Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dawn News 2 Jul 2024
Dawn News 2 Jul 2024
Dawn News 2 Jul 2024
Editorial
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
‘Cruel jest’
ANOTHER year and another missed opportunity to set things right. But what is it for those who,
by all appearances (outward shows; )ﻇﺎﮨﺮی ﺷﮑﻞ, consider themselves unaccountable
(unanswerable; )ﻏﯿﺮ ﺟﻮاﺑﺪہto the public and unfussed (unconcerned; )ﺑﮯ ﻓﮑﺮیby their miseries
(sufferings; ?)ﻣﺼﺎﺋﺐPrecisely three weeks ago, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb had
solemnly (seriously; )ﺳﻨﺠﯿﺪﮔﯽ ﺳﮯdeclared that there were “no sacred cows (untouchable
entities; ”)ﻣﻘﺪس ﮔﺎﺋﮯin his eyes and that “everyone would have to contribute to the economy”.
The pronouncement (declaration; )اﻋﻼنhad come a day before the federal budget for the new
fiscal year was unveiled (revealed; )ﺑﮯ ﻧﻘﺎب ﮐﯿﺎ, and it had momentarily (briefly; )ﻋﺎرﺿﯽ ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮ
ignited (sparked; )ﺑﮭﮍﮐﺎﯾﺎsome hope that Pakistan, at long last, was serious about setting itself
on a path of equitable (fair; )ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﮧtaxation and sustainable (maintainable; )ﭘﺎﺋﯿﺪارspending
under a ‘technocrat’ finance minister. Between then and this weekend, however, the nation has
realised that the finance minister’s ‘assurances (guarantees; ’)ﯾﻘﯿﻦ دﮨﺎﻧﯽhad been little more
than a cruel jest (harsh joke; )ﻇﺎﻟﻤﺎﻧﮧ ﻣﺬاق. Speaking at a news conference on Sunday, Mr
Aurangzeb could only express his condolences (sympathies; )ﺗﻌﺰﯾﺖto the salaried class on the
higher taxes he had imposed on them.
It is now widely (extensively; )وﺳﯿﻊ ﭘﯿﻤﺎﻧﮯ ﭘﺮaccepted that the coalition (alliance; )اﺗﺤﺎد
government’s ‘crisis budget’ will achieve little more than strangulating (suffocating; )ﮔﻼ ﮔﮭﻮﻧﭩﻨﺎ
those already paying their dues (payments; )واﺟﺒﺎتwhile allowing sacred cows to fatten
(increase; )ﺑﮍﮬﺎﻧﺎthemselves even further. Actual economic course correction has once again
been put off (delay; )ﻣﻠﺘﻮی ﮐﺮﻧﺎfor another time. The term ‘deepening the tax net (increasing tax
collection; ’)ﭨﯿﮑﺲ ﻧﯿﭧ ﮐﻮ ﮔﮩﺮا ﮐﺮﻧﺎis being used widely in a bid (attempt; )ﮐﻮﺷﺶto rationalise
(justify; )ﺟﻮازwhat was clearly another half-hearted (unenthusiastic; )ﻧﯿﻢ دﻟﯽattempt at fixing the
state’s perennial (lasting; )داﺋﻤﯽrevenue woes (troubles; )ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ. It is little more than a
euphemism (mild term; )ﺧﻮﺷﻨﻤﺎ ﻟﻔﻆ, a fig leaf (cover-up; )ﭘﺮدہ ﭘﻮﺷﯽfor our decision-makers’
continuing unwillingness (reluctance; )ﻋﺪم ﺧﻮاﮨﺶor inability (incapacity; )ﻋﺪم ﺻﻼﺣﯿﺖto
meaningfully (significantly; )ﺑﺎﻣﻌﻨﯽexpand the tax base (taxable resources; )ﭨﯿﮑﺲ ﮐﯽ ﺑﻨﯿﺎد. To add
insult to injury (harm; )ﭼﻮٹ, the government has not felt compelled (forced; )ﻣﺠﺒﻮرto cut its own
expenditures in any meaningful (significant; )ﺑﺎﻣﻌﻨﯽway: those paying will just be forced to pay
even more to fund its profligacy (wastefulness; )ﻓﻀﻮل ﺧﺮﭼﯽ. Meanwhile (at the same time; اﺳﯽ
)دوران, the trader class, whose activities remain largely undocumented (unrecorded; )ﻏﯿﺮ دﺳﺘﺎوﯾﺰی,
have been let off once again, presumably (probably; )ﺷﺎﯾﺪbecause of political expediencies
(advantages; )ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﯽ.
