Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019 DepEd Guidelines for Master Teacher Promotion
2019 DepEd Guidelines for Master Teacher Promotion
MASTER TEACHER
PROMOTION
by Mark Anthony Llego
DepEd Order No. 29, s. 2002 (Merit Selection Plan of the Department of Education
(DepEd)) clearly states that it is the policy of the department to strictly adhere to
the principles of merit, competence, fitness, and equality and that the selection and
promotion of employees shall always be based on their relative qualifications and
competence to perform die duties and responsibilities of the position.
However, most of the said issuances have gray areas that often lead to the different
interpretations of the personnel selection board. Thus, to further achieve the
principles of merit and fitness, and the objectivity and uniformity in the assessment
and evaluation, these clarificatory guidelines are issued.
a. All claims for criterion “a” shall be supported with proofs/evidence for validation
where applicable or to attest to utilization, usefulness, or effectiveness.
b. The project proposal shall be supported by evidence of data, data analysis in
indicators and the terminal report shall contain statistical results.
c. The project should have been acknowledged/noted/endorsed by the school
head/education program Supervisor (specific area) and duly recommended and
approved by the Assistant School Division Superintendent and School Division
Superintendent respectively.
d. Each claim shall be supported with an approved project proposal and a terminal
report after project completion.
e. A certification should be given by the School Head/ PSDS on the project
utilization, usefulness or effectiveness and should be corroborated by at least 5
teachers to attest to the veracity of the claim
f. Any one (1) of the following shall be given 20 points. For group claims, the points
shall be divided equally among the proponents.
1. Curriculum or Instructional Materials
1. Instructional Materials content and development and its effect after
implementation shall require supporting evidences of data, data analysis
and/ or statistical validation.
2. Effective Teaching Technique or Strategies
1. This may be a developed intervention program/ technique/ strategies based
on a result of a research finding.
3. Simplification of work as in reporting system, records keeping, etc. or
procedures in cost reduction.
1. This maybe a result of a Continuous Improvement (CI) project, a research
findings or an offshoot of results of comparative studies.
4. A worthwhile Income-Generating Project (IGP) for pupils given recognition
by higher officials in the division.
1. The IGP shall be for the learners
2. The IGP shall have been sustained or in existence for at least two (2)
consecutive years with a minimum Net Income of P5,000.00
3. The terminal report shall include among others how the income was
generated, how much was generated, where the income were used.
4. Fund-raising activities are not considered as Income-Generating Project.
b. Served as Subject Coordinator or Grade level chairman for at least one (1)
year, or as adviser of school publication and not considered part of the
regular teaching load ~ 12 points.
1. The In-Service activity shall mainly be for the improvement of instructions and/
or professional development of teachers based on development needs.
2. Participants to the INSET are teachers/School Heads/parents/community or a
combination of both/each group.
3. Supporting documents shall include:
a. Training design duly recommended and approved by the ASDS and SDS
respectively.
b. Memorandum for the conduct of the INSET
c. Certificate of recognition/commendation maybe included.
d. Certification of conduct of INSET by the School Head corroborated by 5
teachers.
e. Documents shall clearly show that the claimant is the organizer/initiator
and/or program manager of the INSET.
Such as:
8. Coordinator of BSP and GSP activities or Scouts which gained awards will be
given points as follows:
h. Authorship – 10 points
B. DEMONSTRATION TEACHING
1. Claim for demonstration teaching shall be supported with the following:
1. Lesson Plan
2. Certificate of recognition/commendation as demonstration teacher duly signed
by authorities in the district/ division/region/national as the case may be.
3. It should be corroborated by 3 to 5 teachers present during the demonstration
teaching.
4. Observation tool utilized by observer may be added if there is any.
2. Level of demonstration teaching minimally required is:
1. District level for MT I
2. Division level for MT II