Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investment management
Investment management
Investment management
Portfolio
Portfolios are typically comprised of a variety of asset classes, each with distinct
risk-return profiles, with the core purpose being to generate returns and achieve
financial goals.
Spreading your investments across various asset classes and sectors is crucial. This
helps mitigate risk, as a downturn in one area can be offset by gains in another.
Periodically reviewing and rebalancing your portfolio to maintain your target asset
allocation is vital. Market fluctuations can cause your asset weights to drift, so
rebalancing helps you stay on track.
Portfolio Management
● Maximize Returns: Invest in a way that grows your wealth over time, but
consider this alongside risk tolerance.
● Manage Risk: Balance the potential for growth with the possibility of loss.
Diversification is key!
● Achieve Financial Goals: Align your portfolio with your long-term plans,
whether it's retirement, a down payment on a house, or educational
expenses.
● Maintain Liquidity: Ensure you have access to cash when needed, balancing
long-term goals with short-term needs.
● Optimize Asset Allocation: Spread your investments across different asset
classes like stocks, bonds, and cash equivalents to achieve your desired
risk-return balance.
● Protect Capital: While seeking growth, prioritize the preservation of your
principal investment.
3. Asset Mix Selection: Based on your investor profile and asset allocation
plan, determine the specific percentage you'll dedicate to each asset class.
There are general guidelines, but adjustments are necessary based on your
circumstances.
Prior to the 1950s, portfolio construction relied heavily on the traditional method.
This method focused on qualitative factors like investor goals, risk tolerance, and
top-down analysis of economic trends and industries. Diversification was a key
principle, but there lacked a formal framework for optimizing risk and return.
Enter Harry Markowitz and his groundbreaking work in the 1950s, which led to the
development of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). MPT introduced a paradigm shift
in portfolio construction by incorporating a mathematical framework.
History
For his theory of allocation of financial assets under uncertainty, also known as the
theory of portfolio choice, Markowitz shared the 1990 Nobel Memorial Prize in
Economic Sciences with William F. Sharpe and Merton Miller. Specifically, the
Nobel Committee cited the theory of portfolio choice developed by Markowitz as
the “first pioneering contribution in the field of financial economics.” The Nobel
Committee also acknowledged that Markowitz’s original portfolio theory was the
basis for “a second significant contribution to the theory of financial economics”:
the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), a theory of price formation for financial
assets, developed by William Sharpe and other researchers in the 1960s
Imagine the 1950s, how would someone build a portfolio of assets. They would look
at the assets with the most potential and buy them.
Markowitz argued that investors are risk averse and potential return is not the only
factor that determines an investment decision. Investors did diversification based
on the logic of don’t put all your eggs in one basket. But does buying 10 or 20 stocks
make it a diversified portfolio? There was no discussion of the quantity and
composition of securities in the portfolio.
You need a truly diversified portfolio with one asset that pays when it rains and one
asset that pays when it doesn’t rain. There was no model or formula for that. So he
went on to create the first mathematical model for portfolio creation using the
mean and variance of portfolio. It showed how to create a portfolio with the
optimal risk return characteristics. For the first time, the benefits of diversification
have been codified and quantified.
(Idiosyncratic risk also called unsystematic risk is the risk that is particular to a specific
investment – as opposed to risk that affects the entire market or an entire investment
portfolio. Idiosyncratic risks are rooted in individual companies or individual
investments. It could be corporate culture, operating strategy, financial policies etc)
MPT argues that risk and reward are positively correlated in investing; if you opt
for low-risk investments, such as bonds or cash, you can expect lower returns.
You'll need to invest in investments with more risk, like stocks, to receive higher
returns. You might not be willing to take the gamble and put your money into those
investments, though. It depends on your comfort level with risk. The way to
overcome the risk, according to MPT, is through diversification. This theory
promotes the spread of money across different asset classes and investments.MPT
says you can hold a certain asset type or investment that is high in risk, but when
you combine it with others of different types, the whole portfolio can be balanced.
Then its risk is lower than the individual risk of underlying assets or investments.
For instance, you wouldn't hold only risky stocks or only low-return bonds.
Instead, you would buy and hold a mixture of both to ensure the largest possible
return over time.
Efficient Frontier
According to the MPT, rational risk-averse investors should hold portfolios that
fall on the efficient frontier (since they provide the highest possible expected
returns for a given level of standard deviation)
Global minimum variance portfolio is the portfolio on the efficient frontier with
the lowest amount of risk. Portfolio’s in the efficient frontier below the global
minimum variance portfolio are considered sub-optimal.
Add On Info
Plotting the Expected Return and Risk of a two asset portfolio to create the efficient
frontier
How To Graph The Efficient Frontier For A Two-Stock Portfolio In Excel
Use Excel to graph the efficient frontier of a three security portfolio
This line represents the relationship between risk and return for portfolios that
include a risk-free asset (like cash) and the market portfolio (representing all risky
assets). The CML slopes upwards, indicating that higher expected returns come
with higher risk. The point where the CML touches the efficient frontier is called
the tangency portfolio, which offers the highest expected return for a given level of
risk compared to any other portfolio combination.