Likewise, while a big show has been made of increased taxes on real estate (property; )ﺟﺎﺋﯿﺪاد,
these will apply mainly to ordinary citizens and not to those who belong to the armed forces or
the federal or provincial bureaucracies. Our lawmakers have also managed to have their travel
allowances (stipends; )اﻻؤﻧﺴﺰincreased from Rs10 per kilometre to Rs25, increased the number
of travel vouchers (coupons; )واؤﭼﺮزthey receive annually from 25 to 30, and also introduced a
measure which would see unused air tickets from one year carry over (transfer; )ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﮐﺮﻧﺎto the
next instead of being cancelled. The audacity (boldness; )ﺟﺮاتof such measures should be
illustrative enough to show how the ruling classes continue to privilege (advantage; )اﻣﺘﯿﺎز
themselves while throwing the rest of the nation under the bus. That this is happening while the
authorities clamour (uproar; )ﮨﻨﮕﺎﻣﮧfor an umpteenth (countless; )ﺑﮯ ﺷﻤﺎرIMF [International
Monetary Fund]
An international organization that provides financial support and advice to member countries]
bailout (financial rescue; )ﻣﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﺪدexplains why this country remains unable to break its shackles
(free itself; )ﺧﻮد ﮐﻮ آزاد ﮐﺮﻧﺎand find a more prosperous (wealthy; )ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎلfuture for its teeming
(abundant; )ﺑﮭﺮا ﮨﻮاmillions.
Limited choices
NONE of the limited choices before the international community where dealing with the Afghan
Taliban regime are very good ones. For example, it would not be advisable (recommended;
) ﻣﺸﻮرہ دﯾﺎ ﮔﯿﺎfor foreign countries to fully embrace (accept; )ﻗﺒﻮل ﮐﺮﻧﺎthe Taliban before securing
commitments from them regarding inclusivity (inclusion; )ﺷﻤﻮﻟﯿﺖand lifting of curbs
(restrictions; )ﭘﺎﺑﻨﺪﯾﺎںthat stand in the way of women’s education and participation in public life.
On the other hand, it would be unwise (foolish; )ﻧﺎﻋﺎﻗﺒﺖ اﻧﺪﯾﺶfor the world to isolate Afghanistan
and leave millions of ordinary Afghans in the lurch. It should be remembered that the last time
the comity (courtesy; )ﺧﻮش اﺧﻼﻗﯽof nations refused to engage with the Taliban, the hard-line
(strict; )ﺳﺨﺖ ﮔﯿﺮoutfit (organization; )ﺗﻨﻈﯿﻢmoved even closer to Al Qaeda. Therefore, the most
feasible (possible; )ﻣﻤﮑﻦcourse at this point appears to be limited engagement with the Taliban,
while continuing to apply pressure upon Afghanistan’s de facto (in reality; )در ﺣﻘﯿﻘﺖrulers to lift
their stringent (strict; )ﺳﺨﺖcurbs on women’s freedom. The international community seems to
have realised the practicality (usefulness; )اﻓﺎدﯾﺖof the aforementioned (previously mentioned;
) ﻣﺬﮐﻮرہ ﺑﺎﻻcourse, which is why Taliban representatives were invited to recent UN-backed
(supported by the United Nations; )اﻗﻮام ﻣﺘﺤﺪہ ﮐﯽ ﺣﻤﺎﯾﺖ ﯾﺎﻓﺘﮧdiscussions in Doha about the future
of Afghanistan. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, who led the Afghan delegation (group
of representatives; )وﻓﺪ, did not mention girls’ education or human rights, but was keen to court
foreign support for his country, and called for lifting (removing; )اﭨﮭﺎﻧﺎsanctions (penalties;
) ﭘﺎﺑﻨﺪﯾﺎںon Afghanistan.
While the Taliban’s track record (history; )رﯾﮑﺎرڈon human rights is abysmal (terrible; )ﺑﮩﺖ ﺧﺮاب,
and the international community should not legitimise (validate; )ﺟﺎﺋﺰthe group’s misogyny
(hatred of women; )ﻋﻮرت ﺳﮯ ﻧﻔﺮت, a more realistic (practical; )ﺣﻘﯿﻘﺖ ﭘﺴﻨﺪاﻧﮧview of the issue is
needed. As per the UN, 23.7m people in Afghanistan are in need, and the country continues to
suffer from “entrenched (established; )ﺟﻤﺎﯾﺎ ﮨﻮاpoverty”. It is evident (clear; )واﺿﺢthen that
ordinary Afghans should not be punished for the Taliban’s medieval (middle ages; )ﻗﺮون وﺳﻄﯽ
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
worldview (perspective; )ﻧﻘﻄﮧ ﻧﻈﺮ. Cutting off (disconnecting; )ﮐﺎﭨﻨﺎAfghanistan from the global
financial system, and preventing states from trading with it, will only add to the population’s
misery (suffering; )ﺑﺪﺣﺎﻟﯽ. Therefore, engagement (involvement; )ﺷﻤﻮﻟﯿﺖwith the Taliban should
continue, with the message that full international recognition can only come when girls are
allowed unobstructed (clear; )ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﺴﺪودaccess to education, and women participation in public
life. Moreover, no terrorist outfits can be allowed to use Afghan soil to attack other countries.
As this process continues, Afghans in need should be able to access international humanitarian
aid. Moreover, Muslim states, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, should make more effort to
convince the Taliban leadership that educating girls does not violate religious norms (standards;
)اﺻﻮل.
