Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download Radar Remote Sensing: Applications and Challenges 1st Edition- eBook PDF all chapter
ebook download Radar Remote Sensing: Applications and Challenges 1st Edition- eBook PDF all chapter
ebook download Radar Remote Sensing: Applications and Challenges 1st Edition- eBook PDF all chapter
https://ebooksecure.com/download/hyperspectral-remote-sensing-
theory-and-applications-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/atmospheric-remote-sensing-
principles-and-applications-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/atmospheric-remote-sensing-
ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/remote-sensing-of-ocean-and-
coastal-environments-ebook-pdf/
Remote Sensing of Geomorphology, Volume 23 1st Edition
- eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/remote-sensing-of-geomorphology-
volume-23-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-compressed-sensing-in-
radar-signal-processing/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-comprehensive-remote-
sensing-by-shunlin-liang/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/precipitation-science-
measurement-remote-sensing-microphysics-and-modeling-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/nanotechnology-based-smart-
remote-sensing-networks-for-disaster-prevention-ebook-pdf/
RADAR REMOTE
SENSING
This page intentionally left blank
Earth Observation
RADAR REMOTE
SENSING
Applications and Challenges
Edited by
PRASHANT K. SRIVASTAVA
Remote Sensing Laboratory, Institute of Environment and
Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, India
TANVIR ISLAM
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, United States
DAWEI HAN
Professor of Hydroinformatics, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
RAJENDRA PRASAD
Professor, Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology
(Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, India
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic
or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system,
without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further infor-
mation about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as
the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website:
www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treat-
ment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such
information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including
parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume
any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-823457-0
Contributors xiii
Foreword xix
v
vi Contents
1. Introduction 93
2. Study area 96
3. Materials and methods 97
4. Results 99
5. Discussion 101
6. Conclusions 104
Contents vii
Acknowledgments 105
References 105
11. Flood inundation mapping from synthetic aperture radar and optical
data using support vector machine: a case study from Kopili River basin
during Cyclone Amphan 203
Prasad Balasaheb Wale, Thota Sivasankar, Varun Narayan Mishra and Ratna Sanyal
1. Introduction 203
2. Study area 206
3. Material and methods 207
4. Result and discussion 210
5. Conclusion 216
References 216
1. Introduction 219
Contents ix
2. Datasets 221
3. Methodology 224
4. Results and discussion 229
5. Conclusions and future work 239
Acknowledgments 241
References 241
13. Evaluation of speckle filtering methods using polarimetric Sentinel-1A data 245
Varun Narayan Mishra and Thota Sivasankar
1. Introduction 245
2. Study site and data used 246
3. Methodology 248
4. Results and discussion 249
5. Conclusion 253
Acknowledgment 253
References 254
1. Introduction 309
2. Methodology 311
3. Results and discussion 316
4. Conclusion 322
Acknowledgments 322
Code availability 323
References 323
17. Fuzzy logic for the retrieval of kidney bean crop growth variables using
ground-based scatterometer measurements 327
Dileep Kumar Gupta, Rajendra Prasad, Pradeep Kumar and Prashant K. Srivastava
1. Introduction 327
2. Method and observations 329
3. Fuzzy inference system 331
4. Results and discussion 332
5. Conclusion 337
References 338
19. Toward a North American continental wetland map from space: wetland
classification using satellite imagery and machine learning algorithms
on Google Earth Engine 357
Masoud Mahdianpari, Brian Brisco, Bahram Salehi, Jean Granger,
Fariba Mohammadimanesh, Megan Lang and Souleymane Toure
1. Introduction 357
2. Wetland classification systems 359
3. Wetland field data 362
4. Remote sensing data 363
5. Cloud computing platforms and machine learning algorithms 365
6. Wetland classification results for Canada 366
7. Conclusion 369
References 369
Further reading 373
22. Radar remote sensing of soil moisture: fundamentals, challenges & way-out 405
Hari Shanker Srivastava and Parul Patel
1. Introduction 405
2. Effect of target parameters on SAR sensitivity toward soil moisture 407
3. Addressing the effect of target parameters on SAR sensitivity toward soil moisture 410
4. Effect of the sensor parameters on SAR sensitivity toward soil moisture 416
5. To identify sensitive polarimetric parameters derived from fully and hybrid polarimetric
SAR for soil moisture 427
6. Addressing the various challenges involved in ground truth planning and ground
truth data collection for radar remote sensing of soil moisture 432
7. Addressing the challenges involved in development of a soil moisture retrieval
model using radar remote sensing 435
8. Addressing challenges involved in SAR data processing due to a huge data volume 440
9. Addressing the issue of interval and scale of a soil moisture map 441
10. Conclusion 443
References 444
Index 447
Contributors
Ram Avtar
Graduate School of Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido
University, Sapporo, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, United Nations
