Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HRM_Group1_Report.docx-merged(1)
HRM_Group1_Report.docx-merged(1)
Submitted by:
Report...................................................................................................................................................... 0
Human Resource Management................................................................................................................. 0
Term - III (2024)........................................................................................................................................ 0
CONTENTS................................................................................................................................................ 1
ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................................2
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 2
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................................ 2
CHANGING CONSTANTS.............................................................................................................................. 2
RISING CONCERNS.......................................................................................................................................2
METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................................2
ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................................................. 2
THEMATIC DEEP DIVE..................................................................................................................................2
Leadership Assessment......................................................................................................................... 2
Employee Performance & Satisfaction..................................................................................................2
Internal Firm Outcomes........................................................................................................................ 2
BUSINESS RELEVANCE............................................................................................................................... 2
CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................................ 2
APPENDICES............................................................................................................................................. 2
APPENDIX-I..................................................................................................................................................2
APPENDIX-II.................................................................................................................................................2
APPENDIX-III................................................................................................................................................2
GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................................................2
BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................................... 3
Page | 1
ABSTRACT
The advent of hybrid work models and digital nomadism has catalyzed a transformative shift in the
traditional workplace, posing both unprecedented challenges and opportunities for organizations across
industries. The impact is multifaceted, influencing not only the physical office setup, but also altering ways
of working, communication norms, collaboration dynamics, and employee expectations. Stakeholders,
including employers, employees, and clients, find themselves navigating uncharted territories as they strive
to strike a balance between flexibility and operational efficiency.
The consulting and advisory services industry, which has traditionally relied on in-person working and
face-to-face interactions to drive creativity, innovation, and impact, has been facing headwinds with the
emergence of newer ways of working. Effectively navigating these dynamics and consistently delivering
value and differentiation, has become a top priority. Major consulting firms have focused on fostering and
constantly innovating their culture to ensure that people skills create a strategic differentiator for them.
However hybrid and remote work has upended these efforts, brought a seismic shift in the ways of working
and consequently affected this highly valued culture as well.
Understanding the impact of hybrid models on the company culture, industry-specific ways of working and
stakeholder perspectives provides a baseline for these firms in designing and implementing best-fit
strategies to drive client relationships, employee engagement and overall firm performance.
This whitepaper focuses on profiling the culture of the firm that ultimately underpins these three pivotal
themes that firms need to evaluate while developing “hybrid-native” strategies:
● Leadership Assessment and Ideology
● Employee Performance and Satisfaction
● Internal Firm Outcomes
The report uses OCTAPACE profiling to evaluate the culture of the firm and adopts a statistical approach to
assess these themes in both pre- and post-hybrid working models. Targeted surveys with leadership,
employees, and clients were conducted to analyse the impact and identify areas that have performed
better or worse in the light of this transition.
Page | 2
INTRODUCTION
CHANGING CONSTANTS
As the consulting business moves into a new era where home desks and coffee shops are increasingly
replacing office spaces, consultants operating remotely are revolutionising how the industry interacts with
clients and delivers value.
Traditionally, consultants travelled frequently to meet clients, worked out of client sites, and engaged with
colleagues face-to-face. This model allowed them to build strong relationships, foster collaboration, and
innovation, and deliver high-quality and impactful results. During the pandemic, however, consultants
shifted to a completely remote work environment, relying on digital tools and platforms to communicate
and collaborate. This model, while posing ubiquitous challenges, also allowed for higher flexibility,
autonomy, and in several cases, enhanced performance.
In the post-pandemic era, consultants are adopting a hybrid working model, where they choose to work
from remote locations depending on the nature and need of their engagements. This model brings
together the best of both worlds by driving employee productivity and client outcomes while balancing the
need for flexibility.
However, hybrid work has spawned newer concerns such as security risks, isolation, disappearing
boundaries between professional and personal lives, and perceived loss of the ‘consulting culture.’
Analysts and consultants are faced with difficulties in executing engagements while being remote and
ensuring security and data confidentiality. Treading the fine line between delivering outcomes and
maintaining work-life balance has become increasingly challenging. Meanwhile, senior leaders and partners
are now tasked with building and sustaining strong client relationships and company culture in virtual
settings. Evaluating individual performances, coaching teams, and managing career progressions have
added an additional dimension of complexity to human capital strategy across the organisation.
In a similar vein, clients today are concerned about ensuring impactful results, providing swift feedback,
and leveraging remote teams to drive maximum value out of advisory services.
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS
Hybrid Work: The organisation sets the days and times employees are allowed to work remotely or go into
the office. For this report, the employees work 2 full days a week in the office while being permitted to
work from a location other than the office the rest of the time.