India’s victory
IN the end, the best team won — the team that held its nerve best (calmness; )اﻋﺼﺎب ﺑﮩﺘﺮﯾﻦwhen
the stakes (risks; )داؤwere the highest. Batting lynchpin (key player; )ﮐﻠﯿﺪی ﮐﮭﻼڑیVirat Kohli had
laid the platform before bowling ace Jasprit Bumrah brought his side back (team return; ﭨﯿﻢ
) واﭘﺴﯽinto the game and when Suryakumar Yadav took that catch — the debate will rage on
whether it was a legitimate take or a six — the glory (honor; )ﻋﻈﻤﺖwas India’s. For Rohit
Sharma’s men, the T20 World Cup crown ended an 11-year wait for an international title. For
South Africa, the loss in their maiden (first; )ﭘﮩﻠﯽglobal tournament final adds to their long list of
heartbreaks. The title seemed to be theirs with 30 runs required off (needed from; )ﺿﺮورت ﺗﮭﯽ
the last 30 deliveries; the momentum with them. But India came back, just like they did against
arch-rivals (main competitors; )اﮨﻢ ﺣﺮﯾﻒPakistan in the first round of the tournament, to stun the
South Africans. Bumrah delivered telling overs (decisive overs; )ﻓﯿﺼﻠﮧ ﮐﻦ اوورزto clip Proteas’
wings. Yadav then pulled off (achieved; )ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﮐﯿﺎa stunner (shock; )ﺣﯿﺮاﻧﯽon the boundary —
replays later showing that the skirting (avoiding; )اﺟﺘﻨﺎب ﮐﺮﻧﺎhad been pushed back — to dismiss
David Miller. For their stalwarts, Kohli — who hit 76 in the decider — and captain Sharma, it was
a fitting farewell with the duo (pair; )ﺟﻮڑیannouncing that it was their last Twenty20
International. India took the title by winning all their matches, overpowering (overwhelming; )ﻏﺎﻟﺐ
a South African team that had won all of its games before the final, and even without Kohli and
Sharma, they look well-placed to dominate cricket’s shortest format in the years to come.
There are lessons here. India stuck with Kohli and Sharma even though their strike rates came
under question. They backed the others too. Most importantly, they kept faith. A World Cup
where Afghanistan made a shock run to the semi-finals, and where there were some stunning
upsets (disturbances; )ﮨﻨﮕﺎﻣﮯ, has shown that the big boys of world cricket cannot rest on their
laurels (honors; )اﻋﺰازات. There is a need to constantly improve to be the best.
Opinion
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
Did she slip up (mistake; )ﻏﻠﻄﯽwith emergency?
JUNE 25 marked the anniversary (commemoration; )ﺳﺎﻟﮕﺮہof Indira Gandhi’s 21-month 1975-77
emergency. The 50-year-old event came up for censure (criticism; )ﺗﻨﻘﯿﺪin the Lok Sabha
Speaker’s and president Draupadi Murmu’s address to the joint sitting of the two Houses of
Parliament last week. The fuss (commotion; )ﮨﻨﮕﺎﻣﮧover the emergency looks clearly designed to
frame the resurgent (reviving; )اﺑﮭﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﻮاCongress and mask the BJP’s role in far worse and truly
horrific (terrifying; )ﺧﻮﻓﻨﺎکevents like the ethnic (racial; )ﻧﺴﻠﯽcleansing (purging; )ﺻﻔﺎﺋﯽin
Manipur, Gujarat pogroms and the destruction of Kashmiri lives under the Modi government.
Be that as it may, Khushwant Singh, J.R.D. Tata, Bal Thackeray and the Communist Party of
India (CPI) supported Mrs Gandhi’s suspension of civil liberties (personal freedoms; )ﺷﮩﺮی آزادﯾﺎں.
The usually phlegmatic (calm; )ﭘﺮﺳﮑﻮنTata said that “things had gone too far. You can’t imagine
what we’ve been through here — strikes, boycotts, demonstrations (protests; )ﻣﻈﺎﮨﺮے. Why, there
were days I couldn’t walk out of my office into the street”.
The emergency, of course, was fought when it needed to be fought. At JNU, at the dead of night,
K.N. Ganesh would be on the prowl (roam; )ﮔﮭﻮﻣﻨﺎwith cyclostyled (duplicated; )ﻧﻘﻞ ﺷﺪہsheets
excoriating (criticizing; )ﺗﻨﻘﯿﺪ ﮐﺮﻧﺎthe dictatorship. The targets included alleged ‘collaborators’
from faculty and management. Ganesh would slip in his subversive papers under the doors of
hostel inmates (prisoners; )ﻗﯿﺪی. A few could tell from the dragging sound of his worn-out
slippers (footwear; )ﭼﭙﻞwith which he attended Romila Thapar’s ancient history classes that the
zealous (enthusiastic; )ﭘﺮﺟﻮشCPI-M supporter was on the move.
