Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design SSS C3 - Matthew Plummer
Design SSS C3 - Matthew Plummer
1
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Contents Page
Aims of the workshop 3
IB mission statement 4
MYP Design cycle 5
Consider this 6
Analysis of MYP Standards and Practices 8
MYP requires… 9
Teaching and learning MYP design in the 21st Century 10
Unpacking the learner profile 12
Design aims and the IB learner profile 13
How do we compare? 14
Conceptual understanding 24
Working on the work while staying on track 25
Interdisciplinary teaching and learning 26
Reflecting on Global contexts 27
Statements of Inquiry 28
Teaching and learning through inquiry 28
Inquiry in the MYP 30
Alignment of MYP design objectives and ATL 31
Looking forward, looking backwards 33
Task-specific clarification 35
MYP assessment 40
Standardizing a task 41
Self-reflection 44
MYP unit planner: Welcome to Phnom Penh 45
Reflection: MYP Assessment 50
MYP Projects 51
Service as action 52
Reflections 53
2
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
• MYP design guide: pre-publication, January 2014 (available from the OCC)
• Developing MYP units: pre-publication, January 2014 (available from the OCC)
• Standards and practices, January 2014 (available from the OCC)
• Examples of existing completed unit planners (old format)
• Examples of existing student tasks
• Existing vertical and horizontal curriculum planners
• Examples of service as action projects
• Examples of personal projects
• School ATL learning expectations
• Memory stick to share resources
• Laptop (if possible)
• build upon effective teaching and learning strategies and design tasks that will
support the implementation of the subject groups and guidelines (principle:
effective teaching and learning
• continue to align their educational beliefs and values to reflect those of the IB in
order to create a challenging programme of international education (principle:
international mindedness and cultural understanding)
• understand the outcomes of the “MYP: Next chapter” project and the implications
for MYP Design
3
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
IB Mission statement
The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring
young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through
intercultural understanding and respect.
To this end the organization works with schools, governments and international
organizations to develop challenging programmes of international education and rigorous
assessment.
4
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
5
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Consider this…
Circle the number that best represents you response to the following statements
• I teach design because I believe I can fundamentally change young people’s lives.
Strongly agree Moderately agree Strongly disagree
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
• I believe that what you teach is more important than how you teach it.
Strongly agree Moderately agree Strongly disagree
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
6
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
• I teach because I believe that MYP can improve teaching and learning.
Strongly agree Moderately agree Strongly disagree
1 2 3 4 5
7
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
8
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
9
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Challenges
10
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Name of famous Identify which IB learner profile attributes are most evident
individual in their actions.
Discuss the Learner Profile and the ten qualities that form it. Below, record your group’s views in terms
of how an observer would recognize each of these qualities in our workshop.
As Knowledgeable Learners…
… We develop and use conceptual understanding,
exploring knowledge across a range of disciplines. We
engage with issues and ideas that have local and global
significance.
As Thinking Learners…
… We use critical and creative thinking skills to analyse
and take responsible action on complex problems. We
exercise initiative in making reasoned, ethical decisions.
As Caring Learners…
… We show empathy, compassion and respect. We have
a commitment to service, and we act to make a positive
difference in the lives of others and in the world around
us.
As Principled Learners…
… We act with integrity and honesty, with a strong sense
of fairness and justice, and with respect for the dignity
and rights of people everywhere. We take responsibility
for our actions and their consequences.
11
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
As Communicative Learners…
… We express ourselves confidently and creatively in
more than one language and in many ways. We
collaborate effectively, listening carefully to the
perspectives of other individuals and groups.
As Inquiring Learners…
… We nurture our curiosity, developing skills for inquiry
and research. We know how to learn independently and
with others. We learn with enthusiasm and sustain our
love of learning throughout life.
As Balanced Learners…
… We understand the importance of balancing different
aspects of our lives—intellectual, physical and
emotional—to achieve well-being for ourselves and
others. We recognize our interdependence with other
people and with the world in which we live.
