Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Annals of Oncology 17: 1234–1238, 2006

original article doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl120


Published online 9 June 2006

CA 125 half-life and CA 125 nadir during induction


chemotherapy are independent predictors of
epithelial ovarian cancer outcome: results of
a French multicentric study
J. M. Riedinger1*, J. Wafflart2, G. Ricolleau3, N. Eche4, H. Larbre5, J. P. Basuyau6, I. Dalifard7,
K. Hacene8 & M. F. Pichon9
1
Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, Centre GF. Leclerc, Dijon, France; 2Laboratoire de Radioanalyse, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; 3Laboratoire d’ Oncobiologie,
Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; 4Laboratoire de Biologie, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; 5Laboratoire de Biologie Clinique, Institut J Godinot,
Reims, France; 6Laboratoire de Biologie, Centre H Becquerel, Rouen, France; 7Laboratoire de Radioanalyse, Centre P. Papin, Angers, France; 8Service de Statistiques
Médicales, Centre René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; 9Laboratoire d’Oncobiologie, Centre René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France

Received 13 July 2005; revised 22 March 2006; accepted 13 April 2006

Background: CA 125 assays enable treatment-response monitoring in ovarian cancer.


Patients and methods: A multicentric study of CA 125 kinetics under induction chemotherapy was performed
in 631 patients. CA 125 half-life was calculated by mono-compartmental logarithmic regression. Nadir CA 125
concentration and time to nadir were also studied. Survival analyses for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall
survival (OS) used univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate (Cox) models.
original
article

Results: For 553 stage IIC–IV patients, 459 (83.0%) relapsed and 444 (80.3%) died from cancer. Median (range)
follow up time was 32 months (2–214 months). Median (range) for CA 125 kinetics were: 263 kU/l (5–52000 kU/l)
before 1st course, 15.8 days (4.5–417.9 days) for CA 125 half-life, 16 kU/l (3–2610 kU/l) for nadir and 85 days
(0–361 days) for time to nadir. Pre-chemotherapy CA 125, its half-life, nadir concentration and time to nadir all had
a univariate prognostic value for DFS and OS (P < 0.0001). In Cox models, CA 125 half-life, residual tumour
(P < 0.0001 for both), nadir concentration (P = 0.0002) and stage (P = 0.0118) were the most powerful prognostic
factors for DFS. For OS, the significant variables were similar, with age ranking last (P = 0.0319).
Conclusion: Among well-established prognostic factors in ovarian cancers, CA 125 half-life and nadir concentration
bear a strong and independent prognostic value.
Key words: CA 125, ovarian cancer, survival

introduction CA 125 [2–7]. A first approach consisted in defining


responses according to precise criteria for CA 125 decrease
In oncology, treatment responses need to be classified [8–13]. Study of CA 125 half-life [2, 5, 7, 14–21], CA 125
according to standard definitions, such as the widely accepted return to normal range after 2 or 3 chemotherapy courses [5–7,
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) 18–19, 22], nadir CA 125 concentrations [4, 23] and time to
guideline [1]. However, in ovarian cancer patients without reach the nadir [9] were also investigated. We performed
measurable targets, responses cannot be assessed using the a multicentric study with a large cohort of ovarian cancer
RECIST criteria. The CA 125 tumour marker, elevated in 90% patients during and after primary treatment to analyse the
of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, represents long term prognostic value of the different criteria linked to
an alternative to monitoring treatment responses. CA 125 kinetics.
Different prognostic and predictive criteria derived from
CA 125 variations under induction chemotherapy have been
investigated. Most of the previous studies of CA 125 under
chemotherapy included less than 100 patients and there is
patients and methods
still no agreement about the prognostic value of post-operative patients
Six hundred and thirty-one patients with epithelial ovarian cancer from
*Correspondence to: Dr J. M. Riedinger, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale,
eight French Cancer Centres were retrospectively studied. Their primary
Centre GF Leclerc, 1 rue du Pr Marion, 21034 Dijon cedex, France. treatment was performed between 1988 and 1996 and patient follow up
Tel: +33 03 80 73 75 10; Fax: +33 03 80 73 75 26; E-mail: jriedinger@dijon.fnclcc.fr was censored at May 2005. Diagnostic and treatment procedures, identical

