Early Symbolic Systems for Communication in Southeast Europe Volume 1 Compiled and edited by Lolita Nikolova BAR International Series 1139 2003‘Louse Nmouor (eo), Ean Senouic Svsres For Counenteaion m SoumMesty Conor. 241-289 LaTE CHALKOLITHIC Porrery FROM SupIEvO TELL, Nova Zacora District CHAPTER 26 TOWARDS THE CHARACTERISTICS OF KARANOVO VI CeRAMIC STYLE iN EasTeRN Upper THRACE NADEZHDA Toporova, PeTUR LESHTAKOV Contents ‘The tell of Sudievo, p. 261 Investigations, Stratigraphy and Chronology, p.241 ‘Characteristics ofthe Ceramic Material, p. 242 Comparative Analysis, p. 250 ‘Omamentaton, p. 260 ‘Acknowledgments, p. 278 References, p, 278 Catalogue, p. 280, Pans: Plans 1-4 - pp. 242-245, ‘ables: Tables 1-3 - pp. 247-249, Tables 4-8 - pp. 251-255, Tables 9-1 = pp, 278-277 Figures: Fiore I -p. 257, Figure 2-p. 258, Figure 3 ~p. 259, Figures 418 - pp, 261-274 ‘The Tell of Sudievo Geographic and cultural context Sudievo tel is located c, km north ofthe village of Sudievo plans 1-2), at 197 m above sea level. It was founded on a low river terace that isthe lft side ofa recently dry stream, the southern foothills of Sredna Gora Mountains. The tis ovat in plan, and slightly prolonged in east ~ west direction. Te diameter ofthe tell ground is 90 x 100 m, and the preserved height above the surrounding area c, 3 m (see plan 3) Gulls surround the tel terrace from east and west. The sil is delluviel caused by seasonal downpour inthe space be- ‘ween them. Low non-erosion hills border the ll ftom the north, and the terrair smoothly inclines down, 10-15° in the direction AND TATYANA KUNCHEVA-RUSSEVA, of the plain, The good climatic and soil preconditions, in combina tion with a big nurmber of water resources nearby are evidently za reason several sites from different epochs to have existed to the east, southeast and south of the prehistoric tell under dis- cussion, For instance, next tothe tell, there are Late Chalkolithie ‘fragments spread over c. Decares. They may documenta syn- cchronous satellite settlement similar to the ones registered near Gulubovo tell, Polski Gradets, Mudrets-Gudzhova Mogila etc., ‘but due to the scanty collected material from the surface, only archaeological excavations can confirm that hypothesis. Fur- thermore, Early Bronze I and Early Bronze III fragments have bbeen spread in medium concentration over c. 5 to 19 Decares. Inthe same locality, but over larger area, 30-40 Decares, there are materials from the Early fron Age. Late Iron Age, and the Roman period. Several devoted plates of the Thracian Rider have been discovered c, 250-300 m northeast ofthe tell (Borisov 1980: 27, 32) that infer the existence of a sanctuary dated by BB. Borisov from the second ~ fourth century AD. Investigations, Stratigraphy and Chronology In 1942 Nikola Kojchev initially investigated the tell. To col- lect archaeological material, he made trenches whose number, size and reached depths remain unknown. The site was dated from the Chalkolithic. In the publication (Kojchev 1959) only. a pintadera discovered ata depth of 0.60 m has been examined (1959: 94, fig. 82). A deep agricultural activity up to 0,50-0.70 m in 1974 partially destroyed the uppermost cultural levels of the tel. This ‘was a reason Mityo Kunchev initiated rescue excavations in 1975, Later he was joint by Tatyana Kuncheva-Russeva and242 da aS NaveznoA Tooonovs, PETUR LESKTAROV AND TARVANA KUNEHEVE-RLSSEVA N c on i stent \ ee te ova zaccra @ «= bitave \ ten rn & 25m lon 1. Nova Zagora Boris Borisov - all of them from the Museum of History in Nova Zagora Town at that time. The excavations of the ‘Chalkolithic site continued with some intermissions up to 1984 ‘(Kunchev & Kuncheva-Russeva 1993: 129; Kuncheva-Russeva 1999: 14) Plan 4. Initially two horizons were excavated in @ trench of 350 m?. In the same trench seven other horizons Were documented over a limited area of 70 m up to 2.20 m depths, bot the cultural layer was not completely finished inthe inves- tigated area, In the following campaigns the excavated area reached 1,750 m? where four building horizons have been ¢o pletely investigated (Kunchev 1977: 29-30; Kunchew & Kuncheva 1981: 23-25; 1982: 14; 1984: 26-27; 1985: 38. In the course of the investigations in 1975-1984 the fol- lowing stratigraphy was documented (from top of the tll to wards the ground) The first horizon, 0.20-0.25 m thick atthe preserved sec- tors, consists of gray and green clay-like soil that was probably used for leveling of the terrain (Kunchev 1977: 29-30). No hhouse or other features have been preserved from that level Immediately under the fist level were discovered dest tions of the next (second) horizon. Its basis was documented at ‘depth of 0.70 m from the surface, so the thickness ofthe level ‘was ¢, 0.50 m, According to the excavators, remains of six ‘attle-ant-daub houses with rectangular and quadrate plans ‘were excavated from this level. In one of the houses were re- covered in situ 20 complete and fragmented vessels, a horse- shoe shaped oven and 34 loom-weights (Kunchev 1977: 29- 30), ‘The bases of the third and the fourth horizons were docu- mented at a maximum depth of 1.20 m and 1.50 m respec tively, measured from the surface. A stratigraphic hiatus was lr area, Prehistoric sites Grant Reese registered in the northwest part of the investigated secto ‘(Kunchev & Kuncheva 1982: 14), but it remained unclear that layer documented a hiatus in the occupation ofthe set ment or just changes in the planning. In both horizons were ‘excavated remains of 7 houses with building techniques ths: ‘id not differ from the upper horizons. Of interest are the dis ‘covered fragments of wall crusted linear paint (Kunehev Kuncheva 1982: 14; 1984: 26-27), ‘On the northem periphery was documented a pit with ‘materials from the Early Bronze Age (EBA), Krassimir Leshtakov believes the pit was storage, and the pottery is dates! from the second halfof the EB I - beginning of EB Il (Leshtako 1999: 62-63). In sq. A3 was excavated another dug featur, probably a pit, with a diameter of 3 m, In our opinion, the px caliarites ofthe ceramic materia! date the pt from EB IN Mityo Kunchev and Tatyana Kuncheva-Russeva (192° date the earliest three excavated horizons from Maritsa ct ture: the second and the third horizons from earlier Karanov Vi culture (Krivodol-Gumeinija-Karanovo VI complex), an the first horizon from later Karanovo VI culture, The absenc » of complete publication of the whole material makes impos sible detailed critical analysis of the proposed cclative chro nology. The analysis of the uppermost horizons confirms the’ belonging to later Krivodol-Gumelnija-Karanovo V! comple» Characteristics of the Ceramic Material Technological Criteria ‘The theoretical scheme of the technological analysis by Schneider (1989) later developed by Nadezhda Todorova basesLane Crauxoumue Porvny Pou Sunivo Tet, Nev Zana DITICT 243 Plan 2. Sudievo. ‘onthe material from Yunatste (Todorova and Matsanova 2000: 332-334) has been used forthe technological characteristics of| the pottery from Sudievo 1-2. ‘The basic criteria comprise the content ofthe clay, color and way of steatment of the surface, as well as the existence of missing of additional slip or self-slip. Inthe case of Sudievo, the color of the pottery surface is in many cases 2 result of secondary fing, soit cannot be used as # leading technologi- cal criterion. It remains in the naming of the technological groups to follow the common foundation of the technological ‘analysis of the Karanovo VI culture potery, The biscuits also difficult be analyzed, as most ofthe vessels are complete or reconstructed. Based on the correlation ofthe given criteria, five tech- nological groups have been defined. Technological Groups Gray and black, and black burnished pottery. The number of| the vessels from this technological group is small, It consists of fragmented and whole vessels from the categories of plates and bowls. The pottery surface has gray-and-black, and black (non-homogenous in some cases) calor. Semi-fine and fine cla mixed with fine quartz sand, small gravel, and fine organic material was used forthe ceramic manufacture, Thee isa self= slip of fine and semi-fine angobe on the inner and outer surface of the walls. The burishing is homogeneous, lusteriess or pol ishlike, and there are some instances of burnishing in strips. A pat ofthe vessels are omamented with graphite Light brown burnished pottery. This group comprises plates, bowls and cups. The pottery has light brown, in some instances beige or ochre homogenous color. As an exception, the surface of the vessels has single darker spots. It is made from fine and medium fine clay. As in the group of gray-and= ‘lack bumished pottery, he preferred mixture consisted of quartz sand, small gravel ané organic material, Insome instances there isa‘shamot”. The walls ofall vessels from that prow are covered with medium fine or fine angobe or self-slip. The outer surface is almost always burnished (homogenous or in strips), and the inner surface is bumished in strips or homogencusly smoothed Asarule-as in the case of the same group from Yunatsite (Todorova & Matsanova 2000: 333) -the light-brown burnished portery from Sudievo is not onmamented Brown, gray-and-brown, red-and-brown burnished pot- tery with non-homogenous coloring of the surface (fine pot- tery). This