The Gestetner machine, its ink, A4 sheets and stencils (templates; )ﺳﺎﻧﭽﮯwere to be kept from
the security guards and ‘enemy agents’. An “enemy’s” room was selected as safe for the
purpose. Ali Javed, whose communist (socialist; )ﮐﻤﯿﻮﻧﺴﭧparty supported Mrs Gandhi, would
chortle (laugh; )ﻗﮩﻘﮩﮧfor as long as he lived remembering his playing trustee (guardian; )اﻣﺎﻧﺖ دار
of the rival (competitor; )ﺣﺮﯾﻒpartisans’ printing machine. Several students were rounded up
(gathered; )ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎر ﮐﯿﺎand released. Probir Purkayastha was jailed for the entire duration of the
emergency. Purkayastha was in Tihar jail again recently for running a media platform critical
(crucial; )اﮨﻢof the Modi government. A double whammy (blow; )ﺟﮭﭩﮑﺎfor the former communist
student whose party once courted the BJP as an ally (partner; )اﺗﺤﺎدیin the fight for democracy.
JNU students’ union president Devi Prasad Tripathi was arrested soon after. Popular as DPT
[Democratic Progressive Party A major political party in Taiwan] he became a Rajya Sabha MP
and used his position to arrange visas (permits; )وﯾﺰےfor Pakistani peaceniks (peace advocates;
)اﻣﻦ ﭘﺴﻨﺪ.
The other inference is that Indira Gandhi saw a threat to India’s democracy as it was conceived
by her father’s enlightened associates (partners; )ﺳﺎﺗﮭﯽ.
When elections were held in March 1977, Indira Gandhi suffered a resounding defeat in her
bastion of Rae Bareli. The socialist maverick (nonconformist; )ﻏﯿﺮ رواﯾﺘﯽRaj Narain who laid her
low would soon plead with (beg; )اﻟﺘﺠﺎ ﮐﺮﻧﺎher to help depose (overthrow; )ﻣﻌﺰول ﮐﺮﻧﺎher
successor (heir; )ﺟﺎﻧﺸﯿﻦMorarji Desai and instal (install; )ﻧﺼﺐ ﮐﺮﻧﺎCharan Singh as a short-term
prime minister. While the northern states — where the BJP would gain strength — routed
(defeated; )ﺷﮑﺴﺖ دیMrs Gandhi, the southern states stood solidly (firmly; )ﻣﻀﺒﻮﻃﯽ ﺳﮯwith her.
Which explains her winning 154 seats even as she lost her own. That’s much more than the
Congress tally (count; )ﮔﻨﺘﯽin recent polls. Mrs Gandhi made her last comeback (return; )واﭘﺴﯽ
with 373 MPs in 1980, marking the end of the Janata Party experiment. The tally has mocked
her rivals (competitors; )ﺣﺮﯾﻒ.
The emergency came in for censure (criticism; )ﺗﻨﻘﯿﺪin addresses by the Speaker to the Lok
Sabha and by India’s president to the mandated meeting of the two Houses of the new
parliament last week. Let’s see why Rahul Gandhi was miffed (annoyed; )ﻧﺎراضby the strange
references.
Months of student violence — more vicious (malicious; )ﻇﺎﻟﻢthan what prompts the bulldozing
(forcing; )زﺑﺮدﺳﺘﯽ ﮐﺮﻧﺎof suspects’ homes these days — was widely seen as sponsored (funded;
) ﮐﻔﺎﻟﺖ ﮐﯽby the RSS [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh A right-wing Hindu nationalist organization
in India]. It started in Gujarat and spread to Bihar. It spurred (motivated; )ﺗﺤﺮﯾﮏ دیthe rise of
Jayaprakash Narayan — JP — who called on police and army to disobey (defy; )ﻧﺎﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﺮﻧﺎIndira
Gandhi’s orders, which effectively meant a call to revolt (rebellion; )ﺑﻐﺎوتagainst the sitting
prime minister of India. Mrs Gandhi locked him up with his supporters from the right to the left
of the spectrum (range; )داﺋﺮہ, by declaring internal emergency.
The trigger for the measure lay in the Allahabad High Court judgement that found Mrs Gandhi
guilty of using the Public Works Department to construct a podium (platform; )اﺳﭩﯿﺞfrom which
she addressed an election rally. Also, her election manager was a junior government official,
which was illegal. For that, she had to be removed as prime minister and not be able to contest
(dispute; )ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﮧanother election for six years. Going by the leeway (freedom; )آزادیavailable to
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, for example, the high court verdict (judgment; )ﻓﯿﺼﻠﮧwas vicious,
if also a bad joke. JP came out of the jail as a hero, the Lok Nayak, the people’s leader who
helped retrieve (recover; )ﺑﺎزﯾﺎﻓﺖIndian democracy from Indira Gandhi’s authoritarian (dictatorial;
) آﻣﺮاﻧﮧtalons (claws; )ﭘﻨﺠﮯ.
