Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design_of_Micro-Machined_Frequency_Reconfigurable_Cascaded_Sierpinski_Gasket_Fractal_Antenna_using_RF-MEMS_Switches
Design_of_Micro-Machined_Frequency_Reconfigurable_Cascaded_Sierpinski_Gasket_Fractal_Antenna_using_RF-MEMS_Switches
Design_of_Micro-Machined_Frequency_Reconfigurable_Cascaded_Sierpinski_Gasket_Fractal_Antenna_using_RF-MEMS_Switches
net/publication/358758311
CITATIONS READS
0 5
4 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Bikash Chandra Sahoo on 02 March 2022.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universiti Malaysia Perlis. Downloaded1on March 02,2022 at 06:08:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
II. DESIGN OF SHUNT CAPACITIVE RF-MEMS SWITCH For the MEMS designer the prime target is to reduce the
Final iteration of the proposed design has been made pull in voltage. From above equation it can be inferred that,
frequency reconfigurable with the incorporation of MEMS it can be reduced by (a) increasing the value of (beam
switch. A capacitive shunt type MEMS switch has been used width) and electrode which will enhance the overlapping
to achieve the reconfigurability in the proposed design. The area and consequently increase the overall area of the switch
switch is designed with a gold membrane suspended above (b) (decreasing) the gap between the membrane and
the Co-planer Waveguide Structure (CPW) with 60/100/60 electrode which will give rise to affect the up-state
µm specifications. The side view and the top view of the capacitance hence disturbs the capacitance ratio (c) the most
switch have been shown in Fig. 1 (a) and (b) respectively. appropriate way is to use the beam structure with low spring
The working principle of the MEMS switch lies on the constant. Spring constant of the beam depends upon
mechanical movement of the membrane with respect to the dimensions of the beam and expressed in the equation (3).
force to get the switch in OFF and ON condition in the 3
transmission line. Various methods like electrostatic, t
k = 32 Ew (3)
magneto static, piezoelectric and thermal can be utilized to l
generate force. Here,
E = young’s Modulus of the material used to manufacture
membrane structure
w = width of the membrane
l = length of the membrane
t = thickness of the membrane.
The dimensional and operational specification of the above
designed switch has been shown in the table I.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universiti Malaysia Perlis. Downloaded2on March 02,2022 at 06:08:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universiti Malaysia Perlis. Downloaded3on March 02,2022 at 06:08:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
acceptable impedance matching and gain. The proposed
designed patch antenna can be dynamically reconfigured to
operate at multiple different operating frequencies separated
by few MHz with high gain. There is a maximum shift of 1
GHz has been achieved in the X-band with the actuation of
switches and the highest gain of 10.4 dBi is achieved at 17.7
(d) GHz with switches in ON condition. The proposed design
can be used in various applications of satellite
Fig. 7. 2D radiation patterns of the propsoed design (when switches are in
OFF condition) (a) 6.34 GHz (b) 7.96 GHz (c) 14.2 GHz (d) 17.7 GHz communications such as, for transmit and receive functions
in earth exploration satellite communication.
it can be observed that both E- and H-planes are broadside
in nature except there are some irregularities at high TABLE II. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN
WITH THE CONDITION OF SWITCHES
operating frequency.
Switches ON Switches OFF
Resonant Frequency 6.63, 8.2, 15.13, 16.7, 6.34, 7.96, 14.2,
C. Radiation Characterisitcs of the proposed design (in (GHz) 17.7 17.7
switch ON state) S11 (dB) -13.8, -13.9, -11.7, - -15.8, -18.2, -23.7, -
13.4, -19.6 11.3
In this section, 2D radiation patterns of the proposed design Gain (dBi) 2.1, 3.57, 7.2, 8.3, 10.4 2.2, 3.8, 6.9, 9.7
with the switches in ON condition has been illustrated as Bandwidth 110, 170, 230, 200, 280 120, 150, 760, 180
shown in Fig. 8. A very small gain of 2.1 dBi is achieved at
the lowest operating frequency of 6.63 GHz in C-band. A REFERENCES
moderate gain of 3.5 dBi has been achieved in the frequency [1] C.A.Balanis, Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, Second Edi.
falling in X-band. Similarly, high gain of 7.2 dBi, 8.3 dBi Wiley India Pvt. Ltd., 2008.
and 10.4 dBi has been achieved in the Ku-band frequencies. [2] G. Singh and A. P. Singh, “On the design of planar antenna using
Fibonacci word fractal geometry in support of public safety,” Int.
