Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4 Grmly Report
Chapter 4 Grmly Report
General metrics
24,273 3,562 170 14 min 14 sec 27 min 24 sec
characters words sentences reading speaking
time time
99 1 1
Issues left Critical Advanced
Plagiarism
This text hasn’t been checked for plagiarism
Writing Issues
1 Clarity
1 Unclear paragraphs
Sentence Length 21
Measures average sentence length words per sentence
affect students' mental health, wellbeing, and academic success (Coan and
Ingle, 2020).
Table 1. Cronbach’s Alpha
Dependent Variable
Cronbach’s Alpha
Inter – item correlation
Internal consistency
Physical
0.500
0.289
Acceptable
Mental
0.860
0.311
Acceptable
Emotional
0.793
0.386
Acceptable
Social Health
0.672
0.248
Acceptable
In Table 2, out of 200 students who enrolled in Kidapawan Doctors College, only
43 could complete the survey. Using the frequency and relative frequency
formula, the female has a total frequency of 33 and a relative frequency of 0.77.
While for the male, its frequency of 10 with a relative frequency is 0.23. In Table
31 – 35
26 – 30
21 – 25
20 and below
Course
BS Psychology
BS Medical
Laboratory Science
BS Radiologic
Technology
BS Pharmacy
33
0.77%
10
0.23%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
21
0.49%
22
0.51%
15
0.35%
15
0.35%
0
0
13
0.30%
The ndings from the rst section that the researcher calculated the answer
from the rst level of the student's physical health. Note that the researcher
has adopted a few questions (no. 8 and no. 7) from the previous studies to
understand further the impact of online learning and technology on the
students' wellbeing (Anderson, 2018). It would be the opportunity for the
researcher to observe if the results have lengthened the previous studies.
Table 5 reports that this analysis found statistically signi cant interpreted
'Agree' with the mean of 3.95 and its standard deviation of 0.345. The highest
indicator cracked as 'Strongly Agree' was "I sometimes encounter my eyes
hurting during a long time online." and "I would feel tired looking at the screen
for a long duration of time.". Higher time on-screen having less outdoor time
could potentially affect the eyes of the students, resulting in myopic or
nearsightedness of their being dangerous (Furlong, 2020). The future can lead
to severe eye problems, including certain possibly blinding illnesses. Second
highest that interpreted as 'Agree' such as "I tend to feel uncomfortable sitting
at the table during online classes.", "I tend to feel uncomfortable sitting at the
table during online classes.", "I tend to have back/shoulder/neck pain during a
long hour of an online class.", "I spend more time on my homework than in my
other classes.", and "I always encounter technical dif culties during online
classes.". Lastly, interpreted as 'Fair' such as "I feel that using technology
interferes with my ability to accomplish the required coursework." The "I value
the online learning environment more than face-to-face format."
According to Purdue University (2020) discuss, It is necessary to take a moment
to consult with each other so that we keep our physical bodies healthy for our
best success during this period. The COVID-19 crisis forced universities and
colleges around the globe to switch ef ciently to online instruction, education,
and science in the emergency mode, thus coping with a multitude of
challenging concerns in helping students, encouraging faculty and workers,
and maintaining their economic viability.
3.44
.795
Fair
4.18
.698
Agree
3.74
.875
Agree
4.23
.718
Agree
4.30
.802
Agree
4.67
.474
Strongly Agree
3.00
1.023
Fair
3.69
.802
Agree
3.74
.902
Agree
1. I would feel tired looking at the screen for a long duration of time.
4.51
.550
Strongly Agree
Category Mean
3.95
.345
Agree
4.26-4.67
Strongly Agree
3.11-3.90
Agree
3.00-3.44
Fair
1.76-2.50
Disagree
1.00-1.75
Strongly Disagree
The next set answered the second level of the student's mental health. Since
mental such as depression, anxiety, and inactive lifestyles are all too common
among college students, a new study nds they may have escalated during the
initial outbreak of COVID-19, reported in Table 6 shows a High level of student
mentality.
Numerous recent student surveys suggest that the social and environmental
effects of the pandemic, as well as the continuing instability of their college
and outcome students, have affected their mental wellbeing (Panchal, Kamal,
Cox & Gar eld, 2021). There are multiple that are interpreted as 'Agree' such as
"I do not feel like integrating with small group work in online courses, "I feel
irritable /short-tempered/obsessive whenever I am online (Somerstein, 2013).",
"I seem out of touch with reality.", "I suddenly deteriorated in quality of work.",
"I tend to feel depressed when I am on the screen during online learning., "I do
not feel motivated and engage in an online environment.", and "I do not
regularly get up and move around online." followed by 'Fair' as interpreted, such
as "I feel that the content of work becomes negative/dark/odd in tone." and
lastly "I stopped responding to email and other social media.".
