Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Law-May 2022-Solution
Corporate Law-May 2022-Solution
Corporate Law-May 2022-Solution
1 (a). Major differences between a private limited company and a public limited company
2 Minimum number of By S.18 CAMA the minimum For private companies the
members number of members of a minimum number of members
public is 2 while there is no is 2 while the maximum is 50
maximum. excluding those who are
employees of the company.
9 Statutory Meetings Section 211, CAMA mandates The CAMA 1990 does not
every company to hold a require private companies to
statutory meeting and hold statutory meetings.
consider its statutory report
within 6 months of its
incorporation, which must be
submitted to the Corporate
Affairs Commission.
1 (b). Documents to be filed with the CAC in other to incorporate a public limited company
● The share capital and shareholding formula among shareholders of the company.
● The particulars of a minimum of two (2) Directors with valid means of identification such
● Particulars of the shareholders of the company and their means of identification. Note
that the first directors are also eligible to be the shareholders of the company.
This is a company in which the financial liability of its members (known as guarantors), in the
to the assets of the company, which cannot be less than N100,000. The amount guaranteed can
only be demanded at the time of it being insolvent. This type of companies requires the consent
of the Attorney General of the Federation for its registration and are not formed to make profits
to be distributed to the members but for the promotion of commerce, art, science, religion, sports,
culture, education, research, charity or other similar objects i.e. they do not distribute their profits
to their members but rather apply them solely for the promotion of its objects or use them for
some other charitable purpose. They are also exempted from paying taxes in Nigeria.
In case of unsecured debentures, the holder is an ordinary unsecured creditor. If the company
i) Sue for the principal or interest and after judgement levy execution against the company; or
If the company is already in the course of winding up, he may prove for the amount due to him.
1. Sale: If the debenture-holder is the holder of a single debenture giving a charge on the assets
of the company, he will have an express or implied power of sale. If there is a trust deed, the
trustees have power to sell the property of the company. Any surplus of the proceeds of sale after
debenture-holder may bring an action against the company to obtain payment and to enforce the
security. This is a debenture-holders action. He may sue on behalf of himself and all other
debenture-holders. Where there are separate actions brought by several debenture-holders, the
manager to take charge of the assets subject to the charge provided they are so empowered. If
they lack the power, they may apply to the court for an appointment. In either case the fact of
4. Foreclosure: A debenture-holder may apply to the court for foreclosure which may extend
even to the uncalled capital of the company. However, for its proper exercise it is necessary for
5. Valuation of security and proof of balance: If the company is being wound up and his security
is insufficient, the debenture holder may value his security and prove for the balance of his debt
or give up his security and prove for the whole debt. In case a debenture-holder owes a debt to
the company, he cannot set off his debt against the debenture.
This is being discussed for understanding on their basis for comparison which are being listed
below:
i. Meaning – the Shares are the owned funds of the company. They represent the capital of the
company, while the Debentures are the borrowed funds of the company and represent the
company’s debt;
ii. Holder – the Holder of Shares is known as a Shareholder. The Holder of Debenture(s) is
iii. Status of Holders – Shareholders are owners. Debenture Holders are creditors;
iv. Form of Returns – Shareholders get the Dividend. Debenture Holders get the Interest;
v. Security for Payment – the Shareholders have no security. The Debenture Holders have
security;
vi. Voting Rights – Shareholders have Voting Rights. The Debenture Holder has no Voting
Rights;
vii. Conversion – Shares can never be converted into Debentures. Debentures can be converted
into shares;
viii. Repayment in the Event of Winding Up – Shares are repaid after the repayment of all the
liabilities of the company. Debentures get priority over shares, and are repaid before shares;
x. Trust Deed – No Trust Deed is executed in the case of Shares. When Debentures are issued, a
3 (b). Debenture holders’ rights are different from Shareholders’ rights and are explained
below
Rights as a Shareholder
● To receive the share certificates, on allotment or transfer (if opted for transaction in
● To receive copies of the Annual Report containing the Balance Sheet, the Profit & Loss
● To inspect the minute books of the general meetings Register of Members, Register of
requisite fee.
● To proceed against the Company by way of civil or criminal proceedings, if need be.
● To apply for winding up of the company if the company fails to pay its debt.
(1) Separate Legal Personality: The first consequence is that on incorporation, the company
becomes a separate legal person distinct from the members. It exists independently of the
shareholders who constitute its membership. The law recognizes it as a separate person which
can act and do all such things as any other person. Since it is a different person (though artificial)
its debt and liabilities belong to it. It could be buoyant while the members are poor and vice
versa.
