Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASME B18.15-2015 (2021)
ASME B18.15-2015 (2021)
ASME B18.15-2015 (2021)
15-2015
[Revision of ASME B18.15-1985 (R2008)]
RE AFFIRM E D 2021
Forged Eyebolts
A N A M E R I C A N N AT I O N A L STA N DA R D
ASME B18.15-2015
[Revision of ASME B18.15-1985 (R2008)]
Forged Eyebolts
A N A M E R I C A N N AT I O N A L S TA N D A R D
This Standard will be revised when the Society approves the issuance of a new edition.
ASME issues written replies to inquiries concerning interpretations of technical aspects of this
Standard. Interpretations are published on the Committee Web page and under go.asme.org/
InterpsDatabase. Periodically certain actions of the ASME B18 Committee may be published as
Cases. Cases are published on the ASME Web site under the B18 Committee Page at go.asme.org/
B18committee as they are issued.
Errata to codes and standards may be posted on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages to
provide corrections to incorrectly published items, or to correct typographical or grammatical errors
in codes and standards. Such errata shall be used on the date posted.
The B18 Committee Page can be found at go.asme.org/B18committee. There is an option available
to automatically receive an e-mail notification when errata are posted to a particular code or standard.
This option can be found on the appropriate Committee Page after selecting “Errata” in the “Publication
Information” section.
This code or standard was developed under procedures accredited as meeting the criteria for American National
Standards. The Standards Committee that approved the code or standard was balanced to assure that individuals from
competent and concerned interests have had an opportunity to participate. The proposed code or standard was made
available for public review and comment that provides an opportunity for additional public input from industry, academia,
regulatory agencies, and the public-at-large.
ASME does not “approve,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity.
ASME does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any
items mentioned in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a standard against liability for
infringement of any applicable letters patent, nor assumes any such liability. Users of a code or standard are expressly
advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, is
entirely their own responsibility.
Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted as
government or industry endorsement of this code or standard.
ASME accepts responsibility for only those interpretations of this document issued in accordance with the established
ASME procedures and policies, which precludes the issuance of interpretations by individuals.
Copyright © 2015 by
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
All rights reserved
Printed in U.S.A.
CONTENTS
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
Committee Roster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Correspondence With the B18 Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi
1 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Comparison With ISO Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3 Referenced Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
4 Dimensions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5 Threads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
6 Shank Length. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7 Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8 Finish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9 Designation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
10 Quality Assurance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
11 Marking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Tables
1 Type 1, Styles A and B Plain Pattern (Straight Shank) Eyebolt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 Type 2, Styles A and B Shoulder Pattern Eyebolt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3 Type 1, Plain Pattern (Straight Shank) Eyebolt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4 Type 2, Shoulder Pattern Eyebolt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Nonmandatory Appendices
A Two Methods of Specifying Eyebolt Capacities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
B Cautions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
C Application Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
D Inch Forged Eyebolts With Metric Threads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
iii
FOREWORD
Forged threaded eyebolts used in lifting applications come within the scope of ANSI Standards
Committee B18 on Dimensional Standardization of Bolts, Nuts, Rivets, Screws, and Similar
Fasteners, which was organized in March 1922 under the procedures of the American Engineering
Standards Committee [later renamed the American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI)],
with the Society of Automotive Engineers and The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
as joint sponsors.
Subcommittee No. 15 was appointed in March of 1960 and asked to give initial consideration
to the establishment of a standard on forged eyebolts, including rated capacity. At its first meeting
held on April 22, 1960, the committee decided to ask all of the leading suppliers to furnish
dimensions, tolerances, and rated capacity for their standard eyebolts. These data were collected,
consolidated, and studied in detail. It was soon apparent that it would be impossible to develop
an ANSI standard which would agree with even a small percentage of the standard products
then being produced. The first proposal, therefore, attempted to come as close as possible to an
average value and still maintain an orderly progression from the smaller to the larger sizes.
ANSI Standards Committee B18 approved the proposal by letter ballot taken on
September 24, 1964, and following approval by the sponsors, it was submitted on July 28, 1965,
to ANSI for approval. Because of a conflict with USA Standard Specification for Carbon Steel
Eyebolts, G38.2-1964, final approval was withheld..