group includes a considerable number of whole and fragmented vessels from most ofthe categories. A non-homog- enous coloring characterizes their wall Surface that is a result of the mode of ring, but some of the vessels were secondary fired, Most often the surface has abasic brown, gray-and-brown and red-and-brown color, with spots of brick red, gray, beige and gray-and-black color. The cotor used is medium fine or ‘medium coarse with mixture of quartz gravel of different sizes and concentration, sand, “skamot” and organic material. fn most of the instances the pottery is angobed (fine, medium fine and ‘compact fine), but some of the vessels have selslip. The inner wall ofthe vessels with closed shapes is mostly without angobe and smoothed ~ homogenous or more careless, in tips. The variants ofthe treatment of the angobe parts are numerous. Approximately in equal proportion is represented homogenous and in-strips burishing, and comparatively often there ae both ‘ways of bumishing on one and the same vessel. Brown and red-and-brown burnished pottery with non- homogenous coloring of the surface (technomic pottery). At first view the vessels from this group are very close to the pre- vious one because of the color and the spoty surface. But the clay is medium coarse mixed with a considerable quantity of small, medium, targe and coarse white limestone inclusions ‘Additionally, a mixture of sand, quartz stone and organic char- acterize the clay but in less quantity. There are @ number of ‘eases when medium fine clay was used, with smaller limestone inclusions. A bigger number of the pottery is angobed (me- ddium fine and fine angobe) and burnished (homoxenous or in strips). On some, the angobe is only on the upper wall parts and on the inner surface ofthe vessels In cases where there is no additional slip, the surface is roughly smoothed and porous. It is worth mentioning the existence of limestone as a reason for the emergence of pores and “cracks” an the surface that characterize not only non-angobe but also the angobe vessels, Brown and gray-and-brown course ceramics with non-244 [Napezsos Tooorovs, Perum Lesa ano Tarvava Kuncnevaussva A Plan 3, Sudievo tel homogenous coloring of the wall surface. The vessels of this ‘group ate numerous. The biggest is the number of the bowls, lids, strainers, with bowls and pots as exception. The wall col- coring varies, being non-homogenous and in spots. The clay ‘mixture comprises quart. gravel of different size and concen- cation, sand, “shamot” and organic material; there is a large quantity of medium and bigger quartz stone. In two of the cases ‘were documented snail or mussel shell components. ‘As a whole, the pottery is non-angobed. As for to the treatment of the wall surface, there are several variants. The wall surface is well or coursed smoothed from the outside and ‘more precisely treated from inside (variant 1) or barbotine or dragged outer surface is in combination with seif-slip outside under the rim and inside the wall (variant 2). There are also several cases of vessels whose walls are covered with course and compact slip (variant 3) Discussion ‘The analysis of the technological groups argues that the light brown and brown pottery dominates in the ceramic complex of the I* horizon with differenc nuances of beige, gray-and-brown, ochre, red-and-brown. The black, gray-and-black and dark brown earthenware is rarely distributed. Thus, non-homoge- neous coloring of the surface is one of the peculiarities of the Sudievo pottery, “Another peculiarity is the relatively small amount of ves- sels made from fine clay ~ mostly cups, as well as some bowls, and, more rarely, plates. The so-called kitchen pottery is made from course clay; the surface is often roughly treated and pur- posely made course, The biggest part of it belongs to the group ‘of “the brown, gray-and-brown, red-and-brown bumnished pot- tery with non-homogeneous surface color,” and to “the brown. and gray-and-brown course pottery with non-homogeneous surface color” In the clay of most of the vessels there are mixtures of sand, quartzite stone of different size, “shamot,” and more rarely, organic material, One peculiarity ofthe Sudievo pottery is the considerable amount of small, medium ad large lime- stone mixtures of white color that was documented in the clay of one of the technological groups. The “shamot" is distrib- uted relatively often. Several vessels made from very coarse clay, with coarse organic matters (chaff) represent a distinct technological group. As exception, several esses (smal plates ‘and cups) were made trom very fine clay mixed with fine or- ganic matter only ~ the biscuit is “smooth” without traces of sand of rock ‘A considerable part ofthe pottery from Sudievo 1-2 has ‘preserved additional slip. The self-sip or additional slip cov- ersall surface or only distinct part ofthe vessels, according to ‘the shape and function of the pottery. The surface ofthe slip, ceramics is always burnished. Thus, the technological characteristics indicate three groups of pottery — fine, coarse, and very coarse ceramics. These groups characterize vessels with different functions ~ for serv= ing and eating, for preparing of food, and for storage. Similar technological characteristics characterize the Karanovo VI pottery from the eponymous site (Schroll 1997: 287), Gulubovo, Gudzhova Mogila skits, etc. On the other hhand, technological similarities withthe vessels from Telish 2 3 in Northwest Bulgaria indicate a likeness in the pottery pro- duction between Karanovo VI culture and Krivodal-Saleuta- Bubanj pottery in the Balkans. Classification For the classification of the Sudievo pottery some of the methods of Vossen (1970: 63-66) have been used. The basic terms as well asthe structare ofthe classification is partially based on the K. Leshtakov's contribution to the Earlier Bronze ‘Age pottery in Thrace (Leshtakov 1988: 1). The scheme inthis investigation (Tables 1-8) has been initially used for the Late ‘Chalkolithic pottery from Yunatsite (Todorova and Matsanova 2000: 234 and Annex 2). Inthe systematization ofthe pottery the category (A.etc.), basic shape (I ete.), type (I fc.) and subsype (1 ete.) are the basic hierarchical elements, The basic shapes are defined on the base of the complete structure of the vessels (spherical, ‘prolonged spherical, conical, biconical, etc). The stable com- bination of formal signs, frst of al the profile of the vessels, defines the particular types, Subtypes have been distinguished based on the peculiarities in the shaping of the different ele- ments ~ rim, handles, neck and etc.te ae ac He ve46 “The formal and functional signs are of primary impor- tance for the definition ofthe particular vessels. Modem terms for vessels of similar shapes have been used assuming that they might have had similar function, It should be mentioned that on the whole, the ceramic complex of Sudievo 1-2 is not characterized by a big typologi- cal variety that we know from other Late Chalkolithe sites. Based on the functional and formal characteristics, eight categories can be distinguished: plates, bowls, cups, pots, ids, “strainers”, bases and miniature vessels, There are, of course, humerous sub-rypes and variants. The only exception is the vessels from the categories of the plates and the bowls (types from A.I-V1 and B.I-V groups). These characteristics define the peculiarity of the Sudievo ceramic production ‘Typology of the pottery A. Plates (Tables 1-4). AA1. Deep Plates with straight walls and conical shape ALTA. Straight wall and rim, AL1-L The rim is rounded ‘A142. Therm is thinned and rounded ‘N12. Straight vals, the rim is slighty profiled outward and rounded A3, Straight walls, the rim is thickenta from the otthe wall ‘A13.1. Therm is thickened from the inner side ofthe wal and equally cut onthe top ‘81.3.2. The rim is thickened from the inner side ofthe wall and rounded {A1.3.3. The rim is thickened and obliquely eu rom the inner side ofthe wall Al Conical open plates with straight walls ALI. The rim isnot thickened. A big fa boom AlL1.1. The rim is rounded ‘ALL1.2. The rim is equally cut AJL. The rim is thinned and rounded ‘NAL2. The rim was not thickened; small botom. ‘112.1. The rim is rounded ‘112.2. The rim is thinned and rounded AJL3. The rim is thickened from the inner side of the wall A131. The rim is thickened and rounded from the inner side ofthe wall {A113.2. The im is thickened and obliquely eu from the inner side ofthe wall 113.3, The rim is thickened and sharply shaped Atl. Conieal open pistes with slightly widened walls er side AJILI. The rim is not thickened ALILL.1-The rim is rounded ALLL 2.The rim is thinned and rounded AIL2, ‘The rim is thickened from the inner side of the wall, AJIL3, Very short straight upper part; the rim is thinned AIV. Conical plates, straight walls and short vertical upper pert AIV2. Short upper part; the point of transition is rounded AIV2.1.The transition point is rounded from the outer side and smoothly shaped from the inner side of the wall A1V.2.2.The transition point is rounded from the outer side and sharply shaped from the inner side of the wall ALIV3. Short upper part; the transition point is sharply shaped from the outer side of the wall Naot2non Tonotovn, Pero LESHTAKOV Ano Tarvana KIMCNEVARRASEVA A,1VA.1.The transition point is