: Retratamento endodôntico. Avalia‑ single‑ or rotary multi‑instrument systems and a supplementa‑
ção do limite apical de esvaziamento na remoção do material ry step with the XP‑Endo Finisher. J Endod 2016; 42:1114‑1119.
obturador dos canais. RBO 1995; 52(1):22‑26. 10. Rodig T, Reicherts P, Konietschke F, et al.: Efficacy of reci‑
48. Dezan Júnior E, Holland R, Lopes HP, Santos CA, Alexandre procating and rotary NiTi instruments for retreatment of
AC: Retratamento endodôntico: avaliação da quantidade de curved root canals assessed by micro‑CT. Int Endod J 2014;
resíduos após a desobturação com ou sem o uso de solvente. 47:942‑948.
RBO 1994, 52(6):2‑5. 11. Rios Mde A, Villela AM, Cunha RS, et al.: Efficacy of 2 reci‑
49. Bueno CES: Efetividade de solventes e de técnicas na desob‑ procating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system
turação dos canais radiculares. Estudo “in vitro”. Piracicaba, for gutta‑percha removal. J Endod 2014; 40:543‑546.
SP, 1995:93. Tese (Mestrado). Faculdade de Odontologia de 12. Rossi‑Fedele G, Ahmed HM: Assessment of root canal filling
Piracicaba – UNICAMP. removal effectiveness using micro‑computed tomography: a
50. Porkaew P, Retief DH, Barfield RD, Lacefield WR, Soong SJ: systematic review. J Endod 2017; 43:520‑526.
Effects of calcium hydroxide paste as an intracanal medica‑ 13. So MV, Saran C, Magro ML, et al.: Efficacy of ProTaper retre‑
ment on apical seal. J Endod 1990; 16:369‑374. atment system in root canals filled with gutta‑percha and two
51. Lambrianidis T, Margelos J, Beltes P: Removal efficency of cal‑ endodontic sealers. J Endod 2008; 34:1223‑1225.
cium hydroxide dressing from the root canal. J Endod 1999; 14. Silveira SB, Alves FRF, Marceliano‑Alves MF, et al.: Removal of
25:85‑88. root canal fillings in curved canals using either Mani GPR or
52. Barcelos PM: Estudo “in vitro” da influência do veículo na HyFlex NT followed by passive ultrasonic irrigation. J Endod
permanência de resíduos de hidróxido de cálcio sobre as pa‑ 2018; 44:299‑303‑291.
redes do canal radicular. Rio de Janeiro, 1999:34. Monografia 15. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N: Three‑dimensional
(Especialização) Odontoclínica Central do Exército. evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumenta‑
53. Trope M: Flare‑up rate of single‑visit endodontics. Int Endod tion for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J
J 1991; 24:24‑27. Endod 2008; 34:1370‑1373.
98 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

16. Crozeta BM, Silva‑Sousa YT, Leoni GB, et al.: Micro‑com‑ filling material during retreatment of anatomically complex
puted tomography study of filling material removal from teeth. Int Endod J 2014; 47:1078‑1083.
oval‑shaped canals by using rotary, reciprocating, and adapti‑ 36. Keles A, Arslan H, Kamalak A, et al.: Removal of filling ma‑
ve motion systems. J Endod 2016; 42:793‑797. terials from oval‑shaped canals using laser irradiation: a mi‑
17. Campello AF, Almeida BM, Franzoni MA, et al.: Influence of cro‑computed tomographic study. J Endod 2015; 41:219‑224.
solvent and a supplementary step with a finishing instrument 37. Jiang S, Zou T, Li D, et al.: Effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic,
on filling material removal from canals connected by an isth‑ and photon‑induced photoacoustic streaming activation of
mus. Int Endod J 2018 (in press). NaOCl on filling material removal following retreatment in
18. Keles A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, et al.: Oval‑shaped canal retreat‑ oval canal anatomy. Photomed Laser Surg 2016; 34:3‑10.
ment with self‑adjusting file: a micro‑computed tomography 38. Sae‑Lim V, Rajamanickam I, Lim BK, et al.: Effectiveness of
study. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18:1147‑1153. ProFile .04 taper rotary instruments in endodontic retreat‑
19. Abramovitz I, Relles‑Bonar S, Baransi B, et al.: The effective‑ ment. J Endod 2000; 26:100‑104.
ness of a self‑adjusting file to remove residual gutta‑percha af‑ 39. Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, et al.: Efficacy of ProTaper Universal
ter retreatment with rotary files. Int Endod J 2012; 45:386‑392. rotary retreatment system for gutta‑percha removal from root
20. Alves FRF, Vieira MV, Moreno JO, et al.: Removal of filling canals. Int Endod J 2008; 41:288‑295.
material in the apical root canal by three retreatment appro‑ 40. de Mello Junior JE, Cunha RS, Bueno CE, et al.: Retreatment
aches. ENDO (Lond Engl) 2012; 6:257‑262. efficacy of gutta‑percha removal using a clinical microscope
21. Imura N, Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, et al.: The outcome of en‑ and ultrasonic instruments: part I‑‑an ex vivo study. Oral Surg
dodontic treatment: a retrospective study of 2000 cases per‑ Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108:e59‑62.
formed by a specialist. J Endod 2007; 33:1278‑1282. 41. Kfir A, Tsesis I, Yakirevich E, et al.: The efficacy of five tech‑
22. Friedman S, Lost C, Zarrabian M, et al.: Evaluation of success niques for removing root filling material: microscopic versus
and failure after endodontic therapy using a glass ionomer radiographic evaluation. Int Endod J 2012; 45:35‑41.
cement sealer. J Endod 1995; 21:384‑390. 42. Schirrmeister JF, Hermanns P, Meyer KM, et al.: Detectability
23. Bernardes RA, Duarte MA, Vivan RR, et al.: Comparison of of residual Epiphany and gutta‑percha after root canal retre‑
three retreatment techniques with ultrasonic activation in atment using a dental operating microscope and radiogra‑
flattened canals using micro‑computed tomography and phs‑‑an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2006; 39:558‑565.
scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J 2015; 49:890‑897. 43. Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, et al.: Retreatability of two
24. Peters OA: Current challenges and concepts in the prepara‑ endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a
tion of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30:559‑567. micro‑computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent En‑
25. Niemi TK, Marchesan MA, Lloyd A, et al.: Effect of Instru‑ dod 2017; 42:19‑26.
ment Design and Access Outlines on the Removal of Root 44. Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, et al.: Retreatability of a biocera‑
Canal Obturation Materials in Oval‑shaped Canals. J Endod mic root canal sealing material. J Endod 2011; 37:1547‑1549.
2016; 42:1550‑1554. 45. Rodig T, Kupis J, Konietschke F, et al.: Comparison of hand
26. Fatima K, Nair R, Khasnis S, et al.: Efficacy of rotary and re‑ and rotary instrumentation for removing gutta‑percha from
ciprocating single‑file systems on different access outlines for previously treated curved root canals: a microcomputed to‑
gutta‑percha removal in retreatment: An in vitro study. J Con‑ mography study. Int Endod J 2014; 47:173‑182.
serv Dent 2018; 21:354‑358. 46. Asheibi F, Qualtrough AJ, Mellor A, et al.: Micro‑CT evalua‑
27. de Siqueira Zuolo A, Zuolo ML, da Silveira Bueno CE, et tion of the effectiveness of the combined use of rotary and
al.: Evaluation of the efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc hand instrumentation in removal of Resilon. Dent Mater J
file systems in the removal of root filling material: an ex 2014; 33:1‑6.
vivo micro‑computed tomographic study. J Endod 2016; 47. Helvacioglu‑Yigit D, Yilmaz A, Kiziltas‑Sendur G, et al.: Effi‑
42:315‑319. cacy of reciprocating and rotary systems for removing root
28. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, et al.: Treatment outco‑ filling material: a micro‑computed tomography study. Scan‑
me in endodontics: the Toronto study – phases 3 and 4: or‑ ning 2014; 36:576‑581.
thograde retreatment. J Endod 2008; 34:131‑137. 48. Rodig T, Hausdorfer T, Konietschke F, et al.: Efficacy of D‑Ra‑
29. Rodrigues RCV, Zandi H, Kristoffersen AK, et al.: Influence Ce and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments
of the apical preparation size and the irrigant type on bacte‑ and hand files in removing gutta‑percha from curved root
rial reduction in root canal‑treated teeth with apical perio‑ canals – a micro‑computed tomography study. Int Endod J
dontitis. J Endod 2017; 43:1058‑1063. 2012; 45:580‑589.
30. He J, White RK, White CA, et al.: Clinical and patient‑cen‑ 49. Da Rosa RA, Santini MF, Cavenago BC, et al.: Micro‑CT eva‑
tered outcomes of nonsurgical root canal retreatment in luation of root filling removal after three stages of retreat‑
first molars using contemporary techniques. J Endod 2017; ment procedure. Braz Dent J 2015; 26:612‑618.
43:231‑237. 50. Capar ID, Gok T, Orhan E: Comparison of retreatment ability
31. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K: A prospective study of the fac‑ of full‑sequence reciprocating instrumentation and 360 degrees
tors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: rotary instrumentation. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19:2219‑2222.
part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 2011; 44:583‑609. 51. Delai D, Jardine AP, Mestieri LB, et al.: Efficacy of a thermally
32. Negishi J, Kawanami M, Ogami E: Risk analysis of failure of treated single file compared with rotary systems in endodon‑
root canal treatment for teeth with inaccessible apical cons‑ tic retreatment of curved canals: a micro‑CT study. Clin Oral
triction. J Dent 2005; 33:399‑404. Investig 2018.
33. Carpenter MT, Sidow SJ, Lindsey KW, et al.: Regaining api‑ 52. de Souza PF, Oliveira Goncalves LC, Franco Marques AA, et al.:
cal patency after obturation with gutta‑percha and a sea‑ Root canal retreatment using reciprocating and continuous ro‑
ler containing mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2014; tary nickel‑titanium instruments. Eur J Dent 2015; 9:234‑239.
40:588‑590. 53. Silva EJ, Orlowsky NB, Herrera DR, et al.: Effectiveness of ro‑
34. Souza RA: The importance of apical patency and cleaning of tatory and reciprocating movements in root canal filling ma‑
the apical foramen on root canal preparation. Braz Dent J terial removal. Braz Oral Res 2015; 29:1‑6.
2006; 17:6‑9. 54. Mollo A, Botti G, Prinicipi Goldoni N, et al.: Efficacy of two
35. Cavenago BC, Ordinola‑Zapata R, Duarte MA, et al.: Efficacy Ni‑Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta‑percha from
of xylene and passive ultrasonic irrigation on remaining root root canals. Int Endod J 2012; 45:1‑6.
Ca p í tulo

Tratamento do Fracasso Endodôntico 18


Seç ã o

Cirurgia Perirradicular
Carlos A. F. Murgel | José Maurício P. Camargo | Rafael V. Camargo
18.3

microscope and super‑Eba as a root‑end filling material. J En‑


Referências Bibliográficas dod 1999; 25(1):43‑48.
16. Rubinstein R, Kim S: Long‑term follow‑up of cases conside‑
1. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K: Outco‑ red healed one year after apical microsurgery. J Endod 2002;
me of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the 28(5):378‑383.
literature – part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probabi‑ 17. Worschech CC, Murgel CAF: Micro‑odontologia: visão e preci‑
lity of success. Int Endod J 2007; 40(21):921‑939. são em tempo real. Londrina: Dental Press International, 2008.
2. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K: Outco‑ 18. Carr GB: Microscopes in Endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc
me of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the 1992; 20(11):55‑61.
literature – Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 19. Carr GB: Ultrasonic root end preparation. Dent Clin North
2008; 41(1):6‑31. Am 1997; 41(3):541‑554.
3. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K: Outcome of secondary root ca‑ 20. Rubinstein R, Torabinejad M: Contemporary endodontic sur‑
nal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod gery. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32(6):485‑492.
J 2008; 41(12):1026‑1046. 21. Clark D: The operating microscope and ultrasonics; a perfect
4. Bernabé PFE, Holland R: Cirurgia Parendodôntica: quando marriage. Dent Today 2004; 23(6):74‑76, 78‑81.
indicar e como realizá‑la. In Gonçalves EA, Feller C, editors: 22. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F: Ultraso‑
Atualização na clínica odontológica. São Paulo: Artes Médi‑ nics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 2007;
cas, 1998; p. 217‑254. 33(2):81‑95.
5. Kiryu T, et al.: Bacteria invading periapical cementum. J En‑ 23. Gondim EJ, Murgel CAF, Souza Filho, FJ: Surgical operating
dod 1994; 20(4):169‑172. microscope: the new frontier of XXI century clinical dentistry.
6. Tronstad L, et al.: Periapical bacterial plaque in teeth refrac‑ Revista da Federación Odontológica Latinoamericana/Orga‑
tory to endodontic treatment. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; nización Regional de América Latina de La Federación Dental
6(2):73‑77. Internacional (FOLA‑ORAL/FDI) 1997; 3(9):147‑152.
7. Wada M, et al.: Clinical study of refractory apical periodon‑ 24. Murgel CAF, Gondim EJ, Souza Filho FJ: Microscópio cirúrgi‑
tites treated by apicectomy Part 1 Root canal morphology of co: a busca da excelência na clínica odontológica. Rev APCD
resected apex. Int Endod J 1990; 31(1):53‑56. 1997; 51(1):31‑34.
8. Waltimo TMT, et al.: Fungi in therapy resistant apical perio‑ 25. Carr G: Surgical endodontics. In Cohen S, Burns RC, editors:
dontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30(2):96‑101. Pathways of the Pulp, 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998; p. 533‑564.
9. Gutmann JL, Harrison JW: Surgical endodontics. 1st ed. Bos‑ 26. Krueger H, Conrady P, Zulch J: Work with magnifying glasses.
ton: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991. Ergonomics 1989; 32(7):785‑794.
10. Leubke RG: Surgical endodontics, Dent Clin North Am 1974; 27. Shanelec DA: Optical principals of Loupes. J Calif Dent Assoc
18(2):379‑391. 1992; 20(11):25‑32.
11. Weine FS: Endodontic therapy. 4th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby, 28. Carr GB, Murgel CAF: Operating Microscope in Endodon‑
1989. tics. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54(2):191‑214.
12. Maddalone M, Gagliani M: Periapical endodontic surgery: a 29. JAMBEL: Available at: http://www.jambel.com/binpdf/lu‑
3‑year follow‑up study. Int Endod J 2003; 36(3):193‑198. pas.pdf
13. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Schwartz‑Arad D, Fuss Z: Retrospective eva‑ 30. Baumann RR: How may the dentist benefit from the opera‑
luation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus ting microscope? Quintessence Int 1977; 5:5‑17.
modern technique. J Endod 2006; 32(5):412‑416. 31. Apotheker H: A microscope for use in dentistry. J Microsurg
14. Zuolo ML, Ferreira MO, Gutmann JL: Prognosis in periradi‑ 1981; 3(1):7‑10.
cular surgery: a clinical prospective study. Int Endod J 2000; 32. Johnson, BR, Fayad, MI, Witherspoon, DE: Perirradicular
33(2):91‑98. Surgery. In Hargreaves KM, Berman, LH, editors: Cohen’s Pa‑
15. Rubinstein R, Kim S: Short‑term observation of the results thways of the Pulp Expert Consult. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby,
of endodontic surgery, with the use of a surgical operating 2011; p. 720‑776.
100 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

33. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U: Microbiologic 53. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR: Ac‑
analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the ou‑ curacy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic
tcome of conservative re‑treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodon‑
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85(1):86‑93. titis. J Endod 2008; 34(3):273‑279.
34. Siqueira Jr JF: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why 54. Use of cone‑beam computed tomography in endodontics.
well‑treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34(1):1‑10. Joint Position Statement of the American Association of En‑
35. Briggs PF, Scott BJ: Evidence‑based dentistry: endodontic dodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillo‑
failure‑how should it be managed? Br Dent J 1997; 183(5): facial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
159‑164. Endod 2011; 111(2):234‑237.
36. Pannkuk TF: A new technique for nonsurgical retreatment 55. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P: Clinical applications of
of teeth with amalgam root end fillings: case series. J Endod cone beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Cana‑
2011; 37(3):414‑419. dian Dent Assoc. 2006; 72:75‑80.
37. Kim S, Kratchman S: Modern Endodontic Surgery Concepts 56. Scarfe WC, Farman AG: What is cone beam CT and how does
and Practice: A Review. J Endod 2006; 32(7):601‑623. it work? Dent Clin N Amer 2008; 52:707‑730.
38. Fujikawa K, O’Leary TJ, Kafrawy AH: The effect of retained 57. Ludlow JB, Lester WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG: Accu‑
subgingival calculus on healing after flap surgery. J Periodon‑ racy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam
tol 1988; 59(3):170‑175. computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
39. Surmont P, D’Hauwers R, Martens L: Determination of Path Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103:534‑542.
tooth length in endodontics. Rev Belge de Med Dent 1992; 58. Strateman SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC:
47(4):30‑38. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging
40. ElAyouti A, Weiger R, Löst C: The ability of root ZX apex lo‑ with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2008; 37:80‑93.
cator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic 59. Cevidanes LH, et al.: Superimposition of 3D cone‑beam CT
working length. J Endod 2002; 28(2):116‑119. models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac
41. Newton CW, M Hoen MM, Goodis HE, Johnson BR, Mc‑ Radiol, Houndsmills 2005; 34(6):369‑375.
Clanahan SB: Identify and determine the metrics, hierar‑ 60. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC. Scheetz JP, Farman AG: Accuracy of
chy, and predictive value of all the parameters and/or me‑ linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone
thods used during endodontic diagnosis. J Endod 2009; beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric ra‑
35(12):1635‑1644. diography. Am J of Orth and Dent Orth 2005; 28(6):803‑811.
42. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F: Validation of Cone 61. Kobayashi K, et al.: Accuracy in measurement of distance
Beam Computed Tomography as a Tool to Explore Root Ca‑ using limited cone‑beam computerized tomography. Int J
nal Anatomy. J Endod 2010; 36(7):1187‑1190. Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:228‑231.
43. Lee JKT, Sage LSS. Stanley RJ, Heiken PJ: Tomografia Com‑ 62. Marmulla R, et al.: Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000
putadorizada do Corpo em Correlação com Ressonância Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34(1):28‑31.
Magnética. 3rd ed. São Paulo: Guanabara Koogan, 2001. 63. Misch KA; Yi ES, Sarment DP: Accuracy of cone beam compu‑
44. Tachibana H, Matsumoto K: Applicability of x‑ray compute‑ ted tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Pe‑
rized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol riodontol 2006; 77(7):1261‑1266.
1990; 6(1):16‑20. 64. Mozzo P, et al.: A new volumetric CT machine for dental ima‑
45. Arai Y, Hashimoto K, Iwai K, Shinoda K: Fundamental effi‑ ging based on the cone‑beam technique: preliminary results.
ciency of limited cone‑beam X‑ray CT (3DXmulti ima‑ Eur Radiol 1998; 8(9):1558‑1564.
ge micro CT) for practical use. Japan Dent Radiol 2000; 65. Hashimoto K, et al.: A comparison of a new limited cone
40:2145‑2154. beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a
46. Arai Y, Honda K, Iwai K, Shinoda K: Practical model “3DX” multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med
of limited cone‑beam X‑ray CT for dental use. International Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95(3):371‑377.
Congress Series 2001; 1230:713‑718. 66. Holberg C: Cone‑beam computed tomography in orthodon‑
47. Youssefzadeh S, Gahleitner A, Dorffner R, Bernhart T, Kain‑ tics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005; 66(6):
berger FM: Dental vertical root fractures: value of CT in de‑ 434‑444.
tection. Radiology 1999; 210(2):545‑549. 67. Mora MA, Mol A, Tyndall DA, Rivera E: In vitro assessment
48. Mora MA, Mol A, Tyndall DA, Rivera EM: In vitro assessment of local tomography for the detection of longitudinal tooth
of local computedtomography for the detection of longitudi‑ fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod
nal tooth fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra‑ 2007; 103:825‑829.
diol Endod 2007; 103(6):825‑829. 68. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M, Okumura S, Naitoh
49. Patel S, Dawood A, Pitt Ford T, Whaites E: The potential ap‑ M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, Langlais RP: Image artifact in dental
plications of cone beam computed tomography in the mana‑ cone beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol
gement of endodontic problems. Int Endod J 2007; 40(10): Endod 2006; 101:652‑657.
818‑830. 69. Barrett JF, Keat N: Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidan‑
50. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler ce. Radiographic 2004; 24:1679‑1691.
WG: Endodontic applications of cone beam volumetric to‑ 70. American Association of Endodontists (AAE). Endodontics:
mography. J Endod 2007; 33(9):1121‑1132. colleagues for excellence: cone beam‑computed tomography
51. Rigolone M, Pasqualkini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD: in endodontics. Chicago: AAE; Summer, 2011.
Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior 71. Simonton JD, Trevino E, Azevedo B: Small v large volume
first molar: low‑dose cone beam CT analysis of the pathway CBCT in endodontics. Table Clinic, AAE, Vancouver, 2008.
and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003; 29(11):773‑775. 72. Ainsworth G: Preoperative clindamycin prophylaxis does not
52. Low KM, Dula K, Burgin W, von Arx T: Comparison of pe‑ prevent postoperative infections in endodontic surgery. Evid
riapical radiography and limited cone‑beam tomography in Based Dent 2006; 7(3):72.
posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 73. Pendrill K, Riddy J: The use of prophylactic penicillin in pe‑
2008; 34(5):557‑562. riodental surgery. J Periodontol 1980; 51(1):44‑48.
Capítulo 18   |   Referências Bibliográficas 101

74. Esposito M, Coulthard P, Oliver R, Thomsen P, Worthing‑ 94. Folke LE, Stallard RE: Periodontal microcirculation as re‑
ton HV: Antibiotics to prevent complications following den‑ vealed by plastic microspheres. J Periodontal Res 1967;
tal implant treatment. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2003; (3): 2(1):53‑63.
CD004152. 95. Gage TW: Pharmacology of the autonomic nervous system.
75. Tong DC, Rothwell BR: Antibiotic prophylaxis in dentistry: In Holyroyd SV, Wynn RL, Requa‑Clark B. editors. 4th ed.
a review and practice recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc Clinical pharmacology in dental practice. St Louis: CV Mos‑
2000; 131(3):366‑374. by, 1988; p. 9‑30.
76. Paterson JA, Cardo VA, Stratigos GP: An examination of an‑ 96. Macphee TC, Cowley G: Essentials of periodontology and
tibiotic prophylaxis in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral periodontics. 3rd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publica‑
Surg 1970; 28(10):753‑759. tions 1981; p. 273‑274.
77. Longman LP, Preston AJ, Martin MV, Wilson NH: Endodon‑ 97. Gutmann JL, Harrison JW: Posterior endodontic surgery:
tics in the adult patient: the role of antibiotics. J Dent 2000; anatomical considerations and clinical techniques. Int En‑
28(8):539‑548. dod J 1985; 18(1):8‑34.
78. Sisk AL, Mosley RO, Martin RP: Comparison of preoperative 98. Harrison JW, Jurosky KA: Wound healing in the tissues of
and postoperative diflunisal for suppression of postoperative the periodontium fo lowing periradicular surgery. I. The in‑
pain. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47(5):464‑468. cisional wound. J Endod 1991; 17(9):425‑435.
79. Ahlstrom U, Bakshi R, Nilsson P, Wahlander L: The analgesic 99. Velvart P: Papilla base incision:a new approach to recession
efficacy of diclofenac dispersible and ibuprofen in postopera‑ free healing of the interdental papilla after endodontic sur‑
tive pain after dental extraction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1993; gery. Int Endod J 2002; 35(5):453‑460.
44(6):587‑578. 100. Velvart P, Ebner‑Zimmermann U, Ebner JP: Comparison of
80. Bakshi R, Frenkel G, Dietlein G, Meurer‑Witt B, Schneider long‑term papilla healing following sulcular full thickness
B, Sinterhauf U: A placebo‑controlled comparative evalua‑ flap and papilla base flap in endodontic surgery. Int Endod
tion of diclofenac dispersible versus ibuprofen in postopera‑ J 2004; 37(10):687‑693.
tive pain after third molar surgery. J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 101. Spyros F, Syngcuk K: Modern endodontic microsurgery
34(3):225‑230. concepts. Dent Clin North Am 2017; 61: 81‑91.
81. Dionne RA, Snyder J, Hargreaves KM: Analgesic efficacy of 102. Labanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, et al.: Piezoelectric surgery:
twenty years of use. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 46(4):
ibuprofen in comparison with acetaminophen, acetamino‑
265‑269.
phen plus codeine, and placebo after impacted third molar
103. Stübinger S, Landes C, Seitz O, et al.: Ultrasonic bone cut‑
removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52(9):919‑924; discus‑
ting in oral surgery: a review of 60 cases. Ultraschall Med
sion 25‑6.
2008; 29(1):66‑71.
82. Dionne RA, Wirdzek PR, Fox PC, Dubner R: Suppression of
104. Vercellotti T: Caracteristicas technologicas e indicationes
postoperative pain by the combination of a nonsteroidal an‑
clinicas de la chirurgia osea piezoelectrica. Revista Mundo
ti‑inflammatory drug, flurbuprofen, and a long‑acting local
Dental 2005; p. 26‑28.
anesthetic, etidocaine. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108(4):598‑601.
105. Khambay BS, Walmsley AD: Investigations into the use of an
83. Kim S: Endodontic microsurgery. In Cohen S, Burns RC, eds.
ultrasonic chisel to cut bone. Part 2: cutting ability. J of Dent
Pathways of the Pulp, 8 ed, St. Louis: Mosby, 2002:718‑721.
2000, 28:39‑44.
84. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs:
106. Shearer J, McManners J: Comparison between the use of
Dental management of patients receiving oral bisphosphona‑ an ultrasonic tip and microhead handpiece in periradicular
te therapy expert panel recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc surgery: A prospective randomized trial. Br J of Oral Max
2006; 137(8):1144‑1150. Surg 2009; 47:386‑388.
85. Brown AR, Papasian CJ, Shultz P, Theisen FC, Shultz RE: Bac‑ 107. Abella F, Ribot JD, Doria G, Duran‑Sindreu F, Roig M: Appli­
teremia and intraoral suture removal: can an antimicrobial cations of piezoeletric surgery in endodontic surgery: A lite‑
rinse help? J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129(10):1455‑1461. rature review. JOE 2014; 40(3):325‑332.
86. Young MP, Korachi M, Carter DH, Worthington HV, McCord 108. Horton JE, Tarpley Jr. TM, Wood LD: The healing of surgi‑
JF, Drucker DB: The effects of an immediately pre‑surgical cal defects in alveolar bone produced with ultrasonic instru‑
chlorhexidine oral rinse on the bacterial contaminants of mentation, chisel, and rotary bur. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
bone debris collected during dental implant surgery. Clin Pathol 1975; 39(4):536‑546.
Oral Implants Res 2002; 13(1):20‑29. 109. Bonifácio KC: MEV – avaliação do ápice radicular em den‑
87. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Ministério da Saú‑ tes humanos com e sem vitalidade pulpar. Dissertação Mes‑
de: Prevenção e Controle de Riscos nos Serviços Odontológi‑ trado. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia, Universida‑
cos. Rio de Janeiro, 2008. de Estadual Paulista, 2000.
88. Harrison JW, Jurosky KA: Wound healing in the tissues of the 110. Hess W, Keller O: Le tavole anatomiche di W.Hess i O. Kel‑
periodontium folloing periradicular surgery. 2. The dissectio‑ ler. Pistoia: Edizioni Scientifiche Oral B 1988; 128 p.
nal wound. J Endod. 1991; 17(11):544‑552. 111. Rosa Neto JJ: Estudo em microscopia eletrônica de varre‑
89. Dedolph TH, Clark HB: A histological study of mucoperioste‑ dura do ápice radicular e do limite de obturação em dentes
al flap healing. J Oral Surg 1958; 16(5):367‑376. portadores de lesão periapical crônica. Dissertação Mestra‑
90. Hiatt WH, et al: Repair following mucopcriosteal flap surgery do. Aararaquara: Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraqua‑
with full gingival retention. J Periodontol 1968; 39(1):11‑16. ra‑Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1977.
91. Morris ML: Healing of naturally occurring periodontal po‑ 112. Almeida WA: Cimentos obturadores de canais radiculares.
ckets: preliminary report of the effects of external pressure. J Avaliação histológica da resposta dos tecidos apicais e pe‑
Periodontol 1961; 32:202. riapicais em dentes de cães. Tese Doutorado. Araraquara:
92. Pécora G, Massi O, Massi S: In Lopes & Siqueira editors: Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista,
Endo­dontia – Biologia e Técnica. 3a ed. São Paulo: Guanaba‑ 1997; p. 188.
ra, 2010; p. 739‑769. 113. Leonardo MR, et al.: EM evaluation of apical biofilm and
93. Roberts DH, Sowray JH: Local analgesia in dentistry. 2nd ed. microrganisms on the external root surface of human tee‑
Bristol: John Wright & Sons LTD, 1987. th. J Endod 2001; 28(12):815‑818.
102 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