Two inferences can be made. It’s legitimate, even heroic, to call on the army, the bureaucracy,
the works, to disobey the orders of a dictator, a deemed (considered; )ﺳﻤﺠﮭﺎ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯdictator,
since dictators don’t normally accept the accusation (charge; )اﻟﺰامof being one.
The other inference to be drawn (attracted; )ﮐﮭﯿﻨﭽﺎ ﮨﻮاis that Indira Gandhi saw a threat to India’s
democracy as it was conceived (created; )ﺗﺨﻠﯿﻖ ﮐﯿﺎby her father’s enlightened (informed; روﺷﻦ
) ﺧﯿﺎلassociates in the constituent assembly. In the insidiously (subtly; )ﭘﻮﺷﯿﺪﮔﯽ ﺳﮯright-wing
(conservative; )داﺋﯿﮟ ﺑﺎزوupsurge (rise; )اﺿﺎﻓﮧthat JP was leading, she clearly read the
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
Did Mrs Gandhi fall short of her objective (goal; — )ﻣﻘﺼﺪby focusing more on grooming
(preparing; )ﺗﺮﺑﯿﺖher son Sanjay Gandhi as successor — in vacating (leaving; )ﺧﺎﻟﯽ ﮐﺮﻧﺎthe threat
to democracy she saw and many now also see? “This is worse than the declared emergency”, is
a common refrain (avoid; )ﺑﺎز رﮨﻨﺎtoday. These critics (reviewers; )ﻧﻘﺎدhave seen dark methods of
seeking to crush the opposition, intellectuals (scholars; )داﻧﺸﻮر, farmers and students among
them, some jailed for years without trial (hearing; )ﻣﻘﺪﻣﮧ, manifold (multiple; )ﮐﺌﯽ ﮔﻨﺎlonger than
Mrs Gandhi kept her quarries (mines; )ﮐﺎﻧﯿﮟ.
“Only one thing could have stopped our movement — if our adversaries had understood its
principle and from the first day smashed (broken; )ﺗﻮڑ دﯾﺎwith the utmost (maximum; زﯾﺎدہ ﺳﮯ
) زﯾﺎدہbrutality (cruelty; )ﺑﺮﺑﺮﯾﺖthe nucleus of our new movement (core group; ﮨﻤﺎری ﻧﺌﯽ ﺗﺤﺮﯾﮏ ﮐﺎ
)ﻣﺮﮐﺰ.” Thus exulted (rejoiced; )ﺧﻮﺷﯽ ﺳﮯ ﺟﮭﻮم اﭨﮭﺎAdolf Hitler while addressing the Nuremberg [A
city in Germany known for the Nuremberg Trials post-World War II A city in Germany, historically
significant for the trials of Nazi war criminals] party rally in September 1933. Did Indira Gandhi
fail to grasp (understand; )ﺳﻤﺠﮭﻨﺎhis point?
And so the PML-N has successfully passed a budget, which has been more widely criticised
than any in the recent past; when confronted (faced; )ﺳﺎﻣﻨﺎ ﮐﺮﻧﺎwith criticism, the party continues
to blandly (dully; )ﺑﮯ ﻣﺰہremind us all that everyone knew this was going to be a ‘difficult’ budget.
Of course, what they conveniently (easily; )آﺳﺎﻧﯽ ﺳﮯignore is that the state, the politicians, the
bureaucracy, and the military have managed to avoid any burden or difficulty while the salaried
class and the more vulnerable (exposed; )ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﺤﻔﻮظpeople are left to carry the burden, through
direct and indirect taxes.
expenses (costs; )اﺧﺮاﺟﺎتin government departments have gone up; salaries and pensions have
gone up; bonuses (extra pay; )ﺑﻮﻧﺲare being given generously (lavishly; )ﻓﺮاخ دﻟﯽ ﺳﮯ. But for
those outside the ‘state’, good news is downloading at the speed of their internet. Hope is a tiny
bird, which is sitting where only a few in government can see it.
Consider the finance minister’s latest press conference on Sunday. Pension reform is in the
works, he says, as is tax on traders. Reducing expenses and shutting down (closing; )ﺑﻨﺪ ﮐﺮﻧﺎ
departments is also in the pipeline. Passing responsibilities (read: expenses) on to the
provinces is also being discussed.
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
Its Camelot (ideal place; )ﻣﺜﺎﻟﯽ ﺟﮕﮧin the making but for those stuck (trapped; )ﭘﮭﻨﺲ ﺟﺎﻧﺎin the
purgatory (limbo; )ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺮزخcalled the tax net, hell couldn’t really be any worse.
For those stuck in the purgatory called the tax net, hell couldn’t really be any worse.
This is the second press conference by the finance minister since the budget was presented
and it seems as if he doesn’t realise he is not just dealing with a distrustful (skeptical; )ﺑﮯ اﻋﺘﻤﺎد
IMF but also a citizenry (population; )ﺷﮩﺮیwhich is equally suspicious (doubtful; )ﻣﺸﮑﻮکof the
Pakistan government. Muhammad Aurangzeb may have given up his passport and private
sector comforts (ease; )راﺣﺖto come help the motherland but he is not the first such sincere
(genuine; )ﻣﺨﻠﺺfinance minister who has promised good times to the people in the vague
(unclear; )ﻣﺒﮩﻢfuture.
