Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reidinger Et Al_Ann Oncol_2006
Reidinger Et Al_Ann Oncol_2006
Results: For 553 stage IIC–IV patients, 459 (83.0%) relapsed and 444 (80.3%) died from cancer. Median (range)
follow up time was 32 months (2–214 months). Median (range) for CA 125 kinetics were: 263 kU/l (5–52000 kU/l)
before 1st course, 15.8 days (4.5–417.9 days) for CA 125 half-life, 16 kU/l (3–2610 kU/l) for nadir and 85 days
(0–361 days) for time to nadir. Pre-chemotherapy CA 125, its half-life, nadir concentration and time to nadir all had
a univariate prognostic value for DFS and OS (P < 0.0001). In Cox models, CA 125 half-life, residual tumour
(P < 0.0001 for both), nadir concentration (P = 0.0002) and stage (P = 0.0118) were the most powerful prognostic
factors for DFS. For OS, the significant variables were similar, with age ranking last (P = 0.0319).
Conclusion: Among well-established prognostic factors in ovarian cancers, CA 125 half-life and nadir concentration
bear a strong and independent prognostic value.
Key words: CA 125, ovarian cancer, survival
comparison of patients and CA 125 concentrations time to nadir. In order to delineate dichotomised subgroups for
in the different centres Kaplan-Meier analysis, ROC curves for each parameter were
Mean number of CA 125 determinations per patient was performed with relapse or death as classification variables.
12 ± 4. As three different immunoassays were used by the With relapse as classification variable, area under ROC
participating centres, the homogeneity of patient curves (AUC) were 0. 680 (95% confidence interval (CI)
characteristics with regard to CA 125 results was tested. 0.640–0.719) for pre-chemotherapy CA 125, 0.810 (95% CI
Median CA 125 was 214 kU/l (range 5–52 000, n = 172) for 0.769–0.847) for CA 125 half-life, 0.731 (95% CI 0.692–0.767)
CPE CA 125 II, 230 kU/l (range 9–14 000, n = 278) for ELSA CA for CA 125 nadir and 0.677 (95% CI 0.636–0.716) for time
125 II and 350 kU/l (range 25–21 200, n = 103) for IRMA-mat to nadir. With death as classification variable AUC and 95%
CA 125 II (significant difference, P = 0.008). Pairwise CI were 0.689 (0.648–0.727) for pre-chemotherapy CA 125,
comparisons showed non significant differences between CPE 0.770 (0.727–0.810) for CA 125 half-life, 0.721 (0.682–0.758)
CA 125 II and ELSA CA 125 II methods but significant for CA 125 nadir and 0.669 (0.628–0.708) for time to nadir.
differences with IRMA-mat CA 125 II. The IRMA method Cut-offs obtained were the following: 230 kU/l
was used by a single centre which included 94 of 103 (91.3%) of for pre-chemotherapy CA 125, 14 days for CA 125
stage IIIC or IV patients with 84.5% of residual tumour after half-time, 20 kU/l for CA 125 nadir and 72 days for time to
surgery, whereas the mean proportions were respectively CA 125 nadir.
324 of 450 (72.0% stage IIIC or IV) and 321 of 450 (71.3%) with Among stages IIC–IV patients, 459 (83.0%) relapsed and
residual tumour for the other methods. These proportions 444 (80.3%) died from ovarian cancer. Median DFS was
are significantly different (P = 0.0001 for stage IIIC or IV and 19 months (range 1–214 months) and median OS was
P = 0.009 for residual tumour). It was thus considered that 32 months (range 2–214 months). The four parameters linked
the higher median CA 125 level obtained with IRMA-mat CA to CA 125 kinetics had a strong prognostic value for DFS
125 II was due to the high proportion of advanced stages and OS with P < 0.0001 (Table 2).
and positive residual tumour, and consequently all CA
125 results were pooled for statistical analyses.