114. Ribeiro FC: Distribuição das bactérias nas estruturas mine‑ through the use of rapidly resorbing calcium sulfate he‑
ralizadas de dentes com necrose pulpar e granuloma apical. mihydrate. Trans Soc Biomater, 1992 (Proceedings of the
Dissertação Mestrado. Bauru: Faculdade de Ododntologia Annual Meeting); p. 15‑49.
de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, 1997. 136. Pécora G, Andreana S, Covani U, Margarone III Jr., Sot‑
115. Tronstad L, et al.: Abstract: Anaerobic bactéria in periapical tosanti J: Bone regeneration with Calcium sulfate barrier.
lesions of human teeth. J Endodontol 1986; 12:31. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;
116. Tronstad L, et al.: Extraradicular endodontic infection. En‑ 84:227‑234.
dod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3(2):86‑90. 137. Hermann JB: Changes in tensile strength and knot security
117. Ishikawa H, Sawada N, Kobayashi C, Suda H: Evaluation of of surgical sutures in vivo. Arch Surg 1973; 106(5):707‑710.
root‑end cavity preparation using ultrasonic retrotips. Int 138. Rovee DT, Miller CA: Epidermal role in the breaking streng‑
Endo Journal 2003; 36:586‑590. th of wounds. Arch Surg 1968; 96(1):43‑52.
118. Abedi RH, et al.: Effects of ultrasonic root and cavity prepa‑ 139. Tayler AC, Campbell MM: Reattachment of gingival epithe‑
ration on the root apex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol lium to the tooth. J Periodontol 1972; 43(5):281‑293.
Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80(2):207‑213. 140. Guyton AC: Textbook of medical physiology. 7th ed. St. Lou‑
119. Carr GB, Bentkover SK: Surgical endodontics. In Cohen S, is: Mosby‑Year Book, 1986.
Burns RC, editors: Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed. St. Louis: 141. Orso VA, Sant’ana FM: Cirurgia parendodôntica: quando e
Mosby, 1998; p. 608‑656. como fazer. Rev Fac Odonto 2006; 47:20‑23.
120. Crooks WG, et al.: Longitudinal evaluation of the seal of 142. Nishiyama CK, Leal JM, Camargo JMP: Tratamento cirúrgi‑
IRM root‑end fillings. J Endod 1994; 20(5):250‑252. co das infecções periapicais: quando indicar. In Endodontia/
121. Morandi R: Avaliação histomorfológica realizada em dentes Trauma, São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 2002; cap. 17, p. 369‑390.
de cães com lesão periapical, após apicectomia e obturação 143. Pécora G, Beek SH, Retnan S, Kim S: Barrier membrane te‑
retrógrada convencional com cimento à base de óxido de chniques in endodontic microsurgery. Dent Clin North Am
zinco e eugenol e o Agregado Trióxido Mineral. Dissertação 1997; 41(3):585‑602.
Mestrado. Araçatuba: Faculdade de Odontologia, Universi‑ 144. Moule AJ, Kahler B: Diagnosis and management of teeth
dade Estadual Paulista, 1999; p. 319. with vertical fractures. Aust Dent J 1999; 44(2):75‑87.
122. Pantschev A, et al.: Retrograde root filling with EBA ce‑ 145. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J: An evaluation of endo‑
ment or amalgam. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; dontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J Endod 1999;
78(1):101‑104. 25(7):506‑508.
146. Rud J, Omnell K: Root fractures due to corrosion. Diagnos‑
123. Torabinejad M, et al.: Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide
tic aspects. Scand J Dent Res 1970; 78(5):397‑403.
aggregate when use as a root end filling material. J Endod
147. Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Duarte MAH, Azevedo BC, de
1993; 19(12):591‑595.
Azevedo JR, Bramante CM: Use of cone‑beam volumetric to‑
124. Torabinejad M, et al.: Physical and chemical properties of a
mography in the diagnosis of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral
new root‑end filling in dogs. J Endod 1995; 21(7):349‑353.
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108(2):270‑277.
125. Torabinejad M, et al.: Investigation of mineral trioxi‑
148. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M, Okumura S, Naitoh
de aggregate for root‑end filling in dogs. J Endod 1995;
M, Fujishita M, et al.: Image artifact in dental cone‑beam
21(12):603‑608.
CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
126. Torabinejad M, et al.: Histologic assessment of mineral trio‑
2006; 101(5):652‑657.
xide aggregate as a root‑end filling in monkeis. J Endod
149. Sogur E, Baksı BG, Gröndahl HG: Imaging of root canal
1997; 23(4):225‑228.
fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between
127. Bernabé PFE: Estudo histopatológico realizado em dentes de limited cone beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiogra‑
cães com lesão periapical após apicectomia e tratamento en‑ phy. Int Endod J 2007; 40(3):179‑185.
dodôntico via retrógrada. Influência da obturação e do ma‑ 150. Lofthag‑Hansen S, Huumonen S, Grondahl K, Grondahl
terial obturador. Tese Livre Docência. Araçatuba: Facul­dade HG: Limited cone‑beam CT and intraoral radiography for
de Odontologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1994. the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med
128. Leal JM, Bampa JV: Cirurgias Parendodônticas. In Leonar‑ Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(1):114‑119.
do MR, Leal JM. Endodontia: Tratamento de canais radicu‑ 151. Weine F, Kelly RF, Lio PJ: The effect of preparation proce‑
lares. 3a ed. São Paulo: Panamericana, 1998; p. 737‑801. dures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape.
129. Flath RK, Hicks ML: Retrograde instrumentation and obtu‑ J Endod 1975; 1(8):255‑262.
ration with new devices. J Endod 1987; 13(11):546‑549. 152. Abou‑Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH: The anticurvature filing
130. Gondin JRE: Estudo dos efeitos do preparo sônico e ul‑ method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc
tra‑sônico de cavidades retrógradas em dentes recém ex‑ 1980; 101(5):792‑794.
traídos. Análise de réplicas com microscópio eletrônico de 153. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG: The balanced for‑
varredura. Dissertação Mestrado. Piracicaba: Faculdade de ce concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod
Odontologia, Universidade de Campinas, 1999; p. 165. 1985; 11(5):203‑211.
131. Gorman MC, et al.: Escanning eletron microscopic evalua‑ 154. Ruddle CJ: Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. In Co‑
tion of root‑end preparations. J Endod 1995; 21(3):113‑117. hen S, Burns RC, editors: Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. St.
132. Gutman JL, et al.: Ultrasonic root‑end preparation. Part 1. Louis: Mosby, 2002; p. 231‑291.
SEM analysis. Int Endod J 1994; 27(6):318‑324. 155. Ruddle CJ: Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. In Cohen
133. O Connor, et al.: Leakage of amalgam and super E.B.A. S, Burns RC, editors: Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. St. Louis:
root‑end fillings using two preparation techniques and sur‑ Mosby, 2002; p. 875‑929.
gical microscopic. J Endod 1995; 21(2):74‑78. 156. Kapalas A, Lambrianidis T: Factors associated with root ca‑
134. Wuchenick G, et al.: A comparison between two root‑end nal ledging during instrumentation. Endod Dent Trauma‑
preparation techniques in human cadavers. J Endod 1994; tol 2000; 16(5):229‑231.
20(6):279‑282. 157. Harty FJ, Parkins BJ, Wengraf AM: Success rate in root ca‑
135. Ricci JL, Rosenblum SF, Brezenoff L, Blumenthal NC: Sti‑ nal therapy: a retrospective study of conventional cases. Br
mulation of bone ingrowth into an implantable chamber Dent J 1970; 128(2):65‑70.
Capítulo 18   |   Referências Bibliográficas 103

158. Namazikhah MS, Mokhlis HR, Alasmakh K: Comparison be‑ 178. Nallapati S: Clinical management of a maxillary lateral in‑
tween a hand stainless steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 ta‑ cisor with vital pulp and type 3 dens invaginatus: a case re‑
per. J Calif Dent Assoc 2000; 28(6):421‑426. port. J Endod 2004; 30(10):726‑731.
159. Greene KJ, Krell KV: Clinical factors associated with ledged 179. García B, Martorell L, Martí E, Peñarrocha M: Periapical
canals in maxillary and mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral surgery of maxillary posterior teeth. A review of the literatu‑
Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70(4):490‑497. re. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11(2):E146‑150.
160. Gutmann JL, Dumsha TC, Lovdahl PE, Hovland EC: Pro‑ 180. Jerome CE, Hill AV: Preventing root tip loss in the maxillary si‑
blem solving in endodontics. St Louis: Mosby‑Year Book nus during endodontic surgery. J Endod 1995; 21(8):422‑424.
Inc, 1997. 181. Wallace JA: Transantral endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral
161. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PCV: Ledge formation: review of a Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82(1):80‑83.
great challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007; 33(10): 182. Babu YR, Jayaprakash T: Surgical endodontic treatment of
1155‑1162. a maxillary molar with sinus lift: A case report. Pravara Me‑
162. Imura N, Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Sou‑ dical Revie 2012; 4:26‑29.
za‑Filho FJ: The outcome of endodontic treatment: a retros‑ 183. Lance EM: Some observations on bone graft technology.
pective study of 2000 cases performed by a specialist. J En‑ Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985 Nov; 200:114‑124.
dod 2007; 33(11):1278‑1282. 184. Garcia Jr IR: Avaliação experimental de três diferentes tipos
163. Strindberg LZ: The dependence of the results of pulp the‑ de implantes: polímero de mamona, polietileno poroso de
rapy on certain factors. An analytical study based on radio‑ alta densidade e matriz óssea bovina, no preenchimento de
graphic and clinical follow‑up examinations. Acta Odontol defeitos ósseos maxilares: estudo histológico e histométrico
Scand 1956; 14:1‑175. em macacos. Tese de Doutorado. Araçatuba: Faculdade de
164. Gorni FG, Gagliani MM: The outcome of endodontic retre‑ Odontologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista, 2000.
atment: a 2‑yr follow‑up. J Endod 2004; 30(1):1‑4. 185. Levin LM, Barber D, Betts NJ, Macafee II KA, Feinberg SE,
165. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH: The impact of instrument Fonseca RJ: Bone induction and the biology of grafting.
fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod In Fonseca RJ, Davis WH. Reconstructive preprosthetic
2005; 31(12):845‑850. oral and maxillofacial surgery. Philadelphia: W B Saunders
166. Ng Y‑L, Mann V, Gulabivala K: A prospective study of the Company, 1995; p. 41‑72.
factors affecting outcomes of non‑surgical root canal tre‑ 186. Bassett CA: Clinical implications of cell function in bone
atment: part 1 Periapical health. Int Endod J 2011; 44(7): grafting. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1972 Sep; 87:49‑59.
583‑609. 187. Marx RE, Snyder RM, Kline SN: Cellular survival of human
167. Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S: Treatment out‑ come in marrow during placement of marrow – cancellous bone
endodontics: the Toronto study. Phases I and II: orthograde grafts. J Oral Surg 1979; 37(10):712‑718.
retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30(9):627‑633. 188. Urist MR: Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;
168. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, Marquis V, Farzaneh 150(3698):893‑899.
M, Abitbol S, Friedman S: Treatment out‑come in endodon‑ 189. Pesquisa e desenvolvimento de biomateriais baseados em
tics: the Toronto study phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreat‑ poliuretanas derivadas de óleo de mamona. Projeto PADCT.
ment. J Endod 2008: 34(2):131‑137. Edital SNM 02/94‑04. São Carlos: Universidade de São Pau‑
169. Friedman S, LöstC,Zarrabian M,Trope M: Evaluation of suc‑ lo – Departamento de Química e Física Molecular do Insti‑
cess and failure after endodontic therapy using a glass iono‑ tuto de Química de São Carlos, 1994.
mer cement sealer. J Endod 1995; 21(7):384‑390. 190. Leonel ECF, Mangilli PD, Ramalho LTO, Andrade JS: A im‑
170. Guimarães KB, Post LK, Becerra MF, Isolan CP, Hosni ES: portância da porosidade interna do polímero de mamo‑
Cirurgia parendodôntica com obturação simultânea dos ca‑ na durante a neoformação óssea – Estudo em ratos Cienc
nais radiculares: relato de caso clínico. J Med Biol Sci 2006; Odontol Bras. 2003; 6(3):19‑25.
5:188‑194. 191. Ignácio H, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, Chierici G: Uso da po‑
171. Araújo EF, Gomes APM, Silva EG, Castilho JCM, Camar‑ liuretana derivada do óleo de mamona para preencher de‑
go CHR: Obturação do canal radicular simultânea ao ato feitos ósseos diafisários segmentares do rádio: estudo expe‑
cirúrgico: caso clínico. J Bras Clin Odontol Integr 2004; rimental em coelhos. Rev Bras Ortop 1997; 32(10):815‑821.
8:319‑323. 192. Dias PCPJ, Granato L, Ramalho LTO, Oliveira JA, Pretel H:
172. Sette‑Dias AC, Kátia Lucy de Melo Maltos LM, Aguiar EG: Avaliação histológica da biocompatibilidade do polímero da
Tratamento endodôntico transcirúrgico: uma opção para mamona no dorso nasal de macacos‑pregos (Cebus apella)
casos especiais. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco‑maxilo‑fac 2009; Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) 2009; 75(3):350‑355.
9:81‑86. 193. Pécora G, Kim S, Celletti R, Davarpanah M: Guided Tissue
173. Kuyk J, Walton R: Comparison of radiographic appearan‑ Regeneration principles in endodontic surgery: one year
ce of root canal size to its actual diameter. J Endod 1990; post‑operative results of large periapical lesions. Int Endod
16(11):528‑533. J 1995; 28(1):41‑46.
174. Hulsmann M: Dens invaginatus: aetiology, classification, 194. Beeson WH: Plaster of Paris as an alloplastic implant in the
prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment considerations. Int frontal Sinus. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107(11):664‑669.
Endod J 1997; 30(2):79‑90. 195. Edberg E: Some experiences of filling osseous cavities with
175. Skoner JR, Wallce JA: Dens invaginatus: another use for the plaster. Acta Chirurgica Scandinav 1931; 67:313‑319.
ultrasonic. J Endod 1994; 20(3):138‑140. 196. Bell WH: Resorption characteristics of bone and bone subs‑
176. Benati FW: Complex treatment of maxillary lateral incisor titutes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964; 17:650‑657.
with dens invaginatus and associated aberrant morphology. 197. Shaffer CD, App GR: The use of Plaster of Paris in treating
J Endod 1994; 20(4):180‑182. infrabony periodontal defects in humans. J Periodontol
177. Chaniotis AM, Tzanetakis GN, Evangelos G. Kontakiotis 1971; 42(11):685‑690.
EG, Tosios KI: Combined endodontic and surgical manage‑ 198. Leonel ECF, Andrade JS, Ramalho LTO, Porciúna HF, Man‑
ment of a mandibular lateral incisor with a rare type of dens gilli, Rapoport: A ação do polímero de mamona durante a
invaginatus. J Endod 2008; 34(10):1255‑1260. neoformação óssea. Acta Cir Bras 2004; 19(4):304‑310.
104 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

199. Pretel H: Ação de biomateriais e laser de baixa intensidade 216. Vital CC, Borges APB, Fonseca CC, Tsiomis AC, Carvalho
na reparação tecidual óssea. Estudo histológico em ratos. TB, Fontes EB, Sena MP, Fófano G: Biocompatibilidade e
Dissertação de Mestrado. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odon‑ comportamento de compósitos de hidroxiapatita em falha
tologia de Araraquara – UNESP, 2005. óssea na ulna de coelhos. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2006;
200. Ohara GH, Kojima KE, Rossi JC, Salomão C: Estudo expe‑ 58:175‑183.
rimental da biocompatibilidade do polímero poliuretano 217. Sui G, Yang X, Mei F, Hu X, Chen G, Deng X, Ryu S:
da mamona implantada intraóssea e intra‑articular em coe‑ Poly‑L‑lactic acid/hydroxyapatite hybrid membrane for
lhos. Acta Ortop Bras 1995; 3(2):62‑68. bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;
201. Teixeira HM, Vilarinho RH, Ramalho LTO: Reação à resina 82(2): 445‑454.
vegetal de mamona durante o processo de reparo em de‑ 218. Motta AC, Duek EAR: Síntese, caracterização e degradação
feitos ósseos induzidos no corpo de mandíbula. In Jornada “in vitro” do poli(L‑ácido láctico‑co‑ácido glicólico). Rev
Acadêmica de Araraquara, 9. Resumo. Araraquara: Faculda‑ Matéria 2006; 11(3):340‑350.
de de Odontologia de Araraquara, 1995; p. 117. 219. Tsuruga E, Takita H, Itoh H, Wakisaka Y, Kuboki Y: Depart‑
202. Ignácio H, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH: Utilização da poliure‑ ment of Biochemistry. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite
tana da mamona nas formas compacta e porosa no preen‑ as the cell‑substratum controls BMP‑induced osteogenesis. J
chimento de falha óssea: estudo experimental em cães. Rev Biochem 1997; 121(2):317‑324.
Bras Ortop 2002; 37(5):187‑194. 220. Marx RE, Carlson ER, Eichstaedt RM, Schimmele SR,
203. Carvalho TL, Araujo CA, Teofilo JM, Brentegani LG: Histo‑ Strauss JE, Georgeff KR: Platelet‑rich plasma. Growth factor
logic and histometric evaluation of rat alveolar wound hea‑ enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
ling around polyurethane resin impants. Int J Oral Maxillo‑ thol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85(6):638‑646.
fac Surg 1997; 26(2):149‑152. 221. Giannobile W: Periodontal tissue regeneration by polypep‑
204. Laureano Filho JR, Castelo Branco BL, Andrade ESS, Bar‑ tide growth factors and gene transfer. Tissue Engeneering.
bosa JRA: Comparação histológica entre o osso desminerali‑ Illinois: Quintessence Books 1999; p. 231‑243.
zado e polímero de mamona sobre a regeneração óssea Rev 222. Ross R; Raines EW, Bower‑Pope DF: The biology of plate‑
Bras Otorrinolaringol 2007; 73(2):186‑192. let‑derived growth factor. Cell 1986; 46(2):155‑169.
205. Insaurralde E, Sanada JT, Delben AAST, Souza AS, Ferrão 223. Lozada JL, Caplanis N, Proussaefs P, Willardsen J, Kam‑
Júnior J, Coêlho TMK: Resistência à tração e o módulo de meyer G: Platelet‑rich plasma application in sinus graft sur‑
elasticidade de calvárias de ratos enxertadas com diferentes gery: Part I‑‑Background and processing techniques. J Oral
biomateriais. RGO 2010; 58(3):375‑380. Implantol 2001; 27(1):38‑42.
206. Oonishi H, Kushitani S, Yasukawa E, Iwaki H, Hench LL, 224. Green DM, Klink B: Platelet gel as an intraoperatively pro‑
Wilson J, Tsuji E, Sugihara T: Particulate bioglass compared cured platelet‑based alternative to fibrin glue. Plast Recons‑
with hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute. Clin Orthop tr Surg 1998; 101(4):1161‑1162.
Relat Res 1997 Jan; (334):316‑325. 225. Liu Y, Kalén A, Risto O, Wahlström O: Fibroblast prolife‑
207. Rosa FP, Marcantonio Júnior E, Pizzaia MA, Gabrielli ration due to exposure to a platelet concentrate in vitro is
MAC, Lia RCC, Boschi AO, Santos LA: Avaliação histoló‑ pH dependent. Wound Repair Regen 2002; 10(5):336‑340.
gica de três diferentes tipos de hidroxiapatitas, implanta‑ 226. Knox P, Crooks S, Rimmer CS: Role of fibronectin in the
das em arco zigomático de ratos. Rev Odont Unesp 1998; migration of fibroblasts into plasma clots. J Cell Biol 1986;
27(2):495‑508. 102(1):2318‑2323.
208. Nagahara K, Isogai M, Shibata K, Meenaghan MA: Osteogene‑ 227. Mohan S, Baylink DJ: Bone growth factors. Clin Orthop Rel
sis of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate used as a bone Res 1991; (263):30‑48.
substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7(1):72‑79. 228. Marx RE: Platelet‑rich plasm: evidence to support its use. J
209. Duarte TS, Borges APB, Lavor MSL Filgueiras R, Tsiomis Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(4):489‑496.
AC, Oliveira F L, Pontes KCS: Osteointegração da hidro‑ 229. Freymiller EG, Aghaloo TL: Platelet‑rich plasma: ready or
xiapatita sintética no processo alveolar da mandibular de not? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(4):484‑488.
cães: aspectos histológicos. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2006; 230. Green DM, Klink B: Platelet gel as an intraoperatively pro‑
58(5):849‑853. cured platelet‑based alternative to fibrin glue. Plast Reconstr
210. Cobb CM, Eick JD, Barker BF, Mosby EL, Hiatt WR: Resto‑ Surg 1998; 101(4):1161‑1162.
ration of mandibular continuity defects using combinations 231. Efeoglu C, Akcay YD, Ertürk S: A modified method for pre‑
of hydroxylapatite and autogenous bone: microscopic ob‑ paring platelet‑rich plasma: an experimental study. J Oral
servations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48(3):268‑275. Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(11):1403‑1407.
211. Ettel RG, Schaffer EM, Holpuch RC, Bandt CL: Porous 232. Lindemann S, Tolley ND, Dixon DA, McIntyre TM, Prescott
hydroxyapatite grafts in chronic subcrestal periodontal de‑ SM, Zimmerman GA, Weyrich AS: Activated platelets me‑
fects in rhesus monkeys: a histological investigation. J Perio‑ diate inflammatory signaling by regulated interleukin 1beta
dontol 1989; 60(6):342‑351. synthesis. J Cell Biol 2001; 154(3):485‑490.
212. Laskin DM: State of the art of alveolar ridge augmentation. 233. Rossi RJ, Negreiros RM, Elias FM, Jorge WA: Utilização de
Compend Contin Educ Dent 1982; (Suppl 2):S46‑48. plasma rico em plaquetas em enxertos ósseos para repara‑
213. Yukna RA, Mayer ET, Amos SM: 5‑year evaluation of durapa‑ ção de defeitos ósseos. Rev Odontol Univ Cid São Paulo
tite ceramic alloplastic implants in periodontal osseous de‑ 2008; 20(3):295‑300.
fects. J Periodontol 1989; 60(10):544‑551. 234. Lucarelli E, Beretta R, Dozza B, et al.: A recently develo‑
214. De Vincent JC, López‑Arrans E, Lopes Arrans JS: Tissue ped bifacial plateletrich fibrin matrix. Eur Cell Mater 2010;
regeneration in bone defects adjacent to endosseous im‑ 20:13‑23.
plants: an experimental pilot study. Int J Period Rest Dent 235. Lorenz HP, Longaker MT: Wound healing: repair Biolo‑
2000; 20(1):41‑49. gy and wound and scar treatment. In Mathes SJ ed. Plas‑
215. Orr TE, Villars PA, Mitchell SL, Hsu HP, Spector M: Compres‑ tic Surgery, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2006; p.
sive properties of cancellous bone defects in a rabbit model 209‑230.
treated with particles of natural bone mineral and synthetic 236. Wikipedia: Available form: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/
hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials 2001; 22(14): 1953‑1959. Dom_Quixote.
Capítulo 18   |   Referências Bibliográficas 105

237. Izawa T, Kim S, Suda N, Pécora G, Rubinstein R: Microscopic 242. Strbac GD, Schnappauf A, Giannis K, Moritz A, Ulm C:
endodontic surgery. Quintessence Int(Japan) 1994; 13:54‑65. Guided modern endodontic surgery: a novel approa‑
238. Pécora G, Andreana S: Use of dental operating microsco‑ ch for guided osteotomy and root resection. JOE 2017;
pe in endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 43(3):496‑501.
1993; 75(6):751‑758. 243. Ahn SY, Kim NH, Kim S, Karabucak B, Kim E: Computer‑ai‑
239. Pécora G, Covani U, Giardino L, Rubinstein R: Valutazioni ded design/computer‑aided manufacturing‑guided endo‑
clinico‑statistiche sull’uso dello stereomicroscopio in odon‑ dontic surgery: guided osteotomy and apex localization in a
toiatria. Rivista Italiana di Odontoiatri 1993; ago‑set:425‑431. mandibular molar with a thick buccal bone plate. JOE 2018;
240. Rodes JS: Advanced Endodontics Clinical Retreatemnt and 44(4):665‑670.
Surgery. Adingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Francis, 2006. 244. Giacomino CM, Ray JJ, Wealleans JA: Targeted Endodontic
241. Pinsky HM, Champleboux G, Sarment DP: Periapical sur‑ Microsurgery: A Novel Approach to Anatomically Challen‑
gery using CAD/CAM guidance: preclinical results. JOE ging Scenarios Using 3‑dimensional‑printed Guides and Tre‑
2007; 32(2):148‑151. phine Burs‑A Report of 3 Cases. JOE 2018; 44(4):671‑677.
Ca p ít u l o

19 Causas e Manejo da Dor Crônica


Persistente Pós‑Obturação
José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Marcus V. Freire | Hélio P. Lopes

13. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, et al.: The potential applications