What he doesn’t realise is that he carries the burden of the past few years; half a dozen finance
ministers have sat in the very same chair and made similar promises. Indeed, since 2018, the
people have been promised temporary pain, as the government — any government — gets
around to fixing problems. But while the pain is never-ending, the ‘fixing’ and the relief never
come.
And this is part of the reason why the anger this time around has been immediate, to which the
government seems oblivious. What else would one call it? The government doesn’t even realise
the need for optics. Confront it on its rising expenses and increased salaries, and the
government holds forth (expounds; )وﺿﺎﺣﺖ ﮐﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯon how this will not make much of a
difference to the numbers. In others words, it appears oblivious (unaware; )ﺑﮯ ﺧﺒﺮto the need for
even making token efforts (symbolic actions; )ﻋﻼﻣﺘﯽ ﮐﻮﺷﺸﯿﮟat belt-tightening (austerity; ﮐﻔﺎﯾﺖ
)ﺷﻌﺎری. Why else would the finance minister announce a three-month bonus for the National
Assembly staff during his speech, after having already given the entire bureaucracy a hefty
(large; )ﺑﮭﺎریraise?
But then, the problem is bigger than him or even the PML-N. This budget and the interests it has
protected at the expense of squeezing (pressing; )ﻧﭽﻮڑﻧﺎthe already weak shows, at one level,
the impact of manipulated (controlled; )ﺟﻮڑ ﺗﻮڑelection results — in 2018 and 2024. beleaguered
(troubled; )ﭘﺮﯾﺸﺎنand weak governments are simply incapable of protecting the rights of those
who can vote for them; the protection is, instead, secured for those who have shaped
governments. And this makes many wonder (awe; )ﺣﯿﺮتif this is why governments are being
shaped. To protect the privileges (benefits; )ﻣﺮاﻋﺎت, which may be less secure if the people are
able to choose who comes to power? Institutional and individual likes and dislikes, which drive
(effort; )ﮐﻮﺷﺶnarratives and analyses, are perhaps secondary.
And this is directly linked to the second point of the breathless (panting; )ﺳﺎﻧﺲ ﭘﮭﻮﻟﻨﺎ
commentary (analysis; )ﺗﺒﺼﺮہon how the heavy taxation and high energy bills will lead to
chances of rioting (uproar; )ﻓﺴﺎداتor street protests.
In fact, those who point this out also tend (care for; )ﺧﯿﺎل رﮐﮭﻨﺎto frequently bemoan (lament; ﻣﺎﺗﻢ
) ﮐﺮﻧﺎthe Pakistani people’s inability to protest and push back against an increasingly extractive
(exploitative; )اﺳﺘﺤﺼﺎﻟﯽstate. However, this analysis — both in terms of those who expect rioting
and those who think the people are far too submissive (obedient; — )ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺒﺮدارis too Punjab-
focused. It seems as if they are unaware (ignorant; )ﺑﮯ ﺧﺒﺮof events in Balochistan, where the
discord with the state has led to two interconnected (linked; )ﻣﻨﺴﻠﮏbut distinct (different; )ﻣﻨﻔﺮد
movements. If one is a violent struggle, the second is a peaceful street protest led by women to
highlight enforced disappearances.
Similarly, in parts of KP, the emergence of the PTM [Pashtun Tahafuz Movement A human
rights movement for Pashtuns Pakistan] is also a form of protest politics.
Perhaps one can go so far as to say that at least half of Pakistan is already home to movements
or political expressions, which no longer think parliament is the forum where negotiations
(discussions; )ﻣﺬاﮐﺮاتcan be carried out for the benefit of the people, be it economic or political.
It is important to note that these movements may have political issues at heart but economic
ones are not far behind. The Baloch have long complained about their resources being
monopolised (dominated; )اﺟﺎرہ دارby the centre, instead of being used for the welfare (well-
being; )ﻓﻼح و ﺑﮩﺒﻮدof the people living in the province. The PTM’s initial demands included the
issue of compensation (reparation; )ﻣﻌﺎوﺿﮧfor the damage caused to property and livelihood
(means of living; )ذرﯾﻌﮧ ﻣﻌﺎش.
The point here is that those who think that the decisions of the state will not change unless
there is rioting and street protests, are essentially (basically; )ﺑﻨﯿﺎدی ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮaccepting that the
election cycle, the formal structure of political parties, and parliament are no longer sufficient
(adequate; )ﮐﺎﻓﯽfor providing a voice or space to ordinary people. In other words, for the voice
of the people to be heard, politics now has to be carried out on the street, in the shape of
protests.
Indeed, our politics has been broken for a long time. The budget is simply another proof of this.