Subsequent to the withdrawal of G38.2-1964, ANSI approved the B18 proposal on
February 18, 1969. This revision was approved by letter ballot of ASME Committee B18 on
August 27, 1982, and was subsequently approved by ASME (the sponsor) and submitted to ANSI
for designation as an American National Standard. ANSI approval of this Standard was granted
on July 17, 1985.
In 2013, the ASME B18 Committee received a request to update this Standard to include stainless
steel forged eyebolts for use in marine applications. This work was assigned to Subcommittee 31,
Studs, Lifting Eyes, and Bent Bolts, as Subcommittee 15 had been disbanded in May 2009.
Previously, ASME B18.15M was withdrawn after it was confirmed that the Standard was not
being used as a standard for a hard-metric fastener. The most commonly used international
metric standard for eyebolts is DIN 580. It was also discovered in the investigation that when
U.S. domestic producers of eyebolts receive orders for metric eyebolts, it is a common practice
to use the closest inch eyebolt blank and just apply the closest coarse metric thread. Because of
this common practice, an appendix was added to this revision to provide strength information
and thread-to-eye-size guidance to facilitate consistency when this approach is employed by an
eyebolt producer. This appendix is for information only and does not constitute mandatory
requirements.
This revision was approved by the American National Standards Institute on June 1, 2015.
iv
ASME B18 COMMITTEE
Standardization of Bolts, Nuts, Rivets, Screws, Washers, and
Similar Fasteners
(The following is the roster of the Committee at the time of approval of this Standard.)
v
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE B18 COMMITTEE
General. ASME Standards are developed and maintained with the intent to represent the
consensus of concerned interests. As such, users of this Standard may interact with the Committee
by requesting interpretations, proposing revisions or a Case, and attending Committee meetings.
Correspondence should be addressed to:
Secretary, B18 Standards Committee
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Two Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016-5990
http://go.asme.org/Inquiry
Proposing Revisions. Revisions are made periodically to the Standard to incorporate changes
that appear necessary or desirable, as demonstrated by the experience gained from the application
of the Standard. Approved revisions will be published periodically.
The Committee welcomes proposals for revisions to this Standard. Such proposals should be
as specific as possible, citing the paragraph number(s), the proposed wording, and a detailed
description of the reasons for the proposal, including any pertinent documentation.
Proposing a Case. Cases may be issued for the purpose of providing alternative rules when
justified, to permit early implementation of an approved revision when the need is urgent, or to
provide rules not covered by existing provisions. Cases are effective immediately upon ASME
approval and shall be posted on the ASME Committee Web page.
Requests for Cases shall provide a Statement of Need and Background Information. The request
should identify the Standard and the paragraph, figure, or table number(s), and be written as a
Question and Reply in the same format as existing Cases. Requests for Cases should also indicate
the applicable edition(s) of the Standard to which the proposed Case applies.
Interpretations. Upon request, the B18 Standards Committee will render an interpretation of
any requirement of the Standard. Interpretations can only be rendered in response to a written
request sent to the Secretary of the B18 Standards Committee at go.asme.org/Inquiry.
The request for an interpretation should be clear and unambiguous. It is further recommended
that the inquirer submit his/her request in the following format:
Subject: Cite the applicable paragraph number(s) and the topic of the inquiry.
Edition: Cite the applicable edition of the Standard for which the interpretation is
being requested.
Question: Phrase the question as a request for an interpretation of a specific requirement
suitable for general understanding and use, not as a request for an approval
of a proprietary design or situation. The inquirer may also include any plans
or drawings that are necessary to explain the question; however, they should
not contain proprietary names or information.
Requests that are not in this format may be rewritten in the appropriate format by the Committee
prior to being answered, which may inadvertently change the intent of the original request.
ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of any interpretation when or if additional
information that might affect an interpretation is available. Further, persons aggrieved by an
interpretation may appeal to the cognizant ASME Committee or Subcommittee. ASME does not
“approve,” “certify,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity.
Attending Committee Meetings. The B18 Standards Committee regularly holds meetings
and/or telephone conferences that are open to the public. Persons wishing to attend any meeting
and/or telephone conference should contact the Secretary of the B18 Standards Committee. Future
Committee meeting dates and locations can be found on the Committee Page at
go.asme.org/B18committee.
vi
ASME B18.15-2015
FORGED EYEBOLTS
1
ASME B18.15-2015
D C E
A
H
B
NOTE:
(1) Preferred.