As open-minded Learners…
… We critically appreciate our own cultures and personal
histories, as well as the values and traditions of others.
We seek and evaluate a range of points of view, and we
are willing to grow from the experience.
As Reflective Learners…
… We thoughtfully consider the world and our own ideas
and experience. We work to understand our strengths
and weaknesses in order to support our learning and
personal development.
12
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Consider the MYP design curriculum and how it relates to the IB learner profile.
After reading the MYP design aims, identify how they relate to the attributes of the IB learner profile.
The aims of MYP design are to encourage and enable students to:
• enjoy the design process, develop an appreciation of its elegance and power
• develop knowledge, understanding and skills from different disciplines to design and create
solutions to problems using the design cycle
• use and apply technology effectively as a means to access, process and communicate
information, model and create solutions, and to solve problems
• develop an appreciation of the impact of design innovations for life, global society and
environments
• appreciate past, present and emerging design within cultural, political, social, historical and
environmental contexts
• develop respect for others’ viewpoints and appreciate alternative solutions to problems
• act with integrity and honesty, and take responsibility for their own actions developing effective
working practices.
Choose one of the aims and state what attribute it is related to and why. This will be done collectively.
Please note that more than one attribute can be related to a same aim and that the learner profile
attributes apply to both teachers and students
13
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
How do we compare?
Experts from around the world have been working in collaboration with hundreds of educators to create
the next chapter of the MYP. Teachers in 136 pilot schools located in 46 countries have been involved in
the curriculum development process.
The current Technology guide (2008 – updated 2010) has been reviewed as a result of the Next Chapter
project. A new Design guide will be pre-published this year in December (2013), for use from September
2014/January 2015.
Carefully read the pre-publication guide and spot the difference between old and the new guide
14
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Evaluate Evaluating
Attitudes in Technology
Assessment
Criteria
15
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Statements of inquiry set conceptual understanding in a global context in order to frame classroom inquiry and direct purposeful learning.
Statements of inquiry summarize ‘What we will be learning, and why’ in language that is meaningful to students.
16
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Inquiry questions
Factual: concrete questions that have right and wrong answers (who, why, what, when, where); often focusing on recall
Conceptual: more abstract questions that explore broader meanings, deeper understanding and transferrable knowledge; often involving analysis and
synthesis
Debatable: questions that generate disagreement, engage multiple perspectives, and promote critical and creative thinking; often involving the creation and
exploration of competing values, theories and rationales.
Include the unit’s objectives, listing specific Outline of summative assessment task(s) Relationship between the summative
strands to be addressed including assessment criteria: assessment task(s) and the statement of
Describe the task(s) that students will undertake in
inquiry:
order to demonstrate their achievement of subject Describe how the statement of inquiry and
group objectives (often performances of summative assessment are connected
understanding)
Identify ATL skill(s) that students will develop, through their engagement with the unit’s learning experiences (including formative assessments), that they need
in order to meet the unit’s objectives: general skills AND subject specific skills. An effective way to identify and align ATL skills for MYP units includes a simple
chart:
IB ATL CATEGORY MYP ATL CLUSTER SPECIFIC ATL SKILL LEARNING EXPERIENCES
Approaches to learning are most powerful when teachers plan and students engage with them in connection with significant and relevant content knowledge
in order to develop transferable understanding. Teachers should teach skills explicitly, and students should have structure opportunities to practice,
ATL skills focus on the process of learning, helping students to become confident, independent, self-managed learners for life.
17
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Differentiation
What options do we provide to meet the individual learning needs of all students? How can we help
students to access the curriculum by developing a range of content, processes, products and learning
environments?
Resources
Include detailed information: textbooks and other reading; reference material; internet; student experience; community (cultural and linguistic); people and
organizations; learning environments
18
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Why do we think that the unit or the selection of What difficulties did we encounter while What were the learning outcomes of this unit?
topics will be interesting? completing the unit or the summative assessment
How well did the summative assessment task serve
task(s)?