University (UNU-IAS), Shibuya City, Tokyo, Japan
Avik Bhattacharya
Microwave Remote Sensing Lab, Centre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Mantosh Biswas
Computer Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, Haryana,
India
Brian Brisco
The Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Sumit Chaudhary Kumar
Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Anup Kumar Das
Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Ioannis N. Faraslis
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Thessaly, Thessaly, Greece
Himanshu Govil
Department of Applied Geology, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Jean Granger
C-CORE, St. John’s, NL, Canada
Dileep Kumar Gupta
Remote Sensing Laboratory, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India; Department of Physics, Indian Institute of
Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Vinayak Huggannavar
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Studies, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Powai, Maharashtra, India
J. Indu
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Studies, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Powai, Maharashtra, India
Mamoru Ishikawa
Graduate School of Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido
University, Sapporo, Japan; Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University,
Sapporo, Japan
xiii
xiv Contributors
Ravneet Kaur
Apex Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh
University, Gharuan, Punjab, India; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Punjabi
University, Patiala, Punjab, India
Ali Kharrazi
Advanced Systems Analysis Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,
Laxenburg, Austria; Euro-Mediterranean Center for Climate Change, Ca’ Foscari University of
Venice, Venice, Italy; Faculty of Global Studies, Akita International University, Akita, Japan
Arjun G. Koppad
Department of Natural Resource Management (NRM), College of Forestry, UAS Dharwad,
Karnataka, India
Sooraj Krishnan
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Studies, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Powai, Maharashtra, India
Ajit Kumar
Microwave and Imaging Spectroscopy Research Laboratory, Milliya Arts, Science, and
Management Science College, Beed, Maharashtra, India
Pankaj Kumar
Natural Resources and Ecosystem Services, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies,
Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan
Pradeep Kumar
School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
Shashi Kumar
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Department, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Indian
Space Research Organisation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Sourav Kumar
Department of Geoinformatics, School of Natural Resource Management, Central University of
Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Vikram Kumar
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology,
Patna, Bihar, India
Vineet Kumar
Department of Water Resources, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan
Faculty of Social Work, Health, and Nursing, Ravensburg-Weingarten University of Applied
Sciences, Weingarten, Germany; College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University,
Xiamen, PR China
Megan Lang
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Falls Church, VA, United States
Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez
Institute for Computer Research, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
Contributors xv
Masoud Mahdianpari
C-CORE, St. John’s, NL, Canada; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada
Raman Maini
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, India
Dipankar Mandal
Microwave Remote Sensing Lab, Centre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; Department of Agronomy, Kansas State
University, Manhattan, KS, United States
Rohit Mangla
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Studies, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Powai, Maharashtra, India
Heather McNairn
Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON,
Canada
Varun Narayan Mishra
Centre for Climate Change and Water Research, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur,
Rajasthan, India
Scott Mitchell
Geomatics and Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Fariba Mohammadimanesh
C-CORE, St. John’s, NL, Canada
Monika
Department of Applied Geology, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
S.K. Mustak
Department of Geography, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, Punjab, India
Akhilesh S. Nair
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Studies, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Powai, Maharashtra, India
Mahesh Pal
Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
Arvind Chandra Pandey
Department of Geoinformatics, School of Natural Resource Management, Central University of
Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Varsha Pandey
Remote Sensing Laboratory, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Bikash Ranjan Parida
Department of Geoinformatics, School of Natural Resource Management, Central University of
Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
xvi Contributors
Parul Patel
Space Applications Centre (SAC), ISRO, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
George P. Petropoulos
Department of Geography, Harokopio University of Athens, Kallithea, Athens, Greece
Ankita Pradhan
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Studies, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Powai, Maharashtra, India
Bhanu Prakash
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Department, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Indian
Space Research Organisation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Rajendra Prasad