2
Table 2 Type 2, Styles A and B Shoulder Pattern Eyebolt
K
A
G
D C E
R H
L
J B
F
3
0.47 1.50 1.25 1.12 0.41 3.78 0.4375–14 1.31 0.81 0.25 0.025
1 1
⁄2 0.50 0.50 1.50 1.13 1.12 2.12 0.44 3.81 1.12 0.75 ⁄2–13 or 1.31 0.88 0.19 0.015
[Note (1)] 0.53 1.62 1.25 1.25 0.50 4.19 0.500–13 1.44 0.94 0.25 0.025
ASME B18.15-2015
9 9
⁄16 0.56 0.56 1.62 1.21 1.19 2.25 0.47 4.19 1.25 0.84 ⁄16–12 or 1.50 0.94 0.22 0.020
0.59 1.75 1.34 1.31 0.53 4.56 0.5625–12 1.62 1.00 0.28 0.045
5 5
⁄8 0.62 0.62 1.75 1.31 1.31 2.56 0.56 4.56 1.38 0.94 ⁄8–11 or 1.59 1.00 0.25 0.020
[Note (1)] 0.66 1.88 1.44 1.44 0.62 4.94 0.625–11 1.72 1.06 0.31 0.045
3 3
⁄4 0.75 0.75 2.00 1.50 1.44 2.81 0.62 5.06 1.62 1.12 ⁄4–10 or 1.72 1.12 0.25 0.020
[Note (1)] 0.78 2.12 1.62 1.56 0.69 5.50 0.750–10 1.91 1.25 0.31 0.045
7 7
⁄8 0.88 0.88 2.25 1.75 1.56 3.19 0.75 5.75 1.81 1.31 ⁄8–9 or 2.03 1.31 0.31 0.040
[Note (1)] 0.91 2.38 1.88 1.69 0.81 6.19 0.875–9 2.22 1.44 0.38 0.065
1 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.94 1.69 3.56 0.88 6.44 2.06 1.50 1–8 or 2.22 1.50 0.38 0.060
[Note (1)] 1.06 2.62 2.06 1.81 0.94 6.88 1.000–8 2.41 1.62 0.44 0.095
11⁄8 1.12 1.12 2.75 2.13 1.94 4.06 1.00 7.31 2.31 1.69 11⁄8–7 or 2.59 1.69 0.44 0.060
1.19 2.88 2.26 2.06 1.06 7.75 1.125–7 2.78 1.81 0.50 0.095
11⁄4 1.25 1.25 3.00 2.38 2.12 4.44 1.09 8.00 2.50 1.88 11⁄4–7 or 2.84 1.88 0.50 0.060
[Note (1)] 1.34 3.12 2.50 2.25 1.16 8.44 1.250–7 3.03 2.00 0.56 0.095
11⁄2 1.50 1.50 3.50 2.75 2.44 5.19 1.31 9.22 3.00 2.25 11⁄2–6 or 3.19 2.12 0.50 0.060
[Note (1)] 1.59 3.62 2.87 2.56 1.38 9.72 1.500–6 3.44 2.25 0.62 0.095
13⁄4 1.75 1.75 3.75 3.18 2.75 6.00 1.50 10.50 3.19 2.62 13⁄4–5 or 3.88 2.50 0.50 0.060
1.84 3.88 3.31 3.00 1.62 11.12 1.750–5 4.12 2.62 0.62 0.095
2 2.00 2.00 4.00 3.62 3.06 6.88 1.75 11.53 3.38 3.00 2–41⁄2 or 4.25 2.88 0.62 0.060
[Note (1)] 2.09 4.12 3.79 3.44 1.88 12.22 2.000–4.50 4.50 3.00 0.75 0.095
NOTE:
(1) Preferred.
ASME B18.15-2015
When other materials are required, the material shall Unless otherwise specified, all characteristics shall be
inspected to the inspection levels shown in
be as agreed upon by the purchaser and supplier.
ASME B18.18.