Economic butchery
PAKISTAN is teetering (unstable; )ﻣﺘﺰﻟﺰلon the edge of economic collapse (fall; )ﮔﺮﻧﺎdue to its
persistent (continuous; )ﻣﺴﻠﺴﻞstruggle to increase the tax-to-GDP ratio, a crucial (essential; )اﮨﻢ
measure of its fiscal health (economic stability; )ﻣﺎﻟﯽ ﺻﺤﺖ.
Despite numerous (many; )ﻣﺘﻌﺪدefforts, many potential taxpayers remain outside the formal tax
net. Recent policies have unfairly targeted existing taxpayers, driving talent and capital away
and pushing the nation towards disaster. The recent passage of the Finance Act exemplifies
this flawed (defective; )ﻋﯿﺐ دارstrategy, threatening long-term economic stability.
For the past decade, Pakistan has relied (depended; )اﻧﺤﺼﺎر ﮐﯿﺎheavily on taxing non-filers and
compliant taxpayers to boost (increase; )ﻓﺮوغ دﯾﻨﺎits revenues. Originally, the aim of collecting
taxes from non-filers was twofold (double; )دو ﮔﻨﺎ: generate immediate revenue and use the
gathered data to bring the non-filers into the tax net. Sadly, the state failed to achieve the latter
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
(second; )آﺧﺮ اﻟﺬﮐﺮ. Instead of leveraging (utilizing; )ﻓﺎﺋﺪہ اﭨﮭﺎﻧﺎthis data, it has merely (only; )ﻣﺤﺾ
increased taxes for non-filers, using it as a short-term revenue tool rather than a long-term
strategy for fiscal health.
The Finance Act exacerbates (worsens; )ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺑﻨﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯthis issue, further increasing the rate of tax
on non-filers and imposing tax rates as high as about 60 per cent on existing filers’ income.
This approach is flawed (defective; )ﻋﯿﺐ دار. Unlike Scandinavian countries, where high tax rates
are balanced by extensive social services and a robust (strong; )ﻣﻀﺒﻮطpublic infrastructure,
taxpayers here see little or no return on their contributions. The disparity (inequality; )ﺗﻔﺎوت
creates a significant trust deficit (shortfall; )ﺧﺴﺎرہ, with taxpayers feeling alienated (isolated; اﻟﮓ
)ﺗﮭﻠﮓ. High taxes on compliant taxpayers have stifled (suppressed; )دﺑﺎﯾﺎ ﮨﻮاeconomic activity,
reduced investment, and encouraged (motivated; )ﺣﻮﺻﻠﮧ اﻓﺰاﺋﯽtax evasion (avoidance; )ﮔﺮﯾﺰ.
When individuals and businesses perceive (recognize; )ﭘﮩﭽﺎﻧﻨﺎthe tax system as punitive
(disciplinary; )ﺗﻌﺰﯾﺮیand unbalanced, they are more likely to engage in tax evasion and operate
within the informal economy (unregulated economy; )ﻏﯿﺮ رﺳﻤﯽ ﻣﻌﯿﺸﺖ, undermining efforts to
formalise the economy and broaden the tax base.
The state’s strategy extends to imposing indirect taxes on essential goods such as
milk, baby products, and petrol. This decision is nothing short of economic (financial; )اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی
butchery (slaughter; )ﻗﺘﻞ. By taxing these basic necessities (essentials; )ﺿﺮورﯾﺎت, the state is
placing an unbearable burden on the shoulders of ordinary citizens, particularly those from
lower-income households. The cost of living will skyrocket (increase rapidly; )ﺗﯿﺰی ﺳﮯ ﺑﮍﮬﻨﺎ,
pushing millions deeper into poverty and triggering widespread (extensive; )وﺳﯿﻊ ﭘﯿﻤﺎﻧﮯ ﭘﺮ
discontent (dissatisfaction; )ﻋﺪم اﻃﻤﯿﻨﺎن.
Imagine a family struggling to buy milk for their children because it has been taxed to the point
of unaffordability (expensiveness; )ﻧﺎﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺧﺮﯾﺪاری. Picture parents grappling (struggling; ﺟﺪوﺟﮩﺪ
) ﮐﺮﻧﺎwith the soaring (rising; )ﺑﮍﮬﺘﺎ ﮨﻮاcosts of baby products while trying to provide the best care
for their newborns. Envision the devastating impact of rising petrol prices on transportation
costs, leading to increased prices for all goods and services. This is not a mere (just; )ﻣﺤﺾ
policy error; it is a catastrophe (disaster; )ﺗﺒﺎﮨﯽin the making, an unparalleled disaster that
threatens to unravel the social fabric (society structure; )ﺳﻤﺎﺟﯽ ڈﮬﺎﻧﭽﮧ.