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi,
Uttar Pradesh, India
Shivendu Prashar
Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Solan,
Himachal Pradesh, India; Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology,
Ropar, Punjab, India; Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh, India
Y.S. Rao
Microwave Remote Sensing Lab, Centre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Bahram Salehi
Environmental Resources Engineering, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State
University of New York, New York, NY, United States
Ratna Sanyal
Computer Science and Engineering Area, NIIT University, Neemrana, Rajasthan, India
Syeda Sarfin
NISAR Project, Department of NRM, College of Forestry, UAS Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Sayyad Shafiyoddin
Microwave and Imaging Spectroscopy Research Laboratory, Milliya Arts, Science, and
Management Science College, Beed, Maharashtra, India
Achala Shakya
Computer Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, Haryana,
India
Hari Shanker Srivastava
Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO),
Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Jyoti Sharma
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi,
Uttar Pradesh, India
Contributors xvii
Sartajvir Singh
Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Solan,
Himachal Pradesh, India; Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology,
Ropar, Punjab, India
Sudhir Kumar Singh
KBCAOS, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Rishabh Singh
Remote Sensing Laboratory, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Thota Sivasankar
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Area, NIIT University, Neemrana, Rajasthan, India
Vishakha Sood
Aiotronics Automation, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India
Josaphat Tetuko Sri Sumantyo
Center for Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; Fakultas Teknik,
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo, Indonesia
Prashant K. Srivastava
Remote Sensing Laboratory, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India; Institute of Environment and Sustainable
Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Swati Suman
Remote Sensing Laboratory, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Reet Kamal Tiwari
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Ropar, Punjab, India
Umesh Kumar Tiwari
Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Solan, Chandigarh, India
Souleymane Toure
Environmental Resources Engineering, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State
University of New York, New York, NY, United States
Gaurav Tripathi
Department of Geoinformatics, School of Natural Resource Management, Central University of
Jharkhand, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Deha Agus Umarhadi
Graduate School of Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido
University, Sapporo, Japan
Kaushlendra Verma
Department of Civil Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Studies, Indian Institute of
Technology Bombay, Powai, Maharashtra, India
xviii Contributors
The microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum has some special properties
for remote sensing. The wavelength range of microwave radiation is 1 m to 1 mm. Mi-
crowaves are able to penetrate clouds, dust, and rain to some extent. Remote sensing at
microwave frequencies gathers useful information about the earth’s atmosphere, land,
and oceans under almost all weather conditions at any time.
Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) generated by the sun is not required in radar
remote sensing. It generates its own EMR that is transmitted to the terrain. Radar remote
sensing is popular for earth observations in the scientific community using different types
of radar geometry such as monostatic, bistatic, and multistatic. Experimental investiga-
tions and their applications for backscattering (monostatic) measurements of the natural
terrain have been performed using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) onboard, ground-
based, airborne, and spaceborne platforms including RADARASAT, Advanced Land
Observing Satellite (ALOS) Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar
(PALSAR), ERS-1 and 2, ENVISAT, RISAT, Sentinel, and TERRASAR-X.
SAR data are useful for retrieving many geophysical parameters, ocean variables, and
meteorologic variables. Monostatic SAR imagery contains information only in backscat-
tered signals from the terrain. Bistatic and multistatic SAR systems are useful for gener-
ating three-dimensional images of the terrain. Information gathered by SAR from
different azimuthal and elevation angles is more valuable than only backscattered infor-
mation. Consequently, it is interesting to increase information about the different types
of radar geometry in radar remote sensing for potential applications.
Therefore, the primary aim of this book is to advance knowledge about the scientific
understanding, developments, and applications of radar remote sensing in different radar
geometries such as monostatic, bistatic, and multistatic. In essence, a book needs to be
compiled that is devoted to collecting developments in and rigorous applications of radar
remote sensing using different radar geometries and platforms at different scales including
local, regional, and global. Radar Remote Sensing: Application and Challenges includes broad
coverage for earth’s observation. By linking the entire system, this book is the first hand-
book promoting the synergistic and multidisciplinary activities in and challenges to the
earth’s observation using different types of radar geometry and platforms among scientists
and users who work in the field of radar remote sensing for the earth’s observation.