4
ASME B18.15-2015
60 deg
90 deg
Nominal Size Carbon, Alloy Steel, and Corrosion-Resistant Stainless Steel Rated Rigger’s Capacity, lb [Notes (2)–(4)]
[Note (1)] 0 deg 30 deg 60 deg 90 deg
1
⁄4 400 70 NR NR
5
⁄16 680 200 NR NR
3
⁄8 1,000 375 200 155
7
⁄16 1,380 500 300 235
1
⁄2 1,840 805 470 395
5
⁄8 2,370 1,105 635 520
3
⁄4 2,940 1,340 805 670
7
⁄8 4,340 2,115 1,190 1,040
1 6,000 2,815 1,740 1,475
11⁄8 7,880 3,670 2,390 2,110
NOTES:
(1) Not all sizes may be standard production or available. Suppliers should be consulted prior to attempting procurement.
(2) Warning: Side (angular) loading of plain pattern eyebolts is not recommended for any size. Extreme caution should be taken when side
loading these eyebolts.
(3) Primary consideration for the use of stainless steel is its anticorrosion characteristics. Strength is the secondary consideration. There-
fore, while calculations determine that stainless steel to ASTM A473 has higher mechanical properties than ASTM A489, ASME does
not list stainless steel with capacities higher than carbon steel capacities.
(4) See Nonmandatory Appendix A for information regarding the use of rigger’s capacity.
5
ASME B18.15-2015
60 deg
90 deg
Nominal Carbon, Alloy Steel, and Corrosion-Resistant Stainless Steel Rated Rigger’s Capacity, lb [Notes (1)–(3)]
Size 0 deg 30 deg 60 deg 90 deg
1
⁄4 400 75 NR NR
5
⁄16 680 210 NR NR
3
⁄8 1,000 400 220 180
7
⁄16 1,380 530 330 260
1
⁄2 1,840 850 520 440
5
⁄8 2,370 1,160 700 570
3
⁄4 2,940 1,410 890 740
7
⁄8 4,340 2,230 1,310 1,140
1 6,000 2,960 1,910 1,630
11⁄8 7,880 3,850 2,630 2,320
11⁄4 9,920 4,790 3,840 3,390
13⁄8 12,600 6,200 4,125 3,690
11⁄2 18,260 9,010 6,040 5,460
13⁄4 24,700 12,100 8,250 7,370
2 32,500 15,970 10,910 9,740
NOTES:
(1) Primary consideration for the use of stainless steel is its anticorrosion characteristics. Strength is the secondary consideration. There-
fore, while calculations determine that stainless steel to ASTM A473 has higher mechanical properties than ASTM A489, ASME does
not list stainless steel with capacities higher than carbon steel capacities.
(2) Not all sizes may be standard production or available. Suppliers should be consulted prior to attempting procurement.
(3) See Nonmandatory Appendix A for information regarding the use of rigger’s capacity.
6
ASME B18.15-2015
NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A
TWO METHODS OF SPECIFYING EYEBOLT CAPACITIES
Fig. A-1 Uniform Weight Distribution Fig. A-2 Nonuniform Weight Distribution
1,000 lb 1,000 lb
T1 T2
45 deg 30 deg
30 deg 30 deg
No. 1 No. 2
1,000 lb 1,000 lb
7
ASME B18.15-2015
8
ASME B18.15-2015
NONMANDATORY APPENDIX B
CAUTIONS AND DEFINITIONS
9
ASME B18.15-2015
NONMANDATORY APPENDIX C
APPLICATION INFORMATION
C-1 CAPACITY washer or spacer not to exceed one thread pitch may be
required to put the plane of the eye in the direction of
Capacities shown in Tables 3 and 4 are for carbon
the load when the shoulder is seated. An additional
steel ASTM A489 eyebolts, at temperatures between
safety factor should be considered when a washer or
30°F (−1°C) and 275°F (135°C). Carbon steel is subject
spacer is used, as this may reduce the capacity of the
to failure from shock loading at temperatures below
shoulder eyebolt based on the load pattern.
30°F (−1°C) and loses strength at temperatures above
275°F (135°C).