Referências Bibliográficas of cone beam computed tomography in the management of
endodontic problems. Int Endod J 2007; 40:818‑830.
1. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Veiga LM, et al.: Outlining the cau‑
14. Siqueira JF, Jr: Reaction of periradicular tissues to root ca‑
ses of persistent post‑treatment pain in endodontics. ENDO
nal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 2005;
2009; 3:185‑204.
10:123‑147.
2. Durack C, Patel S: Cone beam computed tomography in en‑
15. Cantatore G, Berutti E, Castellucci A: Missed anatomy: fre‑
dodontics. Braz Dent J 2012; 23:179‑191.
quency and clinical impact. Endod Topics 2006; 15:3‑31.
3. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, et al.: The detection of peria‑
16. Costa FN, Pacheco‑Yanes J, Siqueira Jr JF, et al.: Association be‑
pical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam
tween missed canals and apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2019.
computed tomography – part 1: pre‑operative status. Int En‑
17. Metska ME, Aartman IH, Wesselink PR, et al.: Detection of
dod J 2012; 45:702‑710.
vertical root fractures in vivo in endodontically treated teeth
4. Polycarpou N, Ng YL, Canavan D, et al.: Prevalence of persis‑
by cone‑beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 2012;
tent pain after endodontic treatment and factors affecting its
38:1344‑1347.
occurrence in cases with complete radiographic healing. Int
Endod J 2005; 38:169‑178. 18. Edlund M, Nair MK, Nair UP: Detection of vertical root frac‑
5. ixdorf DR, Moana‑Filho EJ, Law AS, et al.: Frequency of per‑ tures by using cone‑beam computed tomography: a clinical
sistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: a systematic review study. J Endod 2011; 37:768‑772.
and meta‑analysis. J Endod 2010; 36:224‑230. 19. Nixdorf DR, Moana‑Filho EJ, Law AS, et al.: Frequency of no‑
6. Siqueira JF, Jr, Uzeda M, Varejão E: Sintomatologia clíni‑ nodontogenic pain after endodontic therapy: a systematic re‑
ca persistente devido à infecção endodôntica por Fusobac- view and meta‑analysis. J Endod 2010; 36:1494‑1498.
terium nucleatum. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 1995; 20. Manzi FR: Seios paranasais e cavidade nasal. In Haiter Neto
43:149‑152. F, Kurita LM, Campos PSF, editors: Tomografia computado­
7. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Clinical implications and microbio‑ rizada em odontologia. São Paulo: Livraria Tota, 2014; p. 545.
logy of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J En‑ 21. Manzi FR, Tuji FM, Haiter F, et al.: Antrólito maxilar em pa‑
dod 2008; 34:1291‑1301 e1293. ciente assintomático. Revisão da literatura e relato de caso clí‑
8. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr: Endodontology. An integrated biologi‑ nico. ROBRAC 2001; 10:17‑19.
cal and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing, 2013. 22. Hargreaves KM, Keiser K, Byrne BE: Analgesics in endodon‑
9. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lima KC: Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylo- tics. In Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, editors: Pathways of the
coccus xylosus in a secondary root canal infection with persis‑ pulp. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2006:668‑690.
tent symptoms: a case report. Aust Endod J 2002; 28:61‑63. 23. Ong CK, Seymour RA: Pathogenesis of postoperative oral sur‑
10. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. London: gical pain. Anesth Prog 2003; 50:5‑17.
Quintessence Publishing, 2011; p. 403. 24. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Incidence of posto‑
11. Orstavik D, Larheim TA: Radiology of apical periodontitis. perative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimi‑
In Orstavik D, Pitt Ford TR, editors: Essential endodonto­ crobial strategy. J Endod 2002; 28:457‑460.
logy. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008; 25. Torabinejad M, Cymerman JJ, Frankson M, et al.: Effective‑
p. 197‑234. ness of various medications on postoperative pain following
12. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, et al.: Accuracy of cone beam complete instrumentation. J Endod 1994; 20:345‑354.
computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radio‑ 26. Hargreaves KM, Seltzer S: Pharmacologic control of dental pain.
graphy for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008; In Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, editors. Seltzer and Bender’s den‑
34:273‑279. tal pulp. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 2002; p. 205‑225.
Ca pí tulo

Emergências e Urgências
em Endodontia 20
José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças | Hélio P. Lopes

17. Markowitz K, Kim S: The role of selected cations in the desen‑


Referências Bibliográficas sitization of intradental nerves. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88
Suppl 1:39‑54.
1. Tronstad L: Clinical endodontics. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme, 18. Markowitz K, Bilotto G, Kim S: Decreasing intradental nerve
2003.
activity in the cat with potassium and divalent cations. Arch
2. Walton RE, Keiser K: Endodontic emergencies and thera‑
Oral Biol 1991; 36:1‑7.
peutics. In Torabinejad M, Walton RE, editors: Endodontics.
19. Markowitz K, Kim S: Hypersensitive teeth. Experimental stu‑
Principles and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier,
dies of dentinal desensitizing agents. Dent Clin North Am
2008; p. 148‑162.
1990; 34:491‑501.
3. Pashley DH: Mechanisms of dentin sensitivity. Dent Clin Nor‑
20. Orchardson R, Gillam DG: Managing dentin hypersensitivity.
th Am 1990; 34:449‑473.
J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 990‑998; quiz 1028‑1029.
4. Trowbridge HO: Intradental sensory units: physiological and
21. Trowbridge HO, Silver DR: A review of current approaches
clinical aspects. J Endod 1985; 11:489‑498.
to in‑office management of tooth hypersensitivity. Dent Clin
5. Siqueira JF, Jr: Hipersensibilidade dentinária. Visão atual dos
North Am 1990; 34:561‑581.
mecanismos envolvidos e medidas terapêuticas. Revista Brasi‑
22. Cuenin MF, Scheidt MJ, O’Neal RB, et al.: An in vivo study of
leira de Odontologia 1994; 51:55‑58.
dentin sensitivity: the relation of dentin sensitivity and the pa‑
6. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al.: Biocompatibility of surfa‑
tency of dentin tubules. J Periodontol 1991; 62:668‑673.
ce‑sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet
23. Kerns DG, Scheidt MJ, Pashley DH, et al.: Dentinal tubule occlu‑
Dent 1987; 57:1‑8.
7. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al.: Bacterial leaka‑ sion and root hypersensitivity. J Periodontol 1991; 62:421‑428.
ge around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J 24. Pashley DH: Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treat‑
Oral Pathol 1982; 11:439‑450. ment through tubule occlusion. J Endod 1986; 12:465‑474.
8. Kim S, Trowbridge HO, Suda H: Pulpal reactions to caries 25. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Thomaidis S, et al.: Clinical effecti‑
and dental procedures. In Cohen S, Burns RC, editors: Pa‑ veness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hyper‑
thways of the pulp. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002; p. 573‑600. sensitivity. Am J Dent 2005; 18:291‑295.
9. Nanci A: Ten Cate’s oral histology. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 26. Tengrungsun T, Sangkla W: Comparative study in desensi‑
2003. tizing efficacy using the GaAlAs laser and dentin bonding
10. West NX, Sanz M, Lussi A, et al.: Prevalence of dentine hyper‑ agent. J Dent 2008; 36:392‑395.
sensitivity and study of associated factors: a European popu‑ 27. Olusile AO, Bamise CT, Oginni AO, et al.: Short‑term clini‑
lation‑based cross‑sectional study. J Dent 2013; 41:841‑851. cal evaluation of four desensitizing agents. J Contemp Dent
11. Sowinski J, Ayad F, Petrone M, et al.: Comparative investiga‑ Pract 2008; 9:22‑29.
tions of the desensitising efficacy of a new dentifrice. J Clin 28. Gillam DG, Newman HN, Davies EH, et al.: Clinical evalua‑
Periodontol 2001; 28:1032‑1036. tion of ferric oxalate in relieving dentine hypersensitivity. J
12. Poulsen S, Errboe M, Lescay Mevil Y, et al.: Potassium contai‑ Oral Rehabil 2004; 31:245‑250.
ning toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity. Cochrane Data‑ 29. Merika K, HeftitArthur F, Preshaw PM: Comparison of two
base Syst Rev 2006: CD001476. topical treatments for dentine sensitivity. Eur J Prosthodont
13. Orsini G, Procaccini M, Manzoli L, et al.: A double‑blind ran‑ Restor Dent 2006; 14:38‑41.
domized‑controlled trial comparing the desensitizing effi‑ 30. Assis JS, Rodrigues LK, Fonteles CS, et al.: Dentin hypersen‑
cacy of a new dentifrice containing carbonate/hydroxyapati‑ sitivity after treatment with desensitizing agents: a randomi‑
te nanocrystals and a sodium fluoride/potassium nitrate den‑ zed, double‑blind, split‑mouth clinical trial. Braz Dent J 2011;
tifrice. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37:510‑517. 22:157‑161.
14. Yan B, Yi J, Li Y, et al.: Arginine‑containing toothpastes for 31. Cunha‑Cruz J, Stout JR, Heaton LJ, et al.: Dentin hypersen‑
dentin hypersensitivity: systematic review and meta‑analysis. sitivity and oxalates: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2011;
Quintessence Int 2013; 44:709‑723. 90:304‑310.
15. Lin PY, Cheng YW, Chu CY, et al.: In‑office treatment for 32. Ritter AV, de LDW, Miguez P, et al.: Treating cervical dentin
dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and network me‑ hypersensitivity with fluoride varnish: a randomized clinical
ta‑analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40:53‑64. study. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137:1013‑1020; quiz 1029.
16. West NX, Seong J, Davies M: Management of dentine hyper‑ 33. Gerschman JA, Ruben J, Gebart‑Eaglemont J: Low level laser
sensitivity: efficacy of professionally and self‑administered therapy for dentinal tooth hypersensitivity. Aust Dent J 1994;
agents. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42 Suppl 16:S256‑302. 39:353‑357.
108 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

34. Schwarz F, Arweiler N, Georg T, et al.: Desensitizing effects of 55. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lima KC: Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylo-
an Er:YAG laser on hypersensitive dentine. J Clin Periodontol coccus xylosus in a secondary root canal infection with persis‑
2002; 29:211‑215. tent symptoms: a case report. Aust Endod J 2002; 28:61‑63.
35. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, et al.: Lasers for the tre‑ 56. Weine FS: Endodontic therapy. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996.
atment of dentin hypersensitivity: a meta‑analysis. J Dent Res 57. Weine FS, Healey HJ, Theiss EP: Endodontic emergency di‑
2013; 92:492‑499. lemma: leave tooth open or keep it closed? Oral Surg Oral
36. Blatz MB: Laser therapy may be better than topical desensiti‑ Med Oral Pathol 1975; 40:531‑536.
zing agents for treating dentin hypersensitivity. J Evid Based 58. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Microbiology and treatment of acu‑
Dent Pract 2012; 12:229‑230. te apical abscesses. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26:255‑273.
37. Fraga RC, Siqueira JFJ: Avaliação da redução da permeabili‑ 59. Baumgartner JC, Smith JR: Systemic antibiotics in endodon‑
dade dentinária após o uso de “liners” – Comparação entre tic infections. In Fouad AF, editors: Endodontic microbiolo‑
adesivo hidrofílico e cimento ionômero de vidro fotopolime‑ gy, Ames, Iowa: Wiley‑Blackwell, 2009; p. 225‑241.
rizável. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 1995; 43:41‑44. 60. Siqueira JF, Jr: Treatment of endodontic infections. London:
38. Pashley DH: Dynamics of the pulpo‑dentin complex. Crit Rev Quintessence Publishing, 2011; p. 403.
Oral Biol Med 1996; 7:104‑133. 61. Hersh EV: Adverse drug interactions in dental practice: in‑
39. Fraga RC, Siqueira JFJ, Uzeda M: In vitro evaluation antibac‑ teractions involving antibiotics. Part II of a series. J Am Dent
terial effects of photo‑cured glass‑ionomer liners and dentin Assoc 1999; 130:236‑251.
bonding agents during setting. Journal of Prosthetic Dentis‑ 62. Cerel‑Suhl SL, Yeager BF: Update on oral contraceptive pills.
try 1996; 76:483‑486. Am Fam Physician 1999; 60:2073‑2084.
40. Oguntebi BR, DeSchepper EJ, Taylor TS, et al.: Postoperative 63. Torabinejad M, Walton RE: Managing endodontic emergen‑
pain incidence related to the type of emergency treatment of cies. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:99, 101, 103.
symptomatic pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 64. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ: Flare‑ups in endodontics: I. Etiological
73:479‑483. factors. J Endod 1985; 11:472‑478.
41. Hasselgren G, Reit C: Emergency pulpotomy: pain relieving 65. Naidorf IJ: Endodontic flare‑ups: bacteriological and immu‑
effect with and without the use of sedative dressings. J Endod nological mechanisms. J Endod 1985; 11:462‑464.
1989; 15:254‑256. 66. Siqueira JF, Jr: Microbial causes of endodontic flare‑ups. Int
42. Seltzer S: Pain in endodontics. J Endod 1986; 12:505‑508. Endod J 2003; 36:453‑463.
43. Torabinejad M: Mediators of acute and chronic periradicular 67. Siqueira JF, Jr, Barnett F: Interappointment pain: mechanisms,
lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78:511‑521. diagnosis, and treatment. Endod Topics 2004; 7:93‑109.
44. Siqueira JF, Jr, Saboia Dantas CJ: Mecanismos celulares e mo‑ 68. Torabinejad M, Kettering JD, McGraw JC, et al.: Factors asso‑
leculares da inflamação. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI, 2000. ciated with endodontic interappointment emergencies of te‑
45. Diogenes A, Ferraz CC, Akopian AN, et al.: LPS sensitizes eth with necrotic pulps. J Endod 1988; 14:261‑266.
TRPV1 via activation of TLR4 in trigeminal sensory neurons. 69. Fouad AF: Diabetes mellitus as a modulating factor of endo‑
J Dent Res 2011; 90:759‑764. dontic infections. J Dent Educ 2003; 67:459‑467.
46. Ferraz CC, Henry MA, Hargreaves KM, et al.: Lipopolysaccha‑ 70. Fouad AF, Burleson J: The effect of diabetes mellitus on en‑
ride from Porphyromonas gingivalis sensitizes capsaicin‑sensiti‑ dodontic treatment outcome: data from an electronic patient
ve nociceptors. J Endod 2011; 37:45‑48. record. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134:43‑51.
47. Ryan GB: Mediators of inflammation. Beitr Path Bd 1974; 71. Harrington GW, Natkin E: Midtreatment flare‑ups. Dent Clin
152: 272‑291. North Am 1992; 36:409‑423.
48. Torabinejad M, Bakland LK: Prostaglandins: their possible 72. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, et al.: Incidence of posto‑
role in the pathogenesis of pulpal and periapical diseases, perative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimi‑
part 2. J Endod 1980; 6:769‑776. crobial strategy. J Endod 2002; 28:457‑460.
49. Torabinejad M, Bakland LK: Prostaglandins: their possible 73. Walton R, Fouad A: Endodontic interappointment flare‑ups:
role in the pathogenesis of pulpal and periapical diseases, a prospective study of incidence and related factors. J Endod
part 1. J Endod 1980; 6:733‑739. 1992; 18:172‑177.
50. Sebastian R, Drum M, Reader A, et al.: What is the effect of 74. Morse DR, Koren LZ, Esposito JV, et al.: Asymptomatic teeth
no endodontic debridement on postoperative pain for symp‑ with necrotic pulps and associated periapical radiolucencies:
tomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis? J Endod 2016; 42:378‑382. relationship of flare‑ups to endodontic instrumentation, anti‑
51. Siqueira JF, Jr: Tratamento das infecções endodônticas. Rio biotic usage and stress in three separate practices at three di‑
de Janeiro: MEDSI, 1997. fferent time periods. Parts 1‑5. Int J Psychosom 1986; 33:5‑87.
52. Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Ranta K, et al.: Microbiological fin‑ 75. Barnett F, Tronstad L: The incidence of flare‑ups follo‑
dings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases wing endodontic treatment. J Dent Res 1989; 68 (special is‑
selected for microbiological investigation. Int Endod J 1997; sue):1253.
30:91‑95. 76. Imura N, Zuolo ML: Factors associated with endodontic fla‑
53. Ranta K, Haapasalo M, Ranta H: Monoinfection of root canal re‑ups: a prospective study. Int Endod J 1995; 28:261‑265.
with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4: 77. Matusow RJ: Endodontic cellulitis “flare‑up”. Case report.
269‑272. Australian Dental Journal 1995; 40:36‑38.
54. Barnett F, Axelrod P, Tronstad L, et al.: Ciprofloxacin treat‑ 78. Harrison JW, Baumgartner JC, Svec TA: Incidence of pain as‑
ment of periapical Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Endod sociated with clinical factors during and after root canal the‑
Dent Traumatol 1988; 4:132‑137. rapy. Part 2. Postobturation pain. J Endod 1983; 9:434‑438.
Ca pí tulo

Analgésicos em Endodontia 21
Anibal R. Diogenes | Kenneth M. Hargreaves

17. Khan AA, McCreary B, Owatz CB, et al.: The development of


Referências Bibliográficas a diagnostic instrument for the measurement of mechanical
allodynia. J Endod 2007; 33:663‑666.
1. Barry MJ, Edgman‑Levitan S: Shared decision making‑‑pinna‑ 18. Owatz CB, Khan AA, Schindler WG, et al.: The incidence of
cle of patient‑centered care. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:780‑781.
mechanical allodynia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J
2. Montero J, Lorenzo B, Barrios R, et al.: Patient‑centered ou‑
Endod 2007; 33:552‑556.
tcomes of root canal treatment: A cohort follow‑up study. J
19. Khan AA, Owatz CB, Schindler WG, et al.: Measurement of
Endod 2015; 41:1456‑1461.
mechanical allodynia and local anesthetic efficacy in patients
3. Hamedy R, Shakiba B, Fayazi S, et al.: Patient‑centered en‑
with irreversible pulpitis and acute periradicular periodonti‑
dodontic outcomes: a narrative review. Iran Endod J 2013;
tis. J Endod 2007; 33:796‑799.
8:197‑204.
20. Woolf CJ: Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis
4. Pak JG, White SN: Pain Prevalence and severity before, du‑
and treatment of pain. Pain 2011; 152:S2‑15.
ring, and after root canal treatment: A systematic review. J En‑
21. Woolf CJ: Evidence for a central component of post‑injury
dod 2011; 37:429‑438.
pain hypersensitivity. Nature 1983; 306:686‑688.
5. Bevan S, Storey N, Kerr BJ: Modulation of sodium channels
22. Woolf CJ, Salter MW: Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain
in primary afferent neurons – A role for the TTX‑resistant
in pain. Science 2000; 288:1765‑1769.
sodium channel Nav 1.8 in NGF‑induced hyperalgesia, but
23. Penfield W, Rasmussen G: The cerebral cortex of man. New
not neuropathic pain. Novartis Foundation Symposium 2002;
241:144‑153; discussion 153‑148. York: MacMillan, 1950.
6. Lewin GR, Rueff A, Mendell LM: Peripheral and central me‑ 24. Chaves JF, Brown JM: Spontaneous cognitive strategies for
chanisms of NGF‑induced hyperalgesia. European Journal of the control of clinical pain and stress. J Behav Med 1987;
Neuroscience 1994; 6:1903‑1912. 10:263‑276.
7. Ahlquist ML, Franzen OG: Inflammation and dental pain in 25. Quartana PJ, Campbell CM, Edwards RR: Pain catastro‑
man. Endodontics & Dental Traumatology 1994; 10:201‑209. phizing: a critical review. Expert Rev Neurother 2009; 9:
8. Beck PW, Handwerker HO: Bradykinin and serotonin effects 745‑758.
on various types of cutaneous nerve fibers. Pflugers Archiv – 26. Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Sanders AE, et al.: Summary of fin‑
European Journal of Physiology 1974; 347:209‑222. dings from the OPPERA prospective cohort study of inciden‑
9. Hargreaves KM, Troullos ES, Dionne RA: Pharmacologic ra‑ ce of first‑onset temporomandibular disorder: implications
tionale for the treatment of acute pain. Dent Clin North Am and future directions. J Pain 2013; 14:T116‑124.
1987; 31:675‑694. 27. Smith SB, Maixner DW, Greenspan JD, et al.: Potential ge‑
10. Lepinski AM, Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, et al.: Bradykinin netic risk factors for chronic TMD: genetic associations from
levels in dental pulp by microdialysis. Journal of Endodontics the OPPERA case control study. J Pain 2011; 12:T92‑101.
2000; 26:744‑747. 28. Philpott R, Gulabivala K, Leeson R, et al.: Prevalence, predicti‑
11. Tonioli M, Patel T, Diogenes A, et al.: Effect of neurotrophic ve factors and clinical course of persistent pain associated with
factors on bradykinin expression in rat trigeminal sensory teeth displaying periapical healing following nonsurgical root
neurons determined by real‑time polymerase chain reaction. canal treatment: a prospective study. Int Endod J 2018.
Journal of Endodontics 2004; 30:263. 29. Clem W: Post‑treatment endodontic pain. J Am Dent Assoc
12. Dray A, Pinnock RD: Effects of substance P on adult rat sen‑ 1970; 81:1166.
sory ganglion neurones in vitro. Neuroscience Letters 1982; 30. Harrison J, Baumgartner J, Svec T: Incidence of pain associa‑
33:61‑66. ted with clinical factors during and after root canal therapy.
13. Levine JD, Moskowitz MA, Basbaum AI: The contribution of I. Interappointment pain. J Endod 1983; 9:384.
neurogenic inflammation in experimental arthritis. Journal 31. O’Keefe E: Pain in endodontic therapy: preliminary study. J
of Immunology 1985; 135:843s‑847s. Endod 1976; 2:315.
14. Diogenes A, Akopian AN, Hargreaves KM: NGF up‑regula‑ 32. Georgopoulou M, Anastassiadis P, Sykaras S: Pain after che‑
tes TRPA1: implications for orofacial pain. J Dent Res 2007; momechanical preparation. Int Endod J 1986; 19:309.
86:550‑555. 33. Mor C, Rotstein I, Friedman S: Incidence of interappoint‑
15. Dray A: Inflammatory mediators of pain. British Journal of ment emergency associated with endodontic therapy. J En‑
Anaesthesia 1995; 75:125‑131. dod 1992; 18:509.
16. Woolf CJ: Windup and central sensitization are not equiva‑ 34. Morse D, et al.: Infectious flare‑ups and serious sequelae follo‑
lent. Pain 1996; 66:105‑108. wing endodontic treatment: a prospective randomized trial
110 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

on efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in cases of asymptoma‑ 57. Torabinejad M, et al.: Factors associated with endodontic in‑
tic pulpal‑periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol terappointment emergencies of teeth with necrotic pulps. J
1987; 64:96. Endod 1988; 14:261.
35. Trope M: Relationship of intracanal medicaments to endo‑ 58. Dionne R: COX‑2 inhibitors: better than ibuprofen for den‑
dontic flare‑ups. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6:226. tal pain? Compendium 1999; 20:518.
36. Trope M: Flare‑up rate of single‑visit endodontics. Int Endod 59. Dionne RA, Khan AA, Gordon SM: Analgesia and COX‑2
J 1991; 24:24. inhibition. Clinical & Experimental Rheumatology 2001;
37. Walton R: Interappointment flare‑ups: incidence, related 19:Nov‑Dec.
factors, prevention, and management. Endo Topics 2002; 60. Khan AA, Dionne R: COX‑2 inhibitors for endodontic pain.
3:67‑76. Endo Topics 2002; 3:32‑40.
38. Walton R, Fouad A: Endodontic interappointment flare‑ups: 61. Patrono C, Dunn MJ: The clinical significance of inhibition
a prospective study of incidence and related factors. Journal of renal prostaglandin synthesis. Kidney Int 1987; 32:1‑12.
of Endodontics 1992; 18:172‑177. 62. Nakanishi T, Shimizu H, Hosokawa Y, et al.: An immunohis‑
39. Nixdorf DR, Moana‑Filho EJ, Law AS, et al.: Frequency of tological study on cyclooxygenase‑2 in human dental pulp. J
persistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: a systematic re‑ Endod 2001; 27:385‑388.
view and meta‑analysis. J Endod 2010; 36:224‑230. 63. Gold MS, Reichling DB, Shuster MJ, et al.: Hyperalgesic
40. Nixdorf DR, Moana‑Filho EJ, Law AS, et al.: Frequency of no‑ agents increase a tetrodotoxin‑resistant Na+ current in noci‑
nodontogenic pain after endodontic therapy: a systematic re‑ ceptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:1108‑1112.
view and meta‑analysis. J Endod 2010; 36:1494‑1498. 64. Doroshak A, Bowles W, Hargreaves K: Evaluation of the com‑
41. Nixdorf DR, Law AS, John MT, et al.: Differential diagnoses bination of flurbiprofen and tramadol for management of
for persistent pain after root canal treatment: a study in the endodontic pain. J Endod 1999; 25:660.
National Dental Practice‑based Research Network. J Endod 65. Dionne R: Suppression of dental pain by the preoperative ad‑
2015; 41:457‑463. ministration of flurbiprofen. Am J Med Sci 1986; 80:41.
42. Wright EF: Referred craniofacial pain patterns in patients 66. Dionne R, Berthold C: Therapeutic uses of non‑steroidal an‑
with temporomandibular disorder. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; ti‑inflammatory drugs in dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
131:1307‑1315. 2000.
43. Nobrega JC, Siqueira SR, Siqueira JT, et al.: Diferential diag‑ 67. Cooper SA: The relative efficacy of ibuprofen in dental pain.
nosis in atypical facial pain: a clinical study. Arq Neuropsi‑ Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 1986;
quiatr 2007; 65:256‑261. 7:580‑581.
44. Marbach JJ: Orofacial phantom pain: theory and phenome‑ 68. Hersh EV, Cooper S, Betts N, et al.: Single dose and multido‑
nology. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:221‑229. se analgesic study of ibuprofen and meclofenamate sodium
45. Benoliel R, Zadik Y, Eliav E, et al.: Peripheral painful trauma‑ after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
tic trigeminal neuropathy: clinical features in 91 cases and 1993; 76:680‑687.
proposal of novel diagnostic criteria. J Orofac Pain 2012; 69. Hersh EV, Levin LM, Cooper SA, et al.: Ibuprofen liquigel for
26:49‑58. oral surgery pain. Clin Ther 2000; 22:1306‑1318.
46. Creech J, Walton R, Kaltenbach R: Effect of occlusal relief on 70. Torabinejad M, Cymerman JJ, Frankson M, et al.: Effective‑
endodontic pain. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 109:64. ness of various medications on postoperative pain following
47. Flath R, et al.: Pain suppression after pulpectomy with preo‑ complete instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 1994;
perative flurbiprofen. J Endod 1987; 13:339. 20:345‑354.
48. Fox J, et al.: Incidence of pain following one‑visit endodontic 71. McQuay HJ, Derry S, Eccleston C, et al.: Evidence for analgesic
treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970; 30:123. effect in acute pain – 50 years on. Pain 2012; 153:1364‑1367.
49. Genet J, et al.: Preoperative and operative factors associated 72. de Campos DI, Cunha FQ, Ferreira SH: A new mechanism
with pain after the first endodontic visit. Int Endod J 1987; of action of dipyrone: blockade of the release of a nocicep‑
20:53. tive factor from macrophages. Braz J Med Biol Res 1988;
50. Gordon SM, Brahim JS, Dubner R, et al.: Attenuation of pain 21:565‑568.
in a randomized trial by suppression of peripheral nocicepti‑ 73. Duarte ID, dos Santos IR, Lorenzetti BB, et al.: Analgesia by
ve activity in the immediate postoperative period. Anesthesia direct antagonism of nociceptor sensitization involves the
& Analgesia 2002; 95:1351‑1357. arginine‑nitric oxide‑cGMP pathway. Eur J Pharmacol 1992;
51. Isett J, Reader A, Gallatin E, et al.: Effect of an intraosseous 217:225‑227.
injection of depo‑medrol on pulpal concentrations of PGE2 74. Lorenzetti BB, Ferreira SH: Mode of analgesic action of di‑
and IL‑8 in untreated irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2003; pyrone: direct antagonism of inflammatory hyperalgesia. Eur
29:268‑271. J Pharmacol 1985; 114:375‑381.
52. Jostes J, Holland G: The effect of occlusal reduction after ca‑ 75. Marquez JO, Ferreira SH: Regional dipyrone nociceptor blo‑
nal preparation on patient comfort. J Endod 1984; 10:34. ckade: a pilot study. Braz J Med Biol Res 1987; 20:441‑444.
53. Marshall J, Walton R: The effect of intramuscular injection 76. Sachs D, Cunha FQ, Ferreira SH: Peripheral analgesic blo‑
of steroid on posttreatment endodontic pain. J Endod 1984; ckade of hypernociception: activation of arginine/NO/
10:584. cGMP/protein kinase G/ATP‑sensitive K+ channel pathway.
54. Mulhern J, et al.: Incidence of postoperative pain after one‑ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:3680‑3685.
appointment endodontic treatment of asymptomatic pulpal 77. Tatsuo MA, Carvalho WM, Silva CV, et al.: Analgesic and an‑
necrosis in single‑rooted teeth. J Endod 1982; 8:370. tiinflammatory effects of dipyrone in rat adjuvant arthritis
55. Torabinejad M, et al.: Effectiveness of various medications on model. Inflammation 1994; 18:399‑405.
postoperative pain following complete instrumentation. J En‑ 78. Martinez‑Martin P, Raffaelli E, Jr., Titus F, et al.: Efficacy and
dod 1994; 20:345. safety of metamizol vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with mo‑
56. Walton R, Fouad A: Endodontic interappointment flare‑ups: derate episodic tension‑type headache: a randomized, dou‑
a prospective study of incidence and related factors. J Endod ble‑blind, placebo‑ and active‑controlled, multicentre study.
1992; 18:172. Cephalalgia 2001; 21:604‑610.
Capítulo 21   |   Referências Bibliográficas 111