sharply shaped from the outer side and smoothly shaped from the inner side of the wall, A.IV.3.2.The transition point is sharply shaped from the outer and inner sides of the wall A.V. Conical plates with straight walls and short inverted up- ver part AA. The upper part is very short AVL The rim is equally cut AN1L2.The rim is rounded A.V2. Short upper part; the transition poim is rounded from the outer side of the wall A.V3. Short upper part; the transition point is sharply shaped from the outer side of the wall A.V, Conical plates with inverted rim AIL Plates with sharply shaped transition A.VLL.The transition point is smoothly shaped; a vertical up- per part A.VLLLL-The tim is slightly profiled outward A\VILL.2.The rim is fiercely profiled outward A\VL2. The transition point is sharply shaped BL Bowls (Tables 4-5) B11. Conical open bowls BLL. Straight walls B.12, The walls are slightly widened in the upper part of the vessel B.L3. The walls are slightly sharply shaped at the medium point of the vessel B.Il Semispherical bowls B.IL.1. Open semi-spherical bowls B.UL.L.L The rim is rounded BlIL1.2. The rim is slightly cut from the inner side ofthe wall B.I1.2. Semispherical bowls with inclined upper part BIIL2.1, The walls inthe lower part ofthe vessel are widened B.I12.2. The walls in the lower part ofthe vessel are straightly inclined towards the bottom, BIIL3. Semispherical bowls with inclined upper part and very bid flat bottom BLIL3.1. The rim isstraight and not thickened; two small holes under the rim 113.2. The rim is slightly thickened from the inner side of the wall and profiled ourward B.IIL Semi-spherical bowls with neck BIITL., Very short, smoothly shaped upper part BIIIL!.1.The rim is rounded B.IIL.1 2.The rim is obliquely eut B.II1.2, The upper partis clearly shaped B.MIL2.1.The rim is straight B.M.2.2 The rim is inclined BLIV. Biconical bowls with clearly shaped short upper part BAV.1. The upper partis smocthly shaped BIIV.L.L.There is no thickening in the upper part ofthe vessel BIV.1.2.The thickening isin the upper part under the rim BIV2. The upper partis sharply shaped, with thickened and stressed transition point B.V. Bowls with spout; biconical shape with stressed and thick- ‘ened transition point C. Cups (Table 6) CL Cups with cylindrical upper and conical lower part C.L1. The lower partis shorter, Thickened and slightly rounded|. |Lire Cnasnouae Porreny S = ) , \ 7 yl Ne NIN Dy)?250 transition point C.L2. The upper partis shorter. Strongly thickened and stressed transition point Cll, High biconicat cups Cull. The transition point is thickened and sharply shaped. The cim is slightly profiled outward C.il.2.The transition point is slightly thickened and rounded C.12.1. The rim is straight and rounded C.2.2.The rim is slightly profiled outward and rounded Cll. Shon biconical cups CHIL. Biconical cups with straight walls ClIILL.1.The transition point is thickened and sharply shaped C.Ill.1.2.The transition point is thickened and rounded CIIL2. Biconical cups with straight in the upper and slightly ‘widened in the lower part walls, thickened and rounded ransi- tion point CME2.1.The rim is straight C.1N.2.2.The rim is slightly profiled ourward CI1.3.Biconical cups with straight in the lower and widened in the upper part walls; the rim is profiled outward CLV. Cups with spherical-conical and conical upper part CAV.L. The upper partis short C12. The upper partis high D. Pots (Table 7) 11. Conical pot with slighty widened in the upper part walls, D.II. Spherical pot with short cylindrical upper part D.III Pot with flatex spherical shape, and very short and pro- filed outward upper part DIV. Pot with flattened spherical shape, and high conical up- per part. Fourhandles located two by two on the opposite walls under the rim and atthe turning point. D.V.1, Short neck D.V2. Relatively high neck. D.VI. Necked spherical pot with a spout E. Lids (Table 7) ELL Flat lids with one handle in their upper part E.II, Short semispherical lids without or with handle E.ll,1.The base rim is rounded; no handle E.JL.2, The base rim is thinned and rounded; no handle E113. Channel-shaped profiling at the base; no handle E.1L4. A handle in the center E.IN. High semispherical lids with differently shaped and pro- filed outward periphery E\IIL}. The periphery is smoothly shaped without thickening E.111.2The periphery is clearly separated and thickened E1113. The periphery is fiercely profiled ourward and upward E.1V. Lids with conical shape E.IV.L. Rounded on the top E,JV.1.1.Straight walls. A hole in the upper part E,IV.1.2.The walls are shaped with sharply profiling at the base E.1V2, Straight walls and high semispherical bulge in the ‘upper part E.IV.3.A sharp profiling (known by fragment) Strainers (Table 7) FL. Strainers with semispherical shape, rounded on the top FIL. Strainers with semispherical shape and equally cut upper Navezno Toconova, Pero Leseaxa ano TATVANA Kunchvae Rusty part FIL. The base is equally cut FIL2. The base is rounded FI. Conical with equally cut upper part. G. Miniature vessels (Table 8), ‘Comparative analyses Plates (A) ‘This category includes six basic shapes, eighteen types and twenty-one sub-types (Tables 1-4) made ftom medium fine and rarer medium coarse clay. The surface in most of the cases is, carefully treated and burnished, but there are many examples of vessels with non-smoothed and purposely roughed outer surface (Figures 2: 1,3,6; 8: 1,3,4.; 9:5). The omamentation snatch; mostly graphite painted, and characterizes anly some ofthe types. Characteristic of the complex is the deep and shallow plates with conical shape, straight walls and straight (A.L1, ‘AIL2, AIL}; Figure 8: 3,4) or thickened from the inner side rim (A.L3, AAL3; Figure 2: 4; Figures €: 1,2; 7:2; 8: 5,6). A big part of those vessels have precise snalogies in the ceramic complexes from LC Yonatsite 1-2 and Karanovo in Upper Thrace (Todorova & Matsanova 2000: Table 26.1, main shapes Aland A.II; Schrol 1997: Table 132: 2.4), as well as in North- eastern Bulgaria (Golyamo Delchevo 1975: Table 108: 18, 19 (17), Oveharovo 8-10 [1983: Table 64:2, Table 65:3; Table 79: 1]}, ee. Some ofthe shapes such as the shallow plates with wide fat bottom (A.H.1, Fig. 8: 1,2) have parallels at Karanovo (Schrol 1997: Table 132: 2, 4) and at Gudzhova Mogila in Eastern Upper Thrace, as well as in Northeastem Bulgaria (Golyame Delchevo 1975: Table 108: 18, 19). But for the time being, they are unknown from Yunatsite “The conical plates with straight walls and short straight or inclined upper part (A.IV, A.V; Figures 2:2; 6:3;7:3-5:9: 1-5) are often distributed at Sudievo 1-2. Their analogies, as of (pes A FIN, are numerous and originate froma vast geographi- cal region that can be explained by the popularity of these shapes. Pilates AVI are rarely distributed inthe ceramic complex of Sudievo 1-2. Only types with straight vertical and inclined ‘upper part have been represented there (Figures 3: 3; 9: 8-19); that they have exact parallels in Northeast Thrace. Buti is the inclined plates with outer profiled rim that characterize the ‘Upper Maritsa basin (Yunatsite type A. VII.2; Matsanova 1999: 89, Table 4: 5) and Krivodol-Saleufa-Bubanj complex (Berciu 1962: Figutes 85: 6,11; 1019,10; Mikov & Dzkambazov 1960 Figure 47, etc). It is worth mentioning that shape is not char- acteristic ofthe northeast parts of Thrace as it cannot be recog nized among the published and/or observed pottery from Karanovo, Dyadovo, Gulubovo, Gudzhova Mogila, ete A big part of the plates have relatively small sizes (Fig- ures 2: 1-4; 6:1, ete), and some of the types are represented only by miniature shapes (type A 2.1). The amount of graphite painted plates is not large (Figure 3: 1,3) but the plates with roughed outer surface were very popula. ‘Two of the plates were ornamented with red (Fig. 8: 6) and white (Fig. 9:1) compact (crusted) paint, Of interest is the technique of painting that difers from that known to us fromLars Cnazxoumne Porn row Svodvo Tes, Nova Zaoona Dasscr 25) a a 5 = EI a 5 3 | a : J | | ped{ i wo - i >) i i i 12 Clr se >? ij — tro eN OD eeu zara veo z10 ' THD, ~ - <>g i capo ay fo oa 0 5 Ys § sua : e s 5 via — 5 a] E ta ¢ & Ya era 5 > 3 ew _ f eara = ena = = ca cara LLae Chatxourac Porn rou Suevo Tes, Nove ZAcona Ds256 other Chalkolithic sites. In contrast to the known technology of crusted ware, where the strips of painting have non-burnished surface, the vessels have burnished surfaces, and the technique ‘of omamentation is closer to painting with very compact ochre. Unfortunately, because of the bad conditions of the fragments, the reconstruction of the motifs is impossible. Bowls (B) ‘That category consists of variety of typology —five basic shapes, leven types and thirteen sub-types (Tables 4 & 5). There are semispherical close shapes, with orxithout differently shaped upper part (Types B.I1,2, B.1L3, BLIIL 1-2), while the open shapes (Type B.1 and B.IL.1, Fig. 2:9; 10:1,2) are more rarely distributed. Wide and massive bottoms characterize those ves- sels. As a nue, the bowls are made from medium course and ‘medium fine clay; the surface is treated carelessly and are pur- posely roughed, burnished inside and under the rim. Some ves- sels were precisely made with homogenous bumished surface ‘and, in most ofthe cases, non-ormamented (Figures 1:4; 10:3; 