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
Furthermore, the gains of selected elites (privileged; )اﺷﺮاﻓﯿﮧfrom properties have been
preserved (maintained; )ﻣﺤﻔﻮظfrom taxation. Allowances of the armed forces and judiciary
remain untaxed, perpetuating (sustaining; )ﺑﺮﻗﺮار رﮐﮭﻨﺎa system of inequality. No concrete
(tangible; )ﭨﮭﻮسmeasures have been taken to bring agricultural income within the federal tax
fold (enclose; )ﻟﭙﯿﭩﻨﺎ, nor have there been clear directives (instructions; )ﮨﺪاﯾﺎتto provincial
governments to collect more taxes on agriculture and eliminate tax leakages (spills; )رﺳﺎؤ. This
selective taxation preserves the status quo (existing state; )ﻣﻮﺟﻮدہ ﺣﺎﻟﺖfor the elite, while
burdening the average citizen.
To address these issues, it is essential that Pakistan learns from the successful strategies of
other countries. Pakistan should focus on bringing informal (casual; )ﻏﯿﺮ رﺳﻤﯽsectors into the
formal economy through targeted policies and robust enforcement.
Moving forward, the focus needs to shift from overburdening (overloading; )ﺑﻮﺟﮫ ڈاﻟﻨﺎexisting
taxpayers to broadening the tax base. The state should immediately implement comprehensive
reforms to make the tax system more inclusive and transparent to bring the informal economy
into the tax net through incentives (motivation; )ﻣﺮاﻋﺎتand effectively using non-
filer data to identify with the help of technology and data analytics to bring them into the tax net.
Without immediate and decisive reforms, Pakistan will remain on a collision (crash; )ﺗﺼﺎدم
course with catastrophe (disaster; ;)ﺗﺒﺎﮨﯽit faces a doomsday (apocalypse; )ﻗﯿﺎﻣﺖscenario
where our inaction (neglect; )ﻏﻔﻠﺖtoday becomes the tragedy (catastrophe; )ﺳﺎﻧﺤﮧof tomorrow.
Engaging parents
PAKISTAN’S education system faces significant challenges on two fronts. Firstly, there is a
staggering number of out-of-school children, estimated at 26.2 million. This means that a
sizeable portion of the children is not accessing any formal education. Economic factors,
cultural barriers, and inadequate infrastructure are the primary reasons.
For instance, in some areas, cultural norms may prioritise work or domestic responsibilities over
schooling, especially for girls. Additionally, many remote areas lack adequate school facilities,
making access to education physically challenging. These children are denied the opportunity to
develop essential skills and knowledge, that perpetuates cycles of poverty and limits their
prospects. This lack of education not only affects their personal growth and future opportunities
but also hinders national development.
Secondly, the quality of education for the 43m children in school in Pakistan is another major
concern, as most experience poor learning outcomes due to factors like overcrowded
Overcrowded classrooms make it difficult for teachers to give individual attention to students,
hindering effective learning. Many teachers lack proper training and qualifications, which
impacts their ability to deliver quality education. Traditional teaching methods, often focused on
rote learning, do not foster critical thinking or problem-solving skills. Additionally, schools
frequently lack basic resources such as textbooks, teaching materials, and adequate facilities,
further compromising the learning environment. Despite school attendance, children are not
acquiring the necessary skills and knowledge to thrive in an increasingly competitive global
economy.
Shockingly, only 23pc of students at age 10 can read and understand age-appropriate text. This
indicates a significant gap in foundational literacy, which is crucial for future learning and
academic success.
Despite the significant educational challenges facing Pakistan, parents overwhelmingly express
satisfaction with the schooling system. Data from the Pakistan Social and Living Standards
Measurement surveys of 2014-15 and 2019-20 reveal that over 94pc of parents reported
satisfaction with schooling in the country.
Similarly, in the 2019 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study assessment, 76pc
of parents expressed satisfaction, and in the more recent National Achievement Test in 2023,
75pc of parents indicated complete satisfaction with schooling. This apparent paradox between
parental satisfaction and the reality of poor educational outcomes suggests a disconnect
between parents’ perceptions and the actual quality of education their children receive.
Bridging this gap between parental perception and educational reality is crucial for improving
learning outcomes. Parental engagement plays a vital role in a child’s learning journey. Research
shows that when parents are actively involved in their children’s education, children are more
likely to perform better academically, have higher attendance rates, and demonstrate improved
behaviour. Active engagement includes activities like helping with homework, attending parent-
teacher meetings, and encouraging a positive attitude towards learning.
The 2022 Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel report recommended several low-cost
parental involvement approaches that included direct communication from schools to parents,
engaging children in educational activities, reading books to a child (if the parent is literate), and
sharing simple exercises with parents via text or phone call.
Direct communication from schools, such as regular updates and progress reports, helps keep
parents informed and engaged in their children’s education. Encouraging parents to read to their
children and engage in educational activities at home promotes early literacy and cognitive
development. Sharing simple exercises and learning activities via text or phone can provide
parents with practical tools to support their children’s learning at home. Supporting the role of
parents should be a component of public policy in the medium term, as it can have a lasting
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
The writer is an education researcher and works for an Islamabad based think tank.
Unlock your potential and make your CSS dreams a reality with our free
comprehensive study materials, tips, and strategies