79. Planas ME, Gay‑Escoda C, Bagan JV, et al.: Oral metamizol 100. Hargreaves K, Troullos E, Dionne R: Pharmacologic ratio‑
(1 g and 2 g) versus ibuprofen and placebo in the treat‑ nale for the treatment of acute pain. Dent Clin North Am
ment of lower third molar surgery pain: randomised dou‑ 1987; 31:675.
ble‑blind multi‑centre study. Cooperative Study Group. Eur 101. Manchikanti L, Singh A: Therapeutic opioids: a ten‑year
J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 53:405‑409. perspective on the complexities and complications of the
80. Rodriguez M, Barutell C, Rull M, et al.: Efficacy and toleran‑ escalating use, abuse, and nonmedical use of opioids. Pain
ce of oral dipyrone versus oral morphine for cancer pain. Physician 2008; 11:S63‑88.
Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A:584‑587. 102. Miech R, Johnston L, O’Malley PM, et al.: Prescription
81. Heit WF: Hematologic effects of antipyretic analgesics. opioids in adolescence and future opioid misuse. Pediatrics
Drug‑induced agranulocytosis. Am J Med 1983; 75:65‑69. 2015; 136:e1169‑1177.
82. Doll R, Lunde PK, Moeschlin S: Analgesics, agranulocytosis, 103. Baker JA, Avorn J, Levin R, et al.: Opioid prescribing after
and aplastic anaemia. Lancet 1987; 1:101. surgical extraction of teeth in medicaid patients, 2000‑2010.
83. Cryer B, Feldman M: Cyclooxygenase‑1 and cyclooxygena‑ JAMA 2016; 315:1653‑1654.
se‑2 selectivity of widely used nonsteroidal anti‑inflamma‑ 104. Moore RA, Wiffen PJ, Derry S, et al.: Non‑prescription (OTC)
tory drugs. Am J Med 1998; 104:413‑421. oral analgesics for acute pain – an overview of Cochrane re‑
84. Kato M, Nishida S, Kitasato H, et al.: Cyclooxygenase‑1 and views. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD010794.
cyclooxygenase‑2 selectivity of non‑steroidal anti‑inflam‑ 105. Doroschak AM, Bowles WR, Hargreaves KM: Evaluation of
matory drugs: investigation using human peripheral mo‑ the combination of flurbiprofen and tramadol for manage‑
nocytes. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001; 53:1679‑1685. ment of endodontic pain. J Endod 1999; 25:660‑663.
85. Negm MM: Management of endodontic pain with nons‑ 106. Marshall G: Consideration of steroids for endodontic pain.
teroidal anti‑inflammatory agents: a double‑blind, place‑ Endo Topics 2002; 3:41‑51.
bo‑controlled study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 107. Moskow A, et al.: Intracanal use of a corticosteroid solution
67:88‑95. as an endodontic anodyne. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
86. Breivik EK, Barkvoll P, Skovlund E: Combining diclofenac 1984; 58:600.
with acetaminophen or acetaminophen‑codeine after oral 108. Chance K, Lin L, Shovlin F, et al.: Clinical trial of intracanal
surgery: a randomized, double‑blind single‑dose study. Clin corticosteroid in root canal therapy. J Endod 1987; 13:466.
Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66:625‑635. 109. Ehrmann EH, Messer HH, Adams GG: The relationship of
87. Khan AA, Dionne RA: The COX‑2 inhibitors: new analgesic intracanal medicaments to postoperative pain in endodon‑
and anti‑inflammatory drugs. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: tics. Int Endod J 2003; 36:868‑875.
679‑690. 110. Rogers MJ, Johnson BR, Remeikis NA, et al.: Comparison of
88. Wallace J: Selective COX‑2 inhibitors: is the water becoming effect of intracanal use of ketorolac tromethamine and de‑
muddy? Trends Pharmacol Sci 1999; 20:4. xamethasone with oral ibuprofen on post treatment endo‑
89. FDA: MedWatch: Rofecoxib http://www.fda.gov/medwa‑ dontic pain. J Endod 1999; 25:381‑384.
tch/SAFETY/2004/safety04.htm#vioxx. 2004. 111. Liesinger A, Marshall F, Marshall J: Effect of variable doses
90. Mukherjee D, Nissen SE, Topol EJ: Risk of cardiovascular of dexamethasone on posttreatment endodontic pain. J En‑
events associated with selective COX‑2 inhibitors. JAMA dod 1993; 19:35.
2001; 286:954‑959. 112. Kaufman E, et al.: Intraligamentary injection of slow‑release
91. Arash Poorsattar BM, Zahra‑Sadat M, Ali Akbar M, et al.: methylprednisolone for the prevention of pain after endodon‑
tic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77:651.
Analgesic effect of etoricoxib compared to Ibuprofen
113. Gallatin E, Reader A, Nist R, et al.: Pain reduction in untre‑
on post endodontic pain. Oral Health Dent Manag 2013;
ated irreversible pulpitis using an intraosseous injection of
12:186‑190.
Depo‑Medrol. J Endod 2000; 26:633‑638.
92. Chandrasekharan NV, Dai H, Roos KL, et al.: COX‑3, a
114. Nobuhara W, Carnes D, Gilles J: Anti‑inflammatory effects
cyclooxygenase‑1 variant inhibited by acetaminophen and
of dexamethasone on periapical tissues following endodon‑
other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: cloning, structure, and
tic overinstrumentation. J Endod 1993; 19:501.
expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:13926‑13931.
115. Krasner P, Jackson E: Management of posttreatment endo‑
93. Kis B, Snipes JA, Busija DW: Acetaminophen and the cycloo‑
dontic pain with oral dexamethasone: a double‑blind study.
xygenase‑3 puzzle: sorting out facts, fictions, and uncertain‑
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62:187.
ties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005; 315:1‑7.
116. Glassman G, et al.: A prospective randomized double‑blind
94. Schwab JM, Schluesener HJ, Meyermann R, et al.: COX‑3 the
trial on efficacy of dexamethasone for endodontic interap‑
enzyme and the concept: steps towards highly specialized pa‑
pointment pain in teeth with asymptomatic inflamed pulps.
thways and precision therapeutics? Prostaglandins Leukotrie‑ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67:96.
nes & Essential Fatty Acids 2003; 69:339‑343. 117. Fouad A: Are antibiotics effective for endodontic pain?. An
95. Mallet C, Daulhac L, Bonnefont J, et al.: Endocannabinoid evidence‑based review. Endo Topics 2002; 3:52‑66.
and serotonergic systems are needed for acetaminophen‑in‑ 118. Yingling NM, Byrne BE, Hartwell GR: Antibiotic use by
duced analgesia. Pain 2008. members of the American Association of Endodontists in
96. Pickering G, Esteve V, Loriot MA, et al.: Acetaminophen rein‑ the year 2000: report of a national survey. Journal of Endo‑
forces descending inhibitory pain pathways. Clin Pharmacol dontics 2002; 28:396‑404.
Ther 2008; 84:47‑51. 119. Morse D, et al.: Prophylactic penicillin versus erythromycin
97. Larson AM, Polson J, Fontana RJ, et al.: Acetaminophen‑in‑ taken at the first sign of swelling in cases of asymptomatic
duced acute liver failure: results of a United States multicen‑ pulpal‑periapical lesions: a comparative analysis. Oral Surg
ter, prospective study. Hepatology 2005; 42:1364‑1372. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 65:228.
98. Cooper S: New peripherally acting oral analgesics. Ann Rev 120. Abbott A, et al.: A prospective randomized trial on efficacy
Pharmacol Toxicol 1983; 23:617. of antibiotic prophylaxis in asymptomatic teeth with pulpal
99. Cooper S: Treating acute dental pain. Postgraduate Dentistry necrosis and associated periapical pathosis. Oral Surg 1988;
1995; 2: 7. 66:722.
112 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

121. Morse D, et al.: A comparison of erythromycin and cepa‑ with irreversible pulpitis‑a systematic review and meta‑analy‑
droxil in the prevention of flare‑ups from asymptomatic te‑ sis. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21:43‑52.
eth with pulpal necrosis and associated periapical pathosis. 141. Crout R, Koraido G, Moore P: A clinical trial of long‑ac‑
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69: 619. ting local anesthetics for periodontal surgery. Anesth Preog
122. Torabinejad M, et al.: Effectiveness of various medications 1990; 37:194.
on postoperative pain following root canal obturation. J En‑ 142. Gordon S, et al.: Blockade of peripheral neuronal barrage
dod 1994; 20:427. reduces postoperative pain. Pain 1997; 306:264.
123. Walton R, Chiappinelli J: Prophylactic penicillin: effect on 143. Jebeles J, et al.: Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy pain re‑
posttreatment symptoms following root canal treatment of duction by local bupivacaine infiltration in children. Int J
asymptomatic periapical pathosis. J Endod 1993; 19:466. Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 25:149.
124. Fouad A, Rivera E, Walton R: Penicillin as a supplement in 144. Woolf C: Evidence for a central component of post‑injury
resolving the localized acute apical abscess. Oral Surg Oral pain hypersensitivity. Nature 1983; 306:686.
Med Oral Pathol 1996; 81:590. 145. Woolf C: Windup and central sensitization are not equiva‑
125. Keiser K: Strategies for managing the endodontic pain pa‑ lent. Pain 1996; 66:105.
tient. Texas Dental Journal 2003; 120:250‑257. 146. Woolf C: Transcriptional and posttranslational plasticity
126. Keiser K, Hargreaves K: Building effective strategies for and the generation of inflammatory pain. Proc Natl Acad
the management of endodontic pain. Endo Topics 2002; Sci U S A 1999; 96:7723.
3:93‑105. 147. Bacsik C, Swift J, Hargreaves K: Toxic systemic reactions of
127. Rosenberg P: Clinical strategies for managing endodontic bupivacaine and etidocaine: review of the literature. Oral
pain. Endo Topics 2002; 3:78‑92. Surg. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995; 79:18.
128. Hargreaves KM, Keiser K: New advances in the manage‑
148. Moore P: Long‑acting local anesthetics: a review of clinical
ment of endodontic pain emergencies. Journal of the Cali‑
efficacy in dentistry. Compendium 1990; 11:24.
fornia Dental Association 2004; 32:469‑473.
149. American Association of Endodontists: Post‑endodontic
129. Siqueira J, Barnett F: Interappointment pain: mechanisms,
pain control. Chicago: The Association, 1995.
diagnosis, and treatment. Endo Topics 2004; 3:93‑109.
150. Keiser K, Hargreaves KM: Strategies for managing the en‑
130. Hasselgren G, Reit C: Emergency pulpotomy: pain relieving
dodontic pain patient. Journal of the Tennessee Dental As‑
effect with and without the use of sedative dressings. J En‑
sociation 2003; 83:24‑28.
dod 1989; 15:254.
151. Hargreaves K: Neurochemical factors in injury and inflam‑
131. Penniston S, Hargreaves K: Evaluation of periapical injec‑
tion of ketorolac for management of endodontic pain. J En‑ mation in orofacial tissues. In Lavigne G LJ, Sessle B, Dub‑
dod 1996; 22:55. ner R, editors: Orofacial pain: basic sciences to clinical ma‑
132. Jackson D, Moore P, Hargreaves K: Preoperative nonsteroi‑ nagement, Chicago: Quintessence Publishers, 2000.
dal anti‑inflammatory medication for the prevention of pos‑ 152. Troullos E, Freeman R, Dionne R: The scientific basis for
toperative dental pain. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 119:641. analgesic use in dentistry. Anesth Prog 1986; 33:123.
133. Niv D: Intraoperative treatment of postoperative pain. In 153. Breivik E, Barkvoll P, Skovlund E: Combining diclofenac
J IC, editor: Pain 1996 – An updated review, Seattle: IASP with acetaminophen or acetaminophen‑codeine after oral
Press, 1996. surgery: a randomized, double‑blind, single oral dose study.
134. Grga D, Dzeletovic B, Damjanov M, et al.: Prostaglandin E2 Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 54.
in apical tissue fluid and postoperative pain in intact and te‑ 154. Menhinick K, Gutmann J, Regan J, et al.: The efficacy of
eth with large restorations in two endodontic treatment vi‑ pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment
sits. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2013; 141:17‑21. using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and aceta‑
135. Shimauchi H, Takayama S, Miki Y, et al.: The change of pe‑ minophen in a randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑control‑
riapical exudate prostaglandin E2 levels during root canal led study. Int Endod J 2003; 37:531‑541.
treatment. J Endod 1997; 23:755‑758. 155. Stambaugh J, Drew J: The combination of ibuprofen and
136. Attar S, Bowles WR, Baisden MK, et al.: Evaluation of pretre‑ oxycodone/acetaminophen in the management of chronic
atment analgesia and endodontic treatment for postopera‑ cancer pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 44:665‑944.
tive endodontic pain. J Endod 2008; 34:652‑655. 156. Lanza F, et al.: Effect of acetaminophen on human gastric
137. Moore P, et al.: Analgesic regimens for third molar surgery: mucosal injury caused by ibuprofen. Gut 1986; 27:440.
pharmacologic and behavioral considerations. J Am Dent 157. Wright C, et al.: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen kinetics
Assoc 1986; 113:739. when taken concurrently. Clin Pharm Therap 1983; 34:707.
138. Olson NZ, Otero AM, Marrero I, et al.: Onset of analgesia 158. Wideman G, et al.: Analgesic efficacy of a combination of
for liquigel ibuprofen 400 mg, acetaminophen 1000 mg, ke‑ hydrocodone with ibuprofen in postoperative pain. Clin
toprofen 25 mg, and placebo in the treatment of postopera‑ Pharm Therap 1999; 65:66.
tive dental pain. J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 41:1238‑1247. 159. Sunshine A, et al.: Analgesic efficacy of a hydrocodone with
139. Packman B, Packman E, Doyle G, et al.: Solubilized ibupro‑ ibuprofen combination compared with ibuprofen alone for
fen: evaluation of onset, relief, and safety of a novel formu‑ the treatment of acute postoperative pain. J Clin Pharmacol
lation in the treatment of episodic tension‑type headache. 1997; 37:908.
Headache 2000; 40:561‑567. 160. Dionne R: Additive analgesic effects of oxycodone and ibu‑
140. Shirvani A, Shamszadeh S, Eghbal MJ, et al.: Effect of pre‑ profen in the oral surgery model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
operative oral analgesics on pulpal anesthesia in patients 1999; 57:673.
Ca pí tulo

Antibióticos Sistêmicos em Endodontia 22


José F. Siqueira Jr. | Isabela N. Rôças

19. Stewart PS, Costerton JW: Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in


Referências Bibliográficas biofilms. Lancet 2001; 358:135‑138.
20. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Microbiology and treatment of acu‑
1. Friedman M, Friedland GW: As dez maiores descobertas da
te apical abscesses. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26:255‑273.
medicina. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2000.
21. Griffith RS, Brier GL, Wolny JD: Synergistic action of erythromy‑
2. Pallasch TJ: Antibiotics in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am
cin and cefamandole against Bacteroides fragilis subsp. fragilis.
1979; 23:737‑746.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1977; 11:813‑816.
3. Pallasch TJ: Pharmacokinetic principles of antimicrobial the‑
22. Tavares W: Manual de antibióticos e quimioterápicos antiin‑
rapy. Periodontol 2000 1996; 10:5‑11.
fecciosos. 3a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Atheneu, 2003.
4. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J: Brock biology of microor‑
23. Assael LA: A time for perspective on bisphosphonates. J Oral
ganisms. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice‑Hall, 2000.
Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64:877‑879.
5. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr., Bate AL, et al.: Histologic investi‑
24. Flores MT, Andersson L, Andreasen JO, et al.: Guidelines for
gation of root canal‑treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a
the management of traumatic dental injuries. II. Avulsion of
retrospective study from twenty‑four patients. J Endod 2009;
permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2007; 23:130‑136.
35:493‑502.
25. Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Day P, et al.: International Asso‑
6. Ranta H, Haapasalo M, Ranta K, et al.: Bacteriology of odon‑
ciation of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the manage‑
togenic apical periodontitis and effect of penicillin treat‑
ment of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent
ment. Scand J Infect Dis 1988; 20:187‑192.
7. Walton RE: Interappointment flare‑ups: incidence, related fac‑ teeth. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28:88‑96.
tors, prevention, and management. Endod Topics 2002; 3:67‑76. 26. Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, et al.: Prevention of infecti‑
8. Brazier J, Chmelar D, Dubreuil L, et al.: European surveillan‑ ve endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Associa‑
ce study on antimicrobial susceptibility of gram‑positive ana‑ tion: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheu‑
erobic cocci. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 31:316‑320. matic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease Committee,
9. Kuriyama T, Absi EG, Williams DW, et al.: An outcome audit Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the
of the treatment of acute dentoalveolar infection: impact of Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular
penicillin resistance. Brit Dent J 2005; 25:759‑763. Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outco‑
10. Dahlen G: Microbiology and treatment of dental abscesses mes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. J Am Dent
and periodontal‑endodontic lesions. Periodontol 2000 2002; Assoc 2007; 138:739‑745, 747‑760.
28:206‑239. 27. Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, et al.: Prevention of infecti‑
11. Gordon JM, Walker CB: Current status of systemic antibiotic ve endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Associa‑
usage in destructive periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1993; tion: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheu‑
64:760‑771. matic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee,
12. Slots J, Pallasch TJ: Dentists’ role in halting antimicrobial re‑ Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the
sistance. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1338‑1341. Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular
13. van Winkelhoff AJ, Rams TE, Slots J: Systemic antibiotic the‑ Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outco‑
rapy in periodontics. Periodontol 2000 1996; 10:45‑78. mes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation
14. Akimoto Y, Komiya M, Kaneko K, et al.: Ampicillin concentra‑ 2007; 116:1736‑1754.
tions in human serum, gingiva, mandibular bone, dental folli‑ 28. Dajani AS, Taubert KA, Wilson W, et al.: Prevention of bacte‑
cle, and dental pulp following a single oral administration of rial endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart
bacampicillin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44:107‑112. Association. Jama 1997; 277:1794‑1801.
15. Jaouni M, Tolba M, Romberg E, et al.: Penetration of systemic 29. American Dental Association (ADA) Antibiotic prophylaxis
anitibiotics into necrotic pulp space. J Endod 2010; 36:558. prior to dental procedures. Oral Health Topics 2017. Availa‑
16. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Biofilms and apical periodontitis: ble from: http://www.ada.org/en/member‑center/oral‑he‑
study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopa‑ alth‑topics/antibiotic‑prophylaxis. 2017.
thologic findings. J Endod 2010; 36:1277‑1288. 30. Mwandumba HC, Beeching NJ: Pyogenic lung infections: fac‑
17. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Ricucci D: Biofilms in endodontic in‑ tors for predicting clinical outcome of lung abscess and tho‑
fection. Endod Topics 2010; 22:33‑49. racic empyema. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2000; 6:234‑239.
18. Fux CA, Costerton JW, Stewart PS, et al.: Survival strategies of 31. Korownyk C, Allan GM: Evidence‑based approach to abscess
infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol 2005; 13:34‑40. management. Can Fam Physician 2007; 53:1680‑1684.
114 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

32. Carpenter J, Stapleton S, Holliman R: Retrospective analysis 51. Sobottka I, Cachovan G, Sturenburg E, et al.: In vitro activi‑
of 49 cases of brain abscess and review of the literature. Eur J ty of moxifloxacin against bacteria isolated from odontoge­
Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 26:1‑11. nic abscesses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:
33. Daramola OO, Flanagan CE, Maisel RH, et al.: Diagnosis and 4019‑4021.
treatment of deep neck space abscesses. Otolaryngol Head 52. Cachovan G, Boger RH, Giersdorf I, et al.: Comparative effi‑
Neck Surg 2009; 141:123‑130. cacy and safety of moxifloxacin and clindamycin in the tre‑
34. Gill Y, Scully C: Orofacial odontogenic infections: review of atment of odontogenic abscesses and inflammatory infiltra‑
microbiology and current treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med tes: a phase II, double‑blind, randomized trial. Antimicrob
Oral Pathol 1990; 70:155‑158. Agents Chemother 2011; 55:1142‑1147.
35. Baumgartner JC, Xia T: Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria as‑ 53. Heimdahl A, von Konow L, Satoh T, et al.: Clinical appearance
sociated with endodontic abscesses. J Endod 2003; 29:44‑47. of orofacial infections of odontogenic origin in relation to mi‑
36. Khemaleelakul S, Baumgartner JC, Pruksakorn S: Identifica‑ crobiological findings. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22:299‑302.
tion of bacteria in acute endodontic infections and their anti‑ 54. Williams JD, Maskell JP, Shain H, et al.: Comparative in‑vitro ac‑
microbial susceptibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral tivity of azithromycin, macrolides (erythromycin, clarithromy‑
Radiol Endod 2002; 94:746‑755. cin and spiramycin) and streptogramin RP 59500 against oral
37. Jacinto RC, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, et al.: Microbiological organisms. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992; 30:27‑37.
analysis of infected root canals from symptomatic and asymp‑ 55. Lu ZK, Yuan J, Li M, et al.: Cardiac risks associated with anti‑
tomatic teeth with periapical periodontitis and the antimicro‑ biotics: azithromycin and levofloxacin. Expert Opin Drug Saf
bial susceptibility of some isolated anaerobic bacteria. Oral 2015; 14:295‑303.
Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18:285‑292. 56. Rao GA, Mann JR, Shoaibi A, et al.: Azithromycin and levoflo‑
38. Kuriyama T, Williams DW, Yanagisawa M, et al.: Antimicro‑ xacin use and increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia and death.
bial susceptibility of 800 anaerobic isolates from patients with Ann Fam Med 2014; 12:121‑127.
dentoalveolar infection to 13 oral antibiotics. Oral Microbiol 57. Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Merriam CV, et al.: Activities of te‑
Immunol 2007; 22:285‑288. lithromycin (HMR 3647, RU 66647) compared to those of
39. Flynn TR: What are the antibiotics of choice for odontogenic erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin,
infections, and how long should the treatment course last? and other antimicrobial agents against unusual anaerobes.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2011; 23:519‑536, v‑vi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43:2801‑2805.
40. Segura‑Egea JJ, Martin‑Gonzalez J, Jimenez‑Sanchez MDC, et 58. Hersh EV: Adverse drug interactions in dental practice: in‑
al.: Worldwide pattern of antibiotic prescription in endodon‑ teractions involving antibiotics. Part II of a series. J Am Dent
tic infections. Int Dent J 2017; 67:197‑205. Assoc 1999; 130:236‑251.
41. Segura‑Egea JJ, Gould K, Sen BH, et al.: Antibiotics in Endo‑ 59. Cerel‑Suhl SL, Yeager BF: Update on oral contraceptive pills.
dontics: a review. Int Endod J 2017; 50:1169‑1184. Am Fam Physician 1999; 60:2073‑2084.
42. Blandino G, Milazzo I, Fazio D, et al.: Antimicrobial suscepti‑ 60. Garret L: The coming plague. Newly emerging diseases in a
bility and beta‑lactamase production of anaerobic and aero‑ world out of balance. New York: Penguin Books USA Inc., 1994.
bic bacteria isolated from pus specimens from orofacial infec‑ 61. Levy SB: The challenge of antibiotic resistance. Sci Am 1998;
tions. J Chemother 2007; 19:495‑499. 278:46‑53.
43. Lewis MA, Carmichael F, MacFarlane TW, et al.: A rando‑ 62. Clatworthy AE, Pierson E, Hung DT: Targeting virulence:
mised trial of co‑amoxiclav (Augmentin) versus penicillin V a new paradigm for antimicrobial therapy. Nat Chem Biol
in the treatment of acute dentoalveolar abscess. Brit Dent J 2007; 3:541‑548.
1993; 175:169‑174. 63. Handal T, Olsen I: Antimicrobial resistance with focus on
44. Paterson SA, Curzon ME: The effect of amoxycillin versus pe‑ oral beta‑lactamases. European Journal of Oral Sciences
nicillin V in the treatment of acutely abscessed primary teeth. 2000; 108:163‑174.
Brit Dent J 1993; 174:443‑449. 64. Hayward CMM, Griffin GE: Antibiotic resistance: the current
45. Kuriyama T, Karasawa T, Nakagawa K, et al.: Bacteriologic fe‑ position and the molecular mechanisms involved. Brit J Hosp
atures and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolates from orofa‑ Med 1994; 52:473‑478.
cial odontogenic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 65. Heath CH, Blackmore TK, Gordon DL: Emerging resistance
Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90:600‑608. in Enterococcus spp. Med J Aust 1996; 164:116‑120.
46. Lakhssassi N, Elhajoui N, Lodter JP, et al.: Antimicrobial sus‑ 66. Pallasch TJ: Global antibiotic resistance and its impact on the
ceptibility variation of 50 anaerobic periopathogens in ag‑ dental community. J Calif Dent Assoc 2000; 28:215‑233.
gressive periodontitis: an interindividual variability study. 67. Wenzel RP, Edmond MB: Managing antibiotic resistance.
Oral Microbiol Immunol 2005; 20:244‑252. New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 343:1961‑1963.
47. Gilmore WC, Jacobus NV, Gorbach SL, et al.: A prospective 68. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, et al.: Increasing prevalen‑
double‑blind evaluation of penicillin versus clindamycin in ce of multidrug‑resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the Uni‑
the treatment of odontogenic infections. J Oral Maxillofac ted States. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1917‑1924.
Surg 1988; 46:1065‑1070. 69. Hecht DW, Vedantam G, Osmolski JR: Antibiotic resistan‑
48. von Konow L, Kondell PA, Nord CE, et al.: Clindamycin ce among anaerobes: What does it mean? Anaerobe 1999;
versus phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of acute 5:421‑429.
orofacial infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 70. Jones RN, Della‑Latta P, Lee LV, et al.: Linezolid‑resistant En-
11:1129‑1135. terococcus faecium isolated from a patient without prior expo‑
49. Pallasch TJ: Pharmacology of anxiety, pain and infection. In sure to an oxazolidinone: report from the SENTRY Antimi‑
Ingle JI, Bakland LK, editors: Endodontics. 4th ed. Baltimo‑ crobial Surveillance Program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
re: Williams & Wilkins, 1994; p. 641‑679. 2002; 42:137‑139.
50. Baumgartner JC: Antibiotics in endodontic therapy. In New‑ 71. Aminoshariae A, Kulild JC: Evidence‑based recommenda‑
man MG, van Winkelhoff AJ, editors: Antibiotic and antimi‑ tions for antibiotic usage to treat endodontic infections and
crobial use in dental practice. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J
Publishing, 2001; p. 143‑155. Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147:186‑191.
Capítulo 22   |   Referências Bibliográficas 115