12:1,3). Different variants of relief-and-plastic omamentation characteriza the semispherical bowls from Sudievo (Table 9: ‘Table 10: 1-3). The biggest is the number ofthe relief bands attached diagonally over the walls of the vessels (Figures 1 68; 11:7). The bands are often in combination with differently sized small bulges (Figures 1:6; 11: 1,8). ‘Analogies of those vessels come from Dyadovo, Gudalto- ‘va Mogila and Drama (Lichardus, Fol & Getov 2000: 67, Abb. 25: 4,5) in Northeastem Thrace, as well as from Yunatsite in the Upper Maris basin (Todorova & Matsanova 2000: Fig- ure 26,3: 2,4; Table 26.4, Ovcharovo [8-13] (1983: Table 66: 8,11; Table 84 6; Table 85: 15) and Golyamo Detchevo (1975: Table 77: 22; Table 101: 14,17 etc.) in Northeastern Bulgaria, ete. Bowls with diagonally attached bands also originate from Dolnaslav (Radunteva 1991: 110), Dyadovo (Katincharov et al, 1980: Fig. 3: 3), Yunatsite (Todorova & Matsanova 2000: Fig, 26.3: 7), Russe (Georgiev & Angelov 1957: Fig. 33: 4) and Kapitan Dimitrievo tell (Matsanova 1999: Table 5: 4) “The biconical bowls with thick and a slight tuming point (enain shape B.1V; Fig. 14:2) have relatively precise analogies among the pottery from Karanovo (Schlor 1997: Table 137 17), Iskritsa, Kapitan Dimitrievo (Matsanova 1999: Table 8: 2), Dyadovo ete. OF special interest isthe big bow! from this category that has @ double spout and rich incised omamenta- tion (Figure 12: 4) The best analogy of that bowl comes from house 3 at Vunatsite, type B.VI.2 (Todorova & Matsanova 2000: Table 26.5), but it is non-ommamented, and its spout is single. Vessels with double spout but with different shapes have been discovered at Karanovo (Schlor 1997: Taf. 137: 17), Gudzhova Mogila ete Cups (©) Some of the most characteristic shapes fom Sudievo 1-2 are the high- and low-based cups with differently shaped turning. point and rim (basic shape C.II, C.II1), Four basic shapes have ‘been documented and divided into nine types and six sub-types (Table 6: Figures 1: $,7; 5: 1; 6: 7; 16: 4,7,8). The vessels from that category are in most cases made from medium fine and fine clay, and the surface is completely or partially cov- Nane2ios Tooonova, Peres Lesko 490 Tarvata KiscuC-RUSSEVA ‘ered with slip and burnished. A considerable part of the ves- sels ace omamented with graphite in their upper half, and the lower halfin many cases is roughly treated, dragged (Figures $3,557: 6,7; 13: 4-7, SAD). Numerous analogies of those shapes come from sites lo- cated in the eastem part of the Upper Thracian valley and in ‘Northeastern Bulgaria - Dyadovo (Katincharov et al. 1980 Figures 32: 5; 33: 1,2), Karanovo (Sehlor 1997: Taf. 132: 13- 15, 21), Gulubovo (Stefanova 1991: Figures 13¢; 14a,d), Gudzhova Moga, Iskitsa, Kodzhadermen (Popov 1916-1918: Figures 105b, 124a; 125a,b etc.) Russe (Georgiev & Angelov 1957: Figures 33:2; 45: 2,3), Devetak cave (Stoyanov 1992. Figure 4), Ovcharovo (1983: Table 87: 1,2,5,9,15 etc.), Durankulak, Devnya etc ‘At Late Chalkolithic Yunatsite have been documented biconical cups with similar profiling but with two vertical handles (Todorova & Matsanova 2000: Figure 26.5: 2,4,6) In comparison to negative graphite ornaments and the relatively complicated motifs that characterize Sudievo cups, the graph ite painting ofthe cups from Yunatsite is positive, and the lin- car motifs dominate in the ornamentation Beside the typical Sudievo biconical shapes, there are also cups with eylindrical upper pars, conical lower parts and various profiled thick turing points (type C.l, Figure 13: 1,2), as well as vessels with more complicated profiling (main shape CAV, Figure 13:3,8) Poss (D) ‘The vessels from that category af€ not numerous, and it ap- pears they do not differ from each other by a big variety of shapes (Table 7). Ths could be due tothe insufficient number of whole vessels at Sudievo. As are, the pots are made from medium course or course clay; the outer surface istreated care- lessly in such a way that it remained not well smoothed or dragged. Included in the omamental techniques are triangular incisions, (mussel) shell and finger stamps organized in hori- zontal bands, and rarer, moderate relief bulges (Table 10: 11, 14-16), ‘The pots with biconical shape, bulging upper part and short neck (Figure 14: 13) have precise analogies in Eastern Thrace (Dyadovo, personal observations) and in Northeast Bolgara -Kodzhadermen Popov 1916-1918: 11, Figure 104a), Ovcharovo (1983: Table 77: 11, 12; Table 87: 3), Russe Tell (Georgiev & Angelov 1957: 72, Figure 33: 1), ete. One of the vessels (Figure 7: 10) has relatively precise analogy in Oveharovo 8 level (1983: Table 76: 6) its similar with type C.IILI from Yanatsite but has no handle. The pot with fat- tened-spherical shape, high conical upper part with (wo hori- zontal handles from Sudievo 2 (Figure 14: 4) in general re- sembles type E.VI.I from Yunatsite. Of interest i the pot with ‘a small spout from the same level (Figure 14: $) that has only ‘one published precise parallel that originates from Chatalka (Katalog 1981: 127, Figure 14a). Lids (£), Strainers (F) and Stands ‘The large number of lids and strainers characterize the Sudievo ceramic complex (Table 7). Most of them are coarse, their surface is without slip, roughly smoothed or purposely ‘made course through finger dragging or scratching. The lead-Lave Chaixoumac Porant rou Swot Tet, Novs Zacona Dict 257 Figure 1. Sudieve. Pottery stom House I, The first building level. ing shapes are low (E.I; Figure 15: 1-4) and high (E.1M, Fig- ure 6; 10; Figure 15: 6-8) semispherical lids profiled towards the outside periphery, Less frequently distributed are the flat and conical lids (Figures 4: 6,8; 15: 5). Asa ule, they are not ‘omamented. Fragments from conical and semispherical ids with cylindrical bases decorated with channels and often filled with white paste represent shapes that are well known from Upper ‘Thrace and Northeastem Bulgaria, ‘An exception isa low semispherical lid from Sudievo 2 the whole outer surface of which is nail omamented (Figure 15:4). This has a precise analogy among the Chalkolithic ves- sels from Karanovo (Schrol 1997: Taf, 138: 4). The high semi spherical lids profiled toward the outside periphery are repre- sented in the material from Dyadovo, Gudzhova Mogila and Bikovo (Detev 1954: 180, fig. 54), as well as at Golyamo Delehevo (1975: 161-220), Ovcharove (1983: Table 84: 1-1), ete. Some of the shapes such as conical lids with big handles (Figure 15: 2) and high semi-spherical lids fiercely tured to- wards outside periphery (Figure 6: 10) have precise analogies inthe ceramies from Yonatsite (shape KL and type K.111.2) ‘The variety ofthe shape ofthe strainers is not great, but ‘there are some differences in the shaping of the different pars of the vessels (Table 7; Figure 4: 7; 15: 9, 10), That category thas numerous analogies. ‘The stand comprises a find distinguished as such accord ing to the photography published by Kunchev (Kangev 1978: 97, Figure 11), but there is no identical object among those available for analysis pottery from Sudievo 1-2 Miniature Vessels (G) ‘A considerable percentage of the pottery from Sudievo 1-2 comprises miniature vessels - Table 8; Figures 1: 1,2; 4: 1,2,4; 16: 1:3,5,6,9-17. Their technological characteristics vary, as 2 part of them are precisely made from fine clay and have bur- hished surface, while others were shaped carelessly having asymmetric sithouettes and rough non-bumnished surfaces — Figure 16: 9-15. ‘The variety of miniature, shaped vessels is large, and their function is unclear, making this eategory heterogeneous and conventional such as in similar groups ftom later periods (Leshtakov 1988: 7), In most cases they feature vessels fram the other categories (plates, bowls, pots, etc.) on a small seale260 (model). Along with the so-called models, to this category belong some peculiar shapes that are rarely distributed and possibly hd a special purpose. Some of them have no analogy among the published portery from Bulgaria, In particular, no precise analogies are available for three vessels with diferent shapes and not large conical bulges in the middle ofthe bottam. Two of them have a shape of open truncated cone and deep incisions onthe rim that divided the last into three (Figuee 18: 1) and four (Figure 18 2) relatively equal parts, The third vessel also has @ conical but somewhat ‘ate shape, and a short inclined upper part (Figure 7:8). The conical bulge on the bottom is a reason Petur Leshtakov as- sues that these sorts of vessels were candleholdes. Another group comprises three vessels with flattened spherical bodies and very narrow conical neck af medium size, conventionally named “botle™ (Figure 19). Two ofthe minia- ture vessels were recovered in Houses 3 and 4 from the second building level but the third close to them, in $9. BS. The ves- sels were made from fine clay mixed with sand, and their su:- faces have light brown or brown color, burnished with angobe Their inner Volume isnot more than 50 ml, and if we assume that they were for liquids, that small volume infers more spe- cific function. The only precise analogy originates from Dolnosiav (unpublished). Storage Vessels and Other Sorts of Earthenware ‘There are no preserved whole shapes from this category. The fragmented ceramics are not numerous and do not allow ‘graphic reconstruction of certain shapes. This is the reason the ‘vessels from that category are not included in the analysis of the material ‘Among the ceramic material from Sudievo 1-2 are not registered askoi and other shapes known from later Chalkolithie sites from Thrace, but the possible reason is that the data are still not complete ‘Ornamentation (Tables 9-11, pp. 275-277) Analysis of the Omamentation and Surface Treatment Relief-and Plastic Ornamentation and Surface Treatment Bulges and protuberances. When the vessel had fairly dried, the relief omaments of bulges were attached to the wall and shaped, In almost al instances they are situated in the medium parts ofthe vessels ~at the turing point, thickening, as well as at the widest part ofthe vessel with smooth carination, There is no consistency inthe relation between the shape of the vessel and the number of bulges. Most frequently two or four bulges are attached symmetrically atthe walls of the ves- sel, but there ae often instances of one bulge ora combination of bulges of different types. Round bulges: - With semispherical section. They are of different sizes ~ small (Table 9: 1), medium (Table 9:2, Figures 1: 6111) ‘or comparatively lange (Tables 9: 5,6: 9;Figure 11: 3,4), ‘There are often double bulges with the same shape (Table 9. 