Leadership Effectiveness: The measure of how effective the firm’s senior leadership (Associate Director,
Director, Executive Director, and Partner) is in maintaining accountability, ensuring a positive work culture,
and their ability to manage day-to-day operations.
Productivity: Three dimensions of Forsgren’s SPACE framework is used to measure productivity; Satisfaction
and well-being, Performance, and Communication & collaboration.
Internal Firm Outcomes: Upskilling (including Learning & Development), Innovation, and Informal Social
Activities are used as indicators of internal firm outcomes.
Page | 3
METHODOLOGY
Page | 4
ANALYSIS
ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE
Organisational culture is the collective behaviour of all employees who are part of an organisation and the
meanings that the people attach to their both long and short-term actions. Organisational values, visions,
norms, working language, systems, symbols, beliefs and habits collectively constitute culture.
Udai Pareek says that ideas about culture can also be seen as having more than one level. Values are what
give a group its unique character. They are at the core (first level). Climate is the second-level concept.
Climate can be thought of as how people feel about an organisation, its members, groups, and problems.
The third level idea is about the atmosphere, which affects how someone or something grows and
develops.
Dimensions of OCTAPACE
The eight dimensions of OCTAPACE culture are openness, confrontation, Trust, Authenticity, pro-action,
autonomy, collaboration and experimentation. These are all important for strong, effective and ultimately
successful firm outcomes.
In current hybrid work times, the escalating importance of culture is also due to the increasing turbulence,
complexity, and unpredictability faced by organisations in their ever-changing external environments.
Remote work fundamentally changes the way employees interact, work and perceive the environment of
the office as the lines increasingly blur between personal and professional.
OCTAPACE Profile
Statistical Analysis
OCTAPACE Pre Hybrid working model ( Mean) Post Hybrid working model ( Mean)
Authenticity 14 13.4
Pro-action 13.8 15
Collaboration 16 14.5
Page | 5
Experimentation 14.2 16.1
Substantial increase in “Openness” dimension is observed post hybrid work. Pareek defines it as
‘spontaneous expression of feelings and thoughts, and the sharing of these without defensiveness’ and
studying the broader effects of hybrid work it becomes clear that employees have become more likely to
express their feelings both in formal and informal settings. Further during hybrid work consulting firms that
already have a stronger focus on feedback mechanisms, have doubled down on these mechanisms. This
might overall encourage openness in the firm. We see a marginal increase in “Confrontation” as well
highlighting not just increased confrontation (taking up more work and tackling the newer challenges of
ways of working) but also exploration.
A sharp decline in the dimension of “trust” is visible during hybrid work as compared to pre-pandemic
traditional work. The qualitative primary research conducted as part of the study highlighted that the
physical distance between the employers and consultants has created deeper fault lines. As mentioned by
Pareek the outcome of trust includes “empathy, timely support, reduced stress and reduction and
simplification of forms and procedure”. The lack of physical interaction necessarily reduces empathy, with
the responsiveness of support is negatively affected by consultants working across timezones. These two
aspects inevitably foment stress while the concerns for security and confidentiality in these volatile and
uncertain environments create complex forms and procedures.
Finally collaboration and experimentation dimensions also showcase the strong effect hybrid work has had
on the working of consulting firms. As the increased use of digital technologies and tools for video
conferencing has allowed people to connect in real times, they barely substitute for authentic human
interactions thereby affecting collaboration.
Although many aspects of OCTAPACE dimensions have been negatively impacted, firms have excelled in the
“experimentation” fronts. The VUCA world has presented a completely unseen crisis before the consulting
agencies as they find themselves in uncharted waters while at the same time, the economic downturn has
made businesses more reluctant to approach consultants. This has forced these firms to experiment and
innovate tp find novel solutions.
Leadership Assessment
Effective leadership is a key factor that influences long-term performance in any industry, especially in the
context of consulting firms where ‘consultants’ are the central assets. Major consulting firms have shifted
from addressing their employees as ‘human resources’ to ‘human capital’ signaling an enhanced focus on
selecting and nurturing the best talent. Traditional work allowed consulting leaders to effectively exploit
the in-person working styles to keep a tab on the grassroot sentiments, effectively framing and
implementing policies that best leveraged this talent capital. Over the years, open-door policies and open
offices have been pioneered by consulting firms and employees are encouraged to have candid
conversations across the hierarchy.
Page | 6
These ideas have been curated for the
traditional work environment and are
centered around the ‘office culture.’
