Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Comparative Analysis of LGBTQI+ and AAPI Communities on the Path to Equity in America
A Comparative Analysis of LGBTQI+ and AAPI Communities on the Path to Equity in America
A Comparative Analysis of LGBTQI+ and AAPI Communities on the Path to Equity in America
America
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
A Comparative Analysis of LGBTQI+ and AAPI Communities on the Path to Equity in
America
By analyzing and juxtaposing the journeys of two distinct factions within American
culture who have met with differing levels of achievement in pursuit of equitable likelihood, I
shall endeavor to accomplish the task at hand. While immense strides have fortunately been
achieved of late to advance equitable treatment and access for that community comprising
lesbians, gay individuals, bisexuals, transgender people, as well as those identifying elsewhere
on the queer spectrum or as intersex whom shall serve as my initial focus of discussion, certain
challenges persist nevertheless in fully realizing inclusion and nondiscrimination for all. I will
talk about how this community will be the first group I address. The second demographic I shall
investigate consists of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs), who have been subjected
LGBTQI+ Community:
endured mistreatment, bigotry, and intolerance due to their sexuality and personal concept of
gender. Prior to 1950, homosexuality was seen as a mental illness (EEOC, 2022). While much
work remains, there have thankfully been substantial gains over recent years in the ongoing
struggle to ensure equal dignity, respect, and chance for all people across the diverse spectrum of
gender identities and orientations. The U.S. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's
crucial role in advocating for fair and equal treatment of LGBTQI+ individuals in the workplace
cannot be overstated. That year, the highest court's decision determined that bias in the
workplace owing to how one identifies intimately or with respect to sex was banned by the
section of the landmark statute dealing with civil liberties from over half a century prior that
prohibits prejudices in employment. This landmark decision marked a significant step towards
equal employment opportunities for LGBTQI+ individuals. LGBTQI+ individuals are now
actively involved in the military, media, and government, with rights expanded through the
Bostock v. Clayton County Supreme Court decision, Executive directives by President Biden and
provisions against job discrimination in 22 states (EEOC, 2022). The rights and protections of
LGBTQI+ people in American society cannot be taken for granted (EEOC, 2022).
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have faced a myriad of hurdles and hardships
resulting from racism and discrimination endured throughout history. Nearly 3,800 acts of hatred
were reported to the Stop Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Hate Reporting Center
between March 2020 and February 2021 (Uclahealth, 2021). Unfortunately in recent times, the
unfortunate upsurge in intolerant acts of racism and brutality against those of Asian descent has
painfully highlighted the ongoing hardships faced all too often by this marginalized community.
Disparities vary by geography, and no two states adhere to reporting procedures that are
identical, for instance.In publicly accessible databases, people of Asian descent are categorized
as "other" when they are located in the states of South Carolina and Florida (Uclahealth, 2021).
AAPIs have also been subjected to health inequities, with racism being a significant factor to
uneven access to healthcare services. This problem was made much worse by the COVID-19
A comparison of the relative situations of these two groups clearly demonstrates that
while the LGBTQI+ community has attained substantial gains towards equality and equitable
access, those identifying as AAPIs still confront impeding hurdles hindering like progress. The
visibility and advocacy efforts of the LGBTQI+ community, coupled with the legal protections
they have secured and a shifting societal landscape, have contributed to these outcomes differing
determining the apportionment of societal privileges, contemplation may be given not solely to
merit but in addition to attributes such as one's race or ancestry, their gender presentation or
other marginalized affiliations within a community. These decisions might include the granting
of government contracts, admittance to public schools, and job opportunities within the
demands that we advocate for egalitarian policies and legislation, lend support to groups striving
to enact such aims, and confront prejudice and discrimination within our localities. While
world embracing of all remains of utmost importance, earnest self-education paired with tangible
actions advancing inclusion and fairness for every person must be embraced if lasting change is
to be achieved.
References
AmericanBarAssociation. (2009, October 1). Affirmative Action and the Black Experience in
America. Americanbar.org.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/
human_rights_vol36_2009/fall2009/
affirmative_action_and_the_black_experience_in_america/
Uclahealth. (2021, March 29). How racism against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/racism-health-asian-american-pacific-islanders
EEOC. (2022, June 23). Moving Towards Equality in the Workplace for LGBTQI+ Employees.
US EEOC. https://www.eeoc.gov/moving-towards-equality-workplace-lgbtqi-employees