ª 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology


Annals of Oncology original article
in each Centre, followed standard methods included since 1997 in the Toulouse Centres for 199 patients, and ELSA CA 125 II
Standards Options and Recommendations of the French Fédération des (immunoradiometric assay, Cis Bio International, Gif sur Yvette,
Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer [24]. Table 1 summarises patient France) was used for 327 patients monitored in Angers, Nantes, Reims,
characteristics. All patients underwent a primary laparotomy and received Saint-Cloud and Rouen Centres.
a first line of chemotherapy including platinum salts and All assays were run in duplicate with two levels of control sera in
cyclophosphamide. To ensure treatment homogeneity, patients treated each series. Samples showing more than 10% variation between
by taxanes were excluded from the study. duplicates were re-assayed. The threshold for CA 125 elevation indicated
Tumour staging followed the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie by the manufacturers was 35 kU/l for all methods.
Obstétrique (FIGO) recommendations [25]. The number and location of
extra-abdominal metastatic sites were recorded. Histological type was
determined according to World Health Organisation classification and CA 125 kinetics
was grouped into serous, mucinous, endometroid, undifferentiated, clear Serum CA 125 was measured 1–4 days before the first chemotherapy
cell and of unknown histology [26]. Tumour grading was not included in the cycle. Mean interval between the date of surgery and the first
analyses because of insufficient reproducibility [24]. Residual tumour after chemotherapy course was 20 ± 7 days. The lowest CA 125 concentration
primary surgery was classified into three groups: absence, £ 1 cm or > 1 cm. reached during or after chemotherapy (nadir) and the time elapsed from
Induction chemotherapy started 2 to 4 weeks after surgery and patients start of chemotherapy to nadir were also recorded. CA 125 half-life
received 6 ± 1.9 (mean ± SD) chemotherapy courses. Treatment (T1/2) calculation, considered as an early indicator of tumour
evaluation was based on biological and clinical data recorded at each cycle chemo-sensitivity, was based on a mono-compartmental model and an
and on medical imaging. During and after chemotherapy, chest X-rays, exponential regression: T1/2 = Ln 2/s, where s is the slope of the
abdomino-pelvic scans, MRI or ultrasonography were performed regression line and Ln the natural logarithm. A minimum of three serial
according to identified targets. and aligned Ln CA 125 concentrations in the first six blood samples was
Serum CA 125 was measured prior to each cycle (on average each 3 weeks) required to enable regression line calculation. The regression was
using the same immunoassay during monitoring. considered significant only if its correlation coefficient r was ‡ 0.95,
allowing CA 125 half-life results to be taken into account. To ensure
unbiased calculations of CA 125 half-life, only cases with pre-chemotherapy
CA 125 assays CA 125 ‡ 100 kU/l were included in statistical analyses.
Assays were performed following manufacturer recommendations. All
Centres used immunoassays based on monoclonal Centocor/Fujirebio
antibodies but with different assay formats: IRMA-mat CA 125 II statistical methods
(immunoradiometric assay, DiaSorin, Antony, France) was used for Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time elapsed from the date
105 patients from Bordeaux Centre, CPE CA 125 II (enzyme-immunoassay, of the first chemotherapy cycle to the date of clinically proven recurrence.
Cis Bio International, Gif sur Yvette, France) was used in Dijon and Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of the first chemotherapy
cycle to the date of cancer-related death. Patients without recurrences or
Table 1. Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients (n = 553) still alive were censored at study endpoint (May 30, 2005).
Since the post-operative CA 125 distribution was not Gaussian,
non-parametric statistics were used. The Chi-square test was used for
Age at diagnosis (years) Median 60 (range 24–84) comparison of observed frequencies. Receiver operating characteristics
FIGO stage curves (ROC) were used to define the thresholds of CA 125 kinetics
IIC 51 (9.2%) parameters in view of survival analyses.
III 21 (3.8%) Univariate survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier
IIIA 13 (2.4%) method and log-rank test [27]. Cox models were used for multivariate
IIIB 50 (9.0%) survival analyses [28]. For all statistical tests, the level of significance was
IIIC 322 (58.2%) P £ 0.05. Statistical softwares used were SAS v. 8.2 (Cary, NC, USA)
IV 96 (17.4%) and MedCalc v. 8.0 (Mariakerke, Belgium).
Histology
Serous 396 (71.6%)
Mucinous 33 (6.0%)
Endometrioid 49 (8.9%)
results
Undifferentiated 42 (7.6) patients
Clear cell 6 (1.0%)
Six hundred and thirty one patients were included in this
Unknown 27 (4.9%)
multicentric study. Thirty-three patients (5%) were removed
Residual
tumour mass
because of incomplete serial CA 125 measures, absence of
Absence 145 (26.2%) chemotherapy, treatment including taxanes, or deaths unrelated
£1 cm 139 (25.1%) to ovarian cancer. For prognostic studies, only stage IIC to IV
>1 cm 269 (48.7%) patients were included (n = 553). Their main characteristics
Follow-up time (months) Median 32 (range 2–214) are summarised in Table 1. Ascites was noted for 393 (62.3%)
patients. Eighty-four percent of the patients received
Recurrence 459 (83.0%)
chemotherapy including cyclophosphamide + platinum salts,
Endpoint status
16 % cyclophosphamide + platinum salts + anthracycline
Alive 109 (19.7%)
with a mean ± SD number of cycles of 6.1 ± 1.9 and 5.4 ±
Cancer specific deaths 444 (80.3%)
2.3 respectively.