However, with the advent of remote
work, many of these strategies cease to
be feasible. N. Sharon Hill in her article
in the MIT Sloan Review discusses how
hybrid work can compromise group
effectiveness, hinder organizational
alignment and leadership impact. To be
effective in hybrid work, consulting
leaders need to develop and
demonstrate new skills and
competencies that allow them to be
more agile and adaptable to changing
employee needs and expectations.
Leaders are expected to exclude trust
and empathy despite being physically
distant all while maintaining their
ability to effectively communicate firm values through the digital media.
Statistical Analysis
In the light of these developments, the effects of hybrid work on leadership visibility, agility, and the ability
of senior leaders to effectively manage firm operations and create a positive culture have been studied. The
leadership survey gathered responses against ten questions that tracked leadership effectiveness and
overall firm performance in the traditional work setting vis-a-vis the hybrid work environment. The
responses were gathered based on a nine-point Likert scale.
Key Statistics:
Page | 7
● The mean and median both show a substantial decrease in the post-hybrid model in contrast to the
pre-hybrid model Indicating a reduction in average leadership effectiveness and overall firm
performance.
● The Variance and Standard deviation show a significant increase moving from the pre- hybrid model
highlighting a wider divergence in opinion and increased uncertainty across the spectrum in the
post-hybrid model.
● The data is left skewed in the pre-hybrid model while skewing to the right in the post- hybrid model
implying reduced leadership confidence and efficacy among more respondents versus average
responses.
To assess the statistical significance of the observed changes in Leadership Assessment & Ideology between
the pre-Hybrid and post-hybrid Working Models, hypothesis tests were conducted based on twenty-three
recorded responses.
The following Null and Alternate Hypotheses were defined:
Null Hypothesis (H0): Leadership impact, organizational effectiveness, firm strategy, and overall firm
performance are not significantly impacted by the introduction of hybrid working models.
Alternate Hypothesis (Ha): Leadership impact, organizational effectiveness, firm strategy, and overall firm
performance are significantly impacted by the introduction of hybrid working models.
A paired t-test (difference of means for related observation groups) was conducted to determine if any
statistical difference existed between pre and post hybrid working models. A significance level of 0.05 was
defined for the analysis.
Observations 23 23
df 22
t Stat 4.745957378
Page | 8
t Critical two-tail 2.073873068
The determined P-Value (9.7E-05) is less than the defined significance level (0.05). Consequently, the null
hypothesis is rejected, and the alternate hypothesis is accepted.
The observed changes in mean scores between pre and post hybrid working models are statistically
significant and leadership assessment of effectiveness and firm performance has deteriorated in the
post-hybrid work setting.
Across the defined metrics, scores for post-hybrid working models are consistently lower compared to the
pre-hybrid metrics. Leadership’s perspective of firm performance, ability to manage accountability, drive
firm operations and positively impact firm culture have all declined in the post-hybrid working model.
Traditional norms of accountability dated measures of firm performance and top-down communication
strategies are clearly not working. These trends point towards umpteen challenges that the leadership is
faced with and necessitate the development of innovative leadership and delivery models that are hybrid
– native
Page | 9
challenges, implementing new strategies, providing additional training, and enhancing technology
tools for accountability and performance management in the hybrid work setting are essential.
● The Goal Setting Theory of HRM by Edwin Locke and Gary Latham in the late 1960s and early 1970
can help explain the challenges of managing accountability and performance in post-hybrid work
environments. This theory emphasizes the importance of setting clear, specific, and challenging
goals aligned with organizational objectives. By involving employees in the goal-setting process,
providing regular feedback and communication, and ensuring goals are achievable yet challenging,
HRM leaders can effectively manage accountability and improve performance outcomes in the
hybrid work landscape.
● The Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) by Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard in the late 1960s
and early 1970s offers insights into addressing the challenges posed by post-hybrid work models.
SLT suggests that leaders should adapt their approach based on the readiness of their followers. In
hybrid work environments, where communication effectiveness and visibility may decrease, leaders
can adopt a supportive and participative style to enhance communication and engagement. HRM
can support this by providing leadership training to help leaders adjust their style to meet the
demands of hybrid work, ultimately improving leadership presence and communication.
From client research and analyses to proposal delivery, and engagement execution, analysts, consultants,
engagement managers and partners are actively involved across the engagement lifecycle. Gathering
perceptions from the engagement team provides key insights into the impact of working models on overall
engagement delivery.
