Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Week1 Solutions
Week1 Solutions
x′ = x − u1 t , t′ = t . (1)
which corresponds to a Galilean boost with velocity v = u1 + u2 , as expected from the usual
classical addition of velocities. Note that we needed t′ = t in the second step of the first
equation. Therefore, this rule for velocity addition would not hold if time was left invariant
(i.e. if there were an absolute clock).
Solution 2: Estimates of β
a) Take c = 299 792 458 m/s ≃ 3 × 108 m s−1 .
120 000
i) v = 120 km h−1 = m s−1 ≃ 33.3 m s−1 .
3 600
33.3
β≃ ≃ 1.1 × 10−8 .
3 × 108
ii) Source: NASA (facts and figures on the ISS).
v ≃ 5 miles/s ≃ 8 km/h ≃ 8000 m/s (Using 1 mile ≃ 1.6 km).
8000
β≃ ≃ 2.6 × 10−5 .
3 × 108
iii) Source: NASA article on the Halley Comet.
v ≃ 54.55 km/s = 54 500 m/s.
54 500
β≃ ≃ 2 × 10−4 .
3 × 10 8
iv) Source: Florian Peißker et al., The Astrophysical Journal, 899 50 (2020) – Table 3.
v ≃ 23 928 km/s
23 928 000
β≃ ≃ 8 × 10−2 !!!
3 × 108
29.8 × 10−2
v) v = 29.8 cm/ns ≃ −9
m/s = 2.98 × 108 m/s.
10
2.98 × 108
β≃ ≃ 0.994 .
299 792 458
1
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
b) Relativistic effects are most important in scenario v) (the muons seem to live for longer
than they should when measured in the Earth frame — time dilation by a factor of
γ = 9.142).
Although star S4714 presents an extreme case, effects from Special Relativity should still
be weak at 8% of the speed of light, with a time dilation factor of γ = 1.003.
b) An easy way to see how solutions to the wave equation behave is to assume g(x ± ct) to
be a Gaussian distribution with some width σ and mean µ, but any distribution behaves
in essentially the same way. A Gaussian distribution is defined as
(u − µ)2
1
g(u) = √ exp − , and therefore (10)
σ 2π 2σ 2
(x − (∓ct))2
1
g(x ± ct) = √ exp − , (11)
σ 2π 2σ 2
such that for g(x ± ct) the x distribution has mean µ = ∓ct, reflecting that the wave
propagates at c. The sketch of these solutions should look something like figure 1.
What we see is that the solution g(x − ct) propagates forward with at c, while g(x + ct)
propagates backward with speed −c.
2
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
−4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4
x′ = x − V t , (12)
t′ = t , (13)
to obtain
∂ ∂x′ ∂ ∂t′ ∂ ∂
= + = , (14)
∂x ∂x ∂x′ ∂x ∂t′ ∂x′
∂ ∂x′ ∂ ∂t′ ∂ ∂ ∂
= ′
+ ′
= −V ′
+ ′. (15)
∂t ∂t ∂x ∂t ∂t ∂x ∂t
showing that the wave equation is not invariant under Galilean boosts.
3
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
It is also possible to compute the second order derivatives with respect to the boosted
coordinates (t′ , x′ ) explicitly, and one finds as a final result
∂2
′ ′ 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
f (t , x ) − 2 −V ′ − V ′ f (t′ , x′ ) = 0 ⇐⇒ (18)
∂(x′ )2 c ∂t′ ∂x ∂t′ ∂x
∂ 2f
2
∂ 2f 2
1 ∂ f 2 ∂ f
⇐⇒ − − 2V ′ ′ + V = 0, (19)
∂(x′ )2 c2 ∂(t′ )2 ∂x ∂t ∂(x′ )2
which is the same result one obtains when expanding out equation (17).
which turns out to be the case. Therefore, functions of the type (20) are solutions to
the wave equation in the new frame. The form of the solution also tells us that forward
propagating solutions have velocity c−V , while backward propagating waves have velocity
c + V . Additionally, if the boost velocity is equal to that of the wave, one of the solutions
does not propagate.