What do students already know, and what can they to distinguish levels of achievement? Was the task
do? What resources are proving useful, and what other sufficiently complex to allow students to reach the
resources do we need? highest levels?
What have students encountered in this discipline
before? What student inquiries are emerging? What evidence of learning can we identify? What
artefacts of learning should we document?
What does my experience tell me about what to What can we adjust or change?
expect in this unit? Which teaching strategies were effective? Why?
What skills need more practice?
What attributes of the learning profile does this What was surprising?
What is the level of student engagement?
unit offer students opportunities to develop?
What student-initiated action did we notice?
How can we scaffold learning for students who
What potential interdisciplinary connections can
need more guidance? What will we do differently next time?
we identify?
What is happening in the world right now with How will we build on our experience to plan the
What do we know about my students’ preferences
which we could connect teaching and learning in next unit?
and patterns of interaction?
this unit?
How effectively did we differentiate learning in this
Are there any possible opportunities for
How well are the learning experiences aligned with unit?
meaningful service learning?
the unit’s objectives?
What can students carry forward from this unit to
What in the unit might be inspiring for community
What opportunities am I hearing to help students the unit? to the next year/ level of study?
or personal projects?
explore the interpretative nature of knowledge,
Which subject groups could we work with next
Could we develop authentic opportunities for including personal biases that might be retained,
time?
service learning? revised or rejected? (DP Theory of knowledge skills
development) What did we learn from standardizing the
How can we use my students’ multilingualism as a
assessment?
resource for learning?
19
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Feel free to add, change. In your groups you will be asked to comment.
Statement of inquiry
Inquiry questions
20
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
A: Inquiring and analysing.- All four strands Outline of summative assessment task(s) Relationship between summative assessment
including assessment criteria: task(s) and statement of inquiry:
B: Developing ideas. –All four strands.
Inquiring and analysing what is a musical Then end result of this project is a product
C: Creating the solution. –All five strands.
instrument, based upon your own conceptions based upon the students perception of
D: Evaluating. –All four strands culture, conventional or non conventional
Developing ideas: A musical instrument that
meets your cultural or personal requirements
to solve this problem.
Creating the solution:
Plan: How you will make your instrument
Create: Present the solution
Evaluate: Provide an evaluation of your
instrument and does it meet your original
specification.
Research skills: Use research, to aid in planning the focus of the work required.
Communication: evaluate sources of secondary information to ensure their reliability and relevance.
Self-management skills: Plan the creation of the solution
21
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Inquiring and analysing cultures and the way Learning experiences and teaching strategies
they have diverse ways of making music. Class discussions.
Developing ideas of products using different Relevant research what is it, what does it look like.
means of communication.
Collaboration between students and other subject teachers.
Creating the solution construct a logical plan
follow the plan ..
Use tools and equipment safely
Evaluate with all interested parties a final
product.
Formative assessment
Use the specified assessment criteria at this MYP level
Differentiation
Will be developed based upon the student’s abilities and suggestions from the SSD
Resources
22
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Keep evaluation the way students work and be Be prepared to change the unit for the better
prepared to change the teaching approach.
23
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Conceptual understanding
Read Developing MYP units pre-publication, section Inquiry: Establishing the purpose of the unit -
Concepts and MYP design guide pre-publication: pages 18-20
3 thoughts
2 questions
1 analogy
Notes:
24
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Choose one design key concept to work with and two design related concepts in order to discuss
possible projects that might be part of your school curriculum.
++++
Conceptual Understanding
25
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
26
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
_________________________________________
because
________________________________________________
because
because
27
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Statements of Inquiry
Writing a Statement of Inquiry (SoI):
Related concepts:
Statement of inquiry:
FACTUAL
CONCEPTUAL
DEBATABLE
28
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Related concepts:
Statement of inquiry:
Inquiry questions:
Factual –
Conceptual –
Debatable –
29
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
An inquiry–based classroom
Looks like… Feels like… Sounds like…
30
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Take the course you teach as reference and place the learning items within one of the design objectives (A, B, C or
D).