Amidst the rise of hybrid work, employees engaged in
hybrid workplace settings encounter unique
challenges. As per an industry report[2], the use of
collaborative tools at the office has grown by over 40%
since the pandemic, and adapting to newer modes of
collaboration has been received with mixed results
Page | 11
across the industry. Secondly, maintaining the quality and security of data and information, especially when
collaborating with sensitive client information has been a key concern. On the interpersonal front,
balancing work, and well-being, as well as managing the expectations and preferences of clients and
colleagues, has led to increased levels of stress and a feeling of "burnt Figure : Key metrics to measure hybrid work’s
impact
out” among consultants. Building and sustaining meaningful relationships and trust with colleagues is
another challenge that has plagued the hybrid-era consultant. Lastly, one of the salient strengths of any
consulting firm - its network and resources, has become disproportionately challenging to harness in the
face of the hybrid work environment.
Statistical Analysis
Evaluating the impact on employee performance and satisfaction in the transition to a hybrid model is
essential, given the distinct challenges such as increased reliance on collaborative tools, heightened
concerns about data security, elevated stress levels, and difficulties in building and maintaining
relationships. This employee survey gathered responses against ten questions that tracked employee
performance and satisfaction levels in the traditional work setting vis-a-vis the hybrid work environment.
The responses were gathered based on a nine-point Likert scale.
Key statistics:
● The mean shows a minor increase while the median shows no change in the post- hybrid model in
contrast to the pre-hybrid model indicating a slight improvement in the performance of employees.
● The Variance and Standard deviation show a significant increase moving from the pre-hybrid model
highlighting a wider divergence in performance and increased work satisfaction across the spectrum
in the post-hybrid model.
Page | 12
● The data is left skewed in both pre and post-hybrid models implying better employee performance
among more respondents versus respondents' average.
To assess the statistical significance of the observed changes in Employee Performance and Satisfaction
between the pre-Hybrid and post-hybrid Working Models, hypothesis tests were conducted based on thirty
recorded responses.
The following Null and Alternate Hypotheses were defined:
Null Hypothesis (H0): Employee perspective, including job satisfaction, ability to deliver outcomes and
workplace productivity is the same across traditional office-based and hybrid working models.
Alternate Hypothesis (Ha): Employee perspective, including job satisfaction, ability to deliver outcomes and
workplace productivity is different across traditional office-based and hybrid working models.
A paired t-test (difference of means for related observation groups) was conducted to determine if any
statistical difference existed between pre and post hybrid working models. A significance level of 0.05 was
defined for the analysis.
Table : Paired t-test statistical metrics
Observations 30 30
df 29
t Stat -0.632302245
Determined P-Value (5.32E-01) is more than the defined significance level (0.05). Consequently, the null
hypothesis cannot be rejected.
The observed changes in mean scores between pre and post hybrid working models are not statistically
significant. This indicates that employee perspectives in terms of job satisfaction, ability to deliver
Page | 13
outcomes, and workplace productivity remain the same across traditional office-based and hybrid
working models.
Across the evaluated metrics, scores for post-hybrid working models are consistently higher compared to
the pre-hybrid metrics except for employees' perception of opportunities for growth and intent to continue
at the firm. Positive changes in scores, such as increased employee job satisfaction, employee
recommendation of workplace to peers, and employee productivity, suggest improvements in preference
for and likeability of the workplace. Studies, including those from Future Forum and PwC, illustrate that
knowledge workers express a higher satisfaction with remote work compared to traditional office settings.
Notably, flexibility in work location and schedule has been linked to substantial improvements in
productivity and work-life balance. For instance, employees with the freedom to choose their work location
reported up to 44% better work-life balance scores, while schedule flexibility led to even more pronounced
benefits, with productivity scores improving by 53%. Business leaders have corroborated these findings,
observing notable enhancements in workforce productivity during the pandemic. Furthermore, employee
sentiment surveys, such as those conducted by BCG, indicate that a majority of employees were able to
maintain or even increase their productivity on both individual and collaborative tasks despite the abrupt
shift to remote work.
The analysis highlights how a hybrid work model enhances productivity by offering flexibility, improved
work-life balance, less commuting, greater autonomy, a focus on results, advanced technology use, better
work environments, healthier habits, and wider collaboration. This model supports employees in managing
personal and professional life, thus boosting efficiency. Reduced commute times free up energy for work or
rest, while increased control over work settings enhances job satisfaction and motivation. The emphasis on
results over hours worked drives efficiency and acknowledges high achievers. Utilising collaborative tools
enables seamless communication and teamwork, regardless of location. Employees can choose work
environments suited to their tasks, fostering both focus and team dynamics. Additionally, the model
encourages healthier lifestyles and global teamwork, offering further productivity gains.