∂ 2f
= 0, (25)
∂x2
1
This is because we can choose which of the factors to apply first to each solution.
4
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
x1 (t) = (c − vs ) (t − t0 ) , (28)
x2 (t) = (c − vs ) (t − t0 − T ) . (29)
The slopes are fixed by the wave propagation speed, and the linear coefficients are fixed
by the emission times, x1 (t0 ) = 0, x2 (t0 + T ) = 0.
b) The transformation to the rest frame of the medium is an inverse Galilean boost with the
velocity of the source vs ,
y = x + vs t . (30)
y1 (t) = c t − (c − vs ) t0 , (31)
y2 (t) = c t − (c − vs ) (t0 + T ) . (32)
The observed period in this reference frame is obtained by computing the times at which
the wave peaks cross the origin (or any other arbitrary point),
c − vs
y1 (t1 ) = 0 ⇐⇒ t1 = t0 , (33)
c
c − vs
y2 (t2 ) = 0 ⇐⇒ t2 = (t0 + T ) . (34)
c
5
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
z = y − vr t , (37)
z1 (t) = (c − vr ) t − (c − vs ) t0 , (38)
z2 (t) = (c − vr ) t − (c − vs ) (t0 + T ) . (39)
The times at which the observer receive each wave peak are
c − vs
z1 (ta ) = 0 ⇐⇒ ta = t0 , (40)
c − vr
c − vs
z2 (tb ) = 0 ⇐⇒ tb = (t0 + T ) . (41)
c − vr
6
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
d2 ′ d2 ⃗
d2
⃗
r = ⃗
r i − V t = ⃗ri . (45)
dt2 i dt2 dt2
Then, consider the relative position between particles i and j in the boosted frame,
⃗ri ′ − ⃗rj ′ = ⃗ri − V⃗ t − ⃗rj − V⃗ t = ⃗ri − ⃗rj (46)
The most generic force that fits this description is, therefore
X
F⃗i = F⃗ ⃗ri − ⃗rj ; t ,
(47)
j̸=i
where F⃗ is some generic function of all of the relative positions. We have also included
time, which is left unchanged by Galilean boosts.
d ′
p⃗i ′ = mi ⃗r (48)
dt i
d
= mi ⃗ri − V⃗ t (49)
dt
d
= mi ⃗ri − mi V⃗ = p⃗i − mi V⃗ . (50)
dt
!
X X X
P⃗ =
′ ′
p⃗i = p⃗i − mi V⃗ = P⃗ − mi V⃗ . (51)
i i i
Identifying the sum in parenthesis as the total mass of the system M , this reads
P⃗ ′ = P⃗ − M V⃗ . (52)
Differentiating this result with respect to time in the boosted frame, t′ = t, we see
d ⃗′ d ⃗ ⃗ = d P⃗ − M V⃗ = d P⃗ .
P = P − M V (53)
dt′ dt′ dt dt
7
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
F⃗ = −∇U ⃗ = − 1 ∂U R
⃗ (|R|) ⃗. (62)
R ∂R
⃗ ′ = R,
Finally, since we have shown both U ′ = U and R ⃗ we find
F⃗ ′ = F⃗ , (63)
8
Prof. David Hilditch Relatividade
André Cordeiro (TA) Week 1 — Solutions 2023/2024
mẍ = 0 , (64)
mÿ = −mg . (65)
mẍ′ = 0 , (69)
mÿ ′ = −mg . (70)
Since both accelerations and Newtonian gravity are preserved under Galilean trans-
formations,the equations of motion are invariant under Galilean boosts, i.e. observers
B and A agree.
ii) For observer A,
x′ = x − V t =⇒ ẋ′ = ẋ − V , (73)
y ′ = y =⇒ ẏ ′ = ẏ . (74)
The observers do not agree on the initial conditions, which are not invariant under
Galilean transformations.