Volume 17 | No. 8 | August 2006 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl120 | 1235


original article Annals of Oncology

comparison of patients and CA 125 concentrations time to nadir. In order to delineate dichotomised subgroups for
in the different centres Kaplan-Meier analysis, ROC curves for each parameter were
Mean number of CA 125 determinations per patient was performed with relapse or death as classification variables.
12 ± 4. As three different immunoassays were used by the With relapse as classification variable, area under ROC
participating centres, the homogeneity of patient curves (AUC) were 0. 680 (95% confidence interval (CI)
characteristics with regard to CA 125 results was tested. 0.640–0.719) for pre-chemotherapy CA 125, 0.810 (95% CI
Median CA 125 was 214 kU/l (range 5–52 000, n = 172) for 0.769–0.847) for CA 125 half-life, 0.731 (95% CI 0.692–0.767)
CPE CA 125 II, 230 kU/l (range 9–14 000, n = 278) for ELSA CA for CA 125 nadir and 0.677 (95% CI 0.636–0.716) for time
125 II and 350 kU/l (range 25–21 200, n = 103) for IRMA-mat to nadir. With death as classification variable AUC and 95%
CA 125 II (significant difference, P = 0.008). Pairwise CI were 0.689 (0.648–0.727) for pre-chemotherapy CA 125,
comparisons showed non significant differences between CPE 0.770 (0.727–0.810) for CA 125 half-life, 0.721 (0.682–0.758)
CA 125 II and ELSA CA 125 II methods but significant for CA 125 nadir and 0.669 (0.628–0.708) for time to nadir.
differences with IRMA-mat CA 125 II. The IRMA method Cut-offs obtained were the following: 230 kU/l
was used by a single centre which included 94 of 103 (91.3%) of for pre-chemotherapy CA 125, 14 days for CA 125
stage IIIC or IV patients with 84.5% of residual tumour after half-time, 20 kU/l for CA 125 nadir and 72 days for time to
surgery, whereas the mean proportions were respectively CA 125 nadir.
324 of 450 (72.0% stage IIIC or IV) and 321 of 450 (71.3%) with Among stages IIC–IV patients, 459 (83.0%) relapsed and
residual tumour for the other methods. These proportions 444 (80.3%) died from ovarian cancer. Median DFS was
are significantly different (P = 0.0001 for stage IIIC or IV and 19 months (range 1–214 months) and median OS was
P = 0.009 for residual tumour). It was thus considered that 32 months (range 2–214 months). The four parameters linked
the higher median CA 125 level obtained with IRMA-mat CA to CA 125 kinetics had a strong prognostic value for DFS
125 II was due to the high proportion of advanced stages and OS with P < 0.0001 (Table 2).
and positive residual tumour, and consequently all CA
125 results were pooled for statistical analyses.
multivariate survival models
For the variable CA 125 half-time, only cases with validated
half-life calculation (i.e. pre-chemotherpy CA 125 ‡ 100 kU/l)
distribution of CA 125-related parameters during
were included (n = 415). During follow up, 459 recurrences
ovarian cancer monitoring
and 444 deaths were recorded in the IIC–IV group, including
For stage IIC–IV patients, median CA 125 measured before 364 recurrences and 356 deaths in the subgroup with validated
first chemotherapy course was 263 kU/l, (range 5–52 000 kU/l), half-life calculation. Clinico-pathological variables introduced
median CA 125 half-life was 15.8 days (range 4.5–417.9 days), in the Cox models were: age, (continuous or dichotomised
median CA 125 nadir concentration was 16 kU/l (range 3– with 50 years as cut-off), FIGO stage, residual tumour mass
2610 kU/l) and median time to nadir was 85 days (range 0–361 and tumour histology in three groups (serous, mucinous or
days). Median CA 125 before first chemotherapy course was undifferenciated). Parameters related to CA 125 kinetics were
related to residual tumour mass: absence of residual tumour: introduced as continuous and as dichotomised variables. For
78 kU/l (range 5–2985 kU/l), residual tumour £ 1 cm: 165 kU/l the whole population (n = 553), the models obtained were
(range 18–1911 kU/l), residual tumour > 1 cm: 915 kU/l identical for DFS and OS, with CA 125 nadir and residual
(range 40–52000 kU/l) (P < 0.0001). tumour ranking first (all with P < 0.0001) followed by age
as a continuous variable (P = 0.0236 for DFS and
P = 0.0019 for OS) and FIGO stage (P = 0.0236 for DFS
univariate survival analyses and P = 0.0072 for OS). Table 3 shows the results of Cox
Survival analyses were performed according to four criteria: models for DFS and OS in the subgroup with validated CA
pre-chemotherapy CA 125, CA 125 half-life, CA 125 nadir and 125 half-life.