Page | 14
Several theories support the benefits observed in hybrid work models. The Perceived Organisational
Support (POS) theory by Eisenberger (1986) indicates that hybrid models, by offering flexibility and
respect for individual preferences, boost employees' sense of being valued and their motivation.
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) by Richard Ryan and Edward Deci (1980) points out that the autonomy
provided in hybrid settings enhances motivation and productivity by meeting employees' needs for
autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Goal Setting Theory by Edwin A. Locke (1968) aligns with the
hybrid model's emphasis on output, motivating employees to meet specific and challenging goals. Affective
Events Theory (AET) by Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano (1996) suggests that the model's
flexibility and reduced commute times lead to positive emotions like happiness and less stress, thereby
improving work engagement and productivity. These theoretical perspectives collectively explain the
observed improvements in productivity and employee satisfaction in hybrid work settings, advocating for a
thoughtful implementation of such models to maximise their benefits.
The Positive Affectivity and Job Satisfaction Theory of Locke (1976) is a foundational theory that links
employee happiness and satisfaction directly to productivity. According to Locke's theory, job satisfaction is
significantly influenced by the fulfilment of an individual's basic needs and values. When these needs and
values are satisfied, it leads to positive emotional states or happiness. This positive affectivity, in turn, is
closely associated with higher levels of motivation and productivity. The theory suggests that happier
employees are more engaged and committed to their work, leading to better performance outcomes
Conversely, a decrease in employees' perception of opportunities for growth and intent to continue at the
firm indicate potential stagnation that may be setting in. While the transition to hybrid working has
elevated several workplace metrics for employees, the observed decline in employees' perception of
opportunities for growth and intent to continue at the firm, point towards increasing tendencies to switch
jobs and consequently the need for firms to develop employee centric organisational policies, that
consider the preferences for and nuances of remote and hybrid work.
In the time before the pandemic, the workplace thrived on in-person interactions within office spaces.
These settings facilitated comprehensive training, upskilling and peer-led learning opportunities.
Employees engaged in direct communication, brainstorming, and sharing of knowledge in a low-barrier,
interactive environment. This in-person
collaboration played a pivotal role in fostering a
sense of camaraderie and teamwork –
significantly enhancing Internal Firm Outcomes.
Upon employees' return to the workplace, a leading industry report underscores their strong preference for
the hybrid model. The hybrid work approach extends beyond mere enhancements in productivity and
efficiency. It enables teams to explore innovative solutions through unconventional approaches. In
navigating the forthcoming hybrid landscape, organisations must prioritise striking a delicate balance. This
equilibrium revolves around two critical facets: empowering employees through collaboration and skill
enhancement initiatives while ensuring their well-being. This approach addresses diverse employee needs,
promoting a cohesive and productive work environment across varied work setups.
Statistical Analysis
Investigating the intricate interplay of collaboration dynamics, skill enhancement initiatives, and employee
well being offers essential insights for fostering innovation. This employee survey gathered responses
against ten questions that tracked internal firm outcomes in the traditional work setting vis-a-vis the hybrid
work environment. The responses were gathered based on a nine-point Likert scale.
Key Statistics:
● The mean and median both show a substantial decrease in the post-hybrid model in contrast to the
pre-hybrid model indicating a reduction in average levels of upskilling, innovation, and collaboration
among employees.
● The Variance and Standard deviation show a significant decrease moving from the pre-hybrid model
highlighting lesser divergence in opinion and decreased agreement across the spectrum in the
post-hybrid model.
● The data is marginally left skewed in post than pre-hybrid model implying reduced training,
innovation, and collaboration among respondents versus respondents' average.
Page | 16
To assess the statistical significance of the observed changes in Internal Firm Outcomes between the
pre-Hybrid and post-hybrid Working Models, hypothesis tests were conducted based on the thirty
recorded responses.
A paired t-test (difference of means for related observation groups) was conducted to determine if any
statistical difference existed between pre- and post-hybrid working models. A significance level of 0.05 was
defined for the analysis.
Observations 30 30
df 29
t Stat 2.355243844
The determined p-value (2.55E-02) is less than the defined significance level (0.05). Consequently, the null
hypothesis is rejected, and the alternate hypothesis is accepted. The observed changes in mean scores
between pre and post hybrid working models are statistically significant, indicating that these outcomes
differ significantly across the two models. The evidence suggests that internal firm outcomes are
influenced by the choice between traditional office-based and hybrid working models.
Page | 17
Across all evaluated metrics, post-hybrid working model scores consistently lag the pre-hybrid metrics.