The book was made possible because of extensive and valuable contributions from
interdisciplinary experts from across the world in the field of radar remote sensing and
applications. The book is divided into four sections, in which Section I contains the basics
of radar remote sensing, Section II details conventional methods for radar remote sensing,
xix
xx Foreword
Section III provides advanced methods for radar remote sensing, and Section IV provides
future challenges to radar remote sensing.
Chapter 1 provides a brief overview of microwave remote sensing and reviews its
different applications. Chapter 2 provides essential components of the microwave system
that are necessary to design a microwave radar measurement system. The second section
of the book contains chapters related to optical/infrared methods. Chapter 3 of this
section provides the details about different radar bands and configurations used for various
applications. Chapter 4 deals with basic phenomena and parameters related to wave prop-
agation and interactions with distinct media and objects.
Section II starts with Chapter 5, revealing the significance of comparing and analyzing
different polarizations for flood mapping and assessment. Chapter 6 provides techniques
for identifying subsurface features using SAR data. Chapter 7 discusses various radar
remote sensing techniques that aid in monitoring the terrestrial water budget elements
using the Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals product of Global Precipitation Measure-
ment constellation satellites. Chapter 8 of this section provides an overview of SAR
for forest monitoring using L-band frequency. In Chapter 9, the authors provide detailed
information about machine learning techniques for SAR image classification. In Chapter
10, the modeling and retrieval of soil surface parameters based on microwave remote
sensing are discussed using SAR datasets. In Chapter 11, the fusion of SAR data with
optical datasets is reviewed to study the flood situation in a Kopili river basin. Chapter
12 provides a detailed account of artificial intelligence techniques such as kernel-based
support vector machine and artificial neural networks for a classification and performance
assessment of Landsat-8 and ALOS-2 PALSAR, whereas Chapter 13 examines the
effectiveness of various filtering methods to suppress speckles in dual-polarization
Sentinel 1A SAR images.
Section III of the book starts with Chapter 14, which provides an overview of
different concepts and techniques related to target characterization using SAR remote
sensing. Chapter 15 explains the scattering characteristics of C-band circularly polarized
SAR. In Chapter 16, the cloud computing potentials of the Google Earth Engine are
demonstrated as a unified processing pipeline for water cloud model inversion. Chapter
17 explores the potential of backscattering and fuzzy logic algorithms to retrieve kidney
bean crop growth variables using ground-based multiangular, multitemporal, and dual-
polarized bistatic scatterometer data. Chapter 18 reviews studies that used traditional and
time-series InSAR techniques to map peat subsidence in the tropical region, whereas
Chapter 19 provides state-of-the-art satellite remote sensing for wetland classification.
Section IV starts with Chapter 20, which highlights various challenges involved in the
radar remote sensing of soil moisture. Chapter 21 provides a systematic review of the
applications, challenges, and future requirements of SCATSAT-1 over land-cover appli-
cations. This study is essential to understand vegetation dynamics with active microwave
Foreword xxi
sensors and explore the potential applications of SCATSAT-1 in emerging fields. The last
chapter deals with the challenges and future prospects of radar remote sensing.
We believe that this book may be read by people with a common interest in radar
remote sensing in ground-based scatterometers and SAR systems, airborne scatterometers
and SAR systems, and spaceborne scatterometers and SAR systems at different fre-
quencies and polarizations with monostatic, bistatic, and multistatic geometry. This
book is also useful for readers from other diverse backgrounds like earth and environ-
mental, meteorological sciences, etc.
Last but not the least, the editors are grateful to all contributing authors and anony-
mous reviewers for their time, talent, and energies and for adhering to a strict time line;
and to the staff at Academic Press, Elsevier, for their patience and support throughout.
Prashant K. Srivastava
Varanasi, India
Dileep Kumar Gupta
Varanasi, India
Tanvir Islam
Los Angeles, United States
Dawei Han
Bristol, United Kingdom
Rajendra Prasad
Varanasi, India
This page intentionally left blank
SECTION 1
1
This page intentionally left blank
CHAPTER 1
when he received a patent for his RADAR device. The device designed by Watson-Watt
was efficient for locating and ranging aircraft using pulses of microwaves instead of contin-
uous waves. He proposed the idea of developing a system to locate enemy planes and send
an alert to forces. Similarly, researchers in the US Naval Research Laboratory were
exploring pulsed RADAR to detect objects (Jensen, 2009).