72. Walton RE, Chiappinelli J: Prophylactic penicillin: effect on 95. Baumgartner JC, Heggers JP, Harrison JW: Incidence of
posttreatment symptoms following root canal treatment of bacteremias related to endodontic procedures. II. Surgical
asymptomatic periapical pathosis. J Endod 1993; 19:466‑470. endodontics. J Endod 1977; 3:399‑402.
73. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Alves FRF: Resistência bacteriana 96. Baumgartner JC, Heggers JP, Harrison JW: The incidence
a antibióticos: como o endodontista deve lidar com o pro­ of bacteremias related to endodontic procedures. I. Non‑
blema. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 2004; 61:120‑123. surgical endodontics. J Endod 1976; 2:135‑140.
74. Fluit AC, Visser MR, Schmitz F‑J: Molecular detection of anti‑ 97. Reis LC, Rôças IN, Siqueira Jr JF, et al.: Bacteremia after
microbial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14:836‑871. endodontic procedures in patients with heart disease: cul‑
75. Handal T, Olsen I, Walker CB, et al.: Beta‑lactamase production ture and molecular analyses. J Endod 2016; 42: 1181‑1185.
and antimicrobial susceptibility of subgingival bacteria from re‑ 98. Heimdahl A, Hall G, Hedberg M, et al.: Detection and
fractory periodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2004; 19:303‑308. quantitation by lysis‑filtration of bacteremia after diffe‑
76. Fosse T, Madinier I, Hitzig C, et al.: Prevalence of beta‑lacta‑ rent oral surgical procedures. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:
mase‑producing strains among 149 anaerobic gram‑negative 2205‑2209.
rods isolated from periodontal pockets. Oral Microbiol Im‑ 99. Savarrio L, Mackenzie D, Riggio M, et al.: Detection of bac‑
munol 1999; 14:352‑357. teraemias during non‑surgical root canal treatment. J Dent
77. van Winkelhoff AJ, Winkel EG, Barendregt D, et al.: Beta‑lac‑ 2005; 33:293‑303.
tamase producing bacteria in adult periodontitis. J Clin Pe‑ 100. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L: Bacteremia in conjunc‑
riodontol 1997; 24:538‑543. tion with endodontic therapy. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;
78. Brook I, Frazier EH, Gher ME, Jr.: Microbiology of periapi‑ 11:142‑149.
cal abscesses and associated maxillary sinusitis. J Periodontol 101. Pallasch TJ: A critical appraisal of antibiotic prophylaxis. Int
1996; 67:608‑610. Dent J 1989; 39:183‑196.
79. Bernal LA, Guillot E, Paquet C, et al.: Beta‑lactamase‑produ‑ 102. Pallasch TJ: Antibiotic prophylaxis: theory and reality. J Ca‑
cing strains in the species Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella lif Dent Assoc 1989; 17:27‑39.
nigrescens. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1998; 13:36‑40. 103. Pallasch TJ, Slots J: Antibiotic prophylaxis and the medi‑
80. Kuriyama T, Karasawa T, Nakagawa K, et al.: Incidence of be‑ cally compromised patient. Periodontol 2000 1996; 10:
ta‑lactamase production and antimicrobial susceptibility of 107‑138.
anaerobic gram‑negative rods isolated from pus specimens 104. Rajasuo A, Nyfors S, Kanervo A, et al.: Bacteremia after pla‑
of orofacial odontogenic infections. Oral Microbiol Immu‑ te removal and tooth extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
nol 2001; 16:10‑15. 2004; 33:356‑360.
81. Herrera D, van Winkelhoff AJ, Dellemijn‑Kippuw N, et al.: Be‑ 105. Rajasuo A, Perkki K, Nyfors S, et al.: Bacteremia following
ta‑lactamase producing bacteria in the subgingival microflora of surgical dental extraction with an emphasis on anaerobic
adult patients with periodontitis. A comparison between Spain strains. J Dent Res 2004; 83:170‑174.
and The Netherlands. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27:520‑525. 106. Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Kent ML, et al.: Impact of amo‑
82. Veloo AC, Seme K, Raangs E, et al.: Antibiotic susceptibili‑ xicillin prophylaxis on the incidence, nature, and duration
ty profiles of oral pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2012; of bacteremia in children after intubation and dental pro‑
40:450‑454. cedures. Circulation 2004; 109:2878‑2884.
83. Brook I: Beta‑lactamase‑producing bacteria in mixed infec‑ 107. Baltch AL, Pressman HL, Schaffer C, et al.: Bacteremia in
tions. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004; 10:777‑784. patients undergoing oral procedures. Study following pa‑
84. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Antibiotic resistance genes in anae‑ renteral antimicrobial prophylaxis as recommended by the
robic bacteria isolated from primary dental root canal infec‑ American Heart Association, 1977. Arch Intern Med 1988;
tions. Anaerobe 2012; 18:576‑580. 148:1084‑1088.
85. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Detection of antibiotic resistance 108. Bahrani‑Mougeot FK, Paster BJ, Coleman S, et al.: Diverse
genes in samples from acute and chronic endodontic infec‑ and novel oral bacterial species in blood following dental
tions and after treatment. Arch Oral Biol 2013; 58: 1123‑1128. procedures. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:2129‑2132.
86. Jungermann GB, Burns K, Nandakumar R, et al.: Antibiotic 109. Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Sasser HC, et al.: Bacteremia as‑
resistance in primary and persistent endodontic infections. J sociated with toothbrushing and dental extraction. Circula‑
Endod 2011; 37:1337‑1344. tion 2008; 117:3118‑3125.
87. American Association of Endodontists (AAE): Quick Refe‑ 110. Pallasch TJ, Slots J: Oral microorganisms and cardiovascu‑
rence Guide on Antibiotic Prophylaxis 2017 Update, 2017. lar disease. J Calif Dent Assoc 2000; 28:204‑214.
88. Fouad AF: Endodontic infections and systemic disease. In 111. Veksler AE, Kayrouz GA, Newman MG: Reduction of sali‑
Fouad AF, editor: Endodontic microbiology. Ames, Iowa: Wi‑ vary bacteria by pre‑procedural rinses with chlorhexidine
ley‑Blackwell, 2009; p. 320‑338. 0.12%. J Periodontol 1991; 62:649‑651.
89. Lyles AM: What the dentist should know about a patient with 112. Logothetis DD, Martinez‑Welles JM: Reducing bacterial
HIV/AIDS. J Calif Dent Assoc 2001; 29:158‑169. aerosol contamination with a chlorhexidine gluconate
90. Halligan KP, Halligan TJ, Jeske AH, et al.: HIV: medical mi‑ pre‑rinse. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:1634‑1639.
lestones and clinical challenges. Dent Clin North Am 2009; 113. Pallasch TJ, Wahl MJ: Focal infection: new age or ancient
53:311‑322, x. history? Endod Topics 2003; 4:32‑45.
91. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L: Systemic diseases caused by 114. Pallasch TJ: Antibiotic prophylaxis. Endod Topics 2003;
oral microorganisms. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994; 10:57‑65. 4:46‑59.
92. Li X, Kolltveit KM, Tronstad L, et al.: Systemic diseases cau‑ 115. Gendron R, Grenier D, Maheu‑Robert L: The oral cavity as
sed by oral infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000; 13: 547‑558. a reservoir of bacterial pathogens for focal infections. Mi‑
93. Murray CA, Saunders WP: Root canal treatment and general crobes Infect 2000; 2:897‑906.
health: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2000; 33:1‑18. 116. Wright AJ, Wilson WR: Experimental animal endocarditis.
94. Bender IB, Seltzer S, Yermish M: The incidence of bactere‑ Mayo Clin Proc 1982; 57:10‑14.
mia in endodontic manipulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 117. McDevitt D, Rosenberg M: Exploiting genomics to discover
Pathol 1960; 13:353‑360. new antibiotics. Trends in Microbiology 2001; 9:611‑617.
Ca p ít u l o

23 Traumatismo Dentário
Asgeir Sigurdsson | Gilberto Debelian | Martin Trope

16. Herguner A, Erdur AE, Basciftci FA, et al.: Attention‑deficit/


Referências Bibliográficas hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children with traumatic
dental injuries. Dent Traumatol 2015; 31:140‑143.
1. Oldin A, Lundgren J, Nilsson M, et al.: Traumatic dental inju‑ 17. Ehmer U, Tulloch CJ, Proffit WR, et al.: An international
ries among children aged 0‑17 years in the BITA study – a lon‑ comparison of early treatment of angle Class‑II/1 cases. Ske‑
gitudinal Swedish multicenter study. Dent Traumatol 2015; letal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trial. J
31:9‑17. Orofac Orthop 1999; 60:392‑408.
2. Petti S, Glendor U, Andersson L: World traumatic dental in‑ 18. Oliveira Filho PM, Jorge KO, Ferreira EF, et al.: Association
jury prevalence and incidence, a meta‑analysis – One billion between dental trauma and alcohol use among adolescents.
living people have had traumatic dental injuries. Dent Trau‑ Dent Traumatol 2012; 29:322‑327.
matol 2018; 34:71‑86. 19. Koroluk LD, Tulloch JF, Phillips C: Incisor trauma and early
3. Glendor U: Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries‑‑a treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod
12 year review of the literature. Dent Traumatol 2008; Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:117‑125.
24:603‑611. 20. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM: Textbook and color atlas of
4. Andreasen JO: Etiology and pathogenesis of traumatic dental traumatic injuries to the teeth. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1994.
injuries. A clinical study of 1298 cases. Scand J Dent Res 1970; 21. Hohlrieder M, Hinterhoelzl J, Ulmer H, et al.: Maxillofacial
78:339‑342. fractures masking traumatic intracranial hemorrhages. Int J
5. Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ: Epidemiology of traumatic dental in‑ Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33:389‑395.
juries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish popula‑ 22. Hofman PA, Nelemans P, Kemerink GJ, et al.: Value of ra‑
tion sample. Int J Oral Surg 1972; 1:235‑239. diological diagnosis of skull fracture in the management of
6. Bastone EB, Freer TJ, McNamara JR: Epidemiology of dental mild head injury: meta‑analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia‑
trauma: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J 2000; 45:2‑9. try 2000; 68:416‑422.
7. Skaare AB, Jacobsen I: Etiological factors related to dental in‑ 23. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al.: Consensus state‑
juries in Norwegians aged 7‑18 years. Dent Traumatol 2003; ment on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conferen‑
19:304‑308. ce on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. Journal
8. Glendor U: Aetiology and risk factors related to traumatic of athletic training 2013; 48:554‑575.
dental injuries‑‑a review of the literature. Dent Traumatol 24. Pileggi R, Dumsha TC, Myslinksi NR: The reliability of elec‑
2009; 25:19‑31. tric pulp test after concussion injury. Endod Dent Traumatol
9. Alonge OK, Narendran S, Williamson DD: Prevalence of frac‑ 1996; 12:16‑19.
tured incisal teeth among children in Harris County, Texas. 25. Bastos JV, Goulart EM, de Souza Cortes MI: Pulpal response
Dent Traumatol 2001; 17:218‑221. to sensibility tests after traumatic dental injuries in perma‑
10. Forsberg CM, Tedestam G: Etiological and predisposing fac‑ nent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2014; 30:188‑192.
tors related to traumatic injuries to permanent teeth. Swed 26. Gazelius B, Olgart L, Edwall B: Restored vitality in luxated te‑
Dent J 1993; 17:183‑190. eth assessed by laser Doppler flowmeter. Endod Dent Trau‑
11. Correa‑Faria P, Petti S: Are overweight/obese children at risk matol 1988; 4: 265‑268.
of traumatic dental injuries? A meta‑analysis of observational 27. Bhaskar SN, Rappaport HM: Dental vitality tests and pulp sta‑
studies. Dent Traumatol 2015; 31:274‑282. tus. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 86:409‑411.
12. Petti S: Over two hundred million injuries to anterior teeth 28. Bhaskar SN, Rappaport HM: Dental vitality tests and pulp sta‑
attributable to large overjet: a meta‑analysis. Dent Traumatol tus. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 86:306‑312.
2015; 31:1‑8. 29. Ahn SY, Kim D, Park SH: Long‑term prognosis of pulpal sta‑
13. Ramos‑Jorge ML, Peres MA, Traebert J, et al.: Incidence of tus of traumatized teeth exhibiting contradictory results be‑
dental trauma among adolescents: a prospective cohort stu‑ tween pulp sensibility test and ultrasound doppler flowmetry:
dy. Dent Traumatol 2008; 24:159‑163. a retrospective study. J Endod 2018; 44:395‑404.
14. Filho PM, Jorge KO, Paiva PC, et al.: The prevalence of dental 30. Fuss Z, Trowbridge H, Bender IB, et al.: Assessment of relia‑
trauma and its association with illicit drug use among adoles‑ bility of electrical and thermal pulp testing agents. J Endod
cents. Dent Traumatol 2014; 30:122‑127. 1986; 12:301‑305.
15. Souza X, Abreu M, Resende VLS, et al.: What increases the 31. Fulling HJ, Andreasen JO: Influence of maturation status and
risk of dental traumatism in patients with developmental di‑ tooth type of permanent teeth upon electrometric and ther‑
sabilities? Braz Dent J 2018; 29:154‑158. mal pulp testing. Scand J Dent Res 1976; 84:286‑290.
Capítulo 23   |   Referências Bibliográficas 117

32. Trope M: Root resorption of dental and traumatic origin: 52. Swift EJ, Jr., Trope M: Treatment options for the exposed vital
classification based on etiology. Pract Periodontics Aesthet pulp. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999; 11:735‑739; quiz 740.
Dent 1998; 10:515‑522. 53. Cox CF, Bergenholtz G, Fitzgerald M, et al.: Capping of the
33. Dogan MS, Callea M, Kusdhany LS, et al.: The Evaluation dental pulp mechanically exposed to the oral microflora – a
of Root Fracture with Cone Beam Computed Tomography 5 week observation of wound healing in the monkey. J Oral
(CBCT): An Epidemiological Study. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; Pathol 1982; 11:327‑339.
10:e41‑e48. 54. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al.: Biocompatibility of surfa‑
34. Salineiro FCS, Kobayashi‑Velasco S, Braga MM, et al.: Radio‑ ce‑sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet
graphic diagnosis of root fractures: a systematic review, me‑ Dent 1987; 57:1‑8.
ta‑analyses and sources of heterogeneity. Dentomaxillofac 55. Byström A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G: The antibacterial effect
Radiol 2017; 46:20170400. of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phe‑
35. Kobayashi‑Velasco S, Salineiro FC, Gialain IO, et al.: Diagno‑ nol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root
sis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:170‑175.
CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs. J Appl Oral Sci 56. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, et al.: The antimicrobial
2017; 25:227‑233. effect of calcium hydroxide as a short‑term intracanal dres‑
36. Lima TF, Gamba TO, Zaia AA, et al.: Evaluation of cone beam sing. Int Endod J 1991; 24:119‑125.
computed tomography and periapical radiography in the 57. Mejare I, Hasselgren G, Hammarstrom LE: Effect of formal‑
diagnosis of root resorption. Aust Dent J 2016; 61:425‑431. dehyde‑containing drugs on human dental pulp evaluated
37. Robertson A: Pulp survival and hard tissue formation subse‑ by enzyme histochemical technique. Scand J Dent Res 1976;
quent to dental trauma. A clinical and histological study of 84:29‑36.
uncomplicated crown fractures and luxation injuries. Swed 58. Schröder U, Granath LE: Early reaction of intact human te‑
Dent J Suppl 1997; 125:1‑65. eth to calcium hydroxide following experimental pulpotomy
38. Robertson A, Andreasen FM, Andreasen JO, et al.: Long‑term and its significance to the development of hard tissue barrier.
prognosis of crown‑fractured permanent incisors. The effect Odontol Revy 1971; 22:379‑396.
of stage of root development and associated luxation injury. 59. Schroder U: Reaction of human dental pulp to experimen‑
Int J Paediatr Dent 2000; 10:191‑199. tal pulpotomy and capping with calcium hydroxide (Thesis).
39. Canakci V, Akgul HM, Akgul N, et al.: Prevalence and han‑ Odont Revy 1973; 24(Suppl 25):97‑140.
dedness correlates of traumatic injuries to the permanent in‑ 60. Arakawa M, Kitasako Y, Otsuki M, et al.: Direct pulp capping
cisors in 13‑17‑year‑old adolescents in Erzurum, Turkey. Dent with an autocured sealant resin and a self‑etching primer. Am
Traumatol 2003; 19:248‑254. J Dent 2003; 16:61‑65.
40. Tapias MA, Jimenez‑Garcia R, Lamas F, et al.: Prevalence of 61. Heller AL, Koenigs JF, Brilliant JD, et al.: Direct pulp capping
traumatic crown fractures to permanent incisors in a chil‑ of permanent teeth in primates using a resorbable form of
dhood population: Mostoles, Spain. Dent Traumatol 2003; tricalcium phosphate ceramic. J Endod 1975; 1:95‑101.
19:119‑122. 62. Jalan AL, Warhadpande MM, Dakshindas DM: A comparison
41. Cvek M: A clinical report on partial pulpotomy and capping of human dental pulp response to calcium hydroxide and
with calcium hydroxide in permanent incisors with complica‑ Biodentine as direct pulp‑capping agents. J Conserv Dent
ted crown fracture. J Endod 1978; 4:232‑237. 2017; 20:129‑133.
42. Cvek M, Cleaton‑Jones P, Austin J, et al.: Effect of topical ap‑ 63. Faraco IM, Jr., Holland R: Response of the pulp of dogs to ca‑
plication of doxycycline on pulp revascularization and perio‑ pping with mineral trioxide aggregate or a calcium hydroxi‑
dontal healing in reimplanted monkey incisors. Endod Dent de cement. Dent Traumatol 2001; 17:163‑166.
Traumatol 1990; 6:170‑176. 64. Diangelis AJ, Andreasen JO, Ebeleseder KA, et al.: Guidelines
43. Heide S, Mjor IA: Pulp reactions to experimental exposures for the Management of Traumatic Dental Injuries: 1. Fractu‑
in young permanent monkey teeth. Int Endod J 1983; 16: res and Luxations of Permanent Teeth. Pediatr Dent 2017;
11‑19. 39:401‑411.
44. Bimstein E, Rotstein I: Cvek pulpotomy – revisited. Dent 65. Marconyak LJ, Jr., Kirkpatrick TC, Roberts HW, et al.: A Com‑
Traumatol 2016; 32:438‑442. parison of Coronal Tooth Discoloration Elicited by Various
45. Katebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M: Strengthening imma‑ Endodontic Reparative Materials. J Endod 2016; 42:470‑473.
ture teeth during and after apexification. J Endod 1998; 66. Camilleri J: Staining Potential of Neo MTA Plus, MTA Plus,
24:256‑259. and Biodentine Used for Pulpotomy Procedures. J Endod
46. Kerekes K, Heide S, Jacobsen I: Follow‑up examination of en‑ 2015; 41:1139‑1145.
dodontic treatment in traumatized juvenile incisors. J Endod 67. Bhavya B, Sadique M, Simon EP, et al.: Spectrophotometric
1980; 6:744‑748. analysis of coronal discoloration induced by white mineral
47. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al.: Factors affecting trioxide aggregate and Biodentine: An in vitro study. J Con‑
the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990; serv Dent 2017; 20:237‑240.
16:498‑504. 68. Ravn JJ: Follow‑up study of permanent incisors with compli‑
48. Weiss M: Pulp capping in older patients. N Y State Dent J cated crown fractures after acute trauma. Scand J Dent Res
1966; 32:451‑457. 1982; 90:363‑372.
49. Masterton JB: The healing of wounds of the dental pulp. An 69. Fuks AB, Bielak S, Chosak A: Clinical and radiographic assess‑
investigation of the nature of the scar tissue and of the phe‑ ment of direct pulp capping and pulpotomy in young perma‑
nomena leading to its formation. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1966; nent teeth. Pediatr Dent 1982; 4:240‑244.
16:325‑339. 70. Wang G, Wang C, Qin M: Pulp prognosis following conserva‑
50. Cvek M, Cleaton‑Jones PE, Austin JC, et al.: Pulp reactions to tive pulp treatment in teeth with complicated crown fractu‑
exposure after experimental crown fractures or grinding in res‑A retrospective study. Dent Traumatol 2017; 33:255‑260.
adult monkeys. J Endod 1982; 8:391‑397. 71. Granath L‑E, Hagman G: Experimental pulpotomy in human
51. Tronstad L, Mjor IA: Capping of the inflamed pulp. Oral bicuspids with reference to cutting technique. Acta Odontol
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34:477‑485. Scand 1971; 29:155‑161.
118 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

72. Schröder U: Reaction of human dental pulp to experimen‑ 92. Hoshino E, Kurihara‑Ando N, Sato I, et al.: In‑vitro anti‑
tal pulpotomy and capping with calcium hydroxide. Odontol bacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root
Revy 1973; 24(Suppl):5‑22. dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and
73. Fuks AB, Cosack A, Klein H, et al.: Partial pulpotomy as a tre‑ minocycline. Int Endod J 1996; 29:125‑130.
atment alternative for exposed pulps in crown‑fractured per‑ 93. Sato I, Ando‑Kurihara N, Kota K, et al.: Sterilization of in‑
manent incisors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3:100‑102. fected root‑canal dentine by topical application of a mixtu‑
74. Gelbier MJ, Winter GB: Traumatised incisors treated by vi‑ re of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situ.
tal pulpotomy: a retrospective study. Br Dent J 1988; 164: Int Endod J 1996; 29:118‑124.
319‑323. 94. Akcay M, Arslan H, Yasa B, et al.: Spectrophotometric analy‑
75. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Turkenkopf S: Factors affecting succes‑ sis of crown discoloration induced by various antibiotic pas‑
sful repair after root canal therapy. J Am Dent Assoc 1963; tes used in revascularization. J Endod 2014; 40:845‑848.
67:651‑662. 95. Kim SG, Malek M, Sigurdsson A, et al.: Regenerative en‑
76. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, et al.: Factors affecting dodontics: a comprehensive review. Int Endod J 2018;
the long‑term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990; 51:1367‑1388.
16:498‑504. 96. Zachrisson BU, Jacobsen I: Long‑term prognosis of 66 per‑
77. Cvek M: Prognosis of luxated non‑vital maxillary incisors tre‑ manent anterior teeth with root fracture. Scand J Dent Res
ated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta‑percha. 1975; 83: 345‑354.
A retrospective clinical study. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 97. Andreasen FM: Pulpal healing after luxation injuries and
8:45‑55. root fracture in the permanent dentition. Endod Dent
78. Cvek M, Hollender L, Nord CE: Treatment of non‑vital per‑ Traumatol 1989; 5:111‑131.
manent incisors with calcium hydroxide. VI. A clinical, mi‑ 98. Andreasen FM, Andreasen JO: Resorption and mineraliza‑
crobiological and radiological evaluation of treatment in one tion processes following root fracture of permanent inci‑
sitting of teeth with mature or immature root. Odontol Revy sors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4:202‑214.
1976; 27:93‑108. 99. Andreasen FM, Andreasen JO, Bayer T: Prognosis of
79. Cvek M, Nord CE, Hollender L: Antimicrobial effect of root root‑fractured permanent incisors – prediction of healing
canal debridement in teeth with immature root. A clinical modalities. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989; 5:11‑22.
and microbiologic study. Odontol Revy 1976; 27:1‑10. 100. Diangelis AJ, Andreasen JO, Ebeleseder KA, et al.: Interna‑
80. Spångberg L, Rutberg M, Rydinge E: Biologic effects of endo‑ tional Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the
dontic antimicrobial agents. J Endod 1979; 5:166‑175. management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and
81. Heithersay GS: Calcium hydroxide in the treatment of pul‑ luxations of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28:2‑12.
pless teeth with associated pathology. J Brit Endod Soc 1975; 101. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Mejare I, et al.: Healing of
8:74‑92. 400 intra‑alveolar root fractures. 2. Effect of treatment factors
82. Lengheden A, Blomlof L, Lindskog S: Effect of delayed cal‑ such as treatment delay, repositioning, splinting type and pe‑
cium hydroxide treatment on periodontal healing in conta‑ riod and antibiotics. Dent Traumatol 2004; 20:203‑211.
minated replanted teeth. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:147‑153. 102. Rabie G, Barnett F, Tronstad L: Long‑term splinting of ma‑
83. Andreasen JO, Farik B, Munksgaard EC: Long‑term calcium xillary incisor with intra‑alveolar root fracture. Endod Dent
hydroxide as a root canal dressing may increase risk of root Traumatol 1988; 4:99‑103.
fracture. Dent Traumatol 2002; 18:134‑137. 103. Andreasen JO, Hjorting‑Hansen E: Intraalveolar root frac‑
84. Nicoloso GF, Potter IG, Rocha RO, et al.: A comparative eva‑ tures: radiographic and histologic study of 50 cases. J Oral
luation of endodontic treatments for immature necrotic per‑ Surg 1967; 25:414‑426.
manent teeth based on clinical and radiographic outcomes: a 104. Cvek M, Mejare I, Andreasen JO: Healing and prognosis of
systematic review and meta‑analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; teeth with intra‑alveolar fractures involving the cervical part
27:217‑227. of the root. Dent Traumatol 2002; 18:57‑65.
85. Binnie WH, Rowe AH: A histological study of the periapical 105. Zachrisson BU, Jacobsen I: Long‑term prognosis of 66 per‑
tissues of incompletely formed pulpless teeth filled with cal‑ manent anterior teeth with root fracture. Scand J Dent Res
cium hydroxide. J Dent Res 1973; 52:1110‑1116. 1975; 83:345‑354.
86. Cvek M: Treatment of non‑vital permanent incisors with cal‑ 106. Blanco L, Cohen S: Treatment of crown fractures with expo‑
cium hydroxide. IV. Periodontal healing and closure of the sed pulps. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002; 30:419‑425.
root canal in the coronal fragment of teeth with intra‑alveolar 107. Gound T, O’Neal RB, del Rio CE, et al.: Submergence of
fracture and vital apical fragment. A follow‑up. Odontol Revy roots for alveolar bone preservation. II. Reimplanted endo‑
1974; 25:239‑246. dontically treated roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
87. Skoglund A, Tronstad L: Pulpal changes in replanted and 1978; 46:114‑122.
autotransplanted immature teeth of dogs. J Endod 1981; 7: 108. Rodd HD, Davidson LE, Livesey S, et al.: Survival of inten‑
309‑316. tionally retained permanent incisor roots following crown
88. Barrett AP, Reade PC: Revascularization of mouse tooth iso‑ root fractures in children. Dent Traumatol 2002; 18:92‑97.
grafts and allografts using autoradiography and carbon‑per‑ 109. Jacobsen I, Kerekes K: Diagnosis and treatment of pulp ne‑
fusion. Arch Oral Biol 1981; 26:541‑545. crosis in permanent anterior teeth with root fracture. Scand
89. Love RM: Bacterial penetration of the root canal of intact J Dent Res 1980; 88:370‑376.
incisor teeth after a simulated traumatic injury. Endod Dent 110. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Mejare I, et al.: Healing of
Traumatol 1996; 12:289‑293. 400 intra‑alveolar root fractures. 1. Effect of pre‑injury and
90. Iwaya SI, Ikawa M, Kubota M: Revascularization of an im‑ injury factors such as sex, age, stage of root development,
mature permanent tooth with apical periodontitis and sinus fracture type, location of fracture and severity of disloca‑
tract. Dent Traumatol 2001; 17:185‑187. tion. Dent Traumatol 2004; 20:192‑202.
91. Banchs F, Trope M: Revascularization of immature perma‑ 111. Glendor U, Halling A, Andersson L, et al.: Incidence of trau‑
nent teeth with apical periodontitis: new treatment protocol? matic tooth injuries in children and adolescents in the coun‑
J Endod 2004; 30:196‑200. ty of Vastmanland, Sweden. Swed Dent J 1996; 20:15‑28.
Capítulo 23   |   Referências Bibliográficas 119

