Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Power Sharing - Notes
Power Sharing - Notes
Power sharing among different social groups such as religious and linguistic
groups. This method is used to give minority communities a fair share in
power. This type of arrangement is meant to give space in the government
and administration to diverse social groups, who otherwise, would feel
alienated from the government.
Example - ‘Community government’ in Belgium
The system of ‘reserved constituencies’ in assemblies and the
parliament in India
Q. What is the population of Belgium? - a little over one crore, about half the
population of Haryana.
Q. What is the percentage of Dutch speaking people in Belgium? - 59%
Q. Which community of Belgium was rich and powerful - The French speaking
community (however minority)
Q. What was the root cause of tension between the Dutch speaking community
and the French speaking community? - Getting benefit of economic
development and education by the Dutch much later than the French.
Q. During which period did the tension start between the Dutch speaking and the
French speaking communities? - During 1950s and 1960s.
Q. Where in Belgium was the tension between the two communities more
severe? - In Brussels.
Q. How many times was the Belgian constitution amended to have the provision
for all sections to live together harmoniously?
Ans. 4 times (between 1970 to 1993).
Q. Which religion did the most of the Sinhala, speaking people practice? -
Buddhism.
Q. Which religion did the Tamils follow? - They follow either Hinduism or Islam.
Q. Which community constitutes 7% of the Sri Lankan population?
Ans. Christians (they are both Tamils and Sinhala’s)
Q. What is Majoritarianism? A belief that the majority community should be able
to rule a country in whichever way it wants, by disregarding the wishes and
needs of the minority.
Q. When was the Act favouring only the Sinhala’s passed? - In 1956.
Q. What were the main provisions in the Act of 1956?
Ans. i. Sinhala will be the only official language.
ii. The state shall protect and foster Buddhism.
iii. The government follows the preferential policies that favoured Sinhala
applicants for university positions and government jobs.
Q. Why did the relation among the Sinhala and Tamil communities strain?
Class X _ Phase 1 _ Political Science _ Power Sharing _ SDM
Ans. The Tamils felt that none of the major political parties led by the Buddhist
Sinhala leaders was sensitive to their language and culture. They felt that the
constitution and government policies denied them equal political rights,
discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and
ignored their interests.
Q. What were the main demands of Tamils in Sri Lanka?
Ans. i. recognition of Tamil as an official language.
ii. Regional autonomy
iii. equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs.
iv. an independent Tamil Eelam (state) in northern and eastern parts of Sri
Lanka.
Q. What does the word ‘Eelam’ mean? - ‘State’
Q. When were many political organisations formed demanding an independent
Tamil Eelam in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka? - By 1980s.
Q. When did civil war end in Sri Lanka? - 2009.
Beginning in 1983, there was an active revolt against the government by the
Velupillai Prabhakaran led Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. (LTTE, also
known as the Tamil Tigers).
Lebanon’s Power Sharing
Lebanon’s power sharing is explained through a story about a man called
Khalil who lived in Beirut - capital of Lebanon.
His Parents came from different communities
Father - was an Orthodox Christian
Mother - was a Sunni Muslim
People from various communities lived together in Lebanon intermingled, yet
fought a bitter civil war among themselves.
At the end of this civil war, Lebanon’s leaders came together and agreed to
some basic rules for power sharing among different communities
The country’s President must belong to the Maronite sect of Catholic
Christians.