Decline in scores for effective collaboration and teamwork, informal and social activities point towards the
inability of remote work models to meet employee expectations in these areas. Similarly, decline in scores
for meaningful ideation and impactful project delivery imply potential roadblocks to free-flowing ideation
in digital-only settings. Further, decrease in the effectiveness of upskilling and L&D programs signal towards
the in-sufficiency of remote learning and development to achieve desired outcomes. These trends
collectively indicate nuanced effects on collaboration, upskilling, innovation, teamwork, project delivery,
and social activities in the post Hybrid Working Model. This points towards firms’ need for strategic
interventions that identify best-fit delivery models to drive heightened firm outcomes.
A focused group discussion (FGD) was conducted with professionals from PwC to analyse the changes in
upskilling and learning & development (L&D), innovation, and informal social activities in response to the
COVID-19 pandemic. The participants varied in experience, ranging from consultants with 4 years of
experience to a manager with 11 years, all working in the IT and services sector. This diverse group
provided insights on how their firm shifted to online learning platforms, the adaptation of innovation
processes to remote work challenges, and the impact on informal social activities due to the shift to virtual
environments. The discussions revealed both strategic and operational shifts within the organisation,
demonstrating how the pandemic served as a catalyst for significant changes in workplace dynamics and
professional development approaches.
Page | 18
Across the board, there's a clear shift from in-person workshops to virtual platforms. The emphasis is on
self-paced learning and the use of online certifications, which is evident in responses R1 and R5,
highlighting adaptability and self-motivation.
2. Challenges of Virtual Training:
Respondents acknowledge challenges in engagement and technology access in virtual settings (R1 and R2).
Firms faced issues with a lack of hands-on experience and worked to overcome them by incorporating
simulations and case studies (R4).
3. Changes in Skill Demands:
Post-pandemic, there's a noted increase in demand for digital, mental health and wellness, and resilience
training (R2, R3). This aligns with a broader shift towards adaptability, navigating the remote environment,
and data privacy/security (R3 and R5).
4. Enhanced Flexibility and Engagement:
Organisations are seeking to maintain engagement in a remote setting, utilising regular feedback and
virtual check-ins (R1). The blended learning approach and online mentorship are particularly noted for
maintaining engagement (R4).
Page | 19
There is a unanimous indication of a shift towards digital-first innovations post-pandemic (R1, R5), with
firms focusing more on solutions that enhance remote work capabilities and cybersecurity (R1, R5). There's
also a greater focus on creating robust logistics solutions and digital tracking systems (R3).
The most widely accepted framework is the four stage training evaluation model proposed by Kirkpatrick
(1959). Kirkpatrick’s framework classifies training evaluations into four categories:
From the study, we can conclude that training result from pre and post hybrid working model, has very less
impact changes.
Page | 20
BUSINESS RELEVANCE
In the context of the evolving industry landscape influenced by digitalization, it is imperative for
firms such as PwC, which generates a significant portion (45%) of its revenues from its advisory line
of business, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the hybrid model. A report from the Gartner
Digital Business Buying Behavior Survey suggests that 70% of IT service buyers have increased their
spending on consulting services. The new digital business acceleration is a positive trend
contributing to growth, and hence, it is crucial for PwC to maintain a steadfast stance in response to
changing attitudes. The hybrid model does not imply a complete absence of office presence; rather,
it establishes guidelines and expectations regarding appropriate times and modes of engagement
for individuals both in-person and remotely. This is evident in the case of teams operating in
Acceleration Centers and their regular interactions with the main offices in the United States. It
becomes crucial to dwell on the aspects of collaboration and how they affect the lifestyles of
employees, related stakeholders, and the performance of an organization. Dr. Alexandra Samuel,
coauthor of Remote, Inc.: How to Thrive at Work, Wherever You Are talks about punctuated
collaboration. In the model, collaboration is focused, specific, and time-bound.
In addition to its focus on culture and people, innovation has consistently played a central role at
PwC. This is evident in their latest publication on megatrends, where they explore the ongoing
evolution and unfolding of these trends. The way these trends are manifesting today has
significantly shifted compared to a decade ago. On similar lines, a report from Forrester highlights
that mastering hybrids will require organizational innovation. And achieving that innovation
requires experimentation. With its business spread across geographies, PwC has always led
technology-dominated projects from the front, wherein it has indulged itself in the use of
technologies that resonate with today’s trend of digitalization. Whether it is collaborating with
clients across different time zones or facilitating seamless communication with counterparts and
acceleration centers through digital platforms, PwC has consistently recognized the importance of
upskilling and resource development. However, it is crucial to delve deeper and comprehend how
these practices have evolved considering the transition towards a hybrid model. Ultimately,
combining modern technologies with human factors—norms, culture, and leadership—offers
powerful tools for making hybrid work.