Security Market Line (SML) : Similar to the CML, but applies to individual
securities. The SML shows the expected return versus risk (beta) for individual
assets relative to the market portfolio. Assets plotting above the SML are
considered undervalued, while those below are considered overvalued.The SML is a
graphical representation of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). It shows the
relationship between an asset's expected return and its systematic risk, measured
by its beta.
Assumptions of Rationality: MPT assumes that investors are rational and make
decisions solely based on expected returns and risks. However, in reality, investors
may be influenced by emotions, cognitive biases, and other non-rational factors
that can impact their investment decisions.
Focus on Historical Data: MPT heavily relies on historical data for estimating
expected returns, variances, and covariances of assets. This assumption assumes
that past performance is indicative of future performance. However, market
conditions, correlations, and other factors may change over time, making
historical data less reliable for predicting future outcomes.
Normal Distribution Assumption: MPT assumes that asset returns follow a normal
distribution, which may not always hold true in reality. Financial markets can
experience extreme events and exhibit non-normal behavior, such as fat tails or
skewness, which the normal distribution fails to capture adequately.
Ignores Transaction Costs: MPT often overlooks the impact of transaction costs,
such as brokerage fees, taxes, and market impact costs. These costs can erode
portfolio returns and impact the practical implementation of MPT strategies.
Lack of Consideration for Behavioral Factors: MPT does not explicitly account for
behavioral factors, such as investor sentiment, herd behavior, or market
inefficiencies arising from cognitive biases. These behavioral factors can lead to
market anomalies and deviations from MPT's assumptions.
Sensitivity to Input Parameters: MPT outcomes are highly sensitive to the input
parameters, such as expected returns, volatilities, and correlations. Small changes
in these inputs can significantly affect the optimal portfolio allocations, potentially
leading to suboptimal outcomes.
Inability to Predict Black Swan Events: MPT struggles to account for rare,
unforeseen events known as "Black Swan" events. These events, characterized by
their extreme impact and low probability, can have a significant impact on
portfolio performance but are difficult to incorporate into MPT's risk and return
models.
Key takeaways
2. Risk and return are related: MPT recognizes that there is a positive
relationship between risk and return. Investors should expect to be
compensated for taking on higher levels of risk. MPT helps in finding the
optimal balance between risk and return based on an investor's preferences.
Sharpe's Single Index Model, simplifies this process by primarily considering the
relationship between individual securities or portfolios and a broad market index.
It assumes that the performance of a security or portfolio can be explained by its
exposure to the market factor, represented by the market index.
Casual observation of the stock prices over a period of time reveals that most of the
stock prices move with the market index.
When the Sensex increases, stock prices also tend to increase and vice-versa. This
indicates that some underlying factors affect the market index as well as the stock
prices
- Alpha
A measure of the excess return of an investment in comparison to a benchmark
index. Alpha of 1 indicates that the investment outperforms the benchmark by 1%
and Alpha of -1 indicates that the investment underperforms the benchmark by 1%.
- Beta
Systematic risk
Unsystematic risk
Linear Relationship: The model assumes a linear relationship between the excess
return of a security or portfolio and its exposure to the market factor, represented
by the returns of a market index.
Homogeneous Expectations: The model assumes that all investors have the same
expectations regarding the relationship between securities and the market factor,
as well as their risk and return characteristics.
Efficient Market: It assumes that markets are efficient, meaning that all relevant
information is immediately reflected in stock prices and there are no opportunities
for consistently outperforming the market.
Constant Risk-Free Rate: The model assumes a constant risk-free rate of return,
which serves as a baseline for evaluating the excess return of securities or
portfolios.
Homogeneous Expectations: The Single Index Model assumes that all investors
have the same expectations regarding the relationship between securities and the
market factor, as well as their risk and return characteristics. In reality, investors
may have diverse expectations and may differ in their assessments of risk and
return.
Reliance on Historical Data: The Single Index Model relies on historical data to
estimate expected returns and volatilities. This assumption assumes that the
historical relationship between securities and the market factor will hold true in
the future. However, future market conditions and events may differ from
historical patterns, potentially leading to inaccurate estimates.
No Consideration of Transaction Costs and Taxes: The model does not account for
transaction costs or taxes associated with buying and selling securities. In practice,
these costs can impact the actual returns on investments and should be considered
when evaluating investment decisions.
Key takeaways
Imagine driving across the country without a map or GPS. You might reach your
destination eventually, but the journey would be inefficient and stressful.
Similarly, navigating the investment landscape without measuring portfolio
performance can lead to missed opportunities and potentially derail your financial
goals. Here's why it's crucial:
Additional Information:
Benchmarks
Imagine a measuring stick for investments! That's what a benchmark is. It's a
standard used to compare the performance of:
● Individual Stocks: See how a stock stacks up against the broader market
(Sensex or Nifty).
● Mutual Funds: Check if a fund is performing better than its chosen index.
● Performance Check: See if your investments are keeping pace with the
market or a specific sector.