Ask yourself:
• Do you have a balanced course?
• Are any objectives more present than others in your course?
B- Developing ideas
I. develop a design specification which
clearly states the success criteria for
the design of a solution
31
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
a. in electronic form, or
D- Evaluating
I. design detailed and relevant testing
methods, which generate data, to
measure the success of the solution
32
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Creativity and
developing things and ideas creative?
innovation
that never existed before
How can students transfer
Utilizing skills and
skills and knowledge among
Transfer knowledge in multiple
disciplines and subject
contexts
groups?
How can students
Working effectively with
Social
collaborate?
skills
Collaborating
others
information literacy?
Interacting with media to How can students
Media literacy use and create ideas and demonstrate media literacy?
information
33
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Consider how the ATL skills in your unit would progress from Year 1 through to year 5.
In doing so your will create a vertical progression for of each skill from Year 1 through Year
5, including a grade level expectation for what students should be able to do and a sample
activity that would enable the skill to be developed.
34
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Task-specific clarification
In your groups create a task-specific clarification for the assessment task you are presented with. Refer to
your Subject Guide and the interim objectives. Be sure to modify the rubrics to specifically suit the task and
also to make the criteria age appropriate.
A good idea is to start from the highest achievement level and work backwards.
35
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.
1–2
3–4
5–6
7-8
36
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.
1–2
3–4
5–6
7-8
37
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below .
1–2
3–4
5–6
7-8
38
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Criterion D: Evaluating
Maximum 8
0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.
1–2
3–4
5–6
7-8
39
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
40
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Standardizing a task
Individually read the sample student work entitled: Welcome to Phnom Penh
MYP year 5
Background information
Students were introduced to the project using an article stating that Phnom Penh was rated the
second worst city in the world and were tasked by the Cambodian Ministry of Tourism to design a
promotional display to counter this perception. The Students given a total of 39 hours of lesson
time to complete the project.
a. Award an achievement level for each applicable criterion. Do not share your awarded
level(s) until everyone in your group has finished.
b. After everyone has studied the sample and awarded a level per criterion, share your
judgments including the reasons, and giving examples from the student work to support
your decision.
c. Through discussion, the group should come to consensus on the final judgment(s) for
the student work.
d. After a consensus has been reached, write the justification for each level awarded.
e. Share the group’s awarded level(s) with the other groups.
f. As one whole group, write the justification for each level awarded comment.
Participant assessment
Criterion A B C D
Level achieved
41
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
42
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
43
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Self-reflection
Evaluate the overall quality of this assessment task. Consider the objectives of the unit
44
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Statement of inquiry
Inquiry questions
Factual – What does tourism mean for Phnom Penh? Why do we use scale models?
Conceptual – What is needed in order to successfully promote something? How can I use a display booth to promote Phnom Penh?
Debatable – How effectively can modelling represent reality?
45
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
would be used in local international airports to must sell Phnom Penh’s identity as an
promote Phnom Penh as a desirable tourist attractive tourist destination. When tested
destination. They will make a 1:10 scale model along with the Nat Geo article with people who
of it. The scenario is set with the Cambodian know little/nothing about Phnom Penh they
government as the client. Members of the should be convinced that the headline (not the
Ministry of Tourism will visit as part of the reason for the headline) is wrong.
evaluation process.
The below ATL will be focused on throughout the project for improving student skills and learning as necessary and monitored for reporting (mid-
and end-semester reports):
Self-management (organization skills and affective skills)
Communication (communication skills)
Research (information literacy skills)
46
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
47
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Evaluating
How effectively can modeling represent reality?
Improve testing methods based on previous feedback.
Carry out tests. Ministry of Tourism will also provide feedback on each model/display.
Evaluate model’s success.
Suggest improvements to model (in terms of quality of construction and how well it represents
the full size display) and the improvements that would be needed in the full size display for it to
be as effective as possible.
