HATH SBE F No. 127 2008 05 A CAFLEC May fanwmnennen} sauna xanns needs EET EAB RR Bea TER AT HR, RAH ERAS PRUNES OBE LACK 100089) WM HB: ALLRAREGTRL ARMY BEAIALRPPBRERDBE SGRLEBE Ft RATES RANGE EH RRR BK BAM AGS ERE RRR, KERB HERR RDLEPS ER PAMARRE, ALN PARES I AEM GT RHO, BAMBI BERRBARE EMTS BRIE. RRA: RRS BARE TE ALT RRRDHS SPAS} 3eS 1319.3 SUMRARIRD: A 5 BARA) RBA Z RO Sl. AHMED AF AIL AMER RAAB EAR DE IE PYF Ho RIGA TAKE MBB, IEF VA Hoey Hi)" tal YAKS” (lexical priming) FCW RE LIE. Hoey HDR RT BIA SH eae HR LEA Be AE AR FAL i Hh BY 3} AE PB ( 2005; 13). BRE MTR CAMA ML BART AA ATES, PURE SERIE STE ORR, AEE FRO T E AERG RR AEREAARHARRBRAG. ARRAS KERN PARAL ARB. 1 RRERATR 1.1 ARE “JSR” (colligation, HEE“ ACR” a“ HE Be" BURA ORR A. WRI Finh (1957 [1968 ] :181) $8, #4 I watched him 4 FFI" FE — Aft + shat dent + SPARTA A HRA R A AIR, ARI PHY “HR” BD a, ‘SCHLMF : 1001 -5795 ( 2009 )03-0018-0006 BERHZE. RAS, AREREA KARR RAMHRKA. MRT —AKM, Ml Baker, Har- die & McEnery ( 2006; 36) fi) (#38) AEE FARA IL Si) BX colligation 3 — i] 5% B88 EDR TU BN A FBRAI EEN window 336i), BAA window HA Arid. HiME AAR EASTHAM ‘SpAYERLTS TA (1 CLAWS, MEW AEH IA 96 - 7% ) (Garside & Smith, 1997). Xs it WAFS i8 OEE al RRA SRA RAT Mo RAAB ER. — ARIA ( tag sequences 3% POSgrams ) Hi ‘GE RERC OY BA 3) BF (A, Aarts & Granger, 1998 ;Tono, 1999; Hunston & Francis ,2000; #8 &.,2003b) ; =. SEE — TAI BY OEE HL AY ah Ha A HR I SE (Mi, Francis, Hunston & Manning, 1996, 1998; Mindt, 1995 ,2002 ; HBL , 20035 Fh MFA 2004 5 Hh HEIR, Bik $#,2006) ;= BAHAI. Mi Biber & Reppen (1998) & FANE A 4], Gabriclatos ( 2007) F if Fett ARE TE EXP (2004) RF BKB, UR RRR (2008) HAAS FM MHA F HABER TM MMM, ARG HET EMRE TE. RMR ME I, EES HAM; 2008.12.25 RA ATASEAD BIC ATAB A KALE BEC A (O8ICT4OON2) Bem ASCH ARS HE IIR 8 elt — IE, “18+HR F: REFIFRGBHORRRALKRS FAH ERAS BF AS A Ee RICE HAMMASKA, CART MOAB. REAL (UTE GEE HR EI RTT Was EE FEBS RATT Se As A EHH MT think SPER ‘POET iB Fa SEAR ( SPH 1) , LA BAR so. ve that, in order «+, as --+ as 44 Hi) AUG ( Bea) ) HAA A HIST ECR RSE PEELE NTE. so think NP+vP THAT +NP+ VP FALL T think 2 1.2 RRROTR DOF BATRA LT think 3 SPR ST FREERST RURAL RW LEE. RR FLAG think A MAME RA WERT HMR JBL EE Firth ASI AAC X (BU PAS + BS) EAD BK. JAB 1 PHYLA DI) :think Fl so MRM AILS HOAEMC Rea] 4 T think AMMA] so AAMC I think ez THEE that AYA FARE; I think Je that AREAL. AD JI think A BEA ( syntagmatic) KRAVIA Fi (NP) HEH BM (that M47) VA De HR IAI (80) 9 a1 think 1 ARH IEA ( paradigmatic ) PARAVAS ERE. RARE [JAA Sinclair (1991 ) (IFA AY °F 18 HELM ( Idiom: Principle ) #1 FF 1586 #6 J SU) (Open Choice Principle) . RAAT BA, RE SS Aes. tt TAF ASOT EH AKA ERR APTN. HAZ ARRAS HT EP ARATE EMSS HT ERIE, FOP IT AUBHSS. HRDEAAT RAM AR Ae, ALA AF Di BE EAT REET I Ol REM RK. TELIA RAT EEA ARAB | think so 3XPF IRS. ROBE RA Ae RT T think BAA) FUGA. Bb ASHE TIF ARTE BE OTA BAIS RIS ELA PEE RAMS TPL MERA IHT