1, 11, 13:Figures 6:8; 11:5). = With flat section ~"“button’ (Table 9: 3,4) - Flat section, with round pit (Table 9: 6-8; Figures 6: Naveanos ToDoKovA, PETOR LisITaKoy AMD Tarvana KUNCHEVA RUSSEVA 6857:9) ~ Bulges with oval shape ~ single and double (Table 9: 10,12; Figure 11: 8) “Not big conical protuberances (table 9: 15,16): They have been registered for a bow! of type B.II.3 (Figure 6: 6) and a pot of type D.V.1 (Figure 14: 1) “Bulges with asymmetric shape (Table 9: 9,14; Figures, 7. 9;11:9). ‘The different types of bulges are characteristic mainly of type B.IL 1-3 bowls and more rarely docamented at pots of main shapes D.1} and D.V, Relief bands. The relief bands were attached to the ves- sel wall after its complete finishing. Most distributed are nar- row (0.7-1.5 em) carefully shaped interrupted by finger pits and oblique incisions (Table 9: 23-24;10: 1-3). Most often they are situated diagonally groups of four or five at the upper part of the bowls § Horizontal relief bands (Table 9:23). The only regis- tered instance is at semi-spherical bow! (type B.312), as the horizontal are in combination with diagonally atached bands (Figure 11; 7). § Diagonally atached relief bands. They were observed by the category of bowls only (types B.11.1-3;Figures 1: 6.8, 6.9511: 1,8). Barbotine. Purposely coarse surface ofthe vessels, along ‘with the fumetionei had also a decoration function, Mixed with water clay was affixed tothe almost dry wall of the vessel. In many cases with fingers or instrument (possible broom-like) in ‘he new not dried layer of clay were shaped simple ormaments such as parallel or curve-linear lines. § Organized barbotine. There are different variants of the decoration. The parallel fines predominate among the mo- tifs- vertical (Table 9: 17, 21; Figures 6:6; 11; 8), horizontal (Table 9: 19; Figure 9: 5; 14: 1) an oblique (Table 9: 18, 20, 22; Figures 1: 8 6:8; 11:8). There are differences in the width ofthe lines and the manner of shaping. At some of the vessels are observed oblique lines shaped precisely similar to chan- nels (Table 9: 20; Figure 6: 6) Itis worth mentioning in differ- nt parts of one ad the same vessel the lines can be oriented in different directions (Figure 11: 8) § Unorganized barbotine.Itis distributed comparatively often and as 2 rule is situated in the lower parts ofthe vessel (Figure 11: 4; 13:1, 6-8 ete). The coarse surface isa result of chaotic dragging, Deep impressions (pits). There are two main subtypes — ‘ail impressions and pits made witha tool, § Nail impressions (table 10: 11-13). They are impressed with nail into the not dried wall of the vessel. The observed instances comprise parallel horizontal rows that covered the whole surface of D.1V vessels and E.1.2 lids (Figure 14:4; 15 4) or single tow of oval shallow impressions (Figure 12: 4) § Pits made with a tool (Table 10: 15). The possible ‘wooden or bone too! had a triangle section. In one of the regi tered instances eight parallel horizontal rows of pit cover the wall of bowl of type B.1V.1 (Figure 14: 2). Over another bow! of type B.IL.2 a single stip of comparatively neglectfully angle impressions emphasizes the widest part ofthe vessol (Fi ure 10: 4). Shell-impressions. As fine arch-shaped impressions of shell, the technique is documented for two pots (Table 10: 14, 15). On the shoulders of pot of type D.V.2 have been impressedLire Cxasnoune Porany rao! Suv Tex, Nova Zacona Demi 6 gon Figure 4. Sudievo. Ceramic vessels and fragments from the frst horizon 26)262 [Navezvoa Tanonovs, Pn Leak aso Tarvava Kunentua-RUSSEVA Figure S, Sudievo, Pottery from House 2, she second building horizon. seven parallel horizontal strips in such way thatthe arch-shaped impressions have different orientations. Channel Pottery This technique is found rarely. There are two variants: § Horizontal channels ~ registered on a lid of type “Salmanovo (Figuee 4: 9). The channels are somewhat ni +0 in combination with graphite ornamentation, § Wide and deep oblique channels ~ documented for a sherd of a bowl (2) (Figure 4:3) Incised Ornamentation ‘This ornamentation technique was used comparatively often among the pottery from the first and second levels. The ‘omament was incised with pointed wooden or bone too! be- fore the walls ofthe vessel dried and the slip had been applied. ‘The incised lines have different depths in the wall, then the incisions were made with different amounts of force. The un- ‘equal widths ofthe lines indicate there were a variety of tools used. The motifs are in most cases simple, and groups of in- cised parallel or crossing lines prevail, organized in different ways, The omamentation is documented for the vessels from the category of bowls, rarer lids and miniature shapes. It cov- ers the whole outer surface, the lower conical par, the turning, point, and in single cases, the outer or inner surface of the bot- toms. Characteristic are the combinations with pricked and re~ lief-and-plasti decoration. The following motifs have been registered: § Groups of three shor, wide, vertical and parallel tines, (Table 10:8). The mots observed on the shoulders ofa bow! of type B.IV.2 (Figure 12: 2) § Long, wide, vertical and parallel lines (Table 10: 4,5). ‘The motifis documented on bowls and completely covers the surface inthe lower parts ofthe vessels (Figure 10: 4). § Frequently incised vertical and oblique lines (table 10:9, 10). The omamentation is incised on the widest part ofa bow with its spout (form B.V) and shape bordered by oblique pits wide stip, which cover the whole parameter of the vessel. In two places the incised lines are interrupted from double cireles (Figure12: 4). § Oblique, non-organized, often crossing each other lines of different thickness (Table 10:6, 7). The motif is docu- rented for several bowls (Types B.12 B.IL3), It covers the lower part (Figure 11: 6) or the whole surface of the vessel without the rim (Figures 2: 9;6: 9), and in one instance itis the background for the omamentation of bulges and oblique bands Figure 6:9). § Arch-shaped strips of diferent widths, bordered with thin incised lines, filled with chaotic shallow drags (table 10: 17,18), The manner of omamentation is observed on two frag-se Cuatxoune Porrny mos Suoeve Tex, Nova ZacanA Dnsaier 2? HRS Compact red gohe Figure 8, Sudieve, Pottery from the second horizon 265266 [EE copes mate Figure 9. Sudievo, Ceramic plates from the frst and second horizon.Lae Caatxotrnae Porrey mos Sunevo Tet, Nova Zacoka Desmcr Figure 10. Sudievo, Ceramic bowls from the second horizonFigure U. Sudievo. Pottery from the second horizon.[Lave Cnaaxotrne Porrey ron Sunivo Tes. Nov Zacona Demir 27 \ | ate [rain Hane) 1 2 2 Figure 14. Sudievo, Potery from the second horizon\Nanezioa Topokovs, Per Leninskow ato Tarvin Kune RSsevt Figure 15, Sudieve. Ceramic lids and strainers rom the second horizonLane Cuatkournse Porrery now Svottv Tats, Nov Zagoea DIETLe Cuasxeurec Porreny Fron Suoievo Tet, Nov Zacona Disrcr 25 e a Oo oo @ = Table 9, Sudieve, ‘ments ~ shallow bowl (or lid) - Figure 4: 5, and a closed shape —abow or pot (Figure 3: 6). The fragmented motifs cannot be completely reconstructed. 