Discuss the likely impact of the student’s promotion if actually used and made into a full size
display. (Students need to be realistic about the effectiveness of what they actually designed).
Formative assessment
As per year 5 assessment criteria.
Students will receive verbal formative feedback as needed during research stage, written
formative feedback and preliminary achievement level upon submission of the whole of
criterion A and final summative feedback and achievement level upon resubmission of
criterion A.
Students will receive verbal formative feedback as needed for criteria B and C with final
summative assessment upon completion of each criterion. Specifications will be formerly
assessed along with criterion A. Amendments to specifications will not be reassessed
once designing begins but if specifications are poor, students will be encouraged to
improve them. Planning will receive summative assessment before students may begin
creation.
Criterion D will receive verbal formative feedback as needed during evaluation, written
formative feedback and preliminary achievement level upon submission of the whole of
criterion D and final summative feedback and achievement level upon resubmission of
criterion D. Testing methods will be assessed along with criterion A once specifications
have been developed. Students may resubmit as needed until the evaluation of the
product starts.
Students are expected to willingly discuss their progress with the teacher and resubmit work
without reminders.
Students are expected to demonstrate a good understanding of the design cycle and ask
48
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Differentiation
Feedback/instruction to students will be tailored to individuals on an as needed basis.
Resources
Research: Locally produced tourist guide pamphlets/magazines, interviews with tourists and travel agents, internet.
Workshop: wood and its derivatives, any appropriate materials students can find for creation e.g. toilet roll tubes.
This is a successful and challenging project for Visit from Ministry was far more meaningful
students that has run for many years under this year; they seemed to have much more of
several different justifications. The current Nat an idea about effective promotion. They also
Geo survey being the most valid and is still want to work with the airport authorities to
relevant in terms of designing to counter have a display made of the students’ work.
negative press. The Khmer students are
always shocked by the headline and I have
found it motivates them in ways I have not
seen in other projects and also makes them
think twice about the ‘beautification’ going on in
their capital city. Even though the Nat Geo
survey is now few years old, the continuing
‘beautification’ of the city still threatens to
impact its future so the project still has much
relevancy.
49
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
“To this end the organization works with schools, governments and
international organizations to develop challenging programmes of international
education and rigorous assessment.”
IB mission statement
The mission statement uses the term “rigorous assessment”. Where is the rigour in MYP design
assessment?
50
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
MYP Projects
Note: Access the OCC for the MYP Projects guide (pre-published)
PERSONAL
PROJECT
___________________ V ____________________
COMMUNITY
PROJECT
51
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Service as Action
How does design provide opportunities for this? How can you relate
to one of the five stages in your unit planning?
DEMONSTRATION
REFLECTION
ACTION
PREPARATION
INVESTIGATION
52
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
Reflections
2. The road map Who needs to involved? How will the challenge be overcome?
When will it be overcome?
3. Resources What tools will you need?
RESOURCES
53
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar – Design
My challenge mountain…
With your new found knowledge, what does your personal challenge
mountain look like?
What components would you place toward the base (easiest to accomplish
- short term) and what would be at the summit (long term)?
54
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
Appendix A Context for debate-Why is concept-based learning important?
“The aim of pre-collegiate education is not to eliminate ignorance. The view that everything of importance can
be thoughtfully learned by the 12th grade–notice I did not say “taught”–is a delusion. (…) By now you may have
read the articles describing the many things students should know but do not know. I, too, have been dismayed
to discover that some students don’t know where Mexico is or how to read a timetable, never mind solve an
algebra problem with two variables. But, oh, how we forget our earlier and current ignorance. How easy it is to
feel indignant when some student doesn't know what we know. But somewhere out there, in the highly
specialized world, is a well-educated adult who also neither knows it nor deems it essential.”-Wiggins, Grant.