Table 2. Results of Kaplan–Meier analysis (stage IIC-IV ovarian cancers)

Categories n Disease-free survival Overall survival


Median survival P value Median survival P value
estimate (months) estimate (months)
Pre-chemotherapy CA 125 £230 kU/L 260 24.5 48.6
>230 kU/L 293 16.5 <0.0001 25.1 <0.0001
CA 125 half-life £14 days 211 26.5 48.6
>14 days 204 12.6 <0.0001 19.1 <0.0001
CA 125 nadir £20 kU/L 334 26.4 49.1
>20 kU/L 219 11.9 <0.0001 18.7 <0.0001
Time to nadir £72 days 225 24.1 42.8
>72 days 328 18.0 <0.0001 30.6 <0.0001

1236 | Riedinger et al. Volume 17 | No. 8 | August 2006


Annals of Oncology original article
Table 3. Results of Cox models for 415 patients with validated half-life

Variables b SE v2 P-value Categories HR 95% CI


Disease-free survival
CA 125 half-life 0.79645 0.13149 110.47 <0.0001 0: £14 days 1.000 –
1: >14 days 2.218 [1.714; 2.870]
Residual tumour 0.28394 0.08008 27.50 <0.0001 0: 0 1.000 –
1: £1 cm 1.328 [1.135; 1.554]
2: > 1 cm 1.765 [1.289; 2.415]
CA 125 nadir 0.46701 0.12910 13.52 0.0002 0: £20 kU/l 1.000 –
1: >20 kU/l 1.595 [1.239; 2.055]
FIGO stage 0.27846 0.11072 6.33 0.0118 0: IIC 1.000 –
1: III, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC 1.321 [1.063; 1.641]
2: IV [1.131; 2.694]
Overall survival
CA 125 half-life 0.71192 0.13006 101.60 <0.0001 0: £14 days 1.000 –
1: >14 days 2.038 [1.579; 2.630]
Residual tumour 0.26031 0.08119 23.86 <0.0001 0: 0 1.000 –
1: £1 cm 1.297 [1.106; 1.521]
2: > 1 cm 1.683 [1.224; 2.314]
CA 125 nadir 0.49894 0.12812 14.46 0.0001 0: £20 kU/l 1.000 –
1: >20 kU/l 1.647 [1.281; 2.117]
FIGO stage 0.27047 0.11310 5.88 0.0153 0: IIC 1.000 –
1: III, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC 1.311 [1.050; 1.636]
2: IV [1.103; 2.676]
Age 0.01121 0.00523 4.60 0.0319 years 1.011 [1.001; 1.022]

SE, standard error; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival plot for OS according to Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival plot for OS according to CA
CA 125 half-life during induction chemotherapy in stage IIC–IV patients 125 nadir concentration during or after induction chemotherapy in stage
(n = 415). Cut-off 14 days, d £ 14 days, s > 14 days. IIC–IV patients (n = 553). Cut-off 20 kU/l, d £ 20 kU/l, s > 20 kU/l.

for this assumption. Rustin proposed another set of criteria


discussion based on assigned proportions of CA 125 decrease with two or
It is now widely accepted that the tumour marker CA 125 is three serial samples [10].
a predictive and prognostic factor in CA 125 positive ovarian All objective criteria derived from CA 125 kinetics under
cancers. Different criteria derived from CA 125 kinetics during induction chemotherapy were compared in a large series of
primary treatment have been investigated [2, 5, 11, 17, 19]. patients with a long follow up time. Our results show that,
When calculating CA 125 half-life most of the authors, except among other well-established prognostic factors in ovarian
Buller, used only two selected time points, i.e. before cancers, two parameters bear a strong and independent
chemotherapy and up to 3 months later. This implies that prognostic value: CA 125 half-life and CA 125 nadir
the CA 125 decrease under chemotherapy always follows concentration. To be reliable, the CA 125 half-life should
a mono-compartmental model. Our results provide the basis be calculated from the start of chemotherapy on a minimum

Volume 17 | No. 8 | August 2006 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl120 | 1237