multivariate survival models
For the variable CA 125 half-time, only cases with validated
half-life calculation (i.e. pre-chemotherpy CA 125 ‡ 100 kU/l)
distribution of CA 125-related parameters during
were included (n = 415). During follow up, 459 recurrences
ovarian cancer monitoring
and 444 deaths were recorded in the IIC–IV group, including
For stage IIC–IV patients, median CA 125 measured before 364 recurrences and 356 deaths in the subgroup with validated
first chemotherapy course was 263 kU/l, (range 5–52 000 kU/l), half-life calculation. Clinico-pathological variables introduced
median CA 125 half-life was 15.8 days (range 4.5–417.9 days), in the Cox models were: age, (continuous or dichotomised
median CA 125 nadir concentration was 16 kU/l (range 3– with 50 years as cut-off), FIGO stage, residual tumour mass
2610 kU/l) and median time to nadir was 85 days (range 0–361 and tumour histology in three groups (serous, mucinous or
days). Median CA 125 before first chemotherapy course was undifferenciated). Parameters related to CA 125 kinetics were
related to residual tumour mass: absence of residual tumour: introduced as continuous and as dichotomised variables. For
78 kU/l (range 5–2985 kU/l), residual tumour £ 1 cm: 165 kU/l the whole population (n = 553), the models obtained were
(range 18–1911 kU/l), residual tumour > 1 cm: 915 kU/l identical for DFS and OS, with CA 125 nadir and residual
(range 40–52000 kU/l) (P < 0.0001). tumour ranking first (all with P < 0.0001) followed by age
as a continuous variable (P = 0.0236 for DFS and
P = 0.0019 for OS) and FIGO stage (P = 0.0236 for DFS
univariate survival analyses and P = 0.0072 for OS). Table 3 shows the results of Cox
Survival analyses were performed according to four criteria: models for DFS and OS in the subgroup with validated CA
pre-chemotherapy CA 125, CA 125 half-life, CA 125 nadir and 125 half-life.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival plot for OS according to Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival plot for OS according to CA
CA 125 half-life during induction chemotherapy in stage IIC–IV patients 125 nadir concentration during or after induction chemotherapy in stage
(n = 415). Cut-off 14 days, d £ 14 days, s > 14 days. IIC–IV patients (n = 553). Cut-off 20 kU/l, d £ 20 kU/l, s > 20 kU/l.
of three serial samples enabling the calculation of a regression 10. Rustin GJS, Nelstrop AE, McClean P et al. Defining response of ovarian
line and a correlation coefficient. This method is now widely carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125. J Clin Oncol
accessible through software provided with immunoassay 1996; 14: 1545–1551.
11. Peters-Engl C Obermair A, Heinzl H et al. CA 125 regression after two completed
equipment or by using popular spreadsheets. Its only
cycles of chemotherapy: lack of prediction for long-term survival in patients with
drawback is when the pre-chemotherapy CA 125 is too
advanced ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 662–666.
low (< 100 kU/l) to enable half-life calculations. However, 12. Bridgewater JA, Nelstrop AE, Rustin GJS et al. Comparison of standard and
most of the ovarian cancers are detected in advanced CA-125 response criteria in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated
stages, 70% in stages III and IV, and show elevated CA with platinum or paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 501–508.
125 levels after primary surgery [6]. Furthermore, the CA 13. Rustin GJS. Use of CA-125 to assess response to new agents in ovarian cancer
125 nadir, the second powerful criteria from our results, trials. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 187s–193s.
is available even if CA 125 half-life cannot be ascertained. 14. Hawkins RE, Roberts K, Wiltshaw E et al. The prognostic significance of the half-
It is noteworthy that the discriminant cut-off found for life of serum CA 125 in patients responding to chemotherapy for epithelial
CA 125 nadir (20 kU/l) for DFS and OS in stage IIC–IV ovarian carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1395–9.
patients is significantly lower than the usual cut-off 15. Hogberg T, Kagedal B. Serum half-life of the tumor marker CA 125 during
induction chemotherapy as a prognostic indicator for survival in ovarian
proposed by manufacturers (35 kU/l). The latter was
carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 423–9.
established for untreated ovarian cancer patients
16. Markowska J, Kopczynski Z, Manys G, Szewierski Z. CA 125 in monitoring
without taking into account patient menopausal status. chemotherapy of patients with ovarian cancer: early response to the treatment.