Page | 21
CONCLUSION
The statistical analysis sheds light on pivotal insights into the optimization of hybrid work models for
consulting and advisory services firms. Through rigorous hypothesis testing across five key themes, the
impact of post-hybrid working models is examined in comparison to traditional office-based approaches.
The evidence is compelling and transformative. Leadership Assessment & Ideology, and Internal Firm
Outcomes all reveal statistically significant differences, with lower scores in the post-hybrid work setting –
underscoring the challenges of hybrid work and the need to design and adopt newer strategies, which are
hybrid–native.
These findings signal a call to action for organizations to re-evaluate leadership strategies and approaches,
innovate to build strong and impactful client relationships and design employee strategies that overcome
the inherent shortcomings of hybrid work arrangements to drive better internal outcomes.
However, the analysis also surfaces other nuanced results. Employee Performance and Satisfaction, exhibit
no statistically significant differences between traditional and hybrid working models. It appears that
clients and consultants are as happy with the hybrid working model as they were in traditional office-based
settings. While the introduction of hybrid working models has not impacted these themes negatively, the
analysis prompts a thoughtful reflection on how organizations can further refine their post-hybrid
strategies to enhance employee satisfaction and manage client perceptions more effectively.
In the light of these findings, tailored strategies for optimizing post-hybrid working models need to be
defined and adopted. While organization dynamics play a critical role in defining these best-fit strategies,
the following broad recommendations can serve as a guardrail in shaping organizational policies for
optimizing hybrid work.
● Structured leadership enhancement programs with a focus on engaging and managing remote
teams while defining digitally guided accountability frameworks and evaluation policies.
● Setup of dedicated account teams that discover, refine, and disseminate best practices to manage
client engagements in virtually directed interactions while identifying touchpoints that demand
in-person interactions.
● Definition of employee centric hybrid working strategies that factor in workforce preferences for
flexibility and challenges engagement teams face in both remote and in-person work models.
Page | 22
● Driving internal firm strategy by assessing “intent-outcome fit” and devising the optimal modes of
delivery across all firm programs.
This report serves as a compass, guiding organizations in their pursuit of optimized hybrid work models –
providing a foundational assessment and pointing to key areas and themes that require re-calibration and
re-invention. The OCTAPACE cultural profile supports the above statistical survey and analysis performed.
This highlights the role of culture as the underlying cause of these changes. Firms must realise that
effecting cultural changes would be vital in arresting the wider consequences arising out of hybrid work.
The road ahead demands a strategic blend of leadership evolution, client-centric approaches,
employee-centric policies, and dynamic internal strategies. By pivoting to hybrid-native ways of thinking
and maintaining a fine balance between in-person and remote work, organizations can not only adapt, but
thrive in the evolving landscape of digital nomads and increasingly fluid definitions of the workplace.
Page | 23
APPENDICES
APPENDIX-I
To what extent do you agree that leadership To what extent do you agree that leadership
visibility and communication were effective in visibility and communication are effective in
the traditional office setting? the current hybrid work setting?
How confident are you in the ability of How confident are you in the ability of
leadership to adapt and manage the firm's leadership to adapt and manage the firm's
operations during the pre-hybrid working operations in the current hybrid work model?
model?
On a scale from 1 to 9, how would you rate the On a scale from 1 to 9, how would you rate the
overall firm performance in terms of overall firm performance in terms of
productivity, efficiency, and impact before the productivity, efficiency, and impact after the
introduction of the hybrid work model? introduction of the hybrid work model?
To what extent did leadership strategies To what extent have leadership strategies
contribute to a positive work culture before the contributed to maintaining a positive work
adoption of hybrid work? culture in the post-hybrid work environment?
To what extent did you feel that leadership in the To what extent do you feel that leadership in
traditional office setting effectively established the current hybrid work setting effectively
accountability mechanisms and provided tools to establishes accountability mechanisms and
monitor and track individual and team provides tools to monitor and track individual
performance? and team performance?
Page | 24
Employee performance & satisfaction questionnaire:
How satisfied were you with the work-life balance How satisfied are you with the current work-life
in the traditional office setting? balance in the hybrid work setting?
To what extent did the office environment To what extent does the flexibility of the hybrid
contribute to your job satisfaction before the work model contribute to your current job
introduction of the hybrid work model? satisfaction?
How likely were you to recommend your workplace How likely are you to recommend your workplace
to others before the adoption of hybrid work? to others in the current hybrid work environment?