original article Annals of Oncology

of three serial samples enabling the calculation of a regression 10. Rustin GJS, Nelstrop AE, McClean P et al. Defining response of ovarian
line and a correlation coefficient. This method is now widely carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125. J Clin Oncol
accessible through software provided with immunoassay 1996; 14: 1545–1551.
11. Peters-Engl C Obermair A, Heinzl H et al. CA 125 regression after two completed
equipment or by using popular spreadsheets. Its only
cycles of chemotherapy: lack of prediction for long-term survival in patients with
drawback is when the pre-chemotherapy CA 125 is too
advanced ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 662–666.
low (< 100 kU/l) to enable half-life calculations. However, 12. Bridgewater JA, Nelstrop AE, Rustin GJS et al. Comparison of standard and
most of the ovarian cancers are detected in advanced CA-125 response criteria in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated
stages, 70% in stages III and IV, and show elevated CA with platinum or paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 501–508.
125 levels after primary surgery [6]. Furthermore, the CA 13. Rustin GJS. Use of CA-125 to assess response to new agents in ovarian cancer
125 nadir, the second powerful criteria from our results, trials. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 187s–193s.
is available even if CA 125 half-life cannot be ascertained. 14. Hawkins RE, Roberts K, Wiltshaw E et al. The prognostic significance of the half-
It is noteworthy that the discriminant cut-off found for life of serum CA 125 in patients responding to chemotherapy for epithelial
CA 125 nadir (20 kU/l) for DFS and OS in stage IIC–IV ovarian carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1395–9.
patients is significantly lower than the usual cut-off 15. Hogberg T, Kagedal B. Serum half-life of the tumor marker CA 125 during
induction chemotherapy as a prognostic indicator for survival in ovarian
proposed by manufacturers (35 kU/l). The latter was
carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 423–9.
established for untreated ovarian cancer patients
16. Markowska J, Kopczynski Z, Manys G, Szewierski Z. CA 125 in monitoring
without taking into account patient menopausal status. chemotherapy of patients with ovarian cancer: early response to the treatment.
To conclude, CA 125 half life and nadir concentration are Neoplasma 1990; 37: 687–92.
powerful independent prognostic factors which warrants to be 17. Buller RE, Berman ML, Bloss JD et al. CA 125 regression: a model for epithelial
compared to the classical prognostic factors in prospective ovarian cancer response. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1991; 165: 360–367.
protocols of ovarian cancers treatment. 18. Rosman M, Hayden CL, Thiel RP et al. Prognostic indicators for poor risk
epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 1994; 74: 1323–1328.
19. Buller RE, Vasilev S, DiSaia PJ. CA 125 kinetics: a cost-effective clinical tool
references to evaluate clinical trial outcomes in the 1990s. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1996;
174: 1241–125.
1. Therasse P, Susan G, Arbuck SG et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response
