Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dawn News 23 June 2024
Dawn News 23 June 2024
Dawn News 23 June 2024
Editorial
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
China’s concerns
RUMOURS ( )اﻓﻮاﮨﯿﮟhad been swirling ( )ﮔﺮدش ﮐﺮ رﮨﯽ ﺗﮭﯿﮟthat China was less than enthusiastic
,) with new CPEC schemes )آﮔﮯ ﺑﮍﮬﻨﮯ ﮐﮯ ﺑﺎرے ﻣﯿﮟabout forging ahead ((ﺟﻮش و ﺧﺮوش ﻣﯿﮟ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ
primarily ( )ﺑﻨﯿﺎدی ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮdue to concerns ( )ﺗﺸﻮﯾﺶabout the security ( )ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽof its people and
assets ( )اﺛﺎﺛﮯin Pakistan.
Some media reports had hinted ( )اﺷﺎرہ دﯾﺎthat little of substance ( )ﺑﻨﯿﺎدیwas achieved during the
prime minister’s tour ( )دورہof China earlier this month, particularly ( )ﺧﺎص ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮwhere the CPEC
file was concerned, even if official statements ( )ﺳﺮﮐﺎری ﺑﯿﺎﻧﺎتfrom both sides reflected an air of
normalcy ()ﻣﻌﻤﻮل ﮐﮯ ﺣﺎﻻت ﮐﯽ ﻋﮑﺎﺳﯽ.
Yet even in official handouts ()ﺳﺮﮐﺎری دﺳﺘﺎوﯾﺰات, China’s security concerns ()ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽ ﮐﯽ ﺗﺸﻮﯾﺶ
were unambiguous ()واﺿﺢ. For example ()ﻣﺜﺎل ﮐﮯ ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮ, in his meeting with Shehbaz Sharif,
President Xi Jinping expressed ( )اﻇﮩﺎر ﮐﯿﺎthe hope that Pakistan would “create ( )ﺑﻨﺎﺋﮯa safe
)ﮐﺎروﺑﺎریbusiness environment ( )ﭘﯿﺶ ﮔﻮﺋﯽ ﮐﮯ ﻗﺎﺑﻞand predictable ( ﻣﺴﺘﺤﮑﻢstable (,)(ﻣﺤﻔﻮظ
) and )ﻋﻤﻠﮧof Chinese” personnel ( )ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖthe safety ( ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺖ دےthat would “guarantee (”)ﻣﺎﺣﻮل
projects. This same message was delivered ( )ﭘﮩﻨﭽﺎﯾﺎ ﮔﯿﺎto our civil ( )ﺷﮩﺮیand military elite (ﻓﻮﺟﯽ
though in an uncharacteristically ,) )ﭼﯿﻨﯽ اﮨﻠﮑﺎرon Friday in Islamabad by a Chinese official (اﺷﺮاﻓﯿﮧ
). )ﺑﺮاہ راﺳﺖ ﻃﺮﯾﻘﮯdirect manner ((ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﯽ
Liu Jianchao, who heads ( )ﺳﺮﺑﺮاﮨﯽ ﮐﺮﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟthe International Department of the Communist Party
of China, told a forum ( )ﻓﻮرم ﻣﯿﮟ ﺑﺘﺎﯾﺎattended by representatives ( )ﻧﻤﺎﺋﻨﺪوںof Pakistan’s
mainstream ( )ﻣﺮﮐﺰی دﮬﺎرےparties that the security situation ( )ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽ ﮐﯽ ﺻﻮرﺗﺤﺎلhere was
“shaking ( )ﮨﻼ رﮨﯽ ﮨﮯthe confidence ( )اﻋﺘﻤﺎدof Chinese investors (”)ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﮧ ﮐﺎر. He also called for
) the دﮨﺮاﯾﺎreiterated (,) )ﮐﺎروﺑﺎری ﻣﺎﺣﻮلthe business environment ( )ﺑﮩﺘﺮ ﺑﻨﺎﻧﺎimproving ((ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﮧ ﮐﯿﺎ
necessity ( )ﺿﺮورتfor political stability ()ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ اﺳﺘﺤﮑﺎم, and stressed ( )زور دﯾﺎa “CPEC-friendly
media environment (”)ﺳﯽ ﭘﯿﮏ دوﺳﺖ ﻣﯿﮉﯾﺎ ﻣﺎﺣﻮل.
Though the message may have been delivered ( )ﭘﮩﻨﭽﺎﯾﺎ ﮔﯿﺎby a relatively ( )ﻧﺴﺒﺘًﺎmid-level official
ﺟﮩﺎںin the Chinese system where the Communist Party is the state (,)(درﻣﯿﺎﻧﮯ درﺟﮯ ﮐﺎ اﮨﻠﮑﺎر
) of the )ﻣﻮادthat the contents ( ﯾﮧ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺎ ﻣﺤﻔﻮظ ﮨﮯit is safe to assume (,)ﮐﻤﯿﻮﻧﺴﭧ ﭘﺎرﭨﯽ رﯾﺎﺳﺖ ﮨﮯ
statement were endorsed ( )ﺗﺎﺋﯿﺪ ﮐﯽ ﮔﺌﯽby the highest authorities (ﯽ ﺣﮑﺎم ٰ )اﻋﻠin Beijing. Moreover
) to air its concerns )ﻋﻮاﻣﯽ ﻓﻮرمa public forum ( ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﮐﯿﺎthe fact that China chose (,)(ﻣﺰﯾﺪ ﺑﺮآں
) )اﮨﻤﯿﺖ دﯾﺘﯽ ﮨﮯBeijing attaches ( )ﺳﻨﮕﯿﻨﯽthe seriousness ( )ﺑﯿﺎن ﮐﺮﺗﯽ ﮨﮯspeaks of ((ﺗﺸﻮﯾﺶ ﻇﺎﮨﺮ ﮐﺮﻧﺎ
to security.
China’s concerns ( )ﺗﺸﻮﯾﺶshould not be taken lightly ( )ﮨﻠﮑﺎ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﻟﯿﻨﺎ ﭼﺎﮨﯿﮯby Pakistan’s ruling elite
) )ﺿﺮورت ﮨﮯwhen the country needs ( ﺧﺎص ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮ اﯾﺴﮯ وﻗﺖ ﻣﯿﮟespecially at a time (,)(ﺣﮑﻤﺮان اﺷﺮاﻓﯿﮧ
all the foreign investment ( )ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﻠﮑﯽ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﮧ ﮐﺎریit can get. Regarding ( )ﮐﮯ ﺑﺎرے ﻣﯿﮟthe official’s
observation ( )ﻣﺸﺎﮨﺪہabout a “CPEC-friendly media environment (”)ﺳﯽ ﭘﯿﮏ دوﺳﺖ ﻣﯿﮉﯾﺎ ﻣﺎﺣﻮل, more
transparency ( )ﺷﻔﺎﻓﯿﺖabout the long-term plans ( )ﻃﻮﯾﻞ ﻣﺪﺗﯽ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺑﮯfor the project can clear the
air ()ﻓﻀﺎ ﮐﻮ ﺻﺎف ﮐﺮ ﺳﮑﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ. Both governments ( )دوﻧﻮں ﺣﮑﻮﻣﺘﯿﮟshould let ( )اﺟﺎزت دﯾﮟthe media and
the people know ( )ﻣﯿﮉﯾﺎ اور ﻋﻮام ﮐﻮ ﺟﺎﻧﻨﮯ دﯾﮟthe facts ( )ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻖabout the economic corridor (اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی
). )اﻓﻮاﮨﯿﮟrumours ( )اﯾﻨﺪﮬﻦ ﻓﺮاﮨﻢ ﮐﺮے ﮔﯽwill only fuel ( ﻏﯿﺮ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﯿﺖas opacity (,)راﮨﺪاری
Meanwhile ()دراﯾﮟ اﺛﻨﺎ, Pakistan has no option ( )ﮐﻮﺋﯽ آﭘﺸﻦ ﻧﮩﯿﮟbut to neutralise ( )ﻏﯿﺮ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪار ﺑﻨﺎﻧﺎthe
militant threat ( )دﮨﺸﺖ ﮔﺮد ﺧﻄﺮہto Chinese and all other foreign projects ()ﺗﻤﺎم دﯾﮕﺮ ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﻠﮑﯽ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺑﮯ
in the country. The prime minister hinted at this ( )وزﯾﺮ اﻋﻈﻢ ﻧﮯ اس ﮐﺎ اﺷﺎرہ دﯾﺎduring Saturday’s
apex committee meeting ()اﯾﭙﮑﺲ ﮐﻤﯿﭩﯽ ﮐﯽ ﻣﯿﭩﻨﮓ. If foreign workers ( )ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﻠﮑﯽ ﮐﺎرﮐﻦare killed (ﮨﻼک
اور ﮐﺜﯿﺮand multimillion-dollar projects targeted (,) )دﮨﺸﺖ ﮔﺮد ﺣﻤﻠﮯin terrorist attacks (ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ
)ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﮧwill want to invest ( ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺑﯿﺮون ﻣﻠﮏ ﭘﺎرﭨﯽno overseas party (,)اﻟﻤﻠﯿﻦ ڈاﻟﺮ ﮐﮯ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺑﮯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮧ ﺑﻨﯿﮟ
) in this country.ﮐﺎری ﮐﺮﻧﺎ ﭼﺎﮨﮯ ﮔﯽ
War drums
NOT satisfied with the slaughter ( )ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺎمit has unleashed ( )ﭼﮭﻮڑ دﯾﺎin Gaza, Israel is now
preparing to turn its guns on Lebanon, specifically ( )ﺧﺎص ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮHezbollah, the Iran-backed
armed group it has clashed ( )ﺟﮭﮍﭘﯿﮟ ﮨﻮﺋﯿﮟwith multiple times. While Hezbollah and Israel started
trading fire almost immediately after the Oct 7 events — the Lebanese group says it is acting in
solidarity ( )ﯾﮑﺠﮩﺘﯽwith Hamas and the Palestinian people — the exchanges ( )ﺗﺒﺎدﻟﮯnow threaten
to transform ( )ﺗﺒﺪﯾﻞ ﮨﻮﻧﺎinto full-blown ( )ﻣﮑﻤﻞ ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮwar. Over the last few weeks, Israeli officials
have ratcheted up ( )ﺑﮍﮬﺎ دﯾﺎtheir rhetoric ( )ﺑﯿﺎن ﺑﺎزیagainst the Lebanese outfit, while Hezbollah
chief Hasan Nasrallah has said his group is ready for war with the Zionist ( )ﺻﯿﮩﻮﻧﯽstate. In fact,
over the past several months, the Lebanon-Israel border has been turned into an active battle
zone, with thousands of people on both sides evacuated ()ﺧﺎﻟﯽ ﮐﺮ ﻟﯿﺎ. Regarding the threat of a
larger conflict, UN Secretary General António Guterres said on Friday that “one miscalculation
.”) ﺗﺼﻮرbeyond imagination (…) )ﺗﺒﺎﮨﯽa catastrophe ( )ﻣﺘﺤﺮک ﮐﺮﻧﺎcould trigger ((ﻏﻠﻂ ﺣﺴﺎب
Israel has violated Lebanese sovereignty ( )ﺧﻮدﻣﺨﺘﺎریseveral times over the past few decades,
launching two major ground invasions ( )ﺣﻤﻠﮯof its northern neighbour. Yet it would be a
massive folly ( )ﺑﯿﻮﻗﻮﻓﯽif Tel Aviv were to attempt a fresh misadventure ( )ﻏﻠﻂ ﻣﮩﻢin the north,
though the warmongers ( )ﺟﻨﮓ ﮐﮯ ﺷﻮﻗﯿﻦin Israel appear to be capable of anything as the Gaza
massacre has shown. Hezbollah is a battle-hardened outfit which can strike deep inside Israel.
A confrontation ( )ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﮧwould be no cakewalk ( )آﺳﺎن ﮐﺎمfor the Zionist ( )ﺻﯿﮩﻮﻧﯽstate. But it is
also true that in any potential war, Lebanon — which is already experiencing an excruciating
would suffer —) )ﻓﺎﻟﺞ زدﮔﯽeconomic crisis, as well as political paralysis ((اﻧﺘﮩﺎﺋﯽ ﺗﮑﻠﯿﻒ دہ
immensely, particularly if Israel targeted civilians, as it is prone ( )ﻣﺎﺋﻞto doing. And if the US
were to jump in to protect its ‘ironclad’ ally from Hezbollah’s missiles, attracting the involvement
of Iran and its regional armed allies, then all bets are off for the region. Of course, this
doomsday ( )ﻗﯿﺎﻣﺖscenario can be avoided if Israel ceases ( )ﺧﺘﻢ ﮐﺮﻧﺎits blood-soaked campaign
in Gaza. Hezbollah has said that it is ready to silence its guns if a ceasefire ( )ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻨﺪیtakes
effect in Gaza. Thus far Israel seems committed to its genocidal ( )ﻧﺴﻠﯽ ﺻﻔﺎﯾﺎcampaign in the
occupied territory. Therefore, if it is foolish enough to launch another war in Lebanon, Tel Aviv
will be solely responsible for setting the Middle East on fire. A fresh cataclysm ( )آﻓﺖcan be
prevented, if Israel comes to its senses.
Balochistan budget
BALOCHISTAN’S Rs955.6bn budget for the fiscal year 2024-25 makes many pledges ( )وﻋﺪےto
the poor citizens of Pakistan’s largest but least populous province. Most of these promises, if
not all, will not be met by the end of the fiscal year — just like in previous years. The first budget
of the new PPP-led government in the conflict-ridden ( )ﺗﻨﺎزﻋﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺑﮭﺮﭘﻮرprovince reflects the lack
of effort to impose fiscal discipline or reform the provincial development expenditure in spite of
a growing throw-forward ( )ادﮬﻮرے ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺑﻮں ﮐﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﮫof incomplete schemes. That the budget
envisages ( )ﺗﺼﻮر ﮐﺮﻧﺎspending a major portion of the development funds of Rs321bn set aside
for next year on more than 2,700 new schemes, instead of completing ongoing projects to slash
) the burden of development throw-forward, speaks volumes about how every (ﮐﻢ ﮐﺮﻧﺎ
government in the province misuses ( )ﻏﻠﻂ اﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎل ﮐﺮﻧﺎthe taxpayers’ money to keep the
lawmakers on their side. Yet when the chips are down ()ﺣﺎﻻت ﺧﺮاب ﮨﻮﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ, there is no stopping
the defections ()وﻓﺎدارﯾﻮں ﮐﯽ ﺗﺒﺪﯾﻠﯽ. The story is repeated in Balochistan every few years.
Indeed, public trust in the province’s political leadership has consistently faltered ( )ﮐﻤﺰور ﮨﻮ ﮔﯿﺎon
account of poor governance, patchy development and rampant financial corruption. With nearly
60pc of Balochistan’s population living below the poverty line and a widening trust deficit
between the people and rulers, it is not surprising to see rising political disaffection ()ﺑﮯ اﻃﻤﯿﻨﺎﻧﯽ
and growing militancy across the province. Balochistan’s worsening law and order demands
that the provincial authorities improve political and financial governance, beginning with major
development budget reforms, to narrow the trust gap. This will not happen overnight. However,
the present government could take the first step by formulating ( )ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ دﯾﻨﺎa longer-term
development strategy to help it allocate ( )ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﮐﺮﻧﺎresources in a transparent manner for the
targeted geographical areas, sectors and schemes. Implementing such a strategy will ensure
that the fruits of development reach people across Balochistan through the efficient use of
whatever meagre ( )ﻗﻠﯿﻞfinancial resources the province has at its disposal.
Opionn
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
Dangerous majoritarianism
PAKISTAN is unable to follow the path of Saudi Arabia or Indonesia, which are progressing
slowly and steadily with religious reforms. Both countries present contrasting ( )ﻣﺘﻀﺎدvisions of
religious reform but are ultimately opening up their respective societies, enhancing governance,
and improving their international image.
In both countries, the leadership promotes religious reforms. In Saudi Arabia, the reform
process is slower than the one in Indonesia, primarily because Indonesian civil society supports
the state’s efforts in this direction. In contrast, the Pakistani leadership needs to be more aware
of the importance of religious reforms in navigating a changing world. Instead, it aligns itself
with extremist ( )اﻧﺘﮩﺎ ﭘﺴﻨﺪforces, gaining ideological and political power while empowering these
groups to use violence against communal ( )ﻓﺮﻗﮧ واراﻧﮧand sectarian ( )ﻣﺴﻠﮑﯽminorities.
The nexus ( )ﮔﭩﮫ ﺟﻮڑbetween the power or ruling elite and the establishment ( )اﺳﭩﯿﺒﻠﺸﻤﻨﭧin
Pakistan is not new. It has been studied extensively by local and international scholars.
However, what remains constant is the elite’s appeasement ( )ﺧﻮش ﮐﺮﻧﺎof extremists and their
inclination to use them for political purposes. While social factors have contributed to the
extremist mindset in Pakistan, the power elite’s actions are often criminal, eroding ()ﮐﮭﻮﮐﮭﻼ ﮐﺮﻧﺎ
the societal fabric.
Incidents ( )واﻗﻌﺎتlike the one in Madyan, Swat, lynchings in Punjab, and vandalism ()ﺗﻮڑ ﭘﮭﻮڑ
against the Ahmadi community during Eid indicate that extremism in society is reaching
dangerous levels. Taking the law into one’s own hands has become standard practice for
charged mobs and activists of radical religious groups. The administration hardly attempts to
restrain ( )روﮐﻨﺎthem, and simply registers cases against the suspects. People with clout (اﺛﺮ و
) then come forward and help the suspects and their families financially and with legal aid. رﺳﻮخ
Once they are released, they become heroes in their communities. This has become the norm
after every blasphemy-related ( )ﺗﻮﮨﯿﻦ رﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﺳﮯ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖtragedy that involves lynchings and mob
violence.
The system is paralysed ( )ﻣﻔﻠﻮجwhen it encounters the challenge of religiously motivated mob
violence.
A majoritarian ( )اﮐﺜﺮﯾﺘﯽmindset is at play, with the state a mere spectator ()ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﺋﯽ. In Punjab
and urban Sindh, the Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan is fanning the flames ( )آگ ﺑﮭﮍﮐﺎ رﮨﺎ ﮨﮯof
extremism. Although other religiously motivated actors have acted in a similar fashion in the
past, the TLP’s rhetoric ( )ﺑﯿﺎن ﺑﺎزیis now so powerful that they cannot compete.
The TLP has transformed itself into an extensive phenomenon ()رﺟﺤﺎن, reflecting a mindset
shared by perhaps most of society. This majority is religiously and politically disillusioned
)ﻧﺎﻻand growing increasingly resentful ( ﻋﻮاﻣﯿﺖfalling into the trap of political populism (,)(ﻣﺎﯾﻮس
) this majority ﺗﺎﺋﯿﺪ ﮐﺮﻧﺎstate institutions endorse (,) )اﻟﭧ ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮof the power elites. Paradoxically (ں
mindset and side with the extremists when issues of religious sentiment arise.
The common man cannot fully comprehend the dichotomy ( )دوﻏﻼ ﭘﻦof the state, and his anger
against the latter is increasing. However, the TLP and other religious parties have their
constituencies ( )ﺣﻠﻘﮧ اﻧﺘﺨﺎبin the semi-urban areas, and among low-income groups, while a
significant portion of the middle class, too, exhibits the same mindset. While the middle class
tends to avoid direct involvement in violence, they fully support the actions of the fanatics.
These radical religious groups draw their core strength from middle-class youth, who serve as
keyboard warriors ()ﮐﯽ ﺑﻮرڈ ﮐﮯ ﺟﻨﮕﺠﻮ, developing political strategies and evolving organisational
tactics.
The power elites do not feel much threat from the core leadership of extremist groups because
they maintain open communication channels and often interact with them. They are more
concerned about the keyboard warriors and seek to regulate virtual ( )ﻣﺠﺎزیspaces. They have
similar fears about social media activists from populist political parties and nationalist political
parties in the peripheries ()ﮔﺮدوﻧﻮاح
The power elites believe that more control over social media, building firewalls ()ﻓﺎﺋﺮ واﻟﺰ, and
tightening legal regulations will eliminate dissent ( )اﺧﺘﻼف راﺋﮯin all forms. Social media is
merely a medium, but despite reviewing its policies and practices vis-à-vis ()ﮐﮯ ﺑﺎرے ﻣﯿﮟ
extremism and extremist parties, the establishment is more interested in controlling it. Apart
from controlling social media spaces, the state has taken cosmetic ( )ﺳﻄﺤﯽpolicy measures to
deal with extremism. Until the power elites do not end their appeasement ( )ﺧﻮش ﮐﺮﻧﺎapproach
and address the core issue and encourage religious reforms as Saudi Arabia and Indonesia are
doing, extremism will continue to shape an ugly majoritarian ( )اﮐﺜﺮﯾﺘﯽmindset.
The whole system seems paralysed ( )ﻣﻔﻠﻮجonce it encounters the challenge of religiously
motivated mob violence. The federal and provincial governments avoid even commenting on
such incidents and leave it to the establishment and local administrations to deal with such
cases on their own. The governments are scared that their involvement in such cases would
divert ( )ﻣﻮڑﻧﺎthe public’s anger towards them. This attitude encourages the extremists.
The police and lower judiciary deal with such cases carelessly and, in many cases, leave
loopholes ( )ﻧﻘﺎﺋﺺin their decisions that ultimately benefit the culprits ()ﻣﺠﺮم. The higher
judiciary has taken such issues more seriously, but its reviews and decisions have failed to
trigger ( )ﻣﺘﺤﺮک ﮐﺮﻧﺎany major change in society.
The state institutions need to break the support system of the extremists. Apart from the power
elites’ appeasement ( )ﺧﻮش ﮐﺮﻧﺎpolicy and the system’s flaws in dealing with the menace ()ﺧﻄﺮہ,
two major sources of support are encouraging the people to take the law into their own hands.
First is the influential ( )ﺑﺎاﺛﺮclass. Mostly, they are local businessmen and lawyers who provide
financial and legal aid to the criminals on behalf of the rest of the community. Second are the
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
mosque imams, who are directly or indirectly affiliated with the extremist groups; once such
incidents happen, they invite these groups for their help. The extremist groups take this as an
opportunity to increase their influence and take command of matters ranging from negotiating
with the administration to dealing with legal matters. The extremist groups have lawyers’ wings,
influencing the courts during the proceedings ()ﮐﺎررواﺋﯿﻮں.
In such a society, where the state and society nurture and protect an infrastructure of
extremism, who can hope for change? Religious reforms in Pakistan will remain a dream for a
long time.
Past lives
"IN the mid-1980s (1980 )ﮐﯽ دﮨﺎﺋﯽ ﮐﮯ وﺳﻂ ﻣﯿﮟ, our English teacher at school in Kuwait got us to
read The Outsiders ( )ﺑﺎﮨﺮ واﻟﮯby S.E. Hinton. It’s set in rural America in the 1960s and tells the
story about two rival ( )ﺣﺮﯾﻒgangs, the Greasers and the Socs, and a murder that causes
fissures ( )دراڑﯾﮟin their town. It is told by a teenage boy who sees himself as an outsider, and
although it is about a time none of us private school children had any connection to, nor were
we familiar with the topics in the book — financial hardship ()ﻣﺸﮑﻼت, class divide, violence — the
book had a significant impact on us. We all felt like outsiders in some way or the other; in
between children and adults, not in charge of our lives, and most importantly, not understood.
And then our teacher showed us the movie. Directed ( )ﮨﺪاﯾﺖ دی ﮔﺌﯽby Francis Ford Coppola in
1983, the cast featured Tom Cruise, Patrick Swayze, Matt Dillon, Emilio Estevez, C. Thomas
Howell, Ralph Macchio, Diane Lane and even Hinton in a cameo ()ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﻇﮩﻮر. This is before any
of the aforementioned were household names ()ﻣﺸﮩﻮر ﻧﺎم. The film resonated ( )ﮔﻮﻧﺠﺎjust as
much, and we would watch it, and a host of other movies by filmmakers like John Hughes —
described by a film critic as “the philosopher ( )ﻓﻠﺴﻔﯽof adolescence ( — ”)ﻧﻮﺟﻮاﻧﯽon VHS tapes,
on repeat. It did not matter that the cast of The Breakfast Club or Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, for
example, was white and set exclusively in the US but the stories they told resonated with
teenagers around the world. I’d watch these films maybe a year or two after they were released
but it was a different time; we had no choice but to wait, there were no spoiler-style (ﭘﮩﻠﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺑﺘﺎﻧﮯ
) reviews, no social media posts, no influencers.واﻟﮯ اﻧﺪاز
I was reminded of this while watching Brats, a documentary by actor Andrew McCarthy, a
member of the Brat Pack, a term coined ( )اﯾﺠﺎد ﮐﯿﺎby a New York Magazine writer who reported
on a new crop ( )ﻧﺌﯽ ﻓﺼﻞof Hollywood actors that were making films for a new teenage audience
going to the cinema. However, the term would haunt ( )ﭘﺮﯾﺸﺎن ﮐﺮﻧﺎthis group who felt it impacted
their careers as it portrayed them in a negative light. This is what McCarthy attempts to
reconcile ( )ﻣﻔﺎﮨﻤﺖ ﮐﺮﻧﺎin this documentary, which proved a walk down memory lane. It was also a
reminder of the age-old question: why does nostalgia hit so hard?
These films in the mid-1980s tapped into a new audience by portraying friendship in a way we
hadn’t seen before; usually relationships were about romance, falling in or out of love. The
Breakfast Club, for example, portrayed high school stereotypes ( )ﺗﺼﻮراتbut made it about
unexpected alliances ()اﺗﺤﺎد. These films explored what it meant to be young, not understood by
elders, and the complexities of adolescence, a phenomenon I experienced in Kuwait as did
friends in other cities. In today’s parlance ()زﺑﺎن, we felt ‘seen’ in these movies.
“When they see the 1980s films they’re thinking of their own youth,” McCarthy tells Rob Lowe in
Brats. “And we are the avatars ( )ﻧﻤﺎﺋﻨﺪےof that moment in their life and that is a beautiful thing.”
Nostalgia is a beautiful thing. One study showed that inducing ( )ُاﮐﺴﺎﻧﺎnostalgia in a group saw
positive feelings, “including higher self-esteem and an increase in the feeling of being loved and
protected by others”. Another study showed that nostalgia can counteract ( )ﺗﺪارک ﮐﺮﻧﺎthe effects
of loneliness. Nostalgia could provide a link “between our past and present selves” — that “it
may provide us with a positive view of the past and this could help to give us a greater sense of
continuity ( )ﺗﺴﻠﺴﻞand meaning to our lives”.
But nostalgia, which is personal, ie, my response to a period of time, can prove dangerous when
it is framed ( )ﭘﯿﺶ ﮐﺮﻧﺎas a collective ( )اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽexperience. The right-wing longs for good ole’
times before immigrants ( )ﻣﮩﺎﺟﺮﯾﻦcaused all the problems they believe their country faces.
Pakistanis, too, want to go back to the time of their favoured political/army leader when things
were rosy. Pray tell when was that time? Our nostalgia for this mythical time has created more
harm than good.
There is no going back because the world is different. These 1980s films can’t be made today
because audiences will not forgive racism, xenophobia ()ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﻠﮑﯿﻮں ﮐﺎ ﺧﻮف, misogyny (ﻋﻮرﺗﻮں ﺳﮯ
) on screen. And that’s a good thing. Every generation has a pack and I suspect that ﻧﻔﺮت
influencers play a bigger role than actors, but I don’t think they command the staying power the
Brat Pack does, 40 years on, warts and all ()ﮐﻤﺰورﯾﻮں ﮐﮯ ﺑﺎوﺟﻮد.
The 1985 film St Elmo’s Fire may still be able to speak to generations today because it tackles a
subject that we can relate to: the challenge of navigating the real world — especially after
college. And it is about friendship, about showing up for each other — something I hope endures
the test of time.
War in Ukraine
THE leaders of G7 ()ﺳﺎت ﺻﻨﻌﺘﯽ ﻣﻤﺎﻟﮏ ﮐﮯ رﮨﻨﻤﺎ, a grouping of seven highly industrialised (ﺑﮩﺖ زﯾﺎدہ
) countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, and US), met in Apulia, Italy, on ﺻﻨﻌﺘﯽ
June 13-15, 2024. It was the 50th session ( )ﭘﭽﺎﺳﻮﯾﮟ اﺟﻼسof the group, which has been meeting
regularly since 1975, essentially to preserve ( )ﺑﻨﯿﺎدی ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮ ﻣﺤﻔﻮظ ﮐﺮﻧﺎthe existing world order
آﻓﺎﻗﯽuniversal human rights (,) )ﮐﺜﯿﺮاﻟﺠﮩﺘﯽon multilateralism ( )ﻣﺒﻨﯽpredicated ((ﻣﻮﺟﻮدہ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﯽ ﻧﻈﺎم
). آزاد ﺗﺠﺎرتand free trade (,) آزاد ﺟﻤﮩﻮرﯾﺖliberal democracy (,)اﻧﺴﺎﻧﯽ ﺣﻘﻮق
At Apulia, too, the G7 leaders called for strengthening the rules-based international order (ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ
). They also decided to provide $50 billion to ﭘﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﯽ ﺑﯿﻦ اﻻﻗﻮاﻣﯽ ﻧﻈﺎم ﮐﻮ ﻣﻀﺒﻮط ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ اﭘﯿﻞ ﮐﯽ
Ukraine, support the two-state solution ( )دو رﯾﺎﺳﺘﯽ ﺣﻞ ﮐﯽ ﺣﻤﺎﯾﺖ ﮐﺮﻧﺎfor Israel-Palestine, and
bolster ( )ﻣﻀﺒﻮط ﮐﺮﻧﺎties with nations in Africa and the Indo-Pacific (ﭘﯿﺴﻔﮏ-)اﻧﮉو. The summit also
discussed food security ()ﺧﻮراک ﮐﯽ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ, climate resilience ()ﻣﻮﺳﻤﯿﺎﺗﯽ ﻟﭽﮏ, irregular migration
ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﯽ ذﮨﺎﻧﺖ ﮐﮯand AI’s benefits and risks (,) ﻣﺎﻟﯽ اﺳﺘﺤﮑﺎمfinancial stability (,)(ﻏﯿﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﯽ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ
).ﻓﻮاﺋﺪ اور ﺧﻄﺮات
The G7’s emphasis on maintaining the rules-based world order seems to be a desperate
attempt ( )ﻣﺎﯾﻮﺳﯽ ﮐﯽ ﮐﻮﺷﺶto preserve the West’s dominance ()ﻣﻐﺮب ﮐﯽ ﺑﺎﻻدﺳﺘﯽ. However,
realities are changing. The existing world order is in disarray ()اﻧﺘﺸﺎر ﮐﺎ ﺷﮑﺎر. New power centres
) have emerged, including several major economies in Asia, which would have (ﻧﺌﮯ ﻃﺎﻗﺖ ﮐﮯ ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ
to be accommodated ( )ﺟﮕﮧ دﯾﻨﯽ ﭘﮍے ﮔﯽin the evolving multipolar world order (ﺗﺮﻗﯽ ﭘﺬﯾﺮ ﮐﺜﯿﺮ ﻗﻄﺒﯽ
and groupings like ,) دوﺑﺎرہ اﺑﮭﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﻮا روسresurgent Russia (,))اﺑﮭﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﻮا ﭼﯿﻦ. A rising China (ﻋﺎﻟﻤﯽ ﻧﻈﺎم
BRICS and SCO have changed the complexion ( )ﺻﻮرت ﺣﺎل ﮐﻮ ﺑﺪل دﯾﺎof the West-dominated
international order.
Several other challenges ( )ﮐﺌﯽ دﯾﮕﺮ ﭼﯿﻠﻨﺠﺰare also impacting our world. Firstly, a growing trend
towards unilateralism ( )ﯾﮑﻄﺮﻓﮧ ﭘﻦ ﮐﺎ ﺑﮍﮬﺘﺎ ﮨﻮا رﺟﺤﺎنhas replaced the spirit of globalism and
multilateralism in addressing issues of global concern. Ironically ()اﻧﺘﮩﺎﺋﯽ ﺳﺘﻢ ﻇﺮﯾﻔﯽ, it was US
military action in Iraq in 2003, in disregard ( )ﻧﻈﺮ اﻧﺪاز ﮐﺮﺗﮯ ﮨﻮﺋﮯof the UN Security Council, that
initiated the weakening ( )ﮐﻤﺰور ﮐﺮﻧﺎ ﺷﺮوع ﮐﯿﺎof the rules-based international order. This was
followed by Russia’s unilateral invasion ( )ﯾﮑﻄﺮﻓﮧ ﺣﻤﻠﮧof Crimea and India’s unprovoked strike (ﺑﻼ
) in major )ﻧﻈﺮ اﻧﺪاز ﮐﺮ دﯾﺎ ﮔﯿﺎon Balakot. Secondly, the UN has been sidelined (اﺷﺘﻌﺎل ﺣﻤﻠﮧ
international conflicts ()ﺑﮍے ﺑﯿﻦ اﻻﻗﻮاﻣﯽ ﺗﻨﺎزﻋﺎت. Thirdly, universal human rights have been
politicised ()ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ ﺑﻨﺎﯾﺎ ﮔﯿﺎ, and double standards are in full display (دوﮨﺮے ﻣﻌﯿﺎرات واﺿﺢ ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ آ
).رﮨﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ
China, the world’s second largest economy ()دﻧﯿﺎ ﮐﯽ دوﺳﺮی ﺳﺐ ﺳﮯ ﺑﮍی ﻣﻌﯿﺸﺖ, was not invited to
the summit even though it has been at the forefront of defending the rules-based international
order ()ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ ﭘﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﯽ ﺑﯿﻦ اﻻﻗﻮاﻣﯽ ﻧﻈﺎم ﮐﺎ دﻓﺎع. The geopolitics ( )ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﯿﺎﺋﯽ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖof major power
competition ( )ﺑﮍی ﻃﺎﻗﺘﻮں ﮐﮯ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﮯtrumps the spirit of working together even as China repeatedly
calls for reviving the spirit of globalism ( )ﻋﺎﻟﻤﮕﯿﺮﯾﺖ ﮐﯽ روح ﮐﻮ ﺑﺤﺎل ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ اﭘﯿﻞto address conflict
and underdevelopment ()ﺗﻨﺎزﻋﺎت اور ﭘﺴﻤﺎﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﮐﺎ ﺣﻞ.
The G7 has often been criticised ( )ﺗﻨﻘﯿﺪ ﮐﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮧ ﺑﻨﺎﯾﺎ ﮔﯿﺎfor trying to impose its will on the rest of
the world. This concern was partly addressed by the formation ( )ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞof G20, a group of 19
leading economies ()اﮨﻢ ﻣﻌﯿﺸﺘﻮں, as well as the EU and African Union. However, the two groups
have not only further marginalised ( )ﻣﺰﯾﺪ ﮐﻤﺰور ﮐﺮ دﯾﺎthe UN-led universally accepted
multilateralism but also given rise to the trend towards multi-alignment (ﮐﺜﯿﺮ اﻟﺠﮩﺘﯽ رﺟﺤﺎن ﮐﻮ ﺑﮍﮬﺎ
).دﯾﺎ
The Apulia summit announced $50bn for Ukraine by leveraging immobilised Russian sovereign
assets ()ﻣﻨﺠﻤﺪ ﺷﺪہ روﺳﯽ ﺧﻮدﻣﺨﺘﺎر اﺛﺎﺛﮯ. This was G7’s response to President Vladimir Putin, who
CSS Beginners Facebook CSS Beginners WhatsApp
This File is Provided by CSS Beginners Free of Cost
had recently set terms for starting peace talks: Ukraine to withdraw from the regions partially
occupied by Russia (( )ﺟﺰوی ﻃﻮر ﭘﺮ روس ﮐﮯ زﯾﺮ ﻗﺒﻀﮧ ﻋﻼﻗﮯDonetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia)
and give up its efforts to join Nato. Putin denounced ( )ﻣﺬﻣﺖ ﮐﯽthe G7 decision to use Russian
assets to finance the Ukraine war, and remarked that “…theft is still theft and will not go
unpunished (”)ﭼﻮری ﭼﻮری ﮨﯽ ﮨﻮﺗﯽ ﮨﮯ اور ﺳﺰا ﮐﮯ ﺑﻐﯿﺮ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ رﮨﮯ ﮔﯽ.
In the Ukraine peace summit in Switzerland, that followed the G7 meeting, several important
countries including India, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia, and the UAE
chose not to sign the joint communiqué ()ﻣﺸﺘﺮﮐﮧ ﺑﯿﺎن ﭘﺮ دﺳﺘﺨﻂ ﻧﮧ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﮐﺎ ﻓﯿﺼﻠﮧ ﮐﯿﺎ. Most of them
felt that peace in Ukraine required the presence of all stakeholders (ﺗﻤﺎم ﺷﺮاﮐﺖ داروں ﮐﯽ ﻣﻮﺟﻮدﮔﯽ
). South Africa ﺑﺎﻣﻌﻨﯽ ﻣﺬاﮐﺮات ﮐﮯ ﻟﯿﮯespecially Russia, for meaningful negotiations (,)ﺿﺮوری ﮨﮯ
noted with surprise that Israel, which has just been accused of war crimes by a UN-backed
commission ()اﻗﻮام ﻣﺘﺤﺪہ ﮐﮯ ﺣﻤﺎﯾﺖ ﯾﺎﻓﺘﮧ ﮐﻤﯿﺸﻦ, had been invited to the summit. China did not
attend, nor did Pakistan.
Meanwhile, the crisis in Ukraine remains stalemated ()رﮐﺎ ﮨﻮا ﮨﮯ. Legally, Ukraine is right because
its territorial integrity ( )ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺋﯽ ﺳﺎﻟﻤﯿﺖhas been violated. Politically, Russia has a point that it was
provoked by Nato’s constant expansion eastwards ()ﻣﺸﺮﻗﯽ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﺴﻠﺴﻞ ﭘﮭﯿﻼؤ, despite the
assurances given to it earlier. What argument is more relevant for Pakistan and what
consideration should guide its policy on Ukraine?
Indeed, Ukraine is a victim of foreign aggression ( )ﺑﯿﺮوﻧﯽ ﺟﺎرﺣﯿﺖ ﮐﺎ ﺷﮑﺎرand, therefore, deserves
Pakistan’s support. Pakistan should never accept such aggression, having itself faced it when
India intervened militarily ( )ﻓﻮﺟﯽ ﻣﺪاﺧﻠﺖ ﮐﯽin East Pakistan. It must uphold the principle of
territorial integrity ( )ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺋﯽ ﺳﺎﻟﻤﯿﺖ ﮐﮯ اﺻﻮل ﮐﻮ ﺑﺮﻗﺮار رﮐﮭﻨﺎfor Ukraine. However, global geopolitics
has pushed Russia towards China, Pakistan’s close friend. This places Pakistan in an awkward
position ()ﻏﯿﺮ آرام دہ ﭘﻮزﯾﺸﻦ: legally it must support Ukraine, whose territorial integrity was
violated. Politically, it should stay neutral given that Russia was provoked by Nato, and is now
leaning towards China, which itself is fighting strategic coercion ( )ﺗﺰوﯾﺮاﺗﯽ دﺑﺎؤby the US-led West.
The writer is a former foreign secretary and chairman of Sanober Institute Islamabad.
Unlock your potential and make your CSS dreams a reality with our free
comprehensive study materials, tips, and strategies