(Nov 1989). The Futility of Trying to Teach Everything of Importance”. Educational Leadership, v47 n3 p44-48
“Clearly, students need to understand the fundamental concepts, theories, and examples in the disciplines
that they study. We rightfully expect that, after studying chemical reactions, students like Ayesha can describe
qualities of certain gases such as color or solubility in chlorine, ammonia, or oxygen, as well as conditions that
impact them, like pressure and temperature. Likewise, after learning about ecosystems, we expect our
thirteen-year-old students to be able to define concepts like species, reproduction, or interdependence, name
a variety of species in a given ecosystem, describe how food chains work, and tell what happens when a
foreign species invades such an ecosystem. Students demonstrate disciplinary understanding when they can
use concepts, theories, and findings in the disciplines flexibly.
As experienced teachers know, however, not all ideas are equally essential. Often times, the yearly curriculum
is especially relevant. What disciplinary ideas will have a greater impact on students’ capacity to make sense of
new information or phenomena in the discipline or in the world? In other words, how should we concentrate
our time and effort strategically to maximize students’ enduring disciplinary understanding? The answer is: a
curriculum of big ideas and essential understandings.” Extract: BY VERONICA BOIX MANSILLA, “ON
DISCIPLINARY UNDERSTANDING FOR ALL”, IBO POSITION PAPER
55
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
Read through the task and deconstruct in using the following questions:
1. Where does the task allow for each of the selected objective strands to be met?
2. How and where does the task allow students to engage with the concepts of the
unit?
3. How and where does the task allow students to engage with the context of the
unit?
4. Does the task allow give students the opportunity to reach the highest descriptor
band for each strand?
5. How are the command terms used in the task?
6. Was this an authentic summative assessment task, aligned to real world
experiences? Why/Why not?
Authenticity
GRASPS
Age
Appropriateness
56
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
The Entry Point Approach is an approach to learning—a structure for designing curricula rather than a
particular curricular vehicle (such as the Generic Game). The notion of entry points was introduced by
Howard Gardner in The Unschooled Mind (1991):
My own belief is that any rich, nourishing topic—any concept worth teaching—can be
approached in at last five different ways that, roughly speaking, map onto the multiple
intelligences. We might think of the topic as a room with at least five doors or entry points
into it. Students vary as to which entry point is most appropriate for them and which routes
are most comfortable to follow once they have gained initial access to the room.
Awareness of these entry points can help the teacher introduce new materials in ways in
which they can be easily grasped by a range of students; then, as students explore other
entry points, they have the chance to develop those multiple perspectives that are the best
antidote to stereotypical thinking (p. 245).
The framework features five different points of entry into any topic: the Aesthetic, the Narrative, the
Logical/Quantitative, the Foundational, and the Experiential. MUSE researchers initially suggested
that by experiencing all five entry points, learners can discover: 1) if and when they prefer one entry point
over another, and 2) that there are many different and valid ways to think and learn about any subject.
The Aesthetic Window. The entry point through which learners respond to formal and sensory qualities
of a subject or work of art. For example: the color, line, expression, and composition of a painting; the
intricate patterns on the surface of a beehive; or the alliteration and meter of a poem.
The Narrative Window. The entry point through which learners respond to the narrational elements of a
subject or work of art. For example: the legend depicted in a painting, the sequence of events in a
period of history, or the story behind the construction of a skyscraper.
The Logical/Quantitative Window. The entry point through which learners respond to aspects of a
subject or work of art that invite deductive reasoning or numerical consideration. For example: the
question of what decisions led to the creation of an art object, the problem of calculating the overall
dimensions of an automobile, or the determination of which character in a mystery is the real villain.
The Foundational Window. The entry point through which learners respond to the broader concepts or
philosophical issues raised by a subject or work of at. For example: whether and why calculus is thought
to be important to society, whether metaphors depict or defy reality, or why a painting of soup cans is
considered art.