Return Measures
1. Total Return
This is the most basic metric and reflects the overall change in your
portfolio's value over a specific period. It encompasses both capital
appreciation (increase in asset prices) and any income generated (dividends,
interest). It's calculated as:
2. Annualized Return(CAGR):
Risk Measures
1. Standard Deviation
Standard deviation measures the dispersion of your portfolio's returns around its
average return. In simpler terms, it tells you how much your returns fluctuate over
time.
A lower standard deviation implies less volatility - returns tend to stay closer to
the average, suggesting a potentially less risky portfolio.
Limitations
Additional Information:
The 68-95-99.7 rule, also known as the empirical rule, is a principle in statistics
that applies to normally distributed data. It describes the probability of finding
data points within a certain number of standard deviations (SD) from the mean
(average). Here's the breakdown of the rule:
● 68%: Approximately 68% of the data falls within one SD of the mean.
● 95%: Roughly 95% of the data falls within two SDs of the mean.
● 99.7%: About 99.7% of the data falls within three SDs of the mean.
Let's say you're analyzing an investment with an expected annual return (mean)
of 10% and a standard deviation (SD) of 3%. The 68-95-99.7 rule can help you
understand the potential range of returns for this investment:
● 68% Confidence Interval: Within one standard deviation (3%) of the 10%
mean, you can expect returns to fall between 7% and 13% (10% ± 3%) in
roughly 68% of the years.
● 95% Confidence Interval: Expanding to two standard deviations (6%), the
range widens to 4% and 16% (10% ± 6%) in approximately 95% of the
years.
● 99.7% Confidence Interval: Considering three standard deviations (9%),
the total range becomes 1% and 19% (10% ± 9%) for 99.7% of the years.
Interpretation
The 68-95-99.7 rule doesn't predict the exact return for any particular year.
However, it provides a framework for understanding the probability of returns
falling within certain ranges based on the historical average (mean) and
volatility (standard deviation).
2. Beta
A beta of 1 indicates your portfolio's returns move in line with the market.
A beta greater than 1 suggests your portfolio's returns are more volatile than the
market. It amplifies market movements - both upwards and downwards.
A beta less than 1 implies your portfolio's returns are less volatile than the market.
It doesn't move as much as the market in either direction.
Limitations
● It only considers market risk, not other types of risk like interest rate or
credit risk.
3. Maximum Drawdown
Limitations
Alan Job Jose
St.Francis College, Bengaluru
Investment Management
Module 5 : Portfolio Management
● Maximum drawdown only captures the biggest single decline, not the
frequency or severity of smaller losses.
● The timeframe used for calculating maximum drawdown can impact the
result. A longer period might reveal a larger drawdown.
These three measures provide valuable insights into the risk profile of your
portfolio. Here's how you can leverage them:
● Compare your portfolio's risk to its return. A high return with high
standard deviation or beta might be suitable for a high-risk tolerance
investor.
● Track these measures over time. Monitor how these risk measures evolve to
assess changes in your portfolio's risk profile.
1. Sharpe Ratio
The Sharpe Ratio measures the additional return your portfolio generates per unit
of risk taken, compared to the risk-free rate (typically the return on government
bonds). It essentially helps you gauge how much excess return you're getting for
the volatility you endure.
A lower Sharpe Ratio suggests less efficient risk management. You might be
getting similar returns with less risk elsewhere.
Limitations
2. Treynor Ratio
Similar to the Sharpe Ratio, the Treynor Ratio focuses on excess return, but it uses
beta instead of standard deviation as the risk measure. Beta reflects how much
your portfolio's returns move with the market.
A lower Treynor Ratio suggests the portfolio might not be efficiently capturing
market risk for the return it generates.
Limitations
● Treynor Ratio assumes a linear relationship between your portfolio and the
market, which might not always hold true.
3. Jensen's Alpha
Alpha measures the excess return (above what the market would expect based on
beta) generated by your portfolio. It essentially helps you understand how much
your portfolio manager potentially outperformed the market after adjusting for
risk.
Alan Job Jose
St.Francis College, Bengaluru
Investment Management
Module 5 : Portfolio Management
A negative alpha suggests the portfolio underperformed the market relative to its
risk.
Limitations
Additional Information:
Alpha and Jensen's alpha are two key metrics used for this purpose. Alpha simply
measures if your portfolio outperformed a chosen benchmark (like a market
index), but doesn't consider risk. Jensen's alpha refines this by incorporating
risk. It uses the CAPM model to estimate the expected return based on your
portfolio's risk profile, and then sees if you actually achieved more than that
(positive alpha) - potentially indicating skillful management. So, alpha gives a
basic idea of beating a benchmark, while Jensen's alpha adds a layer of
sophistication by considering how much risk you took to achieve that
outperformance.
4. Sortino Ratio
Similar to the Sharpe Ratio, the Sortino Ratio measures risk-adjusted return, but it
focuses on downside risk (volatility of negative returns) instead of total volatility.
This can be particularly relevant for investors who are more concerned about
potential losses.
A lower Sortino Ratio suggests the portfolio might be exposed to more significant
downside risk for the return it generates.
Limitations