112. Lindskog S, Pierce AM, Blomlof L, et al.: The role of the ne‑ 131. Yanpiset K, Trope M: Pulp revascularization of replanted
crotic periodontal membrane in cementum resorption and immature dog teeth after different treatment methods. En‑
ankylosis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:96‑101. dod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:211‑217.
113. Hammarstrom L, Lindskog S: General morphological as‑ 132. Ritter AL, Ritter AV, Murrah V, et al.: Pulp revasculariza‑
pects of resorption of teeth and alveolar bone. Int Endod J tion of replanted immature dog teeth after treatment with
1985; 18:93‑108. minocycline and doxycycline assessed by laser Doppler flo‑
114. Tronstad L: Root resorption‑‑etiology, terminology and wmetry, radiography, and histology. Dent Traumatol 2004;
clinical manifestations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 20:75‑84.
4:241‑252. 133. Andreasen JO, Kristerson L: The effect of limited drying
115. Trope M: Root resorption due to dental trauma. Endod To‑ or removal of the periodontal ligament. Periodontal hea‑
pics 2002; 1:79‑100. ling after replantation of mature permanent incisors in
116. Andreasen FM, Zhijie Y, Thomsen BL, et al.: Occurrence of monkeys. Acta Odontol Scand 1981; 39: 1‑13.
pulp canal obliteration after luxation injuries in the perma‑ 134. Bjorvatn K, Selvig KA, Klinge B: Effect of tetracycline and
nent dentition. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3:103‑115. SnF2 on root resorption in replanted incisors in dogs.
117. Andreasen FM, Pedersen BV: Prognosis of luxated perma‑ Scand J Dent Res 1989; 97:477‑482.
nent teeth‑‑the development of pulp necrosis. Endod Dent 135. Malmgren B, Tsilingaridis G, Malmgren O: Long‑term
Traumatol 1985; 1:207‑220. follow up of 103 ankylosed permanent incisors surgically
118. Trope M, Moshonov J, Nissan R, et al.: Short vs. long‑term treated with decoronation – a retrospective cohort study.
calcium hydroxide treatment of established inflammatory Dent Traumatol 2015; 31:184‑189.
root resorption in replanted dog teeth. Endod Dent Trau‑ 136. Andersson L, Malmgren B: The problem of dentoalveolar
matol 1995; 11:124‑128. ankylosis and subsequent replacement resorption in the
119. Trope M, Yesilsoy C, Koren L, et al.: Effect of different en‑ growing patient. Aust Endod J 1999; 25:57‑61.
dodontic treatment protocols on periodontal repair and 137. Lin S, Ashkenazi M, Karawan M, et al.: Management of
root resorption of replanted dog teeth. J Endod 1992; 18: ankylotic root resorption following dental trauma: a short
492‑496. review and proposal of a treatment protocol. Oral Health
120. Kling M, Cvek M, Mejare I: Rate and predictability of pulp Prev Dent 2017; 15:467‑474.
revascularization in therapeutically reimplanted perma‑ 138. Sigurdsson A: Decoronation as an approach to treat ankylo‑
nent incisors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2:83‑89. sis in growing children. Pediatr Dent 2009; 31:123‑128.
121. Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Day P, et al.: International As‑ 139. Lin S, Schwarz‑Arad D, Ashkenazi M: Alveolar bone width
sociation of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the mana‑ preservation after decoronation of ankylosed anterior inci‑
gement of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of perma‑ sors. J Endod 2013; 39:1542‑1544.
nent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28:88‑96. 140. Trope M, Hupp JG, Mesaros SV: The role of the socket in
122. Andreasen JO: Effect of extra‑alveolar period and storage the periodontal healing of replanted dogs’ teeth stored
media upon periodontal and pulpal healing after replan‑ in ViaSpan for extended periods. Endod Dent Traumatol
tation of mature permanent incisors in monkeys. Int J Oral 1997; 13:171‑175.
Surg 1981; 10:43‑53. 141. Kristerson L, Andreasen JO: The effect of splinting upon
123. Soder PO, Otteskog P, Andreasen JO, et al.: Effect of drying periodontal and pulpal healing after autotransplantation of
on viability of periodontal membrane. Scand J Dent Res mature and immature permanent incisors in monkeys. Int J
1977; 85:164‑168. Oral Surg 1983; 12:239‑249.
124. Andreasen JO, Hjorting‑Hansen E: Replantation of teeth. 142. Trope M: Clinical management of the avulsed tooth: pre‑
I. Radiographic and clinical study of 110 human teeth re‑ sent strategies and future directions. Dent Traumatol 2002;
planted after accidental loss. Acta Odontol Scand 1966; 18:1‑11.
24:263‑286. 143. Sae‑Lim V, Wang CY, Choi GW, et al.: The effect of systemic
125. Hiltz J, Trope M: Vitality of human lip fibroblasts in milk, tetracycline on resorption of dried replanted dogs’ teeth.
Hanks balanced salt solution and Viaspan storage media. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; 14:127‑132.
Endod Dent Traumatol 1991; 7:69‑72. 144. Sae‑Lim V, Wang C‑Y, Trope M: Effect of systemic tetracycline
126. Hammarstrom L, Pierce A, Blomlof L, et al.: Tooth avulsion and amoxicillin. on inflammatory root resorption of replan‑
and replantation‑‑a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; ted dogs’ teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; 14:216‑220.
2:1‑8. 145. Andreasen JO: Luxation of permanent teeth due to trauma.
127. Blomlof L, Lindskog S, Andersson L, et al.: Storage of ex‑ A clinical and radiographic follow‑up study of 189 injured
perimentally avulsed teeth in milk prior to replantation. J teeth. Scand J Dent Res 1970; 78:273‑286.
Dent Res 1983; 62:912‑916. 146. Cvek M, Cleaton‑Jones P, Austin J, et al.: Pulp revasculariza‑
128. Blomlof L: Milk and saliva as possible storage media for tion in reimplanted immature monkey incisors – predicta‑
traumatically exarticulated teeth prior to replantation. bility and the effect of antibiotic systemic prophylaxis. En‑
Swed Dent J Suppl 1981; 8:1‑26. dod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6:157‑169.
129. Blomlof L, Lindskog S, Hammarstrom L: Periodontal hea‑ 147. Öhman A: Healing and sensitivity to pain in young replan‑
ling of exarticulated monkey teeth stored in milk or saliva. ted human teeth. An expermimental, clinical and histologi‑
Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:251‑259. cal study. Odontol Tidskr 1965; 73:168‑227.
130. Trope M, Friedman S: Periodontal healing of replanted dog 148. Ray HA, Trope M: Periapical status of endodontically treated
teeth stored in Viaspan, milk and Hank’s balanced salt solu‑ teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling
tion. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:183‑188. and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28:12‑18.
Ca p ít u l o

24 Reabsorções Dentárias
Hélio P. Lopes | Isabela N. Rôças | José F. Siqueira Jr.

21. Andreasen JO: Relationship between surface and inflamma‑


Referências Bibliográficas tory resorption and changes in the pulp after replantation of
permanent incisors in monkeys. J Endod 1981; 7:294‑301.
1. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM: Pathways of the pulp. 9a ed. St. 22. Mjor IA, Heyeraas KJ: Pulp‑dentin and periodontal anatomy
Louis, Missouri: Mosby, 2007. and physiology. In Essential endodontology. D Ørstavik, T
2. Lopes HP, Siqueira Jr JF: Endodontia: biologia e técnica. 2a Pitt Ford, editors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008;
ed. Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara Koogan, 2004. p. 10‑43.
3. Simon JH: Reabsorção de dentes. In De Deus QD: Endodon‑ 23. Bosshardt DD, Selvig KA: Dental cementum: the dynamic tis‑
tia. 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI, 1992:139‑154. sue covering of the root. Periodontol 2000 1997; 13:41‑75.
4. Soares IJ, Goldberg F: Endodontia: técnica e fundamentos. 24. Katagiri T, Takahashi N: Regulatory mechanisms of osteo‑
Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2001. blast and osteoclast diferentiation. Oral Dis 2002; 8:147‑159.
5. Trope M, Chivian N: Root resorption. In Cohen S, Burns CR. 25. Siqueira JF, Jr, Saboia Dantas CJ: Mecanismos celulares e mo‑
Pathways of the pulp. 6a ed. St. Louis. Missouri: Mosby, 1994; leculares da inflamação Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI, 2000.
p. 486‑512. 26. Asagiri M, Takayanagi H. The molecular understanding of os‑
6. Andreasen JO: Lesiones traumaticas de los dientes. 3a ed. teoclast differentiation. Bone 2007; 40:251‑264.
Barcelona: Labor, 1984. 27. Bruzzaniti A, Baron R: Molecular regulation of osteoclast ac‑
7. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM: Root Resorption following tivity. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2006; 7:123‑139.
traumatic dental injuries. Precedings of the Finish Dental So‑ 28. Hofbauer LC, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, et al.: Interleukin‑1be‑
ciety, Helsinki, 1992; Supplement I: 88:95‑114. ta and tumor necrosis factor‑alpha, but not interleukin‑6, sti‑
8. Andreasen JO: Eiology pathogenesis of traumatic dental inju‑ mulate osteoprotegerin ligand gene expression in human os‑
ries. Scand J Dent Res 1970; 78:329‑342. teoblastic cells. Bone 1999; 25:255‑259.
9. Melo LL: Traumatismo Alvéolo‑Dentário. São Paulo: Artes 29. Kimble RB, Matayoshi AB, Vannice JL, et al.: Simultaneous
Médicas, 1998. block of interleukin‑1 and tumor necrosis factor is required
10. Trope M, Blanco L, Chivian N, et al.: O papel da endodontia to completely prevent bone loss in the early postovariectomy
após o traumatismo dentário. In Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. period. Endocrinology 1995; 136:3054‑3061.
Caminhos da Polpa. 9a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Mosby – Elsevier, 30. Kimble RB, Srivastava S, Ross FP, et al.: Estrogen deficiency
2007; p. 610‑649. increases the ability of stromal cells to support murine os‑
11. Bakland LK: Trauma dental. In De Deus QD. Endodontia. 5a teoclastogenesis via an interleukin‑1 and tumor necrosis fac‑
ed. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI, 1992; p. 577‑613. tor‑mediated stimulation of macrophage colony‑stimulating
12. Bergenholtz G: Micro‑organisms from necrotic pulp of trau‑ factor production. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:28890‑28897.
matized teeth. Odont Rev 1974; 25:347‑358. 31. Suda T, Takahashi N, Martin TJ: Modulation of osteoclast di‑
13. Tronstad L: Root resorption etiology, terminology and clini‑ fferentiation. Endocr Rev 1992; 13:66‑80.
cal manifestations. Endodontics Dental Traumatology 1988; 32. Suda T, Udagawa N, Nakamura I, et al.: Modulation of osteo‑
4(6):241‑252. clast differentiation by local factors. Bone 1995; 17:87S‑91S.
14. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM: Textbook and color atlas of 33. Boyce BF, Xing L: Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprote‑
traumatic injuries to the teeth. Copenhagem, Denmark: gerin. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9 Suppl 1:S1.
Munksgaard, 1994. 34. Teitelbaum ST: Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 2000;
15. Frank AL, Simon JH, Abou‑Rass M, et al.: Endodoncia clinica 289: 1504‑1508.
y quirurgica. Fundamentos de la pratica odontologica. 1a ed. 35. Teitelbaum SL: Osteoclasts; culprits in inflammatory osteoly‑
Barcelona: Labor, 1986. sis. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8:201.
16. Gunraj MN: Dental root resorption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 36. Takayanagi H: Mechanistic insight into osteoclast differentia‑
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88:647‑653. tion in osteoimmunology. J Mol Med 2005a; 83:170‑179.
17. Li Z, Kong K, Qi W: Osteoclast and its roles in calcium me‑ 37. Takayanagi H: Inflammatory bone destruction and osteoim‑
tabolism and bone development and remodeling. Biochem munology. J Periodontal Res 2005b; 40:287‑293.
Biophys Res Commun 2006; 343:345‑350. 38. Gillespie MT: Impact of cytokines and T lymphocytes upon
18. Teitelbaum SL: Osteoclasts; culprits in inflammatory osteoly‑ osteoclast differentiation and function. Arthritis Res Ther
sis. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8:201. 2007; 9:103.
19. Hammarström L, Lindskog S: General morphologic aspects 39. Nguyen L, Dewhirst FE, Hauschka PV, et al.: Interleukin‑1
of resorption of teeth and alveolar bone. lnt Endod J 1985; beta stimulates bone resorption and inhibits bone formation
18:93‑108. in vivo. Lymphokine Cytokine Res 1991; 10:15‑21.
20. Owens PDA: The root surface in human teeth: a microradio‑ 40. Stashenko P, Obernesser MS, Dewhirst FE: Effect of immune
graphic study. J Anat 1976; 122:389‑401. cytokines on bone. Immunol Invest 1989; 18:239‑249.
Capítulo 24   |   Referências Bibliográficas 121

41. Roodman GD: Cell biology of the osteoclast. Exp Hematol 63. Siqueira Jr JF: Avaliação da invasão bacteriana de túbulos
1999; 27:1229‑1241. dentinários e da atividade antibacteriana de medicamentos
42. Azuma Y, Kaji K, Katogi R, et al.: Tumor necrosis factor‑alpha intracanais. Rio de janeiro, 1996, p. 103. Tese de Mestrado
induces differentiation of and bone resorption by osteoclasts. Faculdade de Odontologia da UFRJ.
J Biol Chem 2000; 275:4858‑4864. 64. Siqueira Jr JF, Lopes HP, Uzeda M: Atividade antibacteriana
43. Kobayashi K, Takahashi N, Jimi E, et al.: Tumor necrosis fac‑ de medicamentos endodônticos sobre bactérias anaeróbias
tor alpha stimulates osteoclast differentiation by a mecha‑ estritas. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 1996; 50:326‑332.
nism independent of the ODF/RANKL‑RANK interaction. J 65. Siqueira Jr JF, Lopes HP, Uzeda M: Recontamination of co‑
Exp Med 2000; 191:275‑286. ronally unsaled root canals medicated with camphorated pa‑
44. Jimi E, Nakamura I, Duong LT e al.: Interleukin 1 induces ramonochlorophenol or calcium hydroxide paste after saliva
multinucleation and bone‑resorbing activity of osteoclasts in challenge. J Endod 1998; 24:11‑14.
the absence of osteoblasts/stromal cells. Exp Cell Res 1999; 66. Webber RT: Traumatic injuries and the expanded endodon‑
247:84‑93. tic role of calcium hydroxide. In Gertein H: Techniques in
45. Hoshino K, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, et al.: Cutting edge: Toll‑li‑ clinical endodontics. EUA: WB Saunders Co., 1983:172‑258.
ke receptor 4 (TLR4)‑deficient mice are hyporesponsive to 67. Holland R, Souza V, Nery MJ, et al.: Root canal treatment
lipopolysaccharide: evidence for TLR4 as the Lps gene pro‑ with calcium hydroxide effect of an oily of water‑soluble vehi‑
duct. J Immunol 1999; 162:3749‑3752. cle. Rev Odont UNESP 1983; 12:1‑6.
46. Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, et al.: Defective LPS signaling 68. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin
in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 N Amer 1967; 11(4):723‑744.
gene. Science 1998; 282:2085‑2088. 69. Lopes HP, Costa Filho AS, Jones Junior J: O emprego de hi‑
47. Qureshi ST, Lariviere L, Leveque G, et al.: Endotoxin‑tole‑ dróxido de cálcio associado ao azeite de oliva. RGO 1986;
rant mice have mutations in Toll‑like receptor 4 (Tlr4). J Exp 34(4):306‑13.
Med 1999; 189:615‑625. 70. Frank AL: External‑internal progressive resorption and non‑
48. Greenfield EM, Bi Y, Miyauchi A: Regulation of osteoclast ac‑ surgical correction. J Endod 1981; 7 (l0):472‑476.
tivity. Life Sci 1999; 65:1087‑1102. 71. Heithersay GS: Invasive cervical resorption. Endodontic To‑
49. Mundy GR: The effects of TGF‑beta on bone. Ciba Found pics 2004; 7:73‑92.
Symp 1991; 157:137‑143; discussion 143‑151. 72. Lopes HP, Costa Filho AS, Galan Junior J, et al.: Reabsorção
50. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, et al.: Osteoprotegerin ligand is dentária extracanal invasiva. RBO set/out 1993; 50(5):22‑27.
a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activa‑ 73. Southam JC: Clinical and histological aspects of peripheral
tion. Cell 1998; 93:165‑176. cervical resorption. J Period 1967; 38:534‑8, apud Frank AL,
51. Consolaro A: Reabsorções dentárias. 2a ed. Maringá: Dental Bakland LK: Nonendodontic therapy for supraosseous extra‑
Press, 2002. canal invasive resorption. J Endod 1987; 13(7):348‑355.
52. Andreasen JO: External root resorption: its implication in 74. Beck BW, Harris EF: Apical root resorption in orthodonti‑
dental traumatology paedodontics, periodontics, orthodon‑ cally treated subjects: Analysis of edgewise and light wire me‑
tics and endodontics. Int Endod J 1985; 18:109‑118. chanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105:350‑361.
53. Andreasen JO, Kristersson L: The effect of limited drying or 75. Madison S, Walter R: Cervical root resorption following
removal of the periodontal ligament: periodontal healing af‑ bleaching of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1990;
ter replantation of mature permanent incisors in monkeys. 16:570‑574.
Acta Odontol Scand 1981; 39:285‑289. 76. Gimlin DR, Schindler WG: The management of postblea‑
54. Henry JL, Weinmann JP: The pattern of resorption and re‑ ching cervical resorption. J Endod 1990; 16(6):292‑297.
pair of human cementum. J Amer Dent Ass 1951; 42:270‑290. 77. Goon W, Cohen S, Borer RF: External cervical root resorp‑
55. Bhaskar S: Patologia bucal. 4a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Artes Médi‑ tion following bleaching. J Endod 1986; 12(9):414‑417.
cas, 1976. 78. Harrington GH, Natkin E: External resorption associated
56. Hovland EJ, Dumsha TC: Problems in the management of too‑ with bleaching of pulpless teeth. J Endod 1979; 5:344‑348.
th resorption. In Gutmann JL, et al.: Problem Solving in En‑ 79. Lado EA, Stanley HR, Weisman MI: Cervical resorption in
dodontics. 1a ed. EUA: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1988; p. bleached teeth. Oral Surg 1983; 55(1):78‑80.
38‑155. 80. Montgomery S: External cervical resorption after bleaching a
57. Mattison GD, Delivanis HP, Delivanis PD: Orthodontic root pulpless tooth. Oral Surg 1984; 47(2):203‑206.
resorption of vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 81. Cohen S: lnternal tooth resorption. J Dent Child 1965;
1984; 10:354‑358. 32(1):49‑52.
58. Mirabella AD, Artun J: Risk factors for apical root resorption 82. Valera MA, Busquim SSK, Tamanaha AC, et al.: Tratamento
of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am endodôntico de dentes com reabsorção interna. Jornal Brasi‑
J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108:48‑55. leiro de Endo/Perio 2000; 1(2):25‑29.
59. Spurrier SW, Hall SH, Joondeph DR, et al.: A comparison of 83. Wedenberg G, Zetterqvist L: Internal resorption in human te‑
apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment in endo‑ eth. A histologycal, scanning electron microscopic, and enzi‑
donticaly treated and vital teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Or‑ me histochemical study. J Endod 1987; 13(6):255‑259.
thop 1990; 97:130‑134. 84. Wang Z: Bioceramic materials in endodontics. Endod Topics
60. Ferlini Filho J: Estudo radiográfico e microscópico das rea‑ 2015; 32:3‑30.
bsorções radiculares na presença de periodontites apicais 85. Camilleri J: Mineral trioxide aggregate: present and future
crônicas (microscopia óptica e eletrônica de varredura). São developments. Endod Topics 2015; 32:31‑46.
Paulo, 1999. 186. Tese de Doutorado – Faculdade de Odon‑ 86. Shen Y, Peng B, Yang Y, Ma J, Haapsalo M: What do diferen‑
tologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru. te tests tell about the mechanical and biological properties of
61. Lauz M, Aboot PV, Pajarola G, et al.: Apical inflammatory bioceramic materials? Endod Topics 2015; 32:47‑85.
root resorption a correlative radiographic and histologycal 87. Trope M, Bunes A, Debellian G: Root filling materials and tech‑
assessment. Int Endod J 2000; 33:483‑493. niques: bioceramics a new hope? Endod Topics 2015; 32:86‑96.
62. Hasselgren G, Olsson B, Cvek M: Effects of calcium hydro‑ 88. Haapsalo M, Parhar M, Huang X, Wei X, Lin J, Shen Y: Cli‑
xide and sodium hypoclorite on the dissolution of necrotic nical use of bioceramic materials. Endod Topics 2015; 32:
porcine muscle tissue. J Endod 1988; 14 (3):125‑127. 97‑117.
Ca p ít u l o

25 Tratamento Endodôntico de Dentes


com Rizogênese Incompleta
Hélio P. Lopes | José F. Siqueira Jr. | Mônica A. S. Neves | Juan A. Pacheco‑Yanes

15. Torabinejad M, Chivian N: Clinical applications of mineral


Referências Bibliográficas trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25(3):197‑205.
16. Holland R, Souza V, Tagliavini RL, Milanezi LA: Healing pro‑
1. Shabahang S: 2013. Treatment options: apexogenesis and cess of the teeth with open apices: histological study. Bull
apexification. J Endod 2013; 39(3 Suppl):S26‑29. Tokyo Dent Coll 1971; 12(4):333‑338.
2. Leonardo MR: Endodontia: tratamento de canais radicula‑ 17. Holland R: Healing process after root‑canal therapy in imma‑
res. 3a ed. São Paulo: Panamericana, 1998. ture human teeth. Fac Odont Araçatuba 1973; 2(2):269‑272.
3. Trope M: Treatment of the immature tooth with a non‑vi‑ 18. Holland R, Mello W, Nery MJ, Bernabë PFE, Souza V: Reac‑
tal pulp and apical periodontitis. Dent Clin North Am 2010; tion of human perirradicular tissue to pulp extirpation and
54(2):313‑324. immediate root‑canal filling with calcium hydroxide. J Endod
4. Venumbaka NR, Baskaran P, Mungara J, Chenchugopal M, 1977; 3(2):63‑67.
Elangovan A, Vijayakumar P: Comparative evaluation of en‑ 19. Rafter M: Apexification: a review. Dent Traumatol 2005;
dovac and conventional irrigating syringe on apical extrusion 21(1):1‑8.
in primary molars. An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018; 20. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR: Physi‑
42(5):355‑360. cal and chemical properties of a new root‑end filling mate‑
5. Huiz Peeters H, Suardita K, Mooduto L, Gutknecht N: Ex‑ rial. J Endod 1995; 21(7):349‑353.
trusion of irrigant in open apex teeth with periapical lesions 21. Bernabé PFE, Holland R: MTA e cimento Portland: con­
following laser‑activated irrigation and passive ultrasonic irri‑ siderações sobre as propriedades físicas, químicas e biológicas.
gation. Iran Endod J 2018; 13(2):169‑175. In Odontologia: arte e conhecimento. RJA Cardoso, MEL Ma‑
6. Çapar ID, Aydinbelge HA: Effectiveness of various irriga‑ chado, editores. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 2003.
tion activation protocols and the self‑adjusting file system 22. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M: Mineral trioxide aggregate: a
on smear layer and debris removal. Scanning 2014; 36(6): comprehensive literature review – part II: leakage and bio‑
640‑647. compatibility investigations. J Endod 2010; 36(2):190‑202.
7. Holland R, Souza V, Mello W, Nery MJ, Bernabé PFE, Otobo‑ 23. da Rosa WLO, Piva E, da Silva AF: Disclosing the physiolo‑
ni Filho JA: Manual de endodontia. São Paulo: Faculdade de gy of pulp tissue for vital pulp therapy. Int Endod J 2018;
Odontologia de Araçatuba – UNESP, 1978/1979. 51(8):829‑846.
8. Heithersay GS: Stimulation of root formation in incomplete‑ 24. Banchs F, Trope M: Revascularization of immature perma‑
ly developed pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol nent teeth with apical periodontitis: new treatment protocol?
1970; 29(4):620‑630. J Endod 2004; 30(4):196‑200.
9. Koenigs JF, Heller AL, Brilliant JD, Melfi RC, Driskell TD: In‑ 25. Ingle J, Bakland LK: Endodontics. 4th ed. Philadelphia:
duced apical closure of permanent teeth in adult primates Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
using a resorbable form of tricalcium phosphate ceramic. J 26. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St.
Endod 1975; 1(3):102‑106. Louis: Mosby, 2006.
10. Lopes HP, Costa Fo AS: Tratamento de dentes com rizogênese 27. Esberard RM: Rizogênese incompleta. Princípios, técnicas e
incompleta e necrose pulpar. Rev Bras Odont 1984; 41(2): formas de reparação (apostila). Araraquara, São Paulo, 1993.
2‑12. 28. Soares I: Tratamento de dentes com rizogênese incompleta.
11. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM: Textbook and color atlas of Rev ABO‑Nac 1996; 4(1):26‑31.
traumatic injuries to teeth. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munks‑ 29. Osborn JW, TenCate AR: Histologia dental avançada. 4a ed.
gaard, 1994. São Paulo: Quintessence, 1988.
12. Vidal K, Martin G, Lozano O, Salas M, Trigueros J, Aguilar 30. Rutherford RB: The time‑course of the induction of reparati‑
G: Apical closure in apexification: a review and case report ve dentine formation in monkeys by recombinant human os‑
of apexification treatment of an immature permanent tooth teogenic protein‑1. Arch Oral Biol 1994; 39:833‑838.
with biodentine. J Endod 2016; 42(5):730‑734. 31. Holland R, de Souza V, Murata SS, Nery MJ, Bernabe PF, Otobo‑
13. Tsukiboshi M, Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Mandibular pre‑ ni Filho JA, Dezan Junior E: Healing process of dog dental pulp
molars with immature roots and apical periodontitis lesions after pulpotomy and pulp covering with mineral trioxide aggre‑
treated with pulpotomy: report of 3 cases. J Endod 2017; gate or Portland cement. Braz Dent J 2001; 12(2):109‑113.
43(9S):S65‑S74. 32. Chacko V, Kurikose S: Human pulpal response to mineral
14. Frank AL: Therapy for the divergent pulpless tooth by conti‑ trioxide aggregate (MTA): a histologic study. J Clin Pediatr
nued apical formation. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 72(1):87‑93. Dent 2006; 30(3):203‑209.
Capítulo 25   |   Referências Bibliográficas 123