(2) Perpetual Succession: On incorporation, a company acquires perpetual succession and a
common seal as a mark of authenticity of its actions. Perpetual succession means that the
company remains forever while members and staff come and go. The only process that could
(3) Legal Actions: Once a company is incorporated, it exists under its own separate name. By
virtue of its separate legal existence, it acquires the right to sue and be sued in its corporate
name. Litigation by and against it is in its own name and judgement recovered against it will be
(4) Right to Own Property: From the separate and juristic personality of a company arises the
right to acquire, own and dispose of its property as it deems fit. The property belongs to it and
not to the directors or members. Thus its decision to own or dispose of property is not the
(5) Limited Liability: This is one of the most profound effects of incorporation of a company. It
means that once the company comes into existence, the shareholders will only be liable for its
debts to the extent of the unpaid part of their shareholding in the company. Thus on the winding
up of the company, the members cannot be called upon to bear its debts except to the extent of
A company has a separate entity from its directors and members, hence, the members are not
liable for the misdeeds of the company. However, there are situations when the directors and
members would be held liable. This is the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil.
● Statutory Lifting of the Veil: There are several statutory provisions under the Companies
and Allied Matters Act1990 (as amended) which stipulate instances where the veil of
incorporation could be lifted and the officers will be liable for the acts of the company.
1) Where the number of the directors or members falls below that required by law: Section
93 of CAMA provides that: “if a company carries on business without having at least two
members and does so for more than 6 months, every director or officer of the company,
during the time that it so carries on business after those six months who know that it is
carrying on business with one or no member shall be liable jointly and severally with the
company for the debts of the company contracted during that period”.
2) Where Donation to political parties: Section 38(2) CAMA prohibits a company from
giving or exercising power either directly or indirectly to make a donation or gift of any
of its property or funds to a political party or political association, or for any political
purpose.
3) Personal liabilities of directors: section 290 of CAMA states that where a company
receives money by way of loan for a specific purpose; or receives money or other
property by way of advance payment for the execution of a contract or project; and with
intent to defraud, fails to apply the money or other property for the purpose for which it
was received, every director or other officer of the company who is in default shall be
personally liable to the party from whom the money or property was received for a refund
of the money or property so received and not applied for the purpose for which it was
received.
4) Publication of Company Name: section 548(1) of CAMA states that every company shall
after incorporation ensure that it paints or affix and after painting and affixing ensures
that remains painted and affixed, the name and registration number on the outside of
every office or place in which its business is carried on, in a conspicuous position, in
letter easily legible. Subsection (2) states that failure of the company to do so shall be
liable to a fine of N 100 for not doing so, and every director or manager of the company
who willfully and knowingly authorizes or permits the default shall be liable to the like
penalty.
● Shadow directors: Shadow Directors can be seen to have the following elements:
- A person or persons who exert influence on the directors of the company. That is
- In his professional capacity, gives advice and the directors of the company act
on it.
● Alternate Directors: Alternate directors are persons who are nominated by a director to
act in their absence. An alternate director can only be appointed with the agreement of a
● Life Director: The CAMA allows the appointment of a person as a director for life
provided that he may be removed under section 262. He is not subject to retirement by
● Becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally
● Becomes prohibited from becoming a director by reason of any order made under section
Before 1990 in Nigeria: Ultra Vires is predicated upon the doctrine of constructive notice of
registered documents. Persons dealing with the company, even if they do not have actual notice
of the company’s powers because they have not inspected the memorandum, have constructive
notice of the powers, i.e. they are rightly deemed and presumed in law to know them, because
the memorandum, like most of the documents registered with the Registrar of companies, is open
anyone desirous of dealing with the company. Accordingly, if they make a contract which is to
their knowledge, actual or constructive, ultra vires the company, and the company takes the
point, they cannot enforce it. If they have supplied goods or performed services under such a
contract, they cannot obtain payment, and if they have lent money, the general rule is that they
After 1990 in Nigeria: CAMA abolished the doctrine of constructive notice. By section 69(a),
any person dealing with the company or dealing with someone that derived title from the
company is entitled to presume that the company or the person that derived title from the
company complied with the Memorandum and Articles of association however, a person is not
entitled to make this presumption if he had actual knowledge that the company did not comply
with its Memorandum and Articles of association or having regard to his position with or
relationship with the company, he ought to know that the company did not comply with its
Memorandum and Articles of association. Section 38(1) endows every company with all the
powers of a natural person of full capacity for the furtherance of its authorized business or
object. Consequently, a company can only enjoy its power like a natural person to contract, but
must be within the scope of its business or object, contained in its Memorandum of association.
Section 39(1) retains the ultra vires doctrine. It recognizes and affirms that a company being a
creation of the statute for a specific purpose should keep within its authorized objects and
powers. However, the effect was whittled down by section 39 subsections (2) to (5). Section
39(3) is to the effect that even if a company exceeds its objects or powers, the act will be valid.
The purport of this subsection is that where a company has executed a contract with a third
party, neither the company nor the third party to the contract can bring an action to set aside the
contract or transaction on the ground that it is ultra vires. It is of no moment whether or not the
third party knew that the company acted outside the scope of its objects. In other words, a party
who has performed his part of the contract can sue to enforce the performance of the other party
and the defaulting party cannot plead ultra vires in order to avoid the obligations of the contract.