With the global COVID-19 pandemic, schools have encountered unforeseen
obstacles, working rapidly to move classes into an online format, ensuring
equal access for all pupils, supporting the educational interests of teachers
and students, and making preparations in the face of great uncertainty. The
pandemic itself triggered a lot of concern, tension, and sorrow. These stressors
can cause obstacles to mental wellbeing for everyone and can cause acute
effects for individuals with mental health issues (American Psychological
Association, 2020). Studies found that online learning can be as good or better
for students than in-person learning for the learners who prefer it.
Nevertheless, through an interpersonal college experience for hunts,
thousands of students will quickly reach their third semester of remote
teaching. This transformation's mental, emotional, and academic
consequences are likely to be dif cult considering the long-term development
of remote learning (Burke, 2020).
3.74
1.114
Agree
3.60
.791
Agree
3.11
1.028
Fair
3.32
.808
Fair
3.72
.934
Agree
3.58
1.028
Agree
3.53
.984
Agree
3.55
.933
Agree
1. I don't feel like integrating with small group work in online courses.
3.83
.870
Agree
3.67
1.040
Agree
Category Mean
3.56
.669
Agree
4.26-4.67
Strongly Agree
3.11-3.90
Agree
3.00-3.44
Fair
1.76-2.50
Disagree
1.00-1.75
Strongly Disagree
The second to the last set was answered by a researcher on the student's
emotional health. This level nds crucial in multiple respondents who
responded 'Agree' contributing to students' distress during this pandemic;
however, there remains much to be learned about the psychological, such as
the emotional health impacts facing students and what can be done to reduce
it. Table 7 reported a high level of the students' emotional health in Kidapawan
Doctors College. "I feel irritated when I cannot get into an online class because
of the slow signal." As reported in other studies, Online schools are not a
perfect surface for in-person appointment lessons (Lederman, 2020). Lagging
WIFI suggests collapsing blocks of dialog as the internet freezes, and the style
and listening atmosphere is different from sitting in a classroom of professors
and classmates. The "I feel that my future might be disrupted because of the
pandemic." followed by "I feel lonely online rather than in class.". Then, "I do not
feel productive during my time in the online class." and "I do not feel
encouragement during the online classes." Offering students all over the world
is up to the dif cult mission of not only adjusting and switching to free forms of
teaching but also multitasking by studying new technologies to provide online
3.51
.702
Agree
3.30
.741
Fair
3.18
.794
Fair
3.79
.773
Agree
3.83
.949
Agree
1. I feel irritated when I can't get into online class because of slow signal.
4.39
.622
Agree
3.93
.935
Agree
3.67
.944
Agree
3.81
1.006
Agree
3.81
.852
Agree
Category Mean
3.56
.669
Agree
4.26-4.67
Strongly Agree
3.11-3.90
Agree
3.00-3.44
Fair
1.76-2.50
Disagree
1.00-1.75
Strongly Disagree
Lastly, the respondents answered the nal set of the level, which is social
health. This level stresses that while people must take social distancing
seriously, they also nd ways to interact with family and friends during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Psychologically, it is a whole new world for people, and not
being able to interact can be very depressing and stressful (Clendenin, 2020).
The level of "Agree" shows signi cantly. The "I cannot communicate with others
properly because of the slow net connection." indicates the highest mean of
4.16, interpreted as 'agree' followed by "I feel degraded whenever I see my
parents feeling stress/tired/anxious after work.", "I often get distracted and
lose time during an online class.", and "I think online education is more
conducive to cheating.".
Whether it is a parent, full back time for dinner, a pet who begs for attention
before taking a test, or a chore behind saying the present for attendance, it is a
signi cant dilemma for students. Without absolute peace, quietness, and
concentration, the productivity spree ruins before the pandemic. The
uncommon sense of consistency concerning the future is felt in many other
students (Mayzenderg, 2020). The "I am becoming less active in interacting
with online people." shows that smartphones and social networks have
decreased the population of students doing so in and out. Social media has
harmed their wellbeing and family connections in the lives family members
(Chrysanthos, 2020). The "I have a working device if there is a video or audio
presented during the online class." followed by "I feel that I am struggling to
adapt with the technology.". Lastly, "I am unable to perform my
task/assignment because of my parent's intervention during an online class."
and "I enter the online class late/absent." were interpreted as 'Fair .'Social
distance also appears to be operating for this pandemic since shortly, and
some prediction forecasts are exhibiting a likely downward trend.
Table 8. Level of Social Health
Mean
Std. Deviation
Interpretation
3.25
.902
Fair
3.90
.717
Agree
3.79
.914
Agree
3.53
.984
Agree
4.16
.753
Agree
3.90
1.019
Agree
3.11
1.028
Fair
3.72
.881
Agree
3.90
.781
Agree
3.00
.816
Agree
Category Mean
3.63
.482
Agree
4.26-4.67
Strongly Agree
3.11-3.90
Agree
3.00-3.44
Fair
1.76-2.50
Disagree
1.00-1.75
Strongly Disagree
The researcher sought to calculate the overall median from a student with
different levels but similar health-related courses. The highest median score is
60 under the physical level in Psychology, followed by 59.5 in the emotional
story from the Medical Laboratory Science. A median score of 55 from the
1
social class in Pharmacy is reported in Table 9.