to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer lnst 2000; 92: 205–16. 20. Riedinger JM, Barillot I, Coudert B et al. Prognostic value of CA 125 initial
half-life measured during first-line chemotherapy in 62 patients with epithelial
2. Van Den Burg MEL, Lammes FB, Van Putten WLJ, Stoter G. Ovarian Cancer: the
prognostic value of the serum half-life of CA 125 during induction chemotherapy. ovarian cancer stage III or IV. Bull Cancer 1996; 63: 654–663.
Gynecol Oncol 1988; 30: 307–312. 21. Gadducci A, Cosio S, Fanucchi A et al. The predictive and prognostic value of
3. Makar AP, Kristensen GB, Kaern J et al. Prognostic value of pre- and serum CA 125 half-life during paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy in
postoperative serum CA 125 levels in ovarian cancer: new aspects and patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 93: 131–6.
multivariate analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 1002–10. 22. Ferrero JM, Largillier R, Ramaioli A et al. Prognostic value of early normalization
4. Gard GB, Houghton CR. An assessment of the value of serum CA 125 of CA 125 during chemotherapy in stages III and IV ovarian tumors. Bull Cancer
measurements in the management of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol 1997; 84: 722–728.
Oncol 1994; 53: 283–289. 23. Crawford SM, Peace J. Does the nadir CA125 concentration predict a
5. Gadducci A, Zola P, Landoni F et al. Serum half-life of CA 125 during early long-term outcome after chemotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary? Ann Oncol
chemotherapy as an independent prognostic variable for patients with advanced 2005; 16(1): 47–50.
epithelial ovarian cancer: Results of a Multicentric Italian Study. Gynecol Oncol 24. Standards Options et Recommandations. Ovarian Cancer. Kerbrat P, Lhomme C,
1995; 58: 42–47. Fervers B et al. French National Fédération of cancer (FNCLCC). Br J Cancer
6. Munstedt K, Krisch M, Sachsse S, Vahrson H. Serum CA 125 levels and survival 2001; 84 Suppl 2: 18–23.
in advanced ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1997; 259: 117–23. 25. International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Changes in
7. Colakovic S, Lukic V, Mitrovic L et al. Prognostic value of CA125 kinetics and definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary. Am J Obstet
half-life in advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Biol Markers 2000; 15: 147–52. Gynecol 1987; 156: 263–264.
8. Makar AP, Kristensen GB, Bormer OP, Trope CG. Serum CA 125 level allows 26. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of
early identification of nonresponders during induction chemotherapy. Gynecol Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. IARC Press: Lyon 2003.
Oncol 1993; 49: 73–79. 27. Kaplan EL and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.
9. Frasci G, Conforti S, Zullo F et al. A risk model for ovarian carcinoma J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.
patients using CA 125. Time to normalization renders second-look laparotomy 28. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc
redundant. Cancer 1996; 77: 1122–30. 1972; B 34: 187–220.

1238 | Riedinger et al. Volume 17 | No. 8 | August 2006

You might also like