33. El‑Meligy OA, Avery DR: Comparison of mineral trioxide 55. Chueh LH, Huang GT: Immature teeth with periradicular
aggregate and calcium hydroxide as pulpotomy agents in periodontitis or abscess undergoing apexogenesis: a para‑
young permanent teeth (apexogenesis). Pediatr Dent 2006; digm shift. J Endod 2006; 32(12):1205‑1213.
28(5):399‑404. 56. Thibodeau B, Teixeira F, Yamauchi M, Caplan DJ, Trope M:
34. Zeldow LL: Endodontic treatment of vital and non vital im‑ Pulp revascularization of immature dog teeth with apical pe‑
mature teeth. New York Dent 1967; 33:327‑335. riodontitis. J Endod 2007; 33(6):680‑689.
35. Vono RMG: Reparação apical e perirradicular pós‑tratamento 57. Cotti E, Mereu M, Lusso D: Regenerative treatment of an im‑
endodôntico dos dentes com rizogênese incompleta. RBO mature, traumatized tooth with apical periodontitis: report
1976; 33(5). of a case. J Endod 2008; 34(5):611‑616.
36. Andreasen FM: Replantation of 400 avulsed permanent inci‑ 58. Shah N, Logani A, Bhaskar U, Aggarwal V: Efficacy of revas‑
sors. 2. Factors related to pulpal healing. Endod Dent Trau‑ cularization to induce apexification/apexogensis in infected,
matol 1995; 1:59‑68. nonvital, immature teeth: a pilot clinical study. J Endod 2008;
37. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Endodontology: An integrated biolo‑ 34(8):919‑925; Discussion 1157.
gical and clinical view. London: Quintessence Publishing, 2013. 59. Kim JH, Kim Y, Shin SJ, Park JW, Jung IY: Tooth discoloration
38. Holland R: Ação do hidróxido de cálcio em contato com o te‑ of immature permanent incisor associated with triple antibio‑
cido conjuntivo. RBO 1981; 29(1):33‑36. tic therapy: a case report. J Endod 2010; 36(6):1086‑1091.
39. Lopes HP, Siqueira JF, Jr.: Endodontia: Biologia e técnica. Rio 60. Shivashankar VY, Johns DA, Vidyanath S, Kumar MR: Plate‑
de Janeiro: Medsi, 1999. let rich fibrin in the revitalization of tooth with necrotic pulp
40. Stanley HR: Pulp capping: conserving the dental pulp – can it and open apex. J Conserv Dent 2012; 15:395‑398.
be done? Is it worth it? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 61. Soares AJ, Lins FF, Nagata JY, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC,
68(5):628‑639. de Almeida JF, de Souza‑Filho FJ: Pulp revascularization after
41. Lopes HP: O emprego de hidróxido de cálcio associado a root canal decontamination with calcium hydroxide and 2%
veículo oleoso no tratamento endodôntico de dentes com ne‑ chlorhexidine gel. J Endod 2013; 39(3):417‑420.
crose pulpar aberto. Estudo in vivo. (Livre Docência). Rio de 62. Yang J, Zhao Y, Qin M, Ge L: Pulp revascularization of imma‑
Janeiro, UERJ, 1987:77. ture dens invaginatus with periapical periodontitis. J Endod
42. Felippe MC, Felippe WT, Marques MM, Antoniazzi JH: The 2013; 39(2):288‑292.
effect of the renewal of calcium hydroxide paste on the apexi‑ 63. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S: Caminhos da Polpa. 10a ed. Rio de
fication and periapical healing of teeth with incomplete root Janeiro: Elsevier, 2011.
formation. Int Endod J 2005; 38(7):436‑442. 64. Davis MS: Periapical and intracanal healing following incom‑
43. Holland R, Souza V, Nery MJ, Mello W, Bernabé PFE: Root‑ca‑ plete root canal fillings in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa‑
nal treatment with calcium hydroxide effect of an oily or a
thol 1971; 31:662‑675.
water soluble vehicle. Rev Odont UNESP (São Paulo) 1983;
65. Nevins A, Wrobel W, Valachovic R, Finkelstein F: Hard tissue
12(1‑2):1‑6.
induction into pulpless open‑apex teeth using collagen‑cal‑
44. Tittle K: Apical closure induction using bone growth fac‑
cium phosphate gel. J Endod 1977; 3(11):431‑433.
tors and mineral trioxide aggregate. 1996; J Endod. 22:198.
66. Nevins A, Finkelstein F, Laporta R, Borden BG: Induction of
[(Abstract # OR141).].
hard tissue into pulpless open‑apex teeth using collagen‑cal‑
45. Sluyk SR, Moon PC, Hartwell GR: Evaluation of setting pro‑
cium phosphate gel. J Endod 1978; 4(3):76‑81.
perties and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide ag‑
67. Martin G, Ricucci D, Gibbs JL, Lin LM: Histological findin‑
gregate when used as a furcation perforation repair material.
gs of revascularized/revitalized immature permanent molar
J Endod 1998; 24(11):768‑771.
with apical periodontitis using platelet‑rich plasma. J Endod
46. Andreasen JO, Munksgaard EC, Bakland LK: Comparison of
2013; 39(1):138‑144.
fracture resistance in root canals of immature sheep teeth af‑
68. Becerra P, Ricucci D, Loghin S, Gibbs JL, Lin LM: Histologic
ter feeling with calcium hydroxide or MTA. Dental Trauma‑
tol 2006; 22:154‑156. study of a human immature permanent premolar with chro‑
47. Andreasen JO, Farik B, Munksgaard EC: Long‑term calcium nic apical abscess after revascularization/revitalization. J En‑
hydroxide as a root canal dressing may increase risk of root dod 2014; 40(1):133‑139.
fracture. Dent Traumatol 2002; 18(3):134‑137. 69. Lovelace TW, Henry MA, Hargreaves KM, Diogenes A: Evalua‑
48. Simon S, Rilliard F, Berdal A, Machtou P: The use of mine‑ tion of the delivery of mesenchymal stem cells into the root
ral trioxide aggregate in one‑visit apexification treatment: a canal space of necrotic immature teeth after clinical regene‑
prospective study. Int Endod J 2007; 40(3):186‑197. rative endodontic procedure. J Endod 2011; 37(2):133‑138.
49. Lopes HP, Estrela C, Elias CN: Comparative study of the hard 70. Diogenes A, Henry MA, Teixeira FB, Hargreaves KM: An
tissue bridge after pulpotomy with calcium hydroxide asso‑ update on clinical regenerative endodontics. Endod Topics
ciated of various vehicles. Braz Endod J 1996; 1:43‑46. 2013; 28:2‑23.
50. Iwaya SI, Ikawa M, Kubota M: Revascularization of an im‑ 71. Ring KC, Murray PE, Namerow KN, Kuttler S, Garcia‑Godoy F:
mature permanent tooth with apical periodontitis and sinus The comparison of the effect of endodontic irrigation on cell
tract. Dent Traumatol 2001; 17(4):185‑187. adherence to root canal dentin. J Endod 2008; 34(12):1474‑1479.
51. Kim SG, Malek M, Sigurdsson A, Lin LM, Kahler B: Rege‑ 72. Egusa H, Sonoyama W, Nishimura M, Atsuta I, Akiyama K:
nerative endodontics: a comprehensive review. Int Endod J Stem cells in dentistry‑part I: stem cell sources. J Prosthodont
2018. Res 2012; 56:151‑165.
52. Murray PE, Garcia‑Godoy F, Hargreaves KM: Regenerative 73. Martin DE, De Almeida JF, Henry MA, Khaing ZZ, Schmi‑
endodontics: a review of current status and a call for action. J dt CE, Teixeira FB, Diogenes A: Concentration‑dependent
Endod 2007; 33(4):377‑390. effect of sodium hypochlorite on stem cells of apical papilla
53. Adnan S, Ullah R: Top‑cited Articles in Regenerative endo‑ survival and differentiation. J Endod 2014; 40(1):51‑55.
dontics: a bibliometric analysis. J Endod 2018. 74. Trevino EG, Patwardhan AN, Henry MA, Perry G, Dyb‑
54. Ball JS: Apical root formation in a non vital immature perma‑ dal‑Hargreaves N, Hargreaves KM, Diogenes A: Effect of irri‑
nent incisor: report of a case. Brit Dent J 1964; 116:166‑167. gants on the survival of human stem cells of the apical papilla
124 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

in a platelet‑rich plasma scaffold in human root tips. J Endod 92. Khademi AA, Dianat O, Mahjour F, Razavi SM, Younessian
2011; 37(8):1109‑1115. F: Outcomes of revascularization treatment in immature
75. American Association of Endodontists (AAE): Clinical consi‑ dog’s teeth. Dent Traumatol 2014; 30(5):374‑379.
derations for regenerative procedures. American Association 93. Jeeruphan T, Jantarat J, Yanpiset K, Suwannapan L, Khew‑
of Endodontists, 2018. sawai P, Hargreaves KM: Mahidol study 1: comparison of ra‑
76. Galler KM, Krastl G, Simon S, Van Gorp G, Meschi N, Vahedi diographic and survival outcomes of immature teeth treated
B, Lambrechts P: European Society of Endodontology posi‑ with either regenerative endodontic or apexification metho‑
tion statement: Revitalization procedures. Int Endod J 2016; ds: a retrospective study. J Endod 2012; 38(10):1330‑1336.
49(8):717‑723. 94. Bukhari S, Kohli MR, Setzer F, Karabucak B: Outcome of re‑
77. Geisler TM: Clinical considerations for regenerative en‑ vascularization procedure: a retrospective case series. J En‑
dodontic procedures. Dent Clin North Am 2012; 56(3): dod 2016; 42(12):1752‑1759.
603‑626. 95. Kim KW, Yassen GH, Ehrlich Y, Spolnik K, Platt JA, Windsor
78. Yamauchi N, Yamauchi S, Nagaoka H, Duggan D, Zhong S, LJ: The effects of radicular dentine treated with double an‑
Lee SM, Teixeira FB, Yamauchi M: Tissue engineering stra‑ tibiotic paste and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the at‑
tegies for immature teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod tachment and proliferation of dental pulp stem cells. Dent
2011;37(3):390‑397. Traumatol 2015; 31(5):374‑379.
79. Galler KM, Widbiller M, Buchalla W, Eidt A, Hiller KA, Ho‑ 96. Nazzal H, Kenny K, Altimimi A, Kang J, Duggal MS: A pros‑
ffer PC, Schmalz G: EDTA conditioning of dentine promotes pective clinical study of regenerative endodontic treat‑
adhesion, migration and differentiation of dental pulp stem ment of traumatized immature teeth with necrotic pulps
cells. Int Endod J 2015. using bi‑antibiotic paste. Int Endod J 2018; 51 Suppl 3:
80. Galler KM, D’Souza RN, Federlin M, Cavender AC, Hartge‑ e204‑e215.
rink JD, Hecker S, Schmalz G: Dentin conditioning codeter‑ 97. Hoshino E, Kurihara‑Ando N, Sato I, Uematsu H, Sato M,
mines cell fate in regenerative endodontics. J Endod 2011; Kota K, Iwaku M: In‑vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bac‑
37(11):1536‑1541. teria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ci‑
81. Lenzi R, Trope M: Revitalization procedures in two trauma‑ profloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. Int Endod J
tized incisors with different biological outcomes. J Endod 1996; 29(2):125‑130.
2012; 38(3):411‑414. 98. Segura‑Egea JJ, Gould K, Sen BH, Jonasson P, Cotti E, Ma‑
82. Cehreli ZC, Isbitiren B, Sara S, Erbas G: Regenerative endo‑ zzoni A, Sunay H, Tjaderhane L, Dummer PMH: Antibio­
dontic treatment (revascularization) of immature necrotic tics in endodontics: a review. Int Endod J 2017; 50(12):
molars medicated with calcium hydroxide: a case series. J En‑ 1169‑1184.
dod 2011; 37(9):1327‑1330. 99. Arruda MEF, Neves MAS, Diogenes A, Mdala I, Guilherme
83. Nosrat A, Seifi A, Asgary S: Regenerative endodontic treat‑ BPS, Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN: Infection control in teeth
ment (revascularization) for necrotic immature permanent with apical periodontitis using a triple antibiotic solution or
molars: a review and report of two cases with a new biomate‑ calcium hydroxide with chlorhexidine: a randomized clini‑
rial. J Endod 2011; 37(4):562‑567. cal trial. J Endod 2018; 44(10):1474‑1479.
84. Garcia‑Godoy F, Murray PE: Recommendations for using re‑ 100. Lenherr P, Allgayer N, Weiger R, Filippi A, Attin T, Krastl G:
generative endodontic procedures in permanent immature Tooth discoloration induced by endodontic materials: a la‑
traumatized teeth. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28:33‑41. boratory study. Int Endod J 2012; 45(10):942‑949.
85. Kling M, Cvek M, Mejare I: Rate and predictability of pulp re‑ 101. Kirchhoff AL, Raldi DP, Salles AC, Cunha RS, Mello I: Too‑
vascularization in therapeutically reimplanted permanent in‑ th discolouration and internal bleaching after the use of tri‑
cisors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2:83‑89. ple antibiotic paste. Int Endod J 2015; 48(12):1181‑1187.
86. Tong HJ, Rajan S, Bhujel N, Kang J, Duggal M, Nazzal H: 102. Kahler B, Rossi‑Fedele G: A Review of Tooth Discoloration
Regenerative endodontic therapy in the management of after Regenerative Endodontic Therapy. J Endod 2016;
nonvital immature permanent teeth: a systematic review‑ou‑ 42(4):563‑569.
tcome evaluation and meta‑analysis. J Endod 2017; 43(9): 103. Ruparel NB, Teixeira FB, Ferraz CC, Diogenes A: Direct
1453‑1464. effect of intracanal medicaments on survival of stem cells of
87. Torabinejad M, Nosrat A, Verma P, Udochukwu O: Regene‑ the apical papilla. J Endod 2012; 38(10):1372‑1375.
rative endodontic treatment or mineral trioxide aggregate 104. Althumairy RI, Teixeira FB, Diogenes A: Effect of dentin
apical plug in teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices: a conditioning with intracanal medicaments on survival of
systematic review and meta‑analysis. J Endod 2017; 43(11): stem cells of apical papilla. J Endod 2014; 40(4):521‑525.
1806‑1820. 105. Berkhoff JA, Chen PB, Teixeira FB, Diogenes A: Evaluation
88. Linsuwanont P, Sinpitaksakul P, Lertsakchai T: Evaluation of triple antibiotic paste removal by different irrigation pro‑
of root maturation after revitalization in immature perma‑ cedures. J Endod 2014; 40(8):1172‑1177.
nent teeth with nonvital pulps by cone beam computed to‑ 106. Yilmaz S, Dumani A, Yoldas O: The effect of antibiotic pas‑
mography and conventional radiographs. Int Endod J 2017; tes on microhardness of dentin. Dent Traumatol 2016;
50(9):836‑846. 32(1):27‑31.
89. Silujjai J, Linsuwanont P: Treatment outcomes of apexifica‑ 107. Anitua E, Sanchez M, Nurden AT, Nurden P, Orive G, An‑
tion or revascularization in nonvital immature permanent dia I: New insights into and novel applications for plate‑
teeth: A Retrospective Study. J Endod 2017; 43(2):238‑245. let‑rich fibrin therapies. Trends Biotechnol 2006; 24(5):
90. Conde MCM, Chisini LA, Sarkis‑Onofre R, Schuch HS, Nor 227‑234.
JE, Demarco FF: A scoping review of root canal revasculari‑ 108. Mullane EM, Dong Z, Sedgley CM, Hu JC, Botero TM,
zation: relevant aspects for clinical success and tissue forma‑ Holland GR, Nor JE: Effects of VEGF and FGF2 on the re‑
tion. Int Endod J 2017; 50(9):860‑874. vascularization of severed human dental pulps. J Dent Res
91. Kontakiotis EG, Filippatos CG, Agrafioti A: Levels of evidence 2008; 87(12):1144‑1148.
for the outcome of regenerative endodontic therapy. J Endod 109. Sachdeva GS, Sachdeva LT, Goel M, Bala S: Regenerative
2014; 40(8):1045‑1053. endodontic treatment of an immature tooth with a necrotic
Capítulo 25   |   Referências Bibliográficas 125

pulp and apical periodontitis using platelet‑rich plasma 116. Garzon I, Martin‑Piedra MA, Carriel V, Alaminos M, Liu X,
(PRP) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): a case re‑ D’Souza RN: Bioactive injectable aggregates with nanofi‑
port. Int Endod J 2015; 48(9):902‑910. brous microspheres and human dental pulp stem cells: A
110. Ray HL, Jr., Marcelino J, Braga R, Horwat R, Lisien M, Kha‑ translational strategy in dental endodontics. J Tissue Eng
liq S: Long‑term follow up of revascularization using plate‑ Regen Med 2018; 12(1):204‑216.
let‑rich fibrin. Dent Traumatol 2016; 32(1):80‑84. 117. Duncan HF, Smith AJ, Fleming GJ, Cooper PR: Epigenetic
111. Yeom KH, Ariyoshi W, Okinaga T, Washio A, Morotomi T, modulation of dental pulp stem cells: implications for rege‑
Kitamura C, Nishihara T: Platelet‑rich plasma enhances the nerative endodontics. Int Endod J, 2015.
differentiation of dental pulp progenitor cells into odonto‑ 118. Albuquerque MTP, Nagata J, Bottino MC: Antimicrobial
blasts. Int Endod J 2016; 49(3):271‑278. efficacy of triple antibiotic‑eluting polymer nanofibers
112. Hong S, Chen W, Jiang B: A comparative evaluation of con‑ against multispecies biofilm. J Endod 2017; 43(9S):S51‑S56.
centrated growth factor and platelet‑rich fibrin on the proli‑ 119. Bukhari S, Kim D, Liu Y, Karabucak B, Koo H: Novel endo‑
feration, migration, and differentiation of human stem cells dontic disinfection approach using catalytic nanoparticles.
of the apical papilla. J Endod 2018; 44(6):977‑983. J Endod 2018; 44(5):806‑812.
113. Nageh M, Ahmed GM, El‑Baz AA: Assessment of regaining 120. Karczewski A, Feitosa SA, Hamer EI, Pankajakshan D, Gre‑
pulp sensibility in mature necrotic teeth using a modified gory RL, Spolnik KJ, Bottino MC: Clindamycin‑modified tri‑
revascularization technique with platelet‑rich fibrin: a clini‑ ple antibiotic nanofibers: a stain‑free antimicrobial intraca‑
cal study. j endod 2018; 44(10):1526‑1533. nal drug delivery system. J Endod 2018; 44(1):155‑162.
114. Meschi N, EzEldeen M, Torres Garcia AE, Jacobs R, Lam‑ 121. Weine FS: Endodontic therapy. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1982.
brechts P: A retrospective case series in regenerative en‑ 122. England MC, Best E: Non induced apical closure in imma‑
dodontics: trend analysis based on clinical evaluation and ture roots of dogs’ teeth. J Endod 1977; 33:438‑449.
2‑ and 3‑dimensional radiology. J Endod 2018; 44(10): 123. Ham JW, Patterson SS, Mitchell DF: Induced apical closu‑
1517‑1525. re of immature pulpless teeth in monkeys. Oral Surg Oral
115. Nakashima M, Iohara K: Recent progress in translation Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33(3):438‑449.
from bench to a pilot clinical study on total pulp regenera‑ 124. Morse DR: Apexification: review of the literature. Quintes‑
tion. J Endod 2017; 43(9S):S82‑S86. sence Inter 1990; 21(7):589‑598.
Ca p ít u l o

26 Inter‑Relação de Endodontia
e Periodontia
Ilan Rotstein

18. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Ziontz M: The interrelationship of pulp


Referências Bibliográficas and periodontal disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
1963; 16:1474‑1490.
1. Mjor IA, Nordahl I: The density and branching of dentinal 19. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Nazimov H, et al.: Pulpitis‑induced in‑
tubules in human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41:401‑412.
terradicular periodontal changes in experimental animals. J
2. Komabayashi T, Nonomura G, Watanabe LG, et al.: Dentin
Periodontol 1967; 38:124‑129.
tubule numerical density variations below the CEJ. J Dent
20. Haapasalo M, Ranta H, Ranta K, et al.: Black‑pigmented Bac-
2008; 36:953‑958.
teroides spp. in human apical periodontitis. Infect Immun
3. Bergenholtz G, Lindhe J: Effect of soluble plaque factors on
1986; 53:149‑153.
inflammatory reactions in the dental pulp. Scand J Dent Res
21. Trope M, Tronstad L, Rosenberg ES, et al.: Darkfield micros‑
1975; 83:153‑158.
copy as a diagnostic aid in differentiating exudates from en‑
4. Muller CJ, Van Wyk CW: The amelo‑cemental junction. J
dodontic and periodontal abscesses. J Endod 1988; 14:35‑38.
Dent Assoc S Africa 1984; 39:799‑803.
22. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA, Jr.: Bacteria in the apical 5 mm
5. Schroeder HE, Scherle WF: Cemento‑enamel junction‑ revisi‑
of infected root canals. J Endod 1991; 17:380‑383.
ted. J Periodontal Res 1988; 23:53‑59.
23. Jansson L, Ehnevid H, Blomlöf L, et al.: Endodontic patho‑
6. Ehnevid H, Jansson L, Lindskog S, et al.: Endodontic patho‑
gens in periodontal disease augmentation. J Clin Periodontol
gens: propagation of infection through patent dentinal tu‑
1995; 22:598‑602.
bules in traumatized monkey teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol
24. Dahle UR, Tronstad L, Olsen I: Characterization of new pe‑
1995; 11:229‑234.
7. Rotstein I, Friedman S, Mor C, et al.: Histological characteri‑ riodontal and endodontic isolates of spirochetes. Eur J Oral
zation of bleaching‑induced external root resorption in dogs. Sci 1996; 104:41‑47.
J Endod 1991; 17:436‑441. 25. Jung IY, Choi BK, Kum KY, et al.: Molecular epidemiology
8. Rotstein I, Torek Y, Misgav R: Effect of cementum defects on and association of putative pathogens in root canal infection.
radicular penetration of 30% H2O2 during intracoronal ble‑ J Endod 2000; 26:599‑604.
aching. J Endod 1991; 17:230‑233. 26. Egan MW, Spratt DA, Ng YL, et al.: Prevalence of yeasts in sa‑
9. Simon JH, Dogan H, Ceresa LM, et al.: The radicular groove: liva and root canals of teeth associated with apical periodon‑
its potential clinical significance. J Endod 2000; 26:295‑298. titis. Int Endod J 2002; 35:321‑329.
10. Rubach WC, Mitchell DF: Periodontal disease, accessory ca‑ 27. Baumgartner JC: Microbiologic aspects of endodontic infec‑
nals and pulp pathosis. J Periodontol 1965; 36:34‑38. tions. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32:459‑468.
11. Lowman JV, Burke RS, Pellea GB: Patent accessory canals: in‑ 28. Siqueira JF, Jr, Sen BH: Fungi in endodontic infections. Oral
cidence in molar furcation region. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97:
Pathol 1973; 36:580‑584. 632‑641.
12. Burch JG, Hulen S: A study of the presence of accessory fora‑ 29. Nair PN: Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of
mina and the topography of molar furcations. Oral Surg Oral endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004; 15:348‑381.
Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38:451‑455. 30. El‑Labban NG: Electron microscopic investigation of hyaline
13. De Deus QD: Frequency, location, and direction of the late‑ bodies in odontogenic cysts. Journal of Oral Pathology 1979;
ral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod 1975; 1:361‑366. 8:81‑93.
14. Kirkham DB: The location and incidence of accessory pul‑ 31. Nair PN: Cholesterol as an aetiological agent in endodontic
pal canals in periodontal pockets. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; failures – a review. Aust Endod J 1999; 25:19‑26.
91:353‑356. 32. Tagger E, Tagger M, Sarnat H: Russell bodies in the pulp of a
15. Gutmann JL: Prevalence, location, and patency of accessory primary tooth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
canals in the furcation region of permanent molars. J Perio‑ Endod 2000; 90:365‑368.
dontol 1978; 49:21‑26. 33. Silver GK, Simon JH: Charcot‑Leyden crystals within a peria‑
16. Poornima P, Subba Reddy VV: Comparison of digital radio‑ pical lesion. J Endod 2000; 26:679‑681.
graphy, decalcification, and histologic sectioning in the de‑ 34. Nair PN, Pajarola G, Schroeder HE: Types and incidence
tection of accessory canals in furcation areas of human pri‑ of human periapical lesions obtained with extracted teeth.
mary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008; 26:49‑52. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;
17. Goldberg F, Massone EJ, Soares I, et al.: Accessory orifices: 81:93‑102.
anatomical relationship between the pulp chamber floor and 35. Simon JH: Incidence of periapical cysts in relation to the root
the furcation. J Endod 1987; 13:176‑181. canal. J Endod 1980; 6:845‑848.
Capítulo 26   |   Referências Bibliográficas 127

36. Mazur B, Massler M: Influence of periodontal disease on 58. Kasuga Y, Ishihara K, Okuda K: Significance of detection of
the dental pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964; Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus and Trepo‑
17:592‑603. nema denticola in periodontal pockets. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll
37. Bender IB, Seltzer S: The effect of periodontal disease on the 2000; 41:109‑117.
pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33:458‑474. 59. Pradhan‑Palikhe P, Mantyla P, Paju S, et al.: Subgingival bac‑
38. Czarnecki RT, Schilder H: A histological evaluation of the hu‑ terial burden in relation to the clinical and radiographic pe‑
man pulp in teeth with varying degrees of periodontal disea‑ riodontal parameters. J Periodontol 2013.
se. J Endod 1979; 5:242‑253. 60. Molven O, Olsen I, Kerekes K: Scanning electron microsco‑
39. Torabinejad M, Kiger RD: A histologic evaluation of dental py of bacteria in the apical part of root canals in permanent
pulp tissue of a patient with periodontal disease. Oral Surg teeth with periapical lesions. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 59:198‑200. 7:226‑229.
40. Gold SI, Moskow BS: Periodontal repair of periapical lesions: 61. Dahle UR, Tronstad L, Olsen I: Observation of an unusually
the borderland between pulpal and periodontal disease. J large spirochete in endodontic infection. Oral Microbiol Im‑
Clin Periodontol 1987; 14:251‑256. munol 1993; 8:251‑253.
41. Adriaens PA, Edwards CA, De Boever JA, et al.: Ultrastructu‑ 62. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Souto R, et al.: Checkerboard
ral observations on bacterial invasion in cementum and radi‑ DNA‑DNA hybridization analysis of endodontic infections.
cular dentin of periodontally diseased human teeth. J Perio‑ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;
dontol 1988; 59:493‑503. 89:744‑748.
42. Adriaens PA, De Boever JA, Loesche WJ: Bacterial invasion in 63. Jung IY, Choi B, Kum KY, et al.: Identification of oral spiro‑
root cementum and radicular dentin of periodontally disea‑ chetes at the species level and their association with other
sed teeth in humans. A reservoir of periodontopathic bacte‑ bacteria in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
ria. J Periodontol 1988; 59:222‑230. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92:329‑334.
43. Wong R, Hirsch RS, Clarke NG: Endodontic effects of root 64. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, Santos KR, et al.: “Red complex”
planing in humans. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989; 5:193‑196. (Bacteroides forsythus, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Treponema
44. Langeland K, Rodrigues H, Dowden W: Periodontal disea‑ denticola) in endodontic infections: a molecular approach.
se, bacteria, and pulpal histopathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;
Oral Pathol 1974; 37:257. 91:468‑471.
45. Mandi FA: Histological study of the pulp changes caused by 65. Nobrega LM, Delboni MG, Martinho FC, et al.: Treponema
periodontal disease. J Brit Endod Soc 1972; 6:80‑82. diversity in root canals with endodontic failure. Eur J Dent
46. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ: The effects of sur‑ 2013; 7:61‑68.
gical exposures of dental pulps in germ‑free and conventio‑ 66. Fenno JC, McBride BC: Virulence factors of oral treponemes.
nal laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; Anaerobe 1998; 4:1‑17.
20:340‑349. 67. Heuner K, Grosse K, Schade R, et al.: A flagellar gene cluster
47. Möller AJR, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, et al.: Influence on peria‑ from the oral spirochete Treponema maltophilum. Microbiology
pical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tis‑ 2000; 146: 497‑507.
sue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:475‑484. 68. Moter A, Hoenig C, Choi BK, et al.: Molecular epidemiology
48. Korzen BH, Krakow AA, Green DB: Pulpal and periapical tis‑ of oral treponemes associated with periodontal disease. J Clin
sue responses in conventional and monoinfected gnotobiotic Microbiol 1998; 36:1399‑1403.
rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 37:783‑802. 69. Simon JHS, Hemple PL, Rotstein I, et al.: The possible role of
49. Blomlöf L, Lengheden A, Lindskog S: Endodontic infection L‑form bacteria in periapical disease. Endodontology 1999;
and calcium hydroxide treatment. Effects on periodontal 11:40‑45.
healing in mature and immature replanted monkey teeth. J 70. Kenny JF: Role of cell‑wall‑defective microbial variants in hu‑
Clin Periodontol 1992; 19:652‑658. man infections. South Med J 1978; 71:180‑190.
50. Jansson L, Ehnevid J, Lindskog SF, et al.: Radiographic atta‑ 71. Jackson FL, Halder AR: Incidence of yeasts in root canals du‑
chment in periodontitis‑prone teeth with endodontic infec‑ ring therapy. Brit Dent J 1963; 115:459‑460.
tion. J Periodontol 1993; 64:947‑953. 72. Wilson MI, Hall J: Incidence of yeasts in root canals. J Brit En‑
51. Jansson L, Ehnevid H, Lindskog S, et al.: The influence of en‑ dod Soc 1968; 2:56‑59.
dodontic infection on progression of marginal bone loss in 73. Damm DD, Neville BW, Geissler RH, Jr, et al.: Dentinal can‑
periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22:729‑734. didiasis in cancer patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
52. Jansson L, Ehnevid H: The influence of endodontic infection 1988; 65:56‑60.
on periodontal status in mandibular molars. J Periodontol 74. Sen BH, Piskin B, Demirci T: Observation of bacteria and
1998; 69:1392‑1396. fungi in infected root canals and dentinal tubules by SEM.
53. Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Ohman AE, et al.: Predominant indi‑ Endod Dent Traumatol 1995; 11:6‑9.
genous oral bacteria isolated from infected root canals after 75. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, et al.: Microbiological sta‑
varied times of closure. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90:134‑144. tus of root‑filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J
54. Sundqvist G: Ecology of the root canal flora. J Endod 1992; 1998; 31:1‑7.
18:427‑430. 76. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Microbiologic analy‑
55. Rupf S, Kannengiesser S, Merte K, et al.: Comparison of pro‑ sis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outco‑
files of key periodontal pathogens in periodontium and en‑ me of conservative re‑treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
dodontium. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:269‑275. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:86‑93.
56. Choi BK, Paster BJ, Dewhirst FE, et al.: Diversity of cultivable 77. Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, et al.: Isolation of
and uncultivable oral spirochetes from a patient with severe yeasts and enteric bacteria in root‑filled teeth with chronic
destructive periodontitis. Infect Immun 1994; 62:1889‑1895. apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2001; 34:429‑434.
57. Dewhirst FE, Tamer MA, Ericson RE, et al.: The diversity of 78. Lomcali G, Sen BH, Cankaya H: Scanning electron micros‑
periodontal spirochetes by 16S rRNA analysis. Oral Microbiol copic observations of apical root surfaces of teeth with apical
Immunol 2000; 15:196‑202. periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996; 12:70‑76.
128 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