4§_ Crossclike motifs. Two variants have been documented -Cross with equal arms (“svastice”) with incisions atthe points “hast with different lengths (Table 10: 19), The motif ‘was incised through very thin lines on the outer and inner side of a miniature bow! (Figure 18: 3) ~"Maltian” cross (table 10: 20). The motifis documented, on two small lids (Figure 18: 4; Kanchev 1978: Figure 1d) The incised lines shaping the cross are wider and deeper (up to (03 em at the instance in Figure 18: 4). In both cases the motif covers almost all the surface. Painted Decoration Presumably, the painted design was applied to the vessel sur- face before firing, Both graphite and mineral pigment were documented among the Sudievo ceramics. Graphite decoration. In the context of the rich graphive ‘omamentation during the Late Chalkolithc in Thrace, itis worth ‘mentioning the relatively small amount of such vessels from Sudievo. Of the analyzed ceramics, mostly cups and some types ofplates were subject to graphite painted design, but even they were affected by the secondary fring that have characterized a considerable part of the vessels, so the graphite was poor pre- served and the reconstruction of the omaments uncertain, ‘inmost ases, the omamentation is negative (Tables 11:3 8; 10: 13), but there are also instances of a combination of negative and positive omament (Table 11: 9, 14-16). The pre ferred zone of the graphite design among the biconical cups was that between the rim and the turning point, mainly complimented by the additionally roughed Surface of the lower par of the vessel. Among the plates, the graphite design was applied overtheir inner surface, sometimes combined with sim- plified motifs that were painted over the outer surface of the upper vessel pat. ‘The main registereé motifs and compositions areas fol- low: § One, or two to five parallel fong lines, the thickness of which vary from 0.1 to 0.5 em, as some ofthe lines were unequally applied. They represent vertical (Table I1: 16), hori- zontal (Table 11: 1,2,9,11) or oblique (Table 1:5) linear posi tive and occasionally negative (Table 11: 12) motifs, whose main function was to divide the omamental field or, as excep- tion, to complete a composition § Compasitions of grouped and short vertical lines, re peated in intervai, thre to nine in number, the thickness of which vary between 0.1 and 0.4 cm. Thy are applied usually ‘over the rim (Table 11: 16), and the upper outer parts of some types of plates, or over the tuming point of ther vesseis Table 11:8,13,16). § "Motifs of grouped, parallel, oblique lines~0.1 t0 0.2 cm thick each ~that have been repeated and multiply in some- what equal intervals as elements of more complicated compo- sitions. § Horizontal and inclined to the left o right solid graph- ite lines, 0.9 to 1.5 cm thick each (Table 11: 3,6,9). They are mainly parts of more complex compositions, in which thinner oblique lines flank them. § Hanging triangles filled with graphite —the so-called “wolf teeth” (Table 11: 4,15), Asa rule, the motifs applied in the upper parts of the vessels, immediately under the rim, There is also a variant composed of triangles with wider base sides, and the lateral walls are flanked by thin graphite lines (Table 1:6). {§ Crescent motif it is a negative motif, and itis @ part ‘of complex composition § “Running wave” ~it isa negative motif (Table 11: 10- [1 that is framed a in wide horizontal band and registered in276 "Naoezoa Tonotovs, Pevur Leiaxow ano Tarvans Keneveva RUSSVA heey y} Vif SE Ile ‘Table 10 Sudievo the upper parts of biconical cups. § Circle ~ registered as a part of a more complicated, possibly four-part, composition over the inner surface of plat. The negative circle is designed in the background of & field filled with graphite, in combination with radial dts on its pe- riphery (Table 11: 16). Motifs of negative circles, imregularly shaped, or negative ovals depict parts of more complex com- positions (Table 19: 45) Crusted Decoration ‘This is an exception among the Sudievo pottery, and is regis- tered over a plate (lid) from the first horizon. A motif of€. 1 cm thick strip of red paint (ochre) is applied over the periphery (or rim) of the vessel Colored Angobe Design ‘This technique differs from the previous, and is represented through two plates (Figures 8: 9; 9: 1) designed with red and white sold paint. Inthe first case (Figure 9: 1), a solid strip of faded paint (angobe), 1-1.5 em thick, is applieé ove the inner rim side of a plate from the second horizon. Traces from an- other strip are preserved over the inner surface ofthe vessel as ‘well. Another plate from the same horizon consists of traces of 1-1.2 cm wide strip applied with solid reddish paint. Because ofthe poor preservation of the omaments, the motifs cannot be reconstructed, but itn be assumed they were simplified and presumably monochrome, Discussion ‘The analysis of the omamentation from Sudievo 1-2 allows one to distinguish some peculiarities as well as specific tech- niques and motifs of omamentation and to point to their analo- gies among KGK V! complex. ‘Among the analyzed pottery, most frequently distributed were different types of relief and plastic omamentation (Tables 9; 10: 1-3) that characterized some bowls. It comprises vari- ery of bulges, in most of the cases symmetrically located by four or two inthe widest part or in the upper half of the vessels Figures \:6;6:6,9; 1:4; 14:1). A different variant of double bulges are also represented in many instances (Figures 6: 8; 7: 9; 11: 5,6,8)- ‘A characteristic peculiarity of the ceramics from Sudievo 1-2 is the presence of a big quantity of relief bands, as a rule located sideways, in groups of four or five (Figures 1: 6,8; 6 9). Less frequently the bands are vertical or in a combination of horizontal and oblique bands, chaotically attached to the walls in the parts ofthe vessels (Figure 11: 7). The variants of the so-called barbotine omament are relatively small in num- ber (Table 9: 17-22; Figures 1: 8; 6: 6,8; 11: 8), but pur- posely-roughed surface is widely distributed in the analyzed ceramic complex (Figures 8: 4,5; 9: 5; 11:4,5,75 13: 1, 6-8, sfc.). Ina considerable number of cases there is a combination of different types of relief omamentation. In comparison to the relief omamentation, the incised, pricked and concave omamentation is less often represented (Table 10; 3-20). The incised ornamentation characterizes mostly some bowls. The vertical and oblique incisions thatLave Chateournac Porreny raou Stowe Tau, Nove Zacota DTI Table 1), Sudieve, dominate and often cross each other and cover the lower (Fig, 11:6) or almost the whoie surface ofthe vessels (Figures 2:9; 6:9; 10; 4). As @ rule, the incisions are somewhat wide and rather carelessly elaborated. Ofinteest are two fagments omamented filed with drags and bordered by incised lines bands. One of te fragments be- langs toa shallow plate (oF lid?) and the omament isin combi- nation with red-crusted paint (Figure 4: 5). The second frag- rent belongs to a vesse! with closed shape (Figure 3:6) but the scheme ofthe motif cannot be reconstructed Similar techniques of omamentation are documented on vessels from Karanovo {Schior 1997: 309, Abb, 152/20), Devetaki Cave (Mikov & Dzhambazov 1960: 69, Figure 50h), Hotnitsa tell recent exca vations), Okol Glava (Petkov 1931: 141, Figure $8), et. ‘The'‘svastika” motif requires special attention. is reg- istered on three vessels from Sudievo tel. Inthe first instance JS incised on both sides ofthe bottom of smal plate (Figure 18: 3) elaborated through thin and shallow incisions less than 0.1 em thick. That motif has analogies at Salmanovo (Popov 1914: Fig. 165a). The second (Figure 18.4) andthe third ves- sel (@ lid published in Kangev 1978: Fig, 1d) originate from House 3 from Sudievo 2. The matits on both of them are simi- Jar to a Maltian Cross. In Figure 18: 4 it is deeply incised, possibly on a lid. ‘Asa independent object, the “svastika” motifs less of- ten distributed in KGK V1 complex. But there aré numerous instances when the motif is an element of more complicated graphite compositions such as on a bow) from Yunatsice (Todorova & Matsanova 2000: Figure 26.1: 4) or ona ld from Kodzhadermen (Popov 1918: Figure 133 ete.). From the area of Tripolie culture there are several instances, in which the motif close to the “Maltian Cross” from the lids from House 3 was represented on anthropomorphic figurines (Pogozheva 1983 Figure 5: 10), Possibly its repetition in the house inventory was not accidental, and it has a peculiar meaning in the house hhold that had lived there. ‘A relatively small number of vessels comprise graphite ‘omamentation, The represented motifs and schemes (Table 11) do not differ from these known in Thrace and the neighboring regions and have numerous analogies. They characterize mostly the upper parts of cups (Figures 3:2; $:3,$; 7:6,7; 1314-11) and the inner walls of some types of plates (Figure 3: 1,3). In 100 of the instances the graphite omament is documented on the lower necks of vessels, which shape cannot be reconstructed with certainly (Figure 3: 4,8), Of special interest is one of graphite motifs. On the inner wall ofa plate from Sudievo 1 is represented a circle with smal! dots on the periphery that stands out against the graphite painted background (Figure 3: 3). The same motif has a big number of precise analogies, which unfortunately have no certain strati-278 graphic positon. It is known from Kodzhadermen tell (Popov 1918: Figure 102), Dyadovo (unstratified sherd), Hotnitsa (Elenski, in print) and from the area of Stara Zagora City (a herd from the Neolithic houses exposition in Stara Zagora that may originate from Stara Zagora ~ Okruzhnitsa Bolnitsa Tell ‘The further comparative analyses of Sudievo ceramic material with other sites from Northeast Thrace’, with the re- gions of the Upper Stryama Valley (Dubene-Sarovka I (Nikolova 2000), ofthe Struma Valley, as well as to the South {Sitagroi 111) will reveal opportunities to argue more chrono- logical and cultural interrelations in the context of the prob- lems of the periodization of Karanovo VI culture of the KKG complex (cp. e. Todorova 1986; Nikolova 2000) and of the