C-6 RATED CAPACITIES
C-2 ANGULAR LIFT To attain the rated capacities in Tables 3 and 4, mini-
Refer to Tables 3 and 4 for reduced loads on angular mum thread shank length of engagement must be as
lift capacities. follows:
(a) steel — one thread diameter
(b) cast iron, brass, bronze — 1.5 thread diameter
C-3 LOAD APPLICATION (c) aluminum, magnesium, zinc, plastic — two thread
Loads must always be applied to eyebolts in the plane diameters
of the eye, not at some angle to this plane (see Fig. C-1).
C-7 VISUAL INSPECTION
C-4 TYPE 1 INSTALLATION Eyebolts should be visually inspected for flaws prior
Type 1 plain eyebolts must be engaged to within one- to applying a coating. Coating, painting, galvanizing,
half turn from the eye end of the threads to obtain rated or plating covers flaws and interferes with inspection.
capacities. Coatings are not recommended.
10
ASME B18.15-2015
11
ASME B18.15-2015
NONMANDATORY APPENDIX D
INCH FORGED EYEBOLTS WITH METRIC THREADS
12
ASME B18.15-2015
60 deg
90 deg
M22 1 6,290 NR NR NR NR
M24 1 8,470 NR NR NR NR
M27 11⁄8 11,440 NR NR NR NR
M30 11⁄4 14,080 NR NR NR NR
M36 11⁄2 19,735 NR NR NR NR
NOTES:
(1) Inch blanks are listed for machining to add metric threads. Metric to inch cross reference was derived from supplier catalogs. ASME
makes no claim as to the correctness. Not all inch sizes may be standard production or available for adding metric threads. Suppliers
should be consulted prior to attempting procurement.
(2) Warning: There are no loads given for inch blanks to be used with metric threads for plain pattern eyebolts in supplier catalogs. Zero-
deg load is as listed by various supplier catalogs for inch plain pattern eyebolts with metric threads for shoulder eyebolts. While plain
pattern and shoulder eyebolts should have the same load capacity at 0 deg, ASME makes no claim to the validity of any load values
on plain pattern in this Table. Suppliers should be consulted. Side (angular) loading of plain pattern eyebolts is not recommended for
any size. Extreme caution should be taken when side loading these eyebolts.
(3) Primary consideration for the use of stainless steel is its anticorrosion characteristics. Strength is the secondary consideration. There-
fore, while calculations determine that stainless steel to ASTM A473 has higher mechanical properties than ASTM A489, ASME does
not list stainless steel with capacities higher than carbon steel capacities.
(4) See Nonmandatory Appendix A for information regarding the use of rigger’s capacity.
13
ASME B18.15-2015
60 deg
90 deg
Nominal Size
Nominal Inch Blank Carbon, Alloy Steel, and Corrosion-Resistant Stainless Steel Rigger’s Rated Capacity, lb [Notes (1)–(4)]
Size [Note (1)] 0 deg 30 deg 45 deg 60 deg 90 deg
1
M6 ⁄4 460 276 138 115 92
5
M7 ⁄16 815 489 245 204 163
3
M8 ⁄8 990 594 297 248 198
7
M10 ⁄16 1,630 978 489 408 326
1
M12 ⁄2 2,260 1,356 678 565 452
9
M14 ⁄16 3,520 2,112 1,056 880 704
5
M16 ⁄8 3,520 2,112 1,056 880 704
3
M18 ⁄4 4,710 2,826 1,413 1,178 972
7
M20 ⁄8 6,290 3,774 1,887 1,573 1,258
NOTES:
(1) Inch blanks are listed for machining to add metric threads. Metric to inch cross reference was derived from supplier catalogs. ASME
makes no claim as to the correctness. Not all inch sizes may be standard production or available for adding metric threads. Suppliers
should be consulted prior to attempting procurement.
(2) Warning: Zero-deg load is as listed by various supplier catalogs. ASME makes no claim to the validity of any load values in this Table.
Side (angular) loads were calculated by ASME, but suppliers should be consulted. Extreme caution should be taken when side loading
any eyebolt.
(3) Primary consideration for the use of stainless steel is its anticorrosion characteristics. Strength is the secondary consideration. There-
fore, while calculations determine that stainless steel to ASTM A473 has higher mechanical properties than ASTM A489, ASME does
not list stainless steel with capacities higher than carbon steel capacities.
(4) See Nonmandatory Appendix A for information regarding the use of rigger’s capacity.
14
ASME B18.15-2015
M03715