On the other side of the Atlantic, the United Kingdom was concerned about the
increasing arial power of Nazi Germany in late 1930. It asked Watson-Watt to invent
a microwave system that could destroy aircraft. Such an idea had been proposed by
Serbian-American scientist Nikola Tesla in 1924. Tesla claimed that death rays invented
by him could stop an aircraft. Similarly, British scientists G.H. Matthews and T.F. Wall
applied for a patent on death rays but failed. In 1934, Tesla again proposed a system that
could hunt 10,000 planes from a distance of 250 miles. For this purpose, he proposed a
plan to construct the 12-power plant worth $2 million each in the United States to
generate 12 death rays. The cost was very high, so no one paid attention to his proposal.
The idea of death rays was also not supported by Watson-Watt.
However, he expressed his view about developing an early warning system to locate
aircraft even in a cloudy or nighttime scenario. Work done by Watson-Watt and core-
searchers resulted in the installation of a series of tall towers with transmitters and receivers
(Chain Home) in Britain during the World War II outbreak. This is why a major devel-
opment was seen in microwave remote sensing technology during World War II. RA-
DAR had become a major technological; weapon to locate enemy aircraft.
Correspondingly, in 1940, with the advancement in cavity magnetrons, the antenna
size was reduced and a wave of up to 10 cm with high power could easily be generated.
It helped to mount small antennas on aircraft to locate ships and enemy aircraft as air-to-
air RADAR. RADAR-like H2S had been developed, which aided navigation to and
from the target surface. With the end of World War II, the application of RADAR diver-
sified. Meteorologists tried to find applications for RADAR in the observation of
weather forecasting.
methane, hydrogen, helium, and nitrogen compounds. The strongest absorption occurs
at wavelengths shorter than 0.3 mm, mainly owing to ozone. The strength of the scat-
tering that takes place depends on several factors: the wavelength of the radiation, the
abundance of particles or gases, and the distance the radiation travels through the
atmosphere.
The optical remote sensing system (Fig. 1.1) is composed of the sun, the targeted sur-
face, the atmosphere, and the sensor installed on the satellite (Kulkarni and Rege, 2020).
Light emitted from the sun interacts with the atmosphere before its interaction with the
targeted surface on the earth. Some part of this light energy reflects from the targeted ob-
ject surface and transmits back to the sensor. Here, the reflection is of two types: diffuse
and specular. Specular reflection is uncommon in remote sensing; however, it may be
found on water’s surface, for instance (Ulaby and Long, 2015). Diffuse reflection is
mostly found with natural surfaces. Often, the characterization of diffuse reflectance
is done through a bidirectional reflectance distribution function. Radar remote sensing
is also called active remote sensing (Singh et al., 2013).
Radar remote sensing provides a unique view for gathering information about the
earth’s environment from space, which cannot be achieved any other way (Fig. 1.2). Ra-
dar signals at higher wavelengths (greater than 1 cm) have the ability to penetrate clouds
and rain to some extent. In RADAR remote sensing, the RADAR antenna acts as a
source of energy in place of the sun, which is used in optical remote sensing. These qual-
ities of RADAR system allow earth observation independently in any time of the day and
under almost all weather conditions. The clouds are dense enough to obscure the ground
surface completely in optical imagery, but they have little effect on microwaves. Ice
clouds have almost little effect on microwave or EM radiation with wavelengths greater
than 1 cm. However, water clouds have less effect on microwaves and a significant effect
on EM radiation with wavelengths less than 2 cm. Rain has a greater effect on micro-
waves than clouds, but it is effective for wavelengths less than 4 cm. Otherwise, at greater
than 4 cm wavelength, rain also has a minimal effect.
Radar systems in remote sensing are coherent. Therefore, RADAR remote sensing
executes measurements within a resolution cell through interference (constructive and
destructive) amid signals scattered from separate targeted objects (Foster et al., 2011;
Tedesco and Jeyaratnam, 2016; Singh and Singh, 2020). The beam of radiation emitted
from RADAR in satellites illuminates the targeted surface; in turn, the target scatters the
radiation in multiple directions. A part of this scattered radiation returns to a small
RADAR antenna. Generally, emission and reception in this type of remote sensing
are done by the same antenna. Therefore, it is called monostatic. To take earth observa-
tions, the spaceborne and airborne implements an aperture synthesis technique called
synthetic aperture RADAR (SAR) (Rahman et al., 2010; Du et al., 2015). SAR uses
the Doppler effect, owing to which high spatial resolution images can be obtained
from earth observatory satellites.