The Experiential Window. The entry point through which learners respond to a subject or work of art by
actually doing something with their hands or bodies. For example: manipulating the same materials
used in a work of art, producing a play about the history of a neighborhood, or setting a poem to music
57
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
Unit
58
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
Section C: Curriculum
Standard C1: Collaborative planning
Collaborative planning and reflection supports the implementation of the IB programme(s).
1. Collaborative planning and reflection addresses the requirements of the programme(s).
Requirements for the Middle Years Programme
a. The school has an approach to curriculum planning that involves all Middle Years Programme
teachers.
b. The school follows the Middle Years Programme planning process.
c. Collaborative planning and reflection facilitates interdisciplinary learning to strengthen cross-
curricular skills and the deepening of disciplinary understanding.
2. Collaborative planning and reflection takes place regularly and systematically.
3. Collaborative planning and reflection addresses vertical and horizontal articulation.
4. Collaborative planning and reflection ensures that all teachers have an overview of students’ learning
experiences.
5. Collaborative planning and reflection is based on agreed expectations for student learning.
6. Collaborative planning and reflection incorporates differentiation for students’ learning needs and styles.
7. Collaborative planning and reflection is informed by assessment of student work and learning.
8. Collaborative planning and reflection recognizes that all teachers are responsible for language
development of students.
9. Collaborative planning and reflection addresses the IB learner profile attributes.
Note: “Collaborative planning and reflection” is used as a single concept as the two processes are interdependent.
59
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
c. The written curriculum includes the following: a subject-specific vertical planning document; vertical
planning for the student learning expectations of each area of interaction; horizontal planning for
approaches to learning.
d. The units of work are documented on unit planners and follow the Middle Years Programme unit
planning process.
e. The curriculum develops the student learning expectations for the areas of interaction within and
across subjects to foster disciplinary and interdisciplinary relationships.
f. The curriculum defines expectations for involvement in service in each year of the programme.
g. There is a system for the regular review of individual units of work, vertical and horizontal subject
documentation and documentation of the areas of interaction.
2. The written curriculum is available to the school community.
3. The written curriculum builds on students’ previous learning experiences.
4. The written curriculum identifies the knowledge, concepts, skills and attitudes to be developed over time.
Requirements for the Middle Years Programme
a. The school documents the curriculum in terms of subject content, including conceptual
understanding and skills that will allow students to reach the prescribed objectives.
5. The written curriculum allows for meaningful student action in response to students’ own needs and the
needs of others.
6. The written curriculum incorporates relevant experiences for students.
7. The written curriculum promotes students’ awareness of individual, local, national and world issues.
8. The written curriculum provides opportunities for reflection on human commonality, diversity and multiple
perspectives.
9. The written curriculum is informed by current IB publications and is reviewed regularly to incorporate
developments in the programme(s).
10. The written curriculum integrates the policies developed by the school to support the programme(s).
11. The written curriculum fosters development of the IB learner profile attributes.
60
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
d. Teaching and learning creates opportunities for involvement in service in every year of the
programme and ensures its qualitative monitoring.
2. Teaching and learning engages students as inquirers and thinkers.
3. Teaching and learning builds on what students know and can do.
4. Teaching and learning promotes the understanding and practice of academic honesty.
5. Teaching and learning supports students to become actively responsible for their own learning.
6. Teaching and learning addresses human commonality, diversity and multiple perspectives.
7. Teaching and learning addresses the diversity of student language needs, including those for students
learning in a language(s) other than mother tongue.
8. Teaching and learning demonstrates that all teachers are responsible for language development of
students.
9. Teaching and learning uses a range and variety of strategies.
10. Teaching and learning differentiates instruction to meet students’ learning needs and styles.
11. Teaching and learning incorporates a range of resources, including information technologies.
12. Teaching and learning develops student attitudes and skills that allow for meaningful student action in
response to students’ own needs and the needs of others.
13. Teaching and learning engages students in reflecting on how, what and why they are learning.
14. Teaching and learning fosters a stimulating learning environment based on understanding and respect.
15. Teaching and learning encourages students to demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways.
16. Teaching and learning develops the IB learner profile attributes.
Note: “Teaching and learning” is used as a single concept as the two processes are interdependent.