ABER. I think so AAT By fee ZEAE BY RS 5 THAT + NP + VP $f, 2 BER WALA RA Eee. AA YE SE AT RE A SL REN LEN. AA MRE AE ME ERT ABRET MES) AEE TIL AK GB MEY DT BA AY RF TS A Ts IR EE MAME LRSM, LAMENT AER ER ORAM MAA KA tT I AUB OAR ALR. UI MURA AG BE, ATE AT CLS RA ETT. A FER ATR AA RE LS th IE TFET KARAM ADT. 2 WRAL IARC 21 STFROGAOAREMRA RWS A — BiG T AES (ED A PEAS, FRAT R ODA ARER. PETE EF EMA PERCE RL RIE RY ER Reo BUR RATA MLA CRE, LAY IE A MT EARN EAE ANB RHAREARAREBA YT a: 1) ARATE BH PARR, Ec AS EHHERRR (2) SE FATE RUBE, EK EE HA RI ( AT ARERR TE TALENTS AS EE DAA , WA Be IT REVENS) : 3) RRBE, ULM GA AKA WE, PT WRARKR. 2.2 RTT EMR BUTTE APTA AR A EET LA RE SY ‘$F #5 ( Colligator ) 4M iE WY #34 ( regular expressions) . SEPARA RE OA PEP A DEFEA A E145 FF BCBS AF PFE DK A IK ( pat- term) FFGE AY TIL. TEM RS AAT DL FEE RE SL RATAN 5 DALAM, SEE TE AS PT DF TE Mes A—-VHH (TL 3). FIRES 2 A RARE AT ER So SSA 50 BE I 8, SL AE SS oh ES WMO, RATAN LARA He 2 EL os A RCM AL HBR Ze | AV 2) RB AE LTH Results TO. 38 1 ABA HICK AR IL ESRD PEAS IAAL TEU SB 4 EAS © FRED AMAR IRIE CLAWST Tage, HE be ‘p27 Feel lcs uh laa7 ings. +19HEE, F: REPISRGEMMRRRARD FER 2 RSH RRA SS SIR aE PANAMA. Results YO PAT Hae SGEALA dr IF WA PH Details 0 id SAROERIX, FRU FWR AAA De- tails C1 Se SR FT ak — A BARMEL. ADL PL 3 AL FIRED DT AE Re BH HS OTE ESEBUARDL ( #ziAGRW “\S + _VB\S + \3(\S +_ (RX]\S + \s) # \S+_V\SN" G8 SREESIZE 1). FS ARI Shi RENE Rah SAU AR TAHT BN Tr ESE eA I HERA AR EAe E A HDAE BRL FRA SOT, eB FT LAGE HR ah eA HE, PATHAK. ARATAM PMCS BRE AA ar 0 OEE RAR A, ME HR 2008). FREAD Y Oe BS AE AAR SHAS AM PLT ESOT. BAS SATA REE A SH AFT EBT AEST TT Fo HEF CLAWS RUSE Bh ABS SEI ES RMSE AA EAN. RATA VLA BY 20+ RPE AVERSA EK S BA Te ET BA BBE HIG IRD TT fist. 2.3 APRA #1 LAHAREPTE (SHREYA AT(1) 2, 32629 LO #1 R4) PENH ASAE AE SPA TED. FE) A) LOEB REE IA the AY SAUER ee a EH th SK FAY PEARS ALE the (AALS WISER the + BIZ, Hal + Sta] + the + 4 ial” UE TP HEMT ED) FATS RARE. IRA RR OK BAe) S wR RT. NT BCR EAS EBS, RATE AY MG SEA AE HD A SRAM HGR BRA LE AED BE A A PS AP ET HR 21 RUA ‘SAR RE POR 16s te ry . saa “« Ee RAE] 16K mR 4) he RRC + Ae NSE the eet tee the elt he tion PIRHAMONET te qulty he cheatin the at oe ie the phe wd 2.4 RT 2.4.1 tee e SESE 2 LD AN PE (NS) ABE _ SPAHR (INNS) HIM 10 8 3 ~4 ava RR WL 2) > RAPRITITES 5 PALE OBR BR FS SL C1 FPS WORD Sta). ATT EE — IS a et HEBEE SF (40.05 WERE AK L,LL > 3. 84), MOREA OTe AT LAE A AEA HTD IEA EAE Dy tt APE HES ARB a HE 52 “PTL APPGE NNI S44 , 4 FT 38 Uk int my -APPGE opinion_NN1, JE(i6/41 5 YK in_II our_APPGE, society NNI,4 %& in_IT our_APPGE country_NN1,3 in_II my_APPGE view _NN1,2 2K to_Il our_APPGE na- tion_NN1,2 Uk to_II our_APPGE society _NNIo ZE3¢3¢ BALM 275 Ue AT NNI IO AT Hitiy 67 YW the_AT end_NNI of_1O the_AT, #E5%—. #248 Renouf( 1992)HEE: RATEISRECHHRRRFLBL FRAG ULB PIE Fait b> BNC fH) POSgram (#9445, the end of the #8 J2: HES — HY DU SEIB. 275 HPA 67 tk AT NNI 10 AT SE — AA LH, AEE IE SI AE — SE. OP EA: REDE Ath SMA TASHTAAAMERSIE, BAUME Bal AEF Re SEAR A (TE BE HY) HE PETRA TSE. 22 POAREHARARES -4 MBSA (M10) NS Be 32 APPGE NNT 2S ATNNLIO AT 6s 4 MATHN 2m WATNNT IO 3.08 40 MATIN 258 ATNNL IO NN Ln 9 UMATHN mr WATNNL 2.95 35 OAPPCE NN 20 WAT ILNNI 298 33 WaTanN 17 ATU NNL IO an 29 NNLIOAPPCE NMI 172._-NNIIOAT-NNI 195 28 NNIAT NN i NM maT NE Ls a ATEN 156 ATION an 24 CSAPPSODB WWD ISI_ATLISNN Lo 2.4.2 MRR KI MS SURE T fe ee ECHR FE Sy th GH BRAT A AF IRA OT RENE eT SBR-RING RRR RK. RL Bi + (EL) HARD BRR HE TAG HRAR, HK ARH N\w +1 Viw +0)" oil, MRA I, RD RAMM + ARMM RAR( BH) 19 nog mae etm hve We become | 3 coin hae 6 city have reverent hve | 3 © weld have | 3 etn have 4 _prertent bil bo elo eelip 3 PRORETAMNE EE eRO aA A oh AY ETA — BA. ERLE BE SPT, BRAT PT VA iE — Be eB a] a Bs ‘education, goverment, society, student, world, coun- try, university, life, technology, patient, family, school F. AIL education #i technology ESC A HEH Ke te AR AT EA — BC AR. RPA — TI SS MS RRS EL TEL Ae Te A LL, SOIC TERA, Sa Hah EER. WEF world, country, university, school (ARSE (KBE. AR RERD GRLARAPLREEELAX, ARB RABBIT EMRE. KATA CUE BES RES 25 WESC OARS 2.5.1 SRR ER HORA ALG EE SETH the + HORE TE ial A ALFALFA, CED TRE PAT LR the_\S +\s\S +_[IR]\S +R, Shim BIA IF 2 4 HEE. BEM G MOAR, Tae IRA AF a8 0 5 A BE BAT I BA te + LEER 7 The aR BRR » The RoR pC 3 Toe RRR Asa SLAP TEP NA La RAP ORE, EAT LAB 29 4 ‘The RGR Sif) —2¢ 5k FARK , M0 the less advantaged , the less motivated, the less privileged, the more active, the more common RATE ATIEL AIA P ECA] make BEM SECA SEE, HE JTTAAR ( make a claim,makes a deci- sion making a comment,made policies %) , #19 LUA JATERIE (mal kd]e(s)? V\S + \s(alan_\S +\ 8)? \S+_N\S + ) #98 ALIS FAD He BERRI FE. 2.5.2 RRS A Rw aE EAR ie SES CAVIAR tT SH HE BE FGAATHER. IF] Cheng et al. (2006) ArH DIA ARE Set" REHASH” (skipgram) AMAL BE Hy IEE FAY“ HEA AAA” (concgram ) i 23K fol, LE BR TE eb aes A (M0 Ih is + BRIA), as «+ as,on F) PIM AEDT REP AER it_\S + \s\S + VBAS +\s\S +_J\S + SLEW R3) , PILATE B) “Te+ be Shia] + JE Ai)” aH BST A ER Bho TPA BAR, M RAT RITE EP RR AH) 264 ORI A 82 Ut + is + LRA + for + AVA, ‘TARLIR” ,48 It + is + BAT + JAE] that” #1 39 Ke + is + BR + to + Shia”, 254 WII: TUS PAS PEA om RR iS FE :86 “It + is + LBA + to + HARA” 58 MMe + is + BA] + SAID RERA that” , P13 20 “Te + is + AE i + for + FRAY PASH” Sb A AA BE IS SLT ARR BYR ALIA, EECA It is ADJ for sb. to -2L-HRS, FE: AFEIAREBAH ARRAS FAA cdo sth”. FAVE Hid 2 8 HO) ART FR St BD ke EH OY. RATA ARAL IG Aa RS A +s + obvious AE Fil)” (FGA: “it_\S + \s\S +_VB \S + \s( (apparent) | (clear) | ( discernible) | (evident) | (noticeable) | ( observable) | ( obvious) )_J\S +". LAF BRAVE AP — FR HL EG PAE SE RATES 2.6 ERISM SIE iB RE SAGES SPT BS SF RE, BATT A PA A ME TPE Oy RE 5 HE Da A AE A, BAT, RSET AL