To conclude, CA 125 half life and nadir concentration are Neoplasma 1990; 37: 687–92.
powerful independent prognostic factors which warrants to be 17. Buller RE, Berman ML, Bloss JD et al. CA 125 regression: a model for epithelial
compared to the classical prognostic factors in prospective ovarian cancer response. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1991; 165: 360–367.
protocols of ovarian cancers treatment. 18. Rosman M, Hayden CL, Thiel RP et al. Prognostic indicators for poor risk
epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 1994; 74: 1323–1328.
19. Buller RE, Vasilev S, DiSaia PJ. CA 125 kinetics: a cost-effective clinical tool
references to evaluate clinical trial outcomes in the 1990s. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1996;
174: 1241–125.
1. Therasse P, Susan G, Arbuck SG et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response
to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer lnst 2000; 92: 205–16. 20. Riedinger JM, Barillot I, Coudert B et al. Prognostic value of CA 125 initial
half-life measured during first-line chemotherapy in 62 patients with epithelial
2. Van Den Burg MEL, Lammes FB, Van Putten WLJ, Stoter G. Ovarian Cancer: the
prognostic value of the serum half-life of CA 125 during induction chemotherapy. ovarian cancer stage III or IV. Bull Cancer 1996; 63: 654–663.
Gynecol Oncol 1988; 30: 307–312. 21. Gadducci A, Cosio S, Fanucchi A et al. The predictive and prognostic value of
3. Makar AP, Kristensen GB, Kaern J et al. Prognostic value of pre- and serum CA 125 half-life during paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy in
postoperative serum CA 125 levels in ovarian cancer: new aspects and patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 93: 131–6.
multivariate analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 1002–10. 22. Ferrero JM, Largillier R, Ramaioli A et al. Prognostic value of early normalization
4. Gard GB, Houghton CR. An assessment of the value of serum CA 125 of CA 125 during chemotherapy in stages III and IV ovarian tumors. Bull Cancer
measurements in the management of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol 1997; 84: 722–728.
Oncol 1994; 53: 283–289. 23. Crawford SM, Peace J. Does the nadir CA125 concentration predict a
5. Gadducci A, Zola P, Landoni F et al. Serum half-life of CA 125 during early long-term outcome after chemotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary? Ann Oncol
chemotherapy as an independent prognostic variable for patients with advanced 2005; 16(1): 47–50.
epithelial ovarian cancer: Results of a Multicentric Italian Study. Gynecol Oncol 24. Standards Options et Recommandations. Ovarian Cancer. Kerbrat P, Lhomme C,
1995; 58: 42–47. Fervers B et al. French National Fédération of cancer (FNCLCC). Br J Cancer
6. Munstedt K, Krisch M, Sachsse S, Vahrson H. Serum CA 125 levels and survival 2001; 84 Suppl 2: 18–23.
in advanced ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1997; 259: 117–23. 25. International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Changes in
7. Colakovic S, Lukic V, Mitrovic L et al. Prognostic value of CA125 kinetics and definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary. Am J Obstet
half-life in advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Biol Markers 2000; 15: 147–52. Gynecol 1987; 156: 263–264.
8. Makar AP, Kristensen GB, Bormer OP, Trope CG. Serum CA 125 level allows 26. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of
early identification of nonresponders during induction chemotherapy. Gynecol Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. IARC Press: Lyon 2003.
Oncol 1993; 49: 73–79. 27. Kaplan EL and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.
9. Frasci G, Conforti S, Zullo F et al. A risk model for ovarian carcinoma J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.
patients using CA 125. Time to normalization renders second-look laparotomy 28. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc
redundant. Cancer 1996; 77: 1122–30. 1972; B 34: 187–220.