regional peculiarities of the Karanovo VI ceramic style. Aclnowledgments We are grateful to many colleagues who allowed us to examine some unpublished ceramics to compare the characteristics of Sudievo pottery. Dr. Krassimir Leshtakov (Sofia University) {gave us important information for Gudzhova Mogila and Iskritsa pottery. Mr. Ventsislav Gergov (Pleven) made it possible for us to work with Telish pottery. Thanks to Mr. Nedko Elenski (Museum of History in Veliko Tumovo City), we had an op- portunity to see the material from Hotnitsa tell. Last but not least, we gratefully appreciate the editorial effort of Dr. Lolita Nikolova, REFERENCES Abbreviations Golyama Delehevo 1975, Todorova Ke al. Selishimata mogila Golyamo Delchevo. Sofa. BAN. Razkophi i prouchvaniya 5 Ovcharovo 1983 Todorova H. et al. Ovcharovo, Sofia. BAN. Razkopki i prouchvaniya 8 Vinits 1976 Raduncheva A. 1976 Vintsa, Eneolimno selishte i nekrapol. Sofia. BAN. Razkopki i prouchvaniya 6 Berciu D. 1962 Coniribuf a prablemele neotticuul tn Roménia in lumina noir cercetd, Bucuresti Borisov B, 1980 Nepublikuvani abrochni plochki na Trakijskiys konnik ot muzeya v Nova Zagora. Thracia Antiqua 7. Bozhilov V. 1999 Predmeti ot kusnokhakolitnata materialna kultura In: Nikolov V. (ed), Selishenata mogila Kapitan Dimitrievo Razkophi 1998-1999. Sofia & Peshtera Detev P, 1954 Selishtnata mogila pris, Bikove, Godishnikina Muzeite 01 Plovdiveki Okrug 1, 157-197, Diney L. & K. Mishev 1980 Bulgaria. Kratka geographiva. Sofa Elenski N (in print) Stratigrafski profil na Hotnishkata selishina "For instance, with the recently published pottery from Mudrets- Goudzhova Mogila, skits, Polski Gradets and other sites from the area of the Maritsa-iztok Energetic Works that was issued after sub- ritting this work for publication. See Leshtakow K., Kancheva- RussevaT.& Sloyanov St 2001, Prehistoric studies. Settlement Sites In: Maritsa-Iziok Archaeological Research. Vol. 5, 15-69, Radnevo, ALEA Publishers. [Nanez¥on Toponovs, Peru Leswraxov avo Tara Kune Russe mogila vestiya na Istoricheskiya Mize) ¥ Turnovo 15 (in print). GeorgievG- Ul. & N. Angelov 1952 Razkopk na selishnata mogila do Ruse prez 1948-1949 g, Irvestiva na Artheologicheskiya Institut 18, 119-194 Georgiev G. Il. & N. Angelov 1957 Razkopki na selishinata mogila do Ruse prez 1950-1952 g, Izvestiya na Arkheologicheshiva Institut 21, 42-124 GcorgievG.IL,N. ¥. Merpert, R. Katincharov & D.G. Dimitrov (ed) 1979 Bzere. Rannobronzovoto zelishe. BAN. Sofia, JerOme P. 1901 L’époque néolithique dans de vallée du Tonsus (Thrace). Rev Arch. 2, 328-349, Kantev M. 1978 Fouiles d'un tll prés de village Sudievo, dep. du Sliven. Studia Praehistorica 1-2, 96-100. Katalog 1981 = Jungsteinzeit in Bulgarien. Katalog, Wunstrf Katincharov R., Y. Best, V. Nikolov & V. Nikolova 1980 Selishinata rmogils do's. Dyadovo: Sondazhen izkop (arkheologicheski razkopki 1977/78 g.). Expeditio Thracica 1, 9-94 Kojehev N. 1959 Neobnarodvani pametnitsi ot Novozagarsko. Artheologiva 1-2, 93-96. Kunchev M, 1976 Razkopki na selishinala mogila do 5. Sudievo, Sivenski okrug. AOR prez 1975. Smolyan, 20-21 Kunchev M, 1977 Rezkopki na selishtnata mogila pri s. Sudievo, Slivenski okzug. AOR prez 1976, Russe, 29-30, Kunchev M. 1990 Prehistoric setlements in Nova Zagora Region. ‘Annual of the Tokyo 16 (in Japanese), $9-79. Kunchew M, & T; Kuncheve 1981 Razkopki na slishnata mogila do ‘5. Sudievo, Slivenski okrug. 4OR prez 1980. Preslay, 23-25. Kunchev M, & T. Kuncheva 1982 Razkopki na slishtnata mogila of Ikhalkolita, severno ots Sudievo. AOR prez 1981, Mihajlovgrad, pie Kunchev M, &T. Kuncheva 1984 Razkopki na selishinata mogila oF -khalkolita,severno ots, Sudievo, AOR prez 1983. Smolyan, 26- 21, Kunchev M, & T. Kuncheva 1985 Razkopki na selishtnata mogila oF ‘khalkolta, sevemno ot s. Sudievo. AOR prez 1984. Sliven, p. 38. Kunchev M. & T. Kuncheve-Russeva 1993 Antropomorina plasika (or selishinata mogila do s. Sudievo, Novozagorsko. In: Nikolov V.(ed,), Praisoricheskt nathodk sledvantya, Shormiky pamet na prof G. Il Georgiev. Sofia, 129-139. Kuncheva-Russeva T. 1999 Arkheologicheski prouchvaniya na praistoricheski abekti v Novozagorsko. In: Arheologichesk’ i istoricheski prouchvaniya v Novozagorsko. Nove Zagora, 11-21 Leshtakov K. 1988 Osnovni Klasifkatsonni prinsipi za keramikata ‘ot rannata srednata bronzove epokha v Trakiya. Arkheologiva3, Ls. Leshtakoy K. 1992 Razkophi na selishna mogila vs. Mudreis, Gulubovsko. Gudshova mogila. Otchet na razkopkite za 1992 (manuseript). Leshtakov K. 1995 The Mudrets | (Tell Goudjova Mogi). tn: Nikolova L. (ed), Early Bronze Settlements Patterns in the Balkans (Ce. 3300 - 2000 BC, Caltbrated Dates). Part. Reports of Prehistoric Research Projects 1, 1, 4547, Leshiakov K, 1999 Rannobronzovi sudove ot obeti v Novezagorshiya rayon, In: Arkeologicheski | istoricheski prouchvaniya v Novozagorsko, Nova Zagora, 57-90. Leshtakov K. 2000 New data for the Karanovo I-IV sites in the “Maritsa valley and the Westem Sakar Region. In: Hille S.& V. Nikolov (Hr), Karanove, Bd Ill Betrage zum Neolthilum in Sudosteuropa, Wien. Lichardus1., A Fol &L. Getov 2000 Forschungen in der Milroregion von Drama (Sudostbulgarien). Zusammenfasung der Hauptergebnisse der bulgarisch-deutschen Grabungen in den Jahren 1983-1999. Bonn, Mikov V. & N. Dehambazov 1960 Devetashkata peshtera. BAN, Sofia. Nikolov V, 1998 Prouchvaniya vurku nolinata keramikav Trakiya, Keramichnite kompletsi Karanovo ILI, II ILIV v Ronteksa‘Lave Chaaxoumee Porrny fron Suieve Tett, Nova ZAgota Dict ‘na Severocapadna Anatolia I Yugoistochna Evropa. Agato. Sofia. ‘Nikofova L, 2000 Towards the Neolithic and Copper Age Develop- ‘ment in the Balkans (Data from the Stryama Valley) In: Nikolova (ed), Technology, Style and Soctery, 65-92 Nikolova L.(ed,) 2000 Technology, Style and Society. BAR Interns- tional Series 854, Oxford. Panayotova K. 1982 Zemlishteto na Korten v praistoriyata i antichnostta Expeditio Thracica 2, 117-127. Pogozheva A.P. 1983 Antropomorfnaya plastita Tripolya. Novosibirsk Popov A., D. Kunchev et al, 1997 Fizicheska geographiya na Bulgariva. Sofia. Popov R. 1914 Predistocheskata Deneva mogila pri Salmanovo, Ievestivana Bulgarskoto Arheologichesko Drizhestvo 4, 148-226. Popov. 1918 Kodzhadermenskata mogila pri gr. Shumen. Izvestiya ‘na Bulgarskovo Arheologichesto Druzhestva 6, 11-155. Radundeva A. 1991 Kurzer Vorbericht aber die Ausgrabungen in Dolnosiav. In: Lichardus J. (Hr), Die Kupjerzeit als histoische Epoche. Symposium Saarbricken und Otzenhaxcen 1988. Tel | Saarbrdcken, 107-110, Schior I. 1997 Die chatkoitische Keramik aus Grube ZI: Hiller 8. & V Nikolow feds), Karanovo, Vol. 1. Horw/Wien, Ferdinand Berger & Sthne, 285-321 Schneider G. 1989 NaturwissenschaMliche Kriterien urd Verfahren 279 zur Beseiveibung der Keramik. Acta Prehisorica et Archaeologica 21, 7-39. Seute G, & A. Degrand 1906 Exploration quelques elles de la Thrace, BCH 30, 359-432 Shkorpil K. Kh, Shkorpil 1898 Mogilte Pametnits ie Bulgarsko Plovdiv Stefanova T. 1991 Selishina mogila Gulubova -khalkoftna epokh, (in Panayotov 1, K. Leshtakoy, §. Alexandroy |. Zmejkova, Ts. Popova, T Stefanava, Selishtna mogila Gutubovo ~ Khalkolitna, ranna i srednabronzova epokha).In: Panayotov I,K, Leshtakoy, R. GeorgievaS. Alexandrov & B. Borisov (eds), Maritea-Itok Arkheologickeski prouehvaniya. Vol. 1. Sofia 141-153 ‘Stoyanov M. 1994 Spastenisrkheologicheskirazkopki v Devetash- kata peshtera, AOR prez 1992 g. Sofia, 14-16, Todorova H. 1986 Kamenno-medhata epoka v Dulgaria(peto thi pr ne). Sofa, Nauka i izkustvo, ‘Todorova N.& V. Matsanova 2000 Late Chalkolithie Ceramic style at Yantste Tell (Approach tothe Systematization of the Cerar- {es from the Newly Excavated Levels). In: Nikoloval. (ed), Teeh- nology: Sole and Sociery, 331-361 Vossen R. 1970 Klassifkationsprobleme und Klassifikationssyste ‘me in der amerikanische ArchBeologie. Acta Preahisirica and Archaeologica | E-mail addresses: ntodorovabg@yahoo.com (Nadezhda Todorova), junior_}_bg@yahoo.com (Petur Leshtakov) & ‘museumnz@infoteL.bg (Tanya Kuncheva-Russeva)Su pa ‘apie ous Dens avea Tosonova, Perum LESraKov aXo TATYANA KUNCHEVA-RUSSEVA 280 wt oi snomgea| smmopieasssbsot ee ee spepordaee mera sens ve 11 women] "Rees lees | menausoanen| alt ‘pes poner sone ecae si| mama| MEBEEEE | eewsteunystog en | nao stave pony on vunt| ta yea rents | ea dashed cnostoa | spun passband yong crore wee : . od a crept pont ve sete zee a | “edinpoidooy sect on | siaq-fes apispo atoqnary | sug ume a us sins «| snsn sean Seber sete manner | smunn ex sone . es en xe es eons | nS mauwoquéa | sonumen es ess . peer en ws on cL sens ste seburmennir| ont won cur vo] nla store dyes | monpaieg | span | sepueert . “ : — cmatounystog | ans © : ok ge 7 5 ° sft lad) Fie de i & z g g Beae3 5 in GE é g 5 3 Aoyog payesnsmity ay) Jo andopeyw 328) Fae RTT petpoul apo ped dan pea pais one | -EEEESEREE | sensanctmonea| —eaco | gene e|__roenes son eoprmanén| oa! OS — woouyage SE een xm partons : came steenarin| varie spi eava| oyun seanses| ——_snatnwerearnna | apunie ses siren |_aprsiane se mn | sempre | ee te seo eouen| ous of pets satin ogra | soya a ster wroqrns rt aang et sens [aes | aesacgnepeneunoe | — un | woe ur stay yen .