6 Radar Remote Sensing
3. Fundamentals of RADAR
Radar detects an object by analyzing alterations in the transmitting frequency and time
duration. Primary RADAR consists of a frequency generator and a time control unit;
a modulator with a transmitter to produce a modulated pulse; an antenna to transmit
the pulse; a duplexer that helps bidirectional communications between the transmitter
and the receiver; another antenna to collect reflected pulses from the target; a receiver
to analyze this reflection; and some other units such as signal processing, data processing,
and a display unit. The processing unit is to process the received signal to detect the tar-
get’s location, relative velocity, and direction. The target location can be calculated with
the help of the travel time taken by the signal from the transmitter to the receiver. The
relative velocity of the target can be measured by analyzing changes in the carrier fre-
quency of the arrived signal. The direction or relative angle of the target can be deter-
mined by analyzing the reflected wave’s angle.
transmitter and channel the reflected echo signals to the receiver instead of the trans-
mitter. The duplexer contains two gas-discharge devices: transmit-receive (TR) and
antitransmit-receive (ATR). The function of TR is to protect the receiver at the
time of transmission, and ATR directs echo signals toward the receiver at the
time of reception.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Ca.[250]
THOMAS DUKE OF GLOCESTER.
[After this tragedy was[251] ended, maister Ferrers sayde: seeing
it is best to place eche person in his order, Baldwine, take you the
chronicles and marke them as they come: for there are many worthy
to bee noted, though not treated[252] of. First the lord Murrey, a
Scotishman, who tooke his death’s wound through a stroke lent him
by the earle of Notyngham, whom hee chalenged at the tylt.[253] But
to omit him, and also the fatte pryor of Tiptre, pressed to death with
throng of people vpon London bridge at the queene’s entry,[254] I will
come to the duke of Glocester, the king’s vncle, a man mynding[255]
the common welth, and yet at length miserably made away. In whose
person if yee will gieue eare, yee shall heare what I thinke meete to
be saied.]
How Syr Thomas of Woodstocke Duke
of Glocester, vncle to King Richarde
the second, was vnlawfully murdered,
Anno 1397.[256]
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
For fortune’s floude thus running with[267] full streame,
And I a duke discended of great kinges,[268]
Constable of England, chiefe officer of[269] the realme,
Abused with desperaunce[270] in these vayne thinges,
I went without feete, and flewe without winges,
Presuming so farre vpon my high estate,
That dreade set apart, my prince I would mate.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Where not in roabes, but with[291] baslardes bright,
Wee came [for] to parle of the publike weale,
Confirming our quarell with maine and [with] might,
With swordes and no wordes wee tried our appeale:
In steede of reason declaring our zeale,
And whome so wee knew with the king in [good] grace,
Wee plainely depriued of[292] power and [of] place.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
For lying at Plashey my selfe to repose,
By reason of sickenesse which helde mee full sore:[305]
The king espying mee apart from those,
With whom I confedered in hand before,[306]
Thought it not meete to tract the time more,
But glad to take mee at such a vauntage,[307]
Came to salute mee with friendly visage.
26.
27.
28.
G. F.[312]
[When maister Ferrers had ended his[313] fruitfull tragedy,
because no man was ready with any other, I, hauing perused the
story which came next, sayed: “Because you shall not say, my
maisters, but that I will somewhat doe my part, I will, vnder your
correction, declare the tragedy of Thomas Mowbrey, duke of
Northfolke,[314] the chiefe worker of the duke of Glocester’s
destruction: who to admonishe all counsailours to beware of
flattering princes, or falsely enuying or accusing their peregualles,
may lament his vices in maner following.”]
How the Lord Mowbrey, promoted by
King Richard the second, to the state
of a Duke,[315] was by him banished
the realme, the yeare of Christ, 1398,
and after died miserably in exile.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Wherefore to th’end I might alone enioy
The king’s good will,[329] I made his lust my lawe:
And where of late I laboured to distroy
Such flattering folke, as thereto stoode in awe,
Now learned I among the rest to clawe:
For pride is such, if it bee kindely caught,
As stroyeth good, and stirreth vppe euery naught.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
23.
24.
25.