How would you rate your perceived level of How would you rate your perceived level of
productivity and impact on projects in the productivity and impact on projects in the current
traditional office setting? hybrid work setting?
To what extent did the opportunities for career How has the perception of opportunities for
progression and professional growth in the career progression and professional growth in the
traditional office setting influence your perception current hybrid work setting influenced your views
of promotion and rewards, and subsequently, your on promotion, rewards, and your intention to stay
intention to stay with the firm? with the firm?
Page | 25
Internal firm outcomes questionnaire:
To what extent did in-person collaboration To what extent does virtual collaboration contribute
contribute to innovative solutions and ideas in to innovative solutions and ideas in the current
the traditional office setting? hybrid work setting?
How effective were traditional training and How effective are virtual or remote training and
development programs in upskilling employees development programs in upskilling employees in
before the introduction of the hybrid work the current hybrid work model?
model?
On a scale from 1 to 9, how would you rate the On a scale from 1 to 9, how would you rate the level
level of collaboration and teamwork in the of collaboration and teamwork in the post-hybrid
pre-hybrid working model? working model?
To what extent did physical proximity contribute To what extent do virtual collaboration tools and
to the generation of innovative ideas and platforms contribute to the generation of innovative
projects in the pre-hybrid working model? ideas and projects in the current hybrid work
environment?
To what extent did informal, in-person social How have virtual or remote social activities (e.g.,
activities (e.g., team outings, workshops, or online team-building events, virtual workshops, or
gatherings) contribute to a positive and informal virtual gatherings) contributed to
collaborative work environment in the maintaining a positive and collaborative work
traditional office setting? environment in the current hybrid work model?
Page | 26
APPENDIX-II
Work Experience
Respondents Designation (in years) Field of activity Company
R1 Consultant 4 IT and services PwC
R2 Senior Consultant 5.5 IT and services PwC
R3 Senior Consultant 6 IT and services PwC
R4 Consultant 4 IT and services PwC
R5 Manager 11 IT and services PwC
Page | 27
Table of FGD structure and questions
Introduction
Purpose: Study the impact of hybrid work on internal firm outcome
Upskilling, L&D
1 How has your firm's approach to employee upskilling and learning & development
changed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic?
2 What challenges did your firm face in delivering training and development
programs during the pandemic, and how were they addressed?
3 Have you noticed a shift in the types of skills or training that employees seek or
require post-COVID-19?
4 How has the adoption of remote or hybrid work models affected your firm's
learning and development initiatives?
Innovation
5 Did the COVID-19 pandemic accelerate innovation within your firm? If so, in what
ways?
6 How did your firm adapt its innovation processes to the challenges posed by the
pandemic?
8 Has there been a change in the focus areas of innovation within your firm
post-COVID-19?
9 How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected informal social activities at your
company?
10 What strategies did your firm employ to maintain a sense of community and social
interaction among employees during periods of remote work?
11 Have you noticed any long-term changes in the way employees engage in informal
social activities as a result of the pandemic?
12 How important do you think informal social activities are in the current work
environment compared to the pre-COVID-19 era?
Page | 28
Appendix: Summary of findings
Main category Generic category Sub Category 1 Sub Category 2 Sub Category 3
In person training to virtual
Self-paced learning Adaptability and self-motivation
Shift to Online Platforms platforms
Challenges (Engagement, Tech Access) Lack of hand on experience Lack of engagement Simulation and case studies
Upskilling and L&D
Mental health and personal
Demand for digital resilience Remote work and data privacy
Changes in Skill Demands wellness
Enhanced Flexibility and Engagement Regular feedback Online mentorship Blended learning
Acceleration of Digital Transformation Development of new digital tools Enhanced productivity Operational flexibility
Adoption of Agile and Decentralized Agile methodology Decentralisation Prototyping and testing solution
Innovation in Collaboration Tools Remote collaboration Integrated platforms Streamlined coordination
Innovation
Enhanced Focus on Employee Well-Being Sustainable growth Motivated workforce Mental health
Strategic Partnerships for Innovation Co create solution Hackathon Academic institutions
Shift in Focus Post-Pandemic Digital first approach Cyber security Digital tracking
Decrease in Informal Social Activities Decrease in frequency Shift to virtual interaction Lower Spontaneity
Importance of Informal Activities Team spirit and morale Sense of community Away from isolation
Informal Social
Adaptation to Virtual Team Building Buddy system Virtual celebrations Team building activity
Activities
Long-term Shift to Virtual Activities Reliance on technology Structured social events Decrease in in-person gathering
Innovations in Social Engagement Maintaining team spirit Virtual trivia night Virtual platform