| angers seawvwniao | emo | _aroi «ena tng sgt eorstuneaee| nao | won et eee a won| piowun eoeoeteen em: | in awd cet | cwainumynogien| wna |S > ° aE e 2 2 < ag i : £ F e| ff é = i Lae CrasxoureePorny ost Suni Tes, Nova Zagat Derict (panujuo>) Aronog paxesysng] au Jo anBopeIeDNavezwon Tooonova, Perum Lesirakoy ato Trvana KiNHEVACRUSEVA 282 pain pooous pine nods we 1p tp sing 2D eo | exenes ca} ec| sume] terme | smpnsron sptveon soguimen | aoa oe pur Hap a pgsung 22m “9 issiwees ss ce} soe 4 mano pasta dhs eS Syeds ud rep tqym Unda RATT wng| [sod if Gib sep mo oo | _ ornus + + | cos | cunostatr | pampous yong son sisuyonrar| ump | wos oe toe genus aenco | mois 9 or se | ve] ot . spinon | onsutea opno stones | unpre | “NE oura oo ore £ o oiS9. | paneous Yano aqodue on Arpuccas sods 9899 xv] £9 acs vs s | Soest | umarq ary paysnuing aqouy | snosunfowoy uatoug rT yeous | agsuspd pyar nunoag 2 one ‘ Ps Seton | apne tomstiny nore 3 ot zs| ec | ues | . feueces seetey soot ny unos 2p5u paoous t vorgns nro plane 9s | seems ‘ s| cue . sey spe be in sfoadr1 sua | 1208 o¢ pexeuing ss | tsenass vw] orf zou ‘ SeeSey | _opsw eng piano unas xr suz|_ ho oe woe pooous geuirg tes Ss) reaness w| ss] ‘ seesey | __Kownes soda zetyoud | suyunpeyt ee . PO Pe Sy poxocus apo wed dn nox | puroogane su peng es cc s st eae BPP 2qoauy nee ‘umosq wBey | sug winipare dA Le Z Fol, 2 9 2) fz FF 5 Bl oz! gF BF z z 2 2 2 ; ail EP2is 2) 98) foie : : 5 e g\ ¢ &) 24953 5 2) ak BQ & a 5 & : a8) BRR 3 a (ponuyuod) Kran04 parexsnyTy ayy Jo andopere3283 9a sneoou0y Sungsinayo x cout | warsanmaz| | vv | ester |“ unore | asengumseurous sta seennsouey unosd | say wont “J Supaedsnyn ls soi | ‘wsiavonmz| ecl eo] ve c[ sesoonzasuine sept | soda fart amunese pe | suse 4 oe | ccuzee| eontupme! ef vo! ‘ spippes—yadoonoywonaugn@rt | _ aemeo sa ‘pms pagpous oejme somos sa zou | ‘perdepinge | cur wl se | se pao ses ont soto wsannda | unger i) oy spam patios 8 p6u | 1248 Supting 2 78 st & « PaDOWIS B43 ON aPoqhed wrt | suy wripaw sa so sds pcos co tt | _ 0 Srpena 2 2 6 ou | episino peupous aeosuy ode une a2n09 | ‘oF as 4 sexsang 40 mine secu oi z patton | ¢ ule | psqoous rent saotin one | unc yap opm Biers | ouy umpare es psa rea nm pgp oe ar oes 28a Burpping Z & * oot oe _— parprumg 2908ue now _ysippay ‘umes sm0D ww 8 1 ove petturume| 2c) ee | papous oa 388 oy, spd uunora | suyunpon | ar ee Gis) Sang, posrey sp-soen'paeous ses nto 6L ei wrezes Spina z sé sy oe “ spay rods Ae up tguse unos BVT wp arte isl x estoy sveyourg ex| _arsous| warsupmaz | — 2 2] came ‘ rausuna 2tey soe unaia gestive | sugunpare fe Gust) Say | seme 19 Ose | (eee Baypying 2 ss a 4 | Papoouss (now oqodur on paung Arepunos par spud | Apa eRo5 error "aa pews sachin on 38300 pa spouyedasain emo 69 StUUOLS £ 6| ssi 2 |__ seas us poupoouis “aaa 8uy seeds ysippas yam umag wyary wompore | Wee 6s } 2 y gle ge 8 9 i) pypfe a] HEE Z e go) fil @ ge uE 5 F 5 g Z B) g8g53 E) gi z B es gk R 8 5 a Lave Cuaixounii Porreny Fo Suoiv0 Tet, Nova ZacoRa Dict (ponupde>) Aray 04 poywaysmpyy 43 Jo anZojeyeD[Nawaz Topotov, Peru LesiraKo Ano TATvana KUMCHEVA-RUSSEVA 284 oraes ss| 9] sw | somos soon soiuvwnse | uno | worse peu pour tues was ot| 25} awe| ama| shoveting okey setustaqieo | supwnpre | oar ano poqroas rane sets] noo rot 086 rut a EIST. ‘ ued seddn ut dys sas | umosq-he pus apnig walm UME wunipaye | (MOR £9. cor 9561695, ot 9 4 _snoguafowoy umoaq wart | aug wrapayt | moe 29 201 wu ro| o6| ot a] “She dnte seawen | sxdcqupipa penguin | waco 3 | raovous | portunnte| se] co] nmol stn | sorrows seston | sowtuo'umnenan | semen ‘a sus ous | worrmunae|oso| a | cezuz | npogrung sat ot spimuon ye | sosuneon sas urp es au | sl oe . Gos) sedi mosehasyea | susan sods unosg | 96 eouiyetes se oe | vewsz umes payswne aqo8uy roe ua epippos“umasg eT aug ae aon vs ont vel oon | mee | pegaauy aero splsustagheAxirr | swjunper 96 toe ve Sy sit ‘ papoows oqpduy sods u unos wp zponuson | ssapoqrane yd ss com wi] wr| oe | Spemotes | sokinguseltn einer | spre pd fety@munose | seneo vs so | earsavmee| os | cf st ‘ seid | were cs, osmes| emsmme| 19} es | cous ‘ purpua | sug unr ° poser g gl, 2g © 2 2 9 Paeet Bl gf iy ee g z : z 2 7 §3| 228be 2) 3€) 22228 z 5 g i g| fone §| 2€ aie i g g 2 : i (panuyu05) A1ayog payeaysnyty oy) Jo anSopere-)285 ver] nos | pores] se| 2] aan eL__romnang weary oun sa9n2 wus] do |e es|_ sel aes| sottromnesice | wuampyt| tou wa} —eenoe| worn} ve| —as| sao] stuns | susp | to se se | Rao] Snow apisjno wed saree cna wiatarins vos sya ae sp es val sue | en) ame | a, ORES na aroma | supe | » | tet ru weeune) aes eat sue | tewrsupnnge |e sv| suet | mo pono seer as purses sede ranma | wrpoye | tog 90. a myoar vent po nan cal cor| wostup!f| sor 2s | unis [use| ver sermetS 28 emer ne oe on xl rmamett| al vo] sim) | Meare muataugome| wea moe mal cal uf tea) memdueysetieny | aesiatoewmaa ci | wyumpn| sre ao non a cel ce] tute] | epremas sett | utcpaensaemn| we | are sangre pagiuing di j9¢ HME 500 6sUL ee 901 & | Sie payfinoy aqodur on, ‘sods ur umarg Sr] wurmupoyg | WOR LL earn © reper ae cm aut SOLIS ‘aaa] Suipying Z 6 cy +86 4 | pomoous yBnoy sqodur on | sieds umosq sep tara unasg rary uunupayt | Meo OL aan a como oe ores) watmeed| —o| ve «| aaransasee suum | SER | en — a PAT ‘apisUl palppous “SOEpms sme | wnsyett| vel ee onl] ameeenso [ wearcmen unnee | tour | uses g By 9 9 aes Blo € 2 g £ z 9 < ie i} ag| HE i 5 : : al i 8 ager 5 ® Lire GusxoumcPorreny roi Sutevo Tess, Nov Zactta Dirncr (panunuoy) Aang pasearsngy ayy Jo anFoje1eDNaozzos Tooonova, Petia Lesaxov Ano Tarvaa Kune RUsseve 286 sm LULU6LILS ‘yee Sipping z vel $8 | esteur payjoous Wnoy eqodur ON, sods um a8raq-umosq RIT werpaAL EEE tegtron ea Peper sims an Is su et] 6us srowntouny unaiarrr | sugwmpeye | awe 16 | pursmatnnestenste| mam m| aw cos] eel coven] | aabtotnintnt | rasrmatmenteenges | eee eens ete Settee! om esereocs | — ec| seus vunosg |_saddnun poysusng ooo3uy node w ence wwmpere | dno 83, aa ve] eel some) Tenmtnany won| wt! a a ucipitny vena , nein een imrons| mae Bel IL “onal Bapying Z 8 ot) tase | pad add ur aqodun aur ‘sods umosg yay wt pas ple arupayt ar9 $8 | \ us | anaes — oet 22h | 2a) Supima Z ve ve ust 4 |_saddn ut paysiuing aqoiry faepussag pug ‘umes ar] | sug wmpayt | dro eg vel HBVUSOLS ‘peal Bumping 2 19 ze ze ‘ Poystuung aqoduy snoauadowoy ‘Ae seq oul jo we Be fc By go 2 ° g2pee Fl on| #Ele s2 g Q 8 ° < i HE #) | FRB Pa) oF : i i a) s| oar 2 ae 3 5 a (panuyuo3) Krapog paresisnyy ay) Jo andopee >287 Lave Chasxoumte Porte ros Sunevo Te, Nova Zacoka Disrnict ame un pons pend ascyplies oppo sx vu} onusus ey) v2 | aus | teen | “Eun medoy | pupa fed waueneiie | oman ot ce] oe| ce} tesa | poosune swt | nomsfousgunan yea | using oe wa os} worswnee| el ve] . occu sete | spon ya pug opie ioe: | sopunoer x sas fe veoueos | tom fupinge | ve o ‘ 2 purmows sqotuy | uncuelad spiro unarasart | sum umypope cr Graton ne Se wm | ung ze eS2l 2} pounous now aqo8ur on | sods umoag ap yim UNCON BIT unepoye ol sp vena] fooshon ene ve emo: | omg Sst 2201 L seit | te ea | pagnous vor oqetun ox reds ut umosg fed ec | wags "zat sai] semis » ot | pans simon sromatouey ine | ___ mg ust se es wots | peor re sat ot miei ore | wmre| prc ost | sizes “s - | muriinoy sean | awe gimnacntrs | aaavo | ort 6 Ss we oye sme ssh 2001/0195 ot et 380810 -Bin0 WBoow seein on sed u pas pug urepat rT 86 est ett ve wot 6 |__wapaus gst ot seogsouny U0 8 zen00 | prrus spa pies ey sromaiouny | Toni ro gros wa < wos | “aawed ince seta | speoionetsomnostin | smnken| pss est on : m6 [mons amon | snotty stag | sewage | p's Saponareer et | roses v oe | qnimonas sydey warmennan | seneo | pervs g Bol, 9 9 gi| Sg5TE aE} aER.SE y g e g el @ =| E5552 sé) Faget 2 : : 2 2 i ep oma aap af) | 5 a (panugdoy) Aray0g payeasnyy 949 Jo angopE E>Naoszies Tosonova, Peron LssTaLoy £00 Tarvann KuNcuBve RUSS Tae 39 [ 9s] oH z aR ERY SeRRRESST URE amr w}ssc9e cs| ce] om ‘ agnung ary seat uno au 2s pec | Grou mehoon gmt ayo wot] aounes fey cel vse | “chro pecning seetoy | unese fad vpeyo uaaart | ous mame sri| somes oc| re] ere <|__pomeous satin on comatoucy stoenin | smunpn ea) pons ens uns siot |“ nesres sc] il cone | Sim pus seta sot uuimgnses | ou wagon mpi] coseses er] vz] rope «| mous yr es ox sotshea qa rpunyti | un co ore cixt| soveme| personae] vs] v2) 2s | 210 papas a8 spd fed wep qinstog | sup umpore ist © soon asi] eovaces| pmsonz | >| re] seme | ero pypous setey | sesstouna wen fed ea | ous oper " smo ust wot | wntonintz| | ve | vw «| png nn neu ot sodiuied-0q'hup | waren 0 soup ay put xsi | sousass | pmaummae |e cure | sus irontinn wash ort sed ustognén | __ssneo sot | zeiwous | ‘wonton? ss) se] com | eommans oy sept on seonmtouny fes'var | amr are praia bao sae gous ytd oot ss| ve] ceus| ——saog | “Man pctung setey spd uisteq— uno ous arate BE pa oni wt w| ee | ove | Stopmetane des ‘ sonst urging soen sot! _womns| vaswme| s| rr] ouse| “maa | wapqoous oety spbvstoqnan | sumer 2| poets 5 : gle ge 8 g a | €2Fee Bak ge z g 2 e 9 z ab] aHHy Pag] gi) of fo FL EL eg z) bebe : gap 3 . t I 288 (panujuo3) Capog parensnit] ayy Jo anBoqe Ve,289 Lave Chatxoume Porzey mow Suotevo Tau, Neva Zacoea Disucr — 5 ou mentor te 2 saenesnaee w=| 0 va | oa] wantin | sel oSREESEES!| — ceutucrvmotto| al onl uy = ca | ——eox| wma | ce] oe] col | —pormmnesetr| ett | upamre| : swe ea) ew) arte! | ve] aga te smetnsia| apunon | O cu MOOUIELS ‘oa Surpying Z ee 8t st e poystuing agoSiry sods apep ‘38104 1B T oud ah ¢ » 5 oh gs ° 3 i TE fag] RH) i i fF) og § E| 2°33 5 gap 38 5 5 a . (panuyu0)) Cayog payeaysnyy 9) Jo anZopeyeD