It can be observed that both E- and H-planes are broadside J. RF Microw. Comput. Eng., vol. 29, no. 2, p. e21554, Feb.
in nature except there are some irregularities at high 2019.
operating frequency. [3] J. OuYang, F. Yang, and Z. M. Wang, “Reducing Mutual
Coupling of Closely Spaced Microstrip MIMO Antennas for
WLAN Application,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol.
10, pp. 310–313, 2011.
[4] I. Papapolymerou; R. Franklin Drayton; L.P.B. Katehi,
“NMicromachined patch antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 275–283, 1998.
[5] H. Rajagopalan, J. M. Kovitz, and Y. Rahmat-Samii, “MEMS
Reconfigurable Optimized E-Shaped Patch Antenna Design for
(a) (b) (c) Cognitive Radio,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 3,
pp. 1056–1064, Mar. 2014.
[6] M. Zheng, Q. Chen, P. S. Hall, and V. F. Fusco, “Broadband
microstrip patch antenna on micromachined silicon substrates,”
Electron. Lett., vol. 34, no. 1, p. 3, 1998.
[7] C. G. Christodoulou, Y. Tawk, S. A. Lane, and S. R. Erwin,
“Reconfigurable Antennas for Wireless and Space Applications,”
Proc. IEEE, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 2250–2261, Jul. 2012.
[8] J. P. Gianvittorio and Y. Rahmat-Samii, “Fractal antennas: a
novel antenna miniaturization technique, and applications,” IEEE
Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 20–36, 2002.
(d) (e) [9] C. W. Jung, M.-J. Lee, and F. De Flaviis, “Reconfigurable dual-
band antenna with high frequency ratio (1.6:1) using MEMS
Fig. 8. 2D radiation patterns of the propsoed design (when switches are in switches,” Electron. Lett., vol. 44, no. 2, p. 76, 2008.
ON condition) (a) 6.63 GHz (b) 8.28 GHz (c) 15.13 GHz (d) 16.7 GHz (e) [10] Z. L. Deng, H. Gong, S. Fan, and C. H. Chen, “Ka-Band
17.7 GHz Radiation Pattern Reconfigurable Microstrip Patch Antenna
Employing MEMS Switches,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 411–414,
D. Performance Parameters of the Proposed Design pp. 1674–1679, Sep. 2013.
The performance parameters of the proposed design [11] H. Singh and J. Malhotra, “Quad-band reconfigurable MEMS
antenna on silicon substrate for Ku-band applications,” in 2015
have been shown in table II, which depicts the resonance International Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and
frequencies with gain and shift in the frequencies with the Control (ISPCC), Sep. 2015, pp. 168–172, .
operating condition of the switches. The bandwidth is quite [12] Gabriel M. Rebeiz, RF MEMS: Theory, Design, and Technology.
small at all the frequency bands except at 14.2 GHz in the 2003.
[13] A. Kumar and A. P. Singh, “Design of micro‐machined modified
switch OFF condition. Sierpinski gasket fractal antenna for satellite communications,”
Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Eng., vol. 29, no. 8, p. e21786, Aug.
V. CONCLUSION 2019.
This article presents the multiple frequency [14] R. N. Simons, Donghoon Chun, and L. P. B. Katehi,
“Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) actuators for antenna
reconfigurable micro-machined cascaded Sierpinski gasket reconfigurability,” in 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave
fractal antenna using RF-MEMS Switches. The final design Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No.01CH37157), vol. 1, pp. 215–218.
resonates at various frequencies in C, X and Ku-band with
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universiti Malaysia Perlis. Downloaded4on March 02,2022 at 06:08:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
View publication stats