79. Tronstad L, Barnett F, Riso K, et al.: Extraradicular endo‑ 103. Heling I, Morag‑Hezroni M, Marva E, et al.: Is herpes sim‑
dontic infections. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3:86‑90. plex virus associated with pulp/periapical inflammation?
80. Leavitt JM, Irving JN, Shugaevsky P: The bacterial flora of Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;
root canals as disclosed by a culture medium for endodon‑ 91:359‑361.
tics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1958; 11:302‑308. 104. Sabeti M, Slots J: Herpesviral‑bacterial coinfection in peria‑
81. Goldman M, Pearson AH: Post debridement bacterial flora pical pathosis. J Endod 2004; 30:69‑72.
and antibiotic sensitivity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 105. Sabeti M, Simon JH, Nowzari H, et al.: Cytomegalovirus and
1969; 28:897‑905. Epstein‑Barr virus active infection in periapical lesions of te‑
82. Kessler S: Bacteriological examination of root canals. J Dent eth with intact crowns. J Endod 2003; 29:321‑323.
Assoc S Africa 1972; 27:9‑13. 106. Thomasini RL, Bonon SH, Durante P, et al.: Correlation of
83. Baumgartner JC, Watts CM, Xia T: Occurrence of Candida cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 7 with CD3+ and
albicans in infections of endodontic origin. J Endod 2000; CD3+ CD4+ cells in chronic periodontitis patients. J Perio‑
26:695‑698. dontal Res 2012; 47:114‑120.
84. Waltimo TM, Siren EK, Torkko HL, et al.: Fungi in thera‑ 107. Contreras A, Slots J: Herpesviruses in human periodontal
py‑resistant apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30:96‑101. disease. J Periodontal Res 2000; 35:3‑16.
85. Najzar‑Fleger D, Filipovic D, Prpic G, et al.: Candida in root ca‑ 108. Marton IJ, Kiss C: Protective and destructive immune reac‑
nals in accordance with oral ecology. Int Endod J 1992; 25:40. tions in apical periodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000;
86. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP, et al.: Fungal infection 15:139‑150.
of the radicular dentin. J Endod 2002; 28:770‑773. 109. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, et al.: Microbial
87. Matusow RJ: Acute pulpal‑alveolar cellulitis syndrome. III: biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 1995; 49:711‑745.
Endodontic therapeutic factors and the resolution of a Can- 110. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP: Bacterial biofil‑
dida albicans infection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;
1981; 52:630‑634. 284:1318‑1322.
88. Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Ranta K, et al.: Microbiological 111. Ray JM, Triplett RG: What is the role of biofilms in severe
findings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic head and neck infections? Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North
cases selected for microbiological investigation. Int Endod J Am 2011; 23:497‑505 v.
1997; 30:91‑95. 112. Wang J, Jiang Y, Chen W, et al.: Bacterial flora and extraradi‑
89. Slots J, Rams TE, Listgarten MA: Yeasts, enteric rods and cular biofilm associated with the apical segment of teeth with
pseudomonads in the subgingival flora of severe adult pe‑ post‑treatment apical periodontitis. J Endod 2012; 38:954‑959.
riodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1988; 3:47‑52. 113. Costerton W, Veeh R, Shirtliff M, et al.: The application of
90. Dahlen G, Wikstrom M: Occurrence of enteric rods, sta‑ biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial
phylococci and Candida in subgingival samples. Oral Mi‑ infections. J Clin Invest 2003; 112:1466‑1477.
crobiol Immunol 1995; 10:42‑46. 114. de Beer D, Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z: Liquid flow in hete‑
91. Hannula J, Saarela M, Alaluusua S, et al.: Phenotypic and ge‑ rogeneous biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994; 44:636‑641.
notypic characterization of oral yeasts from Finland and the 115. Fux CA, Costerton JW, Stewart PS, et al.: Survival strategies
United States. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1997; 12:358‑365. of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol 2005; 13:34‑40.
92. Miranda TT, Vianna CR, Rodrigues L, et al.: Diversity and 116. Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, et al.: Biofilms as complex diffe‑
frequency of yeasts from the dorsum of the tongue and ne‑ rentiated communities. Annu Rev Microbiol 2002; 56:187‑209.
crotic root canals associated with primary apical periodonti‑ 117. Novic RP: Autoinduction and signal transduction in the re‑
tis. Int Endod J 2009; 42:839‑844. gulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol Microbiol 2003;
93. Contreras A, Nowzari H, Slots J: Herpesviruses in periodon‑ 48:1429‑1449.
tal pocket and gingival tissue specimens. Oral Microbiol Im‑ 118. Rayner MG, Zhang Y, Gorry MC, et al.: Evidence of bacterial
munol 2000; 15:15‑18. metabolic activity in culture‑negative otitis media with effu‑
94. Contreras A, Slots J: Typing of herpes simplex virus from hu‑ sion. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 279:296‑299.
man periodontium. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2001; 16:63‑64. 119. Friend LA, Browne RM: Tissue reactions to some root filling
95. Stein JM, Said Yekta S, Kleines M, et al.: Failure to detect an materials. Brit Dent J 1968; 125:291‑298.
association between aggressive periodontitis and the preva‑ 120. Holland R, De Souza V, Nery MJ, et al.: Tissue reactions
lence of herpesviruses. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40:1‑7. following apical plugging of the root canal with infected
96. Kamma JJ, Slots J: Herpesviral‑bacterial interactions in ag‑ dentin chips. A histologic study in dogs’ teeth. Oral Surg
gressive periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30:420‑426. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 49:366‑369.
97. Kamma JJ, Contreras A, Slots J: Herpes viruses and perio‑ 121. Yusuf H: The significance of the presence of foreign mate‑
dontopathic bacteria in early‑onset periodontitis. J Clin Pe‑ rial periapically as a cause of failure of root treatment. Oral
riodontol 2001; 28:879‑885. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54:566‑574.
98. Contreras A, Umeda M, Chen C, et al.: Relationship betwe‑ 122. Koppang HS, Koppang R, Stolen SO: Identification of com‑
en herpesviruses and adult periodontitis and periodontopa‑ mon foreign material in postendodontic granulomas and
thic bacteria. J Periodontol 1999; 70:478‑484. cysts. J Dent Assoc S Africa 1992; 47:210‑216.
99. Glick M, Trope M, Pliskin ME: Detection of HIV in the 123. Keresztesi K, Kellner G: The biological effects of root filling
dental pulp of a patient with AIDS. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; materials. Int Dent J 1966; 16:222‑231.
119:649‑650. 124. Engström B, Spångberg L: Wound healing after partial pul‑
100. Elkins DA, Torabinejad M, Schmidt RE, et al.: Polymerase chain pectomy. A histological study performed on contralateral
reaction detection of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in tooth pairs. Odontol Tidskr 1967; 75:5‑18.
human periradicular lesions. J Endod 1994; 20:386‑388. 125. Koppang HS, Koppang R, Solheim T, et al.: Cellulose fibers
101. Slots J: Herpesviruses in periodontal diseases. Periodontol from endodontic paper points as an etiological factor in
2000 2005; 38:33‑62. postendodontic periapical granulomas and cysts. J Endod
102. Rider CA, Rupkalvis R, Miller AS, et al.: Search for evidence 1989; 15:369‑372.
of three viral agents in radicular (periapical) cysts with im‑ 126. Fine L, Mostofi R, Wiemann MR, et al.: Foreign body‑type
munohistochemistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral reaction following crown cementation. J Periodontol 1977;
Radiol Endod 1995; 80:87‑91. 48:294‑297.
Capítulo 26   |   Referências Bibliográficas 129

127. Mincer HH, McCoy JM, Turner JE: Pulse granuloma of 151. Lazarski MP, Walker WA, 3rd, Flores CM, et al.: Epidemiolo‑
the alveolar ridge. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979; gical evaluation of the outcomes of nonsurgical root canal
48:126‑130. treatment in a large cohort of insured dental patients. J En‑
128. Philipsen HP, Reichart PA: Pulse or hyaline ring granuloma. dod 2001; 27:791‑796.
Review of the literature on etiopathogenesis of oral and ex‑ 152. Salehrabi R, Rotstein I: Endodontic treatment outcomes in
traoral lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14:121‑128. a large patient population in the USA: an epidemiological
129. Harn WM, Chen YH, Yuan K, et al.: Calculus‑like deposit at study. J Endod 2004; 30:846‑850.
apex of tooth with refractory apical periodontitis. Endod 153. Rotstein I, Salehrabi R, Forrest JL: Endodontic treatment
Dent Traumatol 1998; 14:237‑240. outcome: survey of oral health care professionals. J Endod
130. Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Bender IB: Epithelial proliferation 2006; 32:399‑403.
in periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969; 154. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Moorer WR: The fate and the role of
27:111‑121. bacteria left in root dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 1995; 28:95‑99.
131. Valderhaug J: Histologic study of experimentally produced 155. Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, et al.: Retreatment
intraoral odontogenic fistulae in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg of endodontic fillings. Scand J Dent Res 1979; 87:217‑224.
1973; 2:54‑61. 156. Salehrabi R, Rotstein I: Epidemiologic evaluation of the
132. Shear M: Hyaline and granular bodies in dental cysts. Brit outcomes of orthograde endodontic retreatment. J Endod
Dent J 1961; 110:301‑307. 2010; 36:790‑792.
133. Bhaskar SN: Periapical lesion: types, incidence, and clinical 157. Saunders WP, Saunders EM: Coronal leakage as a cause of
features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 21:657‑671. failure in root‑canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Trauma‑
134. Browne RM: The origin of cholesterol in odontogenic cysts tol 1994; 10:105‑108.
in man. Arch Oral Biol 1971; 16:107‑113. 158. Madison S, Wilcox LR: An evaluation of coronal microle‑
135. Trott JR, Chebib F, Galindo Y: Factors related to cholesterol akage in endodontically treated teeth. Part III. In vivo study.
formation in cysts and granulomas. J Can Dent Assoc 1973; J Endod 1988; 14:455‑458.
39:550‑555. 159. Ray HA, Trope M: Periapical status of endodontically treated
136. Nair PN, Sjogren U, Schumacher E, et al.: Radicular cyst teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling
affecting a root‑filled human tooth: a long‑term post‑treat‑ and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28:12‑18.
ment follow‑up. Int Endod J 1993; 26:225‑233. 160. Saunders WP, Saunders EM: Assessment of leakage in the
137. Matthews JB: The immunoglobulin nature of Russell bo‑ restored pulp chamber of endodontically treated multiroo‑
dies. Br J Exp Path 1983; 64:331‑335. ted teeth. Int Endod J 1990; 23:28‑33.
138. Leonard EP, Lunin M, Provenza DV: On the occurrence 161. Wilcox LR, Diaz‑Arnold A: Coronal microleakage of perma‑
and morphology of Russell bodies in the dental granuloma: nent lingual access restorations in endodontically treated
an evaluation of seventy‑nine specimens. Oral Surg Oral anterior teeth. J Endod 1989; 15:584‑587.
Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38:584‑590. 162. Goldman M, Laosonthorn P, White RR: Microleakage‑‑full
139. Giardino L, Savoldi E, Pontieri F, et al.: Russell bodies in crowns and the dental pulp. J Endod 1992; 18:473‑475.
dental pulp of permanent human teeth. Oral Surg Oral 163. White SN, Yu Z, Tom JF, et al.: In vivo microleakage of luting
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98:760‑764. cements for cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:333‑338.
140. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T: Robbins’ pathologic basis of 164. Patel S, Saunders WP, Burke FJ: Microleakage of dentin
disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1999. bonded crowns placed with different luting materials. Am J
141. Allison RT: Electron microscopic study of “Rushton” hyali‑ Dent 1997; 10:179‑183.
ne bodies in cyst linings. Brit Dent J 1974; 137:102‑104. 165. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K: Tooth survival following
142. Hodson JJ: Origin and nature of the cuticula dentis. Nature non‑surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the
1966; 209:990‑993. literature. Int Endod J 2010; 43:171‑189.
143. Morgan PR, Johnson NW: Histological, histochemical and 166. Heling I, Gorfil C, Slutzky H, et al.: Endodontic failure cau‑
ultrastructural studies on the nature of hyaline bodies in sed by inadequate restorative procedures: review and treat‑
odontogenic cysts. J Oral Pathol 1974; 3:127‑147. ment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:674‑678.
144. Medak H, Weinmann JP: Hyaline bodies in dental cysts. Brit 167. Bakland L, Flores MT: Management of traumatic dental in‑
Dent J 1960; 109:312‑317. juries. In Torabinejad M, Walton RE, editors: Endodontics.
145. Ackerman SJ, Corrette SE, Rosenberg HF, et al.: Molecular Principles and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier,
cloning and characterization of human eosinophils Char‑ 2009; p. 163‑184.
cot‑Leyden crystal protein (lysophospholipase). J Immunol 168. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Skeie A, et al.: Effect of treat‑
1993; 150:456‑468. ment delay upon pulp and periodontal healing of traumatic
146. Tanabe K, Takahashi K, Maeda M, et al.: Formation of Char‑ dental injuries. Dent Traumatol 2002; 18:116‑128.
cot‑Leyden crystals by human basophils in sputum and peri‑ 169. Andreasen FM, Flugge E, Daugaard‑Jensen J, et al.: Treat‑
pheral blood. Acta Med Okayama 1993; 47:85‑90. ment of crown fractured incisors with laminate veneer res‑
147. Weller PF, Bach D, Austen KF: Human eosinophil lysophos‑ torations. An experimental study. Endod Dent Traumatol
pholipase: the sole protein component of Charcot‑Leyden 1992; 8:30‑35.
crystals. J Immunol 1982; 128:1346‑1349. 170. Andreasen FM: Pulpal healing after luxation injuries and
148. Lao LM, Kumakiri M, Nakagawa K, et al.: The ultrastruc‑ root fracture in the permanent dentition. Endod Dent
tural findings of Charcot‑Leyden crystals in stroma of mas‑ Traumatol 1989; 5:111‑131.
tocytoma. J Dermatol Sci 1998; 17:198‑204. 171. Zachrisson BU, Jacobsen I: Long‑term prognosis of 66 per‑
149. Dvorak AM, Weller PF, Monahan‑Earley RA, et al.: Ultras‑ manent anterior teeth with root fracture. Scand J Dent Res
tructural localization of Charcot‑Leyden crystal protein (ly‑ 1975; 83:345‑354.
sophospholipase) and peroxidase in macrophages, eosino‑ 172. Harrington GW, Natkin E: External resorption asso‑
phils, and extracellular matrix of the skin in the hypereosi‑ ciated with bleaching of pulpless teeth. J Endod 1979;
nophilic syndrome. Lab Invest 1990; 62:590‑607. 5:344‑348.
150. Carson HJ, Buschmann RJ, Weisz‑Carrington P, et al.: Iden‑ 173. Cvek M, Lindvall AM: External root resorption following
tification of Charcot‑Leyden crystals by electron microsco‑ bleaching of pulpless teeth with oxygen peroxide. Endod
py. Ultra Path 1992; 16:403‑411. Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:56‑60.
130 Endodontia | Biologia e Técnica

174. Friedman S, Rotstein I, Libfeld H, et al.: Incidence of exter‑ 196. Kvinnsland I, Oswald RJ, Halse A, et al.: A clinical and roen‑
nal root resorption and esthetic results in 58 bleached pul‑ tgenological study of 55 cases of tooth perforation. Int En‑
pless teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4:23‑26. dod J 1989; 22:75‑84.
175. Heithersay GS, Dahlstrom SW, Marin PD: Incidence of in‑ 197. Fuss Z, Trope M: Root perforations: classification and tre‑
vasive cervical resorption in bleached root‑filled teeth. Aust atment choices based on prognostic factors. Endod Dent
Dent J 1994; 39:82‑87. Traumatol 1996; 12:255‑264.
176. Madison S, Walton R: Cervical root resorption following 198. Jew RC, Weine FS, Keene JJ, et al.: A histologic evaluation of
bleaching of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1990; periodontal tissues adjacent to root perforations filled with
16:570‑574. Cavit. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54:124‑135.
177. Heller D, Skriber J, Lin LM: Effect of intracoronal blea‑ 199. Oynick J, Oynick T: Treatment of endodontic perforations.
ching on external cervical root resorption. J Endod 1992; J Endod 1985; 11:191‑192.
18:145‑148. 200. Roane JB, Benenati FW: Successful management of a perfo‑
178. Rotstein I, Torek Y, Lewinstein I: Effect of bleaching time rated mandibular molar using amalgam and hydroxylapati‑
and temperature on the radicular penetration of hydrogen te. J Endod 1987; 13:400‑404.
peroxide. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991; 7:196‑198. 201. Dazey S, Senia ES: An in vitro comparison of the sealing abi‑
179. Heling I, Parson A, Rotstein I: Effect of bleaching agents lity of materials placed in lateral root perforations. J Endod
on dentin permeability to Streptococcus faecalis. J Endod 1990; 16:19‑23.
1995; 21:540‑542. 202. Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M: Sealing ability of a mine‑
180. Tronstad L: Root resorption‑‑etiology, terminology and clini‑ ral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations.
cal manifestations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4:241‑252. J Endod 1993; 19:541‑544.
181. Magnusson I, Claffey N, Bogle G, et al.: Root reserption 203. Simon JHS: Root extrusion‑ rationale and techniques. Dent
following periodontal flap procedures in monkeys. J Perio‑ Clin North Am 1984; 28:909‑921.
dontal Res 1985; 20:79‑85. 204. Stevens BH, Levine RA: Forced eruption: a multidisciplina‑
182. Karring T, Nyman S, Lindhe J, et al.: Potentials for root re‑ ry approach for form, function, and biologic predictability.
sorption during periodontal wound healing. J Clin Perio‑ Compendium 1998; 19:994‑1010.
dontol 1984; 11:41‑52. 205. Villat C, Machtou P, Naulin‑Ifi C: Multidisciplinary appro‑
183. Boyko GA, Melcher AH, Brunette DM: Formation of new ach to the immediate esthetic repair and long‑term treat‑
periodontal ligament by periodontal ligament cells implan‑ ment of an oblique crown‑root fracture. Dent Traumatol
ted in vivo after culture in vitro. J Periodontal Res 1981; 2004; 20:56‑60.
16:73‑88. 206. Emerich‑Poplatek K, Sawicki L, Bodal M, et al.: Forced
184. Andreasen JO: Periodontal healing after replantation of trau‑ eruption after crown/root fracture with a simple and aes‑
matically avulsed human teeth. Assessment by mobility testing thetic method using the fractured crown. Dent Traumatol
and radiography. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33:325‑335. 1995; 21:165‑169.
185. Heithersay GS: Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic 207. Simon JH, Lythgoe JB, Torabinejad M: Clinical and histolo‑
features of invasive cervical resorption. Quintessence Int gic evaluation of extruded endodontically treated teeth in
1999; 30:27‑37. dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50: 361‑371.
186. Heithersay GS: Invasive cervical root resorption: an analy‑ 208. Al‑Hezaimi K, Naghshbandi J, Simon JHS, et al.: Successful
sis of potential predisposing factors. Quintessence Int 1999; treatment of a radicular groove by intentional replantation
30:83‑95. and Emdogain therapy. Dent Traumatol 2004; 20:226‑228.
187. Heithersay GS: Treatment of invasive cervical resorption: 209. Rotstein I, Simon JHS: The endo‑perio lesion: a critical
An analysis of results using topical application of trichlo‑ appraisal of the disease condition. Endod Topics 2006;
racetic acid, curettage, and restoration. Quintessence Int 13:34‑56.
1999; 30:96‑110. 210. Pitt Ford TR, Torabinejad M, McKendry D, et al.: Use of mi‑
188. Lewinstein I, Rotstein I: Effect of trichloracetic acid on the neral trioxide aggregate for repair of furcal perforations.
microhardness and surface morphology of human dentin Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995; 79:756‑763.
and enamel. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:16‑20. 211. Ross IF, Thompson RH, Jr: A long term study of root reten‑
189. Delzangles B: Apical periodontitis and resorption of the tion in the treatment of maxillary molars with furcation in‑
root canal wall. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4:273‑277. volvment. J Periodontol 1978; 49:238‑244.
190. Cvek M: Treatment of non‑vital permanent incisors. II. 212. Langer B, Stein SD, Wagenberg B: An evaluation of root re‑
Effect on external root resorption in luxated teeth compa‑ sections: a ten year study. J Periodontol 1981; 52:719‑722.
red with the effect of root filling with gutta‑percha. Odontol 213. Kipioti A, Nakou M, Legakis N, et al.: Microbiological fin‑
Revy 1973; 24:343‑354. dings of infected root canals and adjacent periodontal po‑
191. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, et al.: Influence of infection ckets in teeth with advanced periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral
at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic tre‑ Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58:213‑220.
atment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 214. Kobayashi T, Hayashi A, Yoshikawa R, et al.: The microbial
30:297‑306. flora from root canals and periodontal pockets of non‑vital
192. Wedenberg C, Lindskog S: Experimental internal resorption teeth associated with advanced periodontitis. Int Endod J
in monkey teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:221‑227. 1990; 23:100‑106.
193. Wedenberg C, Zetterqvist L: Internal resorption in human 215. Simon JHS, Glick DH, Frank AL: The relationship of endo‑
teeth – a histological, scanning electron microscopic, and dontic‑periodontic lesions. J Periodontol 1972; 43:202‑208.
enzyme histochemical study. J Endod 1987; 13:255‑259. 216. Paul BF, Hutter JW: The endodontic‑periodontal conti‑
194. Trope M, Blanco L, Chivian N, et al.: The role of endodon‑ nuum revisited: new insights into etiology, diagnosis and
tics after dental traumatic injuries. In Cohen S, Hargreaves treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128:1541‑1548.
KM, editors: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/ 217. Chapple I, Lumley PJ: The periodontal‑endodontic interfa‑
Elsevier; 2006:610‑649. ce. Dent Update 1999; 26:331‑334.
195. Torabinejad M, Lemon RR: Procedural accidents. In Tora‑ 218. Blomlöf LB, Lindskog S, Hammarstrom L: Influence of pul‑
binejad M, Walton RE, editors: Endodontics. Principles and pal treatments on cell and tissue reactions in the marginal
practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier; 2009:322‑339. periodontium. J Periodontol 1988; 59:577‑583.
Ca pí tulo

Síndrome do Dente Rachado 27


Domenico Ricucci

10. Ron BD, Lee YE: Analysis of 154 cases of teeth with cracks.
Referências Bibliográficas Dent Traumatol 2006; 22:118‑123.
11. Geurtsen W, Schwarze T, Gunay H: Diagnosis, therapy, and
1. Cameron CE: Cracked tooth syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc
prevention of the cracked tooth syndrome. Quintessence Int
1964; 68:405‑411.
2003; 34:409‑417.
2. Hiatt WH: Pulpal periodontal disease. J Periodont 1997;
12. Ricucci D, Grosso A: The compromised tooth: conservative
48:598‑609.
treatment or extraction? Endod Topics 2006; 13:108‑122.
3. Ratcliff S, Becker IM, Quinn L: Type and incidence of cracks
in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86:168‑172. 13. Kahler B, Moule A, Stenzel D: Bacterial contamination of
4. Homewood CI: Cracked tooth syndrome − incidence, clinical cracks in symptomatic vital teeth. Aust Endod J 2000; 26:
findings and treatment. Aust Dent J 1998; 43:217‑222. 115‑118.
5. Sehy C, Drummond JL: Micro‑cracking of tooth structure. 14. Liebenberg WH: Use of resin‑bonded partial coverage cera‑
Am J Dent 2004; 17:378‑380. mic restorations to treat incomplete fractures in posterior te‑
6. Standlee JP, Collard EW, Caputo AA: Dentinal defects caused eth: a clinical report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:739‑747.
by some twist drills and retentive pins. J Prosthet Dent 1970; 15. Guthrie RC, DiFiore PM: Treating the cracked tooth with a
24:185‑192. full crown. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:71‑73.
7. Williams JJ: Cracked tooth syndrome: A new classification. 16. Liu HH, Sidhu SK: Cracked teeth‑treatment rationale and
Dent Today 1993 June/July;34‑39. case management: case reports. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:
8. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ: The cracked tooth syndrome. J 485‑492.
Can Dent Assoc 2002; 68:470‑475. 17. Behle CA: Conservative direct and indirect resin posterior
9. Turp JC, Gobetti JP: The cracked tooth syndrome: an elusive restorative alternatives for cracked dentition. Pract Periodon‑
diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1502‑1507. tics Aesthet Dent 1997; 9:405‑413.

You might also like