61
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
5. The school has systems for recording student progress aligned with the assessment philosophy of the
programme(s).
6. The school has systems for reporting student progress aligned with the assessment philosophy of the
programme(s).
7. The school analyses assessment data to inform teaching and learning.
8. The school provides opportunities for students to participate in, and reflect on, the assessment of their
work.
9. The school has systems in place to ensure that all students can demonstrate consolidation of their
learning through the completion of the Primary Years Programme exhibition, the Middle Years Programme
personal project and the Diploma Programme extended essay, depending on the programme(s) offered.
62
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
Teaching and learning in the MYP involves understanding concepts in context. Global contexts provide a
common language for powerful contextual learning, identifying specific settings, events or circumstances that
provide more concrete perspectives for teaching and learning. When teachers select a global context for
learning, they are answering the questions:
MYP global contexts, illustrated in Figure 2, provide common points of entry for inquiries into what it means to
be internationally minded, framing a curriculum that promotes multilingualism, intercultural understanding and
global engagement. These contexts build on the powerful themes of global significance that structure teaching
and learning in the PYP, creating relevance for adolescent learners.
Figure
63
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
These and other contexts for teaching and learning inspire explorations of our common humanity and shared
guardianship of the planet. They invite reflection on local, national and global communities, as well as the real-
life issues and concerns of 11- to 16-year-old students. For each MYP unit, teachers should identify one global
context that establishes a focus for meaningful teaching and learning in a programme of international
education. Over the course of their study, students should encounter all six global contexts.
Identities and relationships Who am I? Who are we? Possible explorations to develop
Students will explore identity; beliefs • Competition and cooperation;
and values; personal, physical, teams, affiliation and leadership
mental, social and spiritual health;
human relationships including • Identity formation, self-esteem,
families, friends, communities and status, roles and role models
cultures; what it means to be human.
• Personal efficacy and agency;
attitudes, motivations,
independence; happiness and
the good life
• Physical, psychological and
social development; transitions;
health and well-being; lifestyle
choices
• Human nature and human
dignity; moral reasoning and
ethical judgment;
consciousness and mind
•
Orientation in time and space What is the meaning of “where” and Possible explorations to develop
“when”?
• Civilizations and social
Students will explore personal histories, heritage; pilgrimage,
histories; homes and journeys; migration, displacement and
turning points in humankind; exchange
discoveries; explorations and
migrations of humankind; the • Epochs, eras, turning points
relationships between, and the and “big history”
interconnectedness of, individuals
• Scale, duration, frequency and
and civilizations, from personal, local
variability
and global perspectives.
• Peoples, boundaries, exchange
and interaction
• Natural and human landscapes
and resources
• Evolution, constraints and
adaptation
•
Personal and cultural expression What is the nature and purpose of Possible explorations to develop
creative expression?
• Artistry, craft, creation, beauty
Students will explore the ways in
• Products, systems and
64
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
65
Middle Years Programme: Subject-specific seminar: MYP: Individuals and societies
infrastructure
•
Fairness and development What are the consequences of our Possible explorations to develop
common humanity?
• Democracy, politics,
Students will explore rights and government and civil society
responsibilities; the relationship
between communities; sharing finite • Inequality, difference and
resources with other people and with inclusion
other living things; access to equal
• Human capability and
opportunities; peace and conflict
development; social
resolution.
entrepreneurs
• Rights, law, civic responsibility
and the public sphere
• Justice, peace and conflict
management
• Power and privilege
• Authority, security and freedom
• Imagining a hopeful future
•
Table Global contexts and explorations
66
IB resources MYP unit planner
Statement of inquiry
Inquiry questions
Factual –
Conceptual –
Debatable –
Formative assessment
Differentiation
Resources
Statement of inquiry
Inquiry questions
Factual –
Conceptual –
Debatable –
Formative assessment
Differentiation
Resources