AE RB EBT SAMARAS CAE. BRA EME RAR T TSR ACE AE PAP, ED DARE ETE SC TH SHE HM RHA PTE ES FA He BOR ORR He. Bin, aE aca BUTANE Se A Be A a A BRE SCATH. Heh EERO AO MUE AEIE HEMRABA UR REMERE RS. SOC ATR AOLAVEEHY, HAN Once upon a time Bk Se Hi BEAEA BATE. TE aH A Fh SRE BB (He a ABER + Bhi + BAR + SIR 1, PPISL VO PPY VVO, Xt) 644 #9 % I think you know #11 I mean you know %F) , (ii #5 iz} 9 90H D2 HOS a RAY (Sn, EEN) + 4% id + SPA, AT NN 10, Xt AVES HI the end of F) . KAABAT PE WS) iA BEE EAB — 2 PET RT EERE RA PHL ERHWDE. FEF RRR: HARE ‘WordSmith Tools #1 AntCone 4% 31 ial ( concordance lot) Sy eM NSBR 5 55 — A His RH A AE EI LG FEUD EE FORBADE ROR HE DBA TE ET AT SARA BURL DOPE AT Se MG Me aH EE A ERTED ER. DOANE ER ERIE A} HP, HE AL GE FE AT J, Biber, Connor & Upton (2007 : 95 2.3.4.5 BE) o BERBER EEX PREZ RAR ROR BR RTT UR HP HY 6 FEL (al (ABR DIS |6, | _N\S +) PLR 6 PSE BAILA iA] ( AGAR \b\S16,| IVS +). PPE RRATIE ‘i Sa FA HE “2+ So RELATE PAT RE PEE REE SLA AHR FAR BETTE A A UTR . BE AT A REE ERI AACR. RAG, BERRA ARRAN A A 6 ‘EF AER A HE HSS HE, HOE ‘Bho HE RETA ArT DUAR BY TRAE BS EM AS So BRAT AT DL — We HE HA DS) AI PE BB 3 PRES IRN L F PRE, TT BAE FARA RREROE RA. 3 wie ZR] SEK ATE A RET RET FE RR RTE BOSE URE — TRE AEAOSPOE, RE BALD EE RR AEF ‘HK (usage-based grammar). ULE A MUBLAVIE HMTRKAR ALA, BAA RATE ‘RTT TES AU RR SHAT BATA WRB VEGAN REA EAB AE BE HE AMM REET ATE HIT Sh A BF BIR AE HY He SE PO — eS SEAR, ICICLE SSE HK TE BEAD RARR, AXA TAA UO ES NRA ICT RAKE BR TAC AHS AC FTE TATE A A APH CEA ILDETE HK Ae, AT RS ee oP DEERE Bb oP Hi LAAT ET GG RE REE RASH. AME RESIS AFRERS WAGESAT eer [1] Aarts, J. & S. Granger. Tag Sequences in Leamer Corpora: [A Key to Intelanguage Grammar and Discourse[ A]. In S, Granger (ed). Leamer English on Computer C]. Landon: Longman, 1958 (2] Baker, P., A. Hardie & A. Meknery. A Glosary of Cor pus Linguistics [ MJ. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press ,2006, Biber, D. & R. Reppen. Comparing Native and Leamer Perspectives on English Grammar; A Study of Complement Clauses[ A]. In Granger, S. (e.). Leamer English on Computer). London: Longman, 1998;145 - 158. Biber, D. , U. Connor & T. Upton. Discourse onthe Move: ‘Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure M ] (3. (4HED F: ATFIAREEHHRRRARMS TRA Amsterdam; John Benjamins 2007 [5] Cheng, W. C. Greaves & M. Warren. From N ~ gram to ‘Skipgram to Conegram [J]. Intemational Journal of Corpus Linguistica, 2006, 11(4) 411 ~ 433 [6] Firth, J. A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930 ~S5[ A]. Studies in Linguistic Analysin (Special Volume of the Philo logical Society) ,1957. [7] Reprinted in F. Palmer. Selected Papers of J. R. Fith 1952 -59[C]. London and Harlow: Longmans, Green and Co. , id. ,1968 168 ~208. [8] Francis, G., $. Hunston & E. Manning. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patera 1: Verbs[ MJ. London; HarpeCallns, 1996 [9] Francis, G., $. Hunsion & F. Manning, Collins COBUILD Grammar Patiems 2; Nouns and Adjectives{ MJ. London; HarperCollin 1998, (10} Gabrielatos, C. conditional es Modal Coligations: A Corpus-based Investignion[ A]. In M. Davies, P. Ray- son, S. Hunston & P. Danielsson eds. ). Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference: Corpus Linguistics 2007 ([C]. Birmingham; Univenity of Biemingham,2007. Garside, R. & N. Smith. A Hybrid Grammatical Tagger: CLAWSATA]. In R. Gamide, G. Leech & A. McEnery (eds. ). Corpus Annotation; Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora[ C]. London: Longgan, 1997 102 -121 Hoey, M. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language[ M].. London; Routledge 2005. Hurston, S. & G. Francis, Patten Grammar; A Corpus driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English M ] oy) (12) (3) (4) Us] [16] 7] (18) (19) (20) {21} (22) (23] (24) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000. Mind, D. A Corpus-based Grammar for ELT(A]. In B. Ketleman & G. Marko (eds. ). ‘Teaching and Leaming by Doing Corpus Analysis{ C]. Amsterdam: Rodopi2002. Mindt, D. An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb: Modal Verbs{ J. Berlin: Comelsen, 1995. Sinclar, J. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation[ MJ. Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, 1991. ‘Tono, Y. A Corpus-based Analysis of Imerlanguage Devel- ‘opment; Analysing Part-of-speech Tag Sequences of EFL Leamer Corporal AJ. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszeayk & P. Melia (eds. ). PALC99: Practical Applictions in Lan- spunge Corpora C]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1999 ; 323 ~ 340, RAI, NEITHER. Colligator EBT AL Z]. AOR: SAE SPIE ERE 2008, SBE. KP Ae HES AS FG TE, (J). S555 BATE 2008, (1) 51 ~58. WEE. EAT HAR BALM). TF St RTA HA REAL ,20032, RAR, SERN UII AF PIO HM BERS). Dh Rae SORE, 2003b, (6) 438 - 445. ‘TWEE, AE. LEE 3-8 & SI A BA EEF ROE ATT (I). I OCE SITE, 2006, (4) :272 -278. aM ARF DE A PER SLT]. ARINE,2004, (4) 410-418, HK FALL. COL EC PAL BRAABA RIT (J). SSB #2004 , (4) :30 - 32. Learner Corpus Based Colligation Research; Concepts, Methods and Sample Analyses XU Jia-jin, XIONG Wen-xin (National Research Center for Foreign Language Education , Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China) Abstract: In this paper, we hold a more open view of co-selectiveness between grammar pattems and lexis, gram- matical categories, textual properties and sometimes a combination of these categories. The object of inquiry for the present paper is Chinese leamer English colligational behaviors on the basis of part-of-speech tagged texts. This paper offers a critical review of the concept, as well as tools, research methods and sample analyses. Key words: Colligation; Learner Corpus; Corpus Linguisties; Research Method; Colligator +B