Table 9. Summary of overall median scores for the perceived impact of online
learning and technology on respondent courses on their physical, mental,
emotional, and social health
Course
Physical
Mental
Emotional
Social
BS Psych
60
42
46.5
46
BS MLS
58
55.5
59.5
56
BS Rad Tech
0
0
0
0
BS Pharm
53
52.2
54
55
As a result, it was determined that the overall mode of Psychology students is
41 in both levels in mental and emotional. Next is the emotional and social
class, 59 from the Medical Laboratory Science, and lastly, from the Pharmacy
with 55 scores in the physical, emotional, and social levels shown in Table 9.1.
Table 9.1 Summary of overall mode scores for the perceived impact of online
learning and technology on respondent courses on their physical, mental,
emotional, and social health.
Course
Physical
Mental
Emotional
Social
BS Psych
57
41
41
43
BS MLS
58
52
59
59
BS Rad Tech
0
0
0
0
BS Pharm
55
52
55
55
Pearson's Correlation
After creating these levels, the statistician analyzed using SPSS software for
the individual students who enrolled in Kidapawan Doctors College.
Correlation is the essential context that determines the interaction of variables.
In statistical distributions, a change in the magnitude of 1 variable is
associated with differences in the importance of another variable, either the
same or the opposite way (Schober, Boer, & Schwarte, 2018). Table 10 revealed
a signi cant correlation between the physical, mental, emotional, and social.
The result shows that the scores are effective at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels. There
is a positive relationship between the physical, mental, emotional, and social.
Table 10. Correlation between Student's Physical, Mental, Emotional, and Social
Health
Physical
Mental
Emotional
Social Health
Physical
Pearson Correlation
1
.304*
.304*
.528**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.048
.048
.000
N
43
43
43
43
Mental
Pearson Correlation
.304*
1
1.000**
.316*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.048
.000
.039
N
43
43
43
43
Emotional
Pearson Correlation
.304*
1.000**
1
.316*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.048
.000
.039
N
43
43
43
43
Social
Pearson Correlation
.528**
.316*
.316*
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
.039
.039
N
43
43
43
43
*. Correlation is signi cant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is signi cant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 11. T-test for signi cant differences between gender concerning physical,
mental, emotional, and social health
Dependent Variable
Gender
Mean
SD
t-value
p-value
Physical
Male
3.985
.3401
1.084
0.744
Female
3.850
.3598
Mental
Male
3.573
.6714
0.052
0.718
Female
3.560
.6979
Emotional
Male
3.709
.4766
-.395
0.170
Female
3.780
.5633
Social Health
Male
3.621
.4526
-.220
0.212
Female
3.660
.5967
* Signi cant at p<0.05
The null hypothesis is rejected, which is reported in Table 12. It shows
signi cant differences according to their age in the impact of online learning
and technology on students' physical, mental, emotional, and social in the
health-related course in Kidapawan Doctors College, where the p-value of
0.653, 0.858, 0.413, and 0.951.
Table 12. T-test for signi cant differences between age with respect to physical,
mental, emotional, and social health
Dependent Variable
Age
Mean
SD
t-value
p-value
Physical
20 below
3.971
.3629
.366
0.653
21- 25
3.932
.3301
Mental
20 below
3.621
.6653
0.558
0.858
21- 25
3.505
.6868
Emotional
20 below
3.812
.5033
1.314
.413
21- 25
3.616
.4670
Social Health
20 below
3.692
.4995
.937
.951
21- 25
3.553
.4611
* Signi cant at p<0.05
Table 13 shows the test for differences in the physical, mental, emotional, and
social among the students enrolled in Kidapawan Doctors College when
analyzed according to courses. It reveals that all sub-indicators on the levels
got the p-value of 0.727, 0.101, 0.090, and 0.653. Therefore the null hypothesis
is rejected.
Table 13. ANOVA for signi cant differences between courses with respect to
physical, mental, emotional, and social health.
Dependent Variable
Courses
Mean
SD
t-value
p-value
Physical
BS Psychology
3.973
.2890
.321
.727
BS Medical
Laboratory Science
3.993
.4599
BS Pharmacy
3.893
.2786
Mental
BS Psychology
3.533
.6683
2.432
.101
BS Medical
Laboratory Science
3.857
.7046
BS Pharmacy
3.321
.5591
Emotional
BS Psychology
3.547
.3662
2.553
.090
BS Medical
Laboratory Science
3.943
.5707
BS Pharmacy
3.700
.4723
Social Health
BS Psychology
3.553
.4340
.431
.653
BS Medical
Laboratory Science
3.721
.5659
BS Pharmacy
3.621
.4611
Signi cant at p<0.05*
1. The researcher sought to calculate the overall median from Unclear Clarity
a student with different levels but similar health-related paragraphs
courses. The highest median score is 60 under the physical
level in Psychology, followed by 59.5 in the emotional story
from the Medical Laboratory Science. A median score of 55
fro…