Professional Documents
Culture Documents
he2016
he2016
Zhong He, Gautam Khatu, and Emily Tenenbaum, Primus Green Energy; Weibin Li, Jereh Group; Zengqiang Han,
Jereh Oil & Gas Engineering Corporation
This paper was prepared for presentation at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 7-10 November 2016.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents
of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect
any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written
consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may
not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
Abstract
Historically, gas-to-liquids (GTL) systems have only been implemented at large scales, such as the 1.6 BCF/
D Pearl plant in Qatar. However, recent advances in process design and cost reduction have resulted in
smallscale GTL systems profitable at gas flows of 110,000 to 540,000 Nm3/d (4-20 MMcf/d). Small-scale
GTL units are now an attractive option for monetizing associated petroleum gas that would otherwise be
flared. This paper describes the application of a smallscale GTL solution for flared gas monetization, and
details the process design, feed gas requirements, and liquid product specifications.
To address the problem of oilfield flared gas, a standard, modular lump-sum GTL system has been
developed to convert flows as small as 110,000 Nm3/d (4 MMcf/d) of wellhead associated gas into high
quality gasoline (a.k.a. petrol). The system accepts a wide range of wellhead gas types without modification,
for example wet or dry gas, and gas with up to 25% CO2 content are suitable feedstocks. The unit utilizes
the STG+™ process, which features a series of fixed bed catalytic reactors that convert gas into petrol
in a single gas phase closed loop via syngas, methanol and dimethyl ether intermediates. Process water
and unreacted light gases are recycled within the system, minimizing hydrocarbon loss and the need for
wastewater treatment.
The resulting petrol product can be sold into the regional fuel market or mixed in with the crude oil onsite
for simpler logistics. Compliance with antiflaring regulations, monetization of associated gas, reduction of
CO2 emission, and increased liquid output are achieved via implementation of the GTL system.
This standardization of small-scale GTL technology as a cost effective modular unit enables distributed
deployment directly at the wellhead that was previously not possible with traditional larger scale GTL
technology.
Introduction
In 2012, the total wastefully burned natural gas was about 3.5% of global supply, which is equal to 143
billion cubic meters. 90% of the flared gas volume is from upstream production areas mainly in the form
of associated petroleum gas, while 8% is from refineries and only 2% is from liquified natural gas (LNG)
terminals [1]. Russia has the largest flared gas volume shown in Fig. 1, while the USA leads in terms of
2 SPE-183510-MS
number of flares (2399 out of 7467). There are several disadvantages of flaring the associated gas and
the two most critical ones for oil and gas producers are: (1) Loss of revenue due to the lost energy; (2)
Antiflaring regulations may force oil producers to close oil well production unless flaring of associated
gas is eliminated. Flaring is not complete burning. It generates black carbon particles, incompletely burned
hydrocarbons, dioxins, nitrous oxide, sulfur dioxide, etc. These by-products have a negative impact on air
quality. In addition, raw methane and CO2 emissions greatly impact climate change.
Figure 1—Top 14 countries for gas flaring in 2012, from ref [1]
A number of promising solutions are available in the market to monetize flared gas [2]; these can be
categorized into four groups: (1) Convert to LNG and / or CNG allowing cost effective transportation of
the methane to the market; (2) Convert into liquid products of higher values using the GTL processes; (3)
Locate electricity-hungry desalination plants and air separation units closer to oilfields to use the power
generated from associated gas via a power generation plant; (4) Other solutions including Gas to Wire and
LPG & NGL recovery. Each solution has its own advantages and disadvantages, and is economically viable
only at certain scales and scenarios.
Primus Green Energy has developed STG technology that converts natural gas into petrol, methanol,
or diluent. The STG+ technology is profitable at gas flows as low as 110,000 Nm3/d (4 MMcf/d). In
comparison with conventional GTL such as Shell's $24 billion Pearl FT plant, STG+ technology does not
require an oxygen plant, product upgrade, and power recovery. Other GTL technologies based on an MTG
approach suffer from high capital cost which makes small-scale applications unprofitable. Primus designed,
fabricated, and commissioned a commercial demonstration STG+ plant shown in Fig. 2 in November 2013
at Primus' Hillsborough, New Jersey headquarters, and it has been validated in over 8,500 process hours (as
of August 2016) converting pipeline natural gas into high quality petrol and methanol. This paper details
the process design, feed gas requirements, liquid product specifications, and also describes the various
applications of small-scale STG+ as solutions to problems including cost effective reduction of flared
gas. Small-scale GTL units are now an attractive option for both on-shore and off-shore gas monetization
applications without needing to increase gas pipeline takeaway infrastructure and capacity.
SPE-183510-MS 3
The Primus STG+ Natural Gas-to-Petrol System includes the following principal steps in one continuous
gas-phase process loop [3].
SMR: Natural gas or other hydrocarbon feed gas reacts with steam at a high temperature and pressure
to produce syngas (CO/CO2 and H2). SMR is a mature and robust technology ideal for remote locations
without using air separation units.
Reactor 1 (Methanol Synthesis): Syngas is fed to Reactor 1, which converts most of the syngas to
methanol when passing through the catalyst bed. The chemistry is equilibrium controlled, and any unreacted
syngas is recycled back from separator to reach a conversion higher than 98.5%.
Reactor 2 (Dimethyl Ether Synthesis): The methanol-rich gas from Reactor 1 is next fed to Reactor 2.
The methanol is catalytically converted to dimethyl ether (DME), which involves methanol dehydration to
form DME. Reactor 2 optimizes heat management, which in turn reduces the recycle rate to save OPEX
amd CAPEX.
4 SPE-183510-MS
Reactor 3 (Petrol Synthesis): The Reactor 2 product gas is next fed to Reactor 3, containing the catalyst
for conversion of the methanol/DME mixture to hydrocarbons including paraffins (alkanes), aromatics,
naphthenes (cycloalkanes) and small amounts of olefins (alkenes), mostly from C5 (number of carbon atoms
in the hydrocarbon molecule) to C10.
Reactor 4 (Petrol Treatment): Reactor 4 provides transalkylation and isomerization treatment to the
products coming from Reactor 3. The treatment reduces durene (tetramethylbenzene)/isodurene and
trimethylbenzene components that have high freezing points and must be minimized in petrol. As a result,
the synthetic petrol product has high octane and desirable viscometric properties.
Separator: Finally, the mixture from Reactor 4 is condensed to obtain petrol. The non-condensed gas
and petrol are separated in a conventional condenser/separator, which is the far right element in Figure 3.
The process water is recycled back to the SMR as a feed, while the off-gas is recycled as a fuel for the
SMR burner.
The STG+ petrol system has several advantages over traditional GTL technologies, including:
1. Continuous gas-phase process, no intermediate condensations
2. Single ready-to-use product stream, no further refining needed
3. Features only standard components – fixed bed reactors, heat exchangers, compressors
4. Accepts CO2 and NGLs in feed gas
5. No process wastewater produced
6. Long catalyst lifetime; regeneration is only needed once per year
7. Optimized for profitability at small-scale
Species Limit
N2 < 5 mol%
AKI (RON+MON/2) 85 to 90
E200 (vol %) 45 to 55
E300 (vol %) 77 to 83
Corrosion (D130) 1a
Sulfur (ppmw) -
A new technology is being developed by Primus to boost petrol research octane number (RON) to 100
from standard STG+ process. Primus can address fuels that meet European Union (EU) and Commonwealth
of Independent States (CIS) specifications. There is also potential for this high octane petrol to address the
needs of the low lead aviation petrol (avgas) market, which is currently sized at 150-200 million gallons
per year in the United States.
The small footprint (30 × 50 m) and minimal infrastructure and utilities required shown in Table 3.by
the STG+ units enables them to be easily sited within an existing oil field, gas processing plant, chemical
plant, or refinery facility. Operation of the STG+ system is straightforward and in most cases only requires
one additional operator be added to the existing onsite facility staff. Routine mechanical maintenance and
catalyst regeneration takes place on an annual basis in a scheduled week-long shut down period, as the STG
+ units are designed for 356 days per year of operation.
Utility/Infrastructure Notes
Cooling water (optional) Air cooled design is available for sites with restricted water
access
Component Mole%
Methane 90.2
Ethane 5.1
Propane 2.0
Butane 1.6
Nitrogen 1.0
CO2 0.1
H2S 0
The feed natural gas is supplied at the STG+ boundary limit at a pressure of ~340 psig. The unit's
production cost for petrol, is projected at $0.50/gallon, which includes utilities, labor, and maintenance,
catalyst, and property tax/insurance expenses.
The STG+ unit will enable the customer to monetize wasted gas and move higher up the value chain by
converting wasted gas into a more valuable liquid product. After STG+ upgrading to petrol, the gas owner is
able to realize about $75 million in annual revenue from 17.2 MMscf/d of wasted gas with an unleveraged
return on investment of over 20%. About 1,190,000 MT/year of CO2 emission is eliminated by this gas
monetization when produing an equal amount of petrol by STG+ in comparision with traditional refining
of crude oil. In addition, there will be a reduction in imported petrol with more reliance on indigenously
produced petrol using associated petroleum gas.
• Underutilized reformers in existing refineries and chemical plants. These STG+ applications utilize
already built facilities and increase revenue from underutilized reformer assets.
• Syngas from biomass or coal gasification systems.
The syngas has to meet some simple conditions of ratio of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and carbon
dioxide.
Conclusions
STG+ technology offers an ideal solution to the lack of traditional natural gas pipeline infrastructure
in remote locations, enabling the monetization of gas that would otherwise be stranded or flared. The
standardization of small-scale GTL technology into a cost effective modular unit enables distributed
deployment directly at the wellhead that was previously not possible with traditional larger scale GTL
technology. Primus' STG+ technology creates extra revenue from zero or negative cost of flared gas, helping
producers continue operations and improve the environment as well. Primus, together with Jereh, uniquely
deliver complete lump-sum EPC gas-to-liquid solutions for fast and cost effective monetizing of associated
gas presently being flared.
References
1. Elvidge, C. D., Zhizhin, M., Baugh, K. et al. 2016. Methods for Global Survey of Natural Gas
Flaring from Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite Data. Energies 9 (1): 14-28. http://
dx.doi.org/10.3390/en9010014
2. Layfield, M. 2015. Creating Value from Flared Natural Gas. Presented at Abu Dhabi International
Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, 9-12 November. SPE-177560-MS. http://
dx.doi